WEBVTT - US, China Tensions Grow Over Balloons

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg business Week Inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim stinebec from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>So Russia, all right, folks. I have to say earlier today,

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>when our producer Paul Brennan and our team Maddie and

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>all of us were putting the show together, we realized

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that there really was in a large way a theme

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of geopolitical tensions. We talked a little bit about a

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Chinese invasion of Taiwan, what it would mean for just

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a possible scenario in terms of ships to the UK. Specifically,

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>we had the President talk about objects in the sky.

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>But getting ready to hopefully meet with President g a

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>lot going on. We've seen China the US go back

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and forth with saying actions. So we wanted to check

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in um and get a view on this and we

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>have a perfect guest to do that, and especially when

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it comes to concerns about you know, possible escalating military tensions.

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>So let's head to Colorado Springs and that's where we

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>find retired US Air Force Lieutenant General David dep Deptula

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, he's now advisory board member at Academy Securities

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and he with he's with us via zoom from Colorado Springs. Um, General,

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us here at Bloomberg.

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>There is a lot going on us China. How do

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you kind of gauge the tensions that are out there

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.479
<v Speaker 1>and where it could possibly go? Well, first, thanks very

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:45.119
<v Speaker 1>much for um having me on. UM. What I'd tell

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you is very uncertain period of time right now. UM,

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>if you take a look of what's happened with respect

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Chinese spycraft that entered the United States and

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>was eventually shot down, Uh, in the elopment of the

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>US government's understanding of the Chinese military goals and some

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of the new details they're coming out, they really reveal

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>some misreadings of the U S's reaction by Chinese officials,

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and that indicates just how difficult it is for the

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>United States and China to discern each other's intentions. And

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, the challenge there is that gap could lead

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to greater mistrust in our miscalculation. So we're still trying

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what's going on UM. You know, there's

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>some people that believe that in all actuality, the balloon

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>went off course. But then again, the Chinese officials and

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>balloon operators appeared to make a series of bad decisions.

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>So there's still a lot going on that the US

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>government still doesn't understand, and we've got to figure it

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.679
<v Speaker 1>out before we move. But the other thing that's all

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>points to, UM is we've got to have better communication

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>at the senior most levels between our two countries. Well,

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I will say I think I thought the most notable

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>thing President Biden's comments UM earlier were that he does

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>plan to reach out to President g So it wasn't

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>like that was was a stop. What in terms of

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that Chinese balloon? What is it that, as the President said,

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>they're still kind of figuring stuff out, uh, And what

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it was all about? What development or what known information

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>could come out that would make you a little concerned. Well,

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll be frank with you, of more concern than whatever

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the balloon might have collected. Um. It's the uncertainty, if

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you will, and the indecision that emanated from the Pentagon

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and the White House that was evidenced as the Chinese

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>balloon entered the United States airspace. Um, it was pretty

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>clear that the administration didn't have any answer for that

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of a problem. Uh. And we still don't know

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.119
<v Speaker 1>if the Secretary of Defense actually notified the President when

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the spycraft originally entered Alaskan airspace or not until it

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>entered the continentally United States. Now last week, to their credit,

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>at the Pentagon and the White House acted more rapidly

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>um and clearly they were more prepared. Uh. And the

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>President was notified in the time the matter. But the

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 1>point that I would like to make with you or

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>leave with you, is the issue was not necessarily whatever

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>intelligence could have been extracted by the balloon, it's the

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>policy decision not to have shot it down once it

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>was in US airspace well, and also potentially the lack

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of information about what's already in our airspace. When President

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Biden was speaking, he mentioned three action items, and the

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>first one was just to establish about our inventory of

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in our own aerospace. Does that concern

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you at all us kind of not having enough knowledge

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>about our what's already up there? Or and do you

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>buy a recalibration of the radars? An absolutely wonderful question.

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Let me offer if I may, and I know times

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of essence here, but sometimes these things are a bit complicated.

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>But the North American Air Air Defense Command or nora AD,

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>was originally designed to detect and then defend North America

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>from a catastrophic attack from the Soviet Union, and then

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>back after nine eleven, they had an additional role UH

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to intercept and identify and redirect any unknown aircraft or

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>unidentified aircraft heading towards restricted airspace. So then nora AD

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>radars are tuned to detect aircraft or missiles that meet

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:52.119
<v Speaker 1>that criteria, and balloons, at least until recently, generally don't

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>fit that category. So in order to track both will

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>require modernization of nora AD's cur radars as well as

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>additional radars, and quite frankly, a reversal in the decline

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of the resources that have been allocated in nora AD. Look.

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>NORAD gets its aircraft from the Air Force, but our

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>air Force today is the oldest and the smallest it's

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>ever been in its history. So just like the Air Force,

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>nora AD has been underfunded and allowed to atrophy over

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the past thirty years. It's still employing cold war air technology.

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Just to give you in your audience an example, in

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty nora Ad had about two thousand aircraft under

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>its command, and today they've got about thirty at any

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>one time. So these intrusions ought to be a wake

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>up call to rebuild our air and space defenses. So

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>your perspective is that basically what this revealed is that

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>our air and space defenses have some major holes. No

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>pun intended, but that's the bottom line, at least from

0:06:54.480 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>your perspective. Absolutely, so, okay, So having said that, that's

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>one issue, and then of course there is though the

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>way it kind of played out and just was a

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:10.239
<v Speaker 1>reminder of kind of the tensions that already existed between

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States and China. How do you see that

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>relationship that has been a complicated one from the get go.

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>How do you see it where businesses still want that exposure.

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>We know that, and yet we know it's a very

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>tricky one. Well, I think you know, to the President's credit,

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>he made the point that, look, we want to compete

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>with China, we don't want to engage in a conflict

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>with China. And I think what you'll see is a

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>redoubling of efforts out of the State Department, the Department

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of Defense in the White House to assure that there

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is greater connectivity at the senior most levels to be

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>able to rapidly discuss and put some of these issues

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:57.679
<v Speaker 1>that may result in misinterpretation or miscommunication to BED and

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and so. While there lots of different avenues to explore

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>with respect to what happened here, UM, I think this

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>has been a wake up call for both the leadership

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of the United States as well as China, UM that

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:17.559
<v Speaker 1>we we can't allow misunderstandings to get out of hand,

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>if in fact it might be a little bit. But

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>we've been lists the interesting point that he's been making, Carol,

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking to retired US Air Force Lieutenant General

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>David Deptula. He is on the advisory board UH, and

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>he is an advisory board member over at Academy Securities,

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's been talking with us from Colorado Springs. But

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, um, obviously a military perspective, but talking about

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the potential, at least in his view, that there wasn't

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the correct spending or upgrading, if you will, in terms

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 1>of the protections UH and the defense systems that are

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 1>needing to protect our our space basically in our aerospace,

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>which is really interesting and in some ways alarming given

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the geopolitical tensions that we're facing globally right now.

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I was really curious to get his thoughts on a

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>look ahead because we know that B. Lincoln potentially meeting

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>with Wangi and Munich later this week. I wonder what

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>someone like him, UM General Lieutenant General David Deptula would

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>be looking for out of that meeting. What would a

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>clue be to indicate where U S. China relations are heading?

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 1>General Deptula, I know we've gotten our connection back. We've

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>got about a minute or so left here. So there

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>are said to be meetings UM with the Secretary of

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States. UM State Secretary should say, Uh, Anthony

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Blincoln coming up between he and Chinese officials. What is

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it that you kind of keep on your radar when

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes to those kinds of meetings. Well, I apologize

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that the connection dropped off there, But UM, what I

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>was about to say, or was in the midst of staying,

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is that if anything good comes out of this particular incident,

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it's the fact that at senior levels at the UM

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State level secretary to fence level H in

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>discussions with their counterparts in China. UM, they've got to

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>develop more rapid means of being able to communicate UH,

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 1>to dampen down UH and explain different perspectives when these

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>kinds of situations arise. UM. Furthermore, I think that President

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>was spot on when he articulated UH the message to

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese that they're gonna need to stop these kinds

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of intrusions UM with respect to blatant UH disregard for

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>US airspace, whether it be over Alaska, the continental United States, Guam,

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>or Hawaii. So those are a couple of issues that

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I think UH could move US towards an era where

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>there's greater communication and understanding, not less. All right, we're

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave it on that and hopefully we can catch

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 1>up with you real soon. David Toolah, he is of

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>course UH US Air Force Lutunant general retired. He's an

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>advisory board member over at cat Amy Security Securities. I

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>am tongue twisted on this Thursday, joining s VA Zoom

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>from Colorado Springs. But I do feel like anything US

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>China really pivotal and obviously one of our main geopolitical

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>issues going forward. Absolutely, it's it's critical to watch. All right.

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>You are listening in watching Bloomberg Business Week. This is

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast.

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Catch Just Live weekdays from two to five pm Easter

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Business Band. You too. You

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>can also listen live to our flagship New York station,

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa, Play Bloomberg, E Loove and Dirty. Alright, folks,

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>another day, another concern when it comes to a shooting

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States. Uh, this time yesterday at

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a mall in l Passa that killed one person injured

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>three others. It comes on the heels of the Monday

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>night shooting and Michigan State University that killed three students

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and critically wounded five others. There are truly no words

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>at this point about this national crisis in the US.

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>So let's get to it with someone who has been

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>studying this. Joshua Horritz is co director of the Center

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>for Gun Violence Solutions at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>of Public Health. As you know, supported by Michael R. Bloomberg,

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>founder of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg philanthropies. Mike also co

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 1>founder and supporter of every Town for Guns Safety. Josh

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Baltimore. Josh, Um, good to have

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you here. I wish we kind of didn't have to

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>have you here because it means we've had more shootings. Um,

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.839
<v Speaker 1>they have become so much the norm. How do you

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>look at it and how do we change the narrative?

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 1>How do we change the reality? Well, first of all,

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. I'm very appreciative of that. And um,

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the wake of the toe to terrible tragedies,

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I say this almost every time on the radio, but

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just so sorry to the families and the survivors

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>who have had to go through yet another, um terrible incident. So,

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there's a couple of things for

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the listeners to keep in mind. Number One, this is

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 1>not inevitable. This is not always been what this country

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.479
<v Speaker 1>is about. But in the last several years, we've seen

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>an incredible increase in people killed by guns, which includes

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>homicide and suicides and police violence as well. But that's

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>only almost forty nine people were killed. That's up eight

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>percent from UH and GO. Homicides in general have increased

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>about between two thousand nineteen and two one, and it

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>seems like we have a mass shooting. If it seems

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>like we have a mass shooting every day in America,

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it's because we actually have to UM. Already, in this year,

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>there's been seventy two mass shootings UM, and there's lots

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>we can do about it. So I'm happy to jump

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in if that's what you want me to keep going

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>on right now. Yeah, I mean solutions, Yeah, help us

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>have some hope here. So I think number one, you know,

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a proliferation of assault weapons and high capacity magazines,

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's you know, these shooters often use this. Not

0:13:57.800 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in the not in the ms U shooting, but just

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 1>think about all the other shootings, you know from UM,

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>from the Marjorie Storm and Douglas and some of the shootings,

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the last shooting in El Paso, right in the shooting

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the Tree of Life Synagogue, all these things that are

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>fueled by hate UM. Assault weapons are often the weapons

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of choice, and certainly high capacity guns with high capacity

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>magazines and those used to be banned, uh, you know

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>for between two thousand five and that made a difference

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and from a policy perspective, but a moral perspective as well.

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>We should not have weapons of war running around our

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>streets for anybody over eighteen who sometimes but even without

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a background check, can purchase these weapons. So that's something

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that we really need to focus on. And there's some

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>good policy levers that we have as well. UM we

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>have laws that we know work, like licensing the purchase

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of firearms. We've seen dramatic results in states that have

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>enacted purchasing laws and then then the worse results that

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>for instance, Missouri government of their their permanent law, we

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>saw a dramatic increase in homicide and suicides. So we

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>know that there are laws out there that work. Other

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>things that we want to see are our better firearm

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>domestic firearm violence, fire and removal laws. We know that

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>domestic violence is often a threat in some of these

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>mass shoutings, so there's a link between domestic violence and

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>mass shootings, and we know we need to do a

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>better job removing firearms from people who are under protective

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>order or have a domestic violence conviction. Can I can

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I just jump in for a second, and if you

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>saw yesterday West Virginia lawmakers UM voting to advance a

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>bill that would allow people with concealed carry permits to

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>bring firearms unto state college and university campuses. That's despite

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming opposition from frustrated students who came to the capital

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>there to testify against it. I mean, I feel like

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the trend is going in the other direction unfortunately. So

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it depends what state you're in. There are certainly states

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>like West Virginia, and you can think about, you know,

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the southern states like Alabama and Missouri and Mississippi and

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Missouri where the with a with the trend is going

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the wrong way. There are other states that have made

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a big past a lot of great laws and saved

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of license You can think of places like

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Massachusetts and Connecticut and New York, and you know California

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>where there were a number of horrible shootings a couple

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago, But if you look at their average

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>numbers over the years, they've enacted a strong suite of

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>gun violence prevention laws and on average their gun violence

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>has gone down dramatically and is well below the national average.

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>So we don't have to accept this, and bringing in

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>our research at the Center is very clear more guns,

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>more concealed carry weapons, the more the more violent crime.

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>That's just a given. And so the idea that we're

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>now going to introduce that into a college environment, you know,

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>in with with UM people who are who are you know,

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>using alcohol which is a risk factor, and people who

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>are just starting their undult lives and might not have

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>enough emotional regulation. This is a horrible idea and it

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>goes against all of the evidence that we have. Well,

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I also can stop thinking about this CDC report from

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>earlier this week. We haven't had a chance to talk

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>about it yet, Carol, but it really showed this increase

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>in mental health concerns among teenagers, showing nearly thirty of

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>teen girls have reported considering suicide. I wonder, Josh, if

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you can talk about to what extent is the guns

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>issue in our country impacting mental health for for kids

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and just got about thirty seconds. So look, when when

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a mental health problem and then you have

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>easy access to firems, that's when that's when these things

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>become lethal. And it's not surprising that we are seeing

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a rise, especially in the black community of UM. We've

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.400
<v Speaker 1>seen a unpresident rise of FIM suicide among black youth

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's actually I think there's more access to farms now,

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and we have to really focus on this across the board.

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>But we're seeing some unpresident rises among young people and

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>farms violence, and that's something we need to be really addressing. Well.

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So glad we did get some time for you. Like

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I said, I love, we love talking with you, but

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we hope we wish the trend was going in a

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>different direction. Josh Horowitz over John Hopkins at Bloomberg School

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of Public Health, co director of the Center for Gun

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Violence Solutions. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast.

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Catch us live week days from two to five pm

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, The Bloomberg Business and You too.

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live to our flagship New York station,

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa play Bloomberg e Love and Dirty amid

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 1>all the talk about rolling recessions, soft landings and the

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>new one no Landings. This week, our Business Week team

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>took the time to note the upcoming one year mark

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>one week from tomorrow since that Russian invasion of Ukraine,

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of hard to believe it's still going on. While

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>several stories in this special double issue on the destruction

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in Eastern Europe, including the cover story and how it's

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>becoming clear that the cost to both sides will turn

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>out to be intolerably high. For more, we turned to

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News automation editor and opinion columnist Leonid Burschitski, along

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>with the editor of Bloomberg Business Week magazine Joel Webber.

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>In absolute numbers, Russia has actually lost more than Ukraine

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>because the Russian economy was so much bigger to start

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>with before the war. So even though Russia is not

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 1>economically devastated, it's not about to go bankrupt, it's not

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 1>depending on external aid the way Ukraine is. But it's

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>lost an enormous amount of money. It's lost more than

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a hundred billion dollars in GDP terms um. And and

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 1>that is before we start factoring in the loss of life,

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the immigration, the you know, all of these factors that

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>are also war related. Leon It and of course the

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>war continues. You talk about loss, and you're right, you

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about the impact on economic activity, you name it.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 1>But the law us of life in terms of people

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>who have actually you know, died as a result of

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>this war, but also people who are leaving the countries,

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Russia or Ukraine. You do think about the

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>lasting impact of that that when we get fingers crossed

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of this, what it ultimately means. Yeah, Well,

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>here in Berlin, ware I live. UM. Also as a

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Russian emigrant, basic way, who who left Russia on the

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>war actually began into thousand and fourteen, Um, we see

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of huge influx of people from both Ukraine

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and Russia. And a year's a year after the war began. Um,

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>some of these families have settled in and you know,

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the kids are in school. Uh, people have found jobs,

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>they've learned the beginnings of the language. UH. And a

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of these people, a lot of the Ukrainian refugees too,

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>are not going to go back. The German Migration Office

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>recently held a poll that showed about of the Ukrainian

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>refugees are not planning on going back to Ukraine after

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>the war is over. The actual percentage is probably higher.

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>So uh, even apart from the the actual killing and

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the actual war damage, the actual casualties,

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the loss of the brain drain, the loss of talent,

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the loss of active people, and it is active people

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>who leave under such circumstances in Ukraine. Is overwhelmingly women,

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>and they've taken their kids with them, so that there's

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>going to be extended fallout even once the you know,

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the battlefield action is over. Uh uh, you know, the

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>human losses for both economies will be substantial. Imagine a

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>world where the battlefield we finally might have a version

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of the truce or something. Um, what would it look

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>like on both sides when this conflict eventually does end,

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>because even any outcome, these sanctions have been so successful,

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it does not seem like, you know,

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>easing these sanctions um eventually will end in in any

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of um resolution where this is instant in the

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>recovery is instantaneous, right, we're looking at years here. Yeah, yeah,

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:54.199
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely looking at the will. The worst parts of

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>this is that it's almost impossible to imagine and ending

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to the military action at this point because there's really

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>no common ground. There's no way that the sides can

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>agree on anything until um, one of them is satisfied

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>that it's one and you know, victory for both sides

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 1>seems pretty remote at this point. But even just imagining

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 1>something has happened and the war has ended, the sanctions

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>against Russia will not be lifted a game, even even

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>with Russia loses. They can only be lifted if the

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>puts in regime falls uh and the successors are more

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>pro Western and willing to uh, you know, to to

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 1>to take pretty unimaginable steps um uh in terms of

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>rejoining the Western world. So these the sanctions are going

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to be around for many years. The devastation in Ukraine

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 1>requires hundreds of billions of dollars of investment just to

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>rebuild what was destroyed. UM. It's not clear where that

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of money would come from. Um. From Russian reparations. Uh.

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not clear how much in terms of reparations Russia

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>would actually be able to pay. UM. Whether it's possible

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to confiscate any of the frozen Russian international reserves to

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>fund the rebuilding of Ukraine. UM. It's not clear how

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>interested Western governments will be in providing more money once

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the war is over, especially the enormous amounts that are

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:55.199
<v Speaker 1>required because the entire cities have been wiped off the

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>face of the earth. All right, That, of course is

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News Automation editor and opinion column mist Leon need Burschitski,

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>along with our Bloomberg Business Week editor Joel Webber, who

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>joins us in studio right now. I'm so glad we

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>were able to catch up with him. Yeah. UM, and

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously there's gonna be a lot more written about the

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>one year mark between from Russia's invasion of Ukraine. UM.

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>We felt like, we, you know, absolutely needed to talk

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>about this because of the devastating economic implications on on

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the border. UM. And you know, another

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 1>one that really caught my eye, UM was from our

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>colleague Natalia DRSDIAC And when she she happened to be

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 1>in New York and like kind of whispered this one

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to me, and I was like, wait, what which is Um,

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a shortage of Ammu Emma around the world And UM,

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that is just one of those fascinating stories that UM.

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I asked her to kind of like turn her reporting too.

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And there's more to do there too. I gotta say,

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a great photo essay and there's one photo in

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:57.959
<v Speaker 1>particular of two young girls. I'm not going to tell

0:25:57.960 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you more about it. You've got to go to the

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 1>website or check out the magazine. Jill Weber, thank you

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>so much. This is the cover story of the special

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>double issue of Bloomberg Business Week. It is out now.

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Radio. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Week podcast. Catch us live weekdays from two to five

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>pm Easter on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Business app band

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:22.360
<v Speaker 1>You too. You can also listen live to our flagship

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>New York station, Just Say Alexa, play Bloomberg, e Loove

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and Dirty Mac Journal. But you let me drive? No, no, no,

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>he's home, honey, Please, I'll do good Bride Rebels. Let me.

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to drive, it's good question. Drive. This

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is good. Drive to the clothes music, well, dri jog

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>down on Bloomberg Radio. All right, everybody, we've got just

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>about twelve minutes left, a little bit under more like

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>eleven mixx left in today's session. A lot going on

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>watching the trade here. Just a quick update for you,

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>because stock is pretty much at their loads of the session.

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:09.360
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? The S and P is down

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>one point two percent the Dow Jones industrial average. We're

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at a decline of one percent in NASDAC taking

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the biggest hit on a percentage basis down about one

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent. Quick check on the Treasury trade

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 1>because we've seen yield certainly popping up on some of

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that hot economic news UH tenure note with the yeld

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of three eight six UH and it is just off

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>its highs of the day's two year note most sensitive

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.439
<v Speaker 1>to FED policy, with the yield of four point sixty

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>four off its highs of the days. So let's get

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to it. Our market guest, Ken van Lewin, CEO and

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>founder of the wealth management firm Van Lewin and Company,

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>joining us via zoom from Princeton, New Jersey. Um, Ken,

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>good to have you back with us. How are you well,

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thanks for having me. Nice to be here. Well,

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on this week, Maddie and I try

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to keep on top of it, a lot of economic

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>news and a lot of FED speak. Give us your

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>macro take on this environment and what it means for

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>investment plays right now. Well, it's really interesting, Carol, because

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing, of course is that, of course today's

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>comment about p p I indicates we think that the

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>economy is stronger than what was anticipated. You know, we've

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>gotten some pretty um strong economic numbers the last two weeks,

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>especially Tuesday's number and employment number, So we think the

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Fed um and that's what's kind of pushing the market

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>down today, right. Uh. Bullard came out and said that

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>basically he thinks in March that we're going to have

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to raise again by another half a point rather than

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>these quarter point hikes that we just went through. So again, Um,

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the FED has its mandate to control inflation, and it

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>looks like they're going to be doing that. So that's

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>what's pushing rates up, of course, in the markets down today. Ken,

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you a totally wild and random

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>question here. I know that you just wrote a little

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>piece about how meeting with prospective clients can be like

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a blind date. Can you give me some of your advice?

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>What would you tell clients to ask you if they

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>were on a blind date with you? Well, first of all,

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I want them to ask me about my experience, right like,

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>what have you done? Um? How long have you been

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>doing this? Of course I have some gray hair, so

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>they can tell I've been doing this a while. Um,

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'd ask him about that. I'd ask him about that.

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd ask me have they ever you know, I'd want

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to to explain their situation a little bit and say,

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>have you ever worked with individuals like ourselves myself, and

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>can you give me some solutions to solve that? And

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>then I'd want to say, you know, how are you qualified?

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what kind of designations do you have? What

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>makes you so special? Why are you? Um good at

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>what you do? You know? I would also want to

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>ask how do I get paid? I mean, which is

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate question? Sure? So, yeah, but it's a great

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.719
<v Speaker 1>thing going on these dates. Actually it's alway, it's one

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of the best parts of my business that I really enjoyed. Well,

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it's important, especially because retail investors obviously we know by

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>now they're here to stay. What is your single biggest

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>piece of advice for retail investors today, given the macroeconomic

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>headwinds we're facing, what would you tell a retail investor

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to watch out for. Well, a couple of things, Um,

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to watch out for is that I worry about, you know,

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>chasing a trend. Okay, Like I think one of the

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>things is that, of course, earlier in the week we

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>all about AI, everybody was piling into Microsoft and shunning Google. Um.

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>While I think that Microsoft is a great company, did

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it deserve the price increases that it got earlier in

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the week. Um, I'm not sure of that, right? Why

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is that? Can I stick with you on that for

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a second. Why why is that with Microsoft? Well, what's

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>happening there a little bit. I think what you're just

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>saying is that's because that's the next revolution, and I

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>think investors still want the next best thing. They're still

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>chasing that illusion. Well it's not an illusion, but they're

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>still chasing, you know, a big winner because you know,

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we had big winners in last year, not so much

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we and but people still want that big growth stock

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that's going to go up five ten times. So is Microsoft,

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, is Microsoft something you would commit some new

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>money to because of the AI play and the chat

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>GPT play. Um, we would actually we own it currently

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>so we would continue to hold it, but we wouldn't

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>chase it right now because I think there was a

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>news report actually today that it was creating some kind

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of unseemly conversations when people would put requests into into being.

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, that's kind of it still has to

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>be perfected. I think it's a long way from being there,

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, Intel, when we let's say, with the tech

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>space for you, well, we know we've got a Matt

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>reporting in the semi space after the closing bell. What

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>is it about Intel specifically, which feels like gets been

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>struggling for some time to kind of make some headway

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and kind of get itself on a new trajectory. See.

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I think an overall theme

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of what we like is strong dividend payers. Intel with

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a dividend yield over five percent. And you know, clearly

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>they've struggled lately. UM, they've lost actually UM ground positioning

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to a m D, but there's still a tremendous brand

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>UM and you know, long term in our belief is

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that brands win out UM. That's why we like that Intel.

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, they've got a lot of work to do UM.

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>They're building these new factories in Ohio. But that's the

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>dividend is really what goes. Let me follow on that

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>can because UM. Our story in the Bloomberg by ur

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Ian King and Ryan Blastelica talks about how Intel is

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>among those that the street seems to be saying is

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>prime for a dividend cut because I think at the

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>current rate Morgan has put out there and some other analysts,

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>at the current right, Intel's dividend projected to cost within

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollars this year, and that you know, the

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>company has got to focus on heavy spending needed to

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>re kind of regain its manufacturing leadership, and that as

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a result, they'll have to cut shareholder payouts. So does

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that still make it interesting for you? It still makes

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it interesting because what we've seen in the past, right,

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's the overall health of the company

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>for Intel. Um. Yes, the dividend right now at this

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>rate could potentially be cut, but I'd still a buyer here,

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's at its low valuation. Remember it's only selling

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>at ten times, which is a historically low valuation for Intel,

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to be sure. And that's kind of your view on

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>selective tech names. I want to go over to the

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 1>consumer discretionary side because that's the fun side for my

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>persuasive Yes, talk to me about let's go to Alter

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Beauty because they've got a big competitor with Sephora and

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously a lot of other big players in the beauty space.

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Why do you like Alter? Well, first of all, you know,

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>we like Alta because it's a tremendously well managed um

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>store chain. Um, they've got many great things. Now. I

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:12.839
<v Speaker 1>think they're introducing where you can even get your hairs done,

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>your nails done, things that that nature. They're in the

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 1>different stores. UM Also, I think their long term goals

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>of expanding in China is something that's very, very very

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>appealing to us. And frankly, the CEO, we think is

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:30.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the best retailing CEOs UM in the country

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. Can I ask why why? Just look at

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the what the growth that she has delivered UM to

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>her shareholders. So I think that in a tough environment

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 1>right when we saw basically she came through covid UM,

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>she performed well last year and is continuing to show

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>us this year what they can do. UM just got

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>about thirty seconds left here. In terms of the semi space,

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>you do since a mats reporting just quickly thirty seconds

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>on semi you like why that name on because that's

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the semis in terms of the the digital experience and

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the ability to UM, it's the semiconductor chip that basically

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>can follow you around basically and with all that you

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>know basically in cameras and all those different things. Right now,

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that semiconductor space is one of the few areas that's

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>growing round now and ON is one of the leaders

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and they're a US based company, so and they manufacture

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>here in the US. UM so that's why we like

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>that one. This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcast.

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Listen live each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the I Heart Radio app, tune In,

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and the Bloomberg Business Happen. You can also watch us

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 1>live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>terminal level