WEBVTT - Why China's Economy Is Best Revealed Through Credit Markets

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl podcast. I'm Paul Swinge. You,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.319
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Boy. There has been a lot

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of news on the tape as it relates to China

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>over the last week or so. Just today, White House

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>trade advisor Peter Navarro expects to US and China to

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>sign a Phase one trade deal and then quote next

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>week or so, you've got that. Plus Bloomberg News reported uh,

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>last week about China thinking about launching a carrier aircraft

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>carrier sized investment bank to compete against Goldman sachs Uh

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and Morgan Stanley. Bloomberg News also reporting, uh, just yesterday

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that China is really thinking about dismantling it's great financial

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>wall allowing Western investment banks to come into China. So

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot to kind of unpack their as it relates

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to China. Let's start with the trade deal and we welcome,

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>uh Shazad Kazi, he's a managing director China beige Book International.

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Just thanks so much for coming to our Bloomberg Gonna

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Act their broker studio. Thanks. Let's just go to trade first,

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of where do you think we are with trade

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and kind of what the next steps? Yeah, so you

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>know what we've seen over here is you know, a

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>phase one trade deal. Uh seems like all but a

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>done deal at this point. This is definitely a much

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>smaller deal than was originally being discussed. Right. But when

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the President first tried to go for a larger deal,

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>which would have from the U. S side involved um,

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>far bigger tiref rollbacks and what we're seeing in this

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>particular instance, Um, there really just wasn't much support for that.

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 1>So when as you know, people from the White House

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>started calling up folks on Congress start to socialize the

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>idea with other business uh unions, associations, etcetera, there really

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't much appetite. So what we've ended up with is

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a much smaller deal. Um. The upside of course on

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>on that is that a smaller deal is also a

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit more stable. The chances of things falling apart um,

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for for this particular, you know, the mini mini deal, Um,

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>are are fewer The things I think we want to

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>watch for now is what happens in So we do

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>think this is going to get signed, But then you know,

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>what are the factors which may start to create problems? Um,

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially as we get closer to elections. So, uh,

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>if perhaps the Democratic contender criticizes the president for the

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>fact that this deal really didn't do much for America much,

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the structural issues were left out, etcetera,

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>how does the president react to that? Um? So those

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>are things and things to look out for. When I

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>knew that you were coming in, I got very excited

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like this is sort of one of

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the key pieces of that is it is kind of

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>still a conundrum, the question of how much a trade

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>deal will offer a support to the Chinese economy and

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>how much that tailwind will be offset by the over

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>leveraged sectors. I'm thinking of the housing market in particular,

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it showing signs of weakness certain areas of the industrial

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>sector that are tied to the housing market. Uh, certainly

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>some regional and small banks. How much is that going

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 1>to play out in a negative way that will offset

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the benefit from a little more trade certainty. Yeah, so

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean on on the positive side. First, right, that

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>this stiffs a Chinese some breathing room, which they've been

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>wanting for a long time. The manufacturing sector, really the

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>economy as a whole over the over over the course

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand and nineteen, UM has been receiving a

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of credit support. A ton of it was really

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>targeted towards the manufacturing sector, as we saw in our

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>data repeatedly UM and and so this is much needed

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>breathing room from them. But as you said, now we've

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>got other issues. Domestic demand is still pretty weak, Domestic

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>orders are are still not doing as well. The ordered

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>order growth itself is actually uh somewhat slow in China

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. You've got a property market that hash showing

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>signs of slowing down. Now, we ourselves saw the Chinese

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>property markets slowing down up until November. We saw it

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a bit of an upturn in December, but you know,

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>one month is not a trend, right, So some of

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>those factors remain. If you look at that commodities is

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>struggling right now in China, which is which is not

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a very positive sign for the economy. Um. Yeah, so,

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>so lots of other factors remain. The other problem. You know,

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you brought up issues with being over leverage. One of

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the things that we're starting to pick up on is

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a major spike in firms which are delinquent and debt repayments.

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Right then, this is at a time when credit and

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>borrowing is surging, So that really sets up to be

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>somewhat difficult for some of these firms just struggling. They're

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>not seeing the growth, they're not seeing the revenues, they're

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>falling behind on debt repayments, cash flows tied in general. Um,

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>yet they're taking out more loans alright. So given that

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>economic backdrop, is there a scenario from your perspective, that

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>China would move forward meaningfully with a Phase two type

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of negotiation or maybe they just don't have the capacity

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>right now? You know, I think the Phase to deal

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be about larger structural issues, right and

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>those really haven't been on the table all along as

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>it is. What we may end up seeing really is

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that Phase one egg it's done now, and then what

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 1>we see a discussions towards perhaps Phase one B where

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.359
<v Speaker 1>their additional tariff rollbacks. Perhaps the Chinese made good on

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>their purchases, you know, for agricultural purchases, services a person

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of other goods and services, which by the way, is

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>going to be very difficult for them to pull off.

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Those numbers are pretty high. Um So any type of

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>phase two as we think about it in terms of

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about you know, larger structural issues, I don't first

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>see there being any kind of meaningful progress from that

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in and I'm wondering, you know, one thing that Paul

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>mentioned was the opening up of the financial sector in China.

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>We saw that rate move overnight where they change the

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>benchmark to a more market based kind of factor rather

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>than a state operated benchmark rate. How much do you

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>expect that to really take hold next year? Do you

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>expect you know a lot of foreign firms to really

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>make bigger in roads on the rate stuff. There's just

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the one quick comment I'll make is you know who

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>pays the rate? Right? Who pays these age rates that

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>are set out their state firms have preference of borrowing access,

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, interest rates close to zero sometimes adds zero.

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So perhaps you have the smaller private firms who end

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>up being you know, charged. You know, high interest rates

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.799
<v Speaker 1>in John are ppressive to pay something closer to the benchmark.

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Um So, so some of those moves, uh, you know,

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>might be more window dressing than anything else. As far

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>as firms moving in, I think the proof proof is

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>in the pudding. It's it's yet to be seen. I

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>think it's way too early to tell. The financial sector

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>is so strategically important for Beijing. Um that the idea

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be you know, uh, they're about to

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>take a major step back. It's it's a little bit

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>difficult to buy. And just real quickly here, I'm wondering

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing in terms of the credit expansion, the

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>idea that you've talked about, how the PBSC has been

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>pumping a lot of liquidity into the market. Has that

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>been effective from the preliminary data that you're looking at

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>in December in re accelerating the economy. I think what

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is done is staunch the bleeding a little bit for sure.

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, Q three was pretty weak. It was the

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>weakest data all year long. November was even November data

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>was even worse on what we were observing over the

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Q three period. Um So, the decen b upturn tells

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you that has done something or the other to help

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>staunch the bleeding a little bit. It has provided a

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit of relief, um, you know, But but has

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it Is it going to lead to a sort of

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a turnaround the economy? I don't. I don't think

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>so necessarily. Especially again, as I said, when we're looking

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>at things like weakness and domestic demand, we're looking at

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>corporate health uh, deteriorating pretty significantly. It doesn't make me

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>very confident about a major economic rebound on the horizon.

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>She's that, Kazi, thank you so much for being here,

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for having me. She's that. Cazi is

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>managing director at China beige Book International in New York,

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>joining us here in our interactive Broger Studios. China kind

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of the key question mark when it comes to certainly

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>commodity markets, which we're gonna be talking about coming up, uh,

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and the optimism in oil as the US and China

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>are poised sign phase one A. I'm going to say

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of this trade deal because it is the beginning of

0:07:52.120 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a rolling series of agreements. I am sure. I'm so

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>excited to talk about this. Paul Satellites, Yes, this is

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>very cool. It's very cool. Well, I mean this is

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>like what we talk about when the SpaceX Falcon UH launches.

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the purpose, right to get these satellites in

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and Aridium Communications is a company that has satellites attached

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to UH, say the recent SpaceX Falcon nine reusable rocket

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 1>that went up in order to deposit them into space.

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>And we luckily have the chief executive officer of the company,

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Matt Dash joining us from Washington, d C. Matt, I

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.719
<v Speaker 1>just want to start with how much you've seen your

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>business grow as the emphasis on satellite, the emphasis on

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>expanding the network infrastructure has has grown increasingly important. Well,

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>we have a very unique network, and we've been in

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>operations now for almost twenty years. Now that we have

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a brand new net work, we've really sort of seen

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a and even increase in what has been really a

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 1>very steady and strong growth rate for the last twenty

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>years we've been in operation, especially since we moved from

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>voice communications moving over to data transmission, say, to this

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>thing called the Internet of Things where everything is getting connected,

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>We've been really growing on the basis of that. Give

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of what five G means for your business,

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>if anything, Well, five G IS, you know, is the

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>next iteration of applications that are coming to all of

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>us around the world. And you know, one of the

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>key areas that five G brings is connecting not just

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>people to each other, but you know, every appliance and

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>car and vehicle and drone. And you know, despite the

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>fact that five G IS is very exciting, it still

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>only operates on about ten percent of the planet surface,

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit more so the other whether you're

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in the oceans and the skies, on a mountain, even

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of places here in the US, you know,

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have connection that they won't have five G connections.

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>So we're the things that make the bridge to bring

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 1>those applications to the rest of the planet. I want

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk a little bit about your use of SpaceX

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>rockets to get up to space. How important is the

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>private sector in space exploration in your business? I mean,

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm wondering about what you would be using otherwise. Yeah,

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>when we when we selected our launch program ten years ago,

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>we were one of the first. We took a chance

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>on SpaceX before they'd even had a successful launch. It

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't as hard as you think, because my you know it.

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, they for eight launches, they wanted to charge

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>for me about a half a billion dollars, which seems

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of money. But when the next the

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>next available rockets, save from the Russians or from the

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.719
<v Speaker 1>French or from someone else, was one point to one

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>point three billion dollars, it was less than half the cost.

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So it really helped help make our business case clothes.

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think they've really driven down the cost of

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>launch for um for a lot of US satellite suppliers

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and have made it more possible for some of these

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>business cases to close. So Matt Bloomberg News is reporting,

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess about ten days ago or something that Apple

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is said to be exploring satellites to beam data to

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>its devices. What does that mean for your business in

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 1>your company, Well, it doesn't mean too much. It's a

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>different sort of service that they want to provide, and

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>many of these new new satellite companies really are supplying

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>very different services than what Oridium provides. But you know,

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we've been a successful company, and I think

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we've inspired others to believe it's a lot easier to

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>have your own network in space. Uh, they'll they'll realize

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>that it's very challenging and very expensive and takes a

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of time and effort, as as has many other

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 1>billionaires and very large companies who are looking to launch

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>their networks, whether the Amazon or SpaceX themselves and others

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 1>are all looking to launch networks as well. So I

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>wish them all well, it doesn't really mean much to us.

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>More than anything else, They're probably going to be partners

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of ours because you know, we can help um sort

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of bridge service, especially as they're getting their networks up.

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>So a Ridium Communications. You mentioned how it has a

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty year operating history. It was the largest American bankruptcy

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>prior to Enron. How have you recreated the company or

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>how's the company recreated itself over the past decade to

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>be the successful company that it is that provides uh,

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, crucial satellite services. Yeah, it was. It was

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.199
<v Speaker 1>a challenging business case back in the nineties to spend

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollars in expect you know, to compete with

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>cell phones right off the bat. Unfortunately, they put too

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>much dabt on the company and couldn't service it. But

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>over time we've just been able to generate more and

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>more products more and more partners to take us the

0:12:54.360 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 1>market and have steadily grown at ten on our subscribers

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>over the last twenty years. So I often say we're

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>like a thirty year overnight success story. It takes. It

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>takes some times sometimes in the satellite business because all

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the capital required to make a success, but we finally

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>got there and really are a sort of an important

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>financial transformation right now. I just hope, I hope all

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>these new networks they're launching can go faster and turn

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to their own success. I'm just looking real quickly at

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>your stock chart mid two eighteen. Your stock just started

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a big ascension after being you know, kind of flatish

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>for the prior several years. What was that big event

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>there that turned investor sentiment around. Well, there were a

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>number of things. One, you know, completing the three billion

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>dollar new network and knowing that we weren't gonna have

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to spend that kind of money for another ten years. Uh,

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it meant that we could finally start generating significant cash.

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we're deleveraging now and we'll you know, our

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>investors are starting to see the light that you know,

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the dividends and and other things are possible. Really with

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>all the cash that we're going to be generating over

0:13:57.520 --> 0:13:59.559
<v Speaker 1>the next ten years. So I think it was just

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the patient of that that real financial transformation we've been through. Matt,

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much. We appreciate your thoughts there. Matt Desh,

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>CEO of a Ridium Communications stock symbols I R d

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>M based in Washington, d C. It's had a long,

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>long history, a little bit north of twenty years in

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the satellite business. Probably uh you know, went through that bankruptcy,

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>as Matt said, uh you know, probably not the right

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>capital structure for a company that needed to undergrow six

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars or capex just to get their network in

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the sky. But the coming out of the bankruptcy, the

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>company is doing much better again just by judging by

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the stock price, and the real future of satellite communications

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>going forward in the country certainly seems bright. More competition

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX of course from Elon Musk, and again news that

0:14:45.760 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe Apple thinking about getting into the satellite business. We've

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>been talking about it all morning. There seems to be

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>an increasing divergence between the bulls and the bears within

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the fixed income market heading into but some I'm thinking

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>about PREAMSRA in particular, seeing lower yields ahead for the

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>benchmark tenure, meaning lower yields, higher price given the fact

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps the consumer will disappoint and others coming out

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and saying we're gonna get fiscal stimulus that's gonna push

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>up yields, price down. Tad Ravel joining us now chief

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>investment officer for fixed income at TCW with a hundred

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and seventy five billion dollars under management, joining from Los Angeles,

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>had I'd love to get your view on this. Where

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think this sort of balance lies. What's the

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>bigger likelihood yields lower, yields higher in Well, I guess

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the starting point with that lead in is to confess

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're probably in the in the bear camp as

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it relates to returns in the bond market, opportunities in

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the bond market in terms of rates. It's our view

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that we're in a very late cycle type of environment.

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>The FEDS doing everything it can through the kitchen sink

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and five billion dollars behind that in order to stabilize

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the credit markets in the second half of this year,

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the repo market being part of that. If if, if,

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>if you put a gun to our heads, we'd tell

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you that in time, you're probably going to be in

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a lower yield environment simply because economic growth isn't going

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to support the higher rate environment, and the FED probably

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to initially try to fight it with every

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>weapon it knows knows how to. So it's intering. Ted.

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>What is your I guess, your fundamental economic backdrop as

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it relates kind of supporting your view, Well, there are

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>many I mean, first of all, I think that if

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for signs that you're in a late

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>cycle type of environment, you could begin with manufacturing. That's uh.

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>The data this morning from from Dallas and from Chicago

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is further confirmation that the manufacturing sector has been weak

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>for at least the last six to nine months. This

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>is further refer in the data that reveals activity as

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it relates to movement in and out of ports, air

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>transport type of activity as well. You can look at

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>corporate profit margins that have been declining for several years.

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>You can look at an equity market, which, notwithstanding the

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's got complete blinders on in terms of

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the reality that enterprise profits have actually been fairly flat

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>for the last couple of years. Nonetheless, stay has stayed very,

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>very buoyant. I don't view that as a as a

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>positive sign. I view that as a late cycle type

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of sign. You could throw the real estate market into

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it as well. The residential real estate market certainly there

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>seems to be pushed back from the point of view

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of affordability. I think that's rather clear in markets as

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>diverse as Manhattan or some parts of southern California. But

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>luxury markets generally speaking, I think have essentially run into

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that to the to that wall. You've pushed prices about

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>as far as you're gonna take it. And if you

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>want to put the cherry on top of all of this,

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you take a look at the credit markets, and you

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the excesses in the leverage loan market as

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it relates to covenants. This is a widely reported story.

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>It hardly bears worth going into. At this point. You're

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>either deaf to the warnings that are out there with

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.679
<v Speaker 1>respect to the week underwriting in the corporate sector, or

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>you just don't think it matters at the end of

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the day. So if you're deaf to it, that also

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>means you probably did really well this year. Because the

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the sort of the riskiest assets. Within the credit world,

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly near the end of the year, we're outperforming. I'm

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking of even the triple cs starting to outperform UH

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>this month. I'm trying to figure out what's going to

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>trigger this you know, potential late cycle mess and create

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>some kind of opportunity at least, you know, repricing that

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>people are dying to see. I mean, honestly, they've they've

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>been talking about this for so long, they've been hating

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>on this rally. What's going to be the washout? Well,

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>you never know for sure, but I think that if

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I were to put a couple of possible catalysts, I

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>think one catalyst that could be put forward would be

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the China economy, which has been slowing for a long

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>period of time, and while the data is always okay,

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>so you can't really bring much in the way of

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>precision or clarity to that type of a of a situation,

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's been one of the big drivers

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of global growth over the course of this cycle. So

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>any type of a slowdown there is going to ripple

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>through the global economy. UM and China for what it's worth,

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>as UM by g d P component is about of

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 1>the emerging market, so China and the e M are

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of overlap there. A second place I

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 1>think that it could come from is the continuation of

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>loose fiscal policy in the US. I think those that

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>view that as a as a good thing are not

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to the realities that you sooner or later

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>run into affordability issues with respect to being able to

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>finance trillion trillion and a half, and with any economic

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>slowdown in the US, you would expect those those deficits

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>potentially to move past two trillion. You would be in

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>terror incognito with that, and that would create an interesting

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>push pull in the terms of longer term rates would

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>want to rise, the FED would want to fight that

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>because of its impact on the housing market, etcetera. So uh,

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the the the um imprudence of fiscal policy, I think

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>is a second and the third one is that it

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>might just happen indogenously with respect to the continuing piling

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 1>on of of leverage and credit in the corporate sector,

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>with an awareness or at least an ultimate awareness that

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>there isn't the ability to finance it. You alluded to

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>triple CS. I think that was a good place to look.

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that except for the big catch up, this incredible

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>rally that we've seen in triple seas over the last month.

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>The situation a month ago, if we had this conversation,

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>what I would have said and would have been wrong, obviously,

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is the equity markets up. Triple sees are up four percent.

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Tell me what's wrong with this picture? And what's wrong

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 1>with the picture, of course, is that the market is

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>becoming more intelligent and more discriminating about the kind of

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>risk that it's sponsoring. So tad given the fact that

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you very well made be right, but it hasn't happened yet.

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you say to clients who come to you

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and say, God, come on you like, the triple c

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is totally killed it. You know, the hile bonds they

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 1>crushed it. You can talk about liquidity crisis. It hasn't happened.

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you tell them, Well, I think first of

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>all our clients generally speaking, I think understand where we're

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>coming from. But the basic organizing premise is essentially this

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is that rather than try to call the next rally

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>or whether or not corporate spreads are going to move

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>tighter over the course of the next six or twelve months,

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 1>approach it this way is the way we have always

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>approached it, which is that think of the economic cycle

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>as really an asset price credit cycle, because those are

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially the key underpinnings of it. Um don't talk about

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>it like a conventional business cycle. If you think about

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it as an asset price credit cycle, then think about

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>your game plan being this. In the first third of

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the cycle, you have a big bay to trade all

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>risks basically gets lifted with a very low level of risk,

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>and everybody tells you to stay away from risk, so

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to be an enthusiastic risk taker, and let's

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>say the first third of the cycle. In the next

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>third of the cycle, you're not so much in a

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 1>beta type trade. You're in a more of an alpha

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>trade that you still want to be risked on, but

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>be more particular in the late stage of the cycle.

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So if you accepted the thesis that you're in the

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>late stage of the cycle, you're really supposed to essentially

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>preserve the gains that you've made in the early part

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>and not worry about and not worry about the the

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>incremental return because it comes with more than incremental risk. Hey, Tad,

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We appreciate your thoughts

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>on the credit markets. As always, Tad Raveled, chief investment

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>officer for fixed income at TCW dred seventy five billion

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>under management, so they've got a lot of experience in

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the credit markets fixed to coome. They're based in Los Angeles,

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, Tad has always been consistently since

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>we've been chatting with them here, consistently cautious as it

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>relates to some of the fixed income markets here. Given

0:22:54.600 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>where we are late in the stage right now, we're

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing the Bloomberg's Commodities Index rise to the highest levels

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>since eighteen as people uh survey the land of the

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>trade talks and come back with a positive read. But

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 1>has the positivity gotten ahead of itself? Mike mclogan, who

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>covers all things commodities for us for Bloomberg Intelligence Choices

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>here in our Interactive Broker Studios, we were talking earlier

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>about how perhaps some of the optimism has gotten ahead

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of itself when it comes to certainly the agricultural sector.

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>That's at least according to Karen you be heard, do

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you think broadly that's the feeling that perhaps people are

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a little too sanguine about the risks on the horizon. Yes,

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 1>I feel it's exact opposite of this time last year.

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Remember Christmas Eve, you were just supposed to break out

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the buy tickets and everything and take the risk. This year,

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel it's the opposite. Crude oil is kind of

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>filing along industrial metals, coppers, following along the record breaking

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>stock market, and we have this record trade weighting broad

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 1>dollar UM. That's that's the dollars a problem, push, a

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>problem for commandities, but just following the stock market higher

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and being w t I crudeil near you know, above

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>sixty versus last year this time is near forty is

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 1>at risk. I'm fearful of memor version for next year. Alright.

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I'm just reading here you characterize

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>h for crude oil and natural gas the lost decade trends.

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Why Why is that? What happened to oil and that

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>gas over the last decade? The number one issue is

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>US production. Yes, so this is where I like to say,

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the making America great is really not good

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>for commodity prices because US is a net exporter of

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>crude l beginning this year, first time since the essentially

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>world War two almost and that's a pressure in prices.

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And the key thing to look forward to the next

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>year and the next decade is is that going to change?

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And I don't see that happening. Then we see the carbon,

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and carbon is a shan't happening. So there's less demand.

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Supplies quite strong. So that's why I see crude and

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>also natural gas. There's just so much natural gas. I

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>kept thinking demand's going to catch up, but it's not now.

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Right now, in the short term, natural guests positions are

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>very short, so you might get a pop. But natural

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 1>gas is trading around two twenty million b t u

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>s and the low has been near two in the

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>highst been near three. I think it's more likely continue

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 1>to gravitate towards two and lower. Interesting when you talk

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>about futures positioning, I want to just go back to

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>crude for a second, because futures positioning has gotten increasingly bullish,

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>with the net longs out weighing the net shorts by

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the most I believe since March or April. I mean, basically,

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>they've they've been climbing, and I'm wondering if you think

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.199
<v Speaker 1>that they are going to be right that we're going

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>to see at least a near term pop in the

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>price of crude, even if it fizzles out eventually. I

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>think we've had it. I look at that as a risk.

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>For instance, last year around this time it was way

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>too short and the market is way too bears, which

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is I look at it's okay by and manage money

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:00.679
<v Speaker 1>net positions being too long now at the upper end

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of the range, and we all know the fundamentals. You

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>have to be betting on a substantial cut from OPEC

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 1>and sustained cut, which we all know is kind of

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>unlikely in the big pictures, so I don't see it. Also,

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 1>crude oils dependent on the stock market. We we're this year,

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:17.719
<v Speaker 1>I can do that again. Yeah great, but we know

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.239
<v Speaker 1>what that means. It typically doesn't continue that way. So

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm really worried about crude. I'm actually more bullish on

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the eggs at some point when when the dollar peaks,

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's a big if, and Paul and I've discussed that.

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just hard to ask the favorite question, pork bellies hawks.

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Don't we still have a problem in China? And aren't

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>they buying a bunch of our hogs? We do but

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>if there's one commodity sector I have never been able

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.479
<v Speaker 1>to find, not being able to find good high correlations too,

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it's live stock. I just have not been able to

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>pin down live stock, so I can it helps me

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>determine the prices of corn, soy means, and wheat. There's

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>so many metaphors. It's like I have a hard time,

0:26:57.440 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 1>but I have to be kind of back off on

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>live stock. And and it's live cattle. The hawk, I'm

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>long port bellies. I'm gonna one day bring in just

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a plateful of bacon freedom munch on for the rest

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of the rest of the show. I am curious though

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 1>about the potential boost to the eggs sector from the

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>trade deal. Do you expect China buying to actually give

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>a true boost to some of the farms where we've

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 1>seen the highest bankruptcy rates in years, particularly not for Midwest. Well,

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the key sign. It's it's about as bad as

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 1>it can get. And I think eggs are in certainly

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>grains are in a classic case. And we always say

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in commodities is the cure for lower prices and low prices,

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 1>so stocks to use globe we are really peaking heading

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>lower we see that. The key issue. Yes, China starting

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to get priced back in, which is good. The problem

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>is the dollar so high and so expensive. That's only

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>so long that we can sustain US grain prices in

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the dollar at so such high levels until the dollar peak.

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>So we need the dollar to peak or else grains

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>exported from US the world I used soy being South America, Argentina,

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a corn still will have a bit. We will have

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a problem in the US boosting these grain prices until

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the dollar peaks. Trade weighted broad dollar Bitcoin I'm looking

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 1>at the year to date chart. Started the year about

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>four thousand, peaked at above twelve thousand. Here we are

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>at seventy two hundred. What's just the call for bitcoin

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 1>in if there is one higher? Okay, bottom line simply

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the simplistic weight I like to describe bitcoin is there's

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>only one key thing that matters, and that's basically adoption.

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>So supply demand price there's really supply is going is

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>limited this year of supply increasing around four percent, next

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>year three two percent, and it's going to coninue to

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 1>go down to zero who knows when. So the supply

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>is done and the adoption is kicking in so the

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>only thing that's gonna Why is it done? Can I

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>just go to my computer and print more? No, because

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the cost of mining is greater than the cost

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of each bitcoin. Right, Well, that's part of it. But

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>there's only gonna be twenty one million bitcoins ever produced

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>based on the code now that subject, and there's only

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>seven there's seventeen, almost eighteen, there's eighteen million now, so

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>there's only gonna be any one. Where did that come from?

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So Toshia Namo the god, I shouldn't have asked it. Yeah, Well,

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>well that's the difference between bitcoin and the other cryptos.

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>There's unlimited supply of cryptos, but bitcoin is becoming more

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and more like gold. Yeah. And there is also this

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>mining issue that when it reaches a certain point, it's

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>not profitable, and you've had China cracking down on some

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of the mining. Uh. Anyway, I'm in with the bitcoin

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>knowledge there like well, and I will say that there's

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>another issue when you talk about cryptocurrencies. I was reading

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>about how China is planning there they're sort of sovereign cryptocurrency,

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and how that could up end the entire structure. I'm

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna just stuff right, now because Paul is giving me

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>this look like, oh my god, what do you do

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in your free time? Mike mclogan, thank you so much

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. Mike mclogan covers all things commodities

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>plus bitcoin for us here at Bloomberg Intelligence. Uh and

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>he's a frequent contributor to Bloomberg Radio. Thanks for listening

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Lisa Abram wohit's I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abram

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>whits one before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide.

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.