WEBVTT - Tech News: The Death of G4TV (Again)

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Be there and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you? It is time for

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the tech news for Tuesday, October two thousand twenty two.

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>And boy, how a lot of stuff happened late last

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>week and over the weekend. Let's start with G four TV.

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So I did some episodes about G four TV about

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a year ago, where I talked about the formation of

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the channel, you know it's origins and it's merger with

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>tech TV under Comcast, and then the subsequent dissolution of

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the channel following years of decline, and that era happened

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>between two thousand two and two thousand twelve. Then I

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about how the channel was being revived fived in

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one, coming back from extinction. So the Zomba

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>five G four TV emerged on November six, and with

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the relaunch, we saw the reappearance of programs like x Play,

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:21.279
<v Speaker 1>which was a video game criticism show like a review show,

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>as well as Attack of the Show, which is more

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of a geeky variety show, and some of the hosts

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>from the glory days like Kevin Pereira and Adam Sessler

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>returned and they were joined by newcomers to the channel

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>like Fiona Nova and Gina Darling and others. But then

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.839
<v Speaker 1>less than a year later, the channel has once again

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>gone silent. Comcast Spectator, which in itself is a subsidiary

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of Comcast, sent out a memo on October six, two

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty two a lerning the team that due to

0:01:54.760 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>low viewership, the channel was financially unstable, so that essentially

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>meant that it probably cost more to produce the content

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>on the channel than the channel was actually making. As

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a result, the plug has been pulled and the channel

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>is once again dead. The memo goes on to say

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that Comcast Spectator HR will work with the affected staff

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:21.679
<v Speaker 1>of which they were around, to try and find other

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>opportunities and discuss other options. This stinks because there were

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>some really cool people working over there, you know, talented,

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>hard working folks. I was honestly surprised that the new

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 1>G four TV wasn't more of an online network as

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>opposed to an attempt to to go the traditional TV

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>channel route. Again, I doubt such a channel would be

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>able to attract the same talent pool if it were

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>online only like that would be hard to do because

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you typically don't see the same kind of investment for

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that sort of stuff. However, the costs of production would

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>be much lower as well. A lot of folks online

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>are kind of playing armchair analysts and drawing conclusions like

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that the television era in general is coming to a close,

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's why G four TV couldn't find a new audience,

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>because the audience has moved away from the medium there

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>getting their content online as opposed to on television. I

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>would actually have to do some real research to find

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>out how likely that is. I mean, I know anecdotally

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that I haven't watched any television programming in years, but

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>that's just me. I could be an outlier. I don't know.

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how how popular TV is in general

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>at this point because I'm so far removed from it.

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd have to actually look into it. But I just

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>want to say that I hope the staff of G

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>four TV finds new opportunities quickly and that they are

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>all able to pursue their dreams, just under a different banner, because,

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>like I said, this stinks. Uh I can't really blame

0:03:56.320 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Comcast Spectrum from for doing this, right, Like, if they

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>were unable to find an audience, you can't really justify

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>just running the channel just so it exists. If no

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>one's seeking it out, then ultimately you could argue that

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the effort being put forward to create that content is

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>wasted and that people could achieve better things by doing

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>something else. So I can't really criticize the decision to

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>end the channel. I just hate that it was a

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>necessity because you know, I like some of the folks

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>over there, and um, you know, I I think that

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>this stuff they make is worthwhile. That being said, since

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't watch TV, I hadn't been watching g for TV,

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>so I'm part of the problem, all right. Moving on,

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 1>Also in the geek entertainment sphere is some pretty ugly

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>news coming out of Rooster Teeth. Now, if you're not

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the name Rooster Teeth, it's a company that's

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>known primarily for its podcasts and video series that orbit

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the video d games space. They're either directly about video

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>games or are kind of tangentially related to video games,

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's all with an entertainment spin. The company got

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>started with a web series called Red Versus Blue, which

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>uses the Halo game engine as a kind of studio,

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>actors treating their master Chief characters like digital puppets and

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:27.799
<v Speaker 1>recording voice over with it. That Little Colonel grew into

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a pretty impressive entertainment network, which ultimately branched out into

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>making feature films, premier series, an anime inspired series, and more.

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I've actually had a couple of people from Rooster Teeth

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>on this show as guests in the past, including Bernie

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Burns and Jack Potillo. Well, the news out of Rooster

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Teeth this week is pretty awful, and it started when

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>news broke that the company, which ultimately is part of

0:05:55.920 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Warner Brothers Discovery, dissolved several positions, meaning they just eliminated

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>these positions from existence. That included one of an online personality,

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Matt Bragg who posted that he was

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>going to go part time on sort of a contract

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>basis because of this. Now, that prompted some backlash in

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the community, which then got turned up to eleven in

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>intensity when a former Rooster Teeth employee named Caden talked

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>about her experiences at the company. Her accusations are numerous

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and disturbing. They range from going unpaid for nine months

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>while doing some contract work for the company, to then

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>being vastly underpaid and overworked as a producer and a

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>director and editor, even to a point where she developed

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>pneumonia and then, upon returning to work, was immediately put

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>back under the same grueling schedule. She also said that

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>she was targeted with a homophobic slur in the office,

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and that slur was used by on screen talent in

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>an altered form so that they refer to her with

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 1>this slur while being on camera, and in turn, the

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>community got in on using that nickname, though presumably most

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>folks didn't know what the significance of the word was.

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Side note, however, Caden herself, in a previous life, like

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years ago when she was a teenager, had uploaded

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>videos that featured her and this was before her transition

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>surgery and before her employment at Rooster Teeth, But it

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>featured her using homophobic language, anti Semitic language, racist language.

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>So that doesn't excuse the treatment she received at at

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Rooster Teeth. But you know, I feel like I need

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it because otherwise someone's going to bring

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it up and say, yeah, but Cayden said these terrible

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>things when she was younger, and doesn't that make her

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a hypocrite? Really? I feel like Caden's arguments were that

0:07:55.920 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the company failed to act when she brought these concerns

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to HR. And that's the issue, right. It's not that

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Cayden was a perfect person, or that Kayden herself had

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>not engaged in terrible UH language and and the expression

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of horrible racist and homophobic ideas herself. She had. That

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>was bad that she had done that on her own channel,

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>but rather that this indicated a systemic problem within Rooster

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Teeth and that HR did nothing to take action on

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that and to protect employees. That is still a massive problem. UH.

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Caden's behavior was also a massive problem, something that she

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 1>has apologized for in the past, though you know, some

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>people are are arguing that that apology wasn't sufficient. I'm

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>not here to judge the sufficient nature of apologies because

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a fool's errand in my mind, But anyway,

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't change the fact that there were these systemic

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>problems that Rooster Teeth. Now, Rooster Teeth issued a statement

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people in the community have said,

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't nearly enough, saying that the company failed to really

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>take accountability for the things that Caden accuses the company

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of doing. Largely this reliance on the exploitation of employees

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>who are underpaid by industry standards, while meanwhile some some

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>few people at the top are benefiting disproportionately from that labor.

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>So it is really ugly. This is not the first

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>time that Rooster Teeth has had to face some pretty

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>tough scandals. There was a similar one when Mica Burton

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>left the company and revealed she had been the target

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of racism and abuse, and the company failed to really

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>do anything to help her. Then in scandal broke out

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>again when it was made public that one of the

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>on screen talent at Rooster Teeth had engaged in predatory

0:09:56.400 --> 0:10:00.719
<v Speaker 1>behavior with the fan base. So this later this controversy

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>implies that the company as a whole has failed to

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 1>address those systemic problems within the culture of the organization,

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and many are comparing what's going on within Rooster Teeth

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>two similar situations that companies like Activision, Blizzard and uby

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Soft and Uber. Meanwhile, as part of Warner Brothers Discovery,

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I imagine there's a very real worry at executive level

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>level leadership at Rooster Teeth about what maybe in the

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>future for Rooster Teeth. I mean, as possible they could

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>get sold off, because we know that David Zaslov over

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>at Warner Brothers Discovery and his team are looking to

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>trim billions of dollars off the overall corporate budget, and uh,

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>it may very well be that Rooster Teeth could be

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>on the chopping block for that, whether it gets sold

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>off or dissolved or whatever. Rooster Teeth canceled all of

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>its live podcast recording sessions yesterday, likely because the company

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is working to create a response to these accusations and

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>community reaction, and the host of that podcast would have

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>been potentially been a real mess. Right if you had

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>live interactive chat with a podcast recording, it would be

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>setting the stage for accusations and criticism and abuse and

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>tough questions and it just would have been a big mess.

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Whether this controversy is going to have a lasting effect

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 1>on the company remains to be seen, but it definitely

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>has exposed a very ugly side to Rooster Teeth's corporate culture,

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>one that arguably has been exposed before in the past.

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But the company had had assured community members that steps

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>would be taken to correct it. So, yeah, not a

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 1>good situation. All right. When we come back, we've got

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot more news to get through, but first let's

0:11:48.559 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>take this quick break. We're back. Yeah. Formerly known as

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Kanye West, is in the process of acquiring the beleaguered

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>social network platform Parlor. Now you might remember that Parlor,

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>which brands itself as a free speech platform, became kind

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of a gathering place primarily known for right wing conservatives

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 1>leading up to the twenty twenty election, when there was

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a big spike in interest in Parlor. The service ran

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>into some major turbulence, however, when Apple and Google dropped

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Parlor from app stores citing the company's lack of a

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>suitable content moderation policy around the same time as the

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>January six, two thousand twenty one insurrection. Amazon would then

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>subsequently boot Parlor from its hosting service, and so Parlor

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>had to find a new host and initially switched to

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a Russian based company called de dos Guard, but then

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>switched to an American based company called sky Silk. The

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>general reporting round Parlor has indicated that there's been a

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty substant hill decline in active users since the return

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>from online exile in early one. Anyway, Yea apparently decided

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to purchase Parlor after he received a Twitter ban for

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>posting anti Semitic comments. He had also been banned from Instagram.

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's interesting to point out that Yea

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>has been hanging out with a conservative commentator and author

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>named Candice Owens recently because Owens happens to be married

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to a man named George Farmer, and Farmer happens to

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>be the CEO of Parlor. So that's led some folks

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and allegedly including some folks in Yea's own circles, to

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>perhaps suggest that Owens has influenced Yea and kind of

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>guided him into buying what is a flailing social media site,

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>which will potentially see both her and her husband benefit

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>from that sale. And I am not used to reporting

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>this kind of drama, y'all. Anyway, when you consider that

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is still in the process of acquiring Twitter

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and that Donald Trump on to found Truth Social it's

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>hard to get past the feeling that some highly opinionated,

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>rich people think that the real solution to being moderated

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 1>is to go and buy the platform or to make

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>your own so interesting stuff there. Over in the UK,

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the Competition and Markets Authority or c m A, which

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is a regulatory body, has set a new precedent by

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>ordering Meta to sell off Giffee or Jiffy if you prefer.

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>That's the gif creation website that Meta acquired in twenty though,

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, in Meta was still known as Facebook. Actually,

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the c m A had already ordered Meta to do this.

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>This is not a new decision. However, Meta appealed that decision.

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>The matter went back for review, and now after reviewing

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that initial decision, the c m A says, now we're good,

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>We're still going to make you sell it. So the

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>CMA says that Meta's acquisition hurts competition in the space,

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>potentially cutting off Giffee rivals from being able to leverage Facebook,

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>or forcing those rivals to give up more user data

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook in return for being allowed to access the platform.

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Meta reps issued a statement reading quote, we are disappointed

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>by the CMA's decision, but except today's ruling as the

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>final word on the matter, we will work closely with

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the c m A on divesting Giffee end quote. So

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the dismantling of meta has begun, or

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is just the beginning and end of it all.

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll we'll have to wait and see. Researchers at the

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>security firm z Scaler warned that there's a new data

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>stealing malware propagating across Facebook. A phishing campaign called Ductail

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>appears to be responsible, and according to a report on

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>tech Radar that's titled a phishing campaign is spreading brand

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>new malware targeting Facebook users. This malware quote cannot only

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>steal Facebook adjacent data, but also other sensitive data stored

0:15:56.280 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 1>in browsers, such as data related to cryptocurrency, wallet's a

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>count information, and basic system data end quote. Ducktail has

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>previously distributed malware through LinkedIn messages containing malicious links, and

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like this particular attack is really insidious and

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that it mostly works within computer memory, which helps it

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>evade detection from anti virus programs. It also sounds like

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>this started as a spear phishing campaign. UH. Spear phishing

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>means that the perpetrators are targeting specific populations. It's not

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>just throwing out a phishing attack in general, it's really

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>focusing them. So in that case, it involved high level

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>employees who had access to company Facebook business accounts. However,

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>z scaler is now warning that this campaign has widened

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to target pretty much anyone. Z Scaler says that quote

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the malicious executable files are mostly in dot zep format

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and hosted on file sharing platforms, posing as cracked versions

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of office applications, games, subtitle files, porn related files, and

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>others end quote. So once again, just a reminder, don't

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>download files from questionable sources. You're playing Russian Roulette with

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 1>your computer and potentially all of your data, including financial data.

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business Insider reports that Microsoft has recently held layoffs, affecting

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 1>quote less than one thousand employees end quote this week,

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and that the cuts were made across pretty much all

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 1>of the company, including the Xbox division and Microsoft's strategic

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>missions and technology departments. Business Insider also references an internal

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>email that indicated the company is re prioritizing various projects,

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 1>with some essentially being canceled or shelved. This kind of

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 1>goes in line with what we've been hearing across the

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 1>industry really, as large companies have put in hiring phrases

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and started holding layoffs. Uh. Microsoft has previously said that

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>it anticipates it will not lay off more than one

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>percent of its workforce globally, but the you know, this

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>is part of that process, and I think we're going

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to see a lot more stories about various folks facing

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>tough situations like this across the tech industry. So on

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a similar note, Engadget reports that some leaked documents from

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:24.959
<v Speaker 1>inside Amazon paint a really bleak picture for the company

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to retaining employees. The report says that attrition,

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>which is a nice way to say the loss of

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>employees that is both regretted and unregretted, which essentially means

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>both the folks who quit and the folks that we

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>fired or laid off collectively. They cost the company some

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dollars annually eight billion dollars billion with a B,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>all because of turnover, whether that's from layoffs and firings

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>or folks quitting the company. The documents indicate that about

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>twice as many people leave the company on their own

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.719
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to being laid off or fired. So that

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely does not paint a nice picture of what it's

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>like to work for Amazon. Right, So you've got this

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>massive issue of turnover. The vast majority of which involves

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>people leaving the company quitting the company, and that you know,

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>regretted attrition a people who are leaving on their own

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>account was at a low of sixty nine point five

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>percent and a high of any one three percent across

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>all levels of employees. Yikes. And it goes on to

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 1>add that only one out of three employees even sticks

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>around for ninety days or more. That means if you

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>get three Amazon employees who joined on you know, January one,

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>two out of those three are going to be gone

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>before the end of March. Like that crazy. That's an

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>insane amount of turnover. And we've always known that turnover

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.719
<v Speaker 1>at Amazon has been a big problem. It's just that

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:13.640
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't really been quantified like this before these internal

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 1>documents got out. At that rate, Amazon is really going

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to burn through all potential employee options in major cities

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>within a couple of years. And then where is it

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be. I mean, that sounds like it's hyperbole,

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>but other news outlets have actually said exactly the same

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that at the rate of Amazon's turnover, the employable

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>public in the various cities where Amazon has major operations

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to be run through and then you've got

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.479
<v Speaker 1>no one left. So you've got to address these issues

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>with retention. It also seems to at least imply that

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>working conditions at Amazon are lousy, right otherwise you wouldn't

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 1>have people quitting within three months of getting a job.

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's a costly problem that Amazon needs to solve.

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I really recommend reading the whole article. The article has

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the title exclusive Amazon's attrition costs eight billion annually according

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to leaked documents, and it gets worse. And again that's

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>over at in Gadget. Okay, I've got a few more

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>stories to go through before I get to those. Let's

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break. We're back. Not too long ago,

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I covered a story about how YouTube was experimenting with

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>putting four K content behind a sort of paywall. So

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>some users in various regions, but not all of them,

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 1>but some some areas of the world reported that when

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>they encountered videos on YouTube that were available to watch

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in four K, they first saw a prompt to upgrade

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>to YouTube Premium in order to access the content in

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>four A resolution. Now mac Rumors reports that the company

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>has ended this experiment, removing the upgrade prompts and returning

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 1>four K content to just being a normal option for

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:15.239
<v Speaker 1>users to choose from for videos that have that availability.

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>The company has indicated that this experiment is officially over.

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 1>They've said so in tweets people have sent in questions

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 1>over Twitter and YouTube accounts of State stated that this

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>experiment has ended. However, there hasn't really been any comment

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>on what prompted the experiment to come to an end.

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Presumably the decision is not to lock four K behind

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a paywall. It is possible that user backlash convinced YouTube

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>leaders that putting higher resolution content behind an upgrade requirement

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>would not be an effective way to actually drive people

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe to YouTube premium. If their conclusion was people

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>are just angry and it's not really making anyone subscribe,

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>then obviously it doesn't make any sense to institute that

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>strategy across the platform because it's not gonna work anyway,

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's just gonna take off your user base. So, um,

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what YouTube is going to try next

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to try and increase YouTube Premium subscriptions, but it apparently

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>will not be locking content, you know, high resolution content

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>behind the paywall. So that's good news if you like

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>watching you know, four K content on YouTube and you

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>don't want to have a YouTube premium subscription. German regulators

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>have now levied a five million dollar fine on Telegram,

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the messaging app that originates out of the United Arab Emirates.

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a Dubai based company, and the regulators are saying

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that the reason for the fine, this five million dollar

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>fine is that Telegram has failed to fulfill two requirements

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to operate a messaging service within Germany. Namely,

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Telegram has not created a legal way for reporting illegal

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>content to German officials. So content within Germany that is

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>considered illegal must be reported to the authorities, and Telegram

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>has not proposed a way of doing that. And the

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>other accusation is that Telegram has not named a German

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 1>entity like a company or point of contact, who would

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>be responsible for receiving official communications from the German authorities

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>or from Telegram, kind of being a liaison between Telegram

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and the German government. Telegram does have the option to

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>appeal the fine um and the company has recently named

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a German law firm as sort of a point of contact,

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>so potentially one of the two problems has been resolved.

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not Telegram has formulated an official process for

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 1>reporting illegal activity, I have not heard, so that may

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>still be an issue. Finally, the European Space Agency plans

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 1>to launch a demonstration satellite in twenty four that aims

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to push encryption into the quantum age, or at least

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>play a part in it. So this plan involves putting

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a satellite, a communication satellite called Eagle one, into orbit,

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and this satellite is going to serve as part of

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a quantum key distribution system and will be used to

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>help test different strategies centered around quantum encryption, which is

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>important in the age of quantum computing. And I've covered

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>quantum computing in the past, but just as a quick reminder,

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>quantum computers, at least those that have enough processing capability

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 1>as well as the right algorithms to go with it,

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>can pose an enormous threat and existential threat to our

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>modern methods of encryption. Um. So your standard computer would

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>have to work thousands of years to decrypt a really

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated encrypted message today like that would just because the

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>way classical computers work, it would take so long as

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:11.199
<v Speaker 1>to be unrealistic to ever be able to decrypt a

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>truly well encrypted message, But a suitable quantum computer paired

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:19.199
<v Speaker 1>with the correct algorithm could do the same thing in

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a relative blink of an eye, because it's effectively solving

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>all versions of the problem simultaneously. That's a drastic oversimplification

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on, but you can think of it

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in those terms. So while a classical computer would be

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>working kind of step by step to try and solve

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a problem, the quantum computer is trying to solve all

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of the problem all the same time and quickly comes

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>up with solutions that it assigns a probability to. So

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in other words, it's not like you get the solution,

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you get potential solutions with a a likelihood of them

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 1>being correct. That's still way faster, way faster than using

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a classical computer, And that means that quantum computers could

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:11.120
<v Speaker 1>potentially decrypt pretty much everything that has ever been encrypted

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>by computers, which means no more secrets, right. It means

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 1>anything that has been encrypted could be uncovered. That includes

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>things like financial transactions. The entire basis of data security

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>would be completely undermined by this emergence of quantum computers

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 1>and algorithms that can break encryption. So there is a

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>need to establish a new encryption method that can withstand

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>both classic and quantum computer attacks, and that is what

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>this Eagle one satellite is meant to be part of

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a deployment of technology platforms upon which we can test

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>different strategies to see which are viable. We've already seen

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>stories of a proposed quantum encryption scheme that ended up

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>being vulnerable to classical computer attacks. So this is an

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>important and difficult area of research. So really interesting that

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>this is looking at a launch. Uh, it really does

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>show how how on the verge we are of this

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 1>quantum computing age and how important it is to start

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>setting the standards for encryption moving forward. Okay, that's it

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>for the news that I have to cover today Tuesday,

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 1>October two thousand twenty two. If you have suggestions for

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>topics I should cover in future episodes of tech Stuff,

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>please reach out to me. One way to do that

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>is to download the I Heart radio app and you

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>can navigate over to tech Stuff in the little search

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>field and you'll see that there's a little microphone icon

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you can click on and you can leave a voice

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>message up to thirty seconds in length. On there. If

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you would like me to use the message in an

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>upcoming episode of tech Stuff, just let me know that

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. And uh, that's one way to get in

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>touch with me. The other is to reach out on Twitter.

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>The handle for the show is tech Stuff H s

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>W and I'll talk to you again really soon. Y.

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Text Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from I Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app,

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.