WEBVTT - From the Vault: Dissolver of Worlds

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. Came today we're

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>bringing you an episode from the Vault. This one is

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:20.159
<v Speaker 1>called Dissolver of Worlds. It originally published on April. I

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>remember being very excited about this one when we recorded it.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Uh we we talk a lot about the history of

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the quest for a universal solvent in in alchemy. All right,

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>let's dive right in. Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Mind production of My Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe McCormick, and I wanted to start off today

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>by thinking about containers. Um, if you ever look around

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a chemistry lab, you will notice that there are a

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of containers made out of glass. Glass is often

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>thought of as as the chemist's friend, right, And this

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is because silica, the stuff that glass is made out of,

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is generally chemically inert, not much reacts with it, and

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>glass is insoluble in in most solvents, so it's not

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be leaching off and contaminating your sample. But

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>this is not true in all cases. For instance, there's

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a chemical we've talked about on the show before, called

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>hydrofluoric acid, uh, the solution of hydrogen fluoride or HF

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in water. Hydrogen fluoride is known to actually corrode even glass,

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and there's some pretty good videos of this that you

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>can look up, like the YouTube channel called periodic Videos

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>as one you can find where they dissolve a glass

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>light bulb in hydrofluoric acid. I think while it's plugged

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in by the way, at least when when the glass

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>finally does dissolve and break off in the liquid, the

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the film inside the light bulb, I recall, is like

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>sparking in the solution in a in a very weak

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and creepy and cursed way. But it's kind of disturbing

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to see even glass, the ultimate non reactor, just getting

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of cleanly sheared off of the top of a

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>bulb when it's dipped into this this stuff and then

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>falling away and eventually just dissolving into it and becoming

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a liquid itself. Regular glass, of course, is made of

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>silica sand, which is made of silicon dioxide or s

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I O two, and when you put glass into hydrogen

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>fluoride into hydrofluoric acid, the hydrogen fluoride breaks the bonds

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>between silicon and oxygen in silica to form silicon fluorine molecules,

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and the result is the hydrofluoric acid eats right through

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 1>the solid glass. So here you've got this material, this

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>hydrofluoric acid that cannot be stored in regular glass containers,

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>has to be stored in special plastic containers or it

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>might eat right through the bottle and spill everywhere. And

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a jumping off point for today's episode, because

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be looking at the question of what if

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:12.959
<v Speaker 1>you were to imagine a material that pushed the boundaries

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>even farther, if there was a solvent that that could

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 1>dissolve everything it touched, a sort of universal solvent. M Yeah,

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>this reminds me a lot of our discussions in the

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>episode on Hollywood Acid, the the way that acids are

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>sometimes presented in science fiction, especially where you know, you

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you wound a xenomorph and it's so it's it's acidic

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>blood seems to just burn its way through every floor,

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the way through the hull of the ship. Yeah, precisely.

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.119
<v Speaker 1>So this will be kind of a follow up episode

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to that. But but going more into the history of

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>alchemy and getting into some of the metaphorical realms of

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>these these high powered solvents. Now, one thing this immediately

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>relates to for me is a thought experiment that I

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>remember encountering from reading some of the American philosopher Daniel

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Dennett's books, where um Dinnett often talks about a metaphor

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that he uses called universal acid. It's basically exactly what

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>we're describing here, but he doesn't mean it in the

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>pure material sense. Then it uses the metaphor of universal

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 1>acid to describe evolution. Uh. And and what he means

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>there is that evolution is a concept that is not

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>just a theory in biology. It's not just that when

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we discovered evolution by natural selection we could suddenly explain

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the diversity of species on Earth. That was true, but

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it's also a sort of revolutionizing world view that changes

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>everything it touches. And so, to quote from his summary

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of this idea from his book Intuition, Pumps and Other

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Tools for Thinking, din it writes, universal acid is a

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>liquid so corrosive that it will eat through anything, but

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you keep it in? It dissolves glass bottles

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>and stainless steel canisters as readily as paper bags. What

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>would happen if you somehow came upon or created a

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>dollop of universal acid? Would the whole planet eventually be destroyed?

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>What would it leave in its wake after everything had

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>been transformed by its encounter with universal acid? What would

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>the world look like? Little did I realize that in

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a few years I would encounter an idea, Darwin's idea

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>bearing an unmistakable likeness to universal acid. It eats through

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>just about every traditional concept and leaves in its wake

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a revolutionized worldview, with most of the old landmarks still recognizable,

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>but transformed in fundamental ways. Now there's a thing here

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>where the metaphor I think might not be the best one,

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>because we get Hollywood acid in our brains, and when

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>we think about Hollywood acid, Hollywood acid doesn't just change,

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.799
<v Speaker 1>it destroys. Right. You put the Batman in the Hollywood acid,

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and then the Batman is no more. Yeah. I mean

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this, though, comes down to what we

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean when you talk about things being destroyed. This

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is a very human viewpoint. This is a very um,

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, organism based view of things. That the Batman

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is destroyed in the acid, that the the car is

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>destroyed in the crash. Uh that or that even something

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is destroyed when it is um you know, when it's

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>just you know, a metal or something and it's melted

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>or it's uh or it's it's it's it's put into

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>some sort of an acid or a base. But you know,

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes back to the basic principle that matter can

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>neither be uh, you know, ultimately created or destroyed. Everything

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.679
<v Speaker 1>can only be transferred into different states or broken down

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>into different components. That's a very good point. Yeah, from

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the sort of like chemical view of the universe, nothing

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>has been destroyed. But I think it'd be fair to

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>say that if you put a batman in a bunch

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of sulfuric acid and then you liberate all the possible

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>water molecules from him and just leave a bunch of

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>elemental carbon, you could say, in some sense the batman

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>has been destroyed conceptually at least, yes, But I mean

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>part of that is the difficulty of then recreating a batman, right,

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>because right, I mean we would have to recreate not

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>only the batman's body, but the batman's psyche, and and

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're huge hurdles, not only in terms of

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of science and our understanding of psychology, but also time.

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:23.119
<v Speaker 1>It's a huge time investment to try and reproduce another Batman. Right, So,

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know if maybe he could have used

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a slightly better metaphor for what he means, because what

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he means is not that the concept of

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>evolution destroys everything it touches in culture, but rather it

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>reacts with everything it touches. So it leaves the world

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we knew before populated with the same questions and beauties

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and wonders, but each of them sort of now upgraded

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>by a chemical reaction, each one sort of changed somewhat

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>by our new perspective. You have a new scientific way

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about everything that you knew before. Yeah, you know,

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this this argument, it certainly applies to evolution

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>very wrongly, uh, but you know, into evolutionary theory, but

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it also can apply to even um hypotheses that we've

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>discussed in the show before. You know that take, for instance,

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the bi cameral mind hypothesis by Julian Jaynes. That's an

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>example of of of a very infectious idea that once

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you have, if you've really gotten into it. You it

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of can change the way you think about so

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>many other things. Um. And then there are even less

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, controversial ideas you can think of where once

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you have once you were alert to say, um, oh

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>just you know, certain sort of psychological ideas about how

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, how things like trauma work. You know, Uh,

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>it changes the way you think about reality because you

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>have a different way of processing, uh, what is going

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>on or maybe going on with other people and other

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>groups and throughout history. Yeah, and the metaphorical sense, I mean,

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of ideas I guess can become a mental

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>universal solvent. I would say in some cases with more

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>use than in other cases, Like sometimes we just start

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>applying an idea to everything because it's really fun. And

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>in other cases we start applying idea an idea to

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 1>everything because we get we we at least believe we're

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>getting some kind of analytical use out of it, like

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it's explaining more than, uh than than other ideas that

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>we had previously. Though, I would say, be cautious of

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>any lens that seems to explain everything, because you know,

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I've been through phases in my life where I sort

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of like learned a new analytical lens and then it

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>explained literally everything in the world, And like, you gotta

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>be careful about those. Usually you're probably over applying it

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>at that point. Yeah, Like if you if you just

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>apply aliens to everything, yeah, and then it works. Uh,

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're probably over applying aliens. And there was

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>actually a sample I hear every now and then in

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a in a track where someone saying, you know, listing

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>off all these different things and then saying, you drop

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>aliens in the middle of this and everything makes sense.

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>U always true. It's always true. So if there's anything

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>like that, yeah, you could. You can sub anything for

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>aliens if if it feels like it's a perfect fit,

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that it explains everything that it that it absolutely dissolves

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>all the mysteries of life. I don't know, it's it's

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>probably not the universal solvent you're you're really looking for,

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>but it can seem like that. But before we get

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>back into the fully metaphorical space, but what it means

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to to think about the world in terms of universal solvents.

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to actually consider the real material possibility of

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a universal solvent, especially as it has figured into the

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>history of alchemy, because you probably know, even if you

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>only have passing familiarity with alchemy, that one of the

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>endeavors of of alchemy was this search for these sort

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of dream materials, these holy Grail materials. What an author

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be quoting extensively in this episode, Lawrence

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Prince you pay calls chemical arcana or I guess singular

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>chemical ar kanum. Uh. These objects that are sort of

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the mcguffins of alchemy that alchemists were requesting after. So

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>one of these things might be like the Philosopher's stone

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 1>that could allow you to transmute base metals into gold

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in the process known as chrysopoeia, or other ones might be.

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Actually I talked about one in an Artifact episode and

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it did not too long ago. Uh. It's an idea

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that you can find going all the way back to

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>ancient Roman times, and that's the concept of bindable glass,

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the vitrum flexila or vitrum malle abel that you could

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>have glass that could be soft like dough and shaped

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>into into different you know, into whatever form you needed.

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>But another similar arcanum in alchemy was the concept of

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>alcahest a, a substance that would act as a universal

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 1>solvent that could break down anything. Now, discussing alchemy is

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>always a little bit difficult because alchemy is somewhat controversially

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>find like different people try to insist on different historical understanding.

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Is of exactly what alchemy was. I mean, you can't

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>say it's a It's the general output of a group

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of certain scholars who, you know, we're kind of secretive

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>about their beliefs, and we're working with materials in some way.

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a kind of slippery concept. In English,

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 1>the term has been used to refer to a huge

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>range of beliefs and behaviors, with special emphasis on things

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>done that that sound in some way related to sorcery,

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the hermetic, and the occult, and these associations are absolutely

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>not without foundation. Like that they much of alchemy does

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>have occult and and and supernatural connections. But another way

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to understand alchemy, for the purpose of today's discussion at least,

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>is that it is sort of the proto scientific study

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of the dynamics of matter, particularly concerned with transforming one

0:12:54.960 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>type of matter into another, or of isolating the constituents

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>of a material, refining that material, or enhancing its alleged properties,

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>many of which were perceived to be medicinal properties. I

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people in the modern era when

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>they think of alchemy, they think about people trying to

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>turn lead into gold. And then then that was a

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>preoccupation of some people in the world of alchemy. But

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>also a huge part of alchemy was a quest for medicine. Yeah.

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess to two points to make here. One is

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that we do often think of that when we think

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of alchemy, we may think of a very Western context,

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and we think of people who look like wizards, you know,

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>or even specifically someone who looks like John d or Merlin, Uh,

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>toying around with science stuff. You know, alchemy is science

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff what wizards do. Uh. But it is also important

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to note that that alchemy and things that we think

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of in English and uh in the end, in the

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Western world as alchemy, you also find that in the

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Arabic world, you find it in in ancient India,

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you find it in ancient China. Uh. You know. So

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>alchemy can very broadly speaking be seen as kind of

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a global effort of learned individuals trying to learn more

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>about the world. Um. I think one way to think

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of it too. Is think about geographic discovery. You know,

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>people setting out on on voyages, trying to find distant

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>lands that they know to exist or that they have

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>heard to exist. Sometimes those lands do not exist at all.

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they are, you know, islands of the imagination. But

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.359
<v Speaker 1>in the quest to find those places, they find real places,

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately this leads up to a a more accurate

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and more refined understanding of the world. Own interesting parallel

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>between alchemy and your geography. Example, during the ages of exploration,

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>where people were trying to get away from their home

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>country and figure out what else was out there that

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>they could find. They're going to be different levels of

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>perspicacity and reporting, you know, because like, whatever you've discovered,

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you may think of this is, oh, this is knowledge

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to share with the world, But you may

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>also very much think of it as like kind of

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a trade secret or a personal You know, this is

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>something I've discovered for me and my my, my buddies,

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and we need to keep this secret and not let

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody else get in there before we've had a good

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.239
<v Speaker 1>go at it. Yeah, and then you have the pesky

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>situation of discovering the real but keeping it secret or

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>only holding on to it because of your quest for

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the unreal. And we've touched on this before on the

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>show before um when we were talking about urine at

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>some point urine's role in alchemy, and uh, I forget

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that the exact chemical episode we were discussing this. But

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the history of alchemy is full of such scenarios, you know.

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I was reading actually a Washington Post article from January

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>eighteen by Ben Guarino that interviews Lawrence Prince you pay,

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the authors who's an expert

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>on alchemy that we're gonna be talking about in this episode.

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And this article ends up talking a lot about p

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and there was one part I found very fun. It's

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about how in prince hips lab he will try

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to recreate some some old alchemy experiments as they are

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>described from these these texts, and so the artifacts of

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>these experiments are all all around his lab. And and

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the article here describes on the counter sits a large

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>jar labeled flim of acidified urine. More than one alchemical

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>recipe calls for human p. Prince Ship said. An old

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Arabic text used the phrase the secret is within you,

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>probably meaning well reader you go figure it out, and

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>then it quotes Prince saying, but some people took that

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>more literally, so they ended up using vast amounts of urine.

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's wonderful. Yeah. And and now that I've had

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:50.239
<v Speaker 1>a second to reflect, it was our our invention episode

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>or episodes on the matchtick. Uh yeah, we're we're talking.

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't rea. So we talked about multiple people who

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>used urine. At least one of the main people who

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>was big into it to urine experiments was was the

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>seventeenth century alchemist Hinnig Brund who who really specifically wanted

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>urine from beer drinkers. So it was like, go to

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the bars, get the drunks to p in a bucket,

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and I will create a huge, a gigantic vat of

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 1>beer drinker p. Yes. Yes, so it was brand He

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>was in search of the Philosopher's stone, um, but in

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>doing so made these discoveries that ultimately tied into our

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>understanding of phosphorus and matches and you know, or matches

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 1>being the one of the the actual real world and

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>world inventions to come out of this quest for the fantastic.

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>But it's so funny also about like misinterpreting the line

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the secret is within you two mean like literally in

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>your bladder, because that that seems just just perfect for

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the world of alchemy, because there was a lot of

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of metaphors and secret keeping, kind of coded language.

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>A Prince Pay talks in in one interview was watching

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>about how, you know, in some alchemical texts, the author

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>will not say the conventional names of the chemicals that

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about. He might instead of saying nitric acid,

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 1>he will say the red dragon, And instead of saying, um,

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, like add nitric acid to this solution, he

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>would say something like allow the red dragon to consume

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 1>the white eagle or something. So, you know, it's kind

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 1>of you have to like dig through and figure out

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>what all of these code words refer to, not in

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 1>every case, but in many. Yeah, So it it makes

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>looking back on some of these recipes and ideas oftentimes confusing,

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>because like I'm reminded of of the recipe that I

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>looked at once for the creation of a homunculous and

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it has this kind of coded language in it. So

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's hard to determine, you know, how much of

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>what you're looking at is just abject occultism and in sorcery.

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And how much is coded material referring to something more

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>closely related to to the world of chemistry and reality?

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh right, so like is it actually asking for like

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>a bat swing or is it or is that a

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>code for like saltpeter or something? Yeah, and I guess

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you can. You can look at similar situations throughout our

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you know the world of language and spirituality and all.

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>But um, I guess one of the things to drive

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>home with with alchemy is that, yes, we're talking about

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>ultimately a proto scientific sphere. Uh. You know, this is

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 1>one though, in which scientific considerations are either inherently mingled

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>with philosophic and supernatural ideas, or at the very least

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are heavily susceptible to flowing into those subjects. And is

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the author um Mercia Eliade put it in the Forge

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Crucible quote Alchemy posed as a sacred science,

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>whereas chemistry came into its own when substances had shed

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>their sacred attributes. Oh that's interesting, I mean, yeah, One

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.199
<v Speaker 1>thing I we want to talk about as we go

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>on is the ways that different uh practitioners of the

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>alchemy period didn't they weren't just looking for chemical formulas,

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:13.959
<v Speaker 1>but they really thought chemicals meant something. Yeah. Yeah, And

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you you can imagine too where this gets. You know,

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>we can't look at something without working without you know,

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>without our brain beginning to ponder over the possible metaphors there.

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, how does this relate to me? Um And

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe we're we get we're a little further from that now,

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we have to sort of put ourselves

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in the mindset of of older uh, you know, experimentors.

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>And uh, this is where I want to bring up

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the some of the thoughts that Terrence McKenna

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>brought to the table concerning alchemy um And and I

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>think he I think he made he made some good,

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>good points on the topic. He gave a series of

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>lectures on alchemy in the late nineties um And touched

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 1>on this. And I want to read a quote from

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it from a transcription. In this he is citing Iliade

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it also putting his own spin on things. Quote. The

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>shaman is the brother of the smith. The smith is

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the metallurgist, the worker in metals. And this is where

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 1>alchemy has its roots. We who take this for granted,

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>have no idea. How mysterious and powerful this seemed to

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>ancient people, and in fact it would seem so to

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>us if we had anything to do with it. I mean,

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>how many of us are welders or castors of metal.

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a magical process to take, for instance, cinnabar, a

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>red soft ore, and by the mere act of heating

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it in a furnace, it will sweat liquid mercury onto

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 1>its surface. We have unconsciously imbibed the ontology of science,

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:40.640
<v Speaker 1>where we have mind firmly separated out from the world.

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>We take this for granted. It's effortless because it is

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the ambiance of the civilization that we've been born into.

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>But in an earlier age, some writers would say, a

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>more naive age. But I wonder about that mind and

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 1>matter were seen to be alloyed together throughout nature, so

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that the sweating of mercury out of cinnabar is not

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a material process. It is a process in which the

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>mind and the observations of the metal worker maintain an

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 1>important role. Well, I don't know what to think about

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:10.959
<v Speaker 1>that claim about the idea the role of the mind

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 1>in the transformations, but I think he's absolutely right that

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>like you know, it's one of the frustrations of the

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>modern world is that we rely so on so much

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>um science and technology in the background of our lives

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that we can lose sight of the sheer wonder that

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that is on, you know, visible if you're actually watching

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>these processes unfold in firsthand. Yeah. I mean we talk

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>about technological metaphors all the time on the show. How

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>how often we think about our own cognition in terms

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of computers and cameras and digital recordings and so forth,

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>uh and photoshop, etcetera. You know, and and these can

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:55.679
<v Speaker 1>all be useful, but they can also distort and create

0:22:55.960 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a a distorted version of what's actually going on inside

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the mind or outside of it. And yeah, I think

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you were to put yourself in someone

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>who day in and day out, was not using an iPhone,

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>was not using a PC or a GO or a

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Mac or whatever, but was instead, uh working with the

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>base materials and with metals and chemicals and trying to

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>figure out their properties. Like this would be the primary

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>way that they would also think about the mind. I

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>mean it it makes perfect sense to me, like these

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>would be there, this would be their telephone, their television,

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>their computer. These would be the ways that they might

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>then self reflect. Well, yeah, I mean it's it's apparent

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that witnessing chemical reactions suggested to people some kind of deep,

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>underlying spiritual reality that was like more than just uh

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>an idea about like different types of atoms and how

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>they can fit together, but suggested like like big truth.

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>So that applied to everything, you know, that that alchemy could,

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in its own way, become a one of these metaphorical

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 1>universal solvents that it explains everything about about God and

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the universe and humankind in our minds. Now, since I

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>did mention McKenna, one might easily say, well, for Terence McKenna,

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>surely mushrooms psychedelics were kind of the universal solvent. And yeah,

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I can certainly that can you can certainly make a

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 1>case for that, especially within certain works of his you know,

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the Food of the Gods, etcetera. Um, that's kind of

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a case where you can say, oh, you drop mushrooms

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of this and everything makes sense. Um. Oh,

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>did he suggest that Paracelsis took mushrooms? Uh? No, Actually

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>he in these lectures, he he really took quite the

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>opposite approach and that's why I want to share one more, uh,

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>snippet from from this lengthy lecture series, which by the way,

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you can find online um in several places, either in

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, audio form or transcribed. But this is what

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 1>he had to say. Quote. I will not claim and

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>do not in fact think it is so that there

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>was anything of eartly psychedelic in the sense of pharmacologically

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>based about alchemy. When we look back through the alchemical literature,

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>there's very little evidence that it was far pharmacologically driven.

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Only when you get to the very last adambirations of

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 1>out of the alchemical impulse in someone like Paracelsus, do

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you get use of opium. It is interesting that the

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>great drugs of modern society were accidentally discovered by alchemist

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in their research distilled alcohol as a product of alchemical work.

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>And as I mentioned, opium was very heavily used of

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the Paracelsian school. But what they possessed was an ability

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 1>to liquefy their mental categories and then to project the

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>contents of the mind onto these processes and read them back. Now, um,

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>real quick, uh, Paracelsus, We'll we'll get back to Paracelsus

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in a bit, But this is an individual of fourteen

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>nine three or fourteen ninety four through fifteen forty one,

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a Swiss physician and alchemist of the German Renaissance, and

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>he made a number of contributions to modern met iCal science.

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 1>And he's come up before on the show. I think

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in our episodes on the Trident, on dangerous foods, on Frankenstein,

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and on blood drinking, which I guess are all areas

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>where you might well imagine that the realms of chemistry

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and UH and alchemy might come together to some degree. Yeah,

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Paracelsus is considered one of the sort of granddaddy's of alchemy.

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Um Paracelsis is his nickname. By the way, it's worth

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>mentioning his real name, which was Philippus Areolas, the Ephrastus

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Bombastus von Hohenheim. I like that Bombastus. Yeah, I think

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>there's some question about whether the word bombastic comes from

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>his name, because he he would throw down like Paracelsis

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>would get into it. In fact, I want to read

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a a passage from a book that that I'm going

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to be referring to for the rest of the episode,

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that is by Lawrence imprincepe called The Secrets of Alchemy

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 1>that was published in by the University of Chicago Press.

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Uh Princeps professor at Johns Hopkins University, specializing in the

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>history of science and technology, and he's written a ton

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 1>about alchemy and its role in the development of science.

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>But um, there's a passage from his book where he

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>briefly introduces the figure of Paracelsus, and he does it

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>like this. He says, Paracelsis spent much of his life

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>wandering from town to town, generally stirring up trouble wherever

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>he went with his iconoclastic and quick tempered ways. It

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>has been claimed erroneously that the word bombastic in the

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>sense of pampas speech derives from his name. Okay, so

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 1>that was he's saying. No, that is not where it

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>comes from. But I have encountered that erroneous claim. Prince

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>pay goes on. Paracelsis is best known as a vociferous

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:48.199
<v Speaker 1>critic of traditional medicine. His writings, frequently imitated in style

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:52.679
<v Speaker 1>by later followers, are filled with vitriolic and sarcastic condemnations

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of physicians, apothecaries, and the entire medical establishment. It is

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>reported that he publicly burned the medical where Things of

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Ibben Sinah, standard texts for medical education at the time,

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 1>as a sign of his contempt. Paracelsis's other provocative habits

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:11.880
<v Speaker 1>included lecturing for the short time he gave medical lectures

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 1>in Basle and writing in his native Swiss German rather

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>than Latin, and promoting the use of German medicinal plants

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>over more established classical Mediterranean ones. He was a strong

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 1>advocate of alchimia, but only as one of the pillars

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of medicine, that is to say, for its ability to

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>prepare pharmaceuticals and to explain bodily functions. He showed no

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>interest in chrisopoeia and occasionally wrote contemptuously of it, and again,

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>chrisopoeia is the is the attempt to transmute base metals

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>into gold. It's interesting, all these are our attributes of

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>someone who very much wanted to dissolve the rigidity of

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the of of the establishment. You know, you could you

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>could look at them acting as a kind of trying

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to act as a kind of universal solvent within their

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>own culture. Thank yeah, And I guess that should bring

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>us to the concept of the universal solvent itself, because

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Paracelsis wrote of something called alcohest, but Paracelsis meant something

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>different by it. Paracelsis wrote of alcohest as a type

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of medicine for treating a bad liver. But in the

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>wake of Paracelsis, some later alchemists would take the idea

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of alcohest as a universal solvent and really run with it. Now,

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Remember again, as I said earlier, alchemy is often concerned

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>with the search for these particular chemical arcana in princeps terms.

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>So again, this might be a method for transmuting base

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>metals into gold, doing the process of chrisopoeia. Uh. It

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>turns out that this is despite the fact that some

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>people are still trying to do this today. This is

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>not really possible by conventional chemical means, Like gold as

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>as we have it here on Earth is forged. It's

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a product of nucleosynthesis that occurs in some of

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the most violent phenomena in the universe, like neutron star

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>collisions or exploding you know, stars at the end of

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>their lifespan. Uh. Like, you can't turn lead into gold.

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>That is just not a human power, I guess, unless

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you're talking maybe about I don't know, like like tiny

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>amounts of it in particle colliders or something, you know,

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>atomic experiments that accelerate protons to extremely high speeds and

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>collide with things. And even in that case, I'm not sure.

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I just can't rule it out there by conventional chemical means,

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about significant amounts of matter, you cannot

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>turn base metals into gold. That would require rearranging the

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>nucleus of an atom, which we just don't have the

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>power to do, right. And maybe if you were John

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>d and you could actually, um, you know, if you

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>were actually going to capture or utilize an angel and

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you could somehow tap into their powers there they're just

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>like base energy level, then okay, maybe maybe would be possible,

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>But but not without any like additional supernatural add ons

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:06.479
<v Speaker 1>to the chemical understanding that we have. Right. And so

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>while the transmutation of base metals like lead into gold

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>is probably the best known quest of alchemy, Prince Pay

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>writes a lot about how alchemy was so much bigger

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>than that it. Alchemy was not just the greedy gold

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>slog of people who had you know, Mida's brain, uh like,

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it was generally the study of chemical change, and the

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>study of chemical change is a really important and fascinating

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>subject that helps you understand sort of unlocks all of

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the other physical sciences. I already mentioned the idea of

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of recipes for bendable glass. I think this is a

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>much more obscure one, but I just bring it up

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>because I did an episode on it. A big part

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of alchemy, as we've already mentioned, was concerned with refining

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and improving medicines. But of course another holy grail of

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>alchemy was the universal solvent alcohest. And so the place

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>where alcohest really comes into the picture is in work

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of the influential Flemish chemist and physician Jean Baptista van Helmont,

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>who lived fifteen seventy nine to sixteen forty four. Uh,

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and of van Helmont is responsible for has more of

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a legacy than you might expect. Van Helmont is responsible

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>for coining the English word gas. Uh. He was one

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of the first people, maybe the first, to identify a

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>gas other than general air, when he differentiated carbon dioxide

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>as a distinct form of matter from the rest of

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the gas in the atmosphere. Apparently, the word gas that

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>he coined comes from the Greek word chaos. Now, Prince

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Bay writes that van Helmont is the is the origin

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of this search for alcohest as the as the universal solvent,

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>but notes that Paracelsus, as I already said, had used

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the word alcohest previously, and this was again for a

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>very special medicine for the liver. But Van Helmont would

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:03.719
<v Speaker 1>take that word alcohest and start using it to describe

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a hypothetical substance that would be able to dissolve any

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>other substance, the universal solvent. And apparently a Paracelsus had

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a similar idea for a universal solvent that would have

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>been a material called circulated salt or cell circulatum um.

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>But but for van Helmont, alcohest became not just something

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that you wanted to be able to make, but something

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that was fundamental in understanding the very nature of matter.

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Because Van Helmont held a fascinating and mostly wrong but

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe not entirely wrong, at least sort of in the

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>direction of being right in some interesting ways, a view

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of matter that had these qualities, and it brought in

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>ideas from medicine and theology and previous studies of chemicals.

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>But the idea was that Van Helmont believed basically everything

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is made of water, that water is quote the base

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>material substratum of all substances. You drop water in the

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>middle of this and everything makes sense very good. Um.

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So this was a departure from previous ideas about the

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>constituents of matter. Again, Paracelsus had written about something called

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the tria prima, which means the three primary things. And

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Paracelsus he did not originate this idea fully either. He

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 1>was building upon the pre existing chemical knowledge, mostly passed

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:34.320
<v Speaker 1>down from Arabic scholars who had written that some metals

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and minerals could really be reduced to fundamental constituents, which

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>were mercury and sulfur. Uh. This was not correct, but

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it did show a tendency of thinking that was scientifically useful,

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>which was the idea that matter could be decomposed into

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 1>its constituent parts, different chemical parts that would come together

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to make molecules of familiar substances, which is very true

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and the basis of what would become the real science.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>It's of chemistry. And so Paracelsus is picking up on

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this idea. Uh. And he concluded that it was not

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 1>just that some metals and minerals were could be broken

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 1>down into mercury and sulfur. He concluded that basically all

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:17.720
<v Speaker 1>material could be broken down into three things mercury, sulfur,

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and salt. Again factually wrong but a a but trending

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 1>in a useful direction in terms of ways of thinking

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>about matter. Yeah, kind of coming back into what we're

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about with destruction, Like if you were to destroy anything,

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>what would remain? What are the things that make up

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the whole? Sure? Uh? And I actually wanted to go

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>into a brief digression on paracelsus is mingling of theological,

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 1>metaphysical and protoscientific thinking from a paragraph in prince Ship

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>base book that that I found really interesting. So in

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 1>writing about Paracelsus is idea of the Tria prima prince

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>ship A writes quote. These three chemical principles provided a

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>terrestrial material trinity that reflected the celestial immaterial trinity as

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>well as the human triune nature of body, soul, and spirit. Further,

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Paracelsus endeavored to generate an entire world system embracing the

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>whole of theology and natural philosophy as an alternative to

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and he no doubt hoped ultimately a substitute for prevailing

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 1>contemporaneous systems. For him, chemical processes provided the fundamental model

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:30.919
<v Speaker 1>for explaining natural processes in the physical universe as well

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>as within the human body. For example, the cycle of

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>rain through sea, air, and land was for Paracelsus a

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>great cosmic distillation the formation of minerals underground, the growth

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of plants, the generation of life forms, as well as

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the bodily functions of digestion, nutrition, respiration, and excretion, where

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>for him inherently chemical processes, God himself is the master chemist.

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.760
<v Speaker 1>His creation of an ordered world out of primordial chaos

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 1>was akin to the chemist's extraction, purification, and elaboration of

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 1>common materials into chemical products, and his final judgment of

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the world by fire, like a chemist using fire to

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:19.240
<v Speaker 1>purge impurities from precious metals. Paracelsis system has been called

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 1>a chemical world view, and it proved remarkably influential in

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>succeeding generations. So for Paracelsis, not only did he inspire

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the later search for a literal universal solvent that we're

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be talking about, but it seems very much

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 1>again in the metaphorical in the mind space alchemy was

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:41.359
<v Speaker 1>his universal solvent. It it explained everything. I remember. Van

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Helmont would go on to break with Paracelsus in believing

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that matter could be reduced beyond the Tria prima ultimately

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>always down to what it was made of at bottom,

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 1>which was water. So why would Van Helmont think that

0:37:56.520 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>ultimately everything was made of water? Well, his reasoning was

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>partly theological. Part of it was the primacy of water

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>in the Genesis account of creation. Uh. And this also

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 1>calls to mind how in the recent Nile episode we

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 1>discussed the prominence of water, not just in the Biblical

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>creation story, but it's probably at least in the estimation

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of the scholar David Leming, the single most common theme

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in creation narratives around the world, if you like, compare

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 1>all of the world's religions creation myths. He says, the

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that is in the most of them is water,

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, primordial cosmic oceans. Yeah yeah. And then oftentimes,

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>like we discussed in that episode, we even would think

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of the cosmos as ocean. Uh yeah, So, I mean

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you would if it's not in the beginning there's some

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 1>void or some just empty space of darkness, which I

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:48.959
<v Speaker 1>guess to a large point, you could be a large

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>part point you could say is derived from our modern

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>popular understanding of of what outer space is. They've never

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:00.959
<v Speaker 1>been to space. They don't know what space was. Yeah,

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the vast emptiness was the ocean, that was the that

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>was the vast mystery, the vast primordial body. But it

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just these theological influences. Van Helmont also based this

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>belief in the material primacy of water on physical experiments

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that he conducted in the lab. So here's an example,

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 1>as described by Principe. In Van Helmont's most famous experiment,

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:28.320
<v Speaker 1>he planted a willow tree sapling that he had weighed beforehand.

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>The willow tree was five pounds, and he planted it

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in a container with two hundred pounds of soil. Then

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>he watered the tree for five years, and at the

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:41.320
<v Speaker 1>end of five years, the tree had grown from five

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>pounds to a hundred and sixty nine pounds. It had

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>gained about thirty three or thirty four times its original weight.

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 1>But he also measured the soil that the tree had

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 1>been planted in, and he discovered that the soil weighed

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:59.720
<v Speaker 1>almost exactly the same as it did when he planted it. Thus,

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and Helmont concluded that water alone had been transformed into

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>all of the substances that make up the tree, the wood,

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the leaves. This is all just water that has been

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>somehow transformed into higher forms of water, more solid forms

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of water. And in a way he was he was

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>partially correct. I mean, much of the bodies of living

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 1>organisms is made of water. Uh. But also without understanding

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the science of photosynthesis, Van Helmont didn't realize that the

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 1>carbon content of the tree, which is the bulk of

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>its nonwater weight, was actually from carbon dioxide from the air,

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 1>which is absorbed from the atmosphere by the leaves, and

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:45.320
<v Speaker 1>then a chemical reaction powered by energy from the sunlight

0:40:45.680 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>breaks apart the CEO two so that it can be

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>used to make these carbon molecules that the tree needs

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 1>to make its body. Again, we've talked about this on

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the show a million times, but it's one of the

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:58.399
<v Speaker 1>most astounding facts that you know, trees are made out

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of air. But without this knowledge of photochemistry and botany,

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it was somewhat reasonable for for Van Helmont to believe

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that what had gone into the tree was simply what

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 1>he had put into it, which was water. That's the

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 1>only thing he'd added to it. So how did this

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:18.959
<v Speaker 1>system of this this protean water based matter work well?

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:21.879
<v Speaker 1>To read a section from from Prince Pay describing Van

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Helmont's thinking quote, the various transformations of water, he argued,

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 1>are managed by semina or seeds capable of organizing water

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 1>into other substances. Most materials can be turned back into

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>primordial water through heating and cold, thus establishing a continuous

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:45.760
<v Speaker 1>cycle of creation and destruction. Fire destroys substances by turning

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>them into gas again, a word Van Helmont coined from chaos,

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a non condensable substance more subtle than any. Vapor gas

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 1>rises to the upper parts of the atmosphere, where, exposed

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to extreme cold, it returns to elemental water that falls

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>with the rain. The alcohest performs this return to water

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 1>more quickly and usefully, so it base. Everything is made

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of water, and we're just seeing different forms of water.

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:17.280
<v Speaker 1>And if you get something really hot in a fire,

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it will transform. It will transform not only into liquid water,

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:24.880
<v Speaker 1>but sort of beyond this point into a gas that

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>floats up into the atmosphere. Then when it's up in

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere, it cools down, turns back into liquid water

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 1>and falls as rain, So it's sort of water to water,

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:38.839
<v Speaker 1>wet to wet worldview. And then the alcohest comes in

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:41.799
<v Speaker 1>as a universal solvent because it seems to serve the

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:44.959
<v Speaker 1>function of reducing all matter back down to the state

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of liquid water without degrading it in the process. So,

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:51.920
<v Speaker 1>according to Van Helmont, if you were to heat a

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 1>substance mingled with alcohest, it will first be reduced to

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:59.360
<v Speaker 1>its proximate ingredients. These would be sort of the middle

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 1>constitut wins right before you get all the way to water.

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 1>It will break down into some other things first, and

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:09.240
<v Speaker 1>these would be comparable to Paracelsis idea of the Tria prima.

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>But then further heating with alcohest will reduce even these

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:16.720
<v Speaker 1>proximate ingredients to the ultimate base material, which is water.

0:43:17.520 --> 0:43:20.399
<v Speaker 1>So from Van Helmont's point of view, the alcohest was

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 1>was not a chemical arcanum because it would turn your

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>lead into gold and make you rich. It was actually

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:31.839
<v Speaker 1>desirable as the ultimate research tool. Alcohest would have been

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate implement for studying what every type of matter

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:39.839
<v Speaker 1>is made of. And there's a there's a sentence from

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Van Helmont quoted in print based book, where he writes,

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>there is no more certain genus of acquiring knowledge than

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 1>when one knows what is contained in a thing and

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 1>how much of it there is. So how would you

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 1>do this? Well? Van Helmont thought that if you could

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 1>stop the reaction between alcohest and the material in question

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:02.440
<v Speaker 1>at just the right time, and then distill the alcohest

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to remove it, you would be left with what was

0:44:05.040 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 1>called the first essence, or the ins prem um, and

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:11.080
<v Speaker 1>this ins prem um would be there in the container

0:44:11.200 --> 0:44:14.399
<v Speaker 1>left behind as a kind of crystall in salt. And

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>so you could make better medicines this way, for instance,

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 1>because the this ins prem um would have the medicinal

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:25.120
<v Speaker 1>powers of whatever substance that you had been working on,

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 1>but it would remove all of the toxic or noxious

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>uh sort of side effects and impurities that could be

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:35.839
<v Speaker 1>caused by the original medicinal thing. And thus, in Van

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Helmont's view, the alcohest was a tool for research. It

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:41.279
<v Speaker 1>was a tool for what was called chemi atria, or

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the development of medicines through chemistry. Now, Van Helmont claimed

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that he had been able to make alcohest. He's like,

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>I figured it out. I know how to do it,

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I can prepare it. But he never revealed his secret recipe,

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 1>and many other scholars struggled in vain to discover Van

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Helmont's formula of for the universal solvent. Uh. Some at

0:45:02.480 --> 0:45:05.239
<v Speaker 1>various points believed they had found it. For example, Prince

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:09.799
<v Speaker 1>sites a laboratory notebook entry by the seventeenth century Colonial

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 1>American alchemist George Starkey, who wrote quote at Bristol on

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>twentieth March sixteen fifty six, God revealed to me the

0:45:18.000 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 1>whole secret of the liquor alcohest let eternal blessing, honor

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and glory be to him. So I'm not sure exactly

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 1>what he discovered, but I do not think it was

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a real universal solvent. I like that it's described as

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the liquor alcohest Like imagine if alcohest was a liquor,

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>would it be impossible to make a cocktail with it?

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Would it always like break the cocktail back down into

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:42.600
<v Speaker 1>its uh it's primary ingredients? You probably wouldn't want to

0:45:42.680 --> 0:45:45.400
<v Speaker 1>drink it. Yeah, do you would just melt? You just

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>become water? Right, I always wanted to be water. It's

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:54.839
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate in refreshment though. Right, that's good marketing. Now,

0:45:54.880 --> 0:45:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at another book by Lawrence Prince about

0:45:57.400 --> 0:46:00.440
<v Speaker 1>alchemy called The Transmutations of Chemists Tree, and this is

0:46:00.520 --> 0:46:04.279
<v Speaker 1>chemistry spelled with a an intentionally archaic spelling c h

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Y M I S t r Y, which is UH

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:11.399
<v Speaker 1>to distinguish it from the modern science of chemistry. UH.

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 1>This was published in by University of Chicago Press, and

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:19.279
<v Speaker 1>in this case UH princepe is discussing the efforts of

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>alchemists like Jan von Helmont to perform chemical analysis of

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 1>materials such as the bodies of plants. Where the idea was, yeah,

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you can use fire to break materials down into their

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:33.880
<v Speaker 1>constituent parts. But the problem is that fire, while it

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:38.120
<v Speaker 1>will decompose the materials into the approximate constituents, fire was

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:42.680
<v Speaker 1>deceitful as it would corrupt to those constituents in the process.

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:45.800
<v Speaker 1>And of course the solution was alcahast, which could break

0:46:45.840 --> 0:46:49.399
<v Speaker 1>things down without corrupting them in the process. And there's

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a part here where alcohost is referred to as better

0:46:52.920 --> 0:46:57.120
<v Speaker 1>than fire. It is the fire of Gehenna, which that's

0:46:57.160 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a biblical metaphor. It's a metaphor for igno many as

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 1>destruction that is used in the Bible. That is often

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a little little Bible interpretation note, often translated into English

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Bibles as hell. Uh. The previous show guest bart Erman,

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:16.920
<v Speaker 1>who's a secular Bible historian. He explains that this translation

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:21.800
<v Speaker 1>is actually really misleading. It's actually reading later theology about

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the afterlife into the original text. Uh. And he argues

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:28.799
<v Speaker 1>that Gehenna in the original text is not supposed to

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 1>refer to a place of eternal suffering afterlife, but in

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:34.480
<v Speaker 1>fact it was a real place. It is basically a

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:38.799
<v Speaker 1>desolate valley that was um It was historically associated with

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:42.680
<v Speaker 1>human sacrifice, and so, according to Irman, being sent to Gehenna,

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:45.919
<v Speaker 1>as is often discussed in the New Testament, has nothing

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:48.399
<v Speaker 1>to do with an afterlife of eternal suffering, but rather

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 1>as a sort of it's a squalid and unceremonious annihilation.

0:47:52.840 --> 0:47:55.359
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of equivalent to telling somebody that they're going

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to die and be thrown into a garbage dump. Not

0:47:59.520 --> 0:48:02.360
<v Speaker 1>nice ide way, but but somewhat different than the idea

0:48:02.360 --> 0:48:06.239
<v Speaker 1>of everlasting suffering in hell. Yeah. So, ultimately, if you're

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 1>putting a garbage dump, and I guess in the right conditions,

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you are going to break down and become a part

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:16.799
<v Speaker 1>of the natural world again, get to become your tree

0:48:16.800 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a prima and then and then water. I guess, yeah,

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 1>But in Gehanna, it sounds like it would have been

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 1>we know, it wouldn't be like a modern garbage dump.

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:25.279
<v Speaker 1>It would be a place where you break down or

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:29.880
<v Speaker 1>probably partially consumed by scavenging beasts that you know, ultimately, uh,

0:48:30.840 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty cushy. Anyway, that that was just a

0:48:34.120 --> 0:48:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Bible nerd side note, so it probably doesn't figure in

0:48:37.880 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 1>here because I would guess Van Helmont is is referring

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:44.239
<v Speaker 1>to the supernatural hell interpretation. So alcahest is much better

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 1>than earthly fire. It's like a holy supernatural fire. But

0:48:48.600 --> 0:48:52.560
<v Speaker 1>again Van Helmont writes about how the alcahest could decompose

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:55.720
<v Speaker 1>matter into its tree a prima or its constituent parts

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and then eventually back into water with no compromise or

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:02.360
<v Speaker 1>destruction of the pretties along the way, and uh, and

0:49:02.400 --> 0:49:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Principa writes about how, again we mentioned earlier, this could

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:10.040
<v Speaker 1>be used to make better medicines, and in this section

0:49:10.080 --> 0:49:12.359
<v Speaker 1>he actually mentions what a couple of these medicines would

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 1>have been. Quote Van Helmont describes several pharmaceuticals he claims

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to have prepared using the alcohest, most notably a cure

0:49:20.080 --> 0:49:23.720
<v Speaker 1>for kidney and bladderstones made from a mineral he calls lutus,

0:49:24.280 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and an elixir of life prepared from Lebanon cedar. Would

0:49:29.000 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the only obstacle in this glorious royal road for chemistry

0:49:32.640 --> 0:49:35.920
<v Speaker 1>was that no one knew how to prepare Van Helmont's alcohest.

0:49:43.560 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess the obvious is is the is the truth

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that if the alcahest was possible, if there was a

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:55.000
<v Speaker 1>universal solvent to be found, then surely modern chemistry would

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 1>have found it in the wake of alchemy. Yeah, and

0:49:57.560 --> 0:50:00.120
<v Speaker 1>so here we revealed that there are several flaw as

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to the fundamental assumptions on which the the Alcohest was based.

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one thing is that Van Helmont's conception of

0:50:06.600 --> 0:50:10.080
<v Speaker 1>all material ultimately being based on water is not true.

0:50:10.360 --> 0:50:14.160
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that modern chemistry is is without

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:19.560
<v Speaker 1>some really exceptional, exquisite dissolvers that will maybe while maybe

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 1>not being universal solvents, will break down lots of stuff,

0:50:24.719 --> 0:50:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a shocking amount of stuff. Uh so a couple that

0:50:28.520 --> 0:50:30.719
<v Speaker 1>are worth mentioning. One I wanted to talk about is

0:50:30.800 --> 0:50:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the chemical known as aqua regia, which the name literally

0:50:34.560 --> 0:50:38.319
<v Speaker 1>means royal water in Latin. It's made with one part

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:43.560
<v Speaker 1>nitric acid and three parts hydrochloric acid. It is extremely corrosive.

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:46.399
<v Speaker 1>It's a liquid with a reddish orange color that can

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 1>not only cause severe burns if you touch it, it

0:50:49.040 --> 0:50:54.680
<v Speaker 1>can literally dissolve otherwise nonreactive metals like gold and platinum.

0:50:54.719 --> 0:50:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Aqua Regia briefly came up in our episode on heavy Water,

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I think because we were talking about the historical anecdote

0:51:02.120 --> 0:51:05.719
<v Speaker 1>where the chemists George to Heavish had to h had

0:51:05.760 --> 0:51:08.720
<v Speaker 1>had to quickly find a way to hide the Nobel

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Prize medals, which I think we're made of gold in

0:51:11.719 --> 0:51:14.799
<v Speaker 1>the laboratory of Nils Bore when the laboratory was being

0:51:15.080 --> 0:51:17.759
<v Speaker 1>captured and searched by the Nazis, and he ended up

0:51:17.760 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Speaker 1>dissolving the metals in Aqua regia to prevent them from

0:51:21.040 --> 0:51:26.359
<v Speaker 1>being found out. So Aqua Regia sounds refreshing. Is not refreshing, though,

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 1>do not buy a bottle of it at your local

0:51:29.520 --> 0:51:33.399
<v Speaker 1>convenience store. Not a good Lacroix flavor, maybe better than

0:51:33.400 --> 0:51:37.280
<v Speaker 1>coconut oh I love coconut. Coconut Coconut's a good lacroise

0:51:37.400 --> 0:51:39.279
<v Speaker 1>you do for me at least at the beach, and

0:51:39.320 --> 0:51:42.480
<v Speaker 1>as long as it's cold. But if it warms up

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not at the beach, then uh yeah, it's

0:51:44.920 --> 0:51:46.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly both of those are true. Then yeah, I don't

0:51:46.680 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 1>want any part of it. I'm a picky so I. I

0:51:48.600 --> 0:51:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I do love the soda waters, I like the lacroise.

0:51:51.600 --> 0:51:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I like most flavors, uh and and I like real

0:51:54.640 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 1>coconut stuff, but the coconut lacroix. Something about it. It's like,

0:51:57.920 --> 0:52:01.799
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's like drinking sunscreen. Something's wrong. I think

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:03.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's why I like it, because it kind of

0:52:03.800 --> 0:52:08.799
<v Speaker 1>tastes like what sunscreen historically smelled like. And so it's

0:52:08.840 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>like it's like drinking the the you know, the alchemical

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:16.840
<v Speaker 1>truth of the beach um while at the beach. So

0:52:16.920 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I can go on even better on these uh, these dissolvers.

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:24.160
<v Speaker 1>There's one thing I've been reading about called Piranha solution.

0:52:25.040 --> 0:52:28.320
<v Speaker 1>This is this is a class of industrial and laboratory

0:52:28.400 --> 0:52:32.680
<v Speaker 1>grade cleaning solutions colloquially known as Piranha solutions. And you

0:52:32.719 --> 0:52:36.320
<v Speaker 1>can guess how they got their name. They are typically

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:40.320
<v Speaker 1>used as a ruthless and very dangerous way to strip

0:52:40.440 --> 0:52:45.799
<v Speaker 1>all residue of organic molecules from a container, surface, or substrate. Now,

0:52:45.800 --> 0:52:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting that it has it is it is getting closer.

0:52:48.920 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like to what we think of as as

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood acid, but in doing so, it invokes Hollywood piranhas. Yes, yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:52:58.120 --> 0:53:00.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's making you think of what's the James Bond

0:53:00.760 --> 0:53:03.640
<v Speaker 1>movie where you only live twice? Right with the bridge

0:53:03.680 --> 0:53:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that goes over the piranhas. And if you like, that's

0:53:06.320 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 1>your bad performance review means that your fish food. Yeah,

0:53:10.200 --> 0:53:14.719
<v Speaker 1>that's the one with Donald pleasants is blowfeld. So a

0:53:14.719 --> 0:53:18.880
<v Speaker 1>common formulation of Piranha solutions extremely dangerous material would be

0:53:19.000 --> 0:53:21.920
<v Speaker 1>three parts sulfuric acid or H two S O four

0:53:22.320 --> 0:53:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and one part hydrogen peroxide, which is H two O two.

0:53:26.520 --> 0:53:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Piranha solution is from everything I read, extremely temperamental. Mixing

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the elements in the wrong order, or in the wrong ratio,

0:53:34.960 --> 0:53:38.560
<v Speaker 1>or in the presence of the wrong contaminants can immediately

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:41.719
<v Speaker 1>lead to explosions. It seems like there are just lots

0:53:41.800 --> 0:53:44.879
<v Speaker 1>of ways that using it can lead to explosions. More

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:46.840
<v Speaker 1>on that in a bit, so I was trying to

0:53:46.880 --> 0:53:50.319
<v Speaker 1>figure out, Okay, how exactly does this stuff work? Um,

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:53.240
<v Speaker 1>there was a helpful podcast episode I found. The Royal

0:53:53.280 --> 0:53:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Society of Chemistry has a podcast called Chemistry and Its Element,

0:53:56.880 --> 0:53:58.560
<v Speaker 1>though sometimes I see it referred to just as the

0:53:58.640 --> 0:54:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Chemistry World podcast. Chemistry World is their magazine, their publication.

0:54:04.360 --> 0:54:07.920
<v Speaker 1>But this podcast episode was hosted by Sam Tracy, and

0:54:07.960 --> 0:54:10.800
<v Speaker 1>it's about Piranha solution, and I appreciated the way Tracy

0:54:10.880 --> 0:54:14.439
<v Speaker 1>explained what the solution does at the molecular level. First

0:54:14.440 --> 0:54:16.239
<v Speaker 1>of all, I wanted to point out Tracy notes that

0:54:16.280 --> 0:54:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not just named Piranha Solution for its ability to

0:54:20.080 --> 0:54:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to dissolve all organic matter that it comes into contact with,

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps also for its tendency to boil vigorously when

0:54:28.480 --> 0:54:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it's in the presence of organic matter. So like in

0:54:30.760 --> 0:54:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that scene and you only live twice where the piranhas

0:54:33.120 --> 0:54:35.600
<v Speaker 1>started attacking somebody, it looks like the water has been

0:54:35.600 --> 0:54:39.080
<v Speaker 1>put on the boilers, bubbles everywhere. Yeah, almost as if

0:54:39.600 --> 0:54:43.640
<v Speaker 1>um a a bubbling mechanism was placed underwater to create

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the illusion of a horde of piranhas um, you know,

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:50.520
<v Speaker 1>tearing something apart in movie fashion. Actually, here's something I

0:54:50.560 --> 0:54:54.000
<v Speaker 1>want to see. Uh, answer this question if you were

0:54:54.040 --> 0:54:56.800
<v Speaker 1>actually attacked by a school of piranhas. I don't know

0:54:56.840 --> 0:54:58.960
<v Speaker 1>if they even swarm like that in reality, I kind

0:54:59.000 --> 0:55:01.359
<v Speaker 1>of doubt it. But if you were, would it would

0:55:01.360 --> 0:55:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it would the water boil like that? Or would it

0:55:03.520 --> 0:55:05.759
<v Speaker 1>look very calm on the surface. Well, I think we

0:55:05.800 --> 0:55:08.560
<v Speaker 1>should answer this question into an episode on piranhas. I

0:55:08.560 --> 0:55:11.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know that i've i've ever we've ever devoted an

0:55:11.400 --> 0:55:13.680
<v Speaker 1>episode to piranhas. So let's let's come back to it.

0:55:13.719 --> 0:55:17.480
<v Speaker 1>They're they're beautiful fish. Okay, So how does it work? Well?

0:55:17.520 --> 0:55:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Paranha solution again, as I mentioned as two main ingredients,

0:55:20.280 --> 0:55:23.120
<v Speaker 1>has sulfuric acid H two S O four and hydrogen

0:55:23.160 --> 0:55:26.560
<v Speaker 1>peroxide H two O two. So if you imagine a

0:55:26.640 --> 0:55:31.239
<v Speaker 1>glass container with organic residue of glucose sugar stuck to

0:55:31.280 --> 0:55:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the inside, uh, and imagine this is exposed to a

0:55:35.120 --> 0:55:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Piranha solution for cleaning. Each of the two ingredients plays

0:55:38.840 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a different role in cleaning the sugar away. So sugar,

0:55:42.239 --> 0:55:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, is an organic molecule. It's a carbohydrate molecule

0:55:45.120 --> 0:55:47.640
<v Speaker 1>with the formulas C six H twelve O six at

0:55:47.680 --> 0:55:52.040
<v Speaker 1>least that's glucose. Different types of sugar of different chemical compositions,

0:55:52.280 --> 0:55:56.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's got carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, and when exposed

0:55:56.400 --> 0:56:00.879
<v Speaker 1>to concentrated sulfuric acid, this acid acts as an aggressive

0:56:01.120 --> 0:56:06.680
<v Speaker 1>dehydrating agent, so it will chemically react to remove water

0:56:06.840 --> 0:56:10.960
<v Speaker 1>molecules as much as it can, So the sugar molecules

0:56:11.000 --> 0:56:14.600
<v Speaker 1>will get broken apart, and the sugar will lose hydrogen

0:56:14.640 --> 0:56:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and oxygen atoms in the form of water vapor H

0:56:17.560 --> 0:56:20.480
<v Speaker 1>two O. And So if you have a molecule like

0:56:20.520 --> 0:56:23.759
<v Speaker 1>sugar that's based on carbon, hydrogen and oxygen and you're

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:27.319
<v Speaker 1>rapidly pulling hydrogen and oxygen off of it, what are

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you going to have left over a lot of carbon?

0:56:30.480 --> 0:56:33.400
<v Speaker 1>So if you've ever seen this experiment where you douse

0:56:33.480 --> 0:56:35.600
<v Speaker 1>sugar and sulfuric acid, there there are a lot of

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:39.000
<v Speaker 1>videos you can look up online. Um, usually you will

0:56:39.000 --> 0:56:40.759
<v Speaker 1>have like a beaker with a bunch of sugar in it.

0:56:40.880 --> 0:56:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Somebody douses it and sulfuric acid and then stirs it

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:46.520
<v Speaker 1>up with a glass pipette. Uh, the sugar will first

0:56:46.560 --> 0:56:49.359
<v Speaker 1>turn brown and then black and then give off all

0:56:49.400 --> 0:56:51.759
<v Speaker 1>of these fumes. I think it's giving off both water

0:56:51.880 --> 0:56:55.400
<v Speaker 1>vapor and noxious fumes of sulfur dioxide. So you shouldn't

0:56:55.440 --> 0:56:59.040
<v Speaker 1>do this experiment without you know, supervision of somebody who

0:56:59.040 --> 0:57:01.640
<v Speaker 1>knows what they're doing, because it gets very hot and

0:57:01.719 --> 0:57:04.200
<v Speaker 1>it puts off these fumes. It can be dangerous potentially.

0:57:04.280 --> 0:57:07.239
<v Speaker 1>But but what eventually ends up happening is that the

0:57:07.280 --> 0:57:10.360
<v Speaker 1>carbon residue that's left over from the reaction of the

0:57:10.400 --> 0:57:13.880
<v Speaker 1>acid with the sugar, this carbon residue will start to

0:57:14.080 --> 0:57:17.240
<v Speaker 1>climb out of the beaker in a looming column like

0:57:17.280 --> 0:57:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a giant tube worm or snake that is made out

0:57:20.200 --> 0:57:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of charred soit uh And you can find a whole

0:57:23.720 --> 0:57:28.520
<v Speaker 1>genre of carbon snake pictures online from demonstrations of this reaction.

0:57:28.560 --> 0:57:31.200
<v Speaker 1>They're pretty great. Yeah, they can be quite impressive. Yeah,

0:57:31.320 --> 0:57:34.880
<v Speaker 1>all praise be to the carbon snakes. But Sam Tracy

0:57:35.000 --> 0:57:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in in this podcast, I was talking about mentions that

0:57:37.560 --> 0:57:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the role of sulfuric acid is twofold quote. It's acidity

0:57:41.800 --> 0:57:46.400
<v Speaker 1>catalyzes the reaction and being a hygroscopic substance, it combines

0:57:46.480 --> 0:57:49.720
<v Speaker 1>with the water, releasing a great quantity of heat, meaning

0:57:49.720 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the reaction cannot go in the reverse direction and can

0:57:52.840 --> 0:57:56.880
<v Speaker 1>only proceed to completion. But of course this alone would

0:57:56.880 --> 0:58:00.600
<v Speaker 1>not make a cleaning agent because sulfuric acid alone would

0:58:00.640 --> 0:58:03.840
<v Speaker 1>tend to simply eat up organic molecules, strip them of

0:58:03.960 --> 0:58:06.400
<v Speaker 1>what water can be pulled out of them, and leave

0:58:06.480 --> 0:58:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a ton of black elemental carbon in its wake. And

0:58:09.240 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that is not clean. Like, you don't want black elemental

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:15.600
<v Speaker 1>carbon stuck to your glass surfaces or your electronics or

0:58:15.640 --> 0:58:18.320
<v Speaker 1>your you know, your wafer chips, whatever whatever it is

0:58:18.360 --> 0:58:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to clean. So this is where the hydrogen

0:58:21.080 --> 0:58:24.840
<v Speaker 1>peroxide comes in. Hydrogen peroxide serves to eat away the

0:58:24.920 --> 0:58:27.920
<v Speaker 1>remaining carbon byproduct that would have been left over from

0:58:27.960 --> 0:58:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the acids attack on the carbohydrate. Uh So, hydrogen peroxide

0:58:32.080 --> 0:58:35.160
<v Speaker 1>H two O two will react with the elemental carbon

0:58:35.280 --> 0:58:38.760
<v Speaker 1>by donating oxygen atoms to the carbon, which combined to

0:58:38.760 --> 0:58:41.760
<v Speaker 1>produce carbon dioxide gas, which floats away in the air,

0:58:42.160 --> 0:58:47.520
<v Speaker 1>eventually leaving your substrate clean of all organic material. So hypothetically,

0:58:47.560 --> 0:58:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you you have and again i'm not advising to do this,

0:58:50.400 --> 0:58:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it's extremely dangerous, but what would happen is you have

0:58:53.400 --> 0:58:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a glass container or an electronics part, whatever it is

0:58:57.280 --> 0:58:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to clean off. It's got a little bit

0:58:59.320 --> 0:59:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of organic MATERI areal on it, maybe some sugar or

0:59:01.440 --> 0:59:04.480
<v Speaker 1>some other kind of carbohydrates something like that, and you

0:59:04.560 --> 0:59:08.360
<v Speaker 1>add this solution to it. It is UH. The organic

0:59:08.400 --> 0:59:11.840
<v Speaker 1>materials are ripped apart by the acid, and then the

0:59:11.880 --> 0:59:16.520
<v Speaker 1>remaining carbon is just removed and evaporated by the hydrogen peroxide.

0:59:17.040 --> 0:59:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I was reading about many ways that the piranha solution is,

0:59:19.600 --> 0:59:22.720
<v Speaker 1>as I've said several times now, extremely dangerous. This is

0:59:22.760 --> 0:59:24.840
<v Speaker 1>not one to try it with a home chemistry set,

0:59:24.880 --> 0:59:28.560
<v Speaker 1>as it can easily explode and cause severe injuries and burns.

0:59:29.480 --> 0:59:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I was reading a story that was sent to UH

0:59:32.840 --> 0:59:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in a letter to Chemical Engineering News by a couple

0:59:35.440 --> 0:59:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of researchers in the year nineteen nine that was about

0:59:38.360 --> 0:59:42.680
<v Speaker 1>multiple accidents that had occurred in university labs with Piranha solutions.

0:59:42.760 --> 0:59:46.400
<v Speaker 1>One where a container of paranha solution was sitting stored

0:59:46.440 --> 0:59:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in a fume hood and about a week after it

0:59:48.800 --> 0:59:52.479
<v Speaker 1>was mixed, it just spontaneously exploded. Another one they talked

0:59:52.480 --> 0:59:56.160
<v Speaker 1>about is UH it occurred at Cornell University, where I

0:59:56.200 --> 0:59:59.560
<v Speaker 1>think what happened is that some Piranha solution was accidentally

0:59:59.640 --> 1:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and very unfortunately mixed with acet tone and this caused

1:00:03.720 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a violent explosion that like ripped apart the hood that

1:00:06.840 --> 1:00:09.919
<v Speaker 1>it was under severely injured the person who was working

1:00:09.960 --> 1:00:11.840
<v Speaker 1>on it. They ended up, you know, covered in this

1:00:11.920 --> 1:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>corrosive liquid with a bunch of glass embedded in them.

1:00:14.880 --> 1:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>So it is not something to screw around with. So

1:00:17.640 --> 1:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>not literal alcahist, not a literal universal solvent, but but

1:00:21.400 --> 1:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>parana solution will get you a lot of the way there.

1:00:24.160 --> 1:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, you know, at this point we're reaching

1:00:26.000 --> 1:00:27.959
<v Speaker 1>the end of the podcasts, and I think the only

1:00:28.240 --> 1:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>only way to really go at this point is to

1:00:30.800 --> 1:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>at least briefly discuss new age occult thinking and um

1:00:36.240 --> 1:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>also tech biz lingo. Okay, let's let's start with with

1:00:42.520 --> 1:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the with the new age, new age and occult psych

1:00:45.320 --> 1:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and psychedelic thinking, basically discussing universal solvent is a metaphor. Now.

1:00:51.120 --> 1:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Earlier in our discussion, I brought up Terrence McKinnon his

1:00:53.400 --> 1:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>lectures on alchemy, and again McKenna said that he didn't

1:00:55.880 --> 1:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>see much of a a connection between alchemy and psychedelics. Uh,

1:00:59.040 --> 1:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>those certain important uh pharmacological discoveries would come out of alchemy.

1:01:03.440 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>For the most part, psychedelics were the domain of the shaman.

1:01:06.760 --> 1:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>But of course other schools of thought would later on

1:01:10.320 --> 1:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in human history come back to alchemy, uh and it's

1:01:13.280 --> 1:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>sacred and obscure dimensions and find new meanings there. So,

1:01:17.080 --> 1:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>for instance, we see that with the unions, and we

1:01:20.600 --> 1:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>also see that with psychedelic and new age thinking as well. Again,

1:01:24.240 --> 1:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're dealing with with recipes that are dealing

1:01:26.920 --> 1:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, talking about the red dragon and using code words,

1:01:31.040 --> 1:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>but also dealing in philosophical and magical ideas. It's irresistible

1:01:36.320 --> 1:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to come back and sort of um, you know, and

1:01:40.040 --> 1:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>view your own meaning into it and uh and and

1:01:43.160 --> 1:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>perhaps even rediscover aspects of your your your current, your

1:01:47.240 --> 1:01:52.439
<v Speaker 1>contemporary system by breathing it into this archaic apparatus. Yeah,

1:01:52.440 --> 1:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not mistaken, I think alchemy. Concepts from alchemy

1:01:56.880 --> 1:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>were very popular to be played around with by like

1:01:59.480 --> 1:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uh the sort of new religious movements

1:02:02.240 --> 1:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of the late nineteenth century. Yeah, and and really this

1:02:06.080 --> 1:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>ultimately fits the basic format of alchemy throughout history. Like

1:02:10.720 --> 1:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of alchemy, even you know, you know, in

1:02:12.640 --> 1:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the old days, revolved around looking back at old texts,

1:02:17.000 --> 1:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>piecing together bits from old texts, and trying to to

1:02:19.880 --> 1:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>break new ground understand what these these other authors were

1:02:23.520 --> 1:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about, and uh in creating some new frame of

1:02:27.320 --> 1:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>meaning around it. You know, something that alchemy also has

1:02:30.320 --> 1:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>in common with religious texts is pseudonymous writings. Uh so

1:02:34.880 --> 1:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in in for example, in the early centuries of Christianity,

1:02:38.440 --> 1:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a huge thing that would often go on is like

1:02:40.440 --> 1:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you would write a new book that you know, you

1:02:42.600 --> 1:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>would want to be taken as scripture that would advance

1:02:44.840 --> 1:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>your view of the correct theological interpretation of Christ. But

1:02:48.560 --> 1:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you'd be like, well, and nobody knows who I am,

1:02:50.840 --> 1:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to say that this was written by St. Peter,

1:02:54.600 --> 1:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, this is the Gospel of Peter, Like,

1:02:57.160 --> 1:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>this is definitely not written by Peter. Um the people.

1:03:00.000 --> 1:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>We're doing this kind of thing all the time. The

1:03:01.360 --> 1:03:04.959
<v Speaker 1>same thing happened with alchemy. People would write pseudonymously as

1:03:05.080 --> 1:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>like you know, as one of the great masters of alchemy. Yes, uh,

1:03:08.880 --> 1:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>this was by Paracelsus, but it actually wasn't. It was

1:03:11.480 --> 1:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>just some somebody well, you know in in In dealing

1:03:15.800 --> 1:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>specifically with it with alcohest and the idea of a

1:03:18.080 --> 1:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>universal solvent. You know, I looked through some of the

1:03:20.880 --> 1:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>writings of uh and and lectures of mckinna. I looked

1:03:24.200 --> 1:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>through uh iLiad's work and uh, you know, it's possible

1:03:28.560 --> 1:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I missed something, but I didn't find any case where

1:03:31.640 --> 1:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>either of them specifically spoke or wrote about the alcahest um. However,

1:03:36.960 --> 1:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you do see the alcohest pop up in New Age

1:03:39.840 --> 1:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and psychedelic literature as a metaphor in some cases for

1:03:43.480 --> 1:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>psychedelic compounds. Um, you know, a way of thinking about

1:03:46.840 --> 1:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>with something like the psilocybin can do in the mind.

1:03:50.320 --> 1:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>But it reminds me a little bit of mckinna's arguments

1:03:52.840 --> 1:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>about the argument that psychedelics in the West may have

1:03:55.960 --> 1:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>enabled Buddhism to spread more thoroughly through Western thought. I'm

1:03:59.640 --> 1:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>not sure I agree with them completely on that, but

1:04:01.480 --> 1:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a it's a valid point that as

1:04:03.120 --> 1:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a culture's understanding of consciousness changes, it does open them

1:04:07.160 --> 1:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>up to the discovery and rediscovery of various spiritual concepts. Okay, So,

1:04:12.680 --> 1:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in if you're thinking in the Terence mckinna type, vein,

1:04:16.160 --> 1:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the idea is that, uh, is that the use of

1:04:19.400 --> 1:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>psychedelics would have broadly enabled sort of reduced the mind

1:04:23.760 --> 1:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to its tree a prima or to its more proximate

1:04:26.160 --> 1:04:31.720
<v Speaker 1>constituents without degradation, allowing h more different types of states

1:04:31.720 --> 1:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of mind to be accessed as opposed to the narrower

1:04:35.720 --> 1:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>window of different ways you can think based on your

1:04:38.120 --> 1:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>cultural upbringing. Yeah, yeah, I think so. And and yeah,

1:04:41.760 --> 1:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I like this idea. I like the idea of using

1:04:43.880 --> 1:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>alcoholst as a as a kind of metaphor for anything

1:04:46.120 --> 1:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that like breaks down unuseful rigidity and thought or culture. Um. Yeah,

1:04:52.080 --> 1:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and and and I also like the idea of of

1:04:54.960 --> 1:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of psychedelics being seen as some sort of a universal

1:04:58.160 --> 1:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>solvent potentially. And and again you know you then the

1:05:01.760 --> 1:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>breaking down of things that I think it also drives

1:05:03.640 --> 1:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>home that it's a delicate process and you know what

1:05:05.320 --> 1:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you're doing, and you don't want to, you know, to

1:05:07.640 --> 1:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to go too far and dissolve too much. Uh but uh,

1:05:11.280 --> 1:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, breaking down the mind that's too rigid to

1:05:13.640 --> 1:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>melt right. Um. The one point McKenna does point out

1:05:17.240 --> 1:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that there's this, um, this alchemical alphamism that in in

1:05:21.680 --> 1:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in Latin is dissolutio at coagulato, which we're just discussing

1:05:28.720 --> 1:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>this off, Mike. Uh, Like this basically breaks down to

1:05:32.960 --> 1:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the dissolving and um and the coagulation of things to

1:05:37.360 --> 1:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>break things down and then things build back up UM,

1:05:40.600 --> 1:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and that that ultimately this is all one needs to

1:05:43.160 --> 1:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>know about like the nature of reality. Uh, you know,

1:05:45.880 --> 1:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the the alchemical truth of things. And uh, I think

1:05:49.400 --> 1:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, this is this is a basic

1:05:52.000 --> 1:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>idea that you can apply to the physical world but

1:05:54.520 --> 1:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>also to you can you can see how readily one

1:05:57.000 --> 1:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>could take to this as a as as a psychological

1:06:01.520 --> 1:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>concept as well, and certainly a psychedelic concept. You know,

1:06:04.680 --> 1:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea of breaking things down. But then but then

1:06:07.000 --> 1:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that rigidity is going to is going to return. There's

1:06:10.000 --> 1:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be some coagulation that's going to take place again,

1:06:13.280 --> 1:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I do. Before we end, though, I want

1:06:15.320 --> 1:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to come back to something that I think we touched

1:06:17.200 --> 1:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>on earlier, which is the potential dangers of of seeing

1:06:21.720 --> 1:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the world in terms of universal solvents. I mean, one

1:06:24.160 --> 1:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>thing we learned as alchemy passed away and gave way

1:06:27.040 --> 1:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to modern chemistry is that there is in fact no

1:06:29.600 --> 1:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>such thing as a as a universal solvent in chemistry.

1:06:32.800 --> 1:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are solvents that will dissolve lots of things,

1:06:35.440 --> 1:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>but but there is no universal acid in the Daniel

1:06:38.840 --> 1:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Dennett sense, and I wonder if that is also a

1:06:41.400 --> 1:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>lesson that should be applied in in the metaphorical way,

1:06:44.040 --> 1:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of coming back against everything we've talked about in

1:06:46.360 --> 1:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>this episode, because I, I I mean, I really do believe

1:06:50.080 --> 1:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that a huge amount of trouble and confusion in the

1:06:53.920 --> 1:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>world comes from people getting overly attached to a certain

1:06:59.040 --> 1:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>lens of viewing the world or or analytical tool or

1:07:02.880 --> 1:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>new strategy and thinking that it will solve everything. Uh,

1:07:07.360 --> 1:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that it will answer all questions, that it will solve

1:07:10.480 --> 1:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>all your problems. You know, Like I feel like that

1:07:13.400 --> 1:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that that is something that we all have a tendency for,

1:07:16.880 --> 1:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's very dangerous and something to watch out

1:07:20.240 --> 1:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>for in yourself. And one of the weird ways I

1:07:22.360 --> 1:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about this is actually pulling us away from

1:07:25.600 --> 1:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the the mysterious worlds at the intersection of you know,

1:07:29.440 --> 1:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>theology and metaphysics and science and chemistry. I was thinking

1:07:33.480 --> 1:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>about this in terms of tech business because I was

1:07:38.280 --> 1:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>just thinking about all of the different universal solvents that

1:07:40.960 --> 1:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>we have witnessed come and go over the years working

1:07:44.440 --> 1:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in digital media, and they come and they go, and

1:07:47.400 --> 1:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>they come and they go, and so I'm thinking about

1:07:49.360 --> 1:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the universal solvents of search engine optimization. You remember when

1:07:53.160 --> 1:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>like everything on the Internet suddenly had to change to

1:07:55.680 --> 1:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>be search engine optimized, and it kind of ruined a

1:07:58.640 --> 1:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of content it was good previously and then

1:08:01.840 --> 1:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>was just destroyed by optimization for Google search results. And

1:08:05.640 --> 1:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>then that kind of and then you know, they change

1:08:07.760 --> 1:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>how their search results are calculated anyway, so it becomes

1:08:10.840 --> 1:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>obsolete later on. And then I remember the the u

1:08:13.960 --> 1:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>GC revolution. At some point it was like, well, everything's

1:08:16.960 --> 1:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>got to be user generated content, you know, and everything

1:08:20.280 --> 1:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>is Wikipedia now, yeah, and so and that sort of

1:08:22.720 --> 1:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>destroyed everything in its path, and then that kind of

1:08:25.080 --> 1:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>went away, and you know, the various pivot to videos

1:08:29.160 --> 1:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and the optimization for the Facebook news feed and then that,

1:08:32.280 --> 1:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and then the pivot to blockchain and everything. You know,

1:08:35.040 --> 1:08:38.479
<v Speaker 1>It's like every every few years in our business space,

1:08:38.520 --> 1:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we we see a universal solvent come along that maybe

1:08:42.240 --> 1:08:46.479
<v Speaker 1>changes some things, maybe destroys some things, and maybe maybe

1:08:46.479 --> 1:08:49.519
<v Speaker 1>hopefully there are some things that are relatively unscathed by it.

1:08:49.760 --> 1:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>But then it just goes along on its own way.

1:08:51.880 --> 1:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>And and usually these things do not actually solve all

1:08:55.360 --> 1:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the problems and do not will not last forever. Well,

1:08:58.160 --> 1:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess it ultimately comes down to who is applying

1:09:01.760 --> 1:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a supposed universal solving, right, and it generally comes down

1:09:04.720 --> 1:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to these these businesses of disruption. It is about dissolving

1:09:09.040 --> 1:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the rigidity of the of some aspect of the industry.

1:09:13.160 --> 1:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>But it comes back to that that that alchemical truth

1:09:16.400 --> 1:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that we just laid out right, the dissolution and coagulation there,

1:09:21.280 --> 1:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not so much the dissolution that they're into, it

1:09:24.439 --> 1:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is the eventual coagulation because they wish to be the

1:09:27.080 --> 1:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>masters of that coagulation. You know, I want I don't

1:09:30.000 --> 1:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>want to make everything free so that it remains free.

1:09:33.120 --> 1:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to make everything free because I have a

1:09:35.240 --> 1:09:38.439
<v Speaker 1>new model of how to charge for it, you know. Uh.

1:09:38.520 --> 1:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we see time and time again with

1:09:40.360 --> 1:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>these different disruption strategies. You want to disrupt they take uh,

1:09:45.840 --> 1:09:48.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, cable television, right, I mean, it's just it's

1:09:48.880 --> 1:09:51.519
<v Speaker 1>it's it's classic, you know, all these uh, these services

1:09:51.560 --> 1:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that came along to cut our costs and cut our chords,

1:09:55.760 --> 1:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and we're at the point now where, yeah,

1:09:58.240 --> 1:10:00.559
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch everything that everyone's talking about,

1:10:00.640 --> 1:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>you're spending as much money as you were as you

1:10:03.479 --> 1:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>were probably spending in previous decades on your your cable

1:10:06.560 --> 1:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and your satellite and so forth. So it's just but

1:10:09.479 --> 1:10:11.479
<v Speaker 1>just the structure of it and the masters of it

1:10:11.720 --> 1:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>having some cases changed. Yeah, I mean, I guess it

1:10:14.479 --> 1:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>is often that you're just finding that you go through

1:10:16.560 --> 1:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>destruction and then there's some kind of return to a

1:10:18.760 --> 1:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>new equilibrium. But um, but along the way, I would

1:10:22.000 --> 1:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>just say, be careful not to be led astray or

1:10:24.080 --> 1:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to lose too much to something that seems like it.

1:10:28.360 --> 1:10:30.439
<v Speaker 1>I guess anything that seems like it does anything, the

1:10:30.520 --> 1:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>universal solvent or the panacea. I mean, nothing actually works

1:10:34.240 --> 1:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>in every case. And even if something is good, it's something,

1:10:37.920 --> 1:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not good at everything, right, It just might

1:10:41.400 --> 1:10:46.519
<v Speaker 1>just reduce your product um to a to a carbon husk. Right, Yeah,

1:10:48.600 --> 1:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>all right, Well, we're gonna go ahead and close the

1:10:51.040 --> 1:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>alchemical books on this one, but I'm sure we will

1:10:54.960 --> 1:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>return to alchemy in the future when we deal so

1:10:57.320 --> 1:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>much with the history of sigen ants and UH, and

1:11:00.840 --> 1:11:03.439
<v Speaker 1>you know in the history of religion and spiritual concepts

1:11:03.479 --> 1:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>as well, that inevitably, UH alchemical topics will arise once more,

1:11:09.479 --> 1:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and and I look forward to it. And hey, uh,

1:11:11.760 --> 1:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll do an episode in Piranhas in the near

1:11:13.800 --> 1:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>future as well. I love a good a good biology

1:11:17.280 --> 1:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>exploration as well. In the meantime, if you like to

1:11:20.240 --> 1:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>check out other episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind,

1:11:22.479 --> 1:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know where to find them. There in the Stuff

1:11:24.360 --> 1:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind podcast feed, where you can get

1:11:26.160 --> 1:11:28.680
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. You'll find core episodes on

1:11:28.720 --> 1:11:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Tuesdays and Thursdays. You'll find artifact episodes on Wednesdays, listener

1:11:32.520 --> 1:11:36.479
<v Speaker 1>mails on Mondays. Fridays you'll find episodes of Weird how Cinema.

1:11:36.520 --> 1:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>That's where we just talk about a weird movie with

1:11:38.680 --> 1:11:42.759
<v Speaker 1>little or no concern for science or alchemy uh either.

1:11:43.120 --> 1:11:45.599
<v Speaker 1>And then on the weekends we air a little bit

1:11:45.600 --> 1:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>of a repeating the form of a vault episode. Huge

1:11:48.720 --> 1:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks as always to our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson.

1:11:52.120 --> 1:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to get in touch with us

1:11:53.680 --> 1:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

1:11:56.240 --> 1:11:58.599
<v Speaker 1>topic for the future, just to say hello, you can

1:11:58.640 --> 1:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>email us at contact debt Stuff to Blow your Mind

1:12:01.360 --> 1:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of

1:12:11.760 --> 1:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio. For more podcasts my Heart Radio, visit

1:12:14.840 --> 1:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the I Heart radio, app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you

1:12:17.439 --> 1:12:29.839
<v Speaker 1>listening to your favorite shows.