Speaker 1: Well, we have come in your geta saying you a
Speaker 1: conscious sound.
Speaker 2: Will be desired, and if you want a little banging,
Speaker 2: come alonge.
Speaker 3: And it is a big day.
Speaker 2: I think either way it's a big day.
Speaker 3: But if we get this solved, it's a really big
Speaker 3: day because we're going to save a.
Speaker 1: Lot of lives. Do you then decide, okay, we're gonna
Speaker 1: use mustard gas on civilians.
Speaker 2: The what Trump ordered Dabba to do in Texas is
Speaker 2: mustard gas and democracy. And the perception of this of
Speaker 2: the Biden presidency is just a weak and ineffective presidency.
Speaker 1: But the fact of the matter is his legacy is
Speaker 1: Donald Trump came back.
Speaker 2: Fradom is back in style, Welcome to the revolution, coming
Speaker 2: to your city, way geta and saying you a conscious sound.
Speaker 1: Sean Hennered show more me.
Speaker 2: I'm the scenes, information on freaking news and more bold
Speaker 2: inspired solutions for America. All right, Thank you, Scott Shannon,
Speaker 2: and thanks to all of you for being with us.
Speaker 2: Write down our toll free telephone number you want to
Speaker 2: be a part of the program, It's eight hundred and
Speaker 2: ninety four one, Sean, if you'd like to join us,
Speaker 2: we expect sometime maybe towards the last hour of the
Speaker 2: program today, we will check in with Leo two point Oterrell.
Speaker 2: He will be with the President as he goes out
Speaker 2: with the Metropolitan Police Department in DC, as well as
Speaker 2: Pam Bondi, the Attorney General, to look at their success.
Speaker 2: H d C has had a murder free week, as
Speaker 2: the Attorney General touting seventy seven more arrests and the
Speaker 2: federal takeover in the use of the National Guard. I'll
Speaker 2: play tape later of people in d C being thankful
Speaker 2: that there's law and order and safety and security.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 2: One of the biggest, biggest political you know, this calculations
Speaker 2: of all time is this idiocy of defund, dismantle and
Speaker 2: no bail laws. You know, if you look at where
Speaker 2: DC is now, there's a couple of things here. Even
Speaker 2: though we have by far of every country in the world,
Speaker 2: we have the number one homicide capital in the entire world.
Speaker 2: In other words, our nation's capital has forty four homicides
Speaker 2: per one hundred thousand people.
Speaker 1: That does not factor in the fact that DC.
Speaker 2: Police have been purposely cooking the books of misclassifying deaths
Speaker 2: as quote accidental to drive murder numbers down. So they
Speaker 2: look better. They don't look as bad as they really are.
Speaker 2: I told you a little bit about a story yesterday,
Speaker 2: and this was in the Washington Free Beacon. A veteran
Speaker 2: Metropolitan Police Department officer now alleging in an ongoing lawsuit,
Speaker 2: that law enforcement officials in DC you know, were ordered
Speaker 2: to misclassify apparent obvious murders in an effort to artificially
Speaker 2: deflate the district's homicide numbers with the number one homicide
Speaker 2: capital in the entire world.
Speaker 1: Bagdad is safer? Do I need to say anything else? Anyway?
Speaker 2: The Washington pre Beacons report presenting a danger to public
Speaker 2: safety by allowing murderers to remain on the street. Metropolitan
Speaker 2: Police Department Sergeant Carlos Bundy, who has served in the
Speaker 2: department twenty eight years and was in the Metropolitan Police
Speaker 2: Department's homicide unit from twenty ten to twenty eighteen, alleging
Speaker 2: the police miss management had purposely been mischaracterizing the deaths
Speaker 2: as something other than a homicide to keep the DC
Speaker 2: homicide numbers down. So even though we're still number one
Speaker 2: by almost three times the next closest country, they still
Speaker 2: do this. Now, the President's going to go out with Pam. Well,
Speaker 2: we'll have full coverage. Pam Bondi will be on TV tonight.
Speaker 2: Leo Terrell will give us a preview just before they
Speaker 2: go out this afternoon. We do know the UK already
Speaker 2: in pointing out. You know, we saw this video JD Vans,
Speaker 2: Pete Seth, Steven Miller, you know, getting booed at Union
Speaker 2: station by people supposedly protesting Donald Trump's crime crackdown in DC.
Speaker 1: And that's all the liberal media wants to run.
Speaker 2: Why do you think, and we'll play this montage later,
Speaker 2: why do you think this is a winning political issue?
Speaker 2: If you look at every single major issue that we
Speaker 2: have as a country before US, law and order and
Speaker 2: safety and security are fundamental and basic most Americans. They
Speaker 2: don't mind legal immigration. They do mind illegal immigration. They
Speaker 2: do want people entering our country to be vetted. We
Speaker 2: need to know that we don't have known terrorists and
Speaker 2: murderers and rapists and cartel members and gang members coming in.
Speaker 2: You know, we don't need any more Americans murdered and
Speaker 2: raped and victims of violent crime. But Democrats, they think
Speaker 2: deep undismantled no bail laws work. They want to run
Speaker 2: on that Gavenowssen run away. You know, you have a
Speaker 2: great time. You want to be the sanctuary state of
Speaker 2: California that gives commercial drivers licenses to this guy that
Speaker 2: that killed these three people in my free state of Florida. Well,
Speaker 2: innocent people are dying. They don't even keep statistics. We'll
Speaker 2: get into Gavin later in the program. They don't even
Speaker 2: keep statistics in California because it is a sanctuary state
Speaker 2: of the crimes committed by illegal immigrants. By the way,
Speaker 2: the DC Police union chief is a you know, he's
Speaker 2: admitting the officers of manipulating the data. I mean, it
Speaker 2: really doesn't get any worse than that. It's uh, just
Speaker 2: outright lying rather than doing the smart thing, which would
Speaker 2: be to fix fix things for people. But be it
Speaker 2: open borders. That's the Democratic Party, the party defund dismantled,
Speaker 2: No bet, that's the Democratic Party. Campion in men's rights
Speaker 2: to play women's sports. That that's the Democratic Party. They
Speaker 2: had an opportunity to vote for the largest tax cut
Speaker 2: in history. No, they voted for the largest tax increase
Speaker 2: in history. They had a chance to cut taxes for
Speaker 2: working men and women, no tax on tips, overtime, and
Speaker 2: to protect old people, social security, no taxes there, no,
Speaker 2: they voted against that. They don't want energy dominance, they
Speaker 2: want the Green New Deal. And now they're now they're
Speaker 2: loudest spokespeople are radical Marxists.
Speaker 1: What do you think the Green New Deal is? Is Marxism?
Speaker 2: It's no different than what mom Donnie is advocating in
Speaker 2: New York. Now we have so anyway, the President will
Speaker 2: go out and he will patrol with Metropolitan Police Department cops. Washington,
Speaker 2: DC's homicide rate has nearly doubled since twenty twelve. That
Speaker 2: even MPR reported that. And if MPR is reporting it,
Speaker 2: you know it's bad. It's really bad. James Comer, who
Speaker 2: will be on Hannity tonight, We've got a lot of
Speaker 2: breaking news here. I've gotten the heads up that James
Speaker 2: Comer interviewed Ian SAMs today and we will get into
Speaker 2: this issue. We'll delve into it more deeply later in
Speaker 2: the program. But what he said is that it was
Speaker 2: the most informative interview in his probe so far as
Speaker 2: it relates to Joe's cognitive decline.
Speaker 1: Who knew what and when?
Speaker 2: And also it raises the issue and we have an expert,
Speaker 2: Mike Howell, president of the Oversight Project, will join us
Speaker 2: as well. It also raises the validity issue as it
Speaker 2: relates to the Auto Pen. And what we're learning is, well,
Speaker 2: we're learning from Comer that Ian Sam's only saw Joe
Speaker 2: Biden two times. This is a guy who was all
Speaker 2: over TV saying everybody's a conspiracy theorist. If you if
Speaker 2: you had eyes to see and you saw Joe Biden
Speaker 2: speak or walk or talk, if he the rare moments
Speaker 2: we saw him, you knew it was a disaster anyway.
Speaker 2: So what Comer said, you know, I think one of
Speaker 2: the most shocking things to me is he communicated with
Speaker 2: Joe Biden two times. He saw Biden talk to him
Speaker 2: two times the entire stint as White House spokesperson. But
Speaker 2: yet he would every single day tweet and issue statements
Speaker 2: from the podium of the White House. Now we're also
Speaker 2: learning that the Associate Deputy Attorney General for Joe Biden,
Speaker 2: Bradley Weisheimer, criticized highly problematic language used in a single
Speaker 2: warrant signed by an auto pen that pardoned hundreds of
Speaker 2: criminals in the final days of the Biden administration. He
Speaker 2: sent the email two days before Biden was leaving office
Speaker 2: on January eighteenth, and.
Speaker 1: This is the number two guy.
Speaker 2: This is Merck Garland's right hand man, writing to top
Speaker 2: Biden administration attorneys two days before Biden leaves office, saying
Speaker 2: the wording of the pardon effeir ensins was too vague,
Speaker 2: could render the communication of the commutations and pardons ineff effective.
Speaker 1: We've been saying it's invalid.
Speaker 2: The lack of specificity could also result in commutations in circumstances,
Speaker 2: including crimes for violence that was not intended. He gave
Speaker 2: them very specific He said, there's no clear direction from
Speaker 2: the President, meaning Joe Biden two days before he left,
Speaker 2: meaning to the language for the offenses described to the
Speaker 2: Department of Justice. Ideally, this would be a list as
Speaker 2: to each inmate, listing the offenses that are covered by commutation.
Speaker 2: By far, this is the clearest, least problematic alternative given
Speaker 2: the above, I think the best we receive a statement
Speaker 2: of direction from the President as to the meaning of
Speaker 2: the warrant language. Because no offenses have been described to
Speaker 2: the Department of Justice from the President, the communications he says.
Speaker 1: Do not take effect. His number two do with his.
Speaker 2: Own Justice department, saying all this pretty spectacular. Now we
Speaker 2: have other big news to share with you today and
Speaker 2: then again later. We have a lot of information as
Speaker 2: it relates to James Comy from John Solomon today. He
Speaker 2: believes he has smoking gun evidence as it relates to
Speaker 2: whether or not James Comy ordered his top lieutenants who
Speaker 2: leak classified information two reporters to hurt Donald Trump. We'll
Speaker 2: find out what that information may be in a bombshell
Speaker 2: report coming from John Solomon and his sources are usually impeccable.
Speaker 2: But the major major win for the President today, and
Speaker 2: that is when a New York appeals court throughout this ridiculous, insane,
Speaker 2: massive five hundred million dollar fine. This was the Letitia
Speaker 2: James case and the quote is this fraud case. Remember
Speaker 2: you know, the whole accusation was centered around loans and
Speaker 2: information giving to lending institutions. Every institution got their money back,
Speaker 2: Every institution was happy.
Speaker 1: Not one of them ever complained.
Speaker 2: This is where the judge Erduan, you know, stuck by
Speaker 2: a ridiculous insane valuation of mar A Lago at eighteen
Speaker 2: million dollars.
Speaker 1: It's a billion dollar plus property.
Speaker 2: If you don't believe me, compare it to other Palm Beach,
Speaker 2: Florida properties, and you'll see for yourself. You don't have
Speaker 2: to be a real estate genius to figure it out.
Speaker 2: And it was a very damning injunctive anyway, While injunctive
Speaker 2: relief ordered by the court as well crafted to curb
Speaker 2: defendant's business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs the
Speaker 2: defendants pay nearly a half a billion dollars to the
Speaker 2: State of New York, is an excessive fine. It violates
Speaker 2: the Eighth Amendment of the United States. In the main
Speaker 2: opinion by the main judges in this case, the five
Speaker 2: judge panel kept in place a ban on Trump and
Speaker 2: his two oldest sons from running a company in New
Speaker 2: York for several years, which I think is complete in
Speaker 2: total bs But you know, if you read one of
Speaker 2: the judges in the final page of this I found
Speaker 2: it very very interesting. Here, you know, the Supreme Court
Speaker 2: sanctioning of defense counsel essentially playing the role that they're
Speaker 2: supposed to play in our adversarial judicial system, raising serious
Speaker 2: doubts about the trial Court's objectivity and impartiality in presiding
Speaker 2: over and adjudicating this action. From their writings, it appears
Speaker 2: that Justice Molten and Justice Higgott, I don't know how
Speaker 2: you pronounce his name. Pacitly shared that this concern. Another
Speaker 2: example of the trial Court's troubling attitude towards this case
Speaker 2: was the manner in which it treated defendants experts. At trial,
Speaker 2: defendants submitted testimony by twelve highly qualified experts in relevant fields.
Speaker 2: In its posttrial decisions, Supreme Court ignored ten of the
Speaker 2: experts and summarily dismissed the two remaining, accusing one of
Speaker 2: them of offering unsubstantiated dreams and the other of giving
Speaker 2: testimony ensconced in numerous lines of academic jargon. It is
Speaker 2: a beatdown of all beatdowns. I am troubled that my
Speaker 2: colleagues are affirming Supreme Court's liability finding, notwithstanding the three
Speaker 2: of the five member of this panel belief that the
Speaker 2: judgment should be vacated as the Attorney General has not
Speaker 2: yet proven her case. Nonetheless, what emerges from this Court's
Speaker 2: vacating the five hundred million dollar disgorgement award with which
Speaker 2: I concur is the frustration of what appears to me
Speaker 2: to have been the Attorney General's true aim in bringing
Speaker 2: this action. Plainly, her ultimate goal was not market hygiene,
Speaker 2: as poised by Justice Moulton, but political hygiene. Ending with
Speaker 2: the derailment of President Trump's political career and the destruction
Speaker 2: of his real estate business. The voters have obviously rendered
Speaker 2: a verdict on his political career. This bench today unanimously
Speaker 2: derails the effort to destroy his business for all the
Speaker 2: foregoing reasons, I would reverse the judgment, dismiss the complaint accordingly,
Speaker 2: while I join in vacating the discordment, award and imposition
Speaker 2: of sanctions of the Defense Counsel, I respectfully dissent to
Speaker 2: the extent that you know, affirms this judgment. I've never
Speaker 2: seen language like this. I have a friend of mine
Speaker 2: who's a judge in New York. He goes, does he
Speaker 2: just send it to me? He goes, did you see this?
Speaker 2: And I'm like, wow, you don't get that kind of language.
Speaker 2: This is a major victory for President Trump. But this
Speaker 2: is all of this, all from twenty twenty to twenty
Speaker 2: twenty four. It was all about muddying up, bloodying up Trump,
Speaker 2: so he was not he would be rendered incapable of
Speaker 2: ever winning the presidency. That in and of itself, I
Speaker 2: would argue is election interference. The FBI director Cash Bettel,
Speaker 2: by the way, determined that Biden's FBI mar A Lago
Speaker 2: raid was illegal and had no constitutional basis and no
Speaker 2: lawful predicate.
Speaker 1: We'll get to that. I'm going to do my very best,
Speaker 1: my level best.
Speaker 2: Here to explain how we have had weaponization against Donald
Speaker 2: Trump on a level that I don't think has ever
Speaker 2: happened in the history of this country, which is a
Speaker 2: clear and present danger and a threat to the preservation
Speaker 2: of liberty and the preservation of our republic. And it
Speaker 2: all started even before the twenty sixteen election, as we
Speaker 2: are now learning, and you know what, We're going to
Speaker 2: learn a lot more from John Solomon today about James Comy,
Speaker 2: but with this court decision today, that was the culmination.
Speaker 2: But it impacts before the twenty sixteen election, that the
Speaker 2: classified documents of Tulci Gabbard and John Ratcliffe and what
Speaker 2: we're learning from what deep state actors even up to
Speaker 2: Obama were involved in, what Hillary Clinton was involved in,
Speaker 2: what the deep state FBI was involved in, and the
Speaker 2: lead up to the twenty twenty election pre bunking the
Speaker 2: very real laptop they had authenticated the authenticic they did
Speaker 2: render it an authentic laptop. They knew it was going
Speaker 2: to be leaked, they pre bunked it, and then the
Speaker 2: law fair for four years to bloody up Trump so
Speaker 2: he wouldn't be a viable candidate. All right, I'm going
Speaker 2: to try and put this all together, knowing that we
Speaker 2: have other news coming today. We have the major legal
Speaker 2: victory and the appeals court tossing out this insane a
Speaker 2: billion dollar judgment. That quote was won by disgraced Attorney
Speaker 2: General in New York, Letitia James, who now has her
Speaker 2: own issues involving mortgages, just like Adam Shift, the congenital liar.
Speaker 2: How ironic, you know, it's amazing that the people responsible.
Speaker 2: That's part of the news today, and it is a
Speaker 2: major victory, a three hundred and twenty three page decision,
Speaker 2: including three separate opinions all agreeing the finding against Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: which you know, with interest has gone up to five
Speaker 2: hundred and fifteen million dollars obviously excessive. And that was
Speaker 2: all part of a strategy from twenty to twenty twenty
Speaker 2: four legal strategy that was designed to bloody up Donald
Speaker 2: Trump and make it impossible for him to ever be
Speaker 2: president again. And this is part of a pattern. This
Speaker 2: is where the investigation of cash Patel, the FBI director,
Speaker 2: is so critical. Right now, by the way, the President
Speaker 2: celebrated this massive legal victory over fake New York State
Speaker 2: Attorney General Letitia James. Remember Alan Dershowitz wrote a book,
Speaker 2: Get Trump. We have Leticia James running as a candidate
Speaker 2: saying she's going after one man, Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: One fan will.
Speaker 3: Never be afraid to challenge this illegitimate president when our
Speaker 3: fundamental rights are at stake. I believe that the president
Speaker 3: of these United States can be invited for criminal offenses, that.
Speaker 1: Man in the White House.
Speaker 2: Who can't go a day without threatening our fundamental rights.
Speaker 3: Yes, we need to focus on Donald Trump and his abuses.
Speaker 3: We need to follow his money. We need to find
Speaker 3: out where he's laundered money. We need to find out
Speaker 3: whether or not he's engaged in conspiracy. It's important that
Speaker 3: everyone understand that the days of Donald Trump are coming
Speaker 3: to an end.
Speaker 2: To going into the offers of Attorney general every day,
Speaker 2: suing him, compending your.
Speaker 1: Right and then going home. And that's what she did.
Speaker 2: I'm going to work with my way backwards to see
Speaker 2: if I can make it more understandable for everybody. So
Speaker 2: every single instance that you saw from twenty twenty to
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four through the election, all of it was
Speaker 2: designed by people that wanted to render Donald Trump incapable
Speaker 2: of running for president. They're all now being investigated. The
Speaker 2: FBI director Cash Bettel is investigating what he calls a
Speaker 2: grand conspiracy. That this has gone on for years, and
Speaker 2: there've been a number of actors involved in this, and
Speaker 2: it now goes through three presidential cycles, which I'll explain.
Speaker 2: And the President did respond to this that this is
Speaker 2: a total victory. In the fake New York State Attorney
Speaker 2: General Letitia James case. The judge in this case, Judge Erduan,
Speaker 2: was nothing but an absolute disgrace. He's the judge that
Speaker 2: stood by the ridiculous valuation of mar A Lago. As
Speaker 2: I've been telling you, the President said, I greatly respect
Speaker 2: the fact that the court had the courage to throw
Speaker 2: out this unlawful, disgraceful decision that was hurting businesses all
Speaker 2: throughout New York State. Others are afraid to do business there.
Speaker 2: The amount, including interest and penalties, was over five hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty million dollars. It was a political witch hunt
Speaker 2: in a business sense, and the likes of which no
Speaker 2: one has ever seen before. This was a case of
Speaker 2: election interference by the city and the state trying to
Speaker 2: show illegally that I did things that were wrong, when
Speaker 2: in fact, everything I did was absolutely correct and perfect.
Speaker 2: Every single dollar was thrown out. Now, you know, the
Speaker 2: case centered around, you know, issues involving loans that the
Speaker 2: president's company took out that were all repaid. There wasn't
Speaker 2: a single lender that had a complaint none. The only
Speaker 2: one that wanted to go go after was was the
Speaker 2: Attorney General, who made a campaign promise to do so,
Speaker 2: as did the DA, the local DA, Alvin Bragg, And
Speaker 2: in that particular case, Alvin Bragg, you know, took what
Speaker 2: was a legal non disclosure agreement, which I'm sure his
Speaker 2: own office probably has dozens, if not hundreds of them
Speaker 2: if you go back in the archives, and we ever
Speaker 2: had the opportunity to look into them. Whole purpose of
Speaker 2: a non disclosure is you don't disclose it. But in
Speaker 2: Donald Trump's case, it was a legal non disclosure. It
Speaker 2: was labeled a legal expense, and a lawyer was paid
Speaker 2: money for the legal effort.
Speaker 1: That's it.
Speaker 2: The statute of limitations had run out. It was a
Speaker 2: misdemeanor in New York City. It was not a felony.
Speaker 2: So they, you know, resuscitate that case and turn it
Speaker 2: into thirty four felony counts, all in an effort to
Speaker 2: stop and destroy Donald J.
Speaker 1: Trump.
