WEBVTT - Double-Digit Darts 0:00:01.200 --> 0:00:04.920 Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio. 0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:10.400 Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from my Heart Radio, 0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:15.080 your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation, 0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:18.080 and whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show. 0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:24.480 Now here's your host. Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly on 0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:26.760 Paul Chargi and my co host today of Brian Johnson 0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.240 and Matt Harrison. That means we've got sort of the 0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.680 full complement of brains on this show. And we found 0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:36.040 out Diego is the guy who does the intro. Thanks Diego, 0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.440 Thank you, Dean. So are you saying if we go 0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:43.959 combine our brains into one, we have one collective super brain. 0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.559 We've got two primary topics for the show today, Fantasy 0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:54.760 Football Weekly. First is wide receiver quarterback combos that actually 0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:57.639 makes sense based on the adp that you'd actually could execute. 0:00:57.640 --> 0:00:59.360 I mean, anybody we could sit here and say we'll 0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:01.880 go get Pat Mahomes and Tyree Kill because they're gonna 0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.360 be really good. Well obviously they're going to be really good, 0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.760 but there's an opportunity to cost one round pick on 0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.319 those two or a second or third round pick at best, right, 0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:14.040 So maybe, So that's the you know there's an opportunity 0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:18.080 cost that so as balanced by average draft position. Who 0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.479 are the quarterbacks and wide receiver combos that you could 0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:24.959 actually pull off? And then secondarily guys I am calling 0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:31.160 double digit darts. These are guys from round ten or higher. 0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.560 That's the double triple ds. Yeah, it's like diners, drive 0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:40.520 ins and dives a little bit. But now here's the catch. 0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:44.319 I don't want any of these guys to simply be 0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.800 guys who will just outperform their ADP. I don't want 0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.840 a tenth rounder who could perform like an eighth rounder 0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.280 the to be a double digit dart, a triple d. 0:01:56.040 --> 0:02:01.160 These guys must be guys that with so breaks can 0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.880 perform like a tight end one wide receiver can perform, 0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:10.840 and not an injury break either. Right. I don't want 0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.120 to hear Tony Pollard here, even I'm fascinated by Tony 0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.680 Pollard because Ezekie allowed has to go down for him. 0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.359 Injuries don't count because that's random. You can't count on that. 0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.360 I want guys who don't need an injury break to 0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:27.480 turn into a from a turn their double digit draft 0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.720 location into somebody it's going to go back and go 0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:31.800 well that guy was a third rounder. This seems like 0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.520 a podcast where you should probably get out to your 0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:38.440 pen and paper and start writing down names. Well, it's 0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:42.519 probably good idea for listeners. No, you know what's coming. 0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.240 All right, let's start with the quarterback wide receiver combos 0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.480 that actually makes sense based on their a DP. Brian, 0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.560 I'm gonna have you go first. Tell me your combo 0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.640 players where you need to take them in the draft. 0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.320 Who which teammates are you teaming up? I love this 0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:00.480 topic and Matt will remember this. Going back to the 0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.639 DFS days, I called us the batman in Robbins scenario 0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.000 with the quarterback being the batman in the wide receiver 0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.320 the robin um. But I went with the Detroit Lions 0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.799 and UH with Matt Stafford and Kenny Golladay. And I'll 0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.079 start with Kenny Golladay because he's the more expensive of 0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.400 the two players. When it comes to a DP. He's 0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:21.120 going very late second right now around the eleven pick 0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:25.320 in the second round at wide receiver number eight. Um 0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.560 way too low, mind you. And I'll tell you what. 0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:32.040 Last year Kenny Galladay led all wide receivers with eleven touchdowns. 0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.560 He was twenty onet in targets with a hundred and sixteen. 0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:41.600 Jamison Crowder saw more targets than Kenny Golladay last season, 0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.920 and Jamison Crowder scored two times. And yeah, and he 0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.000 was criminally under used. And we'll get to Stafford in 0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.480 a second. But Golladay had Stafford for half the season 0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.080 and then it was David Bloch and uh, I'm already 0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:55.440 blanking on the other Scrubs name that got some running quarterback, Drisco, 0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.800 Jeff Driscoll, thank you very much. So Yeah, Golladay obviously 0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.400 had a in fire year quarterbacks in the second half 0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.480 of the season, but let's focus on the whole season. 0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.080 Sixty five receptions could have been higher with better quarterbacking. 0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.840 Fifty two of those were for first downs. That is 0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.640 a uber product uber productivity. Uh. He was tied for 0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.400 the lead and receptions of twenty plus yards with Stephen Diggs, 0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.960 both at sixteen and by the way, Diggs led the 0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:25.960 NFL on receptions on yards on long passes of twenty 0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:30.240 plus yards, say it again, on receptions of twenty plus yards, 0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.919 Diggs had the most yards six thirty five on those receptions. 0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:37.800 Gala Day was second was six eight. The next guy 0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.000 was a Marie Cooper with five hundred and three. That 0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.960 is a major disparity there. So Golladay, I mean, if 0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.520 we're not talking pairing with the quarterback, I'm loving golladagg 0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.160 as the wide receiver eight right now. He's got top five, 0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.680 top three potential going into this season. Now over to Stafford, 0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.359 who's going off the board a quarterback fourteen in the 0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.520 early tenth round. Like I said, only played eight games 0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.279 last year before landing on i R. Before he was hurt. 0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:02.720 He was on pace for a career best in the 0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.960 yards per attempt, touchdown percentage, passer rating, and he was 0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.320 leading the entire league in passing yards per game at 0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.160 the site and twelve before getting hurt. That would have 0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.040 put him at five thousand yards on the season if 0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.560 he played the whole year. That's crazy. And now when 0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.000 we're doing this exercise, one of the guy, one of 0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:20.799 the combos I was thinking of doing was Aaron Rodgers 0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:24.760 and Davante Adams. Davante Adams clearly the target hog, but 0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.279 that's it for Rogers. I know that's the problem. So 0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:31.000 that's not an ideal pairing. Stafford's got Marvin Jones, who 0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.240 was second in touchdowns inside the ten yard line last 0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.320 year with five, second to Kenny Golladay who had six, 0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.920 and t J. Hockenson might be might be good. Uh. 0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:43.680 DeAndre Swift certainly a boon in the passing game from 0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.919 a running back perspective. So Matthew Stafford and you know, 0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.239 the Bears aren't that tough against the past. The Vikings 0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.200 certainly aren't that tough against the past anymore. So it's 0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.800 a it's a there's a favorable schedule for Detroit. So 0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.119 I'm gonna shut up now, and that's my parents. Okay, 0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.280 that's your pairing. We'll go with. And honestly, I don't 0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.600 I don't have any qualms with all that. I think 0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.080 that there's a lot of there's a lot of good 0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:06.840 things that there's a lot of good reasons to think 0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:08.919 that those things. We know Kenny goll Day is great, 0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:11.240 And all I need to do is Matthew Stafford to 0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.760 not get hurt. He's had top ten finishes about half 0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.040 of the full seasons he's played in the last seven 0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.320 or eight years. He has that potential for sure. And 0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.880 the defense not as not gonna be as good in Detroit. 0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.400 I think I think they'll be chasing more points than usual. 0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.720 All right, Matt, you're up next your quarterback wide receiver combo. 0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.480 That makes sense based on a DP. Who are they 0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:31.760 and where do I have to take him? Now? We 0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.400 just heard Brian's and I know what yours is. Yes, 0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.960 and I'm slumming it here. Okay, that's fine that there's 0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:44.640 no I like that. I guess quarterback. I mean, Brian 0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:48.719 likes my quarterback. I like my quarterback. Um My, two guys. 0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:50.599 The first guy you have to draft in the fifth round. 0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.560 That's not bad. That's not bad. Uh. Pick fifty six 0:06:53.640 --> 0:07:01.159 wide receiver twenty four. That's d J CHARKA Chark is 0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:06.640 going after Calvin Ridley, DK Metcalf, Robert Woods, d J Moore, 0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:11.400 Odell Beckham, all of which he finished higher in Fantasy 0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:15.360 points year. He finished his wide receiver sixteen. And nothing 0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:19.239 in that offense has gotten significantly worse. Uh. And plus 0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.240 they added Laviska Chennault, who should take a little bit 0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.160 of pressure off him. He's a he's a decent wide 0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.080 receiver two in that offense, and their defense has lost 0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.760 some significant names and they should be playing in Brian, 0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:34.360 are you ready guard gardenage time? Gardenage time a lot 0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:36.440 a lot this year, of course, which brings me to 0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:43.400 Gardner Minshew, who's a sixteen rounder quarterback pick in your draft. 0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:48.280 Seven multi touchdown games in fourteen played and not all 0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.320 of his fourteen games were starts. Last year he topped 0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:53.960 they weren't. You know, they tried Nick Foles in Week one, 0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.000 he got knocked out. Then they brought Nick Foles back in. 0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.960 Foles was worse than Minshew. Yeah, so he got benched 0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.000 for Minshew. Keep in mind, and you know Brian has 0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.920 made these points on previous shows. You know, Nick Foles, 0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:06.600 who they were paying, you know, it's in the middle 0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:10.000 of a fifty million dollar contract, wasn't good enough. He 0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:14.120 definitely was. Uh Minshew top twenty five rushing yards and 0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.720 eight of his games. That's great. A little gravy on 0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.320 top there. And according to Pro Football Focus, Minshew had 0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:24.080 the second most rushing yards on pure scrambles in the 0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.400 league last year. I like that, three fifty rushing yards. 0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.560 I bet Josh Allen was first. No, it was only 0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.800 eight yards behind Lamar Jackson. Oh, come on, Lamar jack Well, 0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.880 he's you said, you said pure you know, so I 0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:40.199 was taking out all of Lamar's designed runs, twenty one 0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.199 touchdown passes, only six picks. He was he was efficient. 0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:48.480 Um And if you extrapolate Minshew's fourteen games to sixteen games, 0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.600 which is not that much of an extrapolation, really, that's 0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:55.079 not bad. His numbers are Kyler Murray's numbers from last year, 0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:59.000 almost exactly. And Kyler Murray, by the way, is it's 0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:03.600 it's sometimes four. Yes, it's about thirty passing yards about 0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.199 the same rushing yards he's Kyler Murray from last year. 0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.200 They were both rookies last year, both entering their second season. 0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.640 So also they get the new coordinator, Jay Gruden, who 0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.560 unlocked some of the best years of Kirk Cousins. Plus 0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.959 there's nobody chasing him, Mike Glennan, are you afraid of 0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:24.000 him taking Gardner Minshew's job? How about Joshua Dobbs who 0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:29.440 hasn't seen the fields. Nobody's taking Gardner Minshew's. And in 0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.080 the fact that they didn't go out and draft somebody 0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.120 or put a you know, make a significant move in 0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.640 free agency to back up that quarterback position tells me 0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.000 they believe in Gardner Minshew. So Chark is a legit 0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:44.599 wide receiver to teetering on wide receiver one number is 0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.160 entering his third year and Gardner minshew, I think he's 0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:51.120 just he's a lock to be a good quarterback this year. 0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.040 He's he's going to outperform his a DPS. He could 0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:57.440 be a starter, no better backup quarterback in fantasy football. 0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.400 In my opinion based on his it's yeah a quarter 0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.560 slam dun slam duncan jam that. I mean, he's not 0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.080 getting drafted and a lot of lots of drafts not 0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.920 getting drafted at all. All right, let's go to my 0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.000 quarterback wide receiver combo that actually makes sense with a DP, 0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.160 and that is, wait, are you saying that mine didn't do? 0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.679 Yours did? Yours did well the way I said it 0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.719 came out Baker Bayfield to Odell Beckham. So let's talk 0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:26.400 about their ADP first, and while you can actually execute this. 0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.440 And by the way, I love to zig when everybody 0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.880 else is zagging, and fantasy football, I also like to 0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.840 zag when everybody else is zigging in fantasy football. They 0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.000 both both work. You know, if this was a two 0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:41.280 thousand nineteen podcast, everybody'd be like, oh, that's just chucky. 0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:46.560 Everybody exactly at this time Last year, everybody wanted a 0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:48.920 piece of the Browns. They all got burned except for 0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:53.120 the Nick Chubb owners. And now this year, nobody wants 0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.560 the Browns, and I'm buying baby post type sleeper. It 0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.600 is the post hype sleeper. So let's begin with Baker 0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.040 Mayfield his average draft position. Last year, he was quarterback 0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:07.560 six off the board last year. This year he's quarterback 0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:11.920 fourteen in round ten. All right, that's Baker Mayfield. Then 0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.720 the Oldell Beckham side. Last year he was wide receiver five, 0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.600 going off at the late first round, early second round. 0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:24.200 Two years ago, he was the first overall picking. This year, 0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.679 Odell Beckham has slumped to wide receiver twenty in round five. 0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.720 So I'm gonna execute my Baker Mayfield Odell Beckham in 0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.640 rounds five and rounds ten, and I've got this hook up. 0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:37.920 So so many reasons to believe the Browns are gonna 0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.880 be a vastly improved offense, a massively improved offensive line 0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.840 featuring first round picked Jedderick Wills, and the best tackle 0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.480 in free agency, Jack Conklin, who got signed by the Browns. 0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.280 Remember Jack Conkerland just got done blocking for Derrick Henry's 0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:57.120 Monster Season is a really good blocker. This is a 0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.000 They also get a massive upgrading coaching from Freddie Kitch 0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:05.120 into Kevin Stefanski. Stefanski just unlocked Kirk Cousins best year 0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.040 of his career. Now Stefanski ran the ball a lot 0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:09.760 for Mike Zimmers. There's a lot of people are like, well, 0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:11.760 you know, I'm nervous. They're just gonna run and they've 0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:13.480 got these two great running backs, which they do. But 0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.200 keep in mind, we think Mike Zimmer was dictating a 0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:20.880 lot of that run pass um ratio in Minnesota, and 0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:24.160 I think step Kevin Stefanski will pass more in Cleveland 0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.880 than he did in Minnesota. Now Mayfield just by himself 0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.800 has got this plethora of weapons. You can throw to Beckham, 0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.000 you can throw the Landry, you can throw to Hooper, 0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.160 you can throw to both of your excellent running backs 0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.880 in Nick Chubb and Kareem Hunts. So he's got all 0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:41.400 of these weapons around him. So even if Odell Beckham 0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.280 does not return to the elite form that he had, 0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.000 you're still pretty solid in this Baker Mayfield check. I think. 0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.800 But Beckham's gonna pan out. He's going to be better 0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:55.679 than this round. Five pick. Needless to say Odell Beckham 0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:57.840 is a good receiver. I mean, I don't think we 0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.240 have to even, you know, have that conversation about with him. 0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.040 But he's a great wide receive. Okay, maybe great right? 0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.160 You know, through three or four years it looked like 0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.120 he was. He was absolutely headed to the Hall of Fame. 0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.240 I happened to believe he made a catch with one 0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:13.640 hand once. Yes, he's done that before. Actually three Gettleman 0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.360 started interrupt real quick. I was at the Packers playoff 0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.000 game in Lambeau, pre Getleman, meaning I was a Giants fan. 0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.160 Then Beckham was not great in that game. I take 0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:26.920 that back. He was got off. Kevin Stefanski unlocked greatness 0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.280 from Stefon Diggs and Adam Thalen, and those guys have 0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.360 turned out to be very good receivers. They have they 0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:37.160 are all they've They've also become better than anybody thought 0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.320 they would ever be. Now you take Odell Beckham, and 0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:44.000 you give Kevin Stefanski a chance to take Odell Beckham 0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.760 and make him the best he can possibly be. And 0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:51.240 I'm very intrigued by what that looks like. Beckham is 0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:54.720 top one thousand yards in every season. Except his four 0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.360 game season in seventeen. So it sounds like he has 0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:01.000 these terrible seasons either. And last year he was daggered 0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.040 by and usually low touchdown production. He got targeted a 0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.440 hundred thirty three times and only scored four times. That's 0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:08.960 going to come back to the norm, and you know 0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.080 he'll he'll be if he gets targeted another hundred thirty 0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.040 three times, He's back to double digit style touchdowns, I believe. 0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.160 So there you go. I'm kind of surprised you left 0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.520 off Jarvis Landry, Who's I mentioned Landry is one of 0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:24.000 the targets Viam Landry really is like he I believe 0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.320 he has the NFL record for most catches in his 0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:31.200 first six years of He's he's absolutely in the role 0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.280 of Adam feeling there too, oh man, that he might 0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:39.560 be in in for even don't forget well he's not 0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.520 that much later. It's a funny thing. He's also round five, Okay, 0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:45.160 So I then I look, man, I feel like I 0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.520 feel like Landry's going like seven eight and the things 0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:52.000 I see him. But so the problem from Landry to 0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.600 me is he's had one season with him with meaningful 0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.760 touchdown production. At the end of the day, that guy 0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.320 that can give me that can return massive value on 0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.360 my fifth round pick. You want some touch I want 0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:08.920 I want touchdowns, I want big plays. Landry's just not 0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:15.400 that guy. He's a chain moving, possession receiver whom there 0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:18.240 was a little wamp to that. I think, would you 0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.440 rather have Landry? Would you execute this? This may feel 0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:24.200 too If they're in the same round, I'd probably go 0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.120 O'Dell and swing for the fences. But I mean, if 0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.120 if I can get Landry a couple of rounds later, 0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.080 depending on how ADP shakes out, if I can get 0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.240 Landry a couple of rounds later, I'd probably go that direction. 0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.480 I'm listening to that. I almost did, may feel to 0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:41.200 Hooper that was tempting people. Hooper is going too late, 0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.560 to all the Browns are going too late. I think 0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:48.280 Matt Ryan Julio Jones was one we both contemplated as well. 0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.080 That you know, I did not because Julio, it's too 0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.120 expensive for me and Calvin and Calvin Ridley this might 0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.240 be the year. So I didn't. I didn't actually did 0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.240 not give that a lot of meaningful thought. Um. There 0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.120 are a couple others obviously that that we did think 0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.120 about let's go to break when we come back, the 0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.720 double digit darts. These are guys from round ten or 0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.840 higher who have a lead upside, like top of the 0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.000 draft upside that can perform like a second round pick 0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.840 or a third round pick, maybe even a first round pick. 0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.400 Maybe it's a big you know, you don't have ad 0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.160 it is a big gass. But guys who have that 0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.560 in them and don't need injury to get there are 0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.480 double digit darts coming up next. Welcome back to Fantasy 0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.760 Football Weekly. Paul Charge and Brian Johnson and Matt Harrison 0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:35.600 with you are double digit darts. These are guys from 0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.920 round ten or higher who have elite upside at their 0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.520 position and do not need injury to get there. That's 0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.280 a key component to this. We begin with Matt Harrison. 0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:49.360 Who you got alright? This guy is going off a 0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:54.240 DP one that qualifies for sure the last pick of 0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:58.800 the sixteenth round. Wow. That man is James Washington of 0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.160 the Pittsburgh Steelers. This is deep. It's deep. He did 0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.160 nothing through the first eight weeks of last season. Well 0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.080 he had no quarterbacking either through all of the weeks 0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:13.639 of last season. Nah, thing at all. It's just what 0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.680 no oh you gotta hold on. Oh there, and then 0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:20.680 duck came around. Yeah yeah, are we go? Uh? First 0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.040 day weeks no touchdowns, didn't top three receptions or fifty 0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.840 two yards. Thanks Mason Rudolph for that, plus a little 0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:31.600 bit of an injury there. Uh. From weeks nine through sixteen, however, 0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:38.560 insert insert the duck right there. Uh, he averaged six 0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.879 point to five targets per game, just over four catches 0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.760 per game, and seventy two yards per game. Added three 0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.760 touchdowns in that span too, over that eight game yards 0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:52.760 per games pretty good over those exact same eight games. 0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.280 There's this guy who's going off the board well higher 0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.480 than James Watching. His name is Deonte Johnson. Everybody loves him. 0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:05.320 I like Johnson. He averaged five point eight targets. That's less. 0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.919 He averaged three point seven five receptions, that's less. He 0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.800 averaged only forty one yards per game, that's about half 0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:16.720 significantly less, and only only had two touchdowns over that span. 0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.920 So why are we spending all of this on Deonte Johnson? 0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:25.760 Want to win j S when James Washington performed better 0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:30.440 than Deonte Johnson and you can get him so much later. Um. 0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:32.760 Last year, at this time Washington was kind of being 0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:35.600 drafted as the Deonte Johnson guy, the guy who could 0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:39.359 take over for Antonio Brown in this offense. Maybe what 0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.200 went wrong it was no Big Ben, and Big Ben's back, 0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.120 and they're gonna pass the ball and they're gonna get 0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.919 it going again. And James Washington stands to be in 0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.040 a pretty good spot, especially if the Steelers aren't as 0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.840 enthused about Juju Smith Schuster or something. So maybe James 0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.960 Washington's in line to be the next guy in Pittsburgh 0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.480 and there and they're they're a manifest acturer of wide 0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:05.960 receivers and they have been over there for I kind 0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:07.760 of like it. You know, I needed some selling and 0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.479 James Washington be got me there. And I'm not sold 0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.600 on Juju Smith Schuster. I know people are right back 0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:15.640 on Juju. Has got like a third round a DP 0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:20.000 right now there, you know, And obviously the quarterbacking was 0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:24.320 horrible last year, but he still didn't show up. I 0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.920 want my great receivers to sort of, you know, make 0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.639 up for some of the shortcomings of their bad quarterbacks, 0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.800 and Juju didn't do that. And I'm just not And he's, 0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.800 by the way, heading into a free agency I'm not 0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.040 convinced yet. I could I could very well be wrong, 0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.960 because I'm in the minority on this that Juju Smith 0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.679 Schuster is part of the future plans of Pittsburgh unless 0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.800 he materially jump, you know, jumps back to where he was. 0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.800 Is anybody convinced for sure that Juju is wide receiver 0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.000 one in Pittsburgh. I mean a lot of people might 0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:57.320 say Deante Johnson is. Don't forget he had Antonio Brown 0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:01.440 on the other side to take a lot of of 0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.560 rookie year All right, Brian, who is your double digit dart? 0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.760 Not quite as deep as uh Washington with Matt I'm 0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.359 gonna go with Nicole Hardman wide receiver for the Chiefs 0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.080 going in the tenth round right now? Double digit? But 0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:18.040 if if a guy can return first round value, this 0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.720 just might be. And that doesn't need an injury to 0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.480 Tyreekill either. So last year as a rookie, Miko Hardman 0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.920 head five and thirty eight yards and six touchdowns. Those 0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:33.439 are like established veteran statistics for a starting wide receiver. Right, 0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:38.000 he did this on forty one targets for twenty six catches. 0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.680 Now forty one targets is like what Michael Thomas totals 0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:46.560 in two weeks like that is a right ridiculously underused, 0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.879 even for a rookie, especially when you're scoring six touchdowns 0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.880 on those forty one targets, averaging over twenty yards per game. 0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.280 I mean, just double those targets and you're looking at 0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.280 double digit touchdowns with that kind of production. But Hardman 0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:02.840 should see at least one hundred targets this year. DeMarcus 0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.960 Robinson saw fifty five last year. Take all of those 0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:10.879 away from him, please. Miko Hardman had a quarterback rating 0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:12.960 and it wasn't always Patrick Mahomes, mind you, throwing the 0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:14.359 ball is a way. He was injured a couple of years, 0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:16.960 a couple of games. Excuse me of a hundred forty 0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:20.120 five quarterback rating throwing to Nicole Hardman, Mikole Harden, I'm 0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.840 gonna go back to the yards on receptions of twenty 0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:28.360 plus yards are more. He totaled more yards than Michael Thomas, 0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:32.119 D J. Moore, guys like this, Tyler Boyd that had 0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.000 a lot of They had a lot of volume that 0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.159 he never had a volume. He totaled more yards on 0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:40.520 deep passes. So yes, Tyreek kills in tow they drafted 0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:44.320 c H Travis Kelsey. But this is a prolific offense 0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.880 and if he can see double the amount of targets, 0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.840 he could push a thousand yards and ten touchdowns easily. 0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:51.840 And if they incret and I know we're not saying 0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:55.760 if someone gets injured, but if someone gets injured, this 0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:57.840 guy's the limit for hardman there already is really as 0:21:57.840 --> 0:21:59.600 long as he gets proper usage. I'm gonna go out 0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.639 on a limb here and say that this show tends 0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:08.240 to like Kansas City Chiefs. Everybody loves Kansas City Chiefs. 0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.199 We have to have an entire show where we go 0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.560 with the negatives of the Chiefs because every one of 0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.120 us is only spouted positivity about the Chiefs. Who wants 0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:22.160