WEBVTT - This is Bigger than Crypto 2.0... You NEED To know | Tim Kotzman

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>They're literally just putting more and more of the best

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>collateral humanities ever known on their balance sheet. Most people

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>in traditional media they can't explain to you what micro

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Strategy is even doing.

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 2>They may not even appreciate.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Everybody wants to pay their bills and get ahead and

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>provide a great future for themselves and their family. Back

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in the day when people were stockpiling gold, there were

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>companies that did that. The most successful event in England

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>became the Bicker of England.

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 3>The very nature of the business is to leverage it.

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.639
<v Speaker 3>Most of them are trying to earn more bitcoin per share.

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 3>But if you don't understand what the target is, then

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 3>how do you really value? Do you find most investors

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 3>have a hard time trying to figure that out. I mean,

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 3>all right, well, let's just talk about the talk of

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 3>the town here, not you, even though you are the

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 3>talk of the town, being the bitcoin tratury space. You've

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 3>obviously started a couple of shows talking about it, sort

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 3>of rose to fame, sort of with sort of the

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 3>micro Strategy True North kind of group, if you will.

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 3>So let's talk about that. Let's start with, first of all,

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 3>what do you see as the difference between companies that

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 3>put bitcoin on the balance sheet versus bitcoin treasury strategy companies.

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think you kind of just made the differentiation,

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>which is like, you can just put bitcoin on your

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet, right, you have cash coming in, you don't

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>need all of it. You can buy some bitcoin, it's

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>on your balance sheet. That's one strategy as opposed to

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>really using the capital markets, engaging the capital markets, and

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>issuing additional equity, issuing debt, issuing other instruments like preferred stock,

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to really aggressively build that bitcoin treasury on your balance sheet.

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>So until this conference, I feel like I just kept

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>kind of saying in different interviews that you can just

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>have to coron the balance sheet, or you can do

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the lbe leverage bitcoin equity strategy or engaging the capital markets,

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>however you want to say it, being more aggressive. Some

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>people don't like the word playbook, but the micro strategy playbook,

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>like that's the strategy. But how else are you going

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to differentiate? And it was really just maybe different operating businesses,

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>like we're a healthcare company, that's the operating business, or

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>we're a BIAI, that's our operating business. And I think

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>what we saw this week was what Matt Cole said

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>with alpha and beta of like actually trying to not

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>just do the capital markets activity, but almost in a

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund sort of operating style, go identify other ways

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to buy bitcoin or basically arbitrage your way into more

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin through those opportunities, and that could be the business.

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And now I'm hearing conversations of especially as they pop

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>up in other international markets. I mean, if you can

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>only go to finance or a startup in a certain jurisdiction,

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe that bitcoin treasury company can have a different, differentiated

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>operating business by launching an OTC desk or doing structured products,

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>like just having an operating business that makes sense for

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 1>that market and provides those products and services, but as importantly,

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>keep it bitcoin branded, in the same way that Metaplanet

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>now is going to do the Metaplanet bitcoin hotel instead

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>of just we have one hotel. I've got to keep

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it on brand and keep it bitcoin.

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 3>So then companies that are putting bitcoin on the balance

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 3>sheet not so attractive, like cool, we have money, you

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 3>have a balance sheet, that money's parked in different things.

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 3>You put it in bitcoin, oh well, versus leveraging the

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 3>ballot sheet and the business the revenue of the business

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 3>to then engineer more bitcoin. That's the big differentiator. What

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 3>would you say is the biggest misconception most investors have

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 3>when taken and look at these types of companies.

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean most people in traditional media, whether it's CNBC

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>or beyond. I'm not trying to pick on anyone in particular.

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>They probably couldn't even pick on them all. They can't

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>explain to you what micro Strategy is even doing. They

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>may not even appreciate bitcoin, and so I think it's

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>really there's so many different doors that you can come into,

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the bitcoin door, or whether it's you know,

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody tells their buddy, Hey, there's this mstr metaplant sort

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of stock that's just going vertical during certain periods of time, right,

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>not financial advice, and they're like, oh right, it's everybody

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>wants to make money. Everybody wants to pay their bills

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and get ahead and provide a great future for themselves

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and their family. So I just think we're that early

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 1>that even talking to some of the employees and executives

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>at game Stop at not steak and Shake, No, it

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>is steak and Shake.

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 2>A couple hours ago, I was saying.

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>One of the places in New York that does burgers,

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's not Steak and Shake.

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 2>I was getting all mixed up.

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>But they are doing these announcements, but internally, I don't

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>think they really expected, especially Steak and Shake, like such

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a reception, such a loyal audience. And I mean they're

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>just like saying what every corporate executive has said, which

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense that hey, it's been overwhelming support,

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, but if you are not already kind of

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>familiar with that appreciative of bitcoin as the asset, you

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>probably weren't expecting that, And so you're kind of scrambling

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>from a all sorts of different perspectives, whether it's operational

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>or media investor relations.

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was thinking more along the lines of like

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 3>a traditional investor trying to understand what's going on in

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 3>this big renchursery strategy space and sort of bringing in

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 3>like maybe like a Warren Buffett or Benjamin Graham values

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 3>on type framework. So one thing I hear quite often

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 3>as soon as I talk about one of these things

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 3>is what's the underlying business model?

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 3>But when you look at a company like MicroStrategy or

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 3>company like Metaplanet, the stock is the business model, right,

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 3>it is the product that they offer.

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing that now.

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 3>So those are some things. I'd also look at maybe

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 3>some of the metrics and how they're measured, right, So like,

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 3>for example, most of them are trying to earn more

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin per share, but if you don't understand what the

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 3>target is, then how do you really value them? So

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 3>those are some of the things I was thinking about it.

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Or why do some trade, like metaplanic trade is such

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 3>a high valuation compared to a mind strike? Do you

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 3>find most investors have a hard time trying to figure

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 3>that out?

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean even members of True North that they spend

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>arguably twelve to sixteen hours a day studying this stuff.

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 2>And they range from.

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Guys that are still in college to guys that could

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>be my dad. I'm forty three.

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>It's so brand new that any certain aspect to it

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that's not appreciated can kind of throw you off. So

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>people are like, oh, it's just the stock and it's

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>this flywheel and it's not sustainable. But if you understand

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin is pristine collateral and that that's literally within

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>a twenty four hour period, if you're selling stock and

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>turning right around and buying bitcoin with it. I mean,

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>compare that to real estate or building a hotel and

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>how long it takes to become profitable, to hold out

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to be profitable from a cash flow perspective, or be

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>able to drop that down after all your expenses on

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>your balance sheet.

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they're literally just.

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Putting more and more of the best collateral humanities ever

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>known on their balance sheet. And one of the panels

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>over in a bitcoin inmesterday at Paris Blockchain we the

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>one guy said it really really well. Part of what

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>he said was back in the day when people were

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>stockpiling gold, there were companies that did that, and the

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>company that did that the most successfully event in England

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>became the Bank of England. Like that's where like if

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you can really appreciate that, that's I think the foundation

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of what If you're not appreciating that, it might be

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>really tough to kind of write then all the preferred

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>stock and all these other tickers and all these companies

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and copycats and what everybody's chatting about. That kind of

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that comes after understanding bitcoin and Christine collateral.

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 3>Do you think most people come into the space understand

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin at that level.

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 2>No, we're all on a journey. Yeah, absolutely not.

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean because if they're trying to get bitcoin for

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 3>shared you know, one of the things I hear I

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 3>want to ask you about is the risk in the market.

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 3>So we'll come to that. But in regards to the risk,

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 3>it's like what happens in a downturn? Well, if my

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.679
<v Speaker 3>goal is to get more bitcoin for a share, what

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 3>is the downturn? Is my bitcoin going up? Because if

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 3>one bitcoin equals one bitcoin, if you're pricing it in bitcoin,

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 3>if on price in bitcoin, what downturn are we talking about?

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 2>And really digging into these companies.

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.719
<v Speaker 1>So that's what these different groups and live streams of

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>podcasts are doing a great job just analyzing is what

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>what is the risk profile? Because during certain periods of time,

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>if something by definition starts with a lower market cap

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and they're really being aggressive with their strategy, there's probably

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:05.079
<v Speaker 1>going to be periods of help performance versus micro strategy

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>or versus right, So it is kind of like this,

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>you know coin, it's sort of a phenomenon, but with

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin as far as these different corporate rappers, so that's

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting and to say the obvious, not all of them.

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be successful. We've already seen, right, won't

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>name names with There's already been companies that they did

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the strategy and now you don't hear about them anymore

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>because they didn't go about it in.

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 2>The correct way. From a government standpoint, I'll just leave.

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 3>It at that.

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.719
<v Speaker 5>Every day we see headlines about inflation and dead and

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 5>diminishing control over our own money. That's why I always

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 5>come back to bitcoin, because it's go for generations.

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 3>It's built for legacy.

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 5>But protecting your bitcoin legacy the right way is not

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 5>always simple. It demands discipline, focus and the right partner. Now,

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 5>that's why I personally use Unchained Signature. It's a premium

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 5>private client service for serious Bitcoin holders who want expert guidance,

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 5>resilient custody, and the enduring partnership. Now Signature you're paired

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 5>with your own dedicated account managemer someone who understands your

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 5>goals helps you every step of the way. You're going

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 5>to get white glove onboarding, same day emergency support, personalized education, reduced.

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Trading fees, and priority access to exclusive events and features.

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 5>Unchained Collaborative Customy model is designed to provide the same

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 5>security as the world's biggest bitcoin custodians. But for those

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 5>who prefer to hold their own keys. Now, I've been

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 5>using and recommending unchained for years. I even got my

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 5>parents to set up with them. So if you want

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 5>to get set up, check out unchained signature at unchained

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 5>dot com, slash mark Moss, and as a loyal listener,

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 5>I got a discount for you. Just use code Moss

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 5>ten at checkout to get ten percent off your first year.

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 5>Because your bitcoin isn't just for life, it's for generations.

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's important to have the alignment throughout the governance

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 3>of that to do that, But let's take a look

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 3>at it. If we think about the companies again, like

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 3>micro strategy, you're a better planet if their ticker is

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 3>the product they're offering, then I would ask you the question.

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 3>Right now, a lot of people are saying, maybe this

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 3>is an over a zuber bubble. Maybe we're seeing this

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 3>rise too fast and the crash is coming. How many

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 3>of these types of companies do you think the market

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 3>could bear. I think the market can bear an infinite

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 3>amount of companies just putting bitcoin on the balance sheet

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 3>without taking on leverage. Certainly beyond that, I don't know

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 3>I think I don't know that micro Strategy would ever

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 3>do this. But let's say we go to get into

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 3>a bear market and there's a company that they have

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 3>ten bitcoin but they're trading at eight bitcoin. Well maybe

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 3>a company that's in a really strong position, like MicroStrategy

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 3>could just buy them for nine bitcoin and everybody's happy enough.

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 3>So I think they'll be kind of like what we're

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 3>seeing with the miners, some consolidation and some just all

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 3>of that different nuance of about activity and m and

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 3>a as we as.

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Just is it of this break new future?

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Yeah, I mean we have thousands of financial products

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 3>in the market today, are tens of thousands of financial products,

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 3>and if you look at each one of them having

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a different strategy than you might

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 3>almost look at them as like an ETF, right, where

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 3>each one is just a little bit different. And there's

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 3>thousands of ETFs as well, but.

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>There shouldn't be thousands more. I mean, guys that we

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>all know and love in the space that have pioneered it,

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean they've specifically said the comment, I don't know

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>why there aren't more ETFs and structured products like there's

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>just and it's hopefully it gets back to the foundational

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>education of bitcoin, like own bitcoin, go through that process

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to really educate yourself on it as round yourself with

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>people that can help you with that. But whatever door

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>they come in through, great, right, it's all good for bitcoin.

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So if they're like these ETFs, then there should

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 3>be even more of them, like you said, then, like

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 3>I said, there's maybe an infinite mouth that we can

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 3>absorb into the market. The problem will become how do

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 3>you get attention? So anyone can go watch an ETF.

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 3>I could do that. I've looked into it. How do

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 3>you get attention to that ETF? So we sort of

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 3>have this window and time right now where these companies

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 3>can sort of take advantage of that, but eventually the

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 3>law of doomision or turns will sort of diminish that.

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 3>So do you think this sort of irrational xuberance last

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 3>six months, twelve months, a year?

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 2>How does that take her off?

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I know some guys are looking at it as it's

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be the it's going to be the traditional cycle,

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, no matter what happens, you're going to

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>take a certain amount off the table, or at least

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>have that mindset of later this year, right is just

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>be really thoughtful about what you're doing if you're, you know,

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>wanting to get out of a position. But I think

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a longer I mean, just everything

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>from the US regulatory environment, the government, I mean, everything

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>seems to be setting up for the potential of the

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>price going quite a bit higher this year.

0:13:57.679 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 2>And into next year.

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if the the US government or I saw

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>something on x about Adam back City's consulting and software

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>wealth funds. I mean, these things are happening. So if

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>they kind of stare step their way up the way

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that we've heard for a while now the ten basis

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>points to one percent, two percent. Now you're hearing five percent,

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and not just from the Kathy Woods of the world,

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>but from more and more, you know, the black Rock

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>saying one to two percent that keeps stair stepping its

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>way up. Then arguably we might make sense that the

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>price just stair steps its way up and it just

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>grinds up with volatility for a longer period and maybe

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we see some sort of low offt top in twenty

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty six. Yeah, nobody knows the future.

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Nobody knows, but we do know cycles and we know

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 3>how they repeat it, so most likely until proved otherwise

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 3>they're going to repeat the nature of this business. If

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 3>we talk about the Treasury Strategy companies, the nature of

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 3>that business is leverage, right, leverage the balance sheet to

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 3>increase the bitcoin for a share. So the very nature

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 3>of the business is to leverage it. And then we

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 3>know humans then take things too far, so then naturally

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 3>some people are going to push it way too far.

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 3>And so we talk about sort of like the warm

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 3>buffet quote. Right when the tide goes out, we see

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 3>wo'swining naked. So a lot of people thought Sailor would

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 3>get liquidated in the last downturn. He built a balance

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 3>sheet in a way that he didn't. But some people

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 3>maybe won't do that. So I guess what would you say,

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 3>are some of the biggest risks or red flags that

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 3>you would look for in some of these companies going

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 3>into a downturn that might scare you?

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean to your point, the leverage ratio super important.

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Sale and Strategy very publicly said they're targeting a twenty

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>or thirty percent equity leverage point, So anyone that's maybe

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>above that, and again digging into the details, of it

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>technically was impossible. After Salem got the traditional bank loans

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>off of it balance sheet, it like it wasn't it's

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>not collateralized. There's no margin feature on any of this.

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>And so to the extent that companies can follow that playbook,

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>for lack of a better word, I think they'll be

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>in a better position than the people that are trying

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to just make it up as they go and really

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>just view it more as a trade. And so yeah,

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I think so.

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 3>The leverage is sort of the main thing you're looking for.

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>The leverage and what are the covenants, what are the

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>details about Like if bitcoin goes down to eighty thousand dollars,

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, do they need to sell some bitcoin? And

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and again you know Strive and Knakamoto, right, David Bailey

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and mac cole have both set publicly bitcoin per share.

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna optimize for bitcoin per share and that could

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>mean buy bitcoin or selling bitcoin. They're super sharp people

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in the industry.

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 2>I talked to you.

0:16:56.720 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>They're like, yeah, when you're a smaller player, and I

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>think Davids had said this right, when you're when you're

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:04.679
<v Speaker 1>a smaller player, you can probably do that.

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 2>And you're not going to move the market.

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>But at a certain point, you know, they may just

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>by personal opinion, I think they may rethink that because.

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 2>Just the messaging. What do you think.

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>My thought is, when you're smaller, maybe it gives more

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>investor confidence that it's being actively managed. But when you

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>get to the point of like a strategy, and you

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 1>have half a million bitcoin or a million bitcoin, I

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>mean I feel like the messaging has to be that

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to sell your bitcoin.

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 3>I think everyone's going to have their own strategy, and

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 3>that's why all these financial products will have a place

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 3>in the market. Right There's going to be a place

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 3>for all of those. Speaking of strategy, what do you

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 3>think about Michael Saylor's comments about not learning the show

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 3>truth on reserts.

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I think if people listen to the whole ten to

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minute response, it is very thoughtful and nuanced, meaning

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>he's open to doing a zero knowledge proof potentially at

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>some point where it masks the address. So I think

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>there are are maybe not actual technical, physical so to speak, risk,

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>but if you have bitcoin in a wallet and then

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin moves, and you just have every single cyber

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>hornet in the world just like well, that one coin

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>moved and it's creating all this fud. I don't think

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that's helpful, even if it's not like an actual security risk,

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't I think that could turn into a really

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>big kind of fud storm that nobody really needs. With

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that said, it certainly differentiates if Strategy is not going

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to do it, but metaplanet is doing it. You know,

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>there's all of these different features that people can consider

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>selling points. I guess you could say, yeah, that that

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of leads into.

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean there's all kinds of unknown risks that

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 3>we don't know about. You do you know some known risks?

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 3>So for example, dustin attacks, right, So why I'm publicizing

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 3>what those wallet addresses are, You're potentially setting yourself up

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 3>some attacks that way. I think there's also potential treasury management.

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 3>So you might not want to hold all five hundred

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 3>and eighty thousand bitcoin in a single wallet. You might

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 3>want twenty or two thousand wallets, and then you might

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 3>decide you want four thousand wallets, and then you might

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 3>decide you want to go to two thousand wallets again,

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 3>and then every time you move those number one, how

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 3>do you update people on four thousand wallets? Number two,

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 3>to your point, are coin moves. Then does the market

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 3>react to that, Oh my gosh, they're selling or whatever? Right,

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 3>And so from a lot of perspectives, you could see

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 3>plenty of readings why you wouldn't want to do that,

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 3>as to why you would want to do that. What

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 3>the people seem to be pretty upset about right now

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 3>is it doesn't really align with the ethos or the

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 3>ideology of bitcoin, because they should be not trusting, but verifying.

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that by showing proof of reserves though,

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 3>it gives people a false sense of security because even

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 3>if they see the bitcoin there, do they really have

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 3>a claim to it? What other encumbrances could there be

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 3>against that bitcoin? Where are they on the stack? So

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 3>maybe it gives people even a false sense of security

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 3>that way.

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think those are all great points. And I mean,

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>unless there's something that I'm not familiar with, all the

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>ETPs all these corporate rappers, you don't have a coin

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>on the bitcoin, maybe they'll be like kind of exchange

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>on the eutpsys or a point. I'm sure there will be,

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>whether it's six months or six years from now. But yeah,

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they're they're all important considerations, and yeah, you

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>don't want that proof of reserve stuff just constantly in

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the news cycle. That's probably not helpful. And to repeat

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>what's been said for five years now, you should be self.

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Sovereign, you should have own bitcoin, you should have.

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Happen to cold storage. So I mean, is there some

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>way that something's in like super deep cold storage. Like

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>let's say you have a million bitcoin, you have one

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand of it, one hundred thousand of it that

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>like argue we are you're never going to touch, and

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it's in such deep cold storage that you can tell

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.719
<v Speaker 1>people what those wallets are. I'm not a security expert

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>on that side of things. That's a terrible idea, but

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that's where my mind goes.

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you mentioned the self sovereign, just get your own

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin and put into cold stories. And so if you're

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 3>really that much into the ideology, then maybe you should

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 3>just buy your own bitcoin because there is counter party risk.

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 3>It's inequity, right, it's not immutable. Yep. So you think

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 3>you think there's sort of a mismatch of the buyer

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 3>in the market where they want to align with somebody

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 3>with like sovereign ethos, but at the same time they're

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 3>buying inequity.

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't think that at all. Every time I

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>see FUD, I just rationally try to think through it. Well,

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>if somebody didn't like the stock, they would either not

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 1>buy the stock or they would sell the stock. So

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>if someone's out there being noisy on social media, what

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>are they actually doing? Are they shorting the stock? Do

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>they have friends that are shorting the stock? Or they

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>get your money where your mouth is?

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like, if you just rationally think through it, it's.

0:21:53.840 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Like like, if there's rational objection or concerns or questions,

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that's one thing. But if someone's just like super hard

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>fudding something, it's like, all right, you can be spend

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>your whole life being upset about stuff. And I've gone

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>through that, right, I'm like, stop talking about the ATM

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 1>like and but it's it's just not you kind of

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>have to stay focused and guard time.

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Guard your energy.

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 3>Now, what about Like most bitcoinners are hoddlers, right, so

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 3>they're long term thinkers. We understand bitcoin is going to

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 3>go a lot over a long period of time, but

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people in the equity space seem to

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 3>be more in a trader mentality. I've been approached by

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 3>countless people, as I'm sure you have as well, just

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 3>at this event where like I think I'm gonna sell

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 3>micro Strategy and roll into X y Z. What do

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:42.360
<v Speaker 3>you think about that?

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 2>What do you say to that? Yeah, so what are

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 2>you optimizing for?

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Again, whether it's micro Strategy versus Metaplanet, Metaplanet versus the

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>next thing? I like, But that's a speculative or trading

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>sort of mentality, which is fine, but I think you

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>should recognize that's what you're doing, unless you're going to say, hey,

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I understand and appreciate what strategy is doing, and I'm

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>going to hold this long term, whether it's over a

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:18.399
<v Speaker 1>year for tax purposes, ten fifteen, twenty years, like what

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>happens after the accumulation phase, and so there's been some

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 1>announcements and talk about that as far as how to

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>yield or whatever, and hopefully without a lot of reasonable

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>counterparty risk or within the bitcoin ecosystem, like what happens

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>when there's products and services or you know, whether it's

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you know and no strategy just is pounding the table

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're not going to become a bank. But like

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>whether it's banking or insurance or other services and Yeah,

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that's I guess my view on where all this is going.

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>And Ben Work's talk to a lot about that of like, hey,

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>there's there's He kind of thinks there's two phases. There's

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the accumulation and then you become the Bank of England

0:23:57.600 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and then you can do whatever you want.

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would probably say Sailor might become the most

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 3>wealthy man in the world, not because he's trading Strategy stock. Yep,

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 3>he's owning it right jet basis because why those guys

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 3>that wor holding Amazon stock not trading it And so

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 3>it's like sort of allocating and sort of way in

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 3>that long term period. Let's switch scares a little bit.

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 3>So I know, you know you're you're sort of the

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 3>pretty girl to dance right now, everyone's talking to you.

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that you're doing is talking to

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 3>other companies that might be considering doing these treasury strategies

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 3>and things like that. What type of companies do you

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 3>think are sort of in the sweet spot to do this,

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.360
<v Speaker 3>and how would you advise them to go about launching

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 3>one of these.

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I think any company that has the right leadership is

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in a great spot. I mean, you look at what

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Simon and Dylan and done with Metaplanet it was one hotel,

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 1>So I don't I think it's industry specific. I think

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>it's leadership specific. And I think the only thing you've

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 1>been remotely close to advising anyone on is like you

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>have your capital strategy, should probably have an attention strategy,

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a media strategy, because if you're not going to announce

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it really to the world and really put a spotlight

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 1>on it, right and not like the crypto bros that

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>are out pumping their coins for five minutes and they're

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>really excited in their YouTube video and then it's over

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>like that doesn't it's probably not a.

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Long term strategy.

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>It's not credible, it's not durable. So yeah, just having

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the right leadership, and I mentioned this on the Live

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Desplaine Monday. I think there's a lot of opportunity for

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that are either in media or

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>want to have seat in this part in space to

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>help these companies.

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Really with that.

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Digital distribution, because I don't think there's going to be

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>many other CEOs that are either going to have the

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 1>interest or a wherewithal to do what Salor's done for

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>five years straight, which is due like a podcast a day,

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I might be being dramatic, but a podcast a week

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>is probably understating it. Just pounding the table on bitcoin

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and messaging that conviction out to the market. So I

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of opportunity for people on the

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>podcast or media side to really helicopter themselves in, help them,

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>help to bring out their story, their conviction and the

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>personal side of the executives, and tell that story in

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>all these different format lights, whether it's thirty seconds or

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>three hours.

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Since I have a fun investor here, I have an

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 3>actual treasury company here, Steven puts that back there, you're

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 3>also working on the treasuries. Anybody want to ask any questions?

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Zach obviously analyzes these. Anybody want to, like, ask how

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 3>many questions? Since we're kind of an informal thing. A

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of people showed up. Yeah please.

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 5>So you mentioned a government regulation of the times, and

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 5>I just wanted to ask you to see bitcoin and

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 5>playing a major role in real estatee organization.

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the coin is going to play a big

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 1>role in a lot of what people are thinking on

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the When they say tokenizing the world, to quote Larry

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Fink or blockchain, we're all about web three, blockchain tokenization,

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>some other buzzword that like you can do so much

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 1>on the blockchain and not just layer one that, as

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Sailor has said, is really going to be for nation

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>states to settle on at a certain point here. But

0:27:55.200 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>layer two, Layer three, layer four, Yeah, Like I don't

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>know my personal but opinion is like they're just going

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a limited or no coin season, Like people

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>are not rotating out of their black rock bitcoin etf

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>into doge coin this time. So I think you'll see

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>people will be surprised to see how much you can

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>build within the bitcoin ecosystem. And I think that'll extend

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to every industry and quite in real estate.

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:25.360
<v Speaker 3>And what I would add on to that is that

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 3>if you think about tokenizing real estate, so if we

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 3>break that down, what does that even me? So token

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 3>would be like a fractional ownership unit piece of real estate,

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of like if I have an LLC and people

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 3>buy shares, So like we already do fractionalize ownership of

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 3>real estate, whether I call it a share or a token,

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Like what's the difference? That's number one? Number two, I

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 3>don't think it makes a lot of sense to try

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 3>to tokenize a physical asset into a virtual asset. So

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin is a bear and right, it's tokenized energy basically

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 3>that I can have and I can keep. But real

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 3>estate is just real estate. It's a physical asset, right,

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 3>So I don't really see any advantage. All of this

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 3>is like, really add friction to the transaction, add liquidity?

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 3>How How I don't I don't see it adding liquidity.

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 3>I think there's specifically in real estate. I think there's

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 3>a really big problem with that. Is that in order

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 3>for things to go from a collected so money has

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 3>an evolutionary process from a collectible to a store, a

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:34.239
<v Speaker 3>valuage or medium exchange and events to create account. Now

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 3>what happens is it has to have the right attributes

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 3>in order to scale that evolutionary process. So to go

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 3>from a store of value like a piece of real

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 3>estate is to become a medium exchange. To have liquidity,

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 3>it has to have the right attributes portable, durable, divisible, recognizable, fundable, saleable,

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. So homes are not fungible. So one unit

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 3>of a four plex in Indianapolis, how do I value

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 3>that against the unit of single families? Reveget to bath

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 3>in Tampa, Miami, or Lando, right, and so I don't

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 3>see it crave more liquid market. But even if it does,

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 3>we don't need bitcoin or a blockchain to do that.

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 3>We can already do that. We have all types of

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 3>fractionized ownership those d platforms that are out there right

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 3>now today, so you can already do it. You can

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 3>already buy a fractional owney with real estate. So I

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 3>don't see how bitcoin at all, much less a token

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 3>would help that necessarily.

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Timmy, your thoughts on it seems to me whether

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 6>it's any land or buying series trying to erry cash

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 6>flower than users investing.

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Balls that did not go so well.

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 5>Given the headitors that we.

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 4>Can face over time for a while, they're generally above

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 4>the cash flow starving series of cat pecks.

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 3>And just revestigators up my edge.

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 7>One seems to me this whole bitcoin treasure strategy, which

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 7>company can differentially on them all the rest can become

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 7>like for sure half the very flow ready to labor

0:30:57.720 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 7>a series cash flow to then just.

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 4>Keep deploying it, not just relo on the counter markets.

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 4>You see any companies out there or you're ready to

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 4>take advantage and that ortryrapic model or mid sized companies

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 4>in the area have that as well.

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a great question.

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I've been approached by private companies that they're like, hey,

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>we own a bunch of well known franchises, right, dozens

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of them, hundreds of them. We want to do the

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>treasury strategy. We don't know how to do it. I

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>guess the paradox is, if you're a mag seven or

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>even a reasonably successful company, as sale Or says, you

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>might not have that that need to know.

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I think it.

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Really just comes down to leadership, and it'll be interesting

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to see what these inflection points are to where is

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it the shareholder pressure, the societal kind of media pressure

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that has some of these mag seven or larger cup

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>firms put like a small amount of bitcoinn of their

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet just to kind of appease everybody, because it

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>becomes so de risked that they're like, yeah, sure, I

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>believe Salon normal Isaac Burn like your softboorder finally changes

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>their mind boats yes, or Apple supposed to might putting

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>up the promises as well. Yeah, so yeah, I guess

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the paradox you could say is the companies that

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>are the most successful don't have a need to know,

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>similar to you know the great things that L. Salbador

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>has done, just right, just keep stacking.

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 3>But do you think it also works better with small

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 3>companies because when you're a big company like a Seer's

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 3>or an Apple, I mean, even if you put ten

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 3>percent of your balance sheet into bitcoin, what is that

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 3>really going to do to the overall market cap?

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's that's the answer to a common question

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is is a company going to catch strategy? Well, sure,

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>if you have enough cash or it can raise enough cash,

0:32:55.080 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>we can probably match their holdings potentially, But you're gonna

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:02.479
<v Speaker 1>be as leveraged as they are because you if you're

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>an Apple, you have such a huge operating business that

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>is just not the same amount of leverage of bitcoin

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>versus operating Yeah.

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 8>One of the comments gave up, you know is that

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 8>MS trying to say, well, you know, it's company as

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 8>anology straight for a you know, actual margin. There's I

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 8>kind of see that playing out of work here.

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 6>Or you know there's some company that trade.

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 7>Out you know seventy nine to ten times.

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 6>And ap allustrated two or three or ale, you know,

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 6>the company that are off by the company a little

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 6>rednap versus using that's accountal A big.

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a really interesting question. I might need an

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>actual analyst or quant It's not you know, I'm not

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not that deep on that side of it, but

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it take a lot of analysis to just,

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's the upside to just buying bitcoin versus

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>if I can acquire a company? What all does that

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>bring to the table, X, Y, and z as far

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>as the bitcoin, the operating business, the leverage ratio and like,

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>will that you know, if you're if you're still in

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of an up grinding up market, like, does that

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>give you more opportunity over that sort of.

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Short to medium timeframe?

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Is it sort of the bitcoin torque number?

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 3>So it's like if I deploy a dollar, how much

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin growth do I get from that? So what's my

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 3>torque number versus if I go out and buy the

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 3>other company?

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:34.319
<v Speaker 3>And I guess you'd compare those two. Thanks for the

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 3>small little group of friends in family they game to

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 3>show up for this. Uh, thanks very thanks for coming

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 3>rob it up.

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for the invice is great.

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah,