WEBVTT - Prediction Markets with Rebecca Ungarino and Nick Devor

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Also media.

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Better Offline. I am, of course your host

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 2>ed Zeitron. Now we're back in the studio in beautiful

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 2>New York City, New York State. You need to check

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 2>out the show notes. Of course, we have these beautiful

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 2>fuck Data Center t shirts. Subscribe to my newsletter and

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 2>so on and so forth. But today joining me at

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Swaggage Claim are two of Barons's finest reporters, the legendary

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Nick Dever who handles the gambling industry, and the Wall

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Street reporting legend Rebecca Ungarno. Thank you so much for

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:48.639
<v Speaker 2>joining us now, Nick, Yes, we have had so many

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 2>people emailing about prediction markets, and you cover the gambling

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 2>industry as well. How are they different? How are they

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 2>not the same thing, because they very much seem similar. Yeah.

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 3>I think from a consumer point of view, there's very

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:05.199
<v Speaker 3>difference between these products. You put money on the line,

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 3>if your team wins, you get paid out. So from

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 3>like a layman's point of view, I think there's very

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 3>little difference. However, there is a difference on a gambling

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 3>In gambling, you're betting against the house, so the betting

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 3>firm sets the odds that you're betting against, right whereas

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 3>in a prediction market, your counter party is another trader.

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 3>So trader or prediction markets are just essentially brokers that

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 3>are putting two traders together on one contract. And I

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 3>can explain that in a little more detail.

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 2>If you like, please.

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 3>So prediction markets sell what are called event contracts. So

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 3>event contracts are futures contracts. They're also called binary options,

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 3>and they're built around yes or no questions. So each

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 3>contract is worth one dollar, and it has two traders.

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 3>There's a trader on the yes side and there's a

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 3>trader on the no side. So like, will this podcast

0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 3>go well, we can make that a prediction market. I hope,

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 3>I hope it goes well.

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's get this. I'm just set that up right now. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 3>So if person A thinks there's a seventy five percent

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 3>chance that it will go well, and person B thinks

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 3>there's a twenty five percent chance that it will not

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 3>go well, person A pays seventy five cents and person

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 3>B pays twenty five cents. Right, So if it turns

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 3>out yes, the yes trader gets the twenty five cents

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 3>put up by the no trader and makes and now

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 3>has a dollar contract. Now, let's say on a second contract,

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 3>person C thinks there's a twenty five percent chance of yes,

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 3>person D thinks there's a seventy five percent chance of no.

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.399
<v Speaker 3>So these two contracts where the odds are flipped average out,

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 3>and there's a fifty to fifty chance that this podcast

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 3>goes well, right, right, So the price of the contract

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 3>is the predictions, and prediction markets are just brokers. The

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 3>businesses themselves are just connecting to trades.

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 2>So where's the crypto side as well? Because I remember

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 2>when polymarkets started it was a weird crypto thing. But

0:02:59.200 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 2>is it still that?

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would say it's still a weird crypto thing.

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 3>They most of their business is still their international side

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.679
<v Speaker 3>where they just take I think it's US d T,

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 3>it's some stable coin of that. They all of the

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 3>contracts are traded on that. That's poly Market. They're an

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 3>offshore run company. Yeah, offshore meaning right, yeah, I love this,

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 3>yeah yeah, meaning not regulated in the US, not a

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 3>US US based company. Contrast that with Calshi. Calshi was

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 3>the first registered designated contract market by the CFTC that's

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 3>the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. They regulate all of this stuff,

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 3>and so Calshi was the first firm to actually do

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 3>this in what we would call like the legal way,

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 3>whereas poly Market does not have to abide by the

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 3>US regulations because they are not a US firm and

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 3>they're trying to become They've gotten permissioned to operate in

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 3>the US, but they're like slowly rolling that out. A

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 3>lot of people in the US don't have Polymarket US accounts. Yeah,

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 3>if you want to trade on poly Market in the US,

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 3>you're mostly using a VPN.

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 2>A new zone, but you unique crypto to do it. Yes. Yeah.

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.359
<v Speaker 3>For the international site, this feel was.

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 2>Like it be rife with manipulation though.

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, definitely I think that there because poly market operates,

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 3>you know, on the blockchain, it's generally all anonymous, and

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 3>it's very easy to get any kind of market you

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 3>want created, there's a lot of concern around manipulation. I

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 3>think A helpful example is there was some football game

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 3>or some sporting event, and there was a market for

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 3>will someone streak at this event, you know, run onto

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 3>the field naked, and someone did end up streaking, and

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 3>the person that ended up streaking was someone who was

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 3>trading on the market, you know, betting yes that someone

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 3>would end up streaking, and then they went and did it,

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 3>and so they made you know, hundreds of thousands of dollars,

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 3>paid a small fine relative to the sporting people. And

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 3>you know, now we have so you get into this question.

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 3>I think a hopeful metaphor is like our prediction markets,

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 3>a thermostat or a thermometer. Are they like accurately pricing

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 3>the potential outcome? You know, are they saying that something

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 3>is going to happen? Or by their very existence do

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 3>they make something more likely to happen?

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Right, Rebecca, How's how are the banker's dealing with this?

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 2>How's Wall Street looking at this? Because this it's tough

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 2>to really grosp whether this is gambling or a futures contract,

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 2>like banging on the chance of stock will go up,

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 2>will go down, And.

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>There's such a big difference right now.

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 4>It's really interesting because the banks themselves, and this is

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 4>separate from like the market makers or like you know,

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 4>higher frequency trading firms. The banks themselves are very highly

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 4>regulated by like three main agencies, the OCC the Office

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 4>of the Controller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve, and

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 4>the FD I see. So they're how they regulated, and

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 4>then they have a bunch of like state agencies that

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 4>regulate them too. So far, the biggest banks have stayed

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 4>pretty quiet on how they're thinking about these and they're

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, kind of waiting for this regulatory you know clarity.

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 4>It reminds me a little bit of you know, bitcoin

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 4>and crypto going mainstream, you know, ten eleven years ago,

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.799
<v Speaker 4>we're waiting for regulators. We're waiting for regulators, and banks

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 4>are They're really complex. They have a bunch of different

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 4>businesses where they could come in and you know, for example,

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 4>on the banking side, the investment bankers, you know, have

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 4>an interest in well, do we want to help them

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 4>raise money? Do we want to help them raise capital

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 4>or take them public?

