1
00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:02,880
Speaker 1: While it likely will be months before the cause of

2
00:00:02,920 --> 00:00:06,600
Speaker 1: the deadly building collapse and Surf Side, Florida is determined,

3
00:00:06,800 --> 00:00:09,640
Speaker 1: more than a dozen lawsuits have already been filed on

4
00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:13,200
Speaker 1: behalf of the victims and their families against any person

5
00:00:13,320 --> 00:00:16,680
Speaker 1: or entity who might be responsible for the Champlain Tower

6
00:00:16,840 --> 00:00:20,759
Speaker 1: South condo collapse. Joining me is David Prager, a managing

7
00:00:20,800 --> 00:00:24,040
Speaker 1: director on the head of the US restructuring advisory practice

8
00:00:24,079 --> 00:00:28,040
Speaker 1: at Kroll David lawsuits have been filed against a host

9
00:00:28,080 --> 00:00:33,080
Speaker 1: of defendants, including the condominium association, the engineering firm that

10
00:00:33,159 --> 00:00:36,720
Speaker 1: inspected the building, the architects who designed it, the city

11
00:00:36,760 --> 00:00:40,720
Speaker 1: of Surf Side, and building officials. Is this just an

12
00:00:40,760 --> 00:00:45,600
Speaker 1: attempt to cover anyone, any person or entity who might

13
00:00:45,640 --> 00:00:49,440
Speaker 1: be responsible for the building collapse. Well, that's that's a

14
00:00:49,440 --> 00:00:52,400
Speaker 1: great question. I think there's a number of factors going

15
00:00:52,440 --> 00:00:55,400
Speaker 1: on here. One is your right. This is a fishing

16
00:00:55,400 --> 00:00:59,120
Speaker 1: expedition to try to figure out who knew what and

17
00:00:59,200 --> 00:01:02,800
Speaker 1: when and can you impute that knowledge onto other people.

18
00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:05,399
Speaker 1: But at the same time, I think it's also a

19
00:01:05,520 --> 00:01:08,399
Speaker 1: race to figure out where the deep pockets and to

20
00:01:08,480 --> 00:01:11,640
Speaker 1: make sure you're trying to hit at those deep pockets

21
00:01:11,680 --> 00:01:14,280
Speaker 1: as soon as possible. You know, people who unfortunately have

22
00:01:14,440 --> 00:01:18,720
Speaker 1: lost everything. The obvious place to go for recoveries here

23
00:01:19,160 --> 00:01:22,000
Speaker 1: would be to go to the buildings in the building association.

24
00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:25,280
Speaker 1: That's where the insurance was supposed to be held. That's

25
00:01:25,280 --> 00:01:29,520
Speaker 1: about the approximate cause of failure. But there's not much

26
00:01:29,640 --> 00:01:32,280
Speaker 1: left there. As you look at the insurance proceeds, they're

27
00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:36,679
Speaker 1: really minimal. I think there's fifteen million dollars in property

28
00:01:36,720 --> 00:01:39,840
Speaker 1: insurance in another eight or so. Reliability insurance really was

29
00:01:40,080 --> 00:01:44,920
Speaker 1: designed to cover minor incidents relative to this, so you

30
00:01:44,959 --> 00:01:47,160
Speaker 1: have to look somewhere else. You can't look really to

31
00:01:47,200 --> 00:01:49,960
Speaker 1: the board than those pockets aren't gonna be terribly deep

32
00:01:50,400 --> 00:01:54,160
Speaker 1: relative to the hundreds of affective lives here. So then

33
00:01:54,200 --> 00:01:57,080
Speaker 1: you are going to those further steps. The engineering firms

34
00:01:57,160 --> 00:02:00,000
Speaker 1: the city anywhere you can to try to find money,

35
00:02:00,120 --> 00:02:02,840
Speaker 1: and appears the plants are just trying to raise to

36
00:02:02,920 --> 00:02:06,960
Speaker 1: get to that money as quickly as possible. The engineering

37
00:02:07,000 --> 00:02:12,680
Speaker 1: firm released a statement saying it's report detailed significant cracks

38
00:02:12,720 --> 00:02:16,320
Speaker 1: and breaks in the concrete which required repairs to ensure

39
00:02:16,360 --> 00:02:19,120
Speaker 1: the safety of the residents and the public, and there

40
00:02:19,200 --> 00:02:21,720
Speaker 1: was a letter written by the president of the condo

41
00:02:21,800 --> 00:02:26,160
Speaker 1: association asking residents to fund more than fifteen million dollars

42
00:02:26,160 --> 00:02:30,240
Speaker 1: in repairs. How does that play into liability here? Well,

43
00:02:30,840 --> 00:02:33,880
Speaker 1: a lot of this goes, I think to the question

44
00:02:34,000 --> 00:02:37,600
Speaker 1: of what is standard in practice, who is responsible for

45
00:02:37,639 --> 00:02:41,400
Speaker 1: reviewing those reports, and who is responsible for understanding exactly

46
00:02:41,440 --> 00:02:44,040
Speaker 1: what is in there? And frankly, was the board and

47
00:02:44,120 --> 00:02:48,160
Speaker 1: the management company well equipped to understand the level of

48
00:02:48,240 --> 00:02:50,760
Speaker 1: disclosure that was being made by the engineering firm. If

49
00:02:50,800 --> 00:02:54,560
Speaker 1: you look through the two report, the notices that have

50
00:02:54,639 --> 00:02:57,959
Speaker 1: been in the popular press here and are blazoned all

51
00:02:57,960 --> 00:03:02,000
Speaker 1: over the lawsuits are somewhat buried in the reports. You

52
00:03:02,040 --> 00:03:04,680
Speaker 1: have to read down, I think on stage six or seven,

53
00:03:05,120 --> 00:03:06,720
Speaker 1: and you know at the end of the section and

54
00:03:06,840 --> 00:03:10,200
Speaker 1: says it's somewhere is it written in big blazing letters

55
00:03:10,520 --> 00:03:14,480
Speaker 1: warning there's an eminent threat to life here? So who

56
00:03:14,720 --> 00:03:18,160
Speaker 1: was responsible for understanding that? I think certainly if the

57
00:03:18,240 --> 00:03:21,600
Speaker 1: board was responsible for taking upon them selves to understand that,

58
00:03:21,800 --> 00:03:24,600
Speaker 1: I would think that the engineer would have also been responsible.

59
00:03:24,680 --> 00:03:28,360
Speaker 1: But the engineer isn't really a fiduciary to the building

60
00:03:28,639 --> 00:03:31,399
Speaker 1: residents or to the building owners, and so then you'd

61
00:03:31,400 --> 00:03:33,920
Speaker 1: have to look at what their contractual liabilities are and

62
00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:38,080
Speaker 1: does this amount to a gross negligence claim or willfulness

63
00:03:38,120 --> 00:03:42,360
Speaker 1: conduct claim or is there some other claim and torque

64
00:03:42,440 --> 00:03:46,200
Speaker 1: that connects this engineer back to having a legal obligation.

65
00:03:46,400 --> 00:03:50,400
Speaker 1: Certainly in retrospect, it seems that the moral obligation there

66
00:03:50,480 --> 00:03:54,040
Speaker 1: was a shortcoming all along the way, and that seems

67
00:03:54,040 --> 00:03:55,960
Speaker 1: to them the most recent board seems to have been

68
00:03:56,000 --> 00:03:58,680
Speaker 1: trying to clear that up and to clear up their

69
00:03:58,760 --> 00:04:02,680
Speaker 1: legal obligations just a little bit too late, and as

70
00:04:02,680 --> 00:04:06,160
Speaker 1: you're going to look back, too little too late was

71
00:04:06,440 --> 00:04:11,160
Speaker 1: tragic here, but probably leads to some level of culpability.

72
00:04:11,720 --> 00:04:13,600
Speaker 1: We do this all the time at Krolom, were in

73
00:04:13,640 --> 00:04:16,039
Speaker 1: a station as an expert, being in a financial matter

74
00:04:16,200 --> 00:04:19,760
Speaker 1: or otherwise, you look at the known or noable standards.

75
00:04:19,880 --> 00:04:22,839
Speaker 1: Was there fraud being committed based on what was known

76
00:04:22,920 --> 00:04:26,360
Speaker 1: at the time or knowable based on information that was

77
00:04:26,400 --> 00:04:29,160
Speaker 1: available in the public record or in your private records.

78
00:04:29,400 --> 00:04:32,440
Speaker 1: And as we're now going through these reports, you're seeing

79
00:04:32,480 --> 00:04:37,240
Speaker 1: that it was available to the board, it was available

80
00:04:37,279 --> 00:04:39,719
Speaker 1: to the management, and should have been available to the

81
00:04:39,800 --> 00:04:44,479
Speaker 1: condo owners had they made do inquiry. And there's going

82
00:04:44,560 --> 00:04:48,120
Speaker 1: to be I think, unfortunately for for those effected. There

83
00:04:48,160 --> 00:04:51,520
Speaker 1: may be some level of apportionment of blame here to

84
00:04:51,600 --> 00:04:54,320
Speaker 1: go back and say, you know, these condo owners really

85
00:04:54,400 --> 00:04:58,240
Speaker 1: pushed back. They didn't take the actions that are required

86
00:04:58,720 --> 00:05:02,120
Speaker 1: for self help by doing things like paying assessments or

87
00:05:02,200 --> 00:05:06,720
Speaker 1: borrowing to pay those assessments and exercising to care immediately.

88
00:05:07,120 --> 00:05:09,840
Speaker 1: That's going to be weighed against the boards for do

89
00:05:09,839 --> 00:05:12,719
Speaker 1: you share responsibilities? Because the board is the one that

90
00:05:13,680 --> 00:05:16,560
Speaker 1: most informed, The board is the one with professionals, and

91
00:05:16,560 --> 00:05:19,679
Speaker 1: the boarders the one who has volunteered in this case

92
00:05:19,760 --> 00:05:23,440
Speaker 1: to take it upon themselves to take responsibility for everyone

93
00:05:23,839 --> 00:05:27,600
Speaker 1: around them, and that can't be aggregated by making a

94
00:05:28,080 --> 00:05:32,040
Speaker 1: blanket statement to your stakeholders. There were about a hundred

95
00:05:32,040 --> 00:05:36,400
Speaker 1: and sixty thou condominium buildings in the US, and right

96
00:05:36,480 --> 00:05:39,839
Speaker 1: about now condo boards may be asking what they should

97
00:05:39,839 --> 00:05:43,279
Speaker 1: do to prevent anything like this from happening to their buildings.

98
00:05:43,640 --> 00:05:46,080
Speaker 1: I think the first step for board is to look

99
00:05:46,120 --> 00:05:49,720
Speaker 1: around themselves and to say, are we positioning ourselves to

100
00:05:50,600 --> 00:05:55,200
Speaker 1: assess risk fully and completely? Is there enough diversity on

101
00:05:55,279 --> 00:05:59,359
Speaker 1: my board? And while we talk about diversity oftentimes in

102
00:05:59,360 --> 00:06:03,800
Speaker 1: the sense that demographic retroversity and that certainly is important

103
00:06:03,839 --> 00:06:08,279
Speaker 1: in making sure you receive all all sides of views,

104
00:06:08,400 --> 00:06:13,160
Speaker 1: but also professional diversity and skill set diversity. And that's

105
00:06:13,160 --> 00:06:16,280
Speaker 1: really what you need when you're putting together a board

106
00:06:16,320 --> 00:06:20,040
Speaker 1: for something like a condo or even a corporation. And

107
00:06:20,080 --> 00:06:24,400
Speaker 1: when we work with boards, we're always saying to them, Okay,

108
00:06:24,480 --> 00:06:27,599
Speaker 1: let's make sure if you're enough financial restructuring, which is

109
00:06:27,600 --> 00:06:29,920
Speaker 1: a lot of what I deal with that corral. Uh.

110
00:06:30,560 --> 00:06:33,040
Speaker 1: We we say to them, you know, hey, let's make

111
00:06:33,040 --> 00:06:36,400
Speaker 1: sure we have the right financial professionals um on the

112
00:06:36,960 --> 00:06:39,600
Speaker 1: on the board. And at the same time we say, okay,

113
00:06:39,640 --> 00:06:41,719
Speaker 1: if you're dealing with a building, make sure you have

114
00:06:42,440 --> 00:06:46,160
Speaker 1: engineering professionals or architectural professionals. Think you also want to

115
00:06:46,160 --> 00:06:49,200
Speaker 1: make sure you're using your outside experts in the way

116
00:06:49,240 --> 00:06:53,520
Speaker 1: that they're intended. And that doesn't mean receiving a blank

117
00:06:53,640 --> 00:06:56,840
Speaker 1: email with an attachment and letting that go to your

118
00:06:56,920 --> 00:06:59,360
Speaker 1: end box. Means opening it up and reading it with care,

119
00:06:59,480 --> 00:07:03,240
Speaker 1: and since sitting down with your professional thing, Okay, what

120
00:07:03,320 --> 00:07:07,680
Speaker 1: does this really mean? How bad are things really? It'd

121
00:07:07,680 --> 00:07:09,880
Speaker 1: be nice to have all those people on the board,

122
00:07:10,080 --> 00:07:12,360
Speaker 1: but a lot of times it's hard to find anybody

123
00:07:12,480 --> 00:07:14,400
Speaker 1: to be on a board. They just don't want to

124
00:07:14,400 --> 00:07:17,520
Speaker 1: do it, to take the time involved. So you may

125
00:07:17,560 --> 00:07:21,440
Speaker 1: not have the ability to do that. Well, certainly it's

126
00:07:21,480 --> 00:07:25,280
Speaker 1: a thankless job, particularly a volunteer board, and particularly when

127
00:07:25,280 --> 00:07:28,000
Speaker 1: you're living amongst your neighbors and going to have to

128
00:07:28,080 --> 00:07:32,720
Speaker 1: make unpopular decisions. Those are exactly the people you need

129
00:07:32,760 --> 00:07:35,800
Speaker 1: to step up, people who have the courage and the

130
00:07:35,840 --> 00:07:39,560
Speaker 1: integrity and the fort toe to make those hard decisions.

131
00:07:39,680 --> 00:07:41,920
Speaker 1: Let's also look around them and say, you know what,

132
00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:45,320
Speaker 1: I want to be on this board, but I don't

133
00:07:45,320 --> 00:07:47,920
Speaker 1: want to sit on a board with four people just likely,

134
00:07:48,160 --> 00:07:51,720
Speaker 1: so either I should take a step back and let

135
00:07:52,000 --> 00:07:54,120
Speaker 1: you know, someone else with with a better set of

136
00:07:54,320 --> 00:07:58,920
Speaker 1: qualifications to come forward, or I should say nominating committee

137
00:07:59,480 --> 00:08:02,720
Speaker 1: or exist board who's acting a nominating committee. Why don't

138
00:08:02,720 --> 00:08:05,680
Speaker 1: we get some more diversity around us. Let's recruit people.

139
00:08:06,120 --> 00:08:08,720
Speaker 1: Let's not wait for the person who raises their hands.

140
00:08:08,960 --> 00:08:12,080
Speaker 1: Sometimes that's the person you need. Oftentimes that's just an

141
00:08:12,080 --> 00:08:15,680
Speaker 1: echo chamber of the members who are already there. So

142
00:08:15,800 --> 00:08:19,960
Speaker 1: let's be aggressive in recruitment. But also you're right, you

143
00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:22,680
Speaker 1: can you may not be able to recruit, particularly a

144
00:08:22,720 --> 00:08:25,800
Speaker 1: smaller building, or particularly in a building with with more

145
00:08:25,840 --> 00:08:29,840
Speaker 1: animosity amongst its residents, it might be hard to recruit members.

146
00:08:29,880 --> 00:08:33,360
Speaker 1: That's when you're professional advisors can come into place. That's

147
00:08:33,400 --> 00:08:37,800
Speaker 1: when you're your law firm, your financial advisor, your counter,

148
00:08:37,920 --> 00:08:40,760
Speaker 1: your professional engineer, et cetera. You want to bring them

149
00:08:40,800 --> 00:08:44,160
Speaker 1: to the table. But it's also still important to figure

150
00:08:44,160 --> 00:08:47,320
Speaker 1: out who amongst the board members will take responsibility, take

151
00:08:47,360 --> 00:08:52,200
Speaker 1: ownership of the relationship with that professional. You know, I

152
00:08:52,240 --> 00:08:56,760
Speaker 1: oftentimes when I'm advising a board, we'll figure out, Okay,

153
00:08:57,000 --> 00:08:59,920
Speaker 1: this is the board member or two whose most act

154
00:09:00,640 --> 00:09:03,920
Speaker 1: and the ones that are attentive to my issues. It

155
00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:08,120
Speaker 1: may not be the chairman who's dealing with overarching business

156
00:09:08,240 --> 00:09:11,439
Speaker 1: um issues when I'm dealing with a balance sheet restructuring,

157
00:09:11,880 --> 00:09:13,920
Speaker 1: so I might deal with I don't know that the

158
00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:17,280
Speaker 1: chairman of the audit committee or something like that. Similarly,

159
00:09:17,320 --> 00:09:19,880
Speaker 1: if you're an engineer, you want to figure out who

160
00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:23,200
Speaker 1: on that board. If you're the professional retained engineer, figure

161
00:09:23,240 --> 00:09:25,280
Speaker 1: out who on the board is your most direct line,

162
00:09:25,320 --> 00:09:28,920
Speaker 1: the one who's most concerned. And as a professional, it's

163
00:09:28,920 --> 00:09:32,319
Speaker 1: also very hard you want to actually find the board

164
00:09:32,360 --> 00:09:36,040
Speaker 1: member who's going to challenge you the most, because that's

165
00:09:36,040 --> 00:09:38,640
Speaker 1: how you as a professional and the board and its

166
00:09:38,640 --> 00:09:41,719
Speaker 1: fiduciary duties are going to do the best work to

167
00:09:41,800 --> 00:09:47,240
Speaker 1: have a challenging but professional interfaith where you can say,

168
00:09:47,640 --> 00:09:50,320
Speaker 1: as a professional, this is a problem and board you

169
00:09:50,360 --> 00:09:52,280
Speaker 1: need to address it or the board can stay to

170
00:09:52,320 --> 00:09:55,800
Speaker 1: you professionally, you need to give me more complete and

171
00:09:55,840 --> 00:09:58,920
Speaker 1: more directed by and so there's a push pull there

172
00:09:59,000 --> 00:10:03,560
Speaker 1: between the um, the board leadership and the professional leadership.

173
00:10:03,600 --> 00:10:06,480
Speaker 1: They need to work together and they need to supplement

174
00:10:06,520 --> 00:10:10,360
Speaker 1: each other, but very critically have to have an open

175
00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:14,319
Speaker 1: line of communication. So now in Florida there is a

176
00:10:14,400 --> 00:10:18,440
Speaker 1: forty year requirement. Tell us about the requirement in Florida

177
00:10:18,480 --> 00:10:20,520
Speaker 1: and what the board should do if the city doesn't

178
00:10:20,520 --> 00:10:25,319
Speaker 1: have that. It's interesting this borda requirement which I gather

179
00:10:25,440 --> 00:10:28,280
Speaker 1: is every four building over forty years and then every

180
00:10:28,280 --> 00:10:32,360
Speaker 1: ten years thereafter has to reinspect itself. But that should

181
00:10:32,440 --> 00:10:36,040
Speaker 1: just be a baseline. Anytime you have a regulation would

182
00:10:36,040 --> 00:10:39,160
Speaker 1: do this this. Oftentimes, this is where you've seen a

183
00:10:39,200 --> 00:10:42,520
Speaker 1: company like Lehman Brothers get into trouble or an end

184
00:10:42,520 --> 00:10:44,800
Speaker 1: around get into trouble if they were going to follow

185
00:10:44,920 --> 00:10:49,000
Speaker 1: the strict rules of our regulations. Use an accounting regulation

186
00:10:49,480 --> 00:10:53,199
Speaker 1: or building regulation will follow the strict rules and if

187
00:10:53,200 --> 00:10:56,880
Speaker 1: it's not required, we won't do it. Regulations should be

188
00:10:56,920 --> 00:11:00,600
Speaker 1: a starting point, not an ending point. You think it's

189
00:11:00,800 --> 00:11:03,480
Speaker 1: You often feel like it's burdensome to have to comply.

190
00:11:03,720 --> 00:11:07,760
Speaker 1: So that's what you don't understand the reasons why regulations

191
00:11:07,760 --> 00:11:10,840
Speaker 1: were put into place. And so in this case, I'm

192
00:11:10,880 --> 00:11:13,280
Speaker 1: sure there were many buildings who said, oh, it's the

193
00:11:13,360 --> 00:11:17,040
Speaker 1: forty year per inspection, No big deal. We know our building,

194
00:11:17,440 --> 00:11:19,640
Speaker 1: we know it's in good shape. We know we have

195
00:11:19,800 --> 00:11:24,560
Speaker 1: builded elevator banks and shining floors. Everything must be great,

196
00:11:24,960 --> 00:11:28,880
Speaker 1: and so we're going to skimp on our on our reinspections.

197
00:11:28,960 --> 00:11:33,000
Speaker 1: That's exactly the opposite approach of what you need. You

198
00:11:33,080 --> 00:11:35,280
Speaker 1: need to be using this to remind you that, oh,

199
00:11:35,520 --> 00:11:37,720
Speaker 1: what do your buildings have to be looking out for this? Well,

200
00:11:37,720 --> 00:11:40,480
Speaker 1: I'm twenty five years I'm fifteen years before that. Let

201
00:11:40,559 --> 00:11:42,920
Speaker 1: me start thinking at it a dance. Let me remember

202
00:11:43,000 --> 00:11:47,080
Speaker 1: that there's this product, you know called consulting engineers that

203
00:11:47,120 --> 00:11:49,040
Speaker 1: are out there, and let me be talking to them

204
00:11:49,240 --> 00:11:51,760
Speaker 1: all of the time. Let me make sure that I'm

205
00:11:51,800 --> 00:11:54,120
Speaker 1: ahead of the game. Because the other thing that happened

206
00:11:54,120 --> 00:11:58,600
Speaker 1: here is they waited too long to start the process

207
00:11:58,640 --> 00:12:01,120
Speaker 1: of the repairs and it ended up a problem that

208
00:12:01,200 --> 00:12:03,880
Speaker 1: was seems to have been four decades in the making,

209
00:12:04,720 --> 00:12:07,480
Speaker 1: came to be a very large bill at the very end,

210
00:12:07,920 --> 00:12:10,320
Speaker 1: and then you ended up with protests over how can

211
00:12:10,360 --> 00:12:15,640
Speaker 1: you possibly assessed me the market value of my unit?

212
00:12:16,760 --> 00:12:19,319
Speaker 1: And support? Have been proactive, have been thinking about these

213
00:12:19,320 --> 00:12:23,360
Speaker 1: things all along, had not been differring maintenance and deferred

214
00:12:23,360 --> 00:12:26,199
Speaker 1: maintenance is a liability and should be recognized as such.

215
00:12:26,720 --> 00:12:29,800
Speaker 1: So the boards need to be active in advance and

216
00:12:29,960 --> 00:12:34,719
Speaker 1: to go above and beyond the regulation as we've seen now. Unfortunately,

217
00:12:35,280 --> 00:12:38,920
Speaker 1: we're dealing with lives here, whether it's dealing with lives

218
00:12:39,040 --> 00:12:42,400
Speaker 1: or livelihoods where you often see in the financial context.

219
00:12:43,200 --> 00:12:49,320
Speaker 1: In either event, the stakes are extremely high, So why

220
00:12:49,320 --> 00:12:51,280
Speaker 1: would you try to save a penny here and there?

221
00:12:51,760 --> 00:12:54,120
Speaker 1: Thanks for being on the Bloomberg Land Show, David. That's

222
00:12:54,200 --> 00:12:56,800
Speaker 1: David Prager, a managing director and head of the US

223
00:12:56,920 --> 00:13:06,360
Speaker 1: restructuring Advisory practice at Kroll. This is Bloomberg Law with

224
00:13:06,440 --> 00:13:11,920
Speaker 1: June Brussel from Bloomberg Radio. The Biden administration is moving

225
00:13:11,960 --> 00:13:15,480
Speaker 1: to allow migrants crossing the US border to make their

226
00:13:15,520 --> 00:13:20,160
Speaker 1: cases for asylum before Department of Homeland Security officials rather

227
00:13:20,200 --> 00:13:23,320
Speaker 1: than judges. This applies to people who claim they have

228
00:13:23,320 --> 00:13:26,640
Speaker 1: a credible fear of persecution at home. The new approach

229
00:13:26,679 --> 00:13:30,559
Speaker 1: would represent a wholesale change to the way asylum claims

230
00:13:30,559 --> 00:13:33,520
Speaker 1: are treated and would mark an about face from former

231
00:13:33,559 --> 00:13:37,880
Speaker 1: President Donald Trump's efforts to tighten asylum requirements. Joining me

232
00:13:37,960 --> 00:13:40,680
Speaker 1: is Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland and Knight. Tell

233
00:13:40,760 --> 00:13:44,760
Speaker 1: us what happens now when someone arrives at the border

234
00:13:44,880 --> 00:13:49,400
Speaker 1: requesting asylum. So it's de pays as we speak, because

235
00:13:49,559 --> 00:13:52,240
Speaker 1: there are multiple layers of this. But first of all,

236
00:13:52,720 --> 00:13:56,760
Speaker 1: if you arrive at the border seeking asylum as one

237
00:13:56,880 --> 00:14:00,920
Speaker 1: human being without any family members, what's the ever At

238
00:14:00,960 --> 00:14:05,160
Speaker 1: the moment, you're currently blocked from seeking asylum because of

239
00:14:05,200 --> 00:14:08,240
Speaker 1: something called Title forty two of the Public Health Code,

240
00:14:08,520 --> 00:14:12,280
Speaker 1: which the which the Trump administration first activated and the

241
00:14:12,360 --> 00:14:17,600
Speaker 1: Biden administration has kept, which says, because of COVID, we

242
00:14:17,640 --> 00:14:21,520
Speaker 1: are excluding people and not allowing them into the country. Now,

243
00:14:21,680 --> 00:14:27,120
Speaker 1: assuming that that is removed at some point, or assuming

244
00:14:27,160 --> 00:14:29,680
Speaker 1: you're coming with a family, which is you know, there's

245
00:14:29,680 --> 00:14:33,480
Speaker 1: an adult and there's a child, those individuals are being

246
00:14:33,480 --> 00:14:37,440
Speaker 1: allowed into the United States, and when that happens, they

247
00:14:37,480 --> 00:14:43,440
Speaker 1: have to at the moment satisfy a immigration official that

248
00:14:43,560 --> 00:14:48,600
Speaker 1: they have a credible fear of persecution in their home country,

249
00:14:48,680 --> 00:14:51,400
Speaker 1: meaning they will be persecuted on the basis of their race,

250
00:14:51,800 --> 00:14:56,400
Speaker 1: their religion, their national origin, their political opinion, or their

251
00:14:56,680 --> 00:15:00,840
Speaker 1: social group. And so you have to show that. If

252
00:15:00,880 --> 00:15:04,040
Speaker 1: you can't show that, then you can do one appeal

253
00:15:04,080 --> 00:15:06,760
Speaker 1: to an immigration judge to try to show that. But

254
00:15:06,800 --> 00:15:10,080
Speaker 1: if you can't show that in neither of those two phases,

255
00:15:10,600 --> 00:15:14,080
Speaker 1: you are excluded from the United States under something called

256
00:15:14,160 --> 00:15:17,840
Speaker 1: expedited removal. But if you can show that, then you're

257
00:15:17,880 --> 00:15:22,720
Speaker 1: allowed into the United States, whereby you can wait and

258
00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:27,200
Speaker 1: make your claim, your full asylum case before an immigration court.

259
00:15:27,360 --> 00:15:30,840
Speaker 1: And the criticism is that that process has taken many

260
00:15:30,960 --> 00:15:33,800
Speaker 1: years and that a lot of people don't then show

261
00:15:33,880 --> 00:15:36,760
Speaker 1: up the courts when it's their time to finally show

262
00:15:36,800 --> 00:15:39,720
Speaker 1: up the court. What would this change by the Biden

263
00:15:39,760 --> 00:15:44,960
Speaker 1: administration do. So, the change the Biden administration would do

264
00:15:45,360 --> 00:15:49,080
Speaker 1: is it would try to adjudicate a lot of these

265
00:15:49,120 --> 00:15:53,480
Speaker 1: asylum planes up front before ever waiting the many many

266
00:15:53,560 --> 00:15:56,480
Speaker 1: years to go to the immigration court. They would actually

267
00:15:56,520 --> 00:15:59,080
Speaker 1: take officers from U S c I S the U

268
00:15:59,160 --> 00:16:02,520
Speaker 1: S ship an immigration service and see if they can

269
00:16:02,560 --> 00:16:07,760
Speaker 1: at least get the meritorious planes out of the bunch

270
00:16:08,360 --> 00:16:10,800
Speaker 1: and adjudicate them up front, so we can see who

271
00:16:10,880 --> 00:16:14,160
Speaker 1: actually can win right up front and not make them

272
00:16:14,160 --> 00:16:17,160
Speaker 1: have to wait many years, and then take the rest

273
00:16:17,200 --> 00:16:20,640
Speaker 1: of the pile who then don't have the meritorious planes,

274
00:16:21,120 --> 00:16:23,640
Speaker 1: and you can move them through a much more expedited

275
00:16:23,680 --> 00:16:27,680
Speaker 1: immigration court pocket that would be dedicated to their cases

276
00:16:27,720 --> 00:16:30,920
Speaker 1: that would not take four years to resolve. So that

277
00:16:30,920 --> 00:16:33,960
Speaker 1: would be the idea would sort of creates an initial

278
00:16:34,480 --> 00:16:37,960
Speaker 1: layer of reviews that could say, we're not going to

279
00:16:38,040 --> 00:16:40,880
Speaker 1: have a group that fails because their case takes four years,

280
00:16:40,880 --> 00:16:43,160
Speaker 1: and they don't drop the court in the meantime. If

281
00:16:43,200 --> 00:16:46,640
Speaker 1: they have a meritorious case, let's get their asylum claim

282
00:16:46,680 --> 00:16:50,120
Speaker 1: adjudicated immediately. And if we don't think they have a

283
00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:54,360
Speaker 1: meritorious case, let's move them into an immigration court proceeding

284
00:16:54,440 --> 00:16:57,920
Speaker 1: that's more rapid, and let's try to get them through

285
00:16:57,960 --> 00:17:01,200
Speaker 1: this system quickly so that we don't have an incentive

286
00:17:01,280 --> 00:17:03,800
Speaker 1: for people to come in just so that they can

287
00:17:04,000 --> 00:17:06,639
Speaker 1: wait here for many years while the case is pending.

288
00:17:07,200 --> 00:17:10,480
Speaker 1: Solely on what kind of proof can they offer. So

289
00:17:10,640 --> 00:17:13,800
Speaker 1: it depends on the type of asylum claim you're making.

290
00:17:14,320 --> 00:17:17,800
Speaker 1: But let's take the two asylum claims that are typical

291
00:17:18,160 --> 00:17:22,240
Speaker 1: for Central America. So Central America, there's two typical cases

292
00:17:22,280 --> 00:17:24,199
Speaker 1: you see, and both of these are right at the

293
00:17:24,280 --> 00:17:27,600
Speaker 1: gray area of immigration law. But the Trump of illustration

294
00:17:27,920 --> 00:17:31,240
Speaker 1: had issued some decisions saying neither of these were asylum cases.

295
00:17:31,640 --> 00:17:35,280
Speaker 1: And the Biden administration has already canceled those decisions, but

296
00:17:35,359 --> 00:17:38,520
Speaker 1: they haven't supplemented it with exactly what you have to show.

297
00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:41,440
Speaker 1: And so the case, so the cases are as followed.

298
00:17:41,880 --> 00:17:46,040
Speaker 1: For men who seek asylum, it usually takes the path

299
00:17:46,240 --> 00:17:51,399
Speaker 1: of I was approached by gang members to join the gang.

300
00:17:51,920 --> 00:17:53,960
Speaker 1: I was told if I didn't join this gang, I

301
00:17:53,960 --> 00:17:56,800
Speaker 1: would be murdered. I went to the police for help.

302
00:17:57,200 --> 00:18:00,720
Speaker 1: The police did not help me, and so I come back.

303
00:18:01,080 --> 00:18:04,280
Speaker 1: The gang will murder me. And so in those situations,

304
00:18:04,359 --> 00:18:07,960
Speaker 1: if you can show hospital records that show you were attacked,

305
00:18:08,480 --> 00:18:13,960
Speaker 1: if you could provide affidavit from witnesses who saw things

306
00:18:14,000 --> 00:18:17,480
Speaker 1: about you being attacked in those countries, if you can

307
00:18:17,600 --> 00:18:21,440
Speaker 1: provide any kind of, you know, evidence of a police

308
00:18:21,440 --> 00:18:24,760
Speaker 1: report that you filed in that country those things. The

309
00:18:24,800 --> 00:18:27,960
Speaker 1: more of that sort of circumstantial evidence that you can provide,

310
00:18:28,320 --> 00:18:30,920
Speaker 1: the stronger it makes your asylum case. And then on

311
00:18:31,040 --> 00:18:34,480
Speaker 1: the on the female front, typically what you see is

312
00:18:34,520 --> 00:18:38,000
Speaker 1: a case where someone is alleging domestic violence, that they

313
00:18:38,040 --> 00:18:40,399
Speaker 1: went to the police and the police wouldn't do anything

314
00:18:40,440 --> 00:18:43,640
Speaker 1: about the domestic violence since some of they returned home

315
00:18:43,680 --> 00:18:45,719
Speaker 1: they were likely to be killed, that they were fleeing

316
00:18:46,119 --> 00:18:50,080
Speaker 1: domestic violence. And so again here, if you had hospital records,

317
00:18:50,119 --> 00:18:53,480
Speaker 1: if you had a police report, those would be persuasive

318
00:18:54,080 --> 00:18:56,959
Speaker 1: pieces of evidence that you could provide for these plans

319
00:18:57,160 --> 00:19:00,320
Speaker 1: to be blunt. Does anyone ever arrive at the order

320
00:19:00,359 --> 00:19:03,320
Speaker 1: and say, you know, I'm here to improve my life.

321
00:19:03,359 --> 00:19:07,240
Speaker 1: I want better economic opportunities. So some people believe it

322
00:19:07,320 --> 00:19:11,040
Speaker 1: or not do Even at the height of the Obama administration,

323
00:19:11,760 --> 00:19:15,359
Speaker 1: where we had the biggest ways of people coming through,

324
00:19:15,800 --> 00:19:18,600
Speaker 1: you still have ten percent of people who would literally

325
00:19:18,640 --> 00:19:22,440
Speaker 1: say just past and subject themselves to expedite and removal.

326
00:19:22,760 --> 00:19:27,439
Speaker 1: They literally said that. But you did have people saying

327
00:19:27,480 --> 00:19:30,920
Speaker 1: that they had some fear of persecution. Both you never

328
00:19:31,000 --> 00:19:35,080
Speaker 1: had zero, like you said, but it's very it's very rare.

329
00:19:35,280 --> 00:19:40,360
Speaker 1: So at the height of how many people were getting expedited,

330
00:19:40,400 --> 00:19:42,760
Speaker 1: remove on how many people were getting credible fear. During

331
00:19:42,760 --> 00:19:47,480
Speaker 1: the Obama administration, it was in that situation. So yes,

332
00:19:48,000 --> 00:19:54,280
Speaker 1: people were saying persecution based playing and the law is

333
00:19:54,480 --> 00:19:57,600
Speaker 1: very generous at the upfront stage. What the law says

334
00:19:57,720 --> 00:20:01,760
Speaker 1: is you have to have a significant possibility of being

335
00:20:01,800 --> 00:20:06,520
Speaker 1: able to assert a favorable asylum claim. And so basically

336
00:20:06,640 --> 00:20:10,320
Speaker 1: that is considered something less than a ten percent chance

337
00:20:10,760 --> 00:20:13,000
Speaker 1: of winning. But if you have lessons, if you can

338
00:20:13,040 --> 00:20:16,000
Speaker 1: show that you have something like a little less than

339
00:20:16,080 --> 00:20:19,320
Speaker 1: ten percent chance of winning your claim, they're supposed to

340
00:20:19,400 --> 00:20:23,199
Speaker 1: let you say in the United States, so that you

341
00:20:23,280 --> 00:20:26,200
Speaker 1: can make this claim. And it's only if your claim

342
00:20:26,280 --> 00:20:30,520
Speaker 1: has completely no credibility or you're not saying that you

343
00:20:30,600 --> 00:20:33,679
Speaker 1: have this fear that you don't get to stay in

344
00:20:33,680 --> 00:20:39,080
Speaker 1: this situation. So, now is there any downside for immigrants

345
00:20:39,119 --> 00:20:43,639
Speaker 1: to have this new rule? Well, so the idea is

346
00:20:43,680 --> 00:20:46,480
Speaker 1: this The criticism that it's been getting in the press

347
00:20:46,960 --> 00:20:51,960
Speaker 1: is that if you don't articulate a new standard by

348
00:20:51,960 --> 00:20:55,359
Speaker 1: which people with the domestic violence or gang based claim

349
00:20:55,480 --> 00:20:59,200
Speaker 1: can make their plane, or if you don't provide them

350
00:20:59,280 --> 00:21:03,040
Speaker 1: counsel to a system to get the evidence that they

351
00:21:03,080 --> 00:21:06,240
Speaker 1: need to make these planes. That all this will do

352
00:21:06,280 --> 00:21:09,320
Speaker 1: is have them lose, and so you don't want them

353
00:21:09,400 --> 00:21:13,680
Speaker 1: losing faster because you didn't change the standard or because

354
00:21:13,720 --> 00:21:16,760
Speaker 1: you didn't provide legal existence to do it. So that's

355
00:21:16,800 --> 00:21:20,760
Speaker 1: the concern that the immigrants rights community is setting forth is, Hey,

356
00:21:20,880 --> 00:21:24,080
Speaker 1: this could be a very very positive change if people

357
00:21:24,119 --> 00:21:27,920
Speaker 1: have some assistance to work through the system, or if

358
00:21:27,920 --> 00:21:33,199
Speaker 1: the standard can articulate a clear and articulable basis. But

359
00:21:33,320 --> 00:21:35,960
Speaker 1: that's what they're waiting for the language to see on

360
00:21:36,080 --> 00:21:40,119
Speaker 1: how someone with a domestic violence based claim or a

361
00:21:40,320 --> 00:21:43,960
Speaker 1: gang based plane can actually gain or pylom And so

362
00:21:44,160 --> 00:21:46,400
Speaker 1: that's the issue, and so they want to they want

363
00:21:46,440 --> 00:21:50,760
Speaker 1: their waiting for the regulatory language, the specific word for

364
00:21:50,880 --> 00:21:54,560
Speaker 1: word language to figure out does this regulation lay out

365
00:21:54,600 --> 00:21:57,240
Speaker 1: how you win one of these planes? And if it

366
00:21:57,320 --> 00:22:01,480
Speaker 1: does and it seems fair and it provides access to

367
00:22:01,680 --> 00:22:05,000
Speaker 1: some legal assistance to do it, then they would say

368
00:22:05,160 --> 00:22:08,040
Speaker 1: they're satisfied with that regulation. So that will be what

369
00:22:08,080 --> 00:22:12,240
Speaker 1: everyone looked up for to determine whether the immigrants rights

370
00:22:12,280 --> 00:22:15,159
Speaker 1: community at least is satisfied with it. But but rid large,

371
00:22:15,520 --> 00:22:19,280
Speaker 1: this is an improvement because For most people, this just

372
00:22:19,320 --> 00:22:22,720
Speaker 1: gives them an extra chance of winning. While it does

373
00:22:22,880 --> 00:22:27,320
Speaker 1: expedite the potential of laws for some people. It does

374
00:22:27,359 --> 00:22:29,479
Speaker 1: that in a way which is fair, which is, at

375
00:22:29,520 --> 00:22:32,159
Speaker 1: the end of the day, you've been given now a

376
00:22:32,280 --> 00:22:34,520
Speaker 1: second bite at the apple that you wouldn't have had

377
00:22:34,560 --> 00:22:37,720
Speaker 1: originally win. So if you have any time, you get

378
00:22:37,760 --> 00:22:39,760
Speaker 1: an extra byte at the apple to win your case.

379
00:22:40,480 --> 00:22:43,200
Speaker 1: Rid large, it is a benefit for the people going

380
00:22:43,240 --> 00:22:47,600
Speaker 1: through the system. The Biding administration previously said they're going

381
00:22:47,640 --> 00:22:51,320
Speaker 1: to advance this through a fast track process, and now

382
00:22:51,359 --> 00:22:53,760
Speaker 1: they're going to do it through I guess the regular

383
00:22:54,160 --> 00:22:58,440
Speaker 1: rule process. Is there a reason for that change, Yes,

384
00:22:58,480 --> 00:23:02,840
Speaker 1: because when you expedite a process, the problem is, first

385
00:23:02,840 --> 00:23:05,440
Speaker 1: of all, number one, you make it much more subject

386
00:23:05,480 --> 00:23:08,280
Speaker 1: to lawsuits, and so they've been getting suited by lots

387
00:23:08,280 --> 00:23:10,399
Speaker 1: of states government and they don't want to have it

388
00:23:10,520 --> 00:23:13,320
Speaker 1: subject to that. But I think number two, if we're

389
00:23:13,320 --> 00:23:16,240
Speaker 1: being practical about it, I think that they're going to

390
00:23:16,280 --> 00:23:19,159
Speaker 1: be keeping with the delta variants. This title forty to

391
00:23:19,320 --> 00:23:23,920
Speaker 1: authority in place for at least two months three more months,

392
00:23:24,040 --> 00:23:26,280
Speaker 1: and because of that, there's no need to do an

393
00:23:26,280 --> 00:23:31,240
Speaker 1: emergency order because you can actually get the new changes

394
00:23:31,280 --> 00:23:34,840
Speaker 1: in place before you end up lifting this title forty

395
00:23:34,880 --> 00:23:38,359
Speaker 1: two exclusion authorities. So I think that the need for

396
00:23:38,560 --> 00:23:42,000
Speaker 1: the speed is not as high if they're not going

397
00:23:42,040 --> 00:23:44,359
Speaker 1: to lift the title forty two authority because of the

398
00:23:44,400 --> 00:23:47,960
Speaker 1: delta varreas and just explain the title forty two authority.

399
00:23:48,320 --> 00:23:50,720
Speaker 1: The title forty two authorities. What I've spoken about a

400
00:23:50,720 --> 00:23:54,600
Speaker 1: little earlier, which is this public health law that allows

401
00:23:54,760 --> 00:23:57,760
Speaker 1: the administration to simply say, we're not even gonna consider

402
00:23:57,960 --> 00:23:59,919
Speaker 1: don't even talk to us. You're trying to come in

403
00:24:00,000 --> 00:24:03,199
Speaker 1: a country your banned because of public health reasons. And

404
00:24:03,240 --> 00:24:05,639
Speaker 1: so you never even get to this discussion about whether

405
00:24:05,680 --> 00:24:08,840
Speaker 1: someone has a credible fear or not because they can

406
00:24:08,880 --> 00:24:12,200
Speaker 1: never make that discussion because the band has been put

407
00:24:12,200 --> 00:24:15,800
Speaker 1: in place for public health reasons. So, now, how much

408
00:24:15,840 --> 00:24:20,520
Speaker 1: is the Biden administration doing to change Trump policies. There's

409
00:24:20,520 --> 00:24:23,639
Speaker 1: a new policy that they won't detain or arrest people

410
00:24:23,640 --> 00:24:26,919
Speaker 1: who are pregnant or nursing. Well, I think there's been

411
00:24:26,960 --> 00:24:30,119
Speaker 1: a lot of changes. There's a lot of changes in

412
00:24:30,160 --> 00:24:33,720
Speaker 1: the population of who's being detained. You're seeing no one

413
00:24:33,760 --> 00:24:38,400
Speaker 1: who's being detained essentially in our defension facilities from the

414
00:24:38,480 --> 00:24:41,600
Speaker 1: interior of the United States, meaning someone who's actually been

415
00:24:41,680 --> 00:24:45,119
Speaker 1: in the country and now they're being placed in removal proceedings.

416
00:24:45,119 --> 00:24:50,080
Speaker 1: The ICE removal facilities are basically composed entirely of people

417
00:24:50,080 --> 00:24:52,800
Speaker 1: who have shown up at the border and they're not

418
00:24:53,000 --> 00:24:56,479
Speaker 1: from Mexico or Central America such that they can be

419
00:24:56,520 --> 00:25:00,640
Speaker 1: removed very quickly back across instead of these people from

420
00:25:00,680 --> 00:25:05,159
Speaker 1: Ecuador or Brazil or places all around the world that

421
00:25:05,880 --> 00:25:08,840
Speaker 1: Mexico won't allow us to just place these individuals back

422
00:25:08,880 --> 00:25:11,639
Speaker 1: into Mexico because they're not Mexican and they're not from

423
00:25:11,680 --> 00:25:15,640
Speaker 1: anywhere near Mexico, And so for those individuals, we're having

424
00:25:15,680 --> 00:25:18,480
Speaker 1: to detain them in order to remove them back to

425
00:25:18,640 --> 00:25:21,600
Speaker 1: their specific nation. But that's it. Those are the only

426
00:25:21,640 --> 00:25:25,040
Speaker 1: people who you're seeing for the most part in ICE facilities,

427
00:25:25,480 --> 00:25:29,400
Speaker 1: And so it is a dramatic change. You're seeing much

428
00:25:29,440 --> 00:25:33,959
Speaker 1: more usage of prosecutorial description. And now is this regulation

429
00:25:34,040 --> 00:25:38,359
Speaker 1: You're gonna see an articulation that is much more generous

430
00:25:38,400 --> 00:25:42,440
Speaker 1: in terms of these domestic violence and gang related asylum

431
00:25:42,480 --> 00:25:45,160
Speaker 1: based claims and you had seen in the prior administration.

432
00:25:46,080 --> 00:25:51,160
Speaker 1: So how is that transformed into numbers? Are there more

433
00:25:51,200 --> 00:25:55,280
Speaker 1: immigrants being allowed in, so the numbers are higher in

434
00:25:55,400 --> 00:25:58,520
Speaker 1: terms of people presenting themselves into the border, the numbers

435
00:25:58,640 --> 00:26:01,920
Speaker 1: are you know, we're seeing total around a hundred thousand

436
00:26:01,920 --> 00:26:05,040
Speaker 1: individuals a month trying to cross the southern border, and

437
00:26:05,119 --> 00:26:07,040
Speaker 1: so you know that's over and you or do that

438
00:26:07,080 --> 00:26:09,880
Speaker 1: over the course of a year, you're seeing like one

439
00:26:09,880 --> 00:26:12,640
Speaker 1: point two million people apprehended, which is higher than it's

440
00:26:12,680 --> 00:26:16,600
Speaker 1: been in the recent path. And so the question is

441
00:26:16,800 --> 00:26:21,040
Speaker 1: once this Title forty two authority is removed and so

442
00:26:21,160 --> 00:26:24,320
Speaker 1: that anybody who claims asylum and has a credible fear

443
00:26:24,560 --> 00:26:27,720
Speaker 1: will be permitted inside, the question is will not open

444
00:26:27,800 --> 00:26:31,640
Speaker 1: an exponential increase in the number of people getting into

445
00:26:31,720 --> 00:26:34,399
Speaker 1: the United States or will it just continue with the

446
00:26:34,440 --> 00:26:37,840
Speaker 1: one point two million per year, which is still higher

447
00:26:37,840 --> 00:26:40,159
Speaker 1: than it's been. It's not higher than it used to

448
00:26:40,160 --> 00:26:43,399
Speaker 1: be in the nineties and the early two thousands, but

449
00:26:43,640 --> 00:26:47,080
Speaker 1: for the range of I would say between two thousand

450
00:26:47,080 --> 00:26:49,600
Speaker 1: and eight and two thousand twenty, it would be in

451
00:26:49,680 --> 00:26:53,480
Speaker 1: the high range. And so the question is is that rage,

452
00:26:53,560 --> 00:26:58,280
Speaker 1: which Republican view is unacceptably high, gonna get higher if

453
00:26:58,320 --> 00:27:00,480
Speaker 1: some of these changes are made. And that's theming needs

454
00:27:00,480 --> 00:27:02,760
Speaker 1: to be something that we will see, and I think

455
00:27:02,800 --> 00:27:06,080
Speaker 1: it will depend a great deal on how quickly the

456
00:27:06,280 --> 00:27:10,840
Speaker 1: system actually works to remove people who don't have valid

457
00:27:10,920 --> 00:27:14,240
Speaker 1: plais in the United States. If that system works quickly,

458
00:27:14,960 --> 00:27:19,000
Speaker 1: then I think you will see eventually the numbers participate.

459
00:27:19,640 --> 00:27:22,720
Speaker 1: But if the system does that work quickly, then most

460
00:27:22,760 --> 00:27:25,520
Speaker 1: likely you will see a higher demand for access to

461
00:27:25,560 --> 00:27:29,320
Speaker 1: the States. Is there an inconsistent message from the Biden

462
00:27:29,320 --> 00:27:32,560
Speaker 1: administration and that you know, they're trying to rebuild the

463
00:27:32,600 --> 00:27:39,159
Speaker 1: asylum process here and provide a legal path for undocumented immigrants,

464
00:27:39,160 --> 00:27:44,080
Speaker 1: but they're pushing for border enforcement southward, and they're enlisting

465
00:27:44,160 --> 00:27:48,160
Speaker 1: the Mexican, the Guatemalan, and the Honduran authorities to try

466
00:27:48,160 --> 00:27:52,280
Speaker 1: to militarize their southern borders. And Vice President Harris has

467
00:27:52,320 --> 00:27:56,720
Speaker 1: focused on diplomacy to improve conditions in the region. So

468
00:27:56,840 --> 00:28:00,159
Speaker 1: is there a mixed message or are they just trying everything? Well,

469
00:28:00,160 --> 00:28:03,680
Speaker 1: I think it's complicated, because I do think they're trying

470
00:28:03,800 --> 00:28:06,280
Speaker 1: and we will see if they can succeed to have

471
00:28:06,400 --> 00:28:09,800
Speaker 1: a framework where if you're from Central America, you could

472
00:28:09,800 --> 00:28:13,800
Speaker 1: actually make this claim for asylum in your home country,

473
00:28:13,880 --> 00:28:17,000
Speaker 1: whether it be in Savado or Guatemala or under it

474
00:28:17,400 --> 00:28:19,879
Speaker 1: and then if you win, you would just a visa

475
00:28:20,119 --> 00:28:22,960
Speaker 1: that you can then use a refugee visa to enter

476
00:28:23,040 --> 00:28:25,120
Speaker 1: into the United States. And we will have to see

477
00:28:25,119 --> 00:28:27,520
Speaker 1: in the regulations if they do that and if they

478
00:28:27,560 --> 00:28:31,680
Speaker 1: actually formalize the process that allows that, in which case,

479
00:28:31,720 --> 00:28:34,800
Speaker 1: if you don't follow that process, you would reach a

480
00:28:34,800 --> 00:28:38,680
Speaker 1: militarized response in whatever border you were trying to crawl.

481
00:28:39,080 --> 00:28:41,080
Speaker 1: So I think if you had both of those things

482
00:28:41,080 --> 00:28:45,000
Speaker 1: in place, then they are consistent and they can work together,

483
00:28:45,400 --> 00:28:48,200
Speaker 1: and that is ideal. But it's to the extent that

484
00:28:48,240 --> 00:28:51,440
Speaker 1: you don't have a cohesive system in place, that's when

485
00:28:51,600 --> 00:28:54,280
Speaker 1: it's odd because then you can't tell someone who's a

486
00:28:54,400 --> 00:28:58,360
Speaker 1: legitimate refugee don't come, because that's not something you would

487
00:28:58,360 --> 00:29:02,360
Speaker 1: say to a legitimate refugee and be that's not something

488
00:29:02,400 --> 00:29:05,000
Speaker 1: that would deter a legitimate refugee. Anyone who fears for

489
00:29:05,120 --> 00:29:07,440
Speaker 1: their life is going to come, regardless of whether a

490
00:29:07,480 --> 00:29:11,720
Speaker 1: politician is saying don't come. But if it's an economic migraine,

491
00:29:12,000 --> 00:29:16,440
Speaker 1: then that response is actually appropriate and then you can

492
00:29:16,480 --> 00:29:19,320
Speaker 1: actually say don't comment. You can have a militarized border,

493
00:29:19,600 --> 00:29:22,160
Speaker 1: but you would only know that if you had an

494
00:29:22,160 --> 00:29:25,160
Speaker 1: interaction with someone that would allow you to determine that.

495
00:29:25,680 --> 00:29:29,240
Speaker 1: And so the question is cando's interactions be made closer

496
00:29:29,280 --> 00:29:32,880
Speaker 1: to where people are than at our southern border, and

497
00:29:32,920 --> 00:29:36,360
Speaker 1: so that's the question of conduct. Coherent policy be built

498
00:29:36,560 --> 00:29:39,120
Speaker 1: so that that's permitted and that people can make these

499
00:29:39,120 --> 00:29:43,040
Speaker 1: claims closer to where they are than at our southern border. Thanks.

500
00:29:43,720 --> 00:29:46,520
Speaker 1: That's Leon Fresco of Hollanden Knight. And that's it for

501
00:29:46,600 --> 00:29:49,360
Speaker 1: this edition of the Bloomberg Law Show. I'm June Grasso,

502
00:29:49,440 --> 00:29:50,720
Speaker 1: and you're listening to Bloomberg