WEBVTT - Everything you need to know about the NFC East

0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show. Now,

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>here's your host. Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm Paul

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>charchy in. My co host is Brian Johnson. Welcome back.

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Finally you can say welcome back to me. Yeah, I

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>mean normally you're here again. Yeah, that's usually the case.

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish filled in admirably for you, and it wasn't

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>even a filling. I mean, you know you were available.

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>We just wanted you know, he's a cost in the show.

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>He gets to come back. You choose the film. I'm

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>sure he did. Alright, he did, great, he did. Um,

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna break down the NFC East and it we'll

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>talk through our how we see these offenses functioning for

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>this season. We've been doing this now, I think six

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>straight weeks where we've broken down different different divisions and uh,

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the NFCUS because it gives us a chance to talk

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>about some shaky quarterbacking on the whole. But some football teams,

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>football teams, we're gonna talk about some and I will

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>be breaking down football team. Because it's Stu Beird, I'm

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna take the Stupird option. So I've got Washington, You've

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>got the Giants. Before we jump into the Giants, let

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>me just remind people I gave you Stu Beird though

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we were discussing, we were prepping for the show, and

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the first thing I said was you get Stu Beird.

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course, thank you. We appreciate your yes. Um, and

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you got stuck with the team you love to hate,

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. So yeah, the division champions Giants, I forgot

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>about that. I wait, no, Washington's the division channel. They

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't matter. They both made the playoffs though, right, No,

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that's right. I'm forgetting that the Giants should have won.

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>They should have well, no one should have won that

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>division last year anyway, Properly, that's enough reality football. We

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>jump into the Giants. A reminder gives you Lead dot

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Com open for new league starting now if you've always

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>wanted to try one available at whatever prizing level that

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to play for, and private leagues available. If

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got a bunch of friends, I want to play

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Guillotine League. We support h private league play

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>for groups between eight and eighteen teams at Guillotine League

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com and the forty four team super Chop twelve

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>twelve team leagues as of right now is about half full.

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>That's one and you could be a part of history.

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>That's the flagship super Chop content is cash prizing that.

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the grand prize is three grand in that one,

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>if memory serves not bad for a fifty Yeah, that's

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that would be. That would be awfully nice. We we

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>filled up the scott Fish Bowls Super Chop for charity

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in a day, in less than a day, like five hours.

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I was given last Friday off day off quote unquote

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>at that day launches and I'm not I don't have

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the day off. Then that was awesome. They feel really

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>fast though, and thank you to everybody that decided to

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>participate in that. And the fifty dollars that went to

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Cares was great. Rhodo Wire for the free subscription,

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>outstanding trophy Smack for the amazing rings that they're producing

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>for this and really really nice. So let's talk about

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the giants. Let's jump in here, and as we've done

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>for all of our past shows on this again. We're

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>not recapping last year. We're looking forward for how we

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 1>think this offense is going to look. And let's jump

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>into the Giants. Giants. Uh, last year offense not good

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty feet and uh thirty one in yards per game

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and points per game. Um. Joe Judge makes his return

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>as head coach his second year. He brings along UH

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>he's had Jason Garrett into offensive mastermind. Jason Garrett uh

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.839
<v Speaker 1>still the offensive coordinator for the g Men. Uh. Let's

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>start with se Kwan Barkley obviously got to start with Barkley. UH.

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>The big name of course on the team. Running back

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>five really player five overall as of right now, it's

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>either like you, unless it's a super flex league and

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>one quarterback leagues, you're taking a a top five running

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>back or Travis Kelsey, which, by the way, it's Travis Kels.

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Well now his mom says it's Kelsey, so his mom

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>would know, so so this thing is still very ambiguous.

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>We had the bit because my fantasy league would pronounce

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it Travis Kels and we used to make fun of that.

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>The shouty guy was the best bits. Yeah, We're like,

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>they're so wrong. It's funny, but no, it might be right.

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, UH, if you're not taking Barkley, UH, you

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>might be taking Kelsey outside of one of the other

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>big backs. But Barkley injured Week one of last year.

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 1>As everyone remembers, UH last season, people are expecting a

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:44.239
<v Speaker 1>full on bounce back. They're banking on it. At ADP five,

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about him. It's a little more this segment. UH.

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And if for handcuffed reasons you're interested. Davante Booker is

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the top backup running back, and they also have Corey

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Clement who came over from the Eagles, and our rookie

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Gary bright Well. But whoever the running back is for

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, the a running behind arguably the worst offensive

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>line in the NFL. In Pro Football Focus his mind

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that ranked thirty seconds going into this season. UH. And

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>this despite the fact that they have put money and

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>draft picks towards that line. They have tried, but the

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>players that they've invested in have not worked out. UH.

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 1>They invested a fourth, fourth overall pick in Andrew Thomas

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>last year, UH flopped at left tackle. UH. Nate Solder,

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>who was the starting left tackle last year, will probably

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>move to right tackle. List here does make his return.

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>He opted out in so that that will help. That

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>does help a lot. But uh, outside of that, Um,

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>they have a converted guard playing center. This will be

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a second year playing center, and the other two guard

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>spots right now wide open for competition. The line is

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>even defined right now, so very worrisome there for the

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>running game and not only the passing game. Daniel Jones

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>currently quarterback one, pretty much free in terms of a

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>starting quarterback. If you wants too high, you mean he

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>should be going later. You're going later than that. I

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>mean there are guys after him, like Carson Wentz, I'd

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>rather roll the dice on, and many you know, many others.

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about him soon. Ryan Fitzpatrick going after uh,

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones. I would take fits nine out of ten

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>times over Jones and probably Deshaun Watson. The one other

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>time was also going after Daniel Jones. Worth the lotto

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>play moral stands aside. Um, Jones does have a shiny

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>new toy in wide receiver Kenny Golladay, who is the

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:29.239
<v Speaker 1>leader of that pack. Now he's going off the board

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>as wide receiver wide receiver twenty seven right now, which

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>seems about right Uh, he's definitely the wide receiver you

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>want out of this corpse. Uh corps of corps corpse

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>might be a more pronounced that. It's actually a deep

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>set of receiver Sterling Shepherd. The problem, I think because

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it's too many Sterling Shepherd, Darius Layton. You can get them. Well,

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>then if you're drafted Darius Tony, a rookie that some

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>people are excited about from a redraft. Respect don't like

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this landing spot. He's he's dead to me there um,

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, giants wide receivers do not did not produce

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>last year. Granted Golliday wasn't there, but they were bottom

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>made and catches bottom four and yards and touchdowns at

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the position. I'm just kind of out on this whole

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>whole pass game at the wide receiver, even Holiday, who

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>in theory should immediately become the alpha. We see a

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of times even very good receivers first year on

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>new teams struggle. I just and there's just too many

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>balls to go around, including Barkley, Evan Ingram, Sterling Shepherd, Tony.

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just you know, slat and there's just so many

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>guys that need to get fed. I worry about Golliday

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>getting appropriate usage here. I'm with you, and the Giants

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>actually have a very good defense, you know, so I

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't know if they're gonna be giving up

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a ton of points, so I don't know how active.

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>If they're really wanting to win games, I mean they are,

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know how many they're gonna win. It's

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be more good defense, ball control with Barkley, that's

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the recipe for success. And you just mentioned

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Evan Ingram. Let's talk about him and I might as

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>well throw in the He is my highest upside player

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Giants right now. He has underachieved so far

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in his career, to say the least, just thirteen touchdowns

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:14.119
<v Speaker 1>across four seasons. Of course, he plays all sixteen games

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>last year for the first time in his career, scores

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown God, the only tight end touchdown for the Giants.

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>But man, the Giants do utilize their tight ends a lot.

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>They're they've been top eleven and catches for three straight years,

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>usually a focal point of the offense. But Kyle Rodolf,

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>is there a really good red zone end zone target?

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>And I worry that this could be another one to

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>three touchdown season for Evan Ingram. But right now it

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end fourteen. I mean he's gone like tight end

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>six five, like his a DP and now the bottom

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>has fallen out finally maybe he puts it all together.

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Still a freakish athlete, he's showing flashes of brilliance. Of

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>course he's had some some bad drops. But at tight

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>end fourteen right now, if you're missing out on the

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Big three or four, however you want a group of

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>those guys. There's top six seven potential here for Ingram.

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>If you can put it all together in a tight

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>end fourteen, that's a virtually free uh, if you're looking

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>at your starting tight end and to the riskiest player,

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty obvious. And he's a top five pick if

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>he gets hurt like he did last year, year done

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>before and the year before, and of course everyone is

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:29.199
<v Speaker 1>at risk of injury, but uh, obvious a little concerned.

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>They don't like fully unleashed him out of the gate either.

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>When the season starts, you know, like people are thinking

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>thirty touches, I'm thinking more seven team twenty worlcome back

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I know he's a freak of nature.

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>He's still very young, very much in the prime of

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 1>his career. But I don't know top five pick, it's

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it's too risky for me. He's not he's not locked

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>or produced. E've been taking DeVante Booker late in a

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of drafts, even if you don't have Barkley right

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>not right now. I don't have Barkley at any I

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have any shares of Barkley and across any of

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>my draft. So I would almost argue, if you have

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Barkley not to take Booker. Booker will be serviceable. But

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>if Barkley goes down, you're pretty much done. But if

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't know in Barkley and you get the starting

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, but uh that's but uh yeah, that's all.

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>That's all we have to say for the Giants, other

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>than I hope Gettleman Dave Gettleman finally gets fired after

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>this season. I think it will happen. I hope. So

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>for Washington football team, they get competent quarterbacking for the

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>first time in years, and this team is said to

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>improve significantly over last year. Brian, you're gonna hear a

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of optimism. This team finished twenty fifth points last year.

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Twenty yards. I think they're going to be closer to

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>top twelve top fourteen in both of those categories. So

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>let's start with Ryan Fitzpatrick, your new starter, although we'll

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>mention uh Taylor Heineke looked pretty darn good at the

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>end of last year. But Fitzpatrick goes in as the starter,

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and he played well last year, and his benching for

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to a Toungo violoa should not be viewed as a

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>reflection of Fitzpatrick's play. And you know, I'm gonna give

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you some numbers here that really I think will will

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>help demonstrate why he's going to be very valuable here,

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 1>and especially compared to recent Washington quarterbacks. You know, Fitzpatrick

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>impressed the ball upfield. He finished eleventh in completed air

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>yards last year, in eighth in yards per attempt. And

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>this despite last year he had the second shortest time

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to throw and he still finished eighth and yards pert tempt.

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean that guy hung tough in the pocket and

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:41.319
<v Speaker 1>delivered downfield. Last year. He ranked number one in aggressiveness,

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>which is next next. Jen stats is calculation for a

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>pastor's willingness to throw into tight coverage. I like that

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>about him. He's always been this way. He'll take the

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>periodic pick if it means that he can get the

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>ball towards his best receivers. Fitzpatrick led the league in

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>on target a percentage in balls thrown twenty yards or

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>longer last year. He was good last year, and they

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned him anyway, the Dolphins would have made the playoffs.

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm convinced that they kept him there for sure. All

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>we needed was one more win his He had six

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>his sixty five completion percentage. People think that he's a

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.439
<v Speaker 1>very errand thrower, but he completed six of his passes.

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers completed sixty six, so I really think that's

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>not accurate either. He was next gent Stats seventh ranked

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in completions above expectation. So you're all that together anything,

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And I've got more on him later. So let's go

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to Let's go to his receiving targets, beginning with Terry

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:47.839
<v Speaker 1>mcterry McLaurin sitting on a breakout season. He's already really

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>good despite the terrible quarterbacking they've had. Um, how bad

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>was it last year? Mclauren was seventy five in catchable

0:12:56.080 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 1>target rate. Last year seventy five among why receivers and

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>catchable targets. Now with Fitzpatrick, he's going to see way

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>more downfield opportunities. Fitzpatrick's a dot has been the top three, sorry,

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>top ten for three straight years, so we're gonna see

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>McLaurin work downfield much more. I love that opportunity for him. Um.

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick's number one wide receiver, so his top wide receiver.

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>His averaged one hundred forty two targets per season when

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick has started ten or more games, which he has

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>projected to do. Here, if we put Terry McLaren on

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>one forty two targets, he will be a top ten

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver this year easily. McLaren played a whopping eight

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>per cent of the team's plays last year, so obviously

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I love mclauren. Curtis Samuel gets reunited with Ron Rivera

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.599
<v Speaker 1>and Scott Turner, who know him very well from Carolina.

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>He'll presumably read that jack of all trades guy that

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>he has been for Carolina. UM, but now with the

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>best quarterbacking of his career, and he's reunited with Terry McLaurin,

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>who they went. Isn't that fun? Um? You know, so

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 1>you know it's gonna be the same we did to

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>we do. Just say that Fitzpatrick loves to feed his

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>number one and that's going to continue to be the

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 1>case here. Um, but Samuel figures to be the number

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>two receiver in this offense, and they're gonna run him

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>some and do some other stuff with him. I think

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you'll get a lot of high and low stuff. Let

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>me note this. He ran predominantly from the slot last year,

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>but under Scott Turner in Carolina Curtis Samuel lined up

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>outside much more often. And I think he's going to

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>be an outside receiver for this team because Adam Humphries

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to man the slot and he'll likely be

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>on the field more than people realize because people in

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>their minds still think Samuel, like last year, is gonna

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>be predominantly slot. I don't think he is. I think

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna go outside much more so. Um. He Humphries

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>got cut from the Titans. He was two years into

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a four year deal, and that's you that was worrisome

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't decide to keep him, and he had

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the concussions last year. But um, you could play him

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in a PPR situation only and sort of pick your spots.

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>He played with Fitzpatrick and Tampa for what it's worth,

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think Humphries is anything more than the

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>last last pick of your draft kind of guy, or

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>some of you pick up off the waiver wire. Rookie

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Diemi Brown is there. He's a speedcer with deep speed,

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and we do have a deep armed quarterback here, so

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>he might be somebody who could you could throw a

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>dart at from time to time. But there's also Campsen's

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and Antonio Golden Gandy and Kelvin Harmon, and there's other guys.

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Stevens sim City. I like that it is sim City

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>with two Sims on the team. Uh. Tight end Logan

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Thomas is fascinating. So he had the improbable path as

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a college quarterback turned tight end turned journeyman, bouncing around

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>from team to team to team, and then last year

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>he's on the field for Washington's plays. And he was

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a pro drafted as a pro quarterback. But Cardinals, that's

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>like the fourth quarterback. He wasn't like signed as a

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>free Asian or anything like that. He was drafted to

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>play quarterback. Didn't work out and do his credit. I mean,

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>he's managed to stay in the league and Lions gave

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>up on him, and then now he's turned into a

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>very good tight end. Over the final eleven games of

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>last year, he finished with per game averages of five catches,

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty one yards and half a touchdown per game. That's

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty solid, lead the team in red zone targets. There's

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>downside here though, because again Fitzpatrick feeds his number one

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel's now there, Adam Humphries now there. They dat

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>drafted Diamie Brown. I think there's some downside on Logan Thomas.

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's gonna get quite as much usage,

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>quite as many balls, but he's he's still I still

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>probably make sense about where he's going in most fantasy drafts.

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>As currently as tight ends eight off the board. Yeah,

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, it's the big three. And then he

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>got Hockinson, got Art and uh Kyle Pitts and then

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it gets scared to that. Then it's then it starts

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>with Logan Thomas, and I don't like him being the guy.

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of avoiding that situation. But as good as

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>he was last year, if you told me I get

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>five catches fifty have a touchdoff from him that I'm

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely in, which is what he did in the second

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>half last year. Let's go to the running back position.

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's high in Antonio Gibson at this point, including me

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>his abilities. I think we're overlooked by many last year.

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think given the off season of reflection, people

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have gone back and looked at his body of work

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 1>last year and realized Antonio Gibson was really good. He

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>was Pro Football Focus his sixth ranked running back last year.

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry led the NFL and miss tackles. Antonio Gibson

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>tied him in miss tackles per carry. That's pretty impressive,

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Pretty impressive, the team repeatedly said last as repeatedly said

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in the offseason, They're gonna throw to him more, as

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you probably remember at Tuni with Gibson's converted wide out

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and so that makes sense. I think he will. I

0:17:57.760 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>think that will end up happening, and that will end

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>up dink J. D. McKissick, whose only real value to

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>fantasy fans is fantasy players, is as a PPR back.

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I read a report today, uh from NBC Sports Edge

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever Rhodo World's called now about how he's put on

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>muscle though, put on some weight kiss and now that

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna take the job from Antonio Gibson. But have

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>given the opportunity, he might be more than he could

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>be the full on bell cow backup for Gibsons. That

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>could make sense. Uh, here's the real problem for Antonio Gibson.

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>His pass blocking is awful. ProFootball Focus ranked him sixty

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>one at the position. There are only three qualified runners

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>who ranked lower than Antonio Gibson, and he we need

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>him to be on the field and third down if

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>we want to see the past catching get better and

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 1>then the receiving numbers go up. So he's got to

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>get better than that riskiest player. His current ADPs loan

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Logan Thomas, who as I mentioned earlier, he's going off

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the board and round seven. Last year there were only

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:56.679
<v Speaker 1>three viable targets on the whole team. This year there

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>might be six, so I think his numbers are could

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>potentially go down. The player with the most upside, we're

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>back to Ryan Fitzpatrick, quarterback twenty six right now. Had

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick been allowed to play the full season in Miami,

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>he was on track for four thousand one d passing yards,

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven and a half touchdowns, thirty three thirty rushing

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>yards and five rushing touchdowns. His closest comparable quarterback Justin Herbert.

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Justin Herbert's ADPs quarterback six. Ryan Fitzpatrick, who put up

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>again was on a per game basis. Is putting the

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>same numbers as Justin herbert Is ADP is six too cheap.

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Too cheap. Hopefully you will not be too cheap to

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>consider the sponsors that you were about to hear. As

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>we take a break, we come back, we'll talk about

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the Philadelphia e goals eight, an offense in a great

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>deal of transition. We'll tell you how we feel about

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>them in moments. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Giargie

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and Brian Johnson. We you, let's talk about the Eagles.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 1>There may be no more player with upside and downside

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>then Jalen Hurts. If he can be a good enough

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>passer to hold that job all year and continue running

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>like he did last year, he has top five fantasy

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in him. But if his passing stays at the

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.479
<v Speaker 1>level it was last year, Brian, I can't tell you

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>he even finishes the season as the start. Yeah, well, uh,

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll certainly talk about the upside and downside of Jalen

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Hurts a little more. But like you mentioned, a lot

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of change going on in Philly. A new head coach,

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Nick Sirianni, the former offensive coordinator for the Colts. They

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>also have a new offensive coordinator, Shane Stiken, who is

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.719
<v Speaker 1>the former O C for the Chargers. So a lot

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:50.719
<v Speaker 1>of changes on the sidelines for Philly. Um, we're not

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>good in terms of yards per game in points per

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>game last year respectively. That was a lot of Carson

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Wentzlough and not Jalen Hurts of course. Uh. Well, and

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>again that offensive line just amated by injury, and we'll

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about the line a little more as well. Uh,

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Philly did rank top eight in past play percentage passed

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball over of the time, very past friendly offense. UM.

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>For Jalen Hurt's sake and his past catchers, hopefully that

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>remains the same. But I let's talk about the running,

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the running game and Miles Sanders, who's had a somewhat tortuous,

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>tortuous tortuous in the league, especially from a fantasy perspective.

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Big weeks down weeks just very inconsistent, even when it

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>just comes from his usage and touches per game. Just

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 1>six h rushing touchdowns last year's zero receiving touchdowns right now,

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>going off the board as RB eighteen, just after the

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Swifts and j K. Dobbins of the world. But

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I like that spot for Sanders

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and Redraft. I like guys like Chris Carson David Montgomery

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>who are going after Sanders. Uh, just from the safety

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Here's why I kind of like Sanders. Everybody's so down

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>on him. A DP is really depressed, and that offensive line,

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>when healthy is actually quite good. So I'm kind of

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 1>interested in Sanders this year. The So let's talk about

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the line. It's been elite for years. The Eagles have

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>had a very good offensive line, and it fell off

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot last year because of injury and and they're

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>they're stars are falling a little bit. Right tackle Lane

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Johnson and center Jason Kelse is he kels or is

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 1>he kills he too? He's gotta bell. They might be

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>past their their prime by a pinch, but they're still

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>still very good players. Uh. They did invest a nineteen

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>first round pick and left tackle Andre Dillard, but he

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>has yet to live up to expectations. They do get

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>back the Eagles, that is right guard Brandon Brooks, who

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 1>missed all of that'll help. He was Pro Football Focused

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>hot Pro Football Focus his highest graded guard in twenty

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and he missed all of last year, so the

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>line much improved they are. They are only ranks seventeenth

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.439
<v Speaker 1>by Pro Football Focus going into the season, but if

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it stays intact, it could return to its glory days

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and UH help boost Miles Sanders into top twelve RB territory.

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>But he's very much a coin flip and very much

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a contestant or a finalist for the highest downside. For

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>give you another reason that I'm optimistic here. You know

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Doug Peterson's gone. Peterson used a maddening running back by

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 1>committee that oftentimes was not reflective of who the best

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>runners were, and Sanders is the best runner. But we

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>know Nick Sirianni won't do that in the Colts. That's

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of very much so it I agree it is,

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's a but it's an opportunity for it for

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Sanders to um to get more work than he had,

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's a decent chance he does here

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 1>you would you would hope to think he does. And

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>just for the sake of mentioning Boston, Scott will be

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>the primary backup. He has filled in admirably, admirably in

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the past, and they do. They did sign carry On

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Johnson for those wondering if he's still in the league

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and drafted, Uh, Kenneth Gainwell, I think in the fourth

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>round as a he's a rookie. Uh. Tailing off the

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>running back commy there. Uh So let's go to the

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.479
<v Speaker 1>passing game and Jalen Hurts the other big name in Philly.

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh inside the overall top eighty five players currently quarterback

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>nine in most formats, going right after Aaron Rodgers, before

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady, Matthew Stafford, Ryan Tannehill, Joe Burrow. A lot

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of faith being put in Jalen Hurts. Uh. But like

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you said, he he was great last year. But but

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the sample was small. We'll we'll dive into Hurts just

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more in a second. Let's talk about

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>his receivers really quick. And when you start with the

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Philly receivers, you really have to start with the tight

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>ends and not the wide receivers. And for at the moment.

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>As of right now, the tight ends are both Dallas

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Goddard and zach Ertz. Zach Ertz is still an Eagle. Uh.

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles have always used their tight ends a ton,

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 1>always ranking near the top of all relevant fantasy stats.

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Richard Rodgers and Jason Croom were catching tight ends catching

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns for the Philly for the Eagles last year at

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>tight end. Uh. The real history has Sirianni comes from

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>India where they use multiple tight ends all the time too.

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, the recent history for the Philly tight ends

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>has gone from all zach Ertz to kind of a

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>fifty fifty Earth's got her platoon, but the torch is

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>certainly getting passed to god Heart now currently tight ends

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>seven going after all the big names, and again Ertz

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>is there for now at tight end twenty one. I'm

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>thank him leaving. I am too, I you know, I

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>like taking Art's late and then I just think they're

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna end up moving him someplace. Now, you know, where

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 1>they move him may not be a desirable spot, but

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>presumably any team that's gonna trade whatever it costs to

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>get zach Ertz and Earth's wants to be well paid

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to um you know that's gonna pay him and trade

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the equity for him. Presumably they're going to use him.

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo was the primary landing spot that we've heard about. Yeah,

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>I would love that, but anyway, we'll see what happens

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>with Earth's. As for the wide receivers, not very exciting.

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna talk about DeVante Smith very quickly. He's the

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>only one I'm gonna mention. I'm not gonna talk about

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Jalen reagor Travis Folgum. I'm not going there in drafts.

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they start producing in the season, I'll ad him

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>off the waiver. Why but they're they're not draftable in

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>my mind, not even Reager, even though he has a

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>draftable a DP at one sixty two, people are drafting him.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I would not. DeVante Smith is my highest upside player.

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>He's a rookie wide receiver forty right now, but he's

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the top wide receiver on this team. Not the top receiver.

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>That would be Dallas Goddard. But uh, one of the

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 1>most exciting wide receivers ever to play college football. Is

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>absolutely dominated. Won the Heisman, almost won the national championship

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>on his own. It's quite simply he's if he's the

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>top target at wide receiver on a team that's top

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>eight in passing play percentage, and if Jalen Hurts can

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>keep it clicking. If you're getting Devonte Smith at wide

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>receiver forty, I'm not comparing to Randy Moss. People concerned,

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>well from the Thinness factor a little bit, but you know,

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of concerns with Randy Moss go

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>into his rookie year. There are a lot of concerns

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>with Devonte Smith. He could throw all those out the

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>window and just be a phenom right out of the game.

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>And wide receiver forty, I'll roll the dice there, And

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>unlike Jalen Waddle, Um, you know who who's going, I

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know about if team picks ahead of him, twelve

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>picks ahead of him, you know that offense, that passing

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>offense is largely going to go through Smith, and you

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.919
<v Speaker 1>know that's that's there's a certain amount of appeal to

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that for those that need productivity from him this year.

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And lastly, it was either you know, Miles Sanders or

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts as your riskiest player. I guess maybe Dallas

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Goddard could have been in the convo, But I'm going

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts if you're taking quarterback. We've said it in

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>previous pods. It might be the deepest that's ever been

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy. If you're sinking uh, you know, a top

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 1>six seven round pick into Jalen Hurts. He has to

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>pan out, and if he doesn't, yeah, you'll probably feel

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 1>uh find someone on the waiveward to back him up.

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 1>But you caught it cost yourself a stud at another

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>position if it Hurts doesn't pan out, So yeah, most

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>risk I'm with him that um and tons of upside. Definitely,

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:49.959
<v Speaker 1>it all comes down to his passing. He just he

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 1>has to be able to pass better than what we

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 1>saw last year. He'll give you that rushing floor, but

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:56.120
<v Speaker 1>if his arm doesn't keep him on the field, he's

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be getting any rushing. That's at the end

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of the day. It's a passing position and people don't

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:02.679
<v Speaker 1>like to hear that in Fantasy owners and you know,

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I get it, but and you're here for the rushing,

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but at some point your quarterback has to be able

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to pass. Let's go to the Dallas Cowboys. Bryant uh

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott returns to lead a high powered offense that

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>struggled without him. As you already know from last year,

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 1>in the four full games he played, he was Fantasy

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Football's highest scoring quarterback last year. There's a lot of

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>optimism for him. He uh he topped four hundred fifty

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>passing yards in three of his four full games last year.

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Four fifty. Dak obviously very good passer, elite weaponry around him,

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 1>a very safe fantasy selection despite coming off the ankle.

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the question is, though, on this rebuild ankle,

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>are they going to run him as much? I mean,

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>much of his fantasy upside had come from these combo

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>games where you know, he ran for forty five yards

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and maybe a touchdown and he threw for two eighty

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>or three thirty and a couple of scores, and you know,

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in combination, those are really good Dak Prescott games. Just

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to unclear as to whether or not that rebuilt ankle

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to allow him to produce the same kind

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of rushing numbers and if Mike McCarthy will allow him

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to have the same kind of rushing numbers. I'm not

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>too worried about the ability, but yeah, they're not going

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to force it as much as they did in the past.

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's true. Let's talk about the offensive line

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>because that's much of the story with Dallas this year.

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Offensive line decimated by injury last year, but should return

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to I'm not calling the elite status because I don't

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>think we're that level for these Cowboys anymore. But this

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>could be a top ten offensive line. It was only

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>two years ago they were the number one line with

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.239
<v Speaker 1>a bullet that's in most people's minds. Yeah, it's an

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>aging Uh, there's it's a somewhat aging line in spots

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>like left tackle Tyrone Smith returns he missed almost the

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>entire season last year. Their right tackle l Collins returns

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>after missing oh of last year with a hip injury.

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Zack Martin, the right guard is elite. The left guard

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is Connor Williams, a solid, not splashy player. Center is

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty big question mark. Travis Frederick had to retire, of course.

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Is most people know um Tyler Biadaz I believe is

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>how you pronounce his name. He was the starter last year,

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't great, and he's back for this year. A

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. You already know. It's a total embarrassment of

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>ridges for the Cowboys. There are three great receivers. They

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.479
<v Speaker 1>each are worthy of one hundred targets. They each had

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>one hundred targets last year. And you know that means

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>when you when you're spreading a hundred targets out three

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>different guys. Some games, all right, I know, UM, some

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>games you're gonna have guys that just don't show up

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in the box score as much because the other two

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>need to get fed. And so that happens. Sometimes. Everybody

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>believes Ceedee Lamb is going to take a big leap

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in year two. I'm I'm certainly on board. In his

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>four full games with Dak Prescott, which were his first

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>four NFL games, by the way, So you know, weeks

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>one through four of last year with Dak Prescott, his

0:30:56.000 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>production there put Ceedee Lamb on pace for ninety re receptions,

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>one thousand, four hundred yards and six touchdowns. So ninety

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>three catches for rookie, that'd be probably it would have

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>been an amazing season for him. Um. Then Dalton came on,

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Lamb season went in the crapper and you know the

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>story from the rest of that. Um, he's tall, he's

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a ranging receiver, surprising burst even though he doesn't have

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>top end speed, tons of huge broken plays at Oklahoma.

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Lamb had the league's second best catch rate last year

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>on balls twenty yards or longer. And now he gets

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a far better, stronger armed quarterback in Dak Prescott ceedee

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>lamb is um is Is has moved in the eyes

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of most people into the teens for his a DP

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Among wide receivers, Amari Cooper led the team in every

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>meaningful statistical category last year, and I'll probably do that

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>again this year, although it'll be much closer, he said,

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>career highs and red zone targets. Last year, he converted

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven percent of his red zone receptions into touchdowns.

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Cooper got seven targets from inside the five yard line,

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>which is nuts. That is a lot for a wide receiver.

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Seven targets from inside the five yard line. He remains

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the safest of the Dallas receivers um, although all the

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>steam for Lamb makes it close. But I still think Cooper.

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>If I had to pick one, I would take Cooper slightly,

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and I've got them ranked within like two players of

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>each other, two receivers of each other. I'll mention this

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>though Cooper underwent ankle surgery in January, didn't participate in

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the team's offseason program at all, and he is expected

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to be okay for the start of training camp. We'll see.

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Then there's Michael Gallup third wheel. Still targeted a hundred

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>thirteen times last year and a hundred five times the

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>year before that, or I might have had those backwards.

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Actually I think it was hundred five last year. Um.

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>He's the big body downfield guy that they throw too.

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the boom er bust stuff. When he gets when

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>he connects on those deep balls, he's great, and he

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>scores on those. It's great, but usually it doesn't work out.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>In his twelve non touchdown games last year, he averaged

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>three catches for forty two yards. That's that kills you.

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Those basically every time I used him on DraftKings it

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>was hard pegging those four so temptingly yeah, yeah, Um,

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the tight ends. Blake Jarwin returns after

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>missing the entire season with an a c L and

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the season opener. He he got in some like practice

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and O t s and mini camps, expected to be

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>available for training camp. He's a far He's he's the

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>much more polished receiver of the two between him and

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Dalton Schultz, and I expect him to resume his number

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>one tight end status that he had going into last year. Um.

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Dalton Schultz just is not a is not a special player.

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 1>And the tight end position though with either guy, I

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>think there's some danger and there's a fair amount of

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>steam on Blake Darwin Um coming back. But in reality,

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the tight end position, no matter who is your fourth

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>or fifth in the pecking order, you're behind the three

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>receivers behind his Sekiel Elliott, and so really at best

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>your fourth or fifth at the time at as looking

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>for balls from back, Darwin broke a lot of hearts.

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>He was a trendy sleeper pick at tight end last year.

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>And I believe you didn't even play. I think you

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>heard him Silvan and you didn't even get like a

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>full game out of him. I think it was early

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.359
<v Speaker 1>in wee. That was brutal. Yea, all right, let's talk

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 1>running back. This is going to be a really hard

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:29.439
<v Speaker 1>decision for a lot of people. There is so much

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>steam right now, and Ezekiel Elliott going off the board

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>right now as running back five and player five, I

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>think it was five, or do you say somebody else

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:41.839
<v Speaker 1>was five earlier Barkley. But I guess, depending demands where

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you're looking, it might be four. Um, in fact, it

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:46.800
<v Speaker 1>might be three. Well, we give it. I should, I should.

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't have in front of me McCaffrey, Cook, Kamara.

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh No, I've got him going after he's gone. I

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>just I do have notes that he's going on Henry.

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten where I was looking fantasy footboll calculator. By

0:34:56.920 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>those what I was I was using for this draft

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>position five for either way. It was at this time

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>last year that I was like, avoid Zeke at all costs.

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>I was really nervous about Zeke for a lot of reasons,

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:11.839
<v Speaker 1>and thinks I'm still somewhat concerned, although I'm a lot

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 1>warmer on Zeke now than I was last year. At

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 1>this time he posted career worst numbers in every Russian category. Um.

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:24.919
<v Speaker 1>But again, the offensive line was really bad last year,

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 1>and it comes back healthy this year. The other thing

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.879
<v Speaker 1>that we should mention is, by all accounts, Zeke looks great.

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>And I've seen photos of Zeke. You know he's you know,

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>he he doesn't like to wear a shirt anyway, and

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:37.280
<v Speaker 1>he does wear a shirt. It's a half shirt because

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.760
<v Speaker 1>he wants to show off his abs and he looks good.

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Zeke looks like he's taking this offseason very seriously, takes

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>very good care of that Billy button. Always lind free,

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 1>always lind free, when even when you take the offensive

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 1>line struggles out of the equation. Though Zeke was not

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>great last year, get this. Next gen stats showed this.

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Zeke had zero point zero seven yards over expectation last year.

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Zero point zero seven yards. Ruler to route to figure

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>out how far that is. That's not the kind of

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.399
<v Speaker 1>double O seven you want. No, that is not um.

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>That tiedem was Zack Moss, and people hate Zack Moss.

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>So that gives you a sense of where of where

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>what the Zeke we saw last year. But obviously people

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>fully expect the bounce back. But here's the reason I'm

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 1>still worried. Tony Pollard is the more dynamic back. Paulard

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>deserves more touches than he's gotten. And just like when

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you go back, Pro Football Focus rates rates Pollard better

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>in pretty much every metric except pass blocking. Zeke is

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>very good. Pollard for two straight years running. Pro Football

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Focus thinks Pollard's the better running and just my eyes,

0:36:56.280 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Pollard is the more dynamic back. There's real risk, and

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>this is why Zeke is the riskiest player at his

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>current ADP for the Cowboys at draft position five. I

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>need a sure thing I do. I don't want to

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 1>have this kind of I don't want to have this

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>hanging over me. Which Zeke am I gonna get? Am

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I gonna get lack the lackluster version we saw last year?

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Am I gonna get a better one? I don't want

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 1>question marks to pick five? And to me, Zeke still

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 1>got question marks. I would say he and Dalvin Cook

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:29.240
<v Speaker 1>are the two top running backs that you have to handcuff.

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't I'm not an advocate of handcuffing all stud

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 1>running backs, but those two feel like the one and

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 1>then you're reaching around to get that ensure you get

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>those handcuffs, right, Yeah, I don't like it. So if

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Zeke is going at draft position five, how many other

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>guys are going in that position in that range who

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 1>aren't clearly the best player at their own position on

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>their own team. I mean that's the worry, right, So

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 1>I still think there's a lot of risk there. Let's

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about the play with the most upside compared to

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a DP. To me, that's a MARII Cooper. He's wide

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:03.839
<v Speaker 1>receiver four teen and round four. Uh ceedee, lamb going

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:06.240
<v Speaker 1>really right in the same range right now. But Cooper

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 1>has just proven to be a workhorse receiver and I

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 1>love the fact that they throw to him inside the

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>five and that's those are cheap, easy touchdowns and I

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>love that stuff. Um, so yeah, I'm taking Amari Cooper.

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Why deceiver fourteen might be a little low with Dak

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Prescott coming back? Who's gonna win this division? Washingtonsionavorite right now?

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that Vegas does. In fact, they're thirty

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to one to win the Super Bowl. Uh football team

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.359
<v Speaker 1>is no, I'm sorry, they're fifty to one to win

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl. Um, I think people don't. I think

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>people just assume Fitzpatrick's no good when I don't. I

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:51.879
<v Speaker 1>don't see it. Cowboys are the odds one. But here's

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the thing. Washington has the best defense in the division

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>by a mile, and maybe the best defense in the league.

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 1>They added William Jackson, a very good cornerback, in the

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>off season, huge upgrade over Ronald Darby. This is is

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a really really good defense and we talked about all

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the playmakers on offense. Now all Fitzpatrick has to do

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:16.360
<v Speaker 1>get the ball into the hands of his playmakers Curtis

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Samuel and Terry McLaurin and Antonio Gibson and Logan Thomas

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and let those guys make plays. And the Eagles plus

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>five hundred is the worst odds. That seems like the

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 1>best bed of them all though, just because in the division,

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:32.799
<v Speaker 1>because the Cowboys Washington in New York, they can implode

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>any drop of the hat based on what happens to

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the front offices. Eagles plus five a Vegas. Put some

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 1>money on it for him. I'm going to actually I'm

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:45.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna take Washington to represent the NFC in the Super Bowl.

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Never bet the team to win the Super Bowl. Always

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 1>just bet them to make the super Bowl because then

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 1>you can hatch, just cash cash that out, and if

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you still love your team, roll that whole bank forward

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>on a super Bowl bet. And if you don't love

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that team, keep your money or go somewhere in between.

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:05.239
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk off line, but you're gonna have to do

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 1>a parlay Chargers a f C champion Justin Herbert m

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 1>v P parlay formula. Oh I like that. I like

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 1>that should hop onto Well, no, no way. But it's

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>like if you have not heard me talking, I'm not hoping.

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I know you're on, but mom, literally hop on that

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.280
<v Speaker 1>ticket with me as well that that I might do.

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>You already have the Chargers to represent the a f

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:28.319
<v Speaker 1>C ticket, but parlay with Herbert. I mean, if they

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 1>get there, of course Ekeler could everywhere. Everything's gonna play

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a big role. But if they make it to the

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl, justin Herbert, that could be Um, he's gotta

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it's got to figure out a way to to be

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good quarterback in his own division, which is

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 1>which is a challenge but possible. Don't let the team

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 1>doctor bring a needle anywhere near you. I got Thanks

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 1>for listening, appreciate getting to the end of the podcast. Uh.

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Next week we'll be back for we'll break down another division.

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know which one yet. We've got we still

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 1>need NFC South an NFC North. Let's say the North

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>for last, since we're in Minnesota for last. Uh, talk

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to you in a week, everybody, Bye bye. Fantasy Football

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Weekly is a production of I Heart Radio. For more

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the i heart radio, app,

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.