WEBVTT - #161 Wrongful Conviction: Junk Science - Gunshot Residue Evidence

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>It's Saturday night. You're in your front yard working on

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>your moped. Your dad is sitting on the picnic bench,

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>chatting with you as you install a new starter. You

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and your friend Alan saved up all year so you

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.959
<v Speaker 1>could each buy a bike. Neither one of them is

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in great condition, but now that school is out you

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>have all summer to fix them up. After a little while,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>your friend Schante arrives at your house and he says, hey,

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Alan's bike has a flat. He wants us to come

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>help him fix it. And you're thinking again, his bike

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>is always breaking down. It's always got some kind of problem.

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>At first, you were a little jealous of Alan's red

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>raz but that guy keeps getting flats. You pat the

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:46.279
<v Speaker 1>seat on your brown moped. It's pretty ugly, but at

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>least it's faithful. You ask your dad if it's cool

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>if you go over to Alan's grandmothers to get the bike.

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>He looks at his watch and says, well, it's pretty late,

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>but hurry up, go get it and you can bring

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it back here to work on it. When you and

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Schante get to Alan's, Chante heads inside to help Alan

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>with the bike. Another flat. You say, when Alan comes

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>out of his house. Don't even start, Alan says, tossing

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you a can of soda. You hang out for a bit,

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and then the three of you start walking Alan's bike

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>towards your house. You're teasing Alan about how often his

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>mopet has problems when a green sedan coming from the

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>opposite direction stops right next to you. The man driving

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the car leans out the window and says, hey, you

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>guys have any dope?

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Nah?

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Alan says, we don't mess with that shit. Yell at

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the guy, Hey, man, get out of here, and the

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>green car speeds off. You walk a bit further down

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:47.199
<v Speaker 1>the block, and then you hear shots ring out. Oh shit.

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>All three of you start frantically running down the street

0:01:53.440 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and don't look back. You don't stop running until you

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>get back to your house. You look around, making sure

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>no one's shooting at you, and then you catch your breath.

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>You Chante and Allen talk about the gunshots for a

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>few minutes. It's not that out of the ordinary in

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>this neighborhood, but still it's totally scariest shit when it happens.

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>The adrenaline finally wears off and you start working on

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Alan's bike there's a nail in the tread of the tire.

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>You pull it out, plug the hole, and let the

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>glue set. After pumping up the tire and giving it

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a few good pushes, Alan grabs his bike and begins

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to walk it back down the street toward his grandmother's house.

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Once Alan gets to his street, he sees the green

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 1>car that stopped to ask for drugs, but now its

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>front end is just demolished. It's smashed into the side

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of a house a few doors down from his grandmother's.

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>There's smoke and chaos and police just everywhere. Over the

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>next few days, you expect to see Alan riding as

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>red raz after all, the tire is fixed, but you

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>don't see him around the neighborhood. A week passes, you

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>knock on his door and his grandmother tells you that

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the man in the green car had been shot. The

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>cops asked Alan to come to the police station to

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 1>help with the investigation. She expected Alan to be home

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that same night, but he's being held in jail. She's

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>afraid and confused, and suddenly so are you. A few

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>weeks later, you're in your backyard throwing a tennis ball

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>against the side of your house, worrying about Alan, wondering

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>if he's okay. Out of the corner of your eye,

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you see some people walking towards you and it's four

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>police officers. At first you freeze, overcome with fear, and

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>then you take off. He took Alan for no reason.

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>What's going to stop them from grabbing you and doing

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. But you're fourteen years old. They're bigger

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>than you, faster, and there's more of them. They catch up,

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>grab you and put you in handcuffs. Your first thought

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is I'm going to disappear, just like Alan. You're putting

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>an interrogation room. You tell the officers what happened that night,

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>the night the guy in the green car got shot,

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 1>how you and Alan told him to go away. But

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to hear the truth. They don't want

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to hear anything you're telling them. One of the detectives, Scoots,

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>is seat closer to you. We know Alan did this.

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 1>His hands tested positive for gunpowder residue. You know what

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 1>that is, Son, We know he was involved. You're going

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to tell us what Alan did. You're going to tell

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>us that Alan had the gun, that you saw that gun,

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>and that what he did is he went up to

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that car that stopped and he talked to the guy

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in the car, And the next thing you knew was

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you heard gunshots and you saw Alan running. And I'm

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna tell you something you don't tell us exactly that

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>here's what's gonna happen. You're gonna get charged with murder.

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>You got that. You know how much power these guys have.

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>They already have Alan, who knows what they're gonna do

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to you. You're petrified. The walls feel like they're closing

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>in on you. You figure, I should just tell these

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>guys what they want to hear. Then my parents can

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>help sort this out later. So you do what they say.

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>You make up a story, one that sounds like what

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>they want to hear, and they record it. You'll tell

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>them anything just to get out of that room. Before

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>letting you go, the cops tell you you're gonna have

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to testify at Alan's trial. We'll see you. Then. A

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>few weeks pass, and you're relieved when school starts again.

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this will distract you from thinking about Alan, from

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the feeling that it's your fault. He's still sitting in

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>jail the day of Allen's trial. You and Chante decide

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to show up. You're not going to

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>testify against your friend, lie again and dig a deeper

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>hole for Allan. But the cops show up at your

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>school and they bring you both to court. At Alan's trial,

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>an officer takes the stand and says that he personally

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>collected samples from Allan's hands. He swabbed the front and

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>back of them with Q tips and then tested those

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Q tips to see if there was gunpowder residue present.

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>The officer testifies the defendant's right hand tested positive for

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.679
<v Speaker 1>antimony and bury him two chemical elements that are present

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 1>in gunpowder residue. There is no doubt in my mind

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that the defendant shot the gun that was used in

0:06:54.920 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>this homicide. This is insane. You think you know Alan

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and didn't have a gun. He was with you when

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 1>those shots rang out. How can they just make this

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff up? When you're on the witness stand, you glance

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>over at the jury. They're all sitting forward, staring right

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>at you, through you. It seems. The prosecutors start asking

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you all of these questions. Your answers are all over

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the place. They barely make sense. You were told to

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>tell lies, but it's hard to keep it all straight

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>because none of what you're testifying to actually happened. But

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>at seventeen years old, Alan is convicted of murder and

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>sentenced to fifteen years to life in prison. The gunshot

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>residue that the police and prosecutors claim was found on

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Alan's hand is the only physical evidence linking him to

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the crime. The story you just heard is based on

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the true events of Raymond Carl Alan Warren's trial. He

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>was convicted of murder based on faulty gunshot residue evidence.

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>The police also coorused his two friends, Chante and Antonio,

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>into giving false testimony, saying that Allan committed the crime.

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Allan is now in his forties and he is still

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in prison. He's been there for over twenty five years,

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>serving a sentence of fifteen to life for a murder

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>he did not commit. I'm Josh Dubin, civil rights and

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>criminal defense attorney and innocent ambassador to the Innocence Project

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Today, on Wrongful Conviction Junk Science, we

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>examined gunshot residue evidence. As listeners to this show, you've

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 1>probably heard how coerse confessions are used to convict innocent

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>people on another podcast in our feed wrongful conviction, false Confessions. Now,

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the coerse confessions of Shanta and Antonio were certainly factors

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>in convicting Allan at his trial, but today our focus

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>is on faulty forensic science and gunshot residue certainly has

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>its issues that began almost a century ago.

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 3>When three dozen former Brooklyn Navy yard workers found themselves

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 3>irreparably poisoned by the asbestos they used in the construction

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 3>of the battleships that won World War Two. Perry White

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 3>and Arthur Luxembourg literally put everything on the line to

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 3>successfully represent them. Since then, they've championed the rights of

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 3>over fifty thousand regular Americans injured through the negligence and

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 3>malfeasance of mainly large corporations. Their ability to level the

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 3>playing field against seemingly insurmountable odds has led them to

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 3>litigate against opponents as diverse as Big Pharma all the

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 3>way to those responsible for rendering the water of Flint,

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Michigan undrinkable. Whites and Luxembourg take it personally when there's

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 3>a miscarriage of justice anywhere, and therefore they feel a

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 3>sense of responsibility to support Bramfel conviction podcasts. You can

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 3>learn more about them by visiting whiteslux dot com. That's

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 3>w e I t z l ux dot com.

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen thirty three, a group of American police officers

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>from several departments gathered in a lab at the police

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>headquarters in Mexico City. They were there to observe Teodoro

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Gonzalez demonstrate his new technique for testing gunpowder residue. The

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>test became known by many names, the dermal nitrate tests,

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the glove tests, but my favorite might be the paraffin

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>gauntlet test. The officers watched as Gonzales poured white, hot

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>liquid paraffin wax over the fingers, hands, and wrists of

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>his lab assistant. A glimmer of discomfort flashed across the

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>assistant's eyes as the hot wax code his skin. Next,

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 1>Gonzales delicately wrapped the layer of cotton around the assistant's

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>fingers and hands. Layer after layer of wax, then cotton

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 1>were added until gloves began to form while the paraffin cooled.

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Gonzales explained that after a suspect fires a gun, the

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>gunpowder residue becomes embedded deep in the pores of the skin.

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Even weeks after a gun is fired. The hot melted

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>paraffin will open up the pores, mix with the oils

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>in the skin, and cause the pores to discharge the

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>gunpowder residue trapped within them. Part of this experiment included

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Gonzalez's assistant firing a gun and then washing his hands

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>prior to them being wrapped. The American officers noted the

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>advantage of this technique, suspects couldn't simply wash their hands

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and avoid detection. Gonzales delicately peeled the gloves from the

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>hands of his assistant and then took them over to

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the lab table and gently laid them down. He measured

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a small beaker of a chemical solution that contained sulfuric acid.

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Drop by drop, he coated the interior of the gloves

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>with the mixture. Minutes later, dark blue specks the size

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of pinpoints began to form, and Gonzales explained that these

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>blue dots indicated the presence of dermal nitrates from gunpowder residue.

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>The police officers huddled around the paraffin gloves to see

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>for themselves. After that, it took only a few years

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>for the paraffine test to become widely used in police

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>departments across the United States. Within three years of Gonzalez's demonstration,

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it was used as forensic evidence in the murder trial

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of James L. Westwood in Pennsylvania. At his trial, the

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 1>state called expert witnesses who testified the gunpowder rene was

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>present on Westwood's hands, indicating that it was he who

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>shot and killed his wife. But Westwood's defense attorney called

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>his own expert witnessed, a chemist who had conducted his

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>own study and found that thirteen different substances could also

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>cause the blue dots to appear on the paraffin gloves.

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:27.839
<v Speaker 1>He cited things like ordinary soot, certain brands of toothpaste,

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>tobacco cigars, cigarette ashes, and different types of matches, but

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>none of that evidence mattered for the jury. Westwood was

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>convicted of the first degree murderer of his wife and

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>sentenced to life in prison. By nineteen sixty seven, a

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>wider study concluded that rust, colored fingernail polish, and residue

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 1>from evaporated urine, soap, and tapwater would all test positive.

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Contact with any of these objects would create blue dots

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to appear on the gloves in a paraffin test. The

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>paraffine test is no longer being used today, and the

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>signs behind testing gunshot residue has changed. By the time

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>Allan was arrested in nineteen ninety four, at sixteen years old,

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>officers used a new version of the test. It's called

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the atomic absorption test, but that test has many of

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the same reliability problems as the paraffin glove.

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 2>None of the evidence that was used to convict Alan

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 2>has withstood the test of time. The test used to

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 2>indicate that he had gunshot residue on his hands is

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 2>no longer considered reliable.

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>So joining us today is Joanna Sanchez and she's from

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the Wrongful Conviction Project at the Office of the Ohio

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Public Defender and we're super excited to have her today.

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>She's currently representing Alan, whose story we talked about at

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of this episode. Now, Alan Allan's full name

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>is Raymond Carl Allan Warren, and Joanna might refer to

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>him as either Alan or Raymond, but don't get confused, okay,

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>because Raymond and Alan are the same person. So Joanna,

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it's great to have you here today and I'd like

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you to start by telling us a little bit about Alan.

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>What was he like as a sixteen year old living

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>in Dayton, Ohio.

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Alan was, by all accounts, a normal teenager. He had

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 2>a few brothers and he's very close with them. He's

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 2>close with his mother, very close with his grandmother. You know,

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 2>had lots of friends in the neighborhood, would spend time

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 2>with them. Alan loves working on cars, so that was

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 2>something he spent a lot of time doing, both fixing

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 2>cars and painting them, playing basketball. And now you know,

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 2>I've known him now for six years. He's a very engaging,

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 2>caring person, very talkative, has strong relationships with his family

0:15:58.040 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 2>and friends.

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Still, so I want to get into the details of

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the crime a little bit. So police officers arrive on

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Allen Street the night when he had been fixing his

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>moped and this green car had crashed into the side

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of a house and the driver is shot. So what

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>makes them even decide to go after Allan as a

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>suspect in the first place?

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's a matter of circumstance. The boys,

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 2>they worked on their scooters for a period of time

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 2>after they heard the gunshots, and then in order to

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 2>go home, Alan had to essentially go through the crime

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 2>scene because it happened on the street he was living

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 2>on with his grandma's. So Alan that night told the

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 2>police about this encounter with the victim, and the police

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 2>asked him if he was willing to come down to

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 2>the police station to give a statement. So he voluntarily

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 2>went to the police station and also voluntarily submitted to

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 2>a gunshot residue test. And the result of that gunshot

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 2>residue test was that Alan tested negative on his left

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 2>hand even though he's left handed, and the palm of

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 2>his right hand, though, tested positive for two elements that

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 2>are known to be in gunshot residue. And I honestly

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 2>think once that gunshot residue test came back, they just

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 2>became laser focused on Alan.

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So tell us a little bit about that test. What

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly did gunshot residue testing entail at the time when

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Alan went down to that police station.

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 2>So, gunshot residue testing, the idea behind it is that

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 2>one a person shoots a firearm, particles will be admitted

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 2>that will land on their clothing, or their hands or

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 2>their face, and that those particles can then be tested.

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 2>You can't see them, but they can be tested and

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 2>tell the please something about whether the person being tested

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 2>might have shot a firearm. All gunshot residue testing is

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 2>not a simple yes or no test. This is gunshot

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 2>residue or it's not. What it's really testing for is

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 2>the elements that are known to make up gunshot residue.

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 2>So specific they test for three elements in most circumstances,

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 2>and that's lead, barium, and antimony. In Raymond's case, they

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 2>actually only tested for two of those elements, and what

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 2>they used was an atomic absorption test, which is now

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 2>largely out of use, and that's because it has a

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 2>high risk of producing false positives. So the reason the

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 2>AA test is unreliable is because it tests for elements

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 2>that are also present in items that are completely unrelated

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 2>to guns. So as a result, a person who's never

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 2>touched or been near a gun could falsely test positive.

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So Joanna, give us an example. What are some things

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that Alan might have touched that would make him test

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>positive for gunshot residue.

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Brake linings are one example of an item that has

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 2>the same elements as gunshot residue, and on the night

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 2>of the shooting, as we know, Raymond, who frequently was

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 2>working on cars, had contact with brake linings while he

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 2>fixed his motorized scooter. So the AA test as used

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 2>in Raymond's case is problematic because we can't know if

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 2>those two elements came from gunshot residue or if they

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 2>came from brake linings or some other substance that has

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 2>those same elements as gunshot residue.

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned that the AA test, the atomic absorption

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>test that was used on Allen, is not really considered

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>any more to be dependable, but they're still using gunshot

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>residue as a form of evidence, just with new tests.

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Has signs progressed in any significant way since the AA test.

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Gunshot residue testing generally has progressed somewhat. The AA test

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 2>is no longer really in favor because of its limitations,

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 2>and there was a switch over in the mid two

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 2>thousands to a test called SEMEDS, and that test was

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>better in that it not only would tell an analyst

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 2>whether those elements were present, but also could tell them

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.199
<v Speaker 2>the shape and size of the elements and sort of

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 2>how they function together, whether they were fused, whether they

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 2>were the shape of a sphere, all things that would

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 2>be important for distinguishing between gunshot residue and let's say

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 2>another substance. And so in order for an analyst to

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 2>have any confidence that something is actually gunshot resume, they'd

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 2>need to do that sort of morphological analysis and also

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 2>compare all of the elements in that gunshot resdue sample

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 2>with all of the elements in other substances so that

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 2>they can actually eliminate other items.

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So that sounds like it does have the potential

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>to be a more accurate test because you're able to

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>look at the residue under a microscope and tell that

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>the molecules actually come from a gun and can't be

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>from anywhere else. But is this a perfect fix?

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Even if that's done properly, there's still a second issue

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 2>with gunshot resdue testing, and that's the reason why the

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 2>scientific community has really pulled back from this testing, and

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 2>that issue is contamination. So gunshot residue is incredibly transferable.

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>It's very easy to pick it up by touching a

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:16.160
<v Speaker 2>surface that's contaminated with gunshot residue. So if I were

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 2>to shoot a gun and shake your hand, you could

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 2>very likely test positive for gunshot residue and with that,

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 2>that creates just too big of a risk for environmental contamination.

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 3>And what it.

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Means is that, you know, people who touch the back

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 2>of police cars, handcuffs, police officers, police stations, there's a

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 2>good chance they could pick up gunshot residue from those surfaces,

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 2>even though they themselves never touched a gun. And we

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 2>know that happened in Raymond's case because he was transported

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 2>to the police station in the back of a police

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.479
<v Speaker 2>car and then held in an interrogation room for several

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 2>hours before he was actually tested. If on the call

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.439
<v Speaker 2>before that police officer had taken somebody who shot a

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 2>gun down to the police station, that person could have

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 2>left gunshot resdue there and then Alan gets in the

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 2>car and picks it up. And there have been studies

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 2>across the country that show that kind of thing occurs.

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 2>So there is a study in Colorado where they tested

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 2>I think forty police cars excuse me, twenty six police

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 2>cars and they found gunshot residue particles and fourteen of them.

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 2>So this kind of transference is very common, unfortunately.

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So and you know, in hearing this, I got to

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>tell you, this is like it's startling, it's scary. And

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you initially start to think, well, how many people might

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>have been wrongfully convicted when the evidence in their case

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 1>was just gunshot residue on their hands. I mean, you

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>have to admit it's pretty compelling evidence for people that

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know otherwise. And I mean what I mean for

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>people that don't know otherwise, I'm talking about jurors. So

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>with that in mind, how big of a role did

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>faulty gunshot residue evidence plane Allen's case?

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 2>The gunshot residue evidence here was critical in Alan's trial.

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 2>The examiner when he testified, what he said was that

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 2>this positive test means one of three things. Either Alan

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 2>shot a gun, Alan was a victim of a shooting,

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 2>or Alan handled ammunition. We we know he wasn't a victim,

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 2>and both of the other options still implicate him, whether

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 2>he's shooting a gun or handling ammunition. What the examiner

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 2>left out is the fourth possibility that this is contamination

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 2>and the fifth possibility, which is that it's not gunshot

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 2>residue at all. It could just be barium and antimony

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 2>on Alan's hands as a result of him having contact

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 2>with brake linings earlier that night, and that is the

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 2>entire scope of the physical evidence in this trial.

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So as a result of this gives gunshot residue evidence,

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Alan gets sentenced to fifteen years to life. He's only

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.719
<v Speaker 1>seventeen years old. I mean, what options did he have

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to seek recourse? How would one go about proving that

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 1>gunshot residue evidence is false.

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 2>It's incredibly difficult for anybody who's incarcerated to collect the

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 2>evidence or knowledge necessary to file a new trial motion

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 2>or raise a claim that they were wrongfully convicted. So

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 2>part of that is he's locked inside, so he can't

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 2>go out and conduct any sort of investigation. He lacks

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 2>the funds, so he doesn't have the ability to hire

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 2>an attorney or an investigator or an expert witness to

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:46.479
<v Speaker 2>go get this evidence. Alan was challenged and that he

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 2>couldn't even get the records in his case. So if

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 2>he wanted to write a motion for a few years,

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 2>he did not even have a copy of his transcript

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 2>that would have helped him to do that. So there

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 2>are so many barriers. He's a smart guy, but he's

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 2>not an attorney. I mean, that's why we say people

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 2>should have attorneys to litigate these complex issues. Is incredibly difficult,

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 2>and it's all the more so for somebody who's a

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 2>teenager and they're incarcerated. They don't have access to these things.

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 2>And so he fought on his own for years and

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 2>years to try to challenge his conviction. The kind of

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 2>changes and evolution with gunshot residue was happening, but he

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 2>did not really know that. He didn't have access to

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 2>forensic science articles or expert witnesses, so he wasn't even

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 2>aware that that was necessarily an issue in his case.

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 2>And eventually, in nineteen ninety nine, Chantey Hunt gave a

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 2>statement and said, I lied because I was scared. Alan

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 2>was with us when we heard the shots, so he

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 2>could not have shot the victim. And in two thousand

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 2>and eight, Antonio gave a very similar statement saying, again,

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I was scared, and this is a lie, and I

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 2>did not come for all these years because I was

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 2>scared of purgery charges.

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Now the Innocence Project has become involved in Allen's case,

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and you and your co counsel are fighting to get

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Allan justice. But as our listeners know by now, as

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you and I can agree, this problem is

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>so much bigger than Alan's case, what needs to happen,

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in your opinion, to make sure things like gunshot residue

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>evidence stop being used to convict innocent people so that

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't happen again and again and again.

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 2>I think police officers and lab examiners should be careful

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 2>about when they do gunshot resdue testing and only do

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 2>it in the very optical circumstances, if at all. I

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 2>think there are some police officers who feel that it's

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 2>just a piece of the puzzle and it's a helpful

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 2>tool and the investigation. But I think the risk with

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 2>that is that it leads to tunnel vision. You know,

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 2>once you have that piece of evidence, you become fixated

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 2>on a suspect, and our courts, our judges, need to

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 2>look at it critically as well. The court is the

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 2>gatekeeper of expert testimony and forensic evidence that comes in,

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 2>and what we're seeing is that some courts are limiting

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 2>what can be said about gunshot rest of evidence, but

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 2>they're still allowing it in. And I think at some

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 2>point we hit a breaking point where the risk of

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 2>prejudice for this evidence outweighs the benefit of it because

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 2>it is so unreliable and so many different aspects that

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 2>are we risking swaying the jury with evidence that really

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 2>isn't reliable enough and shouldn't be presented at all all.

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, So that certainly addresses what people involved in the

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>justice system can do, But what can every day people do.

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>We have a lot of our listeners asking us, you know,

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>what can I do to help? So please tell them

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>things they can do to make sure that this kind

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of junk science stops being used and it gets out

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of our criminal justice system once and for all.

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I think the biggest thing is people sharing this information

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 2>and sharing podcasts like this, sharing when somebody is exonerated

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 2>based on forensic evidence that we now know has been discredited.

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.199
<v Speaker 2>Is the more people that know about this, I think

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 2>the more the system will improve. I think the impact

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.919
<v Speaker 2>of sharing this podcast and sharing his story is that

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:27.719
<v Speaker 2>more people hear about it, and then they take that

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.679
<v Speaker 2>knowledge with them when they vote, and they take that

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 2>knowledge with them when they interact with public officials and

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 2>ask them, how do you approach wrongful convictions? How do

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>you approach forensic science? Are their laws in place that

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 2>allow for these convictions to be challenged appropriately? And I

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 2>think having the knowledge that's gained from listening to a

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 2>podcast like this equips people with the sort of the

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 2>talking points and the ability to ask those questions of

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 2>public officials.

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:00.479
<v Speaker 1>So tell us a little bit about where Ellen is

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>now and what options are left for him at this point.

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Now, Alan had litigated emotion asking for a new trial,

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 2>and we stepped into that litigation on his behalf in

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourteen, and it's kind of been up and down

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 2>through the courts over several years. But earlier this year

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court of Ohio decided not to take his case.

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 2>So where we're at is we continue to fight for him,

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 2>and we believe strongly in his innocence and that he

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 2>was wrongfully convicted, and so we're moving forward. We're hoping

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 2>to find new evidence or hoping that a new avenue

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 2>of relief opens up that allows Alan to challenge his

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 2>conviction and hopefully one day go home.

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Look, Joanna, I my heart sort of you know, aches

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>for you and for Alan really because I have been

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>there before. I know that when cases you know, don't

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>work out, you know on our initial first try or

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>first fifteen tries and go the way we need them

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to go. Because our clients are innocent and we know

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>they're innocent. It can be so frustrating. What's your reaction

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>when you have setbacks like this. I know that I've

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>wept on my wife's shoulder before, I know that I

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>have punched walls. I've had the spectrum of emotions. But

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, tell me a little bit about what it's

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>like for you when you know you're faced with setbacks

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>like this, and you know what it's like with Alan

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>still sitting in prison.

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 2>I think the important thing we do is we kind

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 2>of keep moving forward and keep thinking about our clients,

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 2>keep thinking about Alan and what he's going through, And

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 2>it's so important that we stay in the fight and

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 2>continue to be a voice for those people. And I

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 2>hope one day it's not this way. But I know

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 2>for me, I look at all the two thousand plus

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 2>exonerations that we know about, and I see that those

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 2>are never easy, right. They come after set back, and

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 2>people have to try multiple different times, multiple different ways.

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 2>And so I hope that at some point in time

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't have to be that way. But at least

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 2>for now, I know that it's absolutely worth it to

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 2>keep fighting for this person and to keep hoping that

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 2>one day something we do works and somebody pays attention

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 2>and that he gets the justice he's do.

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I tell people all the time that these

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>wrongful convictions are super difficult. You have to fight tall odds,

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>You have to keep on fighting forward in the face

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of constant rejection from appellate courts. And if you're not

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>willing to deal with setbacks, if you can't pick yourself

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>up and dust yourself off and keep charging up that

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>steep slope, you're really in the wrong business. And it

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>really does take a team effort. So the more you

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>can share these stories, the better off we're all going

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to be, because there's power in numbers, and there's power

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in a collective message. So I hope you will do

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>just that. Please share our podcast and take action, whether

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it be writing your local judges as I often implore

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you all to do, or ensuring that when you vote,

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you are voting for those judges and the jurisdiction which

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you live that actually have the qualifications and the temperament

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to be open minded and thorough such that they won't

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>blindly accept that legal precedent equates to reliability. Sometimes bad

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>science remains in our system of justice because it goes unchallenged.

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>It's up to all of us to shine a bright

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>light on these junk sciences and force a reckoning. Next week,

0:32:56.280 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll explore the junk science of tool mark identification with

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>science journalist Tim Recorth. Wrongful Conviction Junk Science is a

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:08.959
<v Speaker 1>production of Lava for Good Podcasts and association with Signal

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Company Number One. Thanks to our executive producer Jason Flamm

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and the team at Signal Company Number One executive producer

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Wortis and senior producers Karen Kornhaber and Britz Spangler.

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Our music was composed by Jay Ralph. You can follow

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>me on Instagram at Dubin dot Josh. Follow the Wrongful

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Conviction podcast on Facebook and on Instagram at Wrongful Conviction

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and on Twitter at wrong Conviction