WEBVTT - Lawsuits Over Building Collapse

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>While it likely will be months before the cause of

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the deadly building collapse and Surf Side, Florida is determined,

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>more than a dozen lawsuits have already been filed on

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>behalf of the victims and their families against any person

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>or entity who might be responsible for the Champlain Tower

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 1>South condo collapse. Joining me is David Prager, a managing

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>director on the head of the US restructuring advisory practice

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>at Kroll David lawsuits have been filed against a host

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of defendants, including the condominium association, the engineering firm that

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>inspected the building, the architects who designed it, the city

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of Surf Side, and building officials. Is this just an

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>attempt to cover anyone, any person or entity who might

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>be responsible for the building collapse. Well, that's that's a

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>great question. I think there's a number of factors going

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>on here. One is your right. This is a fishing

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>expedition to try to figure out who knew what and

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>when and can you impute that knowledge onto other people.

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, I think it's also a

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 1>race to figure out where the deep pockets and to

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>make sure you're trying to hit at those deep pockets

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>as soon as possible. You know, people who unfortunately have

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>lost everything. The obvious place to go for recoveries here

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>would be to go to the buildings in the building association.

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>That's where the insurance was supposed to be held. That's

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>about the approximate cause of failure. But there's not much

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>left there. As you look at the insurance proceeds, they're

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 1>really minimal. I think there's fifteen million dollars in property

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>insurance in another eight or so. Reliability insurance really was

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>designed to cover minor incidents relative to this, so you

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>have to look somewhere else. You can't look really to

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the board than those pockets aren't gonna be terribly deep

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>relative to the hundreds of affective lives here. So then

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you are going to those further steps. The engineering firms

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the city anywhere you can to try to find money,

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and appears the plants are just trying to raise to

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>get to that money as quickly as possible. The engineering

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>firm released a statement saying it's report detailed significant cracks

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and breaks in the concrete which required repairs to ensure

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the safety of the residents and the public, and there

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>was a letter written by the president of the condo

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>association asking residents to fund more than fifteen million dollars

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in repairs. How does that play into liability here? Well,

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this goes, I think to the question

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of what is standard in practice, who is responsible for

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>reviewing those reports, and who is responsible for understanding exactly

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>what is in there? And frankly, was the board and

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the management company well equipped to understand the level of

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>disclosure that was being made by the engineering firm. If

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you look through the two report, the notices that have

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>been in the popular press here and are blazoned all

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>over the lawsuits are somewhat buried in the reports. You

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>have to read down, I think on stage six or seven,

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know at the end of the section and

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>says it's somewhere is it written in big blazing letters

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>warning there's an eminent threat to life here? So who

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>was responsible for understanding that? I think certainly if the

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>board was responsible for taking upon them selves to understand that,

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I would think that the engineer would have also been responsible.

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>But the engineer isn't really a fiduciary to the building

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.399
<v Speaker 1>residents or to the building owners, and so then you'd

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>have to look at what their contractual liabilities are and

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>does this amount to a gross negligence claim or willfulness

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>conduct claim or is there some other claim and torque

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that connects this engineer back to having a legal obligation.

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Certainly in retrospect, it seems that the moral obligation there

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>was a shortcoming all along the way, and that seems

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to them the most recent board seems to have been

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to clear that up and to clear up their

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>legal obligations just a little bit too late, and as

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you're going to look back, too little too late was

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>tragic here, but probably leads to some level of culpability.

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>We do this all the time at Krolom, were in

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.039
<v Speaker 1>a station as an expert, being in a financial matter

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise, you look at the known or noable standards.

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Was there fraud being committed based on what was known

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>at the time or knowable based on information that was

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>available in the public record or in your private records.

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And as we're now going through these reports, you're seeing

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that it was available to the board, it was available

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to the management, and should have been available to the

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 1>condo owners had they made do inquiry. And there's going

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to be I think, unfortunately for for those effected. There

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>may be some level of apportionment of blame here to

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>go back and say, you know, these condo owners really

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>pushed back. They didn't take the actions that are required

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>for self help by doing things like paying assessments or

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>borrowing to pay those assessments and exercising to care immediately.

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be weighed against the boards for do

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>you share responsibilities? Because the board is the one that

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>most informed, The board is the one with professionals, and

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the boarders the one who has volunteered in this case

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to take it upon themselves to take responsibility for everyone

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>around them, and that can't be aggregated by making a

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>blanket statement to your stakeholders. There were about a hundred

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and sixty thou condominium buildings in the US, and right

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>about now condo boards may be asking what they should

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>do to prevent anything like this from happening to their buildings.

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the first step for board is to look

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>around themselves and to say, are we positioning ourselves to

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>assess risk fully and completely? Is there enough diversity on

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 1>my board? And while we talk about diversity oftentimes in

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the sense that demographic retroversity and that certainly is important

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 1>in making sure you receive all all sides of views,

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>but also professional diversity and skill set diversity. And that's

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>really what you need when you're putting together a board

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>for something like a condo or even a corporation. And

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>when we work with boards, we're always saying to them, Okay,

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>let's make sure if you're enough financial restructuring, which is

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what I deal with that corral. Uh.

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>We we say to them, you know, hey, let's make

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>sure we have the right financial professionals um on the

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>on the board. And at the same time we say, okay,

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're dealing with a building, make sure you have

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>engineering professionals or architectural professionals. Think you also want to

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>make sure you're using your outside experts in the way

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're intended. And that doesn't mean receiving a blank

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>email with an attachment and letting that go to your

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>end box. Means opening it up and reading it with care,

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and since sitting down with your professional thing, Okay, what

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>does this really mean? How bad are things really? It'd

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>be nice to have all those people on the board,

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of times it's hard to find anybody

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to be on a board. They just don't want to

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>do it, to take the time involved. So you may

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>not have the ability to do that. Well, certainly it's

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a thankless job, particularly a volunteer board, and particularly when

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you're living amongst your neighbors and going to have to

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>make unpopular decisions. Those are exactly the people you need

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to step up, people who have the courage and the

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>integrity and the fort toe to make those hard decisions.

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's also look around them and say, you know what,

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to be on this board, but I don't

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>want to sit on a board with four people just likely,

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>so either I should take a step back and let

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, someone else with with a better set of

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>qualifications to come forward, or I should say nominating committee

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>or exist board who's acting a nominating committee. Why don't

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>we get some more diversity around us. Let's recruit people.

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's not wait for the person who raises their hands.

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes that's the person you need. Oftentimes that's just an

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>echo chamber of the members who are already there. So

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>let's be aggressive in recruitment. But also you're right, you

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>can you may not be able to recruit, particularly a

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>smaller building, or particularly in a building with with more

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>animosity amongst its residents, it might be hard to recruit members.

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>That's when you're professional advisors can come into place. That's

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>when you're your law firm, your financial advisor, your counter,

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>your professional engineer, et cetera. You want to bring them

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to the table. But it's also still important to figure

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>out who amongst the board members will take responsibility, take

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>ownership of the relationship with that professional. You know, I

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes when I'm advising a board, we'll figure out, Okay,

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the board member or two whose most act

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and the ones that are attentive to my issues. It

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>may not be the chairman who's dealing with overarching business

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>um issues when I'm dealing with a balance sheet restructuring,

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>so I might deal with I don't know that the

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>chairman of the audit committee or something like that. Similarly,

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're an engineer, you want to figure out who

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>on that board. If you're the professional retained engineer, figure

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>out who on the board is your most direct line,

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the one who's most concerned. And as a professional, it's

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 1>also very hard you want to actually find the board

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>member who's going to challenge you the most, because that's

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>how you as a professional and the board and its

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.719
<v Speaker 1>fiduciary duties are going to do the best work to

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>have a challenging but professional interfaith where you can say,

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>as a professional, this is a problem and board you

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>need to address it or the board can stay to

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you professionally, you need to give me more complete and

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>more directed by and so there's a push pull there

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>between the um, the board leadership and the professional leadership.

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>They need to work together and they need to supplement

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>each other, but very critically have to have an open

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:14.319
<v Speaker 1>line of communication. So now in Florida there is a

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>forty year requirement. Tell us about the requirement in Florida

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and what the board should do if the city doesn't

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 1>have that. It's interesting this borda requirement which I gather

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>is every four building over forty years and then every

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>ten years thereafter has to reinspect itself. But that should

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>just be a baseline. Anytime you have a regulation would

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>do this this. Oftentimes, this is where you've seen a

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>company like Lehman Brothers get into trouble or an end

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>around get into trouble if they were going to follow

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the strict rules of our regulations. Use an accounting regulation

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>or building regulation will follow the strict rules and if

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not required, we won't do it. Regulations should be

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a starting point, not an ending point. You think it's

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You often feel like it's burdensome to have to comply.

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's what you don't understand the reasons why regulations

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>were put into place. And so in this case, I'm

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>sure there were many buildings who said, oh, it's the

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>forty year per inspection, No big deal. We know our building,

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>we know it's in good shape. We know we have

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>builded elevator banks and shining floors. Everything must be great,

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and so we're going to skimp on our on our reinspections.

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly the opposite approach of what you need. You

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>need to be using this to remind you that, oh,

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>what do your buildings have to be looking out for this? Well,

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm twenty five years I'm fifteen years before that. Let

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>me start thinking at it a dance. Let me remember

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that there's this product, you know called consulting engineers that

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>are out there, and let me be talking to them

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>all of the time. Let me make sure that I'm

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the game. Because the other thing that happened

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>here is they waited too long to start the process

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of the repairs and it ended up a problem that

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>was seems to have been four decades in the making,

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>came to be a very large bill at the very end,

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and then you ended up with protests over how can

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you possibly assessed me the market value of my unit?

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 1>And support? Have been proactive, have been thinking about these

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>things all along, had not been differring maintenance and deferred

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.199
<v Speaker 1>maintenance is a liability and should be recognized as such.

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So the boards need to be active in advance and

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:34.719
<v Speaker 1>to go above and beyond the regulation as we've seen now. Unfortunately,

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with lives here, whether it's dealing with lives

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>or livelihoods where you often see in the financial context.

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>In either event, the stakes are extremely high, So why

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>would you try to save a penny here and there?

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for being on the Bloomberg Land Show, David. That's

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>David Prager, a managing director and head of the US

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>restructuring Advisory practice at Kroll. This is Bloomberg Law with

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>June Brussel from Bloomberg Radio. The Biden administration is moving

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to allow migrants crossing the US border to make their

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>cases for asylum before Department of Homeland Security officials rather

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>than judges. This applies to people who claim they have

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a credible fear of persecution at home. The new approach

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 1>would represent a wholesale change to the way asylum claims

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>are treated and would mark an about face from former

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>President Donald Trump's efforts to tighten asylum requirements. Joining me

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland and Knight. Tell

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>us what happens now when someone arrives at the border

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>requesting asylum. So it's de pays as we speak, because

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>there are multiple layers of this. But first of all,

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>if you arrive at the border seeking asylum as one

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>human being without any family members, what's the ever At

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the moment, you're currently blocked from seeking asylum because of

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>something called Title forty two of the Public Health Code,

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>which the which the Trump administration first activated and the

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration has kept, which says, because of COVID, we

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>are excluding people and not allowing them into the country. Now,

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>assuming that that is removed at some point, or assuming

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you're coming with a family, which is you know, there's

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>an adult and there's a child, those individuals are being

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>allowed into the United States, and when that happens, they

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>have to at the moment satisfy a immigration official that

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>they have a credible fear of persecution in their home country,

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>meaning they will be persecuted on the basis of their race,

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>their religion, their national origin, their political opinion, or their

0:14:56.680 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>social group. And so you have to show that. If

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't show that, then you can do one appeal

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to an immigration judge to try to show that. But

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>if you can't show that in neither of those two phases,

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you are excluded from the United States under something called

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>expedited removal. But if you can show that, then you're

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>allowed into the United States, whereby you can wait and

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>make your claim, your full asylum case before an immigration court.

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>And the criticism is that that process has taken many

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>years and that a lot of people don't then show

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>up the courts when it's their time to finally show

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>up the court. What would this change by the Biden

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>administration do. So, the change the Biden administration would do

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>is it would try to adjudicate a lot of these

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>asylum planes up front before ever waiting the many many

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>years to go to the immigration court. They would actually

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>take officers from U S c I S the U

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>S ship an immigration service and see if they can

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>at least get the meritorious planes out of the bunch

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and adjudicate them up front, so we can see who

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>actually can win right up front and not make them

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>have to wait many years, and then take the rest

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of the pile who then don't have the meritorious planes,

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and you can move them through a much more expedited

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>immigration court pocket that would be dedicated to their cases

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that would not take four years to resolve. So that

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>would be the idea would sort of creates an initial

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>layer of reviews that could say, we're not going to

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>have a group that fails because their case takes four years,

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and they don't drop the court in the meantime. If

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>they have a meritorious case, let's get their asylum claim

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>adjudicated immediately. And if we don't think they have a

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>meritorious case, let's move them into an immigration court proceeding

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that's more rapid, and let's try to get them through

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>this system quickly so that we don't have an incentive

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>for people to come in just so that they can

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>wait here for many years while the case is pending.

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Solely on what kind of proof can they offer. So

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the type of asylum claim you're making.

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>But let's take the two asylum claims that are typical

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>for Central America. So Central America, there's two typical cases

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 1>you see, and both of these are right at the

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>gray area of immigration law. But the Trump of illustration

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>had issued some decisions saying neither of these were asylum cases.

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>And the Biden administration has already canceled those decisions, but

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>they haven't supplemented it with exactly what you have to show.

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>And so the case, so the cases are as followed.

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>For men who seek asylum, it usually takes the path

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 1>of I was approached by gang members to join the gang.

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I was told if I didn't join this gang, I

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>would be murdered. I went to the police for help.

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>The police did not help me, and so I come back.

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>The gang will murder me. And so in those situations,

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>if you can show hospital records that show you were attacked,

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>if you could provide affidavit from witnesses who saw things

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>about you being attacked in those countries, if you can

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>provide any kind of, you know, evidence of a police

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>report that you filed in that country those things. The

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>more of that sort of circumstantial evidence that you can provide,

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the stronger it makes your asylum case. And then on

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the on the female front, typically what you see is

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a case where someone is alleging domestic violence, that they

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>went to the police and the police wouldn't do anything

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>about the domestic violence since some of they returned home

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:45.719
<v Speaker 1>they were likely to be killed, that they were fleeing

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>domestic violence. And so again here, if you had hospital records,

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>if you had a police report, those would be persuasive

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:56.959
<v Speaker 1>pieces of evidence that you could provide for these plans

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to be blunt. Does anyone ever arrive at the order

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and say, you know, I'm here to improve my life.

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I want better economic opportunities. So some people believe it

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>or not do Even at the height of the Obama administration,

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>where we had the biggest ways of people coming through,

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you still have ten percent of people who would literally

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>say just past and subject themselves to expedite and removal.

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:27.439
<v Speaker 1>They literally said that. But you did have people saying

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that they had some fear of persecution. Both you never

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>had zero, like you said, but it's very it's very rare.

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>So at the height of how many people were getting expedited,

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>remove on how many people were getting credible fear. During

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administration, it was in that situation. So yes,

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>people were saying persecution based playing and the law is

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>very generous at the upfront stage. What the law says

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is you have to have a significant possibility of being

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>able to assert a favorable asylum claim. And so basically

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that is considered something less than a ten percent chance

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of winning. But if you have lessons, if you can

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>show that you have something like a little less than

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>ten percent chance of winning your claim, they're supposed to

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>let you say in the United States, so that you

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>can make this claim. And it's only if your claim

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>has completely no credibility or you're not saying that you

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 1>have this fear that you don't get to stay in

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>this situation. So, now is there any downside for immigrants

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>to have this new rule? Well, so the idea is

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>this The criticism that it's been getting in the press

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is that if you don't articulate a new standard by

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>which people with the domestic violence or gang based claim

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>can make their plane, or if you don't provide them

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>counsel to a system to get the evidence that they

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>need to make these planes. That all this will do

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is have them lose, and so you don't want them

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>losing faster because you didn't change the standard or because

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you didn't provide legal existence to do it. So that's

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the concern that the immigrants rights community is setting forth is, Hey,

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>this could be a very very positive change if people

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>have some assistance to work through the system, or if

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 1>the standard can articulate a clear and articulable basis. But

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're waiting for the language to see on

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 1>how someone with a domestic violence based claim or a

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>gang based plane can actually gain or pylom And so

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the issue, and so they want to they want

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>their waiting for the regulatory language, the specific word for

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>word language to figure out does this regulation lay out

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>how you win one of these planes? And if it

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>does and it seems fair and it provides access to

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>some legal assistance to do it, then they would say

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>they're satisfied with that regulation. So that will be what

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone looked up for to determine whether the immigrants rights

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>community at least is satisfied with it. But but rid large,

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>this is an improvement because For most people, this just

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>gives them an extra chance of winning. While it does

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>expedite the potential of laws for some people. It does

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:29.479
<v Speaker 1>that in a way which is fair, which is, at

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, you've been given now a

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>second bite at the apple that you wouldn't have had

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>originally win. So if you have any time, you get

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>an extra byte at the apple to win your case.

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Rid large, it is a benefit for the people going

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>through the system. The Biding administration previously said they're going

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to advance this through a fast track process, and now

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>they're going to do it through I guess the regular

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>rule process. Is there a reason for that change, Yes,

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>because when you expedite a process, the problem is, first

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of all, number one, you make it much more subject

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to lawsuits, and so they've been getting suited by lots

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>of states government and they don't want to have it

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>subject to that. But I think number two, if we're

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>being practical about it, I think that they're going to

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>be keeping with the delta variants. This title forty to

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>authority in place for at least two months three more months,

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and because of that, there's no need to do an

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>emergency order because you can actually get the new changes

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in place before you end up lifting this title forty

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>two exclusion authorities. So I think that the need for

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the speed is not as high if they're not going

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>to lift the title forty two authority because of the

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>delta varreas and just explain the title forty two authority.

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>The title forty two authorities. What I've spoken about a

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>little earlier, which is this public health law that allows

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the administration to simply say, we're not even gonna consider

0:23:57.960 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 1>don't even talk to us. You're trying to come in

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.199
<v Speaker 1>a country your banned because of public health reasons. And

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>so you never even get to this discussion about whether

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>someone has a credible fear or not because they can

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>never make that discussion because the band has been put

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>in place for public health reasons. So, now, how much

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is the Biden administration doing to change Trump policies. There's

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 1>a new policy that they won't detain or arrest people

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:26.919
<v Speaker 1>who are pregnant or nursing. Well, I think there's been

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of changes. There's a lot of changes in

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the population of who's being detained. You're seeing no one

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>who's being detained essentially in our defension facilities from the

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>interior of the United States, meaning someone who's actually been

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>in the country and now they're being placed in removal proceedings.

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>The ICE removal facilities are basically composed entirely of people

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>who have shown up at the border and they're not

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.479
<v Speaker 1>from Mexico or Central America such that they can be

0:24:56.520 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 1>removed very quickly back across instead of these people from

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Ecuador or Brazil or places all around the world that

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Mexico won't allow us to just place these individuals back

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>into Mexico because they're not Mexican and they're not from

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 1>anywhere near Mexico, And so for those individuals, we're having

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to detain them in order to remove them back to

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>their specific nation. But that's it. Those are the only

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>people who you're seeing for the most part in ICE facilities,

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>And so it is a dramatic change. You're seeing much

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:33.959
<v Speaker 1>more usage of prosecutorial description. And now is this regulation

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna see an articulation that is much more generous

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of these domestic violence and gang related asylum

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>based claims and you had seen in the prior administration.

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>So how is that transformed into numbers? Are there more

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>immigrants being allowed in, so the numbers are higher in

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of people presenting themselves into the border, the numbers

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 1>are you know, we're seeing total around a hundred thousand

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>individuals a month trying to cross the southern border, and

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>so you know that's over and you or do that

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 1>over the course of a year, you're seeing like one

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 1>point two million people apprehended, which is higher than it's

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>been in the recent path. And so the question is

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>once this Title forty two authority is removed and so

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that anybody who claims asylum and has a credible fear

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>will be permitted inside, the question is will not open

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 1>an exponential increase in the number of people getting into

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the United States or will it just continue with the

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>one point two million per year, which is still higher

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>than it's been. It's not higher than it used to

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>be in the nineties and the early two thousands, but

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>for the range of I would say between two thousand

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and eight and two thousand twenty, it would be in

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the high range. And so the question is is that rage,

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>which Republican view is unacceptably high, gonna get higher if

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>some of these changes are made. And that's theming needs

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to be something that we will see, and I think

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it will depend a great deal on how quickly the

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>system actually works to remove people who don't have valid

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>plais in the United States. If that system works quickly,

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>then I think you will see eventually the numbers participate.

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>But if the system does that work quickly, then most

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>likely you will see a higher demand for access to

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the States. Is there an inconsistent message from the Biden

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>administration and that you know, they're trying to rebuild the

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 1>asylum process here and provide a legal path for undocumented immigrants,

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>but they're pushing for border enforcement southward, and they're enlisting

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the Mexican, the Guatemalan, and the Honduran authorities to try

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to militarize their southern borders. And Vice President Harris has

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>focused on diplomacy to improve conditions in the region. So

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 1>is there a mixed message or are they just trying everything? Well,

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's complicated, because I do think they're trying

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and we will see if they can succeed to have

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a framework where if you're from Central America, you could

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>actually make this claim for asylum in your home country,

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it be in Savado or Guatemala or under it

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and then if you win, you would just a visa

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that you can then use a refugee visa to enter

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 1>into the United States. And we will have to see

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in the regulations if they do that and if they

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>actually formalize the process that allows that, in which case,

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>if you don't follow that process, you would reach a

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>militarized response in whatever border you were trying to crawl.

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think if you had both of those things

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in place, then they are consistent and they can work together,

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and that is ideal. But it's to the extent that

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a cohesive system in place, that's when

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it's odd because then you can't tell someone who's a

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>legitimate refugee don't come, because that's not something you would

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>say to a legitimate refugee and be that's not something

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that would deter a legitimate refugee. Anyone who fears for

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>their life is going to come, regardless of whether a

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>politician is saying don't come. But if it's an economic migraine,

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>then that response is actually appropriate and then you can

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>actually say don't comment. You can have a militarized border,

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>but you would only know that if you had an

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>interaction with someone that would allow you to determine that.

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>And so the question is cando's interactions be made closer

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to where people are than at our southern border, and

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>so that's the question of conduct. Coherent policy be built

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>so that that's permitted and that people can make these

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>claims closer to where they are than at our southern border. Thanks.

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>That's Leon Fresco of Hollanden Knight. And that's it for

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this edition of the Bloomberg Law Show. I'm June Grasso,

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and you're listening to Bloomberg