WEBVTT - Tech Stocks Rally on Hope US Shutdown Nears End

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is a

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>lie from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>York and Ed Lovelow in San Francisco.

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 2>This is a Bloomberg Tech. Coming up, talks continue to

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 2>try and end the US government shutdown, sending airline stocks rallying.

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 2>We'll discuss how AI could play a role in the

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 2>future of travel. Plus, tech and media earnings continue with

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 2>corew Even paramount on the docket after the closing bell,

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 2>and we'll speak with Matt Mayhan, mayor of San Jose

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 2>about the city's growing AI infrastructure and its latest data

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 2>center initiative. First, so check on the market, starting with

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 2>the bigger picture and look at that. We are seeing

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 2>the Nasdaq one hundred surge along with other major indices.

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 2>This is the US Senate advanced as a plan to

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 2>end the longest ever government shutdown. There has gone bid

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 2>lifting tech shares, really driving the rally in equities after

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 2>the tech sector had been hit the hardest in recent days.

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Also coming up, we're going to discuss what to expect

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 2>from tech and media earnings throughout the hour. Core Weaves

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 2>results are expected to raise issues about AI spending after

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 2>last week's sell off. Coryve up one point two percent

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 2>right now, This after a week where was down twenty

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 2>two percent. This is also on the heels of others.

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 2>Spending by tech companies like Meta and Microsoft also paramounts

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 2>guidance down about three tenths of one percent. Ahead of earnings,

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 2>they're expected to report higher revenue and profit. Investors also

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 2>are going to be on the watch for more details

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 2>on the company's reported effort to buy Warner Brothers Discovery

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 2>spending a lot of money too buying up those rights

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 2>to UFC, and that big deal with the Duffer Brothers.

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 2>A group of eight Democrats on Sunday broke the rest

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 2>of their party to vote with Republicans to advance a

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 2>bill to reopen the government on the shutdown's fortieth day.

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Tyler Kendall joins us out of Washington, DC for more. Tyler,

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 2>tell us where we are in the discussion. Where do

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 2>things stand with the Senate back today?

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 5>I hey, Tim, So the Senate advanced this legislation on

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 5>a key procedural vote, but it still has to go

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.519
<v Speaker 5>up to debate and then get a final floor vote

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 5>on the Senate floor, and importantly, any one senator could

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 5>tie up that process. We have our eyes on Senator

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 5>Ran Paul, a Republican from Kentucky. He voted against this

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 5>legislation and could ultimately delay it. However, the broad understanding here,

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 5>we're expecting this legislation to advance out of the Upper

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 5>Chamber and then go to the House later in the week.

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 5>Once the past of the Senate, there are thirty six

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 5>hours for House lawmakers to get back to Washington and vote.

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 5>But we have to look at what's actually in this

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 5>legislation to see some of those pressure points that could

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 5>be building on how Speaker Mike Johnson. This bill would

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 5>fund the government through January thirtieth and then fund some

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 5>key agencies through the rest of the fiscal years. Some

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 5>hardline conservatives may not be happy with that because they

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 5>didn't get the chance to negotiate those longer spending bills.

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 5>This also importantly includes a reverse for mass firings federal

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 5>workers that started on October first, and shields against future

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.239
<v Speaker 5>firings through at least January thirtieth. That of course, goes

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.679
<v Speaker 5>against President Trump's key priority when it comes to reducing

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 5>the federal WORKFORCET, so that also might face some pushback

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 5>when House lawmakers get back to town. I'll say, I'm

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 5>keeping my eye on those moderate Democrats in the House,

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.839
<v Speaker 5>how they could come over and join Republicans, because that's

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 5>what we really saw happen when it came to the Senate.

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 5>They were negotiating, of course, for an extension on those

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 5>Affordable Care Act premium subsidies. The Senate wasn't able to

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 5>get a deal in this legislation, but they were able

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 5>to secure a promise on a vote for an extension

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 5>down the line. We're expecting that to happen by the

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 5>second week of December. See if how Speaker Mike Johnson

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 5>puts anything similar on the floor. At this point, we

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 5>haven't gotten in any indications, but I'd expect some House

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 5>Democrats to push for.

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 3>It, all right.

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Tyler Kendall keeping it on everything happening out of Washington, DC.

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much for that, Tyler well shares of major

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 2>airlines rallying as a potential and to the government shut

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 2>down nears. That's despite one hundred have canceled flights over

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the weekend due to weather and the lack of air

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 2>traffic controllers and President Trump just now weighing in moments

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 2>ago on true social saying, quote, all air traffic controllers

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.119
<v Speaker 2>must get back to work now. Anyone who doesn't will

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 2>be substantially docked. Nancy Shue leads agent for US at Salesforce,

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 2>and joins us now to talk about how AI might

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 2>actually help and be helping in the travel sector. Nancy,

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 2>good to have you with us from our San Francisco studio.

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I got to tell you a.

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Lot of my colleagues, a lot of friends had their

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 2>trips canceled or disrupted over the weekend. It doesn't seem

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 2>like anything could actually help right now. Accept actual air

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 2>traffic controllers and actual TSA agents showing up to work.

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 6>Tim, thanks so much for having me. We are seeing

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 6>with the evolving situation right now at the FAA through

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 6>our own agent platform, Agent Force, that it's really important

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 6>for companies to have agentic solutions and able in order

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 6>to serve their customs daring this very critical time where

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 6>we're seeing a surge in the system. As an example,

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 6>at Agent Force right now, we work closely with Heathrow.

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 6>Heathrow has more than eighty million passengers that walk through

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 6>their airports every single year. And at Heathrow, you know

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 6>those passengers are walking in a four and four am

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 6>in the morning, it could be at noon where they're

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 6>looking for lost luggage, regardless of the time and day. No,

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 6>we have an agent with them called Haley that's helping

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 6>Heathrow passengers right now on the ground, using AI agents

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 6>to address their customer queries, really using that ability for

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 6>AI agents to surge capacity for these companies to build

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 6>more resilient solutions. And this is critical right now with

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 6>the FA situation that's breaking. Enabling our customers and all

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:49.799
<v Speaker 6>the companies that are using AI agents to flex film

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 6>a bit of capacity and really better serve those travelers

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 6>that are on the road today.

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mentioned the President's post on social media just

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 2>in the last hour or so. The post continues to

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 2>say that if if you want to leave service in

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 2>the near future, these are people who are not showing.

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Up to work, he says.

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 2>He says, you will be quickly replaced by true patriots

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 2>who will do a better job on the brand new,

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 2>state of the art equipment, the best in the world

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 2>that we are in the process of ordering that new equipment.

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 2>It's come up fairly often in recent months when talking

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 2>about the challenges at air traffic control and for air

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 2>traffic controllers here in the US, does Salesforce have any

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 2>role in the new air traffic control equipment that is

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 2>being ordered, whether it's software or something else.

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 6>What I can share, Tim, is that we have a

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 6>brand new initiative Mission Force where we're working with national

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 6>security as well as the US government as well as

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 6>allied governments to best support them, using technology and bringing

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 6>them as modern solutions, including RAI to help support national security.

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Today, you've got a great view on the capabilities not

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 2>just now but in the coming years when it comes

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 2>to this technology within our lifetimes. Do you think AI

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 2>could replace air traffic controllers?

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 6>Tim, We are very excited about the vision of enabling

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 6>our customers to be successful using Agent Force, our AI

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 6>agent platform, deploying agents in the travel industry, for example,

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 6>with customers like Engine Heathrows, Singapore Airlines, Thin Air. For US,

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 6>it's really about enabling those companies to work in a

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 6>way where their employees, their humans and AI are partnering

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 6>closely together to enable that to happen. I'll give you

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 6>a very concrete example, Singapore Airlines works closely with agent force. Today,

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 6>with Singapore Airlines, we have over three point five million

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 6>AI workflows that are being run today, and those workflows

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 6>are not actually directly with their customers, but actually servicing

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 6>the humans on the Singapore Airlines team working closely with

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 6>them in cases such as when their service representative is

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 6>helping a customer with a critical issue on the ground.

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 6>Our AI workflows are actually summarizing those cases so that

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 6>those companies, those reps can now better service their customers

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 6>in real time. We think that the future is very

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 6>much AI agents and humans working closely together.

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I certainly understand that from a customer service perspective, Nancy,

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 2>But from the perspective of this high stress decision making

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 2>that takes place in a control tower, is that something

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 2>that could be done by AI and then in the

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 2>future we could sidestep issues and avoid issues such as these.

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 6>AI is a critical part of building a resilient business.

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 6>And I think we're seeing this right now with this

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 6>FAA situation. And it's not just the FAA, right you know,

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 6>right now we're seeing volatility in every market and this

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 6>is not news to us. But what's really exciting, I

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 6>think is that AI agents are actually helping companies become

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 6>more resilient in these volatile markets, not only in travel

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 6>with the companies that I listed earlier, but also we

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 6>have companies like one eight hundred Accountant, right they see

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 6>massive surges during peak tax season and the types of

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 6>queries their customers are coming with help four and we're

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 6>able to, in the case of one eight hundred Accountant,

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 6>help them address more than ninety percent of those cases

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 6>autonomously and to end really serving their customers and ensuring

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 6>that when you do have surges in the system like

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 6>that or these black Swan events, AI agents can help

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 6>these customers be resilient and help them better serve their

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 6>own customers.

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 2>You've mentioned partnerships with Singapore Airlines London's Heathrow Airport, but

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 2>here in the United States do you have partnerships with

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 2>airports that where this technology actually could help in terms

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 2>of air traffic controllers, in terms of helping people who

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 2>are stranded.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we have colleagues who they were.

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:46.439
<v Speaker 2>Told over the weekend that they wouldn't even be able

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 2>to find a flight until Wednesday. And certainly some of

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 2>that is on the airline, but the core of the

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 2>issue still has to do with those people not showing

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 2>up to work on the airport side and the air

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 2>traffic control side.

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 6>TIM, we have customers that we work closely with, like Engine.

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 6>Engine is one of the leading platforms right now that

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 6>is helping do travel management for companies. So it's across

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 6>not just airlines travel flight bookings, but also those hotel

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 6>bookings and those car rentals that are being impacted as

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 6>a result downstream. With a company like Engine, you know,

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 6>they're handling a large volume of customer queries here in

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 6>the US today and in those situations, we're today helping

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 6>them increase or decrease their average handling time by more

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 6>than fifteen percent, and over thirty percent of those complex

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 6>bookings that are happening end to end as well as

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 6>those case resolutions for their customers are being done autonomously

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 6>using agent Force agents, and the impact of that, TIM

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 6>is really helping a company like Engine surge their capacity

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 6>in this critical period so that they're able to flex

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 6>up and down depending on what their customers are needing.

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 6>And right now, of course, the flex is going up.

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Nancy Schue, vice President of AI Product at Salesforce, thanks

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 2>so much for joining us. Today on Bloomberg Tech to

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 2>appreciate it Well. Coming up, we wait earnings from core

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Weave and Paramount, both of these companies set to report

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 2>after the closing bell.

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 3>We've got a.

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Preview what to expect next. This is Bloomberg Tech. Well,

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:32.839
<v Speaker 2>let's take a look at Spotify shares. They've turned lower

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:36.319
<v Speaker 2>amid an announcement out of TikTok, the social platform, teaming

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 2>up with iHeartMedia to create a new TikTok podcast network.

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 2>The deal will feature up to twenty five new podcasts

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 2>hosted by TikTok creators. This is the company looks to

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 2>help creators beyond the TikTok platforms. Spotify shares down about

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 2>one tenth of one percent, I Heeart Media shares down

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 2>about six point three percent. Well, Paramount guidance results do

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 2>add after the closing bell, with investors heavily focused on

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.839
<v Speaker 2>a potential bid for Warner Brothers Discovery. Here with more

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg's Hannah Miller, who covers Media Wow. David Ellison

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 2>has been very busy in his first few months over

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 2>at Paramount sky Dance. Hannah, I know there are a

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of questions about the UFC purchase about the Duffer

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Brothers deal, about the hiring of Barry Weiss, But is

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 2>the big question all about Warner Brothers Discovery and whether

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 2>some or all of those assets go to Paramount's guidance.

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, investors want to hear any updates related to Paramounts

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 7>multiple bids to acquire Warner Brothers Discovery. So far, they've

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 7>been bidding too low. So we'll see what David Ellison

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 7>says today if he gives any insight into their strategy

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 7>going forward.

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Are investors on board with him spending this much money?

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 7>You know, I think investors are surprised. Some are wondering,

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 7>you know, hey, why didn't you go for Warner Brothers

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 7>in the first place instead of Paramount? Might have been

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 7>less complicated, But you know, they want to see what

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 7>David Ellison has in store for Paramount. He has a

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 7>really tech forward approach. He's willing to spend lots of money, So,

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 7>you know, some in the industry are excited to see

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 7>what could happen if these two companies fell under the

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 7>same roof and ownership.

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Hannah Miller follow those results on Bloomberg TV and

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Radio as soon as they come out. After the bell today. Well,

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 2>another company that we are watching, Core We've. Shares, the

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 2>cloud computing firm fell twenty two percent last week.

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 3>This emit a broader pullback in the AI trade.

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Now investors are watching its results closely as concerns grow

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 2>over heavy spending by core Weave's customers. Bloomberg's Dina Bass

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 2>joins us now with more the twenty two percent decline

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 2>and shares last week. The concern about this idea of

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 2>some circular financing, the small number of customers that core

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 2>We've has that really account for a majority of its revenue.

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 2>What's the thing that investors are watching most closely for

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 2>with today's results.

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 4>Dina, As you said, it's the spending and what they

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 4>say about it. It's not just spending by Corewave's customers,

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 4>it's spending by corew weave itself and sort of the

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 4>debt financing, the debt that they're taking on to do that. Think,

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, across the board some of these companies, investors

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 4>are sort of betwixt in between. They on the one hand,

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 4>they want to see spending because it's a solid demand signal.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 4>If companies are spending to expand data centers, it means

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 4>that they think that they're getting more AI business in

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 4>the door. When they stop spending, investors are going to

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 4>worry that that's slowing down. On the other hand, investors

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 4>are also worried that all of that spending just costs

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot of money and what's what's the return? When

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 4>do you start making that back? And so I think

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 4>for core We, there's going to be a you know,

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 4>look at what they're saying about demand signals, what they're

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 4>saying about deals that they've signed about you know, remaining

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 4>performance obligations, so with deals they've already booked and haven't

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 4>been able to fulfill, as well as what's going on

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 4>on the profit or in the case of core We,

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 4>the loss side, you know, in terms of what they're

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 4>spending to get to fulfill those those customer obligations.

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Can core We've actually get everything it needs to build

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 2>the capacity or invest in the capacity that it thinks

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 2>it's customers will need. Can you get the check? Can

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 2>you get the electricity? Can it get the infrastructure?

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 4>Right now, no one is getting everything they need and

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 4>that's you know Corey, you open AI, Microsoft Meta, nobody

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 4>is getting as many chips as they want nobody is

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 4>getting as much power as they think they need. You know,

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 4>it's all coming online rapidly, but not rapidly enough based

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 4>on what these companies think the demand picture looks like.

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Dina Bass joins us now and Dina, thanks so

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 2>much for that update. A reminder, we will have those

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 2>numbers for you as soon as they break after the

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>bell on Bloomberg TV and a radio as well.

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's put all of this spending into context of the

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 2>broader markets as well. With Hillary Frisch, Senior Research analysts

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 2>for Software and IT services at Clearbridge Investments, Healy, good

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 2>to have you on the program.

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 8>Thanks for having me.

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 2>The existential question that Dina was just talking about, when

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 2>is this going to pay off? It's not just with

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Core Weave, it's not just with Microsoft, it's not just

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 2>with meta platforms. This is the existential question that every

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 2>investor asking themselves right now.

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 3>When will it pay off?

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 8>It's the next sistential question.

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 9>However, there's a lot of long range planning occurring at present.

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 9>The commitments that Opening Eye and these ecosystem partners are

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 9>making are stretched out over a very long term horizon,

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 9>and as Dina mentioned, I thought she summarized it will

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 9>nobody can get what they need yet, so it's going

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:28.359
<v Speaker 9>to be an ongoing process of seeing allocations, seeing revenues,

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 9>seeing costs drop, seeing funding, seeing improvement in the across

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 9>the ecosystem, which will reinforce investor confidence in this.

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 8>I think there's a strong belief that.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 9>There is ROI, but investors are paid to evaluate risks

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 9>as well as reward, and sometimes that pendulum shifts really

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 9>firm one direction. And say, in the case of an

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 9>oracle who, similar to core Weave, is supplying a lot

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 9>of this capacity, that stock had gotten back on Thursday

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 9>or Friday.

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 8>To close to where it had been before the big.

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 9>Announcement, the big announcement with o AI, and I think

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 9>investors are viewing what's good as bad until they get.

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 8>Some answers to these questions.

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 9>That said, I think there's more good to come, and

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 9>we'll get milestones along the way proving out the thesis

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 9>of the ecosystem and the returns.

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 2>That thesis of the ecosystem is really something that I'm

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 2>having trouble to visualizing right now. And no matter how

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 2>much Mark Zuckerberg tries to explain superintelligence to me, and

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 2>to shareholders of the company. I still don't understand what

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 2>that ultimate payoff looks like, not just for meta platforms,

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 2>but for the industry in general. Is this something that

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 2>will only pay off when there's mass unemployment so companies

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 2>don't have to actually pay for people because machines in

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 2>AI are doing the work.

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:46.719
<v Speaker 3>Is it an increase in productivity?

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 2>We all keep our jobs, but we have these little friends,

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 2>with these little helpers who help us do it better.

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 3>What is it is?

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 8>Nobody knows.

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 9>I think it's a combination of increased productivity, increased revenue,

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 9>increased velocity of activity. At a minimum, AI should really

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 9>supercharge the individual today. The adoption has been very methodical

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 9>among typical commercial organizations because they have to worry about

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 9>security and orchestration and liability and all sorts of things.

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 9>And that's going to be the case. But we are

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 9>seeing the beginnings of real progress. We're seeing the technologies

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 9>in the marketplace start to mature. We're seeing the very

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 9>beginnings of commercial deployments in production beyond what Palanteer is doing,

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 9>and so I think we're seeing the beginnings of it.

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 9>But as we know, technology trends are overestimated in the

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 9>short term and underestimating the long term, and things move

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 9>very slowly until they start to move quickly.

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 8>And that's just a phenomenon of tech.

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 3>But are you using it at all with your job?

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 8>Sure?

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 9>How Yeah, we're using chat, GPT enterprise, our developers are

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 9>using cogend tools. But those things aren't easier because the

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 9>finished product doesn't have to be correct.

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 8>I can see what works for me and what doesn't.

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 9>But it's a very different phenomenon when you have something

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 9>tam are facing the broadly employee facing where it has

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 9>to work out of the box and it can't bring

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 9>your organization down in trims of liability.

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 8>So it's going to be a process for sure.

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 2>I was talking about this last week with somebody on

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 2>our program and they said, they're basically like an intern,

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 2>these these llms, you know, eager to help out, but

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 2>you really have to check the work to make sure

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 2>that it's something that can actually go to print them,

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 2>something that is actually accurate. Finally, I just want to

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 2>talk about the overall economic effects of this. A lot

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 2>of what we talk about when it comes to AI.

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 2>The real beneficiarias have been the major companies that we

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 2>talk about every day on Bloomberg Tech. But when will

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 2>we start to see these advancements actually affect the bottom

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.959
<v Speaker 2>lines and the productivity of companies that are not necessarily

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 2>tech adjacent.

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 9>So such a great question, And it's funny because people

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 9>are attributing layoffs to AI, and I think in part

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 9>some of those layoffs may come from the need to

0:19:56.200 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 9>fund AI, but not directly from the productivity benefits from

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 9>AI yet.

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 2>So in other words, companies spending money on AI rather

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 2>than people, and that's why they're making investments there rather

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 2>than in human capital.

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 9>Well, they're spending on AI, but there are other things

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 9>behind the layoffs, meaning people that over hired during the pandemic,

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 9>especially in the realm of technology. Not all those hires

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 9>were of the quality that they wanted.

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 8>They had to pay a lot for those folks.

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 9>And also, companies have been been bracing for an economic

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 9>town turn. My industry contexts tell me everybody's bracing for

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 9>a downturn, concern over tariffs, inflation, etc. So I don't

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.959
<v Speaker 9>think it's directly attributable. But to answer your question directly,

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 9>I think next year we start to see we're starting

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 9>to see production workloads going to production Today I think

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 9>companies will have better worked out the kinks by the

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 9>second half of next year. As I mentioned, the technologies

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 9>are maturing, the costs are plummeting, the rois will rise,

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 9>and I think into second half of next year are

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 9>really going to be the first signposts of broader benefits

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 9>from AI to the average commercial working say.

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 2>Hillary Frish, senior research analyst at Clearbridge Investments, thanks so

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 2>much for joining.

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Us on Bloomberg Tech.

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, coming up, GRAB takes the wheel, investing in a

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 2>remote driving startup. Speaking of driving, let's take a quick

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 2>look at Tesla shares. This shareholder is approving a one

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 2>trillion dollar pay package for Elon Musk last week on

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 2>the promise that he'll transition the company to focus on

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 2>AI and robotics. The company likely benefiting from the wider

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:40.640
<v Speaker 2>risk on sentiment today too. This is Bloomberg Tech sign

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 2>out for Talking Tech. First up, Grab investing sixty million

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 2>dollars in remote driving service day, with the potential to

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 2>reach four hundred and ten million dollars.

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Check this out.

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.719
<v Speaker 2>They allows users to order a car, which is then

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 2>operated remotely and delivered to the customer.

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:57.360
<v Speaker 3>The deal is expected to close.

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 2>In the fourth quarter plus, ta MC posted a sixteen

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 2>point nine percent rise in sales for the month of October.

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 2>That's the slowest pace for the chip makers ince February

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty four. Still, the company on track to

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.199
<v Speaker 2>meet average analyst estimates of sixteen percent sales in the

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 2>current quarter and in videas, Jensen Wong remains optimistic about

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 2>the AI demand, asking TSMC for more chip supplies. Speaking

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 2>to reporters in Taiwan, Wong said, quote, the business is

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 2>very strong and it's growing months by month, stronger and stronger.

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. Power constraints are slowing parts

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.959
<v Speaker 2>of Silicon Valley's AI expansion, with two proposed data centers

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 2>in Santa Clara facing potential delays due to limited utility capacity.

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 2>But just south in San Jose, Prolagis has won approval

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 2>to develop new data centers and manufacturing facilities with a

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 2>vision that includes five electric substations for power for more.

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 2>We're joined by San Jose or Matt Mayhem. Matt, good

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 2>to have you on the program today. The first question

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I have is really about why San Jose is a

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 2>good place for facility like this. This is some of

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 2>the most expensive real estates, the most expensive housing in

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 2>the entire United States.

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Why San Jose.

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 10>Well, we're in a really fortunate position in San Jose

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 10>to have two gigawatts of new power coming online over

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 10>the next four years.

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 11>We're the only city in California.

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 10>With that kind of new load capacity, and this particular

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 10>location is really unique. It's up in North San Jose

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 10>next to two thirty seven, a large freeway here right

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 10>next to our wastewater treatment facility, which means access to

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 10>ample recycled water at a reasonable rate, as well as

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 10>one of those new transmission lines coming into the city

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 10>of San Jose. So, as you mentioned, while the rest

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 10>of Silicon Valley, which was largely built out, is having

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 10>to turn data on our projects away, we've just said

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 10>yes to prologe Is in this proposal to put four

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 10>hundred megawatts worth of data centers right here in the

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 10>heart of Silicon Valley. We think it's a really exciting

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 10>opportunity in terms of economic competitiveness, job growth, tax base,

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 10>and those infrastructure pieces are right there in place to

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 10>facilitate it.

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned it's right by a wastewater treatment facility. It

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 2>makes me think that perhaps this wouldn't be the best

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 2>place to build affordable housing. Is it fair to say

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 2>that this is not a site that is zoned for that.

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 10>That's part of the benefit here is that in much

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 10>of the city we're trying to enable housing, mixed juice development, retail,

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 10>more transit oriented development. This particular site is up next

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 10>to the bay. You've got wastewater treatment, there's a landfill nearby. Fortunately,

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.719
<v Speaker 10>servers don't complain about odors, and.

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 11>So we think it's the perfect location.

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 10>There's also just nowhere else in Silicon Valley with access

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 10>to recycled water that's so easy. Plus the availability of

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 10>power that's the biggest barrier. As you know, we've got

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 10>a thousand megawatts of new power coming online over the

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 10>next four years in this exact location.

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, explain where that power is coming from, where it's

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 2>coming online. As I mentioned, one of the most read

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 2>stories on the Bloomberg Terminal today is about data centers

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 2>that are just sitting there idle because they cannot get

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 2>capacity actually hooked up to them to energize them.

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 10>That's right, and sometimes it's better to be lucky than good.

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 10>San Jose is a beneficiary of a decision made by

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 10>kaisso the independent system operator here in California. Many years

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 10>ago before we were talking much about AI, they were

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 10>just looking at general economic growth trends and decided that

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 10>San Jose had some of the highest growth potential in

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 10>the entire state, and they approved new transmission lines. There's

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 10>one line coming up from the south, one from the north,

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 10>but they both come into San Jose.

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 11>Each is a thousand megawatts. So here's a city that

0:25:58.480 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 11>has a million people.

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 10>Twelve large city in the country already consumes about one

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 10>point one gigawatts of power. We have two gigawatts coming

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 10>online over the next four years. That means we can

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 10>triple our energy use in the city of San Jose.

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 10>There's no other city in California, maybe the country, that

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 10>is set up to triple its energy consumption over the

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 10>next four to five years. That's a really unique position

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 10>to be in. We're just blessed with this infrastructure coming online.

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 10>We've of course said yes to it, helped facilitate it,

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 10>been very supportive of it. But we're really optimistic that

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 10>this means more jobs, not just data centers, advanced manufacturing

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 10>R and D labs.

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 11>We're in a really strong.

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 10>Position to capture this technological wave that we're.

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 2>In, the power that it will be used by these

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 2>data centers, the power that's coming online, how is it

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 2>being generated? I know you have that one nuclear power

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 2>plant down South Diablo Canyon on the central coast, and

0:26:56.240 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 2>some renewables certainly too, wind and solar. How's this energy

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 2>are you going to be generated?

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 10>So the City of San Jose a few years ago

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 10>set up something called a community Choice aggregator. Essentially that's

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 10>a mouthful, but essentially the city purchases power on behalf

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 10>of the users within our city limits. We have used

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 10>this policy tool to sign twenty year power purchase agreements

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 10>that enable us to fund new generation capacity. And because

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 10>we have a commitment to cleaner energy, what we're essentially

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 10>doing is buying solar and wind compared with storage, and

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 10>that's the key. The intermittency issue is real, but when

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 10>you build enough storage capacity, you can smooth that curve

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 10>out and actually make it work. And so Santose already

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 10>has one of the cleanest renewable mixes in the country.

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 10>But it's largely because we're using that collective purchasing power

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 10>to invest in cleaner power, invest in innovation, in the

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 10>energy sector, and it's it's taken us a long way,

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 10>and we're going to continue to go down that path

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:07.199
<v Speaker 10>because grid scale storage is the way to clean up

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 10>the grid. You mentioned nuclear. I think that also has

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:12.360
<v Speaker 10>to be part of the mix here if we want

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 10>to really get down our emissions. But I'm proud of

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 10>the work we've done in San Jose, and there's a

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 10>lot of runway left.

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 2>So is it fair to say that none of the

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 2>power that will be used to energize these data centers

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 2>will be you know, quote unquote dirty, non renewable power,

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 2>carbon based stuff.

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 10>Well, I can't guarantee none of it will, because the

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 10>power is coming off the grid, And so what we're

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 10>doing is using this projected increase in demand to sign

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 10>new power purchase agreements that are mostly, if not entirely

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 10>quote unquote clean. But then that gets added to the

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 10>grid and moves up the overall mix of renewable on

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 10>the grid. So I can't promise you that there aren't

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 10>electrons coming off the grid that are coming from nuclear.

0:28:57.320 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 11>Or a gas plant somewhere.

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 10>Certainly, natural gas nuclear are still very much part of

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 10>the foundation California. Isn't isn't using coal we're using. Geothermal

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 10>is growing, but it's really been solar paired with storage.

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 11>That's where most of the growth is coming from.

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 10>And the great thing about growth is you can invest

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 10>in an innovation, and that's what we're doing, is we're

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 10>explicitly purchasing solar paired with storage so that we can

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 10>increase the renewable mix on the grid. Overall, that benefits

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 10>us and the entire state.

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Mayor man any interest yet from some of the large

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 2>hyperscalers or large tech companies in Silicon Valley for using

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:38.239
<v Speaker 2>this capacity, what can you tell us?

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 11>We have a very robust pipeline.

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 10>PGAE did a cluster study last year that's already outdated

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 10>because there's so much more demand. I suspect most of

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 10>those two gigawatts of new power coming online will be

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 10>spoken for over the next eighteen months. We've got a

0:29:55.640 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 10>long pipeline of interested parties, the usual suspects, hyperscalers and

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 10>the big data center developers, some advanced manufacturing uses. So

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:08.959
<v Speaker 10>PGEN will be updating their cluster study, will get a

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 10>better look at how much demand there is in the

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 10>city of San Jose, but last year showed over eight

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 10>hundred megawatts worth of demand. I suspect it's quite a

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 10>bit higher now this year, especially with this news. As

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 10>you know, for this particular site, Prologist builds for the

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 10>world's largest companies, the Hyperscalers, the most innovative companies on Earth,

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 10>and this particular location is a real win win because

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 10>it doesn't displace housing or retail or any other uses.

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 10>It's underutilized land next to a waste of our treatment

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 10>facility that just happens to have a lot of new

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 10>power capacity and recycled water just adjacent to the site.

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 11>So it's kind of the perfect place to do this.

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Matt Mahon, the mayor of San Jose, California, thanks so

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:51.479
<v Speaker 2>much for joining us.

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 3>May Or Mahnon, do appreciate it.

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, Let's stick with the AI theme and take a

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 2>look at some movers right now in that space. The

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Nasdaq and the Philadelphia Semi Index. The socks both up

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 2>now a ZAK one hundred up one point three percent.

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 2>The socks up two percent, this as talks are underway

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 2>to potentially end the month long government shutdown. Chip stocks

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 2>two on the move in Nvidio more than three percent.

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Also as investors responding to strong sector fundamentals, accelerating AI spending.

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 2>A rally started with TSMC's solid results. All eyes too

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 2>on core Weave that is slated to report after the

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 2>closing bell today. Coryve up seven tens of one percent

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 2>right now, kind of those masks. What happened last week?

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Sticking with core Weave, let's bring in Bloomberg Equities reporter

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Carmen Ryanicky Sheet joins us now. Carmen Corewave tough week

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 2>last week, but the stock has absolutely been on a

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 2>tear since it went public. What's the backdrop that the

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 2>company is facing when it reports results after the bell.

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so investors are really going to be watching for

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 12>sort of this balance between revenue growth for Coreve, which

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 12>is just flying it's expected to double to more than

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 12>one point three billion, but also the sort of massive

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 12>spending that it also has while it builds out more

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 12>and more capacity for its large hyper scale clients. As

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 12>you mentioned, Coreeve shares are up more than double still

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 12>since their IPO, but they are also more than thirty

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 12>percent below a record high hit a few months ago,

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 12>and they fell pretty significantly after last earnings on concerns

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 12>about spending. So that's something we're going to be watching

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 12>very closely after the bell today. Stock fell a lot

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 12>last week when we sort of had this broader AI

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 12>sell off, but a little bit of a rebound today

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 12>ahead of those results.

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 2>As you note in a recent piece for Bloomberg News,

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 2>most of Corewave's sales come from Meta, Microsoft and Alphabet.

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Are there questions about diversifying that at all.

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, that's something that investors are definitely looking forward to

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 12>hear if they've added any new clients in this quarter

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 12>to kind of shift away from the dependence on those

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 12>few companies. Though I've also heard from sources that it's

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 12>not the biggest concern because there's just so much demand

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 12>in this space that even if one of their big

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 12>clients were to drop them or move on or something,

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 12>there are going to be others to rush it. So

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 12>definitely investors are looking for, you know, are they signing

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 12>new clients, new customers, But it might not be the

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 12>biggest concern.

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Carmen Ryana Key check out her reporting and more

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 2>on the Bloomberg Terminal, and a reminder for instant earnings

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 2>results and analysis, tune into Bloomberg TV and Radio.

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 3>At the close today.

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Well coming up Isaiah Taylor, CEO valor Atomics, joins us

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 2>fresh off of the back of the company's one hundred

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 2>and thirty million dollar funding round. We're going to talk

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 2>about the startups plants to remake the US nuclear sector. Next,

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 2>this is Bloomberg Tech. Power demand, driven in part by

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 2>AI and the US push to secure key initiatives and

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 2>key industries has led to efforts to revive America's nuclear

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 2>power abilities. Startup valor Atomics is seeking to do that

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 2>with the next generation reactor. It's just raised a one

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty million dollars Series A funding round. We're

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 2>joined by the founder and CEO, Isaiah Taylor. Joins us

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 2>right now on Bloomberg Tech. Isaiah, good to have you

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 2>on the program. Congratulations on the rays. When we talk

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 2>about small modular reactors, you're not alone Nano nuclear, Aklo,

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 2>new scale, just a handful of the companies working on

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:29.720
<v Speaker 2>this technology. What makes Valors different?

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, Tim, It's a huge pleasure to be on with

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:34.720
<v Speaker 13>you today and it's a really exciting day for Valor.

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 11>It's a great question.

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 13>There are a lot of people tackling this very very

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 13>difficult problem of how do we make all of the

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 13>energy needs that America has in the future. You know,

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 13>the thing that sets Valor apart is two things. One

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 13>is that we're building very quickly. You know, when we

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.320
<v Speaker 13>started this company, we realized that there was a gap

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 13>in the physical hardware. We wanted to actually build reactors

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.479
<v Speaker 13>and test them out very rapidly. I started this company

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 13>about two years ago, and earlier this year we unveiled

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 13>our full, complete thermal prototype of our reactor. That's just

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 13>incredible speed. We haven't seen that kind of speed in

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 13>nuclear in a long time. The other thing that sets

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 13>us apart is that we want to build these to

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 13>be manufacturable. We're sort of moving away from this era

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 13>of nuclear that's driven by construction and more into mass manufacturing.

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 13>We want to pump these things out like they are

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 13>a car, like they're a bus, and that's what's going

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 13>to drive the cost down and also add a lot

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 13>to safety as well.

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Before you pump these things out, though, you've got to

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 2>build one single example of one that actually works, and

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 2>here in the United States there is still no example

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:34.720
<v Speaker 2>of a small modular reactor that is up and running,

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 2>that is online, taking your company out of the mix.

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Just when do you think there will be an example

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 2>of that in the US.

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 11>That's exactly right.

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 13>We don't have any small modular reactors running in the

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 13>US today. And in fact, even though there have been

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 13>many nuclear startups who have sort of attempted this, there's

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 13>never been a nuclear startup which has yet split the atom.

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 13>So I think the next twelve months are going to

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 13>be extremely exciting. In May of this year, the President

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 13>signed in executive order ordering three American nuclear companies to

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 13>turn on SMRs by July fourth of next year. Our

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 13>company was one of those companies selected, So I think

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 13>I can confidently say before July fourth, there will be

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 13>at least one, we hope three SMRs running in the

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 13>United States, and we definitely think that Valor will have

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 13>one of those.

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 2>How much do they cost? How much will it cost?

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:22.479
<v Speaker 2>What's the ultimate goal?

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 11>So the initial goal is to beat natural gas.

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 13>I think nuclear absolutely has to compete with natural gas

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 13>on price, on timeline, on all of these things that

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 13>developers care about. So that's the initial goal. And that

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 13>gas plant's going, you know, somewhere between one thousand and

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 13>two thousand bucks a kilowat, so we want to be

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 13>at least with parity. Now we're also cleaner, right, So

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 13>it's not just that we're the same prices, that we're

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 13>cleaner as well. But the thing that's interesting about nuclear

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 13>is that it's actually fairly new and there's a lot

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 13>to go down the tech tree, right. There's a lot

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 13>of technological innovation that can happen in the future, so

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 13>we expect that price to continue dropping. You know, I

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.320
<v Speaker 13>think about SpaceX when we talk about this, where dockets

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:02.959
<v Speaker 13>used to cost fifty thousand dollars a kilogram into orbit

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 13>and SpaceX pushing them down to two thousand. I think

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:07.879
<v Speaker 13>we're going to look at that level of drop. There's

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 13>going to be a massive, massive drop in the price

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 13>as Valor gets really good at making these reactors and

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 13>makes many of them.

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 2>You announced earlier this year that you're suing the Nuclear

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Regulatory Commission, the NRCA.

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Why are you doing that?

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, you know, I think the thing that is really

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 13>important in nuclear today is allowing innovation to happen.

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:27.839
<v Speaker 11>Right.

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 13>If you think about the role of a regulator, they're

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 13>trying to figure out how to make sure that we

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 13>have safety and security across thousands of reactors deployed all

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 13>over the place. But what was missing in American nuclear

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 13>was the innovation layer. We need to be able to

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 13>turn on test units and make sure that they work well,

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 13>and that's sort of the layer that's missing. So our

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:49.320
<v Speaker 13>lawsuit really addresses a gap in how the CODA federal

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 13>regulations has been written versus how the law is written.

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 13>And so, you know, we're excited about that. We're also

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:57.359
<v Speaker 13>very excited about the Department of Energy. These executive orders

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 13>signed earlier this year have also opened up incredible power

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 13>ways to be able to move quickly, turn our reactors on, safely,

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 13>test them before we go and scale.

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, Palmer, we were showing an image there of

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 2>different investors in the company, Palmer Lucky of Anderil among

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 2>those investors certainly thinking about the defense space and his

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 2>involvement there. What are the applications of your technology when

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 2>it comes to defense for the United States.

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly right.

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 13>You know, American military bases all around the world are

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 13>generally dependent on their local grid for power. This has

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 13>become a massive vulnerability as grids have become vulnerable to

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 13>cyber attack, you know, by our competitors, and so this

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 13>is a way for us to actually secure American military

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 13>bases abroad. We want to see these reactors deployed on bases.

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:48.320
<v Speaker 13>A couple of months ago, the Janis program was announced

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 13>under the US Army to do exactly this, to actually

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 13>put power on military bases that's fully within American control.

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 13>We think these reactors are perfect for that. This is

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 13>a nice small form factor that's very easy to construct,

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 13>powerful enough to power a base if you put a

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 13>couple of them together. So this is a really exciting

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 13>opportunity and we're willing to help our country in that way.

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 2>We've seen American military basis come under attack in recent

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 2>years in different parts of the world. How would you

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 2>guarantee the safety of this technology if it were to

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 2>come under attack and not lead.

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 3>To some sort of meltdown.

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, you know, this is where this particular technology shines.

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 13>Our reactor is built around a very safe form of

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 13>nuclear fuel called TRESO fuel. TRESO fuel is very small

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 13>beads of uranium encased in very heart ceramic layers, and

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 13>it turns out that these ceramic layers are extremely impervious

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 13>to many different types of attacks. So if you look

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 13>at the spectrum of how you build energy around the world,

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:45.320
<v Speaker 13>we believe this is actually the safest.

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 11>Form of energy generation in the world.

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:48.840
<v Speaker 13>So we're really excited to put it out not on

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 13>the edge, not only on the edge, but also for

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 13>data center's heavy industrial power and eventually synthetic hydrocarbon production.

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 2>Isaiah, before we let you go, is your company going

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 2>to be the first US company to successfully deploy and

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 2>bring online a small modular reactor.

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 13>You know, it's a hot race, and there are a

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 13>lot of awesome people working on the problem. But where

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:12.399
<v Speaker 13>I sit today, I do believe that valor Atomics will

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:12.799
<v Speaker 13>be the first.

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 3>That is absolutely our goal.

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 2>Isaiah Taylor, founder and CEO of valor Atomics, joining us

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 2>from Delaware today. Well, chatbots have become a go to

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 2>source for millions of people looking for information, amusement, and

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 2>emotional support. But evidence is mounting that for some people,

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:37.280
<v Speaker 2>chatbot interactions can lead to dark places. That's the focus

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 2>of a big take from Bloomberg's Ellen Hewitt and Rachel Metz.

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.919
<v Speaker 2>Rachel joins us Now, Rachel, this is a really powerful piece,

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:44.840
<v Speaker 2>really scary piece.

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 3>For it, I think a lot of people.

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 2>You and the team spoke to eighteen different individuals who've

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 2>either experienced delusions themselves or.

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 3>Have a loved one who has what did you find?

0:40:55.840 --> 0:41:00.080
<v Speaker 14>We found that this is happening and has happened to

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 14>all kinds of people. I mean, most of the people

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 14>that we spoke with were based in the US, but

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:08.439
<v Speaker 14>we found through talking to people that there are men

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 14>and women in all different parts of the US, in

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 14>different countries, Canada, in the UK, and many other countries besides,

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 14>who are dealing with this. And it gave us a

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 14>sense that and it wasn't just people that have a

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 14>history of mental health issues in their past. It can

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:29.440
<v Speaker 14>be all kinds of people, people that do, people that don't.

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 14>And it just was really shocking to us how many

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 14>different types of people had been dealing with this experience.

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 2>How do the lllms, how do these chatbots draw people

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 2>in and keep them there?

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:46.360
<v Speaker 14>I think for a lot of the people that we

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:49.800
<v Speaker 14>spoke to, I mean, in every single situation, it started

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 14>out extremely normally. They were using it for Lennie how

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 14>to play the banjo, or getting help with real estate

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 14>things like that. Like these are examples, you know, like

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 14>very normal things that people would be using this sort

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 14>of technology for. And then over time, over like a

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:09.720
<v Speaker 14>period of weeks, often it would kind of get maybe

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 14>more philosophical.

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 11>It would sort of.

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:14.840
<v Speaker 14>Depend on the user's interests. I mean, these chatboss have

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 14>become increasingly personalized, so people that are more interested in

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 14>things like math, for instance, it might sort of move

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:26.279
<v Speaker 14>in that direction, or it might tell people slowly over

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 14>time you have awoken the AI, and people would say really,

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 14>and it would say yes. And they would say really

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 14>and it would say yes. So it was very reinforcing

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 14>and would sort of isolate them from other people in

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 14>their lives slowly and systematically.

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 2>And just in the last thirty seconds that we have

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.720
<v Speaker 2>with you, the companies their response, how have they responded

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 2>to this reporting.

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 14>I mean we've seen a range of responses, both to

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 14>us specifically and also generally to a growing number of

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 14>lawsuits related to these sources of issues. Open AI. I mean,

0:42:56.719 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 14>it's made a lot of changes in recent months, especially

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 14>like adding parental controls, and it's also trying to make

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 14>it better, make its chat about better at noting these

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 14>kinds of issues and getting people help.

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 2>That's Rachel Metz, who along with Ellen Hewitt, reported on

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 2>these delusions for Bloomberg BusinessWeek. It was a recent big take.

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Do check it out on the Bloomberg Terminal and at

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 2>bloomberg dot Com slash Big Take. That is going to

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 2>do it for this edition of Bloomberg Chech Tech. Don't

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 2>forget to check out our podcast. You can find another

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Terminal as well as online at Apple, Spotify, or iHeart.

0:43:28.880 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg