WEBVTT - Adobe's Figma Acquisition and the Ethereum Merge

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power Collie

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Check in San Francisco and this

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:30.319
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology coming up in the next hour. It

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest ever takeover of a private software company.

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.599
<v Speaker 1>Adobe has agreed to buy the software design start up

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Bigma in a deal vuye at billion dollars. We're gonna

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>hear from executives at both companies in an exclusive interview. Plus,

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the merge is here success. We're gonna hear from an

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Ethereum core developer about whether it's all going to plan

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and what is next? And climate tech investor in entrepreneur

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>David Friedberg is with it us. You might also know him.

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a bestie on the all in hud will ask

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>about his news back Today's Big Tech m and A

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and Elon Musk. A number of social platforms will announce

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>new actions to combat hate crimes and racially motivated violence

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 1>at a summit hosted by President Biden at the White House.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Representatives from Instagram, Facebook, Twitch, YouTube, and Microsoft all planning

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to attend. The Company's new efforts will be unveiled alongside

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a package of federal initiatives to design and address hate

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 1>fueled violence. Meantime, hundreds of workers at an Amazon warehouse

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in Coventry, England, are now striking over pay. They've been

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>threatening strikes across the UK after a major rise in

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the cost of living. Any action to protest against the

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>company's pay packages would likely take place in November, according

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Union, and the UK will open an in

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:52.559
<v Speaker 1>depth probe of Microsoft's planned sixty nine billion dollar purchase

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of the video GameMaker Activision. Blizzard regulators saying the deal

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>could hamper competition and that Microsoft turned down the chance

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to offer are remedies to address its concerns. If the

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>merger goes through, it will make Microsoft the world's third

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>largest gaming company. The Brazilian agriculture company is planning to

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>list in the US via spack with the help of

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the most prominent climate tech entrepreneurs, Lavareau, helps

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>farmers boost production by offering a suite of key ingredients

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>like seeds, fertilizer and more. I want to get right

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to David Friedburg Now, a long time founder turned investor

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>focused on climate technology. The CEO of the Production Board

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>which just merged with Lavreaux as well as you might

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>know him as a co host of the All In podcast.

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>David's so great to have you with us, big listener here,

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about the thesis behind this spack deal.

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Why spack why now? Yes, So we set up the

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>back about a year ago specifically to do a strategic transaction,

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>meaning we were seeking a business that operates a scale

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in a market that we know well food, agriculture, biomanufacturing,

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>life sciences, and where we believe technology that exists in

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>our portfolio of businesses could be additive and a creative

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to their operations. And we know AGG very well. UM

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>came across Lavorro, which is the largest AGG retailer in Brazil,

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>leading AGG inputs retailer in Latin America UM, and this

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>business really has an incredible opportunity to transform how farmers

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>farm in this market. And Latin America is the largest

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>AG export market globally is the largest provider of calories

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>around the world. UM and so this is a massive

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>opportunity because farmers locally in that market don't utilize the

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>best technology, they don't have the greatest productivity, which is

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>yield per aker, and using agg retail, we can actually

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>access that farmer and really transition them to new technologies

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>like biologics, software and other tools that can massively improve

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>their productivity. And that results in more calories, more sustainability

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of food production. And it's so impactful because this region

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is so important globally right now. So I'm curious about

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the decision UH to do us back in general when

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.119
<v Speaker 1>they've been under a lot of pressure, you know, they've

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>almost disappeared in the last few weeks. Why do you

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>choose that? Why did you choose that as the vehicle? Yes,

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>so we set up a speck um last summer and

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 1>so we've been UM. You know, it's the only off

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet of vehicle. We have the rest of our

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>operations at the production boarder all balance sheet driven capital

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>UM and we build an investing businesses off our balance sheet.

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>And we did this specifically because there were public market

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>investors that were interested in partnering with us, and we

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>thought that this could be a really great mechanism to

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>find a business that we could be useful to UH,

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's exactly what we're doing. So so we're actually

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>investing a hundred million dollars off our balance sheet into

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the transaction, and several of our businesses are going to

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>be partnering with lavorro UM in the future, we do

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>hope as a way to bring new technology to that

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>important market. And so this is a really great strategic vehicle,

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>and the SPAC is really just a mechanism for doing

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that and for getting a meaningful ownership stake in a

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>business of scale. I mean, this business, as we show

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>in the presentation, UM should do about one point six

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>billion top line this UH this year, and it's doing

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred and seventy two million proform adjusted IBATA

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>this calendar. You're growing to two seventy seven next year UM,

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>And so it's a business of scale, it's profitable, and

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a real way to drive UM

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>further margin improvement and further revenue growth with some of

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the technologies we can bring to their here talk to

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>us about deep tech investing, which has been your thing

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>for so long. How it's different in a bowl and

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>bear market. You know, obviously these are companies that need funding,

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>but it can be a harder sell when times are tough. Yeah,

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's exactly I mean, what you're seeing is exactly right.

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean, deep investing typically invests on a milestone based program.

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So you look at some technical breakthrough, you know, proving

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>something works, and then you raise more capital, and then

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you prove the next thing works, and eventually you have

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a product, and eventually you can sell the product and

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>make the product, and eventually you can scale scale into

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the market. And so that takes several years, and capital

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>needs to be unlocked in milestone based um increments. In

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a market like this where you can buy US creuxuries

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and make four percent, or you know, buy a great

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>stock that's got a five percent dividend yield and it's

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a growing business, it's really hard to find capital into

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>highly speculative long range investment cycles. So then interest rate

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>environment really challenges deep tech UM and it really challenges

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think we've particularly seen it of late in

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the biotech market. I don't know the latest statistic, but

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>as of a few weeks or months ago, biotech um

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>roughly of public issues, we're trading below cash UM, and

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>so I think it really speaks to the channel lunge

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that deep tech businesses face. Now what we're doing with

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Lavoro as an example, and what I think happens often

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>nowadays in biotech and will continue to happen with other

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.679
<v Speaker 1>UM more deep tech UM investing cycles is to partner.

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>So you partner with the large business. You partner with

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the business that has scale, reach, distribution, cash flow that

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>can really benefit if your deep tech pursuit unlock some

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>value or some opportunity for their customer days. UM and

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's what we'll see more of UM

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>likely going forward. Less of the vcs making you know,

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>big check investments early stage hoping for something to UM

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, to hit that you'll likely need to see

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>much more strategic partnership happen to get these things across

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the finish line. I'm so curious what you make of

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the Patagonia founder giving away his company to fight climate change.

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about it? Is that something more

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley founders and CEO should be doing. Yeah, he's

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>always been an interesting guy. UM. You know, he operates

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>his business in a different way than I'd think a

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:04.679
<v Speaker 1>traditional capitalist thinks about operating their business UM and so,

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it doesn't seem surprising knowing the personality and

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the way you've talked about things. In the past and

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the decisions he's made. I mean, I think, uh, he

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of banned putting financial services firms logos, you know,

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>as part of their custom embroidery programs that they were

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>having for a while a few years ago. Um. And look,

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's gonna go into these blind trusts, into

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>these irrevocable trusts, and I'm sure that the stewards or

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the trustees will continue to operate this business in a

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>smart way. I doubt that the trustees are are going

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to basically shred the thing and give it away. I'm

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>sure they're going to continue to run the business, and

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that the dividends and the profits generated from that business

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>over time can be used to fund um, you know,

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>uh initiatives in climate change mitigation. Uh and um. And

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's a very noble way to transfer

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 1>the ownership of your business rather than just give it

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>away to a bunch of NGOs and nonprofits. Let the

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>trustees that you know and trust break the business for

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you that can generate cash and value over time, and

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>then decide where that cash and where that value should

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 1>be allocated to really drive the impact in the world.

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.079
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's a great noble decision, and um, you

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>know it really fits well with the way he's talked

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>about what he's done in the past. Meantime, I got

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to ask you, since the Twitter Musk dispute has been

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a running topic on your all in pod, you interviewed

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk at the All In Summit. Do you think

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>this steal goes through? Does Musk end up buying Twitter?

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And if so, how does that change the social media ecosystem? Yeah?

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, Um, look, there are probably two key things

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>at play here. The first is, you know what what

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>ends up happening in the courts as they go through

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>this this legal process. And um, I saw a great

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>post by a legal analysts a few weeks ago, and

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could remember the person's name and reference them,

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>but they said, you know, the Delaware um Court there,

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the chancery court is less likely to try and force

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a deal to close because then if the parties don't

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>actually close the deal, it really damages the reputation and

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the integrity of the court. And that there's a case

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to be made that Musk would just simply say no,

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not closing. You know, do what you want, give

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>me a fine, of a billion dollars. I don't care.

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not closing the merger on these terms, and so

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>it's on this Legal analysts pointed out that it's unlikely

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that they'll close the deal on those that the court

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>will try and force the deal. And I think on

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the other side, he saw value in the community, he

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>saw value in the user base, he saw value in

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the social network, and I'm sure he still does UM.

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, regardless of what he's identified with respect

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to the bot problem or the stamp problem as he

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>calls it, that there must still be value there. So

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say that based on those two conditions, there's

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>probably a bidass gap that maybe gets met still UM,

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And I would envision that there's still a motivation to

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>do something here that is probably a function of the

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>true size of the true network of user is on

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that platform, because it is such an important platform. Deep down,

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>he probably still really wants to do something. And on

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the other side, the court may end up saying, hey,

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's um, there's some way that you guys

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 1>were only going to charge a fine here, which forces

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter back to the table to negotiate price, and maybe

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>something happens, so you know that would be my middle

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of the line, kind of middle middle of the uh,

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>the aisle here kind of decision or or um perspective

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and what might end up happening over the next couple

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of months here. Um, So we'll be listening. We'll be

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>listening to the podcast for more commentary Dave Friedburg. Great

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us. Thank you so much for

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>stopping by. We'll be right back with more Bloomberg Technology.

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. Let's get back to that Adobe deal

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to buy software design start a Figma. This deal, valued

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>at bion dollars, is the biggest ever takeover of a

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>private software company. I want to bring in Figma's co

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>founder and CEO hillan Field now as well as Adobes,

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>President of the Digital Media Business David Wadwanti for more

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>on this historic deal. Exclusive interview Dylan kind of the

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Draft Valley dream coming true here. You stick with

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>your initial idea, you develop it for a decade, you

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>sell it for billions of dollars. There are still people

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>ask out there asking twenty billion dollars, what do you

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>think is the potential here? And why is Figma worth

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:28.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty billion dollars? Well, First of all, I just want

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:30.839
<v Speaker 1>to give a giant shout out and thank you to

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the Thigma team. I'm on this interview to day, and

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.719
<v Speaker 1>there's so many other people that have been involved in

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>SUSA Thigma along the way, past figmates, current figmates, and

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank all of them. Of course, this

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is about moving forward now and how much potential there

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 1>is a combined Figma Adobe combo, and we really believe

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>there's such potential here. Whether it's looking at Figma and

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how we can accelerate our efforts with fig

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Jam through um Adobe Acrobats and their giant install base

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and their productivity case there, whether it's about the Stigma

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>design platform today and how we can bring capabilities from

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Adobe in whether it be imaging, vector illustration, video three

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>D or more, or it's thinking outside the box where

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we're currently at thinking about developers and thinking about markets

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>were not serving and we were not playing to serve

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>such as creatives and thinking about how do we bring

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the capabilities of Adobe onto the Thingama platform and make

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it set creatives are able to have more collaborative workfloads,

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>make those workflodes web based and make it set creativity

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 1>design and software development are more accessible to more people.

