Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom Huch do libs want to
Speaker 1: cancel Christmas? Two Antifa attacks, Amagaroli in DC, more good
Speaker 1: vaccine news, Washington and Michigan imposed lockdowns and exodus from NYC.
Speaker 1: Is really this is the Buck Sexon Show, where the
Speaker 1: mission or mission is to decode what really matters with
Speaker 1: passionable intelligence, Make no mistakes, are great American? Again the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexon Show begins. He's a great guy. No welcome everybody.
Speaker 1: We are in the middle of November. We're getting close
Speaker 1: to Thanksgiving, and then after that it's going to be
Speaker 1: a rapid a rapid schedule for the holiday period, Christmas, Hanukka,
Speaker 1: New Year's fantastic stuff on the horizon. Except we all
Speaker 1: know that there is this growing movement in the country
Speaker 1: from people who are lockdowners, leftists, statists, people that are
Speaker 1: obsessed with controlling others, or who have been overcome with
Speaker 1: their own anxieties and fears. They want to tell you
Speaker 1: that you're not really allowed to have a holiday, or
Speaker 1: if you have a holiday, it needs to be outside.
Speaker 1: You can only have certain family members, you can't go
Speaker 1: above ten people. And this is all because if you
Speaker 1: don't you're being reckless and people will will literally die
Speaker 1: because of that recklessness. We need to reject this. Enough
Speaker 1: is enough. It's time for us to say back off
Speaker 1: or blank off, if you will. It's time for us
Speaker 1: to tell people that we're not going to sit around
Speaker 1: anymore and allow government authorities to make these on the fly,
Speaker 1: see to the pant's decisions that don't ever have the
Speaker 1: intended outcome. Right, whatever it is, if it's a lockdown now,
Speaker 1: or if it's a lockdown in a month, it will
Speaker 1: be temporary and it will eventually recede. It will happen,
Speaker 1: and then it will stop happening, and then they'll be
Speaker 1: more virus and we'll keep going wash, rinse, repeat. That's
Speaker 1: what we are going through right now as a country,
Speaker 1: and have been for many months. But they don't want
Speaker 1: you to start thinking just because of the promising news
Speaker 1: about a vaccine now another vaccine, this one of moderna
Speaker 1: with ninety four plus percent effectiveness in giving someone protection
Speaker 1: against this virus. Let's all understand there's already some portion
Speaker 1: of the population that has either just good enough immunity
Speaker 1: that they won't even show symptoms from this, or they
Speaker 1: have antibodies and T cell immunity from either cross exposure
Speaker 1: to similar enough viruses or from this virus in the past.
Speaker 1: When you start adding a ninety four to almost ninety
Speaker 1: five percent effective vaccine into the mix, which is far
Speaker 1: higher than what was anticipated, we're getting much closer to
Speaker 1: this being a situation where it's absurd. It's frankly absurd.
Speaker 1: It's wrong to continue to insist that people not live
Speaker 1: their lives because of the risk. Here. Nobody thinks that
Speaker 1: we should build public policy off of a zero risk
Speaker 1: tolerance posture, And if anyone's going to question that, we
Speaker 1: would just say it is true. And I know that
Speaker 1: there's been all this antiflubro stuff over this year because
Speaker 1: this is not the flu. It's different. It's worse for
Speaker 1: older people. But every year tens of thousands of people
Speaker 1: die from the flu, and we don't shut down society
Speaker 1: over it. And you could certainly make an argument if
Speaker 1: we entirely shut down society it would lessen flu cases,
Speaker 1: but there would be catastrophic costs that would come with that,
Speaker 1: especially if it were a yearly accase Asian So what
Speaker 1: do we do. We tell people to try to be sensible,
Speaker 1: take individual take personal precautions, get the vaccine if you're
Speaker 1: an older person, although flu vaccines are really thirty to
Speaker 1: fifty percent effective in most years. And then we all
Speaker 1: live our lives because we do not exist in a
Speaker 1: society where the state promises you perfect health. You know,
Speaker 1: I understand that we have an average life expectancy now
Speaker 1: deep into the seventies. But that doesn't mean the government
Speaker 1: guarantees anyone that they'll make it deep into their seventies,
Speaker 1: or even their eighties, or perhaps even their nineties, right,
Speaker 1: which would be fantastic, and a lot of us hopefully
Speaker 1: we'll make it there. But there are no guarantees in life, friends,
Speaker 1: And to build a government policy around that is destructive.
Speaker 1: It's also unconstitutional. It's eroding the relationship between free people
Speaker 1: and a government that are supposed to be representative but
Speaker 1: limited as well right representative of our interests and supporting them,
Speaker 1: but also knows that there are some areas that it
Speaker 1: cannot transgress. It just can't go. It's not the government's mandate,
Speaker 1: it's not its job. It should be troubling. Then, when
Speaker 1: you have little fauci over the weekend, this guy has
Speaker 1: still to this day not said anything that I could
Speaker 1: point to and say, you know what, this was really helpful.
Speaker 1: This was a game changer for us. This must have
Speaker 1: saved a lot of lives. No, in fact, that critical
Speaker 1: junctures his advice has been wrong, and it really just
Speaker 1: comes down to be afraid, panic, avoid each other, and
Speaker 1: give up as much as you possibly can of your
Speaker 1: life while we try to figure out what the heck
Speaker 1: we're doing. That's really the sum total of what his
Speaker 1: strategy has been. And that's why when he says something
Speaker 1: like this, now I understand that it was fake Tapper
Speaker 1: who even goes to the so no Christmas point in
Speaker 1: the conversation. But over the weekend, this is the the
Speaker 1: top infectious disease expert of the United States government, and
Speaker 1: here he is telling everybody. You know, now, not only
Speaker 1: are we going to have to more or less canceled Thanksgiving,
Speaker 1: we've also got to be prepared for the opposite of
Speaker 1: a jolly Christmas. You know, you can sit alone hoping
Speaker 1: you don't get some virus in your house, in your apartment,
Speaker 1: and zoom family members from far away, because everyone now
Speaker 1: is just a vector for disease and you can't take
Speaker 1: any risks for anyone. Here's how some of that exchange
Speaker 1: went and play the clip. The vaccine, it's got to
Speaker 1: be deployed, and we can't abandon fundamental public health measures.
Speaker 1: You can approach a degree of normality while still doing
Speaker 1: some fundamental public health things that synergize with the vaccine
Speaker 1: to get us back to normal. So not until the
Speaker 1: second or third quarter of twenty twenty one, though Christmas
Speaker 1: is probably not going to be possy. Well, you know,
Speaker 1: I think that if we get most of the country
Speaker 1: vaccinated in so we're not going to have vaccines by
Speaker 1: the end of the year. We've known that, but they
Speaker 1: will start in the new year. But in the meantime,
Speaker 1: what do we do? This is where the debate now lies.
Speaker 1: What should we think is acceptable between now and when
Speaker 1: vaccine distribution actually happens. And they're going back to lockdowns,
Speaker 1: even though the evidence of lockdowns work and save lives
Speaker 1: is questionable at best. And we have a government that's
Speaker 1: basing major policy decisions now a bureaucracy, And yes, the
Speaker 1: Trump administration hasn't pushed back on this as forcefully as
Speaker 1: I think it should have. The Democrats, of course, are
Speaker 1: extreme lockdown ers. They love this power, and we'll get
Speaker 1: into their hopes they can use this far beyond just
Speaker 1: the pandemic, which I've been telling you all along would
Speaker 1: be their reality. But we have to actually fight back
Speaker 1: against this. I mean, Michigan and Washington State have both
Speaker 1: gone into three week stay at home order lockdowns, So
Speaker 1: those are now states where they're pushing even the more
Speaker 1: extreme from what we saw the early stage of the
Speaker 1: pandemic restrictions. And that was why doctor Scott Atlas, who
Speaker 1: was one of the President's advisors on coronavirus, over the
Speaker 1: weekend tweeted out that it's time to rise up against
Speaker 1: this stuff. Now. He didn't mean violence, I know the
Speaker 1: Libs always jumped to that. He just means got to
Speaker 1: tell people, know, you gotta tell people. I'm sorry, We're
Speaker 1: not just going to keep obeying these rules because there's
Speaker 1: some people there who aren't terrified. I mean, if you're
Speaker 1: thirty years old and you're terrified of COVID, chances are
Speaker 1: you're just not very well informed, unless you happen to
Speaker 1: be a very very small percentage of people out there
Speaker 1: who have a kind of immunocompromise state that would make
Speaker 1: them very susceptible to this. But that's we're talking about
Speaker 1: the exception, not the rule. Here. For most people in
Speaker 1: their thirties and their forties, this is not a big deal.
Speaker 1: I just spoke to someone of the weekend. Her whole
Speaker 1: family's got COVID. They feel like they've got some cold symptoms,
Speaker 1: they're basically fine, and they're all in their thirties and
Speaker 1: they've got young children. But this is the standard that
Speaker 1: ends up happening across the country for so many people.
Speaker 1: If you're eighty five, you know you're at tremendous risk
Speaker 1: from the normal flu in any given year, as well
Speaker 1: as the possibility of just getting pneumonia from a variety
Speaker 1: of other infections. People who are at that age range
Speaker 1: are at risk from a lot of diseases, and yes,
Speaker 1: COVID has been a particularly a particularly serious risk in
Speaker 1: this year. But we're treating all of society. I mean,
Speaker 1: the government's policies effectively act like everyone is in their eighties. Now.
Speaker 1: That's not to say that we shouldn't take those steps
Speaker 1: four people in their eighties, but that's the focused protection
Speaker 1: that we talked about in the Great Barrington Declaration. That
Speaker 1: would be far more sensible. I am not afraid of
Speaker 1: getting COVID. I don't want to give COVID to anyone
Speaker 1: who's in their seventies or their eighties, and so I
Speaker 1: would limit my exposure to those people, and I would
Speaker 1: make sure that there would be any you know, that
Speaker 1: I would have precautions taken. But I'm not worried about
Speaker 1: getting COVID, And quite honestly, I'm not worried about giving
Speaker 1: COVID accidentally to somebody else who's in the thirties or
Speaker 1: forties if I'm asymptomatic, because the chances of them being
Speaker 1: particularly sick with it are also very very low. These
Speaker 1: are the things that we've actually learned about this virus,
Speaker 1: about this disease. But they're not letting go of the
Speaker 1: iron grip of control here. They're acting like they've figured
Speaker 1: this stuff out, like they know what needs to be done.
Speaker 1: Here is doctor Fauci telling people that even after you
Speaker 1: are vaccinated, you are to continue with these public health
Speaker 1: measures Play nine once the process is complete. Does that
Speaker 1: mean they can take off their masks, they don't have
Speaker 1: to social distance, they can just go about their lives
Speaker 1: as before, you know, I would recommend that that's not
Speaker 1: the case. I would recommend you have an added area
Speaker 1: of protection. With a ninety plus percent effective vaccine, you
Speaker 1: could feel much more confident. But I would recommend to
Speaker 1: people to not abandon all public health measures just because
Speaker 1: you've been vaccinated, because even though for the general population
Speaker 1: it might be ninety to ninety five percent effective, you
Speaker 1: don't necessarily know for you how effective it is. So
Speaker 1: when I get vaccinated, which I hope too when it
Speaker 1: becomes my turn to get vaccinated, I'm not going to
Speaker 1: abandon completely public health measures. I could feel more relaxed
Speaker 1: and essentially not having the stringency of it that we
Speaker 1: have right now. But I think abandoning it completely would
Speaker 1: not be a good idea because five to ten percent
Speaker 1: of the people that get immunized it will not be
Speaker 1: effective for so they might actually get the virus if
Speaker 1: they just completely let down their guard. Okay, that's interesting. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think even even fake Tapper there's realizing. So now
Speaker 1: we have no risk policy. You have a fiber A
Speaker 1: vaccine that's ninety five percent. Remember it's not a hundred
Speaker 1: percent you're even gonna get infected, and it's not one
Speaker 1: hundred percent. If you get infected, you're even gonna end
Speaker 1: up in the hospital or dying from It's not even close.
Speaker 1: It's less than one percent. Think about the percentages we're
Speaker 1: talking about here. And this is Fauccy. People listen to
Speaker 1: this guy. He's just not very bright, folks. I don't
Speaker 1: want to tell you he doesn't see all the other
Speaker 1: things that are going on in society right now. You know,
Speaker 1: we're abandoned public abandoned public health measures. What does that mean?
Speaker 1: Here's the question, fouch. Can we start going to restaurants,
Speaker 1: stop wearing masks in the gym, stop mask shaming strangers
Speaker 1: for being outside in fresh air without a covering over
Speaker 1: their mouth, in their nose all the time. Once a
Speaker 1: person has the vaccine, the answer is yes, this is
Speaker 1: a policy question. You know, there's a reason why we
Speaker 1: don't have doctors running everything. I'm just gonna say it.
Speaker 1: He's only focused in on this one thing, this one point.
Speaker 1: He has no ability whatsoever to balance out the rest
Speaker 1: of what's happening in society. And he's been wrong less
Speaker 1: times already about the things that he's told us. If
Speaker 1: I get this vaccine, should I wear a mask? Is
Speaker 1: that reasonable? The answer is no, it's not reasonable. Stop
Speaker 1: wearing a mask once you're vaccinated. Anybody who won't say
Speaker 1: that is a lunatic. Okay, they're in love with their
Speaker 1: own control, or they're so brainwashed with fear that they
Speaker 1: can't be trusted to make any decisions. A ninety five
Speaker 1: percent effective vaccine, did you realize what that's? The whole
Speaker 1: point here is that if nine out of ten people
Speaker 1: in a room can't get the virus, then the one
Speaker 1: person that can get it, the chance of them getting
Speaker 1: it is so much lower because that is hurt immunity.
