WEBVTT - Elon Goes to China, X Has an Anniversary

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, Elon Musk is now the richest person on the planet.

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:20.319
<v Speaker 3>More than half the satellites in space are owned and

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 3>controlled by one man.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 4>Well, he's a legitimate super genius. I mean legitimate.

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 3>He says he's always voted for Democrats, but this year

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 3>it will be different.

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>He'll vote Republican.

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 5>There is a reason the US government is so reliant

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 5>on him.

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk is a scam artist and he's done nothing.

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 3>Anything he does, he's fascinating the people. Welcome to Elaning

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Weekly podcast about Elon Musk. It's Tuesday, April thirtieth.

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm your host, David Papadopolis. This week we're talking about

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 3>China and X. Elon took his jet to Beijing Sunday,

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 3>where he cut a deal that will allow Tesla to

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 3>sell what it calls full self driving technology. So far

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 3>the market approves. Tesla stock soared the most in three

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 3>years on Monday, extending a rebound that began after last

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.639
<v Speaker 3>week's earnings call. Then we're going to go down memory

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 3>lane as we celebrate the two year anniversary of the

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:25.479
<v Speaker 3>Twitter board accepting Musk's offer to buy the company. Oh,

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.279
<v Speaker 3>Elon's tried a lot of things these past two years,

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 3>and let's just say not all of them have quite

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 3>worked out dating service anyone. But before all that, a

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 3>quick programming note. We're hitting the road again. We'll be

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 3>in San Francisco next week to record a live episode

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 3>at the Bloomberg Tech Summit. Come join us. We're going

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 3>to start off with Tesla and for this, as always,

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 3>we have Dana Hull, Bloomberg's Elon Reporter extraordinaire Ala Dana. Hey, Hey,

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 3>And we have Max Chepkin, Bloomberg BusinessWeek's senior writer editor

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 3>and ava fanatic of the New York Metropolitans. Hey, David, Hello, Max, Okay, Dana.

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 3>So we wake up Sunday to find Elon is in Beijing.

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure we knew that was going to happen.

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 3>He shows up out of the blue there to do

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 3>what exactly and does he achieve what he's trying to do?

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Well? I mean, if you follow his jet, which obviously

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.679
<v Speaker 1>those of us who follow Elon, no, I mean you

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>knew that he was heading to China, but it wasn't

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>an announced visit, if that's what you mean. But I

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.519
<v Speaker 1>think what's interesting is, you know, to back up for

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a minute, Elon was supposed to go to India. He

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>cancels the trip to India, says he's got pressing matters

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>at Tesla. He has an earnings call where he basically

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>says the future of the company is all about autonomy.

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And then he pops up in Beijing, which is not

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>where Tesla has its factory, but he meets with like

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the number two guy in China, and then basically they're

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to get permission to unroll what they call FSD

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in China, which is a huge undertaking because the mapping

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 1>in China is very different than the road system in

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 1>the United States that it's like a whole different regulatory regime.

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It's an enormous country. But this is like a big

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>deal for Elon, and I think it just kind of

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>shows that, like, you know, love him or hate him,

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever you think about the guy, he is just like

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>operating on a level that is very different from the

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>way most other CEOs operate. And you know, so he's

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>in China and the stock goes up to its highest,

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, has its highest gain in over three years.

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>The market is betting on this whole idea that the

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>future of the company is not really about selling cars,

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it's about selling software.

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, Max, It's funny. For the longest time I've

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 3>been telling myself that, boy, we really need to talk

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 3>about China on this podcast. We have failed to Max

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 3>until now. China is pretty darn important for Tesla, is

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 3>it not.

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So, Tesla is a factory in China. As Dana hinted,

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 2>China is also the biggest market for electric vehicle. It's

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 2>widely thought of as sort of the market with the

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 2>most potential for electric vehicle sales. And you know that's

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 2>because it's a huge country, of course, big economy, but

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 2>also because the government, the Chinese government has invested and

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 2>promoted this industry in a huge way, and it actually

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 2>has made Elon Musk kind of a centerpiece of that.

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 2>The thing is, what's happened in the past couple of

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 2>years is we've seen this new wave of Chinese car companies.

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 2>We've talked on this podcast before about byd Jaomi, you know,

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 2>better known as smartphone maker, is making cars. Lots of

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Chinese companies are having lots of success making cars, which

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 2>was kind of the plan all along. I mean The

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 2>reason that China gave Elon Musk a bunch of sort

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 2>of favorable policies and so on was because they wanted this.

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 2>They wanted him to kind of be at the center

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 2>of their EV industry, and that's kind of what happened.

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 2>And and Elon Musk is kind of still enjoying the

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 2>fruits of that relationship, right.

