1 00:00:01,120 --> 00:00:04,400 Speaker 1: Hi, Perry High Emily. I'm glad to be back. Thank 2 00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:06,960 Speaker 1: you for holding down the fort without me last week. 3 00:00:07,040 --> 00:00:09,920 Speaker 2: I'm glad you had such a nice vacation. And I 4 00:00:09,960 --> 00:00:13,960 Speaker 2: am really excited about today's topic. This is one where 5 00:00:14,040 --> 00:00:16,720 Speaker 2: to be honest, I am hoping to get to my 6 00:00:16,840 --> 00:00:19,759 Speaker 2: smasher pass. Like through the course of our discussion, I 7 00:00:19,840 --> 00:00:20,720 Speaker 2: am not there. 8 00:00:20,960 --> 00:00:22,520 Speaker 1: You haven't committed, You're not crazy. 9 00:00:23,200 --> 00:00:25,640 Speaker 2: It's really difficult. We'll get to that. You know, we're 10 00:00:25,640 --> 00:00:28,760 Speaker 2: talking about full body scans today. And because I know 11 00:00:29,000 --> 00:00:34,120 Speaker 2: our listeners are dedicated Treki's Like, I know this because 12 00:00:34,520 --> 00:00:37,960 Speaker 2: I choose to believe it. And you know, I grew 13 00:00:38,040 --> 00:00:41,440 Speaker 2: up watching Star Trek the Next Generation, and you know, 14 00:00:41,560 --> 00:00:44,400 Speaker 2: watching the doctors use the tricorder scanner and you just 15 00:00:44,479 --> 00:00:47,479 Speaker 2: kind of and all of a sudden, you know everything 16 00:00:47,520 --> 00:00:52,040 Speaker 2: that's wrong with the person. This is basically why I 17 00:00:52,080 --> 00:00:54,280 Speaker 2: wanted to become a doctor. I assumed that this is 18 00:00:54,320 --> 00:01:00,880 Speaker 2: how it would work. I frequently walk around telling people 19 00:01:01,400 --> 00:01:03,560 Speaker 2: God damn it, I'm a doctor, not a blank like 20 00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:05,759 Speaker 2: that is one of my go to catchphrases. 21 00:01:06,080 --> 00:01:09,720 Speaker 1: Yeah, I considered becoming a doctor because I wanted to 22 00:01:09,720 --> 00:01:13,360 Speaker 1: meet Doogie Houser, Because I had the biggest crush on 23 00:01:13,480 --> 00:01:14,400 Speaker 1: Neil Patrick Harris. 24 00:01:14,959 --> 00:01:16,360 Speaker 2: I have some bad news for you, Emily. 25 00:01:16,520 --> 00:01:20,440 Speaker 1: I know, but it's okay, it's okay. And then I 26 00:01:20,440 --> 00:01:23,039 Speaker 1: didn't become a doctor, and you know he's not for me, 27 00:01:23,080 --> 00:01:27,240 Speaker 1: but I still love him anyway. My point is we're 28 00:01:27,240 --> 00:01:29,760 Speaker 1: going to get to your smasher pass. And this is 29 00:01:29,800 --> 00:01:33,319 Speaker 1: a great topic because it apparently intersects with your love 30 00:01:33,319 --> 00:01:36,280 Speaker 1: of Star Trek and my love of bays Rule, and 31 00:01:36,319 --> 00:01:38,280 Speaker 1: we're going to find out about both of those things. 32 00:01:38,560 --> 00:01:39,319 Speaker 2: Awesome, let's go. 33 00:01:42,120 --> 00:01:45,200 Speaker 1: I'm Emily Oster, I'm an economist and a data expert. 34 00:01:45,280 --> 00:01:47,360 Speaker 2: And I'm Perry Wilson, I'm a medical doctor. 35 00:01:47,640 --> 00:01:51,800 Speaker 1: It's Thursday, June twenty fifth, and this is wellness. 36 00:01:51,200 --> 00:01:54,960 Speaker 2: Actually, because you're getting a staggering amount of health and 37 00:01:55,040 --> 00:01:59,040 Speaker 2: wellness information nowadays from every source imaginable, and some of 38 00:01:59,040 --> 00:02:00,760 Speaker 2: it is awesome and some. 39 00:02:00,880 --> 00:02:06,400 Speaker 3: Of it is well actually both Fortunately we're both people 40 00:02:06,440 --> 00:02:09,120 Speaker 3: who know how to read studies, how to parse the data, 41 00:02:09,400 --> 00:02:12,040 Speaker 3: and can tell you what's worth thinking about and what 42 00:02:12,080 --> 00:02:13,240 Speaker 3: you can safely ignore. 43 00:02:13,560 --> 00:02:15,799 Speaker 2: But before we dig in, a note that this podcast 44 00:02:15,919 --> 00:02:18,480 Speaker 2: is for educational purposes and should not be construed as 45 00:02:18,480 --> 00:02:21,720 Speaker 2: medical advice. We don't know your unique situation, so talk 46 00:02:21,760 --> 00:02:23,920 Speaker 2: to your doctor for personal health decisions. 47 00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:29,200 Speaker 1: This week we're asking what's the deal with full body scans? 48 00:02:29,480 --> 00:02:31,920 Speaker 1: Perry and I will give the official smasher pass, and 49 00:02:31,960 --> 00:02:34,600 Speaker 1: then we'll get to your question of the week. But first, 50 00:02:34,760 --> 00:02:49,120 Speaker 1: let's do the health news roundup after the break. And 51 00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:53,040 Speaker 1: now for the health news of the week, Perry. First up, 52 00:02:53,320 --> 00:02:56,959 Speaker 1: the flu. We're having a flu outbreak on a military base. 53 00:02:57,080 --> 00:03:00,280 Speaker 1: No one could have predicted this except us, and also 54 00:03:00,400 --> 00:03:02,960 Speaker 1: many other people say more you. 55 00:03:02,880 --> 00:03:04,680 Speaker 2: Know, no one likes and I told you so. But 56 00:03:05,680 --> 00:03:08,960 Speaker 2: I would like to play the following clip from a 57 00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:12,919 Speaker 2: prior episode of Wellness. Actually, Perry, no. 58 00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:16,800 Speaker 1: More flu vaccine mandates for military troops. 59 00:03:17,320 --> 00:03:23,280 Speaker 2: Your thoughts, Yeah, this is weird. Combat readiness is in 60 00:03:23,360 --> 00:03:26,760 Speaker 2: part determined by the health of the troops in terms 61 00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:28,800 Speaker 2: of infectious diseases. I mean, if you look at like 62 00:03:28,880 --> 00:03:34,040 Speaker 2: the history of warfare, you would find that infection has 63 00:03:34,160 --> 00:03:40,800 Speaker 2: killed vastly more soldiers than combat. Is often responsible for 64 00:03:41,400 --> 00:03:44,720 Speaker 2: losing the war. I mean, one of the reasons the 65 00:03:44,800 --> 00:03:47,480 Speaker 2: Americans were able to hold out during the Revolutionary War 66 00:03:47,640 --> 00:03:51,120 Speaker 2: was because Washington made the rather bold and somewhat risky 67 00:03:51,200 --> 00:03:57,040 Speaker 2: decision to force smallpox vaccination on all the Revolutionary war troops. 68 00:03:57,440 --> 00:04:01,440 Speaker 2: And like, let's not forget that the worst influenza pandemic 69 00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:05,960 Speaker 2: in history, this is the Spanish flu Influenza pandemic, occurred 70 00:04:06,120 --> 00:04:09,840 Speaker 2: after World War One because a bunch of infected troops 71 00:04:09,920 --> 00:04:13,400 Speaker 2: brought brought the virus home. So a weird decision. It 72 00:04:13,400 --> 00:04:18,200 Speaker 2: feels completely like brazenly sort of political to me. I 73 00:04:18,200 --> 00:04:24,200 Speaker 2: see no justification for this in a rational society. All right, 74 00:04:24,240 --> 00:04:31,240 Speaker 2: we told you so. We are referring, of course, to 75 00:04:32,240 --> 00:04:36,640 Speaker 2: influenza outbreak on a joint military base in Lackland, Texas. 76 00:04:37,120 --> 00:04:39,160 Speaker 2: As at the time of this recording, there are two 77 00:04:39,240 --> 00:04:42,800 Speaker 2: hundred and twenty two positive cases from the thirty seventh 78 00:04:42,839 --> 00:04:45,760 Speaker 2: Training Wing. This is from what I can tell, a 79 00:04:45,800 --> 00:04:50,960 Speaker 2: flying training group who live in close quarters, obviously, and 80 00:04:51,040 --> 00:04:54,960 Speaker 2: this is happening after Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth eliminated 81 00:04:55,000 --> 00:04:59,560 Speaker 2: the flu vaccine mandate, after which time for military personnel, 82 00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:03,800 Speaker 2: and after which time only forty percent of trainees chose 83 00:05:04,520 --> 00:05:08,000 Speaker 2: to be vaccinated for the flu, which is a yearly vaccine. 84 00:05:08,360 --> 00:05:12,039 Speaker 2: You know. Once again, although we said it before, military 85 00:05:12,080 --> 00:05:17,320 Speaker 2: readiness is more inhibited by illness than just about anything else, 86 00:05:18,040 --> 00:05:21,160 Speaker 2: which is why vaccination has been such a huge part 87 00:05:21,320 --> 00:05:24,279 Speaker 2: of armies all around the world. And you know, they 88 00:05:24,320 --> 00:05:27,240 Speaker 2: even joke about how much stuff they're getting vaccinated for, 89 00:05:27,320 --> 00:05:29,360 Speaker 2: and there's a reason for that, and this flu outbreak 90 00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:33,440 Speaker 2: is telling us why. It is the case. Two hundred 91 00:05:33,440 --> 00:05:35,200 Speaker 2: and twenty two people out of training for a while, 92 00:05:35,200 --> 00:05:38,279 Speaker 2: two of them hospitalized by the way, which is not great, 93 00:05:38,279 --> 00:05:40,960 Speaker 2: and we're obviously pulling for them. Emily, do you think 94 00:05:40,960 --> 00:05:42,080 Speaker 2: this is going to change policy? 95 00:05:42,400 --> 00:05:45,680 Speaker 1: Nope, I don't, but I wish it would, but I'm 96 00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:48,280 Speaker 1: not optimistic. I think you will hear people say, well, 97 00:05:48,320 --> 00:05:51,160 Speaker 1: even if they had been vaccinated, blah blah blah blah. 98 00:05:51,240 --> 00:05:53,160 Speaker 1: So I don't think it will change policy, even though 99 00:05:53,200 --> 00:05:54,360 Speaker 1: it definitely should. 100 00:05:54,560 --> 00:05:59,279 Speaker 2: Absolutely, let's stick with vaccines for a second, because we 101 00:05:59,360 --> 00:06:02,520 Speaker 2: have some really cool vaccine news. A new study appearing 102 00:06:02,600 --> 00:06:08,400 Speaker 2: in the Lancet about the HPV vaccine in the UK. Emily, 103 00:06:08,560 --> 00:06:09,960 Speaker 2: what's going on with HPV so. 104 00:06:09,960 --> 00:06:13,960 Speaker 1: Great, So I think first it's worth sort of stepping back. 105 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:15,760 Speaker 1: We give kids to the HPV vaccine, and we give 106 00:06:15,760 --> 00:06:19,480 Speaker 1: people the HPV vaccine, typically in adolescents, and it's actually 107 00:06:19,520 --> 00:06:22,560 Speaker 1: one of the vaccines where you see more hesitancy, and 108 00:06:22,640 --> 00:06:24,440 Speaker 1: I think we're not always doing a great job of 109 00:06:24,480 --> 00:06:29,320 Speaker 1: explaining to people why we should give kids this vaccine. 110 00:06:30,200 --> 00:06:33,760 Speaker 1: The vaccine prevents against the human papuloma virus, two different 111 00:06:33,839 --> 00:06:36,600 Speaker 1: versions of it, and the reason for this is that 112 00:06:36,720 --> 00:06:40,520 Speaker 1: those are the primary causes of cervical cancer. So this 113 00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:44,359 Speaker 1: is really a true cancer vaccine. It's a vaccine that 114 00:06:44,400 --> 00:06:48,520 Speaker 1: prevents you from getting cervical cancer in principle and also 115 00:06:48,640 --> 00:06:52,560 Speaker 1: now in practice. So this new study is from the Lancet. 116 00:06:52,640 --> 00:06:55,479 Speaker 1: It's a population based study which looks at cervical cancer 117 00:06:55,560 --> 00:06:59,520 Speaker 1: mortality from two thousand and one to twenty twenty four. 118 00:06:59,600 --> 00:07:02,200 Speaker 1: This cover some of the period in which the vaccine 119 00:07:02,320 --> 00:07:06,320 Speaker 1: was rolled out. You know, it's not a randomized trial 120 00:07:06,400 --> 00:07:08,640 Speaker 1: because at this point the vaccine was available to everyone. 121 00:07:08,680 --> 00:07:11,440 Speaker 1: But they've got calendar year and age to try to 122 00:07:11,600 --> 00:07:15,000 Speaker 1: sort of suss out the causal impact of the vaccine 123 00:07:15,040 --> 00:07:21,120 Speaker 1: on cervical cancer. And more or less, this eliminated get 124 00:07:21,160 --> 00:07:25,120 Speaker 1: close to eliminating cervical cancer. So they estimate a vaccine 125 00:07:25,120 --> 00:07:29,360 Speaker 1: efficacy between eighty five and one hundred percent, which is amazing, 126 00:07:29,600 --> 00:07:32,440 Speaker 1: and you know, people die of cervical cancer. Cervical cancer 127 00:07:32,520 --> 00:07:35,600 Speaker 1: is a it's a really bad cancer. I mean all 128 00:07:35,600 --> 00:07:37,640 Speaker 1: cancers are bad. This is this is a bad one. 129 00:07:37,640 --> 00:07:41,960 Speaker 1: And to have a vaccine that is so effective is amazing. Actually, 130 00:07:42,040 --> 00:07:44,760 Speaker 1: I'm so excited that my kids live in a time 131 00:07:45,400 --> 00:07:47,760 Speaker 1: when they can be vaccinated for this. And I will 132 00:07:47,880 --> 00:07:52,280 Speaker 1: just say, not only should you vaccinate your daughters for this, 133 00:07:52,760 --> 00:07:56,080 Speaker 1: you should also vaccinate your sons because they can give 134 00:07:56,160 --> 00:07:59,920 Speaker 1: people HPV and because there are some other sort of 135 00:08:00,280 --> 00:08:03,520 Speaker 1: reasons why they should be vaccinated. So kids should get 136 00:08:03,520 --> 00:08:04,280 Speaker 1: this vaccine. 137 00:08:04,600 --> 00:08:08,480 Speaker 2: Absolutely, It's not it's not even just cervical cancer. Cancers 138 00:08:08,520 --> 00:08:11,120 Speaker 2: of the head and neck are now more driven by 139 00:08:11,280 --> 00:08:14,400 Speaker 2: HPV than smoking as smoking rates have gone down. Those 140 00:08:14,440 --> 00:08:18,000 Speaker 2: can obviously affect everybody, boys and girls, men and women. 141 00:08:18,920 --> 00:08:23,040 Speaker 2: So really positive results. No cervical cancer deaths in this 142 00:08:23,160 --> 00:08:24,000 Speaker 2: vaccinated group. 143 00:08:24,240 --> 00:08:28,040 Speaker 1: My eleven year old was bemoaning his need for the 144 00:08:28,360 --> 00:08:31,800 Speaker 1: HPV vaccine at the next well child visit, which is 145 00:08:31,960 --> 00:08:35,360 Speaker 1: next week, and I was just like, I can't wait. Sorry, dude, 146 00:08:35,440 --> 00:08:36,400 Speaker 1: I'm so excited. 147 00:08:37,000 --> 00:08:42,680 Speaker 2: The best. Yeah, joy, your eleven year old might have 148 00:08:42,760 --> 00:08:46,840 Speaker 2: something else to bemoan with our last piece of health news, 149 00:08:46,920 --> 00:08:49,640 Speaker 2: and that is that we are saying goodbye to two 150 00:08:49,720 --> 00:08:54,480 Speaker 2: close friends, the blue and brown colored Eminems. 151 00:08:54,760 --> 00:08:55,559 Speaker 1: That's so sad. 152 00:08:56,960 --> 00:08:57,959 Speaker 2: Why are they going away? 153 00:08:58,360 --> 00:09:04,280 Speaker 1: I don't know. I blame the Health secretary for everything, actually, 154 00:09:04,679 --> 00:09:08,719 Speaker 1: but this particular thing. So so, there's been a push 155 00:09:09,679 --> 00:09:15,640 Speaker 1: towards having no artificial dyes in food. We've talked about 156 00:09:15,640 --> 00:09:17,800 Speaker 1: this perhaps before. I'm sure we'll talk more about it. 157 00:09:17,840 --> 00:09:20,280 Speaker 1: I think that's not real evidence based, but at any rate, 158 00:09:20,320 --> 00:09:23,280 Speaker 1: that's the direction we're going. And so Eminem's is trying 159 00:09:23,280 --> 00:09:26,280 Speaker 1: to replace all of their dyes with natural colors, and 160 00:09:26,360 --> 00:09:29,440 Speaker 1: it seems like they can't produce blue and brown. Is 161 00:09:29,480 --> 00:09:32,280 Speaker 1: that your understanding? Like I was a little confused. 162 00:09:32,440 --> 00:09:35,840 Speaker 2: I definitely get blue, like that blue color, Yeah, that's 163 00:09:35,880 --> 00:09:39,040 Speaker 2: not in nature. I don't see that anywhere or that 164 00:09:39,080 --> 00:09:41,120 Speaker 2: flavor Like blue is its own flavor. 165 00:09:40,880 --> 00:09:44,240 Speaker 4: But it was not its own fault, but not for 166 00:09:44,240 --> 00:09:47,200 Speaker 4: eminem but for like, Okay, sure there's like blue, raspberry 167 00:09:47,240 --> 00:09:50,480 Speaker 4: whatever anyway, yes, blue, but like brown, like, I'm pretty 168 00:09:50,600 --> 00:09:53,440 Speaker 4: sure you can find something that's brown. 169 00:09:53,840 --> 00:09:55,960 Speaker 1: There's all kinds of brown things, but it must be 170 00:09:56,120 --> 00:09:58,920 Speaker 1: the yes. I don't understand that much about color dyes, 171 00:09:58,960 --> 00:10:01,480 Speaker 1: but I will say blue and brown eminem's are off, 172 00:10:01,520 --> 00:10:03,800 Speaker 1: and I suspect when we get the new M and 173 00:10:03,920 --> 00:10:07,199 Speaker 1: ms they will also be not so colored. I mean 174 00:10:07,240 --> 00:10:11,040 Speaker 1: one of the features of natural dyes, for example in 175 00:10:11,160 --> 00:10:13,480 Speaker 1: European fruit loops, is that they. 176 00:10:13,400 --> 00:10:17,959 Speaker 5: Are just like they're not as intense, it's not as 177 00:10:18,000 --> 00:10:22,920 Speaker 5: fun and so yes, our producer has pointed out in 178 00:10:22,960 --> 00:10:25,680 Speaker 5: the comments here that chocolate is brown and so could 179 00:10:25,679 --> 00:10:27,760 Speaker 5: you just leave the eminem But I think it's the 180 00:10:27,840 --> 00:10:30,120 Speaker 5: candy coating on the m M that's sort of crazy. 181 00:10:30,160 --> 00:10:33,000 Speaker 2: I mean, what is it without the candy, It's coding. 182 00:10:32,880 --> 00:10:35,920 Speaker 1: It's nothing. Also would melt on itself, which would be 183 00:10:35,960 --> 00:10:36,880 Speaker 1: a bad experience. 184 00:10:37,200 --> 00:10:39,800 Speaker 2: All right, So hoarde your blue eminem's. They will no 185 00:10:39,880 --> 00:10:42,440 Speaker 2: doubt be worth millions of dollars. 186 00:10:42,640 --> 00:10:44,960 Speaker 1: They're going to be people who are selling choco tacos 187 00:10:45,480 --> 00:10:48,200 Speaker 1: and in blue eminems on ets for decades. 188 00:10:48,800 --> 00:10:51,240 Speaker 2: All right. That is it for the health news of 189 00:10:51,280 --> 00:10:54,440 Speaker 2: the week. After the break, what's the deal with full 190 00:10:54,480 --> 00:11:02,800 Speaker 2: body scans? And we are back. What's the deal with 191 00:11:02,800 --> 00:11:06,400 Speaker 2: full body scans? Emily, I'm going to start by playing 192 00:11:06,760 --> 00:11:10,360 Speaker 2: a representative clip from Instagram to get us going here. 193 00:11:10,480 --> 00:11:12,240 Speaker 6: So I just did a full body scan that tests 194 00:11:12,240 --> 00:11:15,320 Speaker 6: for over five hundred different conditions, including cancer. Now you 195 00:11:15,360 --> 00:11:17,200 Speaker 6: sit in this little tube thing for an hour and 196 00:11:17,240 --> 00:11:19,560 Speaker 6: you just watch a little Netflix show, and then you'll 197 00:11:19,559 --> 00:11:21,800 Speaker 6: get all the information. Now there's gonna be a whole 198 00:11:21,800 --> 00:11:24,920 Speaker 6: report of like everything from your brain to your toenails. 199 00:11:25,200 --> 00:11:27,600 Speaker 6: They did find a nodule in my lung. So let 200 00:11:27,600 --> 00:11:29,559 Speaker 6: me show you that. I can see here, there's a 201 00:11:29,600 --> 00:11:32,400 Speaker 6: lung nodule. You can see it there. It's point five centimeters. Now, 202 00:11:32,440 --> 00:11:34,439 Speaker 6: apparently what the doctor told means that lung nodule is 203 00:11:34,480 --> 00:11:37,320 Speaker 6: either from a prior lung infection, which is okay, and 204 00:11:37,360 --> 00:11:39,840 Speaker 6: that it doesn't look like it's cancerous. But we're gonna 205 00:11:39,840 --> 00:11:41,040 Speaker 6: get a scan in a year from now and just 206 00:11:41,040 --> 00:11:42,720 Speaker 6: make sure it doesn't grow, and we'll keep an eye 207 00:11:42,760 --> 00:11:45,360 Speaker 6: on it. And so this scan is preventative. And I 208 00:11:45,360 --> 00:11:48,600 Speaker 6: just don't understand why health insurance companies don't offer and 209 00:11:48,640 --> 00:11:52,800 Speaker 6: pay for this, and or why our entire system doesn't 210 00:11:52,800 --> 00:11:55,800 Speaker 6: provide us more preventive care like this. Now, this total 211 00:11:55,840 --> 00:11:59,280 Speaker 6: scan with pernuvo is twenty five hundred dollars. I know 212 00:11:59,360 --> 00:12:01,840 Speaker 6: that's a lot of money, but for me, thinking about 213 00:12:02,080 --> 00:12:04,959 Speaker 6: all the findings you're going to get I think it's 214 00:12:04,960 --> 00:12:05,520 Speaker 6: well worth. 215 00:12:05,320 --> 00:12:08,520 Speaker 2: It, all right. So so there you have someone and 216 00:12:09,080 --> 00:12:10,720 Speaker 2: you know, this was not hard to find a clip 217 00:12:10,760 --> 00:12:13,600 Speaker 2: like this. There are hundreds of them out there, of 218 00:12:13,640 --> 00:12:16,400 Speaker 2: people who have gone through these direct to consumer scans. 219 00:12:16,440 --> 00:12:18,360 Speaker 2: These are things that you pay for out of pocket 220 00:12:18,520 --> 00:12:22,720 Speaker 2: and you know, find something, and broadly speaking, the people 221 00:12:22,760 --> 00:12:26,280 Speaker 2: seem quite grateful that they've found a thing. 222 00:12:27,760 --> 00:12:34,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, ah, this is a really okay. So let me 223 00:12:34,800 --> 00:12:36,480 Speaker 1: just tee up Why I think this space is so 224 00:12:36,600 --> 00:12:41,280 Speaker 1: complicated because these scans are on a long continuum, some 225 00:12:41,360 --> 00:12:44,200 Speaker 1: of which we recommend, and so you will often hear people, 226 00:12:44,280 --> 00:12:46,280 Speaker 1: you know, doctors say like, well, don't you don't need 227 00:12:46,280 --> 00:12:48,200 Speaker 1: a full body scan? Like you don't you don't need 228 00:12:48,200 --> 00:12:49,880 Speaker 1: a full body scan? But then in the same breath 229 00:12:49,880 --> 00:12:51,800 Speaker 1: it'll be like, but definitely get this, mamma rep and 230 00:12:51,880 --> 00:12:54,040 Speaker 1: definitely get this cooling cancer screening can definitely get. And 231 00:12:54,080 --> 00:12:58,040 Speaker 1: I think that's where it's hard to navigate. It's, well, 232 00:12:58,400 --> 00:13:00,760 Speaker 1: you told me these scans I want. Why don't I 233 00:13:00,800 --> 00:13:02,880 Speaker 1: want this other scan? It just seems like it would 234 00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:04,040 Speaker 1: be better. 235 00:13:04,360 --> 00:13:05,520 Speaker 2: Isn't more information? 236 00:13:05,880 --> 00:13:09,200 Speaker 1: Is it more information better? And there's a sense in 237 00:13:09,240 --> 00:13:12,160 Speaker 1: which the answer must be yes, and then other senses 238 00:13:12,160 --> 00:13:15,560 Speaker 1: in which the answer must be no. But before we 239 00:13:15,640 --> 00:13:18,040 Speaker 1: get into that, you know, there are a lot of 240 00:13:18,080 --> 00:13:21,280 Speaker 1: these scans. The one I think, my guess is people 241 00:13:21,440 --> 00:13:27,000 Speaker 1: have heard most frequently is a company called Prinovo, which 242 00:13:27,200 --> 00:13:31,640 Speaker 1: does a full body MRI, sends it to a radiologist 243 00:13:31,960 --> 00:13:37,920 Speaker 1: and probably some AI to read it. These cost something 244 00:13:37,960 --> 00:13:40,400 Speaker 1: in the range of you onenty to twenty five hundred 245 00:13:40,480 --> 00:13:44,480 Speaker 1: dollars and they come back with some information about what 246 00:13:44,800 --> 00:13:46,720 Speaker 1: to do, and then you maybe have to follow up 247 00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:49,920 Speaker 1: in some other way. So that's the most popular one. 248 00:13:49,960 --> 00:13:53,079 Speaker 2: There are a bunch of popularized by no less than 249 00:13:53,160 --> 00:13:58,520 Speaker 2: Kim Kardashian, who got some significant flack actually for promoting Pernuvo. 250 00:13:59,080 --> 00:14:01,720 Speaker 2: We can talk about this in a little bit, but 251 00:14:01,720 --> 00:14:05,040 Speaker 2: but Kim Kardashian got one of these scans. By the way, 252 00:14:05,080 --> 00:14:09,400 Speaker 2: they Pernuvo often gives these scans to celebrities and influencers. 253 00:14:10,000 --> 00:14:10,959 Speaker 2: So if you look at the. 254 00:14:11,320 --> 00:14:16,480 Speaker 1: No one has offered me any oh, I still haven't 255 00:14:16,480 --> 00:14:19,200 Speaker 1: gotten my graphics card from episode one or two either. 256 00:14:19,320 --> 00:14:20,720 Speaker 1: Come on, we're waiting, guys. 257 00:14:21,000 --> 00:14:21,240 Speaker 3: Guys. 258 00:14:21,520 --> 00:14:23,920 Speaker 2: So Pernuvo will give these scans to influencers and then 259 00:14:24,160 --> 00:14:26,120 Speaker 2: you know, they'll put something on Instagram and with a 260 00:14:26,120 --> 00:14:29,040 Speaker 2: little with a little discount code and stuff like that. 261 00:14:29,080 --> 00:14:32,440 Speaker 2: This is clearly part of their marketing strategy. Kim Kardashian 262 00:14:32,480 --> 00:14:35,480 Speaker 2: had a pernevo scan they found aneurysm in her brain 263 00:14:35,840 --> 00:14:38,280 Speaker 2: that got a lot of attention. She talked about it 264 00:14:38,320 --> 00:14:41,120 Speaker 2: on her reality show. I'm going to hold off for 265 00:14:41,160 --> 00:14:43,040 Speaker 2: a second to tell you what the like end of 266 00:14:43,120 --> 00:14:46,440 Speaker 2: that story is. Uh, but I just want to say that, like, 267 00:14:47,880 --> 00:14:51,120 Speaker 2: this is something that you will hear a lot about 268 00:14:51,160 --> 00:14:52,800 Speaker 2: from really famous people. 269 00:14:53,520 --> 00:14:56,680 Speaker 1: Yeah, so there are a bunch of companies that do this. 270 00:14:56,720 --> 00:14:59,480 Speaker 1: I think one one thing I wanted to kind of 271 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:02,120 Speaker 1: in some ways differentiate a little bit is there is 272 00:15:02,200 --> 00:15:05,560 Speaker 1: another kind of whole body scan called a dexa scan, 273 00:15:06,120 --> 00:15:10,320 Speaker 1: which people will hear about, which is basically a way 274 00:15:10,360 --> 00:15:13,040 Speaker 1: to scan how much body fat and muscle you have. 275 00:15:13,560 --> 00:15:16,720 Speaker 1: These are much cheaper and they are a totally different thing. 276 00:15:16,800 --> 00:15:19,600 Speaker 1: So I sort of in the space of influencers, these 277 00:15:19,640 --> 00:15:22,360 Speaker 1: things will get kind of put on top of each other, 278 00:15:22,520 --> 00:15:24,080 Speaker 1: but they aren't the same thing. 279 00:15:24,240 --> 00:15:24,440 Speaker 6: Here. 280 00:15:24,480 --> 00:15:27,640 Speaker 1: We're really talking about these like full body either CT 281 00:15:27,840 --> 00:15:30,760 Speaker 1: or MRI scans designed to look for things like tumors 282 00:15:30,840 --> 00:15:35,720 Speaker 1: or aneurysms or other abnormalities of your body as opposed 283 00:15:35,760 --> 00:15:38,200 Speaker 1: to looking at your body fat percentage. 284 00:15:38,840 --> 00:15:42,040 Speaker 2: Right, this is really a build as a broad sweep, 285 00:15:42,040 --> 00:15:45,440 Speaker 2: and we have companies in addition to Pernuvo. People may 286 00:15:45,440 --> 00:15:49,040 Speaker 2: have heard of Ezra or True Scan or the Simon 287 00:15:49,120 --> 00:15:53,640 Speaker 2: one scan, or there's even some ct versions. There is 288 00:15:53,800 --> 00:15:58,040 Speaker 2: one that I want to address just because it's like 289 00:15:58,160 --> 00:16:02,040 Speaker 2: exploding on social media just over the last week. So, Emily, 290 00:16:03,160 --> 00:16:05,440 Speaker 2: what if I were to submerge you in water and 291 00:16:05,480 --> 00:16:09,720 Speaker 2: shoot ultrasound waves through your body? Does that seem like 292 00:16:09,760 --> 00:16:10,240 Speaker 2: a good idea? 293 00:16:10,360 --> 00:16:14,320 Speaker 1: Yes, yes, it sounds amazing, is like a massage. 294 00:16:14,680 --> 00:16:17,320 Speaker 2: This just so people, this is the new mid Journey scan, 295 00:16:17,400 --> 00:16:19,680 Speaker 2: which is like the tech bros are are over the 296 00:16:19,680 --> 00:16:22,840 Speaker 2: moonflo mid Journey is the company that did like AI 297 00:16:22,920 --> 00:16:23,680 Speaker 2: image generation. 298 00:16:23,920 --> 00:16:27,000 Speaker 7: Yeah, like that was the big what I'm familiar Now 299 00:16:27,000 --> 00:16:30,320 Speaker 7: they're a full body scanning company, Pivoting, and they've showed 300 00:16:30,360 --> 00:16:32,680 Speaker 7: a demo of like you get submerged in water and 301 00:16:32,720 --> 00:16:35,960 Speaker 7: this thing goes like and you get a whole scan 302 00:16:36,040 --> 00:16:38,240 Speaker 7: of your body using ultrasound. 303 00:16:37,760 --> 00:16:39,840 Speaker 1: Waves and then what how does that help? 304 00:16:39,920 --> 00:16:40,080 Speaker 8: What? 305 00:16:40,320 --> 00:16:43,240 Speaker 2: Well, it's the similar idea to the full body MRI scans, 306 00:16:43,400 --> 00:16:48,240 Speaker 2: except they they're arguing it'll be cheaper and we can 307 00:16:48,280 --> 00:16:51,600 Speaker 2: sort of get to the costs in a minute. Uh 308 00:16:51,680 --> 00:16:55,840 Speaker 2: and and and the problems with full body ultrasound as well. 309 00:16:56,040 --> 00:16:57,840 Speaker 2: I just want to say it at the top because 310 00:16:57,880 --> 00:17:00,120 Speaker 2: I think people will start hearing about this and and 311 00:17:00,120 --> 00:17:03,480 Speaker 2: we will touch on it. But frankly, the data is 312 00:17:03,920 --> 00:17:06,520 Speaker 2: all in that full body MRI scan space. This full 313 00:17:06,560 --> 00:17:09,679 Speaker 2: body ulchstund is completely new, and like there's very little 314 00:17:09,680 --> 00:17:12,160 Speaker 2: we can say about its diagnostic accuracy or anything because 315 00:17:12,160 --> 00:17:14,160 Speaker 2: it hasn't been really used on humans yet, but you'll 316 00:17:14,160 --> 00:17:14,960 Speaker 2: see it in your feeds. 317 00:17:15,240 --> 00:17:17,840 Speaker 1: How much do you think that the AI, the growth 318 00:17:17,840 --> 00:17:20,800 Speaker 1: of AI is powering this. I mean a radiology is 319 00:17:20,800 --> 00:17:22,359 Speaker 1: one of the things that AI is sort of the 320 00:17:22,920 --> 00:17:26,000 Speaker 1: best at, the best kind of doctoring on. I would 321 00:17:26,040 --> 00:17:28,000 Speaker 1: have thought this is like we're only able to do 322 00:17:28,040 --> 00:17:30,400 Speaker 1: this because AI is reading a huge share of these scans. 323 00:17:30,880 --> 00:17:35,000 Speaker 2: In almost all of these companies, AI is built as 324 00:17:35,359 --> 00:17:38,680 Speaker 2: augmenting the read from the radiologists. No one is saying 325 00:17:38,680 --> 00:17:39,919 Speaker 2: like it's only AI. 326 00:17:40,080 --> 00:17:42,320 Speaker 1: You look skeptical, No, I think that's I mean, that 327 00:17:42,800 --> 00:17:47,240 Speaker 1: is the way that radiology I think will work for everything, 328 00:17:47,359 --> 00:17:49,159 Speaker 1: is that the AI does a first read and somebody 329 00:17:49,200 --> 00:17:51,879 Speaker 1: does so as a follow up read, we have actually 330 00:17:51,960 --> 00:17:55,280 Speaker 1: quite a significant radiologist shortage and the moment, and so 331 00:17:55,400 --> 00:17:59,200 Speaker 1: this is a natural place for AI to come in, 332 00:17:59,200 --> 00:18:01,119 Speaker 1: including for these kind of scans. 333 00:18:01,200 --> 00:18:02,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, and if you're one of these companies trying to 334 00:18:02,680 --> 00:18:04,680 Speaker 2: raise money from investors, like, are you not going to 335 00:18:04,720 --> 00:18:06,720 Speaker 2: say the AI AI? 336 00:18:07,280 --> 00:18:10,560 Speaker 1: It's like everybody's an AI company a meal delivery service. 337 00:18:10,600 --> 00:18:15,800 Speaker 1: It's more of an AI meal delivery AI stake. You know, 338 00:18:16,280 --> 00:18:17,560 Speaker 1: we're optimized AI. 339 00:18:17,760 --> 00:18:21,240 Speaker 2: It's all that I I Okay, total aside, But my 340 00:18:22,040 --> 00:18:25,760 Speaker 2: dystopian prediction for the future of AI and consumerism is 341 00:18:25,760 --> 00:18:29,280 Speaker 2: that soon enough, Amazon is actually going to start sending 342 00:18:29,320 --> 00:18:32,280 Speaker 2: things to your house that you haven't ordered. That it's 343 00:18:32,320 --> 00:18:34,399 Speaker 2: going to just like it's going to show up and 344 00:18:34,440 --> 00:18:36,399 Speaker 2: then they'll be like, look, look, send it back if 345 00:18:36,400 --> 00:18:37,639 Speaker 2: you don't if you don't want it. 346 00:18:38,200 --> 00:18:40,639 Speaker 1: That already happens in my house because it's one of 347 00:18:40,640 --> 00:18:43,080 Speaker 1: my children has ordered it. But it's going to be 348 00:18:43,119 --> 00:18:45,080 Speaker 1: even worse when Amazon is doing it. 349 00:18:45,240 --> 00:18:46,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, all right, mark my words. 350 00:18:46,880 --> 00:18:50,879 Speaker 1: Okay, So before we get into the like what do 351 00:18:51,000 --> 00:18:53,480 Speaker 1: we know about these things in the data? I actually 352 00:18:54,080 --> 00:18:57,960 Speaker 1: want to start a little bit bigger picture with how 353 00:18:58,000 --> 00:19:02,640 Speaker 1: we think about scan and how we think about results 354 00:19:02,640 --> 00:19:04,960 Speaker 1: that we get in medicine. So I'm going to give 355 00:19:05,000 --> 00:19:08,080 Speaker 1: you a quiz. It's a quiz for everybody, So everybody 356 00:19:08,080 --> 00:19:11,920 Speaker 1: put your thinking cap on. Imagine you have a disease 357 00:19:12,920 --> 00:19:17,040 Speaker 1: that affects one in ten thousand people. Okay, and you 358 00:19:17,080 --> 00:19:20,240 Speaker 1: have a test for the disease that detects ninety nine 359 00:19:20,280 --> 00:19:23,160 Speaker 1: percent of cases with a two percent false positive rate. 360 00:19:23,280 --> 00:19:25,359 Speaker 1: So it's really good test. It finds ninety nine percent 361 00:19:25,400 --> 00:19:28,439 Speaker 1: of cases. Small false positive rate of two percent. 362 00:19:28,480 --> 00:19:29,840 Speaker 2: Amazing. Tests sounds great. 363 00:19:30,119 --> 00:19:32,920 Speaker 1: You give someone the test and they test positive, what 364 00:19:33,000 --> 00:19:36,920 Speaker 1: is the chance that they have the disease? Short jeopardy pause, 365 00:19:37,119 --> 00:19:37,800 Speaker 1: do you do? 366 00:19:37,800 --> 00:19:38,200 Speaker 9: Do you do? 367 00:19:38,320 --> 00:19:40,520 Speaker 1: Okay, what do you think? 368 00:19:41,200 --> 00:19:46,600 Speaker 2: I think that all your bays are belonged to us. 369 00:19:47,040 --> 00:19:49,480 Speaker 2: I know what you're getting at here, But let me 370 00:19:49,520 --> 00:19:52,040 Speaker 2: tell you what I think your intuition is, and then 371 00:19:52,080 --> 00:19:54,719 Speaker 2: we can talk about why the intuition is wrong. The 372 00:19:54,720 --> 00:19:57,000 Speaker 2: intuition is, here's a test that detects ninety nine percent 373 00:19:57,040 --> 00:19:59,800 Speaker 2: of disease. Great, only has a two percent false positive rate. Great, 374 00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:03,520 Speaker 2: you got a positive test. Pretty sure you have the disease? 375 00:20:03,600 --> 00:20:04,320 Speaker 1: Pretty sure you have. 376 00:20:04,359 --> 00:20:06,720 Speaker 2: That sounds right, yeahad bad news. Right, you have the 377 00:20:06,760 --> 00:20:11,720 Speaker 2: positive test, but you are you mentioned that this is 378 00:20:11,760 --> 00:20:15,760 Speaker 2: a pretty rare disease, one in ten thousand, and so 379 00:20:15,840 --> 00:20:18,120 Speaker 2: maybe you can walk us through the math Emily of 380 00:20:18,160 --> 00:20:21,240 Speaker 2: like what the actual value of a positive test is here. 381 00:20:21,720 --> 00:20:24,800 Speaker 1: So the answer to the question is one half of 382 00:20:24,880 --> 00:20:27,720 Speaker 1: one percent. So with a positive test, the chance that 383 00:20:27,760 --> 00:20:31,440 Speaker 1: you actually have the disease is one in two hundred. 384 00:20:32,480 --> 00:20:35,480 Speaker 1: And the reason for that is that if you think 385 00:20:35,520 --> 00:20:37,840 Speaker 1: about this test, Let's say you have ten thousand people, 386 00:20:37,880 --> 00:20:40,280 Speaker 1: you test, one of them has it, You're going to 387 00:20:40,320 --> 00:20:42,600 Speaker 1: find that the very very good chance you find out 388 00:20:42,720 --> 00:20:44,960 Speaker 1: ninety nine percent chance you ninety nine percent chance. Let's 389 00:20:44,960 --> 00:20:48,000 Speaker 1: say we find that one person, and then there's a 390 00:20:48,080 --> 00:20:50,960 Speaker 1: two percent false positive rate, and that means of the 391 00:20:51,840 --> 00:20:55,240 Speaker 1: ninety nine people who don't have it, about two hundred 392 00:20:55,280 --> 00:20:58,639 Speaker 1: of them are going to test positive. And so now 393 00:20:58,720 --> 00:21:01,920 Speaker 1: you've got two hundred people who tested positive who don't 394 00:21:01,920 --> 00:21:04,480 Speaker 1: have it, and one person who tested positive who does 395 00:21:05,119 --> 00:21:07,359 Speaker 1: and that means that it's about one in two hundred. 396 00:21:08,000 --> 00:21:10,280 Speaker 1: That's the chance that you actually are affected. And so 397 00:21:10,320 --> 00:21:12,000 Speaker 1: if you're sitting there with a positive if you're sitting 398 00:21:12,000 --> 00:21:14,360 Speaker 1: there with a positive test, so I think this will 399 00:21:14,359 --> 00:21:20,720 Speaker 1: really like. I have given this test to many people, 400 00:21:21,160 --> 00:21:24,560 Speaker 1: ranging from middle school students to members of the Ivy 401 00:21:24,640 --> 00:21:29,120 Speaker 1: League corporation, and almost nobody gets it right. And in fact, 402 00:21:29,160 --> 00:21:31,040 Speaker 1: when you get this to doctors, they also mostly don't 403 00:21:31,040 --> 00:21:33,520 Speaker 1: get it right. I guess you're an exception, and a 404 00:21:33,560 --> 00:21:36,320 Speaker 1: lot of people have the instinct it's like ninety five percent. 405 00:21:38,119 --> 00:21:41,000 Speaker 1: The reason that I say this is that one of 406 00:21:41,040 --> 00:21:44,320 Speaker 1: the most significant issues with this kind of full body 407 00:21:44,359 --> 00:21:48,400 Speaker 1: scan and by the way, with any kind of scanning 408 00:21:49,520 --> 00:21:54,119 Speaker 1: for conditions, is that many of these conditions are pretty 409 00:21:54,200 --> 00:21:58,840 Speaker 1: rare and false positives are pretty calm. So when you 410 00:21:58,880 --> 00:22:01,200 Speaker 1: go to scan people for something like breast cancer, even 411 00:22:01,200 --> 00:22:04,080 Speaker 1: with the standard mammogram, there's a lot of false positives, 412 00:22:04,080 --> 00:22:07,320 Speaker 1: a lot of incidental findings, a lot of just we 413 00:22:07,400 --> 00:22:09,200 Speaker 1: saw something on the mammogram and then when we went 414 00:22:09,240 --> 00:22:11,720 Speaker 1: more into it, it it wasn't. It wasn't in there. 415 00:22:12,200 --> 00:22:14,480 Speaker 1: And that's important for two reasons. One is that if 416 00:22:14,480 --> 00:22:16,760 Speaker 1: you do more of this scanning, you're just going to 417 00:22:16,840 --> 00:22:19,200 Speaker 1: have more of these false positives. Now you'll have more 418 00:22:19,240 --> 00:22:22,199 Speaker 1: true positives also, but you will end up with a 419 00:22:22,240 --> 00:22:28,080 Speaker 1: lot of people either very anxious or just having a 420 00:22:28,080 --> 00:22:31,760 Speaker 1: lot of additional testing that they didn't necessarily need. And 421 00:22:31,840 --> 00:22:34,280 Speaker 1: when we think about these tests, we want to weigh 422 00:22:34,359 --> 00:22:38,080 Speaker 1: those things. And full body scans are an extreme form 423 00:22:38,680 --> 00:22:40,800 Speaker 1: of a problem that is already there with any kind 424 00:22:40,800 --> 00:22:43,239 Speaker 1: of scanning. So we already think about this problem with 425 00:22:43,320 --> 00:22:45,840 Speaker 1: breast cancer screening or colonas could be, or prostive cancer 426 00:22:45,880 --> 00:22:49,399 Speaker 1: screening or whatever. That's already an issue. If you're now 427 00:22:49,520 --> 00:22:53,239 Speaker 1: scanning somebody's entire body and you'll picking up every you know, 428 00:22:53,320 --> 00:22:57,440 Speaker 1: weird rando thing in their elbow, you're gonna have this 429 00:22:57,520 --> 00:22:58,960 Speaker 1: problem even more extreme. 430 00:22:59,520 --> 00:23:03,359 Speaker 2: So this is this is so important, but it's also 431 00:23:03,400 --> 00:23:05,760 Speaker 2: going to play into the central tension that I have 432 00:23:06,119 --> 00:23:11,080 Speaker 2: with these scans, and we'll get there, But broadly speaking, 433 00:23:11,840 --> 00:23:13,520 Speaker 2: there's always going to be this thing that like, we 434 00:23:13,520 --> 00:23:16,120 Speaker 2: can look objectively at the numbers on a population level 435 00:23:16,119 --> 00:23:18,000 Speaker 2: and be like, okay, yeah, you know, there's a lot 436 00:23:18,000 --> 00:23:19,920 Speaker 2: of false positives and people are going to be chasing 437 00:23:19,920 --> 00:23:23,160 Speaker 2: this down and seeing the doctor and stuff. But there 438 00:23:23,200 --> 00:23:25,320 Speaker 2: is that one guy, what if it was you, There's 439 00:23:25,320 --> 00:23:27,480 Speaker 2: that one guy you said who actually had that rare 440 00:23:27,520 --> 00:23:33,600 Speaker 2: disease that we caught, and there is clearly some value 441 00:23:33,840 --> 00:23:37,120 Speaker 2: in catching that one guy. But the question is sort 442 00:23:37,119 --> 00:23:41,360 Speaker 2: of how many false positives is worth the true positive? 443 00:23:41,400 --> 00:23:44,480 Speaker 2: And this is where I like get stuck on full 444 00:23:44,480 --> 00:23:45,000 Speaker 2: body scans. 445 00:23:45,080 --> 00:23:46,960 Speaker 1: And I think that's a part of the reason it's 446 00:23:46,960 --> 00:23:51,560 Speaker 1: a very complicated question is that it's probably different if 447 00:23:51,560 --> 00:23:55,240 Speaker 1: we think about what the individual incentive is versus the 448 00:23:55,640 --> 00:23:59,560 Speaker 1: kind of health system incentive. So when we make decisions about, 449 00:23:59,600 --> 00:24:03,200 Speaker 1: you know, who should we recommend a mammography for, we're 450 00:24:03,200 --> 00:24:06,320 Speaker 1: making decisions based on trading off false positives and true 451 00:24:06,359 --> 00:24:11,359 Speaker 1: positives from a kind of like population cost perspective, which 452 00:24:11,480 --> 00:24:14,399 Speaker 1: may be the right frame for some decisions, but maybe 453 00:24:14,440 --> 00:24:16,720 Speaker 1: different from you as an individual, And what do you 454 00:24:16,840 --> 00:24:19,080 Speaker 1: you know, what what is sort of your risk tolerance 455 00:24:19,080 --> 00:24:21,000 Speaker 1: and what is your demand? And I will tell you 456 00:24:21,040 --> 00:24:27,600 Speaker 1: from a personal level. When my mom was diagnosed with 457 00:24:27,720 --> 00:24:30,320 Speaker 1: lung cancer, it was an it was an incidental finding 458 00:24:30,440 --> 00:24:33,879 Speaker 1: on a CT scan that was being done for some 459 00:24:34,000 --> 00:24:36,280 Speaker 1: other reason. She had vertigo, They thought she might have 460 00:24:36,320 --> 00:24:39,399 Speaker 1: a stroke. It turned out they found lung cancer. She 461 00:24:39,640 --> 00:24:41,680 Speaker 1: was in a risk group because she was a former 462 00:24:41,720 --> 00:24:47,000 Speaker 1: smoker who like could have been going for yearly CT scans. 463 00:24:47,560 --> 00:24:50,119 Speaker 1: And there's a lot of debate about exactly who should 464 00:24:50,160 --> 00:24:52,919 Speaker 1: be doing those, and I think all the time, like 465 00:24:53,040 --> 00:24:56,080 Speaker 1: boy ex post, I really wish that she had she 466 00:24:56,200 --> 00:24:58,360 Speaker 1: had been doing that, even if it you know, from 467 00:24:58,400 --> 00:25:01,640 Speaker 1: a kind of population standpoint, maybe that isn't that isn't 468 00:25:01,640 --> 00:25:04,760 Speaker 1: the right thing. So for me, that really crystallizes this 469 00:25:05,080 --> 00:25:08,200 Speaker 1: trade off between yeah, what about the one that you missed? 470 00:25:08,640 --> 00:25:12,280 Speaker 2: Yeah, one hundred percent. So there are a couple of 471 00:25:12,320 --> 00:25:15,240 Speaker 2: concepts that I want people to be aware of. You've 472 00:25:15,480 --> 00:25:19,320 Speaker 2: hit on one, which is the false positive thing. In medicine, 473 00:25:19,320 --> 00:25:21,040 Speaker 2: we call these incidental omas. 474 00:25:21,520 --> 00:25:23,560 Speaker 1: So I just give things regular names. 475 00:25:23,760 --> 00:25:26,600 Speaker 2: I could, you know, because we like to have jargons. 476 00:25:26,600 --> 00:25:34,120 Speaker 10: So that OSMA, this was originally named after these things 477 00:25:34,160 --> 00:25:36,280 Speaker 10: you see on adrenal glands when you get a cat 478 00:25:36,359 --> 00:25:37,080 Speaker 10: scan of the abdomen. 479 00:25:37,160 --> 00:25:38,960 Speaker 2: So we give people cat skins of the abdomen for 480 00:25:39,119 --> 00:25:41,600 Speaker 2: you know everything, right, you come in with abdominal pain 481 00:25:41,640 --> 00:25:42,959 Speaker 2: to the E D whatever, You're getting a cats scan 482 00:25:43,000 --> 00:25:46,320 Speaker 2: your abdue pelvis, and then you know, not infrequently you 483 00:25:46,359 --> 00:25:49,280 Speaker 2: see these little spots on an adrenal gland. We typically 484 00:25:49,320 --> 00:25:52,679 Speaker 2: refer to them as incidental omas. They were found incidentally. 485 00:25:52,680 --> 00:25:56,760 Speaker 2: You weren't looking for them, but they tend to necessitate 486 00:25:56,840 --> 00:25:59,880 Speaker 2: at least some further work up and and and down 487 00:26:00,080 --> 00:26:02,960 Speaker 2: stream stuff, and that can happen anywhere in the body. 488 00:26:03,600 --> 00:26:08,000 Speaker 2: Incidental omas are things that turn out to be nothing. 489 00:26:08,320 --> 00:26:11,600 Speaker 2: So you find them and then you've got to do 490 00:26:11,680 --> 00:26:14,960 Speaker 2: something about it, But then it turns out it didn't matter, right, 491 00:26:15,080 --> 00:26:17,119 Speaker 2: Like you buy up see that thing on your adrenal 492 00:26:17,240 --> 00:26:19,960 Speaker 2: land and it was a benign It was a benign growth. 493 00:26:19,960 --> 00:26:23,160 Speaker 2: It would never have hurt you. It's an incidental oma. 494 00:26:23,800 --> 00:26:26,320 Speaker 2: There's a related concept which people have a little more 495 00:26:26,320 --> 00:26:29,960 Speaker 2: trouble with called over diagnosis, which is when you diagnose 496 00:26:30,040 --> 00:26:33,920 Speaker 2: something that really is bad, like a cancer or something 497 00:26:34,000 --> 00:26:37,680 Speaker 2: like that, but it turns out that had you not 498 00:26:37,800 --> 00:26:40,920 Speaker 2: diagnosed it, it probably wouldn't have hurt you at all, 499 00:26:41,080 --> 00:26:43,680 Speaker 2: because you were going to die of something else before 500 00:26:44,000 --> 00:26:47,840 Speaker 2: this got to you at all. So overdiagnosis is sort 501 00:26:47,840 --> 00:26:51,000 Speaker 2: of a different thing from an incidental oma or a 502 00:26:51,040 --> 00:26:54,040 Speaker 2: false positive. To give you a sense. It's hard to 503 00:26:54,040 --> 00:26:56,560 Speaker 2: get it like some of this stuff, but there are 504 00:26:56,640 --> 00:27:00,359 Speaker 2: autopsy studies where we'll look at people who died something 505 00:27:00,359 --> 00:27:02,639 Speaker 2: else and ask a question, for example of like, okay, 506 00:27:02,920 --> 00:27:05,760 Speaker 2: you died of not a cancer related problem. We do 507 00:27:05,800 --> 00:27:08,840 Speaker 2: an autopsy, how often do we find cancer? And the 508 00:27:08,880 --> 00:27:13,399 Speaker 2: answer is pretty often, Yeah, five percent of the time. 509 00:27:13,640 --> 00:27:17,240 Speaker 2: There's a nice study of eight hundred thousand non cancer 510 00:27:17,320 --> 00:27:21,040 Speaker 2: autopsies in Japan where the overall cancer rate was four 511 00:27:21,040 --> 00:27:22,920 Speaker 2: point two percent. I will say it's a little higher 512 00:27:22,920 --> 00:27:25,560 Speaker 2: in recent years now it's like up to seven percent overall. 513 00:27:25,600 --> 00:27:27,640 Speaker 2: And then of course the older the person was when 514 00:27:27,640 --> 00:27:30,800 Speaker 2: they died, the higher the chance of finding an incidental 515 00:27:30,800 --> 00:27:33,679 Speaker 2: cancer was. This isn't a false positive, like had you 516 00:27:33,760 --> 00:27:36,800 Speaker 2: found that while they were alive and biopsied it, it 517 00:27:36,840 --> 00:27:39,440 Speaker 2: would have come back cancer. They would have gotten cancer treatment, 518 00:27:39,840 --> 00:27:42,639 Speaker 2: but they didn't die of that, so all of that 519 00:27:42,680 --> 00:27:46,800 Speaker 2: treatment was theoretically over diagnosis. So that's the second major concept. 520 00:27:47,520 --> 00:27:49,000 Speaker 1: Yeah, and I think this is I mean, this is 521 00:27:49,000 --> 00:27:51,679 Speaker 1: where you know, for men in particular, a lot of 522 00:27:51,720 --> 00:27:54,399 Speaker 1: men get prostate cancer before they're dead, and at some 523 00:27:54,480 --> 00:27:58,080 Speaker 1: point we almost everyone, almost everybody agains, and at some 524 00:27:58,160 --> 00:28:01,240 Speaker 1: point it makes sense to just stop greening for prostate cancer, 525 00:28:01,240 --> 00:28:03,880 Speaker 1: because if you're ninety three years old and we find 526 00:28:03,880 --> 00:28:07,680 Speaker 1: out you have prosta cancer, it's fine, like something else 527 00:28:07,760 --> 00:28:09,720 Speaker 1: is going to take you before the prostate cancer. For 528 00:28:09,760 --> 00:28:12,639 Speaker 1: almost everybody, and so that is that is in a 529 00:28:12,720 --> 00:28:15,399 Speaker 1: space of overdiagnosis. Again, it's not that it's it's not 530 00:28:15,440 --> 00:28:18,760 Speaker 1: that it's not cancer. It's just not we care about 531 00:28:18,840 --> 00:28:21,160 Speaker 1: the death, not the specific cause of death. 532 00:28:21,280 --> 00:28:23,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, so this brings me back to Kim. 533 00:28:23,760 --> 00:28:27,159 Speaker 1: Ki, Kim k Kim k what's to stay up to? 534 00:28:27,600 --> 00:28:30,960 Speaker 2: So, so what Kim Kardashian told the world, I mean, 535 00:28:31,000 --> 00:28:33,240 Speaker 2: we don't have her report, her Pernuva report, but what 536 00:28:33,280 --> 00:28:36,600 Speaker 2: she what she said publicly is that they found a 537 00:28:36,680 --> 00:28:39,760 Speaker 2: little or small aneurism in her brain, as well as 538 00:28:39,760 --> 00:28:44,440 Speaker 2: some uterine fibroids. She said that, you know, after that 539 00:28:44,520 --> 00:28:46,360 Speaker 2: Pernuva found the little aneurism in her brain, she went 540 00:28:46,360 --> 00:28:49,320 Speaker 2: to see her SINAI. She got quote tons of brain scans, 541 00:28:49,720 --> 00:28:52,440 Speaker 2: met with a bunch of neurosurgeons, et cetera, et cetera, 542 00:28:53,320 --> 00:28:57,280 Speaker 2: and decided to do nothing. It was small enough that 543 00:28:57,320 --> 00:29:00,640 Speaker 2: they decided to do this thing called watchful waiting. That's 544 00:29:00,760 --> 00:29:05,000 Speaker 2: probably the right choice talking about overdiagnosis of aneurysms. If 545 00:29:05,040 --> 00:29:07,680 Speaker 2: you look at the rate of brain incidental brain aneurysms 546 00:29:07,720 --> 00:29:09,840 Speaker 2: at autopsy. Okay, so you take people who did not 547 00:29:09,920 --> 00:29:12,120 Speaker 2: die of a brain aneurism, but you look at their 548 00:29:12,160 --> 00:29:16,120 Speaker 2: brain after they died. Two to six percent have an 549 00:29:16,080 --> 00:29:19,120 Speaker 2: aneurysm in there, so they are there and a lot 550 00:29:19,160 --> 00:29:24,640 Speaker 2: of them don't rupture. And Kim Kardashian's surgeons looked at 551 00:29:24,640 --> 00:29:26,840 Speaker 2: the size and said, well, this is something we can 552 00:29:26,920 --> 00:29:29,840 Speaker 2: keep an eye on. Now. She build this as like 553 00:29:30,640 --> 00:29:34,240 Speaker 2: a life saving thing, like she has talked about this 554 00:29:34,480 --> 00:29:37,240 Speaker 2: as she is so thankful to know about this. She's 555 00:29:37,280 --> 00:29:40,080 Speaker 2: reducing the stress in her life to know potentially reduce 556 00:29:40,080 --> 00:29:42,000 Speaker 2: the risk of this aneurysm bursting. 557 00:29:42,440 --> 00:29:46,720 Speaker 1: I would find this so awful, Like I mean, I 558 00:29:46,880 --> 00:29:49,240 Speaker 1: feel like, at least for some people, and I would 559 00:29:49,240 --> 00:29:53,080 Speaker 1: put myself in this camp. The idea that I have 560 00:29:53,160 --> 00:29:56,840 Speaker 1: this aneurism but I'm doing nothing about it is so 561 00:29:57,000 --> 00:30:00,320 Speaker 1: much worse than not knowing, because in every time you 562 00:30:00,360 --> 00:30:02,480 Speaker 1: have a headache, you're like, oh my God, is in miamirism? 563 00:30:02,840 --> 00:30:02,959 Speaker 3: Right? 564 00:30:03,360 --> 00:30:05,640 Speaker 1: And this is a big part of this is people 565 00:30:05,920 --> 00:30:10,920 Speaker 1: just being anxious about what might happen because the information 566 00:30:11,080 --> 00:30:14,200 Speaker 1: is because we're not robots and we can't like just 567 00:30:14,240 --> 00:30:15,800 Speaker 1: pretending information is not there. 568 00:30:15,920 --> 00:30:19,440 Speaker 2: And I don't know, yeah, and so much of what 569 00:30:19,640 --> 00:30:22,400 Speaker 2: I see when and it's mostly doctors online who are 570 00:30:22,400 --> 00:30:24,920 Speaker 2: pushing back against full body skins. It's mostly like people 571 00:30:25,040 --> 00:30:28,320 Speaker 2: my profession that's like, guy's careful, false positive and all 572 00:30:28,320 --> 00:30:30,360 Speaker 2: this kind of thing. And then there's a lot of 573 00:30:30,400 --> 00:30:34,360 Speaker 2: sort of wellness tech people who are like, no, no, no, 574 00:30:34,560 --> 00:30:37,000 Speaker 2: you know, more information is better. I want to find 575 00:30:37,000 --> 00:30:39,959 Speaker 2: the thing before it becomes a problem. And hey, I 576 00:30:40,000 --> 00:30:42,040 Speaker 2: know there's you know, I know there's false positive. I 577 00:30:42,080 --> 00:30:45,600 Speaker 2: know there's over diagnosis. We'll figure that out over time, 578 00:30:45,680 --> 00:30:48,840 Speaker 2: we'll like learn how better to manage these things. And 579 00:30:49,120 --> 00:30:51,560 Speaker 2: that's the step where I'm like, you know, this is 580 00:30:51,560 --> 00:30:53,480 Speaker 2: going to require if you really want to deal with 581 00:30:53,560 --> 00:30:56,520 Speaker 2: a false positive issue, a lot of people to have 582 00:30:56,600 --> 00:30:59,760 Speaker 2: a spot on their liver, yeah, and to be like, well, 583 00:31:00,360 --> 00:31:03,160 Speaker 2: there's a one percent chance it's cancer or maybe a 584 00:31:03,200 --> 00:31:05,120 Speaker 2: three per Let's say there's a five percent chance it's cancer. 585 00:31:05,160 --> 00:31:07,440 Speaker 2: There's a ninety five percent chance it's not. I'm not 586 00:31:07,480 --> 00:31:09,880 Speaker 2: going to do anything because like, chances are it's fine. 587 00:31:10,320 --> 00:31:12,120 Speaker 2: There's some people who can handle that. There are a 588 00:31:12,120 --> 00:31:14,920 Speaker 2: lot of people who can't. Right, Like, the whole reason 589 00:31:14,960 --> 00:31:16,640 Speaker 2: they did the scan was to find the spot on 590 00:31:16,640 --> 00:31:18,000 Speaker 2: the liver. Now it needs a biopsy. 591 00:31:18,320 --> 00:31:21,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, And I think we see this in you know, 592 00:31:21,600 --> 00:31:24,840 Speaker 1: in outside of the full body scan space in you know, 593 00:31:25,000 --> 00:31:29,040 Speaker 1: in in mimography. So our mamogram approtion mamorrams gotten better 594 00:31:29,080 --> 00:31:32,040 Speaker 1: over time. We're doing more mammograms broadly, that's very good. 595 00:31:32,080 --> 00:31:34,959 Speaker 1: It means we're catching cancers earlier. But there's actually a 596 00:31:35,120 --> 00:31:37,720 Speaker 1: fairly large or at least some set of kind of 597 00:31:37,720 --> 00:31:40,920 Speaker 1: stage zero cancers for which it may be based on 598 00:31:40,960 --> 00:31:42,400 Speaker 1: the age of the person or what it looks like, 599 00:31:42,480 --> 00:31:46,280 Speaker 1: you just shouldn't do anything. And we are almost always 600 00:31:46,280 --> 00:31:48,960 Speaker 1: doing things. So typically people will be given the choice, 601 00:31:48,960 --> 00:31:50,880 Speaker 1: you know, we could do watchful waiting or we could 602 00:31:51,120 --> 00:31:53,400 Speaker 1: do stuff. And people want to do stuff once they 603 00:31:53,440 --> 00:31:56,960 Speaker 1: say you have you know, ductal blah blah blah with 604 00:31:57,000 --> 00:32:00,240 Speaker 1: the word car sonoma on it, you're doing stuff, And 605 00:32:00,360 --> 00:32:05,080 Speaker 1: that is maybe a good idea, but it does it 606 00:32:05,120 --> 00:32:07,680 Speaker 1: does have trade offs. I think it's just not it's 607 00:32:07,760 --> 00:32:10,440 Speaker 1: not free for you or for money. I mean, it's 608 00:32:10,480 --> 00:32:12,240 Speaker 1: not free in terms of money, but it's not free 609 00:32:12,280 --> 00:32:14,000 Speaker 1: in terms of your emotional state either. 610 00:32:14,800 --> 00:32:18,080 Speaker 2: Yeah. I want to walk through the sort of third 611 00:32:18,200 --> 00:32:22,400 Speaker 2: large concept which we've we've tested on here, which is 612 00:32:22,480 --> 00:32:23,960 Speaker 2: called care cascades. 613 00:32:24,360 --> 00:32:26,080 Speaker 1: Can I say before we get to that, can I 614 00:32:26,120 --> 00:32:29,160 Speaker 1: can I say, sort of something else that happens in here. 615 00:32:29,160 --> 00:32:32,600 Speaker 1: That where I think this intersects with some of the 616 00:32:32,640 --> 00:32:35,880 Speaker 1: way we're doing medicine these days, which is it is 617 00:32:36,000 --> 00:32:39,360 Speaker 1: much more common for people to do like a share 618 00:32:39,400 --> 00:32:42,160 Speaker 1: what do we call shared decision making, and shared decision 619 00:32:42,200 --> 00:32:44,520 Speaker 1: making is great because it puts the patient in the 620 00:32:44,600 --> 00:32:47,200 Speaker 1: driver's seat at some of the time, and we generally 621 00:32:47,280 --> 00:32:50,360 Speaker 1: don't want the kind of nineteen fifties doctor where it 622 00:32:50,400 --> 00:32:52,160 Speaker 1: was like he says there and smokes a cigarette and 623 00:32:52,200 --> 00:32:55,080 Speaker 1: tells you you know what to do, like we've moved away, 624 00:32:55,120 --> 00:32:57,640 Speaker 1: and that's yeah, that's probably for the best, especially with 625 00:32:57,920 --> 00:32:58,200 Speaker 1: we're not. 626 00:32:58,200 --> 00:33:01,280 Speaker 2: Going to tell your wife she has cancer just well. 627 00:33:01,360 --> 00:33:05,719 Speaker 1: It'll just make her sad. But the idea that the 628 00:33:05,760 --> 00:33:08,200 Speaker 1: patient should be in the driver's seat around some of 629 00:33:08,240 --> 00:33:13,240 Speaker 1: these decisions is very stressful for people, and I somehow 630 00:33:13,280 --> 00:33:15,360 Speaker 1: it comes up more in these cases where we're just 631 00:33:15,400 --> 00:33:19,880 Speaker 1: not sure what to do, and that piece of it 632 00:33:19,920 --> 00:33:23,160 Speaker 1: feels like, I'm not I'm not sure there's a good 633 00:33:23,160 --> 00:33:25,240 Speaker 1: solution to it, but I think it's yet another piece 634 00:33:25,280 --> 00:33:26,320 Speaker 1: adding to this anxiety. 635 00:33:26,640 --> 00:33:29,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, it varies obviously based on the patient. Some patients 636 00:33:29,680 --> 00:33:31,200 Speaker 2: very much want to be told what to do. It's 637 00:33:31,240 --> 00:33:33,360 Speaker 2: my experience, and they'll phrase that in different ways, but 638 00:33:33,400 --> 00:33:35,640 Speaker 2: often it comes to me as like, Okay, if I 639 00:33:35,680 --> 00:33:37,480 Speaker 2: were your brother or if I were your father, what 640 00:33:37,520 --> 00:33:39,840 Speaker 2: would you tell me to do here? Which is always 641 00:33:39,880 --> 00:33:41,720 Speaker 2: a hard question for me. I'm like, no, I would 642 00:33:41,720 --> 00:33:46,080 Speaker 2: never tell my own family because I'm completely completely biased. 643 00:33:46,600 --> 00:33:49,400 Speaker 2: And then some yeah, some have very strong opinions. And 644 00:33:49,440 --> 00:33:52,440 Speaker 2: then I mean, just to say it as doctor like, 645 00:33:52,560 --> 00:33:56,560 Speaker 2: there are medical legal implications of this stuff, right, someone 646 00:33:56,560 --> 00:33:58,959 Speaker 2: comes to me after a full body scan and says, 647 00:33:59,320 --> 00:34:04,080 Speaker 2: you know, hey, they found this thing on my you know, 648 00:34:04,600 --> 00:34:07,880 Speaker 2: on my kidney. It's ambiguous what it is. Could be cancer, 649 00:34:08,320 --> 00:34:10,520 Speaker 2: might not be. What do you think I should do? 650 00:34:10,680 --> 00:34:12,560 Speaker 2: There's definitely a part of my brain that's like, well, 651 00:34:12,760 --> 00:34:16,359 Speaker 2: you know, if I don't work this up, if I'm 652 00:34:16,400 --> 00:34:18,879 Speaker 2: like it is cancer, what if it is cancer five 653 00:34:18,960 --> 00:34:22,120 Speaker 2: years from now? And and you know, so that's just 654 00:34:22,200 --> 00:34:25,640 Speaker 2: sort of the way we're structured. It's much safer for me, 655 00:34:25,840 --> 00:34:27,480 Speaker 2: in a cover your ass kind of sense, to be like, 656 00:34:27,520 --> 00:34:30,160 Speaker 2: all right, well, let's get you a dedicated scan of that, 657 00:34:30,280 --> 00:34:32,000 Speaker 2: let's get a biopsy of that, and so on and 658 00:34:32,000 --> 00:34:35,040 Speaker 2: so forth, And that is what happens. So a lot 659 00:34:35,080 --> 00:34:37,359 Speaker 2: of these arguments that's like, oh, guys, we just it's 660 00:34:37,400 --> 00:34:39,879 Speaker 2: not the scans that are the problem, it's the psychology 661 00:34:39,880 --> 00:34:41,600 Speaker 2: around them, and we have to get better at dealing 662 00:34:41,640 --> 00:34:44,880 Speaker 2: with ambiguity. Is a nice theory, but we're just not 663 00:34:45,000 --> 00:34:45,640 Speaker 2: very good at it. 664 00:34:45,760 --> 00:34:47,520 Speaker 1: No, we're just not. It's a nice theory, but not 665 00:34:47,960 --> 00:34:48,920 Speaker 1: very realistic. 666 00:34:49,200 --> 00:34:53,560 Speaker 2: Yeah, all right. A guy walked into a routine physical 667 00:34:53,880 --> 00:34:57,440 Speaker 2: feeling completely fine. He walked out ten units of blood 668 00:34:57,480 --> 00:35:00,520 Speaker 2: and fifty thousand dollars later, and he never acts had 669 00:35:00,600 --> 00:35:02,640 Speaker 2: anything wrong with him. 670 00:35:03,239 --> 00:35:05,720 Speaker 1: This is great, not great. 671 00:35:06,320 --> 00:35:10,920 Speaker 2: This is such a great piece of writing from Michael Rothberg, 672 00:35:11,320 --> 00:35:14,319 Speaker 2: who is writing in jama about the true experience of 673 00:35:14,360 --> 00:35:22,040 Speaker 2: his father and how medicine obligates subsequent testing. So let 674 00:35:22,080 --> 00:35:23,640 Speaker 2: me tell you what happened to this person and get 675 00:35:23,640 --> 00:35:26,719 Speaker 2: your opinion. Okay, this older guy comes in, gets his 676 00:35:26,880 --> 00:35:30,319 Speaker 2: routine physical. His doctor does a physical exam, listens to 677 00:35:30,360 --> 00:35:33,239 Speaker 2: his heart, pushes on his belly, feels his a orda 678 00:35:33,440 --> 00:35:36,320 Speaker 2: an aortic exam. You've kind of pushed down the belly, 679 00:35:36,840 --> 00:35:39,080 Speaker 2: feel the pulse. The doctor thinks the order is a 680 00:35:39,080 --> 00:35:42,319 Speaker 2: little bit big. Maybe there's an aneurysm there, but there's 681 00:35:42,360 --> 00:35:44,799 Speaker 2: an appropriate test for that, that's an abdominal ultrasound. So 682 00:35:44,800 --> 00:35:47,360 Speaker 2: he sends him for an abdominal ultrasound. Turns out the 683 00:35:47,360 --> 00:35:50,120 Speaker 2: A order is normal, but during that ultrasound they see 684 00:35:50,120 --> 00:35:53,200 Speaker 2: something in the head of the pancreas. That's an incidental finding. 685 00:35:53,280 --> 00:35:54,759 Speaker 2: All right, Well, now there's something in the head of 686 00:35:54,760 --> 00:35:57,400 Speaker 2: the pancreas. So the next step is, of course to 687 00:35:57,400 --> 00:36:00,520 Speaker 2: get a CT scan. Well, good news. The T scans 688 00:36:00,560 --> 00:36:02,960 Speaker 2: showed the pancreas was normal, but there was a solitary 689 00:36:03,040 --> 00:36:06,960 Speaker 2: lesion on his liver. Okay, that needs to be biopsied, 690 00:36:07,040 --> 00:36:10,680 Speaker 2: so he gets a liver biopsy. It's not liver cancer, 691 00:36:11,040 --> 00:36:13,839 Speaker 2: that's good news, but it was a hamangioma, which led 692 00:36:13,960 --> 00:36:18,520 Speaker 2: to a huge bleed requiring a ten unit's blood transfusion 693 00:36:18,920 --> 00:36:23,880 Speaker 2: and an inpatient stay that cost fifty thousand dollars. Every 694 00:36:24,320 --> 00:36:29,399 Speaker 2: step of this care was appropriate. There was no malpractice here. 695 00:36:29,800 --> 00:36:32,680 Speaker 2: This is all exactly what you do. The only exception 696 00:36:33,000 --> 00:36:37,120 Speaker 2: actually is that initial physical exam palpating the A order. 697 00:36:37,200 --> 00:36:40,000 Speaker 2: There's no evidence that we're good enough at our physical 698 00:36:40,080 --> 00:36:42,960 Speaker 2: exam to tell if someone's order is dilated or not. 699 00:36:43,280 --> 00:36:46,759 Speaker 2: But like if your doctor does that, right, you're sort like, oh, 700 00:36:46,760 --> 00:36:48,279 Speaker 2: this is a good I mean, this is their job 701 00:36:48,280 --> 00:36:52,160 Speaker 2: they do, They're doing stuff. Listen. This is a care cascade, 702 00:36:52,200 --> 00:36:56,400 Speaker 2: albeit obviously one that's very dramatic. But I love this 703 00:36:56,480 --> 00:37:00,120 Speaker 2: story because it illustrates how like these aren't bad decisions. 704 00:37:00,160 --> 00:37:02,920 Speaker 2: Every step of this way was the answer to the 705 00:37:02,920 --> 00:37:05,080 Speaker 2: board question, like what do you do if you see 706 00:37:05,120 --> 00:37:06,879 Speaker 2: a mass in the head of the pancreas you get 707 00:37:06,880 --> 00:37:10,440 Speaker 2: a dedicated CT scan, Like that is all correct, but 708 00:37:10,520 --> 00:37:14,279 Speaker 2: it all started from a screening test. In this case, 709 00:37:14,280 --> 00:37:16,120 Speaker 2: it was a physical exam, not a full body scan. 710 00:37:17,840 --> 00:37:22,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, ah, that's obviously a very extreme story, 711 00:37:22,239 --> 00:37:27,320 Speaker 1: but I do think it is even in the Instagram 712 00:37:27,400 --> 00:37:29,200 Speaker 1: versions of this, it is what we're seeing from a 713 00:37:29,239 --> 00:37:31,799 Speaker 1: lot of people who have these sands. Do you see this? 714 00:37:31,880 --> 00:37:35,120 Speaker 1: You see this? You see you know this? Your liver 715 00:37:35,280 --> 00:37:37,520 Speaker 1: is too big? At least one person I know has 716 00:37:37,520 --> 00:37:39,799 Speaker 1: had these, Like they were like just like your liver 717 00:37:39,920 --> 00:37:41,960 Speaker 1: is enormous, Like you have an enormous liver, And it 718 00:37:42,000 --> 00:37:43,759 Speaker 1: led to all this stuff and it's turned out like 719 00:37:43,760 --> 00:37:45,480 Speaker 1: this person just had kind of a big liver, like 720 00:37:45,520 --> 00:37:51,799 Speaker 1: sometimes sometimes you have that, and so we're over diagnosing, 721 00:37:51,840 --> 00:37:55,600 Speaker 1: we're care caskating, we're just But again, it's not that 722 00:37:55,680 --> 00:37:58,040 Speaker 1: the decisions were wrong, And I think that's that's the 723 00:37:58,120 --> 00:38:00,000 Speaker 1: question is where do you stop the decisions? I think 724 00:38:00,040 --> 00:38:02,359 Speaker 1: that's what's such a hard piece of this is which 725 00:38:02,400 --> 00:38:04,560 Speaker 1: of these things do you not want to do? Which 726 00:38:04,600 --> 00:38:07,319 Speaker 1: piece of information do you want to just stop? And 727 00:38:07,360 --> 00:38:08,960 Speaker 1: then we're attempted to say, well, you know what, I 728 00:38:09,040 --> 00:38:11,719 Speaker 1: just shouldn't have gotten the information in the first place, 729 00:38:11,760 --> 00:38:13,799 Speaker 1: and then we wouldn't have been wouldn't have had all 730 00:38:13,800 --> 00:38:15,480 Speaker 1: these other problems. But then what have you missed the 731 00:38:15,480 --> 00:38:17,200 Speaker 1: one guy? That's why this is hard. 732 00:38:17,600 --> 00:38:20,720 Speaker 2: That's all right. So we've got the big concepts people, 733 00:38:20,840 --> 00:38:23,760 Speaker 2: all right, everyone understands now we have a visceral feeling 734 00:38:23,880 --> 00:38:27,400 Speaker 2: about about what the conceptually, what the issues are. I 735 00:38:27,400 --> 00:38:28,960 Speaker 2: think we need to talk about the data. 736 00:38:29,120 --> 00:38:38,320 Speaker 1: Yes, what happens when this actually occurs? I don't know. Okay, 737 00:38:38,400 --> 00:38:43,279 Speaker 1: So yeah, So let's say a thousand people get a 738 00:38:43,280 --> 00:38:47,400 Speaker 1: full body scan. Seventy of them, just seventy are going 739 00:38:47,440 --> 00:38:50,480 Speaker 1: to get totally normal results, nine hundred and thirty will 740 00:38:50,520 --> 00:38:54,279 Speaker 1: have something abnormal. Three hundred of them we'll need some 741 00:38:54,480 --> 00:38:57,319 Speaker 1: specific follow up twenty two will have cancer. Five will 742 00:38:57,360 --> 00:39:01,359 Speaker 1: have cancer that the scan missed. Anyway, that is a 743 00:39:01,400 --> 00:39:04,600 Speaker 1: broad summary of the data from these full body scans. 744 00:39:05,760 --> 00:39:08,320 Speaker 1: How do we feel about that? Doesn't seem amazing? 745 00:39:09,120 --> 00:39:12,719 Speaker 2: This crystallizes everything we've been saying to me. All right, 746 00:39:12,719 --> 00:39:13,920 Speaker 2: first of all, if you're going to get one of 747 00:39:13,920 --> 00:39:16,200 Speaker 2: these scans. This, by the way, this data comes from 748 00:39:16,239 --> 00:39:21,040 Speaker 2: the Polaris study, which is a Perneuvo funded study. This 749 00:39:21,760 --> 00:39:24,959 Speaker 2: it's still recruiting, but this was their initial read. So, yeah, 750 00:39:25,000 --> 00:39:26,520 Speaker 2: you get one of these scans, there's a ninety three 751 00:39:26,520 --> 00:39:28,560 Speaker 2: percent chance they'll find something abnormal. Like if you think 752 00:39:28,600 --> 00:39:30,399 Speaker 2: you're going to go and get a clean bill of health, 753 00:39:30,440 --> 00:39:30,680 Speaker 2: you're not. 754 00:39:30,880 --> 00:39:33,520 Speaker 1: You're not. No, But and I think that's good. That's 755 00:39:33,560 --> 00:39:35,759 Speaker 1: good for people to know coming into this, right, you know, 756 00:39:35,920 --> 00:39:37,879 Speaker 1: like if you go for one of these, like they're 757 00:39:37,880 --> 00:39:40,319 Speaker 1: finding something, right, This is like this is actually what 758 00:39:40,360 --> 00:39:42,200 Speaker 1: my doctor told me the first time I had an mammorgram. 759 00:39:42,239 --> 00:39:44,399 Speaker 1: She was like, they always find something. It's probably fun. 760 00:39:45,640 --> 00:39:49,280 Speaker 2: Yeah. The next question, of course, is is it actionable? 761 00:39:49,360 --> 00:39:49,520 Speaker 8: Right? 762 00:39:49,600 --> 00:39:52,960 Speaker 2: Like, Like you know, people have found for example, modest 763 00:39:53,040 --> 00:39:56,240 Speaker 2: slip discs or something like that, and for some people 764 00:39:56,239 --> 00:39:59,240 Speaker 2: that's useful, like, oh that's why I have backpain. Okay, great, 765 00:39:59,280 --> 00:40:01,359 Speaker 2: there's nothing to be on about it, or maybe get 766 00:40:01,360 --> 00:40:05,200 Speaker 2: some PT. But three hundred of so thirty percent of people, 767 00:40:05,920 --> 00:40:08,520 Speaker 2: we'll have a finding that requires specific follow up, like 768 00:40:09,200 --> 00:40:11,600 Speaker 2: you now have to see another doctor or get another scan, 769 00:40:11,760 --> 00:40:14,840 Speaker 2: or get another test or something to tie this together. 770 00:40:15,239 --> 00:40:18,680 Speaker 2: And that's where we start running into this. There's sort 771 00:40:18,680 --> 00:40:22,760 Speaker 2: of an ethical issue here, which is that the ethical 772 00:40:22,800 --> 00:40:27,239 Speaker 2: issue with full body scans is that they privatize profits 773 00:40:27,320 --> 00:40:31,120 Speaker 2: but socialize the risks. This is one of the problems 774 00:40:31,160 --> 00:40:33,279 Speaker 2: I have with these companies is that, like, they make 775 00:40:33,320 --> 00:40:35,839 Speaker 2: money from us, right, like you pay them, but if 776 00:40:35,880 --> 00:40:39,360 Speaker 2: they if they find something like your insurance company pays 777 00:40:39,480 --> 00:40:43,640 Speaker 2: for all that subsequent workup and stuff. And the more 778 00:40:43,680 --> 00:40:46,279 Speaker 2: people that do this, the companies keep that money, right, 779 00:40:46,320 --> 00:40:50,520 Speaker 2: they keep the profits that they've made. But theoretically, you're 780 00:40:50,560 --> 00:40:53,200 Speaker 2: the economist then only theoretically, if we're chasing down all 781 00:40:53,200 --> 00:40:56,040 Speaker 2: these incidental omas, it's going to drive up insurance costs 782 00:40:56,120 --> 00:40:59,399 Speaker 2: for everyone, right, because the insurance just has to be like, well, part, 783 00:40:59,440 --> 00:41:01,520 Speaker 2: you know, we got to allocate X number of dollars 784 00:41:01,560 --> 00:41:04,279 Speaker 2: per person for the weird stuff that it's going to 785 00:41:04,280 --> 00:41:05,600 Speaker 2: get fined in full body st sure. 786 00:41:05,600 --> 00:41:07,880 Speaker 1: And also, like there's a much more direct version of this, 787 00:41:07,920 --> 00:41:10,440 Speaker 1: which is if anybody is over sixty five, were already 788 00:41:10,600 --> 00:41:12,760 Speaker 1: you know, your tax dollars are paying for their healthcare, 789 00:41:12,800 --> 00:41:15,000 Speaker 1: and so if they get this thing, then Medicare is 790 00:41:15,000 --> 00:41:17,000 Speaker 1: paying and you're paying for medical rights. 791 00:41:17,320 --> 00:41:19,680 Speaker 2: So you're not the thirty percent of people who get 792 00:41:19,680 --> 00:41:22,120 Speaker 2: follow up, like generally they're not paying for well, they're 793 00:41:22,120 --> 00:41:24,560 Speaker 2: paying their deductibles or whatever. And so people should be aware, 794 00:41:24,640 --> 00:41:26,960 Speaker 2: especially if you buy a deductible plan, that you might 795 00:41:26,960 --> 00:41:29,839 Speaker 2: be digging into that, but you know that's still sort 796 00:41:29,840 --> 00:41:34,120 Speaker 2: of a socialized form of medicine. Twenty two have cancer 797 00:41:34,239 --> 00:41:37,520 Speaker 2: and here's and this is this is a study where 798 00:41:37,600 --> 00:41:40,960 Speaker 2: they they proved it. These are biopsy proven cancer. So 799 00:41:41,000 --> 00:41:43,839 Speaker 2: two point two percent out of the thousand people who 800 00:41:43,880 --> 00:41:46,319 Speaker 2: got a pernuvo scan. And this is where I keep 801 00:41:46,400 --> 00:41:49,640 Speaker 2: just like hitting the wall in terms of what I 802 00:41:49,680 --> 00:41:53,160 Speaker 2: think about this, because from a public health standpoint, I'm like, well, 803 00:41:53,160 --> 00:41:55,000 Speaker 2: clearly this is a bad idea. It costs way too 804 00:41:55,040 --> 00:41:57,880 Speaker 2: much to the public. It's like no one, no no 805 00:41:57,960 --> 00:42:01,480 Speaker 2: agency would ever recommend this. It's it's clearly not cost effective, 806 00:42:01,480 --> 00:42:05,400 Speaker 2: you're spending so much money chasing down nonsense. But for 807 00:42:05,440 --> 00:42:09,799 Speaker 2: an individual one of those twenty two people, Emily like, 808 00:42:10,040 --> 00:42:11,640 Speaker 2: what if you're one of those twenty two people? 809 00:42:13,040 --> 00:42:15,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, And I think it's once you put it in 810 00:42:15,080 --> 00:42:19,400 Speaker 1: that frame again, our psychology makes it very difficult because 811 00:42:19,440 --> 00:42:21,520 Speaker 1: then you're in a I don't know, like a loss 812 00:42:21,560 --> 00:42:26,160 Speaker 1: frame of Basically, if you don't do this, what if 813 00:42:26,160 --> 00:42:27,959 Speaker 1: you're one of the twenty two people, and then that's 814 00:42:28,000 --> 00:42:33,520 Speaker 1: the salient that's the salient fact that feels terrible. And 815 00:42:33,560 --> 00:42:36,040 Speaker 1: of course I would do anything to not be you know, 816 00:42:36,080 --> 00:42:38,760 Speaker 1: to have this found as part of those those twenty 817 00:42:38,800 --> 00:42:39,280 Speaker 1: two people. 818 00:42:39,560 --> 00:42:41,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, Now we don't know if those twenty two what 819 00:42:41,960 --> 00:42:46,480 Speaker 2: number of them are overdiagnosis? Right, some in theory, those 820 00:42:46,520 --> 00:42:50,160 Speaker 2: cancers that really were found might have never amounted to anything. 821 00:42:50,560 --> 00:42:53,080 Speaker 2: I think people might not appreciate this is like we 822 00:42:53,120 --> 00:42:58,239 Speaker 2: as doctors don't really understand disease before it becomes symptomatic 823 00:42:58,680 --> 00:43:02,600 Speaker 2: in a lot of cases, like the way we diagnose 824 00:43:02,840 --> 00:43:06,360 Speaker 2: most cancers, not the screening ones, not breast cancer and 825 00:43:06,400 --> 00:43:09,840 Speaker 2: colon cancer, but cancers that come up in other ways 826 00:43:09,880 --> 00:43:12,520 Speaker 2: is because someone has symptoms and general you know, yes, 827 00:43:12,680 --> 00:43:17,759 Speaker 2: sometimes they get found. Incidentally, we know that it seems 828 00:43:17,800 --> 00:43:20,520 Speaker 2: that cancers start off small and get bigger over time. 829 00:43:22,480 --> 00:43:25,440 Speaker 2: We tend to find them when they are not small, 830 00:43:26,000 --> 00:43:30,759 Speaker 2: unless it's a screening detected cancer. We don't really know 831 00:43:30,840 --> 00:43:34,600 Speaker 2: if the small ones always become the big one. Like, 832 00:43:34,640 --> 00:43:36,960 Speaker 2: we don't because we've never done a study where we 833 00:43:37,000 --> 00:43:38,839 Speaker 2: do a full body scan and just sit on our 834 00:43:38,880 --> 00:43:42,640 Speaker 2: hands and watch. Maybe maybe that'll happen in the future. 835 00:43:42,680 --> 00:43:46,160 Speaker 2: I'm not sure, but it's you're sort of obligated because 836 00:43:46,200 --> 00:43:49,399 Speaker 2: of your understanding of cancer biology to like you got 837 00:43:49,400 --> 00:43:52,560 Speaker 2: to do something about these twenty two cancers. But I 838 00:43:52,600 --> 00:43:54,040 Speaker 2: can't tell you for sure that they all would have 839 00:43:54,120 --> 00:43:54,840 Speaker 2: killed these people. 840 00:43:55,360 --> 00:43:58,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, I think what's missing from this boat, 841 00:43:58,440 --> 00:44:02,280 Speaker 1: from this discussion and from the data is probably two things. 842 00:44:02,280 --> 00:44:05,719 Speaker 1: So one is just a lot of these being done right. 843 00:44:05,760 --> 00:44:08,240 Speaker 1: So if we had a bigger database and we understood 844 00:44:08,320 --> 00:44:11,040 Speaker 1: more about what are the things that will turn into 845 00:44:11,040 --> 00:44:13,000 Speaker 1: something and what are the things that are not, then 846 00:44:13,400 --> 00:44:15,480 Speaker 1: this information would be more valuable because you would have 847 00:44:15,520 --> 00:44:17,920 Speaker 1: more of a sense of what to action on. Even 848 00:44:17,960 --> 00:44:20,719 Speaker 1: within those people with the abnormal findings, you would have 849 00:44:20,719 --> 00:44:23,520 Speaker 1: a better sense of like you know, yeah, like seventy 850 00:44:23,560 --> 00:44:27,120 Speaker 1: three percent of people have an allsion on their pancreas. 851 00:44:27,200 --> 00:44:29,560 Speaker 1: Is no big deal, Like we see that, we see. 852 00:44:29,400 --> 00:44:29,960 Speaker 2: That all the time. 853 00:44:30,280 --> 00:44:32,200 Speaker 1: Since we haven't done this, it's hard to say that. 854 00:44:32,800 --> 00:44:36,080 Speaker 1: I think the second piece here is most of the 855 00:44:36,160 --> 00:44:39,080 Speaker 1: time people are doing this once, or at least most 856 00:44:39,120 --> 00:44:40,839 Speaker 1: of the data is on the first time you do 857 00:44:40,880 --> 00:44:44,360 Speaker 1: a scan, and a lot of what we are looking 858 00:44:44,400 --> 00:44:47,759 Speaker 1: for in medicine to diagnose whether something's a problem, is 859 00:44:47,800 --> 00:44:51,560 Speaker 1: it is a change. Think about dermatology, Think about skin 860 00:44:51,600 --> 00:44:54,239 Speaker 1: cancer screening. You know, why do you go back to 861 00:44:54,280 --> 00:44:56,480 Speaker 1: the dermatologists every six months if you're at high risk 862 00:44:56,520 --> 00:45:00,080 Speaker 1: for skin cancer. It's because they're looking for did that change? 863 00:45:00,280 --> 00:45:02,080 Speaker 1: You know, there's no problem of just being a person 864 00:45:02,120 --> 00:45:04,399 Speaker 1: full of moles. The problem is when your moles start 865 00:45:04,440 --> 00:45:07,239 Speaker 1: looking weird and being a different weird color. Yeah, and 866 00:45:07,360 --> 00:45:10,320 Speaker 1: this is a case where if you have one scan 867 00:45:10,800 --> 00:45:14,080 Speaker 1: and then you can compare them over time those second 868 00:45:14,719 --> 00:45:16,400 Speaker 1: that second scan is going to be a lot more 869 00:45:16,440 --> 00:45:19,600 Speaker 1: cost effective than the first scan because the second time 870 00:45:19,640 --> 00:45:21,560 Speaker 1: you do the scan, all of those things that like 871 00:45:21,600 --> 00:45:23,360 Speaker 1: we saw it before and it looks the same now 872 00:45:23,520 --> 00:45:26,200 Speaker 1: we're just ignoring. We're into the things that are that 873 00:45:26,280 --> 00:45:28,520 Speaker 1: are changing, and I think that's the kind of promise here. 874 00:45:28,560 --> 00:45:30,680 Speaker 1: I assume Pernevo who tells you should do this every 875 00:45:30,800 --> 00:45:33,680 Speaker 1: you know, twenty three days or whatever, because that's what 876 00:45:33,800 --> 00:45:37,120 Speaker 1: money is for. But it does feel like that's a 877 00:45:37,520 --> 00:45:38,680 Speaker 1: that's a piece of something. 878 00:45:38,840 --> 00:45:41,520 Speaker 2: I think there's something there. I will say the mid Journey, 879 00:45:41,560 --> 00:45:44,759 Speaker 2: that whole body ultrasound submerging water like sci fi thing, 880 00:45:45,080 --> 00:45:47,799 Speaker 2: is specifically marketing it for that. They're like, we're going 881 00:45:47,840 --> 00:45:50,000 Speaker 2: to be cheaper. They're saying it might only be one 882 00:45:50,040 --> 00:45:52,799 Speaker 2: hundred dollars a scan, which, like, you know, I've got 883 00:45:52,800 --> 00:45:54,000 Speaker 2: a bridge to sell you if it turns out to 884 00:45:54,040 --> 00:45:56,440 Speaker 2: one hundred dollars, but that's fine. Maybe VC funds it 885 00:45:56,800 --> 00:45:59,360 Speaker 2: like Uber. But but they're like, oh yeah, then you 886 00:45:59,360 --> 00:46:01,560 Speaker 2: can do this heatedly. So we're going to solve the 887 00:46:01,560 --> 00:46:04,439 Speaker 2: false positive and the incidental oma stuff by just you'll 888 00:46:04,440 --> 00:46:06,759 Speaker 2: do this again and again and we'll watch things over time. 889 00:46:06,800 --> 00:46:09,160 Speaker 2: And the answer is like, okay, maybe, but we have 890 00:46:09,280 --> 00:46:11,439 Speaker 2: no data to suggest that that's the case yet. 891 00:46:12,080 --> 00:46:12,640 Speaker 1: Yeah. 892 00:46:12,719 --> 00:46:16,320 Speaker 2: So there's those five people in the in the Pernuvo 893 00:46:16,360 --> 00:46:19,360 Speaker 2: study that ended up having a cancer that Pernuvo missed. 894 00:46:19,760 --> 00:46:22,440 Speaker 2: I'll point out there's just some things that MRIs don't 895 00:46:23,280 --> 00:46:26,200 Speaker 2: see very well. So so breast, colon and thyroid are 896 00:46:26,239 --> 00:46:29,440 Speaker 2: like kind of classic hard to see on MRI. A 897 00:46:29,480 --> 00:46:32,080 Speaker 2: whole body MR you can get dedicated breast MRI, for example, 898 00:46:32,120 --> 00:46:35,800 Speaker 2: but that's not how this works. Breast and colon obviously 899 00:46:36,239 --> 00:46:39,239 Speaker 2: are ones that we screen for. So you know, even 900 00:46:39,239 --> 00:46:41,319 Speaker 2: if you're doing a whole body scan, you still want 901 00:46:41,320 --> 00:46:45,320 Speaker 2: to do your age recommended cancer screening too. 902 00:46:45,719 --> 00:46:49,320 Speaker 1: Yes, you just want to be constantly getting screened. 903 00:46:52,239 --> 00:46:55,440 Speaker 2: Got to generate those generate medical expenses. 904 00:46:57,719 --> 00:47:03,319 Speaker 1: So I think it's worth we're sort of saying how 905 00:47:03,360 --> 00:47:05,920 Speaker 1: common it is to find some kind of as you 906 00:47:06,000 --> 00:47:08,680 Speaker 1: call it, an incidental loma when we do these. When 907 00:47:08,719 --> 00:47:11,160 Speaker 1: we do these just in case people go to do it, 908 00:47:11,520 --> 00:47:14,080 Speaker 1: like what it's going to happen is not that they're 909 00:47:14,120 --> 00:47:16,840 Speaker 1: going to tell you everything's fine. Something is going to happen. 910 00:47:16,880 --> 00:47:19,000 Speaker 1: So to put some datea on this, there's a twenty 911 00:47:19,040 --> 00:47:25,080 Speaker 1: fourteen study that looked at six sixty six MRIs performed 912 00:47:25,160 --> 00:47:28,600 Speaker 1: on people, and they looked at what were the incidental findings, 913 00:47:28,600 --> 00:47:31,680 Speaker 1: And I think an important point to note is that 914 00:47:32,280 --> 00:47:36,440 Speaker 1: they found some incidental finding in six hundred and fifty 915 00:47:36,520 --> 00:47:39,480 Speaker 1: nine of the six hundred and sixty six people that 916 00:47:39,520 --> 00:47:42,839 Speaker 1: they scanned, so that is almost everyone. I don't know 917 00:47:42,920 --> 00:47:44,960 Speaker 1: what happened to those seven people, maybe there was an 918 00:47:45,040 --> 00:47:49,760 Speaker 1: error in their scan or something, but basically everyone found 919 00:47:50,640 --> 00:47:54,880 Speaker 1: something that was wrong. And you know, some of this 920 00:47:55,120 --> 00:47:58,399 Speaker 1: is in your brain, some of it is in your 921 00:47:58,680 --> 00:48:01,759 Speaker 1: your spine, some of that are renal cysts. There were 922 00:48:01,840 --> 00:48:03,840 Speaker 1: many different things that they found, but for me, the 923 00:48:03,880 --> 00:48:06,719 Speaker 1: headline here was like you always get something. Yeah, was 924 00:48:06,760 --> 00:48:07,640 Speaker 1: that your headline? 925 00:48:07,960 --> 00:48:10,160 Speaker 2: Yeah? And I mean, I'll put some numbers on it 926 00:48:10,200 --> 00:48:13,000 Speaker 2: for you. So like between twenty two in the younger 927 00:48:13,000 --> 00:48:18,120 Speaker 2: age group, twenty two percent had some evidence of brain infarct, 928 00:48:18,600 --> 00:48:21,279 Speaker 2: forty five percent in the older group. Things you know, 929 00:48:21,440 --> 00:48:22,920 Speaker 2: just like little areas of the brain that look like 930 00:48:22,960 --> 00:48:25,840 Speaker 2: they've had a problem in the past. Five percent of 931 00:48:25,880 --> 00:48:28,600 Speaker 2: the younger cohort had pulmonary nodules sixteen percent and the 932 00:48:28,680 --> 00:48:32,280 Speaker 2: older cohort renal cysts seventeen percent and forty one percent, 933 00:48:32,360 --> 00:48:35,880 Speaker 2: spinal degeneration twenty three percent and forty five percent. So 934 00:48:35,920 --> 00:48:38,400 Speaker 2: these are like you're gonna you're gonna see this stuff, 935 00:48:38,440 --> 00:48:41,920 Speaker 2: so be prepared, like you there's a very good chance 936 00:48:41,960 --> 00:48:43,840 Speaker 2: that someone's going to tell you after a full body 937 00:48:43,840 --> 00:48:46,200 Speaker 2: scan that you've got a nodule in your lung, you've 938 00:48:46,200 --> 00:48:48,840 Speaker 2: got a spot in your kidney, you have disgeneration, or 939 00:48:48,920 --> 00:48:50,839 Speaker 2: even that you may have at one point in the 940 00:48:50,880 --> 00:48:53,840 Speaker 2: past had a micro's stroke that you've never noticed. 941 00:48:54,920 --> 00:48:59,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, So can we talk about whether there are medical 942 00:49:00,239 --> 00:49:02,799 Speaker 1: risks to doing this? So, I mean we've talked a 943 00:49:02,800 --> 00:49:05,200 Speaker 1: tremendous amount about what I think of as sort of 944 00:49:05,680 --> 00:49:08,680 Speaker 1: cost risks, but also psychology risks. You know, you're going 945 00:49:08,719 --> 00:49:10,719 Speaker 1: to somebody's going to tell you have a you had 946 00:49:10,760 --> 00:49:12,759 Speaker 1: a mini stroke, Like maybe that's going to freak you out. 947 00:49:13,480 --> 00:49:16,560 Speaker 1: But we are also, interestingly, many of the same people 948 00:49:16,560 --> 00:49:18,479 Speaker 1: who are into these things are also very worried about 949 00:49:18,560 --> 00:49:21,160 Speaker 1: radiation from like their microwave, And so I always find 950 00:49:21,160 --> 00:49:23,600 Speaker 1: it interesting to I'd be like, people don't want to 951 00:49:23,600 --> 00:49:26,520 Speaker 1: stand in front of their microwave because of microwaves, but 952 00:49:26,600 --> 00:49:29,400 Speaker 1: then they want to go into an MRI machine and 953 00:49:29,440 --> 00:49:30,480 Speaker 1: get you know, zappered. 954 00:49:31,040 --> 00:49:34,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, is that a problem? I don't, I mean not really. 955 00:49:34,800 --> 00:49:37,480 Speaker 2: You know, the medical risk is mostly from the downstream stuff. 956 00:49:37,520 --> 00:49:41,280 Speaker 2: So MRIs don't use ionizing radiation, and contrast to CT scans, 957 00:49:41,440 --> 00:49:45,640 Speaker 2: So there theoretically is no increased risk of cancer from 958 00:49:45,840 --> 00:49:48,760 Speaker 2: repeated MRI scanning. There are companies that offer whole body 959 00:49:48,800 --> 00:49:51,680 Speaker 2: CEET scans, and that certainly is radiation and so like 960 00:49:51,760 --> 00:49:54,360 Speaker 2: that in theory would increase your risk of cancer over time, 961 00:49:54,800 --> 00:49:58,200 Speaker 2: But for a whole body MRI probably not. I guess 962 00:49:58,320 --> 00:50:00,399 Speaker 2: if you're claustrophobic, there's a risk you could break out. 963 00:50:00,400 --> 00:50:00,560 Speaker 6: You know. 964 00:50:00,600 --> 00:50:02,520 Speaker 2: Those tubes are a little bit Yeah, we should. 965 00:50:02,320 --> 00:50:04,040 Speaker 1: Say the MRI they put you on a tube and 966 00:50:04,040 --> 00:50:05,920 Speaker 1: they get you in this like great loud tube and 967 00:50:05,960 --> 00:50:08,080 Speaker 1: they go, yeah. 968 00:50:07,960 --> 00:50:11,680 Speaker 2: So it's it's not it's not super comfortable, but but yeah, 969 00:50:11,680 --> 00:50:14,040 Speaker 2: I don't think it's a cancer issue. 970 00:50:14,239 --> 00:50:16,719 Speaker 1: Okay, no cancer should is it? Okay to stand in 971 00:50:16,719 --> 00:50:21,879 Speaker 1: fron of the microwave? How is that? We'll do that later. 972 00:50:22,239 --> 00:50:25,360 Speaker 2: I have to watch my food carefully because I'm so hungry. 973 00:50:28,440 --> 00:50:33,600 Speaker 1: Okay. Does anyone think anyone in the official doctor space 974 00:50:34,280 --> 00:50:36,160 Speaker 1: think these are a good idea? 975 00:50:37,600 --> 00:50:38,919 Speaker 2: Uh? No? 976 00:50:39,600 --> 00:50:39,839 Speaker 1: Yeah. 977 00:50:39,880 --> 00:50:46,759 Speaker 2: The the formal like recommendations from the medical societies are like, 978 00:50:48,080 --> 00:50:51,680 Speaker 2: are are that no, that screening whole body MRI is 979 00:50:51,719 --> 00:50:54,520 Speaker 2: not cost effective and will not save lives? 980 00:50:54,760 --> 00:50:58,600 Speaker 1: How do they come? Like? I will say, though, twenty 981 00:50:58,640 --> 00:51:02,799 Speaker 1: two people, like, how do they confront that. I know, 982 00:51:02,960 --> 00:51:06,399 Speaker 1: some of those people maybe were saved by this. 983 00:51:06,600 --> 00:51:08,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, so you're saying there's a chance. 984 00:51:08,640 --> 00:51:09,879 Speaker 1: Yeah, you're saying there's a chance. 985 00:51:10,080 --> 00:51:12,520 Speaker 2: I mean, in the end, I think the problem is 986 00:51:13,120 --> 00:51:18,719 Speaker 2: that we don't have the real high quality study that 987 00:51:18,760 --> 00:51:21,840 Speaker 2: you would do here, which is a full on randomized 988 00:51:21,880 --> 00:51:23,920 Speaker 2: trial where you take ten thousand people and you do 989 00:51:23,960 --> 00:51:26,000 Speaker 2: a whole body MRI and you do take ten thousand 990 00:51:26,000 --> 00:51:28,000 Speaker 2: people that don't you follow them for ten years and 991 00:51:28,040 --> 00:51:31,680 Speaker 2: you see what happens. You know, the thing about those 992 00:51:31,719 --> 00:51:34,840 Speaker 2: twenty two people with cancer, we already like some of 993 00:51:34,880 --> 00:51:38,080 Speaker 2: them maybe the cancer never matters, never would have been detected, 994 00:51:38,080 --> 00:51:40,920 Speaker 2: they die of something else. Some of them the cancer 995 00:51:40,960 --> 00:51:47,760 Speaker 2: would be detected anyway, they develop a symptom. And although 996 00:51:47,800 --> 00:51:52,040 Speaker 2: it's often true that detecting a cancer earlier is better 997 00:51:52,080 --> 00:51:55,000 Speaker 2: than detecting it later, that's not always the case. And 998 00:51:55,120 --> 00:51:57,040 Speaker 2: you know, something comes up in some other way and 999 00:51:57,080 --> 00:51:59,200 Speaker 2: you pick up that cancer and you get to treat 1000 00:51:59,200 --> 00:52:01,560 Speaker 2: it and there's no difference and outcomes and so there's 1001 00:52:01,560 --> 00:52:04,080 Speaker 2: a lot of ways that even in those twenty two people, 1002 00:52:04,320 --> 00:52:07,399 Speaker 2: like if you would do the sliding doors thing of 1003 00:52:07,560 --> 00:52:09,600 Speaker 2: you know, their life where they went through the whole 1004 00:52:09,600 --> 00:52:11,680 Speaker 2: body MRI and their life where they didn't go through 1005 00:52:11,719 --> 00:52:14,920 Speaker 2: the whole body MRI. The outcomes end up being the same, 1006 00:52:15,000 --> 00:52:18,239 Speaker 2: at least on sort of the broad population level. 1007 00:52:18,880 --> 00:52:22,240 Speaker 1: Yeah. I like that study. That study is probably too expensive. 1008 00:52:22,640 --> 00:52:26,040 Speaker 2: It's an expensive study. There's one study I really kind 1009 00:52:26,040 --> 00:52:27,880 Speaker 2: of liked that. I thought it was clever in this space. 1010 00:52:28,719 --> 00:52:30,799 Speaker 2: This is from the European Journal of epidem Aology, and 1011 00:52:31,040 --> 00:52:35,200 Speaker 2: they actually they did a whole body MRI on about 1012 00:52:35,360 --> 00:52:38,680 Speaker 2: thirty three hundred people, so everyone got it, but they 1013 00:52:38,800 --> 00:52:43,360 Speaker 2: actually only disclosed the findings to half of them. That's 1014 00:52:43,440 --> 00:52:46,799 Speaker 2: what they sort of randomized, which I think is really interesting. 1015 00:52:47,880 --> 00:52:48,040 Speaker 8: Yeah. 1016 00:52:48,080 --> 00:52:49,680 Speaker 2: I think this is sort of something that maybe you 1017 00:52:49,680 --> 00:52:54,200 Speaker 2: could only do in Europe. And what they found is 1018 00:52:54,239 --> 00:52:58,320 Speaker 2: that if you disclosed to people, the rate of biopsy 1019 00:52:58,440 --> 00:53:00,320 Speaker 2: of something that turns out not to be care answer 1020 00:53:00,480 --> 00:53:05,480 Speaker 2: was thirty nine percent higher. Okay, so basically, you see something, 1021 00:53:05,560 --> 00:53:07,360 Speaker 2: they get biopsy and it's not cancer. So you've got 1022 00:53:07,400 --> 00:53:10,000 Speaker 2: about a forty percent increased risk of getting a needle 1023 00:53:10,040 --> 00:53:11,800 Speaker 2: stuck in you and it turns out to be nothing. 1024 00:53:12,480 --> 00:53:16,160 Speaker 2: But the rate of biopsies that did turn out to 1025 00:53:16,160 --> 00:53:21,160 Speaker 2: be cancer was seventy four percent higher. Now, there weren't 1026 00:53:21,200 --> 00:53:24,359 Speaker 2: numerically there were very few of these, but sure enough, 1027 00:53:24,440 --> 00:53:26,600 Speaker 2: some of those spots do turn out to be cancer, 1028 00:53:26,640 --> 00:53:30,279 Speaker 2: as we've seen before. The authors concluded that there was 1029 00:53:30,560 --> 00:53:37,160 Speaker 2: good evidence of overtesting an overdiagnosis and called for further research. 1030 00:53:37,200 --> 00:53:39,600 Speaker 2: But I think this is a potential study design that, 1031 00:53:39,680 --> 00:53:42,000 Speaker 2: like if people were willing to not hear their results 1032 00:53:42,000 --> 00:53:44,759 Speaker 2: for two years, but then you can even imagine like 1033 00:53:44,760 --> 00:53:47,520 Speaker 2: two years later when the study's over, they're like, oh, 1034 00:53:47,600 --> 00:53:49,520 Speaker 2: by the way, here are your results. Like there's there's 1035 00:53:49,560 --> 00:53:50,960 Speaker 2: a big spot on your liver. 1036 00:53:50,880 --> 00:53:53,680 Speaker 1: Like check, get it checked out. 1037 00:53:53,800 --> 00:53:55,799 Speaker 2: Don't be mad. I mean you have to do a 1038 00:53:55,800 --> 00:53:57,240 Speaker 2: really good job of informed consent. 1039 00:53:57,600 --> 00:53:59,600 Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I mean I think there's all kinds of 1040 00:53:59,600 --> 00:54:04,080 Speaker 1: interesting sort of information procedures you could think about here, 1041 00:54:04,120 --> 00:54:06,040 Speaker 1: Which is, you know, can you have your AI after 1042 00:54:06,080 --> 00:54:09,040 Speaker 1: a reads the radiology report? Can you have it like 1043 00:54:09,320 --> 00:54:14,040 Speaker 1: decide how to like which pieces of information are potentially 1044 00:54:14,080 --> 00:54:18,240 Speaker 1: actionable and which are and which are not. Again, something 1045 00:54:18,239 --> 00:54:20,560 Speaker 1: for which having more data would be more helpful. 1046 00:54:21,680 --> 00:54:24,200 Speaker 2: I've got one other hypothetical for you. Yeah, Okay, Emily 1047 00:54:24,239 --> 00:54:26,600 Speaker 2: as we're coming down to smasher past this. So I 1048 00:54:26,640 --> 00:54:30,320 Speaker 2: was thinking that one of the issues on a population 1049 00:54:30,440 --> 00:54:33,160 Speaker 2: level is the costs born by downstream care, which, as 1050 00:54:33,160 --> 00:54:34,919 Speaker 2: we said, are sort of born by all of us, 1051 00:54:35,000 --> 00:54:38,320 Speaker 2: and the profits are absorbed by these few companies. Okay, 1052 00:54:39,280 --> 00:54:43,800 Speaker 2: imagine a world where the insurance companies start to say, like, look, listen, 1053 00:54:44,400 --> 00:54:48,680 Speaker 2: we're not gonna pay for anything that happens downstream of 1054 00:54:48,719 --> 00:54:51,400 Speaker 2: these scans, which I don't know if that's possible, or 1055 00:54:52,040 --> 00:54:55,960 Speaker 2: give you an alternative view where they're like, Okay, anything 1056 00:54:56,000 --> 00:54:58,080 Speaker 2: that you chase down after these scans, if it turns 1057 00:54:58,120 --> 00:54:59,960 Speaker 2: out to be like a cancer or something that would 1058 00:55:00,000 --> 00:55:02,400 Speaker 2: I killed you, we'll pay for all that care. But 1059 00:55:02,480 --> 00:55:04,600 Speaker 2: if it turns out to be an incidental oma and 1060 00:55:04,640 --> 00:55:06,680 Speaker 2: you get a biopsy and it's benign, we're not paying 1061 00:55:06,680 --> 00:55:11,200 Speaker 2: for any of that. Do you think that changes the 1062 00:55:11,239 --> 00:55:14,920 Speaker 2: individual calculus here if more of the risk of the 1063 00:55:15,000 --> 00:55:17,839 Speaker 2: results is borne by the individual instead of like the 1064 00:55:17,840 --> 00:55:20,719 Speaker 2: insurance company or society, does that change the outlook for 1065 00:55:20,760 --> 00:55:21,360 Speaker 2: these companies? 1066 00:55:22,640 --> 00:55:24,719 Speaker 1: I think it would change the outlook for the companies 1067 00:55:24,960 --> 00:55:27,719 Speaker 1: quite a lot in the long term, because I think 1068 00:55:27,719 --> 00:55:30,480 Speaker 1: it would limit their growth. I mean, right now, this 1069 00:55:30,680 --> 00:55:33,279 Speaker 1: is broadly consumed by a set of people with quite 1070 00:55:33,280 --> 00:55:38,360 Speaker 1: a lot of resources, for whom I suspect that incentive 1071 00:55:38,400 --> 00:55:40,960 Speaker 1: would be pretty small on the margin. 1072 00:55:41,800 --> 00:55:43,480 Speaker 2: They're like, Okay, I'll pay for it. That's fine. 1073 00:55:43,719 --> 00:55:46,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, Kim Gardassian can pay for her extra stuff. But 1074 00:55:47,520 --> 00:55:50,000 Speaker 1: if you think about trying to expand this into like 1075 00:55:50,040 --> 00:55:53,600 Speaker 1: everybody has this, yeah, then yes, absolutely, it's going to 1076 00:55:53,920 --> 00:55:56,400 Speaker 1: you know, the like downstream costs of this are going 1077 00:55:56,480 --> 00:55:59,000 Speaker 1: to matter. On the other hand, again getting back to 1078 00:55:59,040 --> 00:56:01,280 Speaker 1: the psychology, if you put it in a loss frame 1079 00:56:01,560 --> 00:56:04,440 Speaker 1: like you are, we're going to find what if you're 1080 00:56:04,480 --> 00:56:07,640 Speaker 1: one of the twenty two people like so, maybe it'll 1081 00:56:07,640 --> 00:56:09,600 Speaker 1: cost you a little bit of money, but you might 1082 00:56:09,640 --> 00:56:11,719 Speaker 1: find out that you have cancer and then not die 1083 00:56:11,760 --> 00:56:16,040 Speaker 1: from it so soon. That's a very very very powerful pull. 1084 00:56:18,200 --> 00:56:20,360 Speaker 2: All right, Emily, I need you to go first here. 1085 00:56:20,560 --> 00:56:23,240 Speaker 2: You've got to tell me, please convince me, smash your pass. 1086 00:56:23,280 --> 00:56:24,400 Speaker 2: This is really hard. 1087 00:56:25,719 --> 00:56:29,200 Speaker 1: I also find this one very hard. But right now 1088 00:56:29,239 --> 00:56:33,680 Speaker 1: I am a pass. I think that the the incidental 1089 00:56:33,760 --> 00:56:37,799 Speaker 1: findings feel so much more central to me than the 1090 00:56:37,840 --> 00:56:41,680 Speaker 1: other findings. And I think if people are doing a 1091 00:56:41,719 --> 00:56:45,160 Speaker 1: good job of the regular cancer screenings that they are 1092 00:56:45,200 --> 00:56:49,960 Speaker 1: supposed to be doing mimography, callon cancer screening, et cetera. 1093 00:56:50,920 --> 00:56:55,680 Speaker 1: That is sufficient, So I'm a pass. 1094 00:56:57,000 --> 00:57:01,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, those screenings had random LID trial data to show 1095 00:57:02,280 --> 00:57:05,640 Speaker 2: that they decrease breast cancer specific or colon cancer specific mortality, 1096 00:57:05,680 --> 00:57:08,399 Speaker 2: like they did that work. These companies have not done 1097 00:57:08,400 --> 00:57:12,680 Speaker 2: that work yet. So by that standard, I'm going to 1098 00:57:12,760 --> 00:57:15,160 Speaker 2: say I'm definitely a pass on the sort of population 1099 00:57:15,239 --> 00:57:18,920 Speaker 2: wide level. But for an individual, I'm actually let me 1100 00:57:19,200 --> 00:57:21,640 Speaker 2: just personally like, no, I'm a pass, Like, I don't 1101 00:57:21,680 --> 00:57:25,080 Speaker 2: want to do this. I think I'll find it'll find 1102 00:57:25,080 --> 00:57:26,720 Speaker 2: something that I have to deal with. I don't want 1103 00:57:26,720 --> 00:57:29,320 Speaker 2: to deal with more. Sh I'm going to pass. 1104 00:57:29,600 --> 00:57:34,880 Speaker 1: Okay, we're passing. You seem sad, but you know this 1105 00:57:34,960 --> 00:57:37,040 Speaker 1: is so this I will say, this is the hardest 1106 00:57:38,040 --> 00:57:40,080 Speaker 1: these that we have done for me in terms of 1107 00:57:40,160 --> 00:57:43,240 Speaker 1: like the smash of pass decision. It's something I do 1108 00:57:43,320 --> 00:57:45,360 Speaker 1: think about, like cause and I do all kinds of 1109 00:57:45,360 --> 00:57:47,360 Speaker 1: other weird you know, like all these like blood tests 1110 00:57:47,360 --> 00:57:49,600 Speaker 1: and all this kind of stuff, but this one is 1111 00:57:49,680 --> 00:57:51,160 Speaker 1: just like one step too far from me. 1112 00:57:51,600 --> 00:57:53,400 Speaker 2: Yeah, we're not going to blame anyone for doing it. 1113 00:57:53,480 --> 00:57:55,720 Speaker 1: How about that No, that's for sure. We don't blame people. 1114 00:57:56,320 --> 00:57:58,959 Speaker 1: All right, that's it for full body Scans. Your mail 1115 00:57:58,960 --> 00:58:10,280 Speaker 1: back Question of the Week after the Break. 1116 00:58:06,760 --> 00:58:09,480 Speaker 8: Hey, Emiliam Perry, this is Margaret from Charleston and my 1117 00:58:09,600 --> 00:58:11,920 Speaker 8: question is about the shingles vaccine or I guess it's 1118 00:58:11,920 --> 00:58:15,560 Speaker 8: called the Shingri vaccine, you know, the one for shingles. 1119 00:58:16,080 --> 00:58:17,920 Speaker 8: I've been trying to convince my mother to get it 1120 00:58:17,960 --> 00:58:20,360 Speaker 8: as a way of preventing dementia? Am I right about this? 1121 00:58:20,480 --> 00:58:23,040 Speaker 8: Should I keep harassing her? Love the show? 1122 00:58:23,080 --> 00:58:26,040 Speaker 1: Thanks so much so. There's a lot of new data 1123 00:58:26,320 --> 00:58:31,800 Speaker 1: on this which I find very compelling, So I have 1124 00:58:31,920 --> 00:58:33,920 Speaker 1: been trying. I will just say, full disclosure. I've been 1125 00:58:33,920 --> 00:58:35,120 Speaker 1: trying to get my mother in law to get the 1126 00:58:35,120 --> 00:58:38,760 Speaker 1: Shingrix vaccine for like a decade, and every time there's 1127 00:58:38,760 --> 00:58:42,680 Speaker 1: new information about it, I send it to her. And 1128 00:58:42,720 --> 00:58:45,840 Speaker 1: my read is that the evidence on dementia, while not 1129 00:58:46,000 --> 00:58:51,280 Speaker 1: perfect randomized trial evidence, is increasingly quite strong. It's now 1130 00:58:51,320 --> 00:58:53,960 Speaker 1: coming out of a number of studies stronger for women 1131 00:58:54,480 --> 00:58:59,120 Speaker 1: than for men, and reasonably large effect sizes, you know, 1132 00:58:59,360 --> 00:59:02,320 Speaker 1: five to ten percent reduction in dementia risk, which is 1133 00:59:02,360 --> 00:59:06,800 Speaker 1: like pretty solid, pretty solid for something that also prevents 1134 00:59:06,840 --> 00:59:10,600 Speaker 1: you from getting shingles, which I hear is a terrible experience, horrible, 1135 00:59:11,240 --> 00:59:11,880 Speaker 1: so painful. 1136 00:59:12,080 --> 00:59:18,280 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, the data on dementia is observational, right. 1137 00:59:18,560 --> 00:59:21,000 Speaker 2: You look at large data sets of people, some of 1138 00:59:21,000 --> 00:59:22,840 Speaker 2: whom got the vaccine, some who didn't, and then you 1139 00:59:22,880 --> 00:59:24,760 Speaker 2: look and see if they end up with dementia. And 1140 00:59:24,760 --> 00:59:27,200 Speaker 2: of course there are other factors that predispose both to 1141 00:59:27,600 --> 00:59:30,200 Speaker 2: vaccination and maybe to your dementius. The sort of healthy 1142 00:59:30,240 --> 00:59:32,120 Speaker 2: user effect you can adjust for a lot of things, 1143 00:59:32,600 --> 00:59:34,720 Speaker 2: you know. That said, we interpret this in the context 1144 00:59:34,720 --> 00:59:37,080 Speaker 2: of the risk of the vaccine, which is extraordinarily low, 1145 00:59:37,360 --> 00:59:41,360 Speaker 2: the other benefits like preventing shingles, which is clearly documented 1146 00:59:41,400 --> 00:59:43,960 Speaker 2: in randomized trials, and like, that's great. So this feels 1147 00:59:44,000 --> 00:59:46,240 Speaker 2: like an icing on the cake thing. I will say. 1148 00:59:46,920 --> 00:59:49,440 Speaker 2: Vercella zoster virus, which is the virus that causes both 1149 00:59:49,520 --> 00:59:53,000 Speaker 2: chicken pox and shingles, is a weird one. It's a 1150 00:59:53,080 --> 00:59:56,640 Speaker 2: DNA virus, so it can integrate into the DNA of 1151 00:59:56,680 --> 00:59:59,520 Speaker 2: your cells. That's actually how it lays dormant for so 1152 00:59:59,600 --> 01:00:03,200 Speaker 2: long and goes and it's sitting in your DNA and 1153 01:00:03,280 --> 01:00:06,120 Speaker 2: just waiting to be reactivated and then for reasons that 1154 01:00:06,120 --> 01:00:09,280 Speaker 2: we don't fully understand, stress sometimes like UV light or 1155 01:00:09,320 --> 01:00:14,120 Speaker 2: whatever will reactivate this. That's actually why shingles appears in 1156 01:00:14,160 --> 01:00:17,400 Speaker 2: a patch in your body, because it's traveling out from 1157 01:00:17,440 --> 01:00:19,920 Speaker 2: a nerve, like it's coming from the nerve that innervates 1158 01:00:19,960 --> 01:00:22,400 Speaker 2: that patch of skin. It's also why it's so incredibly painful. 1159 01:00:22,840 --> 01:00:25,840 Speaker 2: So it integrates into DNA, and it's neurotropic, so it's 1160 01:00:25,840 --> 01:00:29,240 Speaker 2: a virus that likes to infect nerve cells. So you know, 1161 01:00:29,480 --> 01:00:33,960 Speaker 2: dementia nerve cells integrates into DNA lasts a really long time. 1162 01:00:34,160 --> 01:00:37,960 Speaker 2: Like I'm there's a lot of convincing push here, so 1163 01:00:38,200 --> 01:00:39,960 Speaker 2: I see no reason not to get this vaccine. 1164 01:00:40,120 --> 01:00:42,360 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean I think that in some sense, there's 1165 01:00:42,360 --> 01:00:43,960 Speaker 1: no reason not to get this vaccine. There are other 1166 01:00:44,000 --> 01:00:47,120 Speaker 1: reasons to get this vaccine other than the dementia risk. 1167 01:00:47,280 --> 01:00:50,240 Speaker 1: And so in many ways this feels to me like, yes, 1168 01:00:50,280 --> 01:00:53,360 Speaker 1: it's one more thing, but also it's just interesting and 1169 01:00:53,400 --> 01:00:55,880 Speaker 1: it's an interesting thing to think about as we contemplate 1170 01:00:55,960 --> 01:01:00,280 Speaker 1: what causes some people to have dementia versus first is 1171 01:01:00,360 --> 01:01:04,200 Speaker 1: not having dementia. So yes, if my mother in law 1172 01:01:04,240 --> 01:01:08,120 Speaker 1: is listening, you should get the shingles vaccine, like I've 1173 01:01:08,120 --> 01:01:08,680 Speaker 1: been telling you. 1174 01:01:11,600 --> 01:01:14,160 Speaker 2: All Right, that's it for us today. Stick with us 1175 01:01:14,200 --> 01:01:17,560 Speaker 2: next week when we'll ask what's the deal with mRNA. 1176 01:01:19,640 --> 01:01:24,080 Speaker 1: Wellness Actually is produced in association with iHeartMedia. Our senior 1177 01:01:24,080 --> 01:01:27,800 Speaker 1: producer is Tamar Avishai. Our executive producer at iHeart is 1178 01:01:27,880 --> 01:01:31,480 Speaker 1: Jennifer Bassett. Our theme music is by Eric Deutsch, and 1179 01:01:31,520 --> 01:01:33,600 Speaker 1: our content is for educational purposes only. 1180 01:01:34,320 --> 01:01:36,560 Speaker 2: If you like the show, help other people find us, 1181 01:01:36,920 --> 01:01:39,680 Speaker 2: leave a rating and review on Apple Podcasts or your 1182 01:01:39,760 --> 01:01:42,520 Speaker 2: podcatcher of choice and help us spread the word about 1183 01:01:42,520 --> 01:01:45,560 Speaker 2: the show. You can follow us on Instagram at Wellness 1184 01:01:45,600 --> 01:01:48,680 Speaker 2: Actually pod and don't forget we want to hear from you. 1185 01:01:49,200 --> 01:01:51,720 Speaker 2: Head over to Wellness Actually dot fm and leave us 1186 01:01:51,760 --> 01:01:54,360 Speaker 2: a question for our mailbag or suggest a topic for 1187 01:01:54,360 --> 01:01:55,040 Speaker 2: a future show. 1188 01:01:55,800 --> 01:01:57,680 Speaker 1: We'll let the influencers have the last word. 1189 01:01:58,160 --> 01:02:00,800 Speaker 9: I got my results from my pronuvosk and if you 1190 01:02:00,800 --> 01:02:02,439 Speaker 9: don't know who that is, it's a full body MRI. 1191 01:02:02,800 --> 01:02:05,760 Speaker 9: So we're gonna go over what they found. And they 1192 01:02:05,760 --> 01:02:07,920 Speaker 9: found twenty six findings. So when I saw this, I 1193 01:02:07,960 --> 01:02:09,520 Speaker 9: was like, oh my gosh, there's twenty six things that's 1194 01:02:09,560 --> 01:02:13,120 Speaker 9: wrong with me. But really yes, but no. But with 1195 01:02:13,240 --> 01:02:16,120 Speaker 9: the minor findings that they did find is that this 1196 01:02:16,520 --> 01:02:18,680 Speaker 9: right here is my lip filler. It says right here, 1197 01:02:18,720 --> 01:02:21,680 Speaker 9: just like filler or botox injections. So this is just 1198 01:02:21,720 --> 01:02:34,280 Speaker 9: showing my lip filler, which is like okay,