WEBVTT - US Consumer Sentiment Rises, Boeing Strike

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple car Playing and Broud Auto with the

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's get more on you missed.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 3>So it was really that one year inflation expectation following

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 3>at two point seven percent, the lowest in December twenty twenty.

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Johanna Sho's University of Michigan Surveys of Consumer director and

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 3>she joins us now walk us through the increase in

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 3>sentiment and the decline in those one year inflation expectations.

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Consumers actually now have had several months of general improvements

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 4>and how they feel about the economy, and clearly the

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 4>drop in one year inflation expectations is a huge part

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 4>of it. Consumers are one hundred percent aware and have

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 4>noticed that inflation has slowed down quite a bit, not

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 4>just this year, but over the course of the last

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 4>two Yearsnsumers are starting to feel a bit more optimistic

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 4>about the future. You know, with one year business conditions,

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 4>we've had four or five consecutive months of increases at

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 4>this point, I think they are recovering a bit from

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 4>the malays that we were saying earlier in the summer.

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:17.119
<v Speaker 5>So the headline, Joanne cam in it you've missed sentiment

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 5>sixty nine versus consensus sixty eight point five and sixty

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 5>seven point nine last period. Can you frame that give

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 5>us a sense of context there? Like, for example, for im,

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 5>above fifties means economies are expanding. Below fifty means it's contracting.

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 5>What does a number of sixty nine mean to you?

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 5>Put that in context for us?

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 6>Please?

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 4>So overall it's still below the historical average that we've

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 4>seen since nineteen seventy eight. But I think what's more

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 4>important than just the number itself is the overall trend.

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 4>And now we've had two consecutive months of increases in

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 4>in sentiment. We're at the highest level since in several

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 4>months now, and so you know, I think the thing

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 4>to notice that consumers are starting to feel a bit

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.279
<v Speaker 4>more upbeat, and that's the or trend that we've been seeing.

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 3>How does it go on party lines, Republican versus Democrat?

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Because is this the first survey that really encapsulates Biden

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 3>out Harrison.

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, We saw a bit of that at the with

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 4>the August reading, and we saw kind of a continuation

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 4>of that. So it's very clear that democrats are seeing

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 4>both Democrats and Republicans are now increasingly expecting a Harris

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 4>win relative to last month and certainly relative to when

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 4>it was Biden versus Trump. Now, Democrats think that's a

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 4>good thing, and we see that in their economic expectations

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 4>that really surged in August, and we were continuing to see,

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, this higher level in September as well. Republicans,

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 4>on the other hand, think that the potential of a

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 4>Harris presidency is bad news, and their their sentiment, their

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 4>expectations have declined. And so we saw a widening of

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 4>the normal partisan gap in August, with Democrats improving, but

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 4>that was offset by Republicans. I'm getting worse, And we

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 4>saw a little bit more of that, not as dramatic

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 4>as last month, but that partisan gap is continuing to widen.

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, Thanks so much to really appreciate Joanne Joan

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Chu University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers Director joining us

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 3>there on. You mish solely grinding its way higher and

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 3>at that one year and Blanche expectation falling as well.

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.679
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 5>All right, let's go to our friends at Boeing here,

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 5>I mean, stockdown two point seven percent. They got to

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 5>strike up there in that Pacific Northwest region of the world,

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 5>which is where they are generally based. I think the

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 5>heart and souls certainly there. George Ferguson joins us. He'son

0:03:53.880 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Intelligence, Senior aerospace analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. George, how

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 5>is it so we've got we've got to strike affecting

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 5>Boeing up there in the Seattle area. How impactful is

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 5>this strike to them? What do they need to do?

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 8>So it's super impactful, right because it's on there seven

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 8>thirty seven Max, I mean, it's going to be on

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 8>the programs that are out of the Pacific Northwest, I

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 8>should say first once you're going to be seven sixty seven,

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 8>Triple seven and the seven thirty seven max.

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 6>The seven thirty seven max is what matters most.

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 8>Right, that's the revenue generator.

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 6>That's the that's the cash flow generator. That's part of

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 6>that's not even part of.

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 8>That's the largest part of their recovery plan for the

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 8>back half, so super important. Look, we'll see how long

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 8>the strike lasts, but if they can't get seven thirty

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 8>sevens delivered, this bat half recovery isn't bad shape.

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 3>So let me get this straight. You were in the

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 3>city yesterday then there was this huge Bloomberg Intelligence celebrating

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.239
<v Speaker 3>fifteen year party where you all are like struggling to focus,

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 3>and it somehow you wind up back at home this morning.

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 2>What is this?

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 6>It's been a.

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 8>Busy twenty four hours. They wish they could have time

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 8>a strike differently, but.

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 3>I definitely thought it'd be showing up very tired. But

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 3>in the studio, all right, what's the TikTok?

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.679
<v Speaker 2>Now? So what's the schedule of events?

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean, I think you know, Boeing and the

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 8>machinists have to get back together at the table and

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 8>figure out what the machinists want so they can get

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 8>them back on the job and start delivering airplanes and

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 8>generating cash right the meanest machinists sounded like they were

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 8>a little bit coy about it too. I heard one

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 8>of them saying, you know what, as soon as we

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 8>have a chance, we'll get back together to talk about it,

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 8>or something like that. So it sounds like they think

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 8>they've got a bit of the upper hand, which I

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 8>think they do. I think, you know, Boeing probably has

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 8>to go back and look in their pockets and figure

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 8>out how much more, how much more of a pay increase.

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 6>They can give.

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 8>Right the Spirit Aero Systems folks got a mid thirties

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 8>pay increase, So I suspect the machinists are looking at

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 8>that thinking, hey, we probably deserve something close to that.

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 8>And I think that they want some better guarantees on

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:08.679
<v Speaker 8>an airplane.

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 6>They want to be guaranteed.

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 8>I think that the next generation seven thirty seven, it's

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 8>the most important airplane for Boeing. So if the machinist

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 8>union has sort of longevity in their sites, they want

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 8>to be building that.

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 6>Seven thirty seven successor. And they don't want just the

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 6>commitment to be able to build it to last for

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 6>the four years of this contract. But they wanted to

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 6>last longer, if not forever.

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 5>And George, just refresh our memory. Where does Boeing actually

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 5>make their planes? I know they do it up in Seattle,

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 5>but did they do it in the question maybe some

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 5>areas of the country that are not unionized.

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, so they do make the seven eighty seven in

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 8>South Carolina down by Charleston, and that's a non union plan,

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 8>So I expect that seven eighty seven production will continue.

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 8>Everything else is made up in the Pacific Northwest from

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 8>a commercial airplane stand point, and so seven sixty sevens,

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 8>triple sevens, they're made in Everett, Washington, north of Seattle,

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 8>and the seven thirty seven has made is final assembled

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 8>at a single plant in rent in Washington, which kind

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 8>of southeast of Seattle.

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 6>Those are all union shops. I expect them all to

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 6>be doing little to know work today.

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 8>And then of course the fuselage comes out of Wichita,

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 8>which is owned by Spirit Air Systems, which Boeing.

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 6>Is buying, Whichita, Kansas.

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 8>But again, they had a strike earlier this year, got

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.679
<v Speaker 8>mid thirties pay increase and they should be continuing to work.

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 2>So I guess then the question becomes how long?

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Now I know we talked about that yesterday and you're like, look,

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 3>it can't go on more than like two weeks. One

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 3>analyst I was mentioning fifty days was what they were

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 3>kind of looking at, which is a significant cash burn

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 3>for Boeing.

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 2>What's your best guess?

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, I think there's a lot of people

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 8>out there saying fifty days because that's the average strike

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 8>blah blah blah. I just don't, you know, I don't

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 8>subscribe to that being the right logic here. I'm saying

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 8>a couple of weeks because I think Boeing really needs

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 8>these workers back on the job. There is no substitute

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 8>for these workers, period, and so I think they've got

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 8>to go engage the union intently and figure out what's

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 8>going to take to put them back, you know, back

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 8>on the job. I mean we think what we you know,

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 8>our analysis was that it would cost an extra billion

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 8>dollars a year or something like that for wages right

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 8>around there at the twenty five percent increase, that would

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 8>probably trim Boeing commercial margins one hundred and seventy two

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 8>hundred basis points.

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 6>Do you like that?

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 8>No, But it's not the end of the world, right,

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 8>They back in back pre pandemic, this was a company

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 8>that was making thirteen percent ish margins in that business

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 8>ten to thirteen.

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 6>So can you bear that and be profitable? You can?

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 6>Can you bear more?

0:08:57.760 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 7>You can?

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 8>So I think that means that Boeing has the leeway.

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 8>They got to get the building airplanes in volume again.

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 8>So they got to engage the union and get it done.

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 8>That's why I'm saying, I think less than a couple

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 8>of weeks, I think they got to get it done.

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 5>Hey, George, I mean, I know in the past you

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 5>talked to us about, you know, the labor shortages and

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 5>aerospace industry. Where are we where's the industry in terms

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 5>of getting past that is that's still a challenge getting

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 5>good folks in the factory floors.

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 8>I think it's totally still a challenge, right, And so

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 8>we saw a pretty decent turnover in the aerospace workers,

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 8>you know, coming out of the pandemic. I think some

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 8>of them watched their industry. It looked like the collapse, right.

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 8>Air travel went to zero for a couple of quarters,

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 8>or almost zero, so you know, demand for airplanes. People

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 8>looked at it and thought, hey, you know, the industry

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 8>I'm in is horrible and if you are, I think

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 8>near retirement age, you said let's cast it in and

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 8>moved to Jacksonville, Florida or something like that, right, So

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 8>it's hard to get those folks back to the line

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 8>from Jacksonville and backfill.

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 6>Part of the backfield challenges.

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 8>The backfield came out of some of the suppliers, so

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 8>they kind of hurt their own ecosystem as they pulled

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 8>some of the backfill in. And they're in the middle

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 8>of training that we even't heard CEO Calhoun say the

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.079
<v Speaker 8>old CEO Calhoun say. I think at one of his

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 8>congressional testimonies he talked about people coming in the door

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 8>having experience bending metal and you know, working with their hands,

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 8>and I think, you know, he said something like in

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 8>the old days, and this isn't exactly right, but it's close.

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 8>You know, maybe seventy five percent of people that came

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 8>to the door had experience working with their hands metalworking.

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 6>Now twenty five percent.

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 8>So they're in the middle of trying to train that

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 8>next generation of aerospace workers and the supply chain is

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 8>still trying to backfill. I think it's it's been getting better, Yeah,

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 8>but that training and backfill is still going there.

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, Hey George, we appreciate it.

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 3>George ferguson Bloomberg Intelligence and your aerospace, defense and Airlines analyst.

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 2>Great stuff. Good to see you there.

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.559
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple CarPlay and Android

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:17.239
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm Alex you alongside pauls. We need this Bloomberg Intelligence Radio.

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 3>We bring you all the top news and business and

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 3>finance economics. So there are lens of our Bloomberg Intelligence folks.

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 3>They cover two thousand companies and one hundred and thirty

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 3>industries worldwide. They're a little tired today. They had a

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 3>fifteen year anniversary party yesterday, so you.

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 5>Know, cut it loose a little bit.

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. I mean Paul got some sleep,

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 3>but the other guys, I'm not sure. All right, But

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 3>so we want to go outside of Bloomberg Intelligence now

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 3>for a look on how to market is positioned into

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 3>the FED. Mohagman is head of Solutions and Multi Asset

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Strategies over at Invesco and he joins us, Now, what

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 3>is this setup like in terms of asset allocation headed

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 3>into Wednesday?

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 9>Well, Alex, thanks for having me, nice to be here

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 9>with you and Paul. I think, you know, we are

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 9>continuing to maintain a bit of a defensive posture, and

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.559
<v Speaker 9>we have been defensive for about a couple of months now,

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 9>and really this is around what we're seeing in economic

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 9>growth expectations, both from the market and from the data.

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 9>We are very benchmark aware, so you know, I think

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 9>that underweight isn't something that's significant at this point, just

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 9>given how the economy has been incredibly resilient and the

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 9>market has been incredibly resilient. But what we're seeing in

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 9>the labor market and what we're seeing with economic growth

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 9>over the several last several quarters is something that we're

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 9>watching very closely.

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 7>Mo.

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 5>And how about being defensive, what does that mean fixed

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:39.479
<v Speaker 5>and come versus equities.

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 9>Here, Yeah, so that means we have a little bit

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 9>of a longer duration profile versus our benchmark, So we're

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 9>you know, favoring fixed income over equity. So and within equities,

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 9>you know, there's a bit of a tilt towards more

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 9>defensive sector, so think healthcare, consumer staples, information technology. You know,

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 9>these are the areas that are a bit more defensive.

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 9>These are companies that are higher quality and lower volatility,

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 9>generally cash flow rich and can weather an economic downturn

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 9>or a slow down in growth.

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 3>So does that mean that you think that the bond market,

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 3>if we look at the equity in the bond market,

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 3>is being on different pages in that we're making like

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 3>another run in the smp here versus the bond bowl

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 3>appears to be very sticky.

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean that the economic.

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Situation is geared more towards a recession than a soft

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 3>landing in your view?

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 9>I don't think so. I think we're still probably base

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 9>case soft landing. But you know, what we're thinking about

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 9>is just in the shorter term period, so from a

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 9>tactical perspective, just given how far extended the equity markets are,

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 9>and you know, in our opinion, yields are very attractive

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 9>at these levels they have been, although they've you know,

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 9>come back a little bit. You know, we're kind of

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 9>extending that duration profile getting underweight equity slightly relative to

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 9>our benchmarks. And again this is all around growth and

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 9>growth expectations. Although we don't necessarily see a recession in

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 9>the next couple of quarters.

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 5>So, MO, how about on the pick income side, are

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 5>we sitting here in to your treasures at three point

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 5>six percent or are we going out there and taking

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 5>some credit risk? What are we doing there in fixingcome So.

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 9>In credit we favor again higher quality credit, so you know,

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 9>credit spreads continue to be incredibly tight, you know, relative

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 9>to equities. I think credit is a very attractive risk

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 9>adjusted allocation. But we're probably not right now favoring kind

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 9>of the lower quality high yield sectors and we're taking

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 9>a bit more.

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 10>It's posteros.

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 5>So the best performance this year and fixing them has

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 5>been and by far has been in US corporate high.

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 9>Yield exactly, and I think that's part of the reason

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 9>that we've gotten a bit defensive. So just to kind

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 9>of backtrack a little bit, you know, we have been

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 9>pretty risk gone in portfolios for the last several years.

