WEBVTT - Sinners, Andrei Rublev (Tarkovsky #2), Madness ‘25 (Finals)

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>What kind of a show you guys putting on here today?

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>You're not interested in art?

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 3>No, Look, we're going to do this thing.

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 2>We're going to have a.

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Conversation from Chicago. This is film Spotting. I'm Adam Kempinar

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Josh Larson. I'm in all over this world.

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean ways I don't even know as possible.

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 3>With his new period horror film Sinners, Ryan Coogler has

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 3>concocted a few new ways for men to die on screen.

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, We've got a review of the latest from the

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>director of Black Panther and Creed, And speaking of period films,

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>we go back to the Middle Ages for the next

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>film in our Tarkowsky Marathon, Andre rublev plus the Championship

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>round of film Spotting Madness.

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 3>It's all ahead.

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>There will be blood. Josh, I'm film Spotting.

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I have a competition in beyond it.

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I want no one else to succeed.

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 4>This episode is brought to you by Peloton break through

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 4>the busiest time of year with the brand new Peloton

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 4>Cross Training tread Plus powered by Peloton Iq. With real

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 4>time guidance and endless ways to move, you can personalize

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 4>your workouts and train with confidence, helping you reach your

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 4>goals in less time. Let yourself run, lift, sculpt, push

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 4>and go. Explore the new Peloton Cross training treadplus at

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 4>one Peloton dot com.

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Film Spotting. This is it, Josh, the Film

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Spotting Madness Best of the Century Final. A bit later

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we will get to the matchup the two films that

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>will duke it out for Film Spotting Madness supremacy, and

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>we have a third place consolation match as well.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 3>It always comes so quickly. I got to say, all

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 3>the months and months of work prep you and Sam

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 3>put into it, all the agonizing listeners do about how

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 3>they're going to vote, and then suddenly we're here about

0:01:59.360 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 3>to Corona Chat.

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Voting is live right now in that Film Spotting Madness Final.

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You can go to film Spotting dot net slash Madness.

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>But we'll have all the details later in the show.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Also later, Josh, you'll have a review of the Legend

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of Ochi, which opens this weekend. Every generation gets the

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>goonies it deserves.

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 3>That's pretty apt, actually, I think.

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>It's also week two of our Andre Tarkovsky Marathon. Nineteen

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>sixty six's Andre ruby Lev was three hours in medieval

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Russia enough for you, Josh? Or were you craving more?

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Is it crazy to say I could have had more?

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Surely believe us though I think where it leaves us.

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, let's go.

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm ready ultra blik. But it's Tarkovsky, so you

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>just kind of want to sit in that space for

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a little while longer somehow. See the full Tarkovsky lineup

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>and more at filmspotting dot net slash Marathons. But first,

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Kugler's Sinners. It's Koogler's first film since the twenty

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty two Black Panther sequel Wakanda Forever, and his first

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>original is non ip what we call it Josh since

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>his celebrated twenty eleven debut fruit Vale Station. But like

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>every film since his debut, it does feature Michael B. Jordan,

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 1>this time in a dual role as twin brothers Smoke

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.519
<v Speaker 1>and Stack such great Names. After years away, the brothers

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>return to their hometown and the Jim Crow era South,

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>only to find a supernatural evil awaiting them. Here's one

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>me Mosaku and Omar Benson Miller in a clip.

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 2>What y'all doing? Just step aside and let me hone

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 2>in now, why you need him to do that? You

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 2>begin strong enough to push basses?

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>What? I wouldn't be too polite, now, would it, miss any.

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 5>I don't know why I'm talking to you anyway.

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Don't talk to him. You're talking to me right now.

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Why you can't just walk your big ass up in

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 2>here without an environment? They admit to it, mid to

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 2>what that you dy.

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 3>To my mind? Adam? We heard in that clip. One

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 3>of the highlights of Sinners one me Mosaku in the

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 3>supporting role of Annie, this former lover to Michael B.

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's smoke.

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Annie knows a thing or two about the spiritual world,

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 3>which comes in handy when things get spooky in Sinners.

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 3>I remember Mosaku from the HBO series Lovecraft Country, which

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 3>had a similar vibe to Sinners and also gave her

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 3>a chance to display a similar power and authority. She's

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 3>great here as our other supporting players, like how about

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 3>del Roy Lindo as an aging bluesman or Jack O'Connell

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 3>remembering him in Startup a movie I do. We both

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 3>loved Adam and I had lost track.

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>And we were right. We were right about Jack O'Connell.

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Apparently it took eleven years, but we were right.

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 3>He plays an Irish immigrant here who, let's say, wants

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 3>to bring his own sort of music to the juke

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 3>joint where much of the action takes place. And of

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 3>course there is Mike b. Jordan in this dual lead

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 3>role of twins Smoke and Stack. I can't wait tear

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 3>your thoughts on his performance. So incredible ensemble cast anchoring

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.840
<v Speaker 3>some thrilling moments where writer director Ryan Coogler and his

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 3>filmmaking team employees cinematography, music, sound design, choreography to create

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 3>sequences that are dazzlingly cinematic. But Sinners more than those showstoppers, Adam,

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 3>does it all hold together? This is a film running

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 3>well over two hours. It shifts gears rather abruptly. I

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 3>feel about halfway through from a period drama to a

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 3>genre exercise, and it includes an extensive post credit sequence

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 3>set decades later than the main narrative. So I want

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 3>to know does all that ambition pay off for you?

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Is Sinners a collection of great cinematic moments or does

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 3>it add up to something more monumental?

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Well? Can't we just enjoy all those great cinematic moments?

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's absolutely Josh, and I think I think here

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it probably could be enough, because as good as Coogler's

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>work to date has largely been, I wasn't fully prepared

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>for how burly I'm gonna say and how fun this

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>film is. These two movies otherwise have almost nothing in common.

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But the last time I felt like I could recommend

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a movie to anyone from cinephile to casual moviegoer and

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>everybody in between, it was The Holdovers, and I was

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>with family for Easter, and I had multiple people who

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't normally have conversations with about movies come up

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to me and asked me if I had seen it yet,

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>because they just saw Sinners and loved it. Really, it

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 1>didn't surprise me. It did not surprise me a bit,

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't surprise me a bit to see that

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it won the box office either, And there's a lot

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of conversation around how much money it made. Because it's

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a film working on every level, on the levels of story, performance, production,

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>we can add in some specific production elements like cinematography,

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>like Ludovic Gorenson's score, all of the music in this film.

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Sinners is a redemption movie, a revenge movie with elements

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of black exploitation and certainly a red blood soaked horror movie.

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>It's also deeply romantic and has the rhythms and audaciousness

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>of some of our boldest musicals. Kogler seems to be

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>drawing from a deep well of cinematic and artistic influences,

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>but still making a film that feels so personal, as

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>if it's been shaped and sharpened his entire life. Everything

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>he's done professionally and everything he's experienced personally has been

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>shaped and sharpened into this. And I said that the

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>great cinematic moments might be enough. But the fact is, Josh,

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I do think all the ambition pays off. I think

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>there is more. I think there's revelation too, revelation that

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that goes beyond the transcendence of Preacher Boy Sammy, his

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>musical number that comes maybe about halfway into this film. Otherwise, Josh,

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know the scene I'm talking about, the early favorite

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>for scene of the year, and if something somehow does

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>beat it out, it's undoubtedly the music moment. Right, There's

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a choice Coogler makes and a line that he gives

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>us in the screenplay that really gives you something to

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>chew on in the moment and after you've left the theater.

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think I'm getting into spoiler territory here.

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>It's all stuff that's hinted at or suggested in the trailer,

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and based on the box office, I'm assuming and hoping

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that most people who are listening to this conversation Josh

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>have seen the movie. The choice is making that lead

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>vampire played by Jack O'Connell, his character's name is Remick,

0:08:55.440 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>making him irish, and the line is I want your music,

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I want your stories. The wrinkle here with these vampires

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:11.719
<v Speaker 1>is that once bitten Remick and presumably the other vampires

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that he's turned, they consume not just you, but your

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>entire being, your identity, your memories, your thoughts, your feelings.

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>So on a literal level, it's as if all that

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>knowledge imviews him with more and more power, which enables

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>him to go on surviving and to go on consuming.

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>But metaphorically, and arn't vampires always a metaphor for something.

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>This is black culture we're talking about with our main characters.

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>This is black art, black narratives being consumed and exploited.

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>So let's just say, when I saw the movie and

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>then a couple hours later, saw somebody tweet about how

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Kogler orchestrated a deal where ownership rights revert to

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>him after twenty five years. I thought, yeah, that checks out,

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>That really checks out based on what I just saw

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>unfold that character. Then Remick is the villain. He's insidious

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and evil, and he is white. But by making him irish,

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 1>at least the implication or the suggestion Josh that I'm

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>still unpacking is that he represents a group of people

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and a culture with its own unique stories and its

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>own unique stories of suffering and exploitation, with its own

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>music and its own language which we hear, and he

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>was possibly once preyed upon then too, which also somehow

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>makes him potentially sympathetic. It's a layer I found just

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>so striking, and it's something that I haven't shaken. And

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it's significant that there is something attractive, Josh sinister, but

0:10:53.000 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>attractive about joining Remick's community. That's what they are outside

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the Duke Joint. They're a collective, or at least that's

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>what he intentionally makes them present themselves. As they dance

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>in a circle, they sing in unison, they have this

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 1>shared joyous experience. They've all been assimilated, and if you're

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>someone who has spent your whole life having to fight

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to survive because the dominant white culture doesn't accept you,

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it would seem awfully enticing to want to be part

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of that community potentially, wouldn't it. And I haven't even

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that, and I won't mention for fear of spoilers

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that post credit sequence that you mentioned, And someone online

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>here reminded me as well that that's something Coogler is

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty much done throughout all of his films. He likes

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to have a post credit sequence that is actually doing

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work and isn't extraneous by any means,

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>actually seems crucial to the film. That's certainly the case here,

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>where all I'll say is a character makes a choice

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that maybe is a bit surprising, but only because we

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>think we know what that care is going to do,

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>largely because of so many other movies or movie characters

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>who have been put in similar predicaments. And maybe I

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>should have been smarter based on the film I just

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>watched for two hours of seventeen minutes, that of course

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Coogler wasn't going to do anything conventional and would

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>surprise us in that moment as well.

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 3>So you've already teased out a couple of the major

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 3>ideas at play here, which I absolutely agree with that

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 3>they're in it. I think if I'm if my enthusiasm

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.959
<v Speaker 3>is a little tempered, which where I might be more

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 3>on the end of amazing cinematic moments, provocative ideas throughout,

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if it all adds up to a

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 3>cohesive thing to the same degree. Is let's stick with

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 3>your remic example, all right, because that line you quoted

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 3>about wanting your music, wanting your stories, there's absolutely elements

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 3>in this film that connect with that and support that,

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 3>and that could be a theme I think the standout

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 3>seat quins that you've already mentioned. So we'll talk a

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 3>little bit more about it here and move and move on.

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 3>But this single take sequence at the juke joint during

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 3>a musical performance with all the dancers on the floor

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 3>and we're swooping through them among them, and suddenly we realize,

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 3>wait a minute, is that is that a DJ over there?

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh? It is anachronistic and yeah, a little bit.

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 3>And then we move on and then there's you know,

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 3>some rappers over here, and the sound design, which I

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 3>think is like one of the MVP elements of this film.

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 3>The sound design is incorporating those styles to the larger

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 3>song we're hearing. So this is all touching on exactly

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 3>what you just mentioned, Adam, about this idea of black art,

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 3>how it has transformed over the eras but also been

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 3>co opted over the eras, and here is a space

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 3>where it is being held and treasured in community that

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 3>completely aligns with the I want your music, I want

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 3>your stories from Remick. But we also have that other

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 3>element you talked about him being an Irish immigrant referring

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 3>seeing his own oppression as an Irish immigrant and losing

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 3>control of himself. Here's where a whole nother thematic thread

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 3>comes in the prospect the specter of religion as an

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 3>oppressive force as decidedly against the freedom that the music

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 3>at the juke joint is enabling folks to experience. And

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 3>so there I thought, okay, this is this is fascinating

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 3>that he is trying to win over this group by saying, listen,

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 3>I've had religion force fed to me. As well. There's

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 3>a moment where a character thinks he's gonna die and

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 3>he starts saying the Lord's Prayer and it get how

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 3>creepy when the Horde it's almost like this bored horde

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 3>they are, I'm gonna probably get in trouble with Star

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Trek people on that, but something like this. They all

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 3>start chanting the Lord's Prayer too, but in a mocking way.

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 3>And the point of that, Remick says is, listen, we've

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 3>been manipulated by religion as well. I'm offering you some

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 3>thing separate and freeing. But that's that's at the same

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 3>time kind of different and not exactly in parallel with

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 3>his being representative of white appropriation of black culture. So

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 3>it's almost like this is a movie stuffed with so

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 3>many intriguing ideas and they're not all working in concert.

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 3>The one that I did latch onto and I think

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 3>gives it its most cohesion, is this idea of music

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 3>as liberation. We see that in the very opening scene

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 3>again where Sammy played by Miles Catton, the young cousin

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 3>of Smoke and Stack, who's an aspiring blues player. He's

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 3>in this opposition with his pastor father right, and he

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 3>sees music as offering the liberation of Saturday. And then

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 3>he says to his father and then I'll come back

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday. You know, he sees this stark, secular sacred line,

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 3>which is another fascinating idea the movie sort of explores.

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 3>And so there's just so much going on here. I

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 3>have to admit there is a part of me. You

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 3>got the great word, you found the great word. I

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 3>was trying to figure out how do I describe this

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 3>as something other than big burly.

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>It's the word.

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 3>There's part of me that admires the burliness but also wishes.

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, man, what if this had been an eighty

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 3>five minute genre piece from the get go, like the

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 3>vampire thing was in the opening sequence. And it's not

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 3>only that that would have cut back on the running time,

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 3>but I wonder if that sort of forced discipline would

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 3>have made Kogler realize, what do I really want this

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 3>to be about? What can this to your point about

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 3>vampire metaphors? What can this really capture well and richly,

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 3>not heavily, not obviously, but in a thrilling genre exercise.

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 3>And maybe that's just my own taste. That's not to

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 3>take away from what's accomplished here. I think maybe if

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 3>push came to shove, I would say, just give me

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 3>it all, Give me it all. If it's a little messy,

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 3>a little contradictory and theme, but I still get all

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 3>of these characters. You know, a bigger movie allows for

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 3>more characters, all of this music, and all of these

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 3>sequences we've already touched on. So I'm a little torn

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 3>on it. But if I'm slightly less enthusiastic then you,

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 3>it's for that reason.

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I never felt that contradiction. And to go with

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>another C word that you've used, I felt that it

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 1>was ultimately cohesive, and maybe more importantly, I saw it

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.239
<v Speaker 1>as just adding these interesting layers of complexity. And so

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for me, having this film not be the eighty five

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>minute genre exercise, as much fun as that might be,

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this film manages to be fun but still really give

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>us something to think about as well. And you talked

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>about all of those characters, the scale of this film.

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I think what I'm most impressed with is that we

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>do meet so many characters, and there are so many

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>different not only themes, but just narrative threads. It should

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>feel so much more it didn't. To me. It should

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.199
<v Speaker 1>feel so much more unwieldy and messier than it is,

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>And I never felt that messiness.

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Josh, I'd agree with Seth. I wouldn't say it's unwieldy.

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, except for maybe I will say this when the

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>blood really starts spilling. I had two reactions. One, a

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>character makes a choice that the plot needs the character

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to make. And I'm not saying that Coogler didn't give

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>us the crumbs in the forest to lead us on

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the trail to make us understand why that character makes

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that choice. But I, even with those crumbs, didn't fully

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>believe it. It felt a little bit too much like

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a plot contrivance for me. And then the action itself

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the only bit of filmmaking I will question it all

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 1>in this film, and I do want to go back

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and watch it again and see if maybe there was

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>something about it that I just found distracting. But when

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the big battle scene occurs in this film, that's the

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>only part where I felt Coogler losing his way a

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit in terms of the intense focus otherwise of

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>this film, And maybe intense focus is the best way

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 1>I can describe one of the things I loved about it,

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that burliness that comes just from Michael B. Jordan's dual

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>performance as Smoke and Stack the prologue is really interesting.

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>That moment right after the prologue that brings us to

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the moment before we go back a day to all

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of these events. That's certainly provocative as well. But josh

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I knew this movie was going to be something when

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 1>he opened that third scene, if you will, on Smoke

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and Stack, just sitting there by the car with the angle,

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the kind of low angle on those two, that very

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>natural light outside, the looks on their faces, that intense focus.

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Characters who seem to have not just a toughness, but

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a hardness to them that I think the entire movie reflects,

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>but they also are still open to They haven't they

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't been killed inside, They're not dead inside. They're still

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>open to some of the wonders of the world. They

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly still have feelings for each other as brothers, and

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 1>they have aspirations that and ambitions that you can really respect.

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>You get to the moment where chaos ensues, and it

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>felt like chaos for me in a film that otherwise

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>felt so so controlled, but controlled in the best way.

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Where when Coogler wants to take the roof off the place,

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>quite literally, the roof comes off and you believe it

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in that moment. In those moments, in some of those

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>fight scenes, I didn't understand where the characters were. I

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't understand what the characters were doing. I didn't understand

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:58.919
<v Speaker 1>completely how the characters were even surviving. And that's the

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>only part for me, John that I am uneasy about.

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would agree with that, And you know, it

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 3>reminds me that the climactic fight scene in Black Panther

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 3>is you know, a real weak spot for that filmy too,

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 3>and so you know it's a similar sort of fight

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 3>choreography and staging. Yeah, there's some of that here too.

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 3>And then I will also say there is sort of

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 3>an epilogue before the credits though that I don't want

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 3>to get into too much, but it evolves an encounter

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 3>with the Clan, which has been another story throw that's

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 3>popped up that also seemed strange in and of itself

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 3>in terms of why it's there, but.

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Also that'sploitation element.

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 3>It's definitely gives you some of that black exploitation, you know, cathartic. Yes,

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 3>that that is that element as well. But yeah, in

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 3>terms of the staging too, I think it's similar to

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 3>that chaotic fight sequence you're talking about. But in terms of,

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, Michael B. Jordan, this lead performance, I want

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 3>to hear a little bit more from you on that

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 3>because I at once loved it because he's having such

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 3>a good time and it's so charismatic and who doesn't

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 3>want to Michael B. Jordan's, but also was left a

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 3>little wanting, if that makes sense. I really feel like

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 3>this movie for me needed a more distinctive separation between

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Smoke and Stack, and the character outlines are there, right.

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Stack is looser, he's got he's freer, and I love

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 3>how he's sort of this this tempter with booze and money.

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 3>Right away he walks around town and he's cajoling everyone.

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 3>And then Smoke is he's more tightly wound. He's the

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 3>planner of the two. He's making sure, you know, the

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 3>bills get paid, however bills they're working with. So I

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 3>get that those character sketches, but I think in terms

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 3>of just the feel of the two of them, there

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 3>is a climactic fight. I think we can say that

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 3>would have for it to matter more beyond just the

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 3>basic logistics, I think we would had to have had

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 3>a sense of the difference or at least the tension

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 3>between these brothers earlier for that to really work. It

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 3>actually made me think of his performance in Kugler's Fruitvale Station.

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, Oscar Grant, I think is the real world

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 3>figure he's playing there, and how this was a guy

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 3>he brought. The challenge there was not to make this

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 3>victim of police violence, you know, a saint or a sinner,

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 3>to use the language of this movie, but to show

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 3>that he was fully human. And so Kugler there gave

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 3>us two sides of one guy who is he can

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 3>be rough, he could be intimidating, and then a scene

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 3>later or in the same scene to a different character,

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 3>he can be understanding and loving. And it was those

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 3>variations in persona from Fruitvale. I'm surprised wasn't more here

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 3>in Smoke and Stack, not that he isn't a ton

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 3>of fun and they don't serve their purpose for the narrative.

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Part of me also was wondering early on, I didn't

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.479
<v Speaker 3>know exactly what happened narratively. I knew there was some

0:23:57.520 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 3>sort of horror element. I was wondering, are these two

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 3>more like mythical figures? Like are we going to find

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 3>out there's some sort of avenging angels or something, and

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 3>is that the reason for the Thinness? Because there was

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 3>a Thinness I detected, and then of course we learn

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 3>I think one of them, I think it might be

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 3>smoke even says something about he doesn't believe in anything

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 3>about the power of money, and so they're very much

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 3>rooted in the here and now. They are not those

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of mythical figures. But I was wondering if it

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 3>was going to go that way just because of Jordan's performance.

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, how did it work otherwise for you?

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I suppose like the film overall, I'm higher on

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the performances from Michael B. Jordan. I like the fact

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that the shades and the distinctions between them are ultimately

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>so subtle, and they're subtle enough that Coogler clearly felt

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>compelled to make sure we always understood which one was which,

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>because one's going to be wearing a red hat and

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>one's going to be wearing a blue hat. Yeah, the

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>costume being makes it clear.

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Otherwise we should say doing the costumes here one of

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:57.719
<v Speaker 3>the greats.

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise we wouldn't really know who is who, which actually

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>for me made them feel even more like Brothers and

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>made Jordan's performance feel more grounded and less theatrical. And

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:14.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's what I'm so stunned by, is that this

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is a film that, on some level you could call

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>very theatrical. It takes bold swings. This is a movie

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>where Coogler really goes for it, and yet it's so

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>grounded by the Michael B. Jordan performances, but also every

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 1>other performance in this film. You've mentioned a fe you already,

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>but how about Hayley Steinfeld showing up on screen and

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.199
<v Speaker 1>getting apart Josh, where we're all all of a sudden

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in a moment. Honestly, the moment she shows up on screen,

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and it might even be before she says a word,

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just her physicality. We know, or think we know

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>everything we need to about who that character is in

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.959
<v Speaker 1>that moment, and there's Steinfeld just reminding us, Oh, in

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>case you forgot, I'm not a pop singer. I'm not

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>just the star of a Transformers movie or those pitch

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>perfect sequels. I'm a really formidable actress. And I think

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what she proves herself to be here. But again,

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>everybody's doing that. It's one of those performances where I

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>almost feel bad about saying this, but within two scenes

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking, so, Delroy Lindo is gonna win Best Supporting Actor, right,

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Like this is a foregone conclusion, right.

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, but can we give him his credit? If

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 3>that happens and we have a long ways to go?

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Who knows what other performance is here? I thought that

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 3>in his first scene right where it's like, oh, this

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 3>is being served on a platter. But also think about

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 3>the subtlety and physicality he brings to that first scene

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 3>when he's offered the beer, and how he negotiates his

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 3>wanting it but not wanting it, not wanting to show

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 3>he wants it. So in a way, it's one of

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 3>those showy best supporting performances because it has those moments

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 3>of charisma. But I think he's doing incredibly deft work.

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Here's what he's recorded.

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 3>To do in this movie, Adam. Delroy Lindo is at

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 3>once required to be the comic relief and the sage,

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 3>like the seer the fount of wisdom and not not

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 3>like not like a holy fool type comic relief wisdom

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:21.959
<v Speaker 3>where they're combined, like these are two different gears. He

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 3>has to shift into, and he shifts into each one

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:30.919
<v Speaker 3>perfectly when needed. It's absolutely the groundedness you're talking about.

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 3>He makes this rooted in a man who has lived

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 3>a hard life and is here now and it's going

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 3>to get harder than he ever could have imagined, and

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 3>he handles that with humor and with wisdom. There's there's

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 3>a moment where he's he's talking. They're riding along in

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 3>an open you know, a convertible down the road, and

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 3>he's telling the story and something about how he's paid

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 3>they were paid in liquor and his friend, his musician friend,

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.199
<v Speaker 3>and I forget what happens to the story, but the

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 3>point is he's asked, what did you do with your

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 3>money or something like that, and he just says, I

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 3>drank it. And then it isn't that line. He's holding

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 3>a flask and he flips the top. I think closed

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 3>at that point, and it's that sort of subtle physicality

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 3>where it's the exculpation point on the story. It's his shame,

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 3>but it's also his desire to still move ahead, like

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of like saying, I'm put in the flask away now,

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 3>like I know you know, but we all know he's

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 3>it's only for this moment, and these are the little

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 3>touches that a performance like this doesn't need to have

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 3>for people to say it's a best supporting actor performance,

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 3>But Lindo gives us them anyway.

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think you're right. Perhaps there is shame

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in that moment. I don't remember the exact dialogue and

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>how it plays out either, but I do recall feeling

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in that moment that that is really wonderful scene because

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's great right. We understand that it is informing

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>us about the character and their life and the type

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of choices that they've had to make. But you also

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>get with Lindo a refusal to embrace any kind of sentimentality.

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>He is not going to go for that. He is

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to try to make you feel pity for

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>him as a character. He says something, there's just some

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>line in there, Josh, in the way he says it

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>where you understand that's the choice he made, and sometimes

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the choices he makes maybe aren't going to be appreciated

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>or understood by everybody, But then you aren't him. You

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>haven't walked in his shoes, and he is just going

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to keep on walking and that's the element that Lindo

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>brings that makes it not just a showy performance. There

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is so much life that is evident in that character,

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:57.479
<v Speaker 1>just years of weariness, so that we sense within a

0:29:57.480 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>few minutes is that.

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 3>The scene too just to go back to the so design.

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Where as he's telling the story, we hear voices from

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 3>the story he's telling on the soundtrack and effects that

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 3>would have happened in the story. If it's not that one,

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 3>it's maybe another story that Lindo tells. I think it's

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 3>also in the car though, and the intricacy of this

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 3>sound design and the layers of music, but also things

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 3>like that, like enhancing a character's story by audibly bringing

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 3>elements of it into the foreground. You may not even

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 3>notice it at first that it's happening, but afterwards you're like,

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 3>why was that such a vivid I mean, the performance

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 3>was great, the writing is great. Oh it's so vivid

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 3>because I literally heard what he was describing that.

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it makes sense, that's yeah.

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we see all that often in films,

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 3>and it's really effective.

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Here, and it makes sense temporarily with this film, a

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>movie that is suggesting how the past and the present

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>in the future, right, can all collide in a way

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>for characters and in certain moments as well. But I

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>really feel like we could go on and on. I

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>want to at least mention if we're going through the list.

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Miles Cayton, who was a new face to me as Sammy,

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's another incredible moment that I was thinking could

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>be my music moment of the year, Josh, if it

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't for the scene that eventually follows. It's the first

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>time we hear him perform. He's in the car and

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember, sorry, despite what I said about how

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>clearly I could distinguish them, I don't remember for sure

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>if it's Smoke or Stack. But he starts playing, and

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the moment he starts singing, and you see the reaction.

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>You see Michael B. Jordan's reaction to his performing, and yeah,

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that sounds right is Stack And what he imparts there

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>with that stunned reaction is twofold. I think he's first

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>just sort of stunned that his cousin is that talented,

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>This person he is known his entire life could sing

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the blues, that type of depth and that type of

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>soul and experience and then the other part, and I

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>think he actually verbalizes this is, oh, we're going to

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of.

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Money exactly both. That's how I knew it was stack

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 3>because I remember that part of it. That's the stack quality,

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 3>which you know, speaks to that there are distinctions between

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 3>them that we come to understand.

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Sinners is currently out in wide release. If you see

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it and agree or disagree with our takes, you can

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>email us feedback at film spotting dot net.

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Let me make.

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 3>Some wadstit going on that with listening is the number

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 3>one thing you can do to support an independently produced

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.719
<v Speaker 3>show like film Spotting. A couple more things you could do.

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Take a minute to give us a rating or a

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:46.479
<v Speaker 3>review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Doesn't matter if you're

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 3>a first time listener or have been listening for twenty years.

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Every new review helps us reach new listeners. Another way

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 3>to support us, you could join the Film Spotting Family

0:32:56.280 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 3>at film Spottingfamily dot com. Thank you to family plus

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 3>member Jeremy Kennis in Severance, Colorado. I've had a chance

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 3>to correspond with Jeremy over the years. If you want

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 3>to follow Jeremy on letterbox, he is Jeremy Kennis k

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 3>E N N I.

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>S Jeremy Wright. So buddy turned me onto film spotting

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>right about the time Josh took over. Been listening ever since.

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Favorite review or segment several, but I'll highlight the episode

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that Adam did his Jimmy Stewart impression when you all massacred,

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a wonderful life, Josh barely keeping it together was hilarious.

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I forgot about that show and that bit, and it

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>does help that I won the prize that week from

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the previous edition. What review, Yeah we got wrong, easy

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>under the Skin. I tried to watch it again after

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>listening to you rave about it, but I just can't

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>get on board even remotely. This, Josh is one of

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the I don't mean it pejoratively, but I'll say oddist

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>letterbox top four that maybe we've seen in this segment

0:33:55.880 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>rushmore Guns of Navarone, Jojo Rabbit and La fem Nikita.

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean that's a four pack. You're going a lot

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 3>of places there.

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, a favorite movie Jeremy revisited recently while he's heading

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to England later this summer. So we watched the trip

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Verry Smart, a random film or filmmaker that he loves

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Formula fifty one, also known as the fifty first State. Now, Josh,

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 1>we took a little bit of grief, playful and supportive grief,

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 1>but a little bit of grief from people who were like,

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you've never heard or you don't know smooth Talk. Come on, Joyce,

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Carol Oates and Criterion Collection. I can't believe you didn't

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 1>know this. Well, I'm gonna say I don't know Formula

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty one or the fifty first State.

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:43.439
<v Speaker 3>Well I didn't think I did. But and here's where

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to lose Jeremy looking it up now at

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Larson on Film a rare zero star review Adam Oh no.

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Josh, I was not anticipating that. But here's the

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>best part. I mean, I'll just admit that it shouldn't

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 1>be a shock that I have blind spots when it

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.240
<v Speaker 1>comes to Hong Kong. App and this is a film

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>directed by Hong Kong action director Ronnie You. It's from

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one. But here's my favorite part. It's

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it's reading the brief plot synopsis in the cast stars

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Samuel L. Jackson as a master chemist turned drug dealer

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 1>with Robert Carlyle, Emily Mortimer as an assassin and meat Loaf.

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't believe I'm scanning the review here. I don't

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 3>believe I even mentioned meat Loaf. No, and you know

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 3>I must be wrong. Come on, Emily Mortimer as an

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 3>assassin that gives you half a star?

