WEBVTT - Russia Strike, Walmart Earnings

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Playing and

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.919
<v Speaker 2>broud Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Geopolitical News front End Center again. Today, the Ukraine carries

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 3>out first strike with US missiles in Russia, you know,

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 3>and then we had some rudder coming out of the

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Russian Foreign Minister down at the G twenty Mark really

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 3>spooky markets.

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 4>Mark Champion joins us.

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 3>He's a calmnist for Bloomberg Opinion. He's located in London

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 3>and he is one of our resident experts on geopolitics,

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 3>particularly in that part of the world. Here, Mark, it

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 3>just feels like, you know, today was not a good

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 3>day for the folks that were looking to try to

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 3>move towards a resolution there in Ukraine. What's your latest

0:00:57.960 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 3>view on what's happening in that part of the world.

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, you know what we the kind of

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 5>trajectory we have is that the Ukrainians are very much

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 5>on the back foot in on the battlefield, and at

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 5>the moment they have been for some months. You know,

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 5>obviously you have a new US president coming in who

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 5>says he wants to end it all in a day.

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 5>But you know, the question is at this point, you know,

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 5>everybody is agreed, including Voladimir's Zelenski, that the you know,

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 5>this needs to come to an end next year. You know,

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 5>the question is which day? Uh? And you know which

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 5>end of the year. And you know, how do you

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 5>get President put into the negotiating tables as you know,

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 5>opposed to just offering to accept Ukraine surrender, you know,

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 5>in the current circumstance or what the Ukrainians want to do,

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 5>what the Biden administration seems to be, you know, trying

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 5>to help it to do is to change the facts

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 5>on the ground such that you know Putin will have

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 5>some incentive to actually negotiate.

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 6>Well, I was gonna say, who has the upper hand

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 6>at this moment.

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, there's no question the Russians do. They're moving, you know,

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 5>every day, they're moving forward along the front lines, and

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 5>it's it's not a collapse. It's not a kind of

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 5>sudden you know, end of days. But you know, there's

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 5>there's no doubt about you know, which side has the

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 5>initiative at the moment. You know, that has kind of

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 5>flipped from one side to the other, you know, throughout

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 5>the war, and it could flip again. But at the moment,

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 5>the Ukrainians simply lack the number of personnel the manpower

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 5>to do it. They were late with the mobilization and

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 5>they are in a pretty bad state. So what they're

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 5>asking for is different ways of helping them so that

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 5>they can stabilize the line, perhaps even change the momentum

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 5>a little bit, and then importantly strike behind the Russian

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 5>lines to increase the cost of continuation for President Putin

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 5>so that he actually has a reason to say, Okay, i'll.

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Talk between now and inauguration day. It seems like a

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 3>day at a time period where each side will be

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 3>trying to just improve their position, with the understanding that

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 3>it looks like, whether we want or not, we're going

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 3>to the negotiating table.

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 5>Is that kind of the view, Yeah, I think that's

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 5>exactly what's going to happen. And you know, that's the

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 5>context in which to say, to look at the sort

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 5>of Russian sabers rattling again on the nuclear issue at

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 5>the moment, I mean, the reasons for not pushing the

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 5>nuclear button have not changed, and there are real hurdles

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 5>and costs involved in doing so. And you know President

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.279
<v Speaker 5>Putin didn't do that when Russia was losing on the battlefield,

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 5>and he's very unlikely to do it when they're winning.

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 5>But it does tell you that he's trying to shape

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 5>what the the US in particular does between now and

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 5>next year. And this is one tool which he has

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 5>to do it. He has others, and you know, yes,

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 5>absolutely both sides will be trying to maximize their position

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 5>for when they actually have to make some kind of deal.

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 6>And does that deal is that contingent on say President

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 6>Trump or you think, regardless of who's in the White House,

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 6>this is the way it was going.

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 5>It was. It's going to probably get there faster because

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 5>of the arrival of Donald Trump, but yes, that's where

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 5>it was going. You you know, Zolenski, if you look

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 5>at Zelenski's victory plan, which you know is often miss construed,

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 5>if you actually read it, you know he's got a

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 5>five point plan there. None of them talk about territory.

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 5>None of them say we have to get crimea back

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 5>or we have to get this back, or that it's

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 5>four points which are just about security. How do we

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 5>secure Ukraine to make sure that when we agree to

0:04:56.080 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 5>a cease fire it's just not a little interlude for

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 5>the Russians attack again. And then a final one which

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 5>is a sort of you know, just a bid to

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 5>interest Donald Trump in particular, but you know the West

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 5>in general in what they can get out of helping

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 5>Ukraine in terms of resources and so on.

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, Mark Champion, thank you so much. We really

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.679
<v Speaker 3>appreciate getting your thoughts there. Mark Champion, he's a calmness

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 3>for Bloomberg Opinion, joining us from London via zoom giving

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 3>us the latest thoughts on Ukraine. Again, the thinking now

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 3>is perhaps in twenty twenty five that might be a

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 3>period for some type of truth to come to that

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 3>part of the world. We'll have more reporting on that.

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple.

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 7>Car Play and Androight Outo with the Bloomberg Business.

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 2>flagship New York station Just Say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 6>This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio. We are broadcasting to live

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 6>from our interactive Brooker studio right here in midtown Manhattan,

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 6>and we want to know what would you like to

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 6>hear about on Bloomberg Radio. This helps make shows like

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 6>ours even better. By taking our Bloomberg Audience survey, visit

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 6>YouTube dot com slash Bloomberg podcast and click the link

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 6>in our profile or community section to take the survey,

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 6>which is hosted by our partners material Fill it out

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 6>now at YouTube dot com slash Bloomberg Podcasts. All right,

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 6>let's get back to the market here. So we may

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 6>have some geopolitical risk shaking in the market, but if

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 6>you take a look at some of the equities, like

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 6>a Walmart still holding up fairly well, that stock now

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 6>are on the highs of the session, up almost five percent.

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 6>Joining us how to discuss as Emily Cohne and Bloomberg

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 6>Consumer team leader, I mean, she heads all the stuff

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 6>of consumer stocks. She joins us now in studio. Emily,

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 6>wonderful to see you.

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 8>Thanks, Alich.

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 6>What do we make about the reaction to Walmart stock?

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 6>Because consensus was already high, the stock had already moved

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 6>like we kind of knew it was going to be good.

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>So when you think about Walmart Walmart is a bellweather

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of the American economy, of the American consumer.

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 8>What is Walmart? Or tell us about that.

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Walmart beat expectations today sent a really strong signal that

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the holiday season is off to a solid start, and

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the market was excited about that.

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 8>The growth in the number.

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Of transactions or checkouts slowed, the growth rate slowed a

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Ticket the average ticket, the amount people were

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>paying in each checkout, was up, and a lot of

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that growth was coming from higher income shoppers, people in

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>households making more than one hundred thousand dollars a year.

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>That cohort made up roughly seventy five percent of the

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>share gains.

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 8>So this was good. It was a solid start to

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 8>the holiday.

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Season, and the stock is up a lot. Four and

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a half percent is up a lot for a company.

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 3>That Big stopstocks at all time high of sixty seven

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 3>percent year today, which I had no idea their e

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 3>commerce business. Talk to us about their e commerce business.

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>I know it's big, but Amazon's pretty big too, So

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 3>how did they talk about their e commerce business?

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>When they talk about e commerce, they just talk about

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the potential to grow. It is big, but there is

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>still so much room to grow. So just in the

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>last couple of months, we saw them branching into categories

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that you wouldn't find in a typical Walmart store. Pre

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>owned watches, collectible sneakers, stuff you would typically go to

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>another retailer for, but now you can buy at Walmart online. Also,

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>they're adding benefits to their services, like Walmart Plus. You

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>can now get discounts of Burger King if you're a

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Walmart Plus member. So they're really expanding their offering there.

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Deliveries can get faster, and they see just endless potential there.

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 8>It's always growing.

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 6>My question I had before the break was those people

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 6>that make over one hundred thousand dollars or more, are

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:56.719
<v Speaker 6>they sticky as in, once the economy save recovers or

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 6>once they feel better about inflation or et cetera, do

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 6>they flee than to go to Target or somewhere else,

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 6>or go to the fancy drug store or do they

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 6>stay at Walmart.

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really good question and something we're

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely watching for. You know, spending across the board at

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Walmart was consistent. The growth, as you said, was coming

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>from these wealthier households. Maybe it's a shopper who typically

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 1>shops at Whole Foods, but is feeling particularly pinched right

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>now and is going to Walmart for value? Do those

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>people stick around when they get a raise in their

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>next paycheck or their paycheck in the next couple of quarters.

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>That's something we're definitely watching for. I think it does

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>have limits.

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 3>So are they still opening stores? Isn't there Walmart pretty

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 3>much in every town USA these days?

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 8>It's a good question.

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, like when they talk about growth now, they're

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>talking about e commerce growth. I think that's where they

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>see the highest potential for growth, and they needed to

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>get profitable. That's something we heard the CEO talk about today.

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 1>Not that they're racing to it, but it's a long

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 1>term game they want their e commerce division to.

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 3>So they feel them pretty okay about a holiday shopping

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 3>season because.

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, holiday, right, Yeah, holiday shopping is off to a

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>strong start. So the interesting thing about the holiday season

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>this year is that it's.

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 8>Shorter than in most years.

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving is following later in the month of November. So

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the answer to that is that they triggered the deals

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>even earlier than than usual.

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 6>Coming in to Paul Knows and I shop on the sales,

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 6>let's go to Low's because that is interesting as well.

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 6>That stock is off the loads of the session, but

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 6>still down over three percent. What did Lo say?

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>So? Lowe's years fell before the bell and quarterly comps

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>were better than expected but still declining. So high interest

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>weight rates and a week housing market means people are

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>moving less than they were before. It means they're spending

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>less on big ticket home renovations. But despite blooming gloomy,

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Lowe's actually raised its forecast for the year, seeing positive

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>growth in its professional business so selling goods to contractors

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and builders, also in e commerce, and spending on smaller.

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 8>Ticket outdoor projects. Last week we.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Saw Home Depot similarly say that the weather was actually

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a bright spot for its sales. So hurricane led to

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>higher sales for Home Depot. Warm weather meant that people

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>were spending more on grills because the Great Grilling Season

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>was getting longer.

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 8>So in general, for these loes, Home Depot.

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Sales are down, but the outlook got a little bit

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>better this quarter.

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Where do we see the weakness in the consumers like

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 3>in the dollar stores? Because I mean I can I

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 3>see a strong number from Walmart to me that is America?

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 3>So where is the American consumer hurting, is it? I

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 3>guess it's even a lower end than.

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.079
<v Speaker 1>Wal Yeah, the lower end is definitelyfering. The dollar stores

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>are suffering. They don't offer the variety that Walmart offers.

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Walmart sixty percent of Walmart's business today is in groceries

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and you can go, wow, uh, you know some pretty

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 1>good stuff at Walmart these days, gluten free items and

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>organic produce and stuff that like you're not going to

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>necessarily find out your dollar store. And that's really really

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>helping them, especially when it comes to growing an e

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.839
<v Speaker 1>commerce business where people are looking for a one stop

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>shop for everything.

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 3>So before I let you I have a gluten free friend.

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 8>And it's a good job.

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:35.079
<v Speaker 4>It's a thing.

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 6>It is a thing.

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 8>I have multiple friends.

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know it was. Oh I've been educated.

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 6>You've been educated for that one friend.

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 8>Before I let you go.

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 6>We get a lot of retailers out this week as well.

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 6>What are you going to be focusing on? The consumer trends? Land?

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Definitely the holiday season? What are people seeing that's the

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>big question this year. Are people spending as much as

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>they usually spend? Are they buying as many gifts as

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a usually by also Thanksgiving for the grocers. I think

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are just worn out from paying

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>really high prices for food.

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 8>They're also worn out from.

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Cooking a lot more than they have been since they're

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 1>eating out less. So how is that showing up in

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 1>consumer sales? Definitely trying to get a sense of how

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the consumer is feeling about what is the most significant

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>shopping season of the year.

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 6>I know my husband's getting a little burnt by all

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 6>the cooking he's doing. I'm really good at ordering takeout.

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 6>He's the chef in the family. All Right, thanks so much,

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 6>it's really I really appreciate it. It was wonderful to have

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 6>you at Emily Cohen joining us. She has consumer trends

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 6>coverage for Bloomberg News.

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple card Play and

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 6>All right, taking a look at the markets again. Get

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 6>the smp is down by about four tens of one

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 6>percent of the nasdag off just slightly. What do you

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 6>do in the market when there is a slight safe

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 6>haven bit. I say slight because we've definitely backed off

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 6>some of the levels that we've seen earlier in the session.

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 6>Chris Walling is CEO and chief market strategist along View Economics,

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 6>and he's here in studio to discuss his latest calls. Chris,

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 6>we're getting all the twenty twenty five calls out now.

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 6>Everyone's looking pretty bullish. But the bear case and then

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 6>the bull case seems to be super wide. What are

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 6>you guys modeling right now?

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think what's really interesting is what we're seeing

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 4>in terms of the global economy next year. When you

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 4>sort of whip around the world, you look at China,

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 4>you look at Europe, the UK, and the States. Obviously

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 4>with this new government, there's all sorts of stimulus coming.

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if you look at a raft of ninety

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 4>central banks around the world, the vast majority of them

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 4>the cutting, and they're in cutting very few raising weights.

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 4>That's normally a very good environment for equity markets. So

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 4>tons of stimulus lots coming. Yes, there's a lot to

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 4>worry about. That's why you get those wide ranges on

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 4>those forecasts. There's a lot of left to fail with

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 4>the new administration, and one's got to think about those

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 4>tariffs and the like, and appointments still to come, so

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 4>one doesn't really know how that's going to play out.

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 4>But I generally think that the thrust is good, and bizarrely,

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 4>we could actually absent those risks. We could actually have

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 4>a year where volatility falls and sort of got you

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 4>remember twenty thirteen or twenty seventeen. Volatility collapses because everyone's

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 4>cutting rates. There's a lot of equality around, so I

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 4>can't get my l's out there.

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 3>So in that kind of environment, long stocks, my long credit.

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 3>How do you think they play it here?

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think your long equities and your long bonds. Bizarrely,

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 4>I think our government bonds are oversold. And actually, I mean,

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 4>I know the data is distorted today, but housing's just struggling.

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 4>They're parts of the US economy that need lower rates

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 4>to get it going. And the fiscal impulse is dying

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 4>as we go into next year, and we'll have to

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 4>wait until you get another fiscal package, and we don't

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 4>know what the size of it will be. So I

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 4>think long stocks and long bonds, and I want you

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 4>want to play the cyclical parts of the market, which

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.359
<v Speaker 4>I think you know, when you get that cyclical week acceleration,

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 4>it's that's a great place to put money. So Mag's

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 4>seven dominance is slowly dying in my opinion. But then

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 4>on the.

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 6>Flip side, you'll say, I'll hear things like, yeah, but

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 6>retail sale are holding up, the job market's still holding up,

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 6>inflation stills holding up, So maybe we're not going to

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 6>get the kind of rad cutting cycle that we might expect.

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, yes, yes, and no. I mean inflation, in my

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 4>opinion is dying. I mean that this was a classic

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 4>monetary surge of inflation. People like to compare it to

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 4>the seventies, but they're much better comparisons going further back.

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 4>We're m two surgees and then two collapses, and that's

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 4>really what we've had. And that's the kind of inflation

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 4>outcome we're going to get where inflation is going to dissipate.

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 4>So that'll encourage the fete, I think, to do a

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 4>little bit more than people expect.

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 3>The event tomorrow, presumably just on the earnings front, will

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 3>be in video after the close.

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 6>I was like, what event.

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Yeah, we've kind of got it.

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 3>We've been talking about it since, you know, earning season began,

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, four or five weeks ago. How important is

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 3>zach is? It seemed like for twenty twenty three, for

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 3>most off not all of this year, the AI trade

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 3>has been powering this market.

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 4>It feels like maybe it's fading a little bit. But

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 4>how important is in video tomorrow? You well, in video

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 4>is important, but it is only one stock. I mean,

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't feel like only one stock. If it feels

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 4>like the whole market, but it's only one stock. And

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 4>really the MAG seven has become the sort of MAG

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 4>one or two, So there's a limit to how much

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 4>the market can be paid high by a couple of stocks.

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's the point. And the other thing

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 4>about in video is, you know, the second duvetive of

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 4>earning's growth is slowing, So it's kind of when stocks

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 4>like that, you need the first two to be fast,

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 4>and that's now slowing. I wonder if margins are topye,

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 4>So you know, I think MAG seven as a whole

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 4>is topy on margins, and video of course is exciting,

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:47.479
<v Speaker 4>but I don't think it has the influence it had

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 4>last year.

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 6>So based on that, and then you talk about the

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 6>rate cutting cycle really being front and foremost and sort

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 6>of how you view the market. Is that an ex

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 6>US equity situation or is that a US and or is.

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 8>That just US?

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 4>So I think it's it's a global cyclical trade, which

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 4>and of course the large gap US is dominated by

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 4>mag seven, So I think what we'll find is they've

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 4>become a source of funds to buy into cyclical parts

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.719
<v Speaker 4>of the global stock market. So in the US mid

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 4>and small caps, some of the cyclical areas of the market,

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 4>for sure, people talk about financials tick. But outside the US,

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 4>tons of stuff, you know, there's so much cheap stuff

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 4>that cyclical we're going into sort of nominal GDP growth.

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:29.120
<v Speaker 4>This is all good for those parts of the world.

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 4>We like the UK. We like Spain. Bizarrely sort of

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 4>no one's talked about Spain for a long long time

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 4>because Spain's spent fifteen years getting his house in order,

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 4>and Germany's the sick man of Europe, which means rates

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 4>are lower in Europe and the otherwise would be in

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.719
<v Speaker 4>Spain gets cheap money. So it's a lovely little combo.

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 4>And Spain's doing really well this year. There's four out

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 4>of fifty countries in the world that are a more

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 4>than fifty cent discount of the US, and they're only

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 4>scor faster over the last few years. Places like that

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 4>are going to do really, really well. Greece is one

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 4>of them. I mean, who talks about Greeen.

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 6>Nobody, Nobody sunys about green That's amazing. That's on equity side.

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 6>So for spanding, Greece is on the equity side, not

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 6>the bond side.

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 4>That's all. The equity side absolutely bonds, you know, I

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 4>mean fine, US bond's great, exactly.

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, So you woke up two weeks ago in

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 3>London South the Americans elect themselves in your president. We

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 3>now know that how the Congress is going to look like.

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:23.959
<v Speaker 3>Did that change your view at all about how to invest?

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 4>Well? At the margin? Potentially you get a bit more

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 4>fiscal and a bit less sort of consumption growth out

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 4>of the States, So there's a bit of a risk

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 4>at that, but actually made me feel more bullish, you know.

