WEBVTT - Zoltan Pozsar and Perry Mehrling Debate Bretton Woods 3.0

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, hello and welcome to another episode of the All

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Allaway and I'm so we have

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>a very very special episode for two reasons. One, we're

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>recording this in front of a live audience, and secondly,

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be featuring two of our favorite people

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to speak to. Yeah, absolutely right. We're gonna be talking

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>about the future of the dollar, which for our entire careers.

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>I feel like dollars. Something is going to happen to

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the dollar. It's gonna blow up, people are gonna stop

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>using it whatever. I still don't even know what the

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>question means. And it's like, what is a post dollar future? What?

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't even understand the top of completely. But we

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>have people who actually do well. We have a lot

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of time to dig into it. So without further ado,

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to introduce our guests for this particular debate.

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>We have Sultan Posar, strategist at Credit Swiss, and Perry Maryland,

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Boston University professor and also the author of the forthcoming

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>book Money and Empire, Charles P. Kindle Burger and the

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 1>Dollar System that's already out in the UK, it's coming

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to the US soon and you can probably guess from

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the title what side of the dollar debate Perry sits on?

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>But why don't we jump into Joe kind of go

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>zumped me on that question. But like, when we talk

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>about the future of the dollar, what exactly are we

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about? Both of you have spent your entire careers

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.119
<v Speaker 1>talking about money and specifically different types of money. So

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:44.639
<v Speaker 1>what is the dollar? What is the dollar? Is the dollar? Well,

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>so that's actually a very interesting first question as a

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact, because there's a lot of different kinds

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of dollars um and the we already know there's the

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars that that are printed by the government, their little

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>green pieces of paper. Is the dollars of the liability

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of the FAID that over bank reserves. That the dollars

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that are the liability of the banking system which we

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>use to make payments to each other. But I would

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>particularly put on the table right now there's the whole

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>offshore dollar system, the your dollar system UM, where there

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>are liabilities of banks that that are not American banks,

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>um and the assets of people who are not American

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>systems UM. And and that is now the global dollar system,

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>which is I think very very important to appreciate and

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that this has grown up basically as the infrastructure of

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the global trading trading system. It's alt I agree with that. UM,

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>what is the dollar? I think I would let me

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>add some some things to that. There is there's all

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>this offshore dollar which is not only in the balance

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 1>sheet of non American banks, but then those balances are

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>held by UM countries that are either aligned or not

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>aligned with UM a certain view of the world. And

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>so that's an extra dimension that I think we have

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>learned about when we when we think about the dollar.

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>There's also the dollar in in in the context of

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>price stability, where you basically have a unipol or world

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>where UM there is one Hedgemen and basically the commodity

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>trade is UM in the control of that Hedgemen. But

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>then there's also a dollar in the world where the

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>commodity market is becoming more dura political resource national nationalism

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>is creeping into the picture, and and that has an

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>impact on the price level, that has an impact on

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>on inflation. So so I would say that the dollar

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is a project. Well, let me ask you this. You've

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>been writing about this, this Brenton Wood's three idea, the

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>shift and course we've been talking about it a lot.

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I guess my question is like, what is the

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>testable hypothesis of whether you're right? What does something look

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>different either now or a few years time. They would say, yes,

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>we entered into some sort of new global regime. Yes.

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>So the first time we talked about Breton Woods three, Um,

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we we said that this is going to

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>be a a long term journey, but it has started. Um.

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the markers since we have first

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>talked about Bretonwoods three that that would support the thesis?

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I think a number of things. Um, we

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>know that the commodity market is no longer exclusively priced

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>in U S dollars. We know that certain countries are

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>getting heavily discounted UM Russian commodities UM for example China,

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>for example India. We know that those countries are paying

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>uh remman b and rupees for those commodities. We know that,

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, Europe stopped paying certain countries stopped paying euros

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>for for gas and they paid rubles. Now there is

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>gas flow issues, obviously, but but again I think on

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>the margin, it's no longer the case that commodities equal dollars. Okay,

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>that's that's um. That's um. That's number one. What is

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>also obvious that in the Western world we have inflationary

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>impulses that we are dealing with which we haven't really

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>had to deal with in in several decades. UM. Whether

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>UH this cycle of inflation will be successfully um uh

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>halted or not, is I think going to have an

0:05:55.200 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>impact on certain currencies status in reserve portfolio. I'm not

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>talking just about the US DADA, but basically G seven currencies,

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the Sterling euros, dollars, UM. I think, UM, I think

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of work that needs to be done

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>still to basically maintain confidence in UH in these currencies.

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>When Paul Walker again he was the last central banker

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that had to deal with a similar episode, and he

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.799
<v Speaker 1>did something very fast and in a very draconian fashion,

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we can also say that what we are

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>doing today in the West is heading in that direction,

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>but not the intensity with which with which we're doing it.

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>So to me again, it's it's a working hypothesis. UM.

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I have been writing about aspects of this Breton Woods

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>three idea. You know that the war in interest rates PIACE,

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>war industrial policy Um, all of these things I think

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>are just you know, trying to look at the concept

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>from many different angles, stress testing it. So far, I

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>think I'm internally consistent. So I'm building up the narrative

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>around it. It's a way of kind of stress testing

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>whether you makes sense. But again, if if it fits together,

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it fits together, and they'll see. But let me just

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>say we are six months into this. I mean, Rome

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't built in one day. God didn't create the world

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>in one day either. Um, probably not in that order.

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's a work in progress. But can

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I just press on? I guess, like, what do you

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>look at to judge the dollar's dominance? Is a pure

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>exchange rate? Because on that basis the dollar has done

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty well over the past six months. Is it? Central

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>bank reserves? Those have been diversifying for some time now,

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Trade financing, invoice, bond issuance, Like what are you looking at?

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>What am I looking at? Um? So I would say

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>two things. The the the the big picture conclusion I

0:07:55.960 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>have arrived at and I think I'm articulating this, uh

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>piece by piece in in in my pieces, is that

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>when you think about the dollar, And again, let me

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>let me just use Peri's work workhorse, which is that

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>money has for prices. There's far interest for an exchange

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and the price level. So my working conclusion about all

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>this is when you think about the dollar and you

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>try to understand the future of the dollar from an

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>exchange rate perspective, I mean, it's it's an exchange rate,

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a nominal thing, right, But versus the Euro and

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a end, I think the dollar is always going to

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>be strong in the present context, right because at least

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the US is energy and commodity self sufficient. Other regions

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of the world are not, and so that has an

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>imprint on their on their exchange rates. Uh. What I

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>what I think about in terms of dollar weakness is

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 1>basically the dollar getting devalued versus commodities. UM. Because again,

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>if you take a step back and look at everything

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that's happening in terms of East and West, you know,

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the G seven versus the Eurasian land mass, resource nationalism,

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>all these things. I think what we are learning is

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that um, that the West is exposed to the East.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>In terms of commodities. UM, we have a number of

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>issues in the commodity markets which we can which we

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 1>can talk about a decade of no investment. As I said,

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, resource nationalism type markets everywhere. So I think

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>commodity prices can go much higher from here, and a

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>dollar can get devalued in terms of commodities in that sense.

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So the way I would say this isn't there in

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen thirties. You know, central banks when we had

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a we had a commodity based money system, they raised

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the price of money in terms of commodities because they's

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>just that when you devalue versus the goal, that's what

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>happens UM. Today, I would say we will have a

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.359
<v Speaker 1>version of this in the sense that the geopolitical realities

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of commodities shift away from your control and you basically

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>are dealing a bit much higher commodity markets UM and

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the valuation of the daughter in that sense. But everything

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>is relative. So Perry obviously want to bring you in

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you I mean, like when you think about okay,

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the last two years or anything you're seeing now and

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>obviously in the sweep of history, like do you see

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>anything fund do you see regime change of sorts, whether

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you'd call it Breton which three or is it? Yeah,

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 1>we have inflation that happens sometimes our commodities are scarce.

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.719
<v Speaker 1>We commodities were expensive in the early two thousand's too,

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Like have we been here before? Um? Well, many people

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>are trying to draw analogy between the present situation and

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the immediate poste um when there was inflation in the

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>seventies and so forth, and when Nixon basically tried to say,

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we we don't want to be the

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>top dollar anymore because it constrains us too much. UM.

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think those analogies are misplaced. UM. And also

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>don't draw the right lessons in the seventies. UM. I

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>do take a longer historical perspective. UM. And you sort

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of in your introductory remarks you were saying, we've been

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>here many times. The dollars you know, going away? Yes, okay,

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And I've just written a book basically about it. So

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>about the construction of the dollar system. Um. After the

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>death of Sterling, basically you could you could you could say, um,

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>And it took a while before we were able to

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>reorganize the global trading system around around the dollar. And

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of what the Breton Woods meeting was there

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to basically acknowledge, like the future is going to be

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a dollar a dollar world, and it was and gradually

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the world grew, the system grew. This is important to

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>appreciate and the traumas of the system like seventy one

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>turned out in retrospect to be growing pains. That what

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>happened after seventy one was not the end of the

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>dollar system, but the offshoring of the dollar system UM

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and and then other crises where we added Asia and

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>actually after the global financial crisis, if you look at

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>what happened in capital markets you mentioned bond markets, this

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>is the extension of the global of the dollar system

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to the global South. UM. Really for the first time

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>when when UM, the national champions in the Global South

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>are able to borrow in dollar capital markets basically because

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are zero in the in the North UM.

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>And so there's a win win here that the pension

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>funds want to want to lend the money UM and

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>they want to borrow money. And so in that longer

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>horizon you see that these financial crises, these periods of trauma,

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, like the Global financial crisis, which which people said,

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>oh the dollars are gonner. You know, obviously it was

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>like it was a crisis of the very core it

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>emerged stronger than ever. Um. And uh So that's what

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 1>I think, that's the perspective that we need to take.

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>So what is the current crisis? Okay, I maybe take

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a different, different view because I can take a longer view.

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not I'm not working for credit squeeze. Um.

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>And I've a couple of weeks versus a book every

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>ten years. Yes, yes, the book every ten years. I

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>try to I try to. Uh, I try to write

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>them more fast than that, but they do take they

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>do take time. Um. The I think the thing that

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I would like to throw into the mix here is

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. Okay, not you know, the war in Ukraine

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>or tensions in Taiwan or something. But what came before that,

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>which is two years of of extremely loose monetary policy

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>throughout the entire world, involvement of the state. You know,

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>this was war finance, this was wartime, okay. And we're

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>switching and then the pandemic is over we don't know,

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe okay. And so we're in the process right now

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of switching from war finance to peace finance. Um. And

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that is a rocky road Okay. So that I would

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>analogize all of this to like immediately after World War Two,

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, when um, the the reigns of the monetary

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>system in the United States had been in the treasury,

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the FED. The Fed's job was simply to finance the

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>government whatever it took, you know. And if the if

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the government is issuing bonds and no one wants to

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>buy them, the FED will buy them. And so that's

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>how war finance works. That's how pandemic finance worked, you know.

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And that work not just that way in our country,

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>but in every country around around the world. That's how

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>it worked. Okay. You may remember that just before the

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>pandemic um there was an attempt to begin raining in

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the elasticity from the global financial crisis to the Taper

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>tantrum and all that sort of thing. That's where we were,

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that's where we are now. Okay, that's what Powell wants

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to do, and it's the right thing to do. We

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>have we were, We've been in a period of elasticity.

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Now we're moving into a period of discipline, and that

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>period of discipline will re establish the dollar. Um I

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I believe that's that's what I think is happening. Actually,

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>So just on this topic, and I'm kind of hoping

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that you'll you'll channel Kindle Burger here. But what are

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of a dollar system outside of the US?

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone is fairly familiar with what the U

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>S gots from it, But what are other countries, especially

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>at a time when the U S is tightening monetary policy,

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>when some economies, notably emerging markets, probably don't necessarily want

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to see a tightening of financial conditions. So I will

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>give you Charlie's answer, Um, Charlie kimno Burger's answer. Everyone

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>called him Charlie, so I will call him Charlie. I

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>call him Charlie throughout the book. And UM, I actually

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>did know him as a matter of fact, and and

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and used to visit him. But but everyone called him

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Charlie even if they didn't know him the his What

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I discovered in writing this book is that Charlie's view

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of the world was very much influenced by his teacher

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>at Columbia, Henry Parker Willis, who was one of the

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>creators of the Federal Reserve system. UM in the United States.

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>And what did the Federal Reserve system do united these

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>disparate little regions into a par clearing area inside the

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>United States. Okay, Um, so that you had a unified

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>monetary system in this country that had never had it before,

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>never had a central bank before. Historians will correct me

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>on that. But the and this is a big achievement.

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>What Charlie wants to do starting in graduate school of

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Columbia is do the same thing for the world. The

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>logic of why it's a good thing to have one

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>currency for for the whole country, okay, and part clearing

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>for the whole country. The logic is just the same

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>for why it might be a good idea to have

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>one currency for the whole world. Um. And that's what

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>people get out of it is that it it makes

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it makes it easier to do trade, to do calculations,

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to do to to unite the globe into a unified economy.

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's basically what it is. I'm very influenced by

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the writings that come out of the bi s appreciating

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that we really live in a unified world. This notion

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of separate nation states with separate currencies, this is something

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that was that was inherited in our minds from World

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>War Two when when that system had all broken down.

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But that's not the world we live in now. It's

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a it's a global dollar system and it has a

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of advantages for now. That does mean, which you

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>were just coming to at the end, that basically there's

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>one monetary policy that matters and and that's and that's

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>US dollar monetary policy that that then gets filtered out

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to the whole rest of the world. And that's what's happening. Now.

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 1>We're moving into discipline mode um and we're already seeing

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>where the weak points are in the in the global system,

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and those are going to be managed in the next

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. So do you see, like you know,

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 1>the coordination costs essentially from Okay, it's great, we have

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>like one unit of account and then we're gonna have

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>multiple ones. Like what are the costs in your view

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>from as you said, are already setting some commodities price

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 1>outside of dollars or an increase in the commodities price

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>outside of dollars, Like, what are going to be the

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:04.479
<v Speaker 1>costs to the world economy if your sort of vision

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>or your sort of characterization proves out. Yes, Well, perhaps

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>before before I answered that question, I mean listening to Perry,

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, Charlie Kindleberger grew up in a certain period, right,

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, post World War. You know, we

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>have a unified clearing system in the US. Let's kind

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of replicate that in the world. And you can replicate

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that in a world where where very basically have one hegement. Right,

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a unipolar world order and it has a currency

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>for it um. But I think everywhere I look today

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>we basically have that unipolar world order being challenged. I mean,

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I wrote about this, so so we can we can

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about some aspects of this. I think,

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you take a step back and you

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>want to kind of distill everything that has been happening

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>since February, you basically have several blockades here, right. You

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have a blockade of Europe from an energy perspective, you

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>have a blockade of a big pile of fex reserves.

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>From a financial perspective, You've had a week long blockade

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on an island in the South China Sea. And we

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>are designing a blockade of of China from from a

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 1>chip sufficiency perspective, not even sufficiency, but you know, be

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>able to make chips with a SML machines, be able

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to upgrade machines that make memory chips. You know, that's

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>the news about UM memory chip manufacturers with facilities in China.

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>The latest iteration is and video which makes AI chips,

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>as as the experts of the media on chip matters.

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh no, So you basically have a very complex kind

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>of chess game. I thought you're going to insinuate that

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the chips we're going to replace what I mean, it's

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>problem again like but but but but the significance of

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>this is that you know, the the E, C, N,

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Y and and everything. You know, China is about AI

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of AI infrastructure being done. It's

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>probably the one sovereign that you associate with AI. And

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>so you know, the the end video, the video news

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:13.719
<v Speaker 1>is significant from that perspective. So you have these multiple blockades. Okay,

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>So if the physical world, okay, is becoming fragmented, I

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's no longer appropriate to think about, you know,

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the world as a unified whole, where you basically need

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to replicate the unified clearing system in the US to

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. Um, you know you you

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mention this before, but but you did ask

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>like what markers am I looking for in terms of look,

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>as I said, the invoicing of flows in different currencies

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in commodities is one thing. But also when you look

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 1>at the stocks of f X reserves, um. You know,

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you know, uh, China for example, is

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>letting its treasury portfolio run down since the beginning of

0:20:56.600 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the war is another important little little bit that you

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.239
<v Speaker 1>need to keep an eye on because I think just

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>as the real world is getting disentangled, the financial world

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is getting disentangled um um. And so these are all

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, little bits of pieces that people follow for

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the next six months, twelve months, five years, and I

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>think the world is going to look very different. You know.

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>The the I think the historical analog here is I remember,

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:24.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean I was, you know, trying to get an

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>internship in Washington, d C. In the year two thousand.

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I was like writing emails from Hungary to Congressman. You know,

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>China just got um admitted to the w t O,

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and like, what the hell does this mean for the world. Well,

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, give eight years and you have three trillion

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars of treasuries, right, you know what is the next

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>five You're going to look like I have no idea.

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if the weight at average maturity of

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>these treasuries in fex reserve portfolios is like five years,

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the world could look very different, you know,

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>five five years from now. So so again it's it's

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a glacial progress, but it's it's it's

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a progress, and I think it's it's time to start

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how the financial landscape is going to evolve

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>when we read about the real world getting more and

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>more fractured every day. So Perry, just on that reserves point,

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is true if you look at FX

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>reserves over the past decade or beyond, actually you can

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>see central banks diversifying. So renmand B reserves have gone up,

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>reserves of I think South Korea and Canada and some

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>other places have gone up as well, dollar reserves going down.

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>When you see something like that, what do you think

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>is happening? Like, what is the rationale for doing that? Um, well,

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 1>diversification but there but this is small potatoes. The numbers

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about are are are really quite small. Um

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the evidence of dollar of dollar dominance is is still

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty overwhelming. I think now Sultan says, wait five years,

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>so maybe, but wait five years, other things could happen

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to you know that. Um, it's not it's not obvious

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to me that all of the long that the trend

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is your friend. UM in this, in in this, in

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>this regard. Um. Well, remember that wars are hot houses

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in many ways. UM. And I mean now I'm talking

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>about the pandemic, um, not not not Ukraine. UM. A

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of things have changed in the pandemic. UM. A

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of technology was developed in order

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to enable us to continue on with our life. This

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>has changed how we work, this has changed where we live.

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>It's changed. There's a lot of dislocation that has happened. Okay,

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 1>and that's what you're seeing in supply chains as. But

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it's also even local inside the United States, you know people. Um,

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And that hasn't yet sort of all settled down by

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>any means. Remember what happened in World War Two. There

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 1>were separate spheres, right, and the and the effect was

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that Germany, you know, invented a lot of whole chemical industry,

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, and we developed atomic energy and we know

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>all there was a lot of stuff developed in World

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>War Two that we then rode that wave basically for

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>the next thirty years, the thirty glorious years. You know,

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 1>we're building on those developments. So it's not obvious to

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>me that we're entering into a gloomy period. Deglobalization. We

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>haven't used that word yet here, but Salton uses it

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>all the time in his writing, and he is a

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say fan advocate. He sees de globalization. Um,

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. I'm not sure. Um. I I think

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>China has its own problems, Russia has its own problems. Um.

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Where he mentions in some of his his I don't

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>know where you get this factor wide, but that's sort

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of because of our of the us UH anti immigrant

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 1>two million jobs have left those and the people have left. Okay,

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>well they've gone somewhere, you know, and they gained skills

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>here and now they're somewhere and they're building firms and

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>doing things. But that's going to take a little while. UM.

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So we the whole supply chain stuff was all disrupted

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>by the pandemic. Um it's being disrupted even more by

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>geostrategic things. But it will get reconstructed. And it's not

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>clear to me that this is a pivot point where

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:22.439
<v Speaker 1>we shift from a market determined system. This is the

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>big point that Charlie always makes. The reason we have

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>dollar to gemin a okay, is not because the US,

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's a uniportly world. In fact, the US doesn't

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>really want to do this. You know, this is a

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>public good the US is providing the rest of the world.

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>So that I wanted to ask about this because you mentioned,

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>okay that if you look at past crisis and you

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>see after the Great Financial Crisis, after each one of

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>these periods of stress, the dollar has gone from strength

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to strength. Is that a burden? I mean people exorbitant privilege,

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>Like it's a good thing, but like there's also a

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>talk that especially pre pandemic, when a lot of the

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>issues were like in sufficient demand, and there was an

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>argument of the dollar is too strong, and that's probably

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>like is there good for the US that these series

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>of crises where the dollar keeps getting stronger? So maybe not?

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not. You know that it is monetary policy. This

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>image we have in the world that every country is

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>separate and they can run their independent monetary policies if

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>they have flexible exchange rates. I think it's not true

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of any country. It's not true of countries in the periphery.

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not true of the country in the center. Because

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>US monetary policy is global monetary policy, and so it

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:34.199
<v Speaker 1>has consequences really, you know, it rebounds on on the

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>United States. The reason I titled my book Money and

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Empire is precisely because of this, to to really highlight

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 1>the kind of contradiction between our political reality, which is

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:51.199
<v Speaker 1>nation states, okay, and our monetary reality, which is global okay.

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And how do you manage that? Um? It's it is

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>managed right now by central bank cooperation mainly UM. And

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the backstop of the global system is this intricate system

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of central bank backstops, liquidity swaps and so forth, and

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>these new female repo facilities and things that extend it

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>further to the global south. UM. But it's but US

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy is a global monetary policy, and so that's

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 1>what's happening. The US has decided now is the time.

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure this was in in collaboration and discussion with

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>other major central banks. They knew that this was not

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a surprise, and so they're coming along, you know, they're

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they're ratcheting up in their own time. UM. And that's

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what is that's how the politics are working. That

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it's cooperation between the central banks in the different countries.

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Will that hold We don't know geo strategic stuff says

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe not. Yes, I mean I would say that you

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 1>know that the data being the the issuer custodian of

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the reserve currency, I guess it comes with responsibilities and

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, backagenes to if you will, But let me

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>let me just have a comment about you know, the

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>dollar bouncing back every stronger again like my formative years were,

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, and onward right, that's when I took

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 1>my first macro class and so yes, the Asian financial

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:20.360
<v Speaker 1>crisis was was a formative period um for me at least.

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And then that was the first financial crisis that I

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 1>followed as a as a as a student, first year

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>macro student. And so yes, that was a crisis where

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it was an offshore dollar crisis, uh, and a certain

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>part of the world got weaker, um and then the

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Washington Consensus came in and kind of cleaned things up.

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And so that was one episode. You know, oh eight

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>was a domestic crisis. That's when we get into the

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 1>QE habits. Uh. Then you know we've been having um,

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, smaller crisis since then. I mean, we we

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll be discussed. You know, the treasury cash futures crisis,

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the report crisis, what do we do about that? Um?

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, the pandemic itself. It happened, but again, the

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>position that the financial system was in at that point

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in time was that you were woefully a liquid to

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to provide all those credit lines to all

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>this corporation. If something like that would happen, today would

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>be a lot more liquid to deal with that. But

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, that was another crisis. And then again today,

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>this crisis of the price level that we have, um

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.719
<v Speaker 1>is a crisis that we haven't had since the nineteen seventies.

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think there are UM, I don't know. It

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>feels to me like that the dollar crisis are coming

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>closer and closer to home. UM. And basically I think

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the period that we are living through at the moment

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is we have trust in an institution, the Federal Reserve,

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>which is tasked with delivering price stability. And and I

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>think and I think that we are learning that you know,

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>can the Fed uh deliver price stability just by hiking

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>interest rates? Or are there kind of forces in the

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>real world, whether it's uh, you know, a shortage of

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>cheap goods, cheap energy, labor, all these things, you know,

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>is it is it? Is it as easy as raising

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>interest rates from zero to five percent to slow inflation down?

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it as easy as as drinking um the balance

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>ship to display intation? Let me let me just offer

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>one one observation, which is that, you know, everybody likes

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the fact that, well, maybe we are

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in the bond bear market and we have you know,

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>lall Street is so young. Nobody has seen rising interest rates,

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>so we don't know how to trade it. A version

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of that, a version of that is that we haven't

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>seen an inflation episode, so we don't know how to

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>think about inflation. Um, we have seen something like what

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>happened in the seventies, but we haven't seen anything that

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, happened a hundred years ago, nineteen fourteen, nineteen

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>forty and all these things. So my impression talking to

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>clients is everybody thinks about the spike in inflation charts

0:30:56.520 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>as if it's another basis. Okay, you know, we are

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>used to be thinking about crisis because we had crisis

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of basis, you know, a pack de x rate and

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a market rate across currency basis a library OI as

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a cash treasury future basis um triple a c d

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>os versus triple A treasuries. There's a basis that creeps

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>in always, and it's always as simple as somebody throws

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet at it and the basis closes. This, this

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>crisis of the price level, this inflation crisis, is a

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>very different ball game. It's not as simple as raising

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>grades because the world doesn't work like that. It's not

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>as simple as doing QT because the world doesn't work

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>like that. UM, so I think this is a real test,

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:42.479
<v Speaker 1>and so and so I think this is a this

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is a very particular moment in time. You know this,

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>This notion that you know the fat can deliver two

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>percent price stability is probably the reason why FX reserve managers,

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>over long periods of time started to diversify away from

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>bills to two year treasuries, five year treasuries. Ten. Your

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>treasure is because it's a good store of value and

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it's an idea. And we will see if that's indeed

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the case, or whether we are going to settle in

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a period where two is not attainable. Um and maybe

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>four at some point is the new target, or maybe

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're just going to be bouncing around between five

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and ten, I don't know. I have a point of clarification,

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>so when we're talking about that, breton Wood's three. So

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>part of the dollar decline idea is geopolitical people are

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>worried that their reserves are going to be seized by

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the US. We've seen that happen with Russia and Afghanistan.

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And then part of it has to do with commodities.

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at the US from a pure

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>commodities perspective, it's not in a bad place right where

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>exporting oil and gas. I mean, I have coal in

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>my basement. It came with the house, like it's a

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>resource rich nation. So how how does that aspect of

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it fit in with the dollar demise idea? Let's think

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>about this step by step. Okay, so peakuro dollar yes

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>or no? Inflection point? Yes or no? I mean that's

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>how it starts. My sense would be yes, speak your dollar,

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>because if if um on the margin, the commodity market

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>is starting to invoice things in currencies other than the

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>US dollar, I think that's something. And again, you know

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the perspective from which I'm trying to understand this is Okay, Um,

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I work as a strategist, you know, I have I

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>have a job which is to talk to investors and

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out the future. This is going to

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>have an implication on commodity prices. This will have an

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>implication on inflation, This will have an implication for the

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>level of interest rates, And this is going to have

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>an implication on swap spreads. You know, cash treasuries versus

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>OI s. What's the demand And as I said on

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>this on on on on the podcast before, um and

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>let's just take two countries. Okay, let's take let's take

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Russia and let's take China. Okay, what is the incentive

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of Russia, for example, to recycle revenues from commodity sales

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in G seven uh into G seven assets zero? Right,

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're invoicing things in different currencies. Take note,

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>because that was a five hundred billion dollars stash of

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 1>liquidity that went into the FIC swap market, that went

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>at some point into US treasuries. Uh. And again you know,

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 1>look at look at China. I mean, you know, they

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 1>accumulated treasuries and then it's flatlined and now it's falling.

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So on the margin, these things matter, um. And I

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>think this is this is how it starts, how it's

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>going to you know, don't think about this as you know,

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>next summer it's going to be like this, and it's

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be like that. It doesn't work like that.

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think on the margin, things have changed, and

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 1>this is going to change things. Um uh. This is

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:55.279
<v Speaker 1>going to change flows on the margin, and we are

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be treading and kind of living with those

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>um um uh every day as you guys write about it,

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 1>as I write about it, as as as others in

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the audience. Um traded. So yes, the US is commodity

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:17.919
<v Speaker 1>is self sufficient. Other parts of the world are not. Um.

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:20.799
<v Speaker 1>But again, as I said, I think the thing that

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>we need to factor in is basically what this means

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for for the price of commodities, which are priced in

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 1>US dollars. So you can have a devaluation of the

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of the of the global euro dollar in terms of commodities,

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>and then you know what that means in terms of

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:41.720
<v Speaker 1>euro yen uh euro dollar dollar yen exchange rates um

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 1>weaker verry um. You know, obviously Russia and China continuing

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to trade more for obvious reasons, perhaps some invoicing of

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>commodities not in dollars. Maybe that's picking up. Like intuitively,

0:35:57.160 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the Redman b should become a bigger deal.

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>And China is a big trading partner, and apparently it

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>seems likely that there are going to be some countries

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>for whom it's a partnership gets even stronger. Like it's

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense to me, Like, what the why wouldn't

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the Redman be become a much more significant global currency

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>just because China is a big country and a big

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 1>trading partner. Um, well, they're a big country and they

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>produce a lot of stuff and that's right. Um, And

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, and and they buy a lot of stuff.

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>But that's not what makes for a global currency. Um.

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're the notion that inflation is some

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>sign that people are are are revulsed by the dollar.

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>You know that this is about depreciation of the dollar there,

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that that's sort of in the air here. Um, I

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's just not right. That's not what's driving inflation.

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 1>What's driving inflation are these wartime dislocations. Um, we had

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic in which we all shifted to two goods,

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and then the pandemic is over, we shifted back to

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:04.799
<v Speaker 1>services and the people to produce those services that all

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>moved out of New York, and so wages are pressured.

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of dislocation that in a market

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>economy shows up as price movements. So we were talking

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:15.320
<v Speaker 1>about this in the green room a little bit before.

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 1>I think what we might be seeing here is a

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>shift to a higher price level. Okay, but whether this

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>is the beginning of a kind of inflationary period, I

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 1>still remain in team transitory, okay. Um, And I as

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>was let me let me, let me, let me say

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a more inflammatory thing than that, Okay, which is that Powell?

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Remember he wanted to tighten before the pandemic, Okay, when

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 1>there was no inflation, right, it was just time to

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:47.919
<v Speaker 1>to put some discipline into the system. He wanted to

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to to tighten as soon as he could after the pandemic.

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>He didn't think there was going to be inflation. He

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>wanted to tighten anyway. Inflation has made it much easier

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.320
<v Speaker 1>for Powell to do what he wants to do because

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 1>now everyone is scared about inflation. So it's this and

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean. That means that's positive for the dollar.

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>That's strengthening the dollar. So I think that the politics

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>are working in favor of of a stronger dollar in

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the future, not not the other way around. Um. And

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 1>as long as the the anchoring of the of the

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 1>of the of the new price level, UM happens and

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't get uh, it doesn't get un anchored. But

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any particular particular sign that that's happened yet.

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>So so this is very interesting because I send some

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>talking past each other. So the dollar can be weak

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and strong at the same time. This is like cubits,

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, like zero and one. You know, the dollar

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.719
<v Speaker 1>can be very very strong versus other g seven currencies

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 1>which we see right. But again I think I think

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the next five years is a story of whether the

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>dollar is going to stay strong versus commodities or commodity

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 1>prices go through the roof and then we are going

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to be dealing with, you know, ring rounds of inflation.

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 1>So let me let me again just just emphasize. I mean,

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>there's two views in the market that this is a

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 1>massive reopening and that we over the fiscal and monetary stimulus,

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 1>and that's a view. I'm sure that is part of

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the picture. But I guess I have been trying to

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 1>articulate and highlight and put on the table is that

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 1>I think the economic war aspect of all this is underappreciated.

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>And if the economic war is indeed the theme that

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 1>is going to be with us for the next five years. Um,

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the way we should think about inflation is not that,

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's all this bad stuff that happened over

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the past twelve months. It pushed the price level higher,

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and the base effects are going to take care of,

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the rate of inflation over time. I think

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>we also need to be mindful of all the potential

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>bad things that can happen over the next twelve months

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to five years. And again when you read the news,

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and I started to read the news, where like I

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>just pick up the paper and I look at commodities,

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I look at the war, I look at text stuff,

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Chris Miller, Chip War, that type of stuff,

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and and I just try to understand the way Russia

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and Europe is evolving as a relationship, and the way

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 1>China and the US are evolving as a relationship, and

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>things are not getting better, you know, So do I

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>think that Do I think that bad stuff can happen

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in in the in the future that are going to

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>mess up supply chains even more? Yes? Do I see

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 1>risks in all the demand construction policies that Europe is

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>doing in the phase of rising gas and electricity prices, Yes,

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it's fanning shortages. Um. Do I see risks in in

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you know, I mean OPEC is effectively

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:54.879
<v Speaker 1>telling us that they want to see a hundred dollar

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>floor under oil. That's about where it's right. We know

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that the drift down in oil prices game partly because

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:04.840
<v Speaker 1>we have released a lot of oil from the spr

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and we know that as every infantry that's finite. And

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:10.439
<v Speaker 1>then we also know that the physical market where oil

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 1>gets produced is super tight. You know, you can't tramp

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff up. There is still a view in the market

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>which I believe that that commodity prices, especially for you know,

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 1>oil gas. I mean it can go vertical. Gas prices

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 1>and electricity prices in Europe are going vertical. Can it

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:29.759
<v Speaker 1>happen in the oil market too, Yes, I mean we

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>basically had you know, I think you're upset about that,

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 1>but but you know, so I think I think this

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is basically the world that you live in, UM. And

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>so this level shifts up in the price level I

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 1>think can happen, you know, every six months. There's reasons

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 1>to believe that that there's there's risks like that, and

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 1>so from that perspective, I don't think that inflation is

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 1>is transitor is. Certainly the reopening bit might be like

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a one time thing, but but I think the geopolitical

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 1>aspects are just getting more complicated and more ski area.

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say so result just on the price level

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>crisis idea, And this is something that came out from

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 1>our last conversation with you, and I think we wrote

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it up in a post, this idea of problems that

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 1>money can't solve, so physical commodities, supply chains, that sort

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:19.239
<v Speaker 1>of thing. In that world, What is the role of

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:21.839
<v Speaker 1>a central bank Because on the one hand, yes, raise

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:24.440
<v Speaker 1>interest rates to fight inflation because you don't have enough

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of the real stuff to go around. But on the

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 1>other hand, if what's required to solve that problem is

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 1>more investment, maybe you don't necessarily want rates going up

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that much. Yes, Um, I think I think a central

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>banks job at the moment and I think that job

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 1>is going to evolve over time. At the moment, the

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>way I think about the fed's role, for example, is,

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've gone from being a central bank that

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is generating wealth via QUEI portfolio balanced gennel um to

0:42:58.320 --> 0:43:01.439
<v Speaker 1>push the demand kurd outward because there's all this cheap

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:05.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff that's coming and what we are afraid of is deflation. Okay,

0:43:05.520 --> 0:43:09.239
<v Speaker 1>so we've had fifteen years of that and then all

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden the supply curves have recotiate back in

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, commodities, labor, cheap goods. Inflation is coming in

0:43:18.320 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>large part from that. So to deal with that inflationary

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>impulse and to kind of take it off a bit,

0:43:23.760 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you need to generate a massive level shift

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:29.320
<v Speaker 1>down in demand such that things are more in linuage supply,

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think J. Powell kind of articulated something similar

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to that that we've been um. You know, we are

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 1>going to need a period of below trend growth. So

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 1>think about this as nominal GDP targeting and reverse. Whereas

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:43.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, we wanted to catch up with the pre

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:46.359
<v Speaker 1>pre pre GFC trend, now we need to kind of

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:50.520
<v Speaker 1>catch down to where where the realities of supplied. Its

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>second um again like the underlying environment in which we

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>will be I think will be inflationary. So the job

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:00.359
<v Speaker 1>of a central bank is to make sure that at

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.880
<v Speaker 1>least real interest rates are not falling, not going more negative,

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 1>but they are kind of heading heading in a in

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a positive territory. Then two things come from this um,

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, as I said in my most recent piece,

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>where I think, you know, we will have to spend

0:44:15.520 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. It's kind of like war finance. Again,

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just to kind of rebuild the world order or something. Um.

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, So before the virus, now we're going to

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, find you know, supply chains falling apart or

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>something like that. You know, so the whole rearmed, reshore, restock,

0:44:32.200 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 1>continue on with energy transition. That's going to require a

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of capital. Uh, that's going to require some reasonable

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>rates at which we can fund them. And so I

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>think yield curve control is in the picture in the

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:47.359
<v Speaker 1>context of that um. But it's a very different yield

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:50.360
<v Speaker 1>curve control. It's it's it's it's not yield curve control

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:52.359
<v Speaker 1>to keep rates at one percent so that you use

0:44:52.440 --> 0:44:56.800
<v Speaker 1>asset prices up. It's basically to make sure that yields

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 1>don't go through the roof. But there is a backstop

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to that's so like what we did in the Second

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 1>World War, where you had a price for short term money,

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you had a price for long term money, and you

0:45:06.600 --> 0:45:09.439
<v Speaker 1>basically had a yield curve and then go and win

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the war. Um. You know, if this is you know,

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:14.879
<v Speaker 1>if you have World War three, that's what people do.

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully this is just going to be an economic war

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 1>where we have to retool and and and finance that

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:24.759
<v Speaker 1>whole process. But I definitely see the central bank kind

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 1>of be engaged in the bond market and provide a

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 1>yield curve cap but with much higher interest rates. And

0:45:30.719 --> 0:45:34.920
<v Speaker 1>then in the case of you know, Japan, Europe, the UK, um,

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:38.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean you have a currency crisis in those places. Um.

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And and again this is back back to Perry's earlier

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 1>uh point about the dollar. And there's one monetary policy,

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:48.279
<v Speaker 1>which is the Fed's monetary policy, and everybody has to

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:51.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of go in that direction otherwise recurrency is going

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:54.319
<v Speaker 1>to suffer. I think in Europe and all the commodity

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:58.400
<v Speaker 1>not self sufficient parts of the world, monetary policy is

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be relegated to making sure that the level

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:04.799
<v Speaker 1>of exchange rate is within the bounds of normalcy, and

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>you know where you can basically afford to import your

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 1>your basic commodities. So I think we can go to

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the questions in part because we just got a question

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that was going to be kind of my last question.

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like a good seg but well one

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:36.279
<v Speaker 1>we had both of you on in March, so like

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:38.399
<v Speaker 1>right at the beginning of the pandemic, but a few

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:41.359
<v Speaker 1>months before that we had spoken to you because that's

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:43.440
<v Speaker 1>when there was all the questions about like running out

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of reserves or insufficient. So we just got a question

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:48.920
<v Speaker 1>about this, which is like, you know, obviously you just

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:52.919
<v Speaker 1>mentioned quantitative tightening. This is kind of a simple question.

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Almost seems like it almost seems old fashioned. But how

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:57.880
<v Speaker 1>much space do you think they have? And is it

0:46:57.920 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be another thing where they have to cut it

0:46:59.640 --> 0:47:02.800
<v Speaker 1>short early because of the amount of reserves demanded in

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the system. Is a question from me about you, But

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll start with you. Are we saying who the questions

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 1>are from? I don't know. Yeah, this is ok. You

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:15.000
<v Speaker 1>can if you send it, If you send a message

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and you don't want your name from Cameron dire I

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of stole okay questions. Qut. I don't think that

0:47:21.680 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of room I don't think that there's

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of room to do QUT. First, I think

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:33.720
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be ultimately a question about demand

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:36.440
<v Speaker 1>for treasuries, not not the systems a bit into the

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:38.920
<v Speaker 1>fund those treasuries, right, because there's a lot of money

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:42.799
<v Speaker 1>in the RRP facility. But it feels like everybody just

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 1>wants to be in the front end, right because the

0:47:44.640 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 1>front end you get the benefit of rates are going up,

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you get higher rates every two every three months. Um.

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we are also going from a period where

0:47:53.880 --> 0:47:56.319
<v Speaker 1>the market was a big believer in this idea that

0:47:56.360 --> 0:47:59.800
<v Speaker 1>we are at peak inflation, peak hawkishness, and so whatever

0:48:00.320 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>three months of QTV we had so far, First of all,

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that the amounts were not that big on the sixty

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars per month, um. You know, the market just

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:11.879
<v Speaker 1>absorbed assuming that we are at peak hawkishness. So all

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:13.839
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna do is raelly from here. I mean, that's

0:48:13.880 --> 0:48:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole let's go along bonds and let's go along

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:18.920
<v Speaker 1>duration view. If we are going to go into a

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:25.480
<v Speaker 1>world where inflation hasn't peaked if you have further um,

0:48:25.560 --> 0:48:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean Europe is in a very different

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:32.320
<v Speaker 1>uh position. Again, I think this energy crisis that Europe

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 1>is having now is not only going to have a

0:48:36.080 --> 0:48:38.840
<v Speaker 1>liquidity event around it, but also it's going to impact

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 1>industry supply chains. You know, what does it mean for

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:44.839
<v Speaker 1>for inflation elsewhere? So again, if if you don't think

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that the FED is at peak hawkishness and that there

0:48:47.000 --> 0:48:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is a risk of you know, the peak of the

0:48:49.440 --> 0:48:51.440
<v Speaker 1>hiking cycle not being three and a half but rather

0:48:51.480 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 1>say five percent, Again, Powell didn't say anything that should

0:48:55.640 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 1>make us think that that's not possible. You know, inflation

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is the target. He'd did not mentioned stocks and as

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:04.800
<v Speaker 1>surprises once in that speech, and that omission is very important.

0:49:04.800 --> 0:49:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when you write these speeches at that venue,

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you think about what you're gonna say, So

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>what you don't say has just as much meaning as

0:49:11.160 --> 0:49:13.400
<v Speaker 1>what you say. But you know, it doesn't seem to

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 1>care too much about the growth impact of hikes. He

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:22.360
<v Speaker 1>does not mention as surprises one bit. It's inflation singular mission,

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:25.279
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're going to do. So if we are

0:49:25.280 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 1>going to go in a in a in a in

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a market period where um, we're going to hike the

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 1>five or six percent, you know, demand for treasuries is

0:49:32.640 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 1>not going to be as good over the next three

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to six months as it was during the first three

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:40.480
<v Speaker 1>months of QT. My new QT at the moment is accelerating.

0:49:40.920 --> 0:49:44.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's another that that's that's another issue. And and

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:49.280
<v Speaker 1>again UM, I think, um, just as we were talking

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:53.840
<v Speaker 1>about this, you know, financial blockades of of FX reserves,

0:49:53.840 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 1>financial energy blockade of Europe, a blockade of Taiwan, a

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:03.920
<v Speaker 1>blockade of chips, um China, can you know, make things

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:07.080
<v Speaker 1>more dynamic as we do QT. Because the only the

0:50:08.400 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 1>weird thing to me about QTS that everybody thinks about it, Well,

0:50:11.239 --> 0:50:13.360
<v Speaker 1>this is what the FED is going to do. Well, okay, fine,

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:15.680
<v Speaker 1>but that's the parable and minimum because others are also

0:50:15.719 --> 0:50:17.960
<v Speaker 1>in a position where you can also start selling treasures

0:50:17.960 --> 0:50:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and not show up at auctions. At a hundred billion

0:50:19.880 --> 0:50:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a month that the private sector will have to absorb

0:50:23.040 --> 0:50:26.759
<v Speaker 1>instead of the FED is just a minimum, right because

0:50:26.760 --> 0:50:29.839
<v Speaker 1>other central banks can can step away from the market.

0:50:29.880 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 1>So basically this means that you know, cash treasuries can

0:50:32.760 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 1>cheapen quite a bit relative to our I has swap

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:41.840
<v Speaker 1>spreads can tighten. There's a certain appetites um uh that

0:50:41.840 --> 0:50:43.799
<v Speaker 1>that the FET is going to have to tolerate that.

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:46.360
<v Speaker 1>But if if that becomes an issue, I think I

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:51.719
<v Speaker 1>think the days of QT are numbered. So what is QT? Okay?

0:50:52.000 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Let us understand what the balance of the FED looks like. Okay,

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the balance of the FED is money market funding of

0:50:58.160 --> 0:51:01.200
<v Speaker 1>capital market limiting. The FIT is a show a bank.

0:51:01.880 --> 0:51:06.359
<v Speaker 1>So QT involves taking those positions and moving them into

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the private sector. Basically, that's what it is. You're shrinking

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheet of the FED and you're expanding a

0:51:11.200 --> 0:51:14.319
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet somewhere else. So it has to become profitable

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:18.239
<v Speaker 1>to do money market funding of capital market lending. Okay, Um,

0:51:18.280 --> 0:51:21.640
<v Speaker 1>otherwise no one will do it. That's what That's what

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:28.680
<v Speaker 1>would make quantitative tapering QT um uh possible. Um. Remember

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:31.360
<v Speaker 1>why how quantity of easing was just the opposite, you know,

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:34.440
<v Speaker 1>where these collapsing positions on private balance sheets were just

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 1>dropped onto the public balance sheet, and so we're just

0:51:36.600 --> 0:51:41.280
<v Speaker 1>moving in the opposite direction. Um. And I think that So,

0:51:41.280 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 1>so mostly that's about prices, right, That's that's about is

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it is it profitable to to do this? Zoltan was

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:50.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of saying that with these business spreads, and he

0:51:50.440 --> 0:51:53.160
<v Speaker 1>has all these fancy words, but in the in the

0:51:53.200 --> 0:51:56.040
<v Speaker 1>big picture, you're shifting the shadow bank from the public

0:51:56.080 --> 0:51:59.839
<v Speaker 1>sector to the to the private sector. Is what you're

0:52:00.080 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is what you're trying to do, um and I do

0:52:03.680 --> 0:52:08.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's possible for interest rates to go um considerably higher.

0:52:08.280 --> 0:52:10.480
<v Speaker 1>What I would add to this, and maybe we have

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a little dispute about this, What matters a lot in

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:16.799
<v Speaker 1>the world is nominal rates. There's a lot of a

0:52:16.840 --> 0:52:19.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of push saying, oh, we still have negative real

0:52:19.520 --> 0:52:22.080
<v Speaker 1>rates and you're never going to get control of inflation. Well,

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I already raise some questions about whether your measure of inflation,

0:52:26.040 --> 0:52:29.439
<v Speaker 1>whether this really is inflation or something. Higher nomin rates

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:32.560
<v Speaker 1>mean that buyers have to pay more money, okay, and

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that that is a clearing that's a settlement constraint, you know.

0:52:36.040 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So it will put if you raise interest rates by

0:52:39.320 --> 0:52:41.880
<v Speaker 1>by a couple of percentage points, the outstanding debt is

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:45.480
<v Speaker 1>going to get re repriced and and the borrowers are

0:52:45.480 --> 0:52:46.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be under a lot more pressure and they're

0:52:46.920 --> 0:52:48.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to do something about that. They're going to

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:51.359
<v Speaker 1>have to pay their their debt instead of doing something else.

0:52:51.520 --> 0:52:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So there will be a there will and that's not

0:52:54.520 --> 0:52:57.000
<v Speaker 1>just in the United States. That's that's globally, and the

0:52:57.080 --> 0:52:59.600
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable borrowers are going to go to the wall. And

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 1>this is this is the period that we're in, Okay,

0:53:02.560 --> 0:53:05.719
<v Speaker 1>so that the quantities will shrink there too because there

0:53:05.760 --> 0:53:10.000
<v Speaker 1>will be defaults. Um. What happened to crypto is just

0:53:10.160 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the first. I'm actually really surprised we haven't had a

0:53:14.080 --> 0:53:17.360
<v Speaker 1>crypto question. I was just throwing that red meat for you.

0:53:17.480 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Let me let me add something to cute I think.

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very important, UM. And it just remind

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:26.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone since the year two thousand, UM, there has always

0:53:26.719 --> 0:53:29.080
<v Speaker 1>been a big central bank on the margin buying a

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:32.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of treasuries. Okay. From two thousand to two thousand

0:53:32.600 --> 0:53:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and eight it was the PBOC and then they flatlined. Okay,

0:53:35.800 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 1>from O eight onwards it was the FED. When the

0:53:39.640 --> 0:53:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Fed stopped, UM, the e c B and the b

0:53:42.960 --> 0:53:46.040
<v Speaker 1>O J started to do QUI. But then all the

0:53:46.120 --> 0:53:49.400
<v Speaker 1>yen and euros they produced on an effex the you know,

0:53:49.440 --> 0:53:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the pension funds in those jurisdictions. UM swapped those euros

0:53:55.440 --> 0:54:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and yen for dollars to buy UH treasury securities. UM.

0:54:00.440 --> 0:54:02.839
<v Speaker 1>So what is the moral of this is that it's

0:54:02.840 --> 0:54:06.160
<v Speaker 1>either the PBOC doing a lot of liquidity injection buy

0:54:06.280 --> 0:54:09.120
<v Speaker 1>treasuries or the FED is doing liquidity injection by buying

0:54:09.160 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 1>treasuries or other central banks for buying their own bonds.

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:14.040
<v Speaker 1>That creates a lot of liquidity in euro and yen

0:54:14.120 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 1>which gets swapped for dollars and then you buy treasuries

0:54:16.560 --> 0:54:20.640
<v Speaker 1>with it. A big central bank liquidity impulse is always

0:54:20.719 --> 0:54:24.680
<v Speaker 1>there to be a marginal buyer. So now okay we

0:54:24.760 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about this. You know, China is not buying anymore,

0:54:28.080 --> 0:54:29.680
<v Speaker 1>had you cause your way to byme and the curve

0:54:29.760 --> 0:54:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is flat, so it doesn't pay anymore to to to

0:54:32.680 --> 0:54:35.640
<v Speaker 1>buy anything on an f FX heach basis anymore. The

0:54:35.840 --> 0:54:38.120
<v Speaker 1>end is close to one fifty. I mean, we are

0:54:38.200 --> 0:54:41.240
<v Speaker 1>now at levels at which you can expect either FEX

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:44.880
<v Speaker 1>interventions out of Japan, which is going to involve you know,

0:54:44.960 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 1>selling treasury securities on the margin, or you are going

0:54:47.760 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to adjust the guilty curve pact to basically adjust UM.

0:54:51.200 --> 0:54:54.600
<v Speaker 1>If that happens, that doesn't mean anything good for UH

0:54:55.160 --> 0:54:58.480
<v Speaker 1>for for duration. And then basically when we think about

0:54:58.480 --> 0:55:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the FED doing QT are basically saying that against this

0:55:02.560 --> 0:55:06.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty year history of who buys treasuries on the margin,

0:55:06.640 --> 0:55:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the FX help buyer can step away. Uh, you know,

0:55:11.160 --> 0:55:14.400
<v Speaker 1>China can step away, and the fat can step away

0:55:14.880 --> 0:55:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's all going to be okay. We're basically expecting

0:55:17.920 --> 0:55:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the private sector to step in instead of the public

0:55:20.560 --> 0:55:24.239
<v Speaker 1>sector in a period where inflation is as uncertain as

0:55:24.280 --> 0:55:26.239
<v Speaker 1>it has ever been. We have no idea if it's

0:55:26.239 --> 0:55:29.000
<v Speaker 1>going to go from ten to five, ten to five,

0:55:29.080 --> 0:55:30.920
<v Speaker 1>ten to fifteen, or if it's going to cost at

0:55:30.920 --> 0:55:33.719
<v Speaker 1>ten what. I'm quite certain obviously it's not going to

0:55:33.760 --> 0:55:36.040
<v Speaker 1>crash back down to two pc. But basically we are

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:40.759
<v Speaker 1>asking the private sector to take down all these treasuries

0:55:40.800 --> 0:55:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that we are going to push back into the system

0:55:43.760 --> 0:55:48.560
<v Speaker 1>without a glitch and without a massive premier. M Um,

0:55:48.600 --> 0:55:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I have a good question from Alex Howett. He asks

0:55:52.239 --> 0:55:55.759
<v Speaker 1>this is for Perry specifically. Um, you know, we all

0:55:55.840 --> 0:55:59.520
<v Speaker 1>understand that it is possible for an international monetary system

0:55:59.560 --> 0:56:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to be served. We saw that before things like sterling.

0:56:04.880 --> 0:56:07.800
<v Speaker 1>What would it take to convince you that the dollar

0:56:08.200 --> 0:56:10.120
<v Speaker 1>was on its way out? What would have to change

0:56:10.120 --> 0:56:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in the world? Um, Well, the that's a good question,

0:56:16.120 --> 0:56:18.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe when I haven't put a lot of energy into

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:22.239
<v Speaker 1>because that's it seems pretty far from that. But so

0:56:22.320 --> 0:56:26.360
<v Speaker 1>let me go back to what what was it that

0:56:26.880 --> 0:56:32.800
<v Speaker 1>undermined sterling? Okay? Um? And it was there was two things. Okay,

0:56:33.040 --> 0:56:37.080
<v Speaker 1>There was that the Bank of England UM could did

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 1>not have the capacity to run the global system on

0:56:41.239 --> 0:56:44.920
<v Speaker 1>its own, and it couldn't get the US to help.

0:56:46.280 --> 0:56:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Both of those things happened, Um it can happen that

0:56:50.760 --> 0:56:53.680
<v Speaker 1>there would be a crisis and the FED is is

0:56:53.719 --> 0:56:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a little overwhelmed. If everyone refused to help the FED, Okay,

0:56:59.600 --> 0:57:02.239
<v Speaker 1>this would be a problem, but it would be a

0:57:02.239 --> 0:57:05.320
<v Speaker 1>problem for everybody. It was a problem for the United

0:57:05.320 --> 0:57:08.200
<v Speaker 1>States that the United States did not help the Bank

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of England UM. As a matter of fact, we had

0:57:09.920 --> 0:57:12.399
<v Speaker 1>a global depression if you if you notice, and and

0:57:12.480 --> 0:57:14.719
<v Speaker 1>some people thought that was mainly a U S thing,

0:57:15.000 --> 0:57:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, but it was. It was actually very very

0:57:17.640 --> 0:57:22.280
<v Speaker 1>damaging to the United States. So I think that the

0:57:22.360 --> 0:57:26.640
<v Speaker 1>cooperation of policy, co operation of the major central banks

0:57:26.640 --> 0:57:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in the global north um is is vital and if

0:57:30.160 --> 0:57:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that breaks down, all bets are off. Can I question?

0:57:36.560 --> 0:57:38.280
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know the answer to this. But but

0:57:38.320 --> 0:57:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I wonder, um, but your take is on this? I

0:57:41.440 --> 0:57:42.920
<v Speaker 1>get this question a lot. I don't know what to

0:57:42.960 --> 0:57:47.640
<v Speaker 1>answer to it. So first, fiat money as a project

0:57:47.800 --> 0:57:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is fairly young. It's let post Nixon, from what I understand.

0:57:53.720 --> 0:57:59.440
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think about that? Number one? And

0:57:59.440 --> 0:58:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's not right, okay, And and and number two. Um,

0:58:06.560 --> 0:58:10.920
<v Speaker 1>if the fundamental building block of fiat money is an

0:58:10.920 --> 0:58:16.800
<v Speaker 1>ability to deliver price stability, and if for for that

0:58:16.840 --> 0:58:19.880
<v Speaker 1>reason there's some risk to that notion, what happens to

0:58:19.920 --> 0:58:24.080
<v Speaker 1>fiat money? Well, I you may have noticed I never

0:58:24.160 --> 0:58:27.880
<v Speaker 1>used the word fiat money, Okay. Um. When I think

0:58:27.920 --> 0:58:31.600
<v Speaker 1>about the Sterling standard, I call it the Sterling standard,

0:58:31.960 --> 0:58:36.120
<v Speaker 1>not the international gold standard. Everyone was using sterling as

0:58:36.120 --> 0:58:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the international money. And yes, sterling was notionally redeemable in gold,

0:58:41.440 --> 0:58:44.040
<v Speaker 1>but nobody ever did it, and all of the all

0:58:44.080 --> 0:58:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of the actual transactions were in sterling. Same with the

0:58:47.280 --> 0:58:50.360
<v Speaker 1>dollar system. You know, so that when you go off gold,

0:58:50.880 --> 0:58:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it I don't know, freak people out. But in a

0:58:52.720 --> 0:58:54.680
<v Speaker 1>certain sense, we never were on gold. We were on

0:58:54.720 --> 0:58:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a dollar standard, and that was there for historical reasons

0:58:58.800 --> 0:59:01.520
<v Speaker 1>or or what ever. Um. And when we got rid

0:59:01.560 --> 0:59:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of it didn't have that. It didn't have that much

0:59:04.160 --> 0:59:07.400
<v Speaker 1>when we when we got rid of that sort of rule. Um,

0:59:07.520 --> 0:59:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we're now fine. So when you say fiat, okay, what

0:59:11.280 --> 0:59:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you're what And I would say this to anybody, you know,

0:59:15.200 --> 0:59:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking that these are green pieces of paper that

0:59:18.000 --> 0:59:20.640
<v Speaker 1>are printed on a printing press, and that's not correct.

0:59:21.080 --> 0:59:23.920
<v Speaker 1>These are liabilities of of a of a bank somewhere, okay,

0:59:24.080 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And there's assets that are on the other side of

0:59:25.920 --> 0:59:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheet. To UM, credit is not a bug.

0:59:29.360 --> 0:59:32.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a feature. Credit is not a bug. It's a

0:59:32.120 --> 0:59:36.400
<v Speaker 1>feature outside money, which is like inventories of gold or

0:59:36.400 --> 0:59:38.600
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Um is never going to be a

0:59:38.640 --> 0:59:41.880
<v Speaker 1>good money. Inside money is the money that you that

0:59:41.880 --> 0:59:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that makes the world go around. It's credit money, okay,

0:59:45.400 --> 0:59:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And so you need credit, okay in order to make

0:59:48.520 --> 0:59:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that go Um credit worthiness and the best credit is money.

0:59:54.920 --> 0:59:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So I have a question. It's sort of a push

0:59:57.560 --> 1:00:01.560
<v Speaker 1>back to Sultan's push back on that topic just now.

1:00:01.600 --> 1:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>But um, it's from John Farley. If bretton Wood's three

1:00:06.000 --> 1:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>comes to pass, how does pegging of currencies to commodities

1:00:10.800 --> 1:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>other than gold actually tame commodity volatility? If the underlying

1:00:16.400 --> 1:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>issue of resource shortages and things like that remain. Okay,

1:00:20.160 --> 1:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>which is which is very important question. I don't think

1:00:23.200 --> 1:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I ever said in any of my pieces that we

1:00:25.680 --> 1:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>are going to go to a world where things are

1:00:29.200 --> 1:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>packed to commodities or they are pegged to gold. What

1:00:33.280 --> 1:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I said was this what you think of as reserves

1:00:40.800 --> 1:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>at the level of a nation state is evolving, right

1:00:44.760 --> 1:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>as as used as as we talked about this before.

1:00:47.040 --> 1:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can't print oil to heat or meat

1:00:50.080 --> 1:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to eat, right, you know there are problems that central

1:00:52.920 --> 1:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>banks cannot solve. We have grown up. I have grown

1:00:56.880 --> 1:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>up in a world right where Southeast Asia got into

1:00:59.800 --> 1:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>try ball because they didn't have dollar liquidity. The binding

1:01:03.160 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>constraint was that as a country, you didn't have the

1:01:06.320 --> 1:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars to import the stuff you needed. What came out

1:01:09.680 --> 1:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of that was was a particular kind of solution medicine,

1:01:16.280 --> 1:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>which is that we need to have a lot of

1:01:18.160 --> 1:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>fex reserves and as a prudent country, we need to

1:01:20.480 --> 1:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>cover two years worth of chronic and deficits with the results.

1:01:23.800 --> 1:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>This is all pre dollars spotline stuff. Okay. So the

1:01:27.680 --> 1:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>emphasis was on, you know, we need to build a

1:01:30.040 --> 1:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>big pile of reserves because that's you know, like as individuals,

1:01:33.560 --> 1:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>we have a pile of savings, and that's how it's

1:01:35.320 --> 1:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>prudent to live. We are now basically, as as I

1:01:39.040 --> 1:01:40.919
<v Speaker 1>said in my pieces, if you go back you read

1:01:40.960 --> 1:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>it carefully. What I said, not what you know was interpreted,

1:01:45.840 --> 1:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>was that at a nation's level, Okay, I'm sitting on

1:01:49.200 --> 1:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>all these reserves. It's dollar liquidity, great, but I need gas,

1:01:53.920 --> 1:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I need electricity, I need read I need whatever stuff

1:01:57.600 --> 1:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>for my you know, I need to build chip foundries

1:01:59.840 --> 1:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and all these things. Right, So, so basically, what is

1:02:03.960 --> 1:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a reserve? The notion of it is changing. Okay, maybe

1:02:08.520 --> 1:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>some countries have way too many dollar liquidity and not enough,

1:02:13.240 --> 1:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>not enough commodity reserves. So I think over the next

1:02:15.680 --> 1:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>five years, as these countries are sitting there looking at

1:02:18.360 --> 1:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>their at their pile of of of of treasuries. You know,

1:02:22.200 --> 1:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>in a context of rising commodity prices, maybe you are

1:02:25.400 --> 1:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>going to reevaluate what it means to have a comfortable

1:02:30.520 --> 1:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and prudent amount of reserves. What should that consist of?

1:02:34.160 --> 1:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Should it only be treasury securities which you can repot

1:02:37.120 --> 1:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and liquid it and sell to raise dollars to buy what? Okay,

1:02:41.160 --> 1:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Should it be treasury securities when you know inflation is

1:02:44.320 --> 1:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>running structurally at eight percent and treasury coupons pay I

1:02:47.480 --> 1:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know, four or five percent if in real terms

1:02:50.880 --> 1:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>those treasuries five year tenure treasuries are buying less. Should

1:02:54.800 --> 1:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I be only in treasuries? Should I have a structurally

1:02:58.320 --> 1:03:02.959
<v Speaker 1>bigger allocation to gold? Should I, as a sovereign sell

1:03:03.080 --> 1:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>some of my treasuries get dollar liquidity and cut the

1:03:05.560 --> 1:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>two hundred billion dollar check and establish a commodity resource

1:03:09.160 --> 1:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>company at the sovereign level, Go out and buy commodities

1:03:12.240 --> 1:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>when it's cheap before we end up into an even

1:03:15.440 --> 1:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>deeper economic war where where need resource national nationalism is

1:03:19.680 --> 1:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a bigger issue. Can it happen that reserve management practices

1:03:24.560 --> 1:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and countries thinking about what is reserves changes in that direction? Yes?

1:03:29.760 --> 1:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>For me, that is what Breton wood Street is about.

1:03:32.480 --> 1:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not establishing a link to gold, It's not establishing

1:03:38.200 --> 1:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a link to a basket of commodities. It's not too

1:03:41.760 --> 1:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>unseats the dollar and kind of elevate you know, something

1:03:45.800 --> 1:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>else on a pedestal. These things, I think over the

1:03:49.080 --> 1:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>next five years are going to happen on the margin again,

1:03:52.560 --> 1:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>as I said like to understand this and too and

1:03:54.640 --> 1:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to kind of again like nursing a baby. You know

1:03:57.360 --> 1:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that baby is changing all the time, but you know

1:03:59.560 --> 1:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going to become something else over time. And I

1:04:02.400 --> 1:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>think and I think that the best approach to look

1:04:05.000 --> 1:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>at Breton Wood Street is to just kind of look

1:04:07.280 --> 1:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>at these things and whether they are happening. Again, Like

1:04:10.840 --> 1:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I can, I can list you a number of headlines.

1:04:14.280 --> 1:04:17.479
<v Speaker 1>You know, India instructing its states to cover three years

1:04:17.480 --> 1:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>worth of residential and industrial Uh call needs to basically

1:04:21.760 --> 1:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>head itself for the winter whatever. Uh you know, Uh,

1:04:25.320 --> 1:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know the news like this are are

1:04:27.600 --> 1:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>are all over the place. But I think that this

1:04:29.520 --> 1:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>team is happening and and and it's going to grow

1:04:33.040 --> 1:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in size and over the next five years. When we

1:04:34.920 --> 1:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>look at fex reserves and central bank balance sheets and

1:04:38.000 --> 1:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>what states balance sheets look like, commodities and gold are

1:04:42.200 --> 1:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>going to play a bigger role. I think treasuries are

1:04:45.480 --> 1:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>going to play a smaller role. And the commodity market

1:04:49.080 --> 1:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a market where it's not just

1:04:51.280 --> 1:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>exclusively dollars that we evoice things in, but also other currencies.

1:04:55.520 --> 1:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>And if that happens to half a trillion and or

1:04:58.160 --> 1:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollar scale. I think that's going to be

1:05:01.480 --> 1:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>meaningful enough that they are going to have implications in

1:05:05.840 --> 1:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>rates markets, at the level of the price level of commodities,

1:05:09.200 --> 1:05:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and faction and all these things. And to me, that's

1:05:11.840 --> 1:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>what Breton Bostree is. Maybe it's a bad term and

1:05:14.800 --> 1:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>it kind of sends you off. I mean, Adam two

1:05:17.320 --> 1:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>said that it's a bad term. So maybe it's a

1:05:19.240 --> 1:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>bad term, but because it pushes you down to think

1:05:21.440 --> 1:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>about things a certain way. But I think these are

1:05:23.800 --> 1:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the practical implications of everything that you're talking about. So

1:05:28.040 --> 1:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I I think it's probably right that we have learned

1:05:32.920 --> 1:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that our supply chains are way too fragile and that

1:05:35.280 --> 1:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>they need to have more redundancy in them, more inventories

1:05:37.800 --> 1:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>along the way. UM that, for geopolitical reasons, maybe be

1:05:41.800 --> 1:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a good idea to be a little more independent, you know,

1:05:44.240 --> 1:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>have your energy, energy security and so forth. All of

1:05:47.160 --> 1:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>those things seemed to me right. I just don't think

1:05:50.600 --> 1:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>they have any implications for the future of the dollar.

1:05:53.640 --> 1:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Um that there. I think that people will be accumulating,

1:05:57.720 --> 1:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, more more reserves of commodity reason and and

1:06:00.920 --> 1:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>worrying about safe food safety and all that sort of thing.

1:06:03.880 --> 1:06:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't see that that's about converting your treasury bills

1:06:06.800 --> 1:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>into grain stores or something. Um. I think you're still

1:06:10.000 --> 1:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna have treasure. So there it's it's not either, it's

1:06:13.560 --> 1:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>not it's not as substitute, okay, um, And I don't

1:06:17.200 --> 1:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any of that as any threat to

1:06:21.400 --> 1:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the dollar. Well, here's a question, and it's very closely

1:06:26.160 --> 1:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>fits with this from Janic's Blue Line futures uh one store.

1:06:31.400 --> 1:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>One project that's been in the work since even before

1:06:34.800 --> 1:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, but which has become much more acute is

1:06:38.000 --> 1:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the attempt by the US to become a natural gas

1:06:40.840 --> 1:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>export powerhouse. And we see the creation of these terminals,

1:06:43.760 --> 1:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and we know that you know, Europe would take all

1:06:45.760 --> 1:06:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the gas it could possibly get right now, is Henry

1:06:49.800 --> 1:06:51.959
<v Speaker 1>Hub that price? And you know, we know that there's

1:06:52.000 --> 1:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>no global price for gas right now, But is there

1:06:54.760 --> 1:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a possibility that Henry Hub at some point in this

1:06:57.840 --> 1:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>evolution becomes the MOBAL benchmark if everyone wants US gas,

1:07:03.200 --> 1:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and does that then have a cementing role in terms

1:07:06.640 --> 1:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of the dollars status as once again back to invoicing

1:07:11.560 --> 1:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the dollar US, that's the price etcetera. Yeah, I mean

1:07:15.840 --> 1:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I would say, sure, why not. I mean, we're heading

1:07:18.960 --> 1:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in that direction, right, um um, guests from here, guests

1:07:23.920 --> 1:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>guests from there. Um. I guess I don't know what

1:07:27.800 --> 1:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the answer there is. Maybe I asked Perry up, I

1:07:30.360 --> 1:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>passed the hot potato onto you. But I mean, in

1:07:32.600 --> 1:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>my mind, like the US became the daughter became the

1:07:36.720 --> 1:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>reserve currency in large part because of the petrol Dotter trade.

1:07:39.600 --> 1:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>But that was basically a situation where the US had

1:07:41.920 --> 1:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to important pay others with US dollars with yeah, yeah,

1:07:45.920 --> 1:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>but but but I guess if you start to export

1:07:48.320 --> 1:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>commodities yourself and then so so you're no longer you're

1:07:54.440 --> 1:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you're running at it from a from a cronic and

1:07:56.760 --> 1:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>surplus perspective, not a cronic and deficit perspective. What does

1:08:01.240 --> 1:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that mean for the amount of dollars out there? You're

1:08:04.880 --> 1:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>not broadcasting those dollars to the rest of the world.

1:08:07.000 --> 1:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>You're basically absorbing those dollars because someone is paying from

1:08:10.840 --> 1:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world to you for your command.

1:08:12.800 --> 1:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what Henry Hubby is Henry Hubby is.

1:08:16.160 --> 1:08:20.799
<v Speaker 1>It is a natural guess I should answer this benchmark

1:08:20.840 --> 1:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in Louisiana. No, no, but but but but I guess

1:08:23.000 --> 1:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the question is if the US is a net commodity

1:08:25.479 --> 1:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>exporter oiling as instead of a net commodity importer. Right,

1:08:29.240 --> 1:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>So the whole petrol dollar idea was they don't have

1:08:32.680 --> 1:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the they don't have the oil, but we have the dollars,

1:08:35.400 --> 1:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>so we pay for the oil the dollars, and then

1:08:38.000 --> 1:08:40.439
<v Speaker 1>others recycled those dollars in treasury. No, I don't think

1:08:40.439 --> 1:08:43.719
<v Speaker 1>if it's a curne on surplus question. Now, the petrol

1:08:43.760 --> 1:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>dollar was was really about the US banking system recycling

1:08:49.439 --> 1:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the surpluses that were being accumulated by the oil exporters

1:08:53.680 --> 1:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>um into lending to the to the oil importers, not

1:08:57.280 --> 1:08:59.519
<v Speaker 1>just the United States, but everyone else in the world too.

1:08:59.800 --> 1:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And that is part of the offshoring of the U.

1:09:02.240 --> 1:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>S dollar. That that was the that that was that

1:09:05.080 --> 1:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>part that I talked about the off shoing of the

1:09:06.760 --> 1:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>US dollar as a after after the collapse of Breton

1:09:10.040 --> 1:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Woods in seventy one. That mechanism was quite important for

1:09:13.640 --> 1:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>getting those balances really up, really fast, um. And it

1:09:17.000 --> 1:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>was definitely pushed by the US government. They were trying

1:09:20.080 --> 1:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>to solve a problem big imbalances, you know, global This

1:09:24.479 --> 1:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't the first time we're having today, w we have

1:09:26.360 --> 1:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>global imbalances. There were those big imbalances there, um, and

1:09:30.600 --> 1:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>if there had been better cooperation, you know, but in

1:09:33.320 --> 1:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the global North, probably it wouldn't have happened. If if,

1:09:36.320 --> 1:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>if the European countries had helped each other use their

1:09:39.120 --> 1:09:42.599
<v Speaker 1>use their gas reserves. You know, they could have fought off, okay,

1:09:42.680 --> 1:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but they did not. They were each each one was

1:09:45.160 --> 1:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>was running for themselves. And so this is what this

1:09:48.280 --> 1:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>is what happened, Um that it was solved by the

1:09:50.800 --> 1:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>private market. I think through this is there's a more

1:09:54.439 --> 1:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>general lesson here, um, which is when the central bank

1:09:57.320 --> 1:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is doing a lot okay, it's bad sign you you

1:10:02.320 --> 1:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>really you know, the industrial policy, which is what you're

1:10:05.280 --> 1:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>pushing with your rearm restock, rewire, re sure okay, industrial policy, Um,

1:10:12.479 --> 1:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't necessarily involve the simple bank and doing much

1:10:15.240 --> 1:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of anything. You know. This is this, this is a

1:10:17.720 --> 1:10:20.599
<v Speaker 1>this is a job for the for for the treasuring,

1:10:20.840 --> 1:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>for for the fiscal side of of the government and

1:10:24.640 --> 1:10:26.519
<v Speaker 1>all the all the Fed has to do is you know,

1:10:26.560 --> 1:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>make sure that there's a market for their bonds or

1:10:28.439 --> 1:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>something like that, but it's not quee. You know, they're

1:10:30.840 --> 1:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>not They're not having they're not trying to stimulate the economy.

1:10:34.120 --> 1:10:36.559
<v Speaker 1>I think one thing we learned is that, you know,

1:10:36.640 --> 1:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>Killey as a as a way of stimulate the economy

1:10:38.600 --> 1:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really work very well. As a way of catching

1:10:41.120 --> 1:10:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the falling NiFe. It works great well, Joe. I really

1:10:45.760 --> 1:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>hate to ask this question, um, but we've gone on

1:10:48.360 --> 1:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>for you know, an hour and twenty minutes. Shall we

1:10:50.640 --> 1:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>leave it there? Let's leave it there. We could go

1:10:52.840 --> 1:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>on for another hour and a half, but I think

1:10:55.000 --> 1:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>we gotta wrap. So big thank you to our guests.

1:10:58.920 --> 1:11:09.719
<v Speaker 1>We really could have got. Follow Peri Merrily on Twitter

1:11:09.880 --> 1:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>at pre Meryling and check out his book if you're

1:11:12.880 --> 1:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in the UK. It's not for sale here. Charles Pekin

1:11:15.120 --> 1:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Burger in the dollar system, Salton, I don't know if

1:11:18.240 --> 1:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you lurk secretly on Twitter, but I guess if you

1:11:20.360 --> 1:11:22.599
<v Speaker 1>want to follow him, maybe become a become a credit

1:11:22.640 --> 1:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>sweet client. That's probably a big thanks to our producer

1:11:27.439 --> 1:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Kerman Rodriguez and Dash Bennett helping you uys put it together.

1:11:32.200 --> 1:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>And I guess that's it. We'll leave it there. Thanks

1:11:35.040 --> 1:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Thanks for coming to Heret