WEBVTT - Seafoam

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Wow, I'm thankful that we didn't get what Caitlin

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>just said on the podcast slightly well you would have

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>edited out anyway. Hi everyone, Welcome to the Renee Stubs

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Tennis Podcast. It is Wow, what a week of tennis.

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>We had what well ten days. We had a blackout,

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:32.279
<v Speaker 1>We've already talked about that. We had some surprises, we

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>had some WTF moments. Wow, Yeah, we had some crazy,

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>crazy time. So let's get into it. Let's talk a

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit about Let's start with the Let's start with

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the men, or should we start with the ladies.

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 2>We have so much to say about the ladies. Usually

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>let's leave them.

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh you want to just table the men's No, no.

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 3>No, let's leave the women's for a rare instance of

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 3>us prioritizing the men and talk about the men. Okay,

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 3>which was such a fun and unexpected final. Yeah, for

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 3>two reasons.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Number one, Alchoriz wasn't there.

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Alchoriz wasn't in it, which, yes, probably him and Sinner

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 3>not being in the draw after you know, Alcrest pulled

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 3>out and obviously Sinner's making has come back this.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Week in win a match.

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Novak is at Sea.

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and we had two unexpected finalists in the form

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 3>of Jack Draper, who is really exciting and I can't

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 3>wait to talk about.

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 2>And also casperud who a couple of.

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Years ago would not have been a surprise surprise finalist,

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 3>but this year has struggled, struggled and has really for

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 3>the last like two years or so, struggled to talk

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 3>about his own mental health struggles, which I think, you know, again,

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 3>as we say often on this pod, like good on you,

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 3>good on you, thank you for talking.

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 2>About that sort of stuff.

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 3>It is useful to obviously understand, and I think it

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 3>does change the dynamic around the athletes. But yeah, Casper Rude,

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 3>like exciting to see him back at the top at

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 3>least especially you know of the clay court season in

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 3>this Madrid final. What did you make of the men's

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 3>draw in total to get these two.

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Finalists, Yeah, I think what was is someone like Jack Draper,

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>for example, who has already won a Masters one thousand.

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So when you think about that, that in and of itself,

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:12.399
<v Speaker 1>you've got Jack's you know, one thousand already this year.

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>He's so young, and then you look down the other end,

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>like Kaspar Rude, who's made two Roland Garris finals and

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and yet has never won a Masters one thousand, which

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is kind of crazy when you think about.

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 2>You mean two rolling finals and he has open finals.

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly.

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 2>He has been to the highest level of the end,

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 2>but he's never won a Master's one.

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Thousand, never won a Masters one thousand, So you think, well, what,

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 1>what the hell, dude. But it also makes you realize,

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>like how special it is to win a Master's one thousand.

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>And you think about the greats like Novak and Roger

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and Rafa and how many Masters one thousands they want

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>throughout their career. It's not easy to do. So look, clearly,

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>our Karaz is not there, sin Theer's not there. That

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>helps not gonna lie. I mean, these guys are the

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>dominant two figures on the men's tour of the last

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. But it was really nice to see.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he obviously like battled his way through to

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the final, and a lot of it is mental, you know,

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it is lot he'd lost a little

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of his Like I don't know, when you lose

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>your confidence, it's really hard to get it back. And

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I have to say this, I loved that he put

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>out that message on Twitter to eager Yeah.

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Agree.

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was so classy of him to say, listen,

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I love watching you play and like, you know,

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>everything's going to be okay kind of thing, because he

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 1>probably felt the same way over the last twelve months

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, everyone was talking about him not

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>being good anymore and he's outside of the top ten

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know he's only a clay guy and blah

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah blah. So you know all these players

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that you think are you know, not human because they

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>don't take all of this on. It's not true. They

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>take all of it on. And you know, you say, well,

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>don't look at social media. Well, okay, you don't necessarily

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>have to look at social media. It's pretty easy to

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>fucking pick up on shit that's being said, either on

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that tour or around the.

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 3>World because the press tends to follow it up where

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 3>it'll be a narrative that becomes self reinforcing, which is like, yeah,

0:03:58.000 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, even if you're not on social media, if

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 3>you're you're not trying to listen to the critics and

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 3>you're trying to stay in your positive bubble, you'll get

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 3>asked a question, like, hey, exactly, you know, Naomi Osaka,

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 3>we you know this is your worst surface. Everyone's talking

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 3>about it on Twitter, and it's like, well, that's a

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 3>press conference, Like is that a nice or responsible thing

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 3>to do to sort of confront a player that way?

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 2>I would argue not. I'm not sure that's really journalism either.

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 3>So I think you can't help but be in the moment,

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 3>and obviously we'll talk to the circumstances that inspired Casper

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 3>Rud's tweet to send to Egosh Fiantek in her pretty

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 3>one sided loss to Coco when we talk about the

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 3>women later, But yeah, wof, But Casper Rude, like, you know,

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't have a massive, massive arsenal of weapons, so

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 3>he really does have to rely on like confidence four

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.119
<v Speaker 3>and his forehand was big this weekend. I was actually

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 3>gonna sort of mention the fact that he looks like

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 3>he was a little bit more of an offensive version

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 3>of himself than somebody I was used to watching, even

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years ago.

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that's just.

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 3>Me because I forgot what he's played like, but it

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 3>also felt like he was taking the initiative a little

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 3>bit more, which against a player like Dreeper who does

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, his massive size and he has a big

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 3>arsenal himself. Like you, I felt really happy that Casper

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 3>rud was taking the initiative and was a very aggressive

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 3>player at that final. Yeah.

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean one of the things that I noted, you know,

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.679
<v Speaker 1>when I was watching the match, because sometimes I don't

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>watch them, and I watched them back later on. I

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>watched both of those matches live, and I have to say,

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>like when I was watching the match, look, he started slowly,

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>clearly got broken early in the first set, and then

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, he managed to I think Jack got a

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit tight towards the end of that first set,

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and then it was interesting after the first set when

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Jack and I put it out on the socials, when

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>Jack was like, I'm done, I'm dead. You know, he

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>was so pissed off at himself after losing that first set,

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>which is never a great sign when you're basically yelling

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>out that I'm dead, Like you don't want to say

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that to someone like Casper who's going to grind you down.

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>But at the same at the same time, he was

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.559
<v Speaker 1>letting out frustration. But I think it's a it's probably

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>a it's probably something that his coaches or people will

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>tell him, and you don't see it on network television

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>because if you're watching the network, it's on the commercial. Yeah,

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>So you don't see him unless they talk about it

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>after right, unless they say, oh well actually, and somebody

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>who works in television you can say to you. I

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>can say to my producer, hey, can you show him

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>on the changeover? It's talking like that.

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 3>And I just want to call that up because I

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 3>so much wish that they would say that a lot

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 3>of times if I'm watching a match live, meaning like

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm there, or if I'm watching it on the World Feed.

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Were you watching on the world feed or were you

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>watching on network?

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 2>I only watch on the.

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>World Okay, So it'd be interesting for our listeners out

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>there who were watching it on the network. And one

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons I'm not watching it on the networks

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>because for some reason, my fucking tennis channel on Spectrum

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>here in New York does not work. Like it just

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>does not work. It's either it's either pixelating or not

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>working or it's frozen. Interesting, So I have to go

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>onto my tennis channel app onto my television to watch it.

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I only watch on the app.

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, watch a network but often I do prefer something.

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 3>I will say the Tennis Channel, who interestingly, they just

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 3>got a new CEO, which I shall portend interesting things

0:06:58.279 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 3>hopefully for the network.

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 2>But I think on the whole the app has.

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 3>Been a really really great experience, and the app has

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 3>gotten a ton better, and the app has been stable.

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 3>And so you know, we are the first to criticize certainly, yeah,

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 3>certainly the first anything the WCA, certainly, you know, the ATP,

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 3>A lot of this stuff, you know, the PTPAS sort

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 3>of maybe well intentioned but baffling lawsuits, you know, like

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 3>it's just you know, I think, if if anything, you

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 3>can kind of just to be honest.

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 2>And so for me, I do have to say.

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 3>The Tennis Yonal app itself has gotten a ton better.

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 3>But you're right, I watch it on the world feet

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 3>and I just don't want to bring that up because

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 3>so much of what makes watching tennis interesting is not

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 3>just the point play, it's the context. Are screaming at

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 3>their box or they did they smash eighteen rackets on

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 3>the changeover? Did they have a lengthy monologue? Did they

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 3>have a dialogue like Bubliic did with Muhammed.

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>That was just hilarious it was hilarious. It was public

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>who this year was this year? When he's like, hey,

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Mohammed Remo used to get to the cortus. It was

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>so easy.

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 3>You're like, the men's tennis depth is great, what a

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 3>great insightful you know.

0:07:57.720 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Muhammedlanda is just like all right, but sure.

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Whatever, But like, there's so much interesting stuff that tells

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 3>you about the players, their mindset, maybe what's happening the

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 3>dynamic in the match.

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:06.559
<v Speaker 1>It's better to watch it on the app.

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 3>And not only is a better watch on the app,

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 3>but I think if you are a network broadcaster taking

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 3>a minute to do what you just said, which is like, hey,

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 3>have this teed up for when we go back from

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 3>a commercial, because I want to talk about a little

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 3>bit more because there's something interesting to unpack here.

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well listen. I mean that's one of the things

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that I I really try and do when I commentate,

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and in general, I'm very perceptive of what's happening on

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the court because little things like that do tell a

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>story that you don't now imagine if you came back

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and just started playing the match again and showed none

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of that of what Jack Draper did on the Chaine.

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Out and then if Jack Draper loses eight points in

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 3>a row by netting it in the bottom, you're.

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Like what, well, yeah, you're like, wow, how did that happen?

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>You're like, well, let me show you. So I think

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that's also another thing about being court sided, Like as

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a court side commentator, I'm very aware that's the things

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that I'm told as a court side commentator is al, wait,

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>we can't necessarily see things all the time in the booth.

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>But that's also another thing about being on site, right,

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is that you you know, often when you're calling a match,

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you can see the player from the booth and you

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>can see things happening if you're caught side, But if

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you're in a booth stuck in Santa Monica, which Tennis

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Channel are most of the time you're in a booth,

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you're not seeing that. So you don't even know that. Yeah,

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So it would have been interesting to see if they

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>even picked up on that on Tennis Channel in general.

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, as a post the World Feet, I was gonna

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 3>say one of my favorite Renee subs is is the

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 3>court side renee stubs. I mean, I know they like

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 3>to use you in the booth and at the desk

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot because you're so good at it, but like

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 3>the court side renee stubs.

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Is the is for me the most fun because you're

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 2>always like leaning close to the microphone and like it

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 2>gets the like I'm always feeling lean too close.

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 3>No, but I feel like I'm getting some kind of

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 3>like insider information because you're like, well, here I am

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 3>down to and I just heard this screaming from the box.

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, Like it really adds to the experience as

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 3>a spectator, which is like, oh, I'm here with somebody

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 3>and it's almost like I'm there.

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 3>I think the one thing I wasn't planning on talking

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 3>about this but I was really excited to see it

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 3>is during the Lorenzo Mussetti Jack Draper semifinal, which Lorenzo

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Mussetti man because we'll just talk about his amazing album.

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Can we just talk about that? Could be the you know,

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 1>likelihood of the best looking match on what's a lot

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of good listen coming from you and me? True, Like

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of good looking man out there. I mean,

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>arguably you've got Rude who's a very good looking guy,

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>him back oat Mill Stallion and you know Jack Drap Baumasetti.

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean good looking fellas it's to say.

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 3>Lorenzo Messeeti, especially because he was wearing that EPC ESX kid.

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Much controversial feedback has that kid received, But for me

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 3>is any plus?

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You like him with the shorter hair.

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 2>I like him with the shorter hair, and I like

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 2>him with the shorter shorts.

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh see, the whole thing was you know how I

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>felt about the shorter shorts. Yes, I've been asking for

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the shorter shorts forever and a day because I want

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>to see the guy's cords. Because I want people to

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>understand how strong they are in the legs because their

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>upper body. Most tennis players will not be strong with

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the bodies he rexes up. Yeah, because you have to

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>have flexibility and all the things. But you don't want

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to be too heavy up top because you're running a lot.

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>But but going back to the.

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Match, wait wa wait, But the reason I brought up

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 3>to Lorenzo Messeeti jack daper match was not to talk

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 3>about their legs or how good looking they were. It

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 3>is that Tennis TV, which is a subsidiary of ATP channel,

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 3>had for a minute and was sharing on their social

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 3>media a camera angle that went not only behind Jack

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Draper or learn Zubi SETI court side so you could

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 3>see the ball, but it also tracked sideways to watch

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 3>the point as it unfolded. The speed, the spin, the movement,

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 3>the dynamics.

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Like it was great.

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 3>And I think tools like that, whether you want to

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 3>show a whole match like that or not, help explain

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 3>to people who are not able to appreciate it from

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 3>a tennis a bird's eye tennis camera angle where it

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 3>just looks like pingpong, how hard it is and how

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 3>fast the ball is traveling and how much court they

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:44.839
<v Speaker 3>have to cover and in what way. So I just

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 3>want to shout that out because it was so good.

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 3>I want I've been complaining about it for years and

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 3>I want to see more of it, and I'm glad

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 3>I did.

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Here's my one comment on you know, we bitched about

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the light that you couldn't see the court at Materia

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and shadows or bad it is, you know, YadA YadA

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>for television. Maybe that's why they've moved the camera angle

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>down lower. I don't know, but here's one of the

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>things that I want the Madrid Tournament to understand or

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>whoever's running the television. You know production there. You cannot

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>have the back lighting of the because they have the

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>led that goes around like the Australian Open introduced to

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the world many years ago. You cannot have the glare

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and the color of that be a fucking lime or

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever that color was. It was like it was like

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 1>a seafoam.

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 3>It's it was like seafoam's color.

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 2>But it's so distracting.

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't even see the fucking tennis ball. Like I

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>if I can't see the tennis ball, God, good luck

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>any layman, amateur tennis player out there trying to watch

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>this tennis match. All of a sudden, I'm like, where's

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball? Oh there it is? Oh where's the Oh

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>there it is. I'm like, what the fuck? You can't

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>have seafoam or teal as a background on television. Just

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>do me a favor, everyone out there. Just go back,

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>get on your tennis channel, app go on your television

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and go to a replay of the Rude Draper match.

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>And every time they showed that lower camera angle, I

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>couldn't see the fucking tennis ball. It's like, what is happening?

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>So whenever it got into the background area of that

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.719
<v Speaker 1>LED screen. The ball just disappeared. You couldn't see it.

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>What are they thinking?

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't look at that LED screens somewhere else?

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>No, the LED screen's fine. We got to make it

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 1>back during the point. What the fuck?

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, making it move during the point.

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>It seems it's not moving. It's just it's just teal. Yeah,

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 1>you can't see the tennis ball anyway, that's that. I

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't think I was going to get on.

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 3>This was a podcast episode, if we don't call that

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 3>something random and specificate and reading.

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>About cephone bloody phone anyway, But back to the match

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>when I could see the fucking tennis ball. There was

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 1>a moment in the second set and Casper was up

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a set. Clearly Jack was struggling. Maybe he even made

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the gesture on that changeover after the first set. He

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>was like huffing and puffing, like he was struggling to breathe.

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>And as we know, it is slightly altitude at Madrid,

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and it is hard. It is a little bit harder

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to breathe and all the things. And it's a one

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>knock on him that some people have talked about his

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>fitness level, which has improved dramatically. Even Jim Corea Andy

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Roddick had spoken about it as well. They both talked

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>about how much he's improved his fitness level and it's

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a knock. That was the one big knock on him.

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>But it was four to three. I believe it was

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>four to three in the second set. Casper was serving

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and he got down fifteen thirty in the game. And

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Casper's biggest strength is looking for the forehand and going

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>for the forehand, much like Jack in a lot of ways,

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>but Casper really depends on that big forehand. Plays very

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>similar to Rougher in a lot of ways. He pussed

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>out so bad in that fifteen thirty point fifteen thirty

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>had a forehand mid court, could have really ripped it,

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>like roped it somewhere inside out or inside in whatever.

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>He hit the worst week fourhand two Jack's forehand and

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Jack just went It was almost like it's like, oh, okay,

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you're welcome, and he just went smack and hit a winner,

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, oh my god, now I know

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it hit me at that moment, I was like, now

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I know why you have one of Masters one thousand

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>or a Grand Slam, because a rafa or a Novak

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>or a Roger or a Serena or a great player

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that just steps up into those big moments. Down fifteen

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty a set and four to three, you know, he's

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>up a set, down three to four, but it's on serve.

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>He just completely puts it out on that shot, and

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought, oh my god. And then he lost the game.

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>He played a really weak couple of points and then

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, Jack just stepped up wins the

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>second set, and I'm like, oh God, if you can't

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>step up, And I give him a ton of credit

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>because in the third set, there are some moments, whether

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it be you know, early in the game when his serve,

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly on his own serve, he every time he had

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a forehand, he went for it. And I was like,

0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>good for you, dude, good for you, because you're not

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>going to win this match unless you go for it.

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Because Jack's one in one thousand. He knows how to

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>do it. He's not afraid. He might be a little

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>bit tired, but you got to step up because if

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't, Jack's going to do that, and especially in

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>his serve. And I was like, that's what made me

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>happiest about Casper and I thought, oh my god, that

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>is a major major shift for him is to go

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>for it to win the match. And that's what he did.

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>He won the match. He played great to break and

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that was it. And as you've already talked about Caitlyn,

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>he's talked, you know, openly about seeing a psychologist and

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>doing the thing. And I think Madison Keys is going

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to make a lot of big difference in a lot

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of players to talk about it and to be honest

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>about why is it that I can't get through these

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>big moments and maybe I need to talk to someone

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that's the catalyst for him.

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think you're rightly. I think it's a lack

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 2>of fear.

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 3>And I think that I know you always have fear, well, no,

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 3>but courage maybe courage in.

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 2>The feace of fear.

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's be brave.

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 3>I think when you are playing from a police of

0:16:58.320 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 3>fear as opposed to playing.

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>From a police of ravery, you're well, okay. Remember Pittko

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>always said that she thought Rafa played from a place

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>of fear.

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:07.959
<v Speaker 3>And fear and anxiety and got through it. I mean,

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 3>obviously he played big, but but you know, I think

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 3>for for a player who maybe doesn't possess as many

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:17.719
<v Speaker 3>as Rafa's, you know, many extollable virtues with regards to

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 3>just being an absolute beast, which Casper is an incredible athlete.

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 3>But you know there's a gap, you know, and I

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:25.719
<v Speaker 3>think for me that was exciting. So so as we

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 3>shift into just to wrap.

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 2>It up on the men, because I know we really

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about women.

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 3>But like as we shift into Rome, which I think

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 3>for most people, because of the lack of altitude, because

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 3>of the speed of the court, is probably a much

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 3>more reliable predictor of who in As those play season

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 3>works towards its apex and Roland Garros towards the end

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 3>of this month, like Sinners coming back, Carlos is hopefully

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 3>over that you know, hip, hopefully thing that that first

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 3>showed up in the Barcelona final and kept him out

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 3>of this Majrid tournament. You know what, what what is

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 3>the results of Madrid, if anything, portend for this next

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 3>shift into realm.

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>For two weeks. Well, I was going to get more

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 1>into it after the women, but you've asked the question now.

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Rome has always been for me a precursor to who's

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the favorite for Paris because the conditions in Rome are

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>very similar to the conditions in Paris. You can have

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>days in Paris that are really hot or really cold.

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>You can have days in Rome where it's really hot

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>or really cold. You never really know. So the clay

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>does change dependent on how hot it is out, if

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you're playing at night, all those sort of things. And

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have to worry about in Paris of playing

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>at night. Now you do because they have the lights right.

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>So there are a lot of similarities to Rome to

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>what we see in Paris. So Madrid is not a

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>precursor to who's going to do well in Paris. I mean,

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>when you think about it, and this is what I

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>was going to bring it up with the women, Sabalenca

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>became the first player to win three Madrid titles since

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Petra Covitteva. Hilarious. That describes to you how different the

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>conditions are in Madrid. I would you that Patrick a

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of a I don't even know. I probably should

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>have looked upfore I did the pod, But can't imagine

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>her winning a lot of clay court tournaments. Now we

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>know she's a two time Wimbledon champion. Because of her game,

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to serve well in Madrid. If you don't

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>serve well, you're going to get crushed. And you saw

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of acing, a lot of big servers,

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of big servers have won the Madrid title,

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 1>which is why Rafa never won. He won Madrid like

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>one or two times.

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, come on his career.

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's crazy.