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 2>Oh, they're touching any of the fundraising.

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 4>They they could my understanding, you would know better than me.

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 4>On Calsham and poly Market who their investors are. Is

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 4>a VC is a PE?

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's I think it's mostly vcs right now. But

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 3>they're both targeting There was recent reporting in the Wall

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Street Journal that they're both poly Market and Calshi are

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 3>targeting twenty billion dollar valuations.

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Now it's just crazy, just totally totally business though.

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's that's kind of the thing is there's not

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 3>like the there's not a lot of difference between trading

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 3>on poly market and trading on CALSHI, Like you're trading

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 3>the same kind of the same contract and in effect,

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 3>like it's the same kind of product that's being traded.

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 3>So you kind of get into a similar thing that

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 3>the sports betting businesses had to deal with, where fan

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 3>duel and draft kings are essentially you know, identical products

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 3>selling you know, identical products and trying to differentiate themselves.

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 3>And so we'll see in the coming months how how

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 3>that ends up working, Rebecca, on the on the.

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, we'll be usually well, I mean, and on

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 4>the trading side, it's a whole other like on the

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 4>other side of the house exactly. Yeah, And like at

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 4>the bank, so like you know, these massive trading businesses.

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 4>It's so some of the reporting that we have so

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 4>far and we're you know, working on this now and

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 4>again the banks are being very tight lept on what

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 4>they're saying about what they're getting involved in or not

0:07:55.640 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 4>getting involved in. This is something that so the investment banks,

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 4>they're like the bankers, the trading desks and then the

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 4>research and that's totally separate, and there's like this firewall, right,

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 4>so research analysts are definitely like looking at these things

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 4>just like any other input, any other source of information.

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 4>Of course, it's yes, there are differences, but it's like, okay,

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 4>well what is cal she saying about this when you know,

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 4>maybe a commodity's analyst who's looking at exactly exactly and

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 4>just another input to look at. So that's all well

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 4>and good. You can look at that. On the trading side, though,

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 4>it's more complicated because again the CFTC, like Nick brought up,

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 4>the Commodity Futures and Trading Commission that you know regulates

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 4>crypto and you know, is now regulating some of these

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.839
<v Speaker 4>prediction marked auctivities. They have to weigh in and they

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 4>have you know, to some extent, but they're waiting for

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 4>kind of a more complete look at Okay, golden sacks,

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, traders or enter any other like big bank traders,

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 4>Like what are we able to trade now? That is

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 4>still kind of out there, right. There are event contracts

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 4>like political elections and you know, things like that quote

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 4>event contracts, right, and then there are other markets where

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 4>on securities where it's like uh, that culture polymarket.

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Market you can you can do like will and video

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 3>stock end the day up or down right, And this

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.359
<v Speaker 3>is something that is happening every day.

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Right exactly.

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 4>And that's a little more complicated because then you are

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 4>dealing with securities rather than just like some amorphis like

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 4>event contract.

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 2>So it's like complicated, but legally speaking that I'm sure

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 2>someone will argue, well, this isn't a security because I'm

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 2>betting on an outcome rather than scary itself.

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Totally, totally, totally.

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Also set us up for something kind of dystopian though,

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 2>if these if banks or traders start trading on these

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 2>markets where you have some of the bank interest and

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.559
<v Speaker 2>whether I don't know, a guy streaks ye oh, whether

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 2>a place gets blown up, like this is where I

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 2>think the fringes of insanity begin.

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 4>Definitely completely, and I just like I'll want you to

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 4>weigh in or yeah, yeah, yeah, but like it just

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 4>opens a whole new for banks that are so regulated. Yeah,

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 4>it opens up a whole new source of like potential

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 4>liability and like you've done more reporting on.

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 3>That, yeah, yeah, we've we've from what we've heard there,

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 3>the banks are not as interested in those kinds of

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 3>markets just because there's no like, you know, they don't

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 3>have an election every single day, and like these destinies

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:19.599
<v Speaker 3>to make money, right, so there needs to be like

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 3>a sustainable, constant kind of liquidity and like enough events

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 3>for them to actually you know, participate in the markets

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 3>and the kind of like securities related markets that maybe

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 3>these banks would be more interested in that they would

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 3>have a better edge on whatever. Those are still mostly

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 3>on poly market, and I really doubt that you know,

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 3>a tightly regulated like US based bank is going to

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 3>want to be trading like in stable coin, like on

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 3>poly market against you know, potential insiders all of this stuff.

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 3>That just doesn't sound like appealing, I would imagine.

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 2>But what about asset like the areas of the world,

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 2>or like private equity vms or private credit firms? Aren't

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 2>they different? And might they be dumb? Like might they

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 2>get them? Might they get themselves involved in I just

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 2>like yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. When I see the data

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 2>center stuff, when I hear in this private credit the

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 2>private credit stuff with like tricula and first brands and

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 2>positive gen and uh, I forget whatever was it was

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 2>the there was the one there's now one in Europe

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 2>where that's us. Yeah. Yeah, the random Onneswer is just

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 2>like yeah, you know when we said we promised you

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 2>this collateral, we also promised it to seventeen other people. Sorry. Yeah,

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 2>I worry that they are going to start, like are

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 2>they allowed to It's.

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 4>A great question and my reporting and it's a great storage.

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 4>It's a great question. I'm not entirely sure like where, if,

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 4>and how they're coming into these things. In other words,

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't be surprised. I don't know, but I wouldn't

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.119
<v Speaker 4>be surprised if one of the big private credit players,

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.959
<v Speaker 4>which is again like some of these things are they

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 4>are just very lightly regulated banks, like to be clear, right,

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 4>like they are lending money like and private credit.

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it is a huge put.

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 2>So cool, so good.

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I love that.

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 4>It's a huge debate right now, like is private credit

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 4>means a lot of different things whatever, But at the

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 4>end of the day, it is lending outside of the

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 4>banking system, Okay, like that that is safe to say.

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised if

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 4>there's you know, like a calshie like a polymarket, if

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 4>there is you know, kind of lending from these firms.

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, but they are becoming the private credit

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, players are becoming so much more active in

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 4>the private sector, and and just all these private, privately

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 4>held companies where there's a whole matrix of like areas

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 4>where they could become involved. I don't know that, and

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 4>I would be curious, but it's probably an input that

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 4>they're looking at too, like just a research you know, input, right,

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 4>Like you know, we like we look at oh, what

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 4>is it saying about that we take about the grain

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 4>of salt, But like, you know, it's still something we're

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 4>going to look at. But it's an interesting question.

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 3>They are the predictions, yeah, sorry, they are. They are

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 3>quite accurate. The you know, there's you know, we can

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 3>there can be arguments made about whether or not they

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 3>are like good for society, whether it's like an okay

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 3>thing that we can bet on, you know, every single

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of I think the the CAUSHI CEO trect Mansur

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 3>his quote is that you know, we want to make

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 3>a monetizable asset out of every difference in opinion Jesus.

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Christ, which is like that's like, yeah, the paraphrase Will

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Manicer of Chapo when he was seeing a video of

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 2>a new sport with two guys run into each other.

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 2>You see, this is the kind of thing you do

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 2>in like.

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Robo call, that's what it's giving.

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 2>It's like, yeah, we could very like near future dystopian. Well,

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 2>someone who spends a lot of time lives in Vegas.

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 2>I just want to say, this is an insult to

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 2>my beautiful gambling. Yeah, beautiful honest dice roll even all

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 2>crapsless craps and not this crappy. Yeah, it's it's very strange,

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 2>and I think we've discussed.

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 4>That's a new state motto. By the way, I really

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 4>like that our craps are not this crappy.

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I love that.

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna rush into that T shirt.

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 1>I love that.

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 2>No, it's it is really scary though. Someone. I feel

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 2>like someone's going to die from this, Like it's gonna

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be this person dies by December thirty first,

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 2>and they're going to get hunted like running men.

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, that's okay, So we're almost there.

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 3>So recently, actually there was a bit of controversy over

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 3>like I guess what we would call death markets on Calshi.

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 3>So when the US attacked Iran. There were lots of

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 3>markets on both poly Market and Calshi related to military

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 3>action in Iran, whether it would happen or not, by

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 3>when it would happen. Usually these are formatted in like,

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, military strikes in Iran by xedate. Yeah, so

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 3>one of the contracts that both Calshi and Polymarket had

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 3>wash Camanie out by x date. Right, so this is

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 3>the supreme leader of Iran. Will he be out as

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 3>preme leader by this date? So the like layman's interpretation

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 3>of that would mean if he dies, he's out right.

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, that's probably how you would So was he

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 3>in office anymore, he's dead, he's probably out right. So

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 3>when on that Saturday Trump announced that he had been

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 3>killed on poly Market, poly Market resolved their contract. Yes

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 3>he is out right, right, But Calshi did not do this.

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 3>They froze, well, they like pause the market for like

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 3>eight hours to like figure out how to handle this.

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 2>What is the consequence of posing the market just to him? Claire, Oh,

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 2>it's just that there's no more trading happening, right, does

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 2>the price move at all? So it's just frozen. It's

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 2>just frozen.

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 3>And what they did is they reset when they made

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 3>their decision, they refunded everyone their stakes the value of

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 3>their contracts at last traded price before death. So if

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 3>there was like a seventy four percent chance that he

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 3>would be out at twelve fifty nine and he died

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 3>at one, then they would pay the Yes, contract would

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 3>pay out seventy four cents, right, right, So they did

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 3>that in order to isolate the death component, right because Calshi,

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 3>in what they have told me, they don't want to

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 3>allow people to profit on death. That's just not something

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 3>they're interested in doing.

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 3>However, there was very large controversy around this because all

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 3>of the Calshi traders who hopped on the Calshi and

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 3>were like, oh cool, yeah, he's probably going to be out,

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 3>I'll bet on this, they were Suddenly they did not

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 3>get the money that they expected to. And Cawshi had

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 3>like in its rules, in its rule book that was

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 3>like laid out, there was like some fine print. But yeah,

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 3>we get into this like weird question of like why

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 3>didn't they pay because he was out?

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Like what was the death?

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 3>They don't want people? Death was a carve out? There

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 3>was a death carve out, so out by any other

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 3>means but death. Now, the Commanie was like in his

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 3>mid eighties, so it's kind of hard to imagine that

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 3>he was going to resign or like, you know, they

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 3>don't hold snap elections, so I don't really know. So

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 3>it was just resignation, I guess that, you know, or

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 3>like kidnapping like we saw in Venezuela. Maybe that was

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 3>its own own yeah episode, Yeah, that was its own thing,

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, was was what happened in Venezuela. Does that

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 3>count as like a war or just like an encourage?

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 3>So we get into all these really weird questions when

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 3>the quote unquote oracle of these prediction markets is only

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 3>resolving based on very specific outcomes, and so at a

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 3>certain point, the entire point of these prediction markets is

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 3>that they provide ways to hedge outcomes that you can't

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 3>find in other markets. Yes, there's no way to like

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 3>hedge against that happening in the stock market, and like

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 3>a clean way, right, but if like, like, okay, so

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 3>let's say that I'm a business owner and I want

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 3>to hedge against the pos stability that Trump does not

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 3>finish this term from my point of view as a

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 3>business owner, if he dies or resigns or is impeached.

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 3>None of all of those three things fulfill the same

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:14.959
<v Speaker 3>thing for me, and I need a hedge against all

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 3>of those outcomes. But if we don't allow these markets

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 3>to resolve on death, and you know, we can argue

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 3>whether or not we could we should, they by definition

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 3>become less valuable hedging tools. And so you kind of

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 3>get into this point spot where you're like, what are

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 3>these actually for? Like who is the person that's hedging

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 3>against Camanie resigning?

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Like you know what I mean? It feels like I

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I have a weird view of this and

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 2>that I think prediction markets are scary and vile and

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 2>they enable something, but I also think they're a condition

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 2>created by the stock market brain take. But I think

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 2>that the stock market has stopped being logical in any way,

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 2>shape or form, and regular people, despite I would say,

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 2>what was like three or four years ago and Robinhood

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 2>went really nuts on options, I think that regular people

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 2>do not have access to a logical or rational way

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 2>of investing. Like you can't just invest in a company

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 2>for being good. You can't invest in a clean outcome

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 2>because you're going to dine up against hedge funds and

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 2>whoever fast trading and such that you couldn't possibly keep up.

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 2>They have information you don't have. There's no way you

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 2>could possibly keep up. I'm not saying prediction markets are good.

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 2>I think they're terrifying. They are RoboCop shit. But it

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 2>feels like something that could only occur in a world

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 2>where there is not enough other ways to accumulate wealth.

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I could not agree more.

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 4>And I think that one thing, like to this point,

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 4>It was a few weeks ago, and I might have

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 4>even said it to you, but there was an AD

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 4>and I don't want to say for a certain it

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 4>was either Caulci or polymarket, but it came up on

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 4>TikTok or Instagram, and it was an AD or like

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 4>a user user generated content type thing where a woman

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 4>was holding a coffee and the did we talk about this?

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 4>And the tagline again it was for one of them.

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to misspeak, but it said, you know,

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 4>like my bet will pay for my coffee, you know,

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 4>like my you know, da da da. And I was like,

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 4>oh my god, that is so bleak because it really

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 4>speaks to this broad like and again financialization of everything,

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 4>not I you know, that's a big conversation right now.

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 4>It's talking about a world in which it is hard

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 4>to accumulate wealth. I mean, just to state the most

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 4>obvious thing, you know, and like, you know, just broad inequality.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 4>My bet will help me pay for my like again,

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 4>and I get it, Like I get that on I

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 4>get why that would be an advertisement, and like I understand,

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 4>but that is so you know, it's like a young woman,

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 4>a young person, and it's like, oh my god, that

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 4>is what that is a symptom of, you know, sort

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 4>of like the world we're living in. And I'm not

0:20:56.240 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 4>saying that's good or bad. I mean it probably it's bleak.

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 4>It's like very bleak.

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 2>It's the growth. It's the same thing with sports scambling.

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 2>And sports gambling seems for now like a lot more

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 2>exploitative because they have the account managers who come and

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 2>they're like, hey, you've lost three grand, why don't we

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 2>give you two grand? Work of credit? Yeah, and all

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 2>of these these ways that you could leverage that it

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 2>is exploiting the fact that because if you think about

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 2>other stock market is these days, what the fuck are

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 2>you meant to do if you if you actually if

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 2>you invest in a company based on its fundamentals, you're

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 2>going to lose money probably. Yeah, It's like Oracle is

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 2>twelve percent up right now. I think we're just going

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 2>out in a week, so who knows where it will be.

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Even though they had like negative twenty four billion dollars

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 2>cash flow, they're obviously misleading people when it comes to

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 2>how like their capex because they're going to spend only

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 2>fifty billion this year and they've already spent over forty

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 2>that work. But if you, if you, because the market

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and their hedge funds have decided there's something else they'd

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 2>like to do, you cannot join that. So what your

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 2>other options you've got? I don't know, Betting on the

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:06.880
<v Speaker 2>slap fights, yeah, Micheal slap competition, you've got sports gambling,

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 2>and you've got this big, impenetrable thing at the stock market.

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 2>But then you've got these seemingly honest, easy bets of Oh,

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 2>I can just bet on an outcome that's fair. Yeah,

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 2>unless the outcome is full of asterisks?

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes, correct? Yeah, yeah, I think there was some there

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 3>was some research recently. I don't know how I should.

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 3>I saw this on Twitter disclaimer that like only thirty

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 3>two and a half percent of prediction market customers are profitable, right,

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 3>so two thirds of players are losers.

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's gamblingbling you.

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I think, yeah, we when we get into this,

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 3>I think gen Z especially, there's a certain amount of

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 3>financial nihilism just general, like dread visa via the future

0:22:58.320 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 3>and how am I ever going to have a house

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 3>and et cetera, et cetera, and oh here's poly market.

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 3>They let me bet on you know, whether Trump will

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 3>say China in his speech.

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 2>And how many times he'll say it.

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah, this could be a fun thing.

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 2>That I could make money on to it, like you

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 2>could make you could pay for your coffee with it. Yes,

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 2>and yes, I will admit. My favorite Cauchy story is

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 2>the one that I'm sure both of you read, where

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 2>it's they tried to hire a fifteen year old streamer

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 2>and I quote your brother legal team confirmed that we

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 2>can't work with minors. R N kind of sad DBH, the.

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>R N and the TVHR.

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 5>Brother.

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>It really just brings it all together.

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 2>It really brings it together. But also you need to

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 2>watch Running Man because all of this just reminds me

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 2>of that moment, just just like the I get your

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 2>slop in a bowl on whether Trump will will say

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 2>a difference, it's cool nuclear the N word, like how

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 2>many times will he do that? And he's done that

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 2>many times, by the way, did not joke indeed, which

0:23:55.960 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 2>is yet another dystopian thing. Yes, it just feel like

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 2>the actual solution here would be more regulation of banks

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 2>and also getting rid of all of this. I think

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 2>sports gamblings. I know you probably can't come out on

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 2>this directly, but I think sports gambling is like one

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 2>of the most noxious things because living in Vegas, gambling

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 2>is everywhere, but it's also very very regulated. If you listen,

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 2>if you look anything close to twenty one, they will

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 2>come and card you, and they will chase you a

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 2>wrend like they know I'm coming up on forty and

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 2>they still like d me sometimes I'm beautiful en not but.

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you look you don't look a day over, you

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 3>look youth twenty.

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 2>But nevertheless it's you. It's because they know that gambling

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 2>is scary and that it's addictive, and that a win

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 2>can make you think every other one will happen. Except

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 2>now it's just you can do it anywhere. You can

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 2>just do it. Everything in the phone you've got every

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 2>device you can gamble. Ah. There are Instagram accounts, yes,

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 2>that just there's there's this one with a guy who

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.360
<v Speaker 2>just dresses up like an old man and has beer

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 2>full of bush fridge full of bush light and it's

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 2>just him being like and he's on a gambling site that.

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 4>Is extremely extremely bleak. And I think it's yeah, and

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 4>I think that like it is prompting like in the

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 4>more traditional like so in banking and kind of like

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 4>I think it is prompting these bigger questions and kind

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 4>of existential questions about like, yeah, what is the difference,

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, in what we're doing and kind of like

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 4>what is like what are we doing here? I mean,

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 4>you know again, it's like it is going back to

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 4>the regulation that is playing out right now. And that

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 4>is why it's such an interesting conversation where you do

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 4>have the Trump administration rolling back so many aspects of

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 4>banking regulation separate from prediction.

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, forget prediction markets, all kind of things different.

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 4>So one example is, you know, for years banks have

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 4>tried to get regulators to go a little bit uh

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 4>make the stress testing process you know again super important

0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 4>post where regulators every year will kind of simulate different

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 4>like disaster scenarios again, like totally hypothetical employment shoots up,

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 4>stock market crashes, you know, these hypothetical scenarios bank and

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 4>they test the banks currently like with the amount of

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 4>capital that a Wells Fargo or a JP Morgan has,

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 4>can you weather this?

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Can you withstand?

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 4>They always do very they always do very well with

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 4>caveats obviously, but you know they come and say, okay,

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 4>you know that could be a weakness.

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:24.919
<v Speaker 1>That could be a weakness.

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.479
<v Speaker 4>Private credit has also introduced an interesting, you know kind

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 4>of wrinkle here because it is by definition there is

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, kind of this hidden leverage, and regulators have

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 4>talked about that don't but they're not thanks correct and

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 4>so that's a whole other, fascinating, you know kind of

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 4>ecosystem where it's like, okay, you are a bank, I'm

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 4>going to stress tests you, you are lending you bank

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 4>are ed bank okay incorporated? You are going to lend

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 4>to private credit lender Okay. But when you lend to there,

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 4>there's not as much tracking what that what your borrower

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 4>is lending to. So you can see it is hard

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.120
<v Speaker 4>to track where that money is going.

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 2>And I read the other day. I think it was

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 2>middle of last year the Boston Fed, I think it

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 2>was said that fourteen percent of large banks loans went

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 2>to private credit and private equity.

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 4>It's a massive is a massive chunk and of loan

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 4>growth overall. And I think that like when you go

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 4>to so when you take prediction markets and you kind

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 4>of take like the current regulatory backdrop, it's like and

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 4>adds an interesting wrinkle because it's like, okay, by and large,

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the financial regulators are like, yes, we

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 4>want to be Like. The bottom line is they are

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 4>rolling back like traditional guardrails, you know, like around the banks,

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 4>but now prediction markets like okay, and that is currently

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 4>being like you know, kind of that is being sorted

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 4>out right now, so we'll see. And like the CFTC,

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 4>I want to say, is like the only regulator again,

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 4>it's like the most relevant one here. It's like come

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 4>out with like some guidance, but it remains to be seen,

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 4>so you know, we'll see kind of how the administration

0:27:57.800 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 4>handles that.

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 2>I just I feel like right now now personal opinion

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 2>not held by I guess I think that there is

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 2>a massive regulatory problem with laying because right now my

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 2>favorite example is open Ai. So open Ai signed a

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 2>deal with AMD, except they didn't. It was just an

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 2>agreement without any formal contract. AMD is not increased guidance

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 2>oracle three hundred billion dollar deal with our open Ai

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 2>can't afford to serve it, don't have the has to

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 2>raise debt. Data centers aren't built. S k Heinez and

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 2>open Ai. Samsung and open Ai signed a big deal

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 2>to take forty percent of RAM, except they didn't. It

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 2>was a letter of intent. All of these stocks have

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 2>popped off of these deals. H nothing happened. It's very

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 2>obvious there was never anything official. There should be regulated

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 2>because people in the audience might hear this and say,

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 2>that's not stock manipulation, But what is if that isn't?

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 2>If that isn't and people could say, oh, it's marketing.

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh we used weezer words. But it's like it feels

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 2>like things like this will lead to outcomes that lose

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of money. There's a lot of people a

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of money, and unless we do something soon, it's

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 2>own to get only gonna get worse. Because every time

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:17.719
<v Speaker 2>someone like this is not stopped, someone else doesn't. They

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 2>just like fuck it. Why would we bother. That will

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 2>lead into the prediction markets as well, because you could

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 2>just start saying whatever. But that's actually that is the

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 2>biggest thing with prediction. You can just say stuff.

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Now there's like over the the extent to which the

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 3>stock market is reliant on like increasingly complicated bits of semantics. Yes,

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 3>it's like we've just never we're ad like a the

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 3>semantic indexes, the asters.

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Like letter of intent, agreement consideration too. There are deals,

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 2>their deals, their agreements, but we've not changed guidance. We've

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 2>not put any money. Now one's actually doing anything. But

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's just.

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Lest we forget a memorandum of understanding.

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Memory MOUs are the best. I love a good MoU

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 2>They mean nothing, but they mean absolutely everyone. I love ANU.

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 2>It's frustrating because I am not a particularly sophisticated trader.

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 2>I may have only recently started putting money in the

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 2>S and P five hundred after a period of not

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 2>but it's and that's in an index, by the way.

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>It's very responsible, very responsible.

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 2>But the point loves the eighty twenty.

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I love diversification.

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Here's the thing. My worry is is that it's very

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 2>obvious how you manipulate these markets, and without regulations to

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 2>stop people, it's only going to get more ridiculous. You're

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 2>just going to get CEOs that say things to create

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 2>a market, possibly creating them themselves. And if they're a

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 2>private company, that's not illegal, I believe. Yeah.

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 3>So when we talk about like, mentioned markets are a

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 3>good example of where I think a lot of the

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 3>like more manipulation concerns are. So a mention market is like, Okay,

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 3>during this podcast, will ed say fuck with We're like

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 3>we're betting on that, like that, the odds are the

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 3>odds are high. You just did it, Ben, Yeah, So

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 3>like will Caroline Levitt at the next White House press

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 3>conference say the word China?

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 2>People?

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 3>These are mentioned markets, So we're literally just betting on

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 3>the words that will come out of someone's mouth.

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 3>So, a very high profile example of this is coinbase

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 3>CEO Brian Armstrong. You know, at the end of an

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 3>earnings call, there was a polymarket mentioned market for what

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 3>will Brian Armstrong say on the earnings call? And and

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 3>you know literally like right before the like moderator was

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 3>like thanks for joining everyone, like right before he's like, oh,

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 3>someone just handed me the polymarket for what I'm gonna say,

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 3>So I'll just get through all these you know, Bitcoin

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 3>web three. It just like went down the list and

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 3>like paid all of them off. So he has come

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 3>out and said that he was not trading on that

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 3>market or involved in any way. But like we are

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 3>opening ourselves up to like new ways that we can

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 3>like manipulate markets. Yeah, insider trade and like when we

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 3>create a market for everything and everything can become a

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 3>bet more people than ever can become insider traders because

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 3>there's just so much more things to insider trade on.

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, is a question, how do you how much is

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 2>necessary to create a market, Like what how much money

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 2>does it require? This is a good question.

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 3>So polymarket pr has told me that the primary criteria

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 3>for if a market can be created, because they field

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 3>suggestions from their users. The primary criteria is if there's

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 3>evidence of demand for the yes side.

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 2>And the no side. That's it. What is evidence in

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 2>this case.

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, if there's activity on Twitter about it, if

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 3>people in the discord are like, please, I want to

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 3>bet on this, it seems pretty ad hoc. I don't

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 3>have much more detail than that, because they give me

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 3>more detail.

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Imagine they don't need to yeah, yeah, it's not money.

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 3>It's I mean, it's just like evidence of trading demand, right,

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 3>and then they'll open it and then people can start

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 3>right on it. You don't have to they have to

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 3>be They don't have to be like, all right, you

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 3>all have five hundred dollars ready to go on this,

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 3>like there's nothing like you like, there's just as long

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 3>as they can see that people will want to trade

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 3>on it, they will make.

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 4>It makes sense, yes, And that kind of goes to

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 4>the question of just like thinly like with banks, like

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 4>thin thinly regulated versus not thinly traded excuse me, versus

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 4>not right. It goes to the question of like when

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 4>banks look at something, they're like, we can't make a

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 4>market out of like, you know, trading on this one.

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Two hundred thousand dollars in volume, Like there's just no

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 3>way that like exactly huge bank is ever going to

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:16.399
<v Speaker 3>like yeah, you just open yourself up to so much.

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 2>So it goes back to that, Yeah, I mean also,

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 2>I guess banks I didn't even think if that ye

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:23.399
<v Speaker 2>banks went want will touch because there's not enough money

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 2>in it.

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's when I think of like a thinly

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 1>traded like stock. Yeah, exactly.

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 4>It just goes back to liquidity and like the volatility,

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 4>and like if banks can find a way to make

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 4>money on something.

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Legally, they will, Yeah, yeah, they will.

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 4>And so it's i you know, you could see a

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 4>world in which and I'm not saying like there is

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 4>no regulatory framework that would allow this.

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm not saying that because in the future, in

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the future you could see it, like who.

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 4>Knows what that could look like. And so the banks

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:52.800
<v Speaker 4>are just like, Okay, we're going to wait for the

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:55.320
<v Speaker 4>regulators to say something. But like it comes to a

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 4>question of also like internal enforcement, like banks all have

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 4>like very very clear, you know, kind of rules around

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 4>insider trading. Someone has non public information, if you trade

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 4>on that, you will be fired. Like you know, that's

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 4>very like well worn, you know kind of like but

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 4>now with prediction markets, how do you enforce that? It

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 4>is hard And so banks are like actively and again

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 4>I'm just like talking about banks specifically. You could also

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.760
<v Speaker 4>talk about like chech companies, healthcare companies, whatever. But banks

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 4>where like we have talked about this a lot, like

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 4>being this nexus of the markets, and they do have

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot of information that you know, Okay, that's different

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 4>from someone in another sector, like how does a compliance

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 4>team enforce that? That is an open question right now

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 4>that banks are like actively figuring out, and it's a

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 4>really interesting question of compliance and enforcement.

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Internally, it's just it feels like the wauls of breaking

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 2>down around everything. Because before we do the prep call

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 2>for this, we talk about analysts, for example, and I

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 2>named someone. I'm not going to name people on this

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 2>just for professional reasons, but people know who are.

0:35:58.040 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>We're very professional, all very professor.

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 2>I say, fuck, but there are these I need someone

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 2>and you were like, that's not an analyst. Yeah. And

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:08.800
<v Speaker 2>it's becoming obviously because they're on CNBC, they're on Bloomberg.

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 2>It's like, you've got these people pretending to be analysts.

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 2>You've got these entities like private credit pretending to be thanks,

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 2>You've got prediction markets pretending to be stocked. Yeah, it

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 2>just feels like the walls are being torn down, and

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 2>I know that this is gonna People aren't gonna like this.

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't think most people should have access to the

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 2>stock market or gambling. I think that they are dangerous

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 2>and I think or at least they should be regulated

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 2>in such a way that it's less dangerous, not just

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 2>open season. And then the third guy on Twitter is like,

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm an analyst, mate, you are a poster.

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Well that's the interesting question.

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:44.320
<v Speaker 4>And I mean, like I couldn't help but think in

0:36:44.400 --> 0:36:47.919
<v Speaker 4>that moment of journalism, right, I mean, like obviously, okay,

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 4>they're journalists and writers, and then they're like people who

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 4>do not have the same are not held to the

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 4>same standards, and that's a whole other conversation.

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:57.240
<v Speaker 1>But like with analysts, yeah, totally.

0:36:57.320 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 4>I mean, like it's there are very clear kind of

0:36:59.880 --> 0:37:02.399
<v Speaker 4>like you are regulated by FINRA, which is the self

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 4>regulated you know, they're a regulator and they regulator. They

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 4>regulate the brokerage industry, and like any quote cell side analyst,

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 4>so like you know, an analyst who is again held

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 4>to these standards like industry standards of disclosures and like

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 4>conflict of interests and things like that, like that is

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 4>quote an analyst. Yeah, you can be an of course,

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 4>there are like other ways, but like that, you can

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 4>be an analyst in and that is legitimate in like

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:29.399
<v Speaker 4>another sector or like another like on the by side. Okay, fine,

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 4>that's all legitimate, but there are certain standards that you're

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 4>held to if you're like, for example, you know, like

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 4>a FINRA analyst, and like that's not analyst capital a analyst,

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 4>and that's not always clear to like a viewer of CMOS.

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 2>This is actually a question what is a sell side analyst?

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Because I have listeners who have lost this before, and

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 2>I realized I haven't really defined it myself very well.

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:52.800
<v Speaker 4>You would not for sure you're at a brokerage, something

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 4>like brokerage inside of a bank, or you're just like

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 4>a standalone kind of brokerage a Morgan Stanley. Great great example.

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 4>They have their investment bank and that's like okay, they

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 4>have their bankers over here. And on the other side

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 4>and it's not this simple, but like on the other side,

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 4>you have the cell side, and that is these analysts

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 4>who are writing research reports.

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:15.359
<v Speaker 1>They are held to FINRA rule two two for one.

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I think SECTIONNE six two two for one. Go google it.

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 4>That covers everything that like a cell side analyst must

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 4>be held to. They are on the cell side versus

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 4>the buy side. So they are selling you know, like

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 4>research and you know, versus like they're not managing a

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 4>fund right like they are giving information, they're issuing a

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 4>buy hold sell. They are giving price targets, they are

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 4>looking at financial models. They are in a different spot

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 4>than against someone on the buy side. That is like

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:51.720
<v Speaker 4>reading the cell side selling selling research, sell selling knowledge

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 4>and wisdom. I don't know how the SEC defines that,

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 4>I'll be very clear, And it's kind of like, I mean,

0:38:57.239 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 4>it's kind.

0:38:57.800 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Of outdated this way.

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:01.439
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's almost like an antiquated thing sellside versus

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 4>by high just kind of how like a wirehouse Like

0:39:04.440 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 4>that's a very antiquated way of saying, like a big

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:07.359
<v Speaker 4>wealth manager.

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:08.839
<v Speaker 2>Big thing. That's scattering me at the moment. And I'm

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 2>not naming anyone specific for professional reasons, but why is

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 2>it that these analysts always set these massive targets and

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 2>don't seem to be affected by reality. Because there is

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:27.919
<v Speaker 2>a nonspecific prominent data center analyst who quite literally went

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:32.280
<v Speaker 2>out on television yesterday and said the oracle was a goodbye,

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 2>and it was that it's actually better when you look

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 2>at the report. This is factually incorrect. It's not even

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 2>an opinion thing. The cell side analysts always seem very

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 2>positive even when reality isn't reflecting that. Shouldn't they know better?

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Is there a reason they would be more positive in

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 2>general not talking about this person. Yeah.

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:52.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's like this is like one of my

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:55.359
<v Speaker 4>favorite issues. It's just it's really fascinating because it kind

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 4>of speaks to like this proliferation of like anyone can

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:00.840
<v Speaker 4>put out research and like you can kind of like

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 4>a lowercase a analyst versus capital a analyst. I think

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 4>that the thing to always go back to is, you know,

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and one. I think two thousand and two

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 4>new regulations were put in you know, spearheaded by Elliott Spitzer,

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 4>who was the New York AG at the time, after

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley put you know, certain

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 4>analysts had put out research that were like was super

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 4>bullish and was total mismatch to how they were privately

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 4>describing Amazon. You know, Henry Blodgett famously, you know, put

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 4>out a report band from the industry that's all well,

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:36.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, chronicled. All new regulations were put in place

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 4>around from security regulators around like okay, you are an analyst, Okay,

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 4>you have to include all sorts of new disclosures, which

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 4>is great, I mean, you know, and and again very

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 4>high a member of my household. I think the language

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 4>is something like me or a member of my household

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 4>owns a security and X y z or something like that.

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:00.839
<v Speaker 4>And also, you know kind of these charts you'll see

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 4>at the bottom of a report where it shows the

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:07.919
<v Speaker 4>stock price, like an Apple, for example, the stock price

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:10.920
<v Speaker 4>relative to like where their price target is to hold

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:13.439
<v Speaker 4>them accountable for like you know kind of what that's

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 4>looking like and stop, uh.

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 2>That would require someone to hold them accountable.

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly.

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 4>And analysts are like, by and large, I mean, there's

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:23.320
<v Speaker 4>plenty of data on this, but like they are a

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 4>very like bullish group. I mean the data if you

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 4>just look at buy hold sell, like, they continue to

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 4>be that and and the whole industry has really evolved

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 4>where you know, this is a whole other conversation. We

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 4>talked about this a little bit, but like people should

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 4>be aware that like corporate access is you know, just

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 4>a much bigger part of the analyst.

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Job and and all that.

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 2>When you say access, what do you mean, Yeah, Like.

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 4>You're an analyst at a again, a Morgan Stanley or

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 4>a UBS. And just to call out two random ones

0:41:56.960 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 4>you your clients, like a hedge fund investor, you know,

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 4>like a big institutional investor access to the management team

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 4>of the company that I cover as an analyst. So

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm covering I'm covering the you know, I'm a healthcare

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 4>analyst and I'm covering Johnson and Johnson, and like I

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 4>can connect, you know, like the investor who's reading my

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:18.880
<v Speaker 4>research with the CFO of Johnson and Johnson. I'm just

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:22.279
<v Speaker 4>calling out random companies, but it's that connection. It's that

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:23.839
<v Speaker 4>like link, and it's well, it's access.

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:29.879
<v Speaker 2>It's just access feels that feels like a bad thing,

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 2>like that doesn't feel like it benefits.

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 4>It is definitely a you know, it's one of these

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 4>things that that analysts have to manage and like these

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 4>one of these and I don't want to call it

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 4>a conflict, because it's not inherently a conflict, but it

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 4>is another kind of piece of the job that frankly,

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 4>and there are many fantastic analysts out there who do

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 4>manage that well and put out you know, have great relationships,

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:54.880
<v Speaker 4>but put out critical research, you know, like substantive research,

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 4>and you just have to manage that. And there are

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 4>many fantastic analysts who do. But I even said, it's

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 4>not unlike sometimes being a beat reporter, where you have

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 4>to maintain just like good working relationships with the people

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 4>you cover, even if you're going to say an accurate

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 4>but like critical fair thing, and then you just have

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 4>to like move on again. Very different from the role

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:16.520
<v Speaker 4>of an analyst, you know, but it.

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there are similarities. I don't know if it's different,

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 1>there are similarities.

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:21.759
<v Speaker 3>I just wait, I just want to make sure I

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:26.080
<v Speaker 3>please please, right, So, a sell side analyst writes reports

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 3>about companies in a certain sector and puts those reports

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:33.240
<v Speaker 3>out publicly and disseminates them to other banks, et cetera.

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:36.839
<v Speaker 3>And then hedge funds can go to the analyst and say,

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 3>I want your specific research that you've done on these companies,

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:43.759
<v Speaker 3>and also can you introduce me to their management team.

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:46.520
<v Speaker 1>That's part of the offering exactly, I see exactly.

0:43:46.560 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 3>And therefore, to be able to connect clients to management

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:54.240
<v Speaker 3>and make money for your firm, you have to maybe

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 3>you have to be a little more positive in your

0:43:57.280 --> 0:43:59.799
<v Speaker 3>report on that firm than you normally would in order

0:43:59.880 --> 0:44:02.359
<v Speaker 3>to be able to connect your clients with them.

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 2>That's that's it.

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 4>That would be the cynical take, absolutely, but the very

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:16.240
<v Speaker 4>fair criticism I would say yes, absolutely, I don't cynical

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:18.360
<v Speaker 4>take but but but it is it's just like a

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:22.280
<v Speaker 4>feature that and again they're like excellent, excellent, excellent analysts

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 4>who just like manage.

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:25.799
<v Speaker 2>That's why we're being on specifically, but and.

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Who just manage that. And it's just like being again

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and again.

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:30.640
<v Speaker 4>Yes, okay, there are differences, but it is not unlike

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 4>you write a tough story on a company. You are

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 4>fair and then you got to move on and then

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:38.319
<v Speaker 4>you got to like move on, you know what I mean.

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 2>But the thing is, I don't know.

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:39.840
<v Speaker 3>I know.

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:43.120
<v Speaker 2>I think access journalism is bullshing and I think we're

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 2>in the beginning of history. As I wrote yeah last week,

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 2>it is it's no longer useful to do access. Access

0:44:50.120 --> 0:44:52.320
<v Speaker 2>journalism doesn't work. It doesn't get you anything. If a

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 2>PR firm or a PR person at a company doesn't

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 2>answer your question because they're mad at you, that's their

0:44:57.560 --> 0:44:59.919
<v Speaker 2>fucking problem. This is not the opinion of my guests,

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 2>is just me. I just when you told me this

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 2>for the first time in the pre courl I was

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of I sat and thought about it a lot

0:45:06.600 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 2>because it's like, you don't have to agree with me here.

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 2>It feels antithetical to good analysis to be like, well,

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:15.839
<v Speaker 2>I can't be too mean, especially when your job is hey,

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:18.640
<v Speaker 2>should I invest in this, and it's like, well, you

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:21.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe should, because I I gotta get you the company.

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:24.120
<v Speaker 2>I got to make sure the company. Fuck that, I

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:26.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. This is the thing though, gets back

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 2>to my wife feeling about the stock market. It's like

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 2>that feels rigged. It feels like you've got analysts who

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:36.279
<v Speaker 2>go on CNBC Bloomberg and I'm sure people will say,

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 2>oh Bloomberg, real traders use the terminal whatever. But it's

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:43.279
<v Speaker 2>like the growth of retail investors is what makes this

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:46.319
<v Speaker 2>dangerous to me, The fact that it's the easiest time

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 2>ever to invest in stocks. If I felt like buying

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 2>a stock right now, I could do so in a

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:54.399
<v Speaker 2>few taps. If that's the case, having or that should

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 2>be the disclosure. Here's a good centrist path. I think

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 2>that they should have to write down reintroduction they've made. Oh,

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 2>they should say every time every time they've introduced a

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:06.799
<v Speaker 2>hedge fund, and they don't even need to name them.

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 2>There's these say made introduction on this date. That way

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:12.520
<v Speaker 2>we could see because I bet there'd be a lot

0:46:12.560 --> 0:46:12.799
<v Speaker 2>of them.

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Also, I'm getting all new ideas for Foyer requests.

0:46:17.960 --> 0:46:19.759
<v Speaker 4>Not that they would be not that I had many

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:21.920
<v Speaker 4>who actually fall into that at all, because it's all

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 4>private sector. But that's, you know, like, but I'm just

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:27.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm just getting ideas. I'm just getting ideas again, totally different.

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 2>But but this is the thing what good journalism is

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 2>because it's like, these messy little lines between informations are

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 2>not disclosed exactly. It wouldn't be as big a deal

0:46:37.880 --> 0:46:41.800
<v Speaker 2>if they disclose this stuff. But also the term analyst

0:46:41.960 --> 0:46:47.520
<v Speaker 2>is used very vaguely these days, totally confusing people. Citriny

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 2>research for example, that.

0:46:50.800 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 4>People who are for example, again get to the heart

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:55.239
<v Speaker 4>of people who are like held to an industry reg

0:46:55.520 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, regulated industry standard that like is very like

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 4>closely held, closely watch versus not. That's a perfect yeah,

0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:04.360
<v Speaker 4>perfect example.

0:47:04.560 --> 0:47:06.279
<v Speaker 2>All Right, I think we're gonna wrap it there. We've

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 2>had a great time.

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:10.239
<v Speaker 3>Where can we find you two, I'm on x at

0:47:10.400 --> 0:47:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Nick Dever Underscore, or you can check out my newly

0:47:13.480 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 3>launched website Nicked and sorry, don't cancel the ed I

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 3>can't believe you outed me at the end or Barons

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:25.480
<v Speaker 3>dot com.

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you can find me on Barons dot com.

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:30.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, everyone, you can find me of course, where's

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:32.760
<v Speaker 2>your ed dot at Better offline dot com. This podcast

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:34.879
<v Speaker 2>that you're already listening to you love them one log

0:47:34.960 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 2>later in the week. Thank you all, Thank you, thank

0:47:46.000 --> 0:47:47.360
<v Speaker 2>you for listening to Better Offline.

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:50.040
<v Speaker 6>The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:52.759
<v Speaker 6>is Matasowski. You can check out more of his music

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:56.279
<v Speaker 6>and audio projects at Matasowski dot com, M A T

0:47:56.440 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 6>T O, S O W S k I dot com.

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 5>You can email me at easy at better offline dot

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:05.400
<v Speaker 5>com or visit better offline dot com to find more

0:48:05.440 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 5>podcast links and of course my newsletter. I also really

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 5>recommend you go to chat dot Where's youread dot at

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 5>to visit the discord, and go to our slash.

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Better Offline to check out I'll Reddit. Thank you so

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:20.000
<v Speaker 1>much for listening. Better Offline is a production of cool

0:48:20.080 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Zone Media.

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 4>For more from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 4>Zonemedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.