WEBVTT - Surveillance: VW CEO Diess Still Optimistic About Trade

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Ye, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>jay Ley. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Now

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>joining us, I'm gonna just say this flat out the

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>Auto interview of our Davos and that is because I'm

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>sure I can speak for those in early morning America.

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Volkswagen is not the Volkswagon that we know. Far more

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>than that, it is the auto company of the world,

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>path breaking and so many things, including this regulatory mess

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and that regulatory mess called into strained out Herbert's Volkswagen

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer and a mechanical engineer from Munich says, uh,

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>this morning, I am driving around the World Economic Forum

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in these gorgeous v W eight share vans and busses

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>on terrofs to the United States. The United States wants

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 1>to keep your product, your vans, your trucks out of America.

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>How are we going to get the advantage of what

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm driving around in davoson get more of those trucks

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>into America. No, you all, you have all those advantages

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>we are exporting. We don't exploit those trucks because the

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>market was small. But the next generation electric we call

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>it bus I d bus. It goes back to the microbus,

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>which was very successful in the sixties, and so we

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>were bringing that product coming two thousand, twenty two, twenty three,

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and then you will have a much nicer car than

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>than the cars. What do you need from the United

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>States on terror relief to get some of your products

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>more into the United States. We're still optimistic today. We

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>have we have very very low tariffs for for import

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to the United States. We have a manufacturing base in

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States, and we are increasing that manufacturing case,

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and we are doing everything to avoid tariffs for importing

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>our cars to the US. Even as if we're making progress,

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>which has announced a eight hundred million dollar investment in

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.959
<v Speaker 1>our Chattanooga factory. We received a positive tweet from the President,

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>so we think we are in the right way. And

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you're one of the very few European chief executives that

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>has actually met with President face to face. Do you

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>think we'll see more political friction between countries and twenty

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen or less, You know, I don't hope, you know.

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>And I'm still optimistic because there is always a lot

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to lose on both sides. And I think the President

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>is well. On the other hand, I understand his case,

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you know. And my background is manufacturing, and the United States,

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>probably forty fifty years ago was really a strong manufacturing

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>base of the world. This machine to linn the streets,

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of of of this industry came down

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and and and lost ground. So I understand this case

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and building up manufacturing again it is probably a valuable

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>approject for every society. So I understand the case, but

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>it takes time, and but we want to contribute. We

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>see the US as a big market chance. We have

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 1>a small market share with our brands. Still we want

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to grow. We think we can provide the right product

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>for the customer. We have a nice heritage in the

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Most of the of our potential

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>customers know us, know many many have written, have learned

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>driving on the folks bag and so Mr He'll talk,

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>He'll talk to you about the heritage in a second.

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>But I want to ask about China. This is a huge,

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>huge market for you, and we saw demand in general

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for cars under pressure also because of the US China

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>trade tensions. How do you see China performing this year. No,

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>China is for sure is under sread as a market,

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>we play a very important role there. We have eighteen

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>percent market share with all our brands. We are we

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>early to China, so we have perceived kind in the

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>country like like a Chinese company grows. We had twenty

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>seven years of continuous growth in China. It's also a

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>big source of income for US. We're financing a lot

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of investment in future technologies out of China, so it's

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>really important. Last year, already, the second half of last

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 1>year was already declining, which is hurting US. We could

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>cope because we come with a lot of new products,

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>so we could increase our market here. We had a

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>slight growth still, but this year will be challenging. And

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>I really hope and and trust in the governments that

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>they come to arrangements because it's it's a lot, you know,

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.039
<v Speaker 1>economics is a lot about mood of the people, and

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.359
<v Speaker 1>and fegure and and in the right words, and the

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and the few agreements would would help a lot. The

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.239
<v Speaker 1>romance for me is I grew up on a VW Beetle,

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>just like in the classic Madman episode, which is the

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>first car I learned a drive on. You've moved technologically

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>from an engineering standpoint a little bit forward, and you

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>have what many in America feel is the Elon Musk killer.

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 1>You've got a tortue automobile. I haven't seen when driving

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>around here, is there a tan? Is it coming? Is

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it's coming? It's not up here yet, and it'll be

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>here next year in the valley. How are you in

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles can kill Ellen Musk and be a Tusla killer. Yeah,

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>we really appreciate what what Ellen Musk has been achieving

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and doing and pushing the industry and really promoting electric costs.

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I take him very seriously. Not it's a it's a

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>good team, very aggressive team. Uh. But we're seeing when

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>it really comes to scaling to exactly to produce all

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>over the world, we have a chance to compete. There's

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe five people like you have, even put Mary Barr

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in this category that really understand the importance and complexity

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of manufacturing processes. When you look at Tesla in a tent,

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>how does a pro manufacturer like you respond, Can you

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 1>get the kind of quality control you need manufacturing in

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a tent. You know, I think this is probably our

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>advantage that we are used to scale up plants in

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>every other region of the world. We are strong in

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>lettin America, strong in China. We can do that. This

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:13.679
<v Speaker 1>is our advantage that makes us a little bit slower.

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>But when we decide when it can become strongly this

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>when you look at evaluations, the traditional car manufacturers are

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe not seen as the ones that will really deliver

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the electric cars of the future. So do you think

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the number of traditional car manufacturers need to shrink? I

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>think all in all, our let's say our industry will

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>change a lot in the next ten to twenty years,

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and yes, it will become much more of a let's say,

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it will become more of an Internet logic. No where

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you have let's say, the economies of scale are nearly

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>everything because it's all about software computers. So economies of

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>scale we play a mat sure all but that is

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that is also an advantage for us because we are

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>already big. If we can converge fast into the new

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>age of ours, we have a good chance to outperform

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the startups because the startups also have to grow a lot.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Now they have to invest a lot, they have to

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>scale up, and that's why I see that probably the

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>startups and and and tech companies are a bit over evaluated,

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're probably been unevaluated when it comes to future mobility.

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>But doesn't mean I mean how many carmakers are there

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>now thirty in the world. Are we going to be

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>left for five major ones probably in twenty years. My

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>assumption would be that there would be a consolidation process

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>because we become more of a let's say tech uh industry.

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Now the economies of scale are even more important than

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to day. In the smartphone world, you have probably four

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>or five manufacturers. Now will there be more on the

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>car sideeas but as many as today? Probably not. The

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>French finance minister told us this morning a Bloomberg exclusive

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>we had at first that was going to resigned last night.

0:07:55.680 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>How does that change the automakers? You know how regard

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Carlos I just bought a car from him, uh and

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and he really was a pillar of the industry and

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>shape the industry also worldwide, not only the European industry.

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>So for sure he's a loss, But there are many

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>talented managers which which will probably step in now to

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>speak of the sensitivities that Mr Ghan is going under

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>right now, the business plan here is the JV the

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>relationship that we have between the French and the Japanese.

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.439
<v Speaker 1>What do you learn from this fractured relationship and how

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>does it redound over to Volkswagens acquisitions, combinations and joint

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>ventures with future companies. I think scale will be even

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>more important in the future than it is today, that

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that you have to partner with and you're not only

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>have to partner with competitor us, you also you have

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to partner with tech companies and managing such kind of

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>network is one of the key skills we need in

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the industry. Are we going to see many more of

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>these alliances? I think so? Between what is the truck maker,

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is it do you have to basically, you know,

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>our alliances of two groups that actually you know, complement

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>each other or that where you really have synergies. Let

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>me just mention what we just agreed with Ford. Now

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>we we be partner in the light commercial vehicles segment.

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Now both companies are relatively big. Now we are we

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>have enough economies of scale in many segments, but in

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>this small segment of commercial light commercial vehicles. We we

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>we're not having the enough economies of scale each so

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>combining we will be very competitive. And this uh you know,

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>this is this is industry, how it works worldwide, a

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>global industry, and so partnering makes sense. Where do you

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:47.959
<v Speaker 1>see that going? I mean, if you look at the

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>partnership with Forward, what exactly is the end game? Yeah,

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>we know we are we are together with Forward in

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>that area to compete against other partnerships. This is an

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>open game. Important is that you have, let's add business relation,

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>which is a trustful one. Do you have a good

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>track record? The advantage of Ford is that we already

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>worked with Ford some two or three decades ago in

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Europe together and in Latin America out of Latino. So

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we have a good track record and it just made

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>sense for us for Post company in America. When you

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>grew up as a kid, you were a Ford family

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>or a Chevy family. There was no other day about it.

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Mario Barbs, Marie Bars, trust me, the edgy families at

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a VW beet or with no heat in it for

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the first fifty miles, the romance of the moment and

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>trust me, folks we didn't have one was the curming gear.

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>It was the definitive design idea. Now now we're getting

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>back to design. Now your Porsche product. I'm gonna do

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a shout out to Bentley. It's wonderful to drive down

0:10:53.640 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Fifth Avenue yesterday. But design is coming back. What are

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you going to do to develop a Volkswagen ethos aesthetic

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>worldwide in design as you had with Carmen gear years ago.

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we we folks weng remained with an iconic design.

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Now we had that step change between the area of

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the times of people and microbus and then to the golf.

