WEBVTT - Surveillance Tech & Biased AI: The ACLU Fights Back

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey, there, everybody, this is Jonathan Strickland, host of Tax Stuff. Today,

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>we have something a little different for you. We have

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a series called First Contact with Laurie Siegel uh, former

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>correspondent with CNN, and if you have not listened to

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that show, you definitely need to check it out. She's

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>doing amazing work having incredible conversations with thought leaders in

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the tech space and the social space, and this particular

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>episode I think is really important and one that really

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>needs to be heard by as many folks as possible.

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>She sits down with a CLU president, Susan Herman, and

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>together they talk about the issue of racially biased face

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>recognition technology. And you've heard me speak on episodes of

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff in the past about bias artificial intelligence, facial recognition,

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, image recognition, that sort of stuff, and how

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that is a real problem in tech and it's something

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that we absolutely have to get our heads wrapped around

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and address. So, without further ado, I'm going to have

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that episode play in lieu of a Tech Stuff episode

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>for today, and I highly recommend you check out First Contact.

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.919
<v Speaker 1>It's a great show and one that I think really

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>dove tails nicely with Tech Stuff. So if you enjoy

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff, I think you're really gonna like First Contact

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>as well, and we will catch you next week with

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>new episodes of tech Stuff. Thanks. First Contact with Lori

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Siegel is a production of Dot Dot Dot Media and

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio. There's a great quote on the A

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>c l U website. The fact that technology now allows

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>an individual to carry such information in his hand does

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>not make the information any less worthy of the protection

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>for which the founders fought. Exactly. I like to talk about,

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the whole points of the Constitution

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>adding the fourth Amendment, which is the protection of privacy,

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 1>is they wanted to protect what was in Benjamin Franklin's disk.

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Nobody should know if he was writing some things that

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>were anti government, and we now have that on our

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>cell phone, so of course, but that's where I think

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of the protection of civil liberties is

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>applying our fundamental principles in different circumstances. We are in

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a moment of reckoning as we enter an age of

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>ubiquitous surveillance, questionable data collection practices, even algorithms that discriminate.

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>It's minorities, especially black and brown communities that are disproportionately affected.

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Over the last months, as the nation has grappled with

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:56.519
<v Speaker 1>a conversation around police brutality, we've seen predator drones used

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>for aerial surveillance at protests, facial recognition technology that wrongfully

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>accused a black man of a crime he didn't commit,

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't a coincidence. Reports say the tech is

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a hundred times more likely to misidentify African, American and

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Asian people, and as COVID nineteen continues to spread, there

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>are serious questions being raised about contact tracing apps and

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>how that data collected could be misused. These issues raise

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>ethical questions about technology and its impact on our civil liberties, equality,

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and the future of our country. For Susan Herman, it

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>is an extraordinary time to be sitting in her seat

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>as president of the a s l U. Over the years,

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the American Civil Liberties Union has filed lawsuits fighting for

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>free speech, reproductive rights, and privacy. But as technology continues

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to muddy the waters, the tradeoffs become more complicated. Where

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>do we draw the line between security and privacy and

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>how do we prevent technological innovation from outpacing the law.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Laurie Siegel, and this is first contact, Susan, thank

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you for being virtually with me today. Thank you for

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>inviting me, Laurie. Yeah, you know, I I always start

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 1>out these interviews with our first contact. I talked to

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>guests about how we met, and we don't really have

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 1>a first contact. We've never met in person, but we

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>met on an email chain because we were going to

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>do an interview together for something else and it and

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>it fell through. So I said, you've got to come

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast because you are just sitting in such

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary seat at such an extraordinary moment in time.

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>So that's our first contact. Well, thanks, It just seems

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to me like our first contact was total serendipity. Yeah, exactly,

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>so you know, to get started. You've been the president

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>of the a c l U since two thousand and eight,

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and I said this before, but you know, what an

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary time to be sitting in your seat. You know,

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>how are you feeling? Oh my, it's just sort of overwhelming.

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.919
<v Speaker 1>You know. As president, I'm go the chair of the board,

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I'm not the one doing the day

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to day work as all of the members of our

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>staff are. But to be a member of the a

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>c l U staff right now is just it's mind

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>boggling because we had, you know, a lot of work

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that we were already doing before two thousand and sixteen,

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>with all of the states making worse and worse laws

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>about reproductive freedom and voting rights and immigrants rights, and

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, all sorts of other things. Then came the election,

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.239
<v Speaker 1>and since that we have brought a hundreds and seventy

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>three legal actions against the Trump administration for things like

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>family separations and the travel BAM and prohibiting trans in

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the military. Then in March, COVID hit, and at that point,

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, since then, we've also brought over a hundred lawsuits,

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>including with a hundred lawsuits just about people who are

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>incarcerated in jails and prisons and ice attention and who

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>are just in a hotspot. You know, they have no

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>control over whether they can social distance, and so we've

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>been working very hard to get vulnerable people out of

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>those terrible situations, out of basically death traps. Plus, the

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>COVID also led to a number of states opportunistically restricting

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>things like freedom of abortion, declaring abortion to be a

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>non essential procedure so people could just wait until the

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>pandemic is over to get an abortion right, and voting

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>rights has also just been a really braught area right

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>now because all the restrictions on voting and the ways

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in which the vote was becoming distorted. Have you just

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>been magnified by all the difficulties of So there's a

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>lot to talk about. So I was a gonna say,

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>what what what I'm hearing from is you're sleeping really

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>well at night. You know, there's no work to do,

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 1>almost nothing to do this stuff that they're just sitting

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 1>around polishing their nails. Yeah, I mean, like, take me

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to March, like coronavirus hits. You have been involved in

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>some of these monumental cases that have just shaped society

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in our civil liberties, like coronavirus hits. And now you know,

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we have a little bit I don't even think we

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>have the luxury of perspective at this point, but we

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit more perspective. But let's take me

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>to March, Like in your role at this extraordinary moment,

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>like what was going through your head? What were you

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>concerned about at the time. Well, you know, one of

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the first concerns is just you have to close the office.

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>So the first concern is how can people do all

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>this umcity It increases the work and makes it more

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>difficult to do the work. So we just had to

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>really make sure that our technology was up to doing things.

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So one thing that the a c l YOU did

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>was to buy new laptops for some stuff. People who

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>are going to be working and you have to worry

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>about how the technology is working um which has been

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a question for us every time there's something really big hits.

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>When the travel band hit, there were so many people

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>wanting to donate to the a c l U. There

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>are website crash so even things like that, you know,

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, like number one of how do you

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>handle this? We have been fortunate so far that the

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a c l U is so well managed and we

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>had not spent every penny that all of our donors

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>had given us up until that point, so have not

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>had to laid people off, which is very fortunate because

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>as you know, saying, there's more than enough work to do.

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that's the first concern of just you know,

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>how do you keep the organization up to speed and

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>ready to do you know what. Staff members now need

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to be doing an incredible amount more work. But for

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>some of them, it's well, they're juggling a toddler and

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a dog. Yeah. Can you give me a run through

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of some of the cases that you've been involved in

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that correct me if I'm wrong. You started out as

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>an intern, right, and really just worked your way up.

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can imagine you've been involved, and I

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>know you've been involved in some pretty extraordinary cases. To

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>give listeners some context, can you explain some of the

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.719
<v Speaker 1>cases that kind of stick out to you. Well, I

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't intern for the a c l U back, you know,

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties seventies, you know, around the time when

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I was in law school. And just to make sure

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that everybody understands, I don't actually work at the a

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>c l U. Day job is I'm a law professor,

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and I don't generally work on the cases. What I'm

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>generally doing is we run the organization. But I'll tell

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you I think it would be interesting start um. But

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the first a c l U case that I actually

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>did work on, which was while I was a law student,

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and this was the case. One of my connections with

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the a c l U originally was that one of

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.319
<v Speaker 1>my law professors in the first year was connected with

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the New York Civil Liberties Union, and he had some

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>clients who came to him who were graduate students at

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Stony Brook on Allowland, and they had just discovered they

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>were not allowed to live together. They had rented a

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>house together, there were six of them, and they had

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>just discovered they weren't allowed to live together because there

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 1>was an ordinance in their village village called belt Hair,

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that prohibited more than two persons unrelated by blood, marriage

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>or adoption from living together. So, you know, they were

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty shocked. And it turned out that under the laws

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:46.719
<v Speaker 1>it was at the time, by the time they were

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about this, they were liable for all sorts of

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>criminal fines and punishment. It was really a very heavy stuff.

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:56.199
<v Speaker 1>So I started working on that case with my law

0:09:56.240 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 1>professor and um we went to a federal job to

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>ask for a temporary restraining order, which means to just

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>until we had litigated whether or not that was a

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 1>constitutional thing to do, to tell people who they couldn't

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>couldn't live with that the village should not be allowed

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to either kick them out of their their house or

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to you know, start walking them up because you know,

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>they owned too many fines for having been illegal residents.

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So um, the judge ended up signing the order, and

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>he was signing the order about that, and then one

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of the ways they which actually the original way in

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>which our clients had discovered that they were illegal residents,

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>was that they had applied for residents only beach permit

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and they were told they couldn't have one because they

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>were illegal residents. So the judge who we had the

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>district judge, who was a very nice man, looked at

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the order we had written out and he said, well,

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's the summer. Don't your clients want to

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>go to the beach while the litigation is pending? Do

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you mind if I write that in that they have

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>to be allowed to park in the parking lot of

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the beach. So we said sure, you know, that's very nice,

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>so he wrote that in. Then, as the junior member

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of the team, I was sent out to explain to

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:02.839
<v Speaker 1>our clients, to show them the order and explained to

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>them what was going on, and they gave me a

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>tour of you what the village looked like in the

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>residents only beach and the minute the wheels of their

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>car hit the parking lot is very large. Your fierce

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>looking man comes striding across and says, what are you

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>doing here? You're not allowed to be in this parking lot.

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>And they all look at me, and I'm thinking, what

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>am I? I'm like, you know, twenty something, I'm not

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>very tall, but what am I supposed to do with

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>this large man who doesn't want us in there in

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>his parking lot? And then I remembered that I had

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.719
<v Speaker 1>a federal court order right on my person, so I

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:33.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of drew myself up, but I showed him my

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>federal court order and I said, well, I'm with the

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>New York Civil Liberties Union kind of, and I have

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a federal court order saying that these people are allowed

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to be in this parking lot and go to the beach.

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And he melted. And that that was, I think, in

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the points at which I thought, Wow, you

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>know this, this is really powerful stuff. Yeah you saw

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.839
<v Speaker 1>that there was my first day case. Yeah, exactly, that's great.

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And I saw I read that. So maybe your your

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>earliest memories, um of speaking up to authority involved I

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>think a dispute over a book at your school library. Yeah,

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that's right, even before the Belchair case. My first civil

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>liberties hero was my mother. So when I was in

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>third grade, we were doing a school play about a

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 1>story called Johnny Tremaine, about a boy in the American Revolution,

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and I like, I thought the play was interesting. Players

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 1>don't have that many words, and we were told that

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>this was based on the book. So I went to

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 1>my school library, my public school library, and I asked

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to take out the book, and the librarian said, oh,

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't take out that book, dear, that's in the

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>boys section. And I was I was surprised to find

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>this out. I've been reading books in the girls section,

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>which were all collections of fairy tales and biographies of

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>president's wives, but it had never occurred to me that

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't allowed to take out a book from the

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>boys section. So I went home and I told my

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>mother about this. You're just thinking, you know, that's the

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>way things are, and she just exploded and she called

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the librarian the next day and say, how dare you

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>told my daughter you know what she's not allowed to read.

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>So the librarian told me that from then on, I

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>could take out any book I wanted, and you know,

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.439
<v Speaker 1>not long after that, they changed the policy for everyone.

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, there was another example of how you

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>know you can kind of speak up to authority when

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>they kind of tell you who to be and prevent

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you from making your own choices. Were you always like that? Well,

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's third grade and I feel like yes,

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I think for most of us are values of form

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>when we're pretty young. Yeah, so you know, seeing my

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>mother do that, I'm sure you would have had an

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>impact on me. Yeah, that's such a good story. And

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>did you I mean, did you always know you wanted

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to go into law? No? I actually really didn't, because

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>having grown up as a woman during that era, my

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>father was a lawyer and he always used to talk

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that law was really not a good

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>profession for women. Why would you want to do that

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>if you could be an English teacher and have the

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>summer off, you take care of your children, so you

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>have to be a while. I graduated from college and

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>then spent a few years doing other things and then

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>decided to go to law school. Well, I mean, it's

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it's so interesting and now to seeing where you're at

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>um and seeing this moment, it does feel like a moment.

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And I was looking at something you said about you know,

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>this feels like a moment we can be optimistic because

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>so many Americans are beginning to really understand the scope

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and the depth of structural racism. It certainly feels, you know,

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm based in New York City. You can just feel

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it right on the streets with the protests, and they

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>hear the sirens and the helicopters, you know, as we

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>sit here, um and we hear you know, your rich

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>history and covering and caring about these issues. What is

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the challenge for you guys ahead, Well, you know, the

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>challenge on that particular subject is that this is work

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that we had already been doing. One of our top

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>priorities for the past several years has been trying to

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>break our addiction to mass incarceration, which, as everybody is

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>now really coming to terms with, has been really it's

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a system that has disproportionately affected people on the basis

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of race and income and disability of co to the

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>people who are arrested or people who are mentally ill,

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.359
<v Speaker 1>And our feeling is that the system has been fundamentally

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>broken and misguided for a long time. So part of

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>what we're trying to do with this moment is to

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>capitalize on the fact that people want to look at

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>what the police do. We're trying to encourage people to

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>look beyond the police. It's not just you. Who are

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the police arresting and how are they treating the people

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>they arrest? I think behind that is the question of

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>what do we really want to treat as a crime.

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>So when you treat all sorts of very minor misconduct

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>as a crime, you're really setting up a situation where

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be more contacts and therefore potentially more

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>arbitrary and discriminatory context. So, if you think about it,

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Eric Garner ended up dying because he was selling single

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>cigarettes on which the tax had not been paid. George Floyd.

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>The basis for that encounter was that they thought he

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>might be passing a counterfeit twenty dollar bill. So I

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>think that if you look at why are we criminalizing

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the things we criminalize, especially if you're talking

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>about people who are mentally ill and are having problems.

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Do we really want the police to be the people

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>who are the first responders to people who are having

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a mental health crisis or is there some more effective

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>way to deal with that that would avoid putting those

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>people into the criminal justice system, which isn't really good

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>for anyone, and to maybe recommit, reallocate some of the

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>resources we're using on arresting people and locking them up

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to actually dealing with the mental health crises. You have

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>mental health treatment. So instead of viewing everything as well

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>dysfunction as a matter of policing, why don't we spend

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>more time reinvesting and to try to prevent more dysfunction.

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Instort of like the old saying, you know, if you're

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Well, you know,

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>not every problem in our society is a problem for

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the criminal justice system, and an occasion to arrest people

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and lock them up a lot of them really should

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>be an occasion for thinking about public health treatments. I'm

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how we want to approach homelessness, and you

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of much deeper thoughts about how you

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.479
<v Speaker 1>prevent dysfunction. Rather than answering everything with you we're going

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to send in the police. It certainly seems also like

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.360
<v Speaker 1>this moment, even coming out of the pandemic, I can

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 1>only imagine the mental health crisis is going to be

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>even worse. Yeah, that could well be um and I

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>think the pandemic is also showing us. Somebody asked me

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the other day whether the protests over policing and police

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>brutality are related to the pandemic, and I was in

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>a webinar and one of the smart people in the

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>room said, oh, no, no, they're two entirely different things.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>But I said, what do you mean. The same people

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>who are being disproportionately affected by policing and police brutality

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>are the people who are being disproportionately affected by COVID.

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>The statistics is that people of color are much more

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:45.959
<v Speaker 1>likely to die, and there are a lot of reasons

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 1>for that. You're having to do with your underlying health

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and having to do with the fact that minorities and

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>people who are not affluent don't get to work from home,

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>they don't get to work through zoom. There are the

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>people who are out there on the streets being the

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>first risk wanders, being the people who are picking up

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the garbage, being the people who was talking the supermarket shills.

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like the virus is really amplifying so

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>many of the inequities we've had in our society. And

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>I think especially you know, I don't know what it's

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>like for everyone else. But I live in Brooklyn and

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. It really felt like a lot

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of the people who were out on the street, they

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>were out on the street because they were upset about

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>George Floyd. But I think it was more that they

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>recognized that George Floyd was the chip of the iceberg

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and that there were just a lot going on that

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>they really just you could not tolerate any longer. More

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>from Susan after the break, and make sure to subscribe

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>to First Contact in Apple podcasts or wherever you listen

0:18:44.520 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>so you don't miss an episode putting on the tech hat.

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think most people probably don't think of

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>tech when they think of the a c l U,

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>But there's quite a bit of litigation in regards to

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>security and privacy issues around contact tracing, surveillance, algorithmic bias,

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and obviously the a c l U has a hand

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 1>in checks and balances and a lot of the issues

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that are merging from the pandemic. You know, what are

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the tech developments that you guys are most

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>concerned about. Well, since you were mentioning the COVID and

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the the contact tracking and tracing, I'll start with that.

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>So the upshot is that we are neither for nor

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>against contact racing. Contact tracing is something that really will

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>contribute to public health. Our concern is not to say no,

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't do it, or you just go right ahead

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and do whatever you want. What we're concerned about is

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 1>to minimize the damage to privacy, the damage to equity. Again, Uh,

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of concerns that we have. The

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>other thing that we're concerned about is discrimination. Again, because

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>there are ways in which the technology could also increase

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>pre existing social inequities. We think that people should not

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>be coerced into participating and in testing. We think it

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 1>should be voluntary, and we also think that it should

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>be nonpunitive, because if you start having the criminal justice

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>system enforcing whether or not people are willing to use

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>their phone to take a test or whatever it is,

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you're just creating more opportunities for police interactions that will

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>at some point be arbitrary or discriminatory. So we don't

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 1>want to see rules and regulations that are good to

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.479
<v Speaker 1>public health rules. Even if they really are good public

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>health rules, we don't want to see those become occasions

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>for filling up the jails with the people who aren't complying,

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>because we've already seen there were some statistics in New

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>York that when you ask the police to start enforcing

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>who's wearing a mask and who's not wearing a mask,

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that right away, excuse excuse, racially truly disproportionate in terms

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of who they were questioning and who they weren't questioning.

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's just a lot of issues they

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>were which is very much prop your reality, because they're

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>very much ethical issues. Yeah, you know, UM one of

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the one of the cases that I'm fascinated by. UM

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and I you know, I honestly I felt like it

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>was just it was only a matter of time until

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 1>we saw this headline. And then we saw the headline,

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, a man was arrested after an algorithm wrongfully

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>identified him. You know, I've been covering for so many years.

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>AI is biased. AI is trained on you know, on

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 1>data online, which can be very racist, you know, And

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I think for so many years we've been having this conversation.

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>But the question of okay, well, what happens when it

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 1>gets into the hands of the police, what happens, you know,

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>if if it could go for policing, And so I

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's such a fascinating case. And and you guys

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 1>that a cl you filed an administrative complaint with Detroit's

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>police department over what you guys are calling the country's

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>first known wrongful arrest involving facial recognition technology. I mean,

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>for context, a man was arrested because he was wrongfully

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>identified by an algorithm. The police department thought he had

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 1>robbed I believe, like stolen watches, and he was arrested.

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can you talk to me about the significance

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of this case. I can't help put put on my

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>tech hat and scream. You guys, this is a really

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>big deal. Yeah, it is a really big deal. And

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>as you're saying, Laurie, we were aware of this problem

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>for a long time and we've been complaining. So going

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>back for a minute before getting to the case you're

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about, Robert Williams UH the National Institute of Science

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 1>and Technology says that African American and Asian people are

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 1>up to a hundred times is likely to be disidentified

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>by official recognition. So yeah, that's the background problem. And

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>so we knew that, right, you know, we knew that

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 1>before the case came up in Michigan. Um, and it's

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>not the algorithm's fault. Obviously, there's something that's being put

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>into the algorithm that that is, you know, that has

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a bias. And I people tend to think that algorithms

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>are you know, are so neutral and that we can

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>rely on algorithms. That's what I was saying about the

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>contact tracking and tracing, that you you start relying on

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>algorithms or apps that you think are neutral, and you

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 1>really have to be very wary of that. So again,

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>before getting to the Robert Williams case, uh An, a

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>c l U staffer at the ah LU of Northern California,

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 1>had the really interesting idea of trying out Amazon's facial

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>recognition program Recognition with the K because yeah, they were

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>just offering this to the police or whatever. This is great,

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 1>it will help you identify and see if you have

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>somebody who matches a mug shot. Well, what they tried

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to do, which I thought was very clever, was they

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>tried to match mug shots against the members of Congress.

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>They got the facial pictures of all the members of Congress.

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>This was in July and there were twenty eight members

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of Congress who were misidentified as matching the mug shots.

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>There were twenty in mistakes out of that, and not

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>only that, but that the false matches were disc apportionately

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 1>people of color. And one of the people who was

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>identified as matching a mug shot, and therefore, you know,

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>probably you know this criminal was civil rights legend John Lewis.

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>You're the guy who was beat up on the bridge

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in Salma to know, to get us all voting rights.

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, we know that almost of the false matches

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>there were of people of color, even though people of

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>color made up only twenty of the members of Congress.

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 1>So in some ways, you know, the Robert Williams case

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 1>is completely predictable. We knew that we allowed for that

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>to happen. It might have already happened elsewhere, but you know,

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>subterranean lee in a way that we don't really we

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't see the case. But what's amazing about the Robert

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Williams cases that it happened right there, you know, visible

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>to everybody where you can just see it. So what

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>happened was that they told him that he was being

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>arrested because they believed that he was that the algorithm

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.959
<v Speaker 1>has said that that that he was a match for

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>this mug shot, and they showed him in the mug shot,

0:24:57.600 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and he said to them, do you guys think all

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 1>black people look alike? That looks nothing like me. So,

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was pretty clearing that if you used

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>your eyes and looked at the picture yourself, if you

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't trust the algorithm, and if you looked at the

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 1>picture in this man's face, they didn't look alike. But nevertheless,

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 1>he spent thirty hours in jail under some pretty miserable

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 1>conditions because the algorithm said it was a match. So

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's really important. In some ways, the fact

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that you know a problem exists is not as inspiring

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to make people want to do something about it as

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>when you see it. So that's what happened with all

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the protests about George Floyd. You people could watch that

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>horrible video. They could see it. It was recorded on

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the video, And here we have an actual person, not

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>just hypothetically statistics are showing, but an actual person who

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>did get arrested and did have a miserable time. He

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>was arrested in front of his family. It was really

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>traumatizing and based on again, the officers involved were trusting

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the science more than they were trusting their their own eyes.

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>When anybody cook he didn't look like the picture right.

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, he wrote an offed in the Washington

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Post and he he asked the question, He said, why

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is law enforcement even allowed to use this technology when

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it obviously doesn't work? So, I guess asking a legal

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>scholar the question. You know, police departments all around the

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>country are using different variations of facial recognition software. So

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, what regulations should we see as we enter

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>this era of algorithmic discrimination. Yeah, that's a great question.

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And again we've been urging, you know, long before Robert

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Williams turned up, we've been urging police departments not to

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>rely on the facial recognition technology that it was just

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it was not reliable enough to you know, to hold

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>people's face in the hands of the algorithms don't have hands,

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.880
<v Speaker 1>but for people's face to be dependent on the spatial

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>recognition technology which was being touted. And again, it's great

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>if a company is doing something to make money, but

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 1>if wanting to make money is your only consideration, and

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're not considering whether you are unleashing something that

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>is really going to be disruptive of people's lives unfairly,

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 1>either because it's just going to be wrong or because

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be wrong in a racially skewed way.

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's just really a problem. So um, we've

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>been urging police departments not to buy and use the technology.

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure you know Amazon has withdrawn the facial

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>recognition technology temporarily and they're not sure whether or not

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they'll bring it back. So the probability of a wrongful

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>arrest is one thing, but when you draw the camera

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>back and look at all the technology in the bigger picture.

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>In addition to facial recognition, one thing that police departments

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>have been doing with facial recognition and different law enforcement

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>agencies is to try to see who attends a demonstration

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>or see who's in the crowd. So it ties not

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>into are you, like, is somebody likely to be wrongly

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>arrested like Robert Williams because they just there was a

0:27:55.560 --> 0:28:00.199
<v Speaker 1>false match. But it starts becoming big surveillance too that

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 1>an agency has the cameras on and then they have

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 1>the facial recognition and they're purporting to identify all the

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>people in that crowd, so that then they contract those people.

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 1>They now know that you were at the George Floyd demonstration,

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and that person was in the the the anti war demonstration,

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.199
<v Speaker 1>And at that point, the government starts having more and

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>more information about all of us, to the point where

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it feels like instead of we're controlling the government, it's

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>like the government controls us. So I think the facial

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>recognition is only one part of the whole tendency of technology.

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Two amplify government power to be kind of watching, watching

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>what we do. Yeah, I mean, it's it's interesting to

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>hear you say that. Um. You know, that type of

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>technology is just a part of it, especially when it

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>comes to this moment where people are out protesting police brutality,

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>when people are out fighting for their civil liberties. You know,

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>there's all sorts of technology that's being built. Their cameras

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that are are being built that can recognize people in

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>real time that are police, police are wearing. There's all

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>sorts of technology. This is just the beginning of it. Um.

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I I know you mentioned Amazon put a hold on

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>their sales of recognition software. Microsoft said it's not going

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to sell face recognition software to police departments until their

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>federal regulations. I know. IBM said that it was going

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to announce a ban on general purpose facial recognition? Is

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that enough? Like? What is I guess, you know, what

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is the government's role here? Like? What do you think

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>should happen? Especially since this is just, as you say,

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>one small part of a larger issue that we're facing

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>as a society. I think that's right, and I think

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that there could be, you know, government regulation, but that's

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen unless the public wants to urge

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>their representatives to start controlling this. And what we've seen

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is that an enlightened public can make something happen even

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>without regulation, right, So, you know, it was that the

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>public is becoming concerned and that's the reason why Amazon

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>acted to withdraw this. They started being concerned that their

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>customers were not going to be happy with them. And

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I think at this point that's almost more effective than

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>government regulation. And once you have that wake up call,

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>then you can start having serious debates. And I think

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>those debates have to take place in many places. They

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>should be taking place in legislatures where people can talk

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>about the trade off between privacy and mass surveillance and

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever the government is trying to accomplish, why do they

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>need this technology? Is it really worth it? You are

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>their crimes that they wouldn't be solving without it, and

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>are they crimes that we're concerned about solving or do

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>they fall into the category of, you know, is that

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>something that we don't think should be a crime at all.

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>People are generally unaware in terms of what the police

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>do that only four to five percent of all arrests

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>involved crimes of violence. So when people think about we

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>want to enable law enforcement to be at catching criminals,

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>where we're concerned about divesting or defunding the police because

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>who's going to protect us from physical harm? Almost none

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of what the police and law enforcement do is about

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 1>physical harm. It's a tiny percentage. Everything else that they're

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>doing is about this whole array of all sorts of

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>other things that we criminalize. And I think that in

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>addition to having better conversations about is there a potential

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>for some of these technologies that the government is using

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to create arbitrary or discriminatory enforcement, I think we need

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to dig deeper behind that question, in the same way

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that you need to dig deeper beyond the George Floyd

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>murder and to ask if there's something systemically wrong here.

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you need to rethink the whole question. So when

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>people say, well, you know, but we need the facial

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>recognition technology because it helps the police solve crimes, well, okay,

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>but you know what crimes and what are the costs?

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think once people are educated enough and once

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>they realize what the nature of the problem is kind

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of what's being unleashed, they can start really being read

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to have that broader conversation. And I think it should

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>take place in legislatures, but I think it also should

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>take place and evidently is taking place in boardrooms at Amazon, Facebook,

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and Google and Microsoft. They should be talking and they

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>do sometimes if the people demand it. And it also

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>has to take part just among people, you know, among

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, tech communities and people just beginning to talk

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>about what are our responsibilities here? Is it okay for

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>us to create products just to make money if we

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.719
<v Speaker 1>know that there are dangers, that the products are going

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to be misused, or maybe aren't reliable enough, or that

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>they just feed into this enormous surveillance date. So let

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>me compare this to an earlier moment. After nine eleven,

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 1>we had a kind of similar phenomenon that in order

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to deal with catching terrorists. We changed a lot of

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>laws that ended up really sacrificing a lot of privacy

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and allowing a lot more government surveillance. And for a

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>number of years that went unchallenged, and people kept saying, oh, well,

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, if if that's what we need in order

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to be safe, we're willing to give up a little privacy. So,

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I think people didn't think about the

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that they weren't giving up their own privacy, they

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>were giving up somebody else's. And second of all, people

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize how extensive the surveillance really was until Edward Snowden.

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>So then after Edward Snowden came along and people realized

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>how the government was just scooping up tons of information

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>about people and just keeping it in government databases and

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>started realizing the horrifying potential of all that. What happened

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>was that Congress made a couple of little changes to

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the law. But more important, Microsoft and Google and other

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>places started to realize that their customers were concerned, and

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>they started being a little less cooperative. At the beginning,

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>right after nine eleven, all of the telecoms, all these

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 1>companies were just saying to the government, you want information here.

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Take it all your verizons are sure, you know, hear

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>all the records of all our customers. Take it all.

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>You're keeping us safe. And I think that to me,

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the most important thing is an informed public. That if

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>people can examine for themselves, but that they really think

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that we're being kept safe by all of this, and

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 1>really examine you both the costs and the benefits in

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 1>an educated way, I think we get much better discussions.

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 1>And I think not only do you have the possibility

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of getting better legislation or regulation, you also have the

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>possibility that private companies and you know, the tech the

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 1>tech companies are not going to want to do it

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>anymore because their customers don't want them to. Yeah. I

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>mean it's hard to have an informed public and to

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>have these discussions, even in this current environment. To some degree.

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people I think are struggling with the idea

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of truth. People are um, you know. And I remember,

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I remember this note in leaks, like

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I remember being in the news room covering technology and

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking to myself because I wrote the tech bubble all

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the way up right, and thinking, this is an extraordinary moment,

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>because we saw that we've been sharing all our data.

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 1>But we saw for the first time that, you know,

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the government had a lot of access to things that

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we had no idea they had access to. And I

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>think it was a fundamental shift, and the lens on

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:08.240
<v Speaker 1>tech companies changed at that moment, and tech companies behavior

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>has changed quite a bit after that. You know, I

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>wonder this moment we're sitting in where we're having these

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>debates about surveillance and privacy and whatnot. These are sticky

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>debates and they're very politicized as we're heading into an election,

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>as we have misinformation spreading online, as a lot of

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 1>people don't know what to believe and what not to believe.

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>As the media landscape has changed, it's it certainly seems

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 1>like a harder environment to even to even have some

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of these conversations. Well, I think in some ways it's

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>harder in some ways. I think the other thing that

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 1>is a catalyst for the discussions is realizing that there's

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a dimension of race to all of us, I think,

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>and talking about artificial intelligence and facial recognition, not many

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>people saw that as an issue of structural racism. You know,

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that there's something wrong with how we're putting together the

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>algorithms and it ends up that John Lewis is going

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to be misidentified as somebody who matches a mug shot

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and that Robert Williams is going to be arrested. So

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that the fact that we now know that

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that is an additional concern enables us to have richer conversations.

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>So we're not only talking about is there a trade

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>off between security and privacy? Plus, I think the other

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that people are feeling much more open to is

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to have that deeper conversation about what are our goals

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>here and if we're enabling all this government surveillance in

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 1>order to help the government to catch criminals, well, you

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>know what do we mean by criminals? What crimes are

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 1>they solving? And how are they using you know, how

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>how are how is this actually being used in services?

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Wood So I feel like in some ways, you know,

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>with the election coming up, I think that gives people

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 1>more impetus to want to talk about these issues, because

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the elections aren't only about the president. They're also about

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 1>local prosecutors and sheriffs and the people who make the

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:53.759
<v Speaker 1>decisions about whether to buy surveillance equipment and what they're

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna do with their authority over the criminal justice system.

0:36:57.320 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>So one thing the a c l U has been

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>doing in addition to everything else, as we've been very

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>involved in elections of prosecutors because that's the place where

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>almost people never used to pay attention to, you know who,

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>who were these people running and maybe they would vote

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>for somebody without really knowing what they voted for. So

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 1>what we're urging, and I think this is very much

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about about having an educated public. We're

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>urging people to go to elections or to go to debates,

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to go to campaign events, attend I guess on zoom

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 1>these days, to attend campaign events and ask the candidates questions,

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:32.839
<v Speaker 1>what would be your policy about whether or not you're

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>going to accept military equipment from the federal government in

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 1>your police department? Are you going to buy tanks? Are

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you going to buy you know, these horrible weapons that

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 1>are used. Is that something you would do? Are you

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>going to buy you know, facial recognition software? Is that

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 1>how you would use your power? If we left you

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>um say that the prosecutors, would you support a reduction

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in cash bail and increase of increased alternatives to incarceration?

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's a place where without way for the government

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to do something, we can ourselves affect what's happening in

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>our communities by encouraging candidates to think about what positions

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 1>they're taking on these different issues and letting them know

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna lose votes. The more people educated, the

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 1>more they are educated, the more they can tell people

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that they'll lose votes, and to try that. This is

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:24.279
<v Speaker 1>something that's worked in some places to encourage candidates to

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 1>take a better position. Yeah. Yeah, they might never never

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>thought of that, but you know, once they commit themselves,

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that that's going to be better. So there

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:33.919
<v Speaker 1>are all sorts of ways that we can affect things.

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 1>More from Susan after the break and make sure you

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>set up for our newsletter at dot dot dot media

0:38:42.200 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Backslash newsletter will be launching this summer. Before

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I move on from specifically some of the tech issues,

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I have to bring up predator drones right right, you know,

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the the U S. Customs and Border Protection flew a

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 1>large predator drone over the Minneapolis protests. You know, people

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>were protesting police brutality and the killing of George Floyd,

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:20.759
<v Speaker 1>and for many reasons, it almost felt symbolic. You know,

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it was raising all these questions about aerial surveillance, about

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 1>what data was being collected, where was this going? What

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>is your take on this? Well, you know, as you're saying, Laurie,

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know that really it really magnifies the opportunity

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to gather more information because you don't even have to

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>have the helicopters or whatever. But so you know that

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of course is a concern just you how much information

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is the government gathering, what are they going to do

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 1>with it, who's going to have access to it? Will

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 1>would ever be deleted or will it just got to

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 1>stay there in the government databasis forever. But I think

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the other thing that the Predator drone brings to mind

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is a question that people were also asking, which is

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>about the new live touris aation of law enforcement we've

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 1>had for years in this country, a passi Comma tat

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 1>us Act as it's called, which says, you don't want

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the military doing everyday law enforcement, because that's that's not

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>our country. We don't want the military to be quote

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 1>dominating the streets, and we don't want the people who

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>are out protesting to be considered the enemy of the

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>United States, there are people who are expressing their opinions,

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 1>and so the whole idea of you know, it's one thing.

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>It's enough if the police held helicopters are flying overhead

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 1>and trying to keep track of, you know, who's in

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the crowd and what the crowd is doing. But once

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you start adding an element of something the military helicopters

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>or the military drones or things that feel like we

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:48.280
<v Speaker 1>are being treated as the enemy of the government, instaid

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that the people who are the government, who are supposed

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to be controlling the government, I think that that's just it.

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a very bad paradigm. You think it's a slippery slope, Well,

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a slippery slope unless we stopped the slipping. And

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:04.279
<v Speaker 1>as we saw with you with Amazon and the facial recognition,

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 1>if people say, wait a minute, yeah, I think we

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:08.879
<v Speaker 1>can make that stuff. But I think if people don't

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 1>pay attention, I think we have a very slippery slope.

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I've been saying about most of the

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 1>issues we've talked about you, starting with the contact tracing

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and the surveillance and everything else. It seems to me

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:23.359
<v Speaker 1>that what's really important is transparency. We should know what

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the government is doing and accountability. Back on the issue

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 1>of contact tracing, one thing that the AHL you do,

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:32.359
<v Speaker 1>together with the a l U of Massachusetts, is we

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:36.320
<v Speaker 1>have filed a lawsuit. We're actually a records request demanding

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that the government, including the CDC, release information about the

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.319
<v Speaker 1>possible uses of all the location data that they would

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:47.359
<v Speaker 1>be collecting in connection with contact tracing, because you know,

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>once if you don't know what they're doing, then you

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:51.799
<v Speaker 1>can't have a discussion about what they should be doing.

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And one reason why I was bringing up all the

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:56.439
<v Speaker 1>post nine eleven changes of law is that I think

0:41:56.480 --> 0:42:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that the whole idea that we can't know the government

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 1>is doing. The government has to act in secret in

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>order to keep us safe or else the enemy will

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to know what they're doing and you know,

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and work around it. But the government can know everything

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that we're doing. I think that just has democracy backwards.

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:15.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, we have to be able to know what's

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:18.839
<v Speaker 1>happening inside the government. And that applies to why are

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 1>they sending the Predator drone? What are they going to

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:22.799
<v Speaker 1>do with the information? What does this mean? Are they

0:42:22.800 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>going to do it again? And it also has to

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:28.400
<v Speaker 1>do with the contact track tracking and tracing. Once they

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>get that data, what happens to it? Are they going

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to erase itever? You know, who do they share it with?

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 1>What are they going to do with it? And I feel,

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:37.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, those are really important issues in a democracy,

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>that we just have the right to know what the

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>government is doing so that we can talk about it.

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:44.359
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like to sort of say, well, this

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is what the government is doing and that's really bad,

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and that upsets me. I think that kind of misses

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the point. If the government is doing something bad, then

0:42:52.320 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it is the duty of every American to find out

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing and to push back. And so at

0:42:57.840 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the a C. O you we have a program that

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:03.399
<v Speaker 1>we call People Power. We first invented that and used

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it to explain to cities and localities all over the

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>country about how they could fight back against draconian immigration

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:14.839
<v Speaker 1>rules by becoming quote sanctuary cities, what what their rights

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>actually were. We then used it for voting rights. We're

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 1>about to use it some more for voting rights. But

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:22.279
<v Speaker 1>what we have really urged and I hope that you know,

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>some of your listeners will go to the a C

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:26.239
<v Speaker 1>l U website and see about what people power is

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>doing in addition to what the a c l U

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.600
<v Speaker 1>is doing, Because what is the A c L you doing?

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:32.759
<v Speaker 1>And that's all the staffers at home trying to you know,

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:34.799
<v Speaker 1>work on their new laptops while they're trying to, you know,

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 1>keep their talkers quiet. But people power is about what

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:40.919
<v Speaker 1>every single person can and I think should be doing.

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:43.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, if people really educate themselves and think about

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the ethical issues, the costs and benefits of all this

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>technology in addition to a lot of other things going on,

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:52.839
<v Speaker 1>I think we get a lot better results if people

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 1>pay attention. Yeah, I mean, it's interesting to watch the

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 1>A c L you take on issues like surveillance, facial recognition.

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I know, the A C L you out a lawsuit

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 1>against clear View AI, which was this very controversial company

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that was using biometric data. I think facial recognition technology

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>helped them collect something like three billion face prints, and

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:15.320
<v Speaker 1>they were giving access to private companies, wealthy individuals, federal,

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 1>state and local law enforcement agencies. And you know, coming

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 1>from the tech space, it certainly feels like sometimes these stories,

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you just don't know what these companies are doing until

0:44:25.200 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you start, you know, peeling back the layers and seeing

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:30.200
<v Speaker 1>all the data went to here and here, and why

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 1>did it go there? And why wasn't this disclosed? And

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and oftentimes it takes the watchdog to really understand where

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:40.879
<v Speaker 1>some of this can can go wrong and how it's

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 1>being used in ways in ways that can be dangerous

0:44:44.200 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in many ways. Yeah, I think that's exactly right. And

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that's why I was saying before that aren't concerned before

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:51.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody jumps on the bandwagon about let's have more contact

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 1>tracing and then you know, like everybody should just be

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>doing all this information. I think we have to get

0:44:57.080 --> 0:45:00.479
<v Speaker 1>a dog. Yeah, you're not gonna have the watch dog

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 1>telling you things unless you build a watchdog into the system.

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And if everything is just you know, a company has

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 1>invented this and is selling it to the police, or

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a company who has invented this and now we're all

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 1>going to buy it. If you just leave out any

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:15.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of oversight, then you really have a tremendous potential problem.

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Are there any other examples of tech that we're not

0:45:17.960 --> 0:45:23.399
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the unintended consequences for our rights or privacy yet? Well,

0:45:23.440 --> 0:45:26.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, a AI is really big altogether across as

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you're saying across many different kinds of issues. I was

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:32.760
<v Speaker 1>just actually, this is not a tangential to your question,

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:34.759
<v Speaker 1>but you were asking me before about cases that I

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 1>had worked on, and there was another case that I

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 1>worked on that was about tech where I wrote the

0:45:39.280 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 1>A c l Use brief in the Supreme Court. It

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:44.759
<v Speaker 1>was an ancus brief. It wasn't about our client, but

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it was a kid called Riley versus California. And what

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:51.239
<v Speaker 1>the police were saying they're most law enforcement places, the

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 1>federal government as well as the state of California and

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 1>many other jurisdictions, was that when you arrest somebody, the

0:45:57.719 --> 0:45:59.880
<v Speaker 1>police get to do what is called a search incident

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to arrest, so they get to see what you have

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:03.839
<v Speaker 1>in your pocket. Makes some sense, right, you know, if

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a gun in your pocket, that's a problem,

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>or you know whatever, So they get to do a

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:09.879
<v Speaker 1>surgeon sent in to arrest. And the law had been

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that if they find something in your pocket like that's

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a container, they can search inside the container to

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:18.760
<v Speaker 1>see if there's anything in it that that could be harmful.

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:21.360
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, there was one situation where they opened

0:46:21.400 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>up a cigarette package that somebody had and they you know,

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:26.719
<v Speaker 1>they could find a razor blade, they could find marijuana,

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>cigarette whatever. So that was law where the Supreme Court said, yes,

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you're allowed to search people and search the containers that

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 1>are on them. Well, what law enforcement said was, your

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 1>cell phone is a container. When we arrest you, we

0:46:38.640 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>can search your cell phone. It's a container. We have

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the right to search incident to risk. And so we

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 1>wrote a brief saying no, it's not you know, it's

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a container, but it's a container that essentially is your home,

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it's your library, it's your desk. So allowing the police

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to look in your cell phone when they only had

0:46:56.440 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>really very feeble and very unlikely scenarios, things just wouldn't

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 1>happen too often for what the need was. You know,

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe you had some remote thing that would go off

0:47:04.560 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and would blow something up, you know, oh come on, yeah,

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:08.640
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, there were other ways to deal with a

0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of that, and so the Supreme Court actually agreed

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 1>with that. They said, yeah, you know, this is really

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:17.400
<v Speaker 1>is just a technological way of finding out what's in

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:20.680
<v Speaker 1>your your papers and books and records. It used to

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:22.120
<v Speaker 1>be they were in your desk, and now they're in

0:47:22.200 --> 0:47:24.839
<v Speaker 1>your cell phone. So that to me, it's a sort

0:47:24.880 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of a whole thread of what we've been talking about.

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:30.400
<v Speaker 1>But the challenges to civil liberties are different and in

0:47:30.440 --> 0:47:35.280
<v Speaker 1>some ways greater when the technology builds up. Yeah, there's

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:37.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a great quote on the A c. L U website.

0:47:37.640 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>The fact that technology now allows an individual to carry

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:42.640
<v Speaker 1>such information in his hand does not make the information

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:45.720
<v Speaker 1>any less worthy of the protection for which the founders fought.

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:49.880
<v Speaker 1>The U. S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts exactly.

0:47:50.360 --> 0:47:52.239
<v Speaker 1>I like to talk about, you know, one of the

0:47:52.239 --> 0:47:55.239
<v Speaker 1>whole points of the Constitution adding the Fourth Amendment, which

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is the protection of privacy, is they wanted to protect

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 1>what was in Benjamin Franklin's disk. You know, nobody should

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 1>know if he was writing some things that were anti government,

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:05.319
<v Speaker 1>and we now have that on our cell phone, so

0:48:05.360 --> 0:48:07.759
<v Speaker 1>of course, But that's where I think that a lot

0:48:07.800 --> 0:48:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of the protection of civil liberties is applying our fundamental

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 1>principles in different circumstances. Taking a gigantic step back, what

0:48:17.200 --> 0:48:19.360
<v Speaker 1>do you think is the biggest threat to civil liberties

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:22.839
<v Speaker 1>in the new World Order? In the New World Order, Well,

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's hard to just select one. In sort

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of like Sophie's choice, you know which, which is your

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:30.319
<v Speaker 1>favorite child? Right now, I think one of our very

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:33.200
<v Speaker 1>top priorities in Adenia. Mass incarceration is a big one

0:48:33.239 --> 0:48:36.319
<v Speaker 1>because so many people's lives are just being totally disrupted

0:48:36.320 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>their families, and often the question really has to be

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 1>for what. One thing that we're hoping is that the

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 1>work we've been doing around trying to get vulnerable people

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:47.680
<v Speaker 1>released from prison so that they won't get the virus

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and get seriously all possibly die is we're helping that

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:56.280
<v Speaker 1>once jurisdictions see that they were able to release thousands

0:48:56.360 --> 0:48:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of people from prisons and jails and that it's not

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>going to cause a spike in the crime rate, it

0:49:01.680 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 1>really is pretty safe thing to do. We're hoping that

0:49:04.200 --> 0:49:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that's going to stick and that long run will be

0:49:07.400 --> 0:49:09.319
<v Speaker 1>able to rethink, well, did we really need to put

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:11.399
<v Speaker 1>all those people in prison and jail to start with?

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:13.920
<v Speaker 1>What are we doing with the criminal justice system? So

0:49:14.000 --> 0:49:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that's really big. But the other thing that I think

0:49:16.239 --> 0:49:19.120
<v Speaker 1>is really big right now is voting rights. I have

0:49:19.160 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 1>alluded to this at the beginning of our conversation, but

0:49:22.760 --> 0:49:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the premise of democracy is that the people get to

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:27.839
<v Speaker 1>decide on who should be running the government and who

0:49:27.840 --> 0:49:30.239
<v Speaker 1>should be making the policy about all these things we're

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:33.279
<v Speaker 1>talking about here. You know, what, what are the regulations

0:49:33.320 --> 0:49:36.960
<v Speaker 1>about technology? What are the regulations about your reproductive freedom?

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Everything else? LGBT rights? Uh, And it's the people's vote

0:49:43.239 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is distorted. That's a real problem that people can't vote.

0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:49.160
<v Speaker 1>So we have litigation going on right now in I

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:53.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's like thirty different states trying to get people

0:49:53.200 --> 0:49:56.359
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to vote. So one of the things that

0:49:57.160 --> 0:50:01.160
<v Speaker 1>has happened in addition to all way is that incumbents

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:03.480
<v Speaker 1>had been using to try to protect their own seats,

0:50:04.160 --> 0:50:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is that the virus has really made it dangerous for

0:50:06.600 --> 0:50:10.000
<v Speaker 1>people to vote in public places. So we saw the

0:50:10.080 --> 0:50:13.480
<v Speaker 1>election in Wisconsin where people were just lined up for

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, tremendous distance is waiting for a really long

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:19.080
<v Speaker 1>time to vote because Wisconsin would not allow them to

0:50:19.200 --> 0:50:22.880
<v Speaker 1>submit absentee ballots. And in fact, a study showed afterwards

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that at least seventeen people got got the virus from voting.

0:50:26.560 --> 0:50:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Many many polling places were closed because they, first of all,

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:32.799
<v Speaker 1>the poll poll workers are generally elderly people, and the

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:35.279
<v Speaker 1>poll workers were not able and willing to to man

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the polling places. There are a number of states that

0:50:38.480 --> 0:50:41.239
<v Speaker 1>don't allow absentee ballots at all unless you have a

0:50:41.280 --> 0:50:44.839
<v Speaker 1>particular situation, like if you're disabled, and the states are saying, oh, well,

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:46.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, the pure the virus are getting yill, that's

0:50:46.920 --> 0:50:50.120
<v Speaker 1>not a disability. Or before you get an absentee ballot,

0:50:50.160 --> 0:50:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to have it notarized, you have to have witnesses. Now,

0:50:53.160 --> 0:50:56.359
<v Speaker 1>how is all this going to happen? So it's very

0:50:56.400 --> 0:50:59.480
<v Speaker 1>concerning that people are going to have to choose between

0:50:59.520 --> 0:51:02.120
<v Speaker 1>their health and they're right to vote, and we don't

0:51:02.120 --> 0:51:04.600
<v Speaker 1>think that that should happen. And that's something that has

0:51:04.640 --> 0:51:07.799
<v Speaker 1>to be attended to right now, because if states don't

0:51:07.840 --> 0:51:10.839
<v Speaker 1>come up with plans for trying to enable everyone who

0:51:10.920 --> 0:51:13.839
<v Speaker 1>wants to vote to be able to vote, and for

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 1>counting absentee ballots and for administering this program, if you

0:51:17.280 --> 0:51:19.640
<v Speaker 1>don't come up right now with the plan and the resources,

0:51:19.880 --> 0:51:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are going to be left out

0:51:21.480 --> 0:51:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to find that either you know, they

0:51:23.560 --> 0:51:25.919
<v Speaker 1>can't vote because they're afraid to go out to the poll,

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:28.400
<v Speaker 1>or the vote is not going to be adequately counted.

0:51:28.880 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think that right now, making democracy work is

0:51:31.560 --> 0:51:34.560
<v Speaker 1>really one of our top projects. What is the solution

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:37.239
<v Speaker 1>to some of these problems? What are your tangible solutions?

0:51:37.560 --> 0:51:39.960
<v Speaker 1>But one tangible solution is that more states have to

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:43.319
<v Speaker 1>make absentee balloting available to people without having all these

0:51:43.320 --> 0:51:48.279
<v Speaker 1>conditions and you know obstacles. Uh. The other solution is

0:51:48.560 --> 0:51:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you were talking before about truth. A lot of the

0:51:52.200 --> 0:51:56.080
<v Speaker 1>reason that's given the very thin veneer of justification that's

0:51:56.120 --> 0:51:58.399
<v Speaker 1>given for we don't want absentee ballots or we need

0:51:58.480 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 1>voter i D keep to carry government to approved voter

0:52:02.680 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 1>i D, which means you have to go down to

0:52:04.560 --> 0:52:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a governmental office live and get your voter i D

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and show it at the polls. The excuse for a

0:52:10.200 --> 0:52:12.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of this is is that there could be fraud. Well,

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:16.160
<v Speaker 1>studies have shown that there's virtually no voter fraud, and

0:52:16.400 --> 0:52:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's really a real unicorn. And again, I

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:21.640
<v Speaker 1>think if people understood that, that might sound good, but

0:52:21.680 --> 0:52:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not true. I think truth is another thing that

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:26.719
<v Speaker 1>we're really fighting for these days. Can you listen to

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the evidence. Can you listen to the public health officials?

0:52:29.120 --> 0:52:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Can you listen to what you what's real? I know

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:34.480
<v Speaker 1>for a fact that tech companies are very concerned about

0:52:34.560 --> 0:52:38.759
<v Speaker 1>voter suppression, you know, and misinformation spreading online. This idea

0:52:38.800 --> 0:52:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of countering truth around a lot of these very important initiatives,

0:52:41.960 --> 0:52:44.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's absentee ballots, whether it's showing up to the polls,

0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:47.680
<v Speaker 1>all that kind of thing. You know. I'd be curious

0:52:47.719 --> 0:52:50.399
<v Speaker 1>to know your take. There's a current battle happening right now.

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:54.680
<v Speaker 1>You have seven fifty advertisers boycotting Facebook asking for better

0:52:54.719 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 1>policing of hateful content. Our social media companies doing enough

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to police harmful content, especially as we head into an

0:53:02.440 --> 0:53:05.239
<v Speaker 1>election where voter suppression and the spread of misinformation will

0:53:05.280 --> 0:53:08.719
<v Speaker 1>most certainly be attacked. It used to manipulate voters. Well,

0:53:08.800 --> 0:53:11.360
<v Speaker 1>let me actually break your question down into two different parts,

0:53:11.360 --> 0:53:13.520
<v Speaker 1>because you were starting by saying about the concern about

0:53:13.600 --> 0:53:16.560
<v Speaker 1>voter suppression. I think one thing that everybody should be

0:53:16.600 --> 0:53:20.200
<v Speaker 1>doing is to increase awareness of what is a fair

0:53:20.239 --> 0:53:24.000
<v Speaker 1>way to improve access to the ballot for everybody. And

0:53:24.040 --> 0:53:26.160
<v Speaker 1>some of those things are tech solutions. We've had tech

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:29.640
<v Speaker 1>solutions for years that are available and not widely enough used.

0:53:30.080 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>How to enable differently able people to vote. You can

0:53:33.600 --> 0:53:36.920
<v Speaker 1>blind people, do they have the technology? So there are

0:53:36.960 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of places where we need the tech community

0:53:39.320 --> 0:53:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and we need everybody to find out how you vote,

0:53:42.560 --> 0:53:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to find out a voting can be made easier, and

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to let people know what the rules for voting are

0:53:47.480 --> 0:53:49.040
<v Speaker 1>where they live. So one thing the a c l

0:53:49.120 --> 0:53:51.080
<v Speaker 1>U Is doing is we have on our website you

0:53:51.080 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 1>know your rights, you know what you're voting regulations are,

0:53:54.560 --> 0:53:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's something that I think people really have to

0:53:56.440 --> 0:53:59.359
<v Speaker 1>start thinking a lot about and to let let all

0:53:59.400 --> 0:54:01.839
<v Speaker 1>their community is all their friends and family know about

0:54:01.880 --> 0:54:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the importance of voting and how they what they have

0:54:04.480 --> 0:54:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to do to vote, and to urge them to just

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:08.759
<v Speaker 1>get out and vote in whatever form that's going to take.

0:54:09.200 --> 0:54:12.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's really important. In terms of disinformation

0:54:13.000 --> 0:54:17.759
<v Speaker 1>on social media, people talk about the First Amendment and

0:54:17.800 --> 0:54:20.400
<v Speaker 1>whether you know there's a First Amendment problem with Facebook

0:54:20.719 --> 0:54:23.479
<v Speaker 1>telling you what you can't do. Well, there isn't, because

0:54:23.520 --> 0:54:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the First Amendment only applies to the government, so you

0:54:26.719 --> 0:54:28.880
<v Speaker 1>don't have a First Amendment right to say whatever you

0:54:28.920 --> 0:54:31.680
<v Speaker 1>want on Facebook. However, I have to say that we're

0:54:31.719 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't regard that issue is altogether a

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:37.640
<v Speaker 1>simplistic issue that Facebook should be telling everybody what they

0:54:37.719 --> 0:54:40.560
<v Speaker 1>can't say, because even though the First Amendment does not

0:54:40.640 --> 0:54:44.080
<v Speaker 1>apply to private companies, there's still a tremendous value to

0:54:44.120 --> 0:54:47.560
<v Speaker 1>free speech. And there are a number of examples which

0:54:47.600 --> 0:54:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, are we've come up with about people who

0:54:50.800 --> 0:54:53.960
<v Speaker 1>are have speech suppressed for bad reasons. I'll give you

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:57.120
<v Speaker 1>one example. There was a woman who African American woman

0:54:57.680 --> 0:54:59.960
<v Speaker 1>who posted something on Twitter and she got all the

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:04.359
<v Speaker 1>it is horrible racist responses, and she posted a screenshot

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of the responses that she got to show people what

0:55:06.680 --> 0:55:09.080
<v Speaker 1>she was up against, and Twitter took it down because

0:55:09.080 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it included racist words that you know, okay, you know

0:55:13.080 --> 0:55:16.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of this is the point. There was another uh

0:55:16.360 --> 0:55:20.000
<v Speaker 1>An CLU lawyer wrote about a statue in Kansas that

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:23.799
<v Speaker 1>was a topless statue is a woman who were bare aggreasted,

0:55:24.080 --> 0:55:27.319
<v Speaker 1>and so whatever the locality was in Kansas decided to

0:55:27.360 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 1>take it down because yeah, that was they considered that

0:55:30.160 --> 0:55:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to be important. So the A. C. L You lawyer

0:55:32.400 --> 0:55:34.680
<v Speaker 1>who was challenging whether or not the I think it

0:55:34.760 --> 0:55:37.759
<v Speaker 1>was city could take it down, posted a portrait a

0:55:37.760 --> 0:55:40.160
<v Speaker 1>picture of the statue and that was it wasn't Twitter

0:55:40.239 --> 0:55:42.680
<v Speaker 1>as I think Facebook, and that was taken down on

0:55:42.719 --> 0:55:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the ground that it was obscene, so she couldn't post

0:55:45.239 --> 0:55:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the picture of what she wanted to do. So we

0:55:47.640 --> 0:55:51.200
<v Speaker 1>think that social media control is really a two age sword.

0:55:51.880 --> 0:55:54.040
<v Speaker 1>What I liked is at one point Facebook had a

0:55:54.040 --> 0:55:56.800
<v Speaker 1>protocol for about you what's true and what isn't true,

0:55:57.280 --> 0:55:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And what they did was they gave you a flag.

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:02.760
<v Speaker 1>So they were concerned that something that was said wasn't true,

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:05.839
<v Speaker 1>they would have a neutral fact checker check it, and

0:56:05.880 --> 0:56:08.080
<v Speaker 1>then if it didn't turn up well, they would put

0:56:08.080 --> 0:56:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a little flag over it and say this has been questioned,

0:56:10.560 --> 0:56:12.319
<v Speaker 1>and you could click on the flag and you could

0:56:12.360 --> 0:56:14.640
<v Speaker 1>see why it was questioned. But they didn't just take

0:56:14.680 --> 0:56:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it down. So you know, I I agree that, you know,

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:20.880
<v Speaker 1>disinformation is a tremendous problem, but I think that the

0:56:20.960 --> 0:56:23.560
<v Speaker 1>idea that the solution is asked the tchech companies to

0:56:23.640 --> 0:56:26.399
<v Speaker 1>decide what we should and shouldn't see. Yeah, I don't

0:56:26.400 --> 0:56:29.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's so great either, And certainly they should not

0:56:29.440 --> 0:56:32.400
<v Speaker 1>be doing it without a lot of transparency and accountability.

0:56:32.440 --> 0:56:34.840
<v Speaker 1>If they're going to be taking things down, they should

0:56:34.840 --> 0:56:38.239
<v Speaker 1>tell us what their protocols are, and you know, there

0:56:38.239 --> 0:56:42.040
<v Speaker 1>should be more public discussion about where the balance is there. Yeah,

0:56:42.040 --> 0:56:44.239
<v Speaker 1>It certainly seems like the protocols changed quite a bit,

0:56:44.360 --> 0:56:47.239
<v Speaker 1>especially having covered tent for for this many years. It

0:56:47.239 --> 0:56:50.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly seems like Facebook changes at Twitter changes it, and

0:56:50.120 --> 0:56:52.879
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes it depends on public pressure. I'm curious to see

0:56:52.920 --> 0:56:56.320
<v Speaker 1>what happens with all these advertisers boycotting. I think personally,

0:56:56.360 --> 0:56:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling it won't impact the bottom line

0:56:58.200 --> 0:57:00.879
<v Speaker 1>much and they'll go back to business, says normal. But

0:57:00.880 --> 0:57:03.239
<v Speaker 1>but who knows, you know, I do know that Zuckerbird

0:57:03.320 --> 0:57:06.839
<v Speaker 1>cares uh deeply about his employees and and but they've

0:57:06.840 --> 0:57:09.719
<v Speaker 1>been kind of up against you know, public scrutiny for

0:57:09.719 --> 0:57:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a very long time. But but it certainly is interesting,

0:57:12.360 --> 0:57:16.240
<v Speaker 1>especially when the stakes get higher and disinformation can go further,

0:57:16.360 --> 0:57:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and especially as we get closer to an election, it

0:57:19.600 --> 0:57:24.919
<v Speaker 1>certainly feels like everyone feels more triggered around it. Yeah, yeah, well,

0:57:24.920 --> 0:57:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the classics statements about the First

0:57:27.120 --> 0:57:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Amendment is that in the marketplace of ideas, the best

0:57:29.840 --> 0:57:33.760
<v Speaker 1>antidote to bad speech is more speech, right, so, you know, suppression.

0:57:33.760 --> 0:57:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we always have to worry every time somebody's

0:57:35.960 --> 0:57:39.880
<v Speaker 1>censoring and suppressing. Yeah, who are we giving that power to?

0:57:40.320 --> 0:57:42.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, nearing a clothes because we don't have you

0:57:42.560 --> 0:57:44.840
<v Speaker 1>for too much longer. I saw that you gave a

0:57:44.880 --> 0:57:49.080
<v Speaker 1>talk um a Democrat and a Republican walk into a bar,

0:57:49.640 --> 0:57:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and you're saying that it seems like these days Democrats

0:57:52.120 --> 0:57:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and Republicans can't really agree on anything, but we all

0:57:54.880 --> 0:57:58.480
<v Speaker 1>need to agree on fundamental American principles like do process,

0:57:58.520 --> 0:58:04.040
<v Speaker 1>equality and freedom of conscience. So is that possible? Do

0:58:04.080 --> 0:58:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you believe are you? Are you an optimist? Do you

0:58:06.040 --> 0:58:10.400
<v Speaker 1>believe that in this current environment? Is that possible? Well?

0:58:10.440 --> 0:58:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's a great wrap up question. Where

0:58:13.160 --> 0:58:15.720
<v Speaker 1>so that speech I gave it the Central Arkansas Library,

0:58:16.480 --> 0:58:18.720
<v Speaker 1>And my chief point, as you're saying, is I think

0:58:18.760 --> 0:58:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that people have to be able to agree on neutral principles.

0:58:24.280 --> 0:58:27.440
<v Speaker 1>The Constitution was designed not to say what we're going

0:58:27.480 --> 0:58:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to do about everything. It was designed to have everybody

0:58:30.440 --> 0:58:33.960
<v Speaker 1>have a fair opportunity to be part of the process

0:58:34.040 --> 0:58:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of deciding what we're going to do. So it sets

0:58:36.400 --> 0:58:39.000
<v Speaker 1>up all these democratic structures where we get to vote

0:58:39.040 --> 0:58:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for the people who are the policy makers and we

0:58:40.960 --> 0:58:44.120
<v Speaker 1>all get to decide. But the principles there, the underlying

0:58:44.160 --> 0:58:46.600
<v Speaker 1>principle is that everybody should have a fair and you know,

0:58:46.920 --> 0:58:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the principle should be neutral. Everyone should get to vote.

0:58:49.640 --> 0:58:51.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not like, you know, if you're a Democrat, your

0:58:52.000 --> 0:58:54.400
<v Speaker 1>vote doesn't count in this area, and if your republic

0:58:54.440 --> 0:58:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and your vote doesn't count in that area, is that's

0:58:56.640 --> 0:59:01.280
<v Speaker 1>not fair. And the basic ideas of the freedom of speech,

0:59:01.320 --> 0:59:04.840
<v Speaker 1>freedom of religion, they're all to be they manage the

0:59:04.880 --> 0:59:07.680
<v Speaker 1>stations of the Golden rule that if I want the

0:59:07.680 --> 0:59:10.120
<v Speaker 1>ability to just choose my own religion and decide what

0:59:10.200 --> 0:59:12.520
<v Speaker 1>religion I'm going to practice, I have to respect your

0:59:12.640 --> 0:59:14.960
<v Speaker 1>right to make a different choice and have your own religion,

0:59:15.200 --> 0:59:17.480
<v Speaker 1>because that's the golden rule. If I want to say

0:59:17.520 --> 0:59:20.120
<v Speaker 1>something that's unpopular, I have to respect your right to

0:59:20.160 --> 0:59:22.640
<v Speaker 1>say something that's unpopular. And if I want to be

0:59:22.720 --> 0:59:25.200
<v Speaker 1>treated fairly and not locked away for you know, doing

0:59:25.240 --> 0:59:27.760
<v Speaker 1>something minor and never given a fair trial, I have

0:59:27.840 --> 0:59:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to respect your right to have the same thing happened

0:59:30.120 --> 0:59:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to you and to be all those fundamental principles are

0:59:33.360 --> 0:59:35.880
<v Speaker 1>things that we really all should agree on. I think

0:59:35.880 --> 0:59:39.120
<v Speaker 1>people get into arguing and assuming that they can never

0:59:39.200 --> 0:59:42.840
<v Speaker 1>agree on the principles because they're differing on what they

0:59:42.840 --> 0:59:45.440
<v Speaker 1>think the results should be. And I think to be

0:59:45.520 --> 0:59:47.760
<v Speaker 1>part of the point of civil liberties is it's all

0:59:47.800 --> 0:59:50.120
<v Speaker 1>about process, it's not about results. The a c l

0:59:50.160 --> 0:59:53.240
<v Speaker 1>U is nonpartisan. We don't try to get Republicans elected,

0:59:53.240 --> 0:59:55.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't try to get Democrats elected. We don't favor

0:59:56.000 --> 1:00:00.360
<v Speaker 1>or disfavor individual politicians or individual parties, but we we

1:00:00.480 --> 1:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>favor or that there should be neutral principles that everybody

1:00:04.000 --> 1:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>can agree to to say, okay, here's what's fair. And

1:00:06.880 --> 1:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the analogy I used in that talk at the Central

1:00:09.760 --> 1:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Arkansas Library. It was one of the nights during the

1:00:13.640 --> 1:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>World Series, but fortunately not a night where there was

1:00:15.920 --> 1:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a game, so people were able to come. And I said, okay,

1:00:19.200 --> 1:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>so what happens before a baseball game is that everybody

1:00:22.360 --> 1:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>has agreed on the underlying rules, and everyone agrees that

1:00:25.720 --> 1:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the your umpires, your referees, and any sports should be neutral.

1:00:30.320 --> 1:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>And you don't want somebody who's partisan. If they were

1:00:32.680 --> 1:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>favoring one team, you get rid of them at all.

1:00:35.000 --> 1:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Sports fans could agree to that. You know, maybe there

1:00:37.360 --> 1:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>would be a few who would be just so you know, matchiavellian,

1:00:39.920 --> 1:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that they would rather have the biased umpire to always

1:00:43.880 --> 1:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>rule for their side. But I think sports fans can

1:00:45.800 --> 1:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>agree what you really want for a fair game. Is

1:00:48.640 --> 1:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you want a fair game, you want everyone to agree

1:00:50.640 --> 1:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>on the principles beforehand. And I think that if we

1:00:53.480 --> 1:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>could sit down in small groups around the country and

1:00:56.040 --> 1:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>really talk about what the fundamental principles are, I am

1:00:59.840 --> 1:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>an enough of the patriot to think we actually could

1:01:01.880 --> 1:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>agree about a lot. And let me give you an

1:01:03.840 --> 1:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>example of why. I think there's some basis for hope.

1:01:07.960 --> 1:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not optimism, but certainly hope. We were talking about

1:01:11.280 --> 1:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>voting rights. So one of the major problems is gerrymandering,

1:01:14.600 --> 1:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the way when a party is in power they try

1:01:17.800 --> 1:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to distort all the district and they try to stack

1:01:20.840 --> 1:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the deck so that their party will remain in power.

1:01:23.880 --> 1:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Or if the party in power in a particular state

1:01:26.360 --> 1:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>thinks it's to their advantage to not have that many

1:01:28.720 --> 1:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>people vote, they try to make it harder to register

1:01:31.640 --> 1:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to vote for new voters, etcetera. Uh, we have had

1:01:36.160 --> 1:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the A C l U and a number of other

1:01:38.680 --> 1:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>organizations working in coalition with US have had a fair

1:01:41.480 --> 1:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>amount of success doing ballot initiatives going to the people

1:01:45.280 --> 1:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of the state in states like Michigan and Nevada and

1:01:48.800 --> 1:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Missouri and Florida, where we were part of getting the

1:01:51.920 --> 1:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>amendment for a past that gave the vote back to

1:01:54.960 --> 1:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>people who have been convicted of a felony at some

1:01:57.160 --> 1:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>point and the people of the state. When you us

1:02:00.240 --> 1:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the people of the state, you can get a majority

1:02:02.440 --> 1:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the super majority of people who say no, we

1:02:04.840 --> 1:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>want the rules to be fair. Who doesn't want the

1:02:07.800 --> 1:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>rules to be fair are legislators who want who are

1:02:11.000 --> 1:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>incumbents and who want to keep their seats even if

1:02:13.200 --> 1:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it takes unfair procedures to do it. So that's a

1:02:16.480 --> 1:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>real problem right where we have right now that the incumbents,

1:02:19.320 --> 1:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the people who are trying to maintain power and not

1:02:21.920 --> 1:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>allow any sort of regime change, are pulling all the levers.

1:02:25.680 --> 1:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>But what I think, I think the chief grounds for

1:02:27.960 --> 1:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>optimism is that when you go to the American people

1:02:30.920 --> 1:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>themselves and say, well, do you want a fair system

1:02:33.320 --> 1:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>or do you want a system where you think your

1:02:34.800 --> 1:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>side is more likely to win? You talk to them

1:02:37.600 --> 1:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>about that, and I think that you're going to get

1:02:39.200 --> 1:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>them to say they would really like to see a

1:02:40.920 --> 1:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>fair system, and that is the promise of America. UM.

1:02:45.280 --> 1:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Last question, you have taught at Brooklyn Law School since

1:02:48.840 --> 1:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>what is the lesson your students will take from this

1:02:51.080 --> 1:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>moment in history. Well, I know there are lots of lessons,

1:02:55.920 --> 1:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>but if you could extract it, what is the lesson

1:02:58.720 --> 1:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>your students will take from this moment in history? Well,

1:03:01.960 --> 1:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, in an individual setting, one thing I'm doing

1:03:05.760 --> 1:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>for the fall is I am preparing of course that

1:03:07.800 --> 1:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm calling COVID nineteen and the Constitution. So what we're

1:03:11.240 --> 1:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna do in this seminar is we're going to be

1:03:12.960 --> 1:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at the way in which the Constitution has been

1:03:15.400 --> 1:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>challenged and to see, you know, how well it holds up.

1:03:17.440 --> 1:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>What does the Constitution have to say about whether you

1:03:19.760 --> 1:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>can quarantine people and whether you can allow people to

1:03:22.840 --> 1:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>be at a religious assembly but not to go to

1:03:24.600 --> 1:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a protest, and etcetera, etcetera. So I think there's a

1:03:27.560 --> 1:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of interesting things there which I think are very

1:03:29.640 --> 1:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>much this particular moment, But big picture, what I would

1:03:32.920 --> 1:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>like the students to take away the constitutional law students

1:03:37.040 --> 1:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>especially is essentially what I just said to you, that

1:03:39.760 --> 1:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution is about process. It's not about results. It's

1:03:43.400 --> 1:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>not about you know, you're a Republican and you're a Democrat,

1:03:45.760 --> 1:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and we have two different countries depending on what your

1:03:48.320 --> 1:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>party is I think that we have one country and

1:03:51.480 --> 1:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>it's all about a neutral process for very good reasons,

1:03:54.480 --> 1:03:56.439
<v Speaker 1>and I would like people to think more about that.

1:03:56.840 --> 1:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>After my speech at the Central Arkansas Library, I had

1:04:00.600 --> 1:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>two examples of people who talked to me. One guy

1:04:02.800 --> 1:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>came up to me, he said, I'm the Republican who

1:04:05.440 --> 1:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>walked into that bar, and he said, you know, you're

1:04:09.960 --> 1:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>making a lot of sense to me. And then there

1:04:12.000 --> 1:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>was another guy who talked to me who was a Democrat.

1:04:14.280 --> 1:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>He said, you know, I never really thought about that,

1:04:16.360 --> 1:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that maybe it's not right if we're only trying to win.

1:04:18.800 --> 1:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I never thought about you know, that's that's not what

1:04:20.720 --> 1:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>we do in sports. And that's what I'd like people

1:04:23.800 --> 1:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to think about. You know, do you really want to

1:04:25.480 --> 1:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>do things that are only about how you think it's

1:04:27.320 --> 1:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>going to come out and cheat and destroy the system

1:04:29.960 --> 1:04:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know, put a film on the scale and

1:04:32.040 --> 1:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, stack the deck in order to make things

1:04:34.840 --> 1:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>come out to what your preferred result is in the

1:04:37.720 --> 1:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>short run or a long term. Is that just a

1:04:40.520 --> 1:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>really bad idea because it's just totally inconsistent. You know,

1:04:44.160 --> 1:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we've just come from fourth of July and totally inconsistent

1:04:47.000 --> 1:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>with the premises on which we would like to believe

1:04:50.360 --> 1:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>our country was founded. Does technology throw a wrench in

1:04:53.920 --> 1:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the system? I mean it does. It does create lots

1:04:56.720 --> 1:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of things you can't control, and and it it always

1:05:00.000 --> 1:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it's always you know, it's always new environment. So you know,

1:05:02.640 --> 1:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>different kind of example, we were talking about technology and surveillance,

1:05:06.000 --> 1:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>where of course technology has enabled a whole lot of

1:05:08.520 --> 1:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>surveillance that we then have to deal with. But technology

1:05:11.640 --> 1:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>also enabled a whole lot of new marketplaces of ideas.

1:05:15.200 --> 1:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So the A. C. L. You did a lot of

1:05:16.640 --> 1:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>litigation you a few decades ago on applying first two

1:05:19.720 --> 1:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Moment principles to the Internet, right, you know, because the

1:05:23.160 --> 1:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>government censor what was on the Internet because you know, child,

1:05:26.360 --> 1:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a child might see it. Yeah, And so you know,

1:05:29.040 --> 1:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>every new generation of technology, there are new challenges about

1:05:33.400 --> 1:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>how you apply our principles like privacy and free speech,

1:05:37.200 --> 1:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>et cetera to the Internet, but the principles remained the same.

1:05:53.760 --> 1:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I hope everyone is doing well in these strange and

1:05:56.240 --> 1:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>surreal times and adjusting to the new normal. Most of important,

1:06:00.560 --> 1:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I hope you're staying healthy and somewhat saying follow along

1:06:04.440 --> 1:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on our social media. I'm at Lorie Siegel on Twitter

1:06:07.240 --> 1:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram, and the show is at First Contact Podcasts

1:06:10.320 --> 1:06:13.439
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram and on Twitter. We're at First Contact pod

1:06:13.960 --> 1:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and for even more from dot dot dot sign up

1:06:16.040 --> 1:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>for our newsletter at dot dot dot media dot com

1:06:18.520 --> 1:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Backslash Newsletter. And if you like what you heard, leave

1:06:21.520 --> 1:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>us a review on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen.

1:06:24.440 --> 1:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate it. First Contact is a production of

1:06:30.520 --> 1:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>dot dot dot Media, Executive produced by Laurie Siegel and

1:06:33.600 --> 1:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Derek Dodge. This episode was produced and edited by Sabine

1:06:38.280 --> 1:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Jansen and Jack Reagan. The original theme music is by

1:06:41.600 --> 1:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Zander Sing. First Contact with Lori Siegel is a production

1:06:54.160 --> 1:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of dot dot dot Media and I Heart Radio