WEBVTT - White House Calls Out Amazon, SoFi CEO Weighs in on Earnings and Regulation

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news, innovation.

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Money and power collide in Silicon Valley and beyond.

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed.

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 2>Ludlow live from New York and San Francisco. This is

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.319
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Technology coming up. The White House takes aim at

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Amazon after a reported play to display the cost of

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 2>tariffs on certain products, but the tech giant denies the move.

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 4>Plus, Spotify sees a surgeon subscribers in the first quarter,

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 4>but shares slide and.

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 2>The SOFI CEO joins us after posting the first quarter

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 2>beat and raising guidance, showing resilience amid.

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 5>The economic turmoil.

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 2>But first way check in on these markets, which are

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.319
<v Speaker 2>also showing some resilience, said, we're up three tens of percent, but.

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 5>Is it bad news? That is good news.

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 2>We see woefully low consumer sentiment, the worst reading in

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 2>terms of consumer sentiment in almost five years. But that

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 2>fuels the desire and the hope that the Federal Reserve

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 2>might indeed start to cut rates to support the economy.

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 2>We're up three tens percent, but some notable names on

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 2>the downside, and you're looking at one of them.

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, very quickly NXP Semiconductor. It's a story you may

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 4>have missed among everything else. The stock was down significantly,

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 4>paired some of the decline to six percent. Two pieces

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 4>of news tariffs impact, an uncertain environment, hitting the outlook

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 4>and performance in the quarter, key supply to the automotive sector,

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 4>but also CEO Sivert's retiring and then promoting from within

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 4>one that you want to keep an eye on key

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 4>name in the supply chain.

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 5>Carring you certainly do.

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, let's return to the White House because it is

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 2>taking aim at Amazon.

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 6>I just got off the Finn with the President about

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 6>iaman Zan's announcement. This is a heartstyle in pull it

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 6>a act by Amazon. It's another reason why we are

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 6>on shoring critical supply chains here at home to shore

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 6>up our own critical supply chain and boost our own manufacturing.

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 2>The comments weighed on shares as the tech giant gears

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>up to report results on Thursday after the closing bell.

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Numa's Kaylee Lines is said to break down the story.

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 2>All of this based on reporting coming.

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 5>From another source.

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Amazon has since denied that it was ever under consideration

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 2>for the main site, that they would make it transparently

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 2>clear that what taris add to the price of goods.

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 5>Just give us the background, Yeah, Caroline.

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 7>The White House was responding here to a report from

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 7>punch Bowl News citing a source familiar with the matter

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 7>that suggested Amazon was soon going to post a separate

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 7>line item for the tariff charge on its website, akin

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 7>to you, for example, what we've since seen Shean or

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 7>Temu doing with import charges. Now the US has ended

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 7>that demonimous exemption on cheaper goods coming out of China

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 7>and Hong Kong. Now Amazon says that that was actually

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 7>never under consideration for its website.

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 5>That yes, the.

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 7>Ultra low cost Amazon Hall team did discuss this, but

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 7>ultimately it was never implemented on any Amazon property. So

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 7>that hostile and political act that Caroline Lovitt referred to

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 7>an act that not actually has been taken. And perhaps

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 7>Amazon in this way is not yet actually going sideways

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 7>with the White House. But the criticism of the company

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 7>that Caroline lobbied today did not end there. I would

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 7>note she also referred to Amazon as a China aligned

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 7>company and referred back to a Reuters report going back

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 7>to twenty twenty one about Amazon partnering with a Chinese

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 7>propaganda arm. Essentially that Amazon allowed itself to respond to

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 7>an edict from Beijing or cooperated with an edict from

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 7>Beijing around negative views of a book published by the

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 7>Chinese government of speeches from Chinese President Shi jin Ping,

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 7>and she really pointed to that as an example of

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 7>the China alignment of this company. She also, as we

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 7>heard her say there, talked about the importance of turning

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 7>away from China buying American and on shoring American manufacturing.

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 7>So what this means for the company's relationship with this

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 7>White House overall obviously a question now after it has

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 7>gone to great links to ingratiate itself with this administration. Remember,

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 7>Amazon donated a million dollars to Trump's inaugural committee. Jeff

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 7>Bezos himself attended that inauguration, has spent time with President

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 7>Trump trying to fortify their relationship, and that relationship the

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 7>presidents in Bezos is one that Carolinelevitt said she did

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 7>not want.

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 5>To speak to this morning.

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 2>The chairman and of course founder of the business, Katie Linesby,

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 2>thank you. Let's turn our attention to another key story,

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Spotify shares as slipping off of the company reported operating

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 2>profit that fell short of anast estimates that that's even

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 2>a subscriber numbers. They grew here to discuss New Meg's

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Ashley Common and really felt that there was a lot

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 2>of good news that ultimately was outshone by a profit hit.

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think investors are just a little bit jittery.

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 8>They're seeing Spotify forecast potentially a miss in their estimates

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 8>for gross profit margin as well as monthly active users.

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 8>So I think they're just kind of like, is this

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 8>going to be the future and the trend or is

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 8>this just a one off kind of moment, And Spotify

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 8>says this is a one off moment of course.

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Actually, the long term Spotify wants you to think about

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 4>is a world where they move into podcasts, audio video more,

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 4>and they might also raise prices along the way.

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 5>Exactly.

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 8>So, over the past couple of years, they've branched into audiobooks.

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 8>They're now launching this creator partner program where they're trying

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 8>to get essentially YouTubers and video podcasters to put videos

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 8>on the service and compensate them based on consumption rather

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 8>than advertisements. So they're really trying to pioneer some new

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 8>format and diversify away from.

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 4>Music bloomber has actually Camen thank you very much. In

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 4>other earnings, new shares of so Far are higher after

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 4>the fintech company raised its full year forecast. So Far

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 4>CEO Anthony Nodo is here with us. Good morning to you,

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 4>mister Noto. You know, I think there was a lot

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 4>of focus in the quarter on the momentum from the

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 4>loan platform business, particularly the interest and demand from private credit.

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 4>Talks me more about that, Anthony, and where you see

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 4>that business going forward.

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 9>Sure, we had a tremendous quarter in a great start

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 9>to twenty twenty five, with thirty three percent year of

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 9>your growth in total revenue to seven hundred and seventy

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 9>one million dollars, and that was up thirty three percent,

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 9>our fastest growth in five quarters. The loan platform business,

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 9>as you mentioned, was a key driver of that very

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 9>strong results there. We basically get paid a fee by

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 9>these asset buyers that want us to underwrite loans against

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 9>a specific credit box that they outline. We leverage our

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 9>underwriting capabilities, our marketing capabilities, and our servicing capabilities.

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 3>And we get paid a fee for that.

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 9>It's something we started about a year ago. We've already

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 9>originated six billion dollars of loans in that particular business,

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 9>and in the quarter is about ninety six million dollars

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 9>or revenue, so it's almost four million dollars on an

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 9>analyzed basis. We expected to be over a billion dollars

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 9>or third billion dollar business over the course of time

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 9>as the demand for that product continues to increase. One

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 9>area that we haven't tapped into yet but that we

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 9>will is taking some of the loans that we decline.

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 9>We decline about one hundred million dollars of loans a

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 9>year and making those available through the loan platform business

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 9>as well for those that want a near prime type

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 9>of credit asset.

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 4>The other area you want to tap is crypto, right.

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 4>You alluded to entering into stable coin markets to us.

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 9>Moll Yeah, We're very fortunate in that we've built. This

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 9>is another record quarter for member growth. We're at eleven

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 9>million members now. We add an eight hundred thousand members

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 9>in the quarter and one point two million products up

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 9>thirty four percent, up thirty five percent, respectively. We want

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 9>to continue to give our members a full suite of

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 9>financial services products. SOFI Money is the largest product that

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 9>we have today. It was up forty one percent, the

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 9>pilots are up fifty two percent. Our this business are

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 9>an acceleration up twenty one percent, and we expect that

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 9>acceleration to continue. Crypto would be another asset class to

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 9>add to the invest business, allowing people to buy, sell,

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 9>and hold crypto coin. It's something we used to do

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 9>and it was eliminated because of our bank license. But

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 9>now that OCC has put out an interpretive letter that

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 9>allows that business to be part of a bank again.

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 9>So we'll continue to evaluate the landscape for changing regulatory environment.

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 9>But we'd like to not just only offer crypto for buy,

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 9>sell and hold, but also have it transcend all of

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 9>our businesses, so using blockchain and crypto in the lending area,

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 9>the spending area, in addition to our third party technology

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 9>platform services offering those types of infrastructure services to financial

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 9>service companies.

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Anthony, you've got a really optimistic tone, and of course

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 2>you'd be, and you raised this on a day when

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 2>consumer sentiment is basically the lowest in five years. How

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 2>do you have that confidence that consumers are going to

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 2>continue to be of demand for you?

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, we're seeing really strong demand for our goods and services.

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 9>Our customer is a higher end customer than the typical

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 9>average American about one hundred and fifty thousand dollars in

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 9>household and come and a credit score on average at

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 9>seven hundred and fifty. From a FICO standpoint, we're taking

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 9>share from the five largest banks in the country, so

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 9>we're not as dependent on the cyclical environment for our

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 9>growth because we're really a secular grower. That said, you know,

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 9>our credit performance has also been very strong, which is

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 9>subject to the macroeconomic environment. But we saw in our

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 9>fifth quarter in a row of improvement in ninety data delinquencies,

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 9>we saw continued improvement our net charge offs. So overall,

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 9>the consumer's looking quite strong as it relates to credit

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 9>and the demand for our other products like SOFI Money

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 9>and Sofi invest I mentioned deposit work quite quite meaningfully

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 9>as well. The last data point is debit spending. We're

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 9>annuallyzing about fourteen billion dollars of debit spending now from

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 9>our installed base and that's been quite strong also.

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 2>So you raise your guidance but really only reflecting the

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 2>beat in this court are just gone, So why not

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 2>raise more broadly? Are you being conservative here?

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah?

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 9>Well, we raised not just for what we beat. We

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 9>also raise for the full year, and our guidance for

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 9>Q two is above consensus on both revenue and profitability.

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 9>You know, we have really strong momentum where we set

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 9>on the call that we're going to step on the

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 9>gas and accelerate our rate of product introductions and the

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:18.079
<v Speaker 9>iteration on our existing products. We feel like our competitive

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 9>position is so strong and the opportunity is so significant

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 9>in front of us that we should accelerate our level

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 9>of investment and rate of innovation. So we feel great

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 9>about it, and we want to make sure we can

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 9>get a compound that these great growth rates of over

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 9>thirty percent for a.

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 4>While, anthy I like to check out what you're saying

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 4>on social media as much as what you said in

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 4>the earnings called transcript And you always use the phrase

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 4>rapid innovation. Where are the rapid innovations And is that

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 4>something you guys are focused on doing in house or

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 4>is M and A going to be a part of

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 4>your toolkit for the balance of the year.

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 9>All of our products, we want them to be the fastest,

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 9>We want them to be the most convenient, to have

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.719
<v Speaker 9>the best selection and the best content. So we're continuously

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 9>iterating on each one of our products against those four

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 9>dimensions in addition to making the products better when they're

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 9>used together. As an example of that, we introduced a

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 9>subscription product called Sofi Plus. It's the best value in

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 9>America for a financial subscription product at over one thousand

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 9>dollars of value. You pay ten dollars a month for

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 9>and it gives you access to a number of different

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 9>benefits that you would now otherwise get if you didn't

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 9>use that product. Ninety percent of our existing members have

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 9>signed up. Of those that have signed up for the product,

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 9>ninety percent are from our existing member base, which says

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 9>people want to use more of our products that we offer,

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 9>and this product makes it more accessible for them to

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 9>be able to get those great benefits and using our

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 9>products together. So a really encouraging sign. And against the

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 9>people that are already our members that are taking out

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 9>Sofi Plus, it's actually triggering them taking out a third

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 9>product thirty percent of the time. So pretty strong performance

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 9>from that new product, which is an iteration that we're

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 9>constantly trying to drive across the five dimensions that I mentioned.

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 4>What's your interpretation of how this administration is looking at regulation,

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 4>looking at supporting the crypto industry as it relates to you,

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 4>But I think fintech broadly is a bit more under

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 4>the microscope, Anthony.

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 9>The early signs in the first one hundred days is

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 9>that it is a more favorable environment from a regulatory standpoint.

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 9>It's really critical that we can teue to provide a

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 9>safe and secure way for our members to use our

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 9>financial services products, and that is our priority, regardless of regulation.

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.839
<v Speaker 9>So we want to have great NPS scores, We want

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 9>to be a trusted household brand name. But it does

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 9>feel like the regulatory environment is going to allow us

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 9>to offer more products to our members that they need,

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 9>you know. As an example, you know, we'd love to

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 9>be able to do secure lending off to cryptocurrency, which

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 9>I believe it would be a great product, lower cost

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 9>of debt for our members, you know, in addition to that,

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 9>potentially being able to offer a stable coin that could

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 9>have some type of interest bearing element to it and

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 9>being used for payments.

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Anthony Notto, So far ceo. Good to have you back

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 4>with us here on Bloomberg Technology.

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much.

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 4>Okay, some breaking news crossing the Bloomberg termin or. Russian

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 4>President Vladimir Putin is insisting that Russia must take control

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 4>of four regions of Ukraine that it doesn't currently fully

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 4>occupy as part of any potential agreement to end the

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 4>war in Ukraine. This is Bloomberg reporting, citing sources. Remember

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 4>that the Administration of the United States has an April

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 4>thirtieth target deadline for a ceasefire, as we report, the

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 4>demand that the Russians are making deals a blow to

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 4>President Trump's efforts to reach that cease fire negotiations. Bloomberg

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 4>is reporting at an impass for now, but according to sources,

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.439
<v Speaker 4>Putin wanting to take control of four regents in Ukraine.

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Caroline.

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 5>Now coming up President Trump.

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, he's also said to offer some taroff relief for

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Automaker's ed We'll have more on that next, but let's

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 2>just get back to the fintech side of the space.

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 2>PayPal are eight ten percent is out of volatile day

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 2>of trade. It left it's full y air. Forecast for earnings

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 2>unchanged unlike so far because they say they have uncertainty

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 2>in the global macro environment, despite of course recording a

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 2>pretty strong first quarter.

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg technology.

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 4>President Trump is set to offer some tariff reprieve for

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 4>automakers lifting some levees on foreign parts for cars and

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 4>trucks made in the US. The move comes as President

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 4>Trump is set to travel to Michigan for a rally

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 4>to mark his first one hundred days in office. For more,

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 4>let's get out to Detroit and Bloomberg's David Welsh on

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Technology. We're probably principally interested in the ev supply chain, David,

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 4>But what do we know about this levee reprieve and

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 4>how does it impact the automakers you cover?

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 11>So we know so far as that they will do something,

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 11>probably to give a reprieve on tariff's on parts, which

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 11>is one of the most difficult things for the administration

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 11>anyone to calculate. They were going to tariff the non

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 11>US content, even of vehicles that qualified for a teriffrey status,

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 11>say under USMCA, and then they also are going to

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 11>try to do something that it's called de stacking, where

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 11>you remove tariffs or you give the automakers a credit

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 11>back if they had already paid a tariff on medals

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 11>used in a part that was coming across the border.

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 11>So I think, for example of say a hood on

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 11>a vehicle, if a company was paying a tariff on

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 11>that because it's steel of twenty five percent, and another

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 11>twenty five percent because it's a part that'd be fifty percent.

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 11>So they're trying to eliminate that sort of double charge.

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 11>But the bigger one would be if they give relief

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 11>on parts. Now, the problem here at is we don't

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 11>know the details of it, which is why when General

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 11>Motors suspended guidance, they didn't give us new guidance. They

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 11>may do that Thursday, but even I don't think they

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 11>completely know yet because they need the details. So the

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 11>car companies themselves are looking at this and saying, Okay,

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 11>we need to know exactly what the administration is going

0:15:57.800 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 11>to do with all of these tariffs before they can

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 11>even give any kind of financial projections and understand the

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 11>impact on their business.

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, briefly, whiplash, we're not seeing much well resolved for

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 2>the stocks. We're still underwater on GM, for example, What

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 2>more clara are you're expecting to get from any of

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 2>these CEOs at this moment.

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 11>I think they really want to know just how much

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 11>of the parts themselves will get tariffs, and if there's

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 11>also any change to the vehicles themselves. GM still antis.

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 11>They bring in some very important vehicles from Canada and Mexico.

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 11>GM brings in it's one of its best sellers, entry

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 11>level vehicles from Korea, or any of that change. So,

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 11>you know, the administration has said that they're for companies

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 11>that make products here, they're going to give them a break.

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 11>But we don't know exactly what it is yet, and

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 11>I think parts is really the big one.

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Though Tesla's actually off by one and a half percent

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 2>amid all of this news. David Welch, we thank you

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 2>very much. I meanwhile, sticking with earnings and just the

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 2>broader tech landscape right now, how to invest in it?

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Michael Reynolds is with US vice president of investment Strategy

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 2>at glen Mead managing four to five point six billion

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 2>dollars in assets, and look, the ongoing changes coming from

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 2>the administration is exhausting for investors and in CEOs and

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 2>anyone to keep track of. How therefore, are you're looking

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 2>towards perhaps big tech earnings coming Wednesday Thursday, and how

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:11.959
<v Speaker 2>you price any of it?

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so we're looking at tech perhaps for Q one

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 12>putting fifteen percent earnings growth on a your ever year basis,

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 12>But we're sort of in this situation where investors are

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 12>asking them sells, well, does it really matter all that

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 12>much what the results are when you know there's really

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 12>big changes coming on the horizon when it comes to tariffs,

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 12>and electronics aren't really exempt from that. I think a

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 12>good analogy for that I've been using is actually a

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 12>baseball analogy. You know, just say your pitcher got through

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 12>a really tough inning. Well, okay, that's great, We're glad

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 12>you did that, but their sluggers up next inning and

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 12>you got to get through that. It's that sort of

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 12>next piece when there's something on the horizon that really

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 12>is a big risk that you want to hear more.

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 3>From these C suites about.

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 12>So we think it's actually more important to be parsing

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.719
<v Speaker 12>through the guidance and the statements out of C suites

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 12>on what they see for the rest of the year,

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 12>rather than the actual results themselves.

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 3>From Q one.

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for example, Apple likely to get a lot of

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 2>pull forward as consumers rush to buy their phones before

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 2>perhaps prices went up. What do you think in terms

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.239
<v Speaker 2>of the narrative we've got of steering into India in

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 2>terms of supply chain. Our CEO is managing to get

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 2>ahead of some of these names.

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 12>Look, there's no shortage of businesses being dynamic in the

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 12>US and that's something that you see really across the board,

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:24.959
<v Speaker 12>and tech is really behaving that way as well, perhaps

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 12>trying to get ahead of some of these supply chain

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 12>reconfigurations that's happening in real time, and I think investors

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 12>are also thinking through when consumers may actually start to

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 12>see these prices start to arrive in the stores with

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 12>their tariff impacts, and electronics are probably some of the

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 12>first places you could see it because a lot of

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 12>our electronics come from abroad and there's actually decent turnover

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 12>in terms of inventory. When it comes to electronics, there

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 12>is a little bit of a reprieve because we got

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 12>that exemption of some electronic parts for tech, which helps,

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 12>but it's probably not going to be all encompassing. So

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 12>it's actually electronics alongside apperil and toy and games, which

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 12>could be one of the first places consumers could start

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 12>seeing those higher prices, and it's going to be really

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 12>important how they react to that. Are they going to

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 12>balk at those prices or are they going to consume

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 12>no matter.

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 4>What, Mike, what you just said a moment ago. With

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 4>big tech focus on guidance, what happens if big tech

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 4>doesn't give us any.

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 12>Well, that's just a really uncertain environment. And uncertainty has

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 12>been the name of the game for all of April

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 12>for certain, and investors have been repricing I think the

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 12>evaluation multiples they've been awarding to the magnificent seven megacab

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 12>tech whatever you want to call it, those.

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 5>Have come down a lot.

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 12>But rs by rs mist those are not actually really

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 12>within the vicinity of fair value just yet, so you

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 12>could start to see a little bit of a risk

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 12>premium baked in if investors are still asking a lot

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 12>of questions that can't be answered.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 4>Yet we're interested in course of the hyperscalers Amazon kind

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 4>of at the core of that. The calculus seems pretty simple,

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 4>not so much how much money they make or earn,

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 4>but how much money they're willing to commit and spend.

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 4>And that applies to Microsoft as well. How closely do

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 4>you watch the capital expendages.

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 12>We're watching Capex really closely. One of the big themes

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 12>over really the last decade is the market's been punishing

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 12>companies that have been really capital intensive and for quite

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 12>some time. A lot of these MAGS seven companies really

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 12>weren't all that capex intensive. But as you've had a

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 12>lot of companies investing in AI, building out data centers,

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 12>what have you, we would argue that at the MAG

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:27.239
<v Speaker 12>seven were their own sector, they'd be one of the

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 12>most capital intensive in the S and P five hundred

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 12>and save maybe utilities in real estate, which are classically

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 12>capital intensive. So it sort of makes sense to see

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 12>the market sort of repricing these companies on that capex

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 12>intensity alone. Because you don't always have a guarantee that

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 12>you have the earnings flow through on that investment. It's

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 12>always pretty uncertain.

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 4>Michael Reynolds, Vice president of investment Strategy, Glenn May, thank

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 4>you very.

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Much, time for talking tech.

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 4>First up, a judge in Spain's national courts has opened

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 4>an investigation to determine whether the countrywide blackout on Monday

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 4>was caused by a cyber attack. Spain's grid operator said

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:15.360
<v Speaker 4>the blackout they impacted Spain, Portugal and parts of France,

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 4>was not due to any external attack based on preliminary analysis.

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 4>Plas Sally Barber has unveiled its latest AI flagship model,

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 4>called the Quen three. The company claims that its newest

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 4>model rivals for performance of deep seek, including.

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 3>In math and coding.

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 4>It also introduces a mixture of expert model for an

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 4>efficient way to mimic human reasoning. And Amazon's first batch

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 4>of twenty seven production satellites have reached Low Earth orbit.

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 4>Amazon's Kuiper satellites lifted off on Monday, with CEO Andy

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Jesse saying they were quote operating as expected just hours later.

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 4>It's the first launch of a planned three two hundred

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 4>and thirty six satellites that Amazon intends to use to

0:21:55.640 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 4>sell Internet connectivity to rival Elon Musk Starling.

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology and Caroline Hyde in

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 2>New York.

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Ed lod Low in San Francisco.

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Quick check on these markets end because we're clinging to

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 2>gains when it comes to the Nasdaq one hundred and

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 2>that as we see some pretty awful consumer sentiment heading overall,

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing a near a five year low. But will

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 2>the FED step in? We're up a third, we call

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 2>it a tenth of a percent right now. We're looking

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 2>at Crypto still managing to outperform. We're at four tenths percent.

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 2>We're at ninety eight and ninety four now so clearly

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 2>been seen as some sort of haven amid the tariff turmoil.

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Move on, having look what's happening in terms of those

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 2>earnings that we really do start to digest. I'm looking

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 2>ultimately at the over Semiconductor Index which is lower to

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 2>the tune of three quarters of percent.

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:45.919
<v Speaker 5>You call that NXP.

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 2>We of course lose the CEO and he's handing over

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 2>the reins even though.

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 5>He's only fifty six years old. He's retiring.

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean about the place in which the

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 2>business is that he leaves as we start to see,

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 2>of course, real concern about the uncertainty amid these tariffs.

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking though at Cadence manages to outperform on its earnings.

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 5>We're almost five percent. They beat the raised.

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 2>They also see the Tesla on the downside one and

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 2>a half percent off. That's as we see Redburn Atlantic

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 2>an analyst coming out saying, I stick by my cell rating.

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 2>This company is going to see volumes declines going forwardead Okay.

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Let's get back to today's top story.

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 4>The White House denouncing Amazon's reported plan to display the

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 4>costs of President Trump's tariffs on products listen to this.

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 6>I just got off the phone with the President about

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 6>Amazan's announcement. This is a hearttyle in political act via Amazon.

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 6>It's another reason why we are on shoring critical supply chains.

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 6>You're at home to shore up our own critical supply

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 6>chain and boost our own manufacturing.

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 4>The White House comments come as the tech giant getting

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 4>ready to report results Thursday after the closing bell. Actually

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 4>the stocks decline much more muted than it had been

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 4>at the market open, now down about nine tenths of percent.

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 4>Bluemokes Matt Day, who covers Amazon, joins us from with

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 4>more and actually in the last twenty minutes, Amazon revived

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 4>their statement. Their response to the White House just hit

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 4>our inboxes. So let's start with that, Matt. What is

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 4>Amazon saying in response to the White House's claim and

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 4>give us the full details of the story.

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 13>So Amazon says that they were never considering any sort

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 13>of terrify like disclosure on their main retail sites. What

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 13>they were considering was they've got a low cost goods

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 13>service called Hall. It's very much in the mold of

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 13>T mood designer ship things directly from China. They say

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 13>they were considering some sort of disclosure they're related to

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 13>closing the exemption on duties for a product shift in

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 13>that manner, but that they have no plans to do

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 13>anything on the main side. And now they're telling us

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 13>that they don't plan to and there's no future for this.

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 2>There is no story here despite the reporting coming from

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 2>punch Bowl, Matt. But the damage almost already done when

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 2>it comes to the narrative that was drawn upon by

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 2>the White House administration.

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 5>And it even went as.

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Though Caroline Leavitt went further, putting in a well an

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 2>old report from Reuter's that was dated well in the

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 2>previous administration.

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, a little bit of a shoot first asked questions

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 13>later from the White House for sure on this before

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 13>Amazon had cleared this up at all. But this kind of,

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.959
<v Speaker 13>you know, validates Amazon's been really quiet on tariffs, you know,

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 13>since they've rolled out right not a whole lot of

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 13>public statements. You know, we saw CEO Andy Jasse interviewed

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 13>about this time a week ago and was asked on tariffs,

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 13>and it was sort of vague on the company's plans.

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 13>They don't see a whole lot of value being in

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 13>the news at all on this and would rather stay

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 13>out of it, and you're kind of seeing why this morning.

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 4>I think it's helpful to our audience, Matt, to help

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 4>them understand how Amazon dot Com works from the inventory standpoint,

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 4>from the vendor standpoint.

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 11>Right.

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 4>So, on April ninth, we reported that Amazon canceled some

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 4>inventory orders from China, and you included the reporting that

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 4>those cancelations put the tariff exposure back on the vendors themselves.

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 4>Just explain how that marketplace works.

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So Amazon sells things in two primary ways.

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 14>You know.

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 13>One is they go and grab a bunch of goods

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 13>in bulk, like any traditional retailer, Walmart, Target, they'd buy it.

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 3>They import it.

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 13>They also have third party sellers that sell directly that

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.199
<v Speaker 13>report that we had, you know. One in other way

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 13>is Amazon gids its goods here is it consolidates shipments

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 13>and it tells the sellers, hey, listen, just give it

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 13>to us at the factory or thereabouts. We'll take it

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 13>and we'll import it for you. They told some of

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 13>their vendors. You know, listen, you guys are responsible for

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 13>this yourselves, essentially putting them on the hook for tariffs.

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Matt Day, Thank you, very much. Let's turn to cybersecurity.

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 4>Demand for cloud protection is expected to surge as more

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 4>businesses adopt AI capabilities. We discussed that with palle Outworks

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 4>Alto Networks acquisition of protect Ai and yesterday's show. The

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 4>biggest move in this space, however, is Google's thirty two

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 4>billion dollar deal for Wiz.

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Joining us.

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 4>To explain the strategy behind it all is raz Herzberg,

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 4>chief marketing officer at Wiz, also VP of Products. The

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 4>innovation that Wiz came up with was super fast way

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 4>of scanning virtual machines, virtual machines cup cloud computing.

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 3>That is what Wiz does.

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 4>What is the benefit to Google in having that technology?

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Is it that Google.

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 4>Uses it itself or is it something that gets offered

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 4>through GCP. I think that's what people are trying to understand.

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 5>So it's a very good question.

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 14>Like the mission it was from day one from inception,

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 14>was helping every organization in the world build securely on

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 14>cloud and secure everything they built and around in cloud.

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 14>And that means any cloud, right, it means like a yes,

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 14>it means as or it also means DCP. And the

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:32.400
<v Speaker 14>mission was a big mission, I mean securing everything organization

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 14>is building around the cloud means securing the modern development

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 14>stack and Wiz I think the growth Liz had, I

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 14>mean it was just found that we started like five

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 14>years ago. It's a major rate of growth that I

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 14>think proves how critical this mission and this problem is

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 14>for modern organizations today. And Google truly shares that mission,

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 14>and the mission they share with us is exactly that

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 14>securing everything, securing every cloud, no matter what their an

0:27:57.720 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 14>organization uses.

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 5>Is little to enable it.

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 14>I can say that on our side, the logic for

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 14>the acquisition was we think we can actually support this

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 14>exact mission of helping organizations secure everything much faster using

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 14>the partnership with Google and the sense of you know,

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 14>being on the bleeding edge of AI technology, which will

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 14>enable us to build even faster and help ship that

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 14>mission faster.

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 4>There is a process that will play out. All deals

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 4>have that there will be regulatory concerns.

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I get that.

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:29.919
<v Speaker 4>Give me the backstory, but how did it come together?

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Who came up with this great idea that Google and

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 4>Whiz should be one.

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 14>I think it really comes to sharing that mission, you know.

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 14>I think the Google team is as committed and as

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 14>passionate to really giving organizations freedom to build securely on

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 14>cloud and to enable them to remain secure, and so

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 14>the partnership is very natural for.

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Us in that sense, and freedom is also given RAZ

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 2>to continue to serve on other cloud offerings as well.

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 5>How much as a product.

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Strategist that you are you thinking about continuing to roll

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 2>out for other organizations not just the enterprises at Google Service.

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 14>No, absolutely, and this was also very clear. I think

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 14>in the way that Google themselves talked about the acquisition,

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 14>the mission is to support as to support Azure, not

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 14>also to support GCP. But we are remaining with the

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 14>exact same mission then Google shares that exact same view.

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 14>So absolutely will continue being the best solution for any cloud.

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 2>And Google Cloud platform perhaps which still like you to

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 2>make M and A RAS. What's so interesting is the

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 2>way in which you were organically growing.

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 5>We're also inorganically growing.

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Are You're still gonna be able to do deals, You're

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:38.719
<v Speaker 2>still gonna be folding in new teams and aquahas.

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 5>So that's a great point.

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 14>Wiz has been very fortunate over the past year and

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 14>a half. We've done really three acquisitions. In all three

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 14>of those acquisitions, we've been I think we approach it

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 14>in a very deliberate way, meaning was acquired companies where

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 14>we really believed in the people and the technology, but

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 14>then we didn't really we didn't really sell technology versus

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 14>Like all three companies kind of joined Wiz and then

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 14>stopped what they were doing and rebuild their product and

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 14>rebuilt their solutions on top of the native Wiz product.

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 14>Because one of the challenges we see in cybersecurity is

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 14>actually giving end users, giving security teams, giving developers a

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 14>really good product that has a seamless experience. So that's

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 14>what we've been doing over the past three years, and

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 14>nothing has changed in our strategy. I think we're always

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 14>on the lookout for making the product even greater and

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 14>for great teams and great solutions in this space.

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Rights.

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 4>So you mentioned a moment ago you founded twenty twenty

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 4>by usaf Yin and Roy Amy. In my career of

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 4>covered companies that have grown very fast, and sometimes too fast,

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 4>they stumbled along the way. What is it that you're

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 4>is unique to It is like, what is the differentiator?

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:50.959
<v Speaker 4>Is it just the talent pool you hired, Is it

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 4>the brainchild of the underlying code base? Just I think

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 4>people don't understand how you pulled it off.

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 14>It's a good question. I can share that even internally.

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 14>It's some think we think about often, and I think

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 14>about often. I think a lot of the secret is

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 14>to really get to this level of fast based and excellence.

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 14>There's many different things Liz had to execute on almost perfectly,

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 14>and it's for sure the tech, but it's also the

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 14>go to market strategy. I think one thing that always

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 14>drove us from day one was really living the problem

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 14>we're solving for. We are a team that lived cloud

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 14>security for the past decade and deeply understood the core

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 14>core challenges organizations face.

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 5>And also from day one. I mean, Wiz.

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 14>Today is proud to serve more than fifty percent of

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 14>the fourtun one hundred companies. Wiz is their solution for

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 14>cloud security. It's by partnering with those companies and really

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 14>listening to our customers. From day one, our entire focus

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 14>is solving for the problems. We wake up all. We

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 14>care about the customers their problems, and that has driven

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 14>every single decision this company made, including hiring, including go

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 14>to market, including pricing everything.

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 3>How do those customers feel right now?

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 4>How willing are they to continue spending on relationships?

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 3>With wiz perfect.

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we've seen.

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 4>No economic uncertainty, tariff recession. Let's take a beat before

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 4>we sign up to a new deal.

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 14>You know, wiz was founded like the months we started

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 14>was marked like when COVID hit that March, So that

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 14>also seemed like a very bad time to be selling

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 14>really anything ever or to start the company. So I

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 14>think we've been you know, we're used to it. I

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 14>think actually, if there's there's some things that never stop

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 14>in some way, and like the technology progression that adoption we

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.239
<v Speaker 14>see across AI, there's a lot of incredible things that

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 14>they're pushing companies even faster to the cloud and making

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 14>them I think look for ways to build securely.

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Russ has worked great test some time with you, Cmo

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 2>VP of Product trustgy Over at WIZ we appreciate it. Meanwhile,

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 2>coming up one hundred days of Trump's second term, well.

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 5>That's also mean one hundred days of DOGE.

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 2>We'll discuss the impact on the tech sector and el

0:32:55.720 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 2>mask as next as blue bed technology.

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 15>You know, i'd say one hundred days in we need

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 15>another one hundred days to kind of see where the

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 15>policy directives are going. As we've tried to have a

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 15>better understanding of how what's talked about so far, particularly

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 15>with respect to trade, is ultimately going to be put

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 15>in place.

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 3>How it's going to play out.

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 5>Got miss SAXEO.

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 2>David Solomon speaking earlier today with Francin Laqua discussing the

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 2>impact of President Trump's first one hundred days in office.

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 5>Let's get the tech perspective, blom megs. Mike Sheppard joins.

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Us now the highs the lows the tech since January

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 2>the twentieth, Mike, it's.

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 16>Been quite a consequential stretch, CARO for the tech industry,

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 16>and they've really been there from day one and January

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 16>twenty through a recall, we saw all those high profile

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 16>leaders from the industry, from Elon Musk, the Sundar Pichai

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 16>to Mark Zuckerberg, to Jeff Bezos and even Tim Cook

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 16>with prime seats at the inauguration, and since then it's

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 16>taken off. The industry really got a seat at the table.

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 16>The President made some early commitments on advancing and revamping

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 16>artificial intelligence policy, and he was also able to claim

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:13.760
<v Speaker 16>some credit on big promises of investments in the US

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 16>by companies like TSMC and Apple and so forth, and

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 16>yet ed, we're hearing all of this concern now surrounding

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 16>the industry because of trade, because of tariff's, the uncertainty

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 16>economically that it creates overall for the US, and also

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:31.800
<v Speaker 16>the risk it it poses to supply chains and increasing

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 16>costs for companies and consumers alike.

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 4>One of the examples was Nvidia pledging to build five

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 4>hundred billion dollars worth of goods five hundred billion dollars

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 4>worth of AI sales, which the administration incorrectly claimed to

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 4>be a five hundred billion dollar investment. Even so, you

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 4>mentioned the word policy. Now, tariff's is one thing. You

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:56.839
<v Speaker 4>have people like David Sachs in the White House as

0:34:56.880 --> 0:35:00.280
<v Speaker 4>the AI ZAR. Have we got anything codified yet?

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 3>Anything through we really have to go through go for it.

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, you know, that's a great question because lost in

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 16>the shuffle and all the turmoil surrounding tariffs are those

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 16>policy efforts that we know are being worked on and

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 16>crafted right now on artificial intelligence and also on crypto

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 16>policy as well. David Sachs is theis are inside the

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 16>White House for both of those areas, and they're crucial

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 16>to the industry. How this policy gets defined could determine

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 16>what regulations ultimately end up being, not only from a

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 16>you know, an agency perspective, but also how Congress may

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:43.399
<v Speaker 16>try to legislate it. But of course, when we talk

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 16>about Congress, they have so much on their plates now

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:49.320
<v Speaker 16>also that it's consequential as well for the tech industry,

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 16>and that is a big tax package that they are

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:55.240
<v Speaker 16>trying to push through to get done by July fourth

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 16>is at least according to Scott Besson, when you talk

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:01.359
<v Speaker 16>to lawmakers, it's a different question. They feel like they

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 16>need a little bit more time.

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 3>To be able to pull that all together.

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, of course companies trying to navigate all of these changes.

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, one who's navigating it today and we reported

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 2>on extensively is Amazon, of course getting course in the crosshairs.

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 2>They've come back and said this was never going to

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 2>happen in terms of identifying tariffs and how much it

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:22.280
<v Speaker 2>would add individual.

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 5>Prices on the site.

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 2>But we hear from CNN that in fact President Trump

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 2>has called Jeff Bezos, the chairman of the company, the

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 2>founder of the company, to complain. According to CNN, that's

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 2>on a post on x about Trump's calls with Bezos.

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:36.879
<v Speaker 5>How are CEOs just trying.

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:39.359
<v Speaker 2>To navigate how are previous founders given how much money

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:43.320
<v Speaker 2>they previously gave to Trump in some cases, Well.

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 16>This is such an interesting question now for companies because

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 16>they are seeing the risk of what this administration is

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 16>trying to bring in policy wise. The Press Secretary of

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 16>this morning sent a very clear signal to Corporate America

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:01.320
<v Speaker 16>that disclosing the costs of those terrors would be considered

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 16>a hostile political act. It was a shot across the bow,

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 16>and they want to make sure that companies are falling

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 16>into line with the policy and not working against it

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 16>and complaining about it in public. And there are other

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 16>ways that the administration has levers to pull one. We

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 16>talked about the policy taking shape on AI, but there

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 16>are other areas too, And antitrust and competition enforcement is

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 16>another area that we have been paying attention to. There

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 16>are two major antitrust trials underway right now, one involving

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 16>Meta and the other the penalties that could be levied

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 16>against Google over chrome and dominance in that area. And

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:42.479
<v Speaker 16>these are two areas where the industry has been trying

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 16>to push for a break, but so far not seeing one.

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 4>Bloombergs Mike Shephard in DC, thank you very much.

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:51.720
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, Elon Musk's doge is reaching one hundred and thirty

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:55.800
<v Speaker 4>days since his formal inception. But the Tesla CEO's political

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 4>ambitions have cost him nearly one hundred and thirteen billion

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:03.360
<v Speaker 4>dollars in his personal wealth, with Tesla stock falling thirty

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 4>three percent since Trump's inauguration. For more, Bloombus Kurt Wagner

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 4>joins us, you've been writing about this and done a

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 4>hole about how through the lens of Tesla shares it's

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 4>been painful for Musk. But if you look at some

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:17.359
<v Speaker 4>of his private companies we break the story Friday night

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:22.240
<v Speaker 4>about Xai potentially raising money, they've had some advantages their cut.

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think there's a lot of interest in being

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 10>associated with Elon Musk right now. There has always been

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 10>that way, you know ed, but even more so now

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 10>that he's close to President Trump, and so we've seen

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 10>him out raising for X and Xai, for SpaceX, for

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.359
<v Speaker 10>some of these other endeavors. And so I do think

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:43.879
<v Speaker 10>that despite all of the negative consumer backlast we've seen

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:46.360
<v Speaker 10>with Tesla, there's still a lot of interest on the

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:49.359
<v Speaker 10>business side, especially with investors to try and get into

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 10>the Elon to orbits.

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 2>What's now confusing people is how much Elon's time will

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 2>be dedicated to the White House going forward. The one

0:38:57.320 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty days is what everyone keeps citing in

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:03.319
<v Speaker 2>terms of something tangible, But many closely with Elon will

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 2>say no, no, He's going to still be a really

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 2>big reasuurce to the White House going forward.

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 5>And what does that mean to his brands.

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:10.919
<v Speaker 3>Not just people close to Elan.

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 10>Elon himself right on the earnings call, I believe he said, hey,

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 10>I am leaving. Bots will stick around one to two

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 10>days per week as long as the President wants me

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 10>to be here. He may even stick around through the

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 10>entire administration to make sure that Doge continues to keep doging.

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:27.839
<v Speaker 3>And so it does feel we.

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 10>Kind of I think refer to it as a soft

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 10>exit from government. The mediate felt as much performative for

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 10>TESLA investors as anything. Right, tell them, hey, I'm coming back,

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 10>give them that news that they're craving, but also reiterate

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 10>I'm not necessarily leaving entirely. And I think that's what

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 10>you know, we will see.

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:45.319
<v Speaker 3>I think we will see him continue.

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 5>To stick around ka Wagner, We thank you for the

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 5>latest chatchipt users.

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:59.439
<v Speaker 2>Well, you can now go shopping using the chatbo Open

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 2>AI and OUTI feature just yesterday and a move to

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 2>challenge rivals like of course Google putting bogs.

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:05.399
<v Speaker 5>Rachel Metz is here with.

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 2>More and technically speaking, you're sort of going to a

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 2>different website via the app.

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but this is similar to what a lot of

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 1>companies that offer reviews online are already doing, such as

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the Wirecutter, for instance, which is on by the New

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>York Times. They'll shore review and then there would be

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a link and you would click out to the website.

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And their Opening Eye is doing a similar thing now

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:30.759
<v Speaker 1>with chat GPT. So if you search for say, I

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 1>think if you say, like, show me a nice nude

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 1>lipstick for one hundred and twenty dollars, in theory, it

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 1>would give you several options. It would give you sort

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of a condensed review of them, and then it would

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:45.399
<v Speaker 1>also have on a sidebar links to buy them from

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>different websites.

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 4>If you do buy that lipstick and you've clicked on

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 4>the links through chat GPT. What I found interesting in

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 4>your reporting is that Opening I won't collect affiliate revenue

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 4>from that transaction. So what's your under standing of the

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 4>business model plan going forward?

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I think right now, it's just like a lot of

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the things that Opening I does. They test a lot

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of things and then they expand them, so it could change.

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 1>They could have some ideas for how they want to

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:16.799
<v Speaker 1>make money. I don't know if in the future they

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 1>will also not be taking affiliate revenue. That actually surprised

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 1>me a bit when I ask them, are you going

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to be making money off of this? Because that seems

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 1>like a really easy way to make some money, right

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:30.760
<v Speaker 1>It seems like like passive, passive income stream.

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 3>But they did. They did.

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:34.439
<v Speaker 1>They were very clear that they are not making money

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 1>off of affiliate revenue when people so when people buy

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a product, and they also the products are showing you

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>are not ads.

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Right Briefly, Rachel, I thought the long term goal was

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 2>that my agent's going to go off and buy everything

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 2>for me. I'm not even going to have to click

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 2>out into a different website for example. Is this just

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 2>like a stepping stone.

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's probably going to ultimately be a

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:58.879
<v Speaker 1>bunch of different ways that people are going to want

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to buy things. And I think that it is possible

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that at some point it'll be much more common for

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>people to say, I want this kind of thing, go

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>buy it. You know, I authorise make credit card and

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a MasterCard is trying out some ways to do payment

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>via agents, So we could certainly see that in the

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:18.359
<v Speaker 1>next few years. But I think right now what we're

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:21.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing is just giving people more options to stay.

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:22.400
<v Speaker 5>In chat GBT.

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Rachel Metz, thank you very much.

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:28.280
<v Speaker 4>Indeed, that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 3>This is what markets look like right now. Is that

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 3>one hundred sort.

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:35.240
<v Speaker 4>Of muted gains, even though well it's basically flat. Economic angst,

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 4>Spotify downs, beat on subscribers, not on profit. There's some

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:41.439
<v Speaker 4>weakness there in Amazon. Our top story of the day

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:44.240
<v Speaker 4>the White House accusing them of hostile acts or report

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:44.840
<v Speaker 4>they deny.

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:45.399
<v Speaker 3>Caro