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 9>You know, post COVID, we took a little bit more

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 9>of an aggressive stance versus our benchmarks. We kind of

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 9>maintained that stance over the last several years, and now

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 9>what we're seeing is just that softening of the economic data.

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 9>We're seeing some softening in the labor markets, and that's

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 9>that's kind of what's informing a bit of a defensive posture.

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 9>But I don't really want to overdo that, right. You know,

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 9>we're not kind of underweight equities to a significant magnitude.

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 9>We're not suggesting that people move into cash. It's actually

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 9>quite the opposite. We're telling investors and clients to get

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 9>out of cash. We've seen elevated cash balances now for

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 9>a long time, and the yields on offer if you

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 9>extend that duration, seem to be very attractive to us,

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 9>especially as we're moving into an easing cycle and those

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 9>short term rates are going to be coming down.

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 3>JP Morgan was saying that usually the rate cut cycle

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 3>needs to get underway more significantly for than the money

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 3>to move, But you're right, I mean over six tillion

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 3>dollars ready to roll. Hey, I'm curious as to dollar yen.

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 3>It has a pretty significant rerating at this point. I

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 3>think we're at one forty right. There was some reports

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg that we're seeing some bullish bets on the

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 3>yen right now. What's your take on where that currency

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 3>goes and is the carry trade unwind situation.

0:15:55.200 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 9>Over So from a currency perspective, just kind of consist

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 9>with my comments earlier around equities and fixed income, we

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 9>have a bit more of a defensive posture, So that

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 9>means overweights and dollar, GBP, euro versus international currencies, you know,

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 9>especially if you kind of think about the more emerging

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 9>market currencies. You know, I think right now the defensive

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 9>posture is probably warranted just given we're kind of going

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 9>into election season. September and October tend to be more

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 9>volatile months for the market overall, and that home country bias,

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 9>at least for US is kind of an important factor

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 9>as we get through the next few months.

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 5>In terms of the equity market, where's evaluation for you guys?

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 5>Do you feel like this market is fully valued at

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 5>this point? How do you guys think about that?

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 9>I would say fully valued to maybe a little extended,

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 9>just given what we've seen here to date. So for us,

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 9>there's no real concerns around earnings or earnings projections. There

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 9>has been some revisions that we're taking a close look at,

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 9>but for now, you know, I would I would say

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 9>probably well priced or maybe a little bit extent did

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 9>relative to what we see kind of on offer in

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 9>other places outside of the US, and I think my

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 9>comments are very much on the US side, and the

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 9>equity market in the US is pretty concentrated. That's another

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 9>topic that we're having a lot of conversations on with clients.

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 9>You know, we expect to see that broadening if the

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.239
<v Speaker 9>economy continues to be resilient, but if we are going

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 9>to go into a prolonged downturn or a growth kind

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 9>of scare, you know, actually the defensive sectors should perform better.

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 9>And I've talked about this a little bit on the

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 9>show before. In the past the relationship between equity sectors

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 9>and rates was was really when when wastes were going up,

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 9>you know that that was not necessarily a good thing

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 9>for sectors that had more duration exposure or more interest

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 9>rates sensitivity, So technology, healthcare we've kind of seen the

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 9>opposite of that. So you know, it's a little bit

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 9>of a weird dynamic at the moment, but I do

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 9>think that should renormalize. So what the catalyst needs to

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 9>be for small cap value stocks to really get going again,

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 9>I think is a little bit of a change in

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 9>the regime and an economy that kind of reaccelerates because

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 9>those companies small cap companies, value companies. They tend to

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 9>have more operating leverage, they tend to be more geared

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 9>to the business cycle, and I do think longer term

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 9>that relationship will still hold.

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, thanks a lot, We really appreciate thanks

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 3>for stopping by mo Hagman joining us. There was his

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 3>call on acid allocation. He had of solutions and multi

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 3>asset strategies. Over at Invesco.

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Alex Steel alongside Paul Sweeney for Bloomberg Intelligence Radio. We're

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 3>broadcasting to live from Interactive Broker Studio right here in

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 3>midtown Manhattan. I saw that though for the Weimo thing

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 3>that like a driverless car like show up even if

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 3>you didn't order one, that'd be kind of weird, right,

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, like like, I mean, what if you don't.

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 5>Want to get into car? The perfect stranger about it,

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 5>no one at all?

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Okay, well, it's an adjustment period for us.

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 2>All all right? Joining us now is Dan.

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 3>I was managing director and senior equity analyst at Wedbush Securities.

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 3>I bet you he's probably bullish on WEIMO and would

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 3>totally get into a driverless car, no worries, Am I right?

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 7>Dan? I mean I've done it. Look, I think I

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 7>think end of the decade, I think twenty percent of

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 7>ride share are going to be no drivers.

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 2>But isn't it weird that they would show up? You

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have a choice.

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 3>It would just be like, here's your driverless car, even

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 3>if you don't want it.

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah. Look, there's gonna be clearly kings to work out here.

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 7>But I mean, and we'll see this at Tessa's Roado

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 7>Taxi day. But the technology is starting to get to

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 7>a point where this is no longer sci fi. I

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 7>know the next few years, it's something where demisation is

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 7>gonna be clear. That's why you see that Uber waymo

0:19:58.119 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 7>mm hmm.

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 3>Well, and I should point out that you're in Bangkok,

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 3>so it's like, what time is it? It's like midnight

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 3>now Friday and Friday. I know he's a good guy, Dan.

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 3>We appreciate that by the way I'm looking at Adobe,

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Adobe is down nine percent.

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 2>What was the problem with their earnings yesterday?

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 7>I think it's really just the softer guidens. But I mean,

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 7>in our opinion, this is just just a transition in

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 7>that Adobe story. I mean, when you look at AI

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 7>and use cases, I think they are probably within three

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 7>to six months of significantly benefiting from AI stock obviously,

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 7>you know, is one of the core plays in big tech.

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 7>But you look at Adobe, obviously little softness. But then

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 7>you look at a Oracle, which I think is probably

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 7>even more important to the broader AI story for big tech.

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 3>Then what about some of the other like so then

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 3>how do we distinguish like what's the line item right?

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 3>And as an investor, how do you know when to

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 3>buy that? Like you might three see three to six

0:20:57.480 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 3>months until we get a really big payoff for Adobe,

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 3>how do you play it?

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Look, that's why we use so much work in

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 7>the field, because they're trying to figure out second third

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 7>derivatives of AI. Who's benefit in terms of real monization.

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 7>That's where you look at, of course Pall and Teer

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 7>Oracle Service. Now I think Salesforce next week some big

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 7>announcements at Dreamforce. What they're going to talk about now,

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 7>Adobe maybe a little softer. They haven't seen it yet, right,

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 7>So this is really gonna be sort of pieces of

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 7>a puzzle trying to figure out who in software are

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 7>benefits from the second derivative. Clearly the hyperscale players, and

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 7>we would argue even cybersecurity are going to benefits. Is

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:43.679
<v Speaker 7>more workless, move to the cloud.

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 5>So Dan, as soon as I get off the air

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 5>here and finish up my twenty seven straight hours of radio,

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna go to my Apple Store app and I'm

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 5>going to pre order that Apple.

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 2>Oh this is today, You're doing today?

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 5>Do it today? Yeah, okay, already gave me my instructions

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 5>Apple sixteen pro. I'm gonna spend a an jillion dollars.

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 5>How many people are out there are going to be

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 5>doing the same thing? How big is this new phone?

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 7>Well, first off, I mean I think it is huge new,

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 7>the Sweeney upgrade.

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 2>This is the this is the start of the super psycle.

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 7>I mean for years, exactly for years, the Sweeney upgrade.

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 7>I know. But Paul, I mean I think now it

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 7>comes down to it's not just you. There's three hundred

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 7>million iPhones that have an upgrade four plus years. And

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 7>this is everything we're seeing here in Asia is showing

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 7>that this is weeding to what we believe is gonna

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 7>be an AI driven supercycle. And I think we'll see

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 7>this pre orders and obviously going to the next week,

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 7>but I think demand's gonna be pretty robust here street.

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 7>I think still underestimate what this is gonna be about.

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but are people in China really buying into that supercycle? Like,

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 3>I know Asia is bigger than just China, but can

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 3>we have a supercycle without a super strong China demand

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 3>for the iPhone?

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So it's a great point. You cannot have a

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 7>super cycle without growth in China. To that point, you

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 7>have one hundred million iPhones in China that are in

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 7>that window of an upgrade opportunity, and everything we're seeing

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 7>that actually China, you will now start to see modern

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 7>to significant growth in the region from iPhone sixteen over

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 7>you know, call it the next year. And that's huge Apple.

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 7>I mean that goes from a headwind too, a taland

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 7>which is really key this whole sum of the part

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 7>story as it plays out, and they monetize China front

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 7>and center.

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 5>So folks when technology channels like Dan i'ves go to Asia,

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 5>it's not just to see their clients. The big reason

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 5>is to do what they call channel checks. Since much

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 5>of global tech hardware software comes out of that part

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 5>of the world. You get a good sense of kind

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 5>of who's making this stuff, who's buying the stuff, who's

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 5>selling the stuff. So Dan IIMs, what's kind of the

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 5>vibe you're getting from your your channel checks there in

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 5>Asia these days?

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean look across Taiwan, and I think just

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 7>across Asia, demand is not slowing. I mean it's accelerating

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 7>in terms of broader when we look at from a

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 7>chip perspective in ai which I think is very very

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 7>important and Jensen talked about this week, demands outstream and

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 7>supply we think twelve to fifteen X and that is

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 7>the most important thing is the use cases where the

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 7>it'torical pound tier that will ultimately be the drivers, but enterprises.

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 7>We're talking about a trillion dours of tap acts that

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 7>ultimately is coming to techo of the next three to

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 7>four years.

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 2>What is that?

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 3>What you make of the in media rally the last

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 3>five days, like how do you understand that structural shift

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 3>and that thesis versus the daily swings of some of

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 3>the biggest players where seemingly they become more important on

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 3>the central banks some days and drag up the broader

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:59.199
<v Speaker 3>equity market, and I can't find a headline on that.

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:02.199
<v Speaker 7>Look, I think part of I mean that was a

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 7>confluence of things from the watch parties to technicals to

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 7>just come into September, and obviously the Macro sell off

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 7>tech front and center. But I think, look, anyone that's

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 7>doing checks in tech, you're not coming back in any

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 7>way negative. Uninvidia. I mean, it is actually getting more

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.919
<v Speaker 7>and more incremental, not just for Nvidia chips, and I

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 7>think brought the AI revolution, so we're gonna have these

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 7>ebbs and flus. But I continue to believe this will

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 7>be a tech market that ultimately rallies into your end

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 7>because I think it all comes down to fundamentals and

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 7>Macro's gonna do what Macro's going to do. But we

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 7>are not seeing any So it is an acceleration clearly

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 7>that we're seeing over the last few weeks.

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 5>All Right, Dan, thanks so much for joining us there

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 5>as always appreciated. Managing director, Senior equity analyst for Webbush

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 5>to curious securities. He's Bangkok Tiland, go out and get

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 5>into some trouble. Uh that's an order, so Dan, I'm

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 5>doing it? Or use again there bullish seeing some channel

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 5>checks there in Asia, suggesting that the demand continues to

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 5>be there, not just for I guess Ai chips, but

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 5>just for you know, tech in general.

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 3>I feel like he's been in Asia for like a

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 3>month the last three times I've talked to him.

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 2>He's been there every.

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 5>Time, five times a year. I think, oh yeah.

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 3>But what I think is interesting, Like we can always

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 3>joke about Dan ives being the bullish guy on tech

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 3>for sure, but is so interesting to get that take

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 3>on the structural shift versus a cyclical market and from

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 3>understanding how the cyclicality makes sense when we're all transitioning

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 3>to a different kind of world. And you can see

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 3>that in lots of other sectors as well. Obviously energy

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 3>is one that I'm gonna be paying attention to cars

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 3>with EVS and the structure issues with that, So it's

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of fun.

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business You can also listen

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 5>All right, what are we doing here with these markets?

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 5>That's a lot of folks are trying to figure out

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 5>as a think about next week when we get the

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 5>Federal Reserve giving us their thoughts on earnings. Cissel joins

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.719
<v Speaker 5>US Chief Presidency of Banryon Capital Management, joining us from

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 5>Chicago via zoom. Shane, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 5>We've had a whole slew of economic data really over

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 5>the past a couple of weeks. You put it all

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 5>together and it seems like the market is getting ready

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:30.199
<v Speaker 5>for the Fed to begin cutting rates. How are you

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 5>guys positioning kind of your portfolio and what are you

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:33.719
<v Speaker 5>telling your clients?

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 11>Well, as much as I love to be a confrarion,

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 11>I am in complete alignment with market sentiment and that

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 11>the Fed will cut at this meeting. You know, Chairman

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:48.479
<v Speaker 11>Powell has been very transparent and in his remarks at

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 11>Jackson Hole, he was very clear that it was time

0:27:52.000 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 11>to make a pivot from their previous roadmap to make changes,

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 11>and cuts were part of that change. So I agree

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 11>with the market. I think where the debate comes in

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 11>is how big that rate cut will be. And as

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 11>you noted earlier, the market probability for a fifty basis

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:19.479
<v Speaker 11>point cut is actually rising. And I'm not sure I

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 11>understand what is driving this belief that the FED will

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 11>cut fifty basis points. They've been super cautious, and I

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:35.679
<v Speaker 11>just can't imagine cutting fifty basis points without seeing something

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 11>in the economic growth activity or in the US economy

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 11>that warrants that kind of what I think would be

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 11>kind of a knee jerk reaction. So we're telling clients,

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 11>you know, to prepare for a loosening cycle. The FED

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 11>is obviously loosening policy, and we want to take advantage

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 11>of that, which in an economy where it's which is

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 11>fairly stable, means that it's a risk on environment.

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 3>So let's go back to what happened in Vidia in

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 3>the last five days. Right, I mentioned this yesterday, Charlie

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Micgela got over at no Mora said that Nvidia was

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 3>basically the central banker of power. That yeah, yeah, we

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 3>can look at the FED, but it was Nvidia and

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 3>the FOMO that kind of gripped the market that has

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 3>really propelled the s and be higher this week. What

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 3>matters more for you and your acid allocation, is it

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 3>what's happening with Nvidia stock or what Jay Powell says

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 3>on Wednesday?

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 11>What Jay Powell says on Wednesday?

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh me and entirely Vida killing me. Sorry, I know

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 2>I love Nvidia, I do.

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 11>But as much as we want to pretend it's a

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 11>proxy for the economy, and it is to some extent,

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:45.719
<v Speaker 11>we should not be basing our portfolio management decisions on, uh,

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 11>the the technical trends of a single stock, especially one

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 11>which is kind of you know, shrinking in terms of

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:58.719
<v Speaker 11>its growth potential. It's an amazing company. It's growing, you know,

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 11>triple digits, but it's growing at a slower rate than

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 11>it was a year ago, and that is reflective of

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 11>what I think the economy is doing. But the Fed

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 11>policies at the end of the day, what drives the

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 11>underlying market liquidity and the under my alying opportunity for

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 11>investors in banks or whatever they take access capital. So,

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 11>you know, nvidious great and control access to capital.

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 5>So I guess just looking at the equity markets in general,

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 5>give us your thoughts on valuation here these days, a

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 5>lot of folks feel like it's stretched. A lot of

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 5>folks will say, yeah, but if you pull out some

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 5>of those big tech names, not so much. So how

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 5>do you guys look at it?

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:42.719
<v Speaker 11>So I learn at Fidelity, and this is super basic,

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 11>but I think it's actually a really great tool for

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 11>people out there who just want to do like quick

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 11>math in their head. But I learned the role of

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 11>twenty during my days at Fidelity. So that is taking

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 11>the pe of the market and adding in the inflation

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 11>number and then looking at it in a historical basis,

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 11>and the general consensus zip it was valuations were above twenty,

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 11>it was stretched, and if it was below twenty, it

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 11>was attractive. And so we're well above twenty. Yes, some

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 11>of that has to do with tech stocks and how

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 11>how much they are are kind of weighing on the market.

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 11>But I think even in the equal weight indexes we

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 11>are above that twenty number, and so there's definitely opportunities

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 11>in the market. But it feels like we're a little

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 11>frothy here. I don't think we're super expensive by any

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 11>stretch of the imagination, but I do think that I

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 11>wouldn't call the market.

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Cheap favorite pick right now.

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 10>You know, I really like Apple.

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 11>I really like Apple.

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, why so the stock up beating.

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 11>Up, and then they had their iPhone event last week,

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 11>which was sort of like anti climactic, So the stock.

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 10>Has been kind of, you know, not doing much for

0:31:58.040 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 10>a while.

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 11>Valuation wise, it's attract when you compare to the rest

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 11>of the Mag seven, and I think that overall, they're

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 11>doing the right things to maintain market share, and I

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 11>think that there's a potential for them to take market

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 11>share in the future. So you know, from that standpoint,

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 11>I think Apple has the ability to grow their global

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 11>footprint and people like the ecosystem. I'm definitely one of

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 11>those people. The stock is relatively attractive on a valuation basis,

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 11>whereas you look at something like an n Video or

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 11>one of the other names in the Mag seven and

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 11>they don't look quite as attractive on a valuation basis.

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Paul scrolling on his old iPhone, ready.

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.239
<v Speaker 3>To buy the new iPhone very soon, as in like

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 3>in forty five minutes time, exactly.

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, Shanna, thanks a lot, really appreciate it.

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 3>A shanea ccil President CEO, benmon On Capital Management joining

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 3>us there.

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. Very much.

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio.

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 3>We bring you all the top news in business and

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 3>finance economics from our beautiful world headquarters right here in

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 3>midtown Manhattan. There's a really interesting big Take story today

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 3>that everyone should read. You can find it Bloomberg Big

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 3>Takes story about college football players facing an ugly truth

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 3>about payment details. You can read the story on Bloomberg

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 3>and at Bloomberg dot com slash Big Tape. But we're

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 3>lucky to Peter Robinson here. He's an investigations reporter here

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 3>at Bloomberg News. Part of this story. I thought college

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 3>football players got their own money now and that was awesome,

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 3>and that was it.

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 2>What's going on.

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 12>That's exactly what the popular belief is. And that's why

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 12>my colleague Noah Bluhire and I wanted to look into this.

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 12>Because if you are a casual fan and you hear

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 12>about these deals apparently worth millions for college football players.

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 12>You think, well, that problem of the players being exploited

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 12>while the coaches and the administrators make millions has been fixed.

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 12>But we took a really deep dive into these contracts,

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 12>and they're at most of the big time football schools.

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 12>They're controlled by booster groups, which are essentially wealthy individuals,

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 12>think the richest car dealer in town, and they're in

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 12>charge of the deal. They write the contracts, and we

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 12>actually got our hands on at least three of these contracts,

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 12>and in many cases, according to other people we've talked

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 12>to as well, these come with broad termination rights which

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.959
<v Speaker 12>wouldn't be seen in virtually any other industry. But there's

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 12>one contract we looked at that said it can be

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 12>terminated at any time for any reason. So players are

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 12>essentially still being exploited. It's a version of the black

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 12>market that's existed in college football for a long time.

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 5>Peter, By and large, do these student athletes have representation,

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.879
<v Speaker 5>whether it's legal or an agent to kind of protect them.

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 10>Here, it really catches catch can and it depends on

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 10>the player.

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 12>And you can imagine for someone who's a teenager, these

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 12>are seventeen, eighteen, nineteen year old kids. They're entering this

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 12>world for the first time. And a majority of the

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 12>players to Division one schools are black, many from disadvantaged backgrounds,

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 12>and so you have these situations where players are not

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 12>aware of their options, they're not apprized of their options.

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 12>And because it's a third party relationship between the university

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 12>and these donor groups, there's really no one looking out

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 12>for their interests. There's no one accountable when one of

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:41.879
<v Speaker 12>these deals goes wrong.

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 2>So how do we fix this?

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:48.280
<v Speaker 12>Many people I've talked to look at the pro leagues

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 12>and they say, what's happening in college football is a

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:56.799
<v Speaker 12>professionalization of college football, and in the pro leagues the

0:35:56.840 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 12>players collectively bargain. In the pro leagues, the NFL Players Association,

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 12>for instance, requires that the contracts be disclosed to them

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:08.879
<v Speaker 12>so that all the players know what all the terms are.

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 12>It's a very transparent, very fair market, and so many

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.240
<v Speaker 12>people I talked to said that that's exactly what should

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 12>happen in college support and at least in big time

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 12>college football, where there are billions being made.

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 5>These booster groups are now have a new moniker. They're

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 5>called collectives. Which I think is kind of spooky in

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 5>and of themselves. And we actually know some people that

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 5>are parts of collectives of their university, and those are

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:36.360
<v Speaker 5>the ones that are who's monitoring or regulating these collectives?

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:40.399
<v Speaker 10>If anyone, Well, that's exactly the question. And yeah, you're right.

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 12>The word collective hasn't been in popular use since the

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 12>nineteen thirty Soviet Union. But because of the way that

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:53.720
<v Speaker 12>NCAA has lost repeated anti trust suits and has lost

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 12>the ability to enforce really any rules over college football,

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:00.839
<v Speaker 12>there is no one monitoring this. Congress has looked at this,

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 12>has held a dozen hearings since twenty twenty, but there

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 12>just hasn't been the momentum for bipartisan legislation that might

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:10.800
<v Speaker 12>put some guardrails in this market.

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:14.240
<v Speaker 3>What about the whole and forgive my complete lack of knowledge.

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 3>The likeness thing like image of likeness, what's that called?

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:18.240
<v Speaker 3>What's the nil?

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 5>That's what we're talking.

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, okay, if you follow college.

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Sports, you clearly I don't look ahead.

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 12>You know that name image likeness has become. It's amazing

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 12>how rapidly it's become part of the daily coverage in sports,

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 12>and it gives people the impression that athletes are signing

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 12>endorsement deals with Nike, with Adidas, that they're out there

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:44.720
<v Speaker 12>on social media.

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 10>But the interesting thing.

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 12>About college football is that although there isn't really good

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 12>statistics about this, the best statistics we have show that

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 12>about eighty percent of these NIL deals are actually from

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 12>these collectives. So people have the impression that Adidas and

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 12>Nike are pouring money into into the sport, into especially

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 12>specific players, but at least as far as what the

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 12>players are making individually, that's not the case.

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 10>It's still these collectives that are in charge.

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 5>And Peter, is this a case so far with the

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 5>big stars get most of the money and if you're

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 5>in a non if you're in like an Olympic sport,

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 5>you're not getting much if anything.

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it really depends on the individual athlete. And like

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 12>the rest of the economy, it's it's a star system.

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:34.800
<v Speaker 12>We looked closely at these contracts and talk to agents,

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:38.959
<v Speaker 12>and what's happening is that if you are a star

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 12>with leverage, you can make you know, a starter at

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 12>a at a power conference school in football can make

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 12>in the six figures every year. But if you're not

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 12>a starter, you you're on a month to month contract.

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:56.399
<v Speaker 12>If you don't perform well or if you're injured, that

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:59.439
<v Speaker 12>that money goes away. So it's just not a guarantee,

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 12>especially in the same way that coaches have. Coaches, even

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:07.280
<v Speaker 12>assistant coaches in college football can make four hundred thousand,

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 12>even up to two million and up.

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:09.280
<v Speaker 6>Wow.

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 3>All right, Peter, thanks a lot, We really appreciate it

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:14.760
<v Speaker 3>was a really great piece everybody. Peter Robson Investigations reporter

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 3>joining us from Seattle, Washington Again. You can find that

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 3>story on the Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot com Slash

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Big Take talking about college football players facing on ugly

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:26.760
<v Speaker 3>truth about how they actually get paid for step.

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you will get your podcasts. Listen live

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 1>each weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal