WEBVTT - Pumpkin Spice Hitler

0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong, Joe Getty arm Strong and

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Jettie and he.

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Eddy. I can't believe it. It is the

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 2>most puzzling, wonderful, rewarding thing I think we've seen in

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 2>baseball in many, many years.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>He is the talk of.

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 2>The baseball world in English and Spanish and any other

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:41.840
<v Speaker 2>language that's close at hand.

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:48.279
<v Speaker 3>Fernando Valenzuela, Fernando Valenzuela, the Dodgers, and the Dodgers are

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 3>back in the World Series, so there'll be a lot

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 3>of nostalgia for that amazing picture from back in the day.

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Who died at the age of sixty three? What do

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you die of? That's not very old.

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't actually know. I hadn't dug into it AnyWho.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 4>I was not part of his medical team.

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 5>He was unhittable for like a couple of seasons there,

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 5>just absolutely unhittable, right, And he was kind of a pudgy,

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 5>unassuming looking, uh Mexican guy.

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, yeah, and just filthy stuff though, as we

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>say in the baseball world.

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and good times and really credited with I didn't

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 5>realize this, but that it really opened up the whole

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 5>Spanish player thing and players from other countries coming over.

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 5>It really, you know, brought us to the baseball we

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 5>got today where a lot of the best players don't

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 5>speak English and are for some from some other country.

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, which I don't love exactly, but you know, it

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 4>is what it is.

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a global sport.

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 5>Fernando, by the way, I heard this on NPR today,

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 5>could speak English. He just didn't want to, so he

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 5>was did did everything through an interpreter, right, he did

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 5>everything to an interpreter.

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>He just didn't want to talk to people.

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 5>I don't blame him. I don't blame the media. He

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 5>didn't want to talk to the media, right. AnyWho, Yeah,

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 5>I get that.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Fernando.

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 4>What were you thinking as you face Jones in the

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 4>fourth inning?

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>No, come friend?

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 5>What do you think I was thinking? I was thinking,

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 5>I want to get the frigging guy out.

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>What a stupid question.

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 5>Are you disappointed in the way the season ended? Yeah,

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 5>we lost, of course, I am what them thrilled. I

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 5>was hoping we'd have a crappy season. Shut up, No,

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 5>come friendly, that's easier. Uh, that's funny. So we're thirteen

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 5>days out and things are getting super ugly. I guess

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 5>behind the scenes. According to a couple of different journalists,

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 5>I read the pressure. I was just reading this, the

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 5>pressure on news outlets to not do anything that could

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 5>possibly help Trump is a fever pitch wow, which you know,

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 5>I do not doubt that for a second. What sort

0:02:57.720 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 5>of pressure can you describe the sort of pressure you

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 5>think their feeling, because I'm picturing everything from in the

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 5>pickup line for their kids that they're very expensive private schools,

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 5>to their social circles, you know, I'm getting in their newsrooms.

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 5>I'm guessing that a lot of it is professional and

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 5>personal that what you just described there. It's just all

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 5>your friends agree with your politics and will give you

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 5>so much crap if you do anything that's within one

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 5>hundred miles of balanced coverage of the election.

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Right right.

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 4>And you have to remember, as our fellow cynics, I

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 4>think a lot of you are, that a lot of

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 4>these people buy the most overheated of their own rhetoric.

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 4>And so if I were to do a story critical

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 4>of Kamala, I would be ushering in the new Hitler,

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 4>Who's going to end our democracy? You know, getting him

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 4>a foot closer to the White House and that's unforgivable

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 4>from their fevered point of view.

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 5>We got such a good example for you here. So

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 5>I mentioned yesterday, I came in, I said, good gud.

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 5>I watched the ABC Evening News last night, and it

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 5>is as if the newscast because everybody's doing the first

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 5>segment pretty much on the election. Although last night they

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 5>did a first segment on McDonald's quarter pounders, which is

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 5>one of my favorite topics making people sick across the country,

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 5>including killing a person apparently.

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Not in the usual way, just the coli apparently.

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, not in a slow you get obese and lethargic way,

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 5>but it's got.

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>A coasease, etc. Yeah.

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 5>Anyway, so I was watching the ABC Evening News and

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 5>I was like, are you kidding me? This is ridiculous.

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you got to at least pretend. Well, here's

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 5>an example. This is from Monday night, because it was

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 5>a big news weekend with all kinds of different stuff

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 5>happened to the both campaigns. Here's Nora O'Donnell's opening to

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 5>the CBS Evening News. See if you feel like she's

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 5>leaning one way or the other.

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 6>Selection day is just over two weeks away, and the

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 6>fight for every single last undecided vote in battleground states

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 6>is intensifying. Vice President Kamala Harris's targeting disaffected Republican voters

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 6>by hitting the trail with Liz Cheney in the crucial

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 6>blue wall states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. Cheney was

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 6>a powerful Republican congressman, and today she called Harris a

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 6>responsible adult. As for former President Donald Trump, he was

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 6>back in North Carolina again pushing false claims about FEMA

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 6>and immigrants, as after he spent the weekends slinging a

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 6>crude insult at Harris, engaging in lewd locker room talk

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 6>about the late golfing legend Arnold Palmer, and staging a

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 6>campaign stunt at a Pennsylvania McDonald's.

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I mean, I was expecting it to be

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 5>too much, but that is crazy. That is crazy, staging

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 5>a photo op and a closed McDonald's, putting all of

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 5>the editorial opinion in your little blurb about what was

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 5>a very successful, by the way, very typical sort of campaign.

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 5>Stop a question for you that had been a press

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 5>release from the DNC. Howd it have differed? It wouldn't

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 5>at all. So Kamala Harris's campaigning with Republicans who call

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 5>her a great leader, evil Trump is going around lying

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 5>and doing phony photo ops.

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about Arnold Palmers crank how there?

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 7>Right?

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 5>You know what's interesting, Jack's I watched NBC News that

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 5>same night and it was virtually word for word the

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 5>same in tone and structure, So again to the point

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 5>that they're under tremendous pressure to not do anything that

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 5>would help Trump in any way.

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>So does Liz Cheney's lost her mind?

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 5>Way, I want to talk about that topic too, But

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 5>so does Nora o'donald know what she just did? I mean,

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 5>are they I've been wondering this for a long time,

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 5>as you know, like the debate when she was on

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 5>there with uh, what's her name? The other one from

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 5>facin Nation, the two CBS people, It's like, do they

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 5>know what they're doing? Are they so so in the

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 5>bubble of people that agree with them, doesn't even feel

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 5>like they're being biased?

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>That's what I think it's the I think it's the

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>second one. Yeah, I think it is too.

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 5>I think Norah O'Donnell feels like, no, I'm doing fair

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 5>coverage of what happened over the weekend.

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump's evil and Kamala is great. So what are you

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about?

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they're they're either completely committed to that and yeah,

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 4>I can't decide.

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm going back and forth, because I was gonna

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>say they're both the both she and Kristen.

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 4>Welker are bright enough to understand how they're coming off.

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 4>But then I started thinking, well, maybe they don't care

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 4>that they're coming off that way because everybody they value,

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 4>everybody whose opinion they value in their lives, agrees with

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 4>that point of view. So I don't know how deliberate

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 4>and how unconscious it is, honestly, but it is absolutely egregious.

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 5>That was I would have had to sit down for

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 5>a half an hour and really put some work into

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 5>it to do as good a job of campaigning for

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 5>Kamala Harris as that opening forty five seconds was on

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 5>the CBS Evening News. Let's make her sound bipartisan, have

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 5>a good quote from a Republican about what a great

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 5>leader she will be, and then point out and exaggerate

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 5>any awful thing that Trump did taking a completely normal

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 5>photo op and making it seem negative somehow.

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, Wow, Well, there we have it there. It is so.

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 5>And I also always think, I think you know, half

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 5>the country is or more is going to vote for Trump.

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 5>They hate when you do that, they hate it a lot.

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 5>It makes them more likely to vote for Trump. Not

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 5>less you think you're convincing people. You are convincing them

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 5>to vote for Trump because it's so clear that the

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 5>mainstream media is in the bag for Kamala Well and

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 5>this guy.

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 4>I can't wait to get post Trump and get back

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 4>to just defending conservative values and policies. I think anything

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 4>that beclowns the mainstream media and points out their egregious

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 4>biases is probably a good thing. They've They've rendered themselves ridiculous, yead,

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 4>I'd say so.

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 5>So anyway, Kamala Harris did an interview yesterday. She didn't

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 5>do hardly any campaign stuff because she had a couple

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 5>of interviews. It's interesting if she ever did no appearances

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 5>of any sort. When she has an interview, she does

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 5>not campaign even two weeks out. Is it that taxing

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 5>or she has to be that focused to try to

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 5>get through an interview without a complete mess up.

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 5>But anyway, she sat down with NBC and here's a

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 5>little bit of that.

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 9>It's a judgment question. That's why I ask, can the

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.199
<v Speaker 9>American people trust you in these moments? Even when it's

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 9>maybe uncomfortable. It sounds like what you're saying is you

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 9>feel like you never saw anything like that from President Bilin.

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 5>I got to set that up or nobody will have

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 5>any idea what they're talking about because we left out

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 5>what they're set up is there? So is it Hayley Jackson, Yeah, yeah,

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 5>she was asking Kamala Harris about Biden's mental state and

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 5>did you ever see it? And you've stood up for

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 5>his mental state even though seventy five percent of Americans

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 5>believe he shouldn't be president, and he embarrassed himself in

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 5>the debate, So what gives?

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>How can people trust you? It's a judgment question.

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 9>That's why I ask, can the American people trust you

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 9>in these moments? Even when it's maybe uncomfortable. It sounds

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 9>like what you're saying is you feel like you never

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 9>saw anything like that from President Biden.

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 7>I have worked with Joe Biden, whether hours and hours

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 7>and hours over these four years, whether it be in

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 7>the situation room or the Oval office. Joe Biden is

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 7>the one who was able to bring NATO together during

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 7>a crisis where for the first time in seventy years,

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 7>Europe saw and has seen war. Joe Biden has done

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 7>the work that has been about being a leader on

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 7>what we have done to fix so much of what

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 7>has been broken in terms of the economy because of

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 7>Donald Trump's mismanagement. I speak with not only sincerity, but

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 7>with a real first hand account of watching him do

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 7>this work.

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I have no reluctance to saying that. Now, that's sound

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>like a dodge at all. Isn't that amazing? Yeah? Wow?

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 5>And the follow up should be, well the stuff I said.

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 5>Seventy five percent of Americans think he shouldn't be president again,

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 5>which is why he stepped down. We all saw him

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 5>at the debate. George Clooney wrote an op ed for

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 5>The New York Times saying, the guy at the debate

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 5>is who he saw at a fundraiser.

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>You're really saying you never saw that? Yeah, this is.

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 4>Why I wasn't that enthused about Brett Baarr asking the

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 4>question in that interview.

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>She would just repeat what she just said.

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 5>Again. I think they think they're helping themselves. It's doing

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 5>more harm than good. Well, so, what would be a

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 5>good answer. Is there a good answer? Am I being

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 5>Are we being fair to her? Maybe there's not a

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 5>good answer.

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>No, there's not.

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 4>No, the Dodge is the only fair answer. Because he

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 4>was sen Island, she knew it. I will credit Hallie

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 4>Jackson with a reasonable, you know, probing question there on

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 4>NBC News.

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm pleasantly surprised.

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, that's that's one of the great scandals of

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 5>I think it'll be written about years from now. It

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 5>doesn't feel like a scandal now, but she and others

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:15.959
<v Speaker 5>covered up for a guy who should not be president.

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 5>He shouldn't be president right this moment. Right he's having

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 5>conversations with Lloyd Austin. I'm sure about this whole North

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 5>Korea troops in Russia thing. Is he able to understand

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 5>what the hell's going on? Is he awake? Or is

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 5>the Secretary of State and the Second Deep Are they

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 5>making decisions without input from the president because he's not

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 5>having a good day that.

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>This shouldn't be known.

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 5>I need more evidence to answer your question. Can we

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 5>listen to clip forty two?

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Please? This is Biden yesterday in conquered New Hampshire. This

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the guy also wants to place.

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 10>Every civil servant, every single one thinks he has a

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 10>writer of the Streme Court ruling on immunity to be

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 10>able to if need be, if there's a case to

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 10>actually eliminate, physically eliminated, shoot kill someone who is he

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 10>needs to be a threat to him. I mean, so,

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 10>I know this sounds bizarre. It sounds like I said

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 10>this five years ago. You'd locked me up. We gotta

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 10>lock him out, political vocuum.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Out, lock him out. That's what we have to do.

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Lock him out. Wow politically wow wow. Boy.

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 5>Well he'll be gone in January. That's quite a ways away.

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 5>January twenty.

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 4>That's an awful long time given the geopolitical tensions.

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Rember December January.

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 5>That's three months from a couple of weeks ago. Three

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 5>months is a long time to be president when you

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 5>have your brain works like that.

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 10>Mess for them in work, unless you want to get better.

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 5>Cuban missile crisis was what twelve days? Yeah exactly.

0:13:56.080 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>We got more on the way, Strong and Getty, this

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is going viral.

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 5>Pizza Hut is offering a new experience to diners in

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 5>New York.

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Take a look at this well restaurant.

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 11>Chain is opening up a one person reservation only restaurant.

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 11>Beginning today in Queens, diners are rather the diner at

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 11>the restaurant. We'll get fifteen minutes to enjoy their very

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 11>own six inch personal tan pizza.

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 5>New Yorkers were like to us, that's a four bedroom apartment. Yeah,

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 5>I think the visual matters on that. It's a little

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 5>shed that's made to look like at pizza hut, but

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 5>it only has for one person that's sitting there and

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 5>eat a little.

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Pizza like that being left alone sign. Yeah, I'm busy eating.

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 4>We barely have any time look at that anyway. A

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 4>couple of other consumer related stories that I found were interesting.

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Starbucks, Jack, you're a big Starbucks guy. I only really hit.

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Starbucks in an airport once in a while. I kind

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 4>of a coffee at home type. But they've been taking

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 4>on water. Can you say that about a nobody that

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 4>sells liquids? Probably not, but they've been struggling mightily of late.

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 4>They've got a new CEO, Brian Nichol, who's taken over

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 4>from the old guy who drove it into the ground,

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 4>and he's credited with saving Chipotle and young brands and

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 4>that sort of thing.

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So the stocks way up. But I'm just curious what

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you think. And fellow Starbucks fans think his new message

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.359
<v Speaker 1>slogan is back to Starbucks.

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 5>I like that, And they're going to get away from

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 5>the hyper efficient, highly digital, robotic mixed drinks and get

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 5>more into the coffee shop.

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Feel.

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I like the idea of that. As a guy

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 5>who goes in there and gets coffee. They have nine

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 5>thousand different kinds of drinks you can get that aren't coffee.

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, here's the thing that's going to be less hyper

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 4>efficient though, it's going to be slower and more relaxed.

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, I know they're going to pare down the menu

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 5>because there are something like eight thousand different sorts of

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 5>things you can order, and they're going to try to

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 5>pair that way way, way way back, which would help

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 5>a big Other part of it, too, is the way

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 5>they handle their bathroom situation because of that that happened

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 5>in Philadelphia with the people they didn't allow in the

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 5>bathroom and its college kids and they have blah blah blah. Anyway,

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 5>so every bathroom situation every Starbucks in America is horrible,

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 5>and that that's a problem. It used to be a

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 5>very nice clean place you could go to and know

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 5>you could go in there, like when my kids were younger.

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 5>That's the one you could count on to go find

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 5>a nice, clean bathroom.

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>And then that all went away.

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 4>One report I saw a reference the nineteen ninety eight

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 4>joke in the Onion that I still remember, oddly enough,

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:32.239
<v Speaker 4>the satirical headline new Starbucks opens in restroom of existing Starbucks.

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 4>Starbucks had twenty five hundred stores at the time. Today

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 4>it has tripled that many in China alone. Wow, and

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 4>about forty thousand worldwide.

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 5>I didn't know Starbucks was a big thing in China.

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 5>You know what I didn't get to is chaos packaging.

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 5>It's the new trend in consumer goods. Chaos packaging, unexpected

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 5>packaging like ice cream, tubs of tampons that's for Tim

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 5>Watz and sunscreen from a whipped cream can.

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>That's the new trend.

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 5>To look for it on shelves near you all explain

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 5>later on, speaking of tampon, Tim, he dropped some bad

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 5>language himself yesterday, among other things on the way say knucklehead,

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 5>armstrong and geddy.

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Forever.

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 12>He was saying she never worked at McDonald's never, so

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 12>now he took himself to McDonald's.

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 5>That was McDonald's.

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>That was clothes, and he.

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 5>Wasn't wearing a hairnet, which really bothered me.

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, no net, really you I don't want some French fried.

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>She actually worked in a McDonald's.

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 12>She didn't go and pander and disrespect McDonald's workers by

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 12>standing there in your red tie and take a.

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 5>Picture who worked briefly as a fry cooker without a hairnet,

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 5>I might add. I listened to some punditry around this,

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 5>a lot of punditry around this, from super smart people

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 5>on both sides, almost all of them agreeing that that

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 5>was a brilliant atop pr thing that Trump did. But

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 5>it wouldn't have been a very big deal really, because

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 5>that sort of thing happens all the time, if the

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 5>Democrats hadn't like, jumped on it and made it into

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 5>such a big deal and criticized it so much and

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 5>given it so much attention. And I heard it you

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 5>used as the example of taking the bait. Remember how

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 5>ridiculous it was that Kamala Harris so easily baited Trump

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 5>into talking about his rallies instead of immigration and the economy.

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 5>People leave your rallies Oh wait a second, No, they don't.

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 5>They did the same thing with the McDonald's up. He

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 5>shows up McDonald's and then the left goes nuts and

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 5>they can't stop talking about it, and they're trying to

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 5>describe why it was awful. Just allows more coverage of

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 5>Trump there in his tie servant fries and uh and

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 5>that's that works for some reason for Trump in a

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 5>way that other politicians would look ridiculous.

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think it's partly that, you know, he's a big, famous,

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 4>billionaire celebrity, and so it's just amusing to see him

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 4>doing that, and he's good at it.

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, the so called backlash to it had a

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 5>very frantic why am mad? Bro feel to it?

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Right? Just what are you so mad about? Aes? We

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>know it was a staged event. What do you think

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>he actually like got a job there? What are you

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>even trying to say? Kind of funny, Yeah, but uh

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 1>so I came across this.

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.439
<v Speaker 5>They had to close down the Yelp reviews of that

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 5>McDonald's because started trolling them so much.

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 4>Help reviews of McDonald's. Yeah, two stars. It tastes like

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 4>every other McDonald's.

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 5>There's what the hell, Well, there's people trolling the fact.

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 5>It's like, for instance, this one that I was funny.

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 5>Tried the McDonald's in Feasterville today. Customer service was a joke.

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 5>A senile old man, old man got bronzer on my fries.

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's funny. Ceni, old man got.

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.640
<v Speaker 5>Bronzer on my fries, didn't wear gloves, repeated himself several times,

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 5>something about Ronald McDonald and the showers at the golf club.

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't no zero stars. You know that's funny.

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 5>Ronald McDonald would come out of the come out of

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 5>the locker room, and all the other clowns would be like, whoa,

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 5>there's a clown.

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 1>He was a real clay. He was all clown.

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 4>Hey, you got a couple, not one, but a couple

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 4>of emails. First of all, I saw a story something

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 4>to the effect of McDonald's workers have been sworn to secrecy,

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 4>or something about the Kamala Harris working there and not

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 4>working there years and years and years ago. But a

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 4>couple of people wrote, almost back to back, this is dell.

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 4>If Harris worked at McDonald's in the seventies or thereabouts,

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 4>it would be recorded under Social Security account. I worked

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 4>at a garden shop in the early sixties, early sixties,

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 4>and it's right there how much I made and how

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 4>much was withheld for Social Security.

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And then Gabe said, Jent, social Security keeps track of

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>your work history.

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 5>They have my two weeks at McDonald's from nineteen eighty four.

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 5>I was the most incredible fry guy, by the way,

0:20:57.400 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 5>amazing with my human hands.

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>By Gabe.

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 5>I think I think she's working at McDonald's, she claims

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 5>in eighty two, because she and I and you are

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 5>the same age.

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:11.479
<v Speaker 1>And but yeah, I don't know.

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 5>I don't I suppose if she made that up, that's

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 5>an interesting story. How don't they think the fact that

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 5>she did work at McDonald's that interesting? If she claims

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:22.880
<v Speaker 5>she didn't, she didn't, that would be an interesting thing

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 5>to do, right.

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 4>And it's all in service to that whole I grew

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 4>up in a hard scrabble working class neighborhood and family,

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 4>which is clearly not true. But the fact that this

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 4>much time and energy is being spent scrutinizing that that

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 4>claims a little silly anyway, in my opinion. I mean,

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 4>there are plenty of world leaders and thinkers who grew

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 4>up in a fair amount of wealth and were brilliant

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 4>and effective. Likewise, Abe Lincoln could not have been more poor.

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 4>They were starving, and he's one of the great presidents ever.

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 5>No, a lot of our founding fathers were quite wealthy

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 5>and come from wealthy family's Fdr Churchill, you get and

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 5>you all kinds of examples. Here's Tim Walls yes day

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 5>on the campaign trail. We could discuss this a little bit.

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 12>I'm gonna talk about his running mate.

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 1>His running mate, Elon Musk.

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 12>Seriously, Elon's on that stage, jumping around, skipping like a

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 12>dip on these stones.

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 2>You know it.

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Listen to that crowd, though, think about it.

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 12>Think about that that guy is literally the richest man

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 12>in the world, spending millions of dollars to help Donald

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 12>Trump by an election.

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 5>Man, Tim Walls is way better at that sort of

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 5>thing than he is sitting for an interview. Tell you

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 5>that he just seems so lost, deer in the headlights

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 5>and uncomfortable in interviews in front of a big crowd

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 5>doing the whole you know, populism, lefty thing.

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>He's really good at that. But were there any.

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Old tampon, Tim who puts tampons in boys rooms? Old coach,

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 4>well assistant coach Tim Mocking. A guy's the richest guy

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 4>on earth because he's built so many incredibly innovative companies.

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's the leftis populism thing.

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 5>But did any were there any headlines about vulgarity the

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 5>Harris campaign lowering themselves to vulgarity to try to describe

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 5>their opponents like they did, O'Donnell miss that one like

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 5>they did with Trump all weekend long? Or does does

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 5>the left get to call somebody a dip s but

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:45.959
<v Speaker 5>the right can?

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 13>I mean, come on, yes, Katie, I just found it

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 13>striking that he was saying that considering that his son's

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 13>on the spectrum and we all know that Elon Musk

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 13>is on the spectrum, So to be calling him a

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 13>dip s for jumping around on the stage like he did,

0:23:58.240 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 13>that's kind of a double standard too.

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's an a hole.

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 5>Tim Wawlsh is not a nice person and I'm a

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 5>knucklehead at times. So just on vote a lion, A

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 5>hole is what you are. Just on voting in general.

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:12.439
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if you agree with this or not.

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 5>This is my take on the whole voting thing, because I,

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 5>for instance, You've got Liz Cheney out there campaigning hard

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 5>for Kamala Harris, talking about what a great leader she's

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 5>going to be and how she'll get abortion back to

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 5>where it needs to be.

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Liz Cheney is one of the most hardcore pro.

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 5>Life Republican people we've had in recent decades. She co

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 5>authored legislation that would have banned abortion nationwide.

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>From the moment of conception.

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 5>And now she's on stage with Kamala Harris pushing Kamla

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 5>because she because she doesn't like Trump. So I get

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 5>not liking Trump, right, I don't get puffing up Kamala Harris.

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 1>So I'm confused by that whole thing. We'll eat in.

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 5>Directions and he's saying specifically about abortion or just bizarre

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 5>given her sponsorship of that bill that whether you want

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 5>to call it conception or fertilization, it was like, from

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 5>the moment sperm meets egg, that is a human being.

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Now she's saying that well with Roe v.

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 4>Wade, the Dobbs decision that some of the things being

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 4>done in the States, I mean, these six week deadlines

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 4>for having an abortion, it's just it's gone too far.

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:28.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'm in favor of Kamala her the way.

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 5>She despises Trump I think has caused her to lose

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 5>her freaking mind.

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you could endorse Kamla.

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 4>You could do the John Kelly you think he's a

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 4>dictator thing. You could make all manner of speeches and

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 4>actions and not campaign with her making just inexplicable claims

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 4>about abortion specifically. I mean, it's it's mystifying what's going

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 4>on with Liz Chaney.

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 5>I have a number of conservative or libertarian type friends

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 5>who can't vote for Donald Trump, But you don't need

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:06.640
<v Speaker 5>to go around inflating Kamala Harris over it or vice versa.

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand.

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 5>My point of view is one of those two people

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 5>are gonna win, and so which one would you prefer?

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 5>Is not a horrible position, I don't I don't quite

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 5>get the you hold your vote so precious that even

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 5>behind closed doors in a state that wouldn't matter, you

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 5>can't pull the lever for one person because like God's watching,

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 5>or your soul is hurt or something.

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't quite get.

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 5>That one of those two people are going to be

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 5>in charge of the country, which would you rather have?

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 5>I don't understand why people can't answer that question. I

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 5>could go into that, but after that from Prize Picks,

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 5>America's number one daily fantasy sports app with over five

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 5>million active members easiest to Prize Picks is the easiest

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 5>and most exciting way to play daily fantasy sports.

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Unlike other apps, that's you against the numbers.

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 5>All you do is pick more or less on at

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 5>least at least two player stat projections up to six

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 5>and why the winnings roll.

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>In Pretty cool right now.

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:04.439
<v Speaker 5>You went up to one hundred times your money on

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 5>Price Picks with as little as four correct picks, so

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 5>if you tend to be good at this, you should

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 5>jump on that right away. Price Picks puts its members first,

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 5>so all withdrawals are fast, safe and secure, and when

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 5>your picks hit, you can get your money and as

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 5>quick as fifteen minutes.

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 4>And Prize Picks invented the flex play, which means you

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 4>can still cash out even if your lineup isn't perfect.

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>You can double your money even if one of your

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>picks doesn't hit, So you know.

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 5>Go a little, go a lot, pick a couple of guys,

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 5>pick it's half a dozen, whatever you want.

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Download the Prize Picks app today.

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 5>Use the code of Armstrong, get fifty dollars instantly when

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 5>you play five dollars. That's the coat Armstrong on Prize Picks,

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 5>get fifty bucks instantly when you play five dollars, and

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 5>you don't need to win to get that fifty dollars bonus.

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 5>It's guaranteed either way. Prize Picks run your game. Can

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 5>answer your question if if you think.

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Both choices are terrible, and it doesn't matter what your

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 4>vote is, why would you bother voting?

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you don't if.

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 5>That's fine, but I don't understand the lack of willingness

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:10.479
<v Speaker 5>of people just to say who would you rather have

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 5>be president? I feel like it's being a pacifist. It's

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.639
<v Speaker 5>taking the easy way out. Sorry, I'm a pacifist. Okay,

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 5>that's fine, but war exists and you have to have

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 5>an opinion or you've just decided not to participate.

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Who would you rather have be president? Kamala Harris, I'm.

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Not seeing you wrong. It's just a question of how

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 4>you look at life. I guess in morality.

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 5>If you think they're both monsters, don't vote for either

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 5>one of them, vote for a third party, or don't

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 5>vote for anybody.

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Vote for Senator, vote for Congress. I think that's a

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 4>perfectly defensible position. It's difficult to come up with a

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 4>good metaphor that compares, you know, like your your war one.

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 5>That's that Pacifism. It's a good one because it's going

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 5>to happen whether you participate or not. Would you like

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 5>to have a role in it with one of them?

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>A role in.

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 5>One or the other unless you're in a swing state.

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 5>It's a purely symbolic role. True, true, true, But I

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 5>just I just feel like it's an easy out. It's

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 5>like when I'm in a crowd of people, I'm a pacifist. Okay,

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 5>so you don't have to engage in the real conversation

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 5>of what's going to happen here, Fine, then go stand

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 5>in the corner. But in the real world, these things

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 5>are happening, pick one or the other. I don't understand it.

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 5>Why I don't chew anything in one of the most

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 5>important things that goes on in the country in a

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 5>purely symbolic way.

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's all.

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 4>You can have a strong and learned opinion on every

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 4>single issue that the country faces and not cast a

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 4>vote for president.

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 5>I guess as an individual at your home, sure, but

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 5>as any sort of you have any sort of public role.

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 5>I guess I'm thinking about Liz Cheney and lots of

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 5>different people. You have any sort of public role. One

0:29:55.080 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 5>of two people are gonna win, So true, but what

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 5>what I don't want? I don't get it the and

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 5>the third party choice or whatever. I guess you can

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 5>kind of make the argumentory about you're trying to help

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 5>build another party, which could happen over time.

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 4>I voted for libertarians for a long time because I

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 4>wanted to pull the Republican Party closer to UH liberty

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 4>in general, small l libertarianism. The Libertarian Party is off

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 4>the crackpot, but small libertarianism.

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Any thoughts on this discussion?

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 4>Mail Bag at Armstrong in Giddy dot com is the

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 4>email address that's mail bag at Armstrong and Giddy dot com,

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 4>or if you'd like to text us if that's more

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 4>of your style. Four one five two nine five k

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 4>FTC four one five two nine five KFTC.

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 5>Eminem's all in for Kamala Harris. Now I feel like

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 5>he's crossed that line in dying dyeing your hair and

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 5>your beard to where now it looks ridiculous. You can

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 5>do it for a while, but now he's at the

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 5>age where it just as silly.

0:30:56.600 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 4>So your your criticism is not extending to his indorsement

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 4>of a progressive moron, indeed his rejection of the inevitable

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 4>signs of aging.

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 5>I really do not look to musicians, rappers of any

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 5>kind to tell me what's the best direction to go

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 5>for me.

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>It's oboists.

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 5>An oboist I can trust because they're not showy, poet earnest,

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 5>they work hard. I'm into the poll. What do the

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 5>poets think? That's what I always say. First my first question?

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 5>We got more in the way, I stay with us?

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Just what going?

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 5>I was gonna make another musical note. The thing about

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 5>the Eagles is they never overplayed the silences, the space

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 5>between the notes.

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the key.

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 5>Justin Bieber suing his managers for squandering three hundred million

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 5>dollar fortune, that'll be quite the story if it's true.

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Oh that would hurt woo oh man. That's the tale

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 4>as old as time management ripping off a creative artist.

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>No, especially if you're like a fourteen year old.

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 4>H If you heard the preceding discussion about voting and

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 4>not voting, that sort of thing and just everything we've

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 4>been talking about.

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>You'll enjoy this note from Ryan in Houston.

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 4>Guys, in a couple of weeks it will be president

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 4>elect Pumpkins Spice Hitler or Kamala?

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Is this my butt or a hole in the ground.

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 5>Pumpkin spice Hitler. That is clever. You should send that

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 5>to Fallon. That's good. That's really clever Ryan. If you

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 5>look at the candidates that way, you should just to

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 5>expect the one you don't like to win and then

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 5>find out.

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 4>Who's running for your city council because that'll be a

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 4>better use of your time instead of hoping your god

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 4>emperor wins and smites your enemies.

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a good email, right there. Yeah, and then he says, ps,

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it's my birthday. Can you play the reck of the

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Edmund Fitzgerald? No, No, we can't, fella. It's been good

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to know you. Oh boy. So I mentioned chaos packaging. Earlier.

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Companies are selling sunscreen in whipped cream cans, water and

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Tall Boys, better known for beer and dumponds in ice

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>cream tubs. As surprise surprising, packaging becomes a sharper tool

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>for marketers.

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 5>I have noticed the beverages in different kinds of cans.

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 5>Thing interesting and marketing isn't yes, and for some reason

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 5>it's appealing.

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 4>Marketing and venture capital consultant You've Never heard of Them

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 4>calls the trend chaos packaging. Other examples include Ilva Serrano's

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Engine Gin, which comes in motor oil containers, and Machino's

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 4>Fresh Cooture perfume, which is packaged in window cleaner like

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 4>spray bottles.

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 5>I hadn't thought about this, but like some water, I

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 5>bought a bottle of water at the store and it

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 5>came in a can, like a kind of like a

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 5>beer can or a popcan or something. For some reason,

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 5>I chose that because I just thought it was kind

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 5>of cool or something.

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think that's it.

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 4>This marketing guy explains pages that cause some kind of

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 4>cognitive dissonance are more likely to capture the attention of

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 4>shoppers than traditional boxes, bottles.

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>And cans interesting, so that appeals to brands.

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 4>Particularly as advertising becomes more expensive, suppliers battle for shelf

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 4>space and direct a consumer model popularized by startups in

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.319
<v Speaker 4>the twenty tens begins to sag under the weight of

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 4>logistics costs and consumers desires for one stop shopping.

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I've got this new tomato soup that comes in a

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>shoe box.

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 5>Yes, Katie, Wow, there's some logistical challenges to that idea.

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 8>But there's a really cool brand called Liquid Death and

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 8>they sell water, but they sell it in a tall

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 8>can that looks like a beer at like concerts and stuff,

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 8>so if you're not drinking, you don't feel the pressure

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 8>of you know.

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 4>That's actually one of the very brands that they highlight

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 4>in this article. Well done.

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I'm just why am I? I'm just going

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to say it.

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 4>Flow, which is the company that sells ladies' devices in

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 4>the ice cream thing, said it's packaging nods to the

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 4>sugar and fat cre that often descend upon women during

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 4>their periods, but the company especially wanted to make sure

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:06.919
<v Speaker 4>it's products caught shopper's eyes on shelves packed with long

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 4>established brands.

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's smart, like it's silly.

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 5>I like my brown gravy to come in a salt shaker.

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 5>That's just the way I am.

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 4>The venture backed olive oil startup Gratza became a millennial favorite,

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 4>primarily thanks to choosing squeezable condiment like bottles instead of

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 4>the traditional glass for all of them.

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 5>Right, yeah, yeah, yeah, huh. I'll be darn I fell

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 5>for it subliminally or subconsciously or something.

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I don't know how I feel about the tampoons

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 8>and the ice cream.

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Man, mind your own damn business.

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 4>Tampoons like that, We'll we'll be stealing that one for

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 4>years and years.

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah's funny, whatever it takes to get attention. I guess

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.879
<v Speaker 1>chaos packaging Joe. That's right.

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:54.879
<v Speaker 4>They give the example of this guy who's a big

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 4>guy in the field. He founded Eos in twenty eight,

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 4>a skincare company that packaged lip ball in spheres rather

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 4>than sticks.

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Right right, I remember that craze started. Yeah huh. I'll

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 1>be darned.

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 5>We're so easily manipulated and we don't even notice it.

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Uh boy.

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 5>The October surprise maybe has dropped about hit uh Trump.

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I almost said it row my cowbo