1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:07,720
Speaker 1: Okay, please introduce yourself now. For the record, my name

2
00:00:07,800 --> 00:00:11,320
Speaker 1: is Andy Greenberg and I'm a senior writer for Wired.

3
00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:15,800
Speaker 1: What drew you to the hunt for Setoshi Nakamodo? Well,

4
00:00:15,880 --> 00:00:21,760
Speaker 1: I um, let's see. In late two thousand fifteen, Andy

5
00:00:22,079 --> 00:00:24,520
Speaker 1: got an email from out of the blue. It was

6
00:00:24,640 --> 00:00:28,960
Speaker 1: encrypted and the writer was using a pseudonym. Andy's mysterious

7
00:00:29,000 --> 00:00:34,120
Speaker 1: correspondent made an incredible claim. He said he possessed documents

8
00:00:34,159 --> 00:00:39,199
Speaker 1: that revealed conclusively the true identity of Setoshi Nakamoto, the

9
00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:43,720
Speaker 1: mysterious creator of the cryptocurrency Bitcoin, one of the tech

10
00:00:43,800 --> 00:00:48,440
Speaker 1: industry's biggest unsolved mysteries. It was the story of the decade,

11
00:00:48,760 --> 00:00:52,680
Speaker 1: a story that could make a journalist career. Andy and

12
00:00:52,720 --> 00:00:56,560
Speaker 1: his correspondent started working together. The evidence was pointing towards

13
00:00:56,560 --> 00:01:01,800
Speaker 1: a little known Australian computer scientist named Craig Right. If

14
00:01:01,840 --> 00:01:05,200
Speaker 1: you just took a glance at this stuff, you would

15
00:01:05,280 --> 00:01:08,720
Speaker 1: very quickly to find enough evidence to convince yourself if

16
00:01:08,760 --> 00:01:11,399
Speaker 1: you believe the documents were real, that this guy had

17
00:01:11,400 --> 00:01:16,720
Speaker 1: created Bitcoin, this eccentric Australian genius you know, nobody had

18
00:01:16,760 --> 00:01:22,319
Speaker 1: ever heard of before they collected his old blog posts.

19
00:01:22,640 --> 00:01:26,080
Speaker 1: They did linguistic analysis to compare rights writing style with

20
00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:31,440
Speaker 1: post written by Satoshi. And on December eight Andy published

21
00:01:31,480 --> 00:01:36,679
Speaker 1: his blockbuster story and Wired titled Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto

22
00:01:36,800 --> 00:01:41,880
Speaker 1: is probably this unknown Australian genius. And then it happened

23
00:01:42,240 --> 00:01:46,640
Speaker 1: what always seems to happen to the Satoshi hunters, this

24
00:01:46,760 --> 00:01:51,840
Speaker 1: community of bitcoin enthusiasts and cryptocurrency fanatics just went to

25
00:01:51,920 --> 00:01:55,760
Speaker 1: work to methodically disprove the claim that Craig Wright was

26
00:01:55,800 --> 00:02:00,480
Speaker 1: Satoshi Nakamoto, and the fallout made Andy Greenberg's life a

27
00:02:00,560 --> 00:02:12,079
Speaker 1: living How. Hi, I'm Brad Stone and I'm Julie r H.

28
00:02:12,240 --> 00:02:16,160
Speaker 1: And this week Undercrypted, we're asking the question whatever happened

29
00:02:16,160 --> 00:02:19,200
Speaker 1: to the hunt for Satoshi Nakamoto? Now, Bratt, I know

30
00:02:19,360 --> 00:02:22,920
Speaker 1: this has captivated me for some time. Julie I confess

31
00:02:22,960 --> 00:02:25,600
Speaker 1: to having fruitlessly spent some time on it as well.

32
00:02:26,120 --> 00:02:30,080
Speaker 1: And over the years, publications like The New Yorker, Gizmoto,

33
00:02:30,320 --> 00:02:34,120
Speaker 1: Fast Company, Forbes, the London Review of Books, Vice have

34
00:02:34,240 --> 00:02:37,080
Speaker 1: all tried to find sitution. It's become a kind of

35
00:02:37,200 --> 00:02:41,639
Speaker 1: journalistic tarbie. The more reporters getting tangled in the mystery,

36
00:02:41,880 --> 00:02:46,400
Speaker 1: the worst fever, and there's this question of whether Satoshi

37
00:02:46,440 --> 00:02:50,240
Speaker 1: should even be identified. You know, Satoshi still controls about

38
00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:53,520
Speaker 1: a million bitcoin, making them the largest holder of the

39
00:02:53,520 --> 00:02:57,679
Speaker 1: cryptocurrency and a billionaire. In paper, a journalist would say,

40
00:02:57,680 --> 00:03:00,320
Speaker 1: the world has a right to know, but maybe this

41
00:03:00,440 --> 00:03:02,960
Speaker 1: genius just wants to be left alone. And if we

42
00:03:03,040 --> 00:03:06,840
Speaker 1: never find out Setoci's true identity, does it even matter anyway?

43
00:03:07,440 --> 00:03:17,080
Speaker 1: Stay with its first, Brad, remind us what we really

44
00:03:17,200 --> 00:03:20,760
Speaker 1: know about Setoshi. All we really know about Setoshi is

45
00:03:20,800 --> 00:03:24,680
Speaker 1: what he wrote. In October two tho paper appeared online

46
00:03:24,720 --> 00:03:28,480
Speaker 1: describing a new kind of digital money called bitcoin. A

47
00:03:28,480 --> 00:03:32,440
Speaker 1: few months later, Satoshi released the very first bitcoin software,

48
00:03:32,880 --> 00:03:36,040
Speaker 1: And this was right after the financial crisis. Is your

49
00:03:36,160 --> 00:03:39,720
Speaker 1: money safe? The fault of Lehman brothers, And of course

50
00:03:39,760 --> 00:03:42,120
Speaker 1: it is not just Lehman's night. Bank of America sealing

51
00:03:42,160 --> 00:03:44,840
Speaker 1: a deal to buy Maryland for twenty nine dollars a

52
00:03:44,880 --> 00:03:48,600
Speaker 1: share that is roughly Bitcoin attracted libertarians and people who

53
00:03:48,640 --> 00:03:52,400
Speaker 1: had lost faith in the global financial system. They liked

54
00:03:52,440 --> 00:03:55,840
Speaker 1: this idea of an electronic currency with no central bank

55
00:03:55,920 --> 00:03:59,320
Speaker 1: standing behind it. In the beginning, Bitcoin was only known

56
00:03:59,360 --> 00:04:03,480
Speaker 1: within small circles of developers, and for a while Satoshi

57
00:04:03,520 --> 00:04:07,760
Speaker 1: communicated with them sending emails, talking on bulletin boards, but

58
00:04:07,840 --> 00:04:11,280
Speaker 1: those people say they never met Setoshi in person. In

59
00:04:11,320 --> 00:04:14,200
Speaker 1: two thousand and eleven, as bitcoin was starting to become

60
00:04:14,200 --> 00:04:18,320
Speaker 1: associated with shady criminal enterprises like the Silk Road, which

61
00:04:18,360 --> 00:04:22,360
Speaker 1: was an illegal online drug market, Satoshi disappeared and his

62
00:04:22,520 --> 00:04:26,040
Speaker 1: final post said quote, I've moved on to other things.

63
00:04:26,200 --> 00:04:29,560
Speaker 1: It's in good hands. And with that the legend of

64
00:04:29,560 --> 00:04:44,760
Speaker 1: Satoshi was born. So Brad together we went to interview

65
00:04:44,800 --> 00:04:48,839
Speaker 1: the very first Setoshi hunter. Right, Joshua Davis is a

66
00:04:48,839 --> 00:04:51,400
Speaker 1: great journalist who wrote one of the first stories about

67
00:04:51,400 --> 00:04:54,400
Speaker 1: bitcoin for the New Yorker magazine all the way back

68
00:04:54,400 --> 00:04:57,479
Speaker 1: in October two eleven. Yeah, and that's just a few

69
00:04:57,480 --> 00:05:00,279
Speaker 1: months after Setoshi went silent. We went for to the

70
00:05:00,279 --> 00:05:03,640
Speaker 1: Mission District in San Francisco for this interview, meeting josh

71
00:05:03,680 --> 00:05:06,560
Speaker 1: at a small office. There was a walk up apartment

72
00:05:06,760 --> 00:05:08,640
Speaker 1: with just a couple of rooms and a gate on

73
00:05:08,640 --> 00:05:11,400
Speaker 1: the entry door. We sat down in a quiet room

74
00:05:11,440 --> 00:05:16,080
Speaker 1: at the back. Please introduce yourself. My name is Joshua Davis,

75
00:05:16,160 --> 00:05:19,640
Speaker 1: and I am the co founder of Epic magazine and

76
00:05:19,760 --> 00:05:26,160
Speaker 1: a contributing editor at Wired. Josh's article cryptocurrency introduced bitcoin

77
00:05:26,200 --> 00:05:28,919
Speaker 1: to a lot of readers. It also said a pattern

78
00:05:28,960 --> 00:05:32,039
Speaker 1: that would be repeated over and over. Journalists would set

79
00:05:32,040 --> 00:05:35,560
Speaker 1: out to understand bitcoin and then get enticed by the

80
00:05:35,560 --> 00:05:39,400
Speaker 1: Satoshi mystery and end up going down the rabbit hole.

81
00:05:40,000 --> 00:05:43,320
Speaker 1: You know, it's like a classic treasure hunt where you

82
00:05:43,360 --> 00:05:46,599
Speaker 1: don't know exactly where the treasure is, but you could.

83
00:05:46,640 --> 00:05:49,000
Speaker 1: You see one crumb, and you follow that crumb to

84
00:05:49,040 --> 00:05:51,400
Speaker 1: the next crumb, and and next thing you know, you've

85
00:05:51,440 --> 00:05:54,919
Speaker 1: been led down this crazy journey. One big win was

86
00:05:54,960 --> 00:05:58,040
Speaker 1: only worth about three dollars at this time. Josh ended

87
00:05:58,120 --> 00:06:00,680
Speaker 1: up buying some and spent them one of the only

88
00:06:00,720 --> 00:06:03,240
Speaker 1: places you could find that accepted it at the time,

89
00:06:03,480 --> 00:06:08,320
Speaker 1: Howard Johnson's hotel near Disneyland. Yikes, and since one bitcoin

90
00:06:08,400 --> 00:06:11,920
Speaker 1: does around ten thousand dollars today, that ended up being

91
00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:16,600
Speaker 1: a very expensive hotel room. Josh also attended a cryptoconference

92
00:06:16,640 --> 00:06:20,160
Speaker 1: in Santa Barbara, one of the first, and became convinced

93
00:06:20,160 --> 00:06:23,880
Speaker 1: that one of the attendees must be Setoshi hiding in

94
00:06:23,920 --> 00:06:27,480
Speaker 1: plain sight. He scanned the attendee list and going on

95
00:06:27,560 --> 00:06:29,800
Speaker 1: clues like the fact that Setoshi seemed to use some

96
00:06:29,880 --> 00:06:33,280
Speaker 1: British sayings in his writing, he settled on an Irish

97
00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:38,000
Speaker 1: cryptography student named Michael Clear. As Josh described it in

98
00:06:38,000 --> 00:06:41,560
Speaker 1: the story, he met with Michael outside the conference and

99
00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:45,599
Speaker 1: then asked him, point blank, are you Setoshi Nakamoto? We

100
00:06:45,680 --> 00:06:48,400
Speaker 1: talked about bitcoin a little bit and I said to him,

101
00:06:48,440 --> 00:06:51,400
Speaker 1: I'm also looking for the person who created it. And

102
00:06:51,440 --> 00:06:54,880
Speaker 1: I said, I know, it happened to notice that you

103
00:06:55,000 --> 00:06:57,359
Speaker 1: have a lot of the same experience, and so I

104
00:06:57,440 --> 00:07:04,000
Speaker 1: just want to ask you. Are you set Toshi? And

105
00:07:04,120 --> 00:07:09,640
Speaker 1: he said no, But if I was, I wouldn't tell you.

106
00:07:14,520 --> 00:07:18,240
Speaker 1: From the story, it's clear Josh wasn't entirely sure if

107
00:07:18,280 --> 00:07:21,760
Speaker 1: Michael was telling the truth, right, because denying it is

108
00:07:21,800 --> 00:07:26,640
Speaker 1: exactly what Satoshi would do. Many years later, Josh's circumspect

109
00:07:26,680 --> 00:07:30,520
Speaker 1: about the challenges of revealing Satoshi's identity. I think the

110
00:07:30,520 --> 00:07:32,400
Speaker 1: biggest problem is that there's just not a lot to

111
00:07:32,440 --> 00:07:37,120
Speaker 1: go on, and so you very quickly start making assumptions.

112
00:07:37,520 --> 00:07:40,200
Speaker 1: This is something we heard over and over. You start

113
00:07:40,280 --> 00:07:42,960
Speaker 1: finding ways to convince yourself that you're on the right track.

114
00:07:43,520 --> 00:07:47,040
Speaker 1: A confirmation bias. So, you know, let's look at some

115
00:07:47,080 --> 00:07:51,880
Speaker 1: of those assumptions. British English, the assumption that it's a

116
00:07:51,960 --> 00:07:55,520
Speaker 1: heat because he's using the name Satoshi Nakamoto. I mean

117
00:07:55,560 --> 00:08:01,000
Speaker 1: the very initial assumption that he's Japanese. Again, there's no

118
00:08:01,080 --> 00:08:06,160
Speaker 1: guarantee that he's Japanese. At many points in the reporting,

119
00:08:06,320 --> 00:08:11,960
Speaker 1: I was imagining Satoshi just laughing, just laughing at me,

120
00:08:12,640 --> 00:08:16,120
Speaker 1: and then over the years, as other people have chased him,

121
00:08:16,160 --> 00:08:24,640
Speaker 1: just laughing at everybody else. A few years later, in

122
00:08:24,680 --> 00:08:28,440
Speaker 1: two thousand fourteen, the crypto community got a rather large

123
00:08:28,520 --> 00:08:33,040
Speaker 1: surprise when Newsweek magazine ran a story revealing the true

124
00:08:33,080 --> 00:08:36,760
Speaker 1: identity of the creator of Bitcoin. It has been one

125
00:08:36,800 --> 00:08:40,720
Speaker 1: of the biggest mysteries raging across the internet and business worlds.

126
00:08:40,720 --> 00:08:45,199
Speaker 1: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? The man who created bitcoin is

127
00:08:45,240 --> 00:08:48,720
Speaker 1: known as the father of Bitcoin, the online currency now

128
00:08:48,800 --> 00:08:51,680
Speaker 1: worth billions. Take a look at this scene last night

129
00:08:51,840 --> 00:08:54,920
Speaker 1: after Newsweek published an article claiming the man in these

130
00:08:54,960 --> 00:08:58,320
Speaker 1: images is the Bitcoin founder. Now, this is probably the

131
00:08:58,360 --> 00:09:01,720
Speaker 1: best known attempt at un mask Satoshi. So speaking to

132
00:09:01,760 --> 00:09:03,800
Speaker 1: the woman who wrote it, was at the top of

133
00:09:03,840 --> 00:09:07,959
Speaker 1: our list. My name is Leah McGrath Goodman, and I

134
00:09:08,000 --> 00:09:11,960
Speaker 1: was the writer of the Bitcoin story cover story for Newsweek.

135
00:09:12,000 --> 00:09:16,520
Speaker 1: Back at this time, Newsweek had been temporarily out of print,

136
00:09:17,240 --> 00:09:20,000
Speaker 1: Leah's article appeared on the cover of their first issue

137
00:09:20,040 --> 00:09:22,920
Speaker 1: back and there was a lot of anticipation around it.

138
00:09:23,559 --> 00:09:27,000
Speaker 1: Leah had identified a sixty four year old Japanese American

139
00:09:27,080 --> 00:09:31,240
Speaker 1: living in southern California, and his real name, as it

140
00:09:31,280 --> 00:09:35,560
Speaker 1: turned out, was Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto. When this hit on March,

141
00:09:37,320 --> 00:09:39,520
Speaker 1: I was back in New York. I was online and

142
00:09:39,600 --> 00:09:42,560
Speaker 1: watching from across the country. There was a huge reaction

143
00:09:42,600 --> 00:09:45,800
Speaker 1: to the story, something Leah says she never could have expected.

144
00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:50,000
Speaker 1: Camera crews and police cars descended on Dorian Nakamoto's home.

145
00:09:50,360 --> 00:09:53,280
Speaker 1: He was hounded by reporters while trying to leave this house.

146
00:09:53,960 --> 00:09:56,520
Speaker 1: I hadn't seen anything like that in California since I

147
00:09:56,600 --> 00:09:58,920
Speaker 1: was a little kid with the O. J. Simpson Wake

148
00:09:59,000 --> 00:10:03,120
Speaker 1: Bronco car chase. I was in complete shock. I just

149
00:10:03,160 --> 00:10:05,400
Speaker 1: got up and walked across the room and people were

150
00:10:05,400 --> 00:10:08,560
Speaker 1: congratulating me and shaking my hand, and I went to

151
00:10:08,559 --> 00:10:13,040
Speaker 1: the ladies room and just threw up um and just panicked,

152
00:10:13,040 --> 00:10:16,000
Speaker 1: had a panic attack because I realized that the theories

153
00:10:16,040 --> 00:10:20,200
Speaker 1: of events that had been found in motion was um

154
00:10:20,360 --> 00:10:28,520
Speaker 1: something I couldn't change or do anything about. In addition

155
00:10:28,600 --> 00:10:32,200
Speaker 1: to the media surface, Leah faced an outcry from bitcoin

156
00:10:32,280 --> 00:10:36,280
Speaker 1: die hards online on Twitter and read it immediately with

157
00:10:36,320 --> 00:10:39,800
Speaker 1: people trying to discredit her story as well. But the

158
00:10:39,840 --> 00:10:44,319
Speaker 1: biggest blow probably came from Dorian Nakamoto himself. When reporters

159
00:10:44,360 --> 00:10:47,199
Speaker 1: confronted him on this driveway, he told them he had

160
00:10:47,320 --> 00:10:57,400
Speaker 1: never worked on cryptography or alternative currencies. It took me

161
00:10:57,480 --> 00:11:00,480
Speaker 1: a while to get Lea comfortable with talking about this

162
00:11:00,600 --> 00:11:03,840
Speaker 1: moment in her life. Corresponded with her for a few

163
00:11:03,880 --> 00:11:06,200
Speaker 1: months and met her for coffee when she visited New

164
00:11:06,240 --> 00:11:09,240
Speaker 1: York before she agreed to speak with us. I'm not

165
00:11:09,280 --> 00:11:13,359
Speaker 1: surprised she was reticent because that story was fairly discredited

166
00:11:13,360 --> 00:11:15,760
Speaker 1: in the in the tech community. So I'm dying to

167
00:11:15,840 --> 00:11:18,040
Speaker 1: know Julie. If she could go back again, would she

168
00:11:18,120 --> 00:11:20,880
Speaker 1: still write her story? Yeah? I asked her about that.

169
00:11:21,400 --> 00:11:23,600
Speaker 1: If you go back again and you knew that this

170
00:11:23,679 --> 00:11:26,360
Speaker 1: whole reaction was going to happen, and I mean, it's

171
00:11:26,360 --> 00:11:29,319
Speaker 1: sort of like altered your life quite a bit, would

172
00:11:29,320 --> 00:11:33,560
Speaker 1: you still go back and write this story? Yeah. I

173
00:11:33,600 --> 00:11:36,080
Speaker 1: have actually had this question recently put to me by

174
00:11:36,080 --> 00:11:38,840
Speaker 1: a couple other people, and I said I couldn't really

175
00:11:38,840 --> 00:11:41,600
Speaker 1: say if I would do it again to be honest,

176
00:11:42,559 --> 00:11:44,600
Speaker 1: So does she still think that Dorian is the real

177
00:11:44,600 --> 00:11:47,640
Speaker 1: said Tosi. Unlike the other people that we've talked to,

178
00:11:48,080 --> 00:11:50,840
Speaker 1: Leah is still quite certain that Dorian is a guy,

179
00:11:51,360 --> 00:11:54,400
Speaker 1: just perhaps as part of a group rather than by himself.

180
00:11:54,920 --> 00:11:57,520
Speaker 1: And we should point out that news Week never retracted

181
00:11:57,520 --> 00:12:13,439
Speaker 1: that story. That probably should have been enough to dissuade

182
00:12:13,480 --> 00:12:17,360
Speaker 1: other journalists from following in Leah's footsteps. But as the

183
00:12:17,400 --> 00:12:20,360
Speaker 1: price of bitcoin rose from two hundred dollars in the

184
00:12:20,360 --> 00:12:24,480
Speaker 1: fall to eight hundred dollars a year later, the stakes

185
00:12:24,559 --> 00:12:28,280
Speaker 1: got higher and the intrigue around the mystery of Satoshi

186
00:12:28,720 --> 00:12:32,360
Speaker 1: got even more intense and irresistible. I found it really

187
00:12:32,360 --> 00:12:35,360
Speaker 1: exciting that there was this unknown thing, like I've always

188
00:12:36,160 --> 00:12:40,320
Speaker 1: writing about whether anonymitia is possible on the Internet, and

189
00:12:40,600 --> 00:12:43,120
Speaker 1: it kind of excited me that someone had actually achieved it.

190
00:12:43,160 --> 00:12:45,920
Speaker 1: Someone had done something really significant on the Internet, and

191
00:12:45,960 --> 00:12:49,040
Speaker 1: we still didn't know who they were. That's Andy Greenberg,

192
00:12:49,240 --> 00:12:52,000
Speaker 1: the writer for Wired magazine we met at the beginning

193
00:12:52,040 --> 00:12:54,839
Speaker 1: of the episode. Brad and I traveled down to One

194
00:12:54,880 --> 00:12:58,240
Speaker 1: World Trade in Manhattan, where the Wired offices are located.

195
00:12:58,960 --> 00:13:01,800
Speaker 1: Andy has a bushy beard which he was stroking as

196
00:13:01,840 --> 00:13:04,319
Speaker 1: he was remembering a time in his life that he

197
00:13:04,360 --> 00:13:08,079
Speaker 1: had tried to forget. Andy says he was originally deflated

198
00:13:08,120 --> 00:13:11,800
Speaker 1: by the Newsweek story. He couldn't believe Satoshi was hiding

199
00:13:11,800 --> 00:13:16,040
Speaker 1: in plain sight. You see, Andy was a Setoshi hunter himself.

200
00:13:17,720 --> 00:13:20,800
Speaker 1: When he was still at Forbes magazine. He had written

201
00:13:20,800 --> 00:13:23,760
Speaker 1: a story about a man named Hal Finny. Now, How

202
00:13:23,880 --> 00:13:26,960
Speaker 1: was a computer scientist and the first person to ever

203
00:13:27,000 --> 00:13:32,640
Speaker 1: exchange emails and bitcoin with Setoshi. Andy suspected maybe How

204
00:13:32,720 --> 00:13:37,199
Speaker 1: was Setoshi himself. Andy had visited Hal, who had advanced

205
00:13:37,240 --> 00:13:39,960
Speaker 1: a LS at his home in two thousand and fourteen.

206
00:13:40,559 --> 00:13:43,080
Speaker 1: At the time, he thought it was significant that Hal

207
00:13:43,480 --> 00:13:46,840
Speaker 1: and Dorian Nakamoto lived only a half mile away from

208
00:13:46,840 --> 00:13:50,360
Speaker 1: each other in Los Angeles. Yeah, but then he concluded

209
00:13:50,600 --> 00:13:53,920
Speaker 1: it was just that confirmation bias at work. Again. There's

210
00:13:53,960 --> 00:13:56,280
Speaker 1: a line in that story that I thought was resident

211
00:13:56,400 --> 00:13:59,760
Speaker 1: and really applies to this entire kind of topic, which

212
00:13:59,800 --> 00:14:02,600
Speaker 1: as I believe that those connections were in fact random,

213
00:14:02,640 --> 00:14:04,640
Speaker 1: that Finny is telling the truth when he denies helping

214
00:14:04,679 --> 00:14:07,000
Speaker 1: to an event bitcoin, and that I am only the

215
00:14:07,000 --> 00:14:09,600
Speaker 1: most recent of a long string of journalists to succumb

216
00:14:09,600 --> 00:14:13,160
Speaker 1: to the mirage of us Atoshi Nakamoto shaped pattern in

217
00:14:13,200 --> 00:14:20,000
Speaker 1: a collection of meaningless facts. Yeah, that's it's even more

218
00:14:20,080 --> 00:14:23,280
Speaker 1: painful to think about those words now because I I

219
00:14:23,320 --> 00:14:27,560
Speaker 1: don't think I may have felt for it again. That's

220
00:14:27,600 --> 00:14:30,280
Speaker 1: because about a year after the Newsweek story fell apart

221
00:14:30,680 --> 00:14:34,840
Speaker 1: in late and he started getting encrypted emails from someone

222
00:14:34,960 --> 00:14:38,640
Speaker 1: using the name weren Brandwyn Goern said he was in

223
00:14:38,680 --> 00:14:43,040
Speaker 1: possession of emails, texts, accounting documents, and other evidence that

224
00:14:43,160 --> 00:14:48,280
Speaker 1: conclusively revealed that an esoteric Australian computer scientist named Craig

225
00:14:48,280 --> 00:14:52,400
Speaker 1: Wright was the one and only Satoshi nakamuk and he

226
00:14:52,520 --> 00:14:55,520
Speaker 1: was looking for advice and a good journalist to share

227
00:14:55,560 --> 00:15:00,400
Speaker 1: this document trove with. So of course I I couldn't

228
00:15:00,480 --> 00:15:02,840
Speaker 1: let Gun just take this to another reporter. I mean,

229
00:15:02,880 --> 00:15:07,040
Speaker 1: I would have, you know, been losing out on the

230
00:15:07,080 --> 00:15:10,640
Speaker 1: biggest story. And I'm sure I'm sure that Green knew

231
00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:14,320
Speaker 1: what he was doing, and so I negotiated with him

232
00:15:14,480 --> 00:15:18,680
Speaker 1: that we would delve into it together. Investigated cod byeline

233
00:15:18,720 --> 00:15:21,600
Speaker 1: of story, which is very strange because he's not a

234
00:15:21,680 --> 00:15:27,520
Speaker 1: journalist and I don't know his real name. Andy spent

235
00:15:27,640 --> 00:15:31,280
Speaker 1: three NonStop weeks working on the story, identifying Craig right

236
00:15:31,400 --> 00:15:35,640
Speaker 1: as Setoshi throwing himself right back into it despite his hesitation.

237
00:15:36,160 --> 00:15:40,880
Speaker 1: I dropped everything like eating and sleeping. They reported carefully

238
00:15:41,000 --> 00:15:44,840
Speaker 1: worried about inadvertently tipping off their competition. So we were

239
00:15:44,920 --> 00:15:49,600
Speaker 1: constantly doing these really kg interviews where we were just

240
00:15:49,680 --> 00:15:53,840
Speaker 1: asking these really circumspects questions that people. They spent hours

241
00:15:53,920 --> 00:15:57,920
Speaker 1: pouring over old Craig Right blog posts comparing his style

242
00:15:58,280 --> 00:16:01,920
Speaker 1: to that of Setoshi's. Andy was focusing on a possible

243
00:16:01,960 --> 00:16:04,960
Speaker 1: cover story for Wired, but he also was preparing a

244
00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:08,480
Speaker 1: shorter piece just in case he heard that competition was

245
00:16:08,560 --> 00:16:12,800
Speaker 1: working on the same story. Andy and Goren contacted Craig

246
00:16:12,880 --> 00:16:16,520
Speaker 1: Right directly, but he was cag full of hints, non

247
00:16:16,560 --> 00:16:20,080
Speaker 1: denials and even a little bit of menace. Right was

248
00:16:20,520 --> 00:16:24,840
Speaker 1: really weird right from the beginning and just got back

249
00:16:24,920 --> 00:16:29,280
Speaker 1: to us with these pseudo denials, like not really denying

250
00:16:29,360 --> 00:16:32,920
Speaker 1: that he was the guy. They were kind of menacing

251
00:16:33,320 --> 00:16:38,040
Speaker 1: responses that were not helpful but not not actual denials either,

252
00:16:38,680 --> 00:16:41,240
Speaker 1: which is like, I feel like that's what Satoshi would

253
00:16:41,240 --> 00:16:45,280
Speaker 1: do to kind of but they were meaner than Satoshi

254
00:16:45,440 --> 00:16:49,320
Speaker 1: is in his um you know, original persona. A picture

255
00:16:49,360 --> 00:16:53,320
Speaker 1: seemed to emerge of this eccentric Craig Right, who had

256
00:16:53,360 --> 00:16:57,320
Speaker 1: worked in tandem to create bitcoin with a forensic investigator

257
00:16:57,320 --> 00:17:01,480
Speaker 1: in US Army veteran named Dave Kleinman who had passed away.

258
00:17:02,520 --> 00:17:05,080
Speaker 1: And so the weird tone of Craig Rights writing, which

259
00:17:05,119 --> 00:17:08,480
Speaker 1: was kind of paranoid and angry and just very strange,

260
00:17:09,000 --> 00:17:12,119
Speaker 1: the fact that didn't match to Toshi's persona that seemed okay,

261
00:17:12,240 --> 00:17:15,080
Speaker 1: like we could explain it away. And then just as

262
00:17:15,160 --> 00:17:18,960
Speaker 1: that picture was coming into focus, Andy got word that Gizmodo,

263
00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:22,240
Speaker 1: the tech news site, was working on the same story.

264
00:17:22,840 --> 00:17:26,120
Speaker 1: Wired rushed its story onto the web. To be clear,

265
00:17:26,200 --> 00:17:28,960
Speaker 1: we did not have the opportunity to do the story

266
00:17:29,040 --> 00:17:33,240
Speaker 1: we wanted to do. Instead, I heard that Gizmodo was

267
00:17:33,240 --> 00:17:35,800
Speaker 1: working on a piece, and like an hour later we

268
00:17:35,920 --> 00:17:39,920
Speaker 1: published hours because we were not going to like run

269
00:17:39,960 --> 00:17:44,040
Speaker 1: the risk of losing what could be a big scoop.

270
00:17:49,280 --> 00:17:52,080
Speaker 1: The next few days were pretty dark for Andy. They

271
00:17:52,080 --> 00:17:55,080
Speaker 1: were miserable days because even if you get the rights,

272
00:17:55,280 --> 00:18:00,920
Speaker 1: everyone's furious a view for having violated the privacy Setoshi Nakamoto.

273
00:18:01,720 --> 00:18:04,639
Speaker 1: Members of the bigcoin community were furious at him and

274
00:18:04,680 --> 00:18:08,600
Speaker 1: Wired for trying to unmask Setoshi. Many of them believe

275
00:18:08,720 --> 00:18:11,720
Speaker 1: the world should never find out who Setoshi is and

276
00:18:11,760 --> 00:18:14,879
Speaker 1: that the person deserves the privacy. It was like he

277
00:18:14,920 --> 00:18:18,080
Speaker 1: had desecrated a temple. The blowback was as bad as

278
00:18:18,119 --> 00:18:22,320
Speaker 1: anything experienced by lea newsweek. Bitcoin is, by its nature

279
00:18:22,840 --> 00:18:25,879
Speaker 1: this thing that a lot of people see as a

280
00:18:25,920 --> 00:18:29,119
Speaker 1: privacy tool, although it actually is very difficult to use

281
00:18:29,119 --> 00:18:31,800
Speaker 1: in a private way. As you know, everybody knows. Increasingly

282
00:18:31,920 --> 00:18:35,639
Speaker 1: it's it's becoming more understood that bitcoin is not actually

283
00:18:35,720 --> 00:18:38,840
Speaker 1: very easy to use in a private way. But it

284
00:18:38,920 --> 00:18:41,840
Speaker 1: comes from the world of cryptography, where everyone is obsessed

285
00:18:41,840 --> 00:18:44,760
Speaker 1: with privacy, and so there are a lot of people

286
00:18:44,760 --> 00:18:47,640
Speaker 1: who are just angry at me and gorn and wired

287
00:18:48,040 --> 00:18:52,960
Speaker 1: for having even attempted to out the docs. Setoshi, Um,

288
00:18:53,040 --> 00:19:01,960
Speaker 1: this poor genius who just wanted to be hidden. My

289
00:19:02,080 --> 00:19:05,920
Speaker 1: Twitter mentions were just a war zone for weeks to come.

290
00:19:08,280 --> 00:19:11,040
Speaker 1: So I spent you know, these just defending the decision

291
00:19:11,520 --> 00:19:14,560
Speaker 1: to try to do this. As journalists. I hope you

292
00:19:14,640 --> 00:19:17,119
Speaker 1: guys can see that you can't you can't not do

293
00:19:17,240 --> 00:19:20,440
Speaker 1: it if the clues come to you. It's not like

294
00:19:22,080 --> 00:19:25,880
Speaker 1: it's not like it's a TOCI is just a random

295
00:19:25,960 --> 00:19:32,200
Speaker 1: private person. He would be a multi billionaire with immense

296
00:19:33,160 --> 00:19:37,320
Speaker 1: power and money and influence, you know, and that you

297
00:19:37,359 --> 00:19:41,880
Speaker 1: know that really matters, Like I do think it's completely

298
00:19:41,960 --> 00:19:45,000
Speaker 1: defensible to to to say who's a toci is if

299
00:19:45,000 --> 00:19:49,560
Speaker 1: you know. But then things got worse. A journalist from

300
00:19:49,560 --> 00:19:53,360
Speaker 1: Forbes wrote a story suggesting that Craig Right had falsified

301
00:19:53,440 --> 00:19:57,120
Speaker 1: his academic record, that he didn't in fact have multiple

302
00:19:57,200 --> 00:20:01,639
Speaker 1: PhD s, and then another reporter up information showing that

303
00:20:01,720 --> 00:20:04,600
Speaker 1: Craig Wright had backdated some of his blog posts to

304
00:20:04,680 --> 00:20:06,600
Speaker 1: make it seem like you wrote them back at the

305
00:20:06,640 --> 00:20:10,120
Speaker 1: creation of bitcoin. Yeah, and he says he knew about that,

306
00:20:10,160 --> 00:20:13,280
Speaker 1: but rationalized it. He felt like Craig was leaving him

307
00:20:13,320 --> 00:20:16,479
Speaker 1: these breadcrumbs that he'd previously concealed. You know a lot

308
00:20:16,520 --> 00:20:18,920
Speaker 1: of people have been pointing to that and said, what

309
00:20:18,960 --> 00:20:20,879
Speaker 1: were you guys thinking? You even saw that he had

310
00:20:20,880 --> 00:20:24,000
Speaker 1: backdated the blog posts? How could you be so silly?

311
00:20:24,400 --> 00:20:26,680
Speaker 1: And I don't know. It's a good point. It was

312
00:20:26,720 --> 00:20:30,159
Speaker 1: confirmation by us, like we had other evidence that was

313
00:20:30,200 --> 00:20:33,919
Speaker 1: pointing in the positive direction. So we found ways to

314
00:20:33,960 --> 00:20:37,000
Speaker 1: tell ourselves that the negative stuff didn't matter as much

315
00:20:37,040 --> 00:20:40,120
Speaker 1: as it should have. Andy followed up three days after

316
00:20:40,160 --> 00:20:43,119
Speaker 1: the original article with a story and Wired that said

317
00:20:43,280 --> 00:20:46,760
Speaker 1: that elements of craig wright story didn't add up. That

318
00:20:46,920 --> 00:20:51,600
Speaker 1: later story was titled new Clues suggests Craig Wright suspected

319
00:20:51,600 --> 00:20:55,920
Speaker 1: Bitcoin creator, maybe a hoaxer now, to be fair, and

320
00:20:56,000 --> 00:20:59,160
Speaker 1: he had hedged his original story well. He made sure

321
00:20:59,200 --> 00:21:01,760
Speaker 1: to say in that first piece that Craig could be

322
00:21:01,760 --> 00:21:04,760
Speaker 1: a huckster. But that's the kind of nuance that gets

323
00:21:04,800 --> 00:21:08,200
Speaker 1: lost in a media scrum, right, and almost didn't matter.

324
00:21:08,680 --> 00:21:12,360
Speaker 1: The Gizmoto story that also identified Craig was less careful

325
00:21:12,720 --> 00:21:16,320
Speaker 1: and together, the impression was that both publications had identified

326
00:21:16,359 --> 00:21:20,560
Speaker 1: Craig as Setoshi. Now they were seemingly big, embarrassing holes

327
00:21:20,600 --> 00:21:24,320
Speaker 1: in their stories. It seemed like another journalistic failure to

328
00:21:24,440 --> 00:21:28,040
Speaker 1: hunt Setoshi down. About six months later, by the way,

329
00:21:28,320 --> 00:21:31,960
Speaker 1: Craig Wright tried to prove publicly that he was Atoshi Nakamoto.

330
00:21:32,320 --> 00:21:36,320
Speaker 1: He gave a technical demonstration that convinced Gavin Andreessen, a

331
00:21:36,400 --> 00:21:39,600
Speaker 1: high profile member of the bitcoin community, But then a

332
00:21:39,640 --> 00:21:43,199
Speaker 1: reputable security researcher alleged that he had faked as proof.

333
00:21:43,760 --> 00:21:47,239
Speaker 1: Rights claimed to be Satoshi seems to have collapsed, at

334
00:21:47,320 --> 00:21:51,720
Speaker 1: least for now, after the whole painful episode. What really

335
00:21:51,800 --> 00:21:54,719
Speaker 1: shocked Andy was that readers didn't seem to care as

336
00:21:54,800 --> 00:21:57,440
Speaker 1: much as he thought they would, right. He actually said

337
00:21:57,440 --> 00:22:02,399
Speaker 1: readership was kind of disappointing. Craig writes story people were

338
00:22:02,480 --> 00:22:05,680
Speaker 1: less interested, Like I thought that would blow up the internet,

339
00:22:06,119 --> 00:22:08,560
Speaker 1: and it didn't because people had already gone through this

340
00:22:08,680 --> 00:22:12,720
Speaker 1: once with the newsweek piece and they kind of didn't

341
00:22:12,760 --> 00:22:16,760
Speaker 1: care as much. And then after Craig writes kind of

342
00:22:16,800 --> 00:22:22,480
Speaker 1: like disappointing mysteries, you know, resolution, but then it's not

343
00:22:22,520 --> 00:22:24,920
Speaker 1: a resolution, and then he comes out again and then

344
00:22:25,520 --> 00:22:28,959
Speaker 1: that's disproven, and it's kind of like never resolved. Uh,

345
00:22:29,480 --> 00:22:32,240
Speaker 1: it's just made the mystery much less fun. Uh, and

346
00:22:32,320 --> 00:22:36,000
Speaker 1: it's it's just kind of sad. And I I know

347
00:22:36,119 --> 00:22:39,480
Speaker 1: that I am part of making that mystery less fun.

348
00:22:39,840 --> 00:22:42,840
Speaker 1: That it makes me. It makes me sad that like

349
00:22:43,200 --> 00:22:48,280
Speaker 1: there was this kind of very pure and like super

350
00:22:48,320 --> 00:22:51,720
Speaker 1: interesting question of who's a Toci Nakamoto And now I

351
00:22:51,840 --> 00:23:02,760
Speaker 1: just get like nauseated thinking about it. And there's one

352
00:23:02,800 --> 00:23:05,840
Speaker 1: other journalist that we talked to, though, Nathaniel Popper from

353
00:23:05,840 --> 00:23:09,080
Speaker 1: the New York Times, who actually covers bitcoin but has

354
00:23:09,119 --> 00:23:11,720
Speaker 1: only made a best guess at who Setosi is rather

355
00:23:11,760 --> 00:23:15,119
Speaker 1: than writing this big expose meant to go on page

356
00:23:15,160 --> 00:23:18,200
Speaker 1: one of the paper. It doesn't mean he hasn't been interested.

357
00:23:18,600 --> 00:23:21,919
Speaker 1: He's just been extremely cautious. There's some part of me

358
00:23:21,960 --> 00:23:24,840
Speaker 1: that's always on edge, waiting for the email that finally says,

359
00:23:25,000 --> 00:23:28,160
Speaker 1: you know, here, I am here, here it is right.

360
00:23:28,400 --> 00:23:31,160
Speaker 1: I doubt anyone could be more curious about the setoci

361
00:23:31,280 --> 00:23:33,920
Speaker 1: hunt than someone like Nathan. But he says he hasn't

362
00:23:33,960 --> 00:23:36,560
Speaker 1: believed the previous attempts for more than a few hours.

363
00:23:37,040 --> 00:23:40,080
Speaker 1: You know, I remember when when Dorian, when that Newsweek

364
00:23:40,119 --> 00:23:42,840
Speaker 1: story came out, and I remember when the Craig Rights

365
00:23:42,880 --> 00:23:46,080
Speaker 1: story came out. There were certainly a few hours where

366
00:23:46,359 --> 00:23:48,520
Speaker 1: it was this open question. I thought, you know, maybe

367
00:23:48,600 --> 00:23:51,479
Speaker 1: this this is it. But I think this is one

368
00:23:51,520 --> 00:23:56,120
Speaker 1: of these cases where the kind of online mob very quickly,

369
00:23:56,840 --> 00:24:02,320
Speaker 1: uh pulls together the evidence on sized and um, you know,

370
00:24:02,800 --> 00:24:06,040
Speaker 1: people reached opinions pretty quickly. But Nathan told us that

371
00:24:06,119 --> 00:24:09,320
Speaker 1: he does hope we'll find out who Satoshi is, and

372
00:24:09,400 --> 00:24:11,800
Speaker 1: so you know, it wouldn't surprise me if we do

373
00:24:12,000 --> 00:24:15,040
Speaker 1: find out at some point. And I'll say, I'm constantly

374
00:24:15,040 --> 00:24:20,240
Speaker 1: getting emails from people who claimed to be Satoshi and say,

375
00:24:20,359 --> 00:24:23,160
Speaker 1: you know, I'm gonna I'm gonna bring forward the evidence

376
00:24:23,200 --> 00:24:25,960
Speaker 1: when the time is right. So what do you think, bred,

377
00:24:26,160 --> 00:24:29,000
Speaker 1: do you think we'll ever find out who Setoshi is?

378
00:24:29,680 --> 00:24:32,600
Speaker 1: You know, unless Satoshi comes out and move some of

379
00:24:32,600 --> 00:24:35,639
Speaker 1: that original block of bitcoin. I think there's gonna be

380
00:24:35,720 --> 00:24:39,200
Speaker 1: some ambiguity that the challenges that we've built up Setohi

381
00:24:39,320 --> 00:24:43,040
Speaker 1: into this legend. And yet people are fallible, They make mistakes,

382
00:24:43,160 --> 00:24:45,560
Speaker 1: you know, they tell little lies that can get exposed.

383
00:24:45,960 --> 00:24:48,880
Speaker 1: I think Andy Greenberg from Wired said of the best

384
00:24:48,960 --> 00:24:51,600
Speaker 1: Julie when he told us we're going to need Setoshi's

385
00:24:51,640 --> 00:24:54,479
Speaker 1: cooperation if we're ever going to settle this. What do

386
00:24:54,520 --> 00:24:57,120
Speaker 1: you think, Yeah, I think you're right. I think we've

387
00:24:57,119 --> 00:24:59,800
Speaker 1: just built up this character. And obviously, as a journalist,

388
00:25:00,280 --> 00:25:02,240
Speaker 1: I'd love to be the one to break this story.

389
00:25:02,320 --> 00:25:06,199
Speaker 1: But then as just a person watching this, this creation

390
00:25:06,440 --> 00:25:09,760
Speaker 1: and seeing how someone has escaped, you know, any sort

391
00:25:09,800 --> 00:25:12,680
Speaker 1: of tracking is just fascinating. And I don't really want

392
00:25:12,680 --> 00:25:15,600
Speaker 1: Setoci to ever be found either. Right, there are a

393
00:25:15,640 --> 00:25:18,080
Speaker 1: lot of members of the bitcoin community that want them

394
00:25:18,080 --> 00:25:20,960
Speaker 1: to come back now, because there there's this division right

395
00:25:21,040 --> 00:25:24,040
Speaker 1: in the community between kind of traditional bitcoin and something

396
00:25:24,040 --> 00:25:27,960
Speaker 1: called bitcoin Cash, there's lots of animosity without getting too

397
00:25:27,960 --> 00:25:30,400
Speaker 1: deep into the split, I mean, it's a tocy come

398
00:25:30,400 --> 00:25:34,040
Speaker 1: back and establish some some order to this world. I

399
00:25:34,040 --> 00:25:35,879
Speaker 1: mean there's pros and cons of that too, right, it

400
00:25:35,880 --> 00:25:39,480
Speaker 1: would be nice to have someone come established order. But

401
00:25:39,560 --> 00:25:42,840
Speaker 1: it was also a bitcoins, something that's supposed to be

402
00:25:42,880 --> 00:25:46,000
Speaker 1: so decentralized and not really have one thing ruling it. It

403
00:25:45,920 --> 00:25:48,879
Speaker 1: It was just meant to be perfect that the onset

404
00:25:48,920 --> 00:25:52,200
Speaker 1: and now you know, all these divisions had happened. There's

405
00:25:52,240 --> 00:25:54,680
Speaker 1: other cryptocurrencies out there that people say are going to

406
00:25:54,760 --> 00:25:57,600
Speaker 1: be better than Bitcoin, and it's just going to be

407
00:25:57,680 --> 00:26:01,000
Speaker 1: such an interesting story to keep following. Maybe we do

408
00:26:01,160 --> 00:26:03,760
Speaker 1: keep Stoshi alone as an icon. I mean, one of

409
00:26:03,800 --> 00:26:06,960
Speaker 1: the great things about this is that he you know,

410
00:26:07,040 --> 00:26:10,560
Speaker 1: he establishes that there is such a thing as anonymity online. Right.

411
00:26:10,920 --> 00:26:14,000
Speaker 1: That principle has been undermined so many times over the years,

412
00:26:14,240 --> 00:26:22,920
Speaker 1: and yet Stocia kind of re establishes it. And that's

413
00:26:22,960 --> 00:26:26,600
Speaker 1: it for this week's Decrypted. Thanks for listening. Join us

414
00:26:26,640 --> 00:26:29,680
Speaker 1: next week for an even more special episode where we

415
00:26:29,760 --> 00:26:34,719
Speaker 1: revealed the true identity of Satoshi Nakamotive. That's not true, folks,

416
00:26:34,720 --> 00:26:37,160
Speaker 1: but do let us know what you thought of today's show.

417
00:26:37,560 --> 00:26:40,840
Speaker 1: You can email us at decrypted at bloomberg dot net

418
00:26:41,400 --> 00:26:43,800
Speaker 1: or reach out to me on Twitter and I'm at

419
00:26:43,880 --> 00:26:47,159
Speaker 1: Julie ver H and I'm at brad Stone. If you

420
00:26:47,200 --> 00:26:50,800
Speaker 1: haven't already subscribed to our show wherever you get your podcasts,

421
00:26:51,160 --> 00:26:54,040
Speaker 1: and leave us a rating or a reef. It really

422
00:26:54,040 --> 00:26:57,919
Speaker 1: help us reach new listeners. This episode was produced by

423
00:26:58,000 --> 00:27:02,960
Speaker 1: Pia Gedkari, Magnus hand Lesen, Liz Smith and tofor Foreheaz.

424
00:27:03,560 --> 00:27:06,800
Speaker 1: Francesco Levie is the head of Bloomberg Podcasts and We'll

425
00:27:06,800 --> 00:27:21,639
Speaker 1: see you next week. M