Speaker 2: And then you had again, I'm working my way backwards
Speaker 2: a little bit. If you look at you know, Hillary
Speaker 2: Clinton top secret classified information on her servers. She destroyed
Speaker 2: the servers with bleach bitch. She acid washed them clean.
Speaker 2: Nobody had ever heard of bleach bit before.
Speaker 3: Then.
Speaker 2: Devices we find out were destroyed with hammers, and sim
Speaker 2: cards removed from cell phones. Now we hear from the
Speaker 2: FBI director today, Cash Bettel, who was doing the grand conspiracy,
Speaker 2: and what he's determined is that the FBI rate at
Speaker 2: Mara Lago was in fact the illegal. He said there
Speaker 2: was no constitutional basis, no lawful predicate predicate for the
Speaker 2: President's DOJ, President Biden's DOJ and FBI to carry out
Speaker 2: there August eighth, twenty twenty two raid on President Trump's
Speaker 2: private residence at mar Alago. They never rated Hillary Hillary
Speaker 2: had she didn't have the Presidential Records Act like Donald
Speaker 2: Trump did. Behind her. They never rated her home, her business.
Speaker 2: Joe Biden, they never they had four separate locations top
Speaker 2: secret classified information, didn't rate his either. Patel was on
Speaker 2: with my colleague and friend, Larry Cutler. He said it
Speaker 2: was a total weaponization and politicizing of the FBI and
Speaker 2: the DOJ that led to the invasion of Donald Trump's
Speaker 2: private home. When asked why mister Trump's mar A Lago
Speaker 2: Residents was rated, FBI Director Patel alleged the Biden Justice
Speaker 2: Department had created a crime where one did not exist.
Speaker 2: Quote Patel, it was made up. It was completely false,
Speaker 2: completely unconstitutional, pursuing to our judicial courts. He goes on,
Speaker 2: we know there was no reason. Now it's time for accountability.
Speaker 2: Twenty twenty three investigation House Judiciary Committee found the raid
Speaker 2: was planned, authorized, carried out well outside the norms of
Speaker 2: federal law enforcement. FBI officials told the committee that their
Speaker 2: guidance that mister Trump first be asked to voluntarily hand
Speaker 2: over the documents was ignored.
Speaker 1: Now, remember the.
Speaker 2: FBI had been there on a prior occasion in the
Speaker 2: very room where the documents were. They were in there,
Speaker 2: and they even called back and asked for an extra
Speaker 2: lock to be put on that room, and the President complied.
Speaker 2: Nobody was ever going to stop the FBI from coming
Speaker 2: in or stop them from taking anything out of mar
Speaker 2: a Lago at the time, you know, top Justice Department
Speaker 2: prosecutors hitting the New York Attorney General. Letitia James could
Speaker 2: avoid prosecution on her own mortgage fraud charges. I mean,
Speaker 2: she's got these issues just as they do. But everything
Speaker 2: from the rate at mar Lago, everything with Latitia James,
Speaker 2: everything with Alvin Bragg, everything post twenty twenty election, everything
Speaker 2: with Jack Smith, all of it combined was designed to
Speaker 2: render Donald Trump incapable of ever running for president and
Speaker 2: winning the presidency? Again, is that part of a grand conspiracy?
Speaker 2: Let's work backwards. Let's go to twenty twenty, shall we,
Speaker 2: Because we had Joe Biden running for president and we
Speaker 2: had zero experience Hunter and zero experience Hunter you know,
Speaker 2: was getting millions of dollars, goes on Good Morning America.
Speaker 2: You have any experience and energy, no oil, no gas,
Speaker 2: no Ukraine No. Why is he getting paid millions of dollars?
Speaker 2: Because maybe Pops is his father, maybe he's vice president.
Speaker 2: Is his dad his father? That said, you're not getting
Speaker 2: the billion dollars. You're not getting it unless you fire
Speaker 2: a prosecutor in Ukraine. You gotta be kidding me. That's
Speaker 2: not corruption. Now they knew on the laptop. The FBI
Speaker 2: got a copy of it from this John Paul Mack,
Speaker 2: this repair shop guy who was a very nice man
Speaker 2: whose life was ruined by all this. And the FBI
Speaker 2: in fact verified the authenticity of the laptop in March
Speaker 2: at twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: What did the FBI do?
Speaker 2: The FBI knew Bob Costello, Rudy Giuliani's then attorney, had
Speaker 2: a copy of the laptop. They knew that laptop was
Speaker 2: gonna leak. They knew what was on that laptop, porn,
Speaker 2: drug use, you know, information, I give half my income
Speaker 2: to Pops. I gotta pay what got account? Should I
Speaker 2: pay Pops for his home repairs in this case and
Speaker 2: that case? And they knew all of this information would
Speaker 2: be devastating to Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: So what did the FBI do at the time.
Speaker 2: They went out and they met weekly with big tech
Speaker 2: corporations weekly in the summer leading into the fall election,
Speaker 2: and they warned these big tech companies that they may
Speaker 2: be victims of a Russian disinformation campaign, and it may
Speaker 2: be about Hunter or Joe Biden or about Barisma anyway.
Speaker 2: Sure enough, the New York Post breaks the story. The
Speaker 2: very same social media companies that were visited weekly by
Speaker 2: the FBI call up, like people like Mark Zuckerberg. I
Speaker 2: give him credit for calling. I give Jack Dorsey a
Speaker 2: Twitter at the time. I give him credit for calling.
Speaker 2: Is this what you were warning us about? Or is
Speaker 2: it true? Or is it false?
Speaker 1: You know?
Speaker 2: Or is the laptop real? They knew they verified the
Speaker 2: author to city, They wouldn't tell them because they knew
Speaker 2: if that story was validated just weeks before the election
Speaker 2: and twenty twenty would likely impact the result, don't you think.
Speaker 2: Then you go to twenty sixteen and the declassification and
Speaker 2: all that we learned from Tulci Gabbert, and you look
Speaker 2: at James Comby no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute, and the
Speaker 2: warning by Bruce Soord not to use the dirty Russian
Speaker 2: disinformation dossier and because it's tainted, it's political, it's bought
Speaker 2: and paid for by Hillary Clinton. And then you look
Speaker 2: at the FISA applications, the bulk of information coming from
Speaker 2: that dirty dossier that was political in nature. And then
Speaker 2: you realize that the FBI knew in twenty You know,
Speaker 2: in December, the senior intelligence officials determined after the twenty
Speaker 2: sixteen election, they determined that there was no Trump Russia collusion.
Speaker 2: Senior career intelligence professionals, well, that wasn't acceptable to the
Speaker 2: likes of Barack Obama. According to Tulsi Gabbert, that wasn't
Speaker 2: acceptable to the deep state actors political actors that surrounded him.
Speaker 2: So we called for another intelligence assessment that absolutely contradicted
Speaker 2: the real intelligence assessment. And then where first they were
Speaker 2: using this Russian disinformation which they were warned not to
Speaker 2: use to impact the election and make it seem like
Speaker 2: Trump was connected to Putin when he wasn't. Then when
Speaker 2: it didn't work out that way, and senior career intelligence
Speaker 2: officials confirmed that, then they rewrite the intelligence assessment in
Speaker 2: the hopes that they can bloody up Donald Trump some
Speaker 2: more and sabotage the incoming president. These people, is that
Speaker 2: part of a grand conspiracy, because that's what's being investigated.
Speaker 2: And on top of that, we'll have other news at
Speaker 2: the top of the hour about how Joe Biden everybody
Speaker 2: knew he was a cognitive mess These last minute, commutations
Speaker 2: and pardons may be invalid. We got a lot of
Speaker 2: news to cover today, and the President will be out
Speaker 2: with Pam Bondy Leo two point Ohoterrell. Leo will join
Speaker 2: us later in the show. Pam Bondy tonight. I got
Speaker 2: a great Hannity nine Eastern tonight. We'll tell you about
Speaker 2: that in a minute. Jay final days of his administration,
Speaker 2: warning against auto pen clemency awards. Yeah, even they thought
Speaker 2: it wouldn't be valid. We'll get into that also, John
Speaker 2: Solomon breaking news on James COMI will hit that Leo
Speaker 2: Terrell is going to be on the streets of Washington,
Speaker 2: d C.
Speaker 1: With the President.
Speaker 2: We'll get a preview Senator Tom Cotton on all of
Speaker 2: the issues involving was there a grand conspiracy in light
Speaker 2: of the new developments, and of course the big win
Speaker 2: against Letitia James in New York for President Trump. That
Speaker 2: and much more coming up on this edition of The
Speaker 2: Sean Hannity Show.