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Golf is is world by our most relevant product, but

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>all the design language, all the technical technical package was

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>driven by the golf. And now comes another step change,

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the electric change. A step change means that the entire

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>design of the car is disrupted. Not from a people

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to a golf. There is a disruption you can see

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not evolutionary anymore. And the next disruption will come

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>now next year, and of next year we see the

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>idea to be launched. It will be similar to the

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>disruption from golf, from people to golf. Now it's from

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>golf to idea couldn't take it over like it, which

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is a small but highest quality brand of Germany. I

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>mean you look at it like a camera, and the

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:04.719
<v Speaker 1>idea is there's an evolving aesthetic of like through the

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>years they got the new fancy one which is all

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>stripped down and that do you need to do that

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>out of Germany? Do you need to run your global

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>platform with the German aesthetic? You know we have Meanwhile,

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and we are a global company means while we're very

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>strong in China, very strong Latin America, a bit weaker

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in the U S. Still, but we have design offices

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>all over the world because we have to make customer

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>happy on the world bad basis, but still it needs

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the ingredients of folks walking design, which has to be

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a bit clean, a bit timeless, not a bit class less, democratic,

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>And we're trying to achieve the save in the next

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>generation of cars. What are we going to fix Devil's traffic?

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>What's the first driverless car coming to Devils. I'm a

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>bit conservative on on this. Now I'm driving around with

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>lots of prototypes worldwide. There's a lot of investment going

0:12:55.840 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in there, but really to see their cars then perform

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>armbing on the road, not not just being kind of

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a hurdle and and standing around and take time. You

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 1>were correct in that I'm metatoralizing here was a Volkswagen ceo.

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>You yeah, I'm in the Volkswagen camp. Will take time.

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Particularly last night at two am outside the piano bar,

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>joining us is Jason Board off of Columbia University, out

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of Brown University, long agoing far away. The cool people

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>carried Daniel Jurgen's a Prize around campus. And as I've

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>told Dr Jurgen, but three people read it at Brown

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>University at that time. The only one that read it

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>cover to cover was Jason. How big that book? You know,

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I've read it a few times coming. Well, you read

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it cover to cover and you move on from Urgans

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the prize to the Quest, and then you move on

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to the now what for big oil and for national

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and international energy policy? You've got to write the Prize,

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the Quest Volume three. Where are we right now as

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>we look forward to the prize? Well that's the conversation

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>here in Davos. I think you know, extreme weather, climate

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>change top the list of concerns. There's a lot of

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>discussion among corporate leaders and abroad recognition of realism in

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a sense that maybe is a little bit new this

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>year about just how far away we are, despite the

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>tremendous progress and renewable energy, tremendous growth and electric vehicles,

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>how far away we are from taking global goals like

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the Paris Agreement to degree target. Seriously, how far away

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we are from achieved is x on here? I am

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>sure I'm using many of the big oil here. Yeah,

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of course they're big oils here. But what is their

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>future given all that we see? Are they like, yeah,

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>climate change go or do it? Forget about it? Or

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>are they really listening to corporate leaders and government officials.

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of variants within the oil and gas industry,

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think at the same time that there's a

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>broader recognition we need to move much faster towards clean

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>energy transition. There's also a realistic recognition that we are

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be using oil and gas for a long time.

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>People are paying close attention today to what's happening in

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>oil markets, whether it's geopolitical risk like Venezuela or possible

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>trade war with China that could slow down growth and

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>put put pressure on prices. So companies are thinking about

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>what it looks like to transition over time. And they're

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>also investing in things like the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative,

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>which is meeting here, trying to do things like lower

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the methane emissions profile of oil and gas to try

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to try to start moving it more in the right direction. Jason,

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>let me know what you think of this argument. A

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>number of years ago, maybe ten years ago, you could

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>make an argument that America needs to shift away from

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels because we were so dependent on fossil fuels

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>from abroad. Ten years later, America becomes the biggest oil producer.

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Does it get harder to make the argument that you

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>need to move away from something that you are the

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>leader in producing. I think it's harder to build consensus

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>towards that now. And so a good example of this

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is the fuel economy standards. When I was in the

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Obama White House, we doubled fuel economy standards. The Trump

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>administration wants to roll that back. If you read their

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>rationale for why they're doing it, it's because in the

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>world where we import almost no oil, uh, there's less

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>national security reason to reduce domestic weil consumption. Now there's

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>still a huge reason to do it in terms of

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>protecting consumers in terms of climate change in the environment,

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>but we used to have the ability to build consensus

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>across the aisle more that it was both for national

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>security reasons and for climate reasons that we needed to

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>do this. That breaks down a little bit in the

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>world where the US is almost energy independent. When you

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>were Brown, did you have to take biology and then

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>onto chemistry and all that or do you avoid that pain?

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I took a pretty diverse set of courses, but Brown

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't require the scientists. At one point you said, these

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>guys are really smart. How does Davos and how does

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>America deal with the president at a good part of

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>America which has an a science outlook, they really don't

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>want to look at the theoretical and applied constructs of

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>modern climate science, do they. I think is certainly a

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>piece of this administration and the segment of American society

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and not just American, other countries as well that has

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>a challenge accepting what's what's what's broad scientific consensus? You

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>consider that a permanence or will that change? I think

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it's going to change, and I think you see that

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.360
<v Speaker 1>already across the aisle and data with the next generation.

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Yale just came out with a study showing rising public

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>opinion recognition that climate change is real, it's caused by

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>human activity, and and that we need to do something

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>John to bring us up because we're gonna do the

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>radio remote next week from the western southwestern shore of Greenland.

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>Didn't there anymore? Is that the Iceberg cup? We'd be

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>on an iceberg, like they'd like us on an iceberthday,

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 1>they would like Ampany from Jersey wants us on an iceberg.

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're already seeing impacts of climate change, and

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>when you look out ten twenty years the current status quo,

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the impacts of climate change are gonna be pretty unpleasant

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>people to deal with. And I don't think a broad

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>public is going to accept that. There will be a

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>tipping point at some point where people turn around and say,

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we just can't keep functioning in this way. I'm gonna

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>try to make this as simple as I possibly can.

0:17:57.680 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there are members of the public and

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>areas of the public that still needs some form of

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>educating to draw a distinction between weather and climates. Absolutely, Yeah,

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>it's well, it's really cold here, and and and we

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>have cold spells all the time. But but the climate

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 1>is a system, and so what's important is the way

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>that system is changing. Average temperatures are rising. We've had

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>four of the five hottest years on record in the

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>last few years. So people need to understand that this

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>is important. There's a new liberal definition coming up in

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the next election. There are progressive there's forty seven presidential candidates.

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>You worked within the Democratic Party. Theology of Barack Obama.

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Where is the liberal aesthetic, the liberal ethos moving on

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>climate change and environment? Is it shifting or we're going

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to see the same debate in two thousand twenty. There's

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount of momentum on on the left and

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>many people in the Democratic Party that came in with

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic takeover the House to push for stronger action

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 1>on climate change, and that's great. There is not full

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>agreement on what that looks like and how you implement

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it and web or we can achieve that with a

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent renewable energy, or whether we need a broader

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>set of solutions, advanced nuclear power, putting a price on

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>carbon and a recognition that there is going to be

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 1>a role for oil and gas in the economy for

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>decades to common. Thank you so much for colombiators to

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>visit us in our New York studios. It's far away

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>from anytime it's comfortable. I have been remiss on this.

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 1>It's really been something one of my weaknesses here. If

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg surveillance is to look at the machine of Europe

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and always devolves down to the Spanish economy. There's a vibrancy, there,

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a difference there within all of their domestic cultures as

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you see across all of Europe. Nadia Calvino as Spanish

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Economy Minister and she joins us today. The stereotypes of

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Spain in America and for that and so much of

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the Western world are so much unfounded. Give us an

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>update and the cultural solidity of Spain. Right now we

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>see this riot, that riot, Barcelona, this I don't even

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>know half the places. Give us an update and the

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>cultural solidity of Spain. Yeah, but thank you very much.

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>First of all, it's a pleasure to be here in Bloomberg.

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the prejudice is there or whether

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the opinions are unfounded. What I can tell you is

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that the Spanish economy after a very deep and long crisis,

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>has been bouncing back, growing quite significantly in the last years.

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 1>There is a quite stable society, very strong social fabric

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and political stability to so I'm gonna get you in

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 1>hot water at home. What's the distinction between Spain in

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Italy and recovery of this crisis. Well, I mean the

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>growth rate is not comparable. We've been having very high

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>growth rate. We reached the maximum above three percent in

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen. Our expectation for twenty nine is two point

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 1>two percent, so we will be growing more than the

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 1>rest of the large European economies, significantly more than the

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 1>EU average. Well, there's no comparison. I mean from the

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>physical policy dimension. Also, we're really committed to fiscal consolidation,

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>reducing the deficit, reducing the debt. Social stability is quite remarkable. Also,

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>very open liberal economy, trying to in society, I would

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>say welcoming. You know, we really encouraged for an investment.

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that there are a number of areas where

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wouldn't be like to be compared to anybody.

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course, a little bit earlier this morning in Dallas, Switten,

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the Dutch Prime minister made some waves he thinks that

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the Italians have been led off lightly for their approach

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>towards where is every day of Boomberg surveillance. Do you

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>think the Italians are being led off lightly by the EU?

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm a bit surprised that the Prime Minister would say that, frankly,

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 1>because last Monday we had the Eurogroup meeting with the

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>finance ministers, and the Dutch Finance minister actually asked the

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>European Commission what their assessment was of the Italian situation.

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>The commissioner explained it and there was no further question.

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>So I'm a bit surprised that there's this assessment of

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the situation. I think other people are surprised as also.

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 1>Some people, though, do think the Italians might be right.

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we do need a bit of fiscal stimulus onto

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the continent. You've done a lot of hard work in Spain,

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fiscal consolidation, a lot of structural reforms,

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and you're reaping the rewards of that. What's your message

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Italian government as they look over the next

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, potentially to loosen the strings a bit

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>fiscally speaking. I think that the way forward and this

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is what our government is pushing for, is striking the

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>right planlets between fiscal discipline and social policy. I think

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have to wait until the streets are

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 1>really full of people complaining to act to try to

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>address the imbalances and the inequalities in society. Let's talk

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>about the imbalances. Minister, you still have a high unemployment

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>rate in Spain. What can you do about it? You've

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>had the growth, it doesn't seem to have taken a

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>big bite out of it. Well know, I mean we

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>we've moved down from twent which was bridgeously higher in

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the crisis, to around We hope to close a year

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>around fourteen, so that's a very significant reduction. It's still

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>unacceptably high. Fourteent to a lot of this audience that

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>will sound a high Yeah. Well, you know, we have

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a structural unemployment situation in Spain and then very high

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>cyclical variations. We want to address that. We want to

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>actually in the coming weeks. And I was a number

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of structural reforms in order to try to address the

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>duality that we see in the labor market in Spain.

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>This was the color of those. That's important. Well, I

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 1>have to, you know, keep the secretary we announced the reforms. Frankly,

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 1>next you that your government can get a budget through

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon. Sorry, how confident argue that your government can

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>get a budget through. I am quite confident because what

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>we are trying to do with this budget proposal, which

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we put forward a couple of weeks ago, it's precisely

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>this balance I was referring to. We want to be

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>very ambitious on reducing the public deficit and public debt,

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>very ambitious, but at the same time tried to focus

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>on some policies which have been neglected in the last

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.239
<v Speaker 1>years and which are important for social cohesion. In the

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>time that we got your minister, I want you to

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>talk to our radio and television audience in America and

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>across all of Europe. I want you to be Iberia

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Airlines right now. The Prado in Madrid is one of

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the great jewels of the world. I don't think it's

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>talked about enough. What do you need to do to

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>move tourism forward, to get more people in Madrid, more

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>people in Spain. Well, last year we had eighty two

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.439
<v Speaker 1>million persons coming to Spain. Actually, we are the record

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in Europe in terms of welcoming tourists. What we're trying

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>to do is move to a more quality tourism so

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that well, we are trying to go beyond the sun

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and beach kind of exactly to the po in Madrid.

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 1>In the Madrid one of the great jewels of the

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Western world. Well, I would say, come to Spain, come

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to Madrid, because not only the city is very attractive

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Proto is outstanding jewel, but there are many

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>very interesting sights and cities around that you can very

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>easily in this I don't care about draggy. I just

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>want to go to the Plato and get a private tour.

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>So you need arn Sorens and a Marriott, Sir Sir

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Roko of Forte Hotels. You need better hotels in Madrid

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and in those areas. Away from what we've seen last year.

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Actually there is that there has been a move from

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the beach and some kind of truism going to the

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>central of Spain and trying to visit these old cities,

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, traditional cities in April and in May with

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>team services. I think it works all the minister that

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>she's going to be paid for an all expensive trips. No,

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>but I will buy you a lunch, that's for sure,

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 1>very good. We wouldn't be able to accept. We would

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>have to pay the Spanish economy. It is great to

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>catch up with you. Thank you very much. Right now,

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>an important guest for us at Bloomberg is Prime Minister

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Netherlands Mark Ruta. But far more than that,

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 1>he's one of the few politicians not only here at

0:25:55.720 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Davos but worldwide who has actual business experience heres ago.

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>You know Weaver as well, Prime Minister. Wonderful to have

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you with us, so much to talk about. I know

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>John wants to go from the distance from say Amsterdam

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>on down to Rome. Will cover that here? Uh? And

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>what's coming now? Well, I do you know what's coming,

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>but totally unexpected. There is a there's a distance from

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Amsterdam to Rome. I want to go to the distance

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.919
<v Speaker 1>right now from your Netherlands to Brexit. You know, I

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>think of the TV show wolf Hall Henry the Tudor

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>England Antwerp in the Netherlands was a nexus of capitalism.

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Right now, is capitalism in London at risk because of

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 1>this arch United Kingdom debate? I don't believe so, but

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>it is not good. I mean Brexit is not good

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>for you. It's not good for you. Out of Kingdom.

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>It will be a smaller, smaller economy and it will

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>have less of an impact on the world stage after Brexit.

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'm very I'm very negative about it. But we

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know what Brexit looks like yet. That promise, that's

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>an assessment. It means it will look like they leave

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 1>the Upen Union and of course then the question is

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>on the on which terms and will it be negotiated

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>leaving or will it be a no deal brexit. But

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in any case, it seems like they will leave and

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 1>that is not good news for the UK. So the

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>City of London, I'm just wondering, from the European perspective,

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is there an acknowledgement that the City of London needs

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to flourish to provide the type of financing that the

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>rest of Europe needs? Do you need the City of London?

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Does the EU need? We need strong financial centers like

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong, New York, London, but we have others like Amsterdam, Frankfort, Paris.

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Can Amsterdam really step up? Yes, we are doing that.

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Frankfort stepping up, Paris are stepping up. We see other

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>financial centers in Europe. Yeah, this is of course reaping

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 1>some benefits from this very negative situation of over Brexit.

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>We see many companies from the UK, particularly with the

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Japanese or Indian background and American beckons coming to the Netherlands.

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you have to shed up a setup shop now

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in Amsterdam? The Financial Times in editorial today had a

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>lovely subhead about capitalism not being debated here in Davos

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>described for us the new capitalism of the Netherlands. There

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.360
<v Speaker 1>are so many ato types of the Netherlands evolving from

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>World War Two. There can be anything from Audrey Hepburn

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and under that experiment of the sixties and the seventies.

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>What's the new capitalism of the new Netherlands. Well, I

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 1>believe it is not new. I I don't see a

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>new alance. But we have always agreed to think that

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>people starting a business earn their own money hiring people,

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that that is the best way to have a strong

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 1>working demarket sings story economy and that economy has to

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>deliver for the people. And it means for me as

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>a politicians that I have basically two tasks. I have

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to make sure the economy is doing well, that we

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>have enough jobs and have to make sure that there

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>is enough safety security in the country. You've made some

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>wives in the last couple of hours in Devil Switzerland.

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you know you have um the comments about

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the Italians being let off the hook by the Europeans.

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm very angry about. Build on that a little bit more.

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.239
<v Speaker 1>What are you angry about. Well, you're facing some new,

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>huge challenges. We can make progress on climate change, we

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>can make progress on the internal market like digital and services.

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>We can make progress on many issues. But there are

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>two big problems. One is the East West divide, which

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>has to do with migration, and the other is a

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>North South divid and there is at this moment a

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>lack of trust in Europe between the North and the South.

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>And You'repean Commission had the task to force Italy to

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>do more to bring its state finances in order, because

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a basic deal in your zone that all of

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>us have to make sure our own house is cleaned up,

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is working well, and then collectively we can make sure

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we become more competitive. But the Commission has not done so,

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>so they have not fulfilled on the task, which is

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to uphold the treaty. Some people watching this program and

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>listening to this program on Blomberg CV and Bloomberg Radio

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>might say, well, why is it okay for the French

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to lift their budget deficit and not for the Italians.

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not okay for the French. But at this moment

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>we have to assess what the mccan proposals in December,

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>his speech to the nation, what that will mean in

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of their microeconomic numbers. We have not seen that,

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>whether that will mean that they will deviate or not

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>from what they have promised to the European Commission, to

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>our colleagues and their colleagues in the European Union. With Italy.

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>We what the situation is. And given that situation, it

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>is a debt to GDP of again, a budget deficit

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of more than two percent. It's not good, and we

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and Thelans have food in place changes, we forms, uh

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>fiscal contraction. We are now growing at a fast space

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>tries the pace of our competing economies because we made

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>those great forms. Italy to Bloomer Surveillance, have tried to

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>advocate this debate, this conversation for years. Yakham Fells, Morgan

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Stanley out PIMCO, Professor Martin Feldstein at Harvard and others

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>have really tried to study the core of Europe and

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>as you say, the troubles, the challenges in the South,

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>are we going to revisit that in the next one

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>two and five years, the idea of a core of

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Europe choosing to separate from the South. I don't think so.

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>We have to your zone. It's it's it's working. If

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the Netlans would still have had the Guilder, the Dutch

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Guilder when the banking crisis erupted in two thousand and eight,

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>we would have run the risk that the speculator food

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>have killed us, being given the size of our banking

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>sector compared to the size of our own currency. So

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>we have been very fortunate to have the Euro. It

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>has brought us many positives. Yeah, but the basic promise

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of the euro is that collectively we will aim for

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a higher level of convergence to competitiveness, whilst making sure

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that we deal with our own problems at home. You

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>cannot explort those problems to the collective. The Eurozone has

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>been very fortunate as well to have President Mario Draki

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>over the e CP. The Eurozone will not have him

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>at the end of this year. Have you endorsed the

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>nation yet that could head the European Central Bank? Have

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you got any idea of who and what country you

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>would like to see at the top of the e

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>c B. I have some ideas, but the first these

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>decisions have to be taken a little bit behind the scenes.

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I cannot comment. Let's get into some of the ideas

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>because some people are worried that if it is someone

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>from say Germany, that the decisions made won't be for

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the continent on aggregate. The decisions that will be made,

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>as Tom points out, with that North South divide in mind,

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that we will have stricter title monetary policy. I don't

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>mind the passport of the new ECP president. What we

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>need again is a president who understands that he or

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>she is there for the collective. Is there not to

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>fill the gaps which the politicians have left. My Duckie

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>was forced in two thousand and twelve to fill some

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of those gaps when he said I will never let

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the Euro down and I will do whatever it takes.

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Every remember that goes around to the London Olympics in

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twelve and he has done a marvelous job

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>over the last seven years, six and a half years,

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and I would hope for his successor that the politicians, me,

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>my colleagues, we will do what we need to do

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and don't leave it to the sp president. Don't you

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>think we get a decision on all of this. It

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>has to be somewhere this year, but I don't know

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly exact timing from Margreta cried the canuality the Netherlands

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>here in damas one thousand, twenty two miles from Amsterdam

0:32:45.280 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to run. I'm joining us right now, an important voice

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>for europe, an important voice for the trans Atlantic politics,

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>going back to the Atlantic Charter of ages ago, the

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>debris out of World War two and the development of

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the North Atlantic Treaty organization that leads to the Norwegian

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah and Stoltenberg and among other things. I should say,

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>absolutely remarkable. That's seven or eight years ago you wandered

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Self Pole in honor of your Amazon. What

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 1>was it like going to the South Pole? And you know,

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 1>not by helicopter? Now what I didn't go on skis

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to the South Pole. We went in by a plane.

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>But we were there to to to celebrate the hundredth

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>anniversary of the first man reaching this old South Pole,

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and that was actually Norwegian and at that time it

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>was an owegn Prime Ministers. We had a big event

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>there to to mark that expedition. The big event for

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 1>NATO is it's survival. You have a challenge in President Trump,

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you have a challenge, and now you regroup and move forward.

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Give us the NATO philosophy three four two nine into

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the future. The NATO philosophy is that as long as

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Europe and North America stands together, then we are strong.

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>And then we are fifty percent of the world's economic

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>might and fifty of the world's military might. So therefore,

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.240
<v Speaker 1>my main task is to make sure that we stand together.

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Despite some differences on issues like trade or climate change.

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>NATO has proven extremely capable of uniting around the court

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 1>aask to defend each other. And the good thing now

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is that European allies are stepping up when it comes

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to defense spending since President Trump came into office in

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:41.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty six talk about that because the President's instinct there

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is correct. The various governments of NATO have not made

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>their contributions in the way they promised to. Did you

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.800
<v Speaker 1>agree with him when he first started making those concerns

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and vocalizing them a whole lot more louder over the

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 1>last year or so, so I agree with him. But

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>even more importantly, all allies agree with him that we

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 1>need fair burden sharing in their lines. And that's exactly

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>why NATO allies in Europe and Canada now are investing

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>more in defense. Since twenty sixteen, they have added in

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:15.839
<v Speaker 1>total forty one billion more for defense spending, and next year,

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>by the end of they added hundred billion more for defense.

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>This is a significant change. It helps to improve burden sharing.

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So we still have a long way to go, but

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>we are really turned the corner and European allies are

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>investing more. Getting those contributions up is really important where

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the money goes. It's also equally as important where does

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that spend need to be made on modernizing our capabilities,

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>investing in modern planes, battle tanks, military infrastructure, but also

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 1>training and and and and and allies working more closer together,

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:55.919
<v Speaker 1>and also on operations, for instance, fighting terrorists. A couple

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago, JAMR. Scheimer Chicago gave a speech to

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the London School that comics his notoriety is that NATO

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Western world and particularly United States overreached and

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 1>their enthusiasm to move towards Russia, to move towards the

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>former Russian states, to expand NATO give us an update

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and your desire to keep NATO status or to expand

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 1>NATO towards Russia is Mr Prutin fears. But first of all,

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>this whole idea that NATO in the kind of aggressive

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 1>way have moved east is wrong. What we speak about

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is that new countries who got their independence off to

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 1>the end of the Cold War shows they wanted two

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 1>democratic decisions to join a niance and it is for

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:42.399
<v Speaker 1>every independence of the nation to choose their own path.

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>They wanted to join NATO, and we welcome them. You know,

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the idea that it's it's a provocation to Russia if

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a neighbor joins NATO, that's a very dangerous ideas Mr

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Prutin feel that though does he feel it's a provocation.

0:36:55.040 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes they speak as if stole now a lot

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>we are joining NATO is a threat to them. No,

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a sovereign, democratic decision by independent nation to choose

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>his own path. Nor where the country I come from

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is a neighbor of Russia. And if anyone has told

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 1>us back in nineteen nine with the joint but that

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>was a probably under the south, far away from the

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:23.879
<v Speaker 1>tradition of the Baltic Sea. This is a little more

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of a heated debate. I love that you favor, but

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean but but but but but but. NATO is

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 1>an organization for Europe and and US and Canada. So

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to Africa or or art of Europe

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. We look at the two modern Turkey in

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty four months. How do we get Turkey

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 1>back into the European sphere and dialogue. So Turkey is

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a very important ally. When we see all the progress

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 1>we have made in the fight against dosh Isle. They

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.720
<v Speaker 1>controlled the territory as big as UK eight million people.

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>They were threatening Baghdad and Damascus. We have been able

0:37:55.640 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to take away that territory for from them. Not is

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 1>because Turkey, as a native ally has contributed to that

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>fight against that told me about the landmark Iron f

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Nuclear Treaty and the risk of the United States leaves

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it and walks away. The challenge now, the threat now

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is that Russia is violating the treaty. This Ironate treaty

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:22.320
<v Speaker 1>banned the whole category of weapons. All intermediate range weapons

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>are banned. Russia has over the last years developed and

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>deployed new intermediate range missiles. These are mobile, these are

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>hard to detect. The short warning times meaning that the

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>decreased the level of any potential use on nuclear weapons

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in the conflict. So they are extremely dangerous. Therefore, we

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>call a Russia to combat into compliance with this treaty.

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>We will meet Russia tomorrow in the Native Russia Council

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in Brussels, and we will continue to call on them

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to come back into compliance. Mr Trump has chosen not

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to attend this year. If you were running the Mry

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Trump in the hallway of this Congress and her, what

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:03.320
<v Speaker 1>would be your message to the President and do his

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>allies in the United States that want to reach back

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 1>from NATO and reach back from our post World War

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>two alliances, as in my message to him, will be

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:17.399
<v Speaker 1>two folded. One, Europeans are stepping up hundred billion more

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 1>from twenty. Second, a strong NATAL is also good for

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:25.399
<v Speaker 1>the United States. To have friends and allies is good

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>for them. Russia, China, don't they don't have eight allies

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and friends, and the only time we invoked article files

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:35.840
<v Speaker 1>often talking not the States eleven. Let's go granulars we

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:38.280
<v Speaker 1>can do. A good friend of Bloomberg surveillance is Admirals

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 1>te Vedas with tough University, now the Carlisle Group, and

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 1>with him, it always turns to submarines. How many different

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>nations have submarines underwater right now in the Baltic Sea.

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Are they gonna all bump into each other? There's so

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:55.800
<v Speaker 1>much military activity there. There are several nations with submarines

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in many places. I will not give you precise figures

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 1>because that's about keep it down to turn now ten

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 1>submarines there are. There are several and many nations. So

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the challenge is that with more military presence under the water,

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.399
<v Speaker 1>on the surface, online, in air, there is a risk

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 1>for incidence accidents, Yes, seriously, and that's one of the

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>reasons why we need to strongly believe also in dialogue

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>with Russia, because we need to have military lines of communications,

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 1>we need to have a mechanisms to reduce risks, to

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:30.799
<v Speaker 1>agree on how to operate, to prevent those instance and

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>accidents from happening, and if they happen, prevent them from

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 1>spying out to control and that sounds like a Syrian

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 1>discussion to take it down south where you're worried about

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>military communication. So let's talk about that. What you see

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 1>happening next in Syria and the United States is declared

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 1>they want to pull out. I think the important day

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>now is that we all focus on ISIS and NATO

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 1>is part of the global collition to the feat ices.

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>We have made enormous progress from the control the big territory.

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Now they hardly control any territory at all. We strongly

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>believe in training local forces, so we are in Iraq

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>training the Iraqi forces, enabling them to stay blast their

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>own country. Nature is not present on the ground in

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Northern Studia, but we strongly believe that we need a

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 1>political solution. We support the U and efforts for the

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:21.280
<v Speaker 1>polctical solution, and then we welcome the fact that Turkey

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and US present in Northern Studia talk together and try

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to coordinate the efforts there. NATI Sect General Yan Stelton

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:29.760
<v Speaker 1>book that you want to gets on day three every

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 1>World Economic Forum in Dava, Switzerland. Thanks for listening to

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, sound Cloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast. You

0:41:52.920 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio