WEBVTT - Growth Stage Investing and Board Service w/ Ceci Kurzman

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Will Lucas and this is black tech, Green money.

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Cc Kurrisman is a private investor, entrepreneur, and independent board member.

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>As a former music executive and talent manager, she's guided

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the careers, business strategies, and brand development of many of

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the biggest artists on the planet. As a board member,

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>she either currently or has out on the boards of

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>directors for Revline, Circus, Dates, so Let, Warner Music Group,

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Line Vine Grew, United Talent Agency, and more. Currently, she

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>leads Nexus Management Grew, a private investment company dedicated to innovative,

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>growth stage businesses in the consumer media and technology sectors.

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Traditional media is still being disrupted daily by innovation that

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>provides a platform to social media commentators and creators, but

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>many new media companies have a hard time figuring it

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>out also, and there are many stories of late were

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>well funded platforms either no longer exists or are today

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>not getting after it, not meeting it full potential. It

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>was all good just a week ago. As someone who's

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>an investor in growing media platforms, I sec to paint

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a picture of what the landscape currently looks like.

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, you know, I think some of the really

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 2>the downfall of some of the larger new digital media businesses.

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 2>I think really speaks to the venture model, which is

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 2>quite broken, and I think we're starting to see where

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 2>the cracks and the pavement are by watching not just

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 2>these media businesses, but some of the other tech businesses

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 2>and other businesses that I think are now suffering because

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 2>of the valuations and the enterprise values that were so

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 2>frovy in the last ten years and didn't really reflect

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 2>the strength and the solid nature of the business. And

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 2>by that, I mean, you know, now everybody's talking about it,

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 2>but we knew. We knew it was happening when it

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 2>was happening, right, We knew valuations were not you know,

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 2>we had companies that were based on valuations with no profitability.

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 2>We had companies that continue to raise large sums of

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 2>capital based on paper valuations, not based on you know,

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 2>an actual business model and the health and structure of

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the business. So it's not I would say, a surprise

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 2>that we're seeing a lot of these media companies go away.

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 2>They're sort of suffering from their own perceived success because

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 2>they did raise a lot of money, and they raised

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of money against the expectations of some really

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 2>really massive valuations. And it's not to say that these

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 2>aren't great companies with great prospects, but unfortunately they were

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 2>burdened by their own success and expectations that were set

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 2>for them and buy them.

0:02:55.800 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Really, So, what's happening from the venture side that allows

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that to happen. Is it just so much money in

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the system that they've got to deploy it somewhere or

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>is it very charismatic founders? What's happening?

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's a combination of things. Right, Media

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 2>and tech are both sort of suffering in the same

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, in the same downturn, and the irony isn't

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 2>it isn't really about the businesses. The businesses in many

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 2>cases are still thriving, right, They're still growing, perhaps not

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 2>at the pace that they did out of the gate,

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 2>or at the pace that was expected based on their valuation.

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 2>So you know, they are good businesses, good teams, good

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 2>underlying business model, but the expectations are out here, right,

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 2>and I think what you're seeing now is really a

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 2>correction to where it should be. But of course anybody

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 2>who invested at the high valuation sees this as you know,

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 2>the end of days, because the valuations are now coming

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 2>down to a place where probably they should have been. Anyway,

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 2>these companies probably shouldn't have raised so much money. Money

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 2>will cover up a lot of mistakes, and sometimes you

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 2>actually need to see and live your mistakes and own

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 2>your mistakes and set backs to be able to continue

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 2>to build a business in a healthy way.

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So, from an investment perspective, what does innovation look like

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>these days in media? Because I brought up there's so

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>many people doing this independently, and you also have a

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of social media commentators on these things. So what

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>does innovation look.

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 2>In any No matter how you slice it, media is expensive.

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 2>To build a media business from scratch is expensive. I

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 2>think you had a lot of companies really diversifying too

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 2>quickly across too many formats to be able to chase

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 2>scale and valuation. If you look at actually some of

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 2>the success stor and media, look at some of the

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 2>incumbents who have actually pivoted in an interesting way. New

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 2>York Times just launched their app. New York Times is

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 2>doing very well. This is this is a you know,

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 2>age old the old gray ladies they call her age

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 2>old media business that has gone from being an incumbent

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 2>and a legacy business and really pivoted in a very

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 2>very strategic way into the modern you know, into the

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 2>modern era. But this is a company that's been built

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 2>over one hundred years, step by step by step. It

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 2>had foundation, it had real brand awareness, it had real following,

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 2>it had real authority in its space. So they had

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 2>all those foundational elements that were built over the years

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 2>to enable them to then innovate. A lot of the

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 2>newer companies really just you know, built really quickly, and

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 2>audiences were fickle, and it was really hard to sustain

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 2>and maintain a solid, you know, solid foundations as they

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 2>needed to scale their audience. And then once the you know,

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 2>once the kind of curtain gets pulled back a little bit,

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 2>they're in real trouble very very quickly.

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 1>And so I think about being a social media being

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>on social media, very active on social media. It's very

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>difficult for people like media and across I guess the

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>many different demographics to leave social media, to go to

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>another link, another location on the Internet. And so I

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>wonder what your thoughts are on Let's say I go,

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to the New York Times, and then I

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>got a paywall, and you know, maybe I'm not a subscriber,

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>so and but you're talking about their growing So how

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 1>are these things happening when a number one social media

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>platforms don't want you to leave, so they made suppress

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>those links out And then when you get to the

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>place now I can only read the first line of

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a story.

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's it's it's an age old market strategy. Right.

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 2>They have to have content that's compelling enough that you're

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 2>going to wanna that you're going to want to get

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 2>behind the paywall. I think they have subscribers because their

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 2>brand is mean something, right, It's like how many streaming

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 2>services are you going to sign up for? Most people

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 2>have Netflix, maybe one or two others, But how do

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 2>you become somebody needs to come over there and do

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 2>and do like you know.

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>An auditious seriously right?

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 2>But Netflix became what I call utility, right, something that

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 2>you just you pay like you play pay the electric bill.

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 2>It's not something you turn off whether you're reading, whether

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 2>you're watching a show that's that's original to Netflix or

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>exclusive to Netflix or not. That is what every media

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 2>outlet aspires to, where the content is such that it

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 2>becomes your utility, something that you're not going to live without.

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 2>And I actually think a lot of social media personalities

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 2>have been able to build their own followings and being

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 2>able to monetize their own followings to many at the

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 2>expense of a lot of these you know, larger digital

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 2>media outlets. The idea is their monetization strategy is different.

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 2>They're able to use other platforms and other platforms advertisers

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 2>to help monetize and pay some of these social media

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 2>pundits and personalities. That's what I love about the business.

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the New York Times is a great example

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 2>of an existing media company, big media company that continues

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 2>to innovate and nurture what already existed in terms of

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 2>a following and hopefully build a few you know, new followers,

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 2>but they had it. What I love and what I

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 2>think the future of media is is these individuals who

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 2>created who have a strong points of view, who hopefully

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 2>in some cases we've got more impartial views, who are

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 2>able to create content that is you know, sticky and

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 2>engaging and build their own followings because there's been this

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 2>great democratization of these social media platforms right that you

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 2>don't have to be a big, huge company with a

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 2>billion dollar valuation to build an audience, and that's I

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 2>think the greatest threat to media is the individuals like

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 2>yourselves and others who have something to say and have

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 2>a point of view and are able to create content

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 2>wherever they are and can build a following behind them

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 2>and monetize that follow That's that's what I think the

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 2>future of media is the individuals building brands around themselves.

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And so I've read that you know you're focused at

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>nexus with innovative growth stage companies, and you know you

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>can debunk that if that's not true. But I wonder

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>what the reasoning behind sticking to growth stage companies is

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of people think about what I'm maybec stage.

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got a really great idea, but why growth stage?

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 2>As an investor, it's one hundred percent to do with

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 2>what my risk tolerance is and also to do with

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 2>where I add value to a business. And you know,

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 2>the early stage, very early stage companies. I almost describe

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 2>most of the success to the team. Is it a

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 2>team that has done this before? Is it a team

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 2>that can lead, can drive value, has had successes but

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 2>has also had failures. To me, the idea is secondary

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 2>to who's going to execute the idea and even secondary

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 2>to how well capitalized it is. And if I look

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 2>at like, the reason I got into investing is because

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 2>I spent my life in the music industry and I

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 2>managed artists, and my goal for the artists was, having

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 2>been in the business a while, is how do you

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 2>give them a second act? Right, Like, how do you

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 2>take that moment when they're at their absolute top of

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 2>their career and their greatest influence and use it to

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 2>leverage that into opportunities that give them the access to

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 2>generational wealth. They give them access to cap tables that

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 2>most people don't have access to. And so we started

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 2>investing on behalf of the artists into businesses like early

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 2>in Spotify right, businesses that didn't need money, weren't accepting

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 2>other checks, but would allow us to come in because

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 2>they thought it was interesting that the value proposition of

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 2>having artists and people who were connected with you know,

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 2>consumers and what the consumer base wanted. So that's how

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 2>I got into investing, really is to engage my artists

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 2>and give them opportunities to you know, opportunities that only

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 2>old wealthy people have had for years and years and

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 2>year and give them a seat at the table and

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 2>that's what got me into investing, and the reason that

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 2>I invest. You know, I have a risk profile. I

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 2>don't love the idea of putting in twenty investments thinking

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 2>one of them is going to work and hoping and praying. Right,

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 2>I don't have that. I can't sit through that risk, right,

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 2>that would stress me out. I like companies that have

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 2>product market fit, have teams, and where they are is

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 2>they're in a position where they're ready to put jet

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 2>fuel on their business. And that's also because that's where

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 2>I can add the value. Right as a brand builder,

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 2>as a marketer, as a business person, my superpowers are around, Okay,

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 2>you've got something really great. You've got the best business

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 2>or brand that not enough people have heard of. Like

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 2>what I can do to help your business is to

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 2>take it and put it on blessed. And that's why

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, for me, i'd rather put money into a

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 2>business that's going that has you know, may not give

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 2>me one hundred times return and maybe one or two times,

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 2>but there's very little risk that it's gonna disappear tomorrow. Right,

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 2>And that's why I don't do early stage And it's

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 2>purely a preference, purely risk tolerance perspective and also where

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 2>I feel I can add the.

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Most, So I mean check the resume. Cec was Vice

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>President of Worldwide Marketing at Epic Records Sony Music, where

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>she led the marketing team and oversaw the USN international

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>strategy for priority artists like Pearl jam Shade, Celine Dion,

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Jackson. She began her career in the record

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>business at Aris the Records, working for the legendary Clive

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Davis as Director of Artists Development in special Projects. From there,

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>decided to take her talent to private investment. What was

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity she saw? Cec speaks on it.

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 2>Really, I'd been working in the music industry for twenty years.

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 2>The opportunity to invest on behalf of my artists gave

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 2>me this visibility across a lot of businesses, different industries,

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 2>different management teams, different investor groups, and it really allowed

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 2>me to sort of diversify my exposure, my professional journey,

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 2>and my skill set. So I after doing quite a

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:35.479
<v Speaker 2>few of these investments, it seemed like a good opportunity

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 2>to sort of allow myself to sort of take a

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 2>few different paths on my professional journey and really do

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 2>some light learning in all these other industries and that's

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 2>what got me into investing, And ultimately why I sit

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 2>on a lot of different boards is because I love

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 2>to have visibility into a lot of different industries. But

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 2>one thing that all of these industries have in common

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 2>is they're central to bring and brand building. And whether

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 2>it be finance, whether it be music and entertainment, or

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 2>whether it be consumer, they're really all like how do

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 2>you storytell? How do you how do you message what

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 2>you're about? How do you message your values? And how

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 2>do you disseminate that that message in a wide you know,

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 2>to a wide group of people.

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned this before. I'm gonna come back to

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the board talking a little bit. But you mentioned when

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the types of investments you involve yourself, is you get

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to bring those experiences as you've had historically. And what

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>types of activities are you involved in operationally or otherwise

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>with the companies that you make.

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, it really varies. Well, you know, I'm involved in

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 2>big companies like Revlon and Warner Music and Man Group,

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 2>which is a big publicly traded hedge fund, and I'm

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 2>involved in earlier growth stage companies that I'm invested in

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 2>and they all require different levels of engagement. I would say,

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, management, finding the right management team and done

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 2>quite a few CEO searches and building the CEO CEOs

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 2>team and management team. Obviously in areas like music and

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 2>entertainment where I have a very specific and longstanding background,

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I get involved in many areas beyond the sort of

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 2>more high level strategic board work, and it could really

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 2>just be there to support the management team wherever I

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 2>can troubleshoot and help make a difference. In the younger companies,

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 2>probably much more operationally involved in terms of you know,

0:16:55.480 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 2>really helping guide the management team, helping them make decison

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 2>in some cases, helping them raise capital, hire teams, build

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 2>a business model, pivot the business model, and help create

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 2>opportunities and use my network to help them create opportunities

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 2>for their business and themselves.

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>And so we had Ursula Burns at a natro tech

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>executive let someone sometime last year and she said something

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that I thought was remarkable, and I wasn't interviewing her,

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>so I didn't get a chance to dig into this

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>sentiment she had shared, and she had she we were

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>talking about boards, and she didn't understand the fascination with

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>board service to this body of people that we were

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in the room, And so I want to position what

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I would follow up with somebody who's had your experience.

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean you at Revlin, you know Uta Circuitay Sola

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and lon Von and more, and you've had all these

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>wonderful experiences, and what are some good reasons to desire

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to sit on a board.

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad you asked the question because I do do

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of do do a lot of talks about

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 2>board service, and you know, my side hustle is putting

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 2>women on boards. It's just something I challenge myself to

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 2>put ten women, especially women of color, on boards every

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 2>year because it's sort of opportunity begets, begets opportunity and

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 2>helping share that network. But I agree with her in

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 2>some quick cases. The first question I always ask a

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 2>room like that is make sure you've answered the question

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 2>why do you want to be on a board, And

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 2>very few people have the answer. The answer for many

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 2>people is immediately it's it's another sort of notch notch

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 2>in my resume. It's sort of the next thing. Once

0:18:56.480 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 2>I've done this, this and this, that's the next you know,

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 2>the next step on the ladder. It looks good. It's

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 2>you helped my personal brand. I think that could be

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 2>part of the reason. But I think there have to

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 2>be a lot more foundational reasons to join a board,

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 2>and there are some, right, I noted one for me.

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to expand beyond my industry of choice, right, entertainment.

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 2>I loved it. I done it a long time. It's

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 2>very hard once you reach a certain level to be

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 2>able to pivot into other industries, right, to be able

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 2>to have that visibility at a strategic level, not at

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 2>an entry level, at a strategic level, and board work

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 2>is one of the ways you can do that. Right.

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 2>It's you have transferable skills that you've learned building and

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 2>running businesses in your core field that you can then

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 2>lend to these other businesses. But also you're learning these

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 2>other businesses. I didn't know consumer products. I don't know

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 2>about supply chain, I didn't know about the capital markets.

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I was able to bring my expertise into these businesses.

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 2>But more importantly, I've gotten so much. I am now,

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, if not fluent, certainly conversant in all these

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 2>other industries. And at a certain point in your career

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 2>when you may say, listen, I don't want to be

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 2>just CCE the entertainment person or the music person. I

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 2>want to both intellectually and professionally expand my skill set.

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a really good reason. I think for

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 2>an operator of a business being able to work, if

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 2>you're a CEO of a business, being able to work

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 2>alongside and watch another CEO of a business work, and

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 2>to be able to partner with them and help them

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 2>but also learn from them. I think that's a really

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 2>good reason to do. To be on a board. I

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 2>think being able to expand your network beyond your industry

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 2>and be on a board with board members that are

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 2>from all sorts of different industries and would be a

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 2>great network for you another great reason to do a board.

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 2>I think where people get it wrong sometimes is they're

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 2>going to make a lot of money. There are some

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 2>opportunities to do that, but it's not. Board work is

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 2>not you know you're stepping into you know you're stepping

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 2>in it. That's not what it is. I think a

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 2>mistake is to do it just purely because you think

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 2>it's a profile choice. And I think it's important to know.

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 2>For example, if you're an operator in a business, it's

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 2>really hard to do board work right. You might be

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 2>able to do one, but when you're on a board

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 2>the time, you don't have to be there all the time.

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 2>They are very specific times you need to show up

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 2>and be involved. But you've got to be there. So

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 2>if you're working a day job, you can't say I

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 2>can't be at that board meeting. You can't say I

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 2>can't you know, be on that call. You've got to

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 2>be able to create the time for that board service.

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 2>And the other issue I find with some people who

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 2>have a day job, especially if they're you know, they're

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 2>a founder or running a business, is if I'm an

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 2>investor or, I'm a board member on your company, I

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 2>want to know that you're one hundred and fifty percent

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 2>devoted to your day job. I don't want you using

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 2>your time and your you know, mental mass to be

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 2>supporting another company that doesn't help grow the business that

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm involved in. So it does become tricky, right. A

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 2>good you know, a good leader can see the value

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 2>of being on another board to help them developmentally as

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 2>a leader. But the idea they have to be able

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 2>to maintain their day job at one hundred and fifty percent,

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 2>and if that ever slips, you have the duty to

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 2>sure that you're fully focused on your day job. The

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 2>other thing I think people don't really understand is there's

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 2>real liability and being on a board actual liability. So

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 2>boards get sued all the time. You have insurance, but

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 2>you need to be prepared for the fact that you

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:17.360
<v Speaker 2>have liability because you're a fiduciary of that company. And

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I think you've seen it. You know, there are people

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 2>getting sued at Disney right now. There are people who

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 2>were sued the suing the shareholders that sued Twitter, Twitter's board.

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, there there have been a lot, there are

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of lawsuits. If a shareholder thinks that they

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 2>did not that the board didn't act in the full

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:44.439
<v Speaker 2>support of the shareholders, they're going to sue. So just

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 2>be prepared that there is liability that comes with it,

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 2>not you know, if the grass isn't always green. Companies

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 2>have problems and then you really on the hot seat

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 2>and you've got to be you know, roll up your

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 2>sleeves and get involved in in solving.

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Those And so I'm gonna ask this question, and it's

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna sound selfish, but there's us there's very core, there's

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>very credentialed people who listen to this podcast, so there

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>will be value across the board. So I have the

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>privilege of sitting on a few boards, university boards, Ohio

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Casino Control Commission, we regulate all the casinos in Ohio,

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Some international corporate boards I've sat on, and

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I want my question is this, there are for people

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>who have sat on boards, there's a desire to get

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>on bigger boards, and you don't want to just always

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.199
<v Speaker 1>trip over at these opportunities. So how can you be

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>specific and intentional about creating opportunities for yourself? Because I'm

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:43.400
<v Speaker 1>not a black woman, so you know, maybe I don't

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 1>qualify for your mentorship in that way, but you know

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I want but seeh I appreciate it. I appreciate that.

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>See but I wonder, like, how can people be intentional about,

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, these opportunities seeking them out?

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 2>I think I think you how to be intentional about

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 2>the opportunities. What I tell people, because you know, when

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 2>as soon as your sort of reach a certain profile,

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 2>inevitably opportunities are going to come your way. And I

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:16.120
<v Speaker 2>would say this in the same way that I would

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 2>speak to my artists about building their own kind of

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 2>career strategies. You're going to get the incoming phone calls.

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 2>You're going to want to say no more than you

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 2>say yes. And so when you say be intentional, think

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 2>about the outgoing phone call. Think about why you know

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 2>the question we just answered, why do you want to

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:41.199
<v Speaker 2>be on a board? Is it to expand your professional

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 2>skill set? Is it to pivot your career? Is it

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 2>to expand your network? Then you ask the question, Then

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 2>you answer the question with what companies really interest me?

0:25:55.960 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 2>What value could I add to a company? And then

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 2>you start to formulate an opinion around the types of

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 2>boards that would be interesting to you, whether they're big, small, private, public,

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's sort of secondary. What are the companies

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 2>that are interesting to you? Because you've asked those questions,

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 2>and I left off one point that I think is

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 2>one of the mission critical questions for yourself. Who else

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 2>is on the board? Right, both in terms of who

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 2>are you? Who do you want to learn from, Who

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 2>do you want to be a part of your network?

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Who do you admire? Who do you want to spend

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of time with? Because you do spend a

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of time with your fellow board members critical questions

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 2>to ask if you ask me. One of the most

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 2>pivotal boards I was on was actually a nonprofit board.

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 2>It was one of my first boards, and I arrived

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 2>at this board and there were seven sitting public company

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 2>CEOs also on the board. When I say it was

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 2>the highest functioning board I have ever seen, the most

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 2>high functioning people, entirely productive. Every meeting ran so well

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 2>and everybody left that we left every meeting with things

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 2>having been done, decisions having been made, And to me,

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 2>that was actually one of the greatest learning experience around

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 2>good governance, high functioning, uh, you know, board meetings and

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 2>best practices and what's you know. The byproduct of that

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 2>is having spent all that quality time peer to peer

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:46.959
<v Speaker 2>and elbow to elbow with these seven sitting CEOs. Not

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 2>only did I learn from them, but they became part

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 2>of my very very close network of advisors, of mentors

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 2>and yes of pipeline to future future board work and

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 2>career oppertuny comunities. There. You cannot understate the importance of

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 2>the network. And I think sort of the board pipeline

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 2>gets a bit of a bad rap because it has

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 2>been historically very insulur, but there's also reason for that. Really,

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 2>the decision around who gets on boards comes down to

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 2>what I call the three c's right. Capability. Obviously, the

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 2>person has to have the capabilities and the skill sets

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 2>to be on that board. Chemistry right really important. Are

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 2>you going to have chemistry with the other board members?

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Are are you a growth mindset person? Are you a

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 2>fixed mindset person? Do you build consensus? Are you a

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 2>table pounder? Are you going to get in that room

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 2>and help it be really productive? And the last one

0:28:57.480 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 2>is character, And this one is the most important one

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 2>because I think it's the reason that boards have been

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 2>very exclusive. Unlike hiring somebody for a regular job, when

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 2>you put them in the boardroom, they have the enormous

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 2>power over and around the business. With that, you need

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 2>an enormous amount of trust of the person you're inviting

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 2>onto the board. You need to trust in their values,

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 2>in their ethics, in their you know, their ability to

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 2>not only add value, but to be constructive. And that's

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 2>not built overnight, right, You can't read that in somebody's

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 2>LinkedIn and understand you know what that character is and

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 2>you know haven't built that trust, So that trust means

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of people call people they know, They

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 2>call people they know, they call people they've worked with,

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 2>They've called people that that have great recommendations because people

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 2>they trust have worked with them. And historically that means

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 2>it's been a very small pool of people to pull from.

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things that I certainly try to

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 2>do is not only put people on boards, but to

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 2>ensure that the people making the choices and decisions have

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 2>exposure in their own network to all of these amazing

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 2>people that may not have been on their radar before.

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Because it's not a supply issue. I think it's a

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 2>connectivity issue. Giving exposure to the enormous supply of highly capable,

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 2>talented people who are now a part of their network,

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.479
<v Speaker 2>and they can build relationships and build trust, which may

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 2>lead to board opportunities, may lead to other career opportunities,

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 2>may lead to mentorship opportunities. But I think really building

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 2>that network and the relationships and the trust is important

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 2>a part of developing the you know, the next generation

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 2>of board members and hopefully much more diverse and representative

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 2>generation of board members as just you know, pipelining resumes

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 2>and using search forbs.

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So I was talking to Tristan Walker, who's a friend.

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It's hits on shake Check's board and foot Locker, and

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about how, you know, not only is

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>diversity on boards the right thing to do, but there's

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>also an economic reason there's diversity impacts the bottom line.

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>And I want to ask a question on this is

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>because at that same Afrotech executive we had with Ursula

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Burns and Merlin and Saint Till who's also on a

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of corporate boards, and there was a conversation around

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>should how how much weight should we put into being

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>on a board because you may be black too, the

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>diversity they need that also, And I wonder what your

0:31:56.560 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>thoughts are on how we should pursue board opportun munities

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>because we might also be black. That doesn't mean that

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean we're not skilled and doesn't mean we have

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>have an asset to provide, but we're also black. How

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>much weight should we put into that?

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Listen, I mean, if two people are equally as qualified

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 2>for a board role, bring representation onto your board, right.

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 2>I think you know, Tristian's point is a really good one,

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 2>and it's an economic imperative. It's not a diversity imperative.

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, boards should reflect their entire stakeholder group all

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 2>the way through. Right, that is their consumer, that is

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 2>their employees, that is their shareholders, that is their management teams,

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 2>that is their board. So all the way through organizations,

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 2>the board should reflect every aspect of that stakeholder group.

0:32:54.960 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 2>And that just becomes an economic, you know, imperative, because

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 2>that means you're going to be able to better serve

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 2>your end consumer, your end business. Right, having representation in

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 2>the room. It's one thing that actually has driven me

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 2>crazy about the beauty industry, which is still so segregated. Right,

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Multicultural teams live over here, general market lives over here.

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 2>And you know, if you want to actually get the best,

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 2>you know for your company, have representation throughout. Bring those

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 2>multicultural folks in, have them be at the point of

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 2>origin of product, innovation, of marketing, of c suite and

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 2>yes of board, and you'll get the benefit of being

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 2>able to wrap your arms around all cultures and the

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 2>entire audience. And you also bring some very important and

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 2>critical perspectives into the room of what they call the

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 2>general market. So, but you know, to answer your question directly,

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I think it's as important that when we get on

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 2>these boards that we are high performing. We need to

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 2>get on those boards and not be in the back quiet,

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, cashing our ticket. We need to come in

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 2>these boards and have a very strong voice and be

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 2>able to make a real impact on the boards. So yes,

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I think we need more diversity, more people of color

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 2>on boards. But it's important when they get out to

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 2>get on those boards that they're there for the right

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 2>reasons and that they're there and can make an impact.

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Otherwise we'll start going in the other direction.

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Certainly. I think I read this from Wall Street Women's Forum,

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and this was written about you. It says, utilizing her

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 1>artist development expertise to develop businesses and entrepreneurs, CC has

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>grown a portfolio of companies taking on varying degrees of

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>operational involvement. And I've referenced that because you said something

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>earlier regarding you know, changing from talent management to investment.

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And so many of us, particularly career minded people, think

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.760
<v Speaker 1>about they may be unhappy in what they're doing today,

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>they may want to do something else, and so many

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of us think that we need to stop what we're

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>doing to do something else. You saw what you were

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>doing as elite as a launch pad to do what

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:18.280
<v Speaker 1>you're doing now, How should we be thinking about reimagining

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 1>our activities and reimagining our skill sets to be able

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:25.359
<v Speaker 1>to deploy them to different targets instead of leaving what

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we're doing altogether to start something new.

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 2>That's a really good question, I think, you know, I

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 2>think about that word reimagining a little bit, and i've

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 2>word that I hear a lot, which is pivoting. I

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 2>think taking stock of the skill sets that you've already developed.

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 2>I think the idea of doing something new is really semantics. Right.

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 2>You're going to bring your experience from whatever you've been

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 2>doing into the next thing you do. There are very

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:11.399
<v Speaker 2>few experiences sets that have no transferable skills. Right. So

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:15.320
<v Speaker 2>when I say I went from talent management building living

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 2>brands into investing, because immediately you see the same thread

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 2>where entrepreneurs are like artists. Right, you're building their brands,

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 2>you're telling their stories, You're ensuring that they what they

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 2>want to put forward is also what the consumer understands,

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 2>creating that connective tissue that is consistent whether you're dealing

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 2>with music artists or you're dealing with entrepreneurs and new businesses.

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Launching a new business in so many ways is super

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.919
<v Speaker 2>similar to developing a new artist's career. And as soon

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 2>as I kind of understood that connective tissue because there

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 2>are so many familiar moments, it gives you a whole

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 2>other level of confidence. Right That's like, Oh, I'm not

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:03.839
<v Speaker 2>switch in careers. I am taking everything I've built and

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 2>developed and learned and internalized, and I'm applying it to

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 2>a new uh industry, or I'm applying it to a

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 2>new position or a new career strategy. But I would

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 2>never say you're you know, You're never starting from scratch,

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 2>is what my point is, so really being able to

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:26.720
<v Speaker 2>take stock of the amazing experience that you've already built

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 2>and think about how it translates into some of these

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 2>other areas.

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Black Tech Green Money is a production of Blavity Afrotech

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in the Black Effect Podcast Network and I Hire Media,

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's produced by Morgan DeVaughn and me Well Lucas.

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 1>The additional production support by Sarah Ragan and Rose McLucas.

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Special thank you to Mike and Davis, Vanessa Surround and

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>my Emoldru. Learn more about my casts and other tech

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>disruptors to innovators at afrotech dot com enjoy your black tech,

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 1>green money. Share us to somebody, go get your money.

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Heakes some love