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Zero stars? Josh? How many zero stars are there? How

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>many will I find over at Larson on film dot com.

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:43.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean there's an easy way to filter the review library,

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 3>let me tell you.

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well I thought you might do it. While I

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>read his next response to one zero, I okay.

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Be a very unhappy man, Adam.

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Apparently a movie did Jeremy credits with becoming a cinophile?

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Is that one of your zero stars? Sling Blade?

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Now, I'm sure I did not give Sleepway zero.

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Sas finally a book about movies or movie making? Now

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 1>he's just pandering. Movies are prayers? Of course?

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Well it was until my formula fifty one slanders zero stars.

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, who's your savior now? Jeremy, thank you for joining

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the family and for all those years of listening. In

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>addition to keeping us doing what we're doing, your support

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 1>comes with perks. Get to listen early in ed free.

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>You get the weekly newsletter. You get to be part

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of the exclusive film Spotting Family discord. You also exclusively

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>get to hear our monthly bonus shows coming up very soon,

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>our April bonus. It's ask us anything. If you have

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a question you'd like to submit for that segment. Feedback

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 1>at film spotting dot Net is the email. Our May bonus.

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Then will be our draft, our annual, our new annual tradition,

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the draft with our film Spotting Madness Bracket contest winner,

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe with a familiar face this year. More on that

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in a bit. Film Spottingfamily dot Com is where you

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 1>can learn everything you need to know about being a

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 1>family member.

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 5>Your parents have offered you to this course, they say,

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 5>here makes something of my boys say texts say fo yeah,

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:19.239
<v Speaker 5>curse like I'm wickedness.

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Leochi. That's from the trailer for the Legend of Ochi,

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 1>which is new to theaters this weekend. It's directed by

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah Saxon. It's his first feature. He's an award winning

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>music video director an animator. The movie is set on

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the fictional island of Carpathia, where elusive creatures known as

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the Ochi are hunted and feared by the island's human population.

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:43.399
<v Speaker 1>A young girl, Helena zengels Yuri, comes across a baby

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Ochi and befriends it. Some of the humans Josh. They're

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>played by Willem Dafoe, Emily Watson and Finn Wolfhart a

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty four et. That's the vibe I'm getting from the trailer.

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Am I way off base? And if I'm not, is

0:37:57.360 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that a bad thing?

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's yeah, that's certainly what they want, and

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 3>maybe it will be for some younger viewers.

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 3>I have a feeling watching this movie, which I wanted

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 3>to love and I like quite a bit. There's a

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 3>lot to admire about it, but it's it never like

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 3>it never took off into the air like those bicycles

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 3>in ET. Right, And you know, I'm thinking, but few

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 3>movies doo, and sometimes the ones that lodge themselves in

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 3>your mind when you're a kid are those that you know,

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 3>fumble a little bit on takeoff, but are idiosyncratic enough,

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 3>visionary enough, ambitious enough, weird enough to kind of stick

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 3>in your memory as a kid and you come to

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 3>love them anyway. They're like kiddy cult movies, right. Cult

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 3>movies we think of as for adults. They're a little

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 3>risque sometimes are pushing the envelope. But kids can have

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 3>cult movies too, these weird little movies that most people

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:56.799
<v Speaker 3>forget as you grow older. But you'll run into someone

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 3>and say, hey, you referenced one earlier in the show.

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 3>Wasn't the Goonies great? And it's like, well, you know,

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 3>if you watch it again, the Goonies is fine, Right,

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 3>you watch ET again, it's a masterpiece the Goonies. Yeah,

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 3>it's okay. It's a little weird, a little scruffy. I

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 3>think of these are going to be eighties titles, because

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 3>that's how old I am. But the never Ending Story

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:18.799
<v Speaker 3>or even something like Labyrinth, right, people love Labyrinth, love

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 3>the never Ending Story. But you know these are not

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 3>fantasy or sci fi films like ET. And I do

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 3>think the Legend of Ochi might be something like that,

0:39:26.600 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 3>because it's overstuffed with characters, way too many motivations going on.

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I found it to be a little undercooked as a fable,

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 3>like what it actually wants to be about, wants kids

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 3>to think about beyond you know, the obvious. But man,

0:39:41.680 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 3>is this thing weirdly unique and a lot of that

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 3>has to do with the puppetry, the choice to use

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 3>puppetry and animatronics, and for the adult Ochi, real actors

0:39:55.280 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 3>in costumes. There is that tactility, that real worldness that

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:06.280
<v Speaker 3>you need for a children's fantasy movie to root itself

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:11.320
<v Speaker 3>in your consciousness, and this absolutely has that. It also

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 3>has a look that's unique. The colors here are deeply saturated.

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 3>It's almost like everything's wet in this movie. It's like

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 3>the wetness has made the colors richer in some way,

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 3>which I admired. The score by David Longstreth is very

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 3>flute heavy, which casts this unique hypnotic spell. And yeah, overall,

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, you do feel like you're watching real creatures

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 3>being discovered, not digitized just pixels essentially, and that goes

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 3>a long way. I think it will go a long

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 3>way for lodging itself in younger audience's minds. So if

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 3>it at all sounds interesting, you check it out. You

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 3>may not love it, but you'll like it, and you'll

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 3>probably years from now someone will say did you ever

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 3>see a movie called The Legend of Ochi? And you'll say,

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 3>n oh, yes, that was kind of that was really

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 3>great wasn't it. I think it's one of those, so

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 3>we'll see what happens.

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>The Legend of Ochi is currently out in limited release.

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>If you see it and agree or disagree with the Josh,

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>email us feedback at filmspotting dot net. Next week on

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the show, it's Movie Book Talk with Adam Josh and

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>guess we've got our friend Mariah E. Gates returning to

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about her new book, Cinema or her way visionary

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>female directors in their own words. We knew back when

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Mariah first told us about this book that when it

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:34.959
<v Speaker 1>came out, we wanted to have her on the show,

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and we wanted to do something that wasn't just an

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:40.800
<v Speaker 1>interview with her. Can we talk about one of the

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:43.479
<v Speaker 1>films it's featured in the book. And it just worked

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>out so serendipitously, Josh, that one of the films she

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>covers is a major blind spot for the two of

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>us that we have wanted to rectify for quite some time.

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Embarrassing.

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Gina Prince Bithwood's Love and Basketball and this month,

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>just as of about a week ago, it celebrated its

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:05.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifth anniversary. So we're going to talk about Love

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and basketball and Mariah's book with her, and then we're

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:11.839
<v Speaker 1>also going to feature my conversation with film writer by

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Le Luca, whose latest book is David Cronenberg Clinical Trials

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of book that was timed, I think fittingly to be

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>released around the release of Kronenberg's latest The Shrouds, a

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:27.320
<v Speaker 1>movie that opens and limited release this weekend. Look forward

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to having both Mariah and Violet on speaking.

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:32.359
<v Speaker 3>Of Cronenberg this week on our sister podcast, The Next

0:42:32.440 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Picture Show, Looking at Cinema's Present via Its Pass. It

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 3>is part two of their Body by Kronenberg pairing. So

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 3>previously they talked about The Fly from nineteen eighty six,

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 3>that one with Jeff Goldblum and Gina Davis, of course,

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, this week they're discussing The Shrouds. Can't wait

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:51.879
<v Speaker 3>to dig into all that. I'm waiting. I'm waiting untill

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:54.319
<v Speaker 3>I see The Shrouds and then I'm going to listen

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 3>to it all together with the Shrouds in my head.

0:42:57.280 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 3>But I do love that pairing from the Next Picture Show.

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:03.399
<v Speaker 3>New episodes drop every Tuesday and you can find them

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:05.400
<v Speaker 3>wherever you get your podcasts.

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Some other bit of housekeeping here, Josh, you threw out,

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:10.799
<v Speaker 1>I think on last week's show that you were going

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to be going to Tokyo. That's this summer or no,

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 1>actually this spring, just next month. That trip is coming up,

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and we've already gotten two responses. You're gonna have at

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:24.359
<v Speaker 1>least a two person meetup, maybe more if we get

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the word out. So tell us about the Tokyo meetup.

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's happening. I thought there was a chance.

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:30.320
<v Speaker 1>You never know.

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:32.799
<v Speaker 3>We hear from listeners every once in a while from

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:37.319
<v Speaker 3>fire flung spots around the globe. But yeah, Michael Tom

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 3>have already written in and said we'd love to meet up.

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:43.360
<v Speaker 3>We're kind of gonna be flexible on the date at

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:45.920
<v Speaker 3>this point because they both can be and we want

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:47.799
<v Speaker 3>to hear from others if anybody else is out there,

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:50.440
<v Speaker 3>it might be May twenty two or twenty three or

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty four, So a couple of options there in Tokyo.

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:56.759
<v Speaker 3>If you're hearing this and want to join us, feedback

0:43:56.880 --> 0:43:58.839
<v Speaker 3>at film spotting dot net.

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:02.320
<v Speaker 1>We promoted this last week, but want to mention again

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that the Chicago Critics Film Festival is coming up, taking

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:08.240
<v Speaker 1>place at the Music Box and it starts May second,

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 1>runs May second through the eighth. I highlighted one title, Josh,

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:15.239
<v Speaker 1>that I have recommended on the show, and if it

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 1>ever gets a full theatrical release, will definitely be a

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Golden Brick nominee for me. That's Zodiac Killer Project, which

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the fest has showing at nine thirty pm on Wednesday,

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>so the second to last night of the festival. That's

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:33.759
<v Speaker 1>one title that I can recommend. We will have a

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>few other titles that will highlight next week that we

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 1>are interested in seeing and that you might want to

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 1>seek out as well. Everything you need to know about

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 1>getting tickets for the Chicago Critics Film Festival is available

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 1>at Chicago Criticsfilmfestival dot com. This is lasting, This is madness.

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:54.719
<v Speaker 2>This is absolute madness.

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>This is madness, maddness, madness.

0:44:58.360 --> 0:44:59.840
<v Speaker 2>But this is absolute madness.

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Why should you build such a thing? That is?

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 3>I was hot off.

0:45:10.960 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 1>It's taken us a couple of months. But Josh, we

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>have our sixty four film bracket down to two final

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:24.240
<v Speaker 1>four results the Battle of Seven. There will be blood

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 1>versus No Country for Old Men. Not a tight one necessarily,

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:35.440
<v Speaker 1>but also not a blowout. There will be blood, though,

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:39.359
<v Speaker 1>is going to advance to the final beat. The Koane

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Brothers fifty five to forty five percent.

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:45.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, just seems unfair that these two were paired

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 3>up before the Championship round. I guess makes it a

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:52.799
<v Speaker 3>little different than some of our our earlier Madness matchups.

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, how does it feel? I got to know,

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:57.880
<v Speaker 3>how does it feel at this point to have Is

0:45:57.960 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 3>it a little bit like the day after Chrismus for

0:46:00.719 --> 0:46:03.400
<v Speaker 3>you and Sam? Like all of this has gone into it,

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 3>I know, and we're here and now no country for

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 3>old men is gone, and that has to make you

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:11.919
<v Speaker 3>feel partly responsible.

0:46:12.400 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it definitely does. I voted for no Country for

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 1>old men in this case, in this Madness iteration. I

0:46:18.640 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 1>may not have a previous one when they faced off,

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:26.879
<v Speaker 1>but it feels like an appropriate culmination. It actually feels good, Josh,

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 1>that it's all all coming down free to this. Yeah,

0:46:29.840 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm saying. It still feels like Christmas Day.

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>And part of that is because our second Final four

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:39.799
<v Speaker 1>matchup pitted Mulholland Drive versus Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>It was our dream Logic contest and this one was

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:49.000
<v Speaker 1>super close. At various points over the past week. It

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:51.720
<v Speaker 1>was tied I don't think there was ever a point

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:55.120
<v Speaker 1>where one film had a lead. There was greater than

0:46:55.200 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty five votes, and it came out this is how

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it ended up, Josh, David Lynch and Mulholland Drive advance

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to have to face Pta Daniel Plainview and his milkshake

0:47:10.360 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty point eight six percent to Eternal Sunshine's forty nine

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 1>point one four.

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:19.400
<v Speaker 3>That's ridiculous. And is that I have a feeling you

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:22.400
<v Speaker 3>would know this. There's a spreadsheet somewhere keeping track of this.

0:47:22.840 --> 0:47:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Is that the closest vote no in Madness history?

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:47:27.360 --> 0:47:30.920
<v Speaker 1>No, It may be the closest in this Madness Yeah tournament,

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:33.359
<v Speaker 1>but we've had even tighter than that. We've had ones

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that have come out under five or six votes. This

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 1>one was just slightly more than that. So Josh it is.

0:47:40.040 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 1>There will be Blood versus Mulholland Drive for film Spotting

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Madness and Best of the Century so far supremacy. We

0:47:48.360 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 1>do have that third place matchup. Who will take the

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:55.160
<v Speaker 1>consolation prize? Will it be Michelle Gandry an Eternal Sunshine

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>or will it be the Coen Brothers and No Country

0:47:58.800 --> 0:48:02.680
<v Speaker 1>for Old Men? You can vote in the Madness final

0:48:02.760 --> 0:48:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and that third place matchup now at film spotting madness

0:48:06.440 --> 0:48:09.919
<v Speaker 1>dot com or filmspotting dot net slash madness. Either place

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:11.360
<v Speaker 1>will take you there. You could also just go to

0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:13.879
<v Speaker 1>the main page of filmspotting dot Net. You can't miss

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the graphic right there at the top of the page

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that will take you to the polls. They close Tuesday,

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:23.919
<v Speaker 1>April twenty ninth at five pm Central time, So next week, Josh,

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:28.279
<v Speaker 1>we will be able to announce a winner. For those

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:31.399
<v Speaker 1>of you who submitted brackets in the bracket contest, check

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:35.280
<v Speaker 1>out how you're doing. Go to film Spotting Madness, click

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 1>on view bracket, go to predictions see how everything shook

0:48:40.680 --> 0:48:42.840
<v Speaker 1>out for you. Once again, we had eight hundred and

0:48:42.960 --> 0:48:47.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty five people who participated, and out of those eight

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:52.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty five, number one for like four weeks

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in a row is the UK's Ricky Kendall. Ricky Ricky

0:48:57.239 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>picked the correct finals matchup he has there will be

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Blood defeating Mulholland Drive. Number two, Josh is Steve Mesa.

0:49:07.800 --> 0:49:10.359
<v Speaker 1>He has the right matchup, but he has Mulholland Drive winning,

0:49:10.400 --> 0:49:13.359
<v Speaker 1>So it will come down to that. Our winner will

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:18.080
<v Speaker 1>come down to who wins the final, either Ricky or Steve.

0:49:18.280 --> 0:49:21.680
<v Speaker 1>It really can't be anybody else. And I should probably

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:23.760
<v Speaker 1>save this for next week. If there will be Blood

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:27.520
<v Speaker 1>does in fact win, and Ricky wins this bracket competition

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:29.360
<v Speaker 1>for the second year in a row. But this is

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the truth. I look this up. If there will be

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Blood wins. If Ricky does end up on top, not

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:40.520
<v Speaker 1>only will he have won this competition two years in

0:49:40.520 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a row, Josh, but he will have correctly predicted sixty

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:50.400
<v Speaker 1>two out of sixty three matchups in each tournament. He

0:49:50.520 --> 0:49:54.280
<v Speaker 1>got one wrong in the sweet sixteen, Otherwise he picked

0:49:54.680 --> 0:49:56.000
<v Speaker 1>every other matchup correctly.

0:49:56.200 --> 0:49:58.640
<v Speaker 3>I still, how I still think Ricky needs to use

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 3>his powers for something better for the good of humanity

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:07.160
<v Speaker 3>than this. Yeah, Ricky, give up madness, find a common

0:50:07.239 --> 0:50:10.800
<v Speaker 3>good project and apply all your brain power towards that. Please.

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I am betraying nothing here. I haven't looked at where

0:50:13.680 --> 0:50:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the voting stands as we're taping this. The final polls

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:20.880
<v Speaker 1>have just been live for only a few hours, and

0:50:20.920 --> 0:50:22.319
<v Speaker 1>again I don't want to look at them. I don't

0:50:22.320 --> 0:50:23.800
<v Speaker 1>want to give anything away, But I'm just going to

0:50:23.840 --> 0:50:27.520
<v Speaker 1>say there's certainly a chance that Ricky Kendall could win again.

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 1>There Will Be Blood was the number one seed after all,

0:50:30.400 --> 0:50:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and if he does, I suppose, Ricky, you should already

0:50:32.560 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 1>start thinking about, if you haven't already, what's your bonus

0:50:35.640 --> 0:50:39.880
<v Speaker 1>content RASP topic will be. But then again, maybe you

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:42.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want to jinx it. You start thinking about things

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:44.399
<v Speaker 1>that they maybe won't happen.

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Who knows how Ricky's mind works, We clearly don't.

0:50:48.160 --> 0:50:53.200
<v Speaker 1>He can. He can obviously manifest whatever he wants exactly. Well,

0:50:53.400 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Steve Mesa, you are still alive in terms of our

0:50:57.320 --> 0:50:59.479
<v Speaker 1>internal competition, josh Am.

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:04.840
<v Speaker 3>I still, well, you're live like a live meaning I

0:51:04.960 --> 0:51:06.279
<v Speaker 3>might not end up in last place.

0:51:06.520 --> 0:51:09.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's definitely the case. If we stop right now,

0:51:09.960 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you're definitely at the bottom. You're one hundred and seventieth overall.

0:51:13.600 --> 0:51:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Your big oversight was having parasite in the final against

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 1>There Will Be Blood. Sam, He's in third place, one

0:51:21.280 --> 0:51:24.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty second overall. He had Eternal Sunshine in

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the final. Mike Marrigan film Spotting Madness Godfather a little

0:51:29.360 --> 0:51:32.680
<v Speaker 1>bit better, one hundred and nineteenth overall, second and our competition,

0:51:33.239 --> 0:51:36.400
<v Speaker 1>like you, he had parasite advancing to the final. That

0:51:36.600 --> 0:51:41.839
<v Speaker 1>means that I am probably temporarily I am in first

0:51:41.880 --> 0:51:44.960
<v Speaker 1>place and I'm twenty ninth overall. That might mean the

0:51:45.120 --> 0:51:47.200
<v Speaker 1>best I've ever been. Again, I think it's going to

0:51:47.239 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 1>be short lived, though, though I haven't looked, I decided

0:51:51.200 --> 0:51:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to be daring. I went with Mulholland Drive over. There

0:51:55.000 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 1>will be blood in the final. So, like Steve Mesa,

0:51:57.320 --> 0:51:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I have a chance to win this whole thing. You

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:01.640
<v Speaker 1>got a shop and Drive wins. But if Mulhallan Drive

0:52:01.719 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't win, despite the fact that it seems like I'm

0:52:04.200 --> 0:52:07.040
<v Speaker 1>crushing the three of you right now, I will finish last.

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:09.479
<v Speaker 1>You could go from first to last, first to last,

0:52:09.840 --> 0:52:12.439
<v Speaker 1>print out David Lynch doesn't pull it out. Print out your.

0:52:12.360 --> 0:52:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Certificate now with twenty ninth overall, I see a spot

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:18.040
<v Speaker 3>behind you on the wall, an empty spot. You could

0:52:18.080 --> 0:52:20.640
<v Speaker 3>frame it, frame it and you'll always have this moment

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:21.000
<v Speaker 3>at him.

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Film spotting Madness dot Com or film spotting dot Net

0:52:24.200 --> 0:52:27.839
<v Speaker 1>slash Madness is where you should go for everything film

0:52:27.880 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Spotting Madness related.

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Prussia, Tiber.

0:52:35.400 --> 0:52:41.360
<v Speaker 4>Skoshna, Budo, New Bodle, the Way, Sadium.

0:52:43.000 --> 0:52:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Yetibira, Schedule, Tame It's nice yep.

0:52:51.400 --> 0:52:55.239
<v Speaker 1>That was from Andre Tarkovski's Andre Rubelov from nineteen sixty six.

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 1>It is actually the third film, the second entry, but

0:52:58.000 --> 0:53:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the third film and our Tarkovsky Blind Spots marathon, we

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:05.560
<v Speaker 1>are watching five films total over four weeks, after which

0:53:06.360 --> 0:53:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we can claim to be Tarkovski Complete us and counted

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:13.839
<v Speaker 1>among the world's experts on the Russian Master. Yes, I'm

0:53:13.840 --> 0:53:16.160
<v Speaker 1>also I'm going to punt out that certificate as please.

0:53:16.239 --> 0:53:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the case, Josh.

0:53:17.520 --> 0:53:19.479
<v Speaker 3>Because these are movies you just need to watch once

0:53:19.560 --> 0:53:20.200
<v Speaker 3>and you've got it.

0:53:20.440 --> 0:53:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, or you know twice, that's it, you

0:53:24.360 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>got it well.

0:53:25.280 --> 0:53:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Andre Rublov came in at number sixty seven on the

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:31.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty two edition of the Citan Sound Top one hundred.

0:53:31.840 --> 0:53:34.839
<v Speaker 3>It is one of three Tarkovski films to make that list.

0:53:35.080 --> 0:53:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Stalker from nineteen seventy nine is next in our marathon

0:53:38.960 --> 0:53:42.600
<v Speaker 3>also made the list, as did nineteen seventy five's Mirror,

0:53:42.840 --> 0:53:45.880
<v Speaker 3>which was part of our Citan Sound Top one hundred

0:53:45.920 --> 0:53:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Blind Spots Marathon a couple of years ago. The subject

0:53:49.480 --> 0:53:53.560
<v Speaker 3>of Tarkovski's film Here Rubylov is a historical figure, a

0:53:53.640 --> 0:53:58.040
<v Speaker 3>painter of religious icons during the fifteenth century. Tarkovski and

0:53:58.360 --> 0:54:03.400
<v Speaker 3>co screenwriter Andre Konchalovsky invented much of rube Lev's story,

0:54:03.520 --> 0:54:06.040
<v Speaker 3>of whom little is known. The movie is told in

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:10.560
<v Speaker 3>eight extended chapters, plus there's a prologue and then an epilogue,

0:54:11.080 --> 0:54:14.440
<v Speaker 3>and it depicts the artist navigating a medieval Russia defined

0:54:14.560 --> 0:54:19.120
<v Speaker 3>by violence and cruelty. Writing about Andre Rubelev last year

0:54:19.160 --> 0:54:21.600
<v Speaker 3>in the Reveal as part of their series dedicated to

0:54:21.640 --> 0:54:24.360
<v Speaker 3>the Citan Sound Top one hundred, Keith Phipps wrote that

0:54:24.640 --> 0:54:27.040
<v Speaker 3>scene it for the first time. He was feeling a

0:54:27.160 --> 0:54:30.880
<v Speaker 3>bit at sea until a scene that helped clarify what

0:54:31.040 --> 0:54:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Tarkovski might be after that. The film was about quote

0:54:34.840 --> 0:54:39.600
<v Speaker 3>ruby Lev's artistic development and the development of his soul. So, Adam,

0:54:39.680 --> 0:54:43.560
<v Speaker 3>we're coming off, I would say a relatively straightforward start

0:54:43.640 --> 0:54:47.839
<v Speaker 3>to this marathon. That's nineteen sixty one's World War two set,

0:54:47.960 --> 0:54:52.759
<v Speaker 3>Ivan's childhood. You have seen Andre rube Lev before. This

0:54:53.080 --> 0:54:56.440
<v Speaker 3>was a blind spot for me, So tell me a

0:54:56.480 --> 0:54:58.560
<v Speaker 3>little bit about I know it was a while ago,

0:54:58.840 --> 0:55:01.440
<v Speaker 3>but what you're mes memories of that first viewing, how

0:55:01.480 --> 0:55:04.920
<v Speaker 3>they informed this one, and what you make of it

0:55:05.200 --> 0:55:07.040
<v Speaker 3>and its episodic structure today.

0:55:07.280 --> 0:55:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, even though I was able Josh to find some

0:55:09.960 --> 0:55:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of my notes from two thousand and five, I have

0:55:11.560 --> 0:55:16.239
<v Speaker 1>to admit that I remember very little about the film specifically,

0:55:16.840 --> 0:55:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's because it was twenty years ago.

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I also think it's because I was ill equipped twenty

0:55:23.760 --> 0:55:28.200
<v Speaker 1>years ago to really sink my teeth into Tarkovski and

0:55:28.239 --> 0:55:30.560
<v Speaker 1>try to make sense of Andrei Rublev. But that's what

0:55:30.680 --> 0:55:33.440
<v Speaker 1>we were doing. We were trying to expand our horizons.

0:55:33.480 --> 0:55:35.879
<v Speaker 1>That's why we did that marathon so early. It's part

0:55:35.920 --> 0:55:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of why Sam and I also started this show to

0:55:39.080 --> 0:55:43.480
<v Speaker 1>give ourselves missions. Just like that, I was more engaged

0:55:43.480 --> 0:55:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and I liked the film that time, but having a

0:55:46.360 --> 0:55:49.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit more perspective twenty years later, not just on cinema,

0:55:50.160 --> 0:55:52.800
<v Speaker 1>but on the work of Tarkovsky, having been able to

0:55:53.000 --> 0:55:56.120
<v Speaker 1>watch and discuss and really appreciate some of his other

0:55:56.200 --> 0:56:00.799
<v Speaker 1>films like Mirror. As you said most recently, I think

0:56:00.840 --> 0:56:03.279
<v Speaker 1>what I was able to put away, Josh was that

0:56:04.000 --> 0:56:08.239
<v Speaker 1>compulsion in I think all of us as humans, not

0:56:08.440 --> 0:56:11.120
<v Speaker 1>just as movie watchers when it comes to art, which

0:56:11.200 --> 0:56:13.879
<v Speaker 1>is to try to make sense of what we're seeing,

0:56:14.040 --> 0:56:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to try to find a certain logic to try to

0:56:17.520 --> 0:56:20.839
<v Speaker 1>understand motivations and see a causality.

0:56:21.120 --> 0:56:21.520
<v Speaker 3>And what you.

0:56:21.640 --> 0:56:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Realize very early on, or what you need to realize

0:56:25.400 --> 0:56:28.719
<v Speaker 1>very early on with Andrey Rublev is that that type

0:56:28.719 --> 0:56:33.399
<v Speaker 1>of temporal logic, that narrative logic, is something that Tarkovsky

0:56:33.560 --> 0:56:37.279
<v Speaker 1>just really is not interested in at all. And the

0:56:37.400 --> 0:56:43.960
<v Speaker 1>movie can be confounding because he'll have characters who we

0:56:44.120 --> 0:56:46.840
<v Speaker 1>met briefly in the first chapter show up all of

0:56:46.880 --> 0:56:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a sudden in chapter eight, and we have to remember

0:56:49.000 --> 0:56:52.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly who that character is, and even sometimes within chapters

0:56:53.239 --> 0:56:57.360
<v Speaker 1>there's leaps in time or you find yourself. For example,

0:56:57.560 --> 0:57:02.600
<v Speaker 1>after chapter one or two where Andrea gets called to

0:57:02.760 --> 0:57:05.920
<v Speaker 1>go off to paint and learn from Theophanes and he

0:57:06.040 --> 0:57:09.520
<v Speaker 1>brings Foma I believe his name is with him. You

0:57:09.680 --> 0:57:13.080
<v Speaker 1>assume when you get to that next chapter that they're

0:57:13.160 --> 0:57:17.520
<v Speaker 1>walking amidst the trees they must be going to work

0:57:17.560 --> 0:57:19.680
<v Speaker 1>with Theophanes, and then all of a sudden, Theophanes is

0:57:19.720 --> 0:57:22.840
<v Speaker 1>there with them. Then he kind of appears almost like

0:57:22.920 --> 0:57:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a ghost, Josh, it's not immediately clear that he was

0:57:27.240 --> 0:57:30.640
<v Speaker 1>part of their traveling party. And those are the types

0:57:30.680 --> 0:57:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of lapses in logic that you have to expect with Tarkovski.

0:57:37.520 --> 0:57:39.520
<v Speaker 1>For me, what I was able to give myself over

0:57:39.680 --> 0:57:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to was that episodic structure once I realize that you

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:48.520
<v Speaker 1>have to see them less as stepping stones to understanding

0:57:49.760 --> 0:57:54.320
<v Speaker 1>anything factual or actual about Andre Rublev the painter an artist,

0:57:54.520 --> 0:57:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and see them as parables. And that's how I ultimately

0:57:58.960 --> 0:58:01.760
<v Speaker 1>embraced those chapter is now, I think in the end,

0:58:02.920 --> 0:58:06.960
<v Speaker 1>even though we can't necessarily say that any of it

0:58:07.120 --> 0:58:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is accurate, or that accuracy is what he's going for,

0:58:10.600 --> 0:58:14.760
<v Speaker 1>we know very little about Andre Rublev the man, we

0:58:14.920 --> 0:58:17.600
<v Speaker 1>have his work. It really is and I think Scott

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and Keith talk about this in their really eloquent conversation

0:58:22.320 --> 0:58:25.280
<v Speaker 1>about the film that we referenced earlier in the reveal.

0:58:25.920 --> 0:58:30.560
<v Speaker 1>It's as if Tarkovsky said, I'm going to take this

0:58:31.600 --> 0:58:37.960
<v Speaker 1>figure and I'm going to use him to explore questions

0:58:38.040 --> 0:58:44.080
<v Speaker 1>about sin, about the responsibility of the artist, about Russia

0:58:44.240 --> 0:58:48.520
<v Speaker 1>itself and its history, about the brutality of man, all

0:58:48.600 --> 0:58:54.040
<v Speaker 1>these big questions. He's going to use this story simply

0:58:54.240 --> 0:58:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to be the provocation or the lure to explore some

0:58:58.880 --> 0:59:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of those big questions, the type big questions we've seen

0:59:01.240 --> 0:59:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Tarkovsky explore with his other films. So I don't know

0:59:04.680 --> 0:59:09.120
<v Speaker 1>if that Parables analogy that I'm making resonates with you

0:59:09.320 --> 0:59:12.280
<v Speaker 1>at all, Josh, But they are stories sometimes that don't

0:59:12.320 --> 0:59:15.760
<v Speaker 1>even have anything to do directly with rube Lev himself.