Speaker 1: That's how we get there. So the chance of the
Speaker 1: velocity of spread is going to collapse as you get
Speaker 1: more and more people vaccine it. Plus you get people
Speaker 1: with the antibodies and the T cell response out there
Speaker 1: who have already been infected, So the pandemic's gonna fall
Speaker 1: off a cliff. We're still gonna wear masks. This lunatic
Speaker 1: really thinks that I want to be walking into my
Speaker 1: building that where I live in a New York City
Speaker 1: next summer in the stifling heat with a mask on
Speaker 1: because there's a one a million chance that I'm gonna
Speaker 1: get COVID. What is it gonna take for people to
Speaker 1: realize this is now a scam. This is outrageous. They've
Speaker 1: moved the goalpost so many times, and now you've got
Speaker 1: this moron Fauci acting like we're trying to gauge for perfection.
Speaker 1: No chance. If you get in COVID, then COVID has
Speaker 1: to be eradicated its entirety. We don't do this with
Speaker 1: other diseases. We don't do this with the flu. You know,
Speaker 1: we don't do this with a name. Anything that kills people,
Speaker 1: that's out there right now, it still exists. It's still
Speaker 1: out there. Oh, you can't leave your house, can't be
Speaker 1: around strangers because you know they might catch it from you.
Speaker 1: But this is what happens because the media is complicit
Speaker 1: in all this, because they knew the only way that
Speaker 1: Biden was gonna win was putting the country in this
Speaker 1: desperate state of COVID panic and using it as a
Speaker 1: just a cudgel to bludgeon Trump with all the time,
Speaker 1: which is what they've done. So they created this panic
Speaker 1: and now they don't want to unwind it. Now they
Speaker 1: want to keep everybody nice and complacent. Bend that knee, peasant,
Speaker 1: do what they tell you, even after a vaccine. Absolutely not,
Speaker 1: And we're gonna have to establish something and people are
Speaker 1: gonna have to just come up with. You know, if
Speaker 1: you're vaccinated, you wear some kind of a yellow wristband
Speaker 1: or something so you can walk around not wearing a
Speaker 1: mask anymore. And I want him yeah you mad yea.
Speaker 1: They didn't even do anything, folks. We're getting more cases
Speaker 1: than ever before. Mask compliance is higher than it has
Speaker 1: ever been in this country, more cases than ever before.
Speaker 1: But they never try to even explain that. Dude. They oh,
Speaker 1: listen to the science. Yeah, the science, the real scientist,
Speaker 1: the ones that have to actually live with results from
Speaker 1: big pharma. They've created vaccines that, once distributed, means we
Speaker 1: get to go back to normal life, full style coughing
Speaker 1: on each other on the subway and not worrying about it.
Speaker 1: That's where we are heading with this vaccine. I don't
Speaker 1: care what Fouci says. You're in the freedom life. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. The average development timeline
Speaker 1: for the vaccine, including clinical tests and manufacturing, can take
Speaker 1: eight to twelve years. Through operation warp speed, we're doing
Speaker 1: it in less than one year. If you had a
Speaker 1: different administration with different people, what we've done would have
Speaker 1: taken in my opinion three four or five years that
Speaker 1: I would have been in the FDA forever. This is
Speaker 1: five times faster than the fastest prior vaccine development in history.
Speaker 1: Five times faster. Said again, five times faster. Nobody can
Speaker 1: believe it. Actually, it's a record, and it's happening, and
Speaker 1: it happened under Trump, because of Trump, because of a
Speaker 1: government plan. And yet again the timing here, it almost
Speaker 1: just feels like there's been history conspiring against the reelection
Speaker 1: of this administration, because I really believe if you had
Speaker 1: this vaccine information out there, if people knew where we
Speaker 1: were with this before they were voting, would have changed
Speaker 1: the minds. Because this is a Trump administration directive. I mean,
Speaker 1: this comes from Trump's action. What we're seeing here, this
Speaker 1: is not just something that happened to occur while he
Speaker 1: was in the Oval office. Operation warp speed. He's been
Speaker 1: talking about it for months, and what could be a
Speaker 1: better outcome here? Ninety five percent multiple vaccines hitting the market.
Speaker 1: We're going to get mass distribution of it the next
Speaker 1: couple of months, next well, next couple of quarters. And
Speaker 1: yet we're going to have a Biden administration that comes
Speaker 1: into power and they're going to do everything they can
Speaker 1: to try to act like, oh, it's their distribution of this.
Speaker 1: It's like Trump did all the homework and Biden's going
Speaker 1: to get to hand it in and act like he's
Speaker 1: the genius. You know, he's the one that really pulled
Speaker 1: this whole thing together. You can already tell the politics
Speaker 1: around this are quote would be completely insane, because when
Speaker 1: it really came down to it, this was the biggest
Speaker 1: challenge of the Trump administration and on the single most
Speaker 1: important issue where he really could have done something a
Speaker 1: huge victory with these vaccines. They'll never give him credit
Speaker 1: for it, though. Thanks for listening to the bus sets
Speaker 1: and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. This process
Speaker 1: has been driven solely by science and data. So it's
Speaker 1: a shame that some one example being the governor of
Speaker 1: New York, have actually injected politics into the process and
Speaker 1: suggested the possibility of intentionally delaying access to an FDA
Speaker 1: authorized vaccine, which is simply unconscionable. Yeah, it's truly sociopathic
Speaker 1: and I'm not trying to be funny. I mean that
Speaker 1: that Governor Cromo would even consider a one day delay
Speaker 1: of this, just despite Trump shows you this guy's a psycho.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's got problems, folks. He's dangerous, doesn't care.
Speaker 1: He goes out there writing leadership books while he's shoveling
Speaker 1: old people with COVID into nursing homes and they're dying
Speaker 1: by the thousands. Because he's too stupid to figure out
Speaker 1: what a catastrophe that is. Then he writes a leadership
Speaker 1: book on what to do during COVID. A person who's
Speaker 1: capable of that is pretty frightening. And that's the situation
Speaker 1: we find ourselves in with Governor Cuomo of New York.
Speaker 1: He has already said that they that he's going to
Speaker 1: have his state health experts look at the vaccine and
Speaker 1: the data before it's approved for people. I live in
Speaker 1: New York, so this is personal to me. You know,
Speaker 1: I have parents here who are in their sixties and seventies,
Speaker 1: and I want them to be able to get this
Speaker 1: vaccine as soon as it comes out. And there may
Speaker 1: be a delay because Cuomo wants to play games. I
Speaker 1: thought that he was the guy that was mister take
Speaker 1: the virus seriously. He wants to wait to get a
Speaker 1: life in life saving vaccine into the hands of people
Speaker 1: who are at high risk in this in this state.
Speaker 1: What because his board of hand picked bureaucrats for whatever
Speaker 1: the New York State, I mean, I don't even know
Speaker 1: what he would call the health authority that would look
Speaker 1: over this is New York State. Bureaucrats are are going
Speaker 1: to do a better job than the scientists at the
Speaker 1: FDA and also at at FISER and Moderna in these
Speaker 1: other places, these multi billion dollars pharmaceutical companies, this is
Speaker 1: all they do. By the way, Big Farma demonized a lot,
Speaker 1: and let's all take a moment here to recognize that
Speaker 1: Big Pharma may have maybe giving us not only saving
Speaker 1: a lot of lives, giving the world our lives back. So,
Speaker 1: you know, a little golf clap for FISA and Moderna
Speaker 1: and these other these other companies that, yes, with the
Speaker 1: profit motive in mind as well, put world class, real
Speaker 1: world class scientists, not world class bureaucrats who've been sitting
Speaker 1: around for decades doing nothing with no results to show
Speaker 1: for anything. Real scientists on this one. And now we're
Speaker 1: in a place where we've got a ninety five percent
Speaker 1: effective vaccine, and there are other vaccines. I mean, I
Speaker 1: don't know how much more effective. I mean, theoretically, I
Speaker 1: guess you'd get to ninety nine percent. Maybe I don't
Speaker 1: think anything will be one hundred percent. But there's more
Speaker 1: that are coming online. And yet there's still politics around this,
Speaker 1: there's still the desire to make it seem like you
Speaker 1: can't trust this because Trump, and that is just disgusting,
Speaker 1: it's reckless. And Kamala and Joe Biden played this game too.
Speaker 1: You remember during the campaign, Oh, I don't know, I
Speaker 1: don't know if you know, if the scientists say, but
Speaker 1: not if Trump says, Well, there was no there was
Speaker 1: no future in which Trump was going to say take
Speaker 1: this vaccine when it hadn't been approved by all the
Speaker 1: scientists in the chain of m maybe four and that
Speaker 1: that was a complete myth. That was preposterous and everybody
Speaker 1: should have recognized it as such. But when there was
Speaker 1: an opportunity for demagoguery and a frightened people, what did
Speaker 1: Kamala and Joe do? Took the took the completely dishonorable
Speaker 1: approach here by saying, oh, you can't trust this, you
Speaker 1: can't trust this vaccine. Here's what Governor Cuomo is is
Speaker 1: the worst governor in America. We have the worst mayor
Speaker 1: in New York City, and I think the worst governor. Well,
Speaker 1: some of you are probably gonna say no, I think
Speaker 1: I think he's the worst governor America. I don't really
Speaker 1: think he could do worst at him? Really, where would
Speaker 1: you have to go for that one? California Gavin Newsom,
Speaker 1: he's smarter than Cuomo, so at least say that for him.
Speaker 1: But Cuomo's Cuomo's threatening to actually sue the Trump administration
Speaker 1: of this vaccine played nineteen. I tell you today, if
Speaker 1: the Trump administration does not change this plan and does
Speaker 1: not provide an equitable vaccine process, we will enforce our
Speaker 1: legal rights. We will bring legal action to protect New Yorkers.
Speaker 1: I mean, this guy is a lunatic. The administration has
Speaker 1: overseen the program that fast track this vaccine to world
Speaker 1: record status. But now his claim is that they don't
Speaker 1: know how to distribute the vaccine. They've been working with
Speaker 1: the farmer companies on this for months and months and months.
Speaker 1: What what evidence is there that Governor Cuomo knows something
Speaker 1: about vaccine distribution that Trump doesn't. What you're hearing, though,
Speaker 1: you'll notice this becomes this becomes the talking point is
Speaker 1: that as Cuomo is suggesting that there's some kind of
Speaker 1: social justice element to this, that there's a lack of access. Really,
Speaker 1: are there neighborhoods where they don't have they have they
Speaker 1: have no health clinics, no Walmarts, no Dwayne Reads, no
Speaker 1: drug stores. And I mean, really that's a thing that
Speaker 1: we're we're going to say, is now the problem with
Speaker 1: the vaccine. Plus they're going to be all kinds of
Speaker 1: government programs to get it directly into nursing homes. Plus
Speaker 1: there's gonna be I mean, they're coming at this from
Speaker 1: so many different angles, and Cuomo is threatening to sue
Speaker 1: them because he doesn't think it's a good enough plan.
Speaker 1: This guy's a maniac. It's really it's really frightening. You know,
Speaker 1: it's really frightening that these are the people who were
Speaker 1: in charge, and that there there are people dumb enough
Speaker 1: to think that they're doing a good job. That's even
Speaker 1: more terrifying. Remember the whole Cuomo Brothers Variety show on CNN.
Speaker 1: Ha ha, you know, got like a big Q tip
Speaker 1: and they did all this stuff. Haha. It was also
Speaker 1: funny where people are dying in unprecedented numbers of COVID,
Speaker 1: I mean, the highest death rate we've ever seen. But
Speaker 1: they were doing a big haha thing late night on
Speaker 1: TV that was really really worthwhile for everybody to watch.
Speaker 1: So he's threatening to sue, and then he's and then
Speaker 1: he's trying to explain why this is a problem, and
Speaker 1: it's all it's all bullcrap. Doesn't make it sense. Play twenty.
Speaker 1: The whole four years has been malpractice. This is a
Speaker 1: person who never said he understood government or wanted to govern.
Speaker 1: There is no governance. It was all public relations. My
Speaker 1: fear is he's making every mistake he made when COVID
Speaker 1: first started. This is just a redux. We're going to
Speaker 1: do vaccines and because Fiser and Maderna have a vaccine, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's like COVID testing. If you remember back then, we're
Speaker 1: going to do COVID testing. I direct the states to
Speaker 1: do COVID testing. And how are the states supposed to
Speaker 1: do testing on vaccine Mika? They have no idea what
Speaker 1: they're talking about. With vaccinations, we have to do three
Speaker 1: hundred and thirty million. This nation, with doing everything we
Speaker 1: did over the past eight months, only did one hundred
Speaker 1: and twenty million. COVID tests. This guy's a moron, he
Speaker 1: really is. We absolutely do not need to do three
Speaker 1: hundred and thirty million vaccinations. He doesn't understand basic epidemiology.
Speaker 1: If you get this vaccine out to let's say, twenty
Speaker 1: to thirty million seniors sixty five and over, the death
Speaker 1: rate from this is going to go to almost almost zero.
Speaker 1: I mean, you're gonna be losing You will be losing
Speaker 1: fewer people to COVID you than you're currently losing to
Speaker 1: the flu and a regular month, if you get the
Speaker 1: vaccine to all the seniors who are at risk, just bait.
Speaker 1: And I'm just telling you if you look at the data,
Speaker 1: if you look at the numbers who dies from COVID nineteen,
Speaker 1: mostly people over seventy five, a good number of people
Speaker 1: over sixty five, and almost no people under fifty. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, a tiny fraction. It's a a wholly manageable
Speaker 1: public health risk to people under the age of fifty.
Speaker 1: And yet he's saying we need to get three hundred
Speaker 1: and thirty million doses of this out. First of all,
Speaker 1: what's okay, what's his plan? You know? Notice this he says,
Speaker 1: they don't know and they're gonna make mistakes, but he
Speaker 1: never Okay, what's the better idea? Just complained, he's got
Speaker 1: nothing to say. This guy is a dangerous buffoon. He
Speaker 1: really is. And it's a shame that New York has
Speaker 1: him as a governor. He's an unserious person, a nepotistic
Speaker 1: thug that should never have had the job in the
Speaker 1: first place. This guy's literally the governor because his daddy
Speaker 1: was governor. It just goes to show you what situation
Speaker 1: is with New York City Democrat machine politics. But it's
Speaker 1: it's also very personal for him. I mean this is
Speaker 1: for him. It's really just about his ongoing feud. Forget
Speaker 1: about getting COVID to people that are scared and that
Speaker 1: are that are at real risk from this. What's most
Speaker 1: important to Cuomo is that his petty little schoolyard crap
Speaker 1: with with Trump is addressed. Play twenty one. That's just
Speaker 1: Trump talking. He's going to be gone. I think, frankly
Speaker 1: spent too much time trying to delve into the bizarre
Speaker 1: world of Trump's. He doesn't like that I criticize him.
Speaker 1: He doesn't like that I stand up to him. He's
Speaker 1: a typical bully and a boy. There's him. It's not
Speaker 1: me who doubts the FDA is fifty percent of the
Speaker 1: American people Kaiser, Pole, Pew, Pole, ABC poll, CNN poll.
Speaker 1: They all say fifty percent of the American people don't
Speaker 1: trust the vaccine. They believe he politicized the process. New
Speaker 1: York and six other states have put together an independent
Speaker 1: review panel to build that trust. So when the FDA
Speaker 1: says here's our process, we have an independent panel with
Speaker 1: a Nobel laureate that can say it was a fair process.
Speaker 1: Because if people don't trust the vaccine, they're not going
Speaker 1: to take the vaccine. It's all for nought. Okay. What
Speaker 1: he just did there is is truly disgusting, beyond words.
Speaker 1: Why do fifty percent of people not trust this vaccine?
Speaker 1: Because Democrats like Cuomo and him specifically, have spent months
Speaker 1: undermining the ability of the Trump administration to help produce
Speaker 1: a vaccine and for the Trump administration's FDA to oversee
Speaker 1: the safety protocols necessary for this. That's why half the country.
Speaker 1: What do you think the correlation is between people being
Speaker 1: Democrats and not trusting a vaccine? Very high. They have
Speaker 1: brainwashed their followers, They have brainwashed Biden voters in the
Speaker 1: thing that you can't trust the Trump FDA, And now
Speaker 1: they turn around and say, because of that distrust, we
Speaker 1: have to have delays and additional layers of safety and
Speaker 1: protection for people. So people like Cuomo created that problem
Speaker 1: with their reckless demagoguery that will result in people dying
Speaker 1: who would not have died. They create that distrust and
Speaker 1: then they turn around like they're just being above the fray. Mica,
Speaker 1: you see the distrust out there about vaccines. We have
Speaker 1: to dispel that distrust. Now, that's why we need to
Speaker 1: have a panel. This is grotesque. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: beyond just political stuff. Now, this country has been through
Speaker 1: hell over this vaccine and they just to want to
Speaker 1: give Trump a win. Brainless thugs like Cuomo just care
Speaker 1: about how it looks for them and their side and
Speaker 1: their team, and they hate Trump. That's what really matters
Speaker 1: to them. Everything else is just for the cameras. Make
Speaker 1: believe secondary. Yeah, eventually we'll get the vaccine out to
Speaker 1: people if we delayed a few months because we want
Speaker 1: to play games with Think about this, this guy is
Speaker 1: really saying his public health experts. New York State government
Speaker 1: is full of morons. I can tell you this I mean,
Speaker 1: I can't speak to other states as well as like
Speaker 1: ken New York, but I've lived here for decades. People
Speaker 1: that work in state government in New York, a lot
Speaker 1: of state reps, big bureaucrats, functionaries within the state government
Speaker 1: system are completely incompetent fools. This is a poorly run state,
Speaker 1: which is why it's also losing hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 1: people now in this last year. But he thinks that
Speaker 1: he's gonna have his his ax by experts, well, locut
Speaker 1: the vaccine. My experts, well are men Whether the vaccinate
Speaker 1: is acceptable? Really, I understand, I understand how the founders
Speaker 1: must have felt about the British overlords not giving a
Speaker 1: crap about them taking their stuff and just ruining their
Speaker 1: lives and not given a care about it in any way.
Speaker 1: That's what it feels like to be an American now
Speaker 1: living in New York City, in New York State under
Speaker 1: Democrat control. These people just don't care. There's nothing that
Speaker 1: I can point to you and say, at least at
Speaker 1: least on that they'll put the politics aside because it
Speaker 1: really matters. Nope, not even saving lives of the vaccine.
Speaker 1: Still got to be Democrats first. Still gotta be leftists
Speaker 1: statists before all. Else you're in the freedom. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show podcast. As soon as April, the
Speaker 1: vaccine will be available to the entire general population, with
Speaker 1: the exception of places like New York State, where, for
Speaker 1: political reasons, the governor decided to say and I don't
Speaker 1: think it's good politically. I think it's very bad from
Speaker 1: a health standpoint. But he wants to take his time
Speaker 1: on the vaccine. He doesn't trust where the vaccine's coming from.
Speaker 1: These are coming from the greatest companies anywhere in the world,
Speaker 1: greatest labs in the world, but he doesn't trust the
Speaker 1: fact that it's this White House, this administration. So we
Speaker 1: won't be delivering it to New York until we have
Speaker 1: authorization to do so. And that pains me to say
Speaker 1: that this is a very successful, amazing vaccine at ninety
Speaker 1: percent and more. But so the governor, Governor Cuomo, will
Speaker 1: have to let us know when he's ready for it.
Speaker 1: Otherwise we can't. We can't be delivering it to a
Speaker 1: state that won't be giving it to its people immediately.
Speaker 1: And I know many I know the people of New
Speaker 1: York very well. I know they want it so the
Speaker 1: governor will let us know when he's ready. He's had
Speaker 1: some very bad editorials recently about this statement and what's
Speaker 1: happened with respect to nursing homes and his handling of
Speaker 1: nursing homes, and I hope he doesn't handle this as
Speaker 1: badly as he handled the nursing homes. Well, that's for sure.
Speaker 1: President not mincing words, You're not pulling back the punches
Speaker 1: that Cuomo so very much deserves be thrown in his
Speaker 1: direction if the governor of New York holds back, or
Speaker 1: any governor for that matter, anywhere across the country. So
Speaker 1: for some of you, you know, it doesn't seem like
Speaker 1: there's quite this interpersonal feud that's broken out with the president,
Speaker 1: but you never know, you know, you never know, Governor Knewsome,
Speaker 1: because Cuomo was talking to other governors about how they
Speaker 1: wanted to try and stop the Trump rollout plan. They
Speaker 1: wanted to do something else. I don't think any of
Speaker 1: them are that stupid, though for their own reasons politically,
Speaker 1: they would go along with this, because if Cuomo, if
Speaker 1: his games, if his nonsense results in this vaccine being
Speaker 1: delayed even one day in its distribution in New York City,
Speaker 1: he should be he should be drummed out of office.
Speaker 1: I mean, he should be forced to resign. And I
Speaker 1: mean that, and it's incumbent upon the people of New
Speaker 1: York and I mean Democrat too. It's disgusting, it's absolutely disgusting.
Speaker 1: He's putting people, he's putting friends of mine, my loved ones,
Speaker 1: my family members at risk by being such a just unbelievable,
Speaker 1: pigheaded thug. I mean, this guy is the worst, the worst,
Speaker 1: and people vote for him. I think it's a good idea. Ah,
Speaker 1: it's it's amazing. There's nothing, there's no redeeming quality this
Speaker 1: guy as whatsoever. None, not even smart. Never mind the
Speaker 1: fact that he's a jerk. But that's what we are
Speaker 1: up against now in this fight to get this vaccine distributed.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter who's going to be put at risk
Speaker 1: by this, it doesn't matter to them. They don't care.
Speaker 1: All they really care about is who gets credit for
Speaker 1: what and how can this be used as a political tool.
Speaker 1: That's what they really care about. And it's a shame
Speaker 1: that people are going to suffer as a result of this.
Speaker 1: It's a shame. But just remember this, because they're going
Speaker 1: to try to take this away from Trump. You can
Speaker 1: be assured of that what President Trump has accomplished here
Speaker 1: with Operation Warp Speed is truly amazing. And what his
Speaker 1: administration and the scientists at these big farmer companies and
Speaker 1: the people working on Operation Warp Speed specifically to put
Speaker 1: in place the financial incentives, the and the and the
Speaker 1: federal government's backstop of this program to create the vaccine
Speaker 1: as it's being tested and proven. This is this is remarkable.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is like a Manhattan project for curing
Speaker 1: a pandemic. And it looks like Trump has pulled this off.
Speaker 1: It's a shame that people didn't figure this out in
Speaker 1: time enough. People didn't figure this out in time to
Speaker 1: have a different election results so far. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the Bust and Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, iHeart Radio, app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: The battle over ballots continues. This election, as I keep
Speaker 1: reminding everybody who listens, is not over. We will be
Speaker 1: looking at lawsuits in the days ahead, at the response
Speaker 1: from judges, and just see where this all goes. We
Speaker 1: are playing out the process. So far, we have not
Speaker 1: seen ironclad proof of some of the more extreme voter
Speaker 1: fraud claims, but we also are early in the process.
Speaker 1: We've certainly seen proof of irregularities, and there is some
Speaker 1: evidence of widespread fraud sworn affidavits from people who say
Speaker 1: this fraudulent thing happened affecting foulsands. Remember when we say widespread,
Speaker 1: if it happened in two or three states, and we're
Speaker 1: talking about thousands of votes, that's widespread enough to swing
Speaker 1: the election, So that's widespread fraud. Still trying to see
Speaker 1: if we can prove this, and the effort on the
Speaker 1: left and the Democrat frenzy right now to get this
Speaker 1: whole thing shut down as fast as possible before we
Speaker 1: can even get to a result, is in and of
Speaker 1: itself very telling. As I've been as I've been saying,
Speaker 1: there's no downside to getting a real answer here. There's
Speaker 1: no problem with this. They can tell you. Oh, but
Speaker 1: it's slowing them. Biden transition and all this A Biden's
Speaker 1: been in government longer than I've been alive, literally longer
Speaker 1: than I've been alive, and we're so worried that he's
Speaker 1: not going to know what to do day one or something.
Speaker 1: Because there's been a few days here of lawsuits, and
Speaker 1: the administration is not already saying all hail the incoming
Speaker 1: Biden chief. Sorry, it's not the way it's going to be. Now.
Speaker 1: Rudy Giuliani, who's the president's lawyer, who's very much involved
Speaker 1: in making this case, I asked him to come on.
Speaker 1: He's busy today, but we'll get him on hopefully another time.
Speaker 1: So I try to go to the source directly with him.
Speaker 1: We had to what I interview Jenna Ellis from the team,
Speaker 1: the Trump legal team last week, so I'm up on
Speaker 1: where they are. Rudy was on Fox making the case,
Speaker 1: and here's here's what he said about where we are
Speaker 1: right now. So I want you to hear it from
Speaker 1: really the president's chief lawyer on this issue right now,
Speaker 1: or at least his most visible lawyer and spokesperson on this,
Speaker 1: Rudy Giuliani. Here he is about the software. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is a big part of this and we have
Speaker 1: to see what we're able to prove. Sydney Powell's also involved,
Speaker 1: And I'll just say this, Sydney Powell was mocked by
Speaker 1: the mainstream media and the Democrat Party for months and months,
Speaker 1: not a serious lawyer, conspiracy theories She was spot on
Speaker 1: when it came to the ambush of General Flynn and
Speaker 1: the deep state betrayal that occurred there on behalf of
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton and the way that the justice system has
Speaker 1: failed General Flynn. It's not that he failed our justice system,
Speaker 1: it's the other way around. The justice system has failed him.
Speaker 1: She was completely correct on that they mocked and ridiculed her,
Speaker 1: and she through the actions that she took and what
Speaker 1: was uncovered as a result of her lawsuit showed us
Speaker 1: just how absurd those hateful claims directed at her work.
Speaker 1: But here is Rudy Giuliani talking about software. Now, this
Speaker 1: is the big This would be a game changer if
Speaker 1: they can prove that there were intentional backdoors, you know,
Speaker 1: all other means of trying to mess with these vote counts.
Speaker 1: Here's Rudy making the case on Fox Play one. The
Speaker 1: software that they use is done by a company called Smartmadock.
Speaker 1: It's a company that was founded by Chavez and by
Speaker 1: Chavez is two allies and still own own it. It's
Speaker 1: been used to cheat in elections in South America. It
Speaker 1: was it was banned by the United States Civil about
Speaker 1: a decade ago. It's come back now as a subcontractor
Speaker 1: to other companies or sort of hides in the weeds,
Speaker 1: But Dominion sends everything to smart Matock. Can you believe it?
Speaker 1: Our votes are sent overseas, they are sent to someplace else,
Speaker 1: some other country. Why do they leave our country? And
Speaker 1: this company and this company has tried and true methods
Speaker 1: for fixing elections by calling a halt to the voting
Speaker 1: when you're running too far behind. They've done that in
Speaker 1: prior elections. Now what happened on election night? He was
Speaker 1: ahead by eight hundred thousand votes in Pennsylvania, Impossible to
Speaker 1: catch up unless you're chanting. And the same thing in Michigan, wisconsint.
Speaker 1: He was ahead in all those states by numbers that
Speaker 1: in prior times, and I can show this to your
Speaker 1: networks would have called for him. Yes, he's making some
Speaker 1: pretty severe allegations here. I just keep saying the same
Speaker 1: thing about this stuff. Let's find out, let's see, let's
Speaker 1: let's understand what evidence can be presented, Let's look at
Speaker 1: what's really out there and come to a conclusion based
Speaker 1: upon what we can prove. He's saying straight up this
Speaker 1: was fixed, and the stuff that he's telling you about
Speaker 1: the information going overseas and this company. That's all you know,
Speaker 1: as smart mannic, as shady as Rudy says it is.
Speaker 1: We should know, we should get answers to all this.
Speaker 1: We should have complete faith that our elections are secure
Speaker 1: and that are they are happening the way that they should.
Speaker 1: And the only way to know that, despite what the
Speaker 1: liberal media tells you, despite what the mainstream keeps pushing,
Speaker 1: the only way to know that is if we check,
Speaker 1: if we compile what we have in terms of data,
Speaker 1: if if we look at these at these allegations, take
Speaker 1: them seriously and get answers about them. Right. So that
Speaker 1: was one the smart manic and the software, that's one
Speaker 1: part of these allegations where he made on TV. Now
Speaker 1: here he is with the pole watchers not being allowed
Speaker 1: to count the mail in ballots another major component of
Speaker 1: their lawsuits played too. I mean, there is unprecedented. They
Speaker 1: are counting mail in ballots and they don't allow any
Speaker 1: Republican to inspect. That is illegal, unlawful, against the law.
Speaker 1: I don't know how else to put it. Never happened.
Speaker 1: I've done a many absentee ballot elections as a Republican.
Speaker 1: On one side, a Democrat on the other, No, no, no,
Speaker 1: the Republican was outside getting pushed around by goons. When
Speaker 1: they finally get in, they're twenty feet away and they're
Speaker 1: told to use binoculars. Binoculars. The only way you can
Speaker 1: tell whether a mail in ballot is valid is by
Speaker 1: examining the outer envelope. The minute you remove the outer
Speaker 1: envelope is gone. You can no longer validate it. And
Speaker 1: that's why, under the law of every state, if you
Speaker 1: don't expect it, the vote is invalid. There are cases
Speaker 1: putting in Pennsylvania that have been overturned for just a
Speaker 1: few ballots that were handled that way. We can prove
Speaker 1: that six hundred and thirty two thousand ballots will handle
Speaker 1: that way, particularly in Philadelphia. And if you tell me
Speaker 1: that Philadelphia doesn't see in elections, I will tell you
Speaker 1: you live in our mars. So that would be a
Speaker 1: lot of ballots that would be invalidated, right, And we
Speaker 1: know the mail in ballots are expected overwhelmingly to have
Speaker 1: been for Biden. So there's your margin and then some
Speaker 1: several times over your margin of victory for Biden disappearing
Speaker 1: and going for Trump. So people who claim that, oh,
Speaker 1: this is these challenges wouldn't even mean anything, They wouldn't
Speaker 1: even do anything. That's just not true. If you discarded
Speaker 1: six hundred thousand ballots because they were not properly observed
Speaker 1: in their mail and ballots, if you did that, that
Speaker 1: obviously would change Pennsylvania. And if you look at what's
Speaker 1: going on in other states, there are substantial questions and
Speaker 1: large numbers of ballots that are at issue there as well.
Speaker 1: Rudy pointed out in Michigan and Detroit, really it's not
Speaker 1: the state of Michigan, it's the city of Detroit, right,
Speaker 1: these Democrat urban machines that are able to churn out
Speaker 1: votes just in time and just in the way that
Speaker 1: was exactly as needed for Biden to win. That there
Speaker 1: were problems in Detroit specifically, and here is Rudy outlining
Speaker 1: those play three. Now we move on to Detroit. In Detroit,
Speaker 1: we have evidence that a hundred thousand ballots were brought
Speaker 1: in at four thirty in the morning and counted it.
Speaker 1: And so the extent that our witnesses, and there are
Speaker 1: four of them, saw it, and one of them is
Speaker 1: an ex employee of Dominion. According to them, every single
Speaker 1: ballot was for Biden. And not only that, whatever ballots
Speaker 1: they could see because Steve weren't Republicans, so they could
Speaker 1: get closer. Every ballot they could see, it just had
Speaker 1: Biden's name on it. Nobody else, not even another Democrat.
Speaker 1: Now why does that happen. It happens because you know
Speaker 1: you're behind. Dominion notifies you, you call off the county.
Speaker 1: Then you start doing ballots like you can't. You can't
Speaker 1: do the down ticket. That's why you have Biden and
Speaker 1: no down ticket, because they just had enough time to
Speaker 1: get Biden's name it. We never got a chance to
Speaker 1: inspect a single one of those. That's another Look, it's
Speaker 1: a big allegation. This is election rigging. This is a
Speaker 1: real threat to our democratic system, an actual threat if
Speaker 1: this is happening. And you know Rudy, remember he was
Speaker 1: he was one saying that they had a lot of
Speaker 1: documents about Hunter Biden, that there was going to be
Speaker 1: more information coming out about Hunter Biden. Now I told you,
Speaker 1: because I'm always honest with you, that I didn't think
Speaker 1: it was going to matter for the election. And it didn't.
Speaker 1: I think that's pretty clear. But it was still worthwhile
Speaker 1: from a new cycle perspective, and it's good that we
Speaker 1: know it, especially if there is a Biden presidency going forward.
Speaker 1: I think people should be aware of how corrupt and
Speaker 1: how outrageous the Biden crime family really is. But that
Speaker 1: all said, Rudy was correct in talking about Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: and the way that he was getting payoffs from foreign countries,
Speaker 1: and he was ridiculed for all that. So do we
Speaker 1: really think that he's completely making all this up right
Speaker 1: now and has nothing to back him up he'd do that?
Speaker 1: Why what benefit would there be to him of exposing
Speaker 1: himself in that way? If he really also didn't believe
Speaker 1: that this effort to change these votes would be successful
Speaker 1: in and of itself, why do you want to be
Speaker 1: the guy who's the bagdad Bob of a losing Trump election.
Speaker 1: That does not sound like fun, That does not sound
Speaker 1: like something that would be an intelligent strategic move for
Speaker 1: just Rudy on a personal level. So for him to
Speaker 1: come out in this way and be firing off these
Speaker 1: kinds of allegations and charges, I think you have to
Speaker 1: take him at his word that he has real reason
Speaker 1: to believe this. And now when ice to take him
Speaker 1: at his word, that just means let's see what he's got.
Speaker 1: They're filing these lawsuits in court, they're presenting it before judges.
Speaker 1: Let's see what the information that they provide really is
Speaker 1: and what the judges response to it. That's all within
Speaker 1: the process, within the system. This is completely legitimate. The
Speaker 1: Left wants to pretend that we've already gone to this
Speaker 1: phase of ignoring what judges have said, going outside the system,
Speaker 1: and that's just not true. That's not what is happening here.
Speaker 1: But when you hear all the places where there were problems,
Speaker 1: when you hear all the places where there were issues,
Speaker 1: I mean, here is Rudy talking about all the different
Speaker 1: states where this software was used that could have been
Speaker 1: an issue play for well, I know I can prove
Speaker 1: that they did it in Michigan. I can prove it,
Speaker 1: we witnesses. We're investigating the rest in every one of
Speaker 1: those states, though we have more than enough illegal ballots
Speaker 1: already documented to overturn the result in that state, because
Speaker 1: not only did they use a Venezuelan company to count
Speaker 1: our ballots, which almost should be illegal per Se number two,
Speaker 1: they didn't allow Republicans in key places to observe the
Speaker 1: mail vote. That makes the male vote completely invalid. Now,
Speaker 1: they didn't do it everywhere. They did it in big
Speaker 1: cities where they have corrupt machines that will protect them,
Speaker 1: meaning in Pennsylvania, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, in Detroit, they didn't
Speaker 1: have to do it. In Chicago, in New York or Boston,
Speaker 1: they could have. They have corrupt machines there. They did
Speaker 1: it absolutely. In Phoenix, Arizona, they did it absolutely. In Milwaukee, Wisconsin,
Speaker 1: Republicans were shut out from enough of the count so
Speaker 1: they could accomplish what Smartmadock wanted to do. As I've
Speaker 1: been saying, this is a lot of a lot of
Speaker 1: big talk, a lot of large allegations here. This is
Speaker 1: major stuff. And we'll see what he's able to prove.
Speaker 1: We'll see what the Trump team, the legal team is
Speaker 1: able to bring forward. I will tell you though, even
Speaker 1: with sworn Affidavid's, even with people coming forward, he said,
Speaker 1: I witnessed the following. My concern isn't that they're not credible,
Speaker 1: or that they don't exist, or that Juliana's making this
Speaker 1: stuff up. I don't think that's the issue. I think
Speaker 1: the issue is that federal judges who look at this
Speaker 1: are going to say, I'm not overturning their rest. I'm
Speaker 1: not overturning this state selection results. Sorry, not going to
Speaker 1: do it. Yeah. So I think that really the fall
Speaker 1: down here is going to be the system just saying
Speaker 1: we don't want to see the country burn We're not
Speaker 1: willing to be the ones who stopped this from happening. Sorry,
Speaker 1: And of course that's perverse because they're supposed to be
Speaker 1: defending our system of democracy. But their idea will be,
Speaker 1: let's allow for this assault on democracy so we don't
Speaker 1: have to have an assault on small businesses and neighborhoods
Speaker 1: all across the country that are gonna get burned down
Speaker 1: by angry ID voters. I am concerned about that, meaning
Speaker 1: that the judges will view it that way and aren't
Speaker 1: willing to turn around. And then it's you think the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court's really going to get involved. I'm getta get
Speaker 1: involved in time in all these different states, I don't think. So.
Speaker 1: I don't think that you could you could even count
Speaker 1: on the Supremes to jump in on this one. So
Speaker 1: that's why I keep saying, let's see what is produced,
Speaker 1: let's see what the judges say, and then we can
Speaker 1: have a conversation about what comes next for America. But
Speaker 1: in the meantime, we simply do not know. We should
Speaker 1: fight this to the end, and when we get to
Speaker 1: the end, we can come to conclusions about what's next.
Speaker 1: But this is not over. That's where we are and
Speaker 1: that's where we're going to stay until the facts change.
Speaker 1: You're in. This is the Buck Sex and Show Podcast.
Speaker 1: Never let a crisis go to waste. Remember that quote,
Speaker 1: Ram Emmanuel Obama's first chief of staff in the White House.
Speaker 1: Remember that. Now that's an old saying. It stretches back. Really,
Speaker 1: I think thousands of years you could find that stuff
Speaker 1: and Sun Sue an ancient Chinese philosophy. You know, a
Speaker 1: crisis and an opportunity or are always intertwined. But some
Speaker 1: other places, notably are our Canadian brothers and sisters up North, Ah.
Speaker 1: They're already hearing from their prime minister. It's embarrassing this
Speaker 1: guy as their prime minister, but he is justin Trudeau
Speaker 1: that the pandemic is about a lot more than the pandemic.
Speaker 1: As some of us have been saying along, the pandemic
Speaker 1: has meeting far beyond just trying to deal with a
Speaker 1: communicable disease and mitigate the impact on health and the economy.
Speaker 1: It's an opportunity, you see, for a great reset. Play
Speaker 1: clip ten. Building back better means getting support to the
Speaker 1: most vulnerable while maintaining our momentum on reaching the twenty
Speaker 1: thirty Agenda for Sustainable Development and the SDGs. Canada is
Speaker 1: here to listen and to help. This pandemic has provided
Speaker 1: an opportunity for a reset. This is our chance to
Speaker 1: accelerate our pre pandemic efforts to reimagine economic systems that
Speaker 1: actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality, and climate change.
Speaker 1: A reset, he tells you, a great reset. Let's let's
Speaker 1: use COVID as a moment to address poverty and climate change.
Speaker 1: What what does COVID have to do with that? Will
Speaker 1: you see? If you took a leftist, statist mindset, he
Speaker 1: wouldn't need to ask that question at all. No one
Speaker 1: we need to ask that question because it's all about
Speaker 1: fear and control. And if that's what you're looking for,
Speaker 1: COVID is a remarkable opportunity. You mean, COVID. If you're
Speaker 1: looking to leverage fear in order to control people, COVID
Speaker 1: is your best opportunity. Certainly since the Great Recession and
Speaker 1: really much more powerful than that, right. I mean they
Speaker 1: remember they told us the entire financial system was going
Speaker 1: to melt down unless Goldman Sachs got bailed out one
Speaker 1: hundred cents on the dollar for its counterparty risk with AIG.
Speaker 1: I mean, there was a lot of stuff that went
Speaker 1: on though that was just stunk to high heaven. But
Speaker 1: it was a hey, let us do this, or else
Speaker 1: the whole system melts down. Sorry, And then the bank
Speaker 1: started paying people huge salaries again the next year, and
Speaker 1: as we know, never really paid the price for it.
Speaker 1: And it was just the losses of Wall Street were
Speaker 1: socialized in the general population in two thousand and eight,
Speaker 1: which is not the way it's supposed to be. But
Speaker 1: this is a much better opportunity for social social control
Speaker 1: even than that. And that's what that's what is being
Speaker 1: said here by Justin Trudeau. He's letting everybody know that
Speaker 1: this moment of mass mobilization against a virus just out
Speaker 1: of the Olinsky text, out of rules for radicals. Now
Speaker 1: you have a mass mobilization that they want to use
Speaker 1: for all the other left wing socialist agenda items. True
Speaker 1: and Canada. True here in America too. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the Bust. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Let's
Speaker 1: dive into the latest on COVID nineteen, lockdowns, vaccines, college
Speaker 1: debt forgiveness, and oh so much more with our friend
Speaker 1: James Altucher. He is an entrepreneur, podcaster, or author, general thinker. Guy.
Speaker 1: You should be following and listening to a whole bunch
Speaker 1: of things. And James, great to have you on the show.
Speaker 1: Buck once again, So so many things happening, so great
Speaker 1: to be on the show to talk about them. Let's
Speaker 1: start with Let's start, if we can, with college debt forgiveness,
Speaker 1: because I find this to be fascinating. The Biden team
Speaker 1: now with the assumption that they will be the new administration,
Speaker 1: that's what they're acting upon. At least they're saying that
Speaker 1: they will be the new administration. They're claiming that they're
Speaker 1: going to. I believe the latest plan is forgive, which
Speaker 1: just means have the federal government wipe away up to
Speaker 1: fifty thousand dollars of student loan debt for people. And
Speaker 1: I see this, and I say, there's so much about
Speaker 1: this that's bothersome, and it really just feels like, you know,
Speaker 1: this would be like if the Republican said, you know,
Speaker 1: we're going to find a favored constituency and just straight
Speaker 1: up right checks out of the Treasury Department to them
Speaker 1: because it'll help us, it'll bail us out. This is
Speaker 1: money going from welders and mechanics to people who went
Speaker 1: to third tiered liberal arts colleges and studied wokeness. Yeah, buck,
Speaker 1: this is so upsetting. By the way, I didn't even
Speaker 1: know how you felt about this particular issue. You know,
Speaker 1: everyone feels differently, whether particularly whether they have debt or not. Well,
Speaker 1: let's just look at it from an economic perspective. Who
Speaker 1: are you going to help the person who studied, you know,
Speaker 1: some you know, got an English degree at Harvard or
Speaker 1: Princeton or wherever and get rid of some of their debt,
Speaker 1: Or are the tens of millions of people who have
Speaker 1: been left unemployed by this pandemic, many people living in
Speaker 1: low income housing who can't even afford afford to get,
Speaker 1: like I don't know, a manicurist license or a license
Speaker 1: to practice any job that will get them out of poverty.
Speaker 1: And instead, let's just give free money to people who
Speaker 1: are already well off, already have jobs, already went to
Speaker 1: a good school. You know, people, the kids who go
Speaker 1: to college that they represent the top two thirds of society.
Speaker 1: Are we once again we elect a president who was
Speaker 1: neglecting completely the bottom third of society and the exact
Speaker 1: marginalized population that Joe Biden kept promising with support. He
Speaker 1: instantly abandoned the instant he's elected. It's so disappointing. I mean,
Speaker 1: I got into I got into business schools. I got
Speaker 1: into a couple of Ivy League business schools, and I
Speaker 1: didn't go because I had been a government employee. I
Speaker 1: didn't have a lot of money at all, and I
Speaker 1: didn't want to take out when you know what maybe
Speaker 1: not want to do one I want to work in media.
Speaker 1: But also, James, I didn't want to pay back loans
Speaker 1: that I knew when all said and done. People always say, oh,
Speaker 1: I took out one hundred and fifty thousand dollars of loans,
Speaker 1: But what they don't realize is that when you pay
Speaker 1: those off on the schedule, it's actually about three hundred
Speaker 1: thousand dollars of earnings over your life that you that
Speaker 1: you're paying back, and you have to make you know,
Speaker 1: considerably more than that at a at a you know,
Speaker 1: at a decent federal tax rate. To have the three
Speaker 1: hundred thousand dollars of your life, it's a huge expense.
Speaker 1: And so I didn't do that. I wanted to get
Speaker 1: a job instead. If I thought the government would just
Speaker 1: go say, yeah, your Columbia MBA or your award in MBA,
Speaker 1: we're paying for it for you, I probably would have
Speaker 1: gone to b school for a couple of years. Yeah, buck,
Speaker 1: this is so ridiculous, Like essentially, they go to eighteen
Speaker 1: year olds who don't even have the don't even have
Speaker 1: the ability to understand what's a huge risk, what's not.
Speaker 1: They say, oh, here's a quarter a million dollars you
Speaker 1: could borrow. And by the way, don't worry about this yet.
Speaker 1: But this is the one kind of debt you can't
Speaker 1: get rid of in a bankruptcy. We will garnish your wages,
Speaker 1: we will make your life miserable, and forget about being
Speaker 1: an entrepreneur. Like we're generating an entire generation of kids
Speaker 1: that can't be entrepreneurs. They have to they have to
Speaker 1: start paying back their loans right away. And again, we're
Speaker 1: not helping the people who need help. Let's think about
Speaker 1: I mean, sure, it always sounds like good intentions. The
Speaker 1: Department of Education started in nineteen eighty. Ever, since nineteen eighty,
Speaker 1: college tuitions have risen three times faster than a then inflation.
Speaker 1: Debt has gone from zero to one point six trillion
Speaker 1: dollars in student loan debt. I mean, the president of
Speaker 1: Quinnipiac College, what school is that, I don't know, makes
Speaker 1: over three million dollars. Why because the student he knows
Speaker 1: the government's gonna make the students all pay this debt.
Speaker 1: And now Joe Biden's administration is gonna forgive this debt.
Speaker 1: And again, what about the girl raising three kids living
Speaker 1: in low income housing who has been I don't know,
Speaker 1: doing her friends nails all her life, but she can't
Speaker 1: afford to get a blue collar license to work in
Speaker 1: a nail saloon. These are people who are actually starving,
Speaker 1: while you know, people who went to great school or
Speaker 1: are vacationing and getting a fifty thousand dollars check from Biden.
Speaker 1: Speaking of James Altucher, author, podcast or entrepreneur, and as
Speaker 1: I've been saying, guy whose insights you should hear on,
Speaker 1: this is a whole bunch of topics. What do you think,
Speaker 1: if anything, should be done. I mean, my position is
Speaker 1: that there should be a lot more And this is
Speaker 1: a broad I know there's a broad spectrum approach. There
Speaker 1: should be a lot more focus on one delaying. I
Speaker 1: don't think people should go from high school right into college.
Speaker 1: I think the gap year. I mean, they do this
Speaker 1: in Europe, they do this in other places. I think
Speaker 1: a gap year at least makes a lot of sense.
Speaker 1: Spend a year or two, you know, making likely minimum
Speaker 1: wage somewhere or at least doing service or whatever it
Speaker 1: may be, and then have a better understanding of what
Speaker 1: it is you want to do. I think four years
Speaker 1: for most undergrad programs is probably absurd. They should condense it.
Speaker 1: I think the college tuitions are far too high now
Speaker 1: we see with all this remote learning. I mean, I
Speaker 1: think there needs to be a pretty radical rethink of
Speaker 1: this four year liberal arts degree as a ticket to
Speaker 1: a better future. For a lot of people, that's just
Speaker 1: not the case, and especially when you're talking about taking
Speaker 1: out you know, sixty seventy thousand dollars of loans a
Speaker 1: year when you add in housing expense and everything else
Speaker 1: to go to schools. That no one ever is gonna say, oh, wow,
Speaker 1: you went there, I'm going to give you a job now.
Speaker 1: I don't think people understand that. I mean, kids don't.
Speaker 1: I mean there is a lot of I mean, since
Speaker 1: nineteen ninety two, the average college graduate between the ages
Speaker 1: of eighteen and thirty five income has gone down inflation adjusted.
Speaker 1: So it's not as even as if going to college
Speaker 1: gets you a better income. People say, oh, well, it
Speaker 1: gives you a better social experience. Let me tell you something.
Speaker 1: For two hundred and fifty thousand dollars, an eighteen year
Speaker 1: old is gonna doesn't need twenty fifty thousand dollars to
Speaker 1: figure out out how to be social with friends. Like
Speaker 1: they're gonna drink and have a party and make friends,
Speaker 1: and you know what, they're gonna work too. So I
Speaker 1: don't even know. I mean, this is an extreme view,
Speaker 1: but I'm not even sure what the benefits of college are.
Speaker 1: It does not help get a job anymore, it does
Speaker 1: not help get a bigger income. I don't remember. Do
Speaker 1: you remember any college. I don't certainly remember anything or
Speaker 1: very little. It's thirty years ago, and most people don't
Speaker 1: do for a career what they did in college. You
Speaker 1: can go to a library, you could read a book,
Speaker 1: you could take online classes. I agree, I don't think
Speaker 1: there should be a college, James. I think that this
Speaker 1: needs to be just radically, you know, changed. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think it's a lot of things, a lot of
Speaker 1: moving pieces here. But yeah, I don't I don't talk
Speaker 1: to anybody went to college with really anymore. And I
Speaker 1: don't care. I don't go back. I wasn't in a fraternity.
Speaker 1: I just I don't understand. I think this is an
Speaker 1: old model, and especially with the way information now, people
Speaker 1: have so much more access. I mean, you can watch,
Speaker 1: you can listen on podcast, you can watch on YouTube.
Speaker 1: Yale professors and they have the whole syllabus online. I mean,
Speaker 1: you can actually do this stuff on your own if
Speaker 1: you really want to know. But it was the thing
Speaker 1: is it was largely, I believe, a credentialing program, and
Speaker 1: that's really what and it turned into this big arms
Speaker 1: race to get into certain schools, and getting into that
Speaker 1: school means that you're going to, you know, have this
Speaker 1: much better life. Well there's only so many schools, that's
Speaker 1: really true. If and even those schools, it's not a
Speaker 1: ticket to anything necessarily it can be an advantage, but
Speaker 1: I think that this has all been It isn't arms race,
Speaker 1: and so the basic undergraduate degree has been diluted, even
Speaker 1: as a marketplace thing. Forget about what you actually learn,
Speaker 1: which I think is minimal at best in most of
Speaker 1: these schools. I think that the value of it has changed.
Speaker 1: I mean, if you have more people than ever with
Speaker 1: undergraduate degrees, people should understand the basic economics of this.
Speaker 1: That means that your undergraduate degree is less competitive for
Speaker 1: jobs when you get out. And we keep seeing this happen. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean again, there's been studies that show, you know, oh,
Speaker 1: thirty years after getting a degree, you'll you'll have more
Speaker 1: money in the bank. But these studies show that if
Speaker 1: you graduated in nineteen eighty, thirty years later you'll have
Speaker 1: money in the bank. Nineteen eighty they didn't have any
Speaker 1: student loan debt and tuitions were much cheaper. But even
Speaker 1: if you look at those studies, benefit only happens if
Speaker 1: you went to Harvard. It turns out that all the
Speaker 1: statistics are bs unless you're talking about Harvard. And so
Speaker 1: even those studies which should do well are not doing well.
Speaker 1: And it's it's so much worse right now, And I agree.
Speaker 1: There's so many great courses online you could take. You
Speaker 1: could take screenwriting from Aaron Sorkin. You could take you know,
Speaker 1: history from you of all Harror. You could take cooking
Speaker 1: for Wolfgang Puck. You could learn actual skills as an
Speaker 1: apprentice somewhere. You know. I have five kids. Some of
Speaker 1: them go to college, some of them don't. The ones
Speaker 1: who don't go to college, they get an extra four years.
Speaker 1: They get they have money in the bank when everyone
Speaker 1: else is in debt, and it's just a great thing.
Speaker 1: The kids don't forget we're talking about a one point
Speaker 1: six trillion dollar loan industry. Do you think they're gonna
Speaker 1: just let that industry die without putting up a fight?
Speaker 1: There is so much marketing. Oh no, you have to
Speaker 1: go to college so they have a well rounded education.
Speaker 1: When was the last time you had to calculate the
Speaker 1: volume of a cylinder or you had to know what
Speaker 1: Ohm's law was, or what the twelfth element on the
Speaker 1: periodic table is? Like, people don't need the things you
Speaker 1: learned in college. You never use later on in life.
Speaker 1: And by the way, your closest friends later on in
Speaker 1: life are the people you work with and your family
Speaker 1: and the people you grow with as an adult, like
Speaker 1: you know, I look, they agree. I think what the
Speaker 1: actual value of colleges it needs to be radically rethought. Yeah, James,
Speaker 1: can we can we hold you through for a second.
Speaker 1: I want to come back and talk to you about
Speaker 1: the pandemic and the flight from NYC. We got James
Speaker 1: al Tucher with us. Everybody follow him on social media,
Speaker 1: check out his podcast, his books, and he's an entrepreneur.
Speaker 1: Will be right back. You're in. This is the Buck
Speaker 1: Sex and Show podcast. We're back with my friend James
Speaker 1: al Tucher, podcaster, author, entrepreneur James Big story over the weekend.
Speaker 1: They're looking at address changes now during the pandemic here
Speaker 1: from NYC, so permanent change of address A few hundred thousand?
Speaker 1: Think was three hundred thousand households left New York. Now
Speaker 1: those are households, so that doesn't mean three d thousand people.
Speaker 1: That could be right, two three four people even, Um,
Speaker 1: what do you think of this number and what do
Speaker 1: you think it's telling us about out New York's prospects? Well, look,
Speaker 1: I love New York. Nobody I've lived in New York
Speaker 1: all my life I live there now. But this is
Speaker 1: exactly what I wrote in my column in August, which
Speaker 1: everybody then hated on. But the reality is, sales taxes
Speaker 1: are going down, income taxes are going down, property taxes
Speaker 1: are going down. One important New York residents haven't paid
Speaker 1: rent since March. Eight thousand to ten thousand restaurants are
Speaker 1: out of business, maybe eighty thousand small businesses are out
Speaker 1: of business. People are going to leave. If you can't
Speaker 1: pay for New York City services through taxes, New York
Speaker 1: City has to fire garbage collectors, teachers, emt workers, police.
Speaker 1: It's not a good situation. If you can't provide services,
Speaker 1: people will want to leave. If you're gonna if you're
Speaker 1: threatening to raise taxes, people will want to leave. This
Speaker 1: is exactly what's happening. It's not three hundred thousand people.
Speaker 1: It's more like a million. And you're not even hearing
Speaker 1: from the people who don't submit change of address. Like
Speaker 1: a lot of young people just simply left town move back.
Speaker 1: Two million people in the country moved back in with
Speaker 1: their parents from urban areas, So three hundred thousands the
Speaker 1: tip of the iceberg. They're saying New York City's thirty
Speaker 1: five percent down in sales taxes. Wait till income taxes
Speaker 1: hit in twenty twenty one and twenty twenty two as
Speaker 1: people are leaving. It's a disaster. And I've got to say,
Speaker 1: there's no reason to believe that the powers that be.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm pretty I'm tough on Cuomo Deblasio on
Speaker 1: this show, but I don't think I'm tough enough. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think they're two of the worst politicians in the country.
Speaker 1: I really do believe that Deblasio was the worst mayor
Speaker 1: in America for a large city. And it seems like
Speaker 1: there's almost a part, especially if Deblasio, that welcomes this
Speaker 1: catastrophe economically, you know, this financial catastrophe for the city,
Speaker 1: because it allows for the great remaking of New York
Speaker 1: into this you know, load of middle income paradise where
Speaker 1: the state is providing for people. Yeah, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: the city can't afford. Right there are about fifty billion
Speaker 1: dollars in the whole when you really add it up.
Speaker 1: And already Deblasio is threatened to fire twenty two thousand
Speaker 1: city employees. These are people who have worked all their
Speaker 1: lives for the city. They were essential workers. During the pandemic.
Speaker 1: Now they're the first one is being fired. And again
Speaker 1: that's gonna provide that's gonna make the city provide even
Speaker 1: fewer services. So you can have guys like Seinfeld from
Speaker 1: the Hampton say, New York City will live forever. We've
Speaker 1: got grit. But what are you going to tell these
Speaker 1: people who who live paycheck to paycheck need their jobs.
Speaker 1: We're frontline workers and now they're getting fired and there's
Speaker 1: no way to pay for them. There's no way to
Speaker 1: raise the money to pay for them. Like, you know
Speaker 1: what you have to do. And this is not going
Speaker 1: to be popular. But why is New York City running
Speaker 1: twenty seven hospitals poorly? Give them to sell them for
Speaker 1: thirty billion dollars to a company that will run them successfully.
Speaker 1: Why are we running all these city University of New
Speaker 1: York So are we in the education business? No, we're cities.
Speaker 1: Sell them to a bigger institution or just get rid
Speaker 1: of them. What are we doing? Like right now, everybody
Speaker 1: who makes a dollar buys on Amazon. No one is
Speaker 1: shopping local anymore. We need to open stores. We're addicted
Speaker 1: to Amazon and so money is not staying in the city.
Speaker 1: We need to provide incentives somehow for people to shop locally.
Speaker 1: Do some kind of creative couponing or even some crypto
Speaker 1: solution get people shopping locally. But it's gonna be really
Speaker 1: hard to encourage people to move back to New York.
Speaker 1: Every no company wants the liability, so they're telling their
Speaker 1: employees work remote. Every company loves saving on the costs,
Speaker 1: so hey, we could, we could at least less floor space.
Speaker 1: And finally, employees, your studies are showing they're more productive
Speaker 1: working at home. So I don't know what's going to happen,
Speaker 1: but it's not good. And everybody I speak to has
Speaker 1: not even offered a single solution. What do you think?
Speaker 1: Just real quick, what's your your sixty second take or
Speaker 1: so on. Now they're telling us we got a mask
Speaker 1: up in social distance after the distribution of a vaccine.
Speaker 1: So even if you get a vaccine that's ninety five
Speaker 1: percent effective as an individual, they're still being You're still
Speaker 1: being told by doctor fault. You know, there's wear a
Speaker 1: mask and social distance. Yeah. I mean, look at like
Speaker 1: Boris Johnson right now, he already had coronavirus, and today
Speaker 1: it was revealed he was exposed to someone with COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: So he's quarantining himself. Where is the studies on the immunity? Okay,
Speaker 1: this this virus has been around for since probably last December.
Speaker 1: What do we know? We must know something about immunity.
Speaker 1: What's the story? How are these vaccines being made of
Speaker 1: not taking into account community? We're gonna need a new
Speaker 1: vaccine every three months. This is just too chaotic. Now
Speaker 1: we know better about the populations that get hit by this,
Speaker 1: we know better about treatment. Let's just us as people
Speaker 1: figure this out. We're not idiots. We don't need to
Speaker 1: have our hands held by the government. If there's an
Speaker 1: outbreak of twelve people in Minnesota, get them treated and
Speaker 1: keep them. You know, we always have to be careful
Speaker 1: about contact tracing. Now people are being literally shipped into
Speaker 1: practically prisons for people who are being quarantined, who are
Speaker 1: exposed to other people with COVID. Some of those conditions
Speaker 1: are getting pretty nasty. So the whole solutions a mess
Speaker 1: right now. It's a mess. They need to back off.
Speaker 1: Everybody listening to James Altucher follow him on social podcaster, author,
Speaker 1: entrepreneur James always appreciate your time. Fuck thanks so much.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. You know who, I really
Speaker 1: don't think we need to hear from right now for
Speaker 1: a lot of people. I mean, how wow. Hillary comes
Speaker 1: to mind, for sure, But you know who, I just
Speaker 1: don't feel any need whatsoever for us to hear from.
Speaker 1: That would be Barack Hussein Obama. Don't need to hear
Speaker 1: from this guy. It's not useful, it's not helpful. But
Speaker 1: of course we're going to because you know what's really
Speaker 1: happened here, right Joe Biden has been propped up and
Speaker 1: put forward as essentially the third term of an Obama administration,
Speaker 1: which is why you're going to have a lot of
Speaker 1: Obama alumni, alumni and alumna or whatever who people that
Speaker 1: work for that administration are going to be in this administration,
Speaker 1: all of them. So get ready for that's I think
Speaker 1: that's a guarantee at this point. But here is Obama
Speaker 1: just piling on with the usual. Trump is a dictator
Speaker 1: or comparison to dictators in the most reckless an irresponsible
Speaker 1: fashion play clip eleven. This sense over the last several
Speaker 1: years that literally anything goes and is justified in order
Speaker 1: to get power. And that's not unique to the United States.
Speaker 1: They're strong men and dictators around the world who think
Speaker 1: that I can do anything to stay in power. I
Speaker 1: can people, I can throw them in jail, I can
Speaker 1: run phony elections, I can suppress journalists. But that's not
Speaker 1: who we're supposed to be. That's crazy. I mean, what
Speaker 1: he's saying here is insane. First of all, literally anything
Speaker 1: goes under Trump. Was he asleep for the last four years.
Speaker 1: Did Trump just say, Okay, you know what, I'm building
Speaker 1: a wall. I don't care what the courts say. I
Speaker 1: don't care what's happening. I'm doing and I'm ordering the
Speaker 1: military to do it and it's done. No, he had
Speaker 1: judges that said no, and he had to go around
Speaker 1: and find it in the budget and see if it
Speaker 1: was legal and then come back and think of all
Speaker 1: the different issues. Did Trump get rid of Obamacare entirely? No?
Speaker 1: He did not. Did he just say it's gone. No,
Speaker 1: didn't happen. What is the unconstitutional action that President Trump
Speaker 1: engaged in. That's what I really want to know. Where
Speaker 1: did Trump because Obama broke the Constitution. In a whole
Speaker 1: bunch of ways, Obama was much closer to a dictator
Speaker 1: than Trump was. This is the part of this that's
Speaker 1: so interesting. Let's just take the media, for example, suppressing journalists.
Speaker 1: CNN might get sold now because they realized that without
Speaker 1: a Trump presidency, what does CNN even offer. It's not
Speaker 1: a journalistic enterprise. So what happens to it? You know,
Speaker 1: how does this have real value going forward? Jim Acosta,
Speaker 1: these other people at CNN, they elevated their careers by
Speaker 1: going against the president. That's the opposite of what happens
Speaker 1: in a dictatorship. In a fascistic state, what you have
Speaker 1: is the media all fawning over the dear leader. Right.
Speaker 1: When you look at dictatorships, the media is co opted.
Speaker 1: And who had a co opted media Obama did. If
Speaker 1: you went against Obama and the media, you were considered
Speaker 1: a right wing loon or your career was dramatically damage.
Speaker 1: You weren't allowed to do it. Nothing Obama did was
Speaker 1: to be criticized. And there was even little things. You know,
Speaker 1: they hid the photo of Obama shaking hand during his
Speaker 1: campaign in two thousand and eight with farracons just because
Speaker 1: they knew they were supposed to do that. You gotta
Speaker 1: hide that photo of Obama shaking hand of the Farrakon.
Speaker 1: That's not gonna look good for him. This was the
Speaker 1: press about suppressing their suppressing information. The big tech companies
Speaker 1: were suppressing information about Hunter Biden this time around, and
Speaker 1: about the Biden's going into the election, as we know.
Speaker 1: But that's not new in the sense that the media
Speaker 1: and big tech were colluding on the suppression of information
Speaker 1: about Obama that was not favorable. Right, Google with their
Speaker 1: algorithms so many ways that this is done. But Obama
Speaker 1: had the media in his pocket. That's really troubling. When
Speaker 1: you have ninety five percent of journalists in a country
Speaker 1: who will find a way to justify your imprisonment by
Speaker 1: a leader by a dictation, that's when you got big concerns.
Speaker 1: When of a journalistic establishment is calling the president, the
Speaker 1: duly elected president, a trader, and they're getting rich and
Speaker 1: famous for doing so. Your problem is not fascism. Your
Speaker 1: problem is a dishonest media. That's the part of this
Speaker 1: that they're hoping that everybody forgets. That's the component of
Speaker 1: this whole situation that you have to remember. As they're
Speaker 1: just going about rewriting history. Hearing including Obama himself here.
Speaker 1: He is then also saying, I mean, also the stuff
Speaker 1: about it. Trump can do anything. I can kill people,
Speaker 1: I can throw them in jail. Who did Trump order
Speaker 1: killed or who? Because you know Obama did have two
Speaker 1: US citizens. I'm more Unlucky and his son killed with
Speaker 1: drone strikes. Never never tried in a court, not even
Speaker 1: tried an absential that we know about. Nothing, just done killed.
Speaker 1: Unlucky Sun was sixteen years old, drone strike gone. How
Speaker 1: many other drone strikes through Obama? Remember that was fine though,
Speaker 1: because Obama was ordering it. You know that the drone
Speaker 1: strikes in Afghanistan in Pakistan, just so many of them,
Speaker 1: and Obama would make jokes about it. But then the
Speaker 1: government would still pretend that it was some big secrets.
Speaker 1: So nobody who knew anything about the drone program, people
Speaker 1: like me could not say anything from their time in
Speaker 1: the intelligence community. Obama could make jokes about it in public.
Speaker 1: I mean I'm being serious, literally make jokes about it.
Speaker 1: Talk about you know, how if anyone, you know, any
Speaker 1: boys ask his daughters out, you know he's got drones
Speaker 1: or whatever. I mean, he make jokes about being the
Speaker 1: president who orders drone strikes, but you couldn't talk about
Speaker 1: it if you had any knowledge of it and say
Speaker 1: that the drone strikes were happening where they were because
Speaker 1: it was classified. Just to protect the government from having
Speaker 1: to actually explain what was going on with that. The
Speaker 1: Obama administration governor to explain that Obama tapped the phones
Speaker 1: used by what twenty associated press journalists. He was tapping
Speaker 1: the phones of journalist friends to get at their sources.
Speaker 1: But but Trump is the tyrant. That's the game we're
Speaker 1: talking about, How Trump is the tyrant? Oh really, the
Speaker 1: Obama DOJ listed a Fox News reporter at the time.
Speaker 1: Now he's at Sinclair James Rosen as an unindicted co
Speaker 1: conspirator on a classified leak of information which people leaked
Speaker 1: to journalist classified information all the time. But the problem
Speaker 1: for the press is Trump. So if you oppose Trump,
Speaker 1: you get more famous and rich. If you are a
Speaker 1: huge anti Trump demagogue demagogue in the media, you've done
Speaker 1: nothing but become more famous. Right, and yet this is
Speaker 1: a brave position, and Trump is a grave threat to
Speaker 1: humanity as this is absurd, friends, this is absurd, right,
Speaker 1: Intelligent people can't really believe this, and of course what
Speaker 1: they really want now is for us to back away
Speaker 1: from Trump and refuse to continue to support him. Here's
Speaker 1: Obama talking about those people that because that's what they want.
Speaker 1: They want ever to pull support from Trump, leave him
Speaker 1: high and dry. So he flails all by himself in
Speaker 1: this legal fight, and I say, no, I refuse. I
Speaker 1: think the president's right to chase down these challenges. He's
Speaker 1: right to make sure this vote was legitimate. There's nothing elicit,
Speaker 1: there's nothing illegal or outside the box of what he's doing.
Speaker 1: Here's though, Obama trying to get Republicans to back off
Speaker 1: Play thirteen. What are these false claims of widespread election
Speaker 1: fraud doing to our country right now? The President doesn't
Speaker 1: like to lose and never admits loss. I'm more troubled
Speaker 1: by the fact that other Republican officials who clearly know better,
Speaker 1: are going along with us, are humoring him in this fashion.
Speaker 1: It is one more step in deal legitimizing not just
Speaker 1: the incoming Biden administration, but democracy generally. And that's a
Speaker 1: dangerous path. We would never accept that out of our
Speaker 1: own kids behaving that way if they lost, I mean,
Speaker 1: if my daughters in any kind of competition and then
Speaker 1: accused the other side of cheating when they lost when
Speaker 1: there was no evidence of it. We'd scold them there
Speaker 1: is evidence, So they can keep saying there's no evidence,
Speaker 1: but that's not true. And I also think it's fascinating
Speaker 1: that they keep going to this. It's a threat to democracy.
Speaker 1: Oh yes, you mean bringing entirely legitimate legal challenges in
Speaker 1: a court of law, completely in accordance with the rule
Speaker 1: of law. That's oh yeah, that's exactly what Stalin would
Speaker 1: have done. Oh, we have an election and I didn't win.
Speaker 1: So let's let's now go and see if the courts
Speaker 1: are going to agree that the election was rigged in
Speaker 1: some way with me. Yeah, or he just would have
Speaker 1: seized power and never even had an election. Right, this
Speaker 1: is so dumb. There's no intelligent argument being made here.
Speaker 1: This is there's nothing dictator like about this. They want
Speaker 1: to call him a cry baby. They want to say
Speaker 1: as a store loser. Fine, I mean that's politics. Say
Speaker 1: he's being a dictator. It's absurd. There's no basis for that.
Speaker 1: There's nothing he's doing that is in violation of norms,
Speaker 1: legal norms. Right, I'm not talking about what people would
Speaker 1: like or how they you know, the spirit of fair
Speaker 1: play or this other stuff they'd complain about that. No
Speaker 1: matter what, Obama's out there giving voice to all of
Speaker 1: this right now. Meanwhile, Ken Starr, who is a guy
Speaker 1: who knows quite quite a few things about recounts and
Speaker 1: votes and politics. Here he is on the irregularities we've
Speaker 1: seen play fourteen. Well, let's just take miss again the
Speaker 1: lawsuit that was filed, and again we have to let
Speaker 1: the lawsuit run its course. The lawsuit, if it is meritorious,
Speaker 1: that's the if we need to know, would change over
Speaker 1: one million votes in Georgia getto and of course Georgia
Speaker 1: itself has a state audit underway. That's exactly right. There
Speaker 1: will be a recount in Georgia if you take all
Speaker 1: these together. Pennsylvania allegations in Pennsylvania, these are allegations. What
Speaker 1: we do know is in Pennsylvania, as Justice Samuel Alito indicated,
Speaker 1: I'm going to embellishare utterly unconstitutional. And we've seen changes,
Speaker 1: including Gavin Newsom in California just condemned by a state
Speaker 1: court judge for doing what he did. This unprecedented flood
Speaker 1: of mail. In balance, all the more reason why in
Speaker 1: this election, we need to check. We need to check.
Speaker 1: That is the argument. There's nothing bad faith about it.
Speaker 1: There's nothing silly or absurd or we need you check.
Speaker 1: That's it. They can complain about this as much as
Speaker 1: they want. They can pretend that this is this is
Speaker 1: awful and it's practically North Korea, that that's just not
Speaker 1: that's just not intelligent, it's not not honest. We need
Speaker 1: to check. We are doing so. The Trump team has
Speaker 1: every right. Let's see where this goes. This fight is
Speaker 1: not over. The states have not certified, the Electoral College
Speaker 1: has not given its votes. We have time left. Let's
Speaker 1: see what they have. But remember this, the Democrats know
Speaker 1: that even more than just this election, which is a lot,
Speaker 1: but even more than just a presidential elections at stake
Speaker 1: right now, if there is fraud that has found and proven,
Speaker 1: and that a chord takes action on that changes even
Speaker 1: one state. Let's say it's not even enough, not even
Speaker 1: enough to flip this election, but it is intentional and
Speaker 1: it's real. That means that the next time around we
Speaker 1: will be on very solid ground. I don't think they'll
Speaker 1: be able to win the argument, at least in the
Speaker 1: court of public opinion that we should not have much
Speaker 1: more secure procedures in place for the next election to
Speaker 1: prevent something like this. Remember, it's not just this election,
Speaker 1: it's the whole concept of almost universal mail in balloting.
Speaker 1: It's not just this election, it's about the next one too.
Speaker 1: It's about the Democrat Party's reputation, perhaps if it's caught
Speaker 1: cheating this time around as the party of cheaters, which
Speaker 1: will be used by our side again the next time
Speaker 1: to say sorry, we're not just going to take it
Speaker 1: on your word. We're not going to allow ballot counting
Speaker 1: to occur without Republicans present, and we'll bring more legal
Speaker 1: challenges the next time. This has done the right way,
Speaker 1: it's done within the rule of law, or it's not
Speaker 1: done at all. That's the way we have to do
Speaker 1: all of this. That's the path way forward. So all
Speaker 1: let's all keep that in mind too. You're in the
Speaker 1: Freedom mind. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: There are lies about voter fraud all across social media
Speaker 1: these days. These lies would not be nearly as popular
Speaker 1: if there were no demand for it. These marches that
Speaker 1: Sarah Seidner was that yesterday, they would not be attracting
Speaker 1: thousands of people. If there was no demand for this
Speaker 1: parallel universe. It's the result of a poisonous stew of
Speaker 1: social alienation, negative partisanship, severe distrust of news sources. And
Speaker 1: I'm sure there are other factors as well. Look, the
Speaker 1: Trump supporters in my life, the people who voted for
Speaker 1: him two weeks ago, they don't believe the election was rigged.
Speaker 1: They're moving on. Most people are moving on. Most Trump
Speaker 1: voters do not buy all the bologna that's being sold
Speaker 1: by Rudy and by Trump and by these others. But
Speaker 1: some dow It's hard to know exactly how many. But
Speaker 1: I think we can confidently say, as I look at
Speaker 1: the ratings reports and web traffic reports, that millions of
Speaker 1: people are buying into this parallel universe. Well, first of all,
Speaker 1: let's understand, how do they trap supporters? Do you think
Speaker 1: bride Stealter really does? How Betty? I think it's very few,
Speaker 1: very few trap supporters that's bride sealter are actually death.
Speaker 1: Why can't they respond? Why can't Stelter media critic over
Speaker 1: at CNN whatever, whatever kind of job that is, right,
Speaker 1: media critic, You're in the media eor, media critic. Why
Speaker 1: is it that Stelter over at CNN can't deal with
Speaker 1: what Trump supporters, at least a lot of us are saying,
Speaker 1: which is you notice he says it's a lie about
Speaker 1: voter fraud. I've never lied about voter fraud on this show.
Speaker 1: I've talked about allegations that are out there that I
Speaker 1: want to investigated. But say, but repeating an allegation is
Speaker 1: not the same thing as a lie, especially on a situation,
Speaker 1: In a situation like this, where why is it so
Speaker 1: unthinkable that there would be voter fraud. There's voter fraud.
Speaker 1: It does happen. And this isn't a space you know,
Speaker 1: alien landing. This is something that actually goes on. I
Speaker 1: know some of you say, Buck, there are extraterrestrials, but
Speaker 1: that's a different show. So why are they saying lies?
Speaker 1: It's not there's no lies here. We're asking for answers.
Speaker 1: We want to know the truth. How do we get
Speaker 1: to the truth putting forward information, having attested in court,
Speaker 1: and letting the public see what's really going on. But
Speaker 1: over the weekend you had the Maga March happening in DC.
Speaker 1: I was sorry I couldn't be down there, but you
Speaker 1: saw these videos of all this extreme violence, and it's
Speaker 1: just all Trump supporters getting attacked. I'm not saying there's
Speaker 1: never violence from the right. I'm not saying there aren't
Speaker 1: people who are Trump supporters who sometimes want to get
Speaker 1: into a scrap. Of course there are. But there is
Speaker 1: a widespread acceptance and promotion of political violence that exists
Speaker 1: on the left that simply does not exist on the right.
Speaker 1: It just doesn't. There's no equivalency here. It's a false equivalency.
Speaker 1: That's why it's so amazing. Even after this weekend, when
Speaker 1: you have leftist attacking Trump supporters, You've got you know,
Speaker 1: the Queen of the Idiots, AOC out there saying that
Speaker 1: Trump is stoking the flames of violence. Play twenty four.
Speaker 1: To me, I already believe that President Trump is already
Speaker 1: stoking the flames of violence, as he has done for
Speaker 1: several years. You know, we saw, we saw even with
Speaker 1: the with the ballot counts that were happening in Philadelphia,
Speaker 1: his rhetoric and his attacks on our institutions and our
Speaker 1: systems inspired, very likely inspired a group of what seems
Speaker 1: like domestic terrorists to attempt to attack um where as
Speaker 1: were being counted in Philadelphia, where's this violence? They keep
Speaker 1: saying Trump is inspiring? Where where is this exactly? And
Speaker 1: Antifa has executed people for being Trump supporters. That happened
Speaker 1: out in Portland. Where where is this? Oh? They they're
Speaker 1: gonna point to that kid up in Kenosha who was attacked,
Speaker 1: including by a guy with a gun shot in self defense.
Speaker 1: That's not Trump violence. They could try to say it is,
Speaker 1: but they're full of it. Where is this massive violence?
Speaker 1: Because Antifa goes around punching people, harassing and menacing them
Speaker 1: in the streets of our nation's capital as they did
Speaker 1: this Wednesday, those are all Biden voters. Folks. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. Liberty, Truth and Great Hair. Feel those funky beats.
Speaker 1: It's time for roll. Call Facebook dot com, Slash buck
Speaker 1: Sexton team buck at iHeartMedia dot com. If you want
Speaker 1: to email us and on Instagram buck Sexton, send us
Speaker 1: a message for the inbox, and make sure you go
Speaker 1: to buck Sexton dot com as well. Please check us
Speaker 1: out there. We've got stories posted hope and have a
Speaker 1: my latest editorial of the week up tomorrow. We're gonna
Speaker 1: try to shoot for Tuesdays. Maybe Tuesdays Wednesdays be our
Speaker 1: editorial day for That's that's right, me writing at editorial
Speaker 1: for buckseexon dot com every week, So please check it out.
Speaker 1: Site is new and improved, looks great, taste great, less filling.
Speaker 1: You remember that you're probably too young for that, producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: I know the reference Miller was a Miller Light or
Speaker 1: bud Light. I think bud light. It was bud Light.
Speaker 1: It's probably a bud light. Yeah, it tastes great. Let's filly.
Speaker 1: Do people still drink Budwiser the same way? Yes, I'd
Speaker 1: say it's the most commonly drunk beer in the in
Speaker 1: the world or in the country. I just feel like
Speaker 1: I saw and they must have stopped doing beer commercials, right,
Speaker 1: because you don't see. I mean, beer commercials used to
Speaker 1: be great. It was like people just all hanging out
Speaker 1: and you know, bathing suits at the beach and then
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, these Clydesdale horses running through snow
Speaker 1: out of nowhere, and it was, you know, it was like, yeah,
Speaker 1: beer commercials, man, I feel like I never see beer
Speaker 1: commercials anymore. They still do some pretty big Super Bowl
Speaker 1: ads and stuff like that. Yeah, yeah, you know what
Speaker 1: it is. Actually, I just realized I don't see commercials
Speaker 1: really because I don't watch normal TV exactly. You don't
Speaker 1: watch sports, and you don't watch That's it, tie. I
Speaker 1: don't watch TV anymore. I mean I watch like digital,
Speaker 1: non linear television almost exclusively. Now I'll have Fox in
Speaker 1: the background somewhat as a kind of a news ticker
Speaker 1: throughout the day. But even that, I mean, the stuff
Speaker 1: I have access to on the Internet is so much
Speaker 1: more timely and speedier than than what I got there.
Speaker 1: How is the producer Mark weekend? Quiet? RESTful? Chilling, just chilling,
Speaker 1: nothing really going on. You try any new shows or anything. No,
Speaker 1: I'm a boring person, but clearly I started watching I
Speaker 1: think of it as peaceful Producer Mark. I started watching
Speaker 1: a show on HBO called The Outsider. It's Stephen King,
Speaker 1: and I usually don't like this horror movie stuff for
Speaker 1: some reason, even though it's really disturbing and and very creepy,
Speaker 1: I keep watching it and we keep watching it, but
Speaker 1: it's it's traumatizing. Like you watch this, you're like, ohoh,
Speaker 1: this is creepy. UM. It's good, though I don't know
Speaker 1: it's well done. I'm kind of like, I think we're
Speaker 1: probably gonna finish the whole first season. We're about six
Speaker 1: seven episodes in UM, so I guess we watched it
Speaker 1: last weekend. This weekend, we watched two or three, you know,
Speaker 1: episodes over the course of the weekend each weekend, so
Speaker 1: that one's pretty good. I gotta finish Barbarian Bob Badden
Speaker 1: or whatever it's called, UM, which is this, uh, this
Speaker 1: show that you know, it's about barbarians and the Roman
Speaker 1: ancient Roman times. So there's that and uh yeah. Other
Speaker 1: than that, I just snow. Princess made me a tray
Speaker 1: of free So it turns out Rice Crispies are not
Speaker 1: technically gluten free. People don't know that Rice Crispies. They
Speaker 1: use a malt or sorry, a barley based sweetener for
Speaker 1: the rice krispies is the final ingreement ingredient and that
Speaker 1: does have gluten. So I can't even eat Rice Krispy treats,
Speaker 1: which is very annoying. But I can get gluten free
Speaker 1: Rice Krispy treat knockoffs, so we got those and she
Speaker 1: made me rice crispy treats. The problem is Producer Mark.
Speaker 1: She made them yesterday. I've basically only had them myself,
Speaker 1: and there was a big pan of them, and now
Speaker 1: half the pan has gone. I think that the boogeyman
Speaker 1: came and took some of them. I think it was you.
Speaker 1: I just feel I gotta come up with a I
Speaker 1: gotta come up with some kind of an excuse here,
Speaker 1: because I gotta yes to Lula, you little scoundrel. You
Speaker 1: got up on that counter. I know you did. She
Speaker 1: would probably love. She actually liked sweet things, which doesn't
Speaker 1: really surprise me. What It's always funny. Mean, sometimes I've
Speaker 1: tried to give her people food, Like I'll try to
Speaker 1: give her a bit of fish that I've cooked or something,
Speaker 1: and she just look at me like, eh no, I'm like, wow,
Speaker 1: doesn't like the cook does not like the cooking anyway.
Speaker 1: So for the way you are officially single, buck is gone?
Speaker 1: What you now started saying we about television shows? Oh yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's O course, yeah yeah, you know it's um, it's good.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm I'm embracing you know. I. I we
Speaker 1: have candles that that go a lot now and I
Speaker 1: keep the apartment cleaner. And you know, I like to
Speaker 1: cook and do some do some slow cooking on the weekends,
Speaker 1: to use the slow cooker and gosh, you know, play
Speaker 1: of easy listening music in the background. Maybe go to
Speaker 1: home depot. I don't know if we're gonna have enough time.
Speaker 1: You know, she coming to Thanksgiving too, because yeah Thanksgiving.
Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, she's coming with the fan of Thanksgiving. You're done, yep, alrighty,
Speaker 1: let's get into the roll call, Michael. If this recount
Speaker 1: goes Trump's a way, well, the Democrats don't want to
Speaker 1: heal our divide and come together. Um, Michael, the answer
Speaker 1: is most certainly no, Democrats will not want to heal
Speaker 1: the country. I am not really prone to overstatement about
Speaker 1: these things. If somehow Trump pulled off the win at
Speaker 1: this point, you would see mass riots in major American
Speaker 1: cities that would last for weeks. Producer Mark, with that
Speaker 1: even surprise. You imagine we wake up in three weeks
Speaker 1: and the news announcers are saying, it turns out that
Speaker 1: the judges and the YadA YadA, Trump actually won these
Speaker 1: three states, so he's now actually the president elect. Do
Speaker 1: you think things? Do you think that people are gonna
Speaker 1: go quietly over that one. I would lock myself down
Speaker 1: and not leave the house for months. Actly. It would
Speaker 1: be like the did you ever see the original Purge movie? Yes, yeah,
Speaker 1: it would be like that, Like you'd want to just
Speaker 1: stay home. You'd want to stay home, you would not
Speaker 1: want to go anywhere. So yeah, I do not think
Speaker 1: that they will accept it at all. I also think
Speaker 1: the odds of that happening are are pretty small. So
Speaker 1: and as I've been telling you all along, I think
Speaker 1: they're pretty small. I was not. Just to be clear,
Speaker 1: my election prediction was not off by very much. It
Speaker 1: was actually much better than pretty much all the posters
Speaker 1: I said. And this is a matter of record because
Speaker 1: I wrote this on Twitter two and I said on
Speaker 1: the show, I said Trump was gonna win Florida and Ohio,
Speaker 1: that Biden was gonna win Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. I
Speaker 1: did say Trump would win in Pennsylvania. That was the
Speaker 1: one that it looks like I got wrong. And I
Speaker 1: didn't realize he was gonna lose Georgia. But other than that,
Speaker 1: and I said it was going to be a very
Speaker 1: narrow Trump win. I think I predicted two hundred and
Speaker 1: seventy something votes to two hundred and sixty something votes
Speaker 1: for Biden. So now granted the electoral college victory for Biden,
Speaker 1: man d up being bigger than that. And that's all
Speaker 1: assuming that we don't get these reversals in the court.
Speaker 1: But I'm just saying I was way closer to reality
Speaker 1: than pretty much all the pollsters except for a Trafalgar
Speaker 1: Brad dear bucking Mark. The election isn't even finalized, and
Speaker 1: the crazy left is already making demands of Biden. I
Speaker 1: recently read news reports the co founder of the BLM
Speaker 1: movement wants a person will sit down with Biden to
Speaker 1: discuss their demands and expectations of the Biden administration for
Speaker 1: giving him the black vote. So now the black vote
Speaker 1: is a quid pro quo to the office of the presidency.
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren wants Biden to bypass the House and take
Speaker 1: executive actions concerning student debt, a minimum wage standards that
Speaker 1: would cost the American taxpayer billions, if not trillions. Where
Speaker 1: has this attitude or belief come from that says everything
Speaker 1: should be given freely, without work or sacrifice, and that
Speaker 1: everything should be fair. I'm very concerned about the effects
Speaker 1: the liberal agenda will have on our great country. I'm
Speaker 1: keeping my fingers crossed for Trump win, for a Trump win,
Speaker 1: but also trying to repair for the liberal onslaught called
Speaker 1: the Biden presidency. Thank you for all that you do,
Speaker 1: keep us unformed, shields high. Yeah, Brada, you know their
Speaker 1: executive orders where you're going to see a lot of
Speaker 1: the early Biden stuff come in again, assuming that we
Speaker 1: don't have these court reversals of the vote in Sylvania, Georgia, Michigan.
Speaker 1: So that's where you're going to see a lot of action.
Speaker 1: That's where're gonna see a lot of movement from the
Speaker 1: Biden team. And that's not the way it's supposed to be.
Speaker 1: The legislative branch. Congress is what's really supposed to be
Speaker 1: in charge of changing policies. But Democrats don't care. What
Speaker 1: they care about is getting their way and getting what
Speaker 1: they want, and so whatever is useful to that end,
Speaker 1: to that purpose is what they're going to support. And
Speaker 1: as for the fairness, this kind of fairness approach, the
Speaker 1: Biden fairness doctrine, Yeah, this is this is also very
Speaker 1: central to Marxist and socialist thought, which is that any
Speaker 1: imbalance in the end result that people enjoy in society
Speaker 1: must be the result of structural inequality. Inequity is the
Speaker 1: result of structural inequality that must be addressed to get
Speaker 1: rid of the inequity, and equity being the end result,
Speaker 1: equality being the treatment of people as the same through
Speaker 1: the through the process. They want to change that. They
Speaker 1: want to change that, and that gives them an endless
Speaker 1: amount of opportunities if they take that approach. For things like, Okay,
Speaker 1: we know that college educated, predominantly college educated whites, for example,
Speaker 1: will be helped um. You know, so a majority of
Speaker 1: the people that will be helped by a student loan
Speaker 1: forgive us up to fifty thousand dollars are college educated
Speaker 1: white liberals. That's the constituency they're going for there. Now
Speaker 1: they are already really have those as Democrats, but they
Speaker 1: it's a it's a huge giveaway to them, and it
Speaker 1: will perhaps mobilize even more help from from that constituency.
Speaker 1: And when you look at for example, when you look
Speaker 1: at college educated white women, that's a demographic. When they're married,
Speaker 1: they become Republicans generally, that's what happens. But when they're single,
Speaker 1: they're they're liberals, they're Democrats, and they want to make
Speaker 1: sure they sure that constituency up going forward. So that's
Speaker 1: why that giveaway is so important to Democrats, Sam Rights,
Speaker 1: how do how do I show a reasonable Democrat that
Speaker 1: mainstream media are not neutral entities but are in fact
Speaker 1: what you call the information arm of the Democrat Party.
Speaker 1: A family overseemed genuinely confused about where I was getting
Speaker 1: information to make me question the election results. When I
Speaker 1: pointed her a conservative news site, she said, but they
Speaker 1: are reporting crazy stuff. That's not true. I know because
Speaker 1: all the legitimate news sites say so, how do I
Speaker 1: show her that the New York Times and CNN are
Speaker 1: not the middle but are only slightly the right of
Speaker 1: Vox and the Huffington Post shields high. Well, Sam, there's
Speaker 1: not really one answer to this. It's it's a collective.
Speaker 1: It's a you know, over time, piece by piece conclusion
Speaker 1: that you come to and and so it build. It's
Speaker 1: cumulative is the word. I was looking for. A cumulative approach,
Speaker 1: not collective. And that's that's really why we know. But
Speaker 1: if you want one thing to do would just be,
Speaker 1: you know, have her, you know, you could sit with
Speaker 1: her and go through the Twitter feed of a prominent
Speaker 1: either CNN personality or CNN just the news site on
Speaker 1: Twitter CNN and go through it all and show that
Speaker 1: anybody who is being honest would see it's a Democrat aligned,
Speaker 1: left wing propaganda effort. That's what that is, what you
Speaker 1: are getting with something like that. I think all you
Speaker 1: have to do is scroll through the Twitter account and
Speaker 1: you'll see that. So that's one way to go if
Speaker 1: you're looking for an easy one. The other thing to
Speaker 1: do would just be set up side by side, show
Speaker 1: her how CNN dot Com covers an issue, and then
Speaker 1: show her how the Huffington Post what their's top stories are,
Speaker 1: and then show her like the BBC. Now the BBC
Speaker 1: is not conservative, it's not. But I just mean as
Speaker 1: a as a as a different news approach because I
Speaker 1: think it's clear how much opinion is infused now, even
Speaker 1: into the headlines and just everything about something like CNN.
Speaker 1: They don't even really try to hide it anymore. They're
Speaker 1: at a new level of Democrat propaganda. They've reached a
Speaker 1: whole new heights of that. You're in the freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. More roll call
Speaker 1: to finish us out for the day, We've got Brian greetings,
Speaker 1: bucket Mark quick question, if a state does a recount
Speaker 1: between a Trump and between Trump and Biden, does that
Speaker 1: automatically trigger recount of downballot candidates as well? Just wondering
Speaker 1: if the recount and Georgia may inadvertently prevent a runoff race.
Speaker 1: I don't think so, Brian. I'd have to look. I mean,
Speaker 1: every state has different laws and results, but I think
Speaker 1: that Georgia Senate runoff situation and is going to play
Speaker 1: out as as anticipated right now. I don't foresee any
Speaker 1: change in that so, and I know Trump is already
Speaker 1: Trump is already very much upset with the ballot recount
Speaker 1: in Georgia. So let's see what other legal challenges are
Speaker 1: going to come up there. Jj a bucking producer, Mark
Speaker 1: everyone's complete lack of surprise. Not only are the Democrats
Speaker 1: canceling Thanksgiving, but they're also depressing the economy. I work
Speaker 1: in the hospitality industry, and while two weeks ago we
Speaker 1: were steadily recovering our business and looking to finally rehire
Speaker 1: some staff, we're drawing back up again. Praying President Trump's
Speaker 1: legal challenges bear fruit. Thanks for keeping us informed and
Speaker 1: courage and safe and warm at night. Well, JJ, you're
Speaker 1: welcome for that safety and warm thank you so much
Speaker 1: for listening to the show. And as for the depressing
Speaker 1: of the economy, yeah, this is a huge component of
Speaker 1: why these COVID lockdowns are so. Yes, costly in financial terms,
Speaker 1: but costly and human terms too. It's more than just
Speaker 1: the loss of a paycheck when someone loses a job.
Speaker 1: It's that it's that sense of purpose in the community.
Speaker 1: It's the respect of peers and family. It's it's that
Speaker 1: that desire to provide and meeting that challenge right, It's
Speaker 1: it's a lot for people, psychologically, emotionally, really challenging for them.
Speaker 1: So it is clearly depressing the economy, and in depressing
Speaker 1: an economy, you're actually depressing people too. You're making them depressed,
Speaker 1: and that has a tremendous downside for our society, for
Speaker 1: our country. And I don't think it's getting nearly enough
Speaker 1: attention in the mainstream press, not at all. Let me
Speaker 1: see here we go. Russ writes Buck. I'm confused. You
Speaker 1: continue to say don't bend the knee, then you say
Speaker 1: I wear a mask all the time. I realize there's
Speaker 1: a little bit of don't charge the machine gunness in that,
Speaker 1: But you're setting a bad example. When does civil disobedience
Speaker 1: become the plan? Well, Rush Russ, let me tell you
Speaker 1: what happens if if I go around not wearing a
Speaker 1: mask by myself, I am outvoted in New York and
Speaker 1: outnumbered at least about nine to eight to nine to one,
Speaker 1: and in Manhattan it's more like twenty or thirty to one.
Speaker 1: And so what happens is I start getting fined and
Speaker 1: then they'll move to have an eviction proceeding against me
Speaker 1: over time in my own building. And it's not a
Speaker 1: battle that I can win. So it is just charging
Speaker 1: the machine gun nests in New York City. There are
Speaker 1: other places in the country where there are enough people
Speaker 1: who are willing to join in a maskless movement. And
Speaker 1: remember I'm not anti mask all the time, you know,
Speaker 1: indoors with people who are at a higher risk, if
Speaker 1: it makes people feel more comfortable, I don't think that's
Speaker 1: as much of an imposition. I'm just adamantly against masking
Speaker 1: up outdoors and for very brief periods where you're walking
Speaker 1: through a restaurant, through a lobby. I mean, it's just absurd.
Speaker 1: I think that the science on masking is incomplete, and
Speaker 1: I think that the policies government policies around that are overreach.
Speaker 1: But you know, it's a little bit ross. Like if
Speaker 1: you ask me, Buck, you say the tax rates too
Speaker 1: high and that that's confiscatory. Why don't you just not
Speaker 1: pay your taxes? Well, because I'll just go to prison.
Speaker 1: That's not that's not building a movement to change the
Speaker 1: tax code. That's just me breaking you know, in New
Speaker 1: York it's stay law, my friend. Right now, so I
Speaker 1: would be breaking the law. I mean, you ask for
Speaker 1: civil disobedience. If there were other New Yorkers who I
Speaker 1: think would join me, that would be one thing. But
Speaker 1: otherwise you're just the one guy with you know, his
Speaker 1: fixed bayonet running up to the machine gun nest with
Speaker 1: the Germans already sighted in on you. And that's not good,
Speaker 1: no point in being cannon fodder, but a fair question.
Speaker 1: I appreciate you asking. All right, team, that's it for today.
Speaker 1: Please check out Buck Sexton dot com and pass the buck.
Speaker 1: Tell somebody about this podcast, The Bucks Exit Show, where
Speaker 1: every listening to podcasts shields high