WEBVTT - Tech News: Poisoning AI with Digital Art

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeartRadio and how the tech

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>are you? It is time for the tech news for Tuesday,

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>October twenty fourth, twenty twenty three. First Up the Hill

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>reports that both Apple and Google have recently disabled live

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>traffic updates in the region around and including the Gaza

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>Strip as Israel pursues a ground war against Hamas. In

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the past, companies that provide real time traffic updates have

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>suspended operations in conflict areas in order to avoid turning

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>into a method for gathering intelligence on things like a

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>military presence and troop movements and that sort of thing.

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg cited anonymous sources saying that the Israel Defense Forces

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>or IDF, made this request to both Apple and to

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Google to temporarily disable live traffic notifications and Google Maps.

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Spokesperson Carlone Bordeaux stated that quote anyone navigating to a

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>specific place will still get routes and ETAs that take

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>current traffic conditions into account end quote, so the navigation

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>tools will still have access to this live traffic data.

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>They're just not going to display the location of any

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>traffic bottlenecks or anything like that. They'll tell you how

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>long it'll take you to get to your destination, but

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>not what points along the route you should expect slow traffic.

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's just an update on things that are going

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>on in the tech sphere in that particular conflict. Yesterday,

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the US government announced it has designated thirty one technology

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>hubs across America that will focus on innovation and be

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>eligible to compete for millions of dollars in grant money.

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>The Economic Development Administration, which is a government office I

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>had not even heard of before today, said that the

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>goal is to encourage regions that are already pursuing innovation

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in quote unquote critical technology ecosystems. The idea is that

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the government is encouraging research and development that will lead

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to technology and organizations that are all about job creation

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and improving national security, like removing our dependence upon other nations,

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, and also making the United States a leader

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in various technical fields. Areas of focus include some pretty

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>obvious candidates like artificial intelligence and clean energy. That also

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>includes stuff like biotechnology, medical technology, and quantum computing, among

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 1>other disciplines. The thirty one hubs span thirty two states

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and Puerto Rico, so it sounds like at least one

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of those hubs state lines. So I hope everybody can

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>get along. The International Energy Agency announced today that according

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to its estimates, renewable energy will make up nearly fifty

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>percent of global electricity production by twenty thirty and that

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>by that time there will be ten times as many

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles on the road as there are today. Now,

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that is encouraging, but we should also remember that our

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>overall demand for electricity grows every year. It's not like

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it stays stable. So while renewable sources will take up

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a bigger piece of the pie, we're also talking about

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a much larger pie. To that end, analysts expect that

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll see peaks in the demand for fossil fuels this decade. Also,

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>electricity is just one way that we actually use energy.

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>If we take all of our energy needs into account,

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>they predict that the share that fossil fuels represents will

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>go from eighty percent down to seventy three percent. So

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>there's it's a very long way to go in order

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to truly eliminate our dependence on stuff like fossil fuels.

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>The agency warns that despite the move toward renewable sources,

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>are continuing use of fossil fuels currently has us on

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a trajectory to see a global temperature increase of around

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>two point four degrees celsius. That's nearly a full degree

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>above the target that was aimed at in the Paris Agreement,

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and it at least implies that we're going to see

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>more major shifts than things like climate and then more

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>granularly weather patterns and severe weather events. Yesterday, Tesla disclosed

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in a financial filing that it is the subject of

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 1>investigations from the US Department of Justice. So the DOJ

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is looking into the company for a whole bunch of

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>different reasons, including how the company markets its driver assists technologies,

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>which Tesla refers to as autopilot and full self driving

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.799
<v Speaker 1>or FSD. The investigation is also looking into whether Tesla

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>purposefully misled customers regarding how far their vehicles can travel

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>on a full charge of the battery. It's also looking

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>into the company practices, like the ones that relate to

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote personal benefits and personnel decisions. So one of

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the personal benefits could be the rumored glass house for

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk. I had totally forgotten about this story, y'all,

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>And when I read that there was a glass house project,

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought, huh, I don't think I've ever heard the

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>term glass house project. I wonder what that is. Is

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that like skunk works. No, we're talking about a literal

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>house with glass walls, you know, the kind of house

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>where you don't want to throw stones. The question is

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 1>if Elon Musk was actually using Tesla to fund and

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>build this house for himself, that would violate laws regarding

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a company paying out benefits to an executive on top

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of their normal compensation. I'm sure the full investigation has

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>a veritable laundry list of concerns, because Musk does have

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a reputation for, let us say, playing fast and loose

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>with rules, as well as a history of campaigning to

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>have fewer rules in general. Analyst Ming chi Quo, whom

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned recently in another news episode, has some more

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>juicy Apple news for us. Apple juice anyway. He wrote

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a piece on medium that says Apple is kicking into

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 1>gear to get into the AI field. The company had

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>lingered behind a bit when compared with competitors like Google

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft, but that's pretty much par for the course

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>for Apple. If you look back on many of Apple's products,

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>like the big revolutionary products that Apple released often, you

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>will see they were not the first to market. The

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>iPod was not the first MP three player, for example. Instead,

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the company would spend time figuring out how to best

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>meet customer expectations, or how to blow them out of

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the water, or how to even create expectations where the

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>customer wasn't aware they had any Anyway, Apple has a

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of catching up to do, and Quo's analysis says

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that the company will be spending an enormous amount per

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>year to get there. So on the conservative end of

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum, Apple would be spending around a billion dollars

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a year to start working on AI implementations. Quo suspects

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be closer to five billion dollars by

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of twenty twenty four, so five billion split

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>over two years, with the vast majority of that really

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>spent in twenty twenty four. Even then, Apple will still

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>be trailing well behind companies like Microsoft. Those companies have

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>been incredibly aggressive while pursuing and developing AI technologies. However,

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>at least in the past, Apple has shown that its

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>approach can have an appeal that its competitors just can't match,

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>so maybe the same thing will be true with AI.

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of AI, Technology Review has an interesting article

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>about how some digital artists are including elements that are

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>invisible to human eye, but they're intended to mess with

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>generative AI. So generative artificial intelligence has to receive training

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>in order to actually generate stuff. So with art, that

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>includes feeding millions of images into the AI system so

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that it, in turn can learn to create images. But

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>this concerns artists because it's their work that becomes the

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>fodder to train these AI systems, and you can end

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>up with generative AI that will lift stylistic elements or

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>sometimes complete actual imagery from an established artist's work and

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>then pass it off as the AI's own creation or

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>someone else if they don't even indicate that AI was

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>used to make it. Meanwhile, you have artists concerned that

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>no one asked them permission to use their art to

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>train these AI models. They certainly haven't been compensated for

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the use of their work. And then the artist's own

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>portfolio can become the fuel that ultimately robs that artist

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of their livelihood or at the very least diminishes the

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>value of the work they produce. So what's the solution. Well,

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>some researchers have developed a tool they call night shade.

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Nightshade by the way, that's a family of plants, but

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure they're specifically referencing deadly nightshade, a plant

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that is in fact poisonous. And the tool makes changes

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 1>to digital art pixels, and it's changes that we humans

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>don't detect, Like it's invisible to us, we don't actually

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>see that any changes have happened. However, the AI scraping

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>these images totally can see that information, and the information

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is misleading the AI. It's giving the AI the wrong

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>implication of how these various elements inside of art are created,

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and it would prompt generative AI to start making some

0:09:55.160 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 1>mistakes when trying to replicate certain types of stuff. And ultimately,

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the more the AI references works that have this kind

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of stuff in it, the more wrong they get. So,

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>for a simple example, you might have some invisible AI

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:16.439
<v Speaker 1>information there that is instructing AI and how to make

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a picture of a dog, but it's all incorrect information.

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the thing that it creates ends up looking more

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>like a cat than a dog, or maybe it looks

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>like a lovecrafty and monster out of the depths of

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>horror and imagination. Who's to say. But the point is

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that if AI does start generating images like that just

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 1>upon simple queries, it indicates two things. One, the AI

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>company that created that tool trained it on art that

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>has been put through this night shade tool, and that

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>would indicate that, yeah, that AI company was doing this

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>was actually using artists' work, presumably without permission or compensation.

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.080
<v Speaker 1>And the proof in the pudding is that, oh, oh,

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>your generative AI isn't creating pictures correctly. And of course

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>number two is the generative AI won't be creating pictures

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>correctly and thus will be less useful as a tool.

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>You can't really use AI to generate art about something

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>specific if it thinks that a house is actually a

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>boat or something along those lines. By the way, you

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>can actually read more about this in the MIT Technology

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Review article titled this new data poisoning tool lets artists

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>fight back against generative AI. Okay, I've got more news

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>stories to go through today. But before we do that,

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. We're back. The Verge reports

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that both AMD and Nvidia are gearing up to produce

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 1>ARM based CPUs for Windows machines soon. So that's significant

0:11:56.559 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>because right now Microsoft is partners with Qualcom when it

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>comes to CPUs for Windows eleven based machines. But it

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>appears that in the not too distant future there will

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>be a lot more competition in that space, and you

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>may find yourself shopping for a new Windows PC and

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>then you might have to compare different ARM based processors

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>with each other. This could also put pressure on Intel

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to innovate in its own processor family or else risk

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>losing market share to AMD and to Nvidia, as well

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>as to Qualcomm. I really like this news because healthy

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>competition tends to mean better products and better prices, both

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of which are great if you happen to be a consumer.

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Gizmoto reports that Microsoft has finally addressed an issue in

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>its spreadsheet platform, Excel, that caused a headache in the

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>field of genetic research. So the problem is that Excel

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>thinks it knows better than the user and will automatically

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>make certain changes to data if that data is in

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a particular format. So, for example, let's say you're a

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>geneticist and you type in the characters sept and the

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>numeral one sept one all together, and of course what

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you mean is septin one, which is a protein coding

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>gene that plays a part in cytokinesis and the maintenance

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>of cellular morphology. Excel would not know that you are

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>creating a spreadsheet about genes, so it would assume that

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>when you typed sept one, what you actually met was

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the first of September, and it might change that entry

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>so it says one dash SEP. The same is true

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>if you happen to be typing about membrane associated ring

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>CH type finger one. Geneticis would encode that as March

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>one m a RCH one. That of course would turn

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 1>into one dash mr. When your spreadsheet starts changing your

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>gene codes into dates, that's a problem. And worse, Excel

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>did not have a feature for you to turn that off,

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>so you couldn't tell it, hey, stop converting my gene

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>code codes into dates. And it meant that when it

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>got time for you to publish your work, you would

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>have to go through and spend countless hours making corrections.

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Because the spreadsheets you were using had changed all your

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>codes into dates, so you had to make sure which

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>one of these should be dates, which of these are

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>actually codes. You could easily make mistakes and miss stuff.

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>It was a huge headache. In fact, it was such

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a huge headache that a few years ago the field

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>overall changed its encoding system to work around this problem.

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>But now Microsoft has created an option in Excel that

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>lets you turn off the autoconversion feature as long as

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not running macros on your spreadsheets, because then apparently

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it all breaks down. I'm not sure if this isn't

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a case of it being better late than never, but

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's an example of how an automated

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>process can actually make things harder rather than easier. When

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you extend that to AI implementations, it can raise some

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>really serious questions. Obviously, this is a much more simplified approach, right,

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>This is a conversion for one tiny instance of data,

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But when you extend that out and you think about

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the sort of things like the conclusions that AI can

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>come to based upon the information it has access to,

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you can understand how sometimes the conclusions are not really

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>ideal all the time, because sometimes AI makes mistakes just

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>like regular I does. And by IY, I mean intelligence,

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>not I. I wasn't making a grammatical error. I was

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>making I guess joke is being too kind. Uh, let's

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>just move on over In the UK, the Public Accounts

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Committee recently highlighted a looming challenge for the energy sector

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>in that company. This is according to the Register, and

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it all has to do with smart meters. Smart meters

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to monitor energy usage and maintain a communications

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>channel between customer and the energy provider, and it's meant

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to keep an accurate tally on how much energy a

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>customer is using, but also to tech stuff like interruptions

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and service and that kind of thing. Ideally, smart meters

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>reduce the need to send actual people out to physical

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>locations to take meter readings, and that ends up freeing

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>them up to do other stuff. Not too long ago,

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the National Audit Office in the UK found that energy

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>companies had rolled out smart meters to around fifty seven

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>percent of their customers, so that meant forty three percent

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>still did not have smart meters. This, by the way,

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>was way behind schedule of the initial plan. Also, about

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of those smart meters were not working correctly. Now,

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the Public Accounts Committee built on top of this report

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and found that twenty percent of the smart meters that

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>have been deployed are living on borrowed time, and that's

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>because these meters are only compatible with aging cellular networks,

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>primarily two G and three G. Meanwhile, telecommunications companies are

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>planning on sunsetting those networks and shutting them down, and

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that means that the smart meters won't be so smart

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>after that. These twenty percent of are deployed smart meters,

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>so this shows there are lots of challenges that still

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>are in front of the energy sector in the UK.

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Nearly half of the businesses and homes in the UK

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>have yet to receive a smart meter at all, some

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>of those who have one have one that doesn't work,

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and then a whole bunch of them around seven million

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>different locations are going to need a new smart meter

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>before the cellular networks completely shut down, or else it'll

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 1>be like they have just a regular meter again. And

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>considering that this whole project has had to push deadlines

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>a few times already, I'm sure this comes as an

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>extremely frustrating development. It also just reminds us that connected

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>technologies are only useful for as long as the underlying

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>connection exists, which I know that's obvious on the face

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of it. We can take that for granted, right when

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 1>we talk about things like the Internet of Things, there's

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of future proofing that needs to happen for

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the Internet of Things to remain useful, because otherwise, if

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the Internet of Things is only compatible with older wireless technologies,

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 1>for example, and we gradually sunset those because we've created

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>better processes, better protocols for wireless communication, if we can't

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>update those IoT devices, they just become inert and we

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>have all the stuff that isn't doing anything. So that's

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>just a good reminder for us to have. And it's

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to future proof things because you never really

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>know how far along they're going to go. Sometimes, if

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you're lucky, you have designed your product, not just lucky,

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>but smart. You've designed your product in such a way

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>where you can update it with things like firmware updates

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>to keep it relevant longer. Ultimately, you're always going to

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>have to swap stuff out. Your goal is to make

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it as less frequent as you possibly can and to

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>maximize the life cycle of the devices you've deployed. Anyway,

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 1>this whole story was giving me flashbacks to the United

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>States back when television broadcasts switched from analog to digital.

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>It caused no end of confusion. Only a small number

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of people were actually affected by that small in the

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>relative sense, because they needed to get a converter to

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 1>convert digital signals to an analog signal to feed into

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>an old television in order to still pick up broadcast TV.

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 1>For a while, everyone was thinking that they might need

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 1>one of those converters, and very few people actually did.

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Dating in the modern world is hard, or so I'm

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>led to understand. I personally do not date because my

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>wife frowns upon it. Jokes. I've been happily married for

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 1>more than twenty five years at this point, so I

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>am totally ignorant when it comes to navigating the dating

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>world these days. To be honest, I wasn't exactly an

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>expert back when I was single. Anyway, What if I

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>told you that Tender is introducing a feature that will

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>let you turn friends and family into your own personal Yenta.

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Yenta was the matchmaker and fiddler on the roof, to

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>be clear, So Tender's introducing this feature where you can

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>list up to fifteen people on your account who will

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>then be able to review potential matches based upon your

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>tender profile, and then they can weigh in on which

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>ones they think you should swipe left on or right on. Now,

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>they won't actually be able to do the swiping for you,

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>which is a good thing because can you just imagine

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>giving your parents access to your tender profile to be

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:51.880
<v Speaker 1>able to vote on whether or not you should ask

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that nice young person out on a date or not.

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.719
<v Speaker 1>What a nightmare scenario that is. I apologize if that

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>major anxiety spike just now. They will also will not

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to message the other profile, so you don't

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about them reaching out on your behalf.

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>What they can do is give their opinion about whether

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>or not a person looks like a catch or if

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you should just nope out of that potential relationship, and

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 1>they call this feature Matchmaker again. Getting back to Filler

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>on the roof, I'm just having the song matchmaker Matchmaker

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>make me a match play through my head, so hopefully

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 1>you are not aware of that song so that it

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do the same to you. But I know that

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the day it's going to be playing

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>in my head, partly because I was in a production

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of Filler on the Roof. Anyway, I think this sounds

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>like Tinder is setting up the stage for a future

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>reality television program. Just imagine it's a reality TV program

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.959
<v Speaker 1>where people can only go on a date with someone

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>who matches on their tender profile and gets the most

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.959
<v Speaker 1>votes from that person's can unity of matchmakers. So like

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 1>your group of friends and family, I'll say this person

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>is right for you, and then you are obligated to

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>go on a date with that person. That sounds like

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a reality TV show, Ready to go. I'm just giving

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>away ideas for free again, aren't I. You know what,

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do some soul searching on that. When we

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>come back, I've got a few more stories to talk about. Okay,

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>we're back, so let me tell y'all a story. Way

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty twelve, a company called Cloud Imperium Games

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>held itself a tiny little kickstarter was for a proposed

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>science fiction space game that they called Star Citizen. The

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>game's scope was to be astoundingly huge, and it would

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>include both multiplayer elements and elements that would be sort

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>of a single player campaign, which became known as Squadron

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>forty two now as Star Citizen grew and grew and

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 1>grew in development and sold more and more in game

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>products for a game that did not yet exist, and

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>made more than half a billion dollars in funding, no joke,

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 1>like they they something like six hundred million dollars I

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>think at this point. Anyway, the company decided to spin

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>off Squadron forty two to be its own standalone single

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 1>player campaign. But that campaign, just like the larger Star

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>Citizen game, kind of just stayed in development year after year.

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And while supporters for Star Citizen have enjoyed releases of

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>some content, like there's been limited releases where you've got

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>some gameplay elements that people can actually play. I don't

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.479
<v Speaker 1>want to I don't want to suggest that nothing has

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>come out. That's not the case. But they were still

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the full promised title, and for Squadron forty two,

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that weight might and I stress might be getting close

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to the end because the company has announced it is

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>now feature complete, so that means that the developers are

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>done adding in features into Squadron forty two. They're not

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:28.479
<v Speaker 1>adding in any more gameplay elements or anything like that. However,

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not quite ready to ship yet. The developer set

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it's working toward a beta and ultimately a release once

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>they are done finalizing the game, polishing the content that

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. They did not give a window for

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>when that might be. They did release a new trailer,

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and I hope that the stars Citizen community that's been

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>waiting for this content for more than a decade at

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:55.199
<v Speaker 1>this point are happy with the result, and that the

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>rest of Star Citizen also ultimately comes out. I do

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>not have a stake in this. I never supported the campaign,

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't pre order anything, and I have some very

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 1>strong feelings about how this whole project has progressed over

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the years. Like I have been very critical of Star

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Citizen in general, but I genuinely hope that the people

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 1>who have poured money and their own hopes into this

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>project end up being very happy. I would hate for

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>this to continue on as just a never ending development,

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and I worry about people being disappointed with the final

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>product simply because they've been waiting so long and have

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>put so much money into it. I'm reminded a little

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of Bethesda, where they had their own Starfield product

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>come out, and there were a lot of people who

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>felt that it did not live up to their expectations.

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Other people really like that game. I have yet to

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>play it, so I haven't formed my own opinion. I

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>know people who think it's a great game, and I

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>know people who feel that it was a total disappointment.

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm sure most people fall somewhere in the middle.

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, here's hoping that the folks who support Star Citizen,

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>when they do get access to Squadron forty two, are

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 1>not left disappointed. Now, imagine that you have to provide

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>tech support to a spacecraft that has left your Solar System.

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>That would be quite the long distance service call. That's

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>what NASA engineers are doing with Voyager one and Voyager two.

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>So both of those spacecraft are now in interstellar space,

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they have left the Solar System, and NASA has sent

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>some instructions to each of them in order to extend

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>their ability to communicate with us all the way back

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>here on Earth for as long as possible. So last year,

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Voyager one started to send some pretty weird communications about

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the spacecraft's telemetry. Voyager sends telemetry data through a system

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 1>called the Attitude Articulation and Control System or AACS. But

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>it was passing this data through a computer system that

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't working properly, and it was odd because it wasn't

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be passing the data through that specific computer system,

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and so sending back garbled data nothing exciting. It's not

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 1>like the garbled data said, Hey, Earth, send more I

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 1>love Lucy episodes, which would have been cool because then

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>aliens would be looking at us. Now it's just like

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>just gibberish, really, And so the engineers have now beamed

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a patch to fix this issue with Voyager one. It's

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a software patch. There is the lingering question as to

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>why Voyager one was routing the data through this computer

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>system in the first place. We still don't know that answer,

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>but hopefully this will at least be a temporary fix

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for the problem. The team also came up with a

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>new schedule for firing spacecraft thrusters for both Voyager one

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and Voyager two in order to reduce the frequency of

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>those thrustering ignitions for a couple of reasons. One, obviously,

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a limited amount of fuel, right like, you don't

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>have infinite fuel on the spacecraft. But the other one

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>is that each time you fire the thrusters, it builds

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit of residue on the inlet tubes

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>that feed into those thrusters. So the concern is that

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>if they kept up with a more frequent schedule, that

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>build up would reach a point where it would interfere

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>with the thrusters. So now they'll do it less frequently

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully extend the useful life of the spacecraft. And

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they're obviously not going to work forever, but the hope

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>is to extend their lifespans a little bit more as

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>they continue on into interstellar space. Now I have a

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of articles that I'm going to recommend, but before

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I do, I do have one final story, and that

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>is Martin Getz has passed away at the age of

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>ninety three. Gets was the first person to secure a

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>US patent for software. He did that back in nineteen

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight. Now, I've talked about this before when I

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>did an episode about the Patent Office, because the idea

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of patenting software was one that had some major hurdles

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to overcome. And that's because the US Patent Office has

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>rules on what you can and cannot patent. One thing

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that you cannot patent is a mathematical process, and there

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>are arguments to be made that software ultimately is really

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>just a series of mathematical processes, and as such, software programs, etc.

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Are not viable candidates for patents. That was the argument. Ultimately,

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the Patent Office rejected this idea, at least within certain parameters,

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and Gets his work in data sorting software became the

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>first to receive a patent from the US Patent Office.

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Gets really campaigned for this in large part because independent

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>software developers had no protection for their work. So let's

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>say that someone came up with a really useful program

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>like sorting data in a mainframe computer system, Well, nothing

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>would stop a massive company with practically unlimited resources from

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>just copying or reverse engineering that software and using it

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>for themselves and never paying the developer anything. So Getz

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>pointed out that would be unfair. It's not fair to

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>just stand by while very powerful tech companies could steal

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the work from independent programmers just because there are no

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>protective measures in place. So his patent set a precedent,

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and it meant that programmers had a chance to secure

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>their work and protect their livelihoods. And I think that's

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a good thing, So rest in peace, Martin gets Now

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that wraps up our stories. But there are a couple

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of articles that I would like to recommend you check

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>out if you have the time. Again, I have no

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 1>connection to these media outlets. I do not know the

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>writers personally or professionally. I just thought these were good

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>articles and you should check them out if you've got

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>time and you're interested. So first up is a piece

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>by Jennifer Pattinson Twoey of The Verge. It's titled Matter

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>one point two is a big move for the smart

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>home standard. Now I'll have to do a full episode

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>about Matter in the future and how the goal is

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to create a foundation for smart home technologies, but this

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>article gives a great overview of where we're at currently

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in that effort. Secondly, I recommend Ashley Bellinger's article in

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Ours Technica titled will chat GPT's hallucinations be allowed to

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>ruin Your Life? This article covers how AI companies are

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to insulate themselves against stuff like defamation lawsuits, so

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.719
<v Speaker 1>that if their AI chatbot claims that I don't know

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that you go around kicking puppies or something, you wouldn't

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to sue them for ruining your reputation. I

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's valuable to read that as well because it

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>very much plays upon the concepts of accountability and artificial

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>intelligence agents very important, really, and it highlights something that

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is kind of in this gray area when it comes

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to the law. You know, we're starting to define AI

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in a legal sense through various court cases. For example,

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the court case that determined that AI is incapable of

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>holding a copyright. You cannot copyright a work that was

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>created by AI because human authorship is a key component

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of copyright as it is defined today. So that's kind

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of how you know, we have to define things in

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the court system. It has to be done by the

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>decisions of judges in various trials. So a very important

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>part of the adoption of artificial intelligence inside the United States.

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>And that wraps up the tech news for Tuesday, October two,

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty forth twenty twenty three. I hope you are all

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>well and I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.