0:59:16.240 --> 0:59:18.560
<v Speaker 1>It seems to be more about not only asking some

0:59:18.680 --> 0:59:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of these big questions or posing some of these big questions,

0:59:21.440 --> 0:59:26.280
<v Speaker 1>but more about providing a backdrop, a potential backdrop to

0:59:26.520 --> 0:59:34.520
<v Speaker 1>understand the types of experiences and the environment that might

0:59:34.960 --> 0:59:36.400
<v Speaker 1>have shaped an artist.

0:59:36.640 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Like Yeah, I love the Parables analogy. I hadn't thought

0:59:40.080 --> 0:59:43.200
<v Speaker 3>about it that way, but I think it's very apt,

0:59:43.880 --> 0:59:46.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, and like the Parables of the New Testament,

0:59:46.200 --> 0:59:51.040
<v Speaker 3>they're individual stories, fables, but they're also all of a

0:59:51.160 --> 0:59:54.160
<v Speaker 3>piece for a single purpose, you know, in that case,

0:59:54.320 --> 0:59:58.240
<v Speaker 3>painting this picture of a unique kingdom. And I think

0:59:59.160 --> 1:00:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Andre Rubla with this film, Tarkovski is trying to ultimately

1:00:03.600 --> 1:00:08.880
<v Speaker 3>paint a unified picture of what it means to make

1:00:09.000 --> 1:00:13.000
<v Speaker 3>religious art. I think that, I mean, first of all,

1:00:13.120 --> 1:00:15.720
<v Speaker 3>just generally speaking to me seeing this for the first time,

1:00:15.840 --> 1:00:17.520
<v Speaker 3>and it's sort of the first time I went to

1:00:17.560 --> 1:00:20.600
<v Speaker 3>see it. I've mentioned before at DUC Films at University

1:00:20.640 --> 1:00:22.920
<v Speaker 3>of Chicago in January because they were screening it and

1:00:23.080 --> 1:00:25.920
<v Speaker 3>just knowing we had this marathon. So I have had

1:00:25.960 --> 1:00:27.960
<v Speaker 3>the chance to see it twice in a couple of months,

1:00:28.000 --> 1:00:30.280
<v Speaker 3>but still in these recent months, it was the first

1:00:30.320 --> 1:00:33.720
<v Speaker 3>time I thought I'd seen all the Tarkovsky masterpieces at him.

1:00:34.560 --> 1:00:38.720
<v Speaker 3>I was like, I've you know, I've seen Nostalgia, I've

1:00:38.840 --> 1:00:43.080
<v Speaker 3>seen Solaristock. It's like, let me go catch up on

1:00:43.200 --> 1:00:46.760
<v Speaker 3>this well regarded. I certainly knew the movie's reputation, but

1:00:47.160 --> 1:00:50.800
<v Speaker 3>knowing it was something of this biography picture historical picture,

1:00:51.520 --> 1:00:55.080
<v Speaker 3>sounded different than the films I was familiar with earlier

1:00:55.200 --> 1:00:59.280
<v Speaker 3>movie right his second full feature, I thought, let me

1:00:59.320 --> 1:01:02.560
<v Speaker 3>catch up with this one. Okay, apparently the guy's up

1:01:02.640 --> 1:01:07.160
<v Speaker 3>to what five masterpieces. In my mind, this thing is incredible.

1:01:07.720 --> 1:01:10.360
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, going back to what you were saying and

1:01:10.640 --> 1:01:14.280
<v Speaker 3>what Keith wrote specifically, you know this notion I think

1:01:14.320 --> 1:01:17.040
<v Speaker 3>he's I think he's very close when he says this

1:01:17.280 --> 1:01:21.640
<v Speaker 3>was about Rubelev's artistic development and the development of his soul,

1:01:22.280 --> 1:01:26.160
<v Speaker 3>except I wouldn't have the ant I would put those

1:01:26.200 --> 1:01:29.520
<v Speaker 3>two things together, because I think they're exactly the same

1:01:29.680 --> 1:01:34.840
<v Speaker 3>thing in terms of what Tarkovsky is interested in exploring

1:01:35.560 --> 1:01:39.280
<v Speaker 3>in this movie and thinking about it in context of

1:01:40.000 --> 1:01:42.040
<v Speaker 3>the further films that he would go on to make.

1:01:42.800 --> 1:01:45.120
<v Speaker 3>It's almost like he's setting the stage here for the

1:01:45.200 --> 1:01:50.160
<v Speaker 3>rest of his career because he's stating these he's discovering.

1:01:50.520 --> 1:01:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Let me say, it feels like he's discovering the terms

1:01:55.040 --> 1:01:57.480
<v Speaker 3>by which he's going to go on to make deeply

1:01:57.720 --> 1:02:03.120
<v Speaker 3>spiritual cinematic films like Solaris, Stalker, Nostalgia. But they're not

1:02:03.320 --> 1:02:07.080
<v Speaker 3>religious films right in the sense that we think of them.

1:02:07.680 --> 1:02:11.960
<v Speaker 3>And so Andre Rubelev is all about an artist whose

1:02:13.320 --> 1:02:16.080
<v Speaker 3>job is to make religious films, and what are we

1:02:16.200 --> 1:02:19.080
<v Speaker 3>told about him? Very early on, one of his fellow

1:02:19.120 --> 1:02:23.600
<v Speaker 3>painters says to Theophanes, he has no faith in his art, right,

1:02:24.160 --> 1:02:27.680
<v Speaker 3>This guy's going through the motions and he doesn't find

1:02:27.840 --> 1:02:33.680
<v Speaker 3>that faith and that artistry until he's recognized that it

1:02:34.000 --> 1:02:38.280
<v Speaker 3>must have a purpose beyond the religious realm. It must

1:02:38.480 --> 1:02:43.840
<v Speaker 3>resonate outside of these cathedrals for it to have true artistry,

1:02:44.160 --> 1:02:48.840
<v Speaker 3>true meaning, true religiosity, I would argue, and I do

1:02:49.080 --> 1:02:51.960
<v Speaker 3>think you know. There's that early section which is comedic

1:02:53.080 --> 1:02:55.520
<v Speaker 3>but sets the stage for all of this, when he

1:02:55.880 --> 1:02:59.080
<v Speaker 3>and his fellow painters stop at this tavern. They're seeking

1:02:59.160 --> 1:03:03.440
<v Speaker 3>shelter from the right. And before they even arrive, we've

1:03:03.520 --> 1:03:07.440
<v Speaker 3>been watching this performer, this jester roll on bikeoff is

1:03:07.520 --> 1:03:11.720
<v Speaker 3>the actor entertaining villagers with this crude and very lude

1:03:11.880 --> 1:03:15.160
<v Speaker 3>song and dance. Right, and then Andre and his fellow

1:03:15.800 --> 1:03:19.880
<v Speaker 3>monks come in and they crash the party. Everyone gets quiet.

1:03:20.240 --> 1:03:23.280
<v Speaker 3>They look at the gester askance. One of his companions says,

1:03:23.320 --> 1:03:27.240
<v Speaker 3>God sent priests, but the devil sent gestures. You know again,

1:03:27.760 --> 1:03:30.120
<v Speaker 3>we're back to sinners, drawing this line between the sacred

1:03:30.240 --> 1:03:34.440
<v Speaker 3>and secular right. But notice in that sequence, Adam, the

1:03:34.600 --> 1:03:37.800
<v Speaker 3>jester connects with the crowd. The monks sit in the corner.

1:03:37.840 --> 1:03:38.560
<v Speaker 3>They're useless.

1:03:39.320 --> 1:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>The clown judge and judge of course, the clown.

1:03:43.720 --> 1:03:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Goes out into the world. He leaves the tavern, he

1:03:46.600 --> 1:03:49.480
<v Speaker 3>takes off his shirt and soaks in the rain. He's

1:03:49.600 --> 1:03:54.240
<v Speaker 3>experiencing life. And I think this is setting the central questions.

1:03:54.280 --> 1:03:56.200
<v Speaker 3>The rest of the movie will explore what good is

1:03:56.280 --> 1:03:59.320
<v Speaker 3>religious art, if it's lifeless, if it's disconnected from the

1:03:59.400 --> 1:04:02.040
<v Speaker 3>human experience. It's when we get to these sections of

1:04:02.160 --> 1:04:06.480
<v Speaker 3>cruelty and violence all at the hands of supposedly religious leaders,

1:04:06.560 --> 1:04:10.440
<v Speaker 3>these princes of Russia, who demand these icons but also

1:04:10.960 --> 1:04:14.200
<v Speaker 3>are merciless. What happens when religious art is co opted

1:04:14.240 --> 1:04:16.920
<v Speaker 3>by the cruel and the powerful. And then here's the

1:04:16.920 --> 1:04:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Tarkovsky question. Can art that isn't explicitly religious be faithful

1:04:21.760 --> 1:04:24.520
<v Speaker 3>as well? This is what I think we see in

1:04:24.600 --> 1:04:26.800
<v Speaker 3>his further films, And here it's almost like he's making

1:04:26.840 --> 1:04:30.560
<v Speaker 3>the argument for that. So I really do think this is,

1:04:31.040 --> 1:04:35.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, as powerful as his later movies, if still

1:04:35.680 --> 1:04:39.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of in this formative space for him as a filmmaker.

1:04:40.720 --> 1:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>It's funny what you said about the Jester and the

1:04:44.280 --> 1:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>importance you placed on that, because I was looking at

1:04:47.240 --> 1:04:48.959
<v Speaker 1>my notes and one of the last things I wrote

1:04:49.000 --> 1:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>down watching at this time was that this movie seems

1:04:51.720 --> 1:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to be fundamentally about fools. Oh yeah, the characters, Holy fools. Yeah.

1:04:57.680 --> 1:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>That Tarkovsky is drawn to the most, that he is

1:05:00.400 --> 1:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>most sympathetic to the characters who he thinks society needs

1:05:05.200 --> 1:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to not only have perhaps more compassion for, but needs

1:05:08.680 --> 1:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to allow more space for. Are these fools? And that

1:05:13.000 --> 1:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't just mean because they're comedic foolish in this case,

1:05:16.440 --> 1:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>also means that they are distancing themselves or in some

1:05:20.880 --> 1:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>way separating themselves from conventional society. I think that's why

1:05:25.200 --> 1:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>we have the prologue, that we have this story that

1:05:28.280 --> 1:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>otherwise so disconnected, but isn't, and it is in terms

1:05:32.160 --> 1:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of filmmaking Bravora Tarkovsky, where that camera is elevating up

1:05:39.120 --> 1:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>into the sky from the point of view of this

1:05:43.440 --> 1:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>fool who has decided, despite the shouts that he is

1:05:48.960 --> 1:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>getting from the people down below, despite the absolute absurdity

1:05:53.200 --> 1:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of this decision, to try to fly. He pulls it off,

1:05:58.760 --> 1:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't he? And it does, as I said, feel disconnected

1:06:01.400 --> 1:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>because narratively it doesn't tie otherwise to our story. But

1:06:05.440 --> 1:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it makes complete sense when you realize that the movie

1:06:07.960 --> 1:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>is filled with these types of characters, including rube Blev himself,

1:06:11.600 --> 1:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>who is constantly going against society, constantly putting himself in

1:06:17.360 --> 1:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a position where he is daring to do something that

1:06:21.400 --> 1:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>subverts norms or subverts expectations, including taking a vow of

1:06:26.160 --> 1:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>silence as we see him later do. I think part

1:06:28.880 --> 1:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>of the complexity here of this film too, and the

1:06:31.160 --> 1:06:37.439
<v Speaker 1>way Tarkowsky really gets at the human condition through rube

1:06:37.480 --> 1:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Lev is having a character who can so clearly in

1:06:42.200 --> 1:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>one moment espouse this epiphany that he's had about his art,

1:06:46.440 --> 1:06:48.919
<v Speaker 1>and it's in the chapter about the Last Judgment where

1:06:49.600 --> 1:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>he seems to have a sort of painter's block. He's

1:06:53.360 --> 1:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>doing everything he can to distract himself from the job

1:06:56.720 --> 1:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>at hand, and he expresses it it's because he doesn't

1:06:59.360 --> 1:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like spreading that message of hell fire and punishment

1:07:05.520 --> 1:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and suffering that doesn't seem to resonate with him. And

1:07:08.920 --> 1:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>then he finally realizes that he wants to tell the

1:07:11.920 --> 1:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>story of a feast instead so he can have he

1:07:16.080 --> 1:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>can have that type of epiphany, Josh, he can understand

1:07:18.720 --> 1:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that he's a man who doesn't believe in, or doesn't

1:07:21.920 --> 1:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>want to espouse these ideas of hell fire and judgment

1:07:25.000 --> 1:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and condemnation of his fellow man. But what does happen

1:07:27.880 --> 1:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in that chapter with the Pagans I believe it's called

1:07:30.400 --> 1:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the Feast? Where as soon as they catch him spying

1:07:34.720 --> 1:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>on lovers and they are going to punish him, what

1:07:39.160 --> 1:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>does he do. He invokes fire and brimstone, he tells him,

1:07:42.080 --> 1:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>But that's going to be punished. I think it is.

1:07:44.240 --> 1:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Actually it's part of his journey. You could say that's

1:07:47.920 --> 1:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>part of his journey, and I think that that would

1:07:49.640 --> 1:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>be fair. You could also look at it as a

1:07:51.680 --> 1:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of a contradiction, because he invokes it when it

1:07:54.520 --> 1:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>suits him and then later it doesn't completely feel right.

1:07:58.920 --> 1:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>But he hasn't he hasn't yet had that moment where

1:08:02.360 --> 1:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>he's realized what the counter is what he believes in instead,

1:08:06.920 --> 1:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I suppose, so I guess that's why I'm kind of

1:08:09.200 --> 1:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>linking them. But you're right ultimately that I think that

1:08:11.920 --> 1:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>is part of that journey, that he's not this fully

1:08:14.680 --> 1:08:18.639
<v Speaker 1>formed character. And not only that, of course, any artist

1:08:18.800 --> 1:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is always developing. We're always developing as humans. But I

1:08:21.320 --> 1:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>think what I'm trying to express, Josh is that this

1:08:24.200 --> 1:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is a character who is constantly shifting, who because of

1:08:29.320 --> 1:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the conditions of the world that he lives in, because

1:08:32.080 --> 1:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of the horrors that he witnesses, because of the ideas

1:08:36.280 --> 1:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that he is constantly confronted with, He's malleable. He's trying

1:08:41.160 --> 1:08:43.479
<v Speaker 1>to find what he really believes in. He's trying to

1:08:43.560 --> 1:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>commit to an ideology. And I like the fact that

1:08:46.920 --> 1:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>we see someone for a good portion of the film

1:08:50.120 --> 1:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>who is seeking, who is searching.

1:08:52.160 --> 1:08:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Yeah, that's the fascinating part of this and he is.

1:08:56.240 --> 1:08:58.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, I don't think if we've even mentioned the

1:08:58.160 --> 1:09:02.720
<v Speaker 3>actor portraying Rublove here and atotally Solnitsen, and I will

1:09:02.800 --> 1:09:05.960
<v Speaker 3>say on this recent second viewing, I did appreciate his

1:09:06.080 --> 1:09:10.599
<v Speaker 3>performance more because of that seeking quality and that he's

1:09:10.680 --> 1:09:15.240
<v Speaker 3>kind of like a Brisson, you know, figure of struggling faith.

1:09:15.360 --> 1:09:18.599
<v Speaker 3>He's what Ethan Hawk is doing in First Reformed. They're

1:09:18.840 --> 1:09:22.759
<v Speaker 3>very much cinematic archetypes. But it is this this striving,

1:09:22.880 --> 1:09:26.120
<v Speaker 3>the seeking, this uncertainty, this lack of faith, this doubt

1:09:26.200 --> 1:09:29.280
<v Speaker 3>that is torturing figures like this, and I think we

1:09:29.479 --> 1:09:33.439
<v Speaker 3>very much get that in this performance, which is quite strong.

1:09:33.920 --> 1:09:36.599
<v Speaker 3>Also quickly before I go back to that is we've

1:09:36.640 --> 1:09:39.439
<v Speaker 3>referenced a couple of times all these horror horrors he witnesses.

1:09:39.520 --> 1:09:43.240
<v Speaker 3>We should say for people listening who haven't seen Andre Rublev,

1:09:43.640 --> 1:09:47.200
<v Speaker 3>one of these chapters is like basically a Kurrosawa film, right.

1:09:47.200 --> 1:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>This Siege on on seven Samurai, It's all there.

1:09:51.040 --> 1:09:53.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's like, okay, let's just take forty five

1:09:53.120 --> 1:09:56.840
<v Speaker 3>minutes to drop in a yeah, Samurai masterpiece, but set

1:09:56.920 --> 1:10:00.320
<v Speaker 3>in medieval Russia. This is the level of artistry working

1:10:00.439 --> 1:10:04.080
<v Speaker 3>on here with Andrea Rubelev. But yeah, I like, also

1:10:04.320 --> 1:10:07.519
<v Speaker 3>continuing your thought about ruby Lev's journey here is that

1:10:08.240 --> 1:10:12.240
<v Speaker 3>he has those qualms about painting the last judgment strong language.

1:10:12.680 --> 1:10:14.679
<v Speaker 3>He starts by saying something about it's not the smoke

1:10:14.760 --> 1:10:18.479
<v Speaker 3>that matters, you know, to his companion who's trying to

1:10:18.520 --> 1:10:20.519
<v Speaker 3>figure out, why are you bothered by this? He says,

1:10:20.600 --> 1:10:24.400
<v Speaker 3>then it disgusts me, like this concept of damnation and

1:10:24.520 --> 1:10:28.280
<v Speaker 3>hell fire discuss me. And then later we notice there's

1:10:28.320 --> 1:10:31.519
<v Speaker 3>another holy fool woman played by Irma Rausch, who wanders

1:10:31.640 --> 1:10:35.840
<v Speaker 3>into this cathedral that they're painting as a character is

1:10:35.920 --> 1:10:38.599
<v Speaker 3>reading a New Testament passage about how women should cover

1:10:38.720 --> 1:10:44.360
<v Speaker 3>their heads in worship. And this is obviously an ironic contrast.

1:10:44.439 --> 1:10:47.519
<v Speaker 3>Here comes this woman into their manly space as they're

1:10:47.560 --> 1:10:51.320
<v Speaker 3>reading this aloud. But it's also where ruby Lev says

1:10:51.360 --> 1:10:54.200
<v Speaker 3>something like she is not a sinner even if she

1:10:54.320 --> 1:10:56.439
<v Speaker 3>does not wear a scarf. And so we're seeing his

1:10:56.600 --> 1:11:01.920
<v Speaker 3>spiritual development here where he's transitioning away from the hell

1:11:02.000 --> 1:11:06.080
<v Speaker 3>fire and damnation to a gospel of grace that he's

1:11:06.160 --> 1:11:09.840
<v Speaker 3>beginning to embrace. And now the tension, the artistic tension,

1:11:09.960 --> 1:11:12.360
<v Speaker 3>is like, but is this what the people paying me

1:11:12.439 --> 1:11:15.720
<v Speaker 3>to paint want and how do I wrestle with that?

1:11:15.920 --> 1:11:17.280
<v Speaker 3>And how do I be true to my art and

1:11:17.320 --> 1:11:21.880
<v Speaker 3>my beliefs. So yeah, it is this this journey of

1:11:22.160 --> 1:11:25.840
<v Speaker 3>discovery on his part, which who knows how historical it is,

1:11:26.640 --> 1:11:29.960
<v Speaker 3>but in terms of rooting it in this narrative and

1:11:30.080 --> 1:11:32.639
<v Speaker 3>how it works on a meta level to my mind,

1:11:32.720 --> 1:11:36.480
<v Speaker 3>with Tarkowsky's development as an artist, I think is fascinating.

1:11:36.800 --> 1:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot that's fascinating about this film and a

1:11:39.360 --> 1:11:42.559
<v Speaker 1>lot that maybe I think we used this word last

1:11:42.600 --> 1:11:44.439
<v Speaker 1>week when we were talking about the first two films

1:11:44.479 --> 1:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in this marathon. A lot that's meant to be mysterious

1:11:47.280 --> 1:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and not perhaps understood, and yet you're drawn to try

1:11:52.920 --> 1:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to make sense of it. And that even includes josh

1:11:56.200 --> 1:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>lines of dialogue like the one in this film where Ki,

1:12:00.240 --> 1:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the character who's a painter who is kind of an adversary,

1:12:03.720 --> 1:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a friend but becomes kind of an adversary,

1:12:06.200 --> 1:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>feels a lot of jealousy towards Andrea because of his talent,

1:12:11.640 --> 1:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>he wants to be seen as a superior painter. He

1:12:15.960 --> 1:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>has greater ambition, but lacks that fundamental ability that his

1:12:21.960 --> 1:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>colleague seems to have when he is just about to

1:12:26.400 --> 1:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>have his great unraveling and he's in his room at

1:12:32.280 --> 1:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the monastery, and I don't remember who is in the

1:12:34.240 --> 1:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>room and who says it to him, but the person says,

1:12:37.360 --> 1:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>why are you burning a candle in the daylight. I'm

1:12:40.240 --> 1:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>still thinking about why are you burning a candle in

1:12:43.680 --> 1:12:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the daylight? Why that's even something that that character posed

1:12:47.760 --> 1:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>to him, and how we might interpret it. But what

1:12:50.560 --> 1:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it says about Kirol as a man, as a monk,

1:12:55.479 --> 1:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>as a painter, that he could be I don't know,

1:13:00.000 --> 1:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>suppose wasteful in that way, that he could feel as if,

1:13:05.720 --> 1:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>even though it's daytime and he should be able to

1:13:08.040 --> 1:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>see everything he needs to say, he nevertheless feels the

1:13:11.040 --> 1:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>need to take in this bit of luxury, this bit

1:13:14.920 --> 1:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of medieval luxury, if you will, or adorn his room

1:13:19.040 --> 1:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in some way with that light. In a character it

1:13:21.840 --> 1:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>seems kind of calls him out on it.

1:13:23.600 --> 1:13:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Kirol is fascinating played by Ivan Lapikov, because I

1:13:28.479 --> 1:13:30.960
<v Speaker 3>think he's also, if I'm remembering correctly, one of these

1:13:31.000 --> 1:13:35.519
<v Speaker 3>figures you were referring to, who disappears for long passages, Yeah,

1:13:35.840 --> 1:13:39.320
<v Speaker 3>and then comes back in a way we don't immediately

1:13:39.439 --> 1:13:41.839
<v Speaker 3>know right it's him, and then he has to confess.

1:13:42.160 --> 1:13:44.920
<v Speaker 3>He has two confessions, first who he actually is, and

1:13:45.040 --> 1:13:49.200
<v Speaker 3>then later in the bell section, he confesses when Andrea

1:13:49.320 --> 1:13:55.040
<v Speaker 3>is mistaken by the jester from the early section for

1:13:55.320 --> 1:13:59.200
<v Speaker 3>the monk who denounced him and led to his punishment.

1:13:59.240 --> 1:14:02.840
<v Speaker 3>And it was actually so yeah, can we talk about

1:14:02.840 --> 1:14:03.400
<v Speaker 3>the bell section?

1:14:03.880 --> 1:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

1:14:04.400 --> 1:14:07.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean masterpiece on its own right like this? To me,

1:14:08.080 --> 1:14:12.280
<v Speaker 3>this movie just has that, and you've got something that

1:14:12.400 --> 1:14:14.840
<v Speaker 3>will stand the test of time. Now, obviously it builds

1:14:14.920 --> 1:14:16.880
<v Speaker 3>on what came before, because I find it to be

1:14:17.600 --> 1:14:22.519
<v Speaker 3>completely culminating, this exploration of what doesn't mean to be

1:14:23.320 --> 1:14:25.280
<v Speaker 3>an artist, let alone a religious artist.

1:14:25.320 --> 1:14:26.759
<v Speaker 1>But really, what does it mean to be an artist

1:14:26.960 --> 1:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>like this?

1:14:27.320 --> 1:14:30.519
<v Speaker 3>This is what the movie, or this section, the bell section,

1:14:30.760 --> 1:14:35.160
<v Speaker 3>offers a possibility, I will say, because I think with

1:14:35.280 --> 1:14:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Tarkovsky everything is a possibility, not necessarily an answer. But

1:14:39.000 --> 1:14:43.080
<v Speaker 3>this is where we find the boy from Ivan's childhood.

1:14:43.080 --> 1:14:46.679
<v Speaker 3>I have his childhood, right, Nikolai Berlyyev, who gave such

1:14:46.720 --> 1:14:49.680
<v Speaker 3>a brilliant performance there as a kid a couple of

1:14:49.720 --> 1:14:53.439
<v Speaker 3>years younger, and is here's this orphan teenager who convinces

1:14:53.520 --> 1:14:57.200
<v Speaker 3>the prince that he has learned to cast church bells

1:14:57.240 --> 1:15:01.519
<v Speaker 3>from his late father, is given the job, which means

1:15:01.600 --> 1:15:06.479
<v Speaker 3>overseeing this massive team of adults, and we learn later

1:15:06.800 --> 1:15:10.280
<v Speaker 3>though suspect right away he has no idea what he's doing.

1:15:10.520 --> 1:15:13.639
<v Speaker 3>His father didn't teach him anything, but he proceeds anyway,

1:15:13.720 --> 1:15:17.760
<v Speaker 3>and everyone follows him. What did you make of this past?

1:15:17.800 --> 1:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's partly why, or a major part of why

1:15:21.479 --> 1:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I am talking about this film in terms of its

1:15:25.160 --> 1:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>emphasis on holy fools or certain fool kids a school too.

1:15:29.800 --> 1:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the kid is I think that's

1:15:32.200 --> 1:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>what really clinched it for me, is that he's another

1:15:34.520 --> 1:15:38.559
<v Speaker 1>character Josh who you said. It turns out he doesn't

1:15:39.120 --> 1:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>know what he's doing. He doesn't know what he's doing,

1:15:42.040 --> 1:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if you can really say that

1:15:44.000 --> 1:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>he's going just off of faith. There's something what's motivating.

1:15:49.200 --> 1:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's a great question, either deeper or more superficial,

1:15:53.360 --> 1:15:56.479
<v Speaker 1>that's driving him. Maybe he just appreciates the power. But

1:15:56.880 --> 1:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason he takes in my mind, he takes

1:16:00.120 --> 1:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the same leap off the church that the guy at

1:16:03.040 --> 1:16:06.479
<v Speaker 1>the beginning does. Right when he flies with the balloon,

1:16:07.000 --> 1:16:11.679
<v Speaker 1>he is putting himself in danger. There is no reason

1:16:12.240 --> 1:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>on this earth, in this world that he should pull

1:16:15.880 --> 1:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this off. He's completely flying without an it and the

1:16:20.120 --> 1:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>punishment for failure here is severe. As we like to

1:16:23.760 --> 1:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>say here on film spotting, the stakes could not be higher.

1:16:27.160 --> 1:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>That is constantly reinforced throughout this entire section. What exactly

1:16:32.400 --> 1:16:35.479
<v Speaker 1>could go wrong and the type of punishment that will

1:16:35.680 --> 1:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>befall him if he doesn't pull this off. And yet, Josh,

1:16:38.800 --> 1:16:41.639
<v Speaker 1>he is a fool. He doesn't know exactly what he's doing.

1:16:42.320 --> 1:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>He is just hoping that through the force of his

1:16:46.920 --> 1:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>own will, that he is going to pull it off.

1:16:49.400 --> 1:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the test. That's another example for me why it

1:16:52.720 --> 1:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>feels a bit like a parable. It isn't supposed to

1:16:55.160 --> 1:16:59.599
<v Speaker 1>necessarily make sense that we believe that this character could

1:16:59.640 --> 1:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>do it. We believe it though in the context of

1:17:02.479 --> 1:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>this story. So yeah, that's that's where that that really

1:17:05.320 --> 1:17:07.799
<v Speaker 1>came from for me, That idea was that character.

1:17:08.200 --> 1:17:10.360
<v Speaker 3>And just to talk a little bit about the filmmaking

1:17:10.479 --> 1:17:14.240
<v Speaker 3>before circling back to the to the meaning, but the

1:17:14.720 --> 1:17:19.200
<v Speaker 3>patience and the attention to the steps of this craft,

1:17:19.360 --> 1:17:22.880
<v Speaker 3>from finding the right clay which he stumbles upon in

1:17:22.960 --> 1:17:25.960
<v Speaker 3>the rain and incredible. I so much rain in this movie.

1:17:26.040 --> 1:17:29.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean water is Skarkowsky right, but he's he's baptized

1:17:29.840 --> 1:17:34.360
<v Speaker 3>when he finds the right clay that shot, and from

1:17:34.479 --> 1:17:38.400
<v Speaker 3>having to mold the bell in the earth to raising

1:17:38.520 --> 1:17:41.680
<v Speaker 3>it up to yeah, the molding of it with how

1:17:41.720 --> 1:17:45.120
<v Speaker 3>about the streams of like burning, I don't know what

1:17:45.280 --> 1:17:48.680
<v Speaker 3>material is lead or silver, but it's glowing. This is

1:17:48.680 --> 1:17:51.560
<v Speaker 3>a black and white film, but it's glowing behind this

1:17:51.760 --> 1:17:57.840
<v Speaker 3>kid conjuring this fool slash wizard conjuring these streams of

1:17:58.000 --> 1:18:00.559
<v Speaker 3>light to I mean, the filmmaking here is just incredible.

1:18:00.960 --> 1:18:03.760
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, to connect it with some of these other

1:18:03.880 --> 1:18:07.400
<v Speaker 3>things we've been talking about. So Andre Rublev at this

1:18:07.479 --> 1:18:12.599
<v Speaker 3>point is still in his vow of silence, living near

1:18:12.760 --> 1:18:16.080
<v Speaker 3>this city, the Prince's city, where the bell is being cast,

1:18:16.600 --> 1:18:20.240
<v Speaker 3>and observing it from afar, and so he's watching this kid,

1:18:20.960 --> 1:18:25.360
<v Speaker 3>and I would say, similar to the way you've been

1:18:25.400 --> 1:18:29.600
<v Speaker 3>describing it, that rube Lev experiences the creation of this

1:18:29.760 --> 1:18:33.120
<v Speaker 3>bell as a miraculous revelation. I mean, he's been on

1:18:33.200 --> 1:18:36.960
<v Speaker 3>this journey of seeking inspiration. He's found it here a

1:18:37.080 --> 1:18:40.439
<v Speaker 3>little bit. But then the sack of the city and

1:18:40.640 --> 1:18:44.840
<v Speaker 3>the violence that he experienced and witnessed caused him to

1:18:44.880 --> 1:18:47.240
<v Speaker 3>give everything up take on the vow of silence. He's

1:18:47.320 --> 1:18:50.040
<v Speaker 3>left his work behind. But here I think what he

1:18:50.200 --> 1:18:53.160
<v Speaker 3>discovers and the holy fool part is an element of

1:18:53.240 --> 1:19:00.400
<v Speaker 3>this that art emerges from talent, but also from beyond himself. Right,

1:19:00.560 --> 1:19:05.479
<v Speaker 3>he's a vessel. Ruby Lev discovers that he's a vessel,

1:19:05.800 --> 1:19:09.919
<v Speaker 3>just like this kid is a vessel for the miracle,

1:19:10.320 --> 1:19:12.559
<v Speaker 3>and I love I almost want to give it away

1:19:12.840 --> 1:19:15.200
<v Speaker 3>because you are right, You're in such suspense. Is that

1:19:15.360 --> 1:19:19.200
<v Speaker 3>bell going to toll? Are we going to hear anything?

1:19:20.360 --> 1:19:23.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm almost positive I meant to rewatch it today, but

1:19:23.760 --> 1:19:26.360
<v Speaker 3>I think when we hear the bell, the camera is

1:19:26.400 --> 1:19:30.840
<v Speaker 3>on Rublev's face, and he is He has been a

1:19:31.160 --> 1:19:33.160
<v Speaker 3>very side figure in this whole passage.

1:19:33.520 --> 1:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>We see him watching.

1:19:34.560 --> 1:19:38.000
<v Speaker 3>He's an observer in the background. But the moment the

1:19:38.120 --> 1:19:41.400
<v Speaker 3>movie has been building too in my mind, we're back

1:19:41.520 --> 1:19:45.880
<v Speaker 3>on his face and it just it kind of seems

1:19:45.960 --> 1:19:49.759
<v Speaker 3>like that is the clarity where he realizes it's about

1:19:49.840 --> 1:19:53.200
<v Speaker 3>more than me. I may have been gifted talent, but

1:19:53.400 --> 1:19:56.080
<v Speaker 3>I need to release a little bit of this control

1:19:56.280 --> 1:20:00.160
<v Speaker 3>because I am, as an artist, a vessel, and I

1:20:00.240 --> 1:20:03.679
<v Speaker 3>do think it connects out with another brilliant visual motif

1:20:04.120 --> 1:20:07.720
<v Speaker 3>throughout this film, and it's something our Tarkowsky returns to

1:20:07.880 --> 1:20:10.720
<v Speaker 3>in different ways. Water again is here, but we see

1:20:10.760 --> 1:20:14.559
<v Speaker 3>many times a paint brush with white paint being held

1:20:14.600 --> 1:20:15.120
<v Speaker 3>in a stream.

1:20:15.400 --> 1:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I was I was going to go there, Josh, my

1:20:17.160 --> 1:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>favorite image in the film. Maybe it's gorgeous.

1:20:19.479 --> 1:20:22.480
<v Speaker 3>And what happens is the paint just kind of diffuses

1:20:22.640 --> 1:20:25.840
<v Speaker 3>but travels as the water travels. Yeah, and it's this

1:20:26.120 --> 1:20:30.960
<v Speaker 3>abstract beauty. Here's the key that the person putting the

1:20:31.000 --> 1:20:34.840
<v Speaker 3>brush in the water never intended. It's a new a

1:20:34.960 --> 1:20:38.240
<v Speaker 3>new creation beyond that. That's that's in the process of

1:20:38.400 --> 1:20:42.840
<v Speaker 3>unfolding before your eyes and what and who knows what

1:20:42.920 --> 1:20:45.479
<v Speaker 3>it means. They were a part of it. They needed

1:20:45.520 --> 1:20:48.800
<v Speaker 3>to be there for it to happen, right, it's not accidental.

1:20:49.320 --> 1:20:52.519
<v Speaker 3>But they were also something of a vessel. And so

1:20:52.920 --> 1:20:56.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that's the you know, that's the what rube

1:20:56.280 --> 1:20:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Lev to my mind, discovers by the end of this movie,

1:21:00.640 --> 1:21:05.760
<v Speaker 3>and pointedly in the historical context he goes on to

1:21:05.880 --> 1:21:08.600
<v Speaker 3>make after this period in his life, according to what

1:21:08.800 --> 1:21:12.960
<v Speaker 3>history we know, his greatest piece the Trinity, his greatest icon,

1:21:13.320 --> 1:21:16.519
<v Speaker 3>the one that's the most revered. So it's just interesting

1:21:16.600 --> 1:21:19.360
<v Speaker 3>to see how historically this could be understood as an

1:21:19.400 --> 1:21:22.680
<v Speaker 3>epiphany moment for him. But I think it might be

1:21:22.760 --> 1:21:23.920
<v Speaker 3>the same for Tarkovsky.

1:21:24.000 --> 1:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Man.

1:21:24.360 --> 1:21:28.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think it's like him understanding you've referenced

1:21:28.960 --> 1:21:33.519
<v Speaker 3>this idea of mystery, like these movies I'm making, I'm

1:21:33.560 --> 1:21:36.479
<v Speaker 3>maybe a vessel for them, like I don't, and this

1:21:36.600 --> 1:21:39.280
<v Speaker 3>is why they're so confounding and we're intimidated by them

1:21:39.320 --> 1:21:41.920
<v Speaker 3>and why we'll never find the answer to them, because

1:21:41.960 --> 1:21:43.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if Tarkovsky knows the answer to.

1:21:43.960 --> 1:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>All of them. Sure, it's as if he has to.

1:21:47.720 --> 1:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>With this film, he's reminding himself or he's proving to

1:21:51.040 --> 1:21:53.559
<v Speaker 1>himself the lesson the rube Lev learns. I think as

1:21:53.560 --> 1:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you're articulating that, yeah, yeah, there, there are all these

1:21:57.560 --> 1:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>reasons to feel like this is probably pointless, or that

1:22:03.120 --> 1:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this beauty or this attempted beauty is not appreciated by society.

1:22:07.640 --> 1:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Is it something society even needs? I think it goes

1:22:09.960 --> 1:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>back to the steamroll or in the Violin too, in

1:22:12.000 --> 1:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that way that's opposing that question and ultimately coming to

1:22:15.920 --> 1:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a realization that you kind of have no choice. It's

1:22:19.080 --> 1:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the only thing ultimately you can do, or certainly you

1:22:22.200 --> 1:22:24.599
<v Speaker 1>can do if you're someone like Rublev or you're someone

1:22:25.120 --> 1:22:29.479
<v Speaker 1>like Tarkovsky, who is a unique visionary artist, and that

1:22:29.720 --> 1:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is definitely on display here. I'm so glad that you

1:22:32.280 --> 1:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the brushes, because that moment where I think it's

1:22:35.240 --> 1:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Foma who I didn't know totally what to make of it,

1:22:38.280 --> 1:22:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And now it's starting to as we talk it out,

1:22:40.920 --> 1:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it's starting to be clear to me. I just liked

1:22:42.760 --> 1:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it as an image, and I liked it as a

1:22:45.040 --> 1:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>singular Tarkovsky image because we've already talked through this marathon

1:22:49.160 --> 1:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and with mir we've talked about water and how he

1:22:52.120 --> 1:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>uses it in so many different ways. But the idea,

1:22:54.560 --> 1:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like, by putting that brush in the water,

1:22:57.000 --> 1:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it creates something new, as I said, something that's forming.

1:23:01.200 --> 1:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>It's in the process of forming itself before your eye.

1:23:05.120 --> 1:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Something is disturbed, something is disturbed. The water that's flowing

1:23:08.760 --> 1:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is disturbed by the introduction of a new liquid by

1:23:12.360 --> 1:23:15.719
<v Speaker 1>someone's hand, a new thing, and then and that creates

1:23:15.760 --> 1:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>something new, and it actually creates an effect. Josh, It's

1:23:18.080 --> 1:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>like the only thing I could write down. I don't

1:23:20.040 --> 1:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>even know if I'm using this word correctly, but it's

1:23:22.479 --> 1:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>like tributaries. It's like within the water, new strips are formed, right,

1:23:28.360 --> 1:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>new streams are formed, which makes sense with some of

1:23:31.800 --> 1:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the imagery we've seen from Tarkovski already. But there's another

1:23:35.280 --> 1:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>moment of that in this film, Josh, and my notes

1:23:37.680 --> 1:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>aren't entirely clear. I have post attack, so it must

1:23:40.840 --> 1:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>be after the raid, something like some kind of milk

1:23:44.520 --> 1:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>or liquid gets spilled into the water and the exact

1:23:47.880 --> 1:23:54.160
<v Speaker 1>same tributary, like yeah, thing forms with that introduction of

1:23:54.280 --> 1:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that liquid in the water, and then I love it's

1:23:57.040 --> 1:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>almost a match cut Tarkovsky gives us from that that

1:24:01.200 --> 1:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>spilling of that liquid in the water to then paint

1:24:04.520 --> 1:24:07.599
<v Speaker 1>being thrown at the yes wall. There is yes, right,

1:24:08.040 --> 1:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's a great kind of visual play on

1:24:11.000 --> 1:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a motif that the Tarkovsky obviously is enamored with. We

1:24:16.280 --> 1:24:19.439
<v Speaker 1>also get here and I didn't know coming into this marathon.

1:24:19.520 --> 1:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know this was a thing. I didn't know

1:24:22.000 --> 1:24:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a thing for Tarkovsky. I didn't know that until I

1:24:24.720 --> 1:24:28.799
<v Speaker 1>saw that incredible scene amongst the birch trees in Ivan's

1:24:28.840 --> 1:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>childhood that this would be a recurring motif, even with

1:24:33.040 --> 1:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the films I've seen, not considering them back to back,

1:24:36.000 --> 1:24:38.759
<v Speaker 1>like this, what happens Josh In one of the early

1:24:38.920 --> 1:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>sequences in this film, they are walking amongst those same

1:24:44.720 --> 1:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>types of birch trees, those white trees. They even comment

1:24:48.680 --> 1:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>on them. I think you never notice until you leave.

1:24:52.280 --> 1:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>And and there's even a moment, Josh, with those trees

1:24:55.280 --> 1:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>where the characters in the scene are walking across the

1:24:58.400 --> 1:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>trees kind of like they're on a tightrope, which is

1:25:01.120 --> 1:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly how they're walking across them in Ivan's childhood. So

1:25:05.640 --> 1:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that was something that stood out to me. The symbolism

1:25:07.840 --> 1:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of those trees, the power of those trees for Tarkovski

1:25:11.320 --> 1:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously very intentional, but again the use of water here,

1:25:15.160 --> 1:25:19.559
<v Speaker 1>and the use of water and layered varying ways by

1:25:19.640 --> 1:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>introducing new bits of liquid into the mix, was a

1:25:23.640 --> 1:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>real standout for me as well. I feel like, Josh,

1:25:26.000 --> 1:25:27.479
<v Speaker 1>this is the movie in a lot of ways, that's

1:25:27.560 --> 1:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the answer to the biopic conundrum. And the secret is

1:25:33.240 --> 1:25:37.519
<v Speaker 1>not only just have someone as visionary as Tarkovsky creating

1:25:37.600 --> 1:25:40.519
<v Speaker 1>the image of help, but just don't be encumbered in

1:25:40.600 --> 1:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>any way by fast events signposts. Yea, the things they

1:25:46.400 --> 1:25:49.599
<v Speaker 1>actually did. Like he's a painter, we don't ever see

1:25:49.680 --> 1:25:52.479
<v Speaker 1>him paint. We don't see any of the painting. We'll

1:25:52.520 --> 1:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>give you some art at the end, otherwise, otherwise we're

1:25:56.000 --> 1:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>going to give you a story that seems very loosely

1:25:59.400 --> 1:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>based on who this man ultimately is.

1:26:02.600 --> 1:26:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what did you make of that? Speaking of the

1:26:04.880 --> 1:26:08.639
<v Speaker 3>end where this has all been in black and white,

1:26:09.000 --> 1:26:14.840
<v Speaker 3>and then we get this long section of close ups

1:26:15.600 --> 1:26:19.760
<v Speaker 3>of some of the icons painted by rublev as this,

1:26:20.000 --> 1:26:23.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, choral music from the period is playing on

1:26:23.439 --> 1:26:26.040
<v Speaker 3>the soundtrack, and it gives you a chance obviously, you know,

1:26:26.120 --> 1:26:28.679
<v Speaker 3>there's an obvious reason and what it means. It gives

1:26:28.720 --> 1:26:31.400
<v Speaker 3>you a chance to see the art, the actual art

1:26:31.479 --> 1:26:33.840
<v Speaker 3>to your point, out of context of him sitting at up,

1:26:34.000 --> 1:26:35.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, sitting down to actually do it.

1:26:36.080 --> 1:26:37.120
<v Speaker 1>So I appreciated that.

1:26:37.479 --> 1:26:41.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's it's you see this in other Tarkovski movies,

1:26:41.240 --> 1:26:43.880
<v Speaker 3>like I think it's The Hunters in the Snow, the

1:26:44.120 --> 1:26:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Brugal the Elder painting shows up in Solaris, and we

1:26:46.800 --> 1:26:49.479
<v Speaker 3>spend a lot of time of the camera just pouring

1:26:49.560 --> 1:26:52.639
<v Speaker 3>over it in detail. So it's a thing he likes

1:26:52.760 --> 1:26:55.920
<v Speaker 3>to do. Did you find that additive?

1:26:56.160 --> 1:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Did you you know? Yeah, Yeah, that's another one of

1:26:59.240 --> 1:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>those very airing formal choices that completely pays off. And

1:27:04.360 --> 1:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason it pays off is is that

1:27:07.120 --> 1:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it's the culmination of everything we've tried to speak to

1:27:11.080 --> 1:27:14.880
<v Speaker 1>during this conversation, which is what this movie is really about.

1:27:15.040 --> 1:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Is what ironically all biopics about artists try to be about,

1:27:21.200 --> 1:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>which is what are the experiences and the perspectives that

1:27:25.360 --> 1:27:28.439
<v Speaker 1>shape the artists in the work that they do. But

1:27:28.560 --> 1:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>by disconnecting them the way that Tarkovsky has making it so,

1:27:31.920 --> 1:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the film itself isn't about the art at all or

1:27:34.840 --> 1:27:37.160
<v Speaker 1>showcase in the art, and it's only at the end

1:27:37.320 --> 1:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that we get it. It really does make us feel

1:27:40.439 --> 1:27:44.120
<v Speaker 1>as if he was finally only capable of doing that

1:27:44.360 --> 1:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>work because of all of these experiences. Yeah. I love

1:27:47.840 --> 1:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that separation of it. I think it's very potent.

1:27:50.000 --> 1:27:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Yeah, that's good. That's the time when we need

1:27:52.720 --> 1:27:56.640
<v Speaker 3>the historical record is at that moment, rather than intersperse

1:27:56.720 --> 1:28:01.200
<v Speaker 3>to sort of justify or you know, try to historically

1:28:01.320 --> 1:28:04.240
<v Speaker 3>root your narrative earlier, it would have been distracting, but

1:28:04.320 --> 1:28:07.400
<v Speaker 3>here it is a very nice exclamation point.

1:28:07.880 --> 1:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned shades of Kurosawa here, or at least filmmaking

1:28:11.760 --> 1:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>on that scale. I can't remember if it's Scott or

1:28:14.200 --> 1:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Keith who mentioned it, but were you like them and

1:28:18.080 --> 1:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like me thinking about during the bell sequence Werner Hertzog

1:28:22.200 --> 1:28:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and thinking about Fitzcaraldo. Not only another fool character right

1:28:28.320 --> 1:28:32.479
<v Speaker 1>in Fitzcaraldo pulling off the unthinkable, pulling off a miracle,

1:28:32.840 --> 1:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>but I was thinking about the character, I was also

1:28:35.360 --> 1:28:38.479
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the filmmaker. I was watching that and real

1:28:38.560 --> 1:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>quick this now made me think, Josh as well when

1:28:41.120 --> 1:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you brought up I also loved that imagery of the lead.

1:28:46.520 --> 1:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Whatever that molten substance is. But Josh, that's another tributary

1:28:50.640 --> 1:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>like visual yes, isn't it. It's as if these rivers

1:28:55.280 --> 1:28:58.679
<v Speaker 1>of that liquid are cascading down. But I was thinking

1:28:58.720 --> 1:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>about the work the entire time. I was just thinking

1:29:02.320 --> 1:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>about the physical work it must have taken, the people

1:29:07.360 --> 1:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>working on this film, the oh gosh, the austion designers,

1:29:11.200 --> 1:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>anyone involved with making this film, and Tarkovski himself to

1:29:14.960 --> 1:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>sew specifically and in such a detailed way render the

1:29:21.680 --> 1:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>creation of that bell and the hoisting of that bell

1:29:25.320 --> 1:29:29.479
<v Speaker 1>the pulling of the levers, the pulleys there on the rope.

1:29:29.680 --> 1:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>It made me think about the totally going over the

1:29:32.080 --> 1:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>mountain if it's Karaldo, and I can't believe he did it.

1:29:34.840 --> 1:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe he pulled it off.

1:29:36.040 --> 1:29:38.759
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if we've communicated the scale of this film.

1:29:38.960 --> 1:29:41.559
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, we've talked about the Kursawa thing,

1:29:41.640 --> 1:29:45.519
<v Speaker 3>but but so many of these sequences have you know,

1:29:45.680 --> 1:29:49.439
<v Speaker 3>they're establishing shots where important things are happening in the

1:29:49.520 --> 1:29:52.000
<v Speaker 3>foreground with characters we know, but if you look way

1:29:52.040 --> 1:29:56.120
<v Speaker 3>in the background, there's like fifty or sixty people doing

1:29:56.280 --> 1:30:00.760
<v Speaker 3>something period appropriate, and frequently there are animal like just

1:30:01.160 --> 1:30:04.479
<v Speaker 3>walking across the screen. I think it's another key thing

1:30:04.560 --> 1:30:08.760
<v Speaker 3>with Tarkowsky where he is. He's not Kubrick in the

1:30:08.880 --> 1:30:10.640
<v Speaker 3>sense that I mean for a lot of reasons, but

1:30:11.880 --> 1:30:14.839
<v Speaker 3>he has control, but not the Kubrickian level of control

1:30:15.160 --> 1:30:17.799
<v Speaker 3>of the frame like he he seems to be open

1:30:17.920 --> 1:30:22.920
<v Speaker 3>to chaos in a way with the incorporation of animals,

1:30:23.040 --> 1:30:26.280
<v Speaker 3>like I said, frequently, but also you know, many extras

1:30:26.360 --> 1:30:30.760
<v Speaker 3>doing their own thing nature the way nature intrudes or

1:30:31.520 --> 1:30:35.000
<v Speaker 3>or is like you know, recreated to seem to intrude,

1:30:35.920 --> 1:30:38.599
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, that also seems to be a unique quality

1:30:38.680 --> 1:30:41.960
<v Speaker 3>of his. But just the scale of this movie Andre

1:30:42.080 --> 1:30:44.719
<v Speaker 3>Rublov alone is incredible to behold.

1:30:45.080 --> 1:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe as we get through a few more films, we'll

1:30:47.760 --> 1:30:50.439
<v Speaker 1>be able to make better sense of how he is

1:30:50.560 --> 1:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>using animals in the symbolic nature, because the final frame

1:30:54.240 --> 1:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of this film is horses, not men. And dogs recur

1:30:59.360 --> 1:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot in film, including in key moments like when

1:31:03.920 --> 1:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Kirol finally renounces this world, the monastic world, and decides

1:31:09.000 --> 1:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to go out and enjoin civilization again, his dog, who

1:31:15.600 --> 1:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>he otherwise seems to quite love and dote on. In

1:31:19.880 --> 1:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>this moment, the dog runs towards him. What does he do?

1:31:22.439 --> 1:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>He beats the dog. The fact that the fact that

1:31:25.120 --> 1:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Tarkowsky felt the need to show that type of brutality

1:31:29.560 --> 1:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>from Kirol in that moment by beating a dog, and

1:31:33.160 --> 1:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>then dogs are a constant presence swirling throughout that entire

1:31:36.960 --> 1:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>raid Josh as well. So just when I think thought

1:31:40.360 --> 1:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>i'd mentioned it's something to keep an eye on, Yeah,

1:31:42.160 --> 1:31:42.519
<v Speaker 1>for sure.

1:31:43.000 --> 1:31:45.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean just when I think that I have a

1:31:46.120 --> 1:31:48.800
<v Speaker 3>decent handle, not a full handle, but a decent handle.

1:31:48.840 --> 1:31:52.519
<v Speaker 3>In Andre Rublov, it ends with those final twenty seconds

1:31:52.680 --> 1:31:56.559
<v Speaker 3>of a color footage of three or four horses along

1:31:56.640 --> 1:32:01.000
<v Speaker 3>a stream. It's sunny but also raining on them. And

1:32:03.000 --> 1:32:03.920
<v Speaker 3>what's that all about?

1:32:04.000 --> 1:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Man? I mean great? Like come on like I was.

1:32:07.439 --> 1:32:09.599
<v Speaker 3>I thought I was doing good here and now sure

1:32:09.800 --> 1:32:12.160
<v Speaker 3>now I'm lost in mystery once again.

1:32:12.640 --> 1:32:15.559
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to elucidate that mystery for us,

1:32:15.600 --> 1:32:17.639
<v Speaker 1>we'd love to hear from you. You can share any

1:32:17.680 --> 1:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>other comments about the show as well feedback at filmspotting

1:32:20.200 --> 1:32:23.519
<v Speaker 1>dot net. Andre rublev is streaming on the Criterion Channel

1:32:23.560 --> 1:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and Max. It's also available at vod Next up. We

1:32:27.320 --> 1:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>are taking a week off, but we will come back

1:32:30.080 --> 1:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and reckon with one of my blind spots nineteen seventy

1:32:34.080 --> 1:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>nine Stocker. More information, filmspotting dot Net, Slash marathons, Josh,

1:32:39.240 --> 1:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>That's our show.

1:32:40.080 --> 1:32:43.439
<v Speaker 3>If you want to find Adam and the show on Instagram, Facebook,

1:32:43.520 --> 1:32:46.559
<v Speaker 3>or letterboxed, he's at film Spotting. I'm at all those

1:32:46.600 --> 1:32:49.800
<v Speaker 3>places as well. You can find me at Larsen on film.

1:32:50.280 --> 1:32:53.280
<v Speaker 3>We are independently produced and listeners supported. You can support

1:32:53.320 --> 1:32:56.800
<v Speaker 3>the show by joining the film Spotting Family at filmspottingfamily

1:32:56.960 --> 1:33:00.200
<v Speaker 3>dot com. You can listen early and ad free. You'll

1:33:00.240 --> 1:33:03.439
<v Speaker 3>also get a weekly newsletter, monthly bonus shows, and access

1:33:03.479 --> 1:33:07.080
<v Speaker 3>to the entire show archive for show t shirts or yep,

1:33:07.240 --> 1:33:11.040
<v Speaker 3>we still have some Film Spotting Fest posters available. Go

1:33:11.160 --> 1:33:13.880
<v Speaker 3>to film spotting dot net slash shop.

1:33:14.439 --> 1:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>In the Film Spotting Archive, you can find conversations about

1:33:17.200 --> 1:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>other Ryan Cougler films, including fruit Vale Station that was

1:33:20.800 --> 1:33:24.799
<v Speaker 1>episode four fifty six, Black Panther six sixty eight, Wakanda

1:33:24.840 --> 1:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Forever eight ninety eight. It looks like we did not

1:33:27.520 --> 1:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>give Creed a proper review on the show. We did

1:33:31.040 --> 1:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>review Creed two, directed by Stephen Cable Junior. That was

1:33:34.600 --> 1:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>episode seven oh seven. Streaming this weekend. You can see Havoc.

1:33:40.000 --> 1:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>This stars Tom Hardy. This is how Sam has described it.

1:33:43.520 --> 1:33:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hardy as jaded cop in Netflix movie. He didn't

1:33:47.479 --> 1:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>even get a name, well, not with Sam anyway. Directed

1:33:51.040 --> 1:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>by Gareth Evans who made The Raid out wide. You

1:33:53.720 --> 1:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>could see Ben Affleck and John Berthel in The Accountant two.

1:33:58.200 --> 1:34:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Is the Accountant review in the film's finding archive. Josh,

1:34:01.560 --> 1:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember.

1:34:02.280 --> 1:34:04.080
<v Speaker 3>I know, I didn't see it, and why do I

1:34:04.160 --> 1:34:06.559
<v Speaker 3>think The Accountant two came out like five months ago?

1:34:06.960 --> 1:34:10.880
<v Speaker 1>This is new. We have been seeing trailers Forever. Okay,

1:34:11.400 --> 1:34:14.479
<v Speaker 1>you're not wrong there. The Legend of Ochi is also out.

1:34:14.600 --> 1:34:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Josh gave that a few minutes and does recommend that

1:34:18.040 --> 1:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>film in limited release. The documentary about the comedy duo

1:34:21.840 --> 1:34:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Cheech and Chong. It's Cheech and Chong's last movie. Magic Farm,

1:34:25.520 --> 1:34:28.439
<v Speaker 1>a movie that features a film crew working for an

1:34:28.560 --> 1:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>edgy magazine traveling to South America to fabricate a trend. Okay,

1:34:33.200 --> 1:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Chloe seven Ye, Alex Wolf, and Simon Rex co star

1:34:36.520 --> 1:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>on Swift Horses is out. Robert Daniels says it's a

1:34:40.520 --> 1:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>slow burning, nineteen fifty set noir western driven by carnal

1:34:44.120 --> 1:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>appetites and a longing to break free from societal expectations.

1:34:47.960 --> 1:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>It stars Jacob Elordi and Daisy Edgar Jones. David Cronenberg's

1:34:52.200 --> 1:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>The Shroud is also out in select cities, with Vincent

1:34:55.000 --> 1:34:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Cassell as a man who invents a technology that allows

1:34:57.400 --> 1:35:00.599
<v Speaker 1>him to Yeah, I suppose that's accurate. Mono the Dead

1:35:01.040 --> 1:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>with Diane Krueger. I also did want to give a

1:35:04.240 --> 1:35:07.040
<v Speaker 1>quick mention Josh to a movie called Jimmy and Saigon,

1:35:07.120 --> 1:35:11.479
<v Speaker 1>a documentary directed by Peter McDowell that I think actually

1:35:12.280 --> 1:35:15.720
<v Speaker 1>counts as a twenty twenty two film, played a lot

1:35:15.800 --> 1:35:18.599
<v Speaker 1>of different festivals, but is just now getting a release

1:35:19.040 --> 1:35:22.799
<v Speaker 1>at the Cinema Village in New York City this weekend.

1:35:23.240 --> 1:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's a documentary about the filmmaker Peter McDowell, who

1:35:27.280 --> 1:35:29.320
<v Speaker 1>grew up he was the baby of the family. I

1:35:29.360 --> 1:35:33.759
<v Speaker 1>think there were five kids total, and had the oldest sibling, Jimmy,

1:35:33.760 --> 1:35:35.800
<v Speaker 1>who he barely knew because of the age difference, and

1:35:35.880 --> 1:35:40.280
<v Speaker 1>also because Jimmy went off to Vietnam and didn't come back,

1:35:41.320 --> 1:35:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and the circumstances surrounding his death were mysterious, and part

1:35:45.400 --> 1:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of the mystery was that his family just never talked

1:35:49.040 --> 1:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>about it. His parents, his other siblings, they seem to

1:35:52.080 --> 1:35:54.320
<v Speaker 1>always want to kind of keep this a secret. And

1:35:54.400 --> 1:35:57.840
<v Speaker 1>so what McDowell does is he tries to unravel the

1:35:57.880 --> 1:36:01.559
<v Speaker 1>mystery of what did happen to his brother back in Saigon,

1:36:01.640 --> 1:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>has experiences post war there, and I do think if

1:36:05.160 --> 1:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you have a chance to see Jimmy and Saigon, it's

1:36:07.120 --> 1:36:10.639
<v Speaker 1>a film worth checking out. Next week, Film Spotting goes

1:36:10.680 --> 1:36:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to the library the Shrouds with author Violet Lucas. She

1:36:13.840 --> 1:36:16.559
<v Speaker 1>just wrote a book about David Cronenberg called clinical Trials

1:36:16.880 --> 1:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and blind Spotting. We'll be looking at Gina Prince Bythwood's

1:36:20.479 --> 1:36:23.599
<v Speaker 1>Love and Basketball at twenty five with Mariah Gates. She's

1:36:23.640 --> 1:36:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the author of Cinema Her Way, visionary female directors in

1:36:26.880 --> 1:36:27.599
<v Speaker 1>their own words.

1:36:27.800 --> 1:36:30.599
<v Speaker 3>Film Spotting is produced by Golden Joe Desso and Sam

1:36:30.760 --> 1:36:33.519
<v Speaker 3>Van Halgren. Without Sam and Golden Joe, this show wouldn't go.

1:36:34.040 --> 1:36:37.759
<v Speaker 3>Our production assistant is Sophie Kempanar special thanks to everyone

1:36:37.840 --> 1:36:42.920
<v Speaker 3>at wbeazy Chicago. More information is available at wbeazy dot org.

1:36:43.280 --> 1:36:44.679
<v Speaker 3>For film Spotting, I'm Josh.

1:36:44.600 --> 1:36:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Larson and I'm Adam Kempinar. Thanks for listening.

1:36:47.400 --> 1:36:50.360
<v Speaker 2>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore.

1:36:51.240 --> 1:37:10.479
<v Speaker 1>The burn film Spotting is listeners supported. Join the film

1:37:10.520 --> 1:37:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Spotting Family at film spottingfamily dot com and get access

1:37:13.720 --> 1:37:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to ad free episodes, monthly bonus shows, our weekly newsletter, and,

1:37:17.560 --> 1:37:19.800
<v Speaker 1>for the first time, all in one place, the entire

1:37:20.120 --> 1:37:22.519
<v Speaker 1>film Spotting archive going back to two thousand and five.

1:37:22.880 --> 1:37:24.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a film Spotting Family dot com.

1:37:27.760 --> 1:37:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Panically