1
00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:07,760
Speaker 1: Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

2
00:00:11,880 --> 00:00:14,560
Speaker 1: Be there and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

3
00:00:14,760 --> 00:00:18,640
Speaker 1: Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

4
00:00:18,680 --> 00:00:21,079
Speaker 1: And how the tech are you? It is time for

5
00:00:21,120 --> 00:00:25,200
Speaker 1: the tech news for Tuesday, October two thousand twenty two.

6
00:00:25,360 --> 00:00:29,640
Speaker 1: And boy, how a lot of stuff happened late last

7
00:00:29,680 --> 00:00:35,000
Speaker 1: week and over the weekend. Let's start with G four TV.

8
00:00:35,560 --> 00:00:38,240
Speaker 1: So I did some episodes about G four TV about

9
00:00:38,280 --> 00:00:41,800
Speaker 1: a year ago, where I talked about the formation of

10
00:00:41,800 --> 00:00:45,400
Speaker 1: the channel, you know it's origins and it's merger with

11
00:00:45,600 --> 00:00:50,320
Speaker 1: tech TV under Comcast, and then the subsequent dissolution of

12
00:00:50,360 --> 00:00:54,200
Speaker 1: the channel following years of decline, and that era happened

13
00:00:54,240 --> 00:00:58,160
Speaker 1: between two thousand two and two thousand twelve. Then I

14
00:00:58,160 --> 00:01:00,560
Speaker 1: talked about how the channel was being revived fived in

15
00:01:00,680 --> 00:01:06,640
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one, coming back from extinction. So the Zomba

16
00:01:06,680 --> 00:01:11,240
Speaker 1: five G four TV emerged on November six, and with

17
00:01:11,360 --> 00:01:15,480
Speaker 1: the relaunch, we saw the reappearance of programs like x Play,

18
00:01:15,520 --> 00:01:21,279
Speaker 1: which was a video game criticism show like a review show,

19
00:01:21,920 --> 00:01:24,000
Speaker 1: as well as Attack of the Show, which is more

20
00:01:24,040 --> 00:01:28,000
Speaker 1: of a geeky variety show, and some of the hosts

21
00:01:28,000 --> 00:01:30,640
Speaker 1: from the glory days like Kevin Pereira and Adam Sessler

22
00:01:30,720 --> 00:01:34,400
Speaker 1: returned and they were joined by newcomers to the channel

23
00:01:34,560 --> 00:01:38,040
Speaker 1: like Fiona Nova and Gina Darling and others. But then

24
00:01:38,160 --> 00:01:40,839
Speaker 1: less than a year later, the channel has once again

25
00:01:41,200 --> 00:01:46,920
Speaker 1: gone silent. Comcast Spectator, which in itself is a subsidiary

26
00:01:46,959 --> 00:01:51,480
Speaker 1: of Comcast, sent out a memo on October six, two

27
00:01:51,520 --> 00:01:54,600
Speaker 1: thousand twenty two a lerning the team that due to

28
00:01:54,760 --> 00:02:00,440
Speaker 1: low viewership, the channel was financially unstable, so that essentially

29
00:02:00,560 --> 00:02:04,240
Speaker 1: meant that it probably cost more to produce the content

30
00:02:04,280 --> 00:02:07,040
Speaker 1: on the channel than the channel was actually making. As

31
00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:10,240
Speaker 1: a result, the plug has been pulled and the channel

32
00:02:10,360 --> 00:02:13,639
Speaker 1: is once again dead. The memo goes on to say

33
00:02:13,639 --> 00:02:17,040
Speaker 1: that Comcast Spectator HR will work with the affected staff

34
00:02:17,639 --> 00:02:21,679
Speaker 1: of which they were around, to try and find other

35
00:02:21,720 --> 00:02:26,360
Speaker 1: opportunities and discuss other options. This stinks because there were

36
00:02:26,400 --> 00:02:29,520
Speaker 1: some really cool people working over there, you know, talented,

37
00:02:29,600 --> 00:02:32,880
Speaker 1: hard working folks. I was honestly surprised that the new

38
00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:37,079
Speaker 1: G four TV wasn't more of an online network as

39
00:02:37,120 --> 00:02:40,640
Speaker 1: opposed to an attempt to to go the traditional TV

40
00:02:40,760 --> 00:02:43,640
Speaker 1: channel route. Again, I doubt such a channel would be

41
00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:46,600
Speaker 1: able to attract the same talent pool if it were

42
00:02:46,639 --> 00:02:50,000
Speaker 1: online only like that would be hard to do because

43
00:02:50,040 --> 00:02:52,720
Speaker 1: you typically don't see the same kind of investment for

44
00:02:52,760 --> 00:02:55,840
Speaker 1: that sort of stuff. However, the costs of production would

45
00:02:55,840 --> 00:02:58,639
Speaker 1: be much lower as well. A lot of folks online

46
00:02:58,720 --> 00:03:02,960
Speaker 1: are kind of playing armchair analysts and drawing conclusions like

47
00:03:03,520 --> 00:03:06,600
Speaker 1: that the television era in general is coming to a close,

48
00:03:07,040 --> 00:03:09,880
Speaker 1: and that's why G four TV couldn't find a new audience,

49
00:03:09,919 --> 00:03:12,960
Speaker 1: because the audience has moved away from the medium there

50
00:03:13,520 --> 00:03:17,880
Speaker 1: getting their content online as opposed to on television. I

51
00:03:17,919 --> 00:03:19,919
Speaker 1: would actually have to do some real research to find

52
00:03:19,960 --> 00:03:23,560
Speaker 1: out how likely that is. I mean, I know anecdotally

53
00:03:23,680 --> 00:03:27,200
Speaker 1: that I haven't watched any television programming in years, but

54
00:03:27,280 --> 00:03:29,919
Speaker 1: that's just me. I could be an outlier. I don't know.

55
00:03:31,160 --> 00:03:34,440
Speaker 1: I don't know how how popular TV is in general

56
00:03:34,960 --> 00:03:37,480
Speaker 1: at this point because I'm so far removed from it.