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 4>I'm I'm a political, I'm a bridge so I don't

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 4>have nothing to do with me. But looking at it objectively,

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 4>it seems much more pro growth with the with the

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 4>with the exception of the tariff's risk basically, So yeah,

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 4>maybe more bullish cyclcal stuff, but.

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 6>I guess what it does matter is the fiscal side

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 6>and the fiscal policy. In which case, where do you

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 6>invest in small caps?

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 9>Say?

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, I think the consumers going to do well.

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 4>There's there's untapped wealth in the US and the UK

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 4>and southern Europe, and so I like consumer cyclicals, and

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 4>I think bonds are coming down, so I like housing

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 4>related stuff. So all of that I think is good.

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 4>I'd be cautious on the biotech because there's also some

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 4>policy changes coming around the corner. But yeah, I think

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a lot to go for in the

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 4>mid and smalls.

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 6>All right, Chris, it's always good to see you. Thanks

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:24.479
<v Speaker 6>for coming by. Great to see you in person at

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 6>Chris Watlin, CEO and chief market strategist of lomuew Economics.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 6>I read read their weekly report every Friday. Good really

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 6>eleven thirty in the morning. But I'm focused. It's just

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 6>paying commercial breaky. You gotta stay car around to engage.

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple.

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 7>Card Play and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business.

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 2>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 6>Alex steal alongside Pulse. We need this Bloomberg and Talidence Radio.

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 6>We bring you all the have news in business, economics

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 6>and finance. There are lens of our Boomberg Intelligence folks.

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 6>They cover two thousand companies in one hundred and thirty

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 6>industries worldwide, and here is one of the best of them.

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 6>Man keep saying, Bloomberg Intelligence, senior tech industry analyst.

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 8>He joins us.

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 6>Now, a lot of things to pick about here. Obviously

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 6>in Vidia tomorrow definitely part of the story. But one

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 6>is Google and the DOJ pushing Google to sell Chrome

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 6>to break up its search monopoly.

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 8>How seriously do.

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 6>We need to take this concerning there's gonna be like

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 6>a new White House and a new DOJ in a

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 6>few months.

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 9>Look, I think it's still uncertain who President and Elect

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 9>Trump is going to appoint to run the agency, and

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 9>a lot depends on how hard they want to go

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 9>against the likes of Alphabet and Meta. But in this case,

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 9>the fact that DOJ is proposing and we know the

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 9>Vice President elect he is not opposed to, you know,

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 9>breaking up these big tech companies. So clearly it is

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 9>a risk, and I think when you look at what

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 9>they're proposing, you know, breaking Chrome. You could argue there

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 9>are independent browser companies out there, like Mozilla, so Chrome

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 9>could exist as an independent company. But it's very hard

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 9>to see how you can make a business model out

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 9>of Chrome. And then it does hurt, you know, Google's engagement.

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 9>In the end. This is the distribution for Google, the

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 9>owning the Android operating system and owning the browser. You

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 9>take out the browser, their distribution for search goes away.

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 9>I mean, Google Search will still be the dominant search engine.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 9>But in the Internet world it's about owning distribution. That's

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 9>why Apple has so much cloud, That's why you know,

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 9>owning Android and Chrome or the crown jewels. When it

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 9>comes to Alphabet as a franchise, so many deep just

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 9>painted is a pretty dire picture there.

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Guess what stocks up today? Why because people like gen

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 3>who covers litigation for us, this is her sense. I

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 3>know you didn't write this exactly, I know her writing.

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 3>If Alphabet were forced by the DOJ to sell its

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Chrome browser Comma, which we view as unlikely. So that's

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of the takeaway there soon, Jenry tells me it's

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 3>kind of unlikely, but still I guess we have to

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 3>expect or I guess Google investors have to expect some

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 3>types of modifications to behavior in their business models. But

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 3>I guess on the margin the market saying it's not

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 3>going to be that material.

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 4>It's reflected in the stock.

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 9>In the end, it comes down to what is the

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 9>valuation right now? What is baked into the stock, and

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 9>all the bad news around regulation is in the stock.

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 9>That's why alphabet is not trading at thirty times earning.

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 9>It's trading at a discount to the likes of Microsoft.

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 9>So look, I mean, I think they will have to

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 9>make remedies, even if it's not a forced syvestiture. They're

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 9>already starting to pair back when it comes to at targeting,

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 9>how much data they mix and match across their family,

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 9>whether it's YouTube, maps, search. So from that perspective, I

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 9>think they are going to try and do these measures

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 9>on their own, and you know, just to convince the

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 9>regulators that owning the browser is not something that gives

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 9>them an advantage, and maybe they have to expose the

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 9>data that they're using for targeting the users. When it

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 9>comes to ads, that's the other part of the remedy here.

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 6>And this just means like then they're getting ahead of it,

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 6>right then they're getting ahead of anything that may come

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 6>from DC or Europe at any time. In essence, what

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 6>are you going to be looking kind of go to

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 6>video now it's it's been a two minutes, okay, so

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 6>tomorrow in video? Or what am I looking at?

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 9>I mean, there's so many things when it comes to

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 9>the continuation of this Genni wave. This is the Belvether company.

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 9>And look, when it comes to data center spend, it's

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 9>all about how scalable the models are going to be

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 9>in terms of you know, whether it's Chat, GPT or

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 9>Google Gemini, how big of a cluster they want to

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 9>create for next year. Because right now everyone is looking

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 9>at the compute that you know, open Ai has used

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 9>for GPT four and they're saying they already have a

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 9>trillion plus parameter model. Can it get any bigger? The

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 9>answer from Nvidia is yes, we are giving you a

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 9>more powerful chip and you can create a bigger cluster

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 9>next year to train your models. So if that's the case,

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 9>then the computer requirements continue to scale up, which is

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 9>what they are betting on. In terms of the data center.

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 9>Upward revisions we have seen the whole of this year,

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 9>and they think the scaling of the foundational models is

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 9>going to continue. The moment you hear about a plateauing

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 9>of the foundational models, that's when you know, you know

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 9>you're not going to see the upward revisions we have

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 9>seen for in radio's data center in video.

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Stock is up three percent today, up one hundred and

0:25:57.520 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 3>ninety percent year to date with a three point five

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 3>trillion dollar market cap. Dan Eyes and what Push Securities

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 3>was at with a tweet this morning saying he believes

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 3>that they will beat on revs by two billion dollars

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:11.120
<v Speaker 3>to take their guidance up by another two billion dollars.

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:14.199
<v Speaker 4>You cause that that dropped the mic, so.

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 9>That may not be enough to drive the multiple. See

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 9>that's the thing.

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're talking about earnings what is.

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 9>Reflected in the stock. In the case of Nvidia, last

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 9>time around when they reported earnings, the stock had a

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 9>fifteen percent downroad draft because everyone had such high expectations

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 9>that even though they had a beaten raise, there wasn't enough.

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 3>So the play man. Yeah, so, but even you came

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 3>in here probably six quarters ago and said, as long

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 3>as they keep doing it, the stock will keep working.

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.479
<v Speaker 3>But at some point with that that quarter's gonna come

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 3>where they're going.

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 9>To because it's not recurring revenue. And in the end

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 9>the moment you're talking about digestion. Okay, if we have

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 9>had enough in terms of scaling. Now we are focusing

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 9>on inferencing and you know, deploying this. We're not getting

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 9>the Bengal for mark when it comes to scaling the models.

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 9>That's when Nvidia has to find another way to you know,

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 9>keep driving to growth.

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 6>All Right, Mandy, we appreciate you and good to see you.

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 6>Thank you so much. Man keep saying, no doubt we'll

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 6>see him every day for the next few days. He's

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 6>senior technology analyst over at Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:26.679
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 2>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 2>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 2>say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Alex Deel, Paul Swening. We're live here in our Bloomberg

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 3>Interactive Proker Studio. We're streaming live on YouTube as well

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 3>as a head over to YouTube dot com and search

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.679
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Podcast and that's where you'll find us. David Bonsen

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 3>joints us here. He's the chief vessel officer at Bonson Group.

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 3>They about six and a half billion dollars assets under management. David,

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 3>thanks so much for joining us here. You woke up,

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, two weeks ago almost we have a new

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 3>president in the White House in starting January, we're going

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 3>to have a new Congress as well. Did that change

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 3>your outlook, your investment outlook at all?

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 10>It did not, in the sense that the primary things

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 10>that drive markets we felt were not going to move

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 10>a ton, which is around the earnings profile, earnings expectations,

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 10>and the monetary policy. However, within the weeds, it reinforced

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.199
<v Speaker 10>our optimism in the energy sector, which has certainly been

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 10>very validated over the last couple of weeks, and the

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 10>financial sector. That was an area where we thought policy

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 10>would make a difference, and particularly some of President Trump's

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 10>policies more favorable in those two sectors, and Vice President

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 10>Harris is less so.

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 3>From the earnings perspective, you mentioned earnings obviously driving stocks here.

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 3>We're just kind of finishing up with some of the

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 3>retailers this week. What is your view of the earnings

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 3>profile this S and P five hundred these days?

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 10>I think that the earning this profile is obviously very good,

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 10>and that the growth of earnings next year is very good,

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 10>and that that is fully and completely priced in the market,

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 10>and so the risk is really very little that earnings disappoint.

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 10>I mean, that's always possible, there's always issues that could

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 10>disrupt expectations. We happen to have a very very good

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 10>track record in our financial markets, so being able to

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 10>project earnings. However, you're paying twenty two, twenty three times

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 10>next year's best case earnings right now, and so I

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 10>find that problematic.

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 8>So where else would you go?

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 9>Then?

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 6>If that feels too expensive?

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 10>We would not buy the entire index, especially where it's

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 10>cap weighted, especially where a lot of the big tech

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 10>names that are big profit earners are trading it over

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 10>fifty times, and if you're looking at trading earnings, they're

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 10>trading at seventy or eighty times earnings. Therefore, you have

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 10>to be more selective, and we're more value biased at

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 10>our firm and very divid and growth oriented. But some

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 10>of the healthcare names, some of the financial names I

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 10>mentioned energy. You know, right now, if everything goes perfectly

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 10>for mag seven, it's about twenty one percent of next

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 10>year's earns. It's thirty three percent of the financial So

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 10>the only two sectors thanks projections are more than what

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 10>they represent within the S and P. So we just

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 10>recommend people be more bottom up right now.

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 3>All right, So within let's save energy, for example, where

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 3>in the energy space are you seeing opportunities.

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 10>Very very heavily in midstream? And that's kind of interesting

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 10>to say, because it's had a heck of a year,

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 10>and really since November of twenty twenty has had quite

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 10>a great tear. But it was doing so from just

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 10>decimated prices out of COVID. Now not only have the

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 10>pricing environment and the psychology and investor sentiment got better,

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 10>but the fundamentals are dramatically better. Way less debt, less leverage,

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 10>way more cash flow coverage, and certainly right now a

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 10>policy you can see from the new Secretary of Energy

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 10>coming in the Secretary of Interior. There is a philosophical

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 10>bend that is pro our ability to get permits for

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 10>new oil and gas pipeline and to export LNG. These

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 10>two things are huge growth sectors.

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, meaning that you can actually put a shovel in

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 6>a ground to build a pipeline.

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Maybe that's right.

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 10>And so what you have right now is a lot

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 10>of value in the current pipelines because they're all we have.

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 10>And then now you get the opportunity to build new pipelines,

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 10>which I think adds to the growth profile of the sector.

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 3>So, Dave, how about in financials here? I mean, do

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 3>you stick with the JP Morgan's Goldman Sachs is of

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 3>the day or do you try to get little bit

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 3>more specialized.

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 10>Well, so we own JP Morgan and have owned it

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 10>since March two thousand and nine, and it's one of

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 10>the most profitable investments we've ever made, and we have

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 10>had to tick down our waiting a little bit because

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 10>it has just done so well. But we're not abandoning it.

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 10>They're the cream of the crop and there isn't another

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 10>big bank we want to own. We also as far

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 10>as big commercial banks, Morgan Stanley is the name we own,

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 10>not Goldman Sachs. They're actually both fantastic companies, great brands,

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 10>great franchises. It's just the dividend growth. We think Ted Pick,

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 10>the new CEO at Morgan Stanley. I joke, he's the

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 10>person in America second most passionate about dividend growth, with

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 10>myself being first. And we think Morgan Stanley's got a

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 10>great fee oriented business that's much less lumpy and much

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 10>less you know, dependent upon institutional securities and investment banking

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 10>versus Goldman Sachs. They are They're wealth management and asset

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 10>management are really annuittized at Morgan Stanley.

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 6>David, we really appreciate it. We always love your perspective

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 6>on this. David Bonson, Chief in Estment Officer at the

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 6>Bonson Group, Thank you very much.

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten Eastern on applecar.

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 7>Play and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 2>flagship New York station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 6>One of the best performing stocks in the S and

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 6>P today yesterday, you name it is super Micro. Here

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 6>with the latest is Wujin Hoo Bloomberg Intelligence Senior technology Analyst.

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 6>So the latest is bdo that's going to be their

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 6>new auditor. That's not like a giant, huge name though, right.

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 6>Are you disappointed in the name or is it just

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 6>the fact that hey, they have someone?

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, Hey, Alex, thanks for having me on the fact

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 11>that they actually had got an auditor, given what they've

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 11>gone through over the last two to three months, is

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 11>actually positive news for them.

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Which when I kind of just look at this story again,

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 3>they've had some real concerns with their auditors, and some

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 3>of the auditors concerns about the risk controls.

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 5>I guess at the company.

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Can you give us your opinion of management of this

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 3>company and the board of this company.

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 11>Yeah. You know, one of the reasons why I and

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 11>Y resigned as an auditor as part of the AK

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 11>filing was that there were some integrity issues that they

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 11>found as part of trying to get some financial documents.

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:18.720
<v Speaker 11>You know, Paul, I haven't seen the word integrity issues

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 11>in an AK filing or an auditor resignation since back

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 11>in the Enron days. I'm not saying that this isn't Enron,

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:31.280
<v Speaker 11>but this is something that you don't typically find in filing.

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:33.919
<v Speaker 11>So you know, I have called for you may need

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 11>an overhaul of the board or greater independence and possibly

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 11>change of the CFO, because this is not the first

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 11>rodeo of having delayed filings.

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 6>Do you feel like the stock move is justified or

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 6>does it have more to go? I mean, I'm taking

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 6>a look at them move in the last couple of

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 6>days and it's tremendous. But if you look at a

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:54.240
<v Speaker 6>one year chart, this move is at pittance.

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:59.439
<v Speaker 11>Yeah. So if we think about the recent moves, there's

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 11>actually been more headline risk that's been driving this doct

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 11>than the fundamentals. I think much of this is more

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 11>of a relief rally that they're not going to get delisted. Now,

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 11>delisting would have meant a couple of things. First of all,

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:17.399
<v Speaker 11>for they get delisted and it is going to start

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:21.439
<v Speaker 11>some force selling, but it also potentially well it would

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 11>have forced the removal of the S and P five hundred,

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 11>which would have been another round of force selling when

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:31.399
<v Speaker 11>the rebalancing comes in December the fifth, So that eliminates

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 11>that risk for super micro So there is some relief there,

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 11>but they're still not out of the woods.

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Where does this company fit into kind of your part

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 3>of the tech stack? Wouge in terms of being a

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 3>supplier of you know, hardware and components and things like that,

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 3>because I mean it's got twenty five billion of I

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 3>guess revenue. I'm just looking at the FA function forecasted

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 3>for June twenty five.

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's a big company.

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 11>Yeah. Look, it's all about AI AI AI. I'm in

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 11>Hotlanta today for an A I conference and quite frankly,

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 11>super Micro is going to take a prominent role at

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 11>this conference to get customers. The question I have is

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 11>how reliable are those estimates. Keep in mind there's been

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 11>several suspend coverage suspensions, and I don't know how up

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 11>to date those estimates are.

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:21.760
<v Speaker 6>Who are the customers for super Micro?

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so we do know that there are a couple

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 11>of large There's one large cloud customer which we suspect

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 11>is Meta, but it's a tier two custom Tier two

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 11>cloud customers company that may be filing for an IPO

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 11>called core Weave, and also Tesla's x AI. They bought

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 11>probably about one point five billion dollars in equipment from

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:46.879
<v Speaker 11>super Micro this past year.

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 3>And which to your point about the analyst coverage, I

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:53.399
<v Speaker 3>just pulled up the A and R function for analysts recommendations.

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Most or a lot of the annals have suspended coverage

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 3>or not rate is kind of what we see.

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 2>So we of the.

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Ones that do have a rating on their three buys,

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 3>seven holds, and two sells. So it sounds like this

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 3>company has a lot of ground ahead of it to

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 3>rebuild confidence from the analyst community, probably their customers, and

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 3>from investors. Is that kind of your.

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 11>Thought, Yeah, yeah, I mean, look, I think some of

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 11>the headline risk has been eliminated for now, or at

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 11>least extended. You know, they only received an extension from

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 11>the Nasdaq. The next milestone, quite frankly, is probably February

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 11>twenty fifth, when if they don't file their filings on

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 11>time by that time, the delisting questions will start arising again.

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 11>They essentially kick the can down the road.

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 6>This might be a super silly question. At one point

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 6>I probably knew the answer to this, But where does

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 6>super Micro sit in the AI play stack?

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so they're actually in the server space. It's the

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 11>hardware equipment that helps run the models. Among the US vendors,

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 11>they actually at the largest amount of AI service sales,

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 11>larger than Dell and larger than HPE.

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 6>So they're very much like needed in this market, Like

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 6>it's going to be hard to replace them either way, right,

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 6>Like they're needed essential.

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 11>Well, that's that's a good comment and good question. Competition

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 11>has grown. Dell is actually strengthening their AI chops quite

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:25.840
<v Speaker 11>a bit. But I came back from a couple of

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 11>conferences recently and we're starting to see other companies with

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 11>similar capabilities that we'll be making it much more competitive.

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:35.360
<v Speaker 11>And one of the evidence there so far is the

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 11>lower gross margin. They peaked their gross margin at around

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 11>seventeen percent a couple of years back when they with

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 11>the sole player, and now that you have more players

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 11>coming in, their gross margin in the last couple of

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:51.320
<v Speaker 11>quarters went from went to about thirteen percent and eleven percent.

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Wow, I'm just going to the dees function. March nineteenth,

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four, the company sold two million shares at

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 3>eight hundred and seventy five dollars per sure. Coleman Sex,

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 3>thank you very much, Wuginho, thank you for joining us

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 3>at Woojin. Host is senior technology channels for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean that is just amazing.

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere. Else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 2>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 2>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 2>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 2>always on the Bloomberg terminal