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Rodger won it. How many times? He won it

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>more times than Rafa probably, so it's not a great

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>precursor on the women's side. It maybe can be a

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit lesser. So, but arguably, look, Sabalanca and Rude

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>will probably be maybe second. Sabellanca certainly second favorite to

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>win the French. I would say Rud's probably third favorite

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>to win the French. Now you think, oh, yeah, I

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>have to put him in. That guy's made it to

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the final twice. He loves the clay there that when

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>would have given him so much confidence, Caitline to win

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a Masses one thousand. He can finally put that away

0:19:58.119 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 1>and say, all right, what's the next thing for me

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 1>to do in a Slam? Can I do it? I

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but I certainly can get to the final.

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Why not it's just dependent on if he plays al

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Chorazin Djokovic. You know, the guys that he that know

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they can win them. I don't know. Listen what I

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>expect from Sinner. He has a buye. He has a

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:20.719
<v Speaker 1>pretty good second round navone or Sinner, not Sinner but

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>with a C. I n a a wild card Italian,

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 1>but you never know, could be the next Sinner. So

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>he has a pretty good draw. He probably will play

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>David David Kin. I can never say his name, thank

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you once I hear it once, I'm good. That could

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>be a tough one. We know how well he can

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>play on clay. But overall his draw is reasonably good.

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>There's no one really up that half of the draw

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be, you know, frankly, in my opinion,

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>better than him.

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Question setting aside the doping stuff, which we've talked about

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 3>at length, and if you need to hear more, Rude.

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Is in his half. So it'll be interesting to see

0:20:58.960 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>how how he sits there.

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 3>What's your feeling generally with tennis players like rest or Rest,

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 3>because now he's had a couple of months off, is

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 3>that good?

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>You know? I think there's there's something in that that

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>is really good for him because the amount of pressure

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>on his shoulders over the last year to win the

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>austrain and Open, win the US Open, have the results

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>that he's had over the last twelve months has been

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty spectacular. I'm sure he would have liked to have

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.360
<v Speaker 1>kept playing because he was playing so well. But at

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the same time, look, you know, he probably went skiing.

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>He probably really enjoyed himself, and then he's probably been

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>working unbelievably hard over the last month to get him

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>back on the court, and he would have been playing

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>practice sets out the wazoo.

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Sure, And it's not like he comes into the realm

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 3>tournament his home Master's one thousand as like an underdog

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 3>or somebody somebody's overlooking. But certainly maybe to your point

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 3>about pressure, like, it's.

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Not the worst thing in the world to like win, Yeah,

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 2>I think be like, hey.

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take you know, I think resting the brain,

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>whether it's my choice or not. Yeah, I mean, listen,

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>only he will be able to answer this question. But

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, whether he's going to be honest about

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>it or not, I think it It also would have

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>been really hard for him to be sitting out of

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the sport for three months knowing that, particularly for him

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>feeling like he didn't do anything wrong. You know, if

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, it would have been hard. He would

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have been ruminating over it every day, like everyone thinks

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm a cheat, Like that's really hard. That must be

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>really hard for him as well, particularly if he knows

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do anything wrong. Look, I'm not saying he

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>did or not. None of us know that. None of

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>us know the truth except him the physio, and maybe

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Nick Curious, who seems to and apparently Nick curious, but

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, really no one knows the truth right accept them.

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>And so if he is truly innocent, and he really

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>does think that he was hard done, I imagine he

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be thinking about it would be really hard to

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 1>deal with that for three months. So I think that

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>he's probably at his very happiest on the tennis court.

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'm sure we'll listen. Time will tell, Time will tell.

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm just I'm really excited about it.

0:22:55.200 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Colitus reappearance, Well, we're all very happy to Carlos. I mean,

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 1>you know how I feel about the guy. He's just

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the best. Zverev is course number two seed in Rome.

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>He of course, he just I don't know his ranking

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>being it to hopefully that changes by the French Open,

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>because he doesn't deserve to be number two in the world.

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>He just doesn't. He just he has not turned up

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>for the big matches.

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's a perennial, like semi finalist.

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 1>He's in alcaraz Is down that half of the draw.

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we'll see. Listen if Verev does beat Carlos,

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>or if he gets through to the finals here or

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>wins Rome. Hey, it's a totally different story. It's a

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>totally different story. And he is deserved of the number

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>two ranking at the French Open. Look, he is because

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of rankings and all that sort of stuff, and you

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>don't get there without winning a lot of matches. And

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>he has won a lot of matches, but there's a

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.239
<v Speaker 1>difference between stepping up when they're big matches. Yeah, and

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, his loss in that should not happen in Madrid.

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>His game is perfect for Madrid, big surve, big fourhand,

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>but he gets tight, He gets so tight on his

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>forehand it's like it's hard to watch. Anyway.

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Let's get to the lady, lady, So do you think

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 4>Coco listened to our last podcast.

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>I think she did. I think she did.

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 3>Because she really you know, yes, she last in the

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 3>final tour in a SOUTHLKA.

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 2>But what a great tournament, what a great tournament.

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>What a great tournament.

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad that I think we couched it. As you know,

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 3>tough love, but mainly love.

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>It's always tough love. But it's always.

0:24:58.320 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Especially with Coco.

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 3>She I mean, let's just talk about her masterclass.

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, No, okay, okay, let's look at let's.

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Talk about that. That's one of the most.

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's look at that objectively, Okay, objectively arguably the worst

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>match I ever seen Eager Chiante play in my entire life.

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Very poor.

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>It was fucking terrible mistakes out the wazoo, not serving well,

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>missing easy backhands, missing easy fourhands, missing returns like it

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>was just brutal. I've never seen such a great player,

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>particularly on a surface that is owned by her play

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and look so incredibly lost on the tennis court. There

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is no height on her shots, there is no margin

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>on the shots. She's going for shots that she shouldn't be,

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 1>She's pulling the trigger too early in the point. It

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>was just brutal. I mean. And the flip side is

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that Coco was absolutely out and serving out of her

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 1>just mind, like acing left and right, which is another thing,

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>like eager stand back, like how about take a step

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>back in the court and give your opponent a different look.

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.679
<v Speaker 1>The one thing you know about Coco is if she

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>hits the double fault or starts missing her first serve,

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you know in your mind you sort of got her. Right,

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a little there's a there's a window that just

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 1>got opened that you can say, Okay, I'm climbing through it. Yes,

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to own this house now because you just

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 1>opened the window, right, which is what happened in the final.

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But we're going to get to that, right, I'm gonna

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>own this house. Sense. So Coco didn't give a lot

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of the free stuff, right, She wasn't double folding. She

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>was serving unbelievable. She was hitting a lot of bases.

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>She served that one out wide like eighty percent of

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the time, like eager, what the f like stand over

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:52.479
<v Speaker 1>there or stand back the app like what is no offense?

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>But whim like come on, man, like you're sitting there.

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>You can tell her anything you want. How about change

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>your return position? Get in her head a little bit,

0:26:59.880 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Like the one thing you want from Coco is to

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>lose her rhythm on her surf. You're standing in the

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 1>same spot, You're going for the same ridiculous return. Like

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 1>there was just it was the it was the epitome

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of like greatness playing against not greatness in one day.

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Coco did not miss her forehand. You could

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>tell eager was going to a forehand and she wasn't

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>making a mistake, and all of a sudden, She's like,

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:22.880
<v Speaker 1>what do I do? It's like, what do you mean,

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>what do you do? You got to move the ball.

