WEBVTT - The 2022 Ig Nobel Prizes, Part 1

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Seth Nicholas Johnson.

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Joe is still out on par rental leave.

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>But we gotta we gotta keep the show rolling, and

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 1>we find ourselves at that time of year when we

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>tend to cover the ig Nobel Prizes. Uh So, this

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 1>episode and probably a second episode are going to look

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>at some of the Igno bell winners from this year.

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we couldn't skip Igno bells just because Joe

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is out on paternity leave. Igno bells are tradition around here,

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Yeah, we've been covering the Igno bells for

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>many years. I'm not even sure when we started covering

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.599
<v Speaker 1>it on the show. We generally don't cover them right

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>away because the awards usually come out during September. Usually

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like late mid to late September or very early

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>October perhaps for a couple of years, and were often

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up in Halloween stuff by that point. But the

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Ignal bells usually make for a fun episode or two

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in early November for us. In a way. It sometimes

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>it's a nice palate cleanser after a bunch of Halloween content.

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Uh so we yeah, again, we tend to use it

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>later than usual. But the two thousand twenty two awards

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>were handed out septembo. It's kind of like the World

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Series versus Halloween. They both usually end up around the

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>same time, and at least in my life growing up,

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it was always kind of a flip of the coin

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>whether or not the World Series would interfere with the

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Simpsons annual Treehouse of Horror. It was oh yeah, sometimes

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.759
<v Speaker 1>they would air a Treehouse of Horror really really early

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to get it out of the way beforehand. Sometimes, and

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>these were the years I hated the most. They would

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>air Simpsons Treehouse of Horror after Halloween, which just flu

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>next me. I hated those years. Yeah, I mean, I

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>think you've pointed out before. It's also a reason why

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>we can feel feel good about doing halloweeny things in

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the weeks following Halloween because the Simpsons President is there. Yes.

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Uh, this is real quick. Did you

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>watch this year's rob I I didn't. I We as

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a family we rewatch the five or so tree ousis

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that we always rewatch, but I'm I'm I'm just I don't.

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I know. You've given me advice on watching more recent

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>episodes in the past, but I'm just I'm kind of scared.

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I just I tend to stick to exactly what I know,

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>even though so many of the jokes, not all of them,

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>but there are certain jokes that are way outdated or

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>haven't stood the test of time, or I just have

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to explain them to my ten year old. The one

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>this year, I have to say, was particularly good. I'm

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>recommending it to you and to all the listeners out there.

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>There was a Baba Duke parody, there was a West

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>World parody, and there was a Death Note parody, and

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the Death Note parody was done exclusively in anime style

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and it was gorgeous. So anyway, anyway, if people like

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>The Simpsons, or even a few don'ts I don't care,

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>go watch this year's Treehouse of Horror in the year two.

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>It was beautiful. I'll have to see all the source

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 1>material for those though. I still haven't seen the Baba Duke,

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>but I saw the episode of Guiana de Toro's Cabinet

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of Curiosities that had the same director. Anyway, Sorry, back

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Igno Bells. Yes, yes, so the Igno Bells

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>um if you're not familiar with these. The Igno Bells

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>are a series of awards given out once a year

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>by a scientific humor journal called The Animals of Improbable Research,

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>edited for many years now by Mark abrams Uh. Their

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>stated purpose is to quote honor achievements that first make

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>people laugh and then make them think so um, and

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll also without it probably goes without saying that this

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>is also kind of a parody of the Nobel Prizes.

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that a mistake has been made many times

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in the past. So occasionally the papers that get selected

0:03:56.080 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>are themselves intended to be satirical, and or how satirical

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>notes to them at any rate. An example that comes

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to mind was a study of the Disgusted whether cats

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>should be considered a solid or a liquid um. You know,

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously there is a fair amount of humor already there.

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Other times it's just a straightforward study that deals with

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>a topic or deal, or there's some detail to the

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>experiment involved that is laughter inducing, or it's just weird,

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>or it's other times it's a study that that does

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>seem to be sort of testing out or exploring something

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that we just take as a given that just seems

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>completely obvious and in perhaps it's a little humorous that

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>there's a study about it, even though this is how

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>we've sort of scientifically prove out the world around us.

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think we're covering both. I think we have

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a wide selection here, covering both the surprisingly impractical and

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the surprisingly practical. Yeah, so in each of these we're

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely going to talk about why it is funny, but

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>also why it is important, like why it matters because

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>again the stated purpose. Uh, stuff different studies and papers

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that make you laugh but then make you think. So

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not just that they're funny, they also are are

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>legitimate scientific papers. Now there, we're not gonna cover all

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the winners. If you want to see the full list

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of winners for this year plus all subsequent years, you

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>can go to the journal's web page at Improbable dot com. Uh.

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Either way, you should definitely check out the website. It's

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>just all on one page all the winners throughout the years,

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and it can be a fun exercise. You just search

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>for various keywords on that page and see what has

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 1>been honored. So, yeah, we're just gonna trade back and

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>forth here on some for this episode, and we'll probably

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>come back in the next episode as well. When I

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>initially scanned it, another thing about it is that a

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>lot of times they are very recent studies. Sometimes they're

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>older studies, and sometimes their their studies that are that

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>are kind of checking in on a on a strange

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>topic and maybe giggle inducing topic that's been around for

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. And so I was instantly interested in

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.559
<v Speaker 1>the Biology Prize for this year because it does touch

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>on a topic, though not a specific study, that Joe

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and I have discussed on the show um at least

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times. There are a trio of studies

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>honored here by the author's Garcia, Hernandes, and Machado and

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 1>uh in particular, there's a there's one just to give

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you a taste of what we're getting into. This one

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is from in the journal Integrative Zoology Short and Long

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Term Effects of an extreme case of auto Tommy colon.

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Does tail loss and subsequent constipation decrease the locomotive performance

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of male and female scorpions? So specific yes, So this

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>gets into a really weird area that that again, longtime

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>listeners of the show might remember. Needless to say, the

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>tale of a scorpion is easily one of the most

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting tales you'll find in the animal world. You can

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>go vertebrate or invertebrate. The scorpion and is still going

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to be up there at the top, because I mean,

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>just just the image of it, this this curled tail,

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>just posed and ready to strike out with that stinger.

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's so good. It becomes part of our monsters,

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>right like we we can't help but blow it up.

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>We can't help it blow up the scorpion, as Ray

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Harry Housing did and clash of the of of the Titans.

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>But the the scorpions tail or meta soma, is composed

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:31.119
<v Speaker 1>of five segments as well as the Tellson Tellson isn't

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>so much a full segment as just sort of the

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>posterior most division of the creature's body, and this contains

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>venom glands, which of course feed the zinc harden stinger

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the tail. The scorpion will use

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>this tail stinger, along with its claws, both offensively and

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>defensively against its many many enemies, because of course it's

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to prey on various creatures. But lots of things

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>are trying to prey on it, and it also has

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the dangers of posed by other scorpions,

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>even of its own species. But there's an interesting quirk

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of evolution with the scorpions. Uh. And this is when

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I first read about this. It was in an ed

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Young paper from that appeared on the National Geographic website,

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and in it, Young points out that the scorpions anus

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't where you think it might be, so just that

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of kind of leading into it. But I

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know, did did you have set did you have

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a a notion in your head about where you might

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>find a scorpions anus. I would compare it to all

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>other animals that I'm aware of and put it's below

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the tail. That's where I would put it. Right that

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that would have been my guess. And and even more

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>so after discussing this bit about the Tellson, you know

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 1>this idea that it's it's not the tail proper, but

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like it's far back on the animals

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 1>you can get before getting to the tail segments. I mean,

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that's already where you're going to have the venom glands.

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>It seems to make sense that you would also have

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>the termination of the gut there, that that's where the

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>anus would be, that's where poop would come out. I

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>still think it's a good guess, but it is absolutely wrong.

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>The anus is on segment five of the tail, meaning

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that the gut cavity of the scorpion extends through the

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>entire tail and then poops out just short of the

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>stinger itself. That's fascinating. So then picture in your mind

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>if it was typically where you would think it would

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>be on on any creature. So move its back legs

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>all the way up to the fifth segments you know

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of of the stinger and that's it would It would

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>be almost like a like a doc sinto like a

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>big long winer dog body. And yeah, that makes sense

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>in its own strange way. Yeah, And it's it's so

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>different from what we tend to expect from animals that

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 1>have not not even similar morphology, because it's not like

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>not like a cow is similar to a scorpion in

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in most major concerns. But but you know, there's a

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a certain rhythm to the way things are laid out.

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>You you grow to expect to find the anus in

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>certain positions compared to the tale of a creature, especially

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>when it seems so consistent. Yeah, now this is already

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty weird. But the kicker to all of this is

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that there is a rare group of South American scorpions,

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and Young points this out that practice auto Tommy. This

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is the act by which a creature can shed parts

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of its body, typically a tail. The most famous example

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.679
<v Speaker 1>of this our little little lizards like backyard skinks and

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>so forth. That I think if you, if you grew

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>up in a world where lizards were running about, you

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>were familiar with this because occasionally you might catch a

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>lizard and its tail would fall off, or you would

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>find that tail. Perhaps you'd find a bird or a

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.719
<v Speaker 1>cat playing with the tail as it's still kind of

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>bops around with some last you know, last ounce of energy.

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>And of course this is generally about enabling a better

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>chance of survival for the creature. And I think there

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I remember talking about this in the show in the past.

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>There a few different ways of looking at this. It's

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of a distracting lure. If a lizard jettison's a

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>tail and that tail still moving around, while that distracts

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a predator, it also is kind of a bribe, like

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna eat me, but here, here's a piece

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of me. Have at it. I'm delicious, but I'm also

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>running away. So we have this rare group of South

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>American scorpions that can do this. They can shed their tail,

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>but since their anus is on the fifth tail segment,

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 1>they also lose that as well. Um and I believe

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in the case of these scorpions we're talking about the

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the the shed occurring, the the uh that they lose

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the tail somewhere at the second or third segment, which

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>which also seems crazy, right because it's like, come on, scorpions,

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>if you just you could have the anus on the tail,

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 1>but maybe just an earlier segment, and you could still

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>do this without losing your ability to poop. But no,

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>there they have the anus on the fifth segment. They're

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>losing their tail at the second or third segment, and

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>so it leaves the scorpion without a tail and without

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 1>an anush to live out the rest of its life,

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>because it does continue to live and and I believe

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking something like maybe eight months more of life,

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>but still enough life to where these scorpions are still

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>going to continue hunting for food, feeding, and even successfully breeding. Wow.

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, yeah, it's like you're saying, if there was

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a focus group to redesign the scorpion, we should either

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>move its anus further up on these segments of the

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>tail or um have the portion of the tail that

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>does disconnect begin after the fifth segments. But but but no, no,

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just just kind of a sad Cronenberg situation. Yeah, so,

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the the creation has taken. All

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>this is. I actually don't don't care what the creation,

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 1>but it seems like it would it seems like it

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>would pose some some some questions. Yeah. So as though, obviously,

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>what happens when a creature cannot poop but it's still

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>continuing to live and eat, well, it begins to swell up. Uh.

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.319
<v Speaker 1>And they're actually you can find images I think Ed

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Young has some of these in his his article where

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you can see these like white globs through the skin

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 1>of the scorpion. And this is the scorpion swelling up

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>with its own extrement because it cannot poop. It reminds

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>me of seeing um, perhaps a crab getting ready to molt.

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>You know where we're like you can see like it's

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>exterior kind of they're they're getting very uncomfortable. In fact,

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I actually just saw some footage last night of a

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 1>of a blue crab. It was given its favorite food,

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>and it wouldn't eat any just simply because it didn't

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>have room for its body to expand after eating. And

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>so what it would do I believe it was a

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>piece of mango that the crab would just kind of

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>put it in its mouth to taste it and then

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>just set it back down because they didn't have room

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>for the food inside it's it's too small body. It

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>had to wait until it molted to be able to finish. So,

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>as Young points out in this article, the scorpion is

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>on borrowed time. At this point, it's defensive and offensive

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>powers are reduced, plus again steadily swelling up with poop,

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>so much so that the swelling apparently sometimes pops off

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the remaining tail segments or stumps. They're kind

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of like a vest button bopping, you know, popping off

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of a stuffed human diner in a cartoon. So here's this,

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>this steadily swelling scorpion, no tail, no stinger. They have

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to end up having to prey on smaller prey because

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>they can't handle the bigger stuff without their their main bioweapon.

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>But they still managed to do it. They still managed

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to mate and reproduce in their remaining eight months or

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>so on average, So this much was known. These latest

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>studies that are that are that are honored by the

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Ignoble Prizes. They look specifically at the scorpions locomotion post autotommy,

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>So how are they moving around? How are they continuing

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to function and reproduce after they've lost that tale? Now

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>why is it funny? I don't, Well, it's constipated scorpions

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>who threw away their anus, So I guess it's it's

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>inherently funny on some level or another. And why is

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>it important? Well, it is a crucial question about how

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the creatures survive in the wild after losing their tail,

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and given that mating still goes on after this point.

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a question with ramifications of evolutionary concern as well,

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>because there the selection pressures are still applying. It's not

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>one of these situations where you could say, well, they've

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>lost their tail, but it's not like they're reproducing anymore.

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're they're essentially dead. At this point. No,

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>they still have life to give and they give it.

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>So again, a trio of studies that were honored here

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>by Garcia, Hernandez and Machado from one and I'm just

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>going to single out the key findings here. Um, we

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>read a couple of quotes from from the papers. First quote,

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>tail loss has no mediate effect on the locomotive performance

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of scorpions. The long term decrease in the locomotive performance

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of autotomized males may impair mate searching. However, because death

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>by constipation takes several months, males have a long time

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to find mates and reproduce. Thus, the prolonged period between

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>autotomy and death by constipation is crucial for understanding the

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>evolution of one of the most extreme cases of autotomy

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and nature. Fair enough, and also they got to use

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>death by constipation twice there um, But then then it

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>gets more interesting as well. Quote. Although the male tail

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>is used during courtship and sperm transfer, autotomy has no

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>effect on male mating success. The combined effect of increased

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>mortality and reduced fecundity resulted in automatized females producing nearly

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty five percent fewer offspring than intact females. In conclusion,

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the negative effects of tail autotomy are clearly sex dependent,

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>probably because the factors that influence reproductive success in males

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and females are markedly different. So the basic take home

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>there being that, yeah, it doesn't seem to really have

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>an impact on how males are mating, but it does

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>have an impact on the way the females are. And

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>then finally they point out the stinger loss reduced UH

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.719
<v Speaker 1>their ability to subdue both small and large prey, and

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that tail autotomy is costly because it decreases predation success.

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>It just makes these little scorpions less good at being

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>little scorpions. Makes sense, So, you know, these are these

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>are not studies that I guess um, they're not completely

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>groundbreaking or anything. They're not revealing something in the natural

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 1>world that we didn't completely you know, there was just

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a mystery to us. But it does answer more questions

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>about this already weird situation that's occurring with UH, a

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>particular variety of scorpion in the wild. And it also

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>just broadens the mind in general. Like, for exact ample,

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>if you would have said to me, you know, I'm

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna bet you fifty dollars that you can't show me

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>where a scorpions anus is. I would have taken that

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 1>bet before this study. I would have said, of course

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I know where it is. But but now now I

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 1>I just can't take these things for granted. You know

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>there there's a broad spectrum of physiology out there. Yeah, absolutely,

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Let's move on to our second story here. Uh,

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>this was the Ignoble Economics Prize. This. Let's see our

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 1>our authors are researchers. I believe they're all from Italy,

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>So I apologize for my lack of pronouncing Italian names

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 1>as as well as I should. This is by Pluccino,

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Beyondo and Rapisarda, and this is for explaining mathematically why

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>success more often goes not to the most talented people

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>but instead to the luckiest. So a lot of Western cultures,

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we can speak for us as two Americans here, but

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of Western cultures are this way,

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>are based on the idea that if you are talented

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>and work hard, you will be successful. That's that's the

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that everyone tells you, whether it be a teacher

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>or a parent. Uh, that that's just how it is.

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Work hard, you know, be, be, be more talented, be smarter,

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>study hard, all that stuff. Uh, And if you want

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to really be successful, you need to be more talented

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>than everyone else and work harder than everyone else. If

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to be a oh whoever, the billionaire dug

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>or just picture them in your mind, whicheveryone you're thinking

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of that one? Now, Um, is this true? Can we

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 1>really break this apart? And can we do it with math?

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I think is the most important thing that these three

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 1>researchers were trying to figure out. Now, if you if

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you talk to one of these people, the people who

0:19:56.240 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 1>are extremely successful, a billionaire, let's say, they will tell

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>you that, you know, it's we worked hard, we we

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>really put our nose to the grindstone, you know. And

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>they'll talk about the virtues of the hustle. You know,

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that's everything you gotta put in all those hours, neglect

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>your personal relationships, etcetera, etcetera. They got where they are

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>because of a meritocracy. Well, our researchers are here to

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>prove that that's just not true using math. So the

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>first claim that the researchers will make is that if

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>we're primarily talking about two aspects here, which is talent

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and success. They're going to need to find a way

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to apply math to those terms. So talent, they are claiming,

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>has a Gaussian distribution. Now, I'm sure even if those

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>of you out there aren't mathematicians, you know more or

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>less where I'm coming from, even if you don't know

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>these terms. A Gaussian distribution, a k A and normal

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 1>distribution is a typical bell curve along the X axis.

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure most of you can picture that in your mind.

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>It's low on the left, it's high in the middle,

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's low on the right, with a a cosine

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>curve easing in and out of each point. This is

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>used all over the place to explain all kinds of

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>averages in numbers, but it's extremely common. Is this typical

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Bell curve? Okay, so our researchers are using a Gaussian

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>distribution to equate with talent, which they're equating with intelligence

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 1>because intelligence is a very measurable trait. Talent, of course,

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>much more difficult to measure. So so so get that

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in your head first. Everyone, picture a little chart, and

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>this is for intelligence, and it's a little bell curve.

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 1>There are people with very very little intelligence on the

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>left people with extremely high intelligence on the right, and

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>then the average most of us right in the middle.

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>And that's where the big you know, the big body

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of the bell is in that bell curve. Now, Rob, first,

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is this a fair equivalence? Do you think? Do do?

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you think equating talent and intelligence? Is that? Is

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that an assumption you would be willing to make? Um? Well,

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's one of those things where

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>the alchemy of success and even things like talent and

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>intelligence on their own or or are far more complicated

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>than something like this is going to really be able

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to represent. But you gotta work with some sort of model.

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>You gotta work with some sort of a simplified and

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>version of reality in order to apply the mathematics improve

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:33.239
<v Speaker 1>things out right. And I do think that there is

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>talents that of course it doesn't require you know, book learning,

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 1>let's say, and um, perhaps something that you could have

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a typically low intelligence by by all all tests that

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>exist in the world, but perhaps are extremely talented in

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>your own ways which are not measurable. So so yes,

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>let's just go with this. If we're using a way

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>to measure talent and we're making that equivalency with intelligence,

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you can measure intelligence. We get a very simple bell curve.

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:03.719
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's just go with that. We'll fall We'll

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>follow their logic on this. So next up, if we've

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>already measured our talent, next we're gonna start measuring success. Now. Now,

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>their way to find a formula for success is they

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>used um wealth, you know, financial gain, financial wealth as success.

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Once again, I'll say, this is perhaps not something you

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>could really you know, one to one. You know that

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>there's there's personal success, there's creative success, and financial success

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is certainly a type of success, but that's a very

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>specific kind. But once again we'll go with it. Okay,

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>So the next assertion for this math formula is that

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.199
<v Speaker 1>success are other aspect that we're really trying to measure

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>here can be represented with a power law a k A.

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>The Parrito principle a k A rule. The Parrito principle,

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>named after the economist phil Fredo Parrito, specifies the eight

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>percent of consequences twenty the causes um so. Assertions using

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>this principle would be things like eighty percent of sales

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>come froment of the clients, eight percent of work done

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>is from you of the employees, and in the case

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of this study, wealth distribution. So the world has a

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>large majority of poor people and a very small number

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>of billionaires. Um. But you can find examples of this

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>principle everywhere. It's actually a very fascinating thing to look into.

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So this study is positing that to a certain degree,

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>wealth equals success. I think there are all kinds of

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>successes we could have in this world. But again, we

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 1>need to hammer this down with one simple principle. Rob,

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 1>what are your thoughts for the purpose of the study,

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>shure wealth can be success? Um? You know, I think

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>that you get into a larger discussion. I think it

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>is certainly a very Western uh idea that that wealth

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>is like the main market success. I've always liked, or

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>not always, but I've long liked the Chinese approach where

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you have the three star gods of Fulu and Show,

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>and each one represents a different sort of desired state

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes I see also kind of translated as luck,

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>which is interesting getting into all of this. But one

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>represents happiness, one represents wealth, and one represents longevity. So

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>wealth is still very much a part of that. With

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>one of these three individuals shown, you know, looking very

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>much like a wealthy business owner, but on his own

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:34.719
<v Speaker 1>you're missing out on on on happiness and longevity, Like

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>these are two things that are also important. You don't

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>want just one of these three statues in your home

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>or your business, you want all three because you want

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to balance of these three forces. Yeah, yeah, I mean again,

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to measure this. So wealth is something that

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>can be measured. If you're talking about like artistic success,

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>perhaps having like you know, your your your your mission,

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and your message be conveyed through art and aesthetics, that's

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>harder to measure. So so, but yeah, I feel like

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in to a larger extent, I feel like, yes, in

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the in the West, we have this idea that wealthiesical success,

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and to a certain extent we can say that's true,

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>but also it's a it's a truth that ends up

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>muddying so many things. Like we get into it into

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>our heads that our hobbies also need to be things

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>that we make money at. That it's like like how

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>how can you be into a writing or painting or whatever, sculpting,

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>whatever your hobby happens to be if it's not producing money,

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Like that's that's not really how hobbies have to work

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:37.919
<v Speaker 1>like I can. I cannot make money at my hobby.

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I can. I cannot be perfect at my hobby. And

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>it's still fine. It's it's it's perfectly acceptable. But we

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>can easily sort of fall into that commercial mindset and

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 1>think of it the opposite way. And I think that

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>applies to most things, like, for example, physical activity, you know,

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>like I love running. I can have all these goals

0:26:57.840 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, like oh, I'm gonna go this far today,

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go this far without stopping to walk, etcetera, etcetera,

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>And that can be very successful at that. There's no

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>money involved, I don't get I'm sure with you. You

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>don't get paid to go swimming or to do your yoga,

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 1>but you can be very successful at those things in

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>our own ways. So yeah, not not to not to

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, harsh on people who do find a way

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to turn a hobby or a passion into a business.

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think obviously it is not required. Yes, yes,

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>So so we we will just accept these equivalences and

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and and continue this paper. So let's picture both these

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>things in our mind. We're picturing the bell curve for intelligence. Okay,

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>so we're all seeing a bell curve in our minds,

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and now for success, we are picturing this eight twenty distribution,

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and if you kind of put those over each other,

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.719
<v Speaker 1>they don't really overlap. So it's like, wait, wait, wait,

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought I thought we lived in a meritocracy. Shouldn't

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>these be one to one? And and that that's not

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the case. So what is that mystery ingredient that makes

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 1>all of this compute? Well, they mentioned it at the

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>very beginning of the thesis. It's luck. So from the paper,

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I really love this segment. Here. I'm gonna be uh

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>quoting most of it, but I'm paraphrasing a couple of

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 1>places quote. There's nowadays an even greater evidence about the

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>fundamental role of chance, luck, or more in general, random

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>factors in determining successes or failures in our personal and

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 1>professional lives. In particular, it has been shown that scientists

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>have the same chance along their career of publishing their

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest hit. You know, as an aside, you would assume

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that you would get smarter and smarter and smarter, so

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>eventually your biggest hit would come at the end of

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>your career. Turns out that's not the case. Oh and

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, um in this paper, they've actually uh cited

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>their sources for each of these claims. These are not

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>just like random claims made by like some podcaster. No no, no,

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>These these are well researched claims that all go back

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to two sources. So if you look at the look

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>up the real paper, they actually have each of these

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>claims cited. So look it up if you're If you're curious,

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I recommend it. So anyway back to it um, it

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>has been shown that scientists have the same chance along

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>their career of publishing their biggest hit. That those with

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>earlier surname initials are significantly more likely to receive tenure

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>at top departments. That one's position in an alphabetically sorted

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>list may be important in determining access to oversubscribed public services.

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>That middle name initials enhance evaluations of intellectual performance. That

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>people with easy to pronounce names are judged more positively

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>than those with difficult to pronounce names. That individuals with

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>noble sounding surnames are found to work more often as

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>managers than as employees. That females with masculine monikers are

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>often more successful in legal careers. That roughly half of

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the variants and incomes across persons worldwise is explained only

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>by their country of residents and by the income distribution

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>within that country. That the probability of becoming a CEO

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is strongly influenced by your name or by your month

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of birth, and that even the probability of developing some

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of cancer might be cutting a brilliant career short.

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>It's mainly due to simple bad luck. And um it's

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was fascinating to go through all these

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and to check all their their sited sources. But but

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that all these things have in common

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is that you have no control over any of these things.

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>No matter how how much you think you have control

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>over any of these you you you really don't. You

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>don't determine your own name. For the most part, you

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't say what month you're born in. I suppose

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you could lie about some of these things, but but

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>but for the most part, you don't have any control

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>what country you're born in, etcetera, etcetera. You know where

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>where your name lands in the alphabets. Um. But but

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it is an interesting idea to think about, like parents

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>choosing their child's name based on like you know, how

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>how will I make sure that my son Aaron a

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Sin is, as you know, at the front of

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>every list and has all the advantages I can possibly

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>provide for them. Yeah, I mean there's a lot to

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>be said about about naming of children, and and different

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>ideas about naming of children, and yeah, the the downstream

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>results of those names. There's been so many studies and

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>about this. In fact, I think I I heard an

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>NPR story about a new one just the other day

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:30.719
<v Speaker 1>that was quite fascinating. Um. But again, yeah, you generally

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>don't get to choose it yourself. Often you get to

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>tweak it later, or you or you do change it later,

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>but you're at least given that starting name that you

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with. Yeah, for most folks, they're unable

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to change their name until adulthood. So in many ways,

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the cards have already been dealt. You've already lived eighteen

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>years of your life. You don't have much control over it,

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>perhaps until you're an adult. Yeah. So, because this is

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a mathematics paper that I'm referring to today, there are

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of equations, charts, and graphs, specifically twenty two

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>pages worth of testing away. In particular, because we have

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the ability to track success based on their model, and

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a way to track um talent based on their model.

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>How are we going to determine luck? So they spend

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty two pages determining that, which which will be very

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>hard for me to express on a podcast, but but hey,

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>they did it. So I recommend you open up this

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>paper and you look at it. You'll see a wide

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>variety of of ways to measure um uh good luck

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and bad luck and um. If you'll kind of picture

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in your mind, it's a pretty random distribution. Honestly, Uh,

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to equate because it's not a typical uh

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.719
<v Speaker 1>line like a like an twenty principle or a or

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>or a Gaussian curve like these. This is a brand

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>new thing to look at, which is the luck and

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a lack of luck curve, which is um kind randomized.

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So I recommend you look it up for details. But ultimately, uh,

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the result is untalented people who don't work hard are

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>not successful. Okay, Also talented people who work hard are

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>not successful. An average person who is averagely talented and

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>works an average amount and is lucky is successful. That's

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>how you are successful in this country, which, honestly, I

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>think you could look at this in a couple of

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>different ways. Um. I think ultimately anyone who is lucky

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and happened to just be a person in the world

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>living their life, you know what I mean. Um. Not

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>too long ago, we actually had a really interesting, uh

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>episode of stuff to Blow your mind. It was called

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Barbara Blatchley on Why we Believe in Luck? And it

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>was really fascinating in particular because Blatchly she was she

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 1>was being interviewed in the episode, she was pointing out

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that the biggest part of luck, honestly, there were a

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>few factors, but a big part of it was just

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>just showing up, just being in the world and existing.

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>So you are open to two lucky things happening to you.

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>That that's that's that this an enormous part of luck

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>is just being a person in the world. So if

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you're an average person with average intelligence, living an average

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>life where you just do your life day to day,

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you might get lucky and you might become one of

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>these mythical billionaires. But if you are I guess isolating

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>yourself too much, then then then you don't have the

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>chance for for most kinds of luck. Yeah, they say

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be in the right place at the

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 1>right time, which means you've got to be you've got

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to go to places. Yes, that's true. It's true. Again.

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:45.479
<v Speaker 1>If you want to hear more about this, I really

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 1>do recommend Barbara Blatchley on Why we Believe in Luck?

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Look it up in any of the stuff that blow

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.800
<v Speaker 1>your mind feeds. It's it's a fascinating episode. So coming

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 1>back to why it's funny, um, I I think this

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>confirms what a lot of horror working people who are

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>not as successful as they want to be I want

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to believe is true, which is that, hey, no matter

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>how hard I work, this country and perhaps this world

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 1>is not a meritocracy, I cannot just will myself or

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>work hard enough to become a billionaire. In fact, in

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the paper they go into this where they're like, Okay,

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>how many hours of work can I put into this

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>formula to ensure billionaire status? And it's not humanly possible.

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's not. You can't track that same thing

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>with um all of the aspects. Really, if you can

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:40.760
<v Speaker 1>go through with the individual elements and be like, how

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>can I become a billionaire and you can't determine it.

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 1>The luck has to be there. It's it's it's the

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:52.359
<v Speaker 1>only factor that is truly determining this crazy segments, So

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't discredit it. It's it's all you can really do. So, um,

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's self fulfilling. It makes the most of us,

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>meaning you know, the majority of us who are not

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>as successful as we think we should be. It's a

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>confirmation of saying, don't worry, it's not your fault. That's

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>why it's funny to me. Yeah, But the kind of

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the flip side is that it's also humbling as well,

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's like, well, you're you're in the place you

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>are as well because of luck, Like you're here and

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>not in some more dire situation of which there are

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>plenty of of of examples to look at, Like I'm

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not there just because of luck as well, I'm

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I was in the right right place and right time

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:38.399
<v Speaker 1>to be here, Uh, even if I'm not up here

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in this billionaire room. And that's why I think it's

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>important coming to that last segment here, it's that, Um,

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it's impressive that they were able to

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>determine this through math and really kind of cut out

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>some um, some possibilities that people who do believe in

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the hustle would claim. It's it's shutting down those arguments. Uh.

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's also a great reminder that the world is

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 1>sadly not a meritocracy. Luck is a huge factor. Your

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>successes are not entirely your own, and neither are your failures.

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's just an important thing to remember. So uh,

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it does confirm what we already think. But

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>it's good to know that through math they were able

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to determine its for sure. Yeah. Thank all right, le,

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>let's move on to another one of these prizes. I

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>decided to go with the physics prize here. Uh. This

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 1>one is a lot of fun. The physics prizes often,

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of these studies, revolve around things you

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:42.320
<v Speaker 1>might not expect um. And this one went to Frank Fish,

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:46.479
<v Speaker 1>Zi Ming Wan uh Ming lu Chen Live Being, Guy

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh Chun Yan Yi and Atla Incessic for trying to

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:54.359
<v Speaker 1>understand how ducklings managed to swim in formation. So the

0:37:54.400 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>physics of ducklings swimming information uh um. And the the

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 1>actual paper that's referenced here energy conservation by formation swimming

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 1>metabolic evidence from ducklings by fish at all published in

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the book Mechanics and Physiology of Animal Swimming. So yeah,

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>this is ultimately an older work here, but finally getting

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:25.839
<v Speaker 1>the the the acclaim that it deserves. So first of all,

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>why is it funny? And I think it's obvious because

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>it concerns ducks, not only ducks, but ducklings. Um ducks

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 1>studies are somehow intrinsically humorous, perhaps simply because ducks are

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>intrinsically humorous if memory serves. A study about duck necrophilia

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>from I think two thousand three, or at least honored

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand three, was also featured in the ig Nobles,

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:51.800
<v Speaker 1>but various other topics have at least brought up ducks. Furthermore,

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>this study is about ducklings and revolves around a complex

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>attempt to understand something that ducks simply do. Like I

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like most of us have probably seen a mother

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>duck followed in the water by her ducklings, and we

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 1>might say something like, oh, isn't that cute? Or oh,

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>look at those ducklings, isn't that sweet? But we're probably

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:13.280
<v Speaker 1>not turning to the person next to us and going, oh,

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 1>my lord, how are they doing that? For? How is

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that possible? And yet, at the same time, the study

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 1>is important because, as the study itself states, quote, the

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>study here sheds light on the importance of the fluid

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 1>mechanics on animals behavior and potentially evolution. So there's always

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>something I always find find it kind of amusing when

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we have these cases of of physics, very serious physics

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>being used, being applied to something that is seemingly mundane

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and thus revealing the hidden complexities of the thing. I

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:50.320
<v Speaker 1>often find fluid mechanics of papers very interesting for this reason.

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>In some cases, they may tackle something seemingly mundane, like

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 1>it might be the way a coffee slashes around in

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a mug or something like that, but it reveals this

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 1>strange world of visible and invisible fluids that we live in,

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:04.959
<v Speaker 1>not only like liquids that we're interacting in, but also

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>gases that we live in and and essentially are swimming

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>through throughout our daily life, that we're born into and

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that we die. And but again this this study is

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>funny too, just because it's ducks. I mean, think of

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 1>how many cartoon ducks that we have. It's quite a few, right,

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, for sure, and yeah, I mean picture they're

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 1>funny walk. I'm sure that's that's the big part of it.

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:27.439
<v Speaker 1>And uh and they're funny little noises they make. Yeah,

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they make funny noises and they walk funny,

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's amusing to us. Yeah, so it's why

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 1>we have Donald Duck. We have Daffy Duck, with have

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:41.719
<v Speaker 1>ducula darkwing duck, the rest, I mean the entire uh

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>town of Duckberg, you know, yeah, yeah, yeah, we have

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Scrooge mc duck and so forth. And I imagine there

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 1>are a number of of less known duck car well,

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and think about this way too, Marvel Comics. You know,

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:58.439
<v Speaker 1>they have many serious superheroes running around doing their thing.

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:01.799
<v Speaker 1>When they want to commit to hero, how are the duck?

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>That's so if you haven't seen this before, obviously when

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:11.439
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about ducks and ducklings in the wild, Yeah,

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just a mother duck in the water followed by

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 1>her ducklings in a straight line. And the obvious question, then,

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>if you want to dive deeper, is why are they

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>doing this formation? Is this the best formation from an

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>energy perspective, because that's often a way of understanding why

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>in the animals do the things they do, why animal

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 1>bodies are the way they are, why animal systems are

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the way they are. I mean, there are some complexities

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that arise in some sort of dead ends that can

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 1>occur via evolution, but for the most part, like energy

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is a great place to look because evolution is is

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>essentially kind of lazy, and energy conservation is extremely important

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 1>for any organism, like what is the most efficient way

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to achieve some end? So in this case, the researchers

0:41:56.200 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>created a simplified mathematical and numerical model and calculated the

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>wave drag on a group of waterfowl in a swimming formation,

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and they highlighted uh two interesting findings too important factors

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in all of this wave riding and wave passing quote.

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>By riding the waves generated by a mother duck, a

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:22.239
<v Speaker 1>trailing duckling can obtain a significant wave drag reduction. When

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a duckling swims at the quote sweet point behind its mother,

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a destructive wave interference phenomenon occurs and the wave drag

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of the duckling turns positive, pushing the duckling forward. More interestingly,

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 1>this wave riding benefit could be sustained by the rest

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:43.239
<v Speaker 1>of the ducklings in a single file line formation. So

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 1>the the the answer then is that like this, this

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 1>is the most energy efficient way to do it. And

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the ducklings, by riding in in this formation behind the mother,

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 1>are able to essentially be propelled along to a certain degree.

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Like they're they're, they're, they're, they're, they're basically that they're

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>literally hiding in her wake. But the way that the

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>wave function here works, uh, they're kind of getting a

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 1>little boost. You know. I play a lot of Mario karts,

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and I would have thought that that would have informed

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:15.560
<v Speaker 1>me that this this is how it goes. But no, no,

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I didn't consider drag and all that at all.

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:21.759
<v Speaker 1>Like like, if if I was thinking to myself, how

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:24.240
<v Speaker 1>do they follow in a line, I'd go use their eyes.

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:26.239
<v Speaker 1>They look at the duck in front of them and

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 1>they just follow that one. You know. But but this

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 1>makes so much more sense. Well yeah, because you I mean,

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:35.279
<v Speaker 1>on one level, yes, it's like this is the mother.

0:43:35.400 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>It pays to keep your eyes on the mother. You're

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:39.799
<v Speaker 1>learning from the mother, and you need to go where

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:42.359
<v Speaker 1>she goes because she's also your protector. She's your source

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:46.359
<v Speaker 1>of of nourishment and so forth. Um, But there does

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>seem to be this added this added level to it,

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:52.920
<v Speaker 1>this energy efficiency to it. Uh. It also gets interesting

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 1>because the researchers here hypothesized that the energy efficiency of

0:43:57.239 --> 0:44:00.759
<v Speaker 1>this formation might be the driving force behind of course,

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it's use in duck evolution, the reason that ducks continue

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>continue and have continued to use this formation. But they

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>also ponder its connection to imprinting. So they charge that

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the importance of this practice may influence the duck's primal

0:44:13.880 --> 0:44:18.359
<v Speaker 1>instinct to follow any moving objects they see during this

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:22.440
<v Speaker 1>crucial period. So imprinting it occurs usually during the first

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 1>day after a hatchling emerges and young ducklings usually, of

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 1>course they're imprinting on the mother duck, but they can

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:33.759
<v Speaker 1>famously imprint on humans as well. There have been some

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:38.960
<v Speaker 1>very important studies in which ducklings have imprinted upon a

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:42.360
<v Speaker 1>human being. Now, don't do this, do not attempt to

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 1>go anywhere and have ducklings imprint upon you. Leave that

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to the scientists. But it's interesting to think about about

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:52.840
<v Speaker 1>this in in its connection to the swimming efficiency. This

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 1>idea of following, what it means to follow the mother around? Uh,

0:44:58.239 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's uh, it's beyond on just learning

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:06.400
<v Speaker 1>what she's doing. It's also benefiting, uh from from the

0:45:06.480 --> 0:45:09.560
<v Speaker 1>energy efficiency of following her in the water. It makes sense,

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:13.879
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense. It's it's it's wonderful with science like

0:45:13.880 --> 0:45:16.400
<v Speaker 1>like like like like we were saying earlier, this is

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the kind of study that I never would have considered.

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I never would have considered the fact that like, oh,

0:45:22.560 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 1>these ducks do this more or less automatically through instinct

0:45:26.160 --> 0:45:28.719
<v Speaker 1>why you know, And it's it's just and then you

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 1>factor things in like, oh no, this is a this

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is an evolutionary trait that can be you know, that

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 1>lead to to to their existence here in today's world,

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, by by by following this, it's like, oh yeah, science,

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, A plus B equals see, yeah, I got it.

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 1>And it it drives home why bio mimetics solutions are

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:53.760
<v Speaker 1>are are often so effective because anything you see animals

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 1>doing like this in the wild, it's not just the

0:45:55.960 --> 0:45:58.359
<v Speaker 1>way they happen to do it. It's not it's not

0:45:58.400 --> 0:46:00.360
<v Speaker 1>like you know, it's easy to compare to things like

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:02.359
<v Speaker 1>human traditions where it's like, well, why do they wear

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:04.520
<v Speaker 1>those funny hats? Well, we just wear these funny hats.

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:07.799
<v Speaker 1>This is the tradition. It's important to us, but in

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the animal world is especially These are these are things

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:15.239
<v Speaker 1>that have been selected for These are things that have

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:21.719
<v Speaker 1>undergone like rigorous um uh, evolutionary forces over time and

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 1>so inevitably, like the way that the duck and the

0:46:25.200 --> 0:46:27.719
<v Speaker 1>ducklings are behaving, like this is the most efficient way

0:46:27.760 --> 0:46:30.279
<v Speaker 1>to do the thing. And I'm not sure off the

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:32.239
<v Speaker 1>top of the top of my head, like where you

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:35.920
<v Speaker 1>might be able to apply this particular scenario to engineering.

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 1>And maybe there's some sort of like dinghy based um

0:46:39.960 --> 0:46:42.919
<v Speaker 1>application here. But but it's the very reason that many

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>cases we can say, well, will we have this engineering

0:46:45.320 --> 0:46:48.319
<v Speaker 1>problem to solve, how can we best do it? Well,

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:51.759
<v Speaker 1>we could crunch out some numbers, we could we could

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:55.360
<v Speaker 1>bust out some some some tests and some models. Or

0:46:55.520 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we could look and see, what's a similar problem that

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 1>has been faced in evolution, has been faced in nature,

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and what lessons seem to have been developed there, what

0:47:06.000 --> 0:47:08.960
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the evolved solution? And can we just

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:12.719
<v Speaker 1>copy their work instead of doing it all from scratch? Here, Yeah,

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it makes perfect sense. Let's say you know you you

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:19.400
<v Speaker 1>are a robotics company who are building robotic freighters to

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 1>send freight across the ocean. For example, if you want

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to spend you know, less on on on fuel. However,

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that may factor into your equation. Perhaps you should follow

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:35.479
<v Speaker 1>a duckling following its mother formula, you know, perhaps using

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that drag. Keeping that in mind, like one big freighter

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in the fronts and a few baby freighters behind it.

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's the best solution. Who knows? Who knows? All right,

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at the clock here and it looks like

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 1>we've about reached the time limit here for this episode.

0:47:52.239 --> 0:47:54.759
<v Speaker 1>But don't worry. We're gonna come back in the next

0:47:54.800 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 1>core episode of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, and we're

0:47:57.160 --> 0:48:00.239
<v Speaker 1>going to continue looking at some but not all, off

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 1>the two Ignobile Prize winners. Yeah, we've got plenty more

0:48:05.320 --> 0:48:07.399
<v Speaker 1>for you. We're looking at a big old list here.

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Some we've already researched, some we still have to research.

0:48:10.360 --> 0:48:12.240
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, we've got a lot more fun on the way.

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:15.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right, So yeah, check back in with us on Thursday.

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Just a reminder that yeah, two season Thursdays are the

0:48:18.280 --> 0:48:21.320
<v Speaker 1>core episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind. On Monday's

0:48:21.320 --> 0:48:23.760
<v Speaker 1>we do listener mail on Wednesdays and short form artifact

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 1>or Monster Effect and on Fridays that's when we do

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Weird How Cinema. That's there time to set aside most

0:48:28.920 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 1>serious concerns and just talk about a weird film. Uh,

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:35.920
<v Speaker 1>let's see if you want to interact with other listeners

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:39.239
<v Speaker 1>other followers of Stuff to Blow your Mind. Uh, there

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:40.759
<v Speaker 1>are at least a couple of places you can go.

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:44.359
<v Speaker 1>There is still a Facebook group called Stuff to Blow

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 1>your Mind Discussion Module. You can seek that out there

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh asked to join, I think you have to

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:52.480
<v Speaker 1>answer a very simple quiz to gain access. If you

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:55.440
<v Speaker 1>would like to join us on discord, well email us

0:48:55.600 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'll shoot that link out to you. And oh,

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:01.120
<v Speaker 1>if you use letterbox, is L E T P E

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:04.800
<v Speaker 1>R B O x D dot com. Well, Weird House

0:49:05.000 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Cinema has an account on there. It's just us, your

0:49:07.680 --> 0:49:10.359
<v Speaker 1>name weird House. You can follow us there and that's

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:12.640
<v Speaker 1>where we keep track of all the movies we've covered

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:15.920
<v Speaker 1>on the show. As always, thanks to Seth Nicholas Johnson

0:49:15.920 --> 0:49:19.239
<v Speaker 1>for producing the show and stitching it all together for

0:49:19.360 --> 0:49:22.400
<v Speaker 1>us and in this case also co hosting. And if

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you would like to get in touch with us via email,

0:49:24.560 --> 0:49:28.279
<v Speaker 1>well send us a message at contact Stuff to Blow

0:49:28.320 --> 0:49:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is

0:49:38.400 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 1>production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts for my

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:49:44.200 --> 0:50:01.440
<v Speaker 1>wherever you're listening to your favorite shows. Past time a

0:50:01.520 --> 0:50:02.760
<v Speaker 1>time to about about