1
00:00:07,240 --> 00:00:09,639
Speaker 1: Hey there, everyone, and welcome back to the Betting Pros

2
00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:13,240
Speaker 1: NFL Podcast, brought to you by Bet MGM. I'm your host,

3
00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:15,240
Speaker 1: Dan Harris and you can find me on Twitter at

4
00:00:15,320 --> 00:00:18,040
Speaker 1: Dan Harris Adi. It is time for our early look

5
00:00:18,040 --> 00:00:20,040
Speaker 1: at next week's lines, and with me to break it

6
00:00:20,079 --> 00:00:23,680
Speaker 1: all down is Chris Jamino, director of Premium content over

7
00:00:23,680 --> 00:00:26,280
Speaker 1: at Roto Grinders. You can find him on Twitter at

8
00:00:26,360 --> 00:00:29,800
Speaker 1: Chris Jamino. That's g I M I n OL. Chris.

9
00:00:29,840 --> 00:00:31,360
Speaker 1: Thanks a lot for coming on the show today. How's

10
00:00:31,360 --> 00:00:32,880
Speaker 1: it going, Oh, it's going great.

11
00:00:32,920 --> 00:00:36,360
Speaker 2: I've got minshew Mania and Live bet the Jaguars right

12
00:00:36,400 --> 00:00:38,720
Speaker 2: at the end of that Denver game last week, so

13
00:00:39,000 --> 00:00:41,080
Speaker 2: I ended up making a little bit of a what

14
00:00:41,159 --> 00:00:43,199
Speaker 2: was a pretty bad week otherwise, So I'm ready to

15
00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:43,800
Speaker 2: talk football.

16
00:00:44,000 --> 00:00:46,199
Speaker 1: I'm a little encouraged to hear that you had a

17
00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:47,880
Speaker 1: bad week because I had a terrible week and I

18
00:00:47,960 --> 00:00:49,720
Speaker 1: had been going on a really good run and I'm

19
00:00:49,760 --> 00:00:52,680
Speaker 1: hearing this, frankly from a lot of people. This week

20
00:00:52,760 --> 00:00:55,000
Speaker 1: was just brutal, man. I mean, you know, I didn't

21
00:00:55,360 --> 00:00:58,000
Speaker 1: I tried to stay away from the public whenever I could,

22
00:00:58,040 --> 00:01:00,400
Speaker 1: but I found myself going with you know, a lot

23
00:01:00,400 --> 00:01:02,920
Speaker 1: of the favorites that we're getting a lot of the

24
00:01:03,000 --> 00:01:06,039
Speaker 1: numbers of bets backing, and it was just a brutal

25
00:01:06,080 --> 00:01:08,600
Speaker 1: week for me. So I'm glad other than you managed

26
00:01:08,600 --> 00:01:11,280
Speaker 1: to stalvage a little bit with the Jaguars Broncos game.

27
00:01:11,480 --> 00:01:13,080
Speaker 1: I'm glad to hear that it was also a tough

28
00:01:13,080 --> 00:01:16,040
Speaker 1: week for you, because it really I got my butt kicked.

29
00:01:16,040 --> 00:01:18,000
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna lie about it, but hopefully we can

30
00:01:18,040 --> 00:01:20,199
Speaker 1: turn around here now. I want to say off the bat,

31
00:01:20,319 --> 00:01:22,120
Speaker 1: how excited I am not to have to deal with

32
00:01:22,120 --> 00:01:25,000
Speaker 1: the line on whatever game the Dolphins usually play because

33
00:01:25,000 --> 00:01:27,560
Speaker 1: they're on a bye, because I think we're basically in

34
00:01:27,760 --> 00:01:30,400
Speaker 1: historic territory here with the Finns and I never know

35
00:01:30,440 --> 00:01:32,880
Speaker 1: how to properly analyze align with them. Are you with

36
00:01:32,959 --> 00:01:35,160
Speaker 1: me there by the way that they've basically broken the

37
00:01:35,240 --> 00:01:36,959
Speaker 1: NFL sports betting framework or what?

38
00:01:37,640 --> 00:01:38,160
Speaker 3: No, I'm not.

39
00:01:38,240 --> 00:01:40,280
Speaker 2: I think that their draw of opponents has just been

40
00:01:40,319 --> 00:01:42,160
Speaker 2: brutal to start this season. I think that we're talking

41
00:01:42,160 --> 00:01:44,680
Speaker 2: about some really good teams that they've seen so far. Now,

42
00:01:44,680 --> 00:01:47,360
Speaker 2: I do think they're bad. I don't think they're historically bad,

43
00:01:47,400 --> 00:01:50,520
Speaker 2: but they're definitely near the bottom. I mean, I look

44
00:01:50,560 --> 00:01:52,240
Speaker 2: at this team over and I don't see a lot

45
00:01:52,240 --> 00:01:55,840
Speaker 2: of redeeming qualities. But I don't know if I'm necessarily

46
00:01:56,040 --> 00:01:58,800
Speaker 2: in agreement that this is some sort of historically bad team,

47
00:01:58,800 --> 00:02:00,480
Speaker 2: at least not the very worst team you've seen. I mean,

48
00:02:00,760 --> 00:02:02,000
Speaker 2: you know, back in the day, there were some pretty

49
00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:03,480
Speaker 2: bad Saints teams and stuff. So I don't know if

50
00:02:03,480 --> 00:02:04,320
Speaker 2: this is the worst one ever.

51
00:02:04,560 --> 00:02:06,560
Speaker 1: I think that's fair to me. I don't know, man,

52
00:02:06,680 --> 00:02:08,800
Speaker 1: when I'm looking at them, I'm wondering where they're going

53
00:02:08,840 --> 00:02:11,600
Speaker 1: to rank historically in terrible teams. And regardless, the bottom

54
00:02:11,639 --> 00:02:13,799
Speaker 1: line is that every single week I see value in

55
00:02:13,880 --> 00:02:17,200
Speaker 1: the line and I can't bring myself to pull the

56
00:02:17,240 --> 00:02:19,600
Speaker 1: trigger on it. Which has been good, but I don't

57
00:02:19,639 --> 00:02:21,880
Speaker 1: know how high the lines need to get for me

58
00:02:21,919 --> 00:02:24,359
Speaker 1: to feel comfortable with them. But regardless, today you and

59
00:02:24,440 --> 00:02:26,040
Speaker 1: I are going to go through each game. Now, we're

60
00:02:26,040 --> 00:02:28,720
Speaker 1: going to be using the consensus odds over at bettingpros

61
00:02:28,760 --> 00:02:31,000
Speaker 1: dot com. That's an aggregation of the odds that are

62
00:02:31,000 --> 00:02:33,480
Speaker 1: available on the market. As always, there are going to

63
00:02:33,520 --> 00:02:36,440
Speaker 1: be differences at the various sports books, so shop around

64
00:02:36,760 --> 00:02:38,760
Speaker 1: for the best odds. Also, if you want to see

65
00:02:38,760 --> 00:02:41,160
Speaker 1: how some of the top sports betting experts are leaning

66
00:02:41,200 --> 00:02:44,560
Speaker 1: on any given bet at any given time. Bettingpros dot

67
00:02:44,560 --> 00:02:46,840
Speaker 1: Com is going to show you that too. All right, Chris,

68
00:02:46,880 --> 00:02:48,679
Speaker 1: let's slide right in here with the Rams at the

69
00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:51,240
Speaker 1: Seahawks on Thursday night. Now, this line, as far as

70
00:02:51,280 --> 00:02:53,520
Speaker 1: I can tell, it has bounced around a ton. I

71
00:02:53,520 --> 00:02:55,920
Speaker 1: think the early look at the Rams favored by at

72
00:02:56,000 --> 00:02:57,880
Speaker 1: least a couple of points. I checked last night and

73
00:02:57,919 --> 00:03:00,600
Speaker 1: the Rams were favored by one. But now these Seahawks

74
00:03:00,840 --> 00:03:03,440
Speaker 1: are favored by one and the over under is forty nine.

75
00:03:03,520 --> 00:03:06,360
Speaker 1: You have any major reaction to that line.

76
00:03:06,320 --> 00:03:08,400
Speaker 2: Yeah, this might be one of my favorite spots that

77
00:03:08,440 --> 00:03:09,960
Speaker 2: I've looked at so far earlier in the week. I

78
00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:12,480
Speaker 2: just think that the Rams are going to be undervalued

79
00:03:12,480 --> 00:03:14,760
Speaker 2: at this point after the performance they had last week

80
00:03:14,800 --> 00:03:18,280
Speaker 2: against Jameis Winston. You know, the defense definitely let them down.

81
00:03:18,280 --> 00:03:23,000
Speaker 2: Marcus Peters got shredded for a long touchdown by Mike Evans.

82
00:03:23,120 --> 00:03:25,160
Speaker 2: You know, there was just a lot of breakdowns and

83
00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:28,400
Speaker 2: some turnovers that really made this team look pretty bad.

84
00:03:28,480 --> 00:03:30,519
Speaker 2: I think that's probably what we're seeing here as the

85
00:03:30,560 --> 00:03:32,440
Speaker 2: line fluctuates back and forth. But at the end of

86
00:03:32,440 --> 00:03:34,960
Speaker 2: the day, if we're going to give the Seahawks favorite

87
00:03:34,960 --> 00:03:37,000
Speaker 2: status here, then I'm definitely going to take the Rams

88
00:03:37,120 --> 00:03:38,280
Speaker 2: on the money line straight up.

89
00:03:38,720 --> 00:03:40,960
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't. I mean, look, when you're moving from

90
00:03:41,120 --> 00:03:43,360
Speaker 1: minus one from the Rams to minus one from the Seahawks,

91
00:03:43,400 --> 00:03:45,680
Speaker 1: it doesn't really do anything, you know, it's kind of

92
00:03:45,680 --> 00:03:48,080
Speaker 1: a meaningless move when you're looking at the spread. But

93
00:03:48,200 --> 00:03:51,160
Speaker 1: I do think that this is an overreaction to yesterday's game.

94
00:03:51,160 --> 00:03:52,760
Speaker 1: I don't know what that was. I mean, it was

95
00:03:52,920 --> 00:03:55,839
Speaker 1: shocking basically how bad the Rams defense was ripped apart

96
00:03:55,880 --> 00:03:58,560
Speaker 1: by Jameis Winston. But really in the other end, I mean,

97
00:03:58,600 --> 00:04:00,760
Speaker 1: maybe people are reading a bit too much into it.

98
00:04:00,960 --> 00:04:02,480
Speaker 1: From the Seahawks side of it as well. They have

99
00:04:02,560 --> 00:04:05,960
Speaker 1: a pretty convincing win over and admittedly bad Arizona team.

100
00:04:06,200 --> 00:04:09,400
Speaker 1: I think the difference is that realistically, the Seahawks have

101
00:04:09,600 --> 00:04:12,520
Speaker 1: not looked very good, and they didn't even look great

102
00:04:13,000 --> 00:04:16,160
Speaker 1: yesterday against Arizona. They did get the defensive touchdown where

103
00:04:16,200 --> 00:04:18,120
Speaker 1: Clowning made the great play on the screen, but you know,

104
00:04:18,200 --> 00:04:19,919
Speaker 1: other than that, you know, I think they put up

105
00:04:19,960 --> 00:04:22,440
Speaker 1: twenty seven points, So I think they put up twenty overall,

106
00:04:22,520 --> 00:04:25,680
Speaker 1: not an overly impressive showing, so I'm inclined to agree

107
00:04:25,680 --> 00:04:27,280
Speaker 1: with you. The total doesn't jump out at me, But

108
00:04:27,320 --> 00:04:29,840
Speaker 1: for me, I'm definitely seeing value on the Rams here

109
00:04:29,880 --> 00:04:31,800
Speaker 1: at the early number, and I don't know which way

110
00:04:31,800 --> 00:04:34,440
Speaker 1: it's going to go because it really has bounced back

111
00:04:34,440 --> 00:04:36,680
Speaker 1: and forth pretty quickly. Of course that there's in that game,

112
00:04:36,720 --> 00:04:38,760
Speaker 1: there's not much more time for it to go. But

113
00:04:38,880 --> 00:04:41,400
Speaker 1: either way, I agree with you. I certainly see value

114
00:04:41,400 --> 00:04:43,600
Speaker 1: on the Rams. Let's move on to the Bills at

115
00:04:43,600 --> 00:04:45,840
Speaker 1: the Titans. The Titans here are laying two and a

116
00:04:45,920 --> 00:04:48,760
Speaker 1: half and the over unders at a pretty low thirty

117
00:04:48,800 --> 00:04:50,840
Speaker 1: eight and a half. Obviously, there's a question mark right

118
00:04:50,880 --> 00:04:53,799
Speaker 1: now around Josh Allen, who remains in the concussion protocol.

119
00:04:53,880 --> 00:04:56,200
Speaker 1: You've got two strong defenses, and to be fair, I

120
00:04:56,279 --> 00:04:58,720
Speaker 1: undersold the Bills defense completely. I thought the Pats were

121
00:04:58,720 --> 00:05:01,200
Speaker 1: going to go up there and be able to cover

122
00:05:01,240 --> 00:05:03,760
Speaker 1: that spread of seven. They really could have lost that

123
00:05:03,760 --> 00:05:06,080
Speaker 1: game pretty easily. But what's the reaction here, Titans laying

124
00:05:06,080 --> 00:05:08,440
Speaker 1: two and a half over under at thirty eight and

125
00:05:08,440 --> 00:05:08,799
Speaker 1: a half.

126
00:05:09,279 --> 00:05:09,479
Speaker 3: Yeah.

127
00:05:09,520 --> 00:05:11,719
Speaker 2: I like the Titans last week because I didn't think

128
00:05:11,760 --> 00:05:14,520
Speaker 2: the type of offense that Atlanta I was bringing to

129
00:05:14,560 --> 00:05:17,120
Speaker 2: the table you know, if you know, presuming that they

130
00:05:17,160 --> 00:05:19,200
Speaker 2: could find a way to take the deep ball away

131
00:05:19,560 --> 00:05:22,560
Speaker 2: from Julio and Ridley, then I thought that the Titans

132
00:05:22,640 --> 00:05:25,120
Speaker 2: defense was going to be a good matchup for the Falcons,

133
00:05:25,160 --> 00:05:26,880
Speaker 2: and I like the Titans last week. I don't think

134
00:05:27,040 --> 00:05:28,640
Speaker 2: the same is true at all for Buffalo. If Josh

135
00:05:28,680 --> 00:05:30,640
Speaker 2: Allen's back, right, I do think that you know, John

136
00:05:30,680 --> 00:05:32,640
Speaker 2: Brown basically is a specialist in the deep ball, and

137
00:05:32,839 --> 00:05:35,000
Speaker 2: you know, Malcolm Butler is just completely capable of being

138
00:05:35,040 --> 00:05:36,800
Speaker 2: torched in any spot. I don't want to get to,

139
00:05:37,279 --> 00:05:40,120
Speaker 2: you know, bogged down on rating a team based on

140
00:05:40,120 --> 00:05:42,560
Speaker 2: one offensive matchup. I do really think that the biggest

141
00:05:42,560 --> 00:05:44,560
Speaker 2: advantage for this game, of any side is going to

142
00:05:44,600 --> 00:05:46,719
Speaker 2: be the Bills defense against this Titans offense. You know,

143
00:05:46,760 --> 00:05:49,040
Speaker 2: the Falcons defense was missing a ton of characters last week.

144
00:05:49,080 --> 00:05:52,080
Speaker 2: They were able to get shredded and give up, you know,

145
00:05:52,080 --> 00:05:54,039
Speaker 2: get some big plays against that Atlanta defense. I do

146
00:05:54,120 --> 00:05:56,320
Speaker 2: not think that will be the case against Buffalo. Buffalo

147
00:05:56,360 --> 00:05:59,120
Speaker 2: specializes in preventing such big plays. So at the end

148
00:05:59,120 --> 00:06:00,800
Speaker 2: of the day, I do you think Buffalo is at

149
00:06:00,839 --> 00:06:02,160
Speaker 2: the advantage here? And I like them in the.

150
00:06:02,120 --> 00:06:04,720
Speaker 1: Spot out of curiosity does the fact that Allen is

151
00:06:04,760 --> 00:06:06,600
Speaker 1: in the concussion protocol, what do you do with that

152
00:06:06,720 --> 00:06:08,840
Speaker 1: as a better Do you just wait and hold on,

153
00:06:08,880 --> 00:06:10,760
Speaker 1: do you try to get in on it now and

154
00:06:10,800 --> 00:06:12,839
Speaker 1: hope for the best, or how do you approach that well?

155
00:06:12,880 --> 00:06:14,120
Speaker 2: I think I want to watch that game one more

156
00:06:14,120 --> 00:06:17,440
Speaker 2: time because Matt Barkley to me looked way more competent

157
00:06:17,480 --> 00:06:19,280
Speaker 2: than I ever saw him or thought of him before.

158
00:06:19,279 --> 00:06:20,960
Speaker 2: And I think the same was true in the preseason

159
00:06:20,960 --> 00:06:23,440
Speaker 2: when I saw Barkley operate this offense. So I really

160
00:06:23,440 --> 00:06:25,880
Speaker 2: want to get a good look at how that offense

161
00:06:25,920 --> 00:06:28,640
Speaker 2: looks with him. There could be some value. Here's what

162
00:06:28,680 --> 00:06:31,440
Speaker 2: I'm saying is if the public doesn't think he's, you know,

163
00:06:31,520 --> 00:06:33,479
Speaker 2: ready for prime time, ready to step in there and

164
00:06:33,480 --> 00:06:35,040
Speaker 2: do the job, I really think the Bills would win

165
00:06:35,040 --> 00:06:37,040
Speaker 2: this game on defense anyway, So as long as he's

166
00:06:37,040 --> 00:06:39,240
Speaker 2: able to manage the game, I would still not be

167
00:06:39,279 --> 00:06:42,159
Speaker 2: shying away from Buffalo, just purely on the presence of

168
00:06:42,160 --> 00:06:44,159
Speaker 2: Matt Barkley. I don't think Josh Allen's that great of

169
00:06:44,200 --> 00:06:46,279
Speaker 2: a quarterback either, so I don't know if the jump

170
00:06:46,320 --> 00:06:48,479
Speaker 2: is as big as people would expect from Barkley to Allen.

171
00:06:48,480 --> 00:06:49,840
Speaker 3: Maybe that's a hot take, but that's just how.

172
00:06:49,760 --> 00:06:52,760
Speaker 1: I feel now. I mean, look from a fantasy perspective.

173
00:06:52,760 --> 00:06:55,320
Speaker 1: You and I both do fantasy work. Of course, Allan

174
00:06:55,600 --> 00:06:57,719
Speaker 1: is great because he provides you know, value with his

175
00:06:57,800 --> 00:07:00,680
Speaker 1: rushing ability. But he is one of the least accurate

176
00:07:00,720 --> 00:07:02,680
Speaker 1: passers in the NFL. There's no doubt about that. And

177
00:07:02,720 --> 00:07:05,760
Speaker 1: when Barkley stepped in, yeah, he looked better overall than

178
00:07:05,800 --> 00:07:08,040
Speaker 1: Alan did. Really in that game, he moved the ball

179
00:07:08,240 --> 00:07:11,680
Speaker 1: relatively well considering he was thrown into the Lions then

180
00:07:11,680 --> 00:07:13,760
Speaker 1: there against the Pats, But I agree, I don't expect

181
00:07:13,800 --> 00:07:16,200
Speaker 1: it to have too much of an impact on the

182
00:07:16,240 --> 00:07:19,240
Speaker 1: spread here, even though quarterbacks can Barkley again, with how

183
00:07:19,280 --> 00:07:21,480
Speaker 1: he looked. You mentioned the preseason as well, and he

184
00:07:21,480 --> 00:07:23,560
Speaker 1: looked fine against New England, I'm not sure it would

185
00:07:23,560 --> 00:07:25,640
Speaker 1: have that big of an impact. Let's move on here

186
00:07:25,680 --> 00:07:28,640
Speaker 1: to the Falcons at the Texans. The Texans here are

187
00:07:28,720 --> 00:07:30,560
Speaker 1: laying four and a half and the over under his

188
00:07:30,600 --> 00:07:33,320
Speaker 1: forty nine, two teams coming off really bad losses. The

189
00:07:33,400 --> 00:07:36,119
Speaker 1: Falcons look kind of in disarray. The defense is really

190
00:07:36,120 --> 00:07:38,559
Speaker 1: compromised without Ken O'Neil in there. How are you feeling

191
00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:40,480
Speaker 1: about this when Texans laying four and a half at

192
00:07:40,480 --> 00:07:41,800
Speaker 1: home over under forty nine.

193
00:07:42,160 --> 00:07:43,960
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean the total is definitely the thing I'd

194
00:07:43,960 --> 00:07:45,680
Speaker 2: be looking at first here. I mean, I'm not so

195
00:07:45,800 --> 00:07:48,600
Speaker 2: sure that I think the Falcons are that good of

196
00:07:48,600 --> 00:07:50,960
Speaker 2: a team. They're one in three and they're just really

197
00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:53,440
Speaker 2: really brutal on defense, and the Texans offense is probably

198
00:07:53,480 --> 00:07:56,120
Speaker 2: capable of getting their share of the points in this game.

199
00:07:56,280 --> 00:07:58,080
Speaker 2: The question is whether the Falcons can put up the

200
00:07:58,080 --> 00:07:59,760
Speaker 2: points on the Texans, and that's why be looking at

201
00:07:59,760 --> 00:08:02,520
Speaker 2: the It's a pretty good line at forty nine. I'm

202
00:08:02,520 --> 00:08:05,000
Speaker 2: not excited to get the over on this, but I

203
00:08:05,000 --> 00:08:06,760
Speaker 2: think if I was leading in anything right now, would

204
00:08:06,800 --> 00:08:09,160
Speaker 2: be you know, can the Falcons get the job done

205
00:08:09,160 --> 00:08:11,800
Speaker 2: against his Texans defense? And then then I would be interested,

206
00:08:11,840 --> 00:08:12,560
Speaker 2: of course in the over.

207
00:08:13,160 --> 00:08:16,200
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean the Texans have been a little disappointing

208
00:08:16,280 --> 00:08:18,080
Speaker 1: on offense, at least to me. I mean, I know,

209
00:08:18,160 --> 00:08:21,239
Speaker 1: you know, the problems with the offensive line. Watson's holding

210
00:08:21,240 --> 00:08:23,520
Speaker 1: the ball for way too long, so they aren't putting

211
00:08:23,600 --> 00:08:26,360
Speaker 1: up the points. And you know, they've played some tough

212
00:08:26,360 --> 00:08:28,840
Speaker 1: defenses here. They played the Jaguars, of course, where they

213
00:08:28,840 --> 00:08:31,000
Speaker 1: weren't able to do much they played the Panthers, and

214
00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:33,640
Speaker 1: the Panthers have a solid defense mostly against the pass,

215
00:08:33,760 --> 00:08:36,040
Speaker 1: less against the run, which is sort of, you know,

216
00:08:36,240 --> 00:08:38,840
Speaker 1: really goes against what the Texans can do. They don't

217
00:08:38,880 --> 00:08:41,560
Speaker 1: run the ball that well with Hide and Duke Johnson.

218
00:08:41,559 --> 00:08:44,360
Speaker 1: It's fine, but it's not their strength over here. Yeah,

219
00:08:44,400 --> 00:08:46,600
Speaker 1: I didn't have a strong lean when I first looked

220
00:08:46,600 --> 00:08:50,480
Speaker 1: at this game. I mean, forty nine, it's around kind

221
00:08:50,480 --> 00:08:51,839
Speaker 1: of where I expected to be in the four and

222
00:08:51,840 --> 00:08:54,440
Speaker 1: a half is fine, but really I'm wondering whether the

223
00:08:54,480 --> 00:08:59,200
Speaker 1: Falcons here are gonna kind of start really really tailing off,

224
00:08:59,280 --> 00:09:02,080
Speaker 1: because I think they just cannot get it going. Yesterday,

225
00:09:02,120 --> 00:09:05,160
Speaker 1: they you know, barely anything to Julio Jones. Ridley has

226
00:09:05,200 --> 00:09:07,720
Speaker 1: basically been phased out at this point. Austin Hooper is

227
00:09:07,720 --> 00:09:09,679
Speaker 1: having a great year, but they're really not going to

228
00:09:09,679 --> 00:09:13,040
Speaker 1: be able to sustain an offensive philosophy dumping the ball

229
00:09:13,080 --> 00:09:15,400
Speaker 1: off to Demonta Freeman constantly and going through Austin Hooper.

230
00:09:15,440 --> 00:09:17,520
Speaker 1: So for me, I'm not quite as confident this. I

231
00:09:17,559 --> 00:09:19,720
Speaker 1: really want to go back and watch yesterday's game, but

232
00:09:19,800 --> 00:09:22,240
Speaker 1: it's something where I don't have a strong lean on

233
00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:23,960
Speaker 1: it as of yet. But it has not moved as

234
00:09:24,000 --> 00:09:25,600
Speaker 1: far as I can tell from the look aheadline, so

235
00:09:25,640 --> 00:09:27,959
Speaker 1: I think this is probably in the end four and

236
00:09:27,960 --> 00:09:30,280
Speaker 1: a half and over under forty nine is basically around

237
00:09:30,280 --> 00:09:32,280
Speaker 1: where it's going to get up, give or take half

238
00:09:32,320 --> 00:09:34,880
Speaker 1: a point. Let's move on here to a divisional matchup

239
00:09:34,960 --> 00:09:38,160
Speaker 1: Ravens at the Steelers. The Ravens are currently minus four

240
00:09:38,200 --> 00:09:40,000
Speaker 1: and the over under is at forty two and a half.

241
00:09:40,080 --> 00:09:43,240
Speaker 1: Now we're recording this before the Monday night game, so obviously,

242
00:09:43,240 --> 00:09:45,920
Speaker 1: if there are any significant developments on the Steelers side

243
00:09:45,920 --> 00:09:47,920
Speaker 1: of the ball, the line could move. Two teams who

244
00:09:47,960 --> 00:09:50,439
Speaker 1: know each other really well. They always battle out close.

245
00:09:50,679 --> 00:09:52,720
Speaker 1: How are you feeling about this one? Ravens minus four

246
00:09:52,960 --> 00:09:53,920
Speaker 1: at Pittsburgh.

247
00:09:54,240 --> 00:09:57,600
Speaker 2: Yeah, the Pittsburgh defense is a pretty good unit. But

248
00:09:57,920 --> 00:10:00,640
Speaker 2: I still think that if we're talking about, you know,

249
00:10:00,720 --> 00:10:02,560
Speaker 2: just a four point favorite for the Ravens, I think

250
00:10:02,559 --> 00:10:05,280
Speaker 2: that overall there's still a much better team. If their

251
00:10:05,679 --> 00:10:08,640
Speaker 2: defensive health improves at all, I would really like them

252
00:10:08,640 --> 00:10:11,319
Speaker 2: in the spot at minus four. I certainly don't think

253
00:10:11,360 --> 00:10:16,800
Speaker 2: that Pittsburgh under Mason Rudolph's command is necessarily a strong

254
00:10:16,840 --> 00:10:17,160
Speaker 2: team to.

255
00:10:17,160 --> 00:10:17,840
Speaker 3: Be betting right now.

256
00:10:17,880 --> 00:10:19,520
Speaker 2: I don't know what they are, yet I don't really

257
00:10:19,520 --> 00:10:22,040
Speaker 2: have a strong take on whether or not they can

258
00:10:22,080 --> 00:10:24,360
Speaker 2: cover a spread versus a team like the Ravens. But

259
00:10:24,480 --> 00:10:26,800
Speaker 2: I think the Ravens underperformed this week, and I think

260
00:10:26,840 --> 00:10:29,760
Speaker 2: that they might have otherwise been bigger favorites here. So

261
00:10:29,840 --> 00:10:32,600
Speaker 2: minus four is something I would possibly be looking at here.

262
00:10:32,800 --> 00:10:35,480
Speaker 1: I'm really surprised that the spread isn't higher. I mean,

263
00:10:35,679 --> 00:10:37,520
Speaker 1: you know, because it's not as if it came down

264
00:10:37,920 --> 00:10:40,160
Speaker 1: when the Ravens just got their butts kicked by the Browns.

265
00:10:40,200 --> 00:10:42,480
Speaker 1: I mean, it was kind of I think the look

266
00:10:42,520 --> 00:10:45,520
Speaker 1: headline was relatively where it was. I think, if anything,

267
00:10:45,720 --> 00:10:48,840
Speaker 1: it leaned a little bit closer towards the Ravens here.

268
00:10:49,080 --> 00:10:51,480
Speaker 1: For me, I don't know. My initial gut on this

269
00:10:51,559 --> 00:10:53,040
Speaker 1: is that there's going to be money that comes in

270
00:10:53,040 --> 00:10:55,040
Speaker 1: on the Ravens that's going to push it a little

271
00:10:55,040 --> 00:10:58,720
Speaker 1: bit higher and the over under. Neither one of these

272
00:10:58,760 --> 00:11:02,400
Speaker 1: teams has a defense that is particularly good at this point.

273
00:11:02,480 --> 00:11:04,800
Speaker 1: I mean, the Ravens, as you mentioned, are banged up,

274
00:11:05,000 --> 00:11:06,959
Speaker 1: but you knew coming in that their defense was not

275
00:11:07,000 --> 00:11:08,760
Speaker 1: going to be as strong as it has been in

276
00:11:08,840 --> 00:11:11,280
Speaker 1: previous years, and I think that's showing itself to be

277
00:11:11,280 --> 00:11:13,280
Speaker 1: true right now. Now. Whether or not the Steelers are

278
00:11:13,320 --> 00:11:15,440
Speaker 1: able to move the ball against them, there's a whole

279
00:11:15,559 --> 00:11:18,040
Speaker 1: nother question, but that's more about the Steelers offense. I

280
00:11:18,080 --> 00:11:21,000
Speaker 1: think Mason Rudolph, who has not looked good, will get

281
00:11:21,040 --> 00:11:23,440
Speaker 1: better as he gets more comfortable playing in the NFL.

282
00:11:23,480 --> 00:11:25,640
Speaker 1: But for me, both the numbers stood out to me.

283
00:11:25,920 --> 00:11:29,040
Speaker 1: At the Ravens laying four seemed light, and I felt

284
00:11:29,040 --> 00:11:30,559
Speaker 1: like the over under at forty two and a half

285
00:11:30,640 --> 00:11:32,520
Speaker 1: also seemed light. Out of curiosity, do you have any

286
00:11:32,520 --> 00:11:34,640
Speaker 1: feel on that over under? Is that about right where

287
00:11:34,679 --> 00:11:35,520
Speaker 1: you think it should be?

288
00:11:35,840 --> 00:11:36,920
Speaker 3: I mean, that's about right.

289
00:11:36,960 --> 00:11:38,760
Speaker 2: Like I said, the defense for the Steelers is a

290
00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:40,840
Speaker 2: pretty good unit, so I would not be expecting a

291
00:11:40,840 --> 00:11:42,520
Speaker 2: ton of scoring in this game. That seems right to me.

292
00:11:42,800 --> 00:11:44,760
Speaker 2: You know, It's worth noting that like this is going

293
00:11:44,840 --> 00:11:46,880
Speaker 2: to be a very public side. Looks like tons of

294
00:11:46,880 --> 00:11:50,400
Speaker 2: money rolling in on the Ravens already as a percentage,

295
00:11:50,600 --> 00:11:52,199
Speaker 2: and the number of bets as well.

296
00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:54,280
Speaker 1: So I'm just do you draw conclusions from that out

297
00:11:54,280 --> 00:11:57,559
Speaker 1: of curiosity this early on in the week, because I'm.

298
00:11:57,320 --> 00:11:59,360
Speaker 2: Not really I mean, I'm just pointing out that that's

299
00:11:59,400 --> 00:12:02,280
Speaker 2: the trend is that the public side is probably going

300
00:12:02,280 --> 00:12:04,800
Speaker 2: to end up being the Ravens side unless this line

301
00:12:04,840 --> 00:12:08,840
Speaker 2: moves significantly. And I don't know, I just I don't

302
00:12:08,880 --> 00:12:12,080
Speaker 2: love just like completely getting a lot of money on

303
00:12:12,160 --> 00:12:14,200
Speaker 2: bets that are just like purely public that the books

304
00:12:14,440 --> 00:12:17,720
Speaker 2: are knowing that they're going to need for their particular week.

305
00:12:17,760 --> 00:12:19,280
Speaker 2: I mean, at the end of the day, that's just

306
00:12:19,640 --> 00:12:21,760
Speaker 2: it doesn't seem like good process right to be that

307
00:12:22,320 --> 00:12:24,040
Speaker 2: far against the book. I mean, the book definitely knows

308
00:12:24,040 --> 00:12:24,960
Speaker 2: what they're getting into here.

309
00:12:25,080 --> 00:12:28,000
Speaker 1: Absolutely, numbers like this scare me a little bit when

310
00:12:28,040 --> 00:12:30,360
Speaker 1: I have a very strong feeling on it, because I

311
00:12:30,400 --> 00:12:32,400
Speaker 1: feel like, exactly as you said, this strikes me as

312
00:12:32,440 --> 00:12:34,160
Speaker 1: a number that I think that John Q. Public is

313
00:12:34,200 --> 00:12:35,959
Speaker 1: going to look at it, and maybe the books are

314
00:12:35,960 --> 00:12:38,200
Speaker 1: banking on the fact that the Ravens look so terrible

315
00:12:38,200 --> 00:12:40,319
Speaker 1: against the Browns that they're not going to get all

316
00:12:40,320 --> 00:12:42,920
Speaker 1: that much money. I don't really think that's necessarily going

317
00:12:42,960 --> 00:12:44,520
Speaker 1: to be the case. I think a team like the Ravens,

318
00:12:44,559 --> 00:12:47,160
Speaker 1: given how they performed early on and they lost a

319
00:12:47,200 --> 00:12:49,160
Speaker 1: close game to the Chiefs, I think the public is

320
00:12:49,160 --> 00:12:50,440
Speaker 1: still going to be on them. So when I see

321
00:12:50,440 --> 00:12:54,680
Speaker 1: these numbers. They strike me as it's likely that the

322
00:12:54,760 --> 00:12:57,160
Speaker 1: number of bets and you know, we'll see about the money,

323
00:12:57,160 --> 00:12:59,040
Speaker 1: because that's more about the sharp betters. But the number

324
00:12:59,080 --> 00:13:00,800
Speaker 1: of bets is going to be wrongly in favor of

325
00:13:00,840 --> 00:13:03,160
Speaker 1: the Ravens, which makes me a little worried because that's

326
00:13:03,320 --> 00:13:06,000
Speaker 1: how I initially lean, and you really don't lose money

327
00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:08,000
Speaker 1: when you fade the public. So it is something that

328
00:13:08,040 --> 00:13:10,920
Speaker 1: I think this line is certainly capable of moving, depending

329
00:13:10,960 --> 00:13:12,959
Speaker 1: on how the money comes in. Let's move on here

330
00:13:12,960 --> 00:13:15,600
Speaker 1: to the Patriots at the Redskins. The Patriots are currently

331
00:13:15,679 --> 00:13:18,160
Speaker 1: laying fifteen and a half. Now, this was fourteen and

332
00:13:18,200 --> 00:13:21,040
Speaker 1: a half when I checked yesterday. The over under is

333
00:13:21,200 --> 00:13:23,360
Speaker 1: forty four and a half. Last I saw Jay Gruden

334
00:13:23,400 --> 00:13:27,600
Speaker 1: decline to name a starter. If he does name Haskins,

335
00:13:27,640 --> 00:13:31,080
Speaker 1: I would assume the spread it would probably jump in

336
00:13:31,120 --> 00:13:33,600
Speaker 1: favor of the Patriots by maybe a point or something

337
00:13:33,640 --> 00:13:35,960
Speaker 1: like that. And even though case Keenum did not look

338
00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:38,040
Speaker 1: all that good. So Patriots on the road here at

339
00:13:38,040 --> 00:13:40,520
Speaker 1: the Redskins laying fifteen and a half with a total

340
00:13:40,720 --> 00:13:42,080
Speaker 1: of forty four and a half. How do you feel

341
00:13:42,080 --> 00:13:42,480
Speaker 1: about that?

342
00:13:43,520 --> 00:13:46,440
Speaker 2: Do you think the Patriots will score forty four points

343
00:13:46,480 --> 00:13:50,000
Speaker 2: or forty five points, because I just have no confidence

344
00:13:50,040 --> 00:13:52,720
Speaker 2: whatsoever in the Washington offense in the spot. Just just

345
00:13:52,720 --> 00:13:55,720
Speaker 2: give me the under here until I can convince myself

346
00:13:55,760 --> 00:13:58,400
Speaker 2: the Patriots are going to score more than whatever whatever

347
00:13:58,440 --> 00:14:01,080
Speaker 2: the total is, because I really think shutout is well

348
00:14:01,080 --> 00:14:02,640
Speaker 2: within the range of outcomes here for watching it.

349
00:14:02,640 --> 00:14:03,200
Speaker 3: That will happen.

350
00:14:03,280 --> 00:14:06,280
Speaker 2: But I mean, will they score ten points? I would

351
00:14:06,320 --> 00:14:07,840
Speaker 2: not bet the over on ten I don't think. I

352
00:14:07,840 --> 00:14:10,320
Speaker 2: really think that this defense is very good and the

353
00:14:10,360 --> 00:14:11,960
Speaker 2: Washington offense is very bad.

354
00:14:12,200 --> 00:14:15,720
Speaker 1: Yeah, don't sell it short. A shutout could legitimately happen here.

355
00:14:15,720 --> 00:14:18,040
Speaker 1: I mean, especially if it's Haskins throwing themall. I mean, look,

356
00:14:18,120 --> 00:14:22,160
Speaker 1: they were they allowed their first you know, offensive touchdown

357
00:14:22,480 --> 00:14:25,200
Speaker 1: against the Bills, but they held them in check entirely.

358
00:14:25,240 --> 00:14:29,000
Speaker 1: They faced a run of really bad opponents, Steelers perhaps

359
00:14:29,080 --> 00:14:31,440
Speaker 1: being the exception in opening week. But that defense is

360
00:14:31,520 --> 00:14:35,440
Speaker 1: one hundred percent legitimate. So, I mean, honestly, out of curiosity,

361
00:14:35,520 --> 00:14:37,920
Speaker 1: if you are analyzing the game that way, which I

362
00:14:37,920 --> 00:14:40,880
Speaker 1: think it's one hundred percent correct, what's wrong with the

363
00:14:40,920 --> 00:14:42,680
Speaker 1: Pats laying fifteen and a half? I mean, the Pats

364
00:14:42,680 --> 00:14:44,960
Speaker 1: are going to score you know, they had a tough

365
00:14:45,000 --> 00:14:47,640
Speaker 1: Bills team and they scored sixteen and they looked terrible.

366
00:14:47,720 --> 00:14:49,840
Speaker 1: I mean, do you think they're gonna probably wind up

367
00:14:49,880 --> 00:14:52,480
Speaker 1: coming up putting up above twenty above, you know, twenty

368
00:14:52,520 --> 00:14:54,000
Speaker 1: four or something like that here.

369
00:14:55,080 --> 00:14:57,320
Speaker 2: Boy, you know, I just don't. I don't like to

370
00:14:57,320 --> 00:14:59,160
Speaker 2: get involved with Patriots long. I don't know what it

371
00:14:59,200 --> 00:15:01,520
Speaker 2: is about these Patriot lines when you're talking about like

372
00:15:01,560 --> 00:15:04,320
Speaker 2: because in theory, when you see an NFL team getting

373
00:15:04,320 --> 00:15:05,720
Speaker 2: two touchdowns, you're not supposed to like that.

374
00:15:05,800 --> 00:15:07,520
Speaker 1: I don't think that's what I was saying with the

375
00:15:07,560 --> 00:15:09,960
Speaker 1: Dolphins where I don't. I never like it, and so

376
00:15:10,000 --> 00:15:12,400
Speaker 1: I'm always like, man, there's value here in the Dolphins,

377
00:15:12,560 --> 00:15:15,680
Speaker 1: and that's why I meant like, I cannot take them. Look, Washington,

378
00:15:16,080 --> 00:15:18,440
Speaker 1: they're not anywhere close to that at this point. But

379
00:15:18,480 --> 00:15:20,640
Speaker 1: if they throw Haskins into there, and you know, the

380
00:15:20,680 --> 00:15:24,520
Speaker 1: problem was Jay grun I think did this correctly. Okay,

381
00:15:24,560 --> 00:15:28,280
Speaker 1: he did not throw Haskins into that Monday night game

382
00:15:28,280 --> 00:15:31,040
Speaker 1: against the Bears, right because he would have gotten absolutely destroyed.

383
00:15:31,200 --> 00:15:33,240
Speaker 1: Keenan was terrible in this game against the Giants. The

384
00:15:33,280 --> 00:15:35,880
Speaker 1: Giants have a terrible defense. They threw them out there like, Okay,

385
00:15:35,880 --> 00:15:38,400
Speaker 1: this is it. It's a weak defense, and he was awful.

386
00:15:38,440 --> 00:15:41,240
Speaker 1: I mean that the Redskins really there was no Terry McLaurin,

387
00:15:41,320 --> 00:15:44,600
Speaker 1: to be fair, but the Redskins could be approaching not

388
00:15:44,800 --> 00:15:47,640
Speaker 1: Dolphin level, because I think Dolphins level is really bad,

389
00:15:47,640 --> 00:15:49,560
Speaker 1: but they could be a team that you're gonna be

390
00:15:49,600 --> 00:15:52,560
Speaker 1: seeing these spreads that are going to be pushing sixteen seventeen.

391
00:15:52,600 --> 00:15:54,280
Speaker 1: And I agree, I don't really like to get involved

392
00:15:54,280 --> 00:15:57,160
Speaker 1: in it, although I'll be honest, this one piques my

393
00:15:57,200 --> 00:15:58,800
Speaker 1: interest a little bit. I think it's gonna rise, by

394
00:15:58,840 --> 00:16:00,840
Speaker 1: the way. I think whatever happens, I think when this closes,

395
00:16:00,840 --> 00:16:02,280
Speaker 1: it is going to be more like sixteen and a

396
00:16:02,320 --> 00:16:04,440
Speaker 1: half or something like that. But we'll have to see.

397
00:16:04,440 --> 00:16:07,240
Speaker 1: But you're saying, essentially you like the total at least

398
00:16:07,280 --> 00:16:09,920
Speaker 1: on an initial glance, right, because you think essentially that

399
00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:12,240
Speaker 1: Washington's going to have trouble scoring. And I think you're

400
00:16:12,240 --> 00:16:14,120
Speaker 1: putting it probably on the Patriots, let's say, to be

401
00:16:14,160 --> 00:16:16,640
Speaker 1: held under you know, thirty five or something like that, right.

402
00:16:17,200 --> 00:16:19,320
Speaker 2: Yeah, And you know I would consider the total if

403
00:16:19,520 --> 00:16:22,920
Speaker 2: I could get it, like without it rising substantially. And

404
00:16:23,000 --> 00:16:25,240
Speaker 2: I was and I knew for sure Haskins was a QBA.

405
00:16:25,320 --> 00:16:26,760
Speaker 2: Can I tell you a secret that I don't think

406
00:16:26,800 --> 00:16:29,360
Speaker 2: anyone needs to know just yet, But I think I

407
00:16:29,400 --> 00:16:32,400
Speaker 2: think Dwayne Haskins might not be good. No, like I

408
00:16:32,400 --> 00:16:35,680
Speaker 2: think now after watching preseason and watching that performance last week,

409
00:16:36,000 --> 00:16:38,640
Speaker 2: like the you know, the whispers are starting in my head,

410
00:16:38,680 --> 00:16:40,320
Speaker 2: like this guy doesn't look that good.

411
00:16:40,480 --> 00:16:44,240
Speaker 1: Okay, look, everybody, okay, you have now heard it here first.

412
00:16:44,320 --> 00:16:46,840
Speaker 1: Okay from Chris Jamino. You have heard it here. It's

413
00:16:46,920 --> 00:16:50,200
Speaker 1: possible that Dwayne Haskins is not good. Okay, So look,

414
00:16:50,240 --> 00:16:52,160
Speaker 1: don't go spreading it around because it's kind of a

415
00:16:52,160 --> 00:16:54,400
Speaker 1: secret and he told you that in confidence, but it

416
00:16:54,440 --> 00:16:56,400
Speaker 1: is possible that it could be true. Yeah, it's really

417
00:16:56,440 --> 00:16:59,360
Speaker 1: funny the way the season has unfolded with Daniel Jones.

418
00:16:59,400 --> 00:17:01,600
Speaker 1: You know, looking he didn't look great in this past game,

419
00:17:01,840 --> 00:17:04,439
Speaker 1: but looking so much better given all the flak that

420
00:17:04,520 --> 00:17:06,359
Speaker 1: the Giants got for him. So yes, if Haskins is

421
00:17:06,400 --> 00:17:08,439
Speaker 1: named the starter, I'll be all over whatever it is

422
00:17:08,480 --> 00:17:10,479
Speaker 1: in favor of the Patriots. But my guess is he's

423
00:17:10,520 --> 00:17:13,280
Speaker 1: gonna go with Keenum here just to protect him, since

424
00:17:13,400 --> 00:17:17,199
Speaker 1: Haskins looked completely completely unprepared to go up against an

425
00:17:17,280 --> 00:17:19,520
Speaker 1: NFL team. Before we move on, I do want to

426
00:17:19,560 --> 00:17:22,280
Speaker 1: tell everyone about the sponsor of today's show, bet MGM.

427
00:17:22,520 --> 00:17:25,240
Speaker 1: Now you know about bet mgm already, and in particular

428
00:17:25,560 --> 00:17:28,399
Speaker 1: the bet mgm Sports app, because it's the easiest and

429
00:17:28,480 --> 00:17:30,159
Speaker 1: best way to place a bet. If you're in the

430
00:17:30,200 --> 00:17:32,439
Speaker 1: state of New Jersey. Just search for and download the

431
00:17:32,440 --> 00:17:36,080
Speaker 1: betmgm Sports app on your phone or visit betmgm dot com,

432
00:17:36,320 --> 00:17:38,359
Speaker 1: sign up for an account, and you can place a

433
00:17:38,400 --> 00:17:40,679
Speaker 1: bet right from your home. And once you sign up

434
00:17:40,680 --> 00:17:42,960
Speaker 1: for an account, you're gonna want to pay attention because

435
00:17:43,000 --> 00:17:47,359
Speaker 1: bet mgm offers boosted bets and promotions across all major sports.

436
00:17:47,400 --> 00:17:49,639
Speaker 1: For example, I just mentioned Daniel Jones. Well, there was

437
00:17:49,640 --> 00:17:52,560
Speaker 1: a Daniel Jones boosted bet last week where the odds

438
00:17:52,560 --> 00:17:54,879
Speaker 1: on him to throw even a single touchdown pass were

439
00:17:54,960 --> 00:17:58,080
Speaker 1: dropped significantly such that you could make even money if

440
00:17:58,080 --> 00:17:59,879
Speaker 1: you placed a bet. Ordinarily that would have been at

441
00:18:00,200 --> 00:18:03,000
Speaker 1: minus three seventy five. They also let you track your

442
00:18:03,000 --> 00:18:05,680
Speaker 1: bets in real time, and they offer early cash outs

443
00:18:05,880 --> 00:18:08,040
Speaker 1: where you can settle a bet before the game ends

444
00:18:08,080 --> 00:18:10,639
Speaker 1: to lock in winnings or cut your losses. And if

445
00:18:10,680 --> 00:18:12,440
Speaker 1: you sign up right now, you can get a free

446
00:18:12,880 --> 00:18:16,200
Speaker 1: five hundred dollars bet. Here's the deal. When you download

447
00:18:16,200 --> 00:18:18,720
Speaker 1: the bet mgm sports app and you sign up using

448
00:18:18,760 --> 00:18:22,080
Speaker 1: our promo code Harris. That is my last name, Harris,

449
00:18:22,280 --> 00:18:24,400
Speaker 1: then your first bet of up to five hundred dollars

450
00:18:24,520 --> 00:18:28,520
Speaker 1: is risk free. If you lose, bet mgm is going

451
00:18:28,560 --> 00:18:31,040
Speaker 1: to credit you the amount you lost up to five

452
00:18:31,119 --> 00:18:33,639
Speaker 1: hundred dollars for future wagers. So I just want to

453
00:18:33,640 --> 00:18:36,800
Speaker 1: make that clear. It is a risk free five hundred

454
00:18:36,840 --> 00:18:40,119
Speaker 1: dollars wager. You're just basically costing yourself money if you

455
00:18:40,119 --> 00:18:42,159
Speaker 1: don't sign up. So just download the app and use

456
00:18:42,200 --> 00:18:44,600
Speaker 1: the promo code Harris to claim the promotion, and you

457
00:18:44,600 --> 00:18:47,520
Speaker 1: can go to betmgm dot com for further details. You

458
00:18:47,560 --> 00:18:49,440
Speaker 1: must be twenty one years or older. And although you

459
00:18:49,480 --> 00:18:52,200
Speaker 1: can sign up an easily deposit money anywhere, you must

460
00:18:52,200 --> 00:18:53,680
Speaker 1: be in the state of New Jersey to place a

461
00:18:53,720 --> 00:18:56,560
Speaker 1: sports bet. Visit betmgm dot com for the full list

462
00:18:56,560 --> 00:18:58,560
Speaker 1: of terms and conditions. And if you've got a gambling

463
00:18:58,600 --> 00:19:01,360
Speaker 1: problem called one eight hundred ambler. All right, Chris, let's

464
00:19:01,359 --> 00:19:04,119
Speaker 1: move on to our next game here, Cardinals at the Bengals.

465
00:19:04,160 --> 00:19:06,560
Speaker 1: Now again, this is something where we have not yet

466
00:19:06,600 --> 00:19:08,640
Speaker 1: seen the Bengals on Monday night, So this could move

467
00:19:08,720 --> 00:19:11,400
Speaker 1: depending on a variety of factors. But as of right now,

468
00:19:11,400 --> 00:19:13,760
Speaker 1: it's the Bengals are laying four and a half points

469
00:19:14,000 --> 00:19:15,920
Speaker 1: and the over under is at forty eight and a half.

470
00:19:15,960 --> 00:19:16,800
Speaker 1: How do you feel about that?

471
00:19:16,920 --> 00:19:18,880
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think there could be some points scored tonight

472
00:19:18,920 --> 00:19:22,920
Speaker 2: here in this game with the Steelers. I don't necessarily

473
00:19:22,960 --> 00:19:24,639
Speaker 2: think all that or even most of that's going to

474
00:19:24,680 --> 00:19:26,600
Speaker 2: come from the Bengals side, but I do think that

475
00:19:27,359 --> 00:19:30,480
Speaker 2: shootouts tend to happen when there's two bad defenses facing

476
00:19:30,520 --> 00:19:33,000
Speaker 2: offenses that can operate with efficiency, especially if there's a

477
00:19:33,000 --> 00:19:35,520
Speaker 2: lot of play volume, and these are two new offenses

478
00:19:35,520 --> 00:19:37,200
Speaker 2: that really want to get a lot of plays off,

479
00:19:37,240 --> 00:19:39,960
Speaker 2: really want to be more involved in the past game

480
00:19:40,640 --> 00:19:43,320
Speaker 2: right now, the opponents that the Cardinals and Bengals have

481
00:19:43,400 --> 00:19:46,360
Speaker 2: faced have not maybe exposed the way that they both

482
00:19:46,440 --> 00:19:48,880
Speaker 2: want to play when they're operating at their most efficient,

483
00:19:49,160 --> 00:19:50,600
Speaker 2: And I do think that the over has a good

484
00:19:50,680 --> 00:19:53,320
Speaker 2: chance of hitting here if in fact, these defenses are

485
00:19:53,320 --> 00:19:55,760
Speaker 2: as bad as I think they are. Both teams in

486
00:19:55,840 --> 00:19:59,800
Speaker 2: the bottom ten of positive play percentage per Sports Info Solutions.

487
00:20:00,240 --> 00:20:03,560
Speaker 2: The Cardinals were eleventh before yesterday's game. I can't imagine

488
00:20:03,560 --> 00:20:07,160
Speaker 2: they improved after that performance last week. So I'm expecting

489
00:20:07,200 --> 00:20:09,480
Speaker 2: the offenses to be more efficient than they've been to

490
00:20:09,520 --> 00:20:11,280
Speaker 2: start this season. And I would really be looking at

491
00:20:11,280 --> 00:20:13,320
Speaker 2: the over here in this spot when I look at

492
00:20:13,359 --> 00:20:15,680
Speaker 2: the way this shakes out, don't don't. I can't say

493
00:20:15,680 --> 00:20:16,920
Speaker 2: I'm like loving it, but I do like it a

494
00:20:16,960 --> 00:20:17,320
Speaker 2: little bit.

495
00:20:17,440 --> 00:20:19,840
Speaker 1: No, I totally agree with you the over if anything

496
00:20:19,880 --> 00:20:21,840
Speaker 1: stuck out to me on this one. I think both

497
00:20:21,960 --> 00:20:23,680
Speaker 1: offenses are going to be able to move the ball.

498
00:20:23,720 --> 00:20:26,639
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, Murray and the Arizona offense was

499
00:20:26,680 --> 00:20:29,520
Speaker 1: not good against Seattle. I fully admit that, and Seattle

500
00:20:29,640 --> 00:20:32,320
Speaker 1: doesn't have a great defense in my opinion, so it

501
00:20:32,480 --> 00:20:34,840
Speaker 1: was a little bit of a negative factor. But certainly

502
00:20:34,880 --> 00:20:36,919
Speaker 1: this is going to be against a Bengals team on

503
00:20:37,000 --> 00:20:40,080
Speaker 1: a short week both offenses. I like what Zach Taylor

504
00:20:40,119 --> 00:20:43,200
Speaker 1: has done with the Bengals offense and against Arizona you

505
00:20:43,240 --> 00:20:45,920
Speaker 1: don't have to have a world beating offense to be

506
00:20:45,960 --> 00:20:47,600
Speaker 1: able to put up a lot of points. And I

507
00:20:47,640 --> 00:20:49,320
Speaker 1: think in the end, the Cardinals are probably going to

508
00:20:49,359 --> 00:20:50,600
Speaker 1: come out They're going to do what they usually do,

509
00:20:50,640 --> 00:20:53,080
Speaker 1: which is script the first couple of drives for Murray,

510
00:20:53,080 --> 00:20:54,560
Speaker 1: and I think they're probably going to be able to

511
00:20:54,600 --> 00:20:56,800
Speaker 1: put up points, So I agree early lean here would

512
00:20:56,840 --> 00:20:58,720
Speaker 1: be over on the forty eight and a half. The

513
00:20:58,800 --> 00:21:00,800
Speaker 1: Bengals laying four and a half. I don't really have

514
00:21:00,840 --> 00:21:02,880
Speaker 1: a good feel for at this point. Even assuming nothing

515
00:21:02,880 --> 00:21:04,760
Speaker 1: happens that strikes me as around the right number, I

516
00:21:04,760 --> 00:21:06,639
Speaker 1: think it's gonna basically stay there. I don't think the

517
00:21:06,640 --> 00:21:09,119
Speaker 1: sharps will necessarily favor one side or the other, so

518
00:21:09,160 --> 00:21:11,600
Speaker 1: I think that's probably where we'll end up. Let's move

519
00:21:11,640 --> 00:21:14,240
Speaker 1: on to the Jaguars at the Panthers. The Panthers here

520
00:21:14,520 --> 00:21:16,840
Speaker 1: are laying three and a half and the over unders

521
00:21:16,840 --> 00:21:19,520
Speaker 1: at forty one. Kyle Allen will start again. Not sure

522
00:21:19,560 --> 00:21:22,399
Speaker 1: if we're gonna see Jalen Ramsey on the field. You

523
00:21:22,440 --> 00:21:24,560
Speaker 1: know he missed this one with his back injury, but

524
00:21:24,600 --> 00:21:26,440
Speaker 1: he's also said he's not sure whether or not he's

525
00:21:26,440 --> 00:21:29,120
Speaker 1: gonna play another game for the Jaguars. So how about here,

526
00:21:29,200 --> 00:21:31,680
Speaker 1: Panthers at home laying three and a half with an

527
00:21:31,680 --> 00:21:32,760
Speaker 1: over under at forty one.

528
00:21:33,359 --> 00:21:34,800
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think if I was going to take a

529
00:21:34,840 --> 00:21:36,480
Speaker 2: side on the total here, it would probably be on

530
00:21:36,520 --> 00:21:39,919
Speaker 2: the underdog Jaguars against the Panthers. I actually don't have

531
00:21:39,920 --> 00:21:42,000
Speaker 2: a lot of respect for what the Panthers are doing

532
00:21:42,040 --> 00:21:43,840
Speaker 2: so far. I think they still need to prove it

533
00:21:43,840 --> 00:21:45,840
Speaker 2: to me as far as what they can do as

534
00:21:45,880 --> 00:21:49,679
Speaker 2: a team defensively. On offense, certainly they've got plenty of

535
00:21:50,000 --> 00:21:52,320
Speaker 2: plenty of capability, but this would be a matchup where,

536
00:21:52,480 --> 00:21:54,360
Speaker 2: you know, the Jaguars might have the tools to put

537
00:21:54,400 --> 00:21:57,160
Speaker 2: a damper on Christian McCaffrey and maybe not allow him

538
00:21:57,160 --> 00:22:02,439
Speaker 2: to just run completely wild. You know, you know, watching

539
00:22:02,520 --> 00:22:05,000
Speaker 2: Joe Flacco move the ball a little bit wasn't that encouraging.

540
00:22:05,040 --> 00:22:08,120
Speaker 2: And we've seen some negative signs from the Jaguars defense too,

541
00:22:08,119 --> 00:22:10,000
Speaker 2: So I'm not saying that there's some end all be

542
00:22:10,119 --> 00:22:13,000
Speaker 2: all type of a defensive unit here, But I you know,

543
00:22:13,000 --> 00:22:14,719
Speaker 2: I don't really love either one of these sides. It's

544
00:22:14,720 --> 00:22:16,240
Speaker 2: a pretty good line, but if I was going to

545
00:22:16,280 --> 00:22:18,840
Speaker 2: lean one way, it would be towards the Jaguars because I, again,

546
00:22:18,880 --> 00:22:19,920
Speaker 2: I don't have a lot of trust in what the

547
00:22:19,920 --> 00:22:20,880
Speaker 2: Panthers are doing right now.

548
00:22:21,119 --> 00:22:24,320
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't really feel great about the spread. I mean,

549
00:22:24,720 --> 00:22:27,280
Speaker 1: I want to look at Gardner Minchew and see how

550
00:22:27,280 --> 00:22:28,920
Speaker 1: he actually came out because I know he's limping a

551
00:22:28,960 --> 00:22:31,000
Speaker 1: little bit at the end of that game. It strikes

552
00:22:31,040 --> 00:22:33,160
Speaker 1: me about right. For me, the total again is where

553
00:22:33,200 --> 00:22:35,040
Speaker 1: I look a little bit. And you mentioned it. If

554
00:22:35,080 --> 00:22:37,720
Speaker 1: you were going one way or the other, you probably

555
00:22:37,840 --> 00:22:39,560
Speaker 1: might be looking at the other. That's where I'm looking

556
00:22:39,600 --> 00:22:42,320
Speaker 1: at it, because I really I like Kyle Allen as

557
00:22:42,600 --> 00:22:44,520
Speaker 1: more of a game manager. But the guy who threw

558
00:22:44,640 --> 00:22:47,439
Speaker 1: four touchdown passes or whatever against the Cardinals, that's not

559
00:22:47,480 --> 00:22:49,639
Speaker 1: what he is. Okay, He's going to be able to

560
00:22:49,800 --> 00:22:51,840
Speaker 1: keep your team in the game. He's more accurate than

561
00:22:51,880 --> 00:22:54,600
Speaker 1: Cam Newton was when you know he was being bothered

562
00:22:54,840 --> 00:22:56,720
Speaker 1: by his foot or shoulder or whatever. In the end

563
00:22:57,040 --> 00:22:58,600
Speaker 1: that it turned out to be and that's fine. But

564
00:22:58,640 --> 00:23:01,040
Speaker 1: I don't see this as an explode of offense at all.

565
00:23:01,040 --> 00:23:03,960
Speaker 1: And the Jaguars still have a relatively strong defense. I

566
00:23:03,960 --> 00:23:06,480
Speaker 1: know Joe Flacco, as you mentioned, was able to move

567
00:23:06,480 --> 00:23:09,080
Speaker 1: the ball pretty well, especially at the end, and on

568
00:23:09,119 --> 00:23:11,119
Speaker 1: the other side of the ball. Look the Jaguars. You know,

569
00:23:11,480 --> 00:23:14,320
Speaker 1: Minshew's got a little magic going. But the Panthers are

570
00:23:14,320 --> 00:23:17,159
Speaker 1: tough against the pass. They really are. They're able to

571
00:23:17,160 --> 00:23:18,840
Speaker 1: get to the quarterback a little bit, but they've got

572
00:23:18,880 --> 00:23:22,720
Speaker 1: strong cornerbacks, especially Bradberry, they're a little vulnerable against the run,

573
00:23:22,760 --> 00:23:24,960
Speaker 1: and so I think the Jaguars plan of attack, assuming

574
00:23:25,000 --> 00:23:28,000
Speaker 1: that Leonard Fournett can carry the load once again, would

575
00:23:28,040 --> 00:23:30,680
Speaker 1: be to probably control the game on the ground, which

576
00:23:30,800 --> 00:23:33,640
Speaker 1: leads me to a low scoring thing. And with the Panthers,

577
00:23:33,680 --> 00:23:35,360
Speaker 1: I mean, I had the one bet that I kind

578
00:23:35,359 --> 00:23:38,920
Speaker 1: of nailed and had in really early this past week

579
00:23:39,080 --> 00:23:42,639
Speaker 1: was the under on the Panthers game because I think

580
00:23:42,840 --> 00:23:44,440
Speaker 1: that's how they really are going to play these games.

581
00:23:44,480 --> 00:23:46,800
Speaker 1: They're going to play these tight, low scoring games and

582
00:23:46,840 --> 00:23:48,679
Speaker 1: try to win it out with their defense and with

583
00:23:48,760 --> 00:23:50,480
Speaker 1: managing it. So that's really how I would see that.

584
00:23:50,520 --> 00:23:53,280
Speaker 1: The total again not high, it's only for to one,

585
00:23:53,680 --> 00:23:56,080
Speaker 1: but I think in the end, if I lean one way,

586
00:23:56,280 --> 00:23:57,960
Speaker 1: it would probably be on the under in this game.

587
00:23:58,720 --> 00:24:01,200
Speaker 1: Bucks at Saints would be next game. Now, this has

588
00:24:01,200 --> 00:24:03,719
Speaker 1: been bouncing back and forth a little bit. The Saints

589
00:24:03,760 --> 00:24:06,000
Speaker 1: right now are laying four and a half points at

590
00:24:06,000 --> 00:24:08,200
Speaker 1: home to the Bucks. It was when I checked last

591
00:24:08,280 --> 00:24:10,280
Speaker 1: night four and a half. I checked this morning it

592
00:24:10,320 --> 00:24:12,080
Speaker 1: was five and a half. I checked right before we

593
00:24:12,160 --> 00:24:13,800
Speaker 1: came on, and it's back to four and a half.

594
00:24:13,960 --> 00:24:16,000
Speaker 1: The over under is at forty eight. Both teams are

595
00:24:16,000 --> 00:24:19,360
Speaker 1: coming off really really big time wins, the Saints relying

596
00:24:19,359 --> 00:24:21,800
Speaker 1: on their defense to beat the Cowboys, the Bucks lighting

597
00:24:21,800 --> 00:24:23,960
Speaker 1: it up against the Rams. As we talked about earlier,

598
00:24:24,160 --> 00:24:25,240
Speaker 1: what's your thoughts on this one?

599
00:24:26,280 --> 00:24:27,040
Speaker 3: Give me the Saints.

600
00:24:27,160 --> 00:24:29,400
Speaker 2: I do not have faith that what we saw last

601
00:24:29,400 --> 00:24:32,040
Speaker 2: week from Tampa Bay is something that you can expect

602
00:24:32,080 --> 00:24:35,400
Speaker 2: with consistency. Jameis Winston has proven to be an inefficient

603
00:24:35,480 --> 00:24:38,480
Speaker 2: quarterback and someone who doesn't even operate that well when

604
00:24:38,520 --> 00:24:41,639
Speaker 2: the pockets clean. So if you know the Saints can

605
00:24:41,680 --> 00:24:44,400
Speaker 2: do anything close to what they did against Dallas last

606
00:24:44,440 --> 00:24:47,919
Speaker 2: night defensively, I mean just you know, I would I

607
00:24:47,920 --> 00:24:50,520
Speaker 2: would easily easily easily shy away from thinking that the

608
00:24:50,560 --> 00:24:52,520
Speaker 2: Tampa Bay Buccaneers or anywhere close to as good of

609
00:24:52,600 --> 00:24:54,840
Speaker 2: a team as what the Saints can be, you know,

610
00:24:54,880 --> 00:24:57,560
Speaker 2: even without Drew Brees right, like we've seen them come

611
00:24:57,800 --> 00:24:59,920
Speaker 2: through with the game plan that's you know, really try

612
00:25:00,240 --> 00:25:02,480
Speaker 2: to slow down these games and really turn it into

613
00:25:02,920 --> 00:25:05,080
Speaker 2: you know, more of a grinded out type of a situation.

614
00:25:05,600 --> 00:25:08,159
Speaker 2: And I don't think the Tampa Bay Buccaneers farewell in

615
00:25:08,160 --> 00:25:10,399
Speaker 2: that scenario at all, especially not on the road. So

616
00:25:10,920 --> 00:25:14,840
Speaker 2: I'm you know, my you know, to spread. If I

617
00:25:14,880 --> 00:25:16,560
Speaker 2: can get three points, I would like that the best.

618
00:25:16,560 --> 00:25:18,239
Speaker 2: If I can get better than that, even better, But

619
00:25:18,640 --> 00:25:21,719
Speaker 2: you know otherwise, I'm just not like in love with

620
00:25:21,920 --> 00:25:23,240
Speaker 2: Tampa Bay at all, And I would.

621
00:25:23,040 --> 00:25:25,719
Speaker 1: Like the Saints for almost the same exact reasons. I

622
00:25:25,760 --> 00:25:29,280
Speaker 1: really like the under here, okay, because I think the

623
00:25:29,359 --> 00:25:31,240
Speaker 1: way you describe this is exactly right. I mean, James

624
00:25:31,240 --> 00:25:33,959
Speaker 1: Winston's a little doctor Jackal and mister Hyde, right. I mean,

625
00:25:34,000 --> 00:25:36,920
Speaker 1: you do not know how this team is gonna come

626
00:25:36,920 --> 00:25:39,399
Speaker 1: out necessarily, and the Saints, as they showed yesterday, have

627
00:25:39,480 --> 00:25:42,040
Speaker 1: a really really strong defense. It's going to be a

628
00:25:42,040 --> 00:25:44,479
Speaker 1: divisional game, which means they're going to get up for it.

629
00:25:44,560 --> 00:25:47,200
Speaker 1: And I don't expect the Bucks to be able to

630
00:25:47,240 --> 00:25:49,800
Speaker 1: put up a ton of points in this game for

631
00:25:49,960 --> 00:25:52,600
Speaker 1: basically exactly the reasons that you said. At the same time,

632
00:25:52,880 --> 00:25:55,120
Speaker 1: I don't think these Saints are built to do that either.

633
00:25:55,200 --> 00:25:58,959
Speaker 1: I mean, Bridgewater is basically out there to manage the games,

634
00:25:59,200 --> 00:26:02,399
Speaker 1: to rely on the defense, and to win kind of close, close,

635
00:26:02,600 --> 00:26:04,840
Speaker 1: you know, hard fought in the trenches type of game.

636
00:26:04,920 --> 00:26:07,600
Speaker 1: So in the end, I also favor the Saints. I'm

637
00:26:07,600 --> 00:26:08,920
Speaker 1: not sure I love it at four and a half.

638
00:26:09,000 --> 00:26:10,600
Speaker 1: It's if you can get it closer. I think I

639
00:26:10,600 --> 00:26:12,440
Speaker 1: would lean that way too. I do think the Saints

640
00:26:12,440 --> 00:26:15,040
Speaker 1: are going to win, but the total for me because

641
00:26:15,080 --> 00:26:16,600
Speaker 1: of that, because I think they're going to rely so

642
00:26:16,680 --> 00:26:18,720
Speaker 1: much on their defense. At forty eight, I like the

643
00:26:18,800 --> 00:26:22,680
Speaker 1: under there for basically the reasons that you described. Let's

644
00:26:22,720 --> 00:26:25,119
Speaker 1: move on to Jets at Eagles. The Eagles are currently

645
00:26:25,200 --> 00:26:27,760
Speaker 1: laying fourteen. It was at thirteen and a half, so

646
00:26:27,800 --> 00:26:30,320
Speaker 1: it's moved a tiny bit since I checked early this morning,

647
00:26:30,320 --> 00:26:32,520
Speaker 1: and the over under is at forty four and a half. Now,

648
00:26:32,520 --> 00:26:35,800
Speaker 1: this sounds like Sam Darnold is probably not going to

649
00:26:35,840 --> 00:26:38,120
Speaker 1: play in this game. He's progressing in the right direction.

650
00:26:38,480 --> 00:26:40,960
Speaker 1: I think he's practicing either with no contact or something,

651
00:26:40,960 --> 00:26:42,920
Speaker 1: but it looks a little bit more likely that he's

652
00:26:42,960 --> 00:26:44,840
Speaker 1: going to be out this week. So how do you

653
00:26:44,840 --> 00:26:46,920
Speaker 1: feel right now at Eagles laying fourteen in the over

654
00:26:47,000 --> 00:26:48,200
Speaker 1: under at forty four and a half.

655
00:26:49,520 --> 00:26:50,840
Speaker 3: Well, I certainly don't like the Jets.

656
00:26:50,840 --> 00:26:53,560
Speaker 2: If Luke Falk's going to be involved here, I do

657
00:26:53,960 --> 00:26:55,920
Speaker 2: you know, I think the line is probably about fair

658
00:26:55,960 --> 00:26:57,399
Speaker 2: If that's the case, and that's so it looks like

659
00:26:57,400 --> 00:27:01,240
Speaker 2: a Luke Falk line right now. But even so, like

660
00:27:01,400 --> 00:27:03,919
Speaker 2: I'm like, I'm not interested in taking the Jets here,

661
00:27:03,920 --> 00:27:06,920
Speaker 2: and I'm not interested in taking a team laying two

662
00:27:06,960 --> 00:27:09,600
Speaker 2: touchdowns either, So I'm pretty much off this spread right

663
00:27:09,640 --> 00:27:11,439
Speaker 2: now as it stands. I think the under would be

664
00:27:11,680 --> 00:27:13,760
Speaker 2: the more interesting side here if you think the Jets

665
00:27:13,800 --> 00:27:18,359
Speaker 2: defense is fairly you know, fairly capable of limiting what

666
00:27:18,400 --> 00:27:20,720
Speaker 2: the Eagles can do on offense. I'm not one hundred

667
00:27:20,760 --> 00:27:22,960
Speaker 2: percent sure of that, So I don't really love either

668
00:27:23,000 --> 00:27:25,000
Speaker 2: side of this. It would be it would be the

669
00:27:25,080 --> 00:27:27,800
Speaker 2: under if I had to take one gun to my head,

670
00:27:27,800 --> 00:27:29,439
Speaker 2: but I just don't. I just don't really like this

671
00:27:29,480 --> 00:27:31,800
Speaker 2: spot at all. I'm not really confident in who the

672
00:27:31,800 --> 00:27:34,320
Speaker 2: Eagles are just yet as an offensive team, you know,

673
00:27:34,359 --> 00:27:36,240
Speaker 2: Are they a team that can you know, light up

674
00:27:36,280 --> 00:27:37,760
Speaker 2: a good defense for a bunch of points to the

675
00:27:37,800 --> 00:27:40,840
Speaker 2: point where an over would hit. I'm not really confident

676
00:27:40,920 --> 00:27:42,280
Speaker 2: of that at the moment. So that's where I would

677
00:27:42,280 --> 00:27:43,960
Speaker 2: say the under is my favorite part of this game.

678
00:27:44,240 --> 00:27:48,280
Speaker 1: Yeah, I basically agree with everything that you've laid out.

679
00:27:48,320 --> 00:27:50,720
Speaker 1: I do think that if Donald were to play, although

680
00:27:50,760 --> 00:27:53,200
Speaker 1: given the fact that he's not really where he needs

681
00:27:53,240 --> 00:27:56,040
Speaker 1: to be, maybe I wouldn't. But I was thinking if

682
00:27:56,119 --> 00:27:58,360
Speaker 1: Donald was totally cleared and he had a full week

683
00:27:58,359 --> 00:28:00,520
Speaker 1: of practice and ready to go, I might the Jets

684
00:28:00,520 --> 00:28:02,480
Speaker 1: in the spot because I do think that the Jets

685
00:28:02,480 --> 00:28:05,879
Speaker 1: have a capable offense once you put Donald under center,

686
00:28:06,080 --> 00:28:08,400
Speaker 1: and their defense CJ. Moseley has had an extra week

687
00:28:08,440 --> 00:28:11,119
Speaker 1: to rest, so they're they're gonna end. Quinnin Williams will

688
00:28:11,160 --> 00:28:13,199
Speaker 1: be back as well, so the defense is going to be,

689
00:28:13,400 --> 00:28:16,040
Speaker 1: you know, much stronger than it looked the past couple

690
00:28:16,080 --> 00:28:18,200
Speaker 1: of games. But if Lukewalk is out there, all bets

691
00:28:18,240 --> 00:28:20,439
Speaker 1: are off. I mean, you know, you don't want to

692
00:28:20,480 --> 00:28:23,840
Speaker 1: take a team laying fourteen points, but there's no way,

693
00:28:23,960 --> 00:28:26,160
Speaker 1: as basically you aptly put it, there's just no way

694
00:28:26,160 --> 00:28:28,679
Speaker 1: you can back Lukewalk no matter basically what he's getting

695
00:28:28,800 --> 00:28:31,600
Speaker 1: the total. I agree, seems like the under would probably

696
00:28:31,640 --> 00:28:33,480
Speaker 1: be the spot to go if you had to pick

697
00:28:33,480 --> 00:28:36,400
Speaker 1: a choice, because I think Falk has such trouble moving

698
00:28:36,440 --> 00:28:38,800
Speaker 1: the ball and you don't expect the Eagles to, you know,

699
00:28:38,880 --> 00:28:41,120
Speaker 1: be able to put up thirty or anything like that.

700
00:28:41,400 --> 00:28:44,000
Speaker 1: But as a general feeling, on this one, given that

701
00:28:44,080 --> 00:28:46,480
Speaker 1: Donald is probably out, it's a stay away game for

702
00:28:46,520 --> 00:28:48,200
Speaker 1: both of us, So I'm glad we're in agreement on

703
00:28:48,240 --> 00:28:51,800
Speaker 1: that one. Bears at Raiders technically, but they are in London,

704
00:28:51,880 --> 00:28:54,000
Speaker 1: so it's more like a neutral field. The Bears here

705
00:28:54,040 --> 00:28:56,640
Speaker 1: are laying four and a half. The over under is

706
00:28:56,680 --> 00:28:58,880
Speaker 1: at forty. Now this sounds like Mitchell Trubisky is almost

707
00:28:58,920 --> 00:29:01,400
Speaker 1: certainly going to be out this week. I'm not sure

708
00:29:01,400 --> 00:29:04,960
Speaker 1: if that's necessarily a downgrade to Chase Daniel. He looked

709
00:29:05,000 --> 00:29:07,680
Speaker 1: pretty competent in their win over the Vikings. The Raiders

710
00:29:07,720 --> 00:29:10,360
Speaker 1: are coming off an uber impressive win over the Cult,

711
00:29:10,440 --> 00:29:12,680
Speaker 1: So in London, Bears lank four and a half over

712
00:29:12,760 --> 00:29:16,560
Speaker 1: under at forty. How do you feel, man?

713
00:29:17,040 --> 00:29:19,120
Speaker 2: I was my favorite bet of the week last week

714
00:29:19,160 --> 00:29:21,000
Speaker 2: was the Raiders plus seven. I ended up making a

715
00:29:21,000 --> 00:29:23,200
Speaker 2: bunch of money on that. Of course lost a bunch

716
00:29:23,200 --> 00:29:24,720
Speaker 2: of other bets, But you know, at the end of

717
00:29:24,760 --> 00:29:27,240
Speaker 2: the day, the Raiders take was a great take, and

718
00:29:27,400 --> 00:29:29,520
Speaker 2: I really just felt like that was more because of

719
00:29:29,760 --> 00:29:32,000
Speaker 2: what the Colts defense wasn't going to do in that game.

720
00:29:32,440 --> 00:29:35,080
Speaker 2: I cannot say the same thing for the Bears defense

721
00:29:35,160 --> 00:29:41,520
Speaker 2: in this spot. If Trubisky was there. I do think, unfortunately,

722
00:29:41,560 --> 00:29:44,600
Speaker 2: that he is a slight upgrade at the quarterback position

723
00:29:44,760 --> 00:29:47,600
Speaker 2: versus what you've gotten Chas Daniel. I realized Chase Daniel

724
00:29:47,600 --> 00:29:49,200
Speaker 2: played well last week, but I've just seen a much

725
00:29:49,240 --> 00:29:52,560
Speaker 2: larger sample size of him completely being inept on offense.

726
00:29:52,600 --> 00:29:55,560
Speaker 2: And you know, it's overseas, so I don't really know

727
00:29:55,600 --> 00:29:57,560
Speaker 2: what to expect from that point of view. But at

728
00:29:57,600 --> 00:29:59,680
Speaker 2: the end of the day, when it's all said and done,

729
00:30:00,080 --> 00:30:01,880
Speaker 2: I do not think the Raiders are going to be

730
00:30:02,000 --> 00:30:05,400
Speaker 2: able to score in this spot, and that's where I

731
00:30:05,440 --> 00:30:08,600
Speaker 2: think I might lean towards the under forty two. If

732
00:30:08,600 --> 00:30:09,920
Speaker 2: you can get forty two, that'd be great. I think

733
00:30:09,960 --> 00:30:11,640
Speaker 2: it was like you have forty right now. I don't

734
00:30:11,680 --> 00:30:14,560
Speaker 2: think I would be as excited at that number, but

735
00:30:15,480 --> 00:30:17,120
Speaker 2: I definitely don't think the Raiders are going to score.

736
00:30:17,200 --> 00:30:19,360
Speaker 2: So it's either the Bears if you think they can

737
00:30:19,360 --> 00:30:21,880
Speaker 2: clear that minus four and a half, or the under.

738
00:30:21,920 --> 00:30:24,280
Speaker 2: But I'm I'm certainly not wanting anything to do with

739
00:30:24,320 --> 00:30:25,240
Speaker 2: the Raiders here in this spot.

740
00:30:25,360 --> 00:30:27,560
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm not scared off of the forty I mean,

741
00:30:27,600 --> 00:30:30,160
Speaker 1: I get it. I wish it wasn't dropping like it

742
00:30:30,280 --> 00:30:33,040
Speaker 1: was but right now at forty, I still lean towards

743
00:30:33,080 --> 00:30:36,720
Speaker 1: the Bears. I completely agree, especially especially with the Raiders

744
00:30:37,080 --> 00:30:39,720
Speaker 1: coming off such a big win. I believe they're coming

745
00:30:39,720 --> 00:30:42,360
Speaker 1: off two road games, if I'm not mistaken, so this

746
00:30:42,440 --> 00:30:46,440
Speaker 1: counts as their home game in London, and it's not

747
00:30:46,560 --> 00:30:50,160
Speaker 1: a home game. They're basically another road game, and it's

748
00:30:50,240 --> 00:30:53,040
Speaker 1: technically going to I don't even know what the time

749
00:30:53,080 --> 00:30:54,520
Speaker 1: zone technically, I guess it's going to be, so I'm

750
00:30:54,520 --> 00:30:56,520
Speaker 1: not even going to say that, but they're certainly not

751
00:30:56,560 --> 00:30:58,720
Speaker 1: going to be on their usual schedule. I think it's

752
00:30:58,760 --> 00:31:01,920
Speaker 1: going to be a really, really difficult thing to get

753
00:31:02,080 --> 00:31:04,640
Speaker 1: up for this game. After their giant win. It can

754
00:31:04,640 --> 00:31:07,560
Speaker 1: see a huge letdown when you saw what the Bears

755
00:31:07,600 --> 00:31:10,320
Speaker 1: defense was able to do to that Vikings offense. I

756
00:31:10,400 --> 00:31:12,520
Speaker 1: get it the Vikings have trouble passing the ball, but

757
00:31:12,600 --> 00:31:16,160
Speaker 1: even just to totally stifle Dalvin Cook, I agree. I

758
00:31:16,160 --> 00:31:17,880
Speaker 1: do not see the Raiders being able to put up

759
00:31:17,880 --> 00:31:20,280
Speaker 1: many points, and with Chase Daniel, I don't necessarily see

760
00:31:20,560 --> 00:31:22,160
Speaker 1: the Bears being able to put up a lot of points.

761
00:31:22,160 --> 00:31:24,760
Speaker 1: So I still like the over under at forty. I'm

762
00:31:24,800 --> 00:31:27,360
Speaker 1: totally with you. It was at even forty one, I

763
00:31:27,400 --> 00:31:29,880
Speaker 1: felt like that was a much better number, But at

764
00:31:29,920 --> 00:31:32,000
Speaker 1: forty I still lean that way, and with the spread

765
00:31:32,040 --> 00:31:33,440
Speaker 1: four and a half. If I had to go one

766
00:31:33,440 --> 00:31:35,680
Speaker 1: way or another, I'd lean the Bears. But again not

767
00:31:35,680 --> 00:31:37,640
Speaker 1: not overly confident in it. But you and I are

768
00:31:37,760 --> 00:31:39,640
Speaker 1: viewing this game the exact same way. We do not

769
00:31:39,680 --> 00:31:40,720
Speaker 1: expect much of a showing.

770
00:31:40,960 --> 00:31:42,960
Speaker 2: Yeah, the ender is definitely the sharper side. I mean

771
00:31:43,000 --> 00:31:44,800
Speaker 2: not you talked me into it. The under let's do

772
00:31:44,840 --> 00:31:45,640
Speaker 2: what under forty?

773
00:31:45,720 --> 00:31:48,200
Speaker 1: All right? Under forty. Let's hope it doesn't drop further

774
00:31:48,240 --> 00:31:51,080
Speaker 1: than that. But if not, yeah, I'm totally good with it.

775
00:31:51,120 --> 00:31:53,640
Speaker 1: I can't see the Raiders really putting up much of anything. Now,

776
00:31:53,640 --> 00:31:55,600
Speaker 1: before we finish up with our last few games, I

777
00:31:55,600 --> 00:31:58,600
Speaker 1: do want tomind everyone about our September contests where we're

778
00:31:58,600 --> 00:32:01,520
Speaker 1: giving away a signed Alvin Mari helmet. Now, although this

779
00:32:01,560 --> 00:32:04,840
Speaker 1: is our September contest, we're actually extending this one a

780
00:32:04,840 --> 00:32:07,200
Speaker 1: couple of weeks, so you can go hook and get

781
00:32:07,240 --> 00:32:09,560
Speaker 1: your reviews in now. To be entered, all you need

782
00:32:09,600 --> 00:32:11,239
Speaker 1: to do is leave a review for the show on

783
00:32:11,280 --> 00:32:14,520
Speaker 1: iTunes or Stitcher and send a screenshot of that review

784
00:32:14,760 --> 00:32:18,160
Speaker 1: to contest at bettingpros dot com. It takes two seconds

785
00:32:18,200 --> 00:32:21,719
Speaker 1: to do and you are automatically entered into this and

786
00:32:21,880 --> 00:32:24,240
Speaker 1: all future contests. So go for it, all right, Let's

787
00:32:24,280 --> 00:32:26,920
Speaker 1: move on here to Vikings at Giants. The Vikings here

788
00:32:27,000 --> 00:32:29,800
Speaker 1: are currently laying five and a half with the over

789
00:32:29,960 --> 00:32:31,720
Speaker 1: under at forty five and a half. How do you

790
00:32:31,720 --> 00:32:32,320
Speaker 1: feel about that?

791
00:32:32,480 --> 00:32:36,760
Speaker 2: Well, if the Giants are beating teams like the Redskins

792
00:32:36,880 --> 00:32:40,920
Speaker 2: and the Buccaneers, color me fully unimpressed. And color me

793
00:32:41,120 --> 00:32:44,160
Speaker 2: unimpressed by the idea that the Vikings couldn't pass on

794
00:32:44,640 --> 00:32:47,400
Speaker 2: the Bears right because they weren't able to protect their

795
00:32:47,480 --> 00:32:51,440
Speaker 2: quarterback and otherwise, I feel like the passing offense has

796
00:32:51,600 --> 00:32:54,840
Speaker 2: upside comparatively, and that's where the Giants absolutely stink. They've

797
00:32:54,920 --> 00:32:57,320
Speaker 2: got roasted by a number of teams in the passing

798
00:32:57,360 --> 00:32:59,760
Speaker 2: games to start this season. And not to mention the

799
00:32:59,760 --> 00:33:02,280
Speaker 2: fact that Dalvin Cook is a beast, one of the

800
00:33:02,280 --> 00:33:04,080
Speaker 2: best in the league. I don't think the Giants are

801
00:33:04,080 --> 00:33:06,880
Speaker 2: going to be able to slow him down either. If

802
00:33:06,920 --> 00:33:10,840
Speaker 2: we're talking about a line of five and a half,

803
00:33:10,880 --> 00:33:14,160
Speaker 2: that's basically you might as well be a touchdown. I'm

804
00:33:14,200 --> 00:33:16,719
Speaker 2: still thinking the Vikings can clear that, so I actually

805
00:33:16,760 --> 00:33:18,720
Speaker 2: like the Vikings minus five and a half. I think

806
00:33:18,720 --> 00:33:19,800
Speaker 2: that they're going to crush.

807
00:33:19,880 --> 00:33:22,200
Speaker 1: My early lean is, this is my favorite bet on

808
00:33:22,240 --> 00:33:26,120
Speaker 1: the slate for sure. I think this is going to

809
00:33:26,640 --> 00:33:29,000
Speaker 1: I think I feel bad for the Giants here. I

810
00:33:29,040 --> 00:33:31,640
Speaker 1: think the Vikings are going to be mad. I think

811
00:33:31,680 --> 00:33:32,920
Speaker 1: they are going to come out and they are going

812
00:33:33,000 --> 00:33:36,960
Speaker 1: to pound Daniel Jones, who again, you know, the shine

813
00:33:37,080 --> 00:33:38,720
Speaker 1: is off a little bit. He did not look great

814
00:33:38,760 --> 00:33:40,880
Speaker 1: at all against the Redskins. You know, I know they

815
00:33:40,880 --> 00:33:43,000
Speaker 1: were able to move the ball with Wayne Gollman, but

816
00:33:43,080 --> 00:33:45,960
Speaker 1: he really, you know, he was not quite that impressive.

817
00:33:46,120 --> 00:33:48,040
Speaker 1: You've got an angry Vikings team. I think they're going

818
00:33:48,120 --> 00:33:50,320
Speaker 1: to put up a huge defensive performance. I think Cook

819
00:33:50,400 --> 00:33:51,760
Speaker 1: is going to be able to do whatever Hee wants.

820
00:33:51,760 --> 00:33:53,239
Speaker 1: I think they are going to use this game as

821
00:33:53,280 --> 00:33:55,719
Speaker 1: a get right game for the passing game. You've already

822
00:33:55,720 --> 00:33:59,120
Speaker 1: got Adam Thielen basically calling out the coaching sab saying

823
00:33:59,120 --> 00:34:00,640
Speaker 1: we need to throw the ball. It's gonna be a

824
00:34:00,680 --> 00:34:03,040
Speaker 1: little bit of a squeaky wheel type game. So my

825
00:34:03,200 --> 00:34:07,000
Speaker 1: early lean on this is, Oh, I'm all over the Vikings.

826
00:34:07,040 --> 00:34:08,880
Speaker 1: At it was at five I got in on it

827
00:34:08,920 --> 00:34:10,680
Speaker 1: when it was five. It's at five and a half. Now,

828
00:34:10,760 --> 00:34:13,880
Speaker 1: that's fine. I'd do it up to a touchdown at

829
00:34:13,880 --> 00:34:16,000
Speaker 1: this point, and frankly, if it got to a touchdown,

830
00:34:16,040 --> 00:34:18,560
Speaker 1: I don't even know. But again, this is one that

831
00:34:18,640 --> 00:34:20,799
Speaker 1: makes me a little nervous just because you just look

832
00:34:20,840 --> 00:34:23,560
Speaker 1: at the line, right your first instinct and it's we

833
00:34:23,600 --> 00:34:26,640
Speaker 1: have the exact same instinct, right, So chance we're both

834
00:34:26,640 --> 00:34:28,719
Speaker 1: well informed guys, But chances are the John Q public

835
00:34:28,880 --> 00:34:30,640
Speaker 1: is going to look at that line and they're also

836
00:34:30,680 --> 00:34:33,040
Speaker 1: going to want the Viking. So it's it's a little

837
00:34:33,120 --> 00:34:35,160
Speaker 1: surprising to me when I see a line that looks

838
00:34:35,520 --> 00:34:37,879
Speaker 1: like it's going to entice the public to go one way,

839
00:34:37,920 --> 00:34:40,280
Speaker 1: you know, because that suggests that that's what they want.

840
00:34:40,719 --> 00:34:42,719
Speaker 1: But in the end, Vikings saying five and a half

841
00:34:42,760 --> 00:34:44,880
Speaker 1: is something that I feel uber comfortable with.

842
00:34:44,960 --> 00:34:47,320
Speaker 2: At the moment, this line will go up, and you

843
00:34:47,480 --> 00:34:49,600
Speaker 2: just bet it now, because if you don't, then you're

844
00:34:49,600 --> 00:34:51,000
Speaker 2: not going to get the number that you want here.

845
00:34:51,320 --> 00:34:52,680
Speaker 2: You know, if you can get you a little bit

846
00:34:52,680 --> 00:34:55,439
Speaker 2: of extra value right now, I agree with you that, like, yeah,

847
00:34:55,440 --> 00:34:57,319
Speaker 2: maybe there's a little bit of hesitation because the line

848
00:34:57,320 --> 00:34:59,640
Speaker 2: looks so soft, but maybe that's just true, maybe just

849
00:34:59,680 --> 00:35:00,720
Speaker 2: pound because it's soft.

850
00:35:00,840 --> 00:35:03,400
Speaker 1: Yeah, And again being on the public side, which I'm

851
00:35:03,440 --> 00:35:05,600
Speaker 1: sure this is going to be, it's not always a

852
00:35:05,600 --> 00:35:07,680
Speaker 1: bad thing. I mean, I remember the Rams against the

853
00:35:07,680 --> 00:35:09,960
Speaker 1: Browns on Monday Night Football, which I saw the line

854
00:35:10,000 --> 00:35:12,000
Speaker 1: at three and I was all over it. I mean

855
00:35:12,080 --> 00:35:13,640
Speaker 1: right from the get go, and I knew it was

856
00:35:13,680 --> 00:35:16,160
Speaker 1: going to be overwhelmingly public. But I couldn't get away

857
00:35:16,160 --> 00:35:19,560
Speaker 1: from it because it didn't really matter, because that line

858
00:35:19,600 --> 00:35:21,759
Speaker 1: just seemed way too small given what it was, and

859
00:35:21,800 --> 00:35:24,000
Speaker 1: it was in the end, although it obviously could have

860
00:35:24,040 --> 00:35:26,359
Speaker 1: been much closer at the end if the play calling

861
00:35:26,360 --> 00:35:29,000
Speaker 1: had been a little different. But it's not. You don't

862
00:35:29,040 --> 00:35:30,960
Speaker 1: have to run away from public bets. It just makes

863
00:35:31,000 --> 00:35:32,319
Speaker 1: you a little nervous. But this one, I think you

864
00:35:32,320 --> 00:35:34,360
Speaker 1: and I are both on the same side where we're like,

865
00:35:34,400 --> 00:35:36,399
Speaker 1: I don't really care what the public's doing because we're

866
00:35:36,440 --> 00:35:38,839
Speaker 1: all good with it. At the current spread, let's move

867
00:35:38,880 --> 00:35:41,160
Speaker 1: on to the Broncos at the Chargers. The Chargers here

868
00:35:41,200 --> 00:35:43,759
Speaker 1: are currently laying six and a half and the over

869
00:35:43,840 --> 00:35:46,200
Speaker 1: under is at forty three and a half. That struck

870
00:35:46,239 --> 00:35:49,160
Speaker 1: me both of those numbers as about right. I know,

871
00:35:49,239 --> 00:35:51,560
Speaker 1: Bradley Chubb now is out for the season, so that

872
00:35:51,600 --> 00:35:54,360
Speaker 1: takes a little bit of the shine off the Broncos defense.

873
00:35:54,400 --> 00:35:56,520
Speaker 1: But how do you feel about that Broncos at the Chargers.

874
00:35:56,640 --> 00:35:58,959
Speaker 1: Chargers laying six and a half over under at forty

875
00:35:59,000 --> 00:36:00,279
Speaker 1: three and a half, I.

876
00:36:00,239 --> 00:36:03,440
Speaker 2: Don't really feel comfortable betting the Chargers, you know, giving

877
00:36:03,480 --> 00:36:06,000
Speaker 2: that many points right now. I mean I have trouble

878
00:36:06,040 --> 00:36:09,040
Speaker 2: betting the Broncos too, But like the Chargers just seem

879
00:36:09,080 --> 00:36:12,000
Speaker 2: every single year to show up and keep things closer

880
00:36:12,040 --> 00:36:14,719
Speaker 2: than they should be, you know, giveaway spots that they

881
00:36:14,760 --> 00:36:17,440
Speaker 2: shouldn't give away. Like I'm almost surprised they covered against

882
00:36:17,440 --> 00:36:19,680
Speaker 2: the Dolphins last week because you know, the way that

883
00:36:19,719 --> 00:36:21,080
Speaker 2: game started, it looked like it was going to be

884
00:36:21,160 --> 00:36:24,040
Speaker 2: yet another Chargers situation where they underwhelmed in a spot

885
00:36:24,080 --> 00:36:26,120
Speaker 2: they're supposed to come in and do something. Now that

886
00:36:26,160 --> 00:36:29,120
Speaker 2: being said, they are in a quote unquote home game

887
00:36:29,200 --> 00:36:32,279
Speaker 2: against the team that's owned four and giving up last

888
00:36:32,280 --> 00:36:36,600
Speaker 2: second touchdown drives to a rookie. So when when I

889
00:36:36,640 --> 00:36:39,640
Speaker 2: added all the factors together, is as little confident as

890
00:36:39,680 --> 00:36:43,440
Speaker 2: I have in the Chargers, it would be towards the

891
00:36:43,520 --> 00:36:45,520
Speaker 2: side of them controlling this game. And really having their

892
00:36:45,520 --> 00:36:47,480
Speaker 2: way against the Broncos more so than not. But I'm

893
00:36:47,480 --> 00:36:48,440
Speaker 2: not really in love with it.

894
00:36:48,520 --> 00:36:50,880
Speaker 1: I've got no feel for this game because what you

895
00:36:50,880 --> 00:36:53,280
Speaker 1: said about the Chargers is exactly right. So I first

896
00:36:53,360 --> 00:36:54,640
Speaker 1: kind of look at this game and I'm like, you

897
00:36:54,719 --> 00:36:56,680
Speaker 1: know what, this is a spot where the Chargers just

898
00:36:56,760 --> 00:36:58,839
Speaker 1: lay an egg because this is what they do every

899
00:36:58,840 --> 00:37:01,319
Speaker 1: single year. And the problem is, look, I like the

900
00:37:01,320 --> 00:37:03,920
Speaker 1: Broncos this week laying three did the Jags, and you know,

901
00:37:04,000 --> 00:37:06,160
Speaker 1: in the end, they just kind of threw up all

902
00:37:06,160 --> 00:37:08,879
Speaker 1: over themselves, and I don't really have confidence and their

903
00:37:08,920 --> 00:37:11,319
Speaker 1: ability to go up there and win this game or

904
00:37:11,360 --> 00:37:14,279
Speaker 1: even necessarily keep it close. I think this is kind

905
00:37:14,280 --> 00:37:16,319
Speaker 1: of a backbreaking loss for them in kind of what

906
00:37:16,480 --> 00:37:18,960
Speaker 1: was their quote unquote last ditch effort to save their

907
00:37:19,000 --> 00:37:20,560
Speaker 1: season even though they weren't going to go anywhere. But

908
00:37:20,560 --> 00:37:23,840
Speaker 1: now they're owned four. So in the end, I basically

909
00:37:23,960 --> 00:37:26,560
Speaker 1: have reasons on both sides of the ball to not

910
00:37:27,239 --> 00:37:29,799
Speaker 1: like this line at all, like to not go one

911
00:37:29,800 --> 00:37:31,319
Speaker 1: way or the other. So it is a game for

912
00:37:31,360 --> 00:37:34,160
Speaker 1: me again, seems about right where the numbers are, and

913
00:37:34,160 --> 00:37:36,279
Speaker 1: it's something where I don't really have a lean one

914
00:37:36,280 --> 00:37:38,759
Speaker 1: way or another because I don't trust either team, So

915
00:37:39,040 --> 00:37:40,520
Speaker 1: I think you and I will both just stay away

916
00:37:40,520 --> 00:37:42,719
Speaker 1: from it and we'll both live to fight another day.

917
00:37:43,280 --> 00:37:45,920
Speaker 1: Let's move on to the Packers at the Cowboys. A

918
00:37:45,920 --> 00:37:48,279
Speaker 1: really interesting game here. The Cowboys here are laying three

919
00:37:48,320 --> 00:37:49,640
Speaker 1: and a half. Now, it was four and a half

920
00:37:49,680 --> 00:37:52,160
Speaker 1: when I checked on Sunday night before that Cowboys game

921
00:37:52,160 --> 00:37:53,680
Speaker 1: wrapped up. I don't know whether or not there was

922
00:37:53,760 --> 00:37:55,480
Speaker 1: money that came in or whether or not the books

923
00:37:55,520 --> 00:37:58,719
Speaker 1: moved generally because of how the Cowboys looked in that game.

924
00:37:58,719 --> 00:38:01,360
Speaker 1: But again, Packers at Cowboys, Cowboys are laying three and

925
00:38:01,400 --> 00:38:03,879
Speaker 1: a half and the over under is at forty seven

926
00:38:03,920 --> 00:38:04,960
Speaker 1: and a half. How do you feel there?

927
00:38:05,480 --> 00:38:07,279
Speaker 2: I'm a little scared of both sides of this bet

928
00:38:07,400 --> 00:38:11,600
Speaker 2: because I would generally like to favor the Cowboys at home.

929
00:38:11,640 --> 00:38:14,080
Speaker 2: I would generally like to favor the under looking at

930
00:38:14,120 --> 00:38:16,839
Speaker 2: how these two defenses have performed. But then you know,

931
00:38:17,200 --> 00:38:20,839
Speaker 2: I'd be taking the under against two efficient quarterbacks, and

932
00:38:21,840 --> 00:38:23,800
Speaker 2: that's not really how I want to live my life.

933
00:38:24,000 --> 00:38:25,520
Speaker 2: So I won't live it that way, and I probably

934
00:38:25,520 --> 00:38:28,920
Speaker 2: won't make that bet. So I'm wish you watch you here.

935
00:38:28,920 --> 00:38:30,440
Speaker 2: I don't have a strong position, and I'm supposed to

936
00:38:30,480 --> 00:38:32,919
Speaker 2: have a position on this, but you know, under forty

937
00:38:32,960 --> 00:38:34,520
Speaker 2: seven and a half, I mean that could easily see

938
00:38:34,560 --> 00:38:37,280
Speaker 2: situations where that goes over. Both these guys can completely

939
00:38:37,320 --> 00:38:40,759
Speaker 2: come out firing, you know, deep touchdowns, accurate passes to

940
00:38:40,800 --> 00:38:43,359
Speaker 2: great receivers. There's no real way for me to fall

941
00:38:43,360 --> 00:38:46,040
Speaker 2: in love with the total side of this game. And

942
00:38:46,080 --> 00:38:49,080
Speaker 2: then of course the spread. I mean we're talking about

943
00:38:49,080 --> 00:38:51,719
Speaker 2: two three and one teams. I think it's a coin

944
00:38:51,760 --> 00:38:54,000
Speaker 2: flip and this is this is like the exact kind

945
00:38:54,040 --> 00:38:55,560
Speaker 2: of bet that I just don't want anything to do with.

946
00:38:55,760 --> 00:38:58,080
Speaker 1: Yeah, first of all, you said, you know you should

947
00:38:58,120 --> 00:38:59,719
Speaker 1: have a position or something like that. You don't have

948
00:38:59,719 --> 00:39:01,080
Speaker 1: to have a position, man, I mean part of the

949
00:39:01,080 --> 00:39:03,719
Speaker 1: time we look at stuff and that's exactly where it is.

950
00:39:03,800 --> 00:39:06,799
Speaker 1: We don't like either side because the number is about

951
00:39:06,800 --> 00:39:08,719
Speaker 1: where it needs to be, and I agree with you.

952
00:39:08,760 --> 00:39:10,960
Speaker 1: I think on the total, I lean a little bit

953
00:39:11,280 --> 00:39:14,919
Speaker 1: towards the under here. And the reason is, really, look,

954
00:39:15,000 --> 00:39:18,640
Speaker 1: both these teams have pretty solid defenses. The Packers in

955
00:39:18,680 --> 00:39:21,759
Speaker 1: particular have a really really good pass defense, but they

956
00:39:21,800 --> 00:39:23,839
Speaker 1: get gashed by the run. So I think you're gonna

957
00:39:23,840 --> 00:39:26,759
Speaker 1: see a lot of Ezekiel Elliott here, and when you

958
00:39:26,800 --> 00:39:28,560
Speaker 1: do that, I think it's going to be a little

959
00:39:28,560 --> 00:39:30,799
Speaker 1: bit more of a control the clock type of game.

960
00:39:30,840 --> 00:39:33,000
Speaker 1: I think they're going to lean on the run pretty heavily.

961
00:39:33,040 --> 00:39:35,960
Speaker 1: I don't see Rogers being able to do a crazy

962
00:39:36,160 --> 00:39:39,160
Speaker 1: amount here, So if I leaned anywhere, I kind of

963
00:39:39,560 --> 00:39:42,440
Speaker 1: a little bit leaning towards the under not overwhelmingly. It's

964
00:39:42,480 --> 00:39:44,080
Speaker 1: not one of my favorite bets or anything like that,

965
00:39:44,160 --> 00:39:46,800
Speaker 1: even at this point, but with the spread in particular,

966
00:39:46,920 --> 00:39:48,960
Speaker 1: I don't feel it. Man. I don't have a good

967
00:39:48,960 --> 00:39:51,040
Speaker 1: sense of what the Packers are doing. I mean, they

968
00:39:51,080 --> 00:39:53,160
Speaker 1: come out and they always look great on offense, and

969
00:39:53,200 --> 00:39:55,840
Speaker 1: then they just don't score at all in the second half,

970
00:39:55,880 --> 00:39:58,160
Speaker 1: So there wouldn't be a time where I would feel

971
00:39:58,160 --> 00:40:00,759
Speaker 1: really comfortable with them. At the same time, they basically

972
00:40:00,840 --> 00:40:03,160
Speaker 1: have a mini by here because of the fact that

973
00:40:03,200 --> 00:40:05,960
Speaker 1: they played the Thursday night game and the Cowboys I

974
00:40:06,040 --> 00:40:07,520
Speaker 1: have a little bit of a short week because they

975
00:40:07,560 --> 00:40:09,960
Speaker 1: played on Sunday night. So in the end, it's something

976
00:40:09,960 --> 00:40:12,480
Speaker 1: where if I had to choose a side, I think

977
00:40:12,600 --> 00:40:14,719
Speaker 1: I would lean towards the Packers because I see this

978
00:40:14,840 --> 00:40:16,480
Speaker 1: being as a really close game. So as long as

979
00:40:16,520 --> 00:40:18,680
Speaker 1: that spread stays above the key number of three. I

980
00:40:18,880 --> 00:40:21,600
Speaker 1: probably lean there, and I'd probably lean a little bit

981
00:40:21,640 --> 00:40:24,640
Speaker 1: towards the under forty seven and a half, but not overwhelmingly.

982
00:40:24,680 --> 00:40:28,439
Speaker 1: So let's move on to the Colts at the Chiefs Here,

983
00:40:28,480 --> 00:40:30,560
Speaker 1: the Chiefs now are laying ten and a half. It

984
00:40:30,600 --> 00:40:32,360
Speaker 1: was nine and a half when I first checked, and

985
00:40:32,440 --> 00:40:36,480
Speaker 1: the over under at a pretty hefty fifty seven. You've

986
00:40:36,480 --> 00:40:38,480
Speaker 1: got injuries on the Colts side of the ball. You've

987
00:40:38,480 --> 00:40:40,600
Speaker 1: got Ty Hilton may or may not be able to

988
00:40:40,600 --> 00:40:42,759
Speaker 1: suit up with that quad injury. You still got Mac

989
00:40:42,800 --> 00:40:45,040
Speaker 1: who had a little bit banged up his ankle, was

990
00:40:45,080 --> 00:40:46,920
Speaker 1: in and out of that game yesterday. It's unclear if

991
00:40:46,960 --> 00:40:48,680
Speaker 1: Darius Leonard is gonna be able to play. So how

992
00:40:48,719 --> 00:40:51,399
Speaker 1: do you feel here, Chiefs at home in primetime Sunday night?

993
00:40:51,440 --> 00:40:53,960
Speaker 1: Ten and a half over under a fifty seven?

994
00:40:54,120 --> 00:40:55,680
Speaker 3: Boy, I like that under a little bit.

995
00:40:56,040 --> 00:40:58,480
Speaker 2: If the Colts are going to be missing Hilton again,

996
00:40:59,080 --> 00:41:01,279
Speaker 2: those receives is just weren't able to get the job

997
00:41:01,320 --> 00:41:04,480
Speaker 2: done against the Raiders no less, you know, like Deon Kane.

998
00:41:04,520 --> 00:41:06,480
Speaker 2: Five targets no catches I think was the number I saw.

999
00:41:06,480 --> 00:41:07,680
Speaker 2: I don't know if he ended up getting win late

1000
00:41:07,719 --> 00:41:10,440
Speaker 2: in that game. But man, it just looks bad out

1001
00:41:10,440 --> 00:41:13,040
Speaker 2: there for the wide receivers on the Colts. And you know,

1002
00:41:13,040 --> 00:41:15,920
Speaker 2: you can't be expected for Eric Ebron and Jack Doyle

1003
00:41:16,000 --> 00:41:19,759
Speaker 2: to completely, you know, shred any kind of a defense level.

1004
00:41:19,760 --> 00:41:23,200
Speaker 2: And the Chiefs who are going to probably be playing

1005
00:41:23,200 --> 00:41:24,640
Speaker 2: with the lead so they'll be able to pin their

1006
00:41:24,640 --> 00:41:26,760
Speaker 2: ears back a little bit. I mean, the Cols offensive

1007
00:41:26,760 --> 00:41:28,400
Speaker 2: line is very good, so they have that working in

1008
00:41:28,440 --> 00:41:31,640
Speaker 2: their favor. But I just, you know, I can't see

1009
00:41:32,000 --> 00:41:34,759
Speaker 2: the Chiefs getting enough points to get over this total.

1010
00:41:34,760 --> 00:41:38,200
Speaker 2: I mean, the Colts, when they're operating efficiently on defense,

1011
00:41:38,239 --> 00:41:39,920
Speaker 2: they're a little bit tougher to get big plays on

1012
00:41:40,760 --> 00:41:42,719
Speaker 2: Saying that Patrick Mahomes can't get a big play on

1013
00:41:42,719 --> 00:41:45,439
Speaker 2: a team is like writing your own death certificate as

1014
00:41:45,440 --> 00:41:48,080
Speaker 2: far as the bets concerned. But if you asked me

1015
00:41:48,120 --> 00:41:50,360
Speaker 2: to take a side here on a Monday, which I

1016
00:41:50,400 --> 00:41:52,719
Speaker 2: am want to do right now, I'm taking the under

1017
00:41:52,760 --> 00:41:54,479
Speaker 2: because I think that's just a little bit too high

1018
00:41:54,600 --> 00:41:56,080
Speaker 2: for what the Colts can do on offense.

1019
00:41:56,280 --> 00:41:59,560
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't know the number is so high. I

1020
00:41:59,640 --> 00:42:01,400
Speaker 1: just don't have a feel for it. I get exactly

1021
00:42:01,440 --> 00:42:04,680
Speaker 1: what you're saying the Chiefs at home in prime time,

1022
00:42:04,760 --> 00:42:06,200
Speaker 1: I think are going to put up a ton of

1023
00:42:06,239 --> 00:42:09,000
Speaker 1: points here, and whether or not, you know, the sort

1024
00:42:09,040 --> 00:42:11,880
Speaker 1: of like they did in this past game against the Raiders,

1025
00:42:11,880 --> 00:42:13,960
Speaker 1: whether or not the Colts can put up you know,

1026
00:42:14,000 --> 00:42:16,400
Speaker 1: points in garbage time, would make me a little iffy

1027
00:42:16,440 --> 00:42:18,440
Speaker 1: on the total. This is just not a game I

1028
00:42:18,480 --> 00:42:21,160
Speaker 1: want to go near. If anything, I would lean towards

1029
00:42:21,160 --> 00:42:23,239
Speaker 1: the under, because I do think that there's value in

1030
00:42:23,239 --> 00:42:25,279
Speaker 1: that number. But it would scare the bejeebas out of

1031
00:42:25,320 --> 00:42:27,239
Speaker 1: me because I just could see this sort of being

1032
00:42:27,280 --> 00:42:29,319
Speaker 1: a game where like, hey, it's looking good here, we're

1033
00:42:29,320 --> 00:42:32,560
Speaker 1: looking fine, and then just everybody going crazy and the

1034
00:42:32,600 --> 00:42:35,319
Speaker 1: ten and a half, I don't know, I really don't.

1035
00:42:35,400 --> 00:42:38,200
Speaker 1: I mean, with the injuries, I don't know if Hilton's

1036
00:42:38,239 --> 00:42:39,880
Speaker 1: going to be back, but it doesn't seem like that,

1037
00:42:39,880 --> 00:42:42,360
Speaker 1: and they're really again you talked about it. The problem

1038
00:42:42,440 --> 00:42:44,560
Speaker 1: is that they don't even have capable number twos or

1039
00:42:44,640 --> 00:42:46,840
Speaker 1: number three's who can kind of step in. It's mostly

1040
00:42:46,840 --> 00:42:48,719
Speaker 1: the tight ends and eric Gie Brown is showing that

1041
00:42:48,760 --> 00:42:51,520
Speaker 1: he was who we thought he was with the drops.

1042
00:42:51,560 --> 00:42:54,280
Speaker 1: He did score a touchdown yesterday, but still not enough

1043
00:42:54,520 --> 00:42:56,000
Speaker 1: to make me excited about them. So this is a

1044
00:42:56,000 --> 00:42:58,719
Speaker 1: game where I don't have a great feel for. But

1045
00:42:59,160 --> 00:43:01,120
Speaker 1: if I did go anywhere, it would probably be the

1046
00:43:01,200 --> 00:43:04,360
Speaker 1: under But I do I don't feel and I know

1047
00:43:04,400 --> 00:43:06,320
Speaker 1: you're not coming on strong on it, but I don't

1048
00:43:06,320 --> 00:43:08,799
Speaker 1: even lean in it as much as you do. I

1049
00:43:08,840 --> 00:43:10,560
Speaker 1: just feel like there's a game where as of right now,

1050
00:43:10,640 --> 00:43:12,719
Speaker 1: I really really don't want to go near for me.

1051
00:43:13,080 --> 00:43:13,839
Speaker 3: Don't get me wrong.

1052
00:43:13,920 --> 00:43:16,640
Speaker 2: I mean I lean the under here, but like you know,

1053
00:43:16,840 --> 00:43:19,880
Speaker 2: Patrick Mahomes, I mean, if you're I couldn't even completely

1054
00:43:19,960 --> 00:43:22,080
Speaker 2: rule out the idea of them getting to fifty seven

1055
00:43:22,120 --> 00:43:22,600
Speaker 2: on their own.

1056
00:43:22,920 --> 00:43:26,200
Speaker 1: Why that's not even a joke, right.

1057
00:43:26,640 --> 00:43:28,760
Speaker 2: I mean that, I mean, of course it's a completely

1058
00:43:28,880 --> 00:43:32,960
Speaker 2: complete outliers situation. But you know, the the bottom line

1059
00:43:33,000 --> 00:43:37,160
Speaker 2: is that you making under bets against Patrick Mahomes, especially

1060
00:43:37,280 --> 00:43:41,040
Speaker 2: if you know, all things being equal, the Coles offense,

1061
00:43:41,040 --> 00:43:43,439
Speaker 2: if it's operating the way it's supposed to operate, even

1062
00:43:43,440 --> 00:43:45,799
Speaker 2: with Brissette, can put up some points and the Chiefs

1063
00:43:45,840 --> 00:43:48,719
Speaker 2: defense is nothing to be scared of. So you know,

1064
00:43:49,160 --> 00:43:51,560
Speaker 2: it's this is definitely not one of my favorite spots.

1065
00:43:51,320 --> 00:43:53,759
Speaker 1: All right, So you're what you're basically saying is you're

1066
00:43:53,800 --> 00:43:55,360
Speaker 1: betting your mortgage on the under.

1067
00:43:55,719 --> 00:43:58,160
Speaker 3: Absolutely not got it. I mean, there is no.

1068
00:43:57,960 --> 00:44:00,560
Speaker 1: Way everybody heard it. Everybody heard it. Don't worry about it.

1069
00:44:00,600 --> 00:44:03,359
Speaker 1: He's got it, mortgage on the under. He's all in. Okay, great,

1070
00:44:03,440 --> 00:44:05,120
Speaker 1: Let's move on to our last game, the Monday night

1071
00:44:05,120 --> 00:44:08,160
Speaker 1: football game, Browns at the forty nine Ers. Forty nine

1072
00:44:08,239 --> 00:44:10,080
Speaker 1: ers here are currently laying three and a half and

1073
00:44:10,120 --> 00:44:12,120
Speaker 1: the over under is at forty eight and a half.

1074
00:44:12,160 --> 00:44:15,040
Speaker 1: A really nice bounce back game here for the Browns

1075
00:44:15,040 --> 00:44:17,640
Speaker 1: to beat the Ravens. They looked pretty good. They still

1076
00:44:17,640 --> 00:44:20,320
Speaker 1: have injuries in their secondary Jarvis Landry Is and the

1077
00:44:20,360 --> 00:44:22,640
Speaker 1: concussion protocol. But the forty nine ers are coming off

1078
00:44:22,680 --> 00:44:24,680
Speaker 1: a bye here and are at home. So forty nine

1079
00:44:24,760 --> 00:44:26,919
Speaker 1: Ers leanth three and a half over under at forty

1080
00:44:26,920 --> 00:44:28,879
Speaker 1: eight and a half. How do you feel We.

1081
00:44:28,840 --> 00:44:30,640
Speaker 2: Haven't seen the forty nine ers in some time, and

1082
00:44:31,080 --> 00:44:34,520
Speaker 2: suddenly we think that they're some kind of a fantastic team,

1083
00:44:34,560 --> 00:44:37,200
Speaker 2: and they've played well to start this season. But I

1084
00:44:37,200 --> 00:44:40,399
Speaker 2: think the Browns underplayed their potential in the first couple

1085
00:44:40,480 --> 00:44:42,640
Speaker 2: of weeks here we saw what they're capable of doing

1086
00:44:42,760 --> 00:44:45,080
Speaker 2: last week. I'm not saying they're going to go roll

1087
00:44:45,160 --> 00:44:46,959
Speaker 2: up forty on the forty nine ers here in this spot.

1088
00:44:47,000 --> 00:44:48,680
Speaker 2: But give me the Browns plus three and a half.

1089
00:44:48,960 --> 00:44:51,000
Speaker 2: I think that they are probably close to as good

1090
00:44:51,040 --> 00:44:52,399
Speaker 2: as we thought they were. They just had a couple

1091
00:44:52,440 --> 00:44:53,040
Speaker 2: of bad games.

1092
00:44:53,280 --> 00:44:56,839
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean it's I don't really disagree with that.

1093
00:44:56,920 --> 00:44:58,719
Speaker 1: When it was at three when I first checked, I

1094
00:44:58,719 --> 00:45:00,120
Speaker 1: didn't like it as much when it got past the

1095
00:45:00,160 --> 00:45:03,200
Speaker 1: key number. Yeah, I lean Browns. I don't feel great

1096
00:45:03,239 --> 00:45:05,720
Speaker 1: about it. And you know, teams coming off buys always

1097
00:45:05,880 --> 00:45:08,359
Speaker 1: give me, you know, make me a little scared because they,

1098
00:45:08,440 --> 00:45:10,560
Speaker 1: you know, especially with a guy like Shanahan who can

1099
00:45:10,640 --> 00:45:12,640
Speaker 1: have plenty of time to dream up creative plays and

1100
00:45:12,640 --> 00:45:15,799
Speaker 1: stuff like that, and their defense. You know, the thing is,

1101
00:45:15,920 --> 00:45:18,200
Speaker 1: I don't know if I'm ready to make any conclusions

1102
00:45:18,239 --> 00:45:20,800
Speaker 1: about the forty nine ers defense because they've looked strong,

1103
00:45:21,160 --> 00:45:23,880
Speaker 1: but I really don't know if they actually are strong.

1104
00:45:24,000 --> 00:45:26,759
Speaker 1: So this could be something where the Browns have gotten

1105
00:45:26,880 --> 00:45:29,920
Speaker 1: right now with this game, because they they're obviously much

1106
00:45:29,960 --> 00:45:32,560
Speaker 1: more talented and should be better than they had looked

1107
00:45:32,760 --> 00:45:34,400
Speaker 1: prior to this past week. So this could be a

1108
00:45:34,440 --> 00:45:37,560
Speaker 1: game where they're going But you know, Monday Night cross Country.

1109
00:45:37,840 --> 00:45:40,000
Speaker 1: I'm a little iffy on it, but as of right now,

1110
00:45:40,280 --> 00:45:42,080
Speaker 1: I agree that as long as we're past the key

1111
00:45:42,200 --> 00:45:43,920
Speaker 1: number of three at worth three and a half, I

1112
00:45:44,000 --> 00:45:46,319
Speaker 1: do lean as well towards the Browns. So I like

1113
00:45:46,360 --> 00:45:48,680
Speaker 1: that we're in agreement there. Well, that is going to

1114
00:45:48,680 --> 00:45:51,160
Speaker 1: do it for today's show, Chris, it was great having

1115
00:45:51,200 --> 00:45:53,719
Speaker 1: you on. Please remind everyone where they can find more

1116
00:45:53,719 --> 00:45:54,720
Speaker 1: of you and your work.

1117
00:45:55,360 --> 00:45:56,879
Speaker 2: Yeah, you're gonna want to check us out if you're

1118
00:45:56,880 --> 00:45:59,840
Speaker 2: playing dfs over at rodo grinders dot com. All the

1119
00:46:00,120 --> 00:46:03,200
Speaker 2: tools that you're going to need to set competitive and

1120
00:46:03,280 --> 00:46:06,520
Speaker 2: potentially week winning lineups. I think we've had a couple

1121
00:46:06,560 --> 00:46:08,320
Speaker 2: of guys get to the tippy top of the leaderboards

1122
00:46:08,320 --> 00:46:10,640
Speaker 2: already this season. We'd like you to come and join them.

1123
00:46:10,840 --> 00:46:12,839
Speaker 2: Of course, if you want to play some prop bets,

1124
00:46:12,840 --> 00:46:14,799
Speaker 2: we've got some tools on rotor Grinders to do that

1125
00:46:14,880 --> 00:46:17,480
Speaker 2: based on our player projections. And of course, if you

1126
00:46:17,520 --> 00:46:20,600
Speaker 2: are into betting the way that I suspect you are.

1127
00:46:20,600 --> 00:46:22,279
Speaker 2: If you're listening to this podcast, you want to check

1128
00:46:22,360 --> 00:46:25,080
Speaker 2: us out on the sharp Side app as part of

1129
00:46:25,080 --> 00:46:26,799
Speaker 2: the Better Collective Network. I think you can get some

1130
00:46:26,800 --> 00:46:31,520
Speaker 2: good information and participate in our gamification of being a

1131
00:46:31,800 --> 00:46:34,319
Speaker 2: betting leader amongst your peers. We were trying to turn

1132
00:46:34,360 --> 00:46:36,040
Speaker 2: it into the betting community over there, so go ahead

1133
00:46:36,040 --> 00:46:37,200
Speaker 2: and check us out on sharpside.

1134
00:46:37,320 --> 00:46:40,040
Speaker 1: Awesome. Well, thanks again for coming on and I hope

1135
00:46:40,040 --> 00:46:41,200
Speaker 1: we can do it again during the season.

1136
00:46:41,880 --> 00:46:43,200
Speaker 3: Sounds great. Thanks for having me all.

1137
00:46:43,200 --> 00:46:45,720
Speaker 1: Right, Thanks again to the sponsor of today's show, bet MGM.

1138
00:46:45,960 --> 00:46:48,520
Speaker 1: Remember to download the bet mgm Sports app and use

1139
00:46:48,560 --> 00:46:51,560
Speaker 1: the promo code Harris to get your risk free first

1140
00:46:51,600 --> 00:46:54,040
Speaker 1: waiter of up to five hundred dollars, and don't forget

1141
00:46:54,080 --> 00:46:56,680
Speaker 1: to rate and review the podcast and send a screenshot

1142
00:46:56,719 --> 00:46:59,600
Speaker 1: of that review to contest at bettingpros dot com for

1143
00:46:59,719 --> 00:47:02,480
Speaker 1: your chance to win a signed Alvin Kamara helmet. We'll

1144
00:47:02,520 --> 00:47:04,439
Speaker 1: be back later this week giving some of our best

1145
00:47:04,440 --> 00:47:06,400
Speaker 1: bets for Week five. I'll talk to you that