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 3>So they did court him back in the day to

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 3>help jump start their EV industry they needed in Then

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 3>I get the sense that China doesn't quite need him

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 3>as much now. He kind of needs China more than

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 3>China needs him.

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 4>No, China doesn't need him.

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 2>We were talking about India a couple of weeks ago,

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 2>and I mentioned that, you know, it's a little risky

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 2>to go to India and potentially announce a big investment

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 2>because China is not going to like that. And I

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 2>don't think it's a coincidence that we had this cancelation

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 2>of the India trip and this trip to China. And

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.919
<v Speaker 2>when you look at the way that the Chinese media

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 2>is playing it, you know they're mentioning, prominently mentioning the

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 2>cancelation of the India trip.

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Now, Dana, this deal that he has apparently inked for

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 3>full self driving, which we have described at length in

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 3>previous episodes. You can you can just find those discussions

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 3>there in the archive. But is this deal, Dana Hall,

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 3>is it final or is it they still need to

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 3>work out some other particular No, I don't.

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Think it's final. I think it's like directionally positive that

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>they got you know, he you know, so he was

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.239
<v Speaker 1>in Beijing meeting with the Number two talking about FSD.

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>He's got a relationship with Beadu to sort of underwrite

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>or underpin a lot of the mapping that's needed. He

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>got some permission from not the military directly, but like

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>some kind of military apparatus that will allow Tesla to

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>operate more easily in China. I mean a lot of

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>things still have to happen, but it's all directionally very positive.

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>And Tesla hasn't announced anything. I mean, there's been no

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>announcement or filing from Tesla whatsoever saying that they're now

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>rolling out FSD in China. But that's certainly what the

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>market is excited about.

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there's no deal.

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 2>They're on a list of like qualified car companies to

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 2>conceivably along with like dozens of others. I think I

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 2>think some seventy or eighty other car models are on

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 2>this list that give them the right to conceivably launch this,

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 2>and they're all of these issues. So China, of course

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 2>is very concerned learned about AI. You know this, this

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 2>is not a liberal democracy as a country that regulates

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 2>its technology very closely that you know, wants certain access

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 2>to data and that's very important with you know, any

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of software and especially with a data collection scheme

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 2>like a quote unquote Robotaxi. And the other thing is

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 2>China has been very adamant about ensuring that local partners

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 2>are playing a role, so that's why they had this this.

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 2>The other part of this is this announcement of a

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 2>deal with Baidu, which Tesla already had you know, a

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 2>relationship with before. But it's it's essentially like little breadcrumbs

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 2>that point in a somewhat promising direction. And that coupled

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 2>with Elon Musk saying last week that he thought, you know,

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 2>full self driving quote unquote could happen in China, that

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 2>the people are taking that as a positive sign.

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and we're going to go back to that earnings call.

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Actually now, you know, Dana whether the market reaction this

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 3>week when the stock short fifteen percent on Monday, is

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 3>an overreaction or not. It comes on the heels of

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 3>a big rebound in the stock last week as well.

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 3>The stock, of course, had been tanking all year, and

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 3>now it's it's bounced back over thirty percent, even though

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.679
<v Speaker 3>I think it's it opened up down a bit today.

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 3>I suppose to a certain degree, you kind of got

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 3>to give it to Musk. He sort of pulled a

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 3>rabbit out of his hat here, turning around a stock

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 3>that had been essentially in free fall.

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean he changed the narrative, and he's very good

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>at that. I mean, this is a guy who's been

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the CEO since two thousand and eight. He has been

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 1>through cycles before and and he kind of he understands

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street psychology, which is like what is the long

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>term future of the company. And you know, so the

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>whole year has been crappy, the stock has been down.

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>He seemed distracted. He seemed to be focusing on all

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of his other companies and not on Tesla, which is

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the key to his wealth. You had the layoffs, you

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>had sagging sales, like all this like negative negative, negative, negative,

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>so he comes into the earnings call and like he

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>knows that he's got to turn it around, so he

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>like plants a flag.

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what exactly did he say on that call? Because

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 3>just shortly before he gets on that call, the earnings

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 3>came out, the first quarter earnings, and they were about

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 3>a disappointing or maybe even more disappointing than everybody had

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 3>thought they'd be. He opens his mouth though on the call,

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 3>and then the stock just starts going up and up

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 3>and up. What was it in particular that that investors

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 3>latched onto.

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, he basically planted a very strong flag and talked

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>about autonomy. And I think we have tape on that.

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 3>Yes we do. You're right, let's listen to it.

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 5>Really, we should be thought of as an AI robotics company.

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 5>If you value tells it as just like an order company,

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 5>you would just have to fundamentally just the wrong framework

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 5>then will come to be. If you ask the wrong question,

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 5>then the right answer is impossible. I mean, if somebody

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 5>doesn't believe tell is going to solve autonomy, I think

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 5>they should not be an investor in the company.

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 3>If you just value Tessel's an auto company. Max Chafkin

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 3>you're a loser. But listen, Dana. But here's the thing.

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 3>Is it actually the autonomous part that drove the stock

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 3>up so much or was it more about him talking about, Hey, no,

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 3>we have actually haven't given up on this affordable tessel

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 3>model idea.

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it was both. They basically said

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of like they split the you know,

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:19.839
<v Speaker 1>split the baby in half, or however you want to

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>call it. It was like, Oh, don't worry, we still

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>are going to make affordable cars. Ish, they're gonna be

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>this kind of like Frankenstein hybrid model where we're going

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to take some of the new car and marry it

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>with some of the next generation unboxed assembly process, and

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have a cheaper model maybe by the

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>end of this year.

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 3>Then actually, let's let's let's listen to the tape on

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 3>that as well. Hold on.

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 5>We've updated our future vehicle lineup to accelerate the launch

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 5>of new models. Head previously mentioned start production in the

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 5>second half of twenty twenty five, so we expect it

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 5>to be more like the early twenty twenty five, if.

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Not late this year.

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 5>These new vehicles, including more affordable models, will use aspects

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 5>of the next generation platform as well as aspects of

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 5>our current platforms, and we'll be able to produce on

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 5>the same manufacturing lenes as like currentfig.

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.599
<v Speaker 3>Lineup, all of which means what mister chaff.

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 4>It means nothing.

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's kind of amazing that we went into

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 2>this saying is he going to what is he going

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 2>to say about the model to this cheaper car? And

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 2>that clip that you played that was it, I mean

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 2>during that because it raises all these questions, like so

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.319
<v Speaker 2>he said that the car would be made on the

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 2>more affordable car will be made on the same production lines.

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Kind of raises a question, so are we talking about

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 2>a new model or we talking about a cheaper version

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 2>of a current model, which an analyst asked and Elon

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Musk said, ooh, no comment. We've said all we will

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 2>on this back to the Robotaxi, and this happened several

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 2>times during the call. An analyst would ask kind of

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 2>like a reasonable question about these new models and or

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 2>supposed new models, and Elon Musk would say, never mind, robotaxi.

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 2>And so it's pretty clear to me anyway that there

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:58.839
<v Speaker 2>are two things going on. One is they're going to

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 2>launch this Robotaxi, and by launch I mean have a

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 2>car that looks Robotaxi ish and lift a sheet off

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 2>of it in August. And they are trying very aggressively

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 2>to lower the prices of the Model three and the

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Model Why Elon Musk hasn't specifically said that there isn't

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 2>going to be a Model too, but it really when

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 2>you look at what he's saying, how he's saying it,

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 2>it seems pretty clear. You have two things. You have

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 2>the Robotaxi, and you have an effort to keep get

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 2>the prices on the current lineup as low as possible

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 2>and maybe do whatever you can to refresh that lineup.

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 2>And that is that is a huge departure from everything,

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 2>not everything, but for many of the things that Elon

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Musk has been signaling and saying and so on over

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 2>the last year or so.

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so Dan Max is from what I glean here

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 3>feels like the market perhaps is irrationally exuberant about mister

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Musk's comments. Nonetheless, the stock is way back up for

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 3>the moment and things are at least looking slightly less

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 3>hour there. But the layoffs continue, do they not?

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Just to be super clear, the news from this morning

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 2>is that two more key executives are gone fired or

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 2>dismissed or however it actually went down, and their entire

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 2>divisions are also closing. So and that's the new Car

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 2>division and as Dana is saying, that the Supercharger division.

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 2>So it's not like you have to like be a

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 2>close reader of the things that Elon Musk says during

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 2>his earnings call to figure out what's going on with

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 2>the new models.

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 4>He just dismissed the entire new model team.

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, so's Ed Ludlow and I reported Musk

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted to cut twenty percent, and then when they announced

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the layoffs, the email from him said more than ten percent.

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>So like, what is that? Is that nineteen percent? Is

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that eighteen percent? Like we've never gotten like a very

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>clear number. But the layoffs have been happening in waves,

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and just overnight a lot of people on the Supercharging

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>team were impacted, and you're starting to see people post

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>on LinkedIn and Twitter and elsewhere about how, yeah, my

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>team and I were wiped out. And this comes at

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>like a really pivotal time for the company because you know,

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the big news of twenty twenty three was that Tesla

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>was finally opening at supercharger network to other automakers, So

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>if you own like a Ford or a GM electric vehicle,

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you can now go to superchargers. And the whole integration

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of supercharging with other automakers is a big theme of

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>like the summer of twenty twenty four. Now all of

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the people that were in charge of kind of you know,

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>inking those deals and leading those partnerships are gone and

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>all of this is happening in the broader context of

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Elon wants his pay package, so he's very much leaning

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>into this like I'm back in the saddle, I'm in charge,

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm making tough decisions, I'm laying people off, I'm going

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to China. Like he's doing all this stuff to kind

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of prove to his shareholders that he is still very

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>much the CEO and he deserves that big pay.

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 2>The other thing is it seems that he has closed

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 2>the policy division, which again is kind of a curious

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 2>choice when you're trying to laun a heavily regulated likely

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 2>to be controversial, you know, I think regulators are gonna

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 2>have something to say about releasing car without a steering wheel,

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 2>And it seems like at least, the current policy team

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 2>is going to be replaced with some new arrangement that

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 2>hopefully won't just be like an emoji like the NITSA

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 2>regulator send an email to to Elon Musk and they

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 2>get a poop back or something.

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, that well, it's distinctly possible. We've we've had

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of poop emojis sent our way over these

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 3>last couple of years. But Dan, so, just to finish

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 3>up for a second on the earnings call, because of

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 3>course before the earnings call, we put out in front

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 3>of the world again our Tesla Bingo card, our earnings

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Bingo card, and did we get bingo or not?

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Once again? You know, Max and I worked really hard

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to kind of try to create a create a Bingo

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Bingo card. That's that was going to do it for us.

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>We were one short because even though he said a

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of things that were on our card, he never

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>said the word interest rates, and then we would have

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>gotten it. We would have gotten it if he'd said

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>interest rates.

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Row one going across Robotax, Saxey regulatory approval, next

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 2>gen and Horse.

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 4>Actually he said horse twice.

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, very good. Well, we'll be back with another new

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 3>and improved Bingos Bingo card. Come come second quarter earnings. Okay,

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 3>So now we're gonna talk about the two year anniversary

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 3>of Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter now X and to

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 3>do that we have joining us Kurt Wagner, Bloomberg technology

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 3>reporter and author of the book Battle for the Bird.

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 6>Welcome, Kurt, hey, Thank you for having me appreciate it.

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 3>It's been a while since we've talked about how things

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 3>are going at X and the current state of finances there.

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 3>How is it going well.

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 6>We don't have many updates from the last time we

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 6>all chatted. We know that things were not going well

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 6>at the end of the lastlast year, not only because

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 6>there was the lingering effects of the advertising you know,

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 6>issues that the company had had, but as you all

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 6>remember very well, Elon then went on stage at the

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 6>deal Book conference and I believe it was early December

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 6>and told advertisers to go f themselves, right. So he

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 6>sort of ended twenty twenty three, came into twenty twenty

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 6>four on a very sour note, and as we've talked

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 6>about historically, like his behavior on X. In my opinion

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 6>and from the conversations i've had with a lot of

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 6>marketers is the biggest turnoff and the biggest hurdle to

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 6>their entire business, and we've seen that that's continued to

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 6>this day. You know, he tweets things that are incredibly

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 6>inappropriate regardless of who you are, but especially as the

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 6>CEO and face of this company. And so we don't

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 6>have numbers because they're not publicly traded, they don't have

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 6>to report earnings, but we just I don't think anything

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 6>has really improved since we talked about this a couple

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:52.959
<v Speaker 6>of months ago, when things were really in a downward spiral.

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Now, Kurt on his behavior on X, he's actually

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 3>been trying to remove what is essentially something of a

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 3>gag order on him on X, not as it's related

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 3>to the company X, but as related to Tesla. This

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 3>is the fame Twitter sitter. Explain what's transpired.

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so quick backstory, But basically, after he promised to

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 6>or pledge to take Tesla private at four hundred and

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 6>twenty dollars per share, which he ultimately did not you know,

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 6>have the money to do, the sec came to a

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 6>settlement agreement with Elon where his posts on Twitter or

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 6>now X that are related to Tesla need to be

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 6>approved or at least vetted by a company lawyer, and

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.880
<v Speaker 6>so he has been trying to get rid of this

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 6>Twitter sitter as it's called, and you know, saying that

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 6>this is an infringement on his free speech. He was

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 6>hoping that the Supreme Court would actually take up this

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 6>case and determine whether this was violation of his free speech.

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 6>But the Supreme Court said, no, we're not. You know,

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 6>we have other things going on that we should probably

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 6>be putting more attention to, so they sort of chose

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 6>not to take that case. But I mean, honestly, honestly,

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 6>I cannot believe that there is a lawyer who already

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 6>reviews his Tesla tweets and approves of them, because it

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 6>seems crazy that any of this stuff is vetted. Certainly,

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.959
<v Speaker 6>everything that's unrelated to Tesla is clearly not vetted. And

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 6>even the Tesla stuff, as you guys can probably attest to,

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 6>sometimes seems quite borderline to me. So I'm not sure

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 6>how much this really matters.

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>So to back up for a minute, I mean, there

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>really was a Twitter sitter. We knew their name at

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>one point. It was in like a filing in between

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>like the sec and MUSC and his lawyers. But then

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 1>there's been so much turnover in Tesla's legal department that

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't know who has the job right now.

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's like the Designated Securities Council, like it has

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>like a name, And a lot of people were like,

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you're just making this up. There is no Twitter sitter,

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, no, no, there really is.

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 6>I guess I'm curious, Dana. You followed Elon as close

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 6>as anybody. Do you really think he's composing a tweet,

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 6>taking the time to email it over to some lawyer,

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 6>waiting for approval before posting it. I just have no

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 6>impossible time imagining.

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 2>How dare you suggest that when Elon Musk tweets a

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 2>picture of one dog placing its testicles on another dog,

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 2>that he is not vetting that with Tesla's compliance department.

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, you don't know what was what was you know

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 3>what the original Yeah, that's true.

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 4>You're right. The compliance department might have been like, we

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 4>got to dial this one back.

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 3>I put a little disclaimer at the bottom and back

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:26.239
<v Speaker 3>on the right side of the line. Absolutely, you know,

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 3>bringing the conversation back to the actual company X for

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 3>a second. You know, Kurt, when he purchased the company,

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 3>he at the time was sort of fairly obsessed with

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 3>we Chat and the idea of an everything app. This

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 3>is actually what he said back then in an interview.

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 8>I mean, we don't even have a that that's as

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 8>good as we Chat in China, and like, in China,

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 8>you like live on we Chat. Basically everyone's like, like,

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 8>you live on we Chat, you do payments, you do everything.

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 5>It's like yep, it's great chats, kick ass. And we

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 5>don't have anything like we Chat outside of China. So

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 5>I was like, my idea would be, like, how about

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 5>if we just copy we Chat?

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Hey, So Kurt his efforts to quote unquote copy weed Chat,

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 3>how's that going?

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, this is the idea of the everything app that

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 6>Elon talks about a lot, and we haven't really seen

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 6>a lot of those ideas materialize. We've heard him talk

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 6>about the idea of banking, certainly, video and entertainment, this

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 6>idea of you know, using X to do shopping perhaps

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 6>or basically to run your life. They were teasing this

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 6>idea of video conferencing within X as well the other day,

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.400
<v Speaker 6>so you know, maybe replaced zoom I think the biggest

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 6>issue is number one. As I mentioned, a lot of

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 6>these products are just sort of talked about, right, They're

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 6>just they're out in the ether, but they don't actually

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 6>exist at the moment. But I think the bigger issue is, uh,

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 6>you know, when you are focused on everything, as Elon

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 6>says he wants to do, you don't really do any

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 6>one thing particularly well, right, And I'm not sure that

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 6>anyone is at this stage looking for a single app

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 6>to do all of these things in their life. And

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 6>that's part of the reason that the everything app idea

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 6>has not taken off outside of China. Right, He's like, Hey,

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 6>we build this and succeeds in China, why don't we

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 6>just build this elsewhere. Well, they've tried to build this.

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 6>Mark Zuckerberg tried to do this at Facebook for several

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 6>years with Messenger and WhatsApp and found basically that in

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:26.959
<v Speaker 6>the US in particular, people are used to having different

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 6>apps that specialize in different skills, and they want to

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 6>go to Uber to get their Uber ride, and they

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 6>want to use their banking app to get their bank.

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to rapid fire hit you with a bunch

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 3>of the things that they've tried over these last two years,

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 3>and you're gonna just you know, give us your reaction

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 3>curt in terms of how they've gone. So I got

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Twitter Blue Premium.

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 6>I think that's been a huge flop for the most part.

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 6>We don't know how many subscribers they have, but estimates

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 6>are I believe less than a million people are willing

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 6>to pay the eight dollars per month for this service.

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 6>I'd say this is where they've done the most change

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 6>to Twitter, Like, if you pay the eight dollars, you'd

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 6>probably get the biggest differentiated experience than you did from

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 6>Twitter one point zero. But I just don't think enough

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 6>people are paying for this for that to be considered

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 6>a huge success right now.

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Not good, Not good, says Max Job search Board Kurt

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Wagner Job Searches.

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 6>This is one thing that I think a lot of

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 6>people don't even realize exists on Twitter, which is that

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 6>if you are a business and you pay for like

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 6>a premium business account, you can then post your jobs

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 6>on there. I funny enough, even though I don't know

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 6>if a lot of people not exist. The company claims

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 6>this is doing incredibly well. Hundreds of thousands of job

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 6>postings and it sort of makes sense, right. I think

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 6>a lot of people do use Twitter in some type

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 6>of professional capacity, So maybe you would you come across

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 6>a job posting on Twitter versus say, you know, Instagram

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 6>or TikTok or something like that. But I don't think

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 6>it's necessarily something that like the average consumer of Twitter

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 6>or X. Now, excuse me, is really you know, clamoring.

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 3>For Kurt premium video premium video?

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 6>You may recall after cees in January, I think I

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 6>came on here. We talked about Don Lemon and Tulsa

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 6>Gabbard and Jim Rome and WWE and how you know,

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:18.479
<v Speaker 6>X was going to be the new place to go

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 6>basically watch like exclusive premium content that has not materialized yet.

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 6>We obviously know what happened with Don Lemon. That deal

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 6>fell apart before it ever got going. As far as

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 6>I know, Tulsa Gabbard and Jim Rome have not actually

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 6>posted any original videos to X. I actually reached out

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 6>to them last week just to make sure, and I

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 6>was told they would get back to me, and then

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 6>I never heard. But I haven't seen anything on their feeds.

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 6>So these deals that they've really promoted in January, I

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 6>don't know if anything exists. There are certainly nothing real mainstream.

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>To me, what I just keep noticing is that it

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>just seems like Musk is doing anything possible to boost

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>engagement and he's failing so spectacularly. Like yesterday, Taylor Swift

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>tweeted something out and then like Musk responded to Taylor

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and then she ignored him, And it's like, oh, man, like,

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>are you just really trying to like goose those numbers?

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 1>And even some of his more like ridiculous kind of

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, juvenile memes and stuff. It's like, I don't know,

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>I just feel I just would love to know what

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the true engagement of numbers are.

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 2>All this is so bad, but I do feel like

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 2>we need to acknowledge some good things, one of which

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 2>is Kurt didn't mention Tucker Carlson.

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 4>And you know, there was a point when not to.

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Just looking for the silver lining here, the Tucker shaped

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 2>lining to this cloud. But there was a point when

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 2>Elon took over Twitter and clearly started shifting to the

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 2>right where it wasn't clear that there even was a

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 2>market for a right wing social network.

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 4>And I think you have to say he's made one.

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 2>This is a more successful version of the company that

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump wanted to start with Truth Social that you know,

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 2>the rumble guys are trying to run. This is truly

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 2>a place where you know, in fluential conservative thought leaders

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 2>are hanging out.

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 3>It's a market. Maybe it's a viable market. Is it

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 3>a monetizable market in a meaningful way?

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 6>It is monetizable, yes, Is it in a meaningful way?

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 6>I'd probably say they've proven thus far that it's been

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 6>really hard. I don't think that the stuff that Elon

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 6>is tweeting about is necessarily the very friendly family friendly

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 6>certainly not ground that a lot of marketers want to

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 6>put their name attached to. And I think that's really

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 6>the biggest issue all.

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Right now, Max, can I go back to my list

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 3>here please for a second. So also I got for

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Kurt dating, the dating service app. What's going on?

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So there's a handful of products I mentioned with

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 6>this everything app idea that we've heard him kind of

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 6>hint at talk about but that have not materialized. Dating

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 6>falls into that category. Wouldn't it be great to find

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 6>your next date on X Stay tuned, Perhaps you will someday.

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 6>As of right now, that does.

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 4>Not exist it's a horrifying prospect.

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, it's worth Kurt bank service and payments. I mean,

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 3>you want me to take my money out of Vanguard

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 3>and move it over to X.

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 6>What if I told you you could get a very

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 6>high yield on those savings that X's hole and that

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 6>was a pledge. Yeah, that's the pledge that Elon has

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 6>made a few times. Again, similar to dating, haven't seen

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 6>the product yet. This one is they have applied for

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 6>payments transfer licenses. Essentially, they have to go through all

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 6>fifty states to get permission to allow users to transfer

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 6>money through the app. They are in the process of

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 6>applying for these. I believe there's something like more than

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 6>a dozen states that have already been approved, but it

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 6>doesn't exist yet. His whole idea was, why don't you

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 6>simply keep your money with us. We'll give you a

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 6>great yield, you know, savings yield on that money, and

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 6>then you can use it to not only buy things

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 6>through ads you see on X, but.

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 3>To pay people. So, Danahll, are you ready to move

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 3>all your money onto X?

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not. I mean, I'm not giving Elon Musk any

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:06.640
<v Speaker 1>access to my personal financial information, but I do want

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to mention that like, if you think about Elon and

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the early history of Elon, like this all comes back

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:14.719
<v Speaker 1>to his PayPal days, which is like the sort of

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Elon era that we all kind of forget about. But

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>when people are like, who is Elon Musk? Oh, yeah,

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>like he's the founder of Tesla, it's like, no, no,

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.199
<v Speaker 1>he's not the founder of Tesla. But also like he

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>became a millionaire because of PayPal and PayPal being sold

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to eBay, and like he's always been interested in payments,

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Like that's like the original sin of like how this

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>guy became who he is. And so I do think

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it is interesting that he's like kind of coming full

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>circle in terms of his original vision for what PayPal

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>could have been.

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but to be fair, he got fired from that

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 2>job for doing this exact thing.

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he he was.

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 3>As it was, he was pushed up. But it was

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 3>a it was a power struggle, right, I mean.

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah.

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 2>He he wanted to do an everything app called X

0:28:56.360 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 2>and the investors and Peter Teel, the co founder, disagreed,

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 2>wanted to focus on payments, and Elon Musk lost that

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 2>power struggle. Of course, here, although there are these debt

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.719
<v Speaker 2>holders and so on. There are external shareholders of X.

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's no you know, no one's challenging him

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 2>on any of this stuff.

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 3>So I guess, like, yeah, two years into X, it

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 3>looks like we're just getting confirmation that tel was right

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 3>back then.

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 2>I do think if you were a you know, X

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 2>dot com truther X dot com as the nineteen nineties version,

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 2>it's been a tough couple of years for you. It

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 2>really does look like, as you said, David, focusing on

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 2>a single product is probably better than kind of scattershot

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.719
<v Speaker 2>launching dating sites and banks and highyield savings accounts.

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, are we going to talk about the one

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 4>thing that is going well at.

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 3>X, the high yield X savings account? Okay, so you

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 3>want to talk about GROC, tell us about.

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Gro So Rock.

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Last week there were news reports, including it at Bloomberg

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 2>that it's raising money at evaluation of eighteen billion dollars. Again,

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, we don't know for sure, but I think

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 2>there's a pretty good chance that Groc is worth more

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 2>right now than X, and Grock, of course, is kind

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 2>of piggybacked, I should say X AI although it's not

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:15.479
<v Speaker 2>technically part of X. It's very much piggybacking on X.

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 2>X is the main distribution platform. These two entities don't

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 2>really exist without the other. And when Kurt's excellent book

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 2>came out, you know, he was on this podcast and

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 2>we talked about you know what, you know, where the

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 2>value was, and Kurt suggested that maybe this is just

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 2>an AI play, And I think that looks pretty good

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 6>I'm never going to be told that I'm that I'm

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 6>right and disagree with you, Max, So that's great. I

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 6>do think like this idea of XAI being the true

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 6>value is totally valid. There's so much potential with these chatbots,

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 6>and we see companies like Meta investing billions and billions

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 6>of dollars into training these large language models to power

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 6>chatbots and things like that. So if you can take

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 6>X the social network and somehow tie it to x

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 6>AI and you know, groc or whatever else comes from that,

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 6>I think that is probably the best way for X

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 6>the social network to have a positive outcome financially here.

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 6>And it feels like that's what's happening there. They're clearly,

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 6>as Max pointed out, Grok is like X the social

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 6>network is the distribution ground. For Grock. It's the training

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 6>data for GROX. So I think what we're seeing here

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 6>is these two companies being tied together. Not sure exactly

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 6>what happens at the end of that, but you know,

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 6>it feels like that's where it's headed.

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Enough about X and it's woes. It's time for another

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 3>feud of the week? Are you just making these feuds up? Max?

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 3>So these feuds are these figments of your imagination? Are

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 3>they're real?

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 4>These are these are very real. This is as real

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 4>as the earth, the sky, the sun.

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Ok, what do you got for us this week?

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Dustin Moskovitz he is kind of a Silicon Valley powerbroker,

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 2>co founder of Facebook, kind of a more of like

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 2>a lesser co founder Facebook, very close friend of Mark Zuckerberg.

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 2>He runs a company called Asana, which is a sort

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 2>of productivity you know type.

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 4>Thing for businesses.

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 2>He is also a major donor to the Democratic Party

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 2>and a bit of a left wing activist, and he

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 2>over the last few months has every now and then

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 2>posted something critical about Elon on threads. Of course on threads,

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 2>and recently though he went way further. He called Tesla

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 2>basically Enron. He said, let's wake up to this.

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 4>This is Enron. They're a fraud essentially, That's what he said.

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the grounds. You know, I spent some time reading

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 2>this very lengthy thread. He's a very verbose guy, a

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 2>little bit hard to unpack. But the basic contention is

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 2>that Tesla is improperly recognizing it's autopilot revenue. I think,

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 2>stepping back from that, Moskovitz is jumping on to a

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 2>common critique about Tesla, which is that autopilot is essentially

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:54.719
<v Speaker 2>vapor where it doesn't actually drive the car for you.

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 2>It's you know, Elon Musk is overstating its capabilities. Elon

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Musk responded in an extremely generous and fashion by posting

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 2>a meme in which Dustin Moskowitz was labeled on one

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 2>dog and another dog I think labeled Elon was performing

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 2>a lewd act on that dog.

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 7>Okay, okay, wow, Like I'm saying, I assume a Tesla

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 7>compliance officer looked at that and said, okay, this is legit.

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 3>This is legit. Again. You don't know what the initial

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 3>post looked like, right, I mean, I have no idea, right,

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 3>So the Twitter sitter said, yeah, this didn't Now now

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 3>that you've edited down scale, the back. This is this

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 3>is fine and legit, to which Dustin responded and said.

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 2>What continuing to he's continuing to criticize Elon Musk.

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean the feud continues, So this is.

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So this is this truly isn't a figment of

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 3>your imagination? Just sounds like a decent fud.

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Look, I think that this, you know, it's it's very

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 2>tempting when somebody, especially on Threads, which you know, despite

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Mark Zuckerberg's best efforts, does not have the kind of

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 2>like cultural capital even that X does. When somebody's just

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 2>like shooting, you know, random verbal assaults at Elon Musk,

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 2>it's's kind of tempting to ignore it. But Moskovitz is

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 2>a important guy. He is a major Democratic donor. He's

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 2>somebody with real juice in political circles. I mean, there

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.439
<v Speaker 2>are also reasons to doubt some things that he said.

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 2>He was a big you know, he's a big effective altuois.

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 2>People have tied him to Sam bankman Fried. Of course

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 2>he has said, you know, his brand of that is

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:39.359
<v Speaker 2>totally different. But either way, like this is somebody that

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 2>like has access to the highest levels of the Democratic

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Party and he is going around criticizing Elon Musk very loudly.

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.280
<v Speaker 4>This is not a good situation for Elon Musk.

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 2>On the other hand, you don't want to overstate it

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 2>because like he's buddies with Mark Zuckerberg.

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Is it this kind of like an extension of the

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Zuckerberg feud?

0:34:58.120 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, it's kind of like a tag team

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 2>situation where you have a Yeah, you have Zuckerberg and

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 2>and Moscow's in one quarter Linda and Elon and the

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 2>other they're tagging it.

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 3>No, that's a very good question if you do go

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 3>tag team and so it's Moscowtz and Zuckerberg tagging, and

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 3>I once who is who is Elon's tag team partner?

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:21.280
<v Speaker 4>I feel like Danna needs to answer that question.

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, who's the guy said he was going to

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>jump on a grenade that.

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 4>Was it's his brother.

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 3>But it's why we should have came up.

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:34.280
<v Speaker 4>You know who it should be though, it should be Walter.

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:37.800
<v Speaker 4>That would be a colorful fight.

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 3>So Max, what I want you to work on this

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 3>next week before the next episode is like you know

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 3>what then, like, what are the costumes they wear in

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 3>the red You've got to work on for each time.

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Kurt Wagner. Thank you for joining us.

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 6>Thank you, thank you, thank you.

0:35:51.360 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Danna Mac pleasure to be here always. This episode was

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 3>produced by Stacey Wang. Naomi Shaven and Rayhan Harmantier are

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:10.919
<v Speaker 3>senior editors. The idea for this very show also came

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:14.280
<v Speaker 3>from Rayhawk. Blake Maples handles engineering, and we get special

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 3>editing assistants from Jeff Grocott. Our supervising producers Magnus Henrickson.

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:22.280
<v Speaker 3>The Elon Inc. Theme is written and performed by Taka

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Yasuzawa and Alex Sugiira. Brendan Francis Newnham is our executive producer,

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 3>and Sage Bauman is the head of Bloomberg Podcasts. I'm

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:34.240
<v Speaker 3>David Papadoppolis. If you have a minute, rate and review

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 3>our show, it'll help other listeners find us. See you

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:37.879
<v Speaker 3>next week.