1
00:00:01,400 --> 00:00:04,480
Speaker 1: My son in law introduced me to the topic. He

2
00:00:04,559 --> 00:00:07,720
Speaker 1: had an interest in it, and he helped me by

3
00:00:07,840 --> 00:00:12,639
Speaker 1: my first fit coin. This was in that twenty time frame.

4
00:00:12,880 --> 00:00:15,800
Speaker 1: First introduction to this world was from my teenage Sonum.

5
00:00:15,960 --> 00:00:19,840
Speaker 1: He was thirteen, and Endy came said, momot my bit point,

6
00:00:20,000 --> 00:00:27,960
Speaker 1: and I said, absolutely not. I'm Stacy Marie Ishmael, Managing

7
00:00:28,040 --> 00:00:31,160
Speaker 1: editor of Crypto for Bloomberg News, And this is Bloomberg

8
00:00:31,160 --> 00:00:35,559
Speaker 1: Crypto at Daily Bloomberg I Heart Podcast. It's Friday, June seventeen.

9
00:00:39,000 --> 00:00:41,560
Speaker 1: Today on Bloomberg Crypto, we're taking another look at the

10
00:00:41,640 --> 00:00:44,920
Speaker 1: u S approach to regulate the cryptocurrencies. There's a real

11
00:00:45,040 --> 00:00:47,559
Speaker 1: drive on Capitol Hill right now to figure out how

12
00:00:47,600 --> 00:00:50,680
Speaker 1: to define and regulate this asset class and how best

13
00:00:50,720 --> 00:00:54,400
Speaker 1: to protect consumers. This is especially true in the wake

14
00:00:54,480 --> 00:00:57,040
Speaker 1: of the collapse of the Terra stable coin on the

15
00:00:57,040 --> 00:01:01,160
Speaker 1: effects that had on retail investors. The latest and biggest

16
00:01:01,200 --> 00:01:04,480
Speaker 1: attempt in this direction comes from the bipartisan duo of

17
00:01:04,520 --> 00:01:08,560
Speaker 1: Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York and Republican Senator

18
00:01:08,640 --> 00:01:12,880
Speaker 1: Cynthia Loomis of Wyoming. They're proposing legislation that would, among

19
00:01:13,080 --> 00:01:16,640
Speaker 1: many other things, clarify the rules of how two very

20
00:01:16,680 --> 00:01:20,959
Speaker 1: different government agencies, the CFTC and the SEC, would divvy

21
00:01:21,040 --> 00:01:24,480
Speaker 1: up the crypto landscape. Their bill also contains a proposal

22
00:01:24,560 --> 00:01:28,120
Speaker 1: for regularly saying crypto mining. But can it pass and

23
00:01:28,160 --> 00:01:31,840
Speaker 1: how would it work in practice? Bloomberg report to Alison Verse.

24
00:01:31,880 --> 00:01:38,600
Speaker 1: Brill joins me. Now, Alison, thank you so much for

25
00:01:38,680 --> 00:01:41,279
Speaker 1: joining us today. We're going to talk about a pair

26
00:01:41,360 --> 00:01:45,480
Speaker 1: of senators. We have on the one side, Senator Kristen Gillibrand,

27
00:01:45,600 --> 00:01:48,200
Speaker 1: who is a Democrat from New York, and a Republican

28
00:01:48,280 --> 00:01:51,720
Speaker 1: Senator Cynthia Loomis of Wyoming, who have just introduced a

29
00:01:51,760 --> 00:01:55,080
Speaker 1: crypto regulation bill. What specifically is in it? So we

30
00:01:55,120 --> 00:01:57,440
Speaker 1: saw several things in this bill. I mean, it's very

31
00:01:57,480 --> 00:02:00,720
Speaker 1: sweeping by nature, but I think on a high level,

32
00:02:00,760 --> 00:02:03,560
Speaker 1: we have stable coin regulation in here. You know, it

33
00:02:03,560 --> 00:02:07,160
Speaker 1: would require issuers to have a hundred percent reserves and

34
00:02:07,160 --> 00:02:11,480
Speaker 1: then make public disclosures about the assets backing their tokens um.

35
00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:14,640
Speaker 1: We would also see a directive that the government a

36
00:02:14,680 --> 00:02:16,960
Speaker 1: government watch out to a study on some of the

37
00:02:16,960 --> 00:02:21,000
Speaker 1: opportunities and risks of investing in retirement savings and digital assets.

38
00:02:21,600 --> 00:02:26,400
Speaker 1: We'd see the Commodities Feature Trading Commission get significantly greater

39
00:02:26,520 --> 00:02:30,720
Speaker 1: role in regulating digital assets. Um. They would actually have

40
00:02:31,320 --> 00:02:34,800
Speaker 1: you know, primary jurisdiction over coins like bitcoin and ether,

41
00:02:34,919 --> 00:02:37,040
Speaker 1: which together make up more than half of the total

42
00:02:37,120 --> 00:02:41,880
Speaker 1: market capitalization. So um, not a small amount of us.

43
00:02:42,440 --> 00:02:46,120
Speaker 1: Not a small amount. And actually the senators after introducing

44
00:02:46,120 --> 00:02:50,240
Speaker 1: this bill, you know, they mentioned so CFTC would have

45
00:02:50,480 --> 00:02:53,080
Speaker 1: kind of, uh, the bigger role when it comes to

46
00:02:53,200 --> 00:02:56,639
Speaker 1: market capitalization, but then sec would likely have a bigger role.

47
00:02:56,680 --> 00:03:00,520
Speaker 1: And when it comes to the number of token that

48
00:03:00,560 --> 00:03:04,720
Speaker 1: would fall under sort of the securities definition. Um, so

49
00:03:04,800 --> 00:03:07,640
Speaker 1: kind of an interesting distinction there. And then we'd also

50
00:03:07,720 --> 00:03:10,799
Speaker 1: have the creation of an advisory committee and this would

51
00:03:10,840 --> 00:03:14,040
Speaker 1: be you know, consist of private and public sector members.

52
00:03:14,560 --> 00:03:18,160
Speaker 1: And essentially the idea is to help the government keep

53
00:03:18,200 --> 00:03:21,919
Speaker 1: pace with innovation, because we know that things move at

54
00:03:21,960 --> 00:03:24,840
Speaker 1: a record pace when it comes to digital assets. Uh.

55
00:03:24,919 --> 00:03:27,040
Speaker 1: And so this this committee would be tasked with coming

56
00:03:27,120 --> 00:03:31,080
Speaker 1: up with recommendations and um, you know, on new developments

57
00:03:31,120 --> 00:03:33,239
Speaker 1: and and kind of which agencies should be in charge.

58
00:03:33,760 --> 00:03:35,520
Speaker 1: And you've got some of the backstory of how these

59
00:03:35,520 --> 00:03:38,480
Speaker 1: senators got interested not just in crypto, but in working

60
00:03:38,480 --> 00:03:40,920
Speaker 1: with each other. Tell me more about that. Both of

61
00:03:40,920 --> 00:03:45,080
Speaker 1: those senators have expressed an interest in cryptocurrency, and I

62
00:03:45,080 --> 00:03:48,680
Speaker 1: think it stems from two different places. With Senator Lemis,

63
00:03:48,760 --> 00:03:51,480
Speaker 1: you know, she started investing in this very early. She

64
00:03:51,560 --> 00:03:55,760
Speaker 1: has um bought her first bitcoin in at the recommendation

65
00:03:55,800 --> 00:03:59,960
Speaker 1: of her son in law. And then and then Senator Delibery.

66
00:04:00,040 --> 00:04:03,120
Speaker 1: And you know, she told me in another colleague of

67
00:04:03,120 --> 00:04:05,640
Speaker 1: mine that she began working on the Senate Intelligence Committee

68
00:04:05,640 --> 00:04:09,400
Speaker 1: about a year ago and really started participating in hearings

69
00:04:09,480 --> 00:04:14,000
Speaker 1: on virtual currency and the blockchain UM. And she also,

70
00:04:14,160 --> 00:04:17,760
Speaker 1: you know, she represents New York, which is the financial

71
00:04:17,760 --> 00:04:20,320
Speaker 1: capital of the world, and so so New Yorkers will

72
00:04:20,320 --> 00:04:22,760
Speaker 1: tell you so New Yorkers will tell you that's right.

73
00:04:23,240 --> 00:04:26,080
Speaker 1: And so she you know, that's there's obviously been a

74
00:04:26,080 --> 00:04:28,760
Speaker 1: lot of interest from local politicians in New York and

75
00:04:28,800 --> 00:04:31,880
Speaker 1: so she's kind of jumping in on that. And you know,

76
00:04:31,960 --> 00:04:35,000
Speaker 1: she was the one um to approach Senator Lummis. So

77
00:04:35,080 --> 00:04:38,520
Speaker 1: she approached Sanis Lumis. Yes, that's the story we were told.

78
00:04:38,600 --> 00:04:42,640
Speaker 1: So it's it's pretty interesting they um. You know, Senator Delibran,

79
00:04:42,720 --> 00:04:45,560
Speaker 1: as she describes it, was working I think about a

80
00:04:45,640 --> 00:04:50,919
Speaker 1: year ago on legislation to help sexual assault victims in

81
00:04:50,960 --> 00:04:55,360
Speaker 1: the military, and she, you know, told a story about

82
00:04:55,400 --> 00:04:57,880
Speaker 1: Senator Lumis being really willing to jump in on that

83
00:04:57,960 --> 00:05:01,800
Speaker 1: effort without having to consult her staff. Um, you know,

84
00:05:01,920 --> 00:05:03,560
Speaker 1: just knowing that it was an area that was of

85
00:05:03,640 --> 00:05:08,919
Speaker 1: interest to Senator Jella Brand. She told us that that

86
00:05:09,000 --> 00:05:11,520
Speaker 1: really really stuck with her. Um. She said, she felt

87
00:05:11,520 --> 00:05:13,880
Speaker 1: like Senator Lammis was an a lawmaker that could make

88
00:05:13,920 --> 00:05:17,040
Speaker 1: decisions quickly, that could act, you know, sort of outside

89
00:05:17,040 --> 00:05:20,520
Speaker 1: of the normal partisan divides we sometimes see in Congress.

90
00:05:20,640 --> 00:05:24,960
Speaker 1: And so when she started getting interested in cryptocurrency and

91
00:05:25,000 --> 00:05:28,080
Speaker 1: she noticed that Senator Lammis was working on a big,

92
00:05:28,120 --> 00:05:32,120
Speaker 1: sweeping bill um to regulate the industry, I came to Washington.

93
00:05:32,839 --> 00:05:36,359
Speaker 1: I found out that very few of any members of

94
00:05:36,360 --> 00:05:40,840
Speaker 1: the Senate had an awareness of how big bitcoin and

95
00:05:40,880 --> 00:05:44,560
Speaker 1: other digital assets were becoming, and that there was a

96
00:05:44,680 --> 00:05:49,839
Speaker 1: vacuum of both interest and knowledge about this topic. And

97
00:05:49,920 --> 00:05:52,840
Speaker 1: yet it was becoming more and more apparent that a

98
00:05:52,880 --> 00:05:57,640
Speaker 1: framework for regulation was going to be needed. She approached her,

99
00:05:57,680 --> 00:05:59,720
Speaker 1: and you know, now we have both of them working

100
00:05:59,720 --> 00:06:03,000
Speaker 1: together there. So, yeah, then is a genuinely refreshing thing

101
00:06:03,240 --> 00:06:07,040
Speaker 1: to hear because you know, so much of how regulation

102
00:06:07,120 --> 00:06:09,080
Speaker 1: is presented, and certainly so much of how politics is

103
00:06:09,120 --> 00:06:14,320
Speaker 1: presented right now, comes from a very adversarial place. Sounds

104
00:06:14,400 --> 00:06:16,320
Speaker 1: like these are two folks who are absolutely coming at

105
00:06:16,320 --> 00:06:19,760
Speaker 1: crypto from very different perspectives, but who found enough to

106
00:06:20,160 --> 00:06:22,520
Speaker 1: agree on. What are some of the things they agree on?

107
00:06:22,560 --> 00:06:24,440
Speaker 1: What are they trying to do with this bill specifically?

108
00:06:25,360 --> 00:06:28,800
Speaker 1: So they both talk a lot about innovation and seeing

109
00:06:28,839 --> 00:06:32,560
Speaker 1: that there are some you know, potential areas um where

110
00:06:32,560 --> 00:06:36,240
Speaker 1: they want to encourage companies to continue experimenting. But they

111
00:06:36,279 --> 00:06:40,919
Speaker 1: also you know, mentioned things like the recent terror collapse

112
00:06:41,040 --> 00:06:43,960
Speaker 1: and and the fact that you know, you need some guardrails,

113
00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:47,440
Speaker 1: that things are getting really complex, um. And so they

114
00:06:47,440 --> 00:06:49,440
Speaker 1: want to regulate, but they're trying to be a little

115
00:06:49,480 --> 00:06:52,400
Speaker 1: bit more flexible. And I think one of the really

116
00:06:52,480 --> 00:06:54,880
Speaker 1: interesting aspects of this bill that they talked to us

117
00:06:54,880 --> 00:06:57,760
Speaker 1: about was this advisory body that they would like to

118
00:06:57,800 --> 00:07:00,919
Speaker 1: create and essentially how that would work anytime there's a

119
00:07:00,920 --> 00:07:03,920
Speaker 1: new development in the industry, So say, you know, non

120
00:07:03,960 --> 00:07:07,680
Speaker 1: fungible tokens a year or so ago, um, then you

121
00:07:07,720 --> 00:07:10,720
Speaker 1: would have this body look at that and kind of decide,

122
00:07:11,120 --> 00:07:13,440
Speaker 1: you know, who should regulate that how should we approach

123
00:07:13,480 --> 00:07:15,600
Speaker 1: us going forward? So they really want to be adaptable,

124
00:07:15,600 --> 00:07:18,280
Speaker 1: which I think is is a pretty interesting concept. And

125
00:07:18,280 --> 00:07:20,920
Speaker 1: now we'll see, uh, you know, how that works in

126
00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:24,680
Speaker 1: the long run. But I think UM that's been one

127
00:07:24,800 --> 00:07:26,600
Speaker 1: of the areas that I think is appealing to the

128
00:07:26,640 --> 00:07:30,400
Speaker 1: industry as well. Is not acknowledging that maybe something that

129
00:07:30,440 --> 00:07:32,440
Speaker 1: works today is not going to work in the future

130
00:07:32,480 --> 00:07:35,720
Speaker 1: for this particular industry. I've talked for a lot of

131
00:07:35,920 --> 00:07:40,320
Speaker 1: industry members and having clarity is extremely important to them

132
00:07:40,400 --> 00:07:42,400
Speaker 1: because they don't want to build a business model that's

133
00:07:42,440 --> 00:07:46,080
Speaker 1: some regulators going to say it is inappropriate three years

134
00:07:46,080 --> 00:07:47,840
Speaker 1: from now or fires from now. They want to be

135
00:07:47,880 --> 00:07:51,200
Speaker 1: able to know that their ideas can be manifest in

136
00:07:51,800 --> 00:07:55,400
Speaker 1: UM a regulatory framework that works for them and works

137
00:07:55,880 --> 00:07:59,160
Speaker 1: for consumer protection and safety and SAMUS and all those medicals.

138
00:07:59,680 --> 00:08:03,400
Speaker 1: So I am optimistic it's still exactly that right, so

139
00:08:03,520 --> 00:08:07,160
Speaker 1: very explicitly addressing the criticism that regulators always regulating the

140
00:08:07,240 --> 00:08:11,040
Speaker 1: last five years and not the coming five years. Yes,

141
00:08:13,440 --> 00:08:15,440
Speaker 1: who are some of the folks who would be key

142
00:08:15,720 --> 00:08:19,920
Speaker 1: to having this have any chance at role at actually

143
00:08:19,960 --> 00:08:23,440
Speaker 1: becoming law? Are there other you know, folks in Congress

144
00:08:23,480 --> 00:08:25,600
Speaker 1: that they need to be allies or at least to

145
00:08:25,720 --> 00:08:29,000
Speaker 1: not be adversaries. So I think, you know, obviously one

146
00:08:29,040 --> 00:08:32,079
Speaker 1: of the positive aspects of this bill is that it's bipartisan,

147
00:08:32,360 --> 00:08:35,080
Speaker 1: but I think you would really need buy in UM

148
00:08:35,120 --> 00:08:37,439
Speaker 1: from leaders on the Senate Banking Committee. You have Chairman

149
00:08:37,520 --> 00:08:40,600
Speaker 1: shared Brown and Ranking Member Pat to me, and then

150
00:08:40,640 --> 00:08:42,920
Speaker 1: you also are going to want some buy in UH

151
00:08:43,160 --> 00:08:45,720
Speaker 1: from leaders on other committees. Had just send it finance

152
00:08:46,160 --> 00:08:49,160
Speaker 1: given that there are tax elements of this bill, so

153
00:08:49,600 --> 00:08:52,480
Speaker 1: having some support from someone like Senator Ron wide And

154
00:08:52,559 --> 00:08:54,839
Speaker 1: doesn't hurt it either. Are there any folks on there

155
00:08:54,840 --> 00:08:58,800
Speaker 1: who may have always say competing interests? So you know,

156
00:08:59,000 --> 00:09:02,920
Speaker 1: I think sometimes is it competing or is it a complementary?

157
00:09:02,960 --> 00:09:05,480
Speaker 1: I think maybe the jury is still out, but we

158
00:09:05,559 --> 00:09:10,000
Speaker 1: do know that Chairwoman uh Stabano of the Senate Agriculture

159
00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:13,800
Speaker 1: Committee is working on a barpartisan bill with um Marky

160
00:09:13,880 --> 00:09:18,680
Speaker 1: Member John Boseman on cryptocurrency oversight UM, specifically giving the

161
00:09:18,679 --> 00:09:22,480
Speaker 1: CFTC more authority over coins like bitcoin and ether um.

162
00:09:22,520 --> 00:09:24,199
Speaker 1: So it's pretty similar to what we're seeing in the

163
00:09:24,280 --> 00:09:28,600
Speaker 1: Lummis and Gillibrand bill, but coming directly from the Chairwoman UM,

164
00:09:28,600 --> 00:09:31,480
Speaker 1: which is important I think, and we've seen that the

165
00:09:31,520 --> 00:09:35,400
Speaker 1: Senator's Lumis and Gilibran have talked about this being complementary

166
00:09:35,440 --> 00:09:38,000
Speaker 1: to what they're doing and not necessarily supplanting kind of

167
00:09:38,000 --> 00:09:41,520
Speaker 1: their real legislation and whole UM. They've actually talked about

168
00:09:41,559 --> 00:09:44,240
Speaker 1: this being a positive sign that you know they're on

169
00:09:44,280 --> 00:09:46,600
Speaker 1: the same page and working towards the same end goal.

170
00:09:47,240 --> 00:09:50,080
Speaker 1: I think it is important though, when you're talking about

171
00:09:50,080 --> 00:09:52,720
Speaker 1: the CFTC oversight piece of all of this is whether

172
00:09:52,840 --> 00:09:56,079
Speaker 1: or not you can get other Senators from other committees

173
00:09:56,160 --> 00:09:58,719
Speaker 1: like maybe Senate Banking UM who might have more of

174
00:09:58,760 --> 00:10:02,200
Speaker 1: an interest in SEC oversight. UM. If you can get

175
00:10:02,280 --> 00:10:05,720
Speaker 1: all of them on board too, agree to this change,

176
00:10:06,640 --> 00:10:16,400
Speaker 1: we'll be right back. Is this one of those examples

177
00:10:16,440 --> 00:10:20,360
Speaker 1: where everybody kind of agrees that something has to happen

178
00:10:20,440 --> 00:10:22,600
Speaker 1: about the devil's in the details, or actually, are you

179
00:10:22,640 --> 00:10:27,040
Speaker 1: seeing much more polarization than that? So I think there

180
00:10:27,320 --> 00:10:31,360
Speaker 1: is a pretty significant consensus that there need to be

181
00:10:31,440 --> 00:10:36,040
Speaker 1: guardrails for cryptocurrency UM. I think the differences are how

182
00:10:36,120 --> 00:10:40,560
Speaker 1: you're approaching both the language and the details on that UM.

183
00:10:40,600 --> 00:10:43,480
Speaker 1: So for the Banking Committee, you have someone like Chairman

184
00:10:43,640 --> 00:10:46,960
Speaker 1: Shared Brown, who has been very critical of the industry,

185
00:10:47,400 --> 00:10:50,680
Speaker 1: you know, has talked about their being fraud Big crypto

186
00:10:50,800 --> 00:10:54,280
Speaker 1: companies are looking to make big profits, are desperate to

187
00:10:54,320 --> 00:10:57,160
Speaker 1: reach as many Americans as they can. They brought in

188
00:10:57,200 --> 00:11:01,040
Speaker 1: celebrities and gimmicks to make crypto sound exciting and daring

189
00:11:01,520 --> 00:11:04,400
Speaker 1: and profitable. But the ads left a few things out.

190
00:11:04,400 --> 00:11:07,360
Speaker 1: They didn't mention the fraud, the scams, and the outright theft.

191
00:11:08,320 --> 00:11:10,360
Speaker 1: And when he was talking about the terracile apps, you know,

192
00:11:10,360 --> 00:11:13,800
Speaker 1: it's pointing to that as a reason for why they

193
00:11:13,840 --> 00:11:15,560
Speaker 1: need to be regulation, but why there needs to be

194
00:11:15,600 --> 00:11:19,559
Speaker 1: strict regulation. And then his immediate counterpart is ranking Member

195
00:11:19,559 --> 00:11:23,520
Speaker 1: Pat to me Um, who is very interested in this industry,

196
00:11:23,840 --> 00:11:27,760
Speaker 1: thinks there's a lot of potential. Um He's put out,

197
00:11:28,280 --> 00:11:31,800
Speaker 1: you know, draft bill of how to regulate stable coins

198
00:11:31,840 --> 00:11:33,520
Speaker 1: and that you know, it was a little bit more

199
00:11:33,520 --> 00:11:36,360
Speaker 1: flexible than what we saw from Treasury and these other

200
00:11:36,440 --> 00:11:41,640
Speaker 1: financial regulators. So I think that'll be an interesting committee

201
00:11:41,640 --> 00:11:44,599
Speaker 1: to watch because I do feel like they're probably on

202
00:11:44,720 --> 00:11:47,120
Speaker 1: pretty different sides of how they would want to regulate,

203
00:11:47,160 --> 00:11:49,040
Speaker 1: and so maybe if they can reach agreement, maybe you

204
00:11:49,080 --> 00:11:54,160
Speaker 1: can disagreement anywhere. So stable coins hot topic. Does the

205
00:11:54,200 --> 00:11:57,680
Speaker 1: bill address these specifically, and particularly as it relates to

206
00:11:57,800 --> 00:12:01,560
Speaker 1: algorithmic stable coins like terra USD. So the bill, you know,

207
00:12:01,640 --> 00:12:05,080
Speaker 1: talks about payment stable coins specifically, and it has this

208
00:12:05,400 --> 00:12:08,360
Speaker 1: reserve requirement. It also has these public disclosures that they

209
00:12:08,360 --> 00:12:11,320
Speaker 1: would have to have with the idea of being that

210
00:12:11,440 --> 00:12:14,560
Speaker 1: it would event it would prevent collapses like the what

211
00:12:14,720 --> 00:12:19,640
Speaker 1: happened with tera Um. It doesn't explicitly mention algorithmic stable coins,

212
00:12:19,640 --> 00:12:22,320
Speaker 1: but you can draw the conclusion that if you have

213
00:12:22,320 --> 00:12:25,040
Speaker 1: a hundred percent reserve requirement that maybe those type of

214
00:12:25,040 --> 00:12:28,600
Speaker 1: stable coins would no longer be existing. There's also something

215
00:12:28,640 --> 00:12:31,000
Speaker 1: in this bill too that relates to stable coin issuers

216
00:12:31,000 --> 00:12:35,000
Speaker 1: regarding sanctions, and it would task the Treasury with developing

217
00:12:35,040 --> 00:12:38,480
Speaker 1: guidance kind of clarifying the responsibility of stable coin issuers

218
00:12:38,640 --> 00:12:42,000
Speaker 1: to comply with those restrictions. And when we talk about

219
00:12:42,000 --> 00:12:45,480
Speaker 1: reserve requirements, what we're saying is, if you're issuing a

220
00:12:45,520 --> 00:12:48,440
Speaker 1: stable coin, you actually have to have some kind of

221
00:12:48,600 --> 00:12:51,760
Speaker 1: underlying assets that backs that. It might be dollars, it

222
00:12:51,840 --> 00:12:54,360
Speaker 1: might be US treasuries, it might be you know, short

223
00:12:54,440 --> 00:12:57,920
Speaker 1: term lending vehicles like commercial paper right right, And here

224
00:12:57,960 --> 00:13:00,720
Speaker 1: they you know, they kind of specific like highly liquid assets, right,

225
00:13:00,800 --> 00:13:03,560
Speaker 1: so they want to really ensure that these coins are

226
00:13:03,800 --> 00:13:06,480
Speaker 1: actually stable, like they say, and that you can redeem

227
00:13:06,520 --> 00:13:09,480
Speaker 1: them one for one um, for instance, with the US dollar,

228
00:13:09,520 --> 00:13:12,120
Speaker 1: if that's what it's pig Two, what does the bill

229
00:13:12,160 --> 00:13:15,439
Speaker 1: say about crypto mining? So crypto mining, you know, the

230
00:13:15,840 --> 00:13:19,120
Speaker 1: bill doesn't um. It doesn't go so far as to

231
00:13:19,160 --> 00:13:22,959
Speaker 1: require miners to maybe disclose their energy uses. It doesn't

232
00:13:22,960 --> 00:13:25,120
Speaker 1: really like crack down on them on mining being able

233
00:13:25,160 --> 00:13:30,840
Speaker 1: to exist. But it does require that the government, specifically

234
00:13:30,880 --> 00:13:35,360
Speaker 1: the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and consultation with the CFTC

235
00:13:35,679 --> 00:13:38,800
Speaker 1: and the Securities in Exchange Commission, that they you know,

236
00:13:38,960 --> 00:13:42,560
Speaker 1: analyze and report on energy consumption in the digital asset market,

237
00:13:43,080 --> 00:13:46,760
Speaker 1: and that includes the energy usage of crypto minors. And

238
00:13:46,800 --> 00:13:48,600
Speaker 1: I think it's safe to say that this was probably

239
00:13:49,080 --> 00:13:52,160
Speaker 1: a compromise area. It gets that, you know, something that

240
00:13:52,280 --> 00:13:55,600
Speaker 1: progressive Democrats care a lot about, but maybe it doesn't

241
00:13:55,640 --> 00:13:58,440
Speaker 1: go so far as to turn off some of these

242
00:13:58,480 --> 00:14:02,600
Speaker 1: other conservative Republicans on the opposite end. It seems like

243
00:14:02,600 --> 00:14:04,920
Speaker 1: there's a lot of compromises on this bill. Yes, there

244
00:14:05,040 --> 00:14:07,960
Speaker 1: is a lot of compromise as as is the way

245
00:14:08,000 --> 00:14:10,960
Speaker 1: with bipartisan legislation. I think, you know, well, we'll have

246
00:14:11,000 --> 00:14:14,360
Speaker 1: to see if there's enough here for for other Senators

247
00:14:14,400 --> 00:14:19,760
Speaker 1: to really agree with. So it's very purpose strimity framework.

248
00:14:19,880 --> 00:14:21,960
Speaker 1: So you know, if it's going to be regulated by

249
00:14:21,960 --> 00:14:25,120
Speaker 1: the CFTC, um it will look more like in commodity,

250
00:14:25,480 --> 00:14:27,920
Speaker 1: and it is going to be regulated by the SEC

251
00:14:28,280 --> 00:14:30,400
Speaker 1: is going to look more like the security and the

252
00:14:30,440 --> 00:14:35,000
Speaker 1: purposes will will align definitely. This bill would allow the

253
00:14:35,080 --> 00:14:39,240
Speaker 1: CFTC to write to directly regulate cryptocurrency um. It would

254
00:14:39,280 --> 00:14:44,760
Speaker 1: also allow the SEC to continue having authority over cryptocurrencies

255
00:14:44,800 --> 00:14:47,680
Speaker 1: that act more like investment contracts. So if you're issuing

256
00:14:47,720 --> 00:14:50,760
Speaker 1: them to the public with the expectation that you know

257
00:14:50,800 --> 00:14:54,280
Speaker 1: there will be profits, then typically that's that falls within

258
00:14:54,320 --> 00:14:56,920
Speaker 1: the SEC. This part of the bill is also the

259
00:14:56,960 --> 00:14:59,800
Speaker 1: part that I think a lot of folks in the

260
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:03,320
Speaker 1: industry have a lot of angst over, and it's definitely

261
00:15:04,120 --> 00:15:07,320
Speaker 1: caused the most push and pool, And I think what's

262
00:15:07,360 --> 00:15:11,360
Speaker 1: interesting is sometimes you have more of these traditional players

263
00:15:11,400 --> 00:15:13,320
Speaker 1: who are wanting to get involved in crypto and they

264
00:15:13,320 --> 00:15:16,760
Speaker 1: actually might prefer the SEC as their regulator. They deal

265
00:15:16,800 --> 00:15:19,320
Speaker 1: with them a lot already. They have their relationships, they

266
00:15:19,320 --> 00:15:22,040
Speaker 1: have their relationships, um, and then it seems like really

267
00:15:22,080 --> 00:15:26,480
Speaker 1: the crypto native firms or the associations are the ones

268
00:15:26,480 --> 00:15:33,360
Speaker 1: that are really pushing for more CFTC oversight. You know,

269
00:15:33,400 --> 00:15:36,280
Speaker 1: I'm so glad you raised that because it very directly

270
00:15:36,360 --> 00:15:40,040
Speaker 1: speaks to the split between Wall Streets and the folks

271
00:15:40,040 --> 00:15:44,200
Speaker 1: who are portraying themselves as defied decentralized finance, the great disruptors,

272
00:15:44,280 --> 00:15:47,160
Speaker 1: people who are like reinventing investment banking but on the

273
00:15:47,160 --> 00:15:51,600
Speaker 1: blockchain or whatever. And you know, this is really setting

274
00:15:51,640 --> 00:15:54,760
Speaker 1: up this dynamic of the crypto native firms are looking

275
00:15:54,880 --> 00:15:59,840
Speaker 1: for what would in practice be possibly a more conciliatory

276
00:16:00,160 --> 00:16:03,440
Speaker 1: leader for them versus being regulated by the SEC, which

277
00:16:03,440 --> 00:16:07,080
Speaker 1: has these tougher investment protections. So I like the culture

278
00:16:07,120 --> 00:16:09,920
Speaker 1: clash there is really interesting, and I think you see

279
00:16:09,920 --> 00:16:12,240
Speaker 1: it in other and other you know, parts of this

280
00:16:12,280 --> 00:16:15,800
Speaker 1: space as well. Obviously you see it with stable coins. Um.

281
00:16:15,840 --> 00:16:19,760
Speaker 1: You know, if you had if you followed the suggestions

282
00:16:19,840 --> 00:16:23,360
Speaker 1: of Treasury and these other financial regulators who essentially want

283
00:16:23,480 --> 00:16:27,640
Speaker 1: all stable coin issuers to be banks, um, then that

284
00:16:27,760 --> 00:16:31,560
Speaker 1: is beneficial to the existing banks. Absolutely. They are like

285
00:16:32,680 --> 00:16:35,640
Speaker 1: were they already you know, they have the charters, they've

286
00:16:35,680 --> 00:16:39,120
Speaker 1: gone through, uh, the hurdles that they need to with regulators.

287
00:16:39,160 --> 00:16:42,560
Speaker 1: Where you have maybe some of these crypto native firms,

288
00:16:42,720 --> 00:16:47,880
Speaker 1: native firms who are currently issuing stable coins, and to

289
00:16:48,000 --> 00:16:50,120
Speaker 1: get that bank charter, it could take them years or

290
00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:52,280
Speaker 1: to get all the regulatory approvals that they need to.

291
00:16:52,400 --> 00:16:54,760
Speaker 1: And I think that's why you see some pushing for

292
00:16:55,200 --> 00:16:57,320
Speaker 1: we'll at least give us some flexibility. Let us be

293
00:16:58,040 --> 00:17:02,280
Speaker 1: something else that's maybe regulated still but not exactly a bank,

294
00:17:02,360 --> 00:17:04,960
Speaker 1: or let us maybe partner with a bank um And

295
00:17:05,000 --> 00:17:07,679
Speaker 1: I think that's going to be something that's very interesting

296
00:17:07,760 --> 00:17:11,320
Speaker 1: to watch. Well, thank you, Ali, I appreciate you taking

297
00:17:11,320 --> 00:17:15,000
Speaker 1: the time, Thanks for having me. You can find more

298
00:17:15,119 --> 00:17:18,119
Speaker 1: of Alison verse Bills reporting on the Bloomberg terminal on

299
00:17:18,160 --> 00:17:21,199
Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot com and you can find her on Twitter

300
00:17:21,400 --> 00:17:24,879
Speaker 1: at Ali their Sprill. That's v R S P R

301
00:17:25,000 --> 00:17:31,399
Speaker 1: I L L E. On the next episode of Bloomberg Crypto,

302
00:17:31,680 --> 00:17:33,920
Speaker 1: we're gonna tackle a little bit of a heavier subject.

303
00:17:34,160 --> 00:17:37,399
Speaker 1: We're going to talk about crypto addiction. There are rehab

304
00:17:37,440 --> 00:17:42,600
Speaker 1: centers for people seeking treatment for addictions to drugs, alcohol, gambling,

305
00:17:43,040 --> 00:17:47,359
Speaker 1: and even recent online experiences like gaming these centers are

306
00:17:47,400 --> 00:17:50,400
Speaker 1: currently seeing an uptick in people looking for help controlling

307
00:17:50,440 --> 00:17:54,600
Speaker 1: their crypto trading. We'll have to Bloomberg reporters joining us,

308
00:17:54,760 --> 00:17:58,719
Speaker 1: Claire Valentine and Charlie Wells. We're off on Monday June

309
00:17:58,840 --> 00:18:03,080
Speaker 1: for Juneteenth. We'll be back on Tuesday. I'm Stacy Marie Ishmael,

310
00:18:03,200 --> 00:18:06,520
Speaker 1: and this is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily podcast from Bloomberg's

311
00:18:06,560 --> 00:18:09,800
Speaker 1: and I Heart Radio. For more shows from I Heart Radio,

312
00:18:10,280 --> 00:18:13,520
Speaker 1: visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

313
00:18:13,600 --> 00:18:17,640
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. Email your comments, questions or suggestions

314
00:18:17,720 --> 00:18:20,720
Speaker 1: the Crypto at bloomberg dot Net. Follow us on Twitter

315
00:18:20,960 --> 00:18:24,960
Speaker 1: at Crypto. The producer and editor of this episode is

316
00:18:25,040 --> 00:18:29,280
Speaker 1: Vicky Verglina Desta wonder At is our engineer. Original music

317
00:18:29,320 --> 00:18:33,080
Speaker 1: by Leo Sidron. Bloomberg's head of Podcasts is Francesca Levi