WEBVTT - The Cult of the Ultra-Wealthy with Ed Elson

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Also media, Hello and welcome to Better Offline arm of

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>course your host ed Zitron. Subscribe to the newsletter and

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>take part in our annual anniversary newsletter sale ten bucks

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>off the annual subscription rateful Life, with the sale extended

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>through Sunday, July twenty six. Now join now support the

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>greater Zitron Empire, and also like this is my main squeeze.

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Now it's listen the podcast. I mean here, I am.

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I love doing this show. Sound like I'm doing the

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>world shittiest oscar speech. Anyway, onto the episode today, I

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>am joined by the incredible ed Elson of Prof g Markets.

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Ed how are you doing.

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing very well.

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm very excited to contribute to the Zitron empire, which

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 3>is growing by the minute.

0:00:56.240 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's it is. It's a dangerous empire. Not terrible ideas.

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>But let's talk about a specific terrible idea. You've been

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>going outrageous over the SpaceX IPO, and I feel like

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.759
<v Speaker 1>I haven't done the listeners just this talking about how

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 1>insane this company is, so please lead us in.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well we could probably start with their proposed valuation,

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 3>which was supposed to you was supposed to go public

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 3>at around two trillion dollars. It eventually came down to

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 3>around one point seventy five trillion dollars, which was just

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 3>flat out insane from the get go because it values

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 3>the company at more than one hundred times sales. And

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, if the if the point of a company

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 3>is to make money or to make you know, more

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 3>money than it spends, then this is just a very

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 3>bad company. It lost five billion dollars last year. It

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 3>lost more than four billion dollars in the first quarter

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 3>of this year. And if the idea is that you know,

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 3>your revenues are going to grow faster than your expenditures,

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 3>well that's currently not the case because their revenue grew

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 3>only fifteen percent in the first quarter and their losses

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 3>grew seven hundred percent. So this is like by all

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 3>forms of standard accounting, this is like genuinely a bad business,

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 3>and you really have to kind of cross your fingers

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 3>and hope that something works out in order to believe

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 3>that this is a viable investment, especially at the valuation

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 3>that they were pushing for. And that's basically what we

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 3>learned in that IPO filing that it was basically just

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 3>a giant message to tell investors heges don't worry about it.

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk is a genius. Just kind of cross your

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 3>fingers and hope for the best. And there's a lot

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 3>in that filing that we can get into, kind of

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of ridiculous language that we could unpack. But

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 3>essentially that is the problem. It's something that I pointed

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 3>out as soon as the company went public. My prediction

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 3>was that it was going to the stock was going

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 3>to pop twenty five percent on the first day because

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 3>of the amount of momentum and the amount of hype

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 3>and the fact that IPOs are in a lot of

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 3>ways a rigged game. It's kind of rigged by the

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street banks to make that these things go well

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 3>and that you have a quote unquote successful ipo. That

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.679
<v Speaker 3>is what happened. But the second bottom, my prediction was

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 3>that the stock would get cut in half. I think

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 3>we're down to forty five percent off it's high, so

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 3>we're not there yet, but we are getting close.

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>So it feels like the Musk industrial complex that has

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>kept Tesla afloat just didn't happen here. Because as I

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>look at this number now, and it'll be different by

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the time this goes like it's what one hundred and

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty one point nine normal way of reading the stock

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>price moving on uh way down from one hundred and

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty five, which is what it listed at. It popped

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>like one hundred and fifty, went over two hundred at

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>one point. But the Muskian bullshit complex that kept Tesla

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>inflat it just hasn't happened here. Why do you think

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that is?

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it can only last for so long.

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Like you look at Tesla, for example, which is already

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of commanding a pretty ridiculous valuation, and that is

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 3>because of the cult of Elon and of the obsession

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 3>with his brain and the fact that you know, he's

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 3>gonna figure out how to build humanoid robots and all

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 3>of this stuff. So the Tesla evaluation is kind of insane.

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 3>But somehow it has been able to sustain itself for

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 3>long enough. SpaceX was like otherworldly no pun intended here

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 3>in terms of its valuation. At some point that has

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 3>to end, at least that is my belief. When it

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 3>comes to markets, I think that when you look at

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 3>what the story that they were actually selling to investors,

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 3>you look at what they said that in that disclosure

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 3>in that filing. One of the things that kind of

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 3>convinced investors that this might be remotely worth it was

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 3>this idea that SpaceX had claimed and identified what they

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 3>call quote the largest actionable total addressable market in human.

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>History, right, And what market was was that exactly?

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 3>So that market was launching rockets one, putting satellites into

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 3>space two, but then the biggest one. And to be clear,

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 3>they said that this total addressable market was twenty eight

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 3>and a half trillion dollars, which would mean that the

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 3>size of this market is larger than the GDP of

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Europe or the GDP of China, which is insane. What

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 3>actually contributes to that market, as I said, rockets, satellites,

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 3>but twenty six trillion dollars of that was AI.

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 2>And of course this is not sorry, go ahead, no, no, no.

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean is that AI data centers? Are the AI

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>data centers on Earth?

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 3>That's that's the real question. So it is AI data centers.

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.239
<v Speaker 3>But supposedly the next theory, the next stage of AI,

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 3>is that we're going to put these AI data centers

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 3>out into space and they're going to orbit around the Earth.

0:05:55.680 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 3>And that's why the AI opportunity is so massive, So obviously,

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean anyone who isn't sort of brought into the

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 3>cult of Elon, anyone who isn't suffering from what I

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 3>believe is Elon derangement syndrome, where you buy into this

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 3>stuff and you believe that any price is worth it

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 3>because it's Elon. Anyone who has their head screwed on

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 3>correctly can understand that that doesn't really make any sense,

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 3>or at least that you can't expect that you're going

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 3>to get real returns from that if they haven't even

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 3>proven that this makes sense both physically in terms of

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 3>like the laws of physics, but also financially and economically,

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 3>they haven't proven that you can get any real return here,

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 3>And that's where all of the language becomes so misleading.

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 3>Like they use this phrase the light of consciousness in

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 3>their est, does that mean that? So that is what

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 3>they say is their mission statement as a company Consciousness.

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 3>To extend the light of consciousness to the stars is

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 3>what their mission is. So it's not about actually delivering

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 3>payloads into space. It's not about delivering broad broadband through

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 3>their satellite business, which is what they should be saying,

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 3>because that's what they do currently, But to get that

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 3>crazy valuation, they need to hype up the scale of

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 3>the project here, and so they have expanded that scale

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 3>not just to the orbital data centers, which they haven't

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 3>proven yet whatsoever, but also to interplanetary travel, interstellar travel,

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and.

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>They were actually promising or suggesting that they would build

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>interstellar travel.

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, they say that they want to extend the life

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 3>of consciousness to the stars. And if that is their

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 3>mission statement, then I'm going to take that literally and say, Okay,

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 3>what you're saying then is that you want to accomplish

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 3>interstellar travel. That's only what that could possibly mean. They're

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 3>basically saying, we want to take humanity and bring them

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 3>out to the stars. So that's if that's your missions. Again,

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 3>they're not promising that that's what they're going to do.

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 3>They're just saying, this is what we are trying to do.

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 3>And then as soon as you say that, suddenly all

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 3>of the investors, all the people on Wall Street go,

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 3>oh my god, this is a company that is that

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.679
<v Speaker 3>is trying to do something bigger than any any company

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 3>has ever done in history. You look at what Deutsche

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Bank called SpaceX. They call this company in their note

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 3>quote the apex of civilizational ambition. They said that SpaceX

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 3>is quote bending the arc of history. So when you

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 3>talk like that, suddenly people's greed glands get going and

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 3>you start to think about, oh my gosh, what if

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 3>they do it, what if they pull this off? And

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 3>then you kind of forget about the numbers. You forget

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 3>about the fact that they are losing money. You forget

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 3>you forget about the fact that the AI business that

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 3>they say is going to generate, you know, ninety percent

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 3>of their revenues down the line. You forget that it

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.719
<v Speaker 3>doesn't work at all. You forget that it's right, two

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 3>selve billion dollars in losses.

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's two assumptions there. There's one that they'll build

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>aye data centers in space, which is somewhere between wang

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and bullshit. And then there's the other one, which is

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that the data center demand exists for that. So just

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>two of them, two of them at the same time,

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>for this data center thing they haven't proven. All right,

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is a more direct question. You kind of

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>hinted it this earlier. What's in it for the banks? Like,

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>just on a very very basic level, why what's in

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.599
<v Speaker 1>it for like a Deutsche Bank or a Goldman or

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>what have you. To say this stuff that if a

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>homeless person screamed it at you, you'd run away.

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 3>So that's the really interesting question. This is where I

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 3>start to kind of put on my tin foil hat

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 3>and get a little bit con that's what it's about exactly,

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 3>and we do it in a data driven way. And

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 3>to be honest, I'll just say this, I'm right. Here's

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 3>why they're doing it. The reason that Wall Street has

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 3>to be nice to SpaceX is because there is a

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 3>very very significant financial incentive to do so. And that

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 3>is this is one of the large IPOs in history

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 3>and one of the most important ways that banks generate revenue.

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 3>The way that they make their money is they take

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 3>companies public. So if SpaceX decides to choose the ed

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 3>Zitron Bank as their underwriter for the IPO, then that

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 3>means that when SpaceX goes public, ed Zitron Bank will

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 3>get a cut of the fees that were generated from this,

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 3>and so.

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Those the fees on the trades. Right, So when someone

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>trades there's like what are the fees that they make?

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 3>They take a percentage of the amount of equities of

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 3>the company that were sold, and it depends the percentages

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 3>can change. For SpaceX, it was slightly smaller as a

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 3>percentage of the average IPO offering, but that's because the

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 3>actual amount that was being raised was so gigantic. So

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 3>you look at the banks that reported their earnings last week,

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 3>they made literally billions of dollars off the SpaceX IPO

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 3>because so many of them took this company public. So

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 3>that's the first thing that you need to know is

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 3>that Wall Street, you know, has an incentive to be

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 3>nice to the banks. We actually had an example of

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 3>this back in our favorite era of market history, which

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 3>was the dot com boom, where there was this guy

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 3>named Henry Blodgett who was an analyst Maryland business insider

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 3>himself exactly so who went on to actually create Business Insider,

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 3>and so he actually had a decent career, but he

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 3>got a lot of trouble back in the dot com

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 3>era because he had spoken publicly, very optimistically about a

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of these Internet companies that were going public. He

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 3>said that they were all buys. He said that he

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 3>publicly recommended them, and that was kind of his job,

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 3>is to talk about these companies, give price targets and

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 3>say this is what I expected the company. After the

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 3>dot com crash, it was then learned there was an

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 3>investigation into Henry Blodgett and they found out that actually,

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 3>in private, he had been saying that a lot of

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 3>these companies were trash or as you like to call them, wank.

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 3>That was, he said that they were junk, he said

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 3>that they were dogs. He said they were pos's translation

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 3>pieces of shit. And so the question is why was

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 3>he saying one thing privately and then you know, out

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 3>of the other side of his mouth going out to

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 3>the public and saying this company is a bye. And

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 3>the reason is what I said, which is that he

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 3>needed to. He had a financial incentive to make these

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 3>companies like them so that they would be choosing his bank,

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Merrill Lynch, to underwrite their IPOs. In that way, Merrill

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Lynch makes money. So this turned out to be a

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 3>huge scandal, and there were a lot of other analysts

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of other Wall Street banks that were

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 3>revealed to be doing the same thing. And so the

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 3>SEC looked at this and they thought, Okay, this is

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of a problem. We can't have these guys publishing

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 3>this research where they're basically lying about these companies, and

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 3>at the same time we learned that, you know, they

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 3>actually don't believe in these companies.

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 2>So they came up with this law.

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Called the Global Research Analyst Settlement of two thousand and three,

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 3>and this was basically an agreement that was created by

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 3>the SEC to address the conflict of interest between the

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 3>investment banking arms and the equity research arms. The team

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 3>that Henry Blodgett was on at the Wall Street banks,

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 3>and they basically said that what we're going to do

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 3>is we're going to separate you too, from one another,

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 3>and we're going to say, you guys, actually, if you

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 3>work in investment banking, you're actually not allowed to talk

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 3>to anyone on equity research at your bank unless we

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 3>have a chaperone present. Because what we've learned is that

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 3>if you guys start to collude with one another, then

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 3>we're going to start to run into conflicts of interest.

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Then we're going to have the banks and they're going

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 3>to start pumping these shitty stocks that are going to

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 3>lose people a lot of money, because that is exactly

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 3>what happened in the dotcom crash. So they created this

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 3>thing and you'd think, Okay, problem solved.

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Then I go not really, well, it seems like you'd

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>have a bloat from just another person in the room

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>with you.

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so that I mean that that's an important point.

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 3>But at the least you could say that they tried

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 3>to address the problem, and the least you could say, Okay,

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 3>we've created a rule that is attempting to make this

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 3>less of a problem than it has been. And maybe

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 3>maybe at most you put a scare into the research

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 3>analyst and you say, hey, guys, this is a big deal,

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 3>and if you start pumping things up, then that's going

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 3>to be a problem. Another thing they did, by the way,

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 3>is they made a law that the equity research analysts

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 3>compensation had to be completely divorced from the investment banking revenues.

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 3>So that way you could sort of argue that if

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 3>you work on equity research, then you don't actually have

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 3>a financial incentive anymore to talk up stocks. Now you

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.479
<v Speaker 3>can just do your research and give your honest recommendations.

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Whether you believe that that actually solved the problem is

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 3>another question, but let it be known they tried to

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 3>and that was the law that they put into effect.

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>That just feels like the least effectual way to do

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>this though, because I don't know. I read byside analysts

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and I've never seen them say anything negative.

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, here's where I'm going to kind of burst the

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 3>bubble here, which is seven months ago that law was terminated.

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, Oh.

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 3>December TWE twenty twenty five. This was the headline from

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 3>the SEC. Quote, the SEC agrees to terminate Global Research

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 3>Analyst Settlement. So they basically decided that we don't need

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 3>to have this law anymore. And their argument the SEC,

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 3>the same SEC which has lost about a fifth of

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 3>its workforce, which is seeing some of the lowest settlements

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 3>in the history of the agency, because they have basically

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 3>made it their mo at this point not to protect investors,

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 3>but to protect white collar crime, which is why we're

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 3>seeing all of the inside trading which has just exploded

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 3>over the past year.

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 2>They said that.

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 3>We don't need to have this law anymore because there

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 3>are other laws that kind of do the job for you.

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Do they come even remotely close to the laws that

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 3>existed beforehand in that initial Global Research Analyst settlement? Do

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 3>they have the laws, for example, where you have to

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 3>have a chaperone in the room for these units to

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 3>be talking to each other.

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 2>No, they don't.

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 3>The laws are a lot weaker, they're a lot more flexible,

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 3>they're a lot less stringent.

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 2>So that happened.

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>We don't even have the half hearted one anymore.

