WEBVTT - Meta Provides Earnings Relief, Palantir CEO Interview

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hinna Blue Mugs World headquarters in New York,

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and I made Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Technology in Carolina, post fed rally for then as that

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>one progress in the battle and inflation warning on rates

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:28.639
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't even got two earnings yet. Macro and

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the micro is super important for certain names to ed.

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about it. Meta surging after earnings relief, plans

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.959
<v Speaker 1>to buy back shares, the company focusing on efficiency, were

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>digging into the short term cost cuts and the long

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.279
<v Speaker 1>term goals as it also wins quarter approval to buy

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>VR startup within plus my exclusive conversation with Palenteer CEO

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Alex carp who has some pointed words for shareholders and

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>potential new hires and crypto hackers. Still more money than

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>ever before. In two that's as Cathy Woods ARC doubles

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>down on it's one million dollar talget for bitcoin. First,

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to go straight to our bloome bag report

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to Alex Brinka, who has all the key takeaways from

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>metas Zarnings addicts, what were the top lines? I mean,

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing here with this stock bub I think

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the cost cutting. Meta has had

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>some kind of shaky ground with investors over the last

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>twelve months because of how much they say they're spending

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>on things like this far flung vision of the virtual

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>reality metaverse. Well, they have come back to earth, it seems,

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and actually lower their expectations for three for their costs

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to about eighty nine to billion dollars and expenses for

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the year. I think the icing on the cake on

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that that's probably exciting investors is the addition of forty

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars to their share a purchase plan. Again. Metas

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>stock sold off the most ever, the most free year

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>ever in two It's recovered a little bit, certainly more today,

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>but adding a little bit to that buy back has

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly got folks excited now in terms of the broader

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>market and what we might also see from Alphabet tomorrow.

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the top line staments for the first

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>quarter for revenue, they're projecting at twenty six to twenty

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half billion dollars. That basically straddles the

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>average analyst expectations. So I think there might be some

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>clues under the hood here that the general malaise in

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the ad market is leveling off similar to what we

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>heard from Snap yesterday. But as the earnings call gets

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>started here, I'm sure that there'll be questions on both

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>costs metaverse aspirations and where that revenue stabilization is coming from.

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure competition with a company that you focus

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot in on, which is TikTok. So it is

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>notable that we're getting that by that push up in

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the shares, but we're still half of where we are

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in the value of Meta stock from this time last

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>year anything in terms of where their market share is

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>looking all their own cannibalization with the fact that they're

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, discounting giving cheap ads on reels for example,

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 1>exactly that that is that reels narrative is one that

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>was really big last earning cycle, and I'm sure they'll

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>get questions now. Reels is their answer to TikTok. It's

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>short form videos that served up to you based on

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>an algorithm. It's really dicky, and users are liking it,

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and they've shown some kind of strides and getting users

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>on board and spending more time there. The problem is

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make as much money for them as other

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 1>places where they could serve ads on Facebook and Instagram.

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>So last earning cycle three months ago they said this

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>will be a twelve to eighteen month process until they

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>can close that gap a hundred percent. I'm sure folks

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>are looking to get an answer on the progress on

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that front. Hey, Alex, As you wrote in the top

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.519
<v Speaker 1>live blog, investors have been laser focused on spending. But

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the number that caught my eyes this two billion Facebook

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>core platform use it based seventy million growth from the

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>same time last year. How surprising is that It's a

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>bit surprising. Remember, Facebook has been around for what almost

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>two decades now, so to see a rise of seventy

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>million users and actually clear that benchmark of two billion

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>people using Facebook every day is an interesting little number

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.119
<v Speaker 1>for a platform that's been around for a while. They've

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>been making changes to Facebook. They've been bringing in things

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>like reels. It seems like they're listening to what users

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>are liking from perhaps other platforms and bringing that into

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>their legacy app. So I'm sure that they will be

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>bragging about that mark. Zuckerberg was in the statement in

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the release about that and also about what he's calling

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>which is the Year of Efficiency. So those two things

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely seem to be the top two that they are

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 1>selling to investors as they let out these earnings today.

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Alex breenca just the perfect summation of all that we've

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>just got in the last hour or so. Let's get

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>even more of a deep dive for you. Debra Ajo

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Williamson is with US Principle Analyst have written insider Intelligence,

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and you were looking at the daily active users of

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Facebook as well and the engagement. It's interesting both snap

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook well met to the parent company showing people

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>are still coming to their platforms that adding eyeballs, but

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>what about the actual revenues about the ads that being bought. Yeah, well,

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean it is a good sign, just to say

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>right straight out, it is a good sign that both

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>daily active users and monthly active users for a platform

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook that is you know, quite quite old in

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>social network to terms, is still gaining right So there,

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>really you have to take that is as an important sign.

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Um that said that, you know, I'm pretty confident that

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the gains are mostly going to be outside of the

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>core advertising markets, which would be the United States and Europe.

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Um and and that is where Meta has been able

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to for a long time now generate a significant portion

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of revenue be able to charge more for advertising, uh,

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated advertisers. And so I think where you're seeing the

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>dichotomy here is UM and this is true for staff

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. Is that because the growth is in areas

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 1>where there is UM you know, where underdeveloped markets or

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>um you know, underdeveloped advertising businesses. Uh, that is impacting

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the the overall revenue picture for the company. Wells also

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to be put into perspective, which I know you highlight

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>time and time again. I mean, this is an enormous

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of revenue. This company is pulling in thirty two

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 1>billion on a quartity basis, more than a hundred and

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>sixteen on an annual But revenue is down and it's

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>been down for three straight. Court is now absolutely and

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, if we pull back to look at the

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>full year, uh, you know, as we expected, Meta closed

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>the year with its first year over year decline in

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>AD revenue. But the downturn was slightly less than we thought,

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>about one percent versus are expected two percent decline. Uh.

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know that's that's not actually a good sign

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 1>when you think and pull back to one which was

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a year when worldwide AD revenue grew nearly thirty seven percent.

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>So we are we've seen a huge swing in the

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>performance of this company, partially because of external factors like

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the worldwide economy, the changes that Apple made to its

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>privacy that affect the effectiveness and the efficiency of the advertising,

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>but also I mean it's true that I think when

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>you think about where Mark Zuckerberg has been focusing his

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>time and attention, it's been on the metaverse. And I

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>think to some extent last year he took his eye

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>off of the ball of the fact that Facebook and

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Instagram are the two biggest worldwide social platforms and there's

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>still room to grow. And I think that was something

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that I think they're trying to rectify now going into well,

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>he called three year of efficiency, which sounds very much

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>like something shareholders have wanted to hear for some time.

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>The other thing shareholders like to hear, Deborah, is buy

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>backs and more of them, Meta boosting their buy back

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>authorization by forty billion. We're sharing on the screen, Uh,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>this chart? Is this just Meta buying its own dip? Yes?

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>So this is an area because insider intelligence focuses mostly

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>on looking at revenue and usage metrics, UM I can't

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>specifically comment on that, but I think anything just bottom

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>line that Meta is doing to you know, to improve

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>its its profitability, to reduce expenses, to you know, to

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>counteract this sort of revenue shortfall is going to be

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>good for the company. Deborrah Williamson, thank you so much

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>for joining us principal analysts and insider intelligence, and the

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>other story we can't get away from. Open ai introducing

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a twenty dollar per month subscription for a premium version

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of chat GPT. Chat GPT Plus will offer access to

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the chat pot even during peak times, with faster responses

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to type queries and early access to new features. Open

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Ai is eagerly trying to find viable business models to

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.559
<v Speaker 1>cover the high cost of running its products, including of course,

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the multimillion billion dollar I should say deal with Microsoft.

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Shares of Pelaton absolutely soaring as the company reported improved

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>cash flow and a narrower net loss in the last quarter.

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.719
<v Speaker 1>CEO Barry McCarthy saying, the questions about the viability of

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the business they put to bed? Have they joining us now?

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Shretter Cajuria, director of Internet Pretty Research, ever care should

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>are they put to bed? Is extinction behind us? I

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>think so first, Paul, thanks for having me. I think

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>if a question is not about extinction anymore, I guess

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the question is whether this is going to be an

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>epic comeback, which is what Barry said in his in

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>his letter, I call it a very very spractical comeback

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>right now with the free dash blows that they posted,

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>excluding some of the one supplier related costs, what is

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>becoming increasingly clear is that this business is self sustainable

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>on a free dash bow basis, which is what their

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>number one priority was. Board remains unclear is what how

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 1>should you think about growth for this company? You mentioned comeback.

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>We asked our own audience if they felt that this

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>was evidence of the Peloton come back. These are the results.

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Pretty overwhelming. No, not convince sixty six of respondents. I

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>guess what is it that the consumer feels right now

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>for Peloton? But how do we assess the user base

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and the growth potential based on the bullish commentary? For management,

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>there's certainly a very good fall line for those who

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 1>own the device. The NBA score remains very high. Uh,

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the usage and engagement with the product remains very robust,

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and the retention grades are intrinsically very high. For this

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>business when we compare them to some of the other

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>subscription based businesses. What is unclear is how many more

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of these UH Internet connected home fitness equipment can they

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>sell in the market. What is the actual growth rate?

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>How fast is the industry blowing? And can Felton grow

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>faster than the overall industry? Are we tapping out of

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the market opportunity or is it is this something that

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>can grow in the double digital thrate. The juries are well,

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>sorry to interrupted. I was going to say the jury

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is out. As I look across the cell side reaction,

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess the concern is we we believe Barry McCarthy

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in the near term, we don't yet have any evidence

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of what the growth story two or three years from now.

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>That seems to be the skepticism out there. That's exactly right.

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So what is in their control was cutting down costs,

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>headcount reduction, variabilizing the cost from fixed costs of variable costs,

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>as well as UH inventory management, better inventory demand management,

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and all that they have done. And it's in the

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>past and they've done a great job since very came

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>on board. What is not in their control is really

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>driving demand. How much of a balance will they need

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to do with marketing spend to drive this incremental demand

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>uh and also maintain positive recshual profitability. And what is

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>also what is unclear among those who are not very

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>happy with Peloton is the recent shift in outsourcing their

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>customer service and so they experience that customers used to

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>have is not the same in terms of expecting the

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the customer service that they have been

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 1>as well as the delivery expectations of the equipment. Yeah,

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you've got to build your own. I'm I'm interested. Therefore,

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>in what they now need to prioritize and execute on.

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it more important than these partnerships like the exporting

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>goods Amazon that they work out, or is it about

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>self investment ensuring that they are updating the act as

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>they need to, that they are improving customer services they

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>need to. It will be a blend of bolt Uh.

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>It is very clear that customer service needs to be

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>better than what it has been at the US and best,

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>but increasingly important is the incremental user base that they

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>will get. So the key growth drivers that they will

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>benefit from our not only the distribution partners that you

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>called out and increasing those who include include more retailers,

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>but also international markets. They launched tread in Australia they

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>could expand into different countries as well as product category

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>expansion and what they call fitnesses and service product which

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>is really the rental program, as well as certified creon

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.719
<v Speaker 1>which is if you own some cells that you want

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to sell that and that drives. Essentially, they are trying

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to make it easy for an average customer do do

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>buy this relatively more expensive equipment right? They also relied,

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of course on promotions and holiday season sales thanks to

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Schwetter Cajurior Director of Internet Equity Research at Evercred. Now

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>coming up some of my exclusive conversation with Palenteers CEO

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Alex Carp That is always come next, a fascinating combative conversation.

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Palentier, the at times mysterious data analysis

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>software firm, is making more commercial deals. It's a change

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of strategy for a company that's thrived in chaos, winning

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>government and military contracts from the pandemic and war in Ukraine.

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I sat down for an exclusive interview with Palans CEO

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Alex Carp and asked him how vestors should view him

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>his view on Silicon Valley and global text perspective on Palenteer.

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Take listen, we are a company whose most important purpose

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 1>is to power the West to to even higher heights

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in the commercial and in the government context. And we've

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>done this in any terror in the kinds of the pandemic,

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and the context of war, in the context of data protection.

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>And you really can't do that if you're going to

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>also transfer those technologies indirectly directly your adversaries, and we've

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>never done it. You're talking on stage about how your

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>public company and you have a responsibility to your shareholders.

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>And at times in the last twenty years, shareholders have

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>complained to you like why are you doing this it's

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>loss making or why are you not doing that? And

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we talked about your strategy. Investors haven't really cheered it.

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>If you clearly go off the share price performance, what

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is your message to them today about the dealers are

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>announcing honest for that. So we are a company that

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>has a primary mission. The primary mission is to make

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the West stronger and better whatever that mission has secondarily

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>led to to see one percent Tager over twenty years,

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty five percent Kager in the US government and the

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>share price is the thing is I think a little

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>bit of a red herring because all teck us down.

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think our shares have been any more punished

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>than anyone else's. So if you are an investor and

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to go long on transforming our country and

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>our allies, you have a home appound here. I have

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>never ever, ever wavered from that statement. And if you

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>don't want to invest in us because of that, you shouldn't.

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>And if you're invest in us thinking I'm gonna change,

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you're making a mistake. You we lay our cards on

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the table. There is nothing besides transparency, or we haven't.

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>When we went to the Ukraine, I didn't ask them

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>can you pay us? I said here's the product. If

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I had gone to standard investor be like, well, you

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>can't do this until they pay you. When we started

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>off in America on the pandemic and in Britain, we said, look,

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>we can help. This is the primary mission of our company.

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think where I'm very aligned with investors is

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>they're hearing the truth. I'm not saying, hey, we might

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>change this prosop policy. We might do crazy deals in

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>adversarial countries, we might put the other missions ahead of

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>our point. No. And by the way, I tell the

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>most important investors that every day Palntarians, and I tell

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>our retail investors, whom I revere that every time I

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>go on TV. And you know when you're buying, when

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you buy a pounder in a spirit of transparency. You

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>yourself has sold stock regularly since the lockoff expiry in

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>one um, in the full, in the fairness of full transparency.

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>In the last year or so, I've only sold for

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>tax reasons. There's been no financial sales. I'm grateful to

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>be here with you in Palo Alto. I'm surprised to

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>be here with you in Palo Alto. You've you've talked

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>about monoculture in Silicon Valley. You moved the company to Colorado,

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and you've not come back often in the last three

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>years because the Silicon Valley is obviously failed in this

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>mission to produce technology that's useful and that the useful

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>for the world. It makes it a better place. And

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>we were I think the first reasonably large company to leave,

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and now I'm very happy to come back and say, look,

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you know on occasion, you know, our position is a

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>position we're proud of. And be surrounded again by people

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>who disagree with me. There are many wokes engineers I

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>think those are words you've used, that have lost their

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>jobs recently at some tech giants. I know that you're

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>looking at growth. Are you open to hiring those engineers?

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Do not join parent here if you're not willing to

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>support the US militaryans allies. You can have, by the way,

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>any political opinion you want, as long as that's not

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.479
<v Speaker 1>a question for you. If it is a question for you,

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>do not punt here is not your home. Unapologetic, uncompromising.

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, he knows where he stands. He is completely

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with palenters offering to government, to security services. And

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that was just a small glimpse of a man that

0:17:54.359 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>many in Silicon Valley of shunned because he has shunned them.

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology and Caroline had in New

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>York and to end New and San Francisco and the

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>tech sector really getting lift off today, unsurprisingly from the

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>macro strands from the FED. Yeah yeah, And I think

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying this is kind of the first big post

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>FED rally since July. And I go straight to one chart,

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>which is now DA futures jump, two year yield goes down.

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>It is a snapshot of the story, and we have

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>one of the great Bloomberg minds joining us at the

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>moment who can get into this. But my point is

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 1>very simple. Twenty five basis point hike and a warning

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 1>from pal that while they're making progress on inflation, they

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>still foresee hikes to come. So for the market, it's

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>about when does the policy pivot come. But in the

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>context of tech, you ask the question, higher rates discount

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the present value of future profits, and that is why

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we look so closely at the relationship between yields and

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the NASA one NAZAC futures. In this case. You talked

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>about bitcoin earlier, but let's just talk about risk assets.

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>It was a pretty broadly I'm looking at them as

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>that one, but also more speculative corners of the market,

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>so the Arc Innovation ETA and also the Goldman Sachs

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Nonprofitable Tech Index. In other words, these stocks that trade

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>at high wall extreme multiples, high multiples some relief for

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>them because they have also been the most downtrodden corners

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of the market through this hiking cycle. And now we

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>start to look at there's some more positive future, and

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that includes bitcoin, which, let's be honest, carry you and

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I both said earlier it's a risk asset inflation hedge

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>not so much. Not yet, let's get into all of it.

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>We're really pleased to say back two days in a

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>row is about Lee's with us, and really you were

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>racing yourself for the technology reaction to this macro story. First,

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>let's dig into the tech starres and the rally on upwards.

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>This is because they've been the most beaten up of late.

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes and Ed had a great summary, making my job

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot easier, but a lot of textures really extended

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>their gains even hitting session highs. You have the legs

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>of neda Amazon alphabet all soaring north of two because,

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>let's face it, they were pummeled last year. They don't

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>really like rising interest rates because that's not good for them,

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that's not good for their projected profits. So now it's

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>welcome used they're happy, they celebrated it, they cheered it.

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>As Ed mentioned, nastag is up two percent and it's

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 1>probably just going to be the start for them. And today,

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, of Meta, I'm sure you're covered it. Also postmarket,

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>they're trading well because of sales speed and Rosie outlooks.

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>So maybe it's the start of a new regime. As

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>some people have said. On a daylight today, there's two

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>places I go, fed go on the Bloomberg term and

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>all just to get a sense of where we sit

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>with rates in this country. But then I go to bitcoin,

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and you heard us talking about it bitcoin the risk

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>asset reaction is that a fair moved by me to

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>make it kind of is because so bitcoin, for some

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>reason dip a little bit around two thirty when power

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>were starting to speak, but since then it's soared four percent.

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Last I checked before I walked over here, it was

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it paired some of its games, but still up around

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>point three. So a lot of the people said that,

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is like bitcoin is behaving like a texture.

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's obviously rising as well. But I talked about

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>this yesterday. Arcane Research said that it's going to be

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a bad month for a bitcoin because the FEDS path

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is still unclear, Like, yes, we got a downshift today

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>only twenty five bibs, but then are we going to pause?

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Are we gonna pivot? So it still remains to be seen,

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>but there are still some people who are very bullish

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>on bitcoin. I mean, it's worth remembering that quite often

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the moves we see precisely after the FED announcement and

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>press conference are completely undone the next day, so we wait,

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 1>we watch for tomorrow's at price action. But longer term,

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the bulls are still very bullish about bitcoin. I mean,

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna sell past twenty three thousand, according to one

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>particular e t F queen. Yes, so twenty three thousand

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is where we're at today. But according to the e

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>t F queen named Kathy Would, we're going to hit

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>one one million in the next decade, which is really

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>just seven years from now, and she said several reasons,

0:21:55.800 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>But then that's four thousand two higher from where we

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 1>are today, and one million is the base is the

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 1>bull case one point forty eight to be exactly, I

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get it wrong. Her bear case is

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>two hundred fifty eight thousand, and her base case is

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>six two. So regardless of whether it's the bull, the

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>base or the bear, it's just kind of hard to

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>imagine how we will get there, especially if you look

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>at where we are today. But this isn't the first

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 1>time she said the one million targets. She's been reiterating

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it in the past. She said is in November when

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin was her bring fifteen thousand. So if there's one

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>thing I admire about Kathy, but it's how she sticks

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>to her guns. I mean a lot of people love her,

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people dislike her. But if anything, she's

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.239
<v Speaker 1>really a woman of conviction. I would say, all right,

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Isabel A a very busy day for you in

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the cross Set team, and we still have a bit

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of a cycle to go. Now, sticking with crypto, thieves

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>saw a record three point eight billion, yes billion worth

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of cryptocurrency in two that according to Chain Analysis Research,

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>nearly half of it was from North Korea alone. Bloomberg's

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Stone has been writing about this data and this

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>report and joins us. Now it's interesting because two stories, right,

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a terrible year for crypto markets, but also a very

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>bad year for those that had cryptocurrencies stolen. Essentially, that's right,

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and also a bad year for the people who are

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>stealing them in some ways if you use that logic, ed,

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a huge number. One point seven billion of

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that three point eight billion is stolen by North Korean hackers.

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>We know it's the same group, according to the United

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>States government that previously breached Sony years ago. If a

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of your viewers will remember that and tried to

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>steal upwards of a billion dollars from Bangladesh's central bank

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 1>years ago too. So this is a busy hacking group

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>really focusing on the same area that a lot of

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>investors are too. Why why are they doing it? It

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>pays It helps them get around UH sanctions. You know,

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the United Nations and the US obviously have come out

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>very forced against North Korea over the past few generations,

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and cryptocurrency is harder to track, is easier to hide,

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and most importantly, it's easy to steal. If you think

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>back at the way that U S intelligence agencies would

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>have assessed that North Korea was selling counterfeit cigarettes or

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>using other means to get around sanctions. UM, this is

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>the latest iteration of that. Hey, Jeff, we talked a

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>lot about UM North Korea uh it's role in this.

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>What about the other side of the table. What is

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the US government, for example, doing to prevent theft like this?

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:39.199
<v Speaker 1>The US is scrambling to educate companies and investors and

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Americans about the risk involved here. UM. This group has

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>has really bullied UM cybersecurity defenders for a really long time.

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>So what the Treasury Department, for instance, is doing is

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>releasing bulletins and advising crypto companies and crypto adjacent companies

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>about the risk of hiring North Koreans who are posing

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>as none North Koreans in order to either gather intelligence

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>or work on projects or steal information for young next

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 1>anything that can be made safer. Protect your password, be

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>smart about which services you're using. Watch Bloomberg well said,

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I love a little bit about Tease Bloomberg Jesston. It's

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating story. One of the most word on the

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>terminal and indeed on dot com. So thanks are coming

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:28.679
<v Speaker 1>on and talking all about it. I mean, while we've

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 1>got so much more to delve into intermn of earnings,

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:33.479
<v Speaker 1>we've got the software maker diner Trace topping estimates, boosting

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>full your earnings outlook, we're going to be speaking with

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>the CEO, Rick McConnell back in a minute now. Chairs

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 1>of diner Trace jumped after the company posted better than

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>expected financial results but crucially also guidance. Dina Trace provides

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>software which helps companies monitor they can shooting systems and

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>identify performance issues with a keen focus on AI solutions.

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>AI of course it is. We're joining us now. Rick McConnell,

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Diana Trace biggest jump to the shares I

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>think since March of and you give strong guidance, which

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in this market is important for you. Was this about

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>pricing that you were able to win? Was it about

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 1>advantage over competition in terms of what you're offering. Talks

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to us through what's driving that ability to give strong guidance?

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Well ed, Thanks so much for having me. It really

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>is about the market for digital transformation overall, and then

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>observe ability our market which is around a fifty billion

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar space specifically, and if you put those two elements together,

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you have a huge array of customers that are moving

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>their workloads the cloud and as that happens, they need

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>software that delivers answers and intelligent automation. You talked about

0:26:56.480 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>AI earlier, Intelligent automation from data that enables them to

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 1>have the Broadway situational awareness to run their software environments.

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about competition and whether you're kind of winning

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>share or even displacing existing cloud platforms. We had Bill

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>mcdermotot on the show the other day of Service Now.

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>I know that Service now has kind of been moving

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>into this observe ability space. Talk to us about how

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you're faring in that regard. Well, we're very synergistic with

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Service now deployments. A good number of our customers would

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>have service now deployed, they still need the observe ability

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>expertise that we provide through our AI OPS platform to

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 1>enable their environments to work perfectly, which is what we

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>strive to do. And so that's that's what we typically

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>see the Service Now Generally. The biggest competitor that we

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>have is do it yourself d Y and that is

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 1>where customers today are using homegrown tools, open source a

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>variety of other solutions to create dashboards. A dashboard to

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>your red, yellow, green, is your software working? What it

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:05.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't tell you is where the problem is and how

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to fix it. And again that's what we can do

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>at a very granular level within your I T ecosystem.

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Davis. Let's talk about the AI power

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>behind Dina trace And what's interesting is you go to

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the meta earning statement and they're talking about their powers

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and AI we're all talking about chat, GBT and open AI.

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>How are you managing with talent at the moment, making

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>sure that you've got the right people, They're secure, they're

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>not suddenly being tempted away at great enormous expense to

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 1>other companies that wanted on artificial intelligence. We do a

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of our R and D out of Austria, actually

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>European general. This is where the company was founded. And

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>while we have people all over the globe, that's really

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>our hub for R and D and it is a

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>fabulous community of developers that we've built over the course

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of well more than a decade to create the AI

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>ops engine. And Davis that you you talk about your

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>line and talk to us a little bit of out,

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you're also speaking very much to your investor base, it

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>feels like in the quotes in your press release, So

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about investing thoughtfully, about managing a business prudently, about

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>ensuring that you've got growth and profitability, is that still

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>very much what you need amid these macro hidwins, you

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>have to keep talking about the bottom line and the

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>profitability the margins. I think this this is an environment

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>as as you are report on almost daily at this

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>point probably daily that growth at our cost is sort

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of done. The good news is we have always managed

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Dina Trace with a balance of top line and bottom

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>line growth, and the result of that is we see

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>mid twenties overall. The our our growth and mid twenties

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>profitability in terms are our pretty margin and high twenties

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and pre cash flow. This is a model that investors

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>want today because it shows the cash flow generation capabilities

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of the company and push us forward, go deep tech

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>for us, and go into the artificial intelligence vision that

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you have right now. Because you all, as you say,

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>strategically investing, where do you invest how do you envision

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in the next five ten years? For Time and Trace,

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a few areas of major investment. One is around automation. Automation.

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Automation you can imagine how companies are doing I T

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>operations and keeping their software working today. It's with an

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>army of people sitting in front of a sea of

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>glass screens looking at dashboards trying to figure out is

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it working, is it not working? If it's not working,

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>how to fix it. So automation is one of those

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>areas of focus. Secondly, focusing on big data and big

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>data analytics and doing that in real time with no reindexing,

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>no rehydration of data stores to make it fast, scalable,

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>UH super performing. And thirdly, it is around application security,

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>which is yet another area that benefits benefits substantially from

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>being integrated deeply into your observe ability platforms. So those

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>three areas are areas of key focus for on our

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>D perspective. Rick, I'm gonna be a bit more direct

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>with you and ask the same question Caroline did. I'm

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at how much cash you've got on your balance

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>sheet and you talk in the commentary Caroline cited from

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>your owning statement, are you going to hire people or

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>do layoffs? And are you going to do M and

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>are not planning on any layoffs? The good news is

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.959
<v Speaker 1>based on the model that we've got ed, we've been

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>able to modulate the hiring to manage to that model,

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and so we feel very good about we are where

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:33.959
<v Speaker 1>we are, and we're continuing to grow headcounts accordingly. In

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of in terms of other areas organic in organic,

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll continue to expand the company is as we see

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>fit UH in an M and A area. We can

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>expand in that fashion as well with smaller tech tuk

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>ins to accelerate root maps. Rick, it's great to catch

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>up with you. Thank you so much for your time,

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>make mcconmoms you Dina traces in a long day. As

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a things came out at six thirty a m. Eastern

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>impression growth was primarily driven by the Asia, Pacific and

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Rest of World regions. The year over year decline in

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>pricing was primarily driven by strong impression growth, especially from

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>lower monetizing surfaces and regions, lower advertiser demand, and foreign

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>currency depreciation. While overall pricing remains under pressure from these factors,

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we have continued to make improvements to our ads targeting

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and measurement that we believe are driving more conversions and

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>better returns for advertisers seasonally. The CFO of Meta and

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It's notable that Marks lack about really trying to hit

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>home on the point of efficiency again on the call,

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is really talking about how they've entered a somewhat different phase.

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>They say of the company, they grew so quickly for

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the like first eighteen years of the company's growth. This

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>is very hard to really crank on efficiency while you're

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>growing that quickly. Nest also though, and talk about where

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>they are growing in the longer term, and it's towards

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a metaverse vision. It's towards perhaps well acquisitions in that field.

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And they got their first victory, didn't they The Federal

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Trade Commission, a federal judge has denied the FTC's request

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to block metas plan to buy virtual reality start up

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>within Unlimited. But the judge also did prevent Meta from

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>closing that deal until the agency decides whether to appeal.

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to near leet Nylon. Who joins us more

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>from Washington And really extraordinary the fact that well Nina

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Kahn getting pushed back in this way. Many felt that

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>perhaps this has really her trying to be aggressive and

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it's denied. Yes, that that was a little bit surprising.

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>The FTC can still appeal. Um, they have until probably

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>next week to decide that. The judge gave them a

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>one week extension on blocking the deal until then and

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>has called hearing next Tuesday. UM, so we'll we'll have

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more than about whether they're going to

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>keep pushing to block the steel or sort of let

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it through. Um. But this was sort of the big

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>first quote last for leader car FTC. You know, she

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>came into her role, UM, saying that the agency needs

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to be much more aggressive block a lot more mergers.

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>They had filed a lawsuit against this one, and they

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>also have the pending one against Microsoft Activision, so UM,

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.399
<v Speaker 1>it'll be interesting to see whether this one has any

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:19.959
<v Speaker 1>impact on that one as well. Lea terrific reporting blue

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Bug sources telling us essentially about this sealed decision from

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the San Jose courts. And as you characterize it right,

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you can either see it as a win for Meta

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>or a loss Felina Kahn. But there is an opportunity

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 1>here to appeal. So what are the chances that that

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>happens and that it is successful. Well, there's actually a

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>couple options for the FTC here. One thing that they

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>could do is appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 1>Appeals in California Um. This judge is ruling directly um,

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and then the Ninth Circuit would rule on whether Meta

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>could go forward with the seal or um whether it

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>remains blocked. The other option is the FTC could let

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Meta close there us and then go into its administrative court,

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and then there would be a longer trial focused on

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 1>the deal, and at the end of that if the

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>FTC wins, it could ask um Matta to sell this off.

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>That's not too unlike what they're doing now with Meta

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 1>over the Instagram and WhatsApp deals. So UM they have

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple options for how they want to go forward.

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 1>The third option, of course, would be sort of just

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 1>to drop the lawsuit altogether and you know, let Meta

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>move forward with UM closing the steel next week. Over

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to you, FTC, Leon Island. It's great reporting. Thank you

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>so much for bringing us that, and let's dig in.

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, many had questioned the overall focus of the

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 1>chain name in change, the focus on twenty thirties when

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you eventually get profitability from these investments in reality labs,

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 1>in acquisitions such as within ed. But the here and

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the now, the investors are liking this focus in the

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>near term on efficiency. This is the year of efficiency,

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 1>and that's it. The slogan for Meta is secured first

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:04.879
<v Speaker 1>earnings report. It's absolutely brilliant. It's interesting because of course

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>he's being asked about generative AI on the call, right,

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and he says, I'm equally as excited as everyone else,

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>but not at the expense of efficiency. This is a

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>very dull Mark Zuckerberg. We've come into three week I

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:20.319
<v Speaker 1>mean learned lessons. There were some investors pushing hard. They

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:22.720
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see a pull back in terms of capital spending.

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:25.879
<v Speaker 1>And look, maybe we will see more job cuts. There's

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:29.319
<v Speaker 1>talking about that middle management that still perhaps is under

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of focus in terms of the effectiveness of

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>having that. Really, this doesn't look like a fascinating overall

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>call is to and I wonder if this share price

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:41.399
<v Speaker 1>reaction holds into tomorrow. Yeah, we'll have to wait and see,

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, analysts, night's sleep on it. We'll see that

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>does it With this addition of Bloomberg Technology, of course,

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 1>tons and tons and tons of tech earnings Thursday and

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 1>unpack at all and don't forget a lot to wrap

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>up on our podcast. Check it out Spotify, I Heart

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>or an Apple podcast wherever you get your podcast. This

0:36:58.440 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg