WEBVTT - AMC Seizes on Meme Stock Mania, US Core CPI Cools

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Cardplay and Android

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Fry Alex Deel alongside Paul Sweeney. This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio.

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 3>We bring you all the top news with our Bloomberg

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence analysts all around the world. They cover two thousand

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 3>companies at one hundred and thirty industries. And we also

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 3>tap our amazing Bloomberg News team who are deep in

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 3>the weeds of everything you need to know in all

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 3>the market action. And one of them is Bailey Lipschualtz.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 3>He's been very busy. He had to actually cancel radio

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 3>hosting yesterday.

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 4>I left Carol hanging the memes stock.

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 5>Crazy, give a day job. It's cool, it's cool.

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 3>So we know the memestocks did some stuff for three

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 3>days and they rally and they're given back to a

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 3>little bit today. Did any of them issue shares or

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 3>anything and take advantage of this?

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 4>So AMC had what we call an at the market

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 4>offering that was approved back in March that enabled them

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 4>to sell shares at the market. Have their bankers just

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 4>keep pumping and creating shares to raise up to two

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 4>hundred and fifty million dollars as fast as slow as

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 4>they would want.

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 6>They did about.

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 4>Half of that prior to the mania, and announced on

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 4>Monday that they completed that, so raised another one hundred

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 4>and twenty five million dollars on the back of Monday's

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 4>what turned into was seventy eight percent pop.

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 6>For the shares.

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Then today they announced plans to do a debtorate equity swap.

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 4>So swap out some debt. Your debt debt holders now

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 4>become equity holders. You create more of those shares, all

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 4>to try to address the fact that they have a

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 4>few billion dollars on their debt load. Most of that

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 4>do in twenty twenty six, So the company has said

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 4>they're actively talking to lenders to try to work on

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 4>addressing those issues.

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 6>AMC Entertainment All right, it's down twenty percent today, but

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 6>just about a billion dollars of stock has traded to day.

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 6>I mean, this isn't pennies, this is real and money.

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.279
<v Speaker 6>When it goes back to my thing, like who's trade

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 6>in this stuff, and that's what we wrote.

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 4>It in my view, a good story because obviously I

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:16.119
<v Speaker 4>wrote it, But we wrote a story yesterday that kind

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 4>of dove into the fact that when I talk to

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 4>people who advise hedge funds, these momentum quants have gotten

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 4>more sophisticated, caught onto the playbook from twenty twenty one,

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 4>and are buying and selling and trading these shares, so

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 4>helping create that big rally we saw Monday and Tuesday

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 4>and likely getting out of the stock whether they're in

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 4>the trade for two minutes or three days. They buy

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 4>when stocks are going up, and then they quickly sell

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 4>and the whole goal is to as we wrote basically.

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 6>In a way front run retail. Whoa, WHOA. I'm looking

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 6>at the is this right, AMC Entertainment's got nine billion

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 6>of debt that includes their leases lease, so call it

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 6>four and a half four and a four four and

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 6>a still they have.

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 4>It's sizable relative to their cases.

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and I'm looking at Ebithal. Let's just take twenty

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 6>twenty five's estimates five hundred million, so still ten times levered.

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 6>Again having bank these guys in the past four times,

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.679
<v Speaker 6>is the multiple is the leverage I would put on

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 6>this thing. Maybe if the sub sub guys want to

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 6>go above it, that's their business. But crazy, but Lisa

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 6>AMC's trying it.

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was gonna say if we don't, we like

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 3>the fact the CFO is like, guys, let's do this, right,

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 3>that's a good thing.

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 6>That's good and that was part of it.

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 4>So a few years ago they created these eight preferred

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 4>shares because they couldn't get approval from investors to sell

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 4>more shares, because you have to get approval to create

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 4>more shares to expand the number of fears you can

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 4>have outstanding. Right now, according to b Riley's Eric World,

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 4>he estimates the company still has one hundred and ninety

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 4>one million common shares authorized but not yet issued, so

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 4>they can hit another ATM, or they can continue to

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 4>do some of these debt swap deals to try to

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 4>address again the fact that they have a lot of debt,

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 4>and they have a lot of near term debt, and Paul,

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 4>as you mentioned, the underlying business is not really doing

0:03:59.480 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 4>a whole lot.

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you know, you think about the theater business, it

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 6>goes to the fundamentals of post pandemic. What's the demand

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 6>for movies in theaters, and it is less, but it

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 6>is still there. That probably the bigger issue, if you

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 6>ask the theater owners today is it's just not a

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 6>lot of movies. And that was in large part because

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.799
<v Speaker 6>of the writer's strike and the and the actors strike

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 6>pushed it just about everything back about a year. And

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 6>then you've had some decisions by Disney to saying, you

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 6>know what, we probably are overplaying our Marvel stuff, our

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 6>Star Wars stuff, putting too close together. Let's spread that out.

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 6>So stuff that was gonna be in twenty four is

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 6>in twenty five, twenty five, it's going to be in

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 6>twenty six. So you put all that together, and if

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 6>you're a theater owner, you're like, I ain't got that

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 6>much it put in my theater.

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 4>When's the last time you saw a movie in the theaters.

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 6>In the last few months? Last few months?

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, a couple of weeks ago. I saw Doing two Oo.

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, I like going to the Nighthawk in Brooklyn where

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 3>they have like drinks and scene they bring to your seat.

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 5>Like I like the whole experience.

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't go to a straight up AMC and

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 3>just eat regular popcorn.

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 5>Wow anymore? So I do the whole.

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 3>It's cheaper than going out to dinner. You can spend

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 3>like one hundred and twenty bucks. You see movies, You

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 3>have dinner, you got drinks, you got dessert, versus going

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 3>and spending three hundred dollars at like getting pasta and

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 3>that's been though.

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 5>You can get a prosco at though.

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 4>See they want to raise elevor they want to elevate it.

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 4>So they're making more margin, more money in terms of

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 4>margins expanded on people.

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 8>Isn't like distracting though, you know everybody's chewing and eating

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 8>a baunch of movie.

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 3>No, they're doing it anyway, I after eating popcorn and stuff. No,

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.239
<v Speaker 3>it's you get used to. It's totally fine.

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 6>The seats are awesome.

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 4>I saw a movie on Friday, I think, and the

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 4>lay back seats.

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 6>I'd never been to a love shore a movie theater.

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 4>And you're like, wow, I'm laying completely horizontal watching a movie.

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 6>This is awesome. And the thing is, you know, if

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 6>you're a movie theater economics of the move movie theaters,

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 6>you don't make really anything on the ticket sales or

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 6>as much because you have to give half to uh,

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 6>the studio where you make it is in the popcorn

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.679
<v Speaker 6>in this that that's all your margin right for the perpection.

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 3>You can, yes, Brownie Sunday exactly so.

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 6>And you know they've been giving you crap for a

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 6>hundred years. You know at some they're just finally waking

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:02.239
<v Speaker 6>up that if I ever want to get that person

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 6>off the couch in front of their eighty inch TV

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 6>in the surround sun, I got to up my game

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 6>a little bit.

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Truffle salt butter popcorn dropped that right there.

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 5>It's just beautiful.

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, before we let you go, what is the downside?

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 3>You think you can we unwind all of the last

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 3>three days or what do you think?

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 6>Probably?

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if you look at fund like why not, well,

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 4>what has changed fundamentally today versus a week ago, realistically

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 4>versus three months ago?

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 6>Nothing?

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 4>Really, And that's been the whole argument. When we saw

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 4>the big rally both stocks up more than seventy percent

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 4>on Monday, all on the back of the Roaring Kitty

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 4>post on Sunday evening, is that that really was just

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 4>kind of like the match to get people back out

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 4>and trading this. It didn't actually change things. And one

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 4>of the things that I think is worth pointing out

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 4>is the difference between now in twenty twenty one is

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 4>people were buying stocks for the first time. In twenty

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 4>twenty one, the stock had already jumped, you know, five

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 4>hundred percent for a lot of retail investors downloaded Robinhood

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 4>found out how to fund it and buy call options.

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 4>People who have been holding these stocks for a long

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 4>time and are sitting on massive losses that if you

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 4>see it go from sixteen to fifty and I got

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 4>in at forty five, I might as well at least

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 4>have some kind of gain as opposed to waiting around forever.

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 6>Right, good stuff, Billy, look the Schultz equity support of

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg new joining us here on a Bloomberg interactive broker's studio,

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 6>you mentioned what kind of pop salt do you like?

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 9>Oh?

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 5>Truffle?

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 6>Have you ever gone truffle hunting?

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 6>I have gone truffle hunting in the South of.

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 8>France with a How do you with a pig or

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 8>a dog?

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 6>They usually do pigs, but the smart ones use dogs

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 6>because the pigs will sometimes eat the truffle. The dogs,

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 6>you can train them not to eat the truffle, so

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 6>they sniff them around underground, they start digging. You pull

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 6>the dog away and then you dig think them out

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 6>the right under the surface. Thank you to Keith Grossman,

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 6>our former head of ad sales at Bloomberg, who had

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 6>arranged these lovely outings two summers in a row, complete

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 6>crazy Bacanelli in south of France. It was great.

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 3>And then and then and then do you like take

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 3>the trouble?

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 5>You can't Coemple's home like to the US, like I

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 5>had trouble.

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 6>I'm not so so everything they have troubles. Yeah. Then

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 6>they have this little store in this little farm. I'm

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 6>still on the mailing list. And the French couple, young couple,

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 6>and they have a little French truffle thing going on.

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 5>I love this.

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 3>For another trip with at in.

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 6>This you know in may Or so that's next on

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 6>the dockt.

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 5>I love all of this. I'm going to ruminate on this.

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern.

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 7>On Apple car Play and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business.

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 2>flagship New York station, Just Say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 6>Let's get to some of that economic data here today.

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 6>Lydia user Joints and she's a senior economist at Ernst

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 6>and Young. She joins us from New York City via

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 6>that zoom thing. So, Lydia looks like like that inflation

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 6>scare that we had maybe the first three four months

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 6>of this year is maybe moderating a little bit. Is

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 6>that the takeaway from the CPI data that you looked

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 6>at today?

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah? Sure, I mean, I think the key takeaway is

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 9>really that inflation continues to move in the right direction

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 9>and that this inflation trend remains in place despite the

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 9>bumping as that we had in the first quarter. I

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 9>think the details of the report this morning were encouraging.

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 9>Both on the goods and services side. We saw that

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 9>cooling and core inflation call goods prices decline in April,

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 9>and that really indicates that this more favorable and normalized

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 9>supply chain environment continues to be conductive of deflation in

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 9>the goods sector. And on the services side, we also

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 9>saw aneasing in the pace of inflation, with many of

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 9>the categories also showing some cooling. So overall, that's the

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 9>report that suggests that we're still moving in the right direction.

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Something I'm still great happling with is why the event

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 3>has such conditions, has such conviction that financial conditions are

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 3>tight when you take a look at MEME stocks, when

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 3>you take a look at the actual financial conditions index,

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 3>do these numbers justify that confidence or no?

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 9>When we look at the economy overall and the package

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 9>of economy data that we got this morning. You mentioned

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 9>retail sales early.

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 5>On the show.

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 9>Retail sales work quite soft, and they do suggest that

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 9>consumers are increasingly cautious with your spending. We have an

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 9>economic environment that's cooling, the label market is rebalancing, wages

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 9>are moderating, and at the same time, we have you know,

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 9>today's some evidence that we remain and we continue to

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 9>see that these inflation happening, especially on the core side.

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 9>So the progress has been slower, but overall, the economy

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 9>continues to cool and inflation is likely to continue to

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 9>gradually ease, you know, throughout the twenty twenty four and

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 9>towards twenty twenty five. I think what will be important

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 9>and important what's important to keep in mind is that

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 9>we may hit the plateau when it comes to inflation.

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 9>CPI inflation in the coming months. But overall, I think

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 9>the report today has helped rebuild a bit of confidence

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 9>that the FED had lost in the first quarter of

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 9>the year.

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 6>Liddy, We also yesterday had a little bit higher than

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 6>expected PPI print. How do you kind of put that

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 6>in the CPI data we got today? How do you

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 6>put that Together's what's the narrative there?

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, looking at the PPI data, I think

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 9>some of the details were more encouraging, especially looking at

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 9>some of the key categories that we feed into the

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 9>PC data, so looking at some of the underlying components

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 9>of PPI. But overall, I think, you know, when we

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 9>look at the overall trend in inflation and what that means.

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 9>Also looking at these two reports for PC inflation, I

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 9>think that we're likely to get, you know, a fairly

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 9>encouraging print on the core PC data, and that overall

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 9>core PC inflation should continue to gradually ease in the

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 9>coming months. I think, you know, we're coming we're coming

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 9>off of that first quarter where inflation has surprise on

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 9>the obside, you know, for several months, and what we

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 9>need to see going forward is really softer inflation print

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 9>a string of softer inflation print that will help THEE

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 9>the FED feel more confident that you know, they're in

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 9>a good spot and can start you know, that is

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 9>in cycle.

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Do you think the using cycle will be two cuts

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 3>this year?

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 5>One and then what.

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so we have our view is that we're gonna

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 9>get two cuts in the second half of this year.

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 9>We do think that, you know, as I said, the

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 9>economic environment will you know, will be you know, and

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 9>will be favorable for those two great cuts. And when

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 9>you think back at what Fetcher Powell said at the

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 9>press conference, he really laid out three paths when it

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 9>comes to a monetary policy going forward, and there are

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 9>two of these paths that are leading.

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 5>To rate cuts.

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 9>You know, if you see a deteriration in label market

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 9>conditions or if you see inflation moving sustainably towards two percent,

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 9>our view is that, you know, the economy is going

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 9>to continue to cool and that conditions are in place

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 9>to continue to see that this inflation. We have an

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 9>economy that's cooling and consumers that are growing increasingly cautious.

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 9>We have a label market that's rebalancing and wages that

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 9>are easing. We also have signs that companies are exercising

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 9>less price in power, and we're likely to see more

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 9>downward pressure on profit margins as well. And lastly, we

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.599
<v Speaker 9>also have more rent these inflation in the pipeline and

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 9>the numbers this morning, we're also encouraging in that front

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 9>where you know, we continue to see that downtrend in

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 9>rent inflation. So overall, I do think that you know,

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 9>this backdrop is going to lead the FED to start

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 9>that is in cycle media and we see two rate

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 9>cuts happening, so more of a recalibration that an aggressive,

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 9>you know, rated cycle.

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:11.599
<v Speaker 6>So we also had the retail sales came in a

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 6>little bit weaker than expected. What's your read across.

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 9>There, Yeah, so the retail sales report weaker than expected.

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 9>Looking at some of the details, it was quite mixed.

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 9>I think there was some categories where we saw some payback.

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 9>Looking at online sales for example, they were very strong

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 9>in March, so they declined in April. And you know, overall,

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 9>I think what these suggest is that a consumer spending

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 9>momentum at the start of Q two is going to

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 9>be you know, looking software, we came out of March

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 9>with significant momentum when it comes to consumer spending and

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 9>you have that robust carry over that's supporting positive consumer spending.

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 9>But what it does suggest is that on the months

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 9>of amounth basis, we've seen somewhat of a down shift,

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 9>and we think that this is a trend that will

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 9>continue because consumers are feeling you know, the impact of

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 9>elevated prices, are your borrowing costs and just you know,

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 9>a more challenging environment, especially for lower income hussles.

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, Lydia, thanks so much. We really appreciate your

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 3>time today. Thank you so much, Lydio bassour Ey pantheon

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 3>A senior economists, We very much thank you for your time.

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of retail, I was really struck by those Burgery numbers.

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Now luxury has been burbery, Yeah, like luxury has been

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 3>certain areas of luxury have been struggling, and Burbery kind

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 3>of doubled down on that.

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 5>They had sort of weaker.

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Sales and their outlook wasn't that great for the first

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 3>half either. So even the high high end continues to

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of get dragged down a little bit, which also

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 3>you find to be a bit confusing.

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, whenever I think of retail and luxury retail, I

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 6>think of the Chinese consumer is kind of the swing factor.

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 6>I wonder what they're saying about the Chinese consumer.

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 3>It's always about China, but also pockets of weakness in

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 3>the US as well, So it's not just a China

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 3>situation when it comes to retail.

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 6>And a podcast about five percent here today.

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 5>Ye weak demand China, n US.

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. So I mean it's it's you know, it's out there.

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 6>It's concerning. But I mean, I guess the overall economic

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 6>data is still generally pretty solid. I guess, you know.

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 6>And it's is it solid enough for the FED to

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 6>start pulling back on rates and if so, when so

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 6>that'll be interesting.

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 3>It's still what I find so interesting is still the

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 3>hard and soft data. The soft data, I appreciate the

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 3>NFIB was a bit better yesterday, but the feelings are

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 3>negative even if the hard data is a little bit

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 3>positive or at least stable. Particularly, we take a look

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 3>at how many people are benefiting from the equity rally,

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 3>and there was a great uh in John Author's piece.

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 3>You really helped break it down. Oh no, it was

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 3>a lu Wang had a piece where she broke it

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 3>down and said, just x amount of people have money

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 3>in the stock market that are benefiting and guess what,

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 3>they're mostly older white people and everything else is a

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 3>bit is a bit, dice Yer. It's a great piece.

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 5>You's definitely check it out.

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern APO card playing Android Otto

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 2>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 2>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Alex Steel alongside Paul Sweeny. This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio.

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 3>We cover all the tap news in business and economics

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 3>through our lens of our Bloomberg Intelligence analysts. They cover

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 3>about two thousand companies and one hundred and thirty industries worldwide.

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 3>We also sometimes take you outside the Bloomberg Intelligence world

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 3>to those that work on the street. And for that

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna go to Marie Shore. She covers senior equity

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 3>analyst over at Columbia thread Needle Investments. They have a

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 3>great team over there. We love talking to these guys.

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.199
<v Speaker 3>Let's get breakdown after retail sales. Thanks for joining us, Mari,

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 3>It's great to see you.

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for having me so.

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Breakdown two things. One where in the retail world makes

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 3>sense and two do equities a record highs make sense.

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 5>Yes, it's a great question.

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 4>I think.

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we look at the retail sales print today,

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>I think we see more of what we've been discussing,

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>which is still a choiceful consumer still spending more on

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>services over goods and needs over wants. So overall, my

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>outlook for spend on more discretionary goods is more cautious.

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>We still see things like home and electronics really weak

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>versus strength in certain channels like e commerce and value retail,

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and in certain categories, like I thought today in the

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 1>retail sales print, the improvement we saw in apparel was interesting,

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen some new trends in apparel, and it

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>seems that some of the traditional apparel companies are taking

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>share back, maybe from some of the athletic apparel companies.

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's I think an interesting trend to watch In

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of the valuations on some of these names. It

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely seemed like the group was a little over extended

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in the earlier part of the string following the rally

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that started in October, and now I think you really

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>need to be selective, so I would say we're still

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>willing to pay a premium for consistent quality growth that

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>we see in names like Walmart and the off price retailers,

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>which are all gaining share right now. I think, you know,

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>given the relatively weak demand backdrop, we are willing to

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>pay more of a premium for those retailers that are

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>taking share.

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 6>All right, Usually we chat with you via zoom, so yes,

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 6>nice to have you in our studio, usually of Boston, right, yes, yes, okay,

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 6>very good coming down to the big town. Okay, marishare

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 6>you cover the equity space for Columbia thread Needle? We

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 6>got Walmart tomorrow, and people who like me who don't

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 6>follow the retail space, I looked at that name as

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 6>kind of a barometer for how the US consumer's doing.

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 6>What are you going to be looking for tomorrow?

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think we're likely to hear from Walmart still

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a more subdued tone on the consumer overall. You know,

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>their core lower end customer is still under pressure. They are, however,

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>taking share across category among higher income consumers, and that's

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>been something they've been talking about for several quarters now.

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think that says a lot about the overall consumer,

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and you know, how they're looking to save money, are.

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 3>They taking a share from them like Target and stuff

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 3>like that.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they are yes across category. You really see

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>it from from Target and others, And I think that

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>consumers are really looking to stock up, you know, and

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>do that one stop shop at value retailog you know,

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>you see it Walmart, you see it at costs go right.

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Their results have also been extremely strong, So I think

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that the results from Walmart tomorrow will show us what's

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>happening from a macro level. But again I want to

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>be mindful that any any strength that Walmart does show,

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I think is likely to reflect not just what's happening

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>at the category level, but what's happening in terms of

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>their share position within category worries.

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 6>So how about the dollar stores? What happens to the

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 6>dollar stores when the lower end of the economic environment

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 6>is in fact struggling they are dealing with inflation. Does

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 6>that benefit their business or does that hurt them even more?

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's sort of mixed. I would say it does

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>hurt their core lower income consumer, and you've seen all

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the dollar stores talking about weakness in their discretionary business

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>among that consumer cohort. However, there is the potential for

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>them to capture that trade down from a hire income consumer,

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and so that is an opportunity I think for the

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>dollar stores, for off price retailers like Burlington and Ross stores.

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>But again, I feel like Walmart has really been the

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>name among those value players that has captured the most

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>share from that higher income consumer.

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 3>So some of the dollar stores are just a disaster

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 3>in terms of like shelf stocking, in terms of employees,

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 3>like it's a real us, like it might be good

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 3>to get a deal, but only if you actually find

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 3>a product, John Tucker, why are.

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 5>You laughing at me?

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 8>One dext to me and I loved it. Just they

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 8>closed up, it was gone. It was just like what

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 8>happened like overnight, it's it's and they only had one

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 8>employee in a pretty large store, and it was just like,

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 8>you want to steal.

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 5>Something, pretty much, go ahead like that. We can't do

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 5>anything about that.

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know if you guys know, if we've

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 3>talked about this, that I am the counter indicator for

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 3>retail somorrio. So here's the deal.

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 5>So I only shop on sale period.

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 3>I will not ever pay full price. So usually where

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm shopping, the joke is is that I'm an indicator

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 3>for what stock you want to short, because I'm only

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 3>going there because the deal is really good and it's

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:45.199
<v Speaker 3>an inventory thing. So I definitely went over budget this weekend.

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 3>I went to Northstroum Rack, but I was buying work clothes.

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 5>So I felt okay about it.

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 3>Am I an outlier here? Like are the discounters gonna

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 3>win or are they gonna lose? And how much will

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 3>I be spending for the rest of the years.

0:22:58.880 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>No, I think And again we saw it in the

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>retail sales data today in the strength and the general

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>merchandise category. I think all of these value retailers, whether

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>it's the mass players, the off pricers, the dollar stores,

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the clubs, they will all continue to take share in

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 1>this in this environment, in terms of the you know,

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in the hunt for deals, I would say I would

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>expect more modest deals going for it only because you know,

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>last year we saw inventory much better controlled, much more

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>closely aligned with sales, and all of the retailers are

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>really focused on protecting margin, so I think you will

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>see lower markdowns going for it. Of course, the retailers

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>will always use promotions to drive traffic, but in terms

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of those major markdowns. Yeah, probably won't see as many

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of those going forward.

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 5>That's definitely gonna hurt a little bit there.

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we went to this anecdotal obviously went to Tjmax,

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 3>which is usually my life go to store.

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 5>Inventory was horrific.

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 3>There was like nothing that was really surprising, and I

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 3>wondered if like they're if they're waiting for a cycle

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 3>to come back, or if they're just really good at

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 3>getting step off their shelves.

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.239
<v Speaker 6>Interesting. How about I'm just asking for John Tucker here

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 6>the luxury sector accent. I'm just talking about Berbery. Yeah,

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 6>some disappointing numbers. I thought luxury was kind of a

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 6>relatively area of strength for retail Yeah.

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would say over the past year or so,

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.239
<v Speaker 1>we've really seen a slow down among I would say,

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>both like the true luxury segment and that more aspirational

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>luxury segment, right, Yeah, and I think I think it

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>really reflects, you know, those consumers now spending again on

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>things like services and travel, and so we've seen, you know,

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of public retailers at this point

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in the true luxury segment in North America, but we've

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely seen a slow down, really globally, you know, across China, Europe,

0:24:56.040 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's that customer spending in other categories

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>and also some of those brands that do have exposure

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>to the wholesale channel, where you know, all of the

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>department store is still managing inventory very tightly, so if

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you're selling into that channel, you may also see pressure is.

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:16.479
<v Speaker 6>In that business, and they did call that out there.

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so I think it's.

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Really a combination of those two things. I think long

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>term luxury is still well positioned, but we're still kind

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of coming off of this period of you know, excessive

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 1>growth that we saw during the pandemic and watching demand normalized.

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, man, twenty six hundred dollars for a raincoat, please,

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 3>well what kind of raincoat?

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 5>Burbery raincoat like that?

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate that's aspirational, but hell no, that just feels

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 3>like a waste of money.

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 6>But don't you have some budget or clothes?

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 3>Oh oh yeah, yeah, So like I give myself a

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 3>budget of oh yeah, but not a trench coat and

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:56.719
<v Speaker 3>that definitely would not be in the budget.

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:02.479
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, they have a budget for wardrobe. Again, another benefit

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 6>I don't really yea, no makeup, Nope.

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 8>They don't send me to travel.

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Bakeup on you.

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 5>You don't let them be you know, I don't know. Yeah,

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 5>downstairs is a wardrobe room. We get our clothes picked

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 5>and everything.

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 6>Really I don't know that.

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they don't chop on sale, but you know I do.

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 6>All right, Marsha, thanks so much for joining us. Marish Shure,

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 6>Senior Equitiana. She covers all the retail space, one of

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 6>our go to voices for retail. She's a Columbia thread

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 6>Needle Investments. They get they're all over the place. I

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 6>first hit thread Needle, they're in London. Then there's been

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 6>all these mergers with the asset managers and now it's

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 6>all under like Columbias and they're good.

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 5>Like they got some serious talent there.

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 6>Up in Boston. But she joins us here on our

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg in Act, the Broker Studio. Maybe she's walking up

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 6>down Fifth Avenue and Madison. I'm kind of checking out

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 6>the stores. That would be my guest.

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 5>Let me know where the sales are, Yeah, exactly.

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar.

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 7>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business.

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen I have on Amazon Alexa from

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 2>our flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 2>eleven thirty.

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio. We bring you all the

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 3>top news and economics and finance, and with the help

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 3>of our Bloomberg Intelligence analysts, they cover our two thousand

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 3>companies and one hundred and thirty industries all around the world.

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 3>We also bring you the view from the street. And

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 3>what do you do in this market when you're at

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 3>record highs and the direction is higher? You just buy

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 3>the stuff. You buy stocks, you buy bond, you sell

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 3>a dollar. That seems to be the trade. Let's get

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 3>the trip with James Demert. He's chief investment officer at

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 3>main Street Research. He joins us via zoom from New York.

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 3>All right, James, do you buy the at a record?

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Simple question?

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 10>Hi, Alex, you do? I think you do. I think

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 10>investors have made a huge mistake for the last few

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 10>quarters of just waiting for something to break before they buy,

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 10>and it's been a mistake. I think it's going to

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 10>be a mistake going forward.

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 6>So what do you buy? James? Let's let's say it

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 6>to the next level there, what do you buy? Do

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.679
<v Speaker 6>I just load into my big tech stocks that are

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 6>work so well for me over the past couple of years,

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 6>or I try to get a little creative.

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think that investors, you know, a lot of

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 10>investors are focusing on the wrong thing, which is the FED,

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 10>and they should be focusing on what's driving this market.

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 10>It's what this market's doing. It's a discounting this new

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 10>AI tech led business cycle in ball market. And so

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 10>when we think about what to buy, even with at

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 10>levels like this, we want to think, well, if this

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:31.199
<v Speaker 10>is the case AI tech led biz cycle, it's going

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 10>to be productivity growth in fast growing earnings, where do

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 10>I go for that? Right, there's ten eleven sectors in

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 10>the economy, and if rates stay where they are, which

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 10>we think they will, you want to go to tech

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 10>for sure, you want to go to telecom in everywhere

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 10>this AI productivity growth can affect. I think healthcare is

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 10>definitely one of those. I think the utility senttor is

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:56.959
<v Speaker 10>sort of interesting here, very inexpensive industrial companies, financials, right,

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 10>Jamie diamond saying a few weeks ago, how AI as

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 10>impacting JP Morgan, So I think you kind of want

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 10>to think about this as an allah nineteen nineties, if

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 10>you will, where that's the last time we had this

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 10>huge boom of productivity growth. That was a different technology,

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 10>obviously the Internet. Now we're in the AI phase.

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Something to say on that, because nineteen nineties didn't always

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 3>end well on that end. But before we get there

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 3>for utilities, I find that so fascinating because usually you

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 3>think of utilities as just a straight up dividend yield play. Right,

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Are utilities a growth sector right now? Can you play

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 3>it and value it like a growth sector?

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Alex, this was my grandmother's favorite sector because that's

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 10>no volatility, very predictable.

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 5>Dividend you.

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:47.959
<v Speaker 10>But here you have a different story, right if it's

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 10>an AI tech led business cycle, particularly with evs, and

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 10>you've got these AI chips just churning away, needing so

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 10>much electricity. We're looking at the utility industry as potentially

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 10>a their a big growth area. So the grid is

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 10>going to have to get way bigger to support what

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 10>we envision is a seven to nine year business cycle.

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 10>It's led by AI profit growth, productivity growth. And I'll

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 10>tell you not just the utilities, but who's going to

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 10>build that grid the industrial companies, and I think that's

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 10>one of the reasons you see, you know, the caterpillar,

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 10>tractors and that sort of thing doing quite well over

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 10>the last few courts. Discounting not what the Fed's gonna do,

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 10>it's discounting. Hey, this is a new era, a very

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 10>different type of business cycle.

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 6>James. One of the names you have on your list

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 6>is Apple, and it's on a lot of people's lists,

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 6>but it's obviously facing some headwinds, notably China. But one

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 6>thing that it hasn't yet quite gotten into its multiple

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 6>is AI. Do you believe the AI, you know, pixie

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 6>Dust can find Apple at some point.

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 10>We do, and I think that Apple's on a lot

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 10>of people's lists. As a bearish call, we are absolutely

0:30:55.920 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 10>the one hundred and eighty degrees opposite bullsh and and

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 10>we think they're late to the game, there's no question,

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 10>and that's frustrating as a shareholder. But you know, as

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 10>we listen to the conference calls and read the tea

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 10>leaves of where Apple's going here, and you can see

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 10>it with their recent sort of partnership with chat GBT,

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 10>we think in June eleventh is going to be a

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 10>big call from from Apple in Cooper, Tino and Cook,

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 10>and I think they're going to talk about, hey, we're

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 10>bringing AI to the iPhone. We we envision it as

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 10>a supercharge sery, you know, like a personal assistance series,

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 10>which is way better than what we have now. Might

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 10>start with subscriptions. Think about the giant installed base around

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 10>the world they have, and then it probably is going

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 10>to force us all to get a new iPhone, maybe

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 10>a few core to support it. So we are fans

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 10>twenty seven times earnings neglected. You know, one of those

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 10>that you want to you want to add here.

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I know, it's like I haye one my phone

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 3>just one day is like we're done here, take us

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 3>to the store.

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 5>We have to get a new one.

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 3>You also like, ASML, why would that be a why

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 3>do you like that for the AI trade? Like, there's

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 3>tons of of those kind of guys that we can

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 3>start playing with. Why is it that one for you?

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 10>ASML work global investors. We love the overseas exposure right

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 10>from the Netherlands. But this is a company no debt,

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 10>and this is an integral part of what makes an

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 10>AI chip work. Right, So there's just a handful of

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 10>companies that actually do the design that Nvidio uses. Right,

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 10>So Nvidia is buying ASMML technology to design and fabricate

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 10>these chips. So they're really at the beginning of the

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 10>cycle of making the chips. Absolutely important company to own,

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 10>not just a chip maker. They're the ones helping the

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 10>chip makers make them make the chips. So very important

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 10>to be at that front end, the most important company

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 10>on that end.

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 6>How about in a fixed income space, James, do you

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 6>guys allocate there? And if so, how do you do?

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 9>So?

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 10>We do a third of our assets under management, we

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 10>manage about two billion are in fixed income. And our

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 10>you is the FED may not do anything. And so

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 10>here's where you want to say, Well, if rates have

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 10>let's say they peak, but they're not going to go down,

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 10>you want to go out here in duration. I think

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 10>it's safe to do that. I don't think the Fed's

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 10>raising rates anytime soon. I think, in fact, at some

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 10>point they'll lower them. I don't think it's this year.

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 10>And so you want to go individual bonds high credit

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 10>quality based on your tax circumstance, either own muni's or corporates.

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 10>I love corporates in a non tax will account, and

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 10>you know, don't feel uncomfortable going out twenty twenty five

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 10>thirty years. Lock that yield in, make sure no one

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 10>can take it away from you, because yes, eventually rates

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 10>will come down and those will not be available. So

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 10>we sort of ladder a little bit on the short end,

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 10>tons in the middle, and lots on the long end.

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 10>Very different than what we were doing three or four

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 10>years ago.

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 5>Our stock's expensive right now. How do you price that in?

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's so many different metrics, particularly when you

0:33:57.480 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 3>compare it to say, the yield you're getting on the

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 3>ten years, So I might say, yeah, you're not getting

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 3>compensated at all.

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 5>That risk is not priced in.

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 10>What do you think, Yeah, Alex, I think people are

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 10>misunderstanding pe ratios. First of all, when you're at the

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 10>beginning of a business cycle, pes can be sort of

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 10>an illus right because we're looking at we look at

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 10>four earrings and that E is underestimated all the time,

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:20.320
<v Speaker 10>so it sort of makes the pe and seem a

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 10>little higher than it is. And more importantly, and I

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 10>think this is the real problem investors are having is

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 10>if you look at the S and P five hundred

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 10>or any normal index, you've got seven stocks trading at

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 10>thirty five times earnings, and you've got the rest of

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 10>the market trading at fifteen. Now, anytime that you have

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:39.280
<v Speaker 10>financials at eleven times earnings, which is what's going on today,

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 10>eleven times is almost historic for financial stocks and the

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 10>rest of market trading at fifteen. That is a value

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 10>proposition as we move towards a growing, expanding economy, and

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 10>one that we view as GDP plus four percent, not

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 10>GDP plus two, which is what we had for the

0:34:56.600 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 10>last twenty years. So higher growth fifty teen time journings absolutely,

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 10>and particularly all these sectors that I mentioned earlier, they

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 10>have not yet been impacted by the power of AI

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 10>and productivity growth.

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 6>All right, James, thank you so much for joining us.

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:14.439
<v Speaker 6>James demmertt He is a chief investment officer at main

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:18.280
<v Speaker 6>Street Research. Joining us from New York City via zooms.

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 6>We appreciate that.

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern.

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:30.919
<v Speaker 7>On applecard Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 2>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 6>Alex Dee and Paul Sweeney were live here in our

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. We're streaming live on YouTube, so

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 6>you can go to YouTube dot com and search Bloomberg

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 6>Podcast and that's where you find us. All right, let's

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 6>turn now to a conversation on artificial intelligence. Last Thursday,

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:58.280
<v Speaker 6>I attended the Boston Consulting Group EDGE Expo in Boston.

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 6>A lotic great conversations with the execs at BCG. One

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 6>was with North America Sharon Marshall. She speaks with CEOs

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 6>daily about what they are dealing with with their own company,

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 6>and one big issue that keeps coming up, Sharon said,

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 6>was AI. I began by asking here what question she's

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:17.319
<v Speaker 6>being asked most by CEOs. Let's take a listen.

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 11>I speak to CEOs on a daily basis, and I

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 11>think the good news is there's cautious optimism. If you

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 11>speak to most CEOs, they see a very very strong potential,

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 11>some say infinite potential in terms of AI. Obviously, the

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 11>economy is here in North America is performing very well

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 11>and creates more stability in terms of capital investment. And

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 11>I think the unknown is about the geopolitics and our

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 11>current political environment and how that will all play out.

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 11>But you know, in speaking to them, cautious optimism thinking

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 11>about AI, how do I scale it, how do I

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 11>get value out of it? And how do I fund

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 11>the journey?

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 5>So looking for opportunities for cost efficiencies.

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, let's go to that AI because that's been a

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 6>topic here today. A lot of smart people we've spoken

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 6>to from BCG about the AI business, about the ethics

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:14.839
<v Speaker 6>of AI, which is something folks really need to think about.

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 6>But the bottom line is it requires, from my understanding,

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 6>a lot of investment and over a long period of time,

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 6>a real commitment here when you talk to CEOs, do

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 6>they get that and are they willing to make that commitment?

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 11>So, Paul, if you click back a year, we were

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:34.240
<v Speaker 11>doing a lot of conversations with boards and with CEOs,

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 11>and there's a lot of experimentation that was going on.

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 11>But it really it was just experimentation. It was use cases,

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 11>and I think people were learning a lot. Now you

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:47.240
<v Speaker 11>flash forward a year and I think companies and CEOs

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 11>are thinking, how can I create competitive advantage using AI?

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 11>And what are the areas I'm going to pick to

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 11>invest in? Because you can invest every it would be

0:37:56.560 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 11>cost prohibitive to pick everything. And so it's interesting as

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 11>you see some companies are picking what you would consider

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:06.839
<v Speaker 11>more strategic aspects of their business. So if you think

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:11.879
<v Speaker 11>about insurance, either claims processing or underwriting core processes which

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 11>are strategic to really lean into and invest. Some other

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 11>companies actually have chosen more of a backed office route.

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 11>So really thinking about customer service, how can AI fundamentally

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 11>transform how we do customer service to make it better

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 11>and more efficient.

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 5>So companies are in different journeys.

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 11>It's going to be expensive, and they have to pick

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 11>the places which is going to pan out for them

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 11>and give them real advantage in the marketplace.

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 6>And on the people side of the equation, there's concern

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 6>out there in the marketplace that AI will take jobs,

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 6>or if it doesn't take jobs, it's going to require

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 6>a tremendous amount of retraining. How do the CEOs think

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 6>about that? Are they again, are they concerned about that?

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 6>Are they willing to make those investments in their people?

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 11>I think that's exactly right. So AI is going to

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 11>change a few things beyond the technology. It's going to

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 11>change in many cases actually organization structure, it's going to

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 11>change process and m process and also skills required. We

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 11>often talk about the ten twenty seventy and the seventy

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 11>percent of the change is going to be people and

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 11>change management. If you speak to CEOs, I think they

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 11>feel like it is worth it. It has to be

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 11>done in order to stay at the head of the

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 11>curve and to provide competitive advantage. But again being choiceful

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 11>and where you choose to scale, because you can't change

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 11>everything all at once.

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 6>I was mentioning to my young producer that is one

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 6>age is one has to really make the commitment to

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 6>embrace change and be open to change. I'm case in point.

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 6>When you go talk to the boards and to the CEOs,

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:51.360
<v Speaker 6>is it a tough sell to say, hey, Ai, this

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 6>is an inflection point in what you've traditionally understood to

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 6>be your tech spend.

0:39:57.480 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 5>I think they understand it.

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 11>I think they're not as familiar with the technology, but

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:05.880
<v Speaker 11>they're pushing themselves to get there because you're absolutely right.

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:08.719
<v Speaker 11>I mean, look, if we look at our own data WITHINBCG,

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 11>the greatest adoption is with our less tenured people, and

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:16.800
<v Speaker 11>the adoption there is very, very high. But we I

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 11>think all of our partners are most senior people as

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 11>well as the CEOs and the board members realize they

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 11>have to get the comfort level and upskill themselves in

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 11>order to be relevant in the future.

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 6>Are there some industries that are maybe doing a better

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 6>job of kind of leaning into this AI and what

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:37.839
<v Speaker 6>it really means in the long term versus some others?

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 11>Know, if it's versus some others, I mean, we're seeing

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 11>a lot of activity, a lot of interests across all

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:50.359
<v Speaker 11>of our major sectors. So really thinking about healthcare as

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 11>an example, so drug research would be an example, or

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 11>medical records writing. So there's a lot in the regulatories

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 11>here that can be improved through AI. If you think

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 11>about insurance, there's an enormous amount of documentation and review

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:09.320
<v Speaker 11>and so in areas, specific areas within each industry and

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 11>within each sector where there's a lot of documentation review,

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:14.919
<v Speaker 11>those are the areas that are.

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:19.279
<v Speaker 6>Being focused on all right, Speaking to CEOs, you have

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 6>to talk about particularly for your global clients, I would

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 6>think geopolitics, for better or worse, is at the top

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 6>of their list or on their to do list. And

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:27.839
<v Speaker 6>you think about what's happened in Ukraine, the Middle East,

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 6>and you know, you can never take your eye off

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 6>Taiwan in Asia? Can you plan for it? This is

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 6>a little bit different world than we had four or

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:34.799
<v Speaker 6>five years ago.

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 11>It's interesting we did more work exactly on that topic

0:41:39.160 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 11>last year than we're doing this year. I feel like

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 11>there was a lot of preparedness and scenario analysis that

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:49.760
<v Speaker 11>was done last year. It's continuing to be done and updated.

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 11>I think many companies are on that journey. And actually

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 11>our recent CEO survey showed that sixty three percent actually

0:41:56.680 --> 0:42:00.560
<v Speaker 11>felt much better prepared for a geopolitical event at this

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 11>time this year versus last year.

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 6>All Right, how about BCG in particular, I was thinking

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:06.919
<v Speaker 6>back way back to my days. Is the Fupal School

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 6>of Business at Duke meeting with all the consulting companies.

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 6>A couple of things that I remember. They paid pretty well,

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 6>but they worked pretty hard. They travel quite a lot.

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 6>How has your business changed since? Maybe since the pandemic,

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 6>maybe with the advent of some new technologies.

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 11>Great question. So look, you know it's super important that

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 11>we travel and that we spend in time time with

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 11>clients and at sites. I think the pandemic has also,

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 11>just like many industries, given us a little bit more flexibility.

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 11>I think our clients are sometimes very happy to meet

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 11>with us on video and we do that quite a

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:43.759
<v Speaker 11>bit as well. And you know, of course, like any

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 11>responsible business, we are trying to lower.

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 6>Our carbon footprint.

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 11>So it's something as we think about, for example, internal

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 11>travel that we really try to manage. So I think

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 11>it's better than when I joined BCG, but it's still

0:42:56.760 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 11>a pretty demanding job.

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 6>Still the demand job. It's still a lot of big

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 6>NBA pipeline there. So talk to us about just kind

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 6>of the business of consulting today. Hey, just how's business.

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 5>Business is good.

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:13.880
<v Speaker 11>So if you if you look at last year, we

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:18.800
<v Speaker 11>we actually registered another year, which is twenty straight years

0:43:18.960 --> 0:43:21.759
<v Speaker 11>of growth in terms of BCG. And I would say

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 11>in North America specifically, our fourth quarter was our strongest

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:27.840
<v Speaker 11>quarter last year, and we're off to a really strong

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 11>start this year as well, both in North America and globally.

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 11>All of our regions are growing and all of our

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 11>practices are growing.

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 6>So that's Does that tell you that the c suite

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 6>the board has some little of confidence that they're either

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 6>willing to engage with you to make the investment in

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:45.400
<v Speaker 6>your type of services, they're looking to do stuff that's right.

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:47.319
<v Speaker 5>We always say that.

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 11>Certainty in either direction, either optimism or pessimism, is good

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 11>for our industry.

0:43:55.960 --> 0:43:58.080
<v Speaker 5>What is bad for our industry is uncertainty.

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:01.360
<v Speaker 11>So if you don't know if there's going to be

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 11>a recession, if you have fear but a lot of uncertainty,

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:07.719
<v Speaker 11>that's a tough time for our industry. I think there's

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 11>greater certainty and energy and CEO is feeling they have to.

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 6>Move, they have to move. Yeah, I would think with

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 6>technology that would make it even more so, more pronounced

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 6>than this whole AI thing. I have to get smart

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 6>on it really quickly.

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 11>Indeed, indeed, a big, a big part of big part

0:44:24.600 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 11>of our business continues to be cost and resiliency, but

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:28.919
<v Speaker 11>a very big part is AI.

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 6>All Right. That was Sharon Marshall. She is the North

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 6>America chair for BCGOS chatting with her last week at

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:39.480
<v Speaker 6>conference up in Boston, and you know, I mean her

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:41.759
<v Speaker 6>job is basically just to take phone calls and field

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 6>fold calls from CEOs their clients and try to help

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 6>them with their problems. And she says, boy, it's like

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:50.520
<v Speaker 6>every single call is about AI. That types of investments

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:53.719
<v Speaker 6>that their clients should be making in AI, how they

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 6>should be making those investments. How do you weave the

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 6>whole ethics thing into this whole AI discussion? But it

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:02.320
<v Speaker 6>certainly top of mind for her and her you know,

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 6>all the other consultants up there.

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Does BCG feel like they're behind that curve or on

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:09.160
<v Speaker 3>top of it because just as it's their clients are panicking,

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 3>I would assume that they don't have all the answers either.

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:13.800
<v Speaker 6>No, they don't, but there's they have a lot of

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 6>people there that are spending a lot of time on

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:17.400
<v Speaker 6>it and they're getting and the people I spoke to

0:45:17.480 --> 0:45:20.319
<v Speaker 6>their at BCG were, you know, seem very well read

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 6>in but acknowledged, like you said, way early in the game.

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 6>But I think one of the key takeaways I had

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 6>was you have to put the whole ethics of it

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:32.879
<v Speaker 6>first before you spend dollar one, which doesn't usually happen

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 6>because usually people are spending on the tech, spend on

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 6>the tech. But you really have to think about how you,

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:39.880
<v Speaker 6>as an institutions, as a company want to frame this

0:45:40.080 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 6>investment in terms of the ethical applications of AI. You

0:45:43.360 --> 0:45:45.840
<v Speaker 6>have to have a really strong call on that before

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:48.239
<v Speaker 6>you put the shovel in the ground, so that's kind

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:51.959
<v Speaker 6>of how they begin the discussion with their clients. But again,

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 6>big dollars being spent, big commitments, that's for sure.

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, spotipy,

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else if you get your podcasts. Listen live

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:05.600
<v Speaker 2>each weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:09.279
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:46:09.440 --> 0:46:12.400
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal