WEBVTT - FFW Micro - Treylon Burks

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>You found Fantasy Football Weekly Micro a deep dive on

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>one player in just five.

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 2>To ten minutes. Now here's your host.

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Paul Chargian Fantasy Football Weekly Micro Edition. I am Paul

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Charchie and my co host, as usual for these micros,

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 3>Tyler Kannabilely Guillotine Leagues Dot Com writer. Hey Tyler, Hello,

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Today we are breaking down and this week it's all winners. Veterans,

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 3>no rookies, all veteran winners from the draft for one

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 3>reason or another, and they're all different. Who were breaking

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 3>down today?

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I call Traylon Burks a veteran,

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>but sophomore wide receiver. Treylon Burks finished last year as

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver eighty one, currently the wide receiver thirty

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>nine and twenty twenty three ADP, and personally my personal opinion,

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>I think he's one of the biggest winners of this

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>draft no one has talking about. I'm seeing all this

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins stuff we've done. And another one, Tony Pollard,

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>huge winner in the draft. Two I was wrong about

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast, all about how they were in draft Someboddy, yeah,

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and they drafted Deuce Fond but not I would he's

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>like Tony Pollard two point zero.

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 2>And if he's like he's just taller short.

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 3>Not Tony Pollard, and and and he is not gonna

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 3>be as good as Tony Pollard.

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I agree, but uh, trailing Burks like they

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>he is right now on the depth chart, it is

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>trailing Burks, and.

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 4>It is nobody.

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Their leading receiver last year was Robert Woods, who had

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and.

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:25.839
<v Speaker 2>Twenty seven yards.

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 3>That's and now Bears and now he's a leading receiver.

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's not even just the wide receiver position, that's

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>just anybody on the team.

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 4>Oh that's terrible.

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.639
<v Speaker 3>But that also doesn't does not bode well.

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 4>For trailing Burks.

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Trailing Burks couldn't get past Robert Woods five hundred and

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven yards. But trailing Brooks was he was coming

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 3>off al by the way.

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>He was dealing with all that concussion stuff, and he

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>had some other naggy grind.

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 4>He had a grind and he had a concussion.

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 3>He played, he started eleven games, he finished ten of

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 3>the eleven games.

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 4>He got the grind and won.

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 3>And I think they can cut which was still a

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 3>full game.

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 2>But yes, if you remember the play on the concussion.

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>It was against the Eagles, catches the ball in the

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>end zone, gets knocked out in the end zone.

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 2>Concussions, right, So.

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 3>That's right, Yeah, thank you. I had forgotten about that. Yeah,

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 3>there's nobody else on roster to steal receptions away from Burkes. Uh,

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Chig and Konkwo is the closest thing they have to

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 3>a threat and Chig.

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 4>But chicks can be very sexy.

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, for sure, we should do We should do

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.119
<v Speaker 3>an episode in him sometimes I love to. Yeah, that'd

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 3>be fun. Uh Man, he looked, he looked really good.

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Lots of question marks to me about trailing Burke's base

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 3>and what we saw last year.

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm worried about volume. I'm worried about his role in this.

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Offense, and I'm worried about talent. I know you're not

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 3>as much, but let's talk it through a little bit.

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I like so, I liked him coming out of college.

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought he's gonna be a really good receiver. Now

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to be one of these Garrett Wilson's

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>where he's gonna get command a lot of targets. I

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>think his comp and I hate that people gave him

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>this comp coming out of college is more the AJ

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Brown in Tennessee, where a J. Brown wasn't necessarily catching

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>ten balls a game. It was all those across the

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>field drag routes, quick slants, and it was run after

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the catch. And that's where Treylon Burke can really excel

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is that run after the catch category. His kind of

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>his one nice game was against Green Bay. We had

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>eight targets, seven catches and one hundred eleven yards that

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I remember a deep ball to him I think late

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:24.119
<v Speaker 1>in the game to close that one out.

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, so but that was week eleven, right, so

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.839
<v Speaker 3>he posts sort of like a statement game in week

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 3>eleven trailing Burg's does that You mentioned the seven catches,

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and eleven yards and you'd think based on

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 3>that it would have continued, But no, it didn't. The

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 3>next week had seventy yards and the next week I

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 3>think he literally had no yards, had no catches.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but do you remember their quarterback situation he was

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>dealing with. Tannehill was kind of in and out of

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that lineup that. Yeahd Malik Willis for at least probably

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>four games who they were like.

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 2>We're done.

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 4>They didn't even like pass.

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 2>We've seen him though after.

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 4>One year of the leak and we stiled the ripcord

0:03:58.000 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 4>on Lily.

0:03:58.400 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Not only was it after one year, We're gonna st

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Josh Dobbs and it must win game against Jacksonville.

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 3>So Dobb's gonna look that bad either, Actually.

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:06.119
<v Speaker 2>He didn't look that bad.

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think you give Burke some consistent quarterback play

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and you keep him in in what we've seen aj

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Brown be good on the top of it. It's not

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>like it's not to say he like he's doom from

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the start. I think he can do it. It's just

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 1>whether or not he's gonna take that next step if

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>he can get some consistency in the offense.

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a very nice bet.

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, but Kenny get the consistency in this offense, I

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I mean, so Tannehill's there. Tannehill got benched

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 3>effectively this year this past year. Right, So then they

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 3>added Will Levis top of the second round. Is he

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 3>gonna be ready to make an immediate help? Is he

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 3>gonna offer immediate help to trailing Burks?

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 4>I think, I don't know.

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 2>Do you like Will Levis?

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 4>I like him?

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I think I like him? Okay too?

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I like him more than people are making

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>like he went. Probably there were teams in the back

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of the first round who were trying to trade up

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to get him, and because he goes at pick thirty, Yeah,

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a problem.

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah it look, I think Will Levis didn't have many

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 3>landing spots in the latter part of the first round anyway.

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 3>But but regardless, you know, the prospects of will Levin

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Levis in his rookie year powering trail in Burgs is low.

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 4>Let me talk about some of the concerns I've got,

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 4>and it's many.

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 3>The biggest is is Mike Rabel going to make a

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 3>seismic shift in his run first offensive philosophy, Because if

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't, Burks is gonna wither and die and it's

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 3>not gonna matter even how good he is, He's gonna

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 3>have too many games where he just doesn't get any volume.

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 3>You know, we've seen that.

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 3>They brought in a new offensive coordinator, Tim Kelly. He

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 3>was part of a massive offseason overhauled coaching staff. Kelly

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 3>had been Tennessee's passing game coordinator last year. So I'm

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 3>optimistic that he's gonna have a little more of a

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 3>passing orientation here and with Derrick Henry on what feels

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 3>like his last season probably in Tennessee, maybe that's gonna

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 3>be Maybe it's gonna bode for a shift away from

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 3>the run heavy stylings that Mike Vrabel has been known for.

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 3>But without that, the volume just isn't there, and it

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 3>ends up putting you in a position where trailing Burks

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 3>gives you ls. So he started eleven games, he didn't

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 3>even get to double digit fantasy points. Well, you only

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 3>got to double digit fantasy points in the eleven starts

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 3>in three games.

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 4>That's how you lose games.

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Look, I'm not trailing Burks.

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:28.239
<v Speaker 3>Was a league loser for you last year.

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>Or your drafting though it was he really a league loser,

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not like you're that's if you started him.

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>If you started him, yeah, if you started him, he

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>hurt you. Here here's where I'm out trailing Burks. This

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>is kind of my overarching kind of thoughts. Okay, his

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>ADP is so low, and I think he has higher

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>upside than almost anybody.

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 3>That's what is what's trailing Burk's ADP right now?

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Why does he wear thirty nine? That's not that low.

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 4>There's thirty two teams in the league.

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm looking at the names right here, and I

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>think he has higher upside than all but maybe one

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of them. I think he just because he is the guy,

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be the only receiver in this offense.

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't really like Chiga Concole. He doesn't

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 2>really do it for me.

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 4>He was the only guy in this offense.

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Last year, Robert Woods only had five hundred yards.

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know, but I think that was the worst

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>case scenario last year. I think they it's only it

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>can only get better from here. And you said the

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>passing coordinator, he knows how good Trailing Burks is, hopefully

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>hope so.

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 3>So Brooks is a big body guy who I thought

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 3>was going to provide touchdowns as early as his rookie

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 3>year last year. Get this inside the red zone. So

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm talking twenty yards. I'm not talking about like inside

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 3>the five yard line.

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 4>Here inside the red zone.

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Last year, you know how many targets Trailing Burkes had?

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 2>How many four? Four? Here's a lot of years where

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I will push back on that. That's ridiculous.

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>You say he's a bigger guy, and he is. I

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's the bigger, like possession receiver that Mike

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Evans is. I would compare him more to Deebo, where

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>like Debo's not running fades, jumping over you, grabbing out

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>your head. That's not Debo's game. Hylan Burks' game is

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>more similar to Debos, where he's a big body, like

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>get the ball in his hands and he's gonna make

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>something for you happen after the catch.

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Defenses gave Trailing Burks seven yards of average cushion at

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 3>the line of scrimmage, which ranked six the most among

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 3>all wide receivers. But in a lot of ways, that's

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 3>an eth e, a compliment. That's like, you know the

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.239
<v Speaker 3>cornerback is seven yards away from you, because why bother?

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 2>It means your respected speed. That's what I meant. Oh,

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 2>that's what it is. That's not Trailing burks game.

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 4>It's not it's not blazing speed.

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Now blazing speed.

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>But he's a deep I consider him like a deep

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>deep field threat kind of guy.

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think you and I just have a fundamental

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 3>disagreement on who Trailing Burks is at this level.

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, let's play the ADP game and see

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>just see how how far part we are Cadarius Tony Well.

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 4>I can't. I can't try so.

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Cadarius Tony's in the same adp as trailing Burks. I

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 3>can't trust Cadarius Well. Tony gives me huge upside, Like

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 3>if you promised me sixteen games. Well, okay, wait, that's

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 3>what I keep saying about. That's what people said about. Uh.

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 3>A lot of different Kansas City receivers who haven't who

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 3>have not panned out right, me Cole Hardman, Well, if

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Mikol Hardman is gonna play every game, it didn't matter.

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 2>To back it up. I think more than me Cole

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 2>had him.

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm taking Burks.

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh there we go. Point for me, point for you,

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>take books too. Deontay Johnson.

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 4>Touchdowns will be better this year. They have to be zero.

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you had zero and all those catches, you know,

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 3>like ninety catches no touchdowns. I'm taking the sure thing

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 3>that is Deontay Johnson and which should be a better offense.

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Your two in Pittsburgh.

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Troyling Burks has more upside than Deontay

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Johnson though you're two for Kenny Pikett.

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Uh, yeah, I mean at this point to Deantay Johnson

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 3>has proven himself to just be and he's all like,

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, give me the eight catches for the eighty

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 3>yards and he probably won't score. So you don't get

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 3>the upside that Johnson has. So if you're drafting for upside,

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 3>I would concede Trailing Burk's there, all right, Brandon.

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 4>Cooks now in Dallas, Dallas, I'll take.

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna throw out last year, which was just a

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 3>lost season for the whole Houston offense outside of Damian Pierce,

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 3>and I think I'd go back to Brandon Cooks in

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 3>a much better offense.

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm gonna throw out last year for trailing Burks.

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take trail on Burks.

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's fair.

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 2>I like it, all right. Gabe Davis, you.

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Couldn't get it done last year, so what makes me

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 3>think this year is gonna be any different? And they

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.199
<v Speaker 3>drafted another receivers a lot like Gabe Davis, so I

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, he couldn't put pull it together through the

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 3>whole of all of last season.

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 4>So I'm out on Davis.

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Doltink and k could sneakily be their what like past

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>receiving option number two of that offense.

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 4>It's not impossible.

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 3>We talked about him enough Friday's Fantasy Football Weekly because

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 3>he was a first rounder. We did all the first rounders.

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 3>Dude's gonna be a stand up tight end. He's not

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 3>gonna be in the line guy. He's gonna be standing

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 3>in the slot constantly. He might have a higher touchdown

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 3>total than gave Davis Will this year.

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, last one, Johann Dotson.

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 3>We broke down John Dotson, and I came out of

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 3>that way more impressed.

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 4>Than I thought I would. So, yeah, I'd take Dotson.

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 2>I'll con see done this one. I'd rather have Dotson

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 3>Yep, all right, thanks for listening everybody. It's been a

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 3>blast talking. Some of the winners were not quite done yet.

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 3>We've got one more veteran winner from the draft coming

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 3>up for you tomorrow, and then we've also, of course,

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 3>got this week the full version of Fantasy Football Weekly,

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 3>in which we're going to recap the notable players that

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 3>went in the second round and beyond, so we encourage

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 3>you to stay tuned for that as well. Thanks everybody,

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Bye bye,