WEBVTT - An Historic Crash

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to What Goes Up, a Bloomberg weekly

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>market podcast. I'm Sarah Ponzek, a reporter on the Cross

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Asset team, and I'm Mike Reagan, a senior editor on

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the Markets Team. This week on the show, two guests,

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>two topics. First, this month marks the tenure anniversary of

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the infamous flash Crash. We're joined by the author of

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a new book. It's called Flash Crash, A Trading Savant,

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a global man hunt, and the most mysterious market crash

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>in history. Also, later on, small cap companies have been

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>pressured even more than the market as a whole through

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:51.279
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus crash. Joh for Rizvi, a portfolio manager over

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>at Harding Lovener, explains how to navigate the space, and

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>as always, we will close out the episode with the

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>craziest things we saw in markets this week. So if

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you saw something crazy, please give us a call on

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the hotline at six four six three two four three

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>four nine. Oh, and maybe we'll play your voicemail on

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the show. Of course, you can tweet at us with

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>your crazy market observations. Just tweet to the handle at

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts and let us know what you're looking at. And uh,

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Sarah obviously, as you know, the craziest thing is uh,

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>my favorite part of the show. We're kind of lucky

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>this week though, in that we don't get to talk

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>about the just the craziest things we saw in markets.

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>This week, we literally get to talk about the craziest

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>thing I think I've ever seen in my career. And

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>that was ten years ago this month. Um, I was

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>the editor handling the daily markets wrap that I know

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you've you've written a million times. And as you know,

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>some some days the market wrap is very easy to write.

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a clear explanation for why the the markets did

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>what they did. Sometimes it's not so easy, and this

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>was one of those days. You know. It was, um,

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>probably a year after the market a little bit more

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>than a year after the market bottom from the financial crisis,

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>so people were still very much on edge, right, and

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden the European debt crisis had just

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>sprung into life and really caused another bout of volatility

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that that was worrying too too many people, um and

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>causing some some swings in the market. Um. This swing

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>was something else though, Uh, you know, I remember distinctly

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that the TV News channels, the cable news channels broadcasting

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>these massive demonstrations in Greece, in Athens and other parts

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of Greece as people sort of rebelled against the austerity

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that was being imposed on Greece as as part of

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>their bailout conditions from the European Union. Um. And so

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the market was understandably weak because of that. But then

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, the bottom just dropped out, and

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean within minutes, uh, every X was crashing. I

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>think at the low point that Dow in the SNP

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>had both dropped more than nine percent during the day.

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>It was insane and and all of that within a

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>matter of minutes, some blue chip company stocks were trading

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 1>for literally a penny apiece. Um. So so needles to say,

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we didn't quite have a great explanation that day in

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the in the Market's wrap. It's ten years later though,

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and we're very lucky to have on the show someone

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>who has uh an excellent book out on this topic

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 1>and on the role of sort of one loner trader

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>outside of London, the role he played on that day

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>when the markets just went crazy. So very happy to

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>have him on the show. His name is Liam Vaughan.

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>He's an investigative reporter with Bloomberg News in London and,

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>as you said, author of that new book flash Crash,

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>which I know I'm a little biased, he's one of us,

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>but honestly, I think this is gonna be one of

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>those finance books that is going to be a must

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>read for every on. It's going to be on everyone's

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>bookshelf soon because from what I've read of it so far,

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just so excellently well written and well reported. Uh So, Liam,

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I hope you're not blushing too much, but welcome to

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the show. I can hardly thank you. Michael, no problem.

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>So tell us briefly, I know, I mean I could

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about this for hours, but just briefly, sort of

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>give us a portrait of uh this character nav Saro,

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>who was uh this loner trader outside of London that

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the US prosecutor sort of zeroed in on for his

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>role in this. But how did he get to that

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>point where he's a guy that uh could at least

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>play some role in what happened on the markets that day? Yes, so,

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Novenda Sings Around is a fairly ordinary in some ways

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>kid from a pretty working class area of West London

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>called Hounslow. He lived with his parents. They live in

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a pretty modest semi detached house which is directly below

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the Heathrow flight path. So if you go to his

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.239
<v Speaker 1>road you can literally look up at every five minutes

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you can see the planes fly by so close that

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you can count the windows and all conversations stops because

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you are you know, because you are that close to

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the flight path. So that gives you a sort of

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>sense of of where he's coming from. Not a partial neighborhood,

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in other words, absolutely not. No. Um And he was

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a gifted, you know, kind of mathematician at school. He

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>had um, you know, some academic chops and he found

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that he could multiply figures in his head with great ease.

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>But he wasn't a great scholar. He was a you know,

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a sort of cheeky lad if you like,

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 1>who loved playing football with his mates. Um And he

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>was also a keen computer gamer, so he used to

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>play the game Fifa, which is a soccer game, and

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>he ended up being in the top seven hundred out

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of three million in the world. So he, you know,

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>he was pretty de extrous, good reflexes, pretty obsessive um.

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>And then after he'd finished university, he saw an advert

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in the Evening Standard newspaper which literally said wanted futures

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>traders must work well under pressure, which is believable to

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>how Goldman Sacks hires their Yeah, amazing. And the interesting

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>thing about now is that he's kind of arrival into

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the market's coincided with this kind of evolution from the

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 1>pits to the screens. So late nineties you had all

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>these pits closing, and you have the beginning of kind

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of mascale or electronic trading, but you don't really have

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>high frequency trading at that point, so you have all

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>these kind of trading arcades that spring up there are

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit rough and ready, And basically the system

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is that they will back you with money, um, and

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>if you don't do well, they'll kind of coach you,

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>give you some sort of tuition on how to use

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the software, how to read the markets, a bit of

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, economics, that kind of thing, um, and then

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>they'll kind of let you loose, and if you have

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>some potential, they'll keep giving you more money, and if

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't, then they'll let you go. Um. And basically

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the way that the business model works for those arcades

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, all you need is a handful

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of naves that are very good and they take a

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>percentage on everything they make. They charge um, you know,

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>per a round trip. And you know it was it

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>was a good business model for a while. But most

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of those that walk through this the door of this

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>firm few text, which is above a supermarket, you know,

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>about forty five minutes outside and miles away from the

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of city of London. Um. And so nav you know,

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>arrives there like all the other sort of rookies. Um.

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And he's taught a style of tray aiding called scalping,

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>which has got nothing to do with kind of macroeconomics

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>or looking at interest rates. In the long term. It's

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>all about looking at orders coming into and leaving the marketplace, um,

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and looking for clues as to whether the markets about

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to fall or about to rise, and then taking very

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>short term positions in and out and in a lot

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of ways it is a weirdly like a kind of

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>computer game, you know, where you're reacting very quickly to

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>information and data that comes your way. UM. So now

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>have you know inevitably turns out to be incredibly gifted

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>at this style of trading, and he goes from literally

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>having no money at all to having two million pounds

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>by the time he leaves few texts five years later,

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>which might sound like small fryer, but this is a

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 1>guy who's still living at home with his parents, um,

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and compared to most of the other traders on the floor,

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:00.839
<v Speaker 1>he was a complete start. So two thousand and eight

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>he decides to leave. He's sick of sort of giving

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>away his profits to the managers a few texts, so

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>he goes home to his parents place, um, and he

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>starts trading from there um. But something happens along the

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>way which kind of changes I guess his destiny in life.

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>He starts to become increasingly fed up with the arrival

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of high frequency trading firms because essentially, you know, what

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>h f T or a certain type of HFT does

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>is very similar to what navs doing. It's kind of

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>looking at orders entering and leaving the market, looking at

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the queue for different price levels, and tries to jump

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>ahead of you know, short term price moves. So people

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>like navs suddenly found themselves really struggling to compete, and

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>rather than quit the market, which is what a lot

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of his friends did. Nev decided that he would get

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in touch with a computer programmer and he would build

0:09:56.000 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>essentially a kind of sophisticated spoofing mach shame, which he

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>could not. Yeah, let me just set up because because

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's sort of the plot twist where

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>it gets really interesting. Because scalping is one thing, and

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>correct me if I'm wrong, but scalping is a type

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>of trading that's basically legal spoofing. Spoofing is when you

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you intentionally put try to flood the market with orders,

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>either by orders to sort of send that futures price

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>up or flood the market with sell orders to bring

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it down. Uh, And you don't really intend those orders

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to be executed. You put them in as as sort

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of a way to trick the other traders, whether they

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>be humans or computer algorithms, into thinking that there is

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a supply demand imbalance going on. So I'm curious when

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>was it when exactly did not make the leap from

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>scalping to to actually spoofing. Did he do that as

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of a hand trader or was it not until

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>he developed this, uh, this computer program that you're talking about.

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So that is a very good question at and I

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>guess one that I'm saying I don't know entirely because

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the first time that he um sort of is on

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>record as kind of getting involved with spoofing is in

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine, which is when he writes to

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>this UM like developer and has a kind of blueprint

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>for this algorithm program that he wants to build, and

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>it's at that point in time where he's quite specific

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>about wanting to exactly, as you say, have a machine

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that will be able to flood the market with said

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>orders specifically and then make sure that they never get

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>hit so the orders will be canceled. But by then

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>other market participants, particularly algorithms that are making very short

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>term decisions, will have reacted to it, and the market

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 1>will have moved a couple of ticks, and that will

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>be simultaneously trading and trying to sort of benefit from that. UM.

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean as to whether it was illegal, the actual

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>spoofing rules themselves didn't come in until later until two

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eleven UM, but arguably what he was doing

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 1>would have been caught up in other kind of statutes

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>like fraud security. Yeah, exactly, so, so, Liam, can you

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>help explain to us the mechanics of what actually happens

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 1>during a flash crash. I mean, we constantly hear this,

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure the mechanics are different in each one

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that has happened over history, But in the likes of

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the one that happened in two thousen, what were the

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>actual mechanics underlying? And then how did nav actually get

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>pulled into all of this? What was his role in it? Sure? So,

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>May six, two thousand and ten, UM, as you was saying, Michael,

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>was a very volatile day anyway. It was the kind

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of midst of the Eurozone crisis. Um. The kind of

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>fear index was was rising very quickly throughout that weekend,

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>increasingly on that day, and you just had prices that

0:12:56.240 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>were we're kind of increasingly fall links throughout the course

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of the US morning, and up until about one thirty

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the market was down about three or four percent already. UM.

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, panned the camera to Kansas City

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and there is a kind of large pension fund called

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>woodele and Reid that had been long stocks and had

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>been benefited from a kind of big ramp up in prices.

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>But on that day, the fund manager got skittish and

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>decided that he wanted to hedge his position, so he

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>so he he sold seventy five thousand e minis, which

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>is worth about four billion dollars at the time. So

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>this very large fund places this very large order. But

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the issue, one of the issues arose in the way

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that they executed the order because they used an algorithm,

0:13:55.000 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't include any kind of um like fail

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>safe so for example, so the so the algorithm they

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>used was to sell at nine percent of the market

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>volume until the order was executed. And the issue arose

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>in the because the markets were so volatile at that

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>point in time, volumes actually spiked and this selling algorithm

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>went into overdrive and was just selling and selling and

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>selling and selling. There was no kind of price level,

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>no stop loss there. So that arrives when you have

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this already highly volatile marketplace, and then there's a bunch

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.479
<v Speaker 1>of other things, weird things that happen as well. So, um,

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is happening in the the futures markets,

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>but meanwhile in the stock markets there is there's like

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>technical issues that day that just so happened to be

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>happening on the New York Stock Exchange, which means that

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>there's delays in prices that are arriving to people, and

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>all of this creates a situation where market participants are

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>just leaving in their droves um and then suddenly, at

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>one forty one PM, the bottom falls out of the

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>market and within the space of four minutes it's fallen

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>another five per cent um, and you know, there's a

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>complete and utter drought of liquidity at that point as

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone is kind of pulling the plug, and then the

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>crmes stop mechanism kicks in because the pride, the volty,

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the velocity of the movie is so great that it

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>pauses the market for five seconds and at that point,

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's the longest five seconds in the world

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>while everyone's kind of waiting to see what happens. And

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>then miraculously and again kind of confusingly because nobody knew

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>really why at the time, but the market as soon

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>as as soon as the market reopens, prices starts to

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>rally again um and within half an hour they're back

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>at the level they were before the drop. But meanwhile,

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in the US stock market, there are, as Michael mentioned,

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, some stocks that are trading at like no

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>all point zero zero one cent others that are suddenly

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>trading at hundred thousand dollars um because there's no liquidity

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in the market, so they've gone to these things called

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>stop stub quotes, and and so in the aftermath of

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>all this, there's a big period of introspection. There's an

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>investigation by the CFTC and the SECUM and they come

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to the conclusion that a combination of the kind of

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>changing marketplace and the increasing preponderance of electronic trading and

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>high frequency trading, the extreme macro economic conditions, and this

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>pension fund had all combined to create the conditions for

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>this exceptional market event. Naver Sara is nowhere to be

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>seen at this point. It's only two years later when

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>another day trader happens to be kind of back testing

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>his trading system on May six, two and ten, just

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>randomly picks that day, and he notices that throughout that

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>day in the order book there are hundreds of millions

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 1>of dollars of sell orders that are just sitting there,

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>never get hit. As soon as the price moves, they

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:13.719
<v Speaker 1>get canceled and reposted um. And to him it's just

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>like a complete shock and an eye opener like, what

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the hell Like, you know, surely this had had a

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>contributing factor as well. So he blew the whistle essentially

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 1>to the CFTC. They've got a program now where if

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you lead to a successful conviction, you know, you get

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>paid for it. So this guy who I interview in

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the book and I call him Mr X, blows the whistle.

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>And that is the first time that Nav appears on

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the radar of the authorities. He probably wouldn't have done

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>if he wasn't for this guy. And then fast forward

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.719
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand and fifteen and and Nav, you know,

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>is asleep in his parents house, in his bedroom in

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 1>hound Slow, and he gets a knock on the door

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's you know, a dozen FBI agents and police

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>officers and they arrest him for manipulation in the market

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and for spoofing and over a period of a long

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>period of time, but specifically as well um on the

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>day of the flash crash um. So you know, one

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of the questions I attempt to grapple with is the

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>extent to which Surround really had a significant impact on

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>what happened that day, whether he was just a contributory factor,

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>whether he had no impact at all, And there's people

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>with views across that whole spectrum eving to this day.

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I know, and I think you and I had gotten

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a Twitter conversation about that with

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 1>some others. Um. And so it clearly, as you point out,

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>there were structural issues with the market. There was you

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>know what Ellen read a fund manager putting in a

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>very aggressive, you know, ill advised sal ord or into

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the market. UM. I do think people sort of rallied

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>behind the character of Nav because he's very much a

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 1>sympathetic character, as you say, a blue collar kid. I

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>believe he has Asperger's right. Um. Uh, you know Matt

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Wiz who sort of makes this small fortune on his own. Um.

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And he's kind of, you know, treating the market like

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a video game, playing at the way he best sees fit.

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>And I don't wonder though, Liam, Now, if if there

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>were some giant hedge funds, some multibillion dollar hedge fund

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>or some uh you know, emerging high frequency trading firm

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>that was doing what he was doing. I mean, he

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>was he was responsible for what was it like thirty

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>or forty of the seal orders on the spres that

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>day something like. One statistic is staggering is that he

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>was amongst the top five largest traders on the E Mini,

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the biggest futures markets in the world,

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>for a period of five years. So crazy to consider

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>one person day trading at home. Yes, I just wonder,

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>what do you think, you know, Uh, would the sympathy

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>be there for what he was doing if if did

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>say it's been a ten billion dollar hedge fund, I

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>won't name any names, or you know, a prominent firm.

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 1>I think you're absolutely right. The thing about nav is

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that he was an outsider. He was like David taking

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>on Golias. You had Michael Lewis's book that had just

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>come out about high frequency traders and now throughout his

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>whole career, and he put you know, there's all these

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>emails that came out afterwards. He used to call the

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>HRT firms nerds and geeks, and he used to complain

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>about them. So he became like almost like a folk hero.

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>So particularly so a lot of day traders. I do

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 1>think that you are right, you know, And and there

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have been a bunch of both banks and hedge funds

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and large h of T shops that have now been

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 1>done for spoofing, and that certainly doesn't seem to be

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the same level of of sympathy around it. Um. My

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>view on the flash crash itself is it's, you know,

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's almost impossible to reverse engineer what happened in

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>such a complex and busy market. It's just sort of

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>suffice to say that he was a major player. He

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>was a major kind of seller, um, and other market

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>participants were reacted to his orders. So I don't think

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you can really say that he had nothing to do

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>with it. Um. But again, would it have happened if

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't there? Maybe maybe it would. So yeah, it's

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>hard to prove the you know, the hypothetical what would

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have happened if he wasn't around? Hey, Liam, Like I said,

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I wish we could talk about this for hours, um,

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's all the time we have for today.

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I encourage everyone check out this book. I and I

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>believe it's going to be made into a movie. Or

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 1>is that correct? It is? Yeah, the Dev Patel, the

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, amazing Hollywood actor, has signed onto play nav

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 1>if you could believe that, So congratulations and yeah, everyone

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone has to either download the book or purchase the

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>book somehow, because it's the perfect quarantine rate. And if

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you need someone to play a frazzled stocks market editor

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to keep up with all of it, you know,

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm I'm Availbule. I'm just saying, and the frazzle journalist, Liam,

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for coming on the show. We appreciate

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it for having me, guys, it was a pleasure. All right.

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Now we're going to switch gears a little bit from

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the flash crash of two thousand and ten to an

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>area of the market that itself has been pretty volatile

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>amidst the coronavirus crash, right, Mike, Yeah, absolutely, Sarah, And

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm fascinated to talk to our next guest because, as

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>we all know, the U S stock market is basically

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 1>become dominated by the big five stocks. You know, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Apple,

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook makeup of the stock market right now. Um,

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>But there's this whole other world of companies out there

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>around the world, global small cap companies. And I think

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of investors maybe get scared at the notion

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of global small caps just because it's unfamiliar. So our

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>guest is gonna walk us through how he goes about

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>UH screening through the universe of global small caps to

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>find value and to find growth potential in You know, again,

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>what I think is an area that most American investors

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>aren't very comfortable with. So so hopefully we'll make them

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more comfortable, UH with some insights from

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 1>Joffer riz Vey. He's a portfolio manager of the Harding

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Lovener Global Small Companies and International Small Companies Funds UH. Joffer,

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the show. Let's let's start with that basic idea.

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think of the universe of small cap

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>stocks around the world, and I don't know what it

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.959
<v Speaker 1>must be number in the thousands, if not tens of

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>thousands of potential stocks. So how do you sort of

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>um sift through that opportunity set? What is what's sort

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of your process for screening the whole world of small

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>caps and and finding stuff that you like. Sure, so

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the global universe is well or ten thousand companies. In fact,

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the indusseries that we are benchmarked against, like

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the m c I All Country World Index, has about

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>six thousand companies in it. So it's a very large universe.

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>If you even think about the US the Russell two thousand,

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>as the name suggests, is four times more than the

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hun group, So this is a much much

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>larger universe than than large caps and on an absolute basis,

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how we screen through it, we use

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially four criteria and we are looking at companies about

0:24:56.320 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>what to invest in. Topmost is the competitive position of

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the company. We look for a competitive advantage that's there

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>today and that's sustainable in the long term. We then

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 1>look at the quality of the management team, which is

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>particularly important in small caps. Incremental decisions by management have

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 1>a much bigger ripple effect in small caps versus large caps.

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Then we look at sustainable growth, how big is the

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>market the company's addressing, can it take market share? And

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>then last we look at financial strength, which is the

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>quality of the underlying financials, the accounting, the balance sheet,

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 1>things like leverage. So those are the four things we

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>look at, and we could sometimes use a screen based

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 1>on those criteria, which would be a quantitative screen, and

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it would be visiting these companies and figuring it

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.400
<v Speaker 1>out by ruling of our sleeves and traveling to their

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:59.959
<v Speaker 1>headquarters and things like that. Drop or are there any

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>qualities that you've maybe been looking for even more so

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>are placing more emphasis on in the past couple of

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>months as we face everything going on. I mean, seems

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 1>like measures of leverage and profitability have really come under

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the microscope. And that's part of the reason that when

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you do look at broad benchmarks of small cap funds,

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 1>they've underperformed. So I'm curious if there's anything in this

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 1>environment that you find to be even more important to

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>be aware of. Absolutely, so we you know, first principle

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>as we stick to our hinting, so we'll still look

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 1>at these four criteria that I that I outlined, but

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, uh, financial leverage is very important. It's

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>coming under the microscope. In fact, we looked looked at

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in quarter one which endined mark thirty one this year,

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 1>we looked at different quintiles of performance. When the quintiles

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>were based on interest coverage, which is a measure of

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the average UM. So when we looked at inface coverage,

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>we looked at UM what did the most labored companies

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>perform versus the least labored companies by quintile, and so

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we put them in five buckets and what we saw

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>us there was about a thousand basis point difference between

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the least level companies, meaning that they underperformed much less.

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Now everything was down, by the way, but they were

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:27.239
<v Speaker 1>down much less than the most labored companies, and there

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>was a little over a thousand basis for in difference

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>between that. So that immediately makes us aware that this

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 1>has been an important factor sort of speak. But we've

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>always looked at it. As I mentioned that financial strength

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>is one of the criteria we look at. UH In

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 1>this environment, small caps particularly are going to be under

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the microscope in terms of financial leverage because it's you know,

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>they don't have the flexibility of large caps. It's very

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>easy for them to lose business in such a way

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that their free cash fows diminished significantly so that they

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 1>can pay back their interest. So in this environment, if

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you flip it around and if a company does have

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>strong financial strength, then it's actually going to give it

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>competitive advantage as well. In other words, they can continue

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to invest while others are scrambling for cash or maybe

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>even winding up. They can continue to invest in R

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and D and new plans. So we think it it's

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>not just important in and of itself, but It's also

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>important because it gives the company competitive advantage. So that's

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the single biggest thing. But again I would say that

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>competitive advantage of the company, this continues to be one

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of the single biggest things we look at. You know what,

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I hear small caps, and and even when I hear

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>international equities, I sort of I sort of think risk.

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, I I feel like there's a touch hole

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 1>potentially more gains there. You know, small caps over the

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>long run famously do better than big caps, but they're

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>often is that trade off with sort of higher blatility?

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Am I wrong in thinking that? Jeffers is the sort

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of risk adjusted returns of small caps around the world? Um,

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, how does that compare to the US? So

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>if we look at international small cap risk as measured

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>by standard deviation of returns, globally, it is higher. We

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>looked at the last twenty years and what we found

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>is if you take the excess returns in the numerator,

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 1>which is the access returns of small caps and believe

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>versus large caps, and then you divide that by the

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>access risk. In other words, this is the sharp ratio

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>how much access returns am I getting versus how much

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>excess risk am I taking taking and the net of

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that ratio is still positive and and statistically significant, meaning

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in simple English, and just hit for risk. I still

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>have better returns in small cap historically looking into the

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>last twenty years, which is a good basis of thinking

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>about our small caps because this is multiple cycles, multiple

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>market cycles. Well before we get to the craziest things.

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I know Mike especially is really looking forward to it.

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>This week. I want to know, have there been any

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>companies within your portfolio in the last couple of months

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>where what's happened due to the coronavirus and people having

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to stay at home where the risk profile has just

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>completely changed and you guys have had to go back

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and just completely maybe reevaluate your outlook on that company

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and the whole ding going forward. So so I give

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a few different examples here, uh, companies where the risk

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>profile has changed unfavorably and in some cases, you know,

0:30:57.000 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly the company has been a beneficiary of mean innars

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of surprising but on the margin, you know, a little

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>bit different than what we were expecting originally. So an

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>example of a company that got directly impacted both because

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of coronavirus as well as the oil shop is core

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>laps there and oil services company. They provide reservoir management

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>services to large, large oil majors. And this company suffering

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is suffering from a lack of demand. And there's also

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>some labor editions as well. So in cases like these,

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>what we're constantly doing, and it's more acute in a

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>crisis like this, is we're re evaluating the fundamental thesis

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that we had and against this again, against those four

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>benchmarks of work is a good company? What is a

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>quality growth company? If the company doesn't meet our criteria anymore, ideally,

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the analysts and the PM is raising their hand saying, look,

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>we got the thesis wrong. One of the things we

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>do continuously and again is brought into sharp focus in

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>circumstances like these, is we have something called mileposts where

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>we are measuring a company's growth against a pre commitment.

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>So we say that we think this company is going

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to grow about the industry, that industry is going se

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>we think this company will grow above the If it doesn't,

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>if it reports quarterly or six monthly growth that's not

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in line with the milepost, and we will say, okay,

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the smile post is it's broken or it's failed or

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it's behind, and depending on that we revalue it. So

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in some cases. Another case would be Senior, which is

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:47.239
<v Speaker 1>a part supplier to the aerospace coming out of the

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>UK out of the air to the aerospace industry out

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of the UK is again impacted because of lack of

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>demand and lack of travel in aerospace. So the the's

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>like these are examples where we'll either generically speaking, we'll

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>either say, look our thesis is broken, we shouldn't want

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it anymore, or look everything is intact. It's just a shock.

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>The long term still looks good, in which case it's

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>become more attractive. Let's buy more of it, so the

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>outcomes would be salad or added to it as you

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>might imagine. The flip side is the flip side of

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>this is companies where we've been surprised, where one example

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is one of the world's largest shipbrokers, again a company

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>out of the UK called Clark Since where because of

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the demand for storage of oil. Because oil became cheap,

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>demand for storage went up. This company supplies big oil

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>tankers or pod carriers, and um it benefited from them.

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:59.719
<v Speaker 1>We did not expect that when we initially started the

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>thesis is on this company, that was a boon for

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>this I mean you didn't expect jagative oil prices to

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>help the oil upstart. So I imagine that you know

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that was that was a little bit unexpected. A more

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 1>expected outcome would be heavy. Like can Access which is

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a Canadian supply chain management software company, demand for supply

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>chain management software went up because the companies are trying

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to figure a new supply chains and this company provides

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>real time supply chain management software. You know where doing inventorieschool,

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>which warehouses should they go to and where should I

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>ship out from? And demand for these company's software went up.

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 1>So so surprises on on on on both sides. Companies

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that we're negatively it to some companies that were positively

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:49.839
<v Speaker 1>it as well. And in those cases where there where

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>where there's a where there's a positive outcome. What what

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>we're doing is we're saying, what is the valuation of

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this company? Is the growth a little more attractive, can

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>we hold it for a little longer, should be trimmed

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>or should be selling evaluation? So again the food side

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 1>of the cell trim decision in these cases, well, Sarah, uh,

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a great segue to the craziest things we saw,

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>because um, the negative oil price shock is just the

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:23.839
<v Speaker 1>crazy thing that keeps on giving. And I'll start with mine,

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>which once again has to do with just the amazing

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 1>glut of oil around the world right now. So Wall

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal story talking about the creative ways people are

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>lengths they're going to the store oil. Remember when this happened,

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of my friends were joking like, oh, you

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>can put it in my garage or fill my swimming pool.

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Well guess what people are really doing that this this

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>journal story, it's nuts. There's there's uh, all these crazy

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>schemes people have to buy oil. Guys buy an oil

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for like a dollar eighteen of barrel, uh, and they're

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to stick it in caves, abandoned rock mines and

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 1>even giants swimming pools. There's and there's something called a

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 1>fuel bladder that's some guys selling that is basically just

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a big giant rubber containment thing for for story storing oil. So, um,

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>good luck to all these people filling their swimming pools

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>with oil. I gotta say I hope that or else.

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:26.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of effort for a whole lot of

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 1>nothing and a good contribution from Twitter from a guy

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:35.360
<v Speaker 1>at Financial Gambler. His craziest thing in markets is similar.

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>It's some how Goldman Sacks has been looking at the

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>use of Zoom and that the user base of Zoom

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and other sort of video conferencing techniques to kind of

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>suss out what the future demand for oil is, with

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:50.399
<v Speaker 1>the thinking obviously that if you're if you're doing more

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 1>virtual meetings, you know you're gonna be taking less car

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>trips and and business trips and air air trips and

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. So, um, it is the crazy

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 1>thing that keeps on giving, for sure. It truly is

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it truly is you mentioned uh using zoom as a

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:11.399
<v Speaker 1>measure of looking at measures of oil in a way,

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of people have been looking at alternative

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 1>data through what we're going through and my crazy thing, um,

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a little bit sobering, I will I'll preface

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>it with that. Um. But there was data out of

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>open table this past week showing that their forecast, they're

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:32.359
<v Speaker 1>calling for one in every four restaurants to go out

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of business by the time this all ends, which is

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:37.479
<v Speaker 1>really crazy to think about and it hard to wrap

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>your mind around, because I feel like there's so many

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:42.959
<v Speaker 1>people thinking that once economy is reopen, we're just gonna

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:45.799
<v Speaker 1>snap back to normal. But that just really highlights how

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 1>much everything might change. Right, So, Jeoffrey, I hope you

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have any restaurant chains in your funds. Have you

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 1>seen any crazy things in the market this week? I

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 1>think for us, the the the most. The craziest thing

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say is that despite value underperforming for so long,

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>including you know, this year, even this past week, the

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>discrepancy between the performance of small cap value versus small

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 1>cap growth and it's just huge. I'm looking at US

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 1>small caps for example, in the US value small caps

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>are down ten percent in the last week or so,

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:43.759
<v Speaker 1>growth small caps are down five, so about that's a

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:46.359
<v Speaker 1>huge difference. And and this is after if you look

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 1>globally small caps, small cap growth is down fourteen percent

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 1>and small cap values down thirty percent, so you know,

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:58.399
<v Speaker 1>over twice as much. So despite the year to day,

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it just continues. And there are so many people calling

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 1>for a turnaround in this situation with abridging change, where

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>value starts are performing, and week after week, including this

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 1>last week, it just it's the same story. Yeah, another

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 1>even before the virus, everyone was predicting that was right

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>around the corner. It's uh, someday, someday we'll get that rotation,

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>even even within the large cap arena. I mean, an

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable statistic from this week. At one point on Thursday,

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>if you look at an equal weighted version of the SMP,

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it was down eight and a half percent, whereas the

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:37.399
<v Speaker 1>SMP was only down about five percent on the week,

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 1>And that was the largest weekly discrepancy in at least

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty years. So it just shows you that we continue

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to see, as you said at the beginning, mega caps

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 1>just ruling really in the stock market and anything, um

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:53.439
<v Speaker 1>that's a bit smaller just it hasn't. Yeah, yeah, it's

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 1>really hard hard to see any of that reversing until

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:59.760
<v Speaker 1>this sort of virus goes away or at least gets

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:04.760
<v Speaker 1>under control and the cyclical value stock start performing again.

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 1>But um, oh sorry, you know, we did get a

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>call from the what Goes Up hotline with a pretty

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>good crazy thing. Let's let's take a listen, and my

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:16.359
<v Speaker 1>name is John, And to me, what the craziest thing

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 1>is is that nobody seems to focus on the fact

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that the FED and the Treasury have eliminated capitalism. So

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 1>these the bastillion of capitalism, the Federal Reserve has effectively

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:38.719
<v Speaker 1>stopped capitalism from working. And your buy back the hypothication

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 1>of now obviously moving towards possibility that the FED is

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>going to buy equities is a perfect example of that.

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>The key component of capitalism is efficiency mechanism, which allows

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 1>businesses to fail and that capital then gets reallocated. So

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 1>not really sure why the society UM hasn't focused on that,

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:11.280
<v Speaker 1>except if it's just obstruction of that information. UM. Last crisis,

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg had to sue the FED in order to get

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the information. Now it seems I don't know what's crazier,

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they're doing it or that no one

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 1>seems to care. But that's a little negative. But that's

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>my view of the insanity. Sorry, I thought a lot

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:34.440
<v Speaker 1>about that voicemail. It's it's a pretty uh intriguing voicemail,

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>And at first I was thinking, well, that's a little

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of hyperbole on this guy's part. The FED killed capitalism,

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, when you think about it, I mean, the

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>cure for this virus really was to shut down capitalism,

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 1>or at least big chunks of it, huge spots of

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:51.520
<v Speaker 1>industry in this country. So I'm not sure if the

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>FEDS the one who did it, or the actual government,

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 1>local government, state governments, and the FED just kind of

0:41:57.160 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 1>reacted to this new regime we're in. But I'm not

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure he's he's too far off with that.

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 1>And we did hear from Powell this past week who

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 1>even said, as it stands, there's really not much more

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:10.840
<v Speaker 1>potentially that they can do, although they will do whatever

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>they need to do, but they're now calling on d

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:17.479
<v Speaker 1>C and for more physical policy because at this point

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:19.920
<v Speaker 1>in time, unless they go negative, which they said they

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want to do at least for now. I mean,

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>what more is there there for the FED to do?

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Crazy times? Indeed, uh Joffre, I don't know, what do

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 1>you think? Did the FED kill capitalism? I hope it's

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>not that easy to kill capitalism, that's right, very tough

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:48.279
<v Speaker 1>to beast to kill. Indeed, I agree, interestingly, that's so

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that voicemails a few days ago. I did see R

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:55.319
<v Speaker 1>I P. Capitalism trending on Twitter yesterday, so I don't know,

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, are catching on? Yeah? Yeah, but who

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:02.800
<v Speaker 1>who would have ever believed we'd be discussing whether or

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:06.279
<v Speaker 1>not capitalism was murdered in our time. Certainly not I,

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>not I. But with that said, Joffer Risby, so glad

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that you were able to join us on the show

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 1>this week. Thank you, Sarah, Thank you Mike. What Goes Up.

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week. Until then, you can find

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>us on the Bloomberg Terminal website and app, or wherever

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. We'd love it if you took

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:35.279
<v Speaker 1>the time to rate interview the show on Apple Podcasts

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>so more listeners can find us, and you can find

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 1>us on Twitter, follow me at at Sara pont Zack,

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Mike is that Reaganonymous, and you can also follow Bloomberg

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts at podcasts. What Goes Up is produced by Toper Foreheads.

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 1>The head of Bloomberg podcast is Francesca Levie. Thanks for listening,

0:43:53.120 --> 0:44:08.280
<v Speaker 1>See you next time. Before