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.199
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like she's so fixated on she was so

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>fixated on getting it to the forehand that she would

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>have an easy backhand and she would still go she

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 1>would try and go down the line and miss it.

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, just hit your best backhand, your best

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.479
<v Speaker 1>backhands as good as anybody else's Like, yes, Coco's got

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a great backhand, but you know, sometimes you got to

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>step up and go manner a manner like I'm gonna

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>which is why she used to beat Coco all the time,

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 1>because she was like, I can handle your backhand to backhand, yeah.

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 2>And then I'll earn a look at your weik for

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 2>h but you're not gonna get there right Only.

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like whim's like you know, you only got

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 1>to go to the forehand, which okay, is fine, But

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Coco lost matches missing backhands too.

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 3>I wonder a couple of things about Ego. I'm not

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.360
<v Speaker 3>that we want to take anything from Coco.

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Unbelievable, so happy to see her with that aggressive sir.

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the fact she stepped up and served it out, like.

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 3>The two points I want to make about do you

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 3>think so Ega had a pretty intense draw up until

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 3>this point and she was playing well.

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Like that was to what was shocking about it. It's

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 2>not like we saw her have a bad day after

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 2>a series of bad days.

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 3>She had a great match with alex Ela that I

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 3>want to come back to because Christy on my team

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 3>had made a point like I wonder if that introduced

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 3>some seeds of doubt in Eagle's mind. Losing a set

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 3>to alex Eya who who had beaten her for sure

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 3>in Miami. Then she plays Lyndonskova, not a bad player.

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Then she played Schneider.

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>In Osco, who she'd lost to at Thestraia.

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Lost the New Australian.

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Then she played Janet Schneider, who's you know, hard hitting lefty,

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 3>went to three sets. Then she beat Madison Keys in

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 3>three sets. Who had you know, beaten her in that

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 3>epic still probably the best match of the year.

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Which I still wonder if that scar tissues really hurt her. Yeah.

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 3>So, like you know, she shows up to the Cocoa

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 3>match and she should be feeling good. She's vanquished two

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 3>former foes in the in the past, three former foes

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 3>who've taken her out this year.

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Alone in the run up, tough matches, tough.

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Matches, physical matches, and to see her physically not show up.

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 2>She wasn't injured that we know of.

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, we know that her grandfather had died the week before,

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>so you know, she hadn't mentioned that. You know, I'm

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>sure that was weighing on her in some regards. But

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, you hadn't gotten you had gotten

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>through three or four matches right round so against you know,

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.719
<v Speaker 1>her first round opponent. Okay, you can understand why that

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>might might be still you know, hanging over. I think

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>this was just there's scar tissue and all those matches

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>she lost a set six love to Madison, Like there's

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>scar tissue along the way of not beating you know,

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Alex in straight sets on clay, which a lot of

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>people were expecting, not beating a Madison, Keys in straight

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>sets on clay, or all these players on clay. Easily

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>we're used to the bagel and the bakery Eager, right,

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the O and one, the one and one, and it's

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>really hard to do that against anyone. That just shows

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you how great she was prior and now there's doubt. Yeah,

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like what's happening with Novak, but in

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a different way because he's older and there's no question

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>his age, and the drive isn't there as much as anymore,

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>but the driver is certainly there for Eager. I just

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>wonder there's a little bit of scar tissue. I talk

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>about it all the time on her brain. Like it's

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 1>like and when you miss some balls, you're like, oh

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>my god, here we go again, and you can see it,

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and she's just it's the same as Coco. As soon

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>as she hits the double fault or misses a foyand

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you see his shoulder slump and she's like, oh my god,

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>get us first servant.

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 2>So I deal with with Eager in particular.

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 3>You know you called out when Fassett, who you know

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 3>has had great results with a lot of players, but

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 3>you tactically you'd like to see her be encouraged to

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 3>go backhand to back in and maybe there's a coaching

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 3>thing there.

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 2>I do also want to say, like, you know, there's

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot.

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Of credit has been given to her mental coach time

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 3>and time again about how tough mentally she is, and

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 3>I have to say she has looked the opposite of

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 3>tough mentally.

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 2>I think that's to me the main issue she looks.

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it goes hand in hand, right. So you

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>can work on someone's mentality all day, every day. But

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>if they're not comfortable on the tennis court, I don't

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>give a shit.

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 2>How many mental coaches job to make sure they're comfortable

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 2>on the tennis cord.

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, yes, but also if they're not comfortable hitting the

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>tennis ball and they're confused about what they should be

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>doing with the tennis ball, then that that is the

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>overriding factor. I can feel great all I want. I

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>can be like, no, no, you're good, you're good, No

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>need to panic, no need to panic, Okay, go to

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>hit that forehand. What do I do? What do I

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>do with it? Oh? My god, that's right in practice,

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I should be hitting it there.

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>They're telling me this, I don't know. And all of

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, for me, it comes down to what you're

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>doing on the practice court as well. And I just

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and also the problem solving that's happening in the match

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and there's no problem solving like that was just there

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>were so many moments where I was like, why would

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you hit that shot? Like why are you going for that?

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>What was that? There were so many times she needs

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to work on her slice. I don't care what anyone says,

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, there were times where she could have. You

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>have to mix the pace up. Yeah, And if it's

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>not working and you're bounding the ball and you're losing rallies,

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to vary the pace. You have to hit

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a high ball. You have to do a slice. That's

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>what mea Andreva does so well.

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 2>And usually you could does that. I mean she used

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 2>to do, but certainly with the off piece.

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Back in the day. I remember she used to have

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>this drop shot. She used to did a drop shot

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>all the time. She didn't drop shot at all anymore,

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Like all of a sudden, she doesn't drop shot, she

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't eat high balls, she doesn't try and vary the pace.

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>She tries to hit every ball one hundred miles an hour,

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's like there's no variation and if it's not

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>going in, then all of a sudden, it's like the

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 1>panic sets in and it's hard to watch. And also

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it comes from me. It starts with this as well.

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I just think she's missing way too many first serves

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and her second serve is getting predictable, and you know,

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it was just it was ugly. It was ugly. It

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>was ugly from Eager, and it was fantastic from Coco,

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>which is why it was one on one.

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Two more things I want to talk about on this relatively.

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Short that'd be like beating Rougher one on one.

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 2>It's staggering.

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but we're going to have a big roam extravaganza

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 3>next week and week after. But just sort of briefly

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 3>as we wrap this up, like shout out to one

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 3>of whim Fassett's former.

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>H wait before we get to Naomi, though, I just

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>want to finish the final so sable Anca Coco definitely

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>come out came out a little bit nervous, isn't it

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>because I think she played so well against Eager that

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>she probably had a little bit of pressure on her

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>coming out, like okay, now you got to you gotta

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>show everybody that you can still do this right. And

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt whether it was subconscious or consciously in

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>her mind. And I think she started a little bit

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>flat and then you know, started playing really, really a

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>lot better. In the first set. You know, Sabalanca gets

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the first set done, they were the tennis was great,

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>like they were hitting the ball so big. And then

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the second set when when Coco gets the break and

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>there's up and then is five when she's serving for

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the set, you, as an opponent, this is what I

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:20.879
<v Speaker 1>was talking about, you know, locker room reputation and all

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>this sort of stuff. It's like, you know, if Coco

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>gives you a little window, you climb through it, and

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Sabalanca doesn't climb through, she smashes it down. Okay, So

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, she's serving for the set, playing

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>great first point double fault. As an opponent, you're like,

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you go, uh, okay, here we go. Now. Subsequently, she

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>had a set point and Sabalanca crushed a return, but

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>again didn't you know, didn't get the free point on

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the serve and all that sort of stuff. But when

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you double fault the first point, there is a moment

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>in you as an opponent where you go, ah, okay,

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, I know she's gonna get tight if I

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>just play positively, and well, right now I'm getting back

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:04.439
<v Speaker 1>in this match.

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 3>And these two have had so much history, yeah that

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 3>they know. Of course, these moments really were and I

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 3>think you can see it.

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>But even if you don't play against them, anyone who

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>knows playing against Coco, you know that there could be

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a window that's opened on the forehand and the serf.

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And unfortunately, and I know this is a tough love again,

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>but when you're serving for the first set, the first

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 1>point is so important, and when you it's one thing

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>to lose it, but to lose it double folding, yeah,

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's just not a good thing.

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 2>No three points.

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 1>So of course the serve breaks down and the forehand

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 1>breaks down. At five four both break down and at

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 1>five all even there, she's love thirty on Sabalanca serve

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:46.879
<v Speaker 1>love thirty Okay, well, we're going to get the break

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:51.720
<v Speaker 1>straight back, which often happens right foehand miss missed return,

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:56.799
<v Speaker 1>forehand miss return and then another error I think on

0:35:56.840 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a backhand and just gave the game back to Applanca

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 1>with errors on the forehand side. Yeah, you know, and

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>then again serving to stay in the match, a couple

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of forehand errors again and on match point double fault. Like,

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 1>so if you're looking at it from a coach's perspective,

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to say what happens there? Now, I've always

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>said bad technique breaks down under pressure, and unfortunately Coco

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>with her serve and forehand, her technique is questionable, right,

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>everything else is so unbelievably good, And there are times

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>where she's hitting the forehand well, but like get the

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:32.839
<v Speaker 1>hide on the forehand, Like I would just be telling

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>her get that hide on the forehand and then smack

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>your backhand.

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:40.839
<v Speaker 3>What's the serve that you're telling her to start that game?

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 3>I think you have to slice body serve where it's

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 3>like percentage but like kind of tough, like what you

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 3>know from a tactics perspective, like obviously I'm going to

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 3>try to get the first serve in. Yeah, but like

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Is there a specific serve that you're telling her, especially

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:55.479
<v Speaker 3>with her game, Yeah, to go for.

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's hard because her technique, you know, it doesn't

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>really allow to. I mean, honestly, it's just super important

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that you get your first serve in on that first characters.

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And you saw her at five to four. She turns

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>around and the camera was on her and she said, oh,

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>first serve. So it's in her head, yeah, you know,

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 1>because she knows the pressure then is on her on

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a second serve, particularly against Sabelenka. I mean, she's just

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna crush your second.

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Sech And that's the thing, Like you can see Sebelinka

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 3>and I remember distinctly watching her play against Coco.

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:26.359
<v Speaker 2>You know, Coco misses the first serve.

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't even matter how hard the first serve is,

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 3>no matter what Arena's taking two steps in and like

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 3>just because she knows she can crush it. But also

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 3>like the aggressive return position on a second serve, like

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:39.280
<v Speaker 3>within a readA to Sablenka, She's gonna give you less

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:41.959
<v Speaker 3>seconds to react, less like and I know that that's

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 3>so much in her head when she's going up to

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 3>the line, which is obviously why the double falls tend

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 3>to tend to show up in those pressure moments. So yeah,

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think for me, the main takeaway from

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Coco is like, what a great week. Still some stuff

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 3>to work on, but like, what a fantastic turnaround of

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 3>the season. She has to be feeling, I tell you,

0:37:57.360 --> 0:37:59.720
<v Speaker 3>so much better better going into Rome and Paris.

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>No, she's going to be real good in Paris. I

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>think she's going to.

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Be real good, but the game is better with her strong.

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 1>I think she needs to understand in the very tight

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>moments when it gets when she gets a little nervous

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and she can feel it, and everybody feels it, everybody

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, when it's happening, you start getting a little

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>bit doubtful in your own mind. You either have to

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>have a word to yourself and be like, fuck, no,

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>not today. You know I'm getting the first servey in

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going for it and I know I'm going

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to make it, or if you know that, you're like

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:29.839
<v Speaker 1>faking it till you make it and you know you're

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit tight and so you get you feel

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 1>your arm a little bit heavy. You got to just

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 1>get that first survey in, like just the first point.

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Just get a good first serve in and what use

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.919
<v Speaker 1>what you use and do as well as anyone, which

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>is run a million balls down, smack some backhands, hit

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the height on your forehand and make your opponent beat you. Instead,

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>it was it was opposite. It was the opposite in

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:58.879
<v Speaker 1>this match, Like she actually gave away three points at five,

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>four and five all she gave those away. She had

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a swinging volley that missed and like so there was

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>there was about six points that she probably if she

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 1>just pulled back a little bit and not push the ball.

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>That's not what I'm talking about.

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 3>But margin, percentage, play of your strength, smacking back hands.

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Make Sablenka in that moment beat you. If she steps

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:19.479
<v Speaker 1>up and hits a couple of winners, you go, okay,

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I've got to be a little bit more aggressive. I mean,

0:39:21.120 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you do have to calculate all this when you're out there.

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying that, Yeah that's not easy, but

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it's this is the separator, right, Well, was what rude?

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Did you know? He got tight in the second set.

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 1>He's like, oh, just make it and then Jack went

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 1>bang and so he's like, shit, I can't do that.

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So if I want to win this match. I have

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to go for it. So you have to get that

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 1>layer of the land when you're out there. But the

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>most important thing for Coco is do not give away

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a free point by double folding. That is the killer

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:49.440
<v Speaker 1>for her. And because it gives your opponents so much

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>breathing room, they just go, okay, okay, she's tight. I'll

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>probably get a free couple of points here, and that

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>makes a world a.

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:58.839
<v Speaker 3>Difference for you, and then Sablanca's shoulders relax and then

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 3>she can swing for you. You know, there's so many

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 3>more things than just the point it happens.

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's really.

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 1>It's a mental match against a mental match as well

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:08.800
<v Speaker 1>as well as hitting four hands and back ends. But anyway,

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 1>congrats to sable Anca, who had lost a couple of

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>finals so this year. So it was I'm sure when

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 1>she was down that set point to Coco thinking fucking hell,

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 1>am I going to lose this match?

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 2>As well? Were the Australian and Australia.

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 1>Lots. She's lost a lot of finals. She just lost

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to Yeah stood too like so she's lost a lot

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:33.879
<v Speaker 1>of finals this year. Anyway, Yes, Naomi Osaka goes down.

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 1>We talked about this a couple of weeks ago. It

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:38.359
<v Speaker 1>was the last week week, Yeah, most last week. How

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it was a good move for her to go down

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to a lower level. And you know, somebody I read

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things on the social media's and someone

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 1>was like, well, I mean, she can't win that tournament,

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:50.799
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, can you guys just do a funk off?

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, have you ever on a tournament win

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Grand Slams? Winning a tournament period, like you know, you

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 3>gotta every day. Yes, granted the level was much lower,

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:02.840
<v Speaker 3>but still like, this is somebody who's really struggled profoundly.

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, especially on the surface, like kudos, it's.

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Still first tournament.

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 3>You can control who you're playing. Yeah, you know, maybe

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean a streaky, amazing person.

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 1>And what people don't realize, Caitline, is the amount of

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>pressure that would have been on her shoulders to win

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that tournament. If you don't win this tournament, yeah you

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be playing anymore, That's right. And so she's like,

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I've seen players go back to playing challenges like twenty

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:26.880
<v Speaker 1>fives and fifties to get matches, you know that ranked

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that are ranked outside of the top two hundred and

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty now that were ranked inside the top twenty. It's like,

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard and it's a lot of pressure on you.

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>It's why a lot of them don't go down to

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the lower levels because they don't want that even more

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>pressure on them to win the tournament. So I give

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 1>her a ton of credit for doing that. It's going

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 1>to give her a lot of Listen, we'll see how

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 1>she does going in the next couple of weeks. I

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to play her.

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:49.319
<v Speaker 2>No, I wouldn't want to play it either.

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 3>And also, like you know, kind of the upside of

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 3>having a weak surface is it doesn't matter like you're

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 3>going to get some wins on a surface.

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 2>That you notably don't like.

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in a part of the year that you notably

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 3>not you know, don't really show up to you, I'm like,

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 3>win when I lift. This gives her more bounds to

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:08.279
<v Speaker 3>go back into the rest of the season with like

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:10.880
<v Speaker 3>sort of a renewed headspace, like I'm off for it.

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I did love that she put on the job application online.

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Did you see that she said for those that are

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember if herbade him, but it was basically

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 1>like she put hey for the haters, here's here, you know,

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 1>try this and she put a job application, so you

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 1>plan now, doesn't tell me to get a job. I've

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>got a job. Why don't you get a job? I

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>thought that was her love that.

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 3>I wish she would tell her Evolve Agency co co

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:38.799
<v Speaker 3>founder Nick Curious to get a job instead of.

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Being you know what's funny. I got a photo from

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 1>my my best friend's daughter is going to university in Canberra?

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Is he there?

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:50.439
<v Speaker 1>And he lives in Canberra, he's from there, and she's

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 1>going to university there doing a law degree. And because

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>she's smart, and Freya texted me and she goes, oh, hey,

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 1>look who I ran into at a bar. Of course,

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Nick Carrious at a bus, wind sprints really getting self

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 1>prepared to play Wimbledon. I don't know what he's doing,

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>but anyway, just really quick. One thing we didn't talk

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 1>about was mir Andreva and Coco. Like that was Coco

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 1>has it over Mira. I agree the last couple of matches,

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 1>but Mira just went off the boil like I don't

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 1>know what happened. I don't know what happened with her.

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:27.320
<v Speaker 1>It was very strange.

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 2>It was like a pre this season. Mir andrev who

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 2>has she just.

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Got the ships in that first set and it just

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 1>like was like, I'm out of here, man. It was weird.

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Con she did not look happy in that situation.

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 2>I thought, that's also and she's still young.

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I also swear about.

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:45.279
<v Speaker 3>Sabalannka, which is like, you know, one of the things

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 3>that makes some of these players uh fun is that,

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's a little bit of crazy.

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:52.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, a little bit of crazy.

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:52.920
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 3>In case anyone forgot, because mir Andreva has been playing

0:43:55.520 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 3>poised above her age.

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>The seventeen year olds down there.

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 3>For a couple of games, it's going to be a

0:44:02.000 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 3>complete mediac Listen, this is one of my favorite tiends

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 3>of the year. There is no more beautiful tennis court

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 3>than the for Italica.

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Are you upset about what they've done to the court

0:44:10.920 --> 0:44:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the second court?

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:14.399
<v Speaker 3>Actually yes, because that should be the most beautiful court

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:17.839
<v Speaker 3>and you cannot put metal stands around it.

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's come on, what are you doing to I mean,

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:23.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously it used to get packed, so they wanted to

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:25.320
<v Speaker 1>have the availability of having.

0:44:25.480 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Build another stadium.

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:28.240
<v Speaker 1>You build another stadium, I agree.

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:28.839
<v Speaker 2>See him? Come on right?

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Anyway, so Rome is going on it's about to start.

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 2>We're going to see really excited.

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Sabalanca number one seed, Canon is in her

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:40.839
<v Speaker 1>little section of the drawer there. Can we just give

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 1>it up for Sophia Cannon back to she's thirty first

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:47.439
<v Speaker 1>seed in Rome, which I imagine she's probably thirty two

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>in the world or thirty one in the world. What

0:44:49.200 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a great effort over the last couple of years, because

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>she's had a bloody hard time, and so I give

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 1>her a lot of credit for being ranked and seeded.

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 1>And she's going to be seated at the French and

0:44:56.880 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just really happy to se Ayla and Costure. First

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:04.359
<v Speaker 1>round in Rome is going to be real fun to watch.

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:06.600
<v Speaker 3>We don't even talk about Murta Chaste because she had

0:45:06.600 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot to say about the randolation. Well, she was right, Sabka, Yeah,

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 3>she was right.

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 1>You can't take your first serve and then be like

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:15.359
<v Speaker 1>it's raining, I can't serve now.

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Drama follows.

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:20.759
<v Speaker 1>Marta is a little bit of a dec drama here

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of a DCU. But she was right

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 1>in the circumstance.

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 2>It was agreed.

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>You can't just serve and go oh no, I can't

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 1>say too bad.

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 2>You hear, but I do think like just yeah, tap

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 2>the bricks.

0:45:34.360 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 1>But I remember you've got the bella Russian Ukrainian thing there.

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm here for one DQ and one di qu only

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:40.800
<v Speaker 2>and that's daniel Collins.

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:42.080
<v Speaker 1>What about Danielle?

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what about it?

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:44.839
<v Speaker 1>We haven't seen any hydro here of her.

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Danielle.

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 1>I think she's collecting the cash all these tournaments and

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>walking away.

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm that's gonna be my wild code. I'm calling it out.

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Room, no chance, maybe a random one is whatever happened

0:45:57.200 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to Bianca and rescue. I know she's had a ton

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of injuries and all that stuff. But your fellow Canadian

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 1>is she just.

0:46:02.280 --> 0:46:04.839
<v Speaker 3>Won a doubles title in at that. I think same

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 3>challenger when Nemeas.

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Was well there you go, look at that. You were

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 1>so open champions going back to A one twenty five

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to get some confidents. Sometimes she can get it in

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 1>doubles grade. She has a pretty good first round. So

0:46:14.400 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>she will play Donna Vekitch in the second round if

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:17.879
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, and that might be an interesting little

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:21.319
<v Speaker 1>matchup because Donna has not been playing well this year

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 1>at all. Changed a coach at the start of this year.

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why she had a great year last year.

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:29.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't have that other coach just didn't want to

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:31.879
<v Speaker 1>be involved. And PAMs Driver is still doing a little

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:35.959
<v Speaker 1>bit with Donna but went to Sasha Bajan and really

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 1>has only won a couple has not played well all year.

0:46:38.680 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 1>So how long is that little coaching situation going to last?

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Kinwin chin win? I think you should say, because you

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 1>get mad at me if I don't say it correctly,

0:46:47.800 --> 0:46:50.040
<v Speaker 1>correct pronuncision. I know, but I have this fight with

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 1>my fellow some of my fellow commentators ARSI is in particular. No,

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I tell you what the problem is. Caitlin on the

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 1>wt website, she says kinwin. Do you know this? Have

0:46:58.520 --> 0:46:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you looked at her thing?

0:46:59.440 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes? She has decided that you can call her chin win,

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:04.480
<v Speaker 3>kinwin or Anna, And it's like, no, guys, just go

0:47:04.560 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 3>with your correct pronunc You should have n.

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I call her chin win, thank you, because I know

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:11.279
<v Speaker 1>that's the correct way to say it in Chinese. But

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:13.839
<v Speaker 1>when you're working with someone who refuses to call them

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>chin win and calls them kin win. Because the WTA website.

0:47:17.400 --> 0:47:19.880
<v Speaker 2>It's a hard the WTO website.

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I know, but this is the these are the arguments

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I have in my ESPN Green role.

0:47:24.080 --> 0:47:26.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad that, by the way, but I'm.

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:27.799
<v Speaker 1>Going with gin win because that's how you say it.

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's gonna be interesting. We'll see how Coco, you know,

0:47:31.800 --> 0:47:33.480
<v Speaker 1>turns it up again. She has a pretty good draw.

0:47:33.560 --> 0:47:36.880
<v Speaker 1>She'll probably play either Benchic or Lynette in like the

0:47:36.960 --> 0:47:40.360
<v Speaker 1>round of thirty two. But I like her draw a lot.

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:44.080
<v Speaker 1>A player that's back, Amanda Anissa Mova back from a

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 1>bit of injury, so we'll see how she does in

0:47:46.640 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 1>this tournament. And a Navarro has been a play that

0:47:48.640 --> 0:47:49.439
<v Speaker 1>has not played well.

0:47:49.560 --> 0:47:51.720
<v Speaker 3>She had such a great year last year that following

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:53.279
<v Speaker 3>it up this year I think was always going to

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 3>be a tough order. Yeah, and you're right, she's really

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 3>looked like she's missed a step.

0:47:58.440 --> 0:48:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Nice. You know, it's nice to see vondrous over back

0:48:01.320 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in the tournament in Rome. Yeah. Man, that girl has

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:07.560
<v Speaker 1>just had no luck with her injuries. Test terrible and

0:48:07.600 --> 0:48:10.759
<v Speaker 1>so well. Well, we'll see, of course, mere Andreva, We'll

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:13.080
<v Speaker 1>see how she fares this week. I think maybe it's.

0:48:13.320 --> 0:48:17.319
<v Speaker 3>The biggest question mark for realm is eager. It's her

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:19.040
<v Speaker 3>tournament under normal circumstances.

0:48:19.200 --> 0:48:21.839
<v Speaker 1>It is her tournament without question. I mean, she won

0:48:21.880 --> 0:48:24.879
<v Speaker 1>a final there against one of the biggest service we've

0:48:24.880 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 1>ever had in a women's game, Caroline Pushkoba. Oh and

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 1>oh in a final.

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:32.440
<v Speaker 2>They should have made him play a third set.

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:36.399
<v Speaker 1>You know what, we decided we're going to do best

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of five and we're starting it right now. Oh and

0:48:40.400 --> 0:48:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to be Carolina, I mean, Carolina made the final, winning

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of matches, hitting the ball. Well. I just

0:48:47.960 --> 0:48:49.839
<v Speaker 1>want people to know I was not coaching her at

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the time, because there's no effing way I would let

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 1>my player loose and I would be like, you were

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:56.360
<v Speaker 1>hitting under arm, you were doing whatever you need to

0:48:56.400 --> 0:49:01.400
<v Speaker 1>do win a game. Again. Interestingly, Caitlin in the little

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:05.319
<v Speaker 1>round of thirty two in Rome, is potential that your

0:49:05.400 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>girl animal will play against Eager Let's go, So that

0:49:11.160 --> 0:49:12.400
<v Speaker 1>will be an interesting situation.

0:49:12.680 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 2>As good as you Lena as Yeah.

0:49:14.760 --> 0:49:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And Switzerlina is down that section of the drawer who's

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:20.640
<v Speaker 1>also had a great year sam Sonova, So I'm excited.

0:49:20.680 --> 0:49:24.719
<v Speaker 1>This is this is This section of the draw for

0:49:25.760 --> 0:49:29.120
<v Speaker 1>EGA is pretty good, although Naomi Osaka is down that

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:31.360
<v Speaker 1>section of the draw too and could play Bodoza in

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the second round, so we'll see. Let's go parla anyway,

0:49:33.920 --> 0:49:35.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, Well, you've got a lot to get to

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Rome next week, and of course

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the French Open is around the corner and Max, yeah, etcetera.

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Taking the French Sadly, I will not be there. I'm

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:46.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bummed about it. I'm not gonna lie. Yeah,

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:50.280
<v Speaker 1>but we will be here for you for the French Open.

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>But in the meantime, thanks for joining us today, Katelin.

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Anything else you want to say, No, I'm just so excited.

0:49:54.600 --> 0:49:55.719
<v Speaker 1>This is like the part of the season.

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:56.720
<v Speaker 2>You love business.

0:49:56.800 --> 0:49:57.279
<v Speaker 1>I do love.

0:49:57.320 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 2>I love the whole thing is I love forgetting Yeah,

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:01.200
<v Speaker 2>I love.

0:50:01.120 --> 0:50:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Of waking up. I'm not an early riser, as you know, Caitlyn,

0:50:04.560 --> 0:50:07.400
<v Speaker 1>so for me to get up early and watch these matches,

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that's how much I love tennis.

0:50:10.120 --> 0:50:13.600
<v Speaker 2>I love watching tennis in the morning and then playing

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:15.080
<v Speaker 2>tennis in the afternoon. It's the best.

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, Caitlin, we have to play a little tennis because

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I got invited back to play in the old farts

0:50:19.480 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 1>at Wimbledon.

0:50:20.160 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 2>So if you will deem to play tennis with me.

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:24.359
<v Speaker 1>I have not hit a ball in a while, and

0:50:24.440 --> 0:50:27.120
<v Speaker 1>so I need to start, all right. Wonderful. On that note,

0:50:27.320 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 1>preparation for Wimbledon starts, for Stubbs Time starts today, and

0:50:32.320 --> 0:50:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the French Open two weeks away. Don't wait, all right, guys,

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for Johnny to say okay bye,