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, there's basically nothing good stuff that happens. SpaceX then

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 3>files its IPO, and then I go and I look

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 3>at the Wall Street price targets that we saw, and unanimously,

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 3>every single bank that underwrote this IPO has said, even

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 3>at that ridiculous valuation that was initially floated, they've said,

0:16:57.440 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 3>this is a bye so Yeah, Gobin Sachs. They said

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 3>it's worth two hundred and five dollars a share. That's

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 3>a two point seven trillion dollar market cap. Yeah, JP

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 3>Morgan they said that this company is worth three trillion

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 3>dollars Morgan Stanley, four trillion dollars, my favorite, Raymond James,

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 3>a lesser known investment bank. They say the company is

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 3>worth ten and a half trillion dollars, which would mean

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 3>that this company should be trading at a price to

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 3>sales multiple of five hundred and forty two times sales.

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 3>It would mean that this company is the most valuable

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 3>company on Earth, more valuable than Meta and Microsoft combined,

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 3>more valuable than in Video.

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>More val Apple and Apple combined.

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 3>Than Apple and Video combined. And at that point you

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 3>have to ask yourself, Okay, what are these guys smoking

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 3>or two? Who's paying that?

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:17:49.920 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 3>And the answer is SpaceX is paying that. And then

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 3>you might say, well, they've already done the IPO, so

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 3>haven't they already gotten their fees. Haven't they already collected

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 3>their revenue? Why would they be incentivized to be pumping

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.199
<v Speaker 3>the stock now after the company has already gone public.

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 3>And this is the part that I'm sure you will enjoy,

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 3>which is this company still needs to raise hundreds of

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 3>billions of dollars to achieve all of the things that.

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>They need to achieve, and that through the banks.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 3>They have to do it through the banks, so they

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:36.959
<v Speaker 3>have to do that. There was the debt offering that

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 3>they recently did, which was somehow people bought, but now

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 3>are seeing that SpaceX bonds are absolutely tanking. But they're

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:47.239
<v Speaker 3>going to have to raise more equity and they're going

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 3>to have to raise more debt. That's close to I

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 3>think it was two hundred billion dollars of morphinancing that

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 3>they'll need later down the pipeline, which means that's tens

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 3>of billions of dollars in future revenue for the investment banks.

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 3>That's revenue that they have literally a fi fiduciary obligation

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 3>to pursue. So when you ask me, okay, why is

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 3>everyone smoking crack when it comes to SpaceX, this is why.

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 3>And the only analysts who have said that the company

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 3>is a sell morning Star for example, they're analysts who've

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 3>had on my show, Nicholas Owens. The only anlysts who

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 3>are saying that this isn't worth what it is currently

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 3>are analysts who don't have a financial incentive. I mean

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 3>morning Star is an example. They're not taking this company public.

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 3>They have no incentive to get these underwriting fees on

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 3>all of the debt and the equity offerings. So that's

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 3>the problem here, and I think that investors are beginning

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 3>to come to their senses. You're seeing a lot of

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 3>fear now as that that line goes down and down

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 3>and down and redder and redder and redder. My projection,

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 3>my expectation is that that number will continue to go down,

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 3>especially as investors start to lose faith in these price

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 3>targets and these revenue projections from the Wall Street banks.

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you look at like the Raymond James estimates

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 3>as an example, they estimate the revenue is going to

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 3>rise from nineteen billion dollars last year. That was the

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 3>number that SpaceX that's how much revenue they generated last

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 3>year to in twenty thirty five five point two trillion dollars.

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sex said that SpaceX's revenue will surge one hundred

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>x yes by twenty thirty.

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 3>Which, by the way, is conservative compared to some of

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 3>these other estimates from legal.

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>The reason I asked that is is this not again,

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>like I guess the is it that they have financial

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>models that they can point to that say the things

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>they want them to say. Is it that there is

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a mathematical basis or be it a rotten one? Or

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 1>are they just nobody bothers to check them.

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that what we know about numbers and statistics

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 3>is that there's a lot of bullshitting and massaging that

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 3>you can do. And the trouble with numbers is that

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 3>they kind of they lend a level of objectivity and

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 3>validity on the surface, but the deeper you dig into them,

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 3>the more you start to realize that numbers can be

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 3>completely fabricated and bullshitted out of thin air.

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 2>And you know this very.

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 3>Well because of the work that you've done investigating the

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 3>finances of an open AI, investigating the finances about Throbbing,

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 3>investigating the finances of a lot of these AI companies,

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 3>which a lot of people are starting to get very

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 3>worried about. I think credit to a lot of the

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 3>work that you have been doing. But the same is

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 3>true of SpaceX. And it's especially true when you have

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 3>a company that whose entire value proposition is predicated on

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 3>a distant dream that is an't and close.

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 2>To being realized.

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 3>So as soon as you say, you know, our total

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 3>addressable market is twenty eight and a half trillion dollars,

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 3>because we're not only going to pursue orbital data centers,

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 3>but we're also going to pursue asteroid mining, and we're

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 3>also going to build a colony of civilization on Mars.

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 3>And as soon as you start saying things that are

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 3>legitimately I mean, currently as we speak that not real,

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 3>then you can apply any number you want to it.

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 3>You can basically say, oh, I don't know. I think

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 3>asteroid mining is going to be like a one hundred

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 3>trillion dollar business, gazillion, a gazillion. Why because if we

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 3>calculate the amount of asteroids in existence, and calculate the

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 3>amount of critical minerals that may or may not be

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 3>lying within those asteroids, then we look at the total

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 3>addressable market, then we can project it out into not

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 3>just twenty thirty five, but twenty forty five, twenty fifty five,

0:22:56.240 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty sixty five. I estimate that it's a bazillion dollar opportunity.

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And there's and so this is outside of SpaceX as well.

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>All of these It goes to any kind of analyst

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>letter about projections for let's say the AI industry or

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>any CAPEX stuff. It's just all of these projections, despite

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.959
<v Speaker 1>them being through an investment bank, can be basically manipulated

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to whatever they want them to say.

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you can, you can.

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.479
<v Speaker 3>You can basically set any price target you want, and

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.400
<v Speaker 3>so long as you come as long as you back

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 3>it up with like some semblance of a model which

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 3>you can go as crazy as you want. You can

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 3>say that, and so long as the SEC doesn't find

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 3>evidence in your emails or in your correspondence with your

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 3>colleagues that you were lying, then technically you're good.

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>You can just convince you and just to be specific,

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>being wrong is not a problem.

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Being wrong is not a problem. You can be wrong

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 2>as much as you like. What I would.

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Against though, to these guys, I mean, for anyone who's

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 3>listening to this and thinking the whole system has rigged

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 3>the Wall Street banks so they can just do whatever

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 3>they want. Their equity research is completely compromise, which I'm

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 3>not disagreeing with what I Eventually, at some point, I

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 3>think these people have to lose their credibility. And you

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 3>and I have discussed this in the past, but when

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 3>you have a draw down like the one we've seen

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 3>with SpaceX, which we're down forty five, but I think

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 3>it could go a lot lower. I think that this

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 3>thing could could fall, you know, seventy or eighty percent.

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 3>When that happens, there are going to be a lot

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 3>of investors out there, a lot of capital allocators who

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 3>read that Raymond James equity research report on SpaceX, and

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 3>they'll think, hold on, this guy is a fucking idiot.

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 3>And at that point they're going to start to realize

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 3>I don't trust the stuff that comes out of these

0:24:57.720 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 3>banks anymore. I don't think that any of this really

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 3>makes any sense. And you know, it seems as though

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 3>this was compromised to begin with, because it seems as

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 3>though this was incentivized by this ridiculous fee structure that

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 3>related to the IPOs and the deal making process. And

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 3>at that point, I think that the banks will have

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 3>to do a lot of work to win back their credibility.

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 3>And if this bubble bursts in the way that you

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 3>have been warning about, then the same thing will be

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 3>true for all of the Wall Street banks, not just

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 3>as it relates to SpaceX, but as it relates to

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 3>all of their research surrounding AI companies. The same will

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 3>be true of the financial media, which I know that

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 3>you've been talking about. At some point, the chickens do

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 3>have must come home to roost here, and I think

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 3>that eventually the credibility will deteriorate two a level that

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 3>is not sustainable, at which point it'll be on them

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 3>to win the credibility back. That's what happened after two

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 3>thousand and we created the regulations a period.

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. The thing is, the analysts who were

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>pro Enron still have jobs like the people that like.

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Though there were the there were some of the software

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>run ones around the dot com bubble and around dan

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Ron who gave bad recommendations, but a lot of them

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:18.199
<v Speaker 1>got away with it by just saying, yeah, well, we

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>just believed the companies and I've the The only cope

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I have with this is that social media was perhaps

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>not as it was not a thing at the same

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>scale back then, and that might hold it because it

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>goes so much further than SpaceX, though it goes into

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I've now read I think I've read my third straight

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>what is it?

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 2>T Cohen?

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>One of the Yeah, another thing from them saying, oh, yeah,

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got all of these channel checks and we've seen

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>all of these data centers are being built. They are

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>talking about twenty gigawats of data centers being under construction,

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>while another fella out, what was it one of the

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>climate ones, Sieline Climate. They're saying, oh, only five gigawats

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is under construction. And it's just it feels like an

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 1>alarming amount of analysis is just pulling things out of

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>your ass and saying it's analysis at this point. But

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you work at an analyst group, so it's kind of established.

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:25.479
<v Speaker 1>It's just very weird because who is going who are

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the actually, yeah, this is a good way to take

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it back to main question. Who are the actual customers

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>for these analyst letters. Is it retail investors, so regular

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>people with Robinhood account or what have you. Or is

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it institutional investors because I think the victim there is

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>going to directly inform whether anything changes.

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 3>The big money is the institutional investors. So I think

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 3>those are the priority clients. But as we're beginning to

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 3>see there's a lot more money coming into retail, and

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of these banks and a lot

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 3>of these financial institutions are doing a lot of work

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 3>to offer more and more retail products and retail funds

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 3>because they know how much money is gushing into that

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 3>side of the industry. So, I mean the way to

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 3>think about it is, I mean, you would hope that

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 3>the job of an equity research analyst is to a

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 3>sell side analyst is to sell their research. It's to

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 3>sell the stuff, the information that they have gathered. But

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 3>increasingly what it seems like it is being sort of

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 3>morphed into which it was supposed to be. It was

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be solved by that global research analyst settlement

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 3>is it's now just getting into selling the securities themselves,

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 3>or at the very least selling optimism about a given

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 3>company that you know is about to go out and

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 3>pursue a lot of deals.

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 2>That that's really that.

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's nothing inside of trading, though I think

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 3>it's I think it's pretty much insider trading. But I

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 3>think one thing, one thing we've learned about the past

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 3>year or so is that insider trading is legal now.

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, here's just.

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Want to be clear that it's not legal advice, but

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that people are acting as if it is. I mean

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that someone seems to get ahead of oil

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>prices every time that there's Donald Trump says there is

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>or is not a cease fire.

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's it's one of the most egregious periods

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 3>of financial corruption, probably the most egregious period of financial

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 3>corruption in the history of the United States. And that

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 3>is saying something, and it is coming from the top down.

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 3>It is coming from an administration that has not only

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 3>normalized it, but they have gutted any semblance of regulation

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 3>and protection that we used to have to prevent this

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:59.239
<v Speaker 3>kind of stuff from happening. I mean, for anyone who

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 3>who doesn't believe that the SEC is compromised, I would

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:08.959
<v Speaker 3>just encourage you to search up the name Margaret Ryan.

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:13.719
<v Speaker 3>And Margaret Ryan was the enforcement director for the SEC,

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 3>who seemed to be one of the only people at

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 3>the agency who was actually interested in enforcement. She started

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 3>to pursue what was some very obvious leads on insider

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 3>trading and essentially criminal behavior among the Trump family. She

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 3>started to pursue these leads and then suddenly she got

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 3>message from someone higher up than her saying, hey, you

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 3>have to stop doing this. You're not allowed to do this.

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 3>She got into a little bit of a fight, and

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 3>then the next thing you know, she was mysteriously disappeared

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 3>from the SEC. And it's not just her. We saw

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 3>the same thing with the DOJ. We saw the same

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 3>thing with Gail Slater, who tried to pursue what she

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 3>believed to be some fixing in the Anti Truss Department

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 3>that was being done by the Trump administration. What do

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, she got a mean letter from her bosses

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 3>and then suddenly she's ousted as well. And you just

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 3>look at the the the amount of people that have

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 3>been laid off at the SEC, not just the SEC,

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 3>but the CFTC, the DOJ, I mean, all of the

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 3>white collar crime enforcement agencies in our government. They've all

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 3>been gutted. And then you look at the fact that

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Trump made one and a half billion dollars on crypto

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 3>last year. He made more on crypto personally than any

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 3>of the largest crypto firms in the United States. He

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 3>made more money on crypto last year than coinbase made

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 3>on crypt.

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>That's fucking insane, It's unbelievable.

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 3>It's it's it's it's to a level that we've never

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 3>ever seen in our lives. It's it's it's I mean,

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 3>to me, the the stamp of approval on what is

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 3>actually happening here, the ratification is the fact that last

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 3>week he decided, or his team decided, they're going to

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 3>start putting his face on one dollar coins. And you

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 3>look at who's done that in history. No US sitting

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 3>president has done that, but there have been other leaders

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 3>who have done it, namely Saddam Hussein Mohamma Gaddafi, Francisco Franca.

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, these are corrupt authoritarian dictators who have done

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 3>the same thing. It's a very very small and specific

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 3>group of people who have done this kind of thing.

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 3>And the reason that it matters is because of the

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 3>things that we're describing, or at least the reason it

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 3>matters for investors, The reason it matters for markets is

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 3>because it encourages and normalizes this level of insider trading

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 3>and corruption where people are realizing, like, this is the

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 3>fastest and easiest way to get rich, this is how

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:50.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to do it his teleprompter and making one

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 3>hundred thousand dollars predicting what he's going to say in

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 3>his speeches.

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, well, that's the thing. Though I think it

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>extends even further than Trump. I fully agree, by the way,

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>into this realm of if we do not have enforcement,

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>if we do not have enforcement of rules, if we

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>don't even have basic responsibility on the parts of the

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>media and regulators, then liars will always profit. Because I've

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>been writing something, I've been writing something today where it's

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>just like it shocks me how little people are actually

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to justify the AI bubble beyond saying it's big, right,

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and the actual under of Nixon. Essho's coming on the

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>show next week. He did a great piece about how

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>like global decision making is being destroyed by AI, because

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing is really based on what AI can do, just

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>on what people will tell you it can do, because

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't. I would say regulation of fact is what

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the job of journalism is, or at least some degree

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of that. And I think that, I know it's harsh

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to say, I think tech and business journalism is to

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>blame just as much for this. I think that the

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>way that Musk has been treated, I think the way

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that AI has been inflated, and the fact that even

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I supposedly objective journalism outlets the world over, I saw

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 1>so many stories about like, oh, I guess Elon Musk

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>is talking about orbital data centers. What the fuck you

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>if I went and said that Donald Duck was going

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to become president of America tomorrow, but I have a

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 1>big following, Is that true now? Because I think Donald

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Duck has a better chance of becoming president than we

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>have fucking data centers in space. But no journalists sit

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:31.800
<v Speaker 1>there and they go, well, you know, it's okay, It's

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just we're just saying what they're saying. We're not

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>going to not going to come down with an opinion

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>about it. Despite the fact that the reason that people

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>are sinking money into AI is because they keep reading

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>in the media that AI can do stuff it can't do,

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's just we're watching as just no one thinks

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they have responsibility for anything, and thus grifters are just

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>running wild.

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly be great.

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 3>I think, I think you've you've put your finger on

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 3>the pulse of what is arguably the largest problem in

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 3>America right now and perhaps in the world, which is

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 3>that no one seems to.

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Have a spine.

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Anyway you look. No one seems to have an ability

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:16.799
<v Speaker 3>to come out and speak with integrity and speak with

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 3>honesty about what it is that they actually believe is true.

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 3>Anyone can say whatever they want, and so long as

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 3>they put a couple of numbers behind it, or even

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 3>if they don't put a couple of numbers behind it,

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 3>anything's fair game. And I do think again, it's if

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 3>we were trying to reverse engineer why people seem to

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.320
<v Speaker 3>believe that this is acceptable and why this has become

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 3>so pervasive in our society. I think a decent argument

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:50.440
<v Speaker 3>would be the fact that the father of the country,

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 3>the role model the president, has demonstrated that this kind

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 3>of behavior can yield results not only in the financial markets,

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 3>but also in polers too, that lying actually works, that

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 3>lying is actually okay, and that you can do that.

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'll just say to your point about financial journalism,

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:14.839
<v Speaker 3>business journalism, I've been shocked by how I will go

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 3>on on various shows and the amount of times that

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 3>people have said to me kind of taken me aside

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 3>and said, hey, by the way, is it okay if

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 3>we ask you about the president? Is it okay? It

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 3>is that fine? As if we're hitting some sort of

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 3>third rail where I might not be able to speak

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 3>with any truth or transparency or honesty about what I

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 3>actually believe is happening in the country. And this is

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 3>a real problem. I think you're right. I think it

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 3>pervades our politics, and I also think it pervades the

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 3>technology industry. Well, we've seen its own generation of grifters

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 3>and carnival barkers and pumpers who have gotten rich from

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 3>just pumping whatever it is that they believe, whether it's

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 3>the crypto grifters or the spac pumpers like Tremath Palahapatia,

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 3>and none of them actually get their come up, and

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 3>none of them are actually punished at the end of

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 3>the day, because of what we have done to our

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 3>regulatory institutions, which means that it incentivizes even more bad behavior,

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:26.720
<v Speaker 3>even more dishonesty in the financial markets.

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I think there's an abstraction higher as well, and I

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 1>think it's the I don't know if a lot of

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>journalism wants to cause problems. And I don't just think

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh, can I say that or not. I

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>think they kind of want the companies to win. I

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 1>think that they see this as sports team stuff. I

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 1>think that they judge. Look at Google Search, it's dog shit.

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Look at microsof off teams, look at Facebook, these broken platforms.

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I read pretty much every article in every major tech company.

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I have seen in the last year

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>more than a couple pieces that talk about the actual

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>experience of using these products, which is bad now. And

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it's because and I think that this is a combination

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of both regulatory authorities dying dying a death and Trump

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to some extent, But it was a problem before Trump

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 1>as well, where it's what is considered successful in a

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:34.399
<v Speaker 1>company is purely numbers, its growth at all cost, throat

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of what you've been right about for years and

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 1>this sense that like, well, Meta isn't a bad was

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>at a conference and I said someone that Meta was

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>an awful company and the person looked at me. He

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>was a host from a TV show, and they looked

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>at me and went, but Met as one of the

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:48.800
<v Speaker 1>most profitable companies all time.

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:49.839
<v Speaker 2>They looked.

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>They looked at me, like like a crazy person. I'm like, yes,

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:54.439
<v Speaker 1>but if you used the product, and they went and

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 1>not recently, it's just like you are a fucking like

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 1>But this is that is the standard earth.

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 3>The Sarah Eisen comment on CNBC reacting to our attack

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 3>on Iran and Trump's threats on Iran said, is threatening

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 3>to end a civilization?

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Is that? Is that bullish for markets? Or is that bearish?

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Hell? Yeah, that's just like your soul is gone at

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that point. Is you don't care about you, You're not

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking of human beings all. But that's the thing. I

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:23.439
<v Speaker 1>don't think most of this coverage thinks of human beings,

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and that certain like AI coverage does not connect with

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>reality at all. And it's weird. It's like you can

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>either Sometimes I wonder if when you join the tech

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:37.399
<v Speaker 1>media officially through the official channels, whether you get a choice.

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:40.359
<v Speaker 1>It's either like you can go insane about AI, where

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you just commit yourself fully to everything they say, like gospel,

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 1>or you can only write completely objectively. You could just

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>repeat what they've said and nothing else.

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think this, I mean one of my favorite

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 3>quotes from f. Scott Fitzgerald is that his definition of

0:39:57.280 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 3>intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing thoughts in

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 3>your head at the same time. And I think that

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 3>what we are experiencing is a variety of industries that

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 3>are being led by people who are and not in

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:15.880
<v Speaker 3>all cases, but in many cases, who are frankly not

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 3>very intelligent, who cannot understand this notion that a company

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:24.319
<v Speaker 3>could at once be incredibly profitable, one of the most

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 3>profitable businesses of all time, and also be very bad

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:30.640
<v Speaker 3>for humanity in terms of what it's done to our

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 3>addictive tendencies and what it's done to the mental health

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 3>of a generation of children. Those two things, Yeah, none,

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:42.280
<v Speaker 3>those two things can be true at the same time.

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 3>And if you were to say Meta is if you

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 3>say Meta is evil for this reason or Meta is

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 3>problematic for this reason, that can be true while the

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 3>company still is a very profitable company and is a

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 3>very investible asset. Those things can be true at the

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 3>same time, and that's what they're struggling to grapple with.

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Sure. But there's also the other thing of if a

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>city had great tax revenue and the economy was booming,

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:13.399
<v Speaker 1>but every single street was just bathing piss, I mean,

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 1>without exception, and the mayor was doing coke with the

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Lockheed Martin every day and throwing dogs and

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:25.719
<v Speaker 1>giraffes into wood chippers on camera. Would the media look

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>at it and say, well, you know what, the city's

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:33.280
<v Speaker 1>doing great? Though, No, they'd say crime rates are blah blah,

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>this piss everywhere, yaddy yady, yadda. They don't do the

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>same thing with tech, despite the fact that I think

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 1>we spend more of our lives online than we do

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 1>in the real world these days. And it's just and

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that what that does this is obviously a

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 1>long term theory. I think what it means is they

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>don't include that in the analysis because it doesn't matter

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to the price for now. But at some point I

0:41:58.040 --> 0:42:01.800
<v Speaker 1>think it has to because the reason, like what's missing

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:04.320
<v Speaker 1>is no one wants to discuss the reason that they're

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 1>growing so fast, which is or not growing even that fast,

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>growing reliably. But the products it's because of monopolies. It's

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:14.799
<v Speaker 1>because they've not got any other business. There's no one

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>else that's really competing meaningfully with Metal or Google or

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft or Amazon other than those four companies, which don't

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>really compete with each other.

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:27.880
<v Speaker 3>And it's just, by the way, that's not a bearish statement,

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 3>that's a bullish statement. Monopolies are incredibly profitable businesses. The

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 3>more that you can maintain a monopoly, the more profits

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:39.279
<v Speaker 3>you can yield over the long term. So I mean,

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:41.720
<v Speaker 3>I look at those things. I think it's a bad

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 3>thing for the long term economic health of America. I

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:48.240
<v Speaker 3>think that it is generally a bad thing for markets.

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 3>And I don't like the fact that we are so

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:54.880
<v Speaker 3>increasingly reliant on the profits or this market is so

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 3>increasingly reliant on the profits of a handful of companies.

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 3>But what you also know is that it's really good

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:04.920
<v Speaker 3>to be a monopoly, and it's really good to be

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:08.719
<v Speaker 3>a shareholder of a monopoly. And I think that's part

0:43:08.760 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 3>of the trouble for financial journalists and people who are

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:17.759
<v Speaker 3>in financial media is that you know, if you were

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:21.359
<v Speaker 3>to say that, I mean, let's take the bubble as

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:25.439
<v Speaker 3>an example. If you were to say six months ago,

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 3>this is a bubble, and by the way, six months ago,

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 3>I think that was a true statement. I think that

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:33.719
<v Speaker 3>it is a true statement today as well. If you

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 3>were to say that six months ago, as an investor,

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 3>you have not performed well. You have massively underperformed your peers.

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 3>If you are a capital allocator, it is problematic for

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 3>you to go out six months ago and say this

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 3>is a bubble, and therefore I'm going to sell my

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:53.719
<v Speaker 3>assets and I'm going to rotate into other assets that

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:56.360
<v Speaker 3>have nothing to do with AI. Why because the only

0:43:56.440 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 3>assets that have yielded the returns that are using this

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:03.840
<v Speaker 3>market are the assets that are tied to AI. And

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:06.759
<v Speaker 3>it's not the big tech companies. It's actually all of

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 3>those crazy names that we're seeing in semiconduct semiconductors and

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 3>materials and all of the infrastructure play and AI. And

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 3>so that's what people are so scared of is if

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:20.279
<v Speaker 3>you call it a bubble, if you say if you

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:24.280
<v Speaker 3>say that in any sense that you think that maybe

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 3>this might be a time to sell, then you are

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 3>making a bold claim that you will then be compared

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 3>against for the rest of your career, and so that's

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 3>part of the fear I think that a lot of

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:38.800
<v Speaker 3>these people have. It shouldn't be the case, It shouldn't

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 3>be as pervasive as it is in financial journalism because

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:43.920
<v Speaker 3>actually your job is just to call balls and strikes

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:46.880
<v Speaker 3>if you're covering this stuff. But if you're an investor,

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 3>that's what you're really frightened of.

0:44:49.200 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 1>But how much of the price action though, and maybe

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:56.400
<v Speaker 1>with the semiconductors it's Hyperscalar spending all this money. Well,

0:44:56.440 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a chicken and egg problem here where

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:00.319
<v Speaker 1>it's like, would hyperscalers have been able to spend that

0:45:00.400 --> 0:45:04.799
<v Speaker 1>much money? If if investors would have dumped the stock

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:06.800
<v Speaker 1>when they saw all the cap x because the media

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 1>had pushed back on AI.

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Well that probably this is where you come in. Yeah,

0:45:13.560 --> 0:45:16.520
<v Speaker 3>and this is where it starts to get ugly. And

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 3>by the way, we're starting to see signals of this.

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 3>We're starting to see a massive unwinding out of the

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 3>AI trade, out of the semiconductor trade. There was some

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 3>report of reporting or some research from Golbin Sachs recently

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 3>showing that the amount of they're seeing some of the

0:45:35.640 --> 0:45:39.800
<v Speaker 3>highest outflows by hedge funds out of the tech sector

0:45:40.200 --> 0:45:44.920
<v Speaker 3>in the history of their coverage of technology, because at

0:45:44.920 --> 0:45:50.799
<v Speaker 3>a certain point, I think the music is going well,

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 3>and then eventually the music starts to stop and they

0:45:53.640 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 3>are starting to pay attention to the stuff that you

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 3>have been talking about, because, Yeah, the reliance on open AI,

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 3>the reliance on anthropic is unsustainable. And how is it

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:06.720
<v Speaker 3>that those two companies have so much money to spend.

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 3>It's not because they're generating cash flows and generating profits.

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Quite the opposite, they're losing money. The reason they have

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 3>the money to spend that is, as you have pointed out,

0:46:15.760 --> 0:46:19.400
<v Speaker 3>because they have been capitalized by a handful of wealthy investors,

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 3>venture investors in Silicon Valley and then also some tech

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:27.480
<v Speaker 3>companies who happen to also be their customers. Cue the

0:46:27.560 --> 0:46:30.879
<v Speaker 3>issue with the circular financing, which I'm not sure how

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 3>people didn't pay more attention to it.

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:37.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's because it because it's there's a childish nature

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:40.799
<v Speaker 1>to it. It didn't break yet, right, it didn't. It

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:43.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't break it. And I think that you said the

0:46:43.400 --> 0:46:45.400
<v Speaker 1>recently we're hanging out, it was like that this is

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>what happens when you orient the market around rich people

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and rich people ideas. And the reason the Microsoft, Google,

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Meta Amazon feel emboldened to spend over a trillion dollars

0:46:55.840 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in four years is because they know they won't get

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 1>pushed back. And also so I don't know if you

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:03.960
<v Speaker 1>exist in this world where every idea you have is

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:06.279
<v Speaker 1>a good idea and every idea against yours is a

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 1>bad idea. Because the media says that the stock number

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:11.360
<v Speaker 1>went up, revenue went up, everything good, you're going to

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:13.839
<v Speaker 1>start believing it. You're just going to believe you can

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 1>manifest everything. And I think that there is something. The

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:22.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that people the mistake that I think people really

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 1>need to stop making is they're like, well, the richest

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>companies in the world couldn't be wrong, and it's like,

0:47:29.239 --> 0:47:33.360
<v Speaker 1>why do you think that? What's the underlying thing? And

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the answer is no matter what the person says, because

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 1>they've yet to explode. It's just like they've yet to explode,

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:45.840
<v Speaker 1>They've yet to fall apart, they've yet to really experience

0:47:45.920 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 1>any consequences. Because I guess the media is talking about

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the AI bubble now, yes, but this is fairly new.

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And even then everywhere everywhere in it's still people are

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:00.719
<v Speaker 1>still doing the well, the dot com bubble, the dot

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:04.080
<v Speaker 1>com bubbles, there's worked out. The dot com bubb was

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:06.680
<v Speaker 1>fine and well looked. I looked at history, I looked

0:48:06.719 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 1>at the Wikipedia for dot com bubble.

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:11.120
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I'm not sure why that's supposed to

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 3>inspire confidence. I mean, that was a period where the

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:16.640
<v Speaker 3>nasdak lost around eighty percent of its value. That's yeah,

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 3>a very bad stretch of time.

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but you know afterwards it was good. Right, No

0:48:22.040 --> 0:48:26.320
<v Speaker 1>one knows what any of this means. But again, media narrative.

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Look up the amount of times I fucking read someone saying, well,

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bubble, after the dot com bubble, useful,

0:48:33.160 --> 0:48:37.280
<v Speaker 1>fiber useful this, and it's I'm I'm only slightly joking

0:48:37.320 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>with how colloquial I'm being, because some of them really

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:43.240
<v Speaker 1>are just like, hey, you know, after the dot com bubble,

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:46.960
<v Speaker 1>everything that the fiber was used at some point? Is

0:48:47.000 --> 0:48:50.399
<v Speaker 1>that true? Only partially? A lot of the fiber was used.

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Lot the copper wasn't. Like there's there's plenty of times

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:56.080
<v Speaker 1>where it didn't work out. And also many companies died,

0:48:57.239 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 1>many people got washed out, many people lost everything. Yes,

0:49:01.080 --> 0:49:04.319
<v Speaker 1>and it was also much much, much smaller, like the

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>American stock market was smaller, the companies were smaller.

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think that this I think that this gets

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 3>to a cultural issue where we have become we have

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 3>a cultic worship of wealth. Yeah, not only because we

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 3>all want to be rich and we all want to

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:29.600
<v Speaker 3>be billionaires, but we believe that if you are a billionaire,

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 3>if you are a CEO of a large company, if

0:49:34.560 --> 0:49:39.319
<v Speaker 3>you are wealthy, that must mean you are intelligent. That

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:44.880
<v Speaker 3>must mean you understand how things work, how economies.

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Work, how the world works.

0:49:45.760 --> 0:49:49.400
<v Speaker 3>That must mean you must have some insight into the future.

0:49:50.200 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 3>And that's not a hyperbolic statement. This is what a

0:49:52.440 --> 0:49:56.359
<v Speaker 3>lot of people actually believe. This is actually what this

0:49:56.440 --> 0:50:00.120
<v Speaker 3>is what fundraising is really all about. It's I I

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 3>have a degree from Stanford and I studied computer science,

0:50:04.680 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 3>and I understand how these things work and these things work,

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:10.360
<v Speaker 3>and therefore you should allocate hundreds of millions of dollars

0:50:10.400 --> 0:50:13.240
<v Speaker 3>to my fund because I have a vision of the future.

0:50:13.280 --> 0:50:15.319
<v Speaker 3>I have an understanding the future that is going to

0:50:15.320 --> 0:50:16.799
<v Speaker 3>be more correct than anyone and I'm going to.

0:50:16.800 --> 0:50:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Make you money.

0:50:17.800 --> 0:50:23.920
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of how capital allocating works. And the trouble is,

0:50:24.320 --> 0:50:29.719
<v Speaker 3>we've become so obsessed and so reliant on the visions

0:50:30.120 --> 0:50:35.480
<v Speaker 3>of rich people that we have decided to offset all

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:38.239
<v Speaker 3>of the cognitive thinking, all of the cognitive work that

0:50:38.280 --> 0:50:40.640
<v Speaker 3>you need to be to do yourself that you have

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 3>done in recognizing hold on this whole thing is dependent

0:50:44.000 --> 0:50:46.279
<v Speaker 3>on two companies and they're going to run out of

0:50:46.280 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 3>money eventually.

0:50:47.600 --> 0:50:49.319
<v Speaker 2>All of that you shirk that.

0:50:49.360 --> 0:50:51.799
<v Speaker 3>You shirk your responsibility to do that, and you say,

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:53.760
<v Speaker 3>you know what, I'm going to leave it to Sati

0:50:53.840 --> 0:50:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Nadella and Sam Altman, and they're going to do all

0:50:57.440 --> 0:51:00.280
<v Speaker 3>of the thinking for me because they're smarter than I am,

0:51:00.360 --> 0:51:03.839
<v Speaker 3>because they are rich. That is kind of the philosophy

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:06.080
<v Speaker 3>that has become pervasive.

0:51:06.120 --> 0:51:06.279
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:09.760
<v Speaker 3>The trouble will come once they turn out to be wrong,

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:11.880
<v Speaker 3>and they're going to have to be wrong in a

0:51:12.080 --> 0:51:15.560
<v Speaker 3>big way for the narrative to shift. I believe we

0:51:15.640 --> 0:51:18.240
<v Speaker 3>are on the precipice of that happening with Sam Altman

0:51:18.600 --> 0:51:21.040
<v Speaker 3>and open Ai. I believe that we have seen him

0:51:21.080 --> 0:51:23.360
<v Speaker 3>make a lot of mistakes, and I think that he

0:51:23.440 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 3>has flown too close to the sun, and I think

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:27.279
<v Speaker 3>that he is going to go down in flames, and

0:51:27.320 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 3>that is going to remind people hold on. Rich people

0:51:30.600 --> 0:51:34.280
<v Speaker 3>aren't always correct. Rich people aren't always right about the future,

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:38.480
<v Speaker 3>at which point that will puncture the narrative and make

0:51:38.520 --> 0:51:41.880
<v Speaker 3>it a lot more difficult to just believe these people

0:51:41.880 --> 0:51:44.880
<v Speaker 3>without doing any of the homework, any of the thinking

0:51:44.920 --> 0:51:47.839
<v Speaker 3>on your own. At that point, I think we'll see

0:51:47.880 --> 0:51:51.840
<v Speaker 3>expectations start to shift. We did see it after the

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 3>dot com crash. Suddenly there was a lot less trust

0:51:54.160 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 3>in these people. A lot of you mentioned the people

0:51:56.600 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 3>who are recommending Enron. I haven't studied those guys, but

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:01.680
<v Speaker 3>I would guess that it was a lot harder for

0:52:01.719 --> 0:52:04.040
<v Speaker 3>them to get a job post to en Run collapse

0:52:04.080 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 3>than it was pre en Run collapse. And I think

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 3>that we saw with the financial crisis too. Yes, some

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 3>people made out like bandits, but overall, there was a

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:16.200
<v Speaker 3>shift in the way people think about markets, in the

0:52:16.239 --> 0:52:18.200
<v Speaker 3>way they think about Wall Street. There was a sense

0:52:18.239 --> 0:52:21.840
<v Speaker 3>of mistrust, There was a sense that these people actually

0:52:21.840 --> 0:52:24.800
<v Speaker 3>didn't really know what they were doing. And it lasted

0:52:24.840 --> 0:52:27.720
<v Speaker 3>for a few years. But of course these things happen

0:52:27.800 --> 0:52:30.440
<v Speaker 3>in cycles, and so I think that we are kind

0:52:30.440 --> 0:52:34.640
<v Speaker 3>of at the peak rich people worship phase, and eventually,

0:52:35.120 --> 0:52:38.360
<v Speaker 3>once something collapses, and I think it will, we'll start

0:52:38.360 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 3>to reset our expectations and we'll decide, Actually, maybe I

0:52:41.640 --> 0:52:44.000
<v Speaker 3>should do some thinking of my own. Maybe I should

0:52:44.080 --> 0:52:46.400
<v Speaker 3>listen to that guy who has a newsletter and an

0:52:46.400 --> 0:52:49.840
<v Speaker 3>interesting podcast. Maybe he was right about it all along.

0:52:50.960 --> 0:52:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I mean I think as we wrap up

0:52:55.200 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 1>this beautiful episode, I think the thing that might be

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:05.760
<v Speaker 1>different here is how balkanized everything. Like everything's very tribal now,

0:53:06.640 --> 0:53:10.839
<v Speaker 1>everyone's very aggressive, everyone's like you will if this Nick's

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a rash piece I mentioned earlier, a big thing he's finding.

0:53:14.680 --> 0:53:17.719
<v Speaker 1>He's a one for software engineer and he talking to

0:53:17.960 --> 0:53:19.800
<v Speaker 1>works as a consultant as well. He talked with various

0:53:19.800 --> 0:53:22.640
<v Speaker 1>firms and he's found this thing where not being pro

0:53:22.719 --> 0:53:28.440
<v Speaker 1>AI is considered dangerous to one's health. Like's if you

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:32.399
<v Speaker 1>are not pro AI within an organization, if you are

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:36.520
<v Speaker 1>not supportive of AI initiatives and indeed the greater religious

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:41.320
<v Speaker 1>thing of AI providing x percent or one hundred x productivity,

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:45.319
<v Speaker 1>you are upsetting to the people around you because there

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:48.840
<v Speaker 1>are all these interlinking things that people just believing that

0:53:48.920 --> 0:53:51.400
<v Speaker 1>AI is the future and agreeing to things and saying

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:53.879
<v Speaker 1>things about it that's not true. And I think that

0:53:53.880 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that's where the real authority crisis is going to break down,

0:53:56.680 --> 0:54:01.200
<v Speaker 1>because we are I think when this burst, we are

0:54:01.239 --> 0:54:05.360
<v Speaker 1>looking at something that could reduce how many LMS we

0:54:05.360 --> 0:54:07.520
<v Speaker 1>see on a day to day basis. But also there

0:54:07.560 --> 0:54:10.880
<v Speaker 1>are people who have staked their entire careers on l

0:54:10.920 --> 0:54:13.720
<v Speaker 1>EM's being like ten times the size they are today.

0:54:14.160 --> 0:54:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Not just like lms will continue to exist, but they're

0:54:16.800 --> 0:54:21.560
<v Speaker 1>like lms will literally be the future of everything, everything, everywhere.

0:54:22.160 --> 0:54:25.359
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure how you come back from this,

0:54:25.400 --> 0:54:28.279
<v Speaker 1>like Jim Kramer came back from it because he I

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:30.560
<v Speaker 1>think he forgets everything he says, the moment he says

0:54:30.600 --> 0:54:35.479
<v Speaker 1>it just just like Dory from finding Nemo or finding Dori,

0:54:35.600 --> 0:54:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess, and coming to Jim, but I think the

0:54:41.160 --> 0:54:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that other than Kramer, there is going to

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:46.600
<v Speaker 1>be a certain degree of I don't know. I don't

0:54:46.640 --> 0:54:51.040
<v Speaker 1>know how you listen to somebody who has been pro

0:54:51.120 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 1>AI after this. I don't know how you take someone

0:54:53.520 --> 0:54:56.760
<v Speaker 1>seriously who has been pro SpaceX, who ignored the things

0:54:57.160 --> 0:54:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that Sam Altman had been promising that went along with it.

0:55:00.200 --> 0:55:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how anyone. And I've been trying to

0:55:02.680 --> 0:55:06.360
<v Speaker 1>warn Jealous about this, like this will be an authority crisis.

0:55:06.840 --> 0:55:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, this will all depend on the price. Right now,

0:55:12.200 --> 0:55:16.640
<v Speaker 3>I look smart because of my SpaceX prediction, and everyone says, oh,

0:55:16.840 --> 0:55:19.800
<v Speaker 3>ED was right, ED got it right, Ed was correct,

0:55:20.200 --> 0:55:22.400
<v Speaker 3>and the people who are pumping the stock looks stupid.

0:55:22.840 --> 0:55:26.920
<v Speaker 3>And so the authority crisis there. It has flipped. If SpaceX,

0:55:26.960 --> 0:55:30.879
<v Speaker 3>for whatever reason, skyrockets to two hundred dollars a share,

0:55:31.400 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 3>everyone will say ED is an idiot, Ed was wrong.

0:55:35.040 --> 0:55:38.000
<v Speaker 3>They will go wherever the wind blows. The only thing

0:55:38.040 --> 0:55:41.200
<v Speaker 3>that really matters in terms of the authority, in terms

0:55:41.239 --> 0:55:43.160
<v Speaker 3>of who to listen to. And this goes back to

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:46.000
<v Speaker 3>the cult of worship around wealth. The only thing that

0:55:46.000 --> 0:55:49.400
<v Speaker 3>matters is the price, right And so once that price

0:55:49.480 --> 0:55:52.000
<v Speaker 3>comes down, and I agree that it's going to have

0:55:52.080 --> 0:55:54.880
<v Speaker 3>to happen for at least a handful of companies. I

0:55:54.920 --> 0:55:57.319
<v Speaker 3>believe Open a Eye is going to implode in some

0:55:58.160 --> 0:56:00.600
<v Speaker 3>in some way, and it'll be full it into some

0:56:00.680 --> 0:56:02.440
<v Speaker 3>other company, probably Microsoft.

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:03.880
<v Speaker 2>I think you again, Yeah.

0:56:03.760 --> 0:56:05.920
<v Speaker 1>That's that's kind of what And I think anthropic has

0:56:05.960 --> 0:56:07.520
<v Speaker 1>passed between Google and Amazon.

0:56:08.040 --> 0:56:12.399
<v Speaker 3>I think that's highly possible too. Once that happens, then

0:56:12.480 --> 0:56:15.480
<v Speaker 3>suddenly Sam Altman is the idiot, and he will be

0:56:15.520 --> 0:56:19.840
<v Speaker 3>remembered in history as such. But be clear, people don't

0:56:19.880 --> 0:56:23.040
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of conviction about what they actually believe

0:56:23.080 --> 0:56:25.560
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to this stuff. All they really care

0:56:25.600 --> 0:56:28.799
<v Speaker 3>about is what happened to the price, and we saw

0:56:28.840 --> 0:56:32.359
<v Speaker 3>it with Sam Bagman Freed and the Crypto saga as

0:56:32.400 --> 0:56:36.440
<v Speaker 3>soon as I mean, Sam Bagman Freed was only a

0:56:36.440 --> 0:56:40.040
<v Speaker 3>criminal once he lost the money. Yes, that was that

0:56:40.160 --> 0:56:41.880
<v Speaker 3>was when they decided, oh, he's a criminal, always a

0:56:41.920 --> 0:56:44.280
<v Speaker 3>bad guy. Put him in jail because he lost the money.

0:56:44.400 --> 0:56:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Same was true of the Henry Blodgett thing. He was

0:56:47.040 --> 0:56:51.040
<v Speaker 3>only punished once the dot com bubble imploded and prices

0:56:51.080 --> 0:56:54.600
<v Speaker 3>went down. Then they decided he's the bad guy. So

0:56:54.719 --> 0:56:56.480
<v Speaker 3>it all that matters here.

0:56:57.200 --> 0:57:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Is the price, and that is people lose money. That's

0:57:00.239 --> 0:57:00.879
<v Speaker 2>exactly right.

0:57:01.600 --> 0:57:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Well Ed, it's been such a pleasure to have you.

0:57:04.200 --> 0:57:06.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll have links to your stuff and then in the

0:57:06.480 --> 0:57:08.600
<v Speaker 1>show notes, thank you so much for joining us.

0:57:08.880 --> 0:57:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much. I enjoyed it and I can't

0:57:11.000 --> 0:57:13.240
<v Speaker 3>wait to have you on my show.

0:57:13.680 --> 0:57:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Hell yeah, do that soon enough. That's right, the Ed Exchange,

0:57:16.920 --> 0:57:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm of course ed Zeitron. I'll be back with the

0:57:19.400 --> 0:57:22.760
<v Speaker 1>monologue this Friday. Thank you for listening as ever, subscribing newsletter,

0:57:22.960 --> 0:57:25.880
<v Speaker 1>download the podcast, goot me on slub That's where I

0:57:25.920 --> 0:57:27.800
<v Speaker 1>get my goots on slub. Now a lot of you

0:57:27.880 --> 0:57:30.880
<v Speaker 1>been slubbing me on goot That's a different social network anyway,

0:57:30.920 --> 0:57:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you know where to find me, of course, Cheers my DearS.

0:57:41.720 --> 0:57:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to Better Offline. The editor and

0:57:44.160 --> 0:57:47.320
<v Speaker 1>composer of the Better Offline theme song is Matasowski. You

0:57:47.360 --> 0:57:49.640
<v Speaker 1>can check out more of his music and audio projects

0:57:49.760 --> 0:57:53.240
<v Speaker 1>at Matasowski dot com, M A T T O. S

0:57:53.320 --> 0:57:57.560
<v Speaker 1>O w Ski dot com. You can email me at

0:57:57.560 --> 0:58:00.440
<v Speaker 1>easy at Better Offline dot com or visit Better Offline

0:58:00.440 --> 0:58:02.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com to find more podcast links and of course

0:58:02.560 --> 0:58:05.680
<v Speaker 1>my newsletter. I also really recommend you go to chat

0:58:05.680 --> 0:58:08.320
<v Speaker 1>dot Where's youread dot at to visit the discord, and

0:58:08.400 --> 0:58:11.080
<v Speaker 1>go to our slash Better Offline to check out I'll Reddit.

0:58:11.880 --> 0:58:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for listening.

0:58:14.040 --> 0:58:16.760
<v Speaker 4>Better Offline is a production of cool Zone Media. For

0:58:16.880 --> 0:58:20.040
<v Speaker 4>more from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool Zonemedia

0:58:20.080 --> 0:58:22.919
<v Speaker 4>dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:58:23.000 --> 0:58:25.640
<v Speaker 4>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.