1
00:00:02,440 --> 00:00:08,600
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

2
00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:15,440
Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

3
00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:18,680
Speaker 2: with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

4
00:00:18,720 --> 00:00:22,280
Speaker 2: for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

5
00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:24,920
Speaker 2: from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

6
00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:27,680
Speaker 2: live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

7
00:00:27,720 --> 00:00:31,280
Speaker 2: am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

8
00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:33,960
Speaker 2: anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

9
00:00:34,040 --> 00:00:35,880
Speaker 2: Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App.

10
00:00:36,479 --> 00:00:40,960
Speaker 1: Unemployment ticking up slightly to four point two percent, Andrew

11
00:00:40,960 --> 00:00:44,360
Speaker 1: Hollenhorst of City saying the unemployment rate is the better

12
00:00:44,479 --> 00:00:47,720
Speaker 1: signal to watch. The report was now quite soft enough

13
00:00:47,720 --> 00:00:49,760
Speaker 1: for the Fed to cut fifty basis points that we

14
00:00:49,800 --> 00:00:53,640
Speaker 1: had projected for December, but a twenty five basis point

15
00:00:53,680 --> 00:00:57,160
Speaker 1: cut appears very likely, followed by cuts in January and

16
00:00:57,240 --> 00:01:00,520
Speaker 1: subsequent meetings. Andrew joins us now, and Andrew, I am

17
00:01:00,560 --> 00:01:02,240
Speaker 1: so glad we get a chance to speak with you,

18
00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:05,479
Speaker 1: because you have a contrarian view, and you have persisted

19
00:01:05,560 --> 00:01:08,120
Speaker 1: in this contrarian view that this labor market has a

20
00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:11,480
Speaker 1: great deal of weakness that people are not seeing what

21
00:01:11,640 --> 00:01:14,280
Speaker 1: gives you that conviction. Now, even though it has been

22
00:01:14,319 --> 00:01:18,040
Speaker 1: a while since we've seen really some of the confirmation

23
00:01:18,480 --> 00:01:20,119
Speaker 1: in the headline numbers, it's.

24
00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:22,600
Speaker 3: Been really noisy data, and so I think that's part

25
00:01:22,600 --> 00:01:25,360
Speaker 3: of the issue with analyzing the labor market here. You

26
00:01:25,440 --> 00:01:28,120
Speaker 3: have to make some decisions. You have to take a

27
00:01:28,160 --> 00:01:31,600
Speaker 3: stand on which data are giving you the correct signal

28
00:01:31,600 --> 00:01:33,440
Speaker 3: about where the labor market is going. To give you

29
00:01:33,480 --> 00:01:34,880
Speaker 3: a sense of the contrast, if you look at the

30
00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:37,960
Speaker 3: payroll survey, the Establishment survey of businesses, that's telling you

31
00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:40,440
Speaker 3: we've added two point two million jobs over the last year.

32
00:01:40,480 --> 00:01:42,720
Speaker 3: It sounds like a great number. On the other hand,

33
00:01:42,720 --> 00:01:44,520
Speaker 3: if you look at the household survey, you call people

34
00:01:44,520 --> 00:01:46,880
Speaker 3: at home and ask them if they're working, We're down

35
00:01:46,959 --> 00:01:49,559
Speaker 3: seven hundred and twenty five thousand jobs in that survey.

36
00:01:49,560 --> 00:01:51,840
Speaker 3: That's typically what you would see going into a recession.

37
00:01:52,200 --> 00:01:54,920
Speaker 3: So which is the true signal? Of course, we don't know,

38
00:01:54,960 --> 00:01:56,560
Speaker 3: and you have to put some weight on each You

39
00:01:56,640 --> 00:01:59,720
Speaker 3: have to have humility in terms of analyzing this data.

40
00:02:00,200 --> 00:02:02,840
Speaker 3: But if you look at that payroll's number, we know

41
00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:07,640
Speaker 3: from the revisions that the business survey Establishment survey, payrolls

42
00:02:07,640 --> 00:02:10,440
Speaker 3: are being overstated. So every month and we get that number,

43
00:02:10,800 --> 00:02:13,799
Speaker 3: we should be subtracting something like seventy thousand jobs per

44
00:02:13,840 --> 00:02:16,919
Speaker 3: month from that number. So that is the overstated number.

45
00:02:17,080 --> 00:02:18,920
Speaker 3: The household survey, which we think is giving us a

46
00:02:18,919 --> 00:02:21,720
Speaker 3: better indication where the labor market is running, is telling

47
00:02:21,800 --> 00:02:24,440
Speaker 3: us that we may actually be losing jobs here. So

48
00:02:24,760 --> 00:02:27,160
Speaker 3: we continue to have this softening trend in the labor market,

49
00:02:27,160 --> 00:02:29,560
Speaker 3: the unemployment rate that's rising, and I think that's the

50
00:02:29,560 --> 00:02:30,560
Speaker 3: trend we should be watching.

51
00:02:30,680 --> 00:02:33,880
Speaker 1: If that is the case, how much can you discount

52
00:02:33,880 --> 00:02:36,560
Speaker 1: the idea that the number of hours worked has actually

53
00:02:36,639 --> 00:02:39,400
Speaker 1: inflected upwards, and that when you pair that with some

54
00:02:39,440 --> 00:02:41,840
Speaker 1: of the wage gains that we've seen, that's when some

55
00:02:41,919 --> 00:02:44,200
Speaker 1: of the inflation concerns start coming back in.

56
00:02:44,560 --> 00:02:49,000
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm not too concerned about inflation cyclically because of

57
00:02:49,040 --> 00:02:51,360
Speaker 3: the softening that we have in the labor market. Now,

58
00:02:51,760 --> 00:02:54,280
Speaker 3: what you're saying is correct that we have a strange

59
00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:57,880
Speaker 3: labor market where businesses are hoarding labor right now. So

60
00:02:57,919 --> 00:03:00,280
Speaker 3: we're seeing a hiring rate that's very low, but we

61
00:03:00,280 --> 00:03:02,840
Speaker 3: don't have a layoff rate that's rising. Right, We don't

62
00:03:02,840 --> 00:03:05,480
Speaker 3: have hours work that's plunging. It's come down, but it's

63
00:03:05,480 --> 00:03:08,720
Speaker 3: not falling further. Wage growth which is slowed, but it's

64
00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:11,080
Speaker 3: been a little bit stickier at a higher level. So

65
00:03:11,320 --> 00:03:13,240
Speaker 3: this is a different labor market than what we've ever

66
00:03:13,240 --> 00:03:15,800
Speaker 3: seen before. I think these things can be happening together

67
00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:18,520
Speaker 3: where you have firms that are reluctant to higher firms

68
00:03:18,560 --> 00:03:21,359
Speaker 3: that want to hold on to their current employees if

69
00:03:21,360 --> 00:03:23,880
Speaker 3: they can, but when they lose those employees, they're not

70
00:03:23,919 --> 00:03:26,679
Speaker 3: backfilling them. And what that means is you don't necessarily

71
00:03:26,720 --> 00:03:29,120
Speaker 3: have a higher probability of losing your job right now,

72
00:03:29,440 --> 00:03:31,600
Speaker 3: but if you do lose your job, you have a

73
00:03:31,680 --> 00:03:34,240
Speaker 3: higher probability of not finding one again, and that's going

74
00:03:34,280 --> 00:03:36,920
Speaker 3: to affect consumer behavior, that's going to affect the broader economy.

75
00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:40,040
Speaker 4: Does that mean that there isn't really a number? I

76
00:03:40,080 --> 00:03:42,200
Speaker 4: mean outside of what would be normal that we could

77
00:03:42,240 --> 00:03:44,760
Speaker 4: get on Wednesday, That would mean that the Fed shouldn't

78
00:03:44,760 --> 00:03:47,040
Speaker 4: be cutting. Should the Fed really be cutting regardless of

79
00:03:47,080 --> 00:03:48,720
Speaker 4: the CPI figure we get on Wednesday?

80
00:03:48,960 --> 00:03:50,880
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think we have to go back to an

81
00:03:50,960 --> 00:03:55,840
Speaker 3: environment where the Fed central banks are balancing risk to

82
00:03:55,880 --> 00:03:59,200
Speaker 3: inflation and risks to the labor market. So it was

83
00:03:59,280 --> 00:04:02,760
Speaker 3: easy to say a year ago that, well, inflation's running

84
00:04:02,840 --> 00:04:05,360
Speaker 3: very high. That should be the complete focus. And I

85
00:04:05,360 --> 00:04:08,880
Speaker 3: think we're still fighting the last battle a little bit here. So, yes,

86
00:04:08,960 --> 00:04:12,200
Speaker 3: inflation has been sticky. Inflation hasn't come down as nicely

87
00:04:12,240 --> 00:04:14,640
Speaker 3: as some people thought that it would. But you also

88
00:04:14,680 --> 00:04:16,479
Speaker 3: have to look to the labor market. So we have

89
00:04:16,560 --> 00:04:18,840
Speaker 3: inflation that looks to be running maybe closer to three

90
00:04:18,880 --> 00:04:21,719
Speaker 3: percent than two percent. I think it's going to continue

91
00:04:21,760 --> 00:04:23,880
Speaker 3: to slow based on what I'm seeing in the labor market.

92
00:04:23,880 --> 00:04:26,239
Speaker 3: But that's a projection, that's a forecast at this point.

93
00:04:26,440 --> 00:04:28,120
Speaker 3: But you have to trade that off with looking at

94
00:04:28,160 --> 00:04:30,280
Speaker 3: the household service Seven hundred and twenty five thousand people

95
00:04:30,320 --> 00:04:30,880
Speaker 3: are not working.

96
00:04:30,880 --> 00:04:33,479
Speaker 4: Now do you think the Fed has that message? It's

97
00:04:33,520 --> 00:04:36,520
Speaker 4: this whole what they should do versus what they will do.

98
00:04:36,520 --> 00:04:38,039
Speaker 4: Do you think that there is a number that for

99
00:04:38,120 --> 00:04:40,760
Speaker 4: them would cause them to stop the cuts in December?

100
00:04:40,880 --> 00:04:43,520
Speaker 3: I think December they're probably going to cut even if

101
00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:45,679
Speaker 3: we get a strong CPI inflation reading.

102
00:04:45,720 --> 00:04:46,800
Speaker 1: I think this would.

103
00:04:46,600 --> 00:04:49,200
Speaker 3: Be more about what are they going to signal for January?

104
00:04:49,400 --> 00:04:52,039
Speaker 3: Right now, I think we'll get a softer report on Wednesday.

105
00:04:52,040 --> 00:04:54,560
Speaker 3: First course, CPI inflation. I think that's going to make

106
00:04:54,600 --> 00:04:56,680
Speaker 3: the decision very easy. But if we don't, if we

107
00:04:56,720 --> 00:04:58,760
Speaker 3: get a stronger reading, then what you would see them

108
00:04:58,839 --> 00:05:00,800
Speaker 3: do I think is still cut in December, but say,

109
00:05:00,920 --> 00:05:02,280
Speaker 3: you know, we might be at that point where we

110
00:05:02,320 --> 00:05:04,279
Speaker 3: would slow the pace of cuts. They've been using this

111
00:05:04,400 --> 00:05:07,400
Speaker 3: really open rhetoric of saying we're going to be cautious,

112
00:05:07,400 --> 00:05:09,360
Speaker 3: We're going to be careful. Of course, every central bank

113
00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:10,960
Speaker 3: is going to be cautious and care You can cautiously

114
00:05:10,960 --> 00:05:13,159
Speaker 3: cut fifty basis points, right, It doesn't really mean anything.

115
00:05:13,200 --> 00:05:14,599
Speaker 3: So we'll see what they say in December.

116
00:05:14,839 --> 00:05:15,119
Speaker 1: Okay.