57
00:03:37,480 --> 00:03:40,000
Speaker 1: I'd have to actually look into it. But I just

58
00:03:40,080 --> 00:03:42,080
Speaker 1: want to say that I hope the staff of G

59
00:03:42,240 --> 00:03:45,960
Speaker 1: four TV finds new opportunities quickly and that they are

60
00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:50,840
Speaker 1: all able to pursue their dreams, just under a different banner, because,

61
00:03:51,240 --> 00:03:55,720
Speaker 1: like I said, this stinks. Uh I can't really blame

62
00:03:56,320 --> 00:04:02,040
Speaker 1: Comcast Spectrum from for doing this, right, Like, if they

63
00:04:02,040 --> 00:04:05,880
Speaker 1: were unable to find an audience, you can't really justify

64
00:04:06,040 --> 00:04:09,440
Speaker 1: just running the channel just so it exists. If no

65
00:04:09,480 --> 00:04:13,320
Speaker 1: one's seeking it out, then ultimately you could argue that

66
00:04:13,800 --> 00:04:16,640
Speaker 1: the effort being put forward to create that content is

67
00:04:16,680 --> 00:04:20,440
Speaker 1: wasted and that people could achieve better things by doing

68
00:04:20,520 --> 00:04:25,159
Speaker 1: something else. So I can't really criticize the decision to

69
00:04:25,440 --> 00:04:28,160
Speaker 1: end the channel. I just hate that it was a

70
00:04:28,960 --> 00:04:32,120
Speaker 1: necessity because you know, I like some of the folks

71
00:04:32,120 --> 00:04:35,680
Speaker 1: over there, and um, you know, I I think that

72
00:04:35,760 --> 00:04:39,159
Speaker 1: this stuff they make is worthwhile. That being said, since

73
00:04:39,160 --> 00:04:41,880
Speaker 1: I don't watch TV, I hadn't been watching g for TV,

74
00:04:42,040 --> 00:04:44,080
Speaker 1: so I'm part of the problem, all right. Moving on,

75
00:04:44,680 --> 00:04:48,599
Speaker 1: Also in the geek entertainment sphere is some pretty ugly

76
00:04:48,680 --> 00:04:51,160
Speaker 1: news coming out of Rooster Teeth. Now, if you're not

77
00:04:51,200 --> 00:04:54,640
Speaker 1: familiar with the name Rooster Teeth, it's a company that's

78
00:04:54,680 --> 00:04:59,640
Speaker 1: known primarily for its podcasts and video series that orbit

79
00:04:59,680 --> 00:05:02,760
Speaker 1: the video d games space. They're either directly about video

80
00:05:02,839 --> 00:05:08,080
Speaker 1: games or are kind of tangentially related to video games,

81
00:05:08,560 --> 00:05:12,000
Speaker 1: and it's all with an entertainment spin. The company got

82
00:05:12,040 --> 00:05:14,720
Speaker 1: started with a web series called Red Versus Blue, which

83
00:05:14,800 --> 00:05:17,920
Speaker 1: uses the Halo game engine as a kind of studio,

84
00:05:18,240 --> 00:05:22,480
Speaker 1: actors treating their master Chief characters like digital puppets and

85
00:05:22,520 --> 00:05:27,799
Speaker 1: recording voice over with it. That Little Colonel grew into

86
00:05:27,839 --> 00:05:32,560
Speaker 1: a pretty impressive entertainment network, which ultimately branched out into

87
00:05:32,600 --> 00:05:38,160
Speaker 1: making feature films, premier series, an anime inspired series, and more.

88
00:05:38,560 --> 00:05:41,080
Speaker 1: I've actually had a couple of people from Rooster Teeth

89
00:05:41,440 --> 00:05:45,440
Speaker 1: on this show as guests in the past, including Bernie

90
00:05:45,480 --> 00:05:49,159
Speaker 1: Burns and Jack Potillo. Well, the news out of Rooster

91
00:05:49,200 --> 00:05:52,960
Speaker 1: Teeth this week is pretty awful, and it started when

92
00:05:52,960 --> 00:05:55,880
Speaker 1: news broke that the company, which ultimately is part of

93
00:05:55,920 --> 00:06:01,360
Speaker 1: Warner Brothers Discovery, dissolved several positions, meaning they just eliminated

94
00:06:01,360 --> 00:06:06,320
Speaker 1: these positions from existence. That included one of an online personality,

95
00:06:06,360 --> 00:06:09,359
Speaker 1: a guy named Matt Bragg who posted that he was

96
00:06:09,400 --> 00:06:12,120
Speaker 1: going to go part time on sort of a contract

97
00:06:12,120 --> 00:06:15,440
Speaker 1: basis because of this. Now, that prompted some backlash in

98
00:06:15,440 --> 00:06:20,200
Speaker 1: the community, which then got turned up to eleven in

99
00:06:20,200 --> 00:06:23,960
Speaker 1: intensity when a former Rooster Teeth employee named Caden talked

100
00:06:23,960 --> 00:06:28,839
Speaker 1: about her experiences at the company. Her accusations are numerous

101
00:06:28,960 --> 00:06:33,320
Speaker 1: and disturbing. They range from going unpaid for nine months

102
00:06:33,320 --> 00:06:36,320
Speaker 1: while doing some contract work for the company, to then

103
00:06:36,440 --> 00:06:41,680
Speaker 1: being vastly underpaid and overworked as a producer and a

104
00:06:41,720 --> 00:06:44,640
Speaker 1: director and editor, even to a point where she developed

105
00:06:44,680 --> 00:06:48,400
Speaker 1: pneumonia and then, upon returning to work, was immediately put

106
00:06:48,440 --> 00:06:51,640
Speaker 1: back under the same grueling schedule. She also said that

107
00:06:51,680 --> 00:06:54,760
Speaker 1: she was targeted with a homophobic slur in the office,

108
00:06:55,320 --> 00:06:58,000
Speaker 1: and that slur was used by on screen talent in

109
00:06:58,040 --> 00:07:01,040
Speaker 1: an altered form so that they refer to her with

110
00:07:01,080 --> 00:07:04,359
Speaker 1: this slur while being on camera, and in turn, the

111
00:07:04,400 --> 00:07:08,920
Speaker 1: community got in on using that nickname, though presumably most

112
00:07:08,920 --> 00:07:11,720
Speaker 1: folks didn't know what the significance of the word was.

113
00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:17,080
Speaker 1: Side note, however, Caden herself, in a previous life, like

114
00:07:17,200 --> 00:07:20,160
Speaker 1: fifteen years ago when she was a teenager, had uploaded

115
00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:25,000
Speaker 1: videos that featured her and this was before her transition

116
00:07:25,040 --> 00:07:28,640
Speaker 1: surgery and before her employment at Rooster Teeth, But it

117
00:07:28,720 --> 00:07:33,640
Speaker 1: featured her using homophobic language, anti Semitic language, racist language.

118
00:07:34,160 --> 00:07:37,040
Speaker 1: So that doesn't excuse the treatment she received at at

119
00:07:37,080 --> 00:07:39,960
Speaker 1: Rooster Teeth. But you know, I feel like I need

120
00:07:40,000 --> 00:07:43,280
Speaker 1: to talk about it because otherwise someone's going to bring

121
00:07:43,320 --> 00:07:46,520
Speaker 1: it up and say, yeah, but Cayden said these terrible

122
00:07:46,600 --> 00:07:50,200
Speaker 1: things when she was younger, and doesn't that make her

123
00:07:50,360 --> 00:07:55,840
Speaker 1: a hypocrite? Really? I feel like Caden's arguments were that

124
00:07:55,920 --> 00:08:00,920
Speaker 1: the company failed to act when she brought these concerns

125
00:08:00,960 --> 00:08:03,920
Speaker 1: to HR. And that's the issue, right. It's not that

126
00:08:04,040 --> 00:08:08,080
Speaker 1: Cayden was a perfect person, or that Kayden herself had

127
00:08:08,120 --> 00:08:15,760
Speaker 1: not engaged in terrible UH language and and the expression

128
00:08:15,800 --> 00:08:20,760
Speaker 1: of horrible racist and homophobic ideas herself. She had. That

129
00:08:20,840 --> 00:08:23,160
Speaker 1: was bad that she had done that on her own channel,

130
00:08:23,200 --> 00:08:26,640
Speaker 1: but rather that this indicated a systemic problem within Rooster

131
00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:31,000
Speaker 1: Teeth and that HR did nothing to take action on

132
00:08:31,040 --> 00:08:37,600
Speaker 1: that and to protect employees. That is still a massive problem. UH.

133
00:08:37,679 --> 00:08:40,560
Speaker 1: Caden's behavior was also a massive problem, something that she

134
00:08:40,600 --> 00:08:43,679
Speaker 1: has apologized for in the past, though you know, some

135
00:08:43,760 --> 00:08:48,200
Speaker 1: people are are arguing that that apology wasn't sufficient. I'm

136
00:08:48,240 --> 00:08:53,080
Speaker 1: not here to judge the sufficient nature of apologies because

137
00:08:53,080 --> 00:08:56,880
Speaker 1: that's that's a fool's errand in my mind, But anyway,

138
00:08:57,360 --> 00:08:59,440
Speaker 1: it doesn't change the fact that there were these systemic

139
00:08:59,440 --> 00:09:02,439
Speaker 1: problems that Rooster Teeth. Now, Rooster Teeth issued a statement

140
00:09:02,480 --> 00:09:04,520
Speaker 1: that a lot of people in the community have said,

141
00:09:05,120 --> 00:09:08,880
Speaker 1: isn't nearly enough, saying that the company failed to really

142
00:09:08,880 --> 00:09:13,520
Speaker 1: take accountability for the things that Caden accuses the company

143
00:09:13,520 --> 00:09:18,800
Speaker 1: of doing. Largely this reliance on the exploitation of employees

144
00:09:19,320 --> 00:09:25,120
Speaker 1: who are underpaid by industry standards, while meanwhile some some

145
00:09:25,240 --> 00:09:30,600
Speaker 1: few people at the top are benefiting disproportionately from that labor.

146
00:09:31,160 --> 00:09:34,720
Speaker 1: So it is really ugly. This is not the first

147
00:09:34,760 --> 00:09:38,240
Speaker 1: time that Rooster Teeth has had to face some pretty

148
00:09:38,280 --> 00:09:41,640
Speaker 1: tough scandals. There was a similar one when Mica Burton

149
00:09:41,760 --> 00:09:44,280
Speaker 1: left the company and revealed she had been the target

150
00:09:44,280 --> 00:09:47,160
Speaker 1: of racism and abuse, and the company failed to really

151
00:09:47,240 --> 00:09:51,120
Speaker 1: do anything to help her. Then in scandal broke out

152
00:09:51,160 --> 00:09:52,920
Speaker 1: again when it was made public that one of the

153
00:09:52,960 --> 00:09:56,280
Speaker 1: on screen talent at Rooster Teeth had engaged in predatory

154
00:09:56,400 --> 00:10:00,719
Speaker 1: behavior with the fan base. So this later this controversy

155
00:10:00,760 --> 00:10:03,520
Speaker 1: implies that the company as a whole has failed to

156
00:10:03,559 --> 00:10:07,199
Speaker 1: address those systemic problems within the culture of the organization,

157
00:10:07,880 --> 00:10:11,120
Speaker 1: and many are comparing what's going on within Rooster Teeth

158
00:10:11,400 --> 00:10:15,520
Speaker 1: two similar situations that companies like Activision, Blizzard and uby

159
00:10:15,559 --> 00:10:19,240
Speaker 1: Soft and Uber. Meanwhile, as part of Warner Brothers Discovery,

160
00:10:19,600 --> 00:10:23,120
Speaker 1: I imagine there's a very real worry at executive level

161
00:10:23,320 --> 00:10:27,040
Speaker 1: level leadership at Rooster Teeth about what maybe in the

162
00:10:27,080 --> 00:10:29,480
Speaker 1: future for Rooster Teeth. I mean, as possible they could

163
00:10:29,520 --> 00:10:33,160
Speaker 1: get sold off, because we know that David Zaslov over

164
00:10:33,200 --> 00:10:36,679
Speaker 1: at Warner Brothers Discovery and his team are looking to

165
00:10:36,760 --> 00:10:42,120
Speaker 1: trim billions of dollars off the overall corporate budget, and uh,

166
00:10:42,120 --> 00:10:44,360
Speaker 1: it may very well be that Rooster Teeth could be

167
00:10:44,360 --> 00:10:46,960
Speaker 1: on the chopping block for that, whether it gets sold

168
00:10:47,000 --> 00:10:51,000
Speaker 1: off or dissolved or whatever. Rooster Teeth canceled all of

169
00:10:51,040 --> 00:10:54,800
Speaker 1: its live podcast recording sessions yesterday, likely because the company

170
00:10:54,840 --> 00:10:58,120
Speaker 1: is working to create a response to these accusations and

171
00:10:58,240 --> 00:11:01,360
Speaker 1: community reaction, and the host of that podcast would have

172
00:11:01,480 --> 00:11:05,440
Speaker 1: been potentially been a real mess. Right if you had

173
00:11:05,760 --> 00:11:12,080
Speaker 1: live interactive chat with a podcast recording, it would be

174
00:11:12,360 --> 00:11:15,880
Speaker 1: setting the stage for accusations and criticism and abuse and

175
00:11:15,920 --> 00:11:19,160
Speaker 1: tough questions and it just would have been a big mess.

176
00:11:19,640 --> 00:11:21,840
Speaker 1: Whether this controversy is going to have a lasting effect

177
00:11:21,880 --> 00:11:25,559
Speaker 1: on the company remains to be seen, but it definitely

178
00:11:25,640 --> 00:11:30,480
Speaker 1: has exposed a very ugly side to Rooster Teeth's corporate culture,

179
00:11:30,559 --> 00:11:34,400
Speaker 1: one that arguably has been exposed before in the past.

180
00:11:34,880 --> 00:11:40,080
Speaker 1: But the company had had assured community members that steps

181
00:11:40,080 --> 00:11:43,480
Speaker 1: would be taken to correct it. So, yeah, not a

182
00:11:43,520 --> 00:11:46,199
Speaker 1: good situation. All right. When we come back, we've got

183
00:11:46,240 --> 00:11:48,560
Speaker 1: a lot more news to get through, but first let's

184
00:11:48,559 --> 00:12:01,840
Speaker 1: take this quick break. We're back. Yeah. Formerly known as

185
00:12:01,920 --> 00:12:05,760
Speaker 1: Kanye West, is in the process of acquiring the beleaguered

186
00:12:05,920 --> 00:12:09,680
Speaker 1: social network platform Parlor. Now you might remember that Parlor,

187
00:12:09,720 --> 00:12:13,640
Speaker 1: which brands itself as a free speech platform, became kind

188
00:12:13,679 --> 00:12:17,160
Speaker 1: of a gathering place primarily known for right wing conservatives

189
00:12:17,720 --> 00:12:20,319
Speaker 1: leading up to the twenty twenty election, when there was

190
00:12:20,360 --> 00:12:25,040
Speaker 1: a big spike in interest in Parlor. The service ran

191
00:12:25,080 --> 00:12:28,880
Speaker 1: into some major turbulence, however, when Apple and Google dropped

192
00:12:28,920 --> 00:12:31,800
Speaker 1: Parlor from app stores citing the company's lack of a

193
00:12:31,840 --> 00:12:34,880
Speaker 1: suitable content moderation policy around the same time as the

194
00:12:34,960 --> 00:12:39,120
Speaker 1: January six, two thousand twenty one insurrection. Amazon would then

195
00:12:39,160 --> 00:12:43,720
Speaker 1: subsequently boot Parlor from its hosting service, and so Parlor

196
00:12:43,800 --> 00:12:46,679
Speaker 1: had to find a new host and initially switched to

197
00:12:46,720 --> 00:12:50,040
Speaker 1: a Russian based company called de dos Guard, but then

198
00:12:50,080 --> 00:12:54,680
Speaker 1: switched to an American based company called sky Silk. The

199
00:12:54,960 --> 00:12:59,040
Speaker 1: general reporting round Parlor has indicated that there's been a

200
00:12:59,160 --> 00:13:03,840
Speaker 1: pretty substant hill decline in active users since the return

201
00:13:04,000 --> 00:13:09,240
Speaker 1: from online exile in early one. Anyway, Yea apparently decided

202
00:13:09,280 --> 00:13:12,600
Speaker 1: to purchase Parlor after he received a Twitter ban for

203
00:13:12,720 --> 00:13:17,600
Speaker 1: posting anti Semitic comments. He had also been banned from Instagram.

204
00:13:17,640 --> 00:13:19,280
Speaker 1: And I think it's interesting to point out that Yea

205
00:13:19,440 --> 00:13:22,760
Speaker 1: has been hanging out with a conservative commentator and author

206
00:13:22,840 --> 00:13:27,240
Speaker 1: named Candice Owens recently because Owens happens to be married

207
00:13:27,440 --> 00:13:30,840
Speaker 1: to a man named George Farmer, and Farmer happens to

208
00:13:30,880 --> 00:13:34,680
Speaker 1: be the CEO of Parlor. So that's led some folks

209
00:13:34,679 --> 00:13:38,400
Speaker 1: and allegedly including some folks in Yea's own circles, to

210
00:13:38,640 --> 00:13:41,560
Speaker 1: perhaps suggest that Owens has influenced Yea and kind of

211
00:13:41,559 --> 00:13:45,120
Speaker 1: guided him into buying what is a flailing social media site,

212
00:13:45,720 --> 00:13:49,280
Speaker 1: which will potentially see both her and her husband benefit

213
00:13:49,400 --> 00:13:52,800
Speaker 1: from that sale. And I am not used to reporting

214
00:13:52,800 --> 00:13:55,760
Speaker 1: this kind of drama, y'all. Anyway, when you consider that

215
00:13:55,840 --> 00:13:58,480
Speaker 1: Elon Musk is still in the process of acquiring Twitter

216
00:13:59,000 --> 00:14:02,200
Speaker 1: and that Donald Trump on to found Truth Social it's

217
00:14:02,200 --> 00:14:04,679
Speaker 1: hard to get past the feeling that some highly opinionated,

218
00:14:04,800 --> 00:14:07,720
Speaker 1: rich people think that the real solution to being moderated

219
00:14:08,280 --> 00:14:10,679
Speaker 1: is to go and buy the platform or to make

220
00:14:10,720 --> 00:14:14,880
Speaker 1: your own so interesting stuff there. Over in the UK,

221
00:14:15,400 --> 00:14:18,560
Speaker 1: the Competition and Markets Authority or c m A, which

222
00:14:18,600 --> 00:14:22,160
Speaker 1: is a regulatory body, has set a new precedent by

223
00:14:22,280 --> 00:14:26,800
Speaker 1: ordering Meta to sell off Giffee or Jiffy if you prefer.

224
00:14:27,200 --> 00:14:33,160
Speaker 1: That's the gif creation website that Meta acquired in twenty though,

225
00:14:33,200 --> 00:14:36,720
Speaker 1: of course, in Meta was still known as Facebook. Actually,

226
00:14:36,760 --> 00:14:39,800
Speaker 1: the c m A had already ordered Meta to do this.

227
00:14:39,800 --> 00:14:44,080
Speaker 1: This is not a new decision. However, Meta appealed that decision.

228
00:14:44,640 --> 00:14:47,840
Speaker 1: The matter went back for review, and now after reviewing

229
00:14:47,960 --> 00:14:51,360
Speaker 1: that initial decision, the c m A says, now we're good,

230
00:14:51,400 --> 00:14:53,400
Speaker 1: We're still going to make you sell it. So the

231
00:14:53,440 --> 00:14:56,880
Speaker 1: CMA says that Meta's acquisition hurts competition in the space,

232
00:14:56,920 --> 00:15:01,320
Speaker 1: potentially cutting off Giffee rivals from being able to leverage Facebook,

233
00:15:01,720 --> 00:15:04,640
Speaker 1: or forcing those rivals to give up more user data

234
00:15:04,720 --> 00:15:08,520
Speaker 1: to Facebook in return for being allowed to access the platform.

235
00:15:08,680 --> 00:15:12,160
Speaker 1: Meta reps issued a statement reading quote, we are disappointed

236
00:15:12,160 --> 00:15:15,320
Speaker 1: by the CMA's decision, but except today's ruling as the

237
00:15:15,360 --> 00:15:17,960
Speaker 1: final word on the matter, we will work closely with

238
00:15:18,000 --> 00:15:22,000
Speaker 1: the c m A on divesting Giffee end quote. So

239
00:15:22,080 --> 00:15:26,000
Speaker 1: it looks like the dismantling of meta has begun, or

240
00:15:26,040 --> 00:15:27,880
Speaker 1: maybe this is just the beginning and end of it all.

241
00:15:27,960 --> 00:15:31,200
Speaker 1: We'll we'll have to wait and see. Researchers at the

242
00:15:31,200 --> 00:15:34,760
Speaker 1: security firm z Scaler warned that there's a new data

243
00:15:34,800 --> 00:15:39,960
Speaker 1: stealing malware propagating across Facebook. A phishing campaign called Ductail

244
00:15:40,440 --> 00:15:43,400
Speaker 1: appears to be responsible, and according to a report on

245
00:15:43,480 --> 00:15:46,920
Speaker 1: tech Radar that's titled a phishing campaign is spreading brand

246
00:15:46,960 --> 00:15:52,080
Speaker 1: new malware targeting Facebook users. This malware quote cannot only

247
00:15:52,160 --> 00:15:56,280
Speaker 1: steal Facebook adjacent data, but also other sensitive data stored

248
00:15:56,280 --> 00:16:00,040
Speaker 1: in browsers, such as data related to cryptocurrency, wallet's a

249
00:16:00,120 --> 00:16:04,600
Speaker 1: count information, and basic system data end quote. Ducktail has

250
00:16:04,640 --> 00:16:10,480
Speaker 1: previously distributed malware through LinkedIn messages containing malicious links, and

251
00:16:10,520 --> 00:16:13,840
Speaker 1: it sounds like this particular attack is really insidious and

252
00:16:13,880 --> 00:16:17,840
Speaker 1: that it mostly works within computer memory, which helps it

253
00:16:18,040 --> 00:16:21,760
Speaker 1: evade detection from anti virus programs. It also sounds like

254
00:16:21,800 --> 00:16:25,880
Speaker 1: this started as a spear phishing campaign. UH. Spear phishing

255
00:16:25,920 --> 00:16:29,840
Speaker 1: means that the perpetrators are targeting specific populations. It's not

256
00:16:29,920 --> 00:16:34,120
Speaker 1: just throwing out a phishing attack in general, it's really

257
00:16:34,160 --> 00:16:37,120
Speaker 1: focusing them. So in that case, it involved high level

258
00:16:37,160 --> 00:16:41,480
Speaker 1: employees who had access to company Facebook business accounts. However,

259
00:16:41,680 --> 00:16:44,480
Speaker 1: z scaler is now warning that this campaign has widened

260
00:16:44,560 --> 00:16:48,840
Speaker 1: to target pretty much anyone. Z Scaler says that quote

261
00:16:49,080 --> 00:16:53,160
Speaker 1: the malicious executable files are mostly in dot zep format

262
00:16:53,520 --> 00:16:57,640
Speaker 1: and hosted on file sharing platforms, posing as cracked versions

263
00:16:57,800 --> 00:17:03,360
Speaker 1: of office applications, games, subtitle files, porn related files, and

264
00:17:03,480 --> 00:17:07,399
Speaker 1: others end quote. So once again, just a reminder, don't

265
00:17:07,520 --> 00:17:11,639
Speaker 1: download files from questionable sources. You're playing Russian Roulette with

266
00:17:11,680 --> 00:17:16,159
Speaker 1: your computer and potentially all of your data, including financial data.

267
00:17:16,640 --> 00:17:21,040
Speaker 1: Business Insider reports that Microsoft has recently held layoffs, affecting

268
00:17:21,119 --> 00:17:24,639
Speaker 1: quote less than one thousand employees end quote this week,

269
00:17:25,400 --> 00:17:28,280
Speaker 1: and that the cuts were made across pretty much all

270
00:17:28,320 --> 00:17:32,199
Speaker 1: of the company, including the Xbox division and Microsoft's strategic

271
00:17:32,280 --> 00:17:37,400
Speaker 1: missions and technology departments. Business Insider also references an internal

272
00:17:37,440 --> 00:17:41,440
Speaker 1: email that indicated the company is re prioritizing various projects,

273
00:17:41,920 --> 00:17:45,199
Speaker 1: with some essentially being canceled or shelved. This kind of

274
00:17:45,200 --> 00:17:47,679
Speaker 1: goes in line with what we've been hearing across the

275
00:17:47,720 --> 00:17:51,880
Speaker 1: industry really, as large companies have put in hiring phrases

276
00:17:51,920 --> 00:17:56,000
Speaker 1: and started holding layoffs. Uh. Microsoft has previously said that

277
00:17:56,080 --> 00:17:59,359
Speaker 1: it anticipates it will not lay off more than one

278
00:17:59,400 --> 00:18:03,920
Speaker 1: percent of its workforce globally, but the you know, this

279
00:18:04,000 --> 00:18:07,399
Speaker 1: is part of that process, and I think we're going

280
00:18:07,440 --> 00:18:11,920
Speaker 1: to see a lot more stories about various folks facing

281
00:18:12,240 --> 00:18:16,639
Speaker 1: tough situations like this across the tech industry. So on

282
00:18:16,680 --> 00:18:20,080
Speaker 1: a similar note, Engadget reports that some leaked documents from

283
00:18:20,119 --> 00:18:24,959
Speaker 1: inside Amazon paint a really bleak picture for the company

284
00:18:25,000 --> 00:18:30,400
Speaker 1: when it comes to retaining employees. The report says that attrition,

285
00:18:30,760 --> 00:18:32,879
Speaker 1: which is a nice way to say the loss of

286
00:18:32,960 --> 00:18:38,280
Speaker 1: employees that is both regretted and unregretted, which essentially means

287
00:18:38,880 --> 00:18:42,399
Speaker 1: both the folks who quit and the folks that we

288
00:18:42,520 --> 00:18:46,119
Speaker 1: fired or laid off collectively. They cost the company some

289
00:18:46,280 --> 00:18:53,200
Speaker 1: eight billion dollars annually eight billion dollars billion with a B,

290
00:18:54,040 --> 00:18:58,800
Speaker 1: all because of turnover, whether that's from layoffs and firings

291
00:18:58,920 --> 00:19:03,320
Speaker 1: or folks quitting the company. The documents indicate that about

292
00:19:03,320 --> 00:19:06,399
Speaker 1: twice as many people leave the company on their own

293
00:19:07,080 --> 00:19:09,719
Speaker 1: as opposed to being laid off or fired. So that

294
00:19:09,880 --> 00:19:12,560
Speaker 1: definitely does not paint a nice picture of what it's

295
00:19:12,600 --> 00:19:15,639
Speaker 1: like to work for Amazon. Right, So you've got this

296
00:19:15,920 --> 00:19:20,920
Speaker 1: massive issue of turnover. The vast majority of which involves

297
00:19:20,960 --> 00:19:24,840
Speaker 1: people leaving the company quitting the company, and that you know,

298
00:19:24,960 --> 00:19:28,320
Speaker 1: regretted attrition a people who are leaving on their own

299
00:19:28,359 --> 00:19:32,840
Speaker 1: account was at a low of sixty nine point five

300
00:19:32,880 --> 00:19:36,000
Speaker 1: percent and a high of any one three percent across

301
00:19:36,080 --> 00:19:40,879
Speaker 1: all levels of employees. Yikes. And it goes on to

302
00:19:40,920 --> 00:19:44,119
Speaker 1: add that only one out of three employees even sticks

303
00:19:44,200 --> 00:19:48,359
Speaker 1: around for ninety days or more. That means if you

304
00:19:48,440 --> 00:19:53,720
Speaker 1: get three Amazon employees who joined on you know, January one,

305
00:19:54,000 --> 00:19:56,000
Speaker 1: two out of those three are going to be gone

306
00:19:56,640 --> 00:20:02,760
Speaker 1: before the end of March. Like that crazy. That's an

307
00:20:02,760 --> 00:20:06,320
Speaker 1: insane amount of turnover. And we've always known that turnover

308
00:20:06,320 --> 00:20:09,719
Speaker 1: at Amazon has been a big problem. It's just that

309
00:20:09,840 --> 00:20:13,640
Speaker 1: it hasn't really been quantified like this before these internal

310
00:20:13,680 --> 00:20:16,919
Speaker 1: documents got out. At that rate, Amazon is really going

311
00:20:16,960 --> 00:20:20,720
Speaker 1: to burn through all potential employee options in major cities

312
00:20:20,720 --> 00:20:22,639
Speaker 1: within a couple of years. And then where is it

313
00:20:22,680 --> 00:20:25,720
Speaker 1: going to be. I mean, that sounds like it's hyperbole,

314
00:20:26,119 --> 00:20:29,440
Speaker 1: but other news outlets have actually said exactly the same

315
00:20:29,480 --> 00:20:34,960
Speaker 1: thing that at the rate of Amazon's turnover, the employable

316
00:20:35,080 --> 00:20:39,320
Speaker 1: public in the various cities where Amazon has major operations

317
00:20:39,920 --> 00:20:42,520
Speaker 1: are going to be run through and then you've got

318
00:20:42,520 --> 00:20:45,479
Speaker 1: no one left. So you've got to address these issues

319
00:20:45,480 --> 00:20:49,800
Speaker 1: with retention. It also seems to at least imply that

320
00:20:49,880 --> 00:20:53,280
Speaker 1: working conditions at Amazon are lousy, right otherwise you wouldn't

321
00:20:53,320 --> 00:20:56,160
Speaker 1: have people quitting within three months of getting a job.

322
00:20:57,040 --> 00:21:01,000
Speaker 1: So it's a costly problem that Amazon needs to solve.

323
00:21:01,040 --> 00:21:04,400
Speaker 1: I really recommend reading the whole article. The article has

324
00:21:04,440 --> 00:21:09,560
Speaker 1: the title exclusive Amazon's attrition costs eight billion annually according

325
00:21:09,600 --> 00:21:13,680
Speaker 1: to leaked documents, and it gets worse. And again that's

326
00:21:13,720 --> 00:21:17,520
Speaker 1: over at in Gadget. Okay, I've got a few more

327
00:21:17,640 --> 00:21:19,920
Speaker 1: stories to go through before I get to those. Let's

328
00:21:19,960 --> 00:21:32,560
Speaker 1: take another quick break. We're back. Not too long ago,

329
00:21:32,880 --> 00:21:36,440
Speaker 1: I covered a story about how YouTube was experimenting with

330
00:21:36,480 --> 00:21:40,400
Speaker 1: putting four K content behind a sort of paywall. So

331
00:21:40,560 --> 00:21:43,880
Speaker 1: some users in various regions, but not all of them,

332
00:21:43,880 --> 00:21:47,120
Speaker 1: but some some areas of the world reported that when

333
00:21:47,119 --> 00:21:51,639
Speaker 1: they encountered videos on YouTube that were available to watch

334
00:21:51,800 --> 00:21:55,760
Speaker 1: in four K, they first saw a prompt to upgrade

335
00:21:55,760 --> 00:21:59,439
Speaker 1: to YouTube Premium in order to access the content in

336
00:21:59,520 --> 00:22:04,280
Speaker 1: four A resolution. Now mac Rumors reports that the company

337
00:22:04,480 --> 00:22:09,000
Speaker 1: has ended this experiment, removing the upgrade prompts and returning

338
00:22:09,040 --> 00:22:11,399
Speaker 1: four K content to just being a normal option for

339
00:22:11,520 --> 00:22:15,239
Speaker 1: users to choose from for videos that have that availability.

340
00:22:15,480 --> 00:22:19,480
Speaker 1: The company has indicated that this experiment is officially over.

341
00:22:19,720 --> 00:22:22,880
Speaker 1: They've said so in tweets people have sent in questions

342
00:22:22,880 --> 00:22:26,679
Speaker 1: over Twitter and YouTube accounts of State stated that this

343
00:22:26,720 --> 00:22:30,480
Speaker 1: experiment has ended. However, there hasn't really been any comment

344
00:22:31,160 --> 00:22:34,200
Speaker 1: on what prompted the experiment to come to an end.

345
00:22:34,680 --> 00:22:39,680
Speaker 1: Presumably the decision is not to lock four K behind

346
00:22:39,680 --> 00:22:43,600
Speaker 1: a paywall. It is possible that user backlash convinced YouTube

347
00:22:43,680 --> 00:22:48,520
Speaker 1: leaders that putting higher resolution content behind an upgrade requirement

348
00:22:49,040 --> 00:22:51,280
Speaker 1: would not be an effective way to actually drive people

349
00:22:51,320 --> 00:22:55,399
Speaker 1: to subscribe to YouTube premium. If their conclusion was people

350
00:22:55,400 --> 00:22:59,520
Speaker 1: are just angry and it's not really making anyone subscribe,

351
00:23:00,160 --> 00:23:02,720
Speaker 1: then obviously it doesn't make any sense to institute that

352
00:23:03,000 --> 00:23:06,439
Speaker 1: strategy across the platform because it's not gonna work anyway,

353
00:23:06,440 --> 00:23:09,680
Speaker 1: and it's just gonna take off your user base. So, um,

354
00:23:09,720 --> 00:23:12,160
Speaker 1: I'm not sure what YouTube is going to try next

355
00:23:12,320 --> 00:23:17,560
Speaker 1: to try and increase YouTube Premium subscriptions, but it apparently

356
00:23:17,600 --> 00:23:21,320
Speaker 1: will not be locking content, you know, high resolution content

357
00:23:21,400 --> 00:23:24,240
Speaker 1: behind the paywall. So that's good news if you like

358
00:23:24,359 --> 00:23:27,560
Speaker 1: watching you know, four K content on YouTube and you

359
00:23:27,640 --> 00:23:33,560
Speaker 1: don't want to have a YouTube premium subscription. German regulators

360
00:23:33,560 --> 00:23:38,160
Speaker 1: have now levied a five million dollar fine on Telegram,

361
00:23:38,200 --> 00:23:41,800
Speaker 1: the messaging app that originates out of the United Arab Emirates.

362
00:23:41,800 --> 00:23:46,080
Speaker 1: It's a Dubai based company, and the regulators are saying

363
00:23:46,119 --> 00:23:48,960
Speaker 1: that the reason for the fine, this five million dollar

364
00:23:49,040 --> 00:23:53,800
Speaker 1: fine is that Telegram has failed to fulfill two requirements

365
00:23:54,160 --> 00:23:58,520
Speaker 1: in order to operate a messaging service within Germany. Namely,

366
00:23:58,960 --> 00:24:03,159
Speaker 1: Telegram has not created a legal way for reporting illegal

367
00:24:03,200 --> 00:24:07,359
Speaker 1: content to German officials. So content within Germany that is

368
00:24:07,400 --> 00:24:12,400
Speaker 1: considered illegal must be reported to the authorities, and Telegram

369
00:24:12,440 --> 00:24:15,600
Speaker 1: has not proposed a way of doing that. And the

370
00:24:15,640 --> 00:24:18,800
Speaker 1: other accusation is that Telegram has not named a German

371
00:24:19,000 --> 00:24:23,400
Speaker 1: entity like a company or point of contact, who would

372
00:24:23,440 --> 00:24:28,640
Speaker 1: be responsible for receiving official communications from the German authorities

373
00:24:28,920 --> 00:24:32,880
Speaker 1: or from Telegram, kind of being a liaison between Telegram

374
00:24:32,920 --> 00:24:36,320
Speaker 1: and the German government. Telegram does have the option to

375
00:24:36,440 --> 00:24:41,080
Speaker 1: appeal the fine um and the company has recently named

376
00:24:41,160 --> 00:24:44,160
Speaker 1: a German law firm as sort of a point of contact,

377
00:24:44,240 --> 00:24:49,240
Speaker 1: so potentially one of the two problems has been resolved.

378
00:24:49,520 --> 00:24:54,359
Speaker 1: Whether or not Telegram has formulated an official process for

379
00:24:55,520 --> 00:24:59,400
Speaker 1: reporting illegal activity, I have not heard, so that may

380
00:24:59,400 --> 00:25:05,159
Speaker 1: still be an issue. Finally, the European Space Agency plans

381
00:25:05,160 --> 00:25:09,439
Speaker 1: to launch a demonstration satellite in twenty four that aims

382
00:25:09,440 --> 00:25:12,800
Speaker 1: to push encryption into the quantum age, or at least

383
00:25:12,800 --> 00:25:16,280
Speaker 1: play a part in it. So this plan involves putting

384
00:25:16,280 --> 00:25:20,160
Speaker 1: a satellite, a communication satellite called Eagle one, into orbit,

385
00:25:20,560 --> 00:25:22,760
Speaker 1: and this satellite is going to serve as part of

386
00:25:22,800 --> 00:25:26,920
Speaker 1: a quantum key distribution system and will be used to

387
00:25:26,960 --> 00:25:32,000
Speaker 1: help test different strategies centered around quantum encryption, which is

388
00:25:32,040 --> 00:25:35,040
Speaker 1: important in the age of quantum computing. And I've covered

389
00:25:35,160 --> 00:25:37,720
Speaker 1: quantum computing in the past, but just as a quick reminder,

390
00:25:38,320 --> 00:25:42,000
Speaker 1: quantum computers, at least those that have enough processing capability

391
00:25:42,200 --> 00:25:44,919
Speaker 1: as well as the right algorithms to go with it,

392
00:25:45,119 --> 00:25:49,240
Speaker 1: can pose an enormous threat and existential threat to our

393
00:25:49,280 --> 00:25:54,000
Speaker 1: modern methods of encryption. Um. So your standard computer would

394
00:25:54,320 --> 00:25:58,280
Speaker 1: have to work thousands of years to decrypt a really

395
00:25:58,359 --> 00:26:03,119
Speaker 1: sophisticated encrypted message today like that would just because the

396
00:26:03,160 --> 00:26:07,320
Speaker 1: way classical computers work, it would take so long as

397
00:26:07,400 --> 00:26:11,199
Speaker 1: to be unrealistic to ever be able to decrypt a

398
00:26:11,359 --> 00:26:16,119
Speaker 1: truly well encrypted message, But a suitable quantum computer paired

399
00:26:16,119 --> 00:26:19,199
Speaker 1: with the correct algorithm could do the same thing in

400
00:26:19,240 --> 00:26:23,920
Speaker 1: a relative blink of an eye, because it's effectively solving

401
00:26:24,600 --> 00:26:31,200
Speaker 1: all versions of the problem simultaneously. That's a drastic oversimplification

402
00:26:31,200 --> 00:26:33,919
Speaker 1: of what's going on, but you can think of it

403
00:26:34,000 --> 00:26:37,080
Speaker 1: in those terms. So while a classical computer would be

404
00:26:37,119 --> 00:26:39,560
Speaker 1: working kind of step by step to try and solve

405
00:26:39,600 --> 00:26:42,840
Speaker 1: a problem, the quantum computer is trying to solve all

406
00:26:42,880 --> 00:26:45,480
Speaker 1: of the problem all the same time and quickly comes

407
00:26:45,560 --> 00:26:49,480
Speaker 1: up with solutions that it assigns a probability to. So

408
00:26:49,520 --> 00:26:52,800
Speaker 1: in other words, it's not like you get the solution,

409
00:26:52,920 --> 00:26:59,200
Speaker 1: you get potential solutions with a a likelihood of them

410
00:26:59,200 --> 00:27:03,120
Speaker 1: being correct. That's still way faster, way faster than using

411
00:27:03,119 --> 00:27:05,760
Speaker 1: a classical computer, And that means that quantum computers could

412
00:27:05,800 --> 00:27:11,120
Speaker 1: potentially decrypt pretty much everything that has ever been encrypted

413
00:27:11,440 --> 00:27:14,560
Speaker 1: by computers, which means no more secrets, right. It means

414
00:27:14,600 --> 00:27:19,160
Speaker 1: anything that has been encrypted could be uncovered. That includes

415
00:27:19,200 --> 00:27:23,400
Speaker 1: things like financial transactions. The entire basis of data security

416
00:27:23,720 --> 00:27:29,679
Speaker 1: would be completely undermined by this emergence of quantum computers

417
00:27:29,720 --> 00:27:32,679
Speaker 1: and algorithms that can break encryption. So there is a

418
00:27:32,800 --> 00:27:37,440
Speaker 1: need to establish a new encryption method that can withstand

419
00:27:37,520 --> 00:27:41,000
Speaker 1: both classic and quantum computer attacks, and that is what

420
00:27:41,240 --> 00:27:43,920
Speaker 1: this Eagle one satellite is meant to be part of

421
00:27:44,320 --> 00:27:47,440
Speaker 1: a deployment of technology platforms upon which we can test

422
00:27:47,520 --> 00:27:51,320
Speaker 1: different strategies to see which are viable. We've already seen

423
00:27:51,400 --> 00:27:54,600
Speaker 1: stories of a proposed quantum encryption scheme that ended up

424
00:27:54,640 --> 00:27:59,000
Speaker 1: being vulnerable to classical computer attacks. So this is an

425
00:27:59,040 --> 00:28:03,879
Speaker 1: important and difficult area of research. So really interesting that

426
00:28:04,119 --> 00:28:08,240
Speaker 1: this is looking at a launch. Uh, it really does

427
00:28:08,280 --> 00:28:12,800
Speaker 1: show how how on the verge we are of this

428
00:28:12,920 --> 00:28:17,119
Speaker 1: quantum computing age and how important it is to start

429
00:28:17,200 --> 00:28:22,840
Speaker 1: setting the standards for encryption moving forward. Okay, that's it

430
00:28:22,960 --> 00:28:25,800
Speaker 1: for the news that I have to cover today Tuesday,

431
00:28:25,960 --> 00:28:29,879
Speaker 1: October two thousand twenty two. If you have suggestions for

432
00:28:29,920 --> 00:28:32,040
Speaker 1: topics I should cover in future episodes of tech Stuff,

433
00:28:32,080 --> 00:28:33,879
Speaker 1: please reach out to me. One way to do that

434
00:28:34,440 --> 00:28:36,840
Speaker 1: is to download the I Heart radio app and you

435
00:28:36,840 --> 00:28:38,840
Speaker 1: can navigate over to tech Stuff in the little search

436
00:28:38,880 --> 00:28:42,520
Speaker 1: field and you'll see that there's a little microphone icon

437
00:28:42,600 --> 00:28:44,720
Speaker 1: you can click on and you can leave a voice

438
00:28:44,720 --> 00:28:47,040
Speaker 1: message up to thirty seconds in length. On there. If

439
00:28:47,040 --> 00:28:48,520
Speaker 1: you would like me to use the message in an

440
00:28:48,600 --> 00:28:50,920
Speaker 1: upcoming episode of tech Stuff, just let me know that

441
00:28:51,000 --> 00:28:53,720
Speaker 1: as well. And uh, that's one way to get in

442
00:28:53,760 --> 00:28:56,200
Speaker 1: touch with me. The other is to reach out on Twitter.

443
00:28:56,320 --> 00:28:59,160
Speaker 1: The handle for the show is tech Stuff H s

444
00:28:59,440 --> 00:29:04,760
Speaker 1: W and I'll talk to you again really soon. Y.

445
00:29:09,040 --> 00:29:12,080
Speaker 1: Text Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more

446
00:29:12,160 --> 00:29:15,520
Speaker 1: podcasts from I Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app,

447
00:29:15,680 --> 00:29:18,800
Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.