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Were truly excited about what can become possible there in

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>our combination with Adobe, David, we all thought we were

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in a downturn, and here you are doing a twenty

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar deal. The stock had kind of a rough

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>day as investors digested the number. Here, what's your response

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to that? Look, we we had Adobe. We're entering our

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>forty year and we continue to be very aggressive about

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities that we see. If you look at the

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>opportunity head and what Dylan and the amazing team and

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Figma have built. UH, they've built a company that's basically

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>going to add two hundred million dollars of air are

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>this year, crossing four hundred million by the end of

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the year, UH and UH and addressing a TAM that's

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and a half billion dollars. And when you put

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it in the context of the efficiency of the business,

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>cash flow positive with a net dollar retention rate over

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a hundred uh, there are very few companies with that profile.

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>And in the context of what we see and some

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of the things Dylan talked about when we look look

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>ahead and the synergies we can do to accelerate Figma's

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>move into that sixty and a half billion dollar CAM

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to accelerate what we do in terms of our core

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>creative flagship applications we imagined with the technology running on

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>top of the Figma platform. Uh. And when you think

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>about it in the context of how Dylan was talking

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>about with Big Game and Acrobat really coming in at

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the cross center across the intersection of um creativity and productivity,

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>we think that the market opportunity here is massive and

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>this was a great time to make that plate. Uh, Dylan.

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>There was a great tweet from Ruben Harris, another startup

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneur out there. He compared Figma to Instagram. Well, if

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you think about it that way, you hear the numbers

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that David just rattled off, your casual positive you could

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>have gone public as soon as the window open. Why sell?

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Why not try to build your own hundred fifty billion

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar company and go public on your own terms? Yeah,

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, first of all, we're super thankful that we

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>had the ability to control our own destiny here. But

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the end the day, we have to think about our community.

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>We need to think about the impact we can have

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and what timeline we can have an impact on. And

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we believe that this accelerates the impact we can have

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>at this Rowden's the impact we can have. And by

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>leveraging and utilizing the expertise of Adobe, the capabilities, the

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>technology they've built, as well as the amazing people they

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>have UH and they've attracted over the past three decades. UM,

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we think that we're able to basically scale the impact

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>we have beyond just design and move into new areas

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and be able to have more impact faster, And that's

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>why we've done this deal. David, I know you were

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the architect of this deal, and you also sold a

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of companies, including one to Adobe in your earlier days.

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>What kind of advice did you give Dylan through this process?

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, personal advice in the best interest of you know,

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Figma and his company and not necessarily the company that

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you work for now. Yeah, well, I think I look

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>at it as as a shared common interest and shared

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>objective here. So you know, Dylan and I have known

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>each other for a few years and we started having

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>this conversation in earnest a few months ago having gone

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>through this process being acquired as part of Macromedia into Adobe.

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>The things I know are if you have shared purpose,

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 1>if you have a shared passion UH, and you have

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a clarity in terms of how you're going to actually

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>operate and go after the market. UH, great things will

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>happen because there's so much that we have in common

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how what we want to approach the market.

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And Dylan and I have been very clear in terms

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of how we're planning to run this. Dylan will remain

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Figma and UH, and he and I will

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>be working very closely to make sure that the decisions

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that he makes with the autonomy that he needs to

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>keep the things that are special about Figma special UH,

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>combined with the things that we can do surgically to

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>accelerate the business, accelerate our technology vision, and accelerate move

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 1>into new markets. That's really the foundation and the big

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the most important thing, and we talked a lot about

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>this of the process is shared vision and trust and

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>and I certainly have a tremendous amount of respect for

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 1>what Dylan and the team has done. And I think

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>he's he knows me well enough that he knows that

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm a person of my word and we're gonna do

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>great things together. It's mutual and it's her years prior

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>as well, all right, fig A co founder and CEO

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Field, along with Adobes President of the digital media

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>business David Wadwanti, thank you both for sharing both sides

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 1>of it. Crypto's most important commercial highway, Ethereum has just

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>been repaved. The blockchain network completed the crypto world's biggest

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>and most ambitious software upgrade to date. This according to

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>its co founder of Italic, Peter and The upgrade is

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 1>called the Merge and appears to be a sell the

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:42.360
<v Speaker 1>news event. Bloomer Boss has been covering for this and Shanale,

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>have you been up all night long? Did this thing

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that we wake up at two am to see what

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:51.360
<v Speaker 1>had happened? Yes, Emily. And while it was successful, remember

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and also one of the biggest upgrades we've ever seen

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 1>in the cryptocurrency industry, it is still the beginning of

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>many changes for Etheroryum ahead to get to those ultimate

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>goals that Atherorum is looking for. So what is really

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>changing now? We are moving to this proof of steak model.

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>We are moving over from that reliance on miners to

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>stakers who are used to validate the chain and really

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>start to expand other things that Ethereum is really looking

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to do, which has become more scalable, improve transaction fees

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>and gas fees. But you know that's not going to

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>happen right away. There are things that you've seen the

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>talk Twitter and talk about today on Twitter that will

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 1>start to get you closer to that, but there's still

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>some concerns right now as we look at the merge

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and how the next couple of days and weeks work out.

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>What are those concerns. Those include scammers potentially appearing and

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>creating forks that look a lot like the Ethereum chain

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>as it continues through the merge, and you're also worried

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>about the impacts on the layer two's that are tied

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to Ethereum. You're also worried about any unanticipated glitches that

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 1>are not just tied to this particular merge, but the

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>future upgrades, because those are the ones that are going

0:19:57.720 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to do the things that we want to see from

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a theory um, which is improved those transaction fees and speeds.

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>So when we take a look here to your point,

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing some pressure on Ethereum, but remember this is

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>not really all about the merge. This is also tied

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of other issues that are happening in

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the macro environment. The merge. While there were a lot

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of people buying it leading into this news, there was

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of education that went around the merge in

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of, you know, the future for ethereum and what

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it looks like as people really start to take to

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the staking model and really bake in the place of ethereum,

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>not just in the crypto community, but while we have

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 1>all these other global issues going on that our headwinds emily,

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>including a hiking interest rate cycle around the world that

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>can pressure on crypto assets including ethereum. So a lot

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>still for theoryum ahead, but again the next few weeks

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>will be pretty critical as people bake in this news.

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Alright now, I hang on, I want to bring in

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Preston van Loon, now ethereum core developer and co founder

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of Prismatic Labs. Preston, thank you so much for joining us.

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Love to get your technical perspective here. It seems like

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it's been a success so far. When will we know

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>for sure? M Well, the merch event definitely was a success.

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Um you know, the emergence ethereums uh switch from proof

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 1>of work to proof of stake is literally emerging. The

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>proof of state blockchain they launched almost two years ago

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>with the Ethereum maininet. We've seen that's had consistent block production,

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>consistent finality. So far, everything is a success. I think

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 1>what we'll see over time is do the metrics hold up.

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Do we continually see nearly participation. Do we see consistent

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>block finalization and a healthy network in the coming weeks

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and months? You know, looking out longer term, what are

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you going to be watching for? Are there any potential

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>um red flags that you are are going to be

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>looking out for? Yeah, great question. Um. You know, with

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>these kind of upgrades, it's really important that Darium stays online. Right.

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a really hard thing to do. Um. But you

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>know with these upgrades there are also so complex, right,

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>so there's a lot of things that could go wrong.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>We do a lot of testing, We make sure that

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>things are working really well before we do the upgrades.

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>But things we're looking for right this speaking, sure liveness

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 1>is continued. We still have the same up time as before.

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>One of the cool benefits of the switch of proof

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.959
<v Speaker 1>mistake is that it's a much smoother blockchain. Box are

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>delivered in Uh, markets the fashion every twelve seconds versus

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>probabilistically every thirteen seconds. UM. So really we're just maintaining

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that the software stays online, that participants are staying online,

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that um, the network is seeing healthy. How do you

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>know when this will be successful? Obviously the price action

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>today wasn't all that good and well actually I was

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>down today, but you did see it rising very significantly

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>until this point overall, before we really hit the crypto winter.

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of excitement around this. But when

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you really see the benefits of the new economy of

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the system, we're seeing the benefits today. Um, the switch

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>is immediate, right, So the the energy efficiency gain that

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we've realized to the nine nine point nine. Uh, the

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>more efficient model is in effect immediately today, and and

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the prior model immediately sees so we already see that benefit.

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>We see the benefit of increased decyndralization. There are way

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>more actors in the in ethereum producing blocks today. UM.

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 1>In principle um ethereums proofistake is working now. It is

0:23:53.720 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>successful now, and it's it's running smoothly, you know. Uh.

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Somehow Panda's preston have become like the signature meme of

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the Ethereum merge. Can you explain that to me? Well,

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it is a meme, right, so there's only so much

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I can explain here. But the idea was that we

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 1>have like a polar bear and a black bear and

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>representing east one east to the two layers that are

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>emerging together. Uh, and apparently those two things make a panda.

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if that's a totally accurate in terms

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of science, but it is a fun mem and thing

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>to really enjoy. What comes next? You know, this is

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>very much, you know, a step in a series of

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>more steps that will presumably give more people who are

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>related to ethereum lower transaction fees, faster transactions. But when

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>do you really start to see that happen. Yeah, this

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the switch to prove his stake has really unlocked the

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>next stages of upgrades. A theory still has a very

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>ambitious roadmap and a very uh large amount of work

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to do in the next coming years. Um, we see

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>that there's already scaling through Layer two technologies, and what

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we want to do there is to increase the security

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and data availability guarantees that the theory has. So what

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that means is to provide more data securely for things

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>like layer too, to provide that the transaction scaling um,

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and at some point will be also working on you know,

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea about charting and having more transaction through put

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>on the later one the base protocol of ethereum. But really,

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is helping the switch proof of state

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>is really unlocking on these things and helping it there

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>will become a global settlement layer that it aims to be.

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>All right, Pressing Vallum, a theorem core developer and the

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>co founder of Prismatic Labs, Thanks so much for giving

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>us your technical view there. We're gonna continue to cover

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the merge at Shanali. Stay with us. We're gonna talk

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>about it from a crypto exchange perspective. The president of

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>f t x US, Brett Harrison, joins us next to

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about spunk trading and more. Let's get back to

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>the big story of the crypto world now, and that

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is the Etherium merge complete, but with the transition to

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>proof of stakes, some community participants still prefer to keep

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 1>supporting the mining based proof of work version, so a

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>hard fork is expected to follow within hours, splitting the

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>chain into which prompted some crypto exchanges to adapt, like

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>f t X, who was the first crypto trading platforms,

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>one of them to launch spot trading for a theory

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>and proof of work tokens. Let's bring in f t

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.479
<v Speaker 1>X US president Brett Harrison for more along with our

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>crypto contributor Shinali bos So. Talk to us bread about

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 1>the dynamics at play with the spot trading here and

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that does this just undermine the merge overall. So with

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>proof of work, in order to be able to support

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the computational puzzle solving, in order to receive the mining

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:21.919
<v Speaker 1>rewards from the network, you have to create these giant

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>rigs of servers that are going to solve these computationally

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 1>hard problems. Expend lots of energy to do so they're

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>very expensive. So all of these companies that put enormous

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>amounts of money and investment into creating these mining rigs

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>suddenly find themselves as useless in the new proof of

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>state post merge world for Etherium. So there's been a

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>consortium with these miners that have banded together to basically

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 1>create an entire fork, a copy of the ethereum main net,

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to create their own proof of work kind of classic

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>version of ethereum and try to keep that going. Now,

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you that it sort of undermines the

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>whole purpose here, which is that Etherium moving to proof

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of state means that this entire network, which is the

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>most popular network for smart contract based computation, is transitioning

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>completely to an energy efficient world that hopefully into a

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>bunch uh you know, faster transaction speed and lower transaction

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>costs in the future. And this new POW token isn't

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 1>going to have the same property. However, these the operators

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of this network, we're air dropping these tokens on existing

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>ethereum uh you know, existing ethereum holders, and they're gonna

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to claim those ethereum tokens, the

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Ethereum w tokens and trade out of them, and so

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to make sure that we allowed that as

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 1>an exchange operator. Now we aren't supporting the positive withdrawals

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in them. We have many concerns over you know, actors

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to uh kind of put themselves in the middle

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of unsuspecting consumers, not being completely sure which ethereum chain

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>they're they're interacting with, and as a result, you know,

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>basically helping kind of steal money from people who don't

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>really know what's going on, and that's not that's really

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>not good. You know, we are full supporters of this

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>move to proof of state. We have also supported other

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>crypto networks that have always supported proof of stake, like Salmana,

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and we think that's really is what's the future of

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>crypto is going to hold. But to the point that

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you're making earlier, On one hand, there's a concern about

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>any potential scamming here at people moving to the wrong areas.

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>But also, you know, while the actual technological change worked

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>well today, how much does something like that undermine any

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>credibility in a system. The majority of the computational effort

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>with regards to the this Ethereum chain that's happening now

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>on the main nuts and a very small amount of

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>power and transactions are happening on this new each proof

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of work chain, or you know, even though some mining

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>activity has moved to Ethereum Classic and some other kind

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of e d M proof of work chains that still exists,

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>everything is happening really on Ethereum. And so what we

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>probably expect over time is for the activity on these

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>kizzle out, you know, the talk himself has said that

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>he expects and hopes that this will happen, and people will,

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically give up the old way a proof

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of work transition completely to prove of steak because this is,

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, a superior system in a lot of ways,

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and obviously there's always trade offs, you know, security, reliability, speed,

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the kind of investment you need to get into the

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>network in the first place, level of decentralization. That's still

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>open for debate between proof of work and proof of

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>stake systems. It brings interesting questions into play with cards

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to pitcoin and what its future is going to be.

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>But we and the Ethereum community as a whole really

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>do support this new proof of steak post merge world,

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and we expect a percent of the activity to move

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>there over time. What's your response to sec Chair Gary

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Gensler's comments on the merge in particular. I mean, you know,

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>he's he's been pretty clear doesn't think bitcoin falls under

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>securities regulation, but that post merge, uh, the Ethereum network could.

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 1>So are many complicated legal analyzes involved in trying to decipher,

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, which aspects of this system might be securities

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and which might not so. For example, um, the CFTC

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>already regulates ethereum the ether futures on multiple venues including CME,

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>ice F, t x US derivatives, and basically lays claim

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to that being a commodity. But perhaps the staking in

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>such a system might be considered an investment contract of

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>some kind, and that's really an open question. And there

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>are multiple kinds of staking as well. There's you directly

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:38.719
<v Speaker 1>participating in the network as a validator. There's you delegating

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>your tokens to a validator to get the rewards from staking.

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>There's also investment staking, which is sort of none of

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the above, where you know, delegate your tokens to some

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of protocol, a defied protocol which promises a certain yield.

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>All of these have, you know, different characteristics that you

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>may or may not pass the four prongs of the

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Howe test, and it's all open question. And aside from

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the regulatory risks, there's also other risks involved in staking.

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, for example, that the price action that can

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>occur between now and when ethereum actually unlocks, and the

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>fact that ethereum staked ethereum won't unlock for people to

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>reap those rewards for probably six to twelve months still,

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and there's operational risk involved. Two. If a validator fails

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to UH to properly validate a block, it could have

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>some of its steak tokens taken away. And so there's

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a number of risks that are still involved in the

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>aspect of stake staking. All right, interesting, so much to

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>continue to follow on this historic tay s t X

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>US President Brett Arison, thanks for breaking that all down

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>for us and our very own Chennali Bossi to you

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>as well. You a win for the European Union of

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>four billion euro fine that's about four billion dollars upheld

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for Google's treatment of services on the App Store. Or earlier,

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>my Bloomberg colleague spoke with Margaret Veastier, Executive Vice President

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of the European Commission, where she is in charge of

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Digital and competition policy. Take a lesson. This is a win.

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Huge majority of the case is completely upheld, which means

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that the court has confirmed of you. And because of that,

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, we also feel the encouragement to continue enforcing.

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to big tech, we have a number

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of investigations ongoing, three Apple cases, one Facebook case, uh

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and quite a big Google case also coming up. Does

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the progress that you made with the guards of the

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Google case, do you think that actually helps you with

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the other antitrust cases that you're bringing. Well,

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>we get the guidance from from the court on our approaches.

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course, one of the major things for US is

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>first to prove dominance, because if you have that kind

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of market power, then our rules say kick in. If

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you're just a small guy, you know you can do

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 1>so many different things. If you're the big guy. If

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you have the market power, then of course we become

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>much more strict. But just to be clear though, I mean,

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>we know that Google is going to continue to fight

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>this as long as they can. That's expected here. Even

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>if you end up with a victory in the traditional

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 1>sense here, does the prolonging of this fight maybe give

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.959
<v Speaker 1>those other companies a little bit more encouragement to fight

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>back in their cases as well? Well? I don't. I

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>don't see it this way. Also because we have regulation

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>coming in to complement what we do with the case

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>by case enforcement. The Digital Markets Act was just signed yesterday,

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>so we'll be uh in trying to force mid October,

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and of course there is sometimes adju to new rules,

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>but by early twenty four those who are designated as skatekeepers,

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, real tech market power. They will have to

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>comply to quite a number of prohibitions, but also things

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that they must do, for instance, share data with some

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of their customers, some of already the threats of certain

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 1>fines in the upholding has changed behavior to a certain degree.

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And I know that, of course the US had welcomed

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>as positives some of the changes, the proposed changes indeed

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 1>that Google has made. It's interesting when you look at

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:22.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the reporting on the Google story from US print,

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.839
<v Speaker 1>the Boston Globe, the Times saying they call you, well,

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 1>big text tormentor. And I'm interested to whether you're finding

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 1>that the US is becoming a tormentor too. When you're

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 1>here talking with your counterparts from a competitive perspective to

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the United States back you in terms of the moves

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you make on some of the big companies here. Well,

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I have you know, the first time I came to

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:48.399
<v Speaker 1>the US as Commissioner for Competition with my Google case,

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>people say what you're talking about? You know, crazy woman?

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>That has changed completely, you know, both public opinion, the

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>legislator in their approach, but you shoul law enforcement now

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>cases are being brought the States also very active. Uh.

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>And it's part of the global development. We see in

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>South Korea, we've seen in Australia, we see you know,

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>around the planet, people say, come on, we need an

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>open marketplace, we need the drive for innovation, we need

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:21.280
<v Speaker 1>people to have choices. So so that has changed enormously.

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.880
<v Speaker 1>And of course we follow very closely what happens in

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 1>Congress and we're very working very closely with our colleagues here.

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>M H. And that does it. For the sedition of

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Blooberg Technology Friday, we've got the CEO of Grinder, the

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>new CEO, George Arison, will talk about his plan to

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:43.839
<v Speaker 1>take on Match and Bumball. And don't forget to check

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>out our podcast wherever you get your podcast. I'm em

0:36:47.040 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 1>only checking in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg. And he'd

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:08.240
<v Speaker 1>show how people are eating as people a people people

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 1>help people had show people eating the aga people have

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>beach peple a people