117
00:05:15,120 --> 00:05:17,520
Speaker 5: Speaking of January, we're going to get a brand new

118
00:05:17,560 --> 00:05:20,760
Speaker 5: Trump administration coming in a sweet Republican sweep, and Trump

119
00:05:20,839 --> 00:05:24,680
Speaker 5: yesterday on Meet the Press was talking about immigration in

120
00:05:24,720 --> 00:05:26,479
Speaker 5: the first one hundred days. You're talking about the fact

121
00:05:26,520 --> 00:05:29,480
Speaker 5: that what's going on in the labor market. How tight

122
00:05:29,520 --> 00:05:31,360
Speaker 5: could a labor market get if we do see things

123
00:05:31,440 --> 00:05:32,640
Speaker 5: like mass deportations.

124
00:05:32,720 --> 00:05:32,920
Speaker 1: Yeah.

125
00:05:32,920 --> 00:05:34,640
Speaker 3: One of the things you talked about in that interview

126
00:05:34,800 --> 00:05:38,720
Speaker 3: was that this is going to start with those immigrants

127
00:05:38,760 --> 00:05:41,359
Speaker 3: that have a criminal history, and that that's going to

128
00:05:41,360 --> 00:05:43,800
Speaker 3: be the focus, at least initially, So Lisa was talking

129
00:05:43,839 --> 00:05:46,880
Speaker 3: about this idea of sequencing. What's the policy sequencing? So

130
00:05:47,000 --> 00:05:49,680
Speaker 3: if that really is the focus, that's not something that's

131
00:05:49,680 --> 00:05:52,720
Speaker 3: going to have a big effect on the domestic labor market. Now,

132
00:05:52,760 --> 00:05:54,640
Speaker 3: we know that a large percentage of workers in this

133
00:05:54,720 --> 00:05:57,599
Speaker 3: country are working without authorization, So if you had a

134
00:05:57,640 --> 00:06:01,440
Speaker 3: large deportation program, then you could have issues where worker

135
00:06:01,600 --> 00:06:04,760
Speaker 3: firms are trying to hold on to their native workers.

136
00:06:05,320 --> 00:06:07,520
Speaker 3: That could tighten the labor market. So you do have

137
00:06:07,520 --> 00:06:09,240
Speaker 3: that risk. I think we have to watch how that

138
00:06:09,279 --> 00:06:12,240
Speaker 3: policy plays out, But based on what I heard over

139
00:06:12,279 --> 00:06:14,320
Speaker 3: the weekend, that's not making me more concerned about an

140
00:06:14,360 --> 00:06:15,440
Speaker 3: inflationary impetus from that.

141
00:06:15,560 --> 00:06:18,359
Speaker 5: The other risk, of course is tariffs, and potentially the

142
00:06:18,400 --> 00:06:20,880
Speaker 5: Fed might have to think about what that means for

143
00:06:20,880 --> 00:06:23,680
Speaker 5: inflation next year. How are you thinking about tariffs? Are

144
00:06:23,680 --> 00:06:25,520
Speaker 5: they negotiating tool? Are they blanket?

145
00:06:26,240 --> 00:06:28,040
Speaker 3: I think they're on two tracks, and I think we've

146
00:06:28,120 --> 00:06:31,680
Speaker 3: already seen tariffs as a negotiating tool. We saw tariffs

147
00:06:31,680 --> 00:06:34,479
Speaker 3: floated from Mexico for Canada. Those tariffs are probably not

148
00:06:34,520 --> 00:06:36,760
Speaker 3: going to come into effect. They're meant to be a

149
00:06:36,839 --> 00:06:41,320
Speaker 3: start to negotiating things related to immigration and ventional right

150
00:06:41,360 --> 00:06:46,440
Speaker 3: non economic issues across the board. Tariff is on a

151
00:06:46,480 --> 00:06:48,560
Speaker 3: separate track. I think I think we will see some

152
00:06:48,880 --> 00:06:52,720
Speaker 3: form of that. That would if you're increasing the cost

153
00:06:52,760 --> 00:06:55,800
Speaker 3: of foreign goods, then some of those costs could pass

154
00:06:55,839 --> 00:06:58,599
Speaker 3: through into consumer prices. But we've heard from FED officials

155
00:06:58,720 --> 00:07:02,400
Speaker 3: is that they're going to be quite slow in terms

156
00:07:02,440 --> 00:07:04,720
Speaker 3: of taking their time and watching how this plays through

157
00:07:04,760 --> 00:07:07,800
Speaker 3: in the economy. And remember, from a central bank perspective,

158
00:07:08,080 --> 00:07:10,920
Speaker 3: if you put that tearf in place, the first instinct

159
00:07:10,960 --> 00:07:13,400
Speaker 3: of central bankers is to say, that's a one time

160
00:07:13,480 --> 00:07:15,480
Speaker 3: rise in the price level. And we don't respond to

161
00:07:15,480 --> 00:07:16,960
Speaker 3: a one time rise in the price level. So I

162
00:07:16,960 --> 00:07:18,520
Speaker 3: don't think this is something that's going to make the

163
00:07:18,560 --> 00:07:20,560
Speaker 3: central bank, make the FED a lot more hawkish.

164
00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:23,120
Speaker 1: I guess one thing that amahs to try to get at,

165
00:07:23,160 --> 00:07:24,680
Speaker 1: and I think it's the right thing to get at,

166
00:07:25,000 --> 00:07:28,720
Speaker 1: is what would make you rethink the thesis if we

167
00:07:28,800 --> 00:07:32,880
Speaker 1: do se say, an increase in inflation from policies, or

168
00:07:33,240 --> 00:07:35,880
Speaker 1: just if CPI comes in hot earth and expected, what

169
00:07:36,200 --> 00:07:38,880
Speaker 1: is it that would force you to look at a

170
00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:42,280
Speaker 1: different set of considerations in your employment template.

171
00:07:42,400 --> 00:07:45,640
Speaker 3: Yeah, if I see growth that's accelerating, if I see

172
00:07:45,720 --> 00:07:48,600
Speaker 3: job growth that's accelerating, the unemployment rate that's coming down

173
00:07:48,640 --> 00:07:51,680
Speaker 3: instead of coming up. We have wage growth that's picking up,

174
00:07:51,800 --> 00:07:53,880
Speaker 3: and we're starting to hear firms say we have a

175
00:07:53,880 --> 00:07:56,080
Speaker 3: lot of pricing power in this market. We can raise prices,

176
00:07:56,120 --> 00:07:57,920
Speaker 3: And that's all the opposite of what we're hearing right now.

177
00:07:58,000 --> 00:07:59,960
Speaker 3: Right we're hearing firms say, even when we cut price,

178
00:08:00,520 --> 00:08:02,640
Speaker 3: we're not getting the kind of sales that we were expecting.

179
00:08:02,680 --> 00:08:05,600
Speaker 3: So that's why I think we're in a down trend

180
00:08:05,720 --> 00:08:08,080
Speaker 3: in terms of inflation. If those things inflected, then you

181
00:08:08,080 --> 00:08:09,440
Speaker 3: would get worried about higher inflation.

182
00:08:09,520 --> 00:08:12,160
Speaker 1: You still see a very big risk of recession.

183
00:08:13,240 --> 00:08:16,360
Speaker 3: I think recession risk is elevated. It's certainly elevated, and

184
00:08:16,400 --> 00:08:19,640
Speaker 3: so I would disagree with FED officials that it's not elevated.

185
00:08:19,720 --> 00:08:21,680
Speaker 3: When you have the unemployment rate that's up by almost

186
00:08:21,680 --> 00:08:24,000
Speaker 3: a percentage point and you have very low hiring rates.

187
00:08:24,160 --> 00:08:26,080
Speaker 3: What you worry about is is this going to move

188
00:08:26,120 --> 00:08:29,920
Speaker 3: over into layoffs. We haven't seen that yet, and that's

189
00:08:29,960 --> 00:08:32,120
Speaker 3: a very good thing, and it looks like maybe this

190
00:08:32,160 --> 00:08:35,720
Speaker 3: could continue sometime without getting that pickup in layoffs. But

191
00:08:36,240 --> 00:08:38,440
Speaker 3: is that risk elevated? I think you have to say

192
00:08:38,480 --> 00:08:41,319
Speaker 3: it's elevated, and I would also say very high valuations

193
00:08:41,320 --> 00:08:44,040
Speaker 3: in equity markets. It doesn't mean that we have to

194
00:08:44,080 --> 00:08:46,040
Speaker 3: have a sell off, right, but does that make the

195
00:08:46,160 --> 00:08:48,920
Speaker 3: risk more elevated that we would get a correction in

196
00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:51,800
Speaker 3: risk assets and that could drive somewhat of a slowing

197
00:08:51,800 --> 00:08:54,240
Speaker 3: in the economy. I would worry about that also, Andrew.

198
00:08:53,960 --> 00:08:56,120
Speaker 1: Andrew hollin Horst, always wonderful to speak with you. Thank

199
00:08:56,120 --> 00:09:08,360
Speaker 1: you for being with us. Tim Adams at the Institute

200
00:09:08,360 --> 00:09:12,240
Speaker 1: of International Finance saying this, we'll likely see burgeoning Emina

201
00:09:12,320 --> 00:09:16,920
Speaker 1: activity with an improved deal making landscape, personnelist policy. Amory

202
00:09:16,960 --> 00:09:19,040
Speaker 1: says that all the time. So we'll see who comes

203
00:09:19,080 --> 00:09:21,960
Speaker 1: in at the regulatory agencies to learn more about the

204
00:09:22,000 --> 00:09:25,200
Speaker 1: future of regulations. Tim joins us now, Tim, thank you

205
00:09:25,240 --> 00:09:27,720
Speaker 1: so much for being here here. So do you see

206
00:09:27,760 --> 00:09:29,960
Speaker 1: right now the banking sector is really driving a lot

207
00:09:30,000 --> 00:09:33,240
Speaker 1: of the optimism in the financial space going forward.

208
00:09:33,320 --> 00:09:35,520
Speaker 6: Sure, and they're hearing from their clients. Animal spirits are

209
00:09:35,520 --> 00:09:37,120
Speaker 6: back in the US. The outlook is for the near

210
00:09:37,200 --> 00:09:38,960
Speaker 6: term at least it's pretty bright. There's a sense of

211
00:09:39,000 --> 00:09:41,800
Speaker 6: deregulation across Europe. In the US. We'll see how much

212
00:09:41,840 --> 00:09:44,160
Speaker 6: of that actually happens. But you know, there's a sense

213
00:09:44,200 --> 00:09:45,679
Speaker 6: of optimism that we haven't seen.

214
00:09:45,520 --> 00:09:46,000
Speaker 1: In a while.

215
00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:49,000
Speaker 4: Does that optimism is it mostly centered or should it

216
00:09:49,000 --> 00:09:51,920
Speaker 4: be mostly centered on the largest American banks or the

217
00:09:51,960 --> 00:09:52,560
Speaker 4: smaller ones?

218
00:09:52,640 --> 00:09:54,319
Speaker 6: Well, I think it's across the board. I think Main

219
00:09:54,360 --> 00:09:56,120
Speaker 6: Street Wall Street are going to do well over the

220
00:09:56,160 --> 00:09:59,760
Speaker 6: near term, but Wall Street looks at the near term

221
00:09:59,760 --> 00:10:02,000
Speaker 6: with great optimism. I think deal flow is going to

222
00:10:02,000 --> 00:10:03,520
Speaker 6: pick up. We're going to see IPOs, We're going to

223
00:10:03,520 --> 00:10:05,840
Speaker 6: see M and A activity, and that's good for our institutions.

224
00:10:06,120 --> 00:10:08,320
Speaker 5: I know you're concerned though about the deficit, so you

225
00:10:08,440 --> 00:10:11,160
Speaker 5: took kindly to the fact there's some deficit hawks when

226
00:10:11,160 --> 00:10:13,600
Speaker 5: it comes to personnel's policy. But over the weekend, Trump

227
00:10:13,640 --> 00:10:16,720
Speaker 5: said that he's not going to cut Social Security entitlements,

228
00:10:16,800 --> 00:10:18,839
Speaker 5: not going to raise the retirement age. How are you

229
00:10:18,840 --> 00:10:19,960
Speaker 5: supposed to get the deficit down?

230
00:10:20,160 --> 00:10:22,600
Speaker 6: Yes, it's very hard because most of what you just described,

231
00:10:22,640 --> 00:10:25,720
Speaker 6: you look at a social insurance and defense and net interest.

232
00:10:25,760 --> 00:10:27,200
Speaker 6: Some of the debt is about ninety percent of what

233
00:10:27,240 --> 00:10:29,120
Speaker 6: we spend. The rest is kind of a rounding error.

234
00:10:29,559 --> 00:10:31,520
Speaker 6: We can grow and I think Scott Bessen to who's

235
00:10:31,559 --> 00:10:33,680
Speaker 6: going to be the next Treasury Secretary is focused on growth.

236
00:10:33,760 --> 00:10:35,319
Speaker 6: That's good, but we're going to have to find ways

237
00:10:35,360 --> 00:10:38,840
Speaker 6: to find savings. Deficit hawks are gone in Washington. They

238
00:10:38,840 --> 00:10:41,320
Speaker 6: don't exist anymore, and maybe you need the Marcus to

239
00:10:41,360 --> 00:10:44,120
Speaker 6: send as a signal it's time to become more sober

240
00:10:44,160 --> 00:10:45,520
Speaker 6: in our fiscal outlook.

241
00:10:45,760 --> 00:10:47,640
Speaker 1: Tim, you've spent a lot of time focused on the

242
00:10:47,679 --> 00:10:49,800
Speaker 1: structure of the financial system in the United States, and

243
00:10:49,800 --> 00:10:53,480
Speaker 1: by all accounts, it's really strong and it's diversified. There's

244
00:10:53,480 --> 00:10:56,840
Speaker 1: been a lot of discussion around mergers amongst smaller banks

245
00:10:56,880 --> 00:10:58,520
Speaker 1: and how much we could see if there is an

246
00:10:58,559 --> 00:11:01,440
Speaker 1: administration that is amenable to that kind of tie up,

247
00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:03,080
Speaker 1: how much could we see.

248
00:11:03,120 --> 00:11:04,679
Speaker 6: I think you'll see a lot. I think you ended

249
00:11:04,720 --> 00:11:07,800
Speaker 6: up seeing a barbelling. The largest institutions get larger and

250
00:11:08,000 --> 00:11:11,000
Speaker 6: the mid size become larger. It's a scale business. Look

251
00:11:11,040 --> 00:11:15,800
Speaker 6: at JP Morgan spend seventeen billion dollars a year on technology.

252
00:11:16,000 --> 00:11:19,040
Speaker 6: Jamie probably would spend trillion. But think about the tech

253
00:11:19,080 --> 00:11:21,280
Speaker 6: spin that these institutions put in place and who they're

254
00:11:21,280 --> 00:11:24,360
Speaker 6: competing with, and then you'll see smaller local institutions than

255
00:11:24,400 --> 00:11:25,240
Speaker 6: know the local markets.

256
00:11:25,280 --> 00:11:26,440
Speaker 1: So it's a bifurcation.

257
00:11:26,760 --> 00:11:28,480
Speaker 6: The mid sized guys are going to get bigger.

258
00:11:28,559 --> 00:11:31,360
Speaker 1: Well, you raise this question, who aren't the big competitors?

259
00:11:31,640 --> 00:11:34,240
Speaker 1: Is it Apple, is it absolutely or is this an

260
00:11:34,240 --> 00:11:37,120
Speaker 1: issue of say, the Apollos of the world. And this

261
00:11:37,160 --> 00:11:40,280
Speaker 1: has been sort of the two sided barbell at a

262
00:11:40,280 --> 00:11:43,880
Speaker 1: time where potentially fewer regulations for the largest banks could

263
00:11:43,880 --> 00:11:45,240
Speaker 1: make them more competitive against both.

264
00:11:45,360 --> 00:11:48,000
Speaker 6: Yeah, I probably mean two hundred CEOs a year. In

265
00:11:48,040 --> 00:11:50,160
Speaker 6: the financial sector. We hear a lot about private credit

266
00:11:50,160 --> 00:11:52,560
Speaker 6: and private equity. We hear a lot about Apple, Google

267
00:11:52,600 --> 00:11:55,000
Speaker 6: and the tech platforms. And if you're Jamie, you're trying

268
00:11:55,040 --> 00:11:57,679
Speaker 6: to compete with the tech platforms, right. And then if

269
00:11:57,760 --> 00:11:59,960
Speaker 6: you're then then you maybe you can acquire or part

270
00:12:00,040 --> 00:12:01,840
Speaker 6: and you're with private equity and private credit.

271
00:12:02,200 --> 00:12:04,640
Speaker 4: I'm really curious what happens to Europe and all of

272
00:12:04,679 --> 00:12:07,840
Speaker 4: this if you have this growing American banking system, if

273
00:12:07,880 --> 00:12:10,000
Speaker 4: the biggest get bigger and they're not just eating the

274
00:12:10,040 --> 00:12:12,440
Speaker 4: smaller bank's launch, they're taking it from Europe too, which

275
00:12:12,440 --> 00:12:15,760
Speaker 4: has been really struggling and has tried UniCredit Commerce trying

276
00:12:15,760 --> 00:12:18,120
Speaker 4: to get some sort of merger through. Do something need

277
00:12:18,200 --> 00:12:19,840
Speaker 4: to change? But it finally start.

278
00:12:19,600 --> 00:12:20,800
Speaker 1: To absolutely core.

279
00:12:20,840 --> 00:12:23,520
Speaker 6: Europe is on this back politically and economically. German economy

280
00:12:23,600 --> 00:12:26,920
Speaker 6: is really struggling. Periphery's doing much better, Spain, Greece, Poland.

281
00:12:27,400 --> 00:12:31,240
Speaker 6: But euro needs banking, consolidation, the need capital markets, union, banking,

282
00:12:31,240 --> 00:12:33,240
Speaker 6: and there's so much that this new Commission and this

283
00:12:33,280 --> 00:12:36,000
Speaker 6: new Parliament needs to take on. They're saying the right things,

284
00:12:36,160 --> 00:12:38,240
Speaker 6: but we'll see it's time for action across Europe.

285
00:12:38,320 --> 00:12:40,199
Speaker 5: We saw uned Credit try to do that with Commerce

286
00:12:40,240 --> 00:12:43,040
Speaker 5: Bank and the Germans really did not want that to happen.

287
00:12:43,360 --> 00:12:46,600
Speaker 5: What could give the boost to these countries to say, okay,

288
00:12:46,640 --> 00:12:47,800
Speaker 5: we should start consolidating.

289
00:12:47,840 --> 00:12:50,719
Speaker 6: Well, you're hearing it from Christine Loard the ECB, she's

290
00:12:50,760 --> 00:12:53,480
Speaker 6: signaling a unique consolidation. You need Brussels to say it's

291
00:12:53,520 --> 00:12:55,760
Speaker 6: time to act as time to consolidate. I think this

292
00:12:55,840 --> 00:12:57,280
Speaker 6: deal is going to go through over time, and I

293
00:12:57,320 --> 00:12:59,120
Speaker 6: think we'll see more over time as well.

294
00:12:59,200 --> 00:13:01,439
Speaker 1: Hold on a second, you think that the Germans are

295
00:13:01,480 --> 00:13:04,560
Speaker 1: going to be okay with an Italian bank taking over

296
00:13:04,640 --> 00:13:05,880
Speaker 1: one of their national champions.

297
00:13:05,960 --> 00:13:09,240
Speaker 6: Let's underscore they already have The Italians have already taken over.

298
00:13:09,360 --> 00:13:12,400
Speaker 6: They have no choice, right, These are great institutions I

299
00:13:12,520 --> 00:13:15,280
Speaker 6: like Comerance Bank. The CEO Betina is wonderful. I think

300
00:13:15,320 --> 00:13:18,000
Speaker 6: they all realize that to compete domestically and the nationally

301
00:13:18,120 --> 00:13:20,960
Speaker 6: compete with US firms on the continent, they've got to consolidate.

302
00:13:21,120 --> 00:13:23,040
Speaker 1: Tim You talk with a lot of regulators, you talk

303
00:13:23,080 --> 00:13:25,640
Speaker 1: with a lot of elected politicians, and I'm curious about

304
00:13:25,640 --> 00:13:28,480
Speaker 1: whether you've really heard a change in tone over in

305
00:13:28,520 --> 00:13:32,280
Speaker 1: Europe that recognizes how different this moment is that they're in.

306
00:13:32,679 --> 00:13:34,920
Speaker 6: I think the Trump shock has gotten their attention. I

307
00:13:34,920 --> 00:13:35,600
Speaker 6: think they know.

308
00:13:35,640 --> 00:13:36,439
Speaker 1: They have to do more.

309
00:13:36,480 --> 00:13:40,439
Speaker 6: But Brussel's a challenging place. You know, it's a bureaucratic machine.

310
00:13:40,640 --> 00:13:42,960
Speaker 6: So you need political leadership right now. That's missing in

311
00:13:43,000 --> 00:13:45,920
Speaker 6: France and Germany. Hopefully in six months we'll have greater stability.

312
00:13:46,240 --> 00:13:49,120
Speaker 6: Brussels needs to act, Frankfort needs to act. We need

313
00:13:49,160 --> 00:13:50,480
Speaker 6: to see political leadership.

314
00:13:50,559 --> 00:13:53,079
Speaker 5: Where is the political leadership right now? And you're at

315
00:13:53,080 --> 00:13:55,640
Speaker 5: the G seven it felt like it was Georgia Maloney

316
00:13:55,720 --> 00:13:59,280
Speaker 5: that was almost this central figure of Europe because everyone

317
00:13:59,320 --> 00:14:01,640
Speaker 5: that showed up was either a lame duck or on

318
00:14:01,679 --> 00:14:02,240
Speaker 5: their way out.

319
00:14:02,600 --> 00:14:05,680
Speaker 6: Well, the polls have the rotating presidency the EU, they're

320
00:14:05,840 --> 00:14:07,640
Speaker 6: very pro growth, and I like what they've done with

321
00:14:07,679 --> 00:14:09,920
Speaker 6: their economy. I like where they want to go. Spain

322
00:14:10,000 --> 00:14:12,000
Speaker 6: is saying, look at us, we're growing fast. In Greece,

323
00:14:12,240 --> 00:14:15,000
Speaker 6: which was always sort of the stepchild of the EU

324
00:14:15,080 --> 00:14:17,720
Speaker 6: for so many years, is now really putting in great performance.

325
00:14:17,960 --> 00:14:20,240
Speaker 6: I think what you'll see over time core you're figuring

326
00:14:20,240 --> 00:14:22,680
Speaker 6: out they need to lead and do more in Germany

327
00:14:22,760 --> 00:14:25,080
Speaker 6: is the secret and the key to the future of

328
00:14:25,120 --> 00:14:25,880
Speaker 6: European growth.

329
00:14:25,960 --> 00:14:28,640
Speaker 1: So you've done on this whirlwind tour of the whole world.

330
00:14:28,760 --> 00:14:30,600
Speaker 1: You're coming to an end. I'm sure you're very happy

331
00:14:30,680 --> 00:14:33,440
Speaker 1: to be going home. What's your big tic takeaway, Tim,

332
00:14:33,480 --> 00:14:36,320
Speaker 1: after meeting with international leaders of finance around the world.

333
00:14:36,520 --> 00:14:39,280
Speaker 6: Yeah, there's an enormous optimism about the US, but there's concerns.

334
00:14:39,280 --> 00:14:41,440
Speaker 6: There's just so much we don't know about what this

335
00:14:41,480 --> 00:14:44,200
Speaker 6: new administration is going to do. The economic leaders that

336
00:14:44,200 --> 00:14:47,200
Speaker 6: have been put in place, that personnel's policy have really

337
00:14:47,240 --> 00:14:51,440
Speaker 6: boyd that outlook. But ultimately, how will these different policies

338
00:14:51,440 --> 00:14:52,080
Speaker 6: be put in place?

339
00:14:52,120 --> 00:14:52,960
Speaker 1: Will we see tariffs?

340
00:14:53,040 --> 00:14:56,960
Speaker 6: Is it selective, incremental or is it much broader? We

341
00:14:57,040 --> 00:14:57,520
Speaker 6: just don't know.

342
00:14:57,800 --> 00:15:00,480
Speaker 1: Tim Adams of the IIF thank you so much with

343
00:15:00,560 --> 00:15:12,120
Speaker 1: us a key question of how tied the hands are

344
00:15:12,160 --> 00:15:15,400
Speaker 1: of the FED to the fact that inflation might be

345
00:15:15,520 --> 00:15:18,040
Speaker 1: the surprise card here heading into the end of twenty

346
00:15:18,080 --> 00:15:18,560
Speaker 1: twenty four.

347
00:15:19,120 --> 00:15:21,720
Speaker 7: Right, So, when you look at last week's jobs report,

348
00:15:21,800 --> 00:15:24,280
Speaker 7: you get a bit of a riddle for twenty twenty five.

349
00:15:24,640 --> 00:15:29,000
Speaker 7: You get very strong job growth, a uptick in the

350
00:15:29,080 --> 00:15:33,880
Speaker 7: unemployment rate, and importantly for the FED, really robust wage growth.

351
00:15:33,920 --> 00:15:37,840
Speaker 7: Where does that lead to sticky inflation? So the riddle

352
00:15:37,960 --> 00:15:40,200
Speaker 7: is an H for hiring or an H for hiking.

353
00:15:40,320 --> 00:15:43,160
Speaker 7: We don't know in twenty twenty five, but the wage

354
00:15:43,160 --> 00:15:46,280
Speaker 7: growth is putting pressure on inflation, and that's something the

355
00:15:46,320 --> 00:15:48,800
Speaker 7: FED has to keep in, you know, in the rear

356
00:15:48,880 --> 00:15:51,960
Speaker 7: rear mirror as they're trying to support the labor market pause.

357
00:15:52,320 --> 00:15:55,760
Speaker 1: You've said recently that it seems like this job's market

358
00:15:55,800 --> 00:15:57,680
Speaker 1: is on a knife edge. It could go one way

359
00:15:57,760 --> 00:15:59,960
Speaker 1: or another. Are you saying that we're at that tip

360
00:16:00,160 --> 00:16:02,520
Speaker 1: point where we could see whether the solidity of the

361
00:16:02,600 --> 00:16:05,920
Speaker 1: labor market is actually contributing to an increasing likelihood of

362
00:16:05,920 --> 00:16:07,160
Speaker 1: stickiness and even a rate hike.

363
00:16:07,480 --> 00:16:11,000
Speaker 7: Yeah, we're in the stasis period, this really quiet period

364
00:16:11,040 --> 00:16:13,960
Speaker 7: in the labor market where there's very low layoffs and

365
00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:17,520
Speaker 7: now pretty you know, average hiring. If you take the

366
00:16:17,600 --> 00:16:20,920
Speaker 7: last three months of the BLS data, you get something

367
00:16:20,960 --> 00:16:22,920
Speaker 7: a little bit less than one hundred and forty thousand

368
00:16:23,000 --> 00:16:27,640
Speaker 7: jobs created every month on average. So that's solid. But

369
00:16:27,680 --> 00:16:30,280
Speaker 7: I don't think we stay in this equilibrium. I think

370
00:16:30,320 --> 00:16:32,720
Speaker 7: there is a tipping point that is coming, and I'm

371
00:16:32,760 --> 00:16:35,480
Speaker 7: not quite sure whether it's a tipping point lower or

372
00:16:35,560 --> 00:16:38,680
Speaker 7: tipping point higher. So I'm watching wages and what wage

373
00:16:38,680 --> 00:16:41,880
Speaker 7: growth suggests. Both in the BLS data and in the

374
00:16:41,920 --> 00:16:46,240
Speaker 7: ADP payroll data. It suggests that wages are still robust,

375
00:16:46,240 --> 00:16:48,760
Speaker 7: they're still growing. That suggests there's still a bit of

376
00:16:48,840 --> 00:16:51,200
Speaker 7: tightness in the labor market, and I think that's tied

377
00:16:51,240 --> 00:16:53,560
Speaker 7: to longer term trends, not something that the FED can

378
00:16:53,600 --> 00:16:54,320
Speaker 7: fix right away.

379
00:16:54,440 --> 00:16:57,280
Speaker 4: Is there a possibility that when that equilibrium shifts, if

380
00:16:57,320 --> 00:17:00,119
Speaker 4: it does shift towards sticky inflation, that it's not just sticky,

381
00:17:00,320 --> 00:17:03,560
Speaker 4: but wage growth also translates into reacceleration of inflation.

382
00:17:03,720 --> 00:17:07,080
Speaker 7: And that's the problem for the FED. It depends on

383
00:17:07,119 --> 00:17:10,840
Speaker 7: what they do right now. It seems like they're on

384
00:17:11,000 --> 00:17:14,480
Speaker 7: track for a cut in December that could be followed

385
00:17:14,480 --> 00:17:17,960
Speaker 7: by a pause early next year. We're all hoping that

386
00:17:18,000 --> 00:17:21,040
Speaker 7: it's not a hike, because that would imply an acceleration

387
00:17:21,160 --> 00:17:24,879
Speaker 7: of inflation much higher than the Fed's projections right now.

388
00:17:25,200 --> 00:17:28,960
Speaker 7: But given how robust wage growth is, remember before the

389
00:17:29,000 --> 00:17:32,159
Speaker 7: pandemic that ten years of expansion, waste growth was between

390
00:17:32,160 --> 00:17:35,200
Speaker 7: two and three percent. We're now at four percent, So

391
00:17:35,280 --> 00:17:38,760
Speaker 7: there's no consistency of a four percent average hourly wage

392
00:17:38,760 --> 00:17:41,240
Speaker 7: growth with two percent target inflation.

393
00:17:41,440 --> 00:17:42,960
Speaker 4: Is there a risk though, that if the FED is

394
00:17:43,000 --> 00:17:46,000
Speaker 4: cutting in December and they continued with some cuts at

395
00:17:46,040 --> 00:17:48,119
Speaker 4: least in the first half of twenty twenty five, that

396
00:17:48,160 --> 00:17:51,159
Speaker 4: they allow that reacceleration to happen, that they create the

397
00:17:51,240 --> 00:17:54,119
Speaker 4: environment where the animal spirits can continue, hiring can continue

398
00:17:54,119 --> 00:17:57,200
Speaker 4: with a hopium of what a president Donald Trump presidency means,

399
00:17:57,400 --> 00:17:58,520
Speaker 4: and that's what creates it.

400
00:17:58,680 --> 00:18:02,000
Speaker 7: Well, decades of FED policy teach us one thing that

401
00:18:02,080 --> 00:18:05,800
Speaker 7: monetary policy is risky business. I mean, usually that's how

402
00:18:06,000 --> 00:18:09,879
Speaker 7: the economy falls into a recession. The FED rates hikes

403
00:18:09,960 --> 00:18:14,960
Speaker 7: rates to contain inflation, and that tips the economy into recession.

404
00:18:15,359 --> 00:18:18,520
Speaker 7: That did not happen this time. Interest rates went higher

405
00:18:18,560 --> 00:18:21,639
Speaker 7: and the FED and the economy kept growing, So we

406
00:18:21,720 --> 00:18:24,560
Speaker 7: really don't know in the context of the current economic

407
00:18:24,680 --> 00:18:27,840
Speaker 7: environment exactly what's going to happen to the economy. When

408
00:18:27,880 --> 00:18:29,639
Speaker 7: you look at the consumer, when you look at the

409
00:18:29,680 --> 00:18:33,160
Speaker 7: labor market, it's still very solid and resilient. So there's

410
00:18:33,160 --> 00:18:35,560
Speaker 7: some that's I guess the hope for the Fed. They

411
00:18:35,560 --> 00:18:36,639
Speaker 7: still have some wig overroom.

412
00:18:36,920 --> 00:18:40,560
Speaker 5: Following the jobs number, we saw these bets for December

413
00:18:40,560 --> 00:18:42,680
Speaker 5: cup go up. Was that too premature or given the

414
00:18:42,720 --> 00:18:44,480
Speaker 5: fact that we don't have CPI.

415
00:18:44,160 --> 00:18:47,160
Speaker 7: Yet, Yeah, I think the seed is waiting for CPI.

416
00:18:48,000 --> 00:18:51,880
Speaker 7: We're seeing a three point three percent core CPI right now.

417
00:18:52,440 --> 00:18:56,040
Speaker 7: We're seeing a month over month that we're not going

418
00:18:56,080 --> 00:18:58,719
Speaker 7: down to a point two or a point one percent

419
00:18:59,040 --> 00:19:03,359
Speaker 7: monthly range. That is a nervous period for the FED

420
00:19:03,440 --> 00:19:06,480
Speaker 7: because if we keep going up a month after month

421
00:19:06,520 --> 00:19:09,359
Speaker 7: ato point three percent, that is not going to drag

422
00:19:09,440 --> 00:19:11,600
Speaker 7: us back down to that two percent. So it's not

423
00:19:11,720 --> 00:19:15,400
Speaker 7: just wages here now, it's shelter costs in housing that's

424
00:19:15,480 --> 00:19:16,480
Speaker 7: driving up inflation.

425
00:19:16,560 --> 00:19:19,399
Speaker 5: Well, we heard from Mickey Bowman on Friday following that report,

426
00:19:19,440 --> 00:19:21,040
Speaker 5: and she says, we have so much growth right now,

427
00:19:21,040 --> 00:19:22,680
Speaker 5: it's hard to think that the level of the interest

428
00:19:22,760 --> 00:19:24,359
Speaker 5: rates is restrictive at this point.

429
00:19:24,800 --> 00:19:25,680
Speaker 1: Are we restrictive?

430
00:19:26,480 --> 00:19:29,640
Speaker 7: That's a question for the FOMC, and we're starting to

431
00:19:29,680 --> 00:19:32,960
Speaker 7: see that there's a lot more disagreement on that FOMC

432
00:19:33,280 --> 00:19:37,199
Speaker 7: than there was previously. Look, you know, when inflation was

433
00:19:37,320 --> 00:19:40,680
Speaker 7: unspeakably high, it was easy to get everyone on agreement,

434
00:19:40,720 --> 00:19:43,000
Speaker 7: and it was easy to see the path. As we

435
00:19:43,040 --> 00:19:45,359
Speaker 7: get closer and closer to that two percent target, I

436
00:19:45,359 --> 00:19:48,359
Speaker 7: think you're going to see the FOMC opinions start to

437
00:19:48,440 --> 00:19:51,800
Speaker 7: diverge on where is that neutruarate and how to get there,

438
00:19:51,800 --> 00:19:53,479
Speaker 7: And that's what you're going to see in these public

439
00:19:53,520 --> 00:19:54,200
Speaker 7: comments now.

440
00:19:54,359 --> 00:19:56,400
Speaker 1: Neila Richardson of ADP, thank you so much.

441
00:19:57,280 --> 00:20:00,840
Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg's Events podcast, bringing you the best

442
00:20:00,880 --> 00:20:04,200
Speaker 2: in markets, economics, angio politics. You can watch the show

443
00:20:04,240 --> 00:20:07,199
Speaker 2: live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to

444
00:20:07,320 --> 00:20:11,080
Speaker 2: nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify

445
00:20:11,240 --> 00:20:13,440
Speaker 2: or anywhere else you listen, and as always, on the

446
00:20:13,480 --> 00:20:15,920
Speaker 2: Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.