WEBVTT - When will space be cheap? (featuring Zach Weinersmith)

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Often in sci fi people will be like, well, water

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:08.959
<v Speaker 1>is going to be really valuable, and it's worth remarking

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a place where you have to pay

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>huge amounts of money for clean drinking water, that's not

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a good situation. You'd rather not do that. You're absolutely right.

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>If the economy already exists, than fine. Or as you say,

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>with California, I get frustrated, not with you.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 2>But with the entire state as an idea, as an ethos. Oh,

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 2>this is two Virginias against one Californian. It's not fair.

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 2>It's not fair.

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Hi.

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist, and I'm pleased to

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 2>say that particle physics is still cheaper than going to space.

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Hello, I'm Kelly wider Smith. I study parasites and space,

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 3>and there are parasites. You just got to pick up

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 3>some roadkill and you could see some parasites. It is

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 3>super cheap investment.

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 2>What about the space based parasite research industry shouldn't be

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 2>good at space to explore tapeworms in space?

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a bad faith argument, Daniel.

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:12.639
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, I don't think there's.

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 3>A lot of money to be made from parasites in

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 3>space right now?

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, so you're turning down that grant.

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Then for now? Yeah, if you want to pay me

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 3>to think about what parasites women accidentally bring with us

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 3>to space, I'm taking money from just about anyone.

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 2>All right there, it is okay, send your money to Kelly.

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Folks for space parasites.

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Whoop?

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:32.279
<v Speaker 2>Is it a science fiction movie? Is it a grant?

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Who knows? We'll find out.

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Could be both Porqueolo's dose.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. And so today on the podcast, we have a

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 2>special guest to come on and talk to us about

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 2>everything that's happening recently in launching two space industries and

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 2>trying to boost a space economy, trying to get humans

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.559
<v Speaker 2>off this planet and live out in the cosmos. Kelly,

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 2>who is today's guest.

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 3>He's a real cutie pie, and you're gonna get a

0:01:58.040 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 3>taste of what it's like to live in the Winersmith

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 3>how Zach likes to go on long soliloquies where I

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 3>interject every once in a while by saying no, Nope,

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 3>that's wrong, And so welcome to our life, listeners, You're

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 3>going to get a little taste of the Wadersmith household.

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, And so today's episode is in response to

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 2>a question from Kay Gilbert, a listener who wrote to

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 2>us asking specifically for an update about what's going on

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 2>in space. Here's Kay's question.

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 4>I learned a lot from doctor Katrine Whitson now please

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 4>invite Zach Wienersmith so he and Kelly can give us

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 4>an update on soonish, specifically the first section on space

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 4>travel becoming cheaper, because that seems to be the most

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 4>nowish since they wrote the book. Many more nations are

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 4>developing active space exploration programs and sending astronauts to the ISS.

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Commercial spaceflight is still in the startup phase, but shows

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 4>a lot of potential and inexpensive CubeSats have made it

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 4>possible for almost anyone with an interest to launch a

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 4>satellite into lower Earth oad orbit. Of course, that just

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 4>makes usable orbits more crowded messes with astronomy and greatly

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 4>increases the amount of space junk. I'm especially interested in

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 4>what Kelly and Zach learned about space economics when writing

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 4>A City on Mars. Thanks all right.

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I love this question because it means like, Wow, this

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 2>person really read both of your books and thought about it. Yeah,

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 2>and now they're coming to you for an accounting of

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 2>what's going on now. You are forever on the hook

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 2>on these topics, Kelly, you have to stay current forever.

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 3>You know. It does actually feel that way. I keep

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 3>trying to move on to the next book project, and

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 3>then I keep getting interview requests from people who are like, oh,

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 3>what do you think about this new thing? And I'm like,

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't check the news. What new thing? And then

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 3>I got to check the news. But it's okay because

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 3>it's fascinating.

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Kelly's so popular, Booty.

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh, you know, you'd be stressed if you weren't getting

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 3>your other work done. But I do like getting to

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 3>talk about space.

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a great book, and so all the attention

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 2>is very worth it. So let's invite onto the podcast

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 2>the other Weeeners, Smith, who will join our conversation about

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 2>the future of the space economy.

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, on today's show, we have the second best

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Wiener Smith, Zach. He is the cartoonist behind Saturday Morning

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Breakfast Cereal. He has three eighths of a physics degree

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 3>and he is a wonderful co author. Welcome to the show, Zach.

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I do forgot two times. Hugo nominee.

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh and one time winner and.

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 1>One time winner, but really the nomination is the true honor.

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 3>You also didn't get the Eisner, right.

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I have twice not gotten the Eisner.

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Actually I have many times.

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, Zach was shortlisted. It's a slightly different.

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I officially didn't live twice. That's right on the record.

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, three eighths of a physics degree. I wonder at

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.239
<v Speaker 2>what point you can round that up to one.

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Not three eighths or ten. He also has a literature degree.

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, that's true.

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, since we're going to be talking about physics and

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 2>space and all sorts of stuff, I think we need

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 2>to hear more about your credentials. Zach, tell us why

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 2>you didn't push that over the line to five eighth

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 2>So a physics degree, that's.

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>A good question. I actually had a like semester where

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I felt like I had to choose. My comics career

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>was starting to go well. So I had already gotten

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>a degree in literature, and I went back for physics.

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 2>A well worn path from literature.

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>This was really weird because usually it's the other way around.

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>My last semester and I got like old bees, which

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>like if it's your second time in college. You know,

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you're not like an undergraduate who doesn't know what they

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>want to do yet you really should be doing perfect.

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>And it was just that, like I was now managing

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>at a comic career that was getting bigger and bigger,

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like the right path was to just kind

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of like do comics that I could teach myself whatever

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I wanted the side. And then things have gotten ever

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>busier and mestically self teach, which is in theory faster

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the university, although I suppose professors have some role earlier.

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 2>So cartooning has stolen another physicist from us.

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's quite a few lists.

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 2>But you're right about self teaching. I mean, I tell

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 2>my grad students to really pay attention in classes because

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 2>it's the last time somebody's going to spend all their

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 2>time trying to teach you something. After that, it's basically

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 2>like you in a textbook. That's how I learned something new.

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the only way to get real depth,

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:14.799
<v Speaker 1>and you can only get so much from another person.

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>You got to really sit with it.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, then consider this your pahd final example.

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 2>If you do well today, we can round who.

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoah. I think you can give him

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 3>a bachelor's but he doesn't get a PhD.

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 2>How about a pod since the podcast, I can't.

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Lurd my pod over him if he has one too.

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>My career fantasy is to get an honorary degree from anywhere,

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>just so I can say. That didn't seem that hard.

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 3>So Daniel, when we had your wife on the show,

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 3>it was very clear that you two are like supportive team.

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Zach and I are competing over everything everything.

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.679
<v Speaker 1>I believe in a free market, I think the best

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>spouse should win.

0:06:58.320 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 3>And she's winning.

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Well, we're not here to do Wiener Smith Merrick.

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 2>They as fun as that might be. We're here to

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 2>talk about space and whether we can access it and

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 2>whether you guys want to continue to throw a wet

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 2>blanket over the prospects of space colonization. You've been writing

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 2>about this for quite a while. Your first book, Sooni

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Ish talked about space elevators and how they might be

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 2>a terrible idea, and then you wrote a whole book

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 2>about how we might not be ready to colonize Mars

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 2>and space, and the listener wants to know, are you

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 2>guys still bearish on space or have things changed? So

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 2>give us some background here, Why is space so hard

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 2>and expensive?

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so there's a lot of angles on that, but

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the probably place to start is just literally

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the access to space, meaning like getting up and fast.

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>And so I would say you can make a pretty

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>good case that the main reason is expensive is because

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>rockets kind of suck. The main reason we use them

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to go to space is we have no other method. Right,

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at a rocket sitting on a pad,

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>it's something like eighty percent propellant meaning fuel and oxidizer

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff that gets burned on the way up. It's something like,

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.679
<v Speaker 1>depending on what you're doing, say sixteen to nineteen percent,

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the like machine that historically you discard during the process,

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>although SpaceX has change that. And then at the very

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>top you have the firing, which is depending on again

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>on what you're doing, one to three percent, say of

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the total mass, and that's what goes to space. And

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you say, why is it so awful? Why is the

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>ratio so terrible? And you know, of course you could say,

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>well if this planet were a little bigger, may we

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.679
<v Speaker 1>just couldn't do it. The example we like to use

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is like if you had to take a road trip

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>from Alaska to Buenos Aires, you would gas up once

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>in a while. If you had to bring all the

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>gas you needed for the entire trip at the beginning,

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you would look like a flea on like a gas tanker. Right,

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And the main problem you're going to face is that

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the first, say gallon of gas is mostly going to

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>move gas. There are gallons of gas you're going to

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>literally move the entire time, and finally we use up

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.839
<v Speaker 1>at the end. The most efficient way to do it,

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and this gets us to space elevators would be of

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>like a magic pixie just dropped the drop of gas

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you need in whenever you needed it, so you never

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>had to carry any mass of gas. Because that's most

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of what a rocket is doing. This is why we

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>have staging, right, That's why a rocket burns up a

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>bunch of propellant and then just drops off a hunk

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>into the ocean, or if it's SpaceX, drops off a

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>hunk that lands itself.

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you have magic pixies as an option, we

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 2>can solve lots of problems.

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Not just.

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 2>That opens up the door, that's.

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, you know, space elevator in a certain sense wouldn't

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 1>be the magic pixie. Right. So space elevator is like

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a cable or a ribbon that dangles from something up

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in space, and there are different ways to do that,

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>but basically you can just visualize this cable that goes

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:48.079
<v Speaker 1>up like a beanstalk, and you climb it. And the

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>nice thing about that is you just expend the energy

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to you know, climb one more foot, right, so you

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>can beam the energy that goes up. Most of like

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>your efforts are going into fighting gravity in the sense

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:01.959
<v Speaker 1>of just getting up the next step instead of carrying

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>oldest propellant, right.

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And I think space elevators are hard for people

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 2>to grow because it feels like it's floating and if

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 2>you stand on it's going to fall down, and there's

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 2>some complex orbital physics there. But essentially the argument is

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 2>it's like a ladder. Right. It's a lot easier to

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 2>climb a ladder one hundred feet than it is to

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 2>jump ondred exactly, right, Yeah, And it takes a lot

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.319
<v Speaker 2>of energy because the ladder is supporting you as you go.

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Up, that's right. And there's been lots of hopes to

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 1>get around the rocket problem, right, yeah, classic one of

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you read Jules Verne's First Spin on the Moon is

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>do you remember what they do?

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>They shooting a gun. There's actually a whole kind of

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>comedy bit about Americans with guns. It's the Baltimore Gun

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Club and they shoot it and it's like a good

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>introductory physics thing because it's like, I think we calculated

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it either for Sunnish or a city on Mars where

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like the initial g's are like twenty thousand to

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 1>actually get to the Moon with the spaceship they're launching,

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>so the humans would go flat.

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:55.719
<v Speaker 2>Oh I seem it's like a cannon. They fire you

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:56.839
<v Speaker 2>out of a canon into the moon.

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:58.839
<v Speaker 1>Literally, it's just a giant cannon. Yeah.

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, it was a gun that came up with

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 3>the proposal. But anyway, the book is called From the

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Earth to the Moon.

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh I'm sorry.

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, well that's not so outlanders these days. If you've

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 2>seen those spin projects, whether they like spin something up

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 2>and then literally launch it into space, it's like good

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 2>for some payloads, but enough for people. Yeah, the gun.

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Would work if your payload was like a hunk of

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>iron or like some some fluid or something. But yeah,

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>with like delicate, little splatty humans.

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 2>It's no good, all right, So getting off of Earth

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 2>is hard. Rockets are bad. Space elevators are problematic for

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 2>other reasons. We can dig into that in another episode.

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Why do we want to lift stuff from Earth? I mean, yeah,

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 2>there's lots of stuff in space. Why don't we just

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 2>like build stuff in space for space?

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to get stuff somewhere in space

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to build with, you got to say to yourself, well,

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>where am I getting it? You don't have a lot

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of options. It turns out you have the Moon, but

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Moon is still pretty far away. It's

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>hard to get to and then you have to like

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>somehow land on the Moon and then boost off, which

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>takes a lot of energy less than doing it on Earth,

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>but a lot. Notably, this is true for the Moon

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:58.719
<v Speaker 1>and Mars. You don't have a thick atmosphere, which is

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>very helpful when you'd like to land in right, you

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>visualize Neil Armstrong in the Lunar Lander. There's no wings

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>on it because there's no reason, and so that makes

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>it more complicated. You could alternatively, like go to get asteroids.

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, people usually think when we say that we're

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about the belt, and I think enthusiasts would say

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 1>that is ultimately the goal, but like for a plausible

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>ish scenario, we're actually talking about near Earth asteroids that

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of unlikely characteristics, so like they have

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to be high and valuable stuff usually called platinum group metals,

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.599
<v Speaker 1>that's the really hot stuff, and ideally they should be

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of locking velossity with the Earth, by which I

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>just mean as the Earth is moving, the asteroid comes

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in such a way that it like is not going

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>too fast with respect to us, So you can imagine

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>like the Earth is going well way the asteroids going

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to the other. Trying to catch it is going to

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>be a dangerous business. That's all really hard and well

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>beyond our current capacity. So we usually say, you know,

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>if you go up to geosynchronous, which is about twenty

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 1>four thousand miles high, you can make money pretty much

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>anywhere in that shell, by data transmission, by remote sensing,

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>by navigation, by doing stuff for militaries. Outside that shell,

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of value financial sense. There is

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously all sorts of cool science value, but there's not

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:04.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of value beyond that.

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 3>It's funny when I first invited Zach on the show,

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 3>He's like, I don't know that I'm going to have

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot to say. And I had thought like, oh,

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 3>maybe it should just be Daniel and Zach on this episode.

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 3>And then Zach was like, all right, I don't think

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna have anything to say it. I was like,

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 3>all right, we'll see. But anyway, this is an interview

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 3>of Zach, so I will continue to let Zach.

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Go for it.

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, I guess, as an audience member to this, I

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 2>might be a little bit skeptical about that. I mean,

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 2>I buy the argument that there's not much in space

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 2>you want to bring back down to Earth. I mean,

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I think people often think, ooh, platinum asteroid, that would

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 2>be worth seventy five quad trillion dollars if I could

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 2>bring it back here and sell it off bit by bit,

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 2>And obviously that's ridiculous, But still catching stuff in space

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 2>for building in space. I know we don't have the

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 2>technology now, but is it impossible to imagine that we

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 2>could never catch an astroid? I mean, I saw it

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 2>happen on for all mankind.

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, yes, obviously at some point we'll have the

0:13:58.160 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>technology to do that. I have no doubt about that.

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>None of this is anti gravity. There's no forbidden physics.

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just engineering. The way I think about that is

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially what you're implicitly doing. There's assuming some kind of

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>space economy, right, You're wishing it into existence, and then

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it's justified. But it's kind of like saying, well, once

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>we have a on the bottom of the Marianna's trench,

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>my French bottom Chicken Sandwich company will really be valuable.

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think this is why a lot of space

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>geeks are in the business of saying, we have to

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>build the city because it's existential. Kelly and I were

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>just talking about this. There's a guy we really like

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>named Winchell Chung who runs something called Project Row, which

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of documents everything ever said about space travel. And

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>this idea calls mcguffinite, which is reference to the idea

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in movies of a McGuff and like a certain something

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>everyone needs. You'll find that movies books everything for space colonization,

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>they always positive mcguffinite. So like an avatar, there's an unobtainium,

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>like insanely stupid name, really hard to get them, which

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is like a room temperature superconductor that somehow you can't

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>just make back home from the same elements. You have

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to get it from like these poor natives. And the

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>way I think with this is like, I'm sorry to

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>be really boring about this, but it's like the whole

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>world is running on the same periodic table. There's not

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>like magic stuff you can get. There's no special in

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>between e elements or whatever anything like this. So I

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know why you'd suppose you would find them, of

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>all places like on an asteroid or on Mars, where

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you know you're just working from the same Giant Solar

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>System accretion disc that made the other planets.

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, from a physics point of view, there could

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 2>be additional stable, super heavy elements. It is positive, yeah,

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 2>so there might be very heavy elements that are stable.

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 2>It's called the island of stability. But you'd need some

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 2>pretty exotic physics to explain why it's created and existing asteroids,

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 2>and it's not here on Earth, and it's also long lived,

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, et cetera. So you're right, Earth is mostly

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 2>made out of the same stuff as asteroids, and so'd

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 2>be pretty unusual that you could find something only in

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 2>asteroids to put in your chicken sandwich.

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, when we say island of stability, I thought physicists

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>meant like two millisecond.

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Long lived is reli Okay, But isn't that the way

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 2>all economies get started? I mean, there used to be

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 2>no economy in California and then you know there was

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 2>a gold rush that we had him a guffn. All

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 2>economies do get started somehow, right, Your argument would essentially

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 2>suggest we can never have new economies.

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, so I say it this way, if,

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>as he promises, mister Musk wants to spend you know,

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars or whatever and just plant a city

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>on Mars, you know, we have all sorts of other

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>concerns about that from other episodes you guys have done.

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>But I suppose he did it, Like I suppose you

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>woke up tomorrow and he had done it. Then maybe

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>there's an argument for some of this stuff. But that's

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>because you've made such a bad situation. Often in sci

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>fi people will be like, well, water is going to

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>be really valuable, and it's worth remarking if you're in

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a place where you have to pay huge amounts of

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>money for clean drinking water, that's not a good situation,

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you'd rather not do that. You're absolutely right if the

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>economy already exists and fine, or as you say, with California,

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I get frustrated, not with you, of course, but.

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 2>With the entire state as an idea, as an ethos. Oh,

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 2>this is two Virginias against one Californian. It's not fair.

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 2>It's not fair.

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm ancestrally from Texas, so I gave both of you

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>coastal leeds. My cost is filmed as it should be, is.

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Near coast the Gulf of America.

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, yeah, that's right, that's right. You can gas your

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>car up in the Gulf of America. So, you know,

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>often when we say this, I totally sympathize with not

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>wanting to be someone who's like, nah, dreams are dumb.

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, people will say, well, if Columbus had thought that,

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>what would have happened, And first of all, I don't

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>want to say is probably fifty million people wouldn't have

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>been murdered.

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 2>But that side, we'd still have all of min in history, right, right,

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 2>you'd have.

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>A couple of nice things. But also, like Columbus shows

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>up and he gathers resources that are widely available in

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>part by the way, because those indigenous people had found

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it and could tell them where it was willingly or otherwise,

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 1>that was generally true. Right, So like Theo's people who

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.360
<v Speaker 1>show up in California, these settlers, they found the San

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Fernando Valley. Right, you want to talk about value, and

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.719
<v Speaker 1>this is in an agricultural era. Right, when I want

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to get at more deeply, I think you and I

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>were talking about this earlier. Is people often talk about

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>resources in this funny way, like it's just the sort

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of stuff and like it obviously exists in the moon

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 1>or asteroids in some sense because they're made of stuff.

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But like in the modern world especially, and this is

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe different from how it was for most of human history.

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Value comes from organization, right, Like if you're running a country,

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>would you rather have a diamond mind or Google? Right, yeah,

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>if you had both. The diamond mind is trivial. It's

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 1>really not a big contributor to the economy, like that

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>tech sector. You know. We got into this. This is

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>actually a late addition to our book. We were talking

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to an economists, to the developmental economists. We said something

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 1>sort vague about this stuff, and he was like, you

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>should look at this thing from the World Bank where

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>they actually taught it up, like the wealth of different nations,

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and like what the actual value was to this planet

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of natural resources, and it was like, I think two

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent of overall wealth is a natural resource.

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>It's minimal. So when people talk about what we have

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to do the asteroids because we'll get so rich because

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of natural resources. Like, by the way, ninety percent of

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that was possil fuels, right, which don't exist on Mars.

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to someone who's a real long term

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>mist about this and she was like, well, but eventually

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to push into space because we're

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>going to run out of resources. And I was like,

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>if you want to have a ten thousand year eventually,

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>why don't you just say we'll all be hooked to

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>like the matrix and we'll just experience infinite value in

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>our heads. If you can invote these crazy sci fi scenarios,

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the idea of value goes bonkers, and I don't think

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it's even worth speculating about.

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we'll all just be downloading our chicken sand, which

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 2>is no need to even go to your chicken sand

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 2>with shack.

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And they'll be perfect yeah.

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, So getting the space is hard, mining stuff

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 2>and using resources in space. It doesn't really have value

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 2>unless it's already an economy, which means people there to

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 2>value it and to need it. So that sort of

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 2>sets the scene. Let's take a break, and when we

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 2>come back, I want to hear from the Wiersmith's all

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 2>about the updates since they're b was written, since we

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 2>have had some rapid progress in reusable rockets and access

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 2>to space and CubeSats and starlink and all sorts of

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 2>other crazy stuff. All right, so everybody go get a

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 2>chicken sandwich and take a break and we'll see you

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 2>on the other side. Okay, we're back, and I'm mediating

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 2>a Wiener Smith marital session.

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 3>I think it's pretty clear that I'm winning, but I'm

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 3>going to continue to let you have the stage for

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.719
<v Speaker 3>a little while and answer these questions since you were

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 3>the guest.

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, So we've been hearing about how difficult

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 2>it is to get to space and to build an

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 2>economy there if you don't already have one. What's changed

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 2>since you guys have written your book. That's essentially what

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 2>our listener wanted to know. Do you have a new perspective.

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.360
<v Speaker 2>First start with what has changed, and then let's talk

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 2>about what it means.

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>One of the funny things that happened with us when

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>we were writing soon Ish was that the change began

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>as we were like, going to press, we're really mad

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>at SpaceX because they kept landing reasonable rockets when we've

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>been trying.

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 3>To discuss impressed with not mad as.

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>I wish they would cut it out because we were like,

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this is future tech and they were doing it and

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>we were like, well, this is just ruining everything. Butzz

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and I don't remember the number, maybe Kelly you did,

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>It was like when we went to press, it was

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>like six times they had landed. The reason we were

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>walked with something like that wasn't much, but it was

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a huge deal. I remember talking to someone who said

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>something like I watched the moon landing and this was

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a bigger deal. And I think most people wouldn't agree

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 1>with that, but I did. But the moon landing was expensive.

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 1>There was no way they were going to let us

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>do this for very long, right the government, whereas like

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>reasonable rockets, this has been like the dream since like

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the fifties. You know, if you go back Max Bajay

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of one of the big NASA engineers had these drawings

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of reasonable rocket. It would have worked by having three

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>stacked rockets with a pilot in each of them with

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>wings right, would have flown back down like insanely dangerous.

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>It's super awesome. Nothing like it ever happened. There are

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple like experiments in the nineties, but they weren't

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>like doing the high speed or any of thething you

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>needed to do. And then all of a sudden SpaceX

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 1>was going to orbit and coming back. And the reason

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that matters is that math we talked about earlier. Right,

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>The old line is like if you have a seven

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>forty seven, but you have to throw it into the

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>ocean after each use, the tickets are expensive, and that's

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>essentially how we did space for the entire Space age

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>up to SpaceX.

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 2>And why are we usable rockets so hard? I mean,

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 2>landing a seven forty seven is tricky, but we can

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 2>do it. Why is landing a rocket so much harder?

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I misspake when I said it was the only time

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>because the course of the Space Shuttle was time before that,

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>which was partially reusable. And I feel like that's actually

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.959
<v Speaker 1>indicative because you know, in the case of the Space Shuttle,

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:46.959
<v Speaker 1>we had two total losses out of you know, one

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty something flights. And it's just because it's

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 1>really dangerous to take something that's in orbit, meaning like

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>if it were in air, it would be at whatever

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it is Map twenty five or something, and just sort

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of gently cruise back into the atmosphere. Right, you get

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of heated it's hard to deal with, you know,

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you get all sorts of crazy accelerations, and so it's

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>just tough, especially if you're trying to keep the humans alive.

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>The nice thing about SpaceX is they don't do this

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.439
<v Speaker 1>trick with humans in the vehicle right, operated by computer.

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 1>It's still insanely impressive though, but yeah, it's just hard

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to make a vehicle that can endure all that. I mean,

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 1>this is really hard stuff.

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 3>It was about thirty thousand dollars per pound to send

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 3>a mass of stuff to space using the shuttle. It

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 3>was really expensive. Once you got that shuttle safely on

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 3>the ground, refurbishing it, getting it ready to go back

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 3>up again cost a lot of money. And so it

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 3>did not lower the cost of sending masks to space

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 3>like people had anticipated.

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, interesting. People thought that the space shuttle was going

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 2>to be like a shuttle literally and make it cheap

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 2>to get stuff to and front space.

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was actually evidence that it was the most

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.479
<v Speaker 1>expensive way during its like heyday, it's funne Ever, when

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>they retired it, like everyone outside the space community was like,

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the end of America, and like everyone in

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the space community was like, thank god, they like took

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that death trap off the market.

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, well, what was wrong, like what was wrong

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 2>about their kindations or the physics or why didn't it

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:03.719
<v Speaker 2>work out? Was it never going to work out? It

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 2>was just silly politics.

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 1>This is like an endless nerd debate. I think people

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>who are more pro shuttle want to defend it would say, look,

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the government made them do all sorts of crazy stuff.

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>They didn't fund it enough the beginning, and then for

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote safety reasons, you had to disassemble and assess

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>all these different parts. So part why SpaceX is cheap,

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not just three usables. They did a clean sheet

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>design that uses a lot of off the shelf parts.

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 1>What argument as part of why SpaceX can exist is

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of off the shelf electronics just got

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>really good in a way that wasn't true in like

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the late seventies. So it's confluence of things. It's possible,

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>it just wasn't the time yet. Notably, the Soviet Union

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>had a very similar vehicle called Brand which I think

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:42.439
<v Speaker 1>flew exactly once.

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about why it's possible. Is it just

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 2>cheap and fast electronics that are also like somehow radiation hard?

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Like why is it possible for SpaceX to do this?

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 2>Was it a moment of genius a particular insight? Was

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 2>it Elon Musk being super cool? What was it that

0:24:58.840 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 2>made this possible?

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>Eric Berger has a great book about this called Liftoff,

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of going into the details. I think it's a

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of things, like, I mean, reusables matter, but actually

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>they were doing pretty well before reusables. And a big

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>part of it is like, if you look at the

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>history of rocketry, most rockets are not clean sheet designs.

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Their old military stuff. The rockets the Mercury guys were

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 1>flying and was just there was a warhead and they

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>took it off and they put Alan Shepherd on top,

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and it was reportedly pretty bumpy too, because it was

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>not meant for humans, right, and This is like the

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>history of rockets for many years, and in fact, a

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of those early rocket designs go back to like

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the NAZV too rockets. That's like where all early rocketry

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 1>comes from, or much of it.

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 2>But if you already have a system that mostly works,

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 2>why do you want to clean sheet design? Aren't you

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 2>saving money by building off of something you already have.

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the argument is usually that those designs they're

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>built for military stuff, so that means a lot of stuff.

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>It means, you know, maybe they're paying for high reliability

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to cost. It could also mean famously, you

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>looked like the F thirty five, where like the Navy

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>gets to say, the Army gets to say, Marines get

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to say, and so you end up with this big,

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>complicated machine, where I think the SpaceX is like a

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>very spare rocket. It's very stripped down. It's also like

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>not as many spoke parts. So that a NASA way

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of doing things, which kind of makes sense for research agency,

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is you use a lot of smoke parts, you don't

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>use a lot of off the shelf. And part of

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.479
<v Speaker 1>that's like historically these parts didn't even exist, right, and

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>so now you can like drop an iPhone in space,

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>it has a chance. These things are pretty durable now,

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and so I think something between doing a clean sheet

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>design having access to modern electronics and yeah, I don't

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>like always big of a position of complimenting e On Musk,

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>but you know, he brought a kind of Silicon Valley

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>view to things. And that was, by the way possible

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 1>because of the COTS program, which started at NASA, which

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't need to get into, but essentially said look,

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to stop doing this cost plus contract business.

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>We're going to actually go out and try to create

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a private sector for launch. I think that mattered a

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 1>lot too, and people like Musk stepped in to fill

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the gap.

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 2>So there wasn't an economy there, and the government invested

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 2>in something and built an economy there.

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, I would say have still built it. I mean

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the money that ghost to SpaceX is

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>government contracts and there's still sustaining it.

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 2>So then what is the state of the art now?

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 2>How cheap is it to go to space compared to

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 2>how it used to be twenty years ago?

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah, So even we were writing the book, the

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>standard number was something like ten thousand of kilogram the

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>latest numbers for Leo or twenty six hundred dollars per kilogram,

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's on Falcon nine. So for comparison to the

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>numbers we have for the Space Shuttle was sixty five

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 1>four hundred dollars per kilogram. So that's a pretty non

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>trivial drop. And it's possible that SpaceX's own internal numbers

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>are even cheaper when they reuse a lot of rockets

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>for their starlink system. The numbers we have for the

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Falcon Heavy, which is essentially like a Falcon with two

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>other Falcon boosters strapped to it, is fifteen hundred dollars

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>per kilogram, like an order of magnitude cheaper than it

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>was just when we were writing ten years ago.

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, So if I had a really big chicken

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 2>sandwich it's a kilogram, and I wanted to launch it

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 2>to space, it would only cost me fifteen hundred bucks.

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I mean, you know you really want to

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>fill the firing with chicken sandwiches, You just have a

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of chicken sandwich. You have to pay for the

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 1>whole vehicle. You don't get a.

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, still, fifteen hundred dollars is not crazy number.

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it would cost me like one hundreds of

0:27:57.040 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 2>dollars to send a chicken sandwich in China, for example,

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 2>and so you know a factor tend to go to

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 2>space honestly seems reasonable. But this is for cargo. What

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 2>about for people? Where are we in terms of like

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 2>sending people into space?

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the Shuttle retired and basically the way

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we were able to get to space was embarrassingly by

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>employing the Russians to launch us. And then SpaceX comes

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>along and made it possible. But it's like it's hard

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to have the extra step where you get humans on board.

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>There's just a lot of extra stuff that has to

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>not go wrong. You have to have high reliability, you

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>have to have these little capsules that have oxygen. And

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:32.400
<v Speaker 1>so they built one. They built the Dragon Capsule, where notably,

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>like companies like Boeing which is a pretty storied company,

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>have not really succeeded, they built this capsule successfully docked

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>multiple times now with the ISS. They also have sent

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>up restocking missions that bring like, you know, consumables, that

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. Cool.

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, so then what does this mean? Right? We

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 2>talked earlier about how difficult it is to get into space.

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Getting up from Earth is expensive. But now things have changed,

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 2>things are cheaper. Does that change our calculus about building

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 2>stuff out in space, getting that space economy going? That

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 2>things changed qualitatively or just quantitatively.

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say both. I mean so quantitatively. More and

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>more of the space business has become private. You know.

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Of course, at the beginning it was exclusively governments, and

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time that was true. And it's

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>really changed, especially in the last ten years. It's majority private.

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>We tried to find people who are trying to estimate this.

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>In a couple of years ago it was already three

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>quarters private, and I'm sure that's just continued. The business

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>has grown. I mean, the nice thing is, you know,

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the stuff grows in what am I trying to use?

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Tandem Panda? Thank you so good? Kelly?

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Is he one for Kelly? Zero point ten?

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh? All right, well you're way behind this plant. We're

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>all ever more data hungry for like I cat videos.

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>There's also practical stuff like even ten years we're all

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in self driving cars. Then they might want you know,

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>lowers orbit satellite uplinks for constant connectivity, and so we

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>just want more and more and more data and so

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the satellites can supply that, right, So you know I

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>said earlier everything below geosynchronous is valuable, and that's what

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it's valuable for. This is nice because it's a sort

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of ratchet where you know, you keep throwing up more satellites.

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>It gets cheaper to mass produce them. Data gets cheaper.

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>But when the data gets cheaper, we just demand more

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and more and more of it, and so we keep

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>throwing up satellites. And so this is why we're finally

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, for a long time people talked about having

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>problems with like satellites smashing into each other, and it's

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>finally becoming like maybe a bit more serious. And it's

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>also maybe we want to lead it into this. It's

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>making space tourism at least more plausible. That we haven't

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>seen like an explosion in that yet.

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:27.959
<v Speaker 2>All right, So then is there a space economy for tourism?

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean people have been launching on these things, you know,

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how high up they're getting, whether their

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 2>accounts of space, whether their counts is tourism, whether they're

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, commercial knots or whatever. Do you think this

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 2>is the beginning of a space tourism industry.

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So, I mean, you know, people have been doing

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>space tourism for like over twenty years now. A bunch

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of people have gone up to the ISS. They're all

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>very rich people. Most of them wrote books about it.

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>We read some of them. And more recently Blue Origin

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>has been sending people up and you can kind of

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>debate if they are space tourists because they don't go

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to orbit, which is kind of like for a nerd,

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the important thing when you go to space, you want

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to go to orbit, which is much harder to do

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>than to just do what they do, which is they

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>go up really high. They get the view of space

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you want, right, They get to see you above the

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere with the stars above, and they get to I

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>think something like four minutes in free fall floating, so

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>they get a kind of like astronaut like experience. So

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>if you count that, the number has gone way up.

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 2>But why does the nerd only value being in orbit?

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Why does it only count if you're in orbit?

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Because it's the hard part, right, I forget. There's some

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>famous line from Hindline which is like the hard part

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>about going to space is not going up high, it's

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>going over fast. Right, So you feel aout this idea

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that when you're in orbit you don't experience gravity, But

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of course you experience gravity because you didn't as you know,

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you fling off in a straight line until you encountered

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>something else. And so it's just that you're at the

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>right velocity. The slingy outy tendency is balanced by the

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>polleyanny tendency, and so you go to a circle.

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 2>I guess. So, but if I wanted to go to

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 2>the Moon or Mars, whatever, I wouldn't go to orbit,

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 2>and I would still count that as going out into space, right.

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, sure, sure. If if Vegas was shipping build to

0:31:56.120 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the Moon, I would waive my objection by all means.

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad we settled that here in nerd Corta.

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>That's right, it's good, right, Yeah, so we don't need

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to go on this change. But actually comes up legally

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>because you have different legal protections if you're an astronaut

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>versus a non astronaut under international law.

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Protection from who.

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 3>That's a good question, Aliens.

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Ghosts on the Moon, Moon's haunted bro.

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it's usually imagined that if there's some disaster

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 3>in space or you land in a foreign country, there's

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 3>a legal obligation to whoever could help you out to

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 3>help you out.

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So like if you went to orbit with your chicken

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>sandwich and you fell over Siberia, the Russians, even if

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>they were really mad at us, would be obligated to

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>deliver you and your vehicle and not be jerks about it. Basically,

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>there's more precise language in the out of space Street,

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but not much more precise. And I guess they'd have

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to render up the sandwich or something you can visualize, right,

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>So SpaceX dragon capsule goes up. If you wash the rocket,

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it'll turn and it will go at high speed into

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>an orbital trajectory, whereas a Blue Origin rocket and this

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is still really cool, but it'll just go up and

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>then come down. There's no attempt to go into orbit

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. So they're not doing the hard part.

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you know, you only get to spend

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, like some amount of minutes doing space

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to days or weeks or whatever.

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Can I ask a quick clarifying question, So when Kentucky

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Fried Chickens sent one of their chicken sandwiches up on

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 3>a high altitude balloon, because it didn't orbit. That doesn't count.

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Rat did that really happen?

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 3>That did really happen? Yes, that doesn't count.

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Right to Zach, that doesn't count as the chicken sandwich

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>being an astronaut.

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 3>No, no, going to space, going to space? Did they

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 3>waste their money on that advertising campaign?

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you guys trying to get KFC as a sponsor

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>right now?

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 2>We talked about Taco Bell recently having a target for

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 2>a reusable vehicle.

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>We shouldn't go on a tangent, but there is a

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of formal line called the carm online you've probably

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about at some point, which is like sixty something

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>miles up that like is technically space, but who cares,

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not orbit. It doesn't count as tourism. I don't know.

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's address the actual question, are we going to get

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a tourism business? And doesn't matter. If you look at

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the number of satellites, it's just totally exploded in the

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>last ten years. That has not happen with space towards

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>The equivalent would be something like dozens of tourists are

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>up right now. SpaceX wants that they've talked about they

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>have this new vehicle called starship. It's as big as

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:19.319
<v Speaker 1>a Saturn five, Like, it's enormous. It could put we

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know yet, but say fifty or one hundred, one

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty tons in orbit, so plausibly you could

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>have like fifty people there all puking on each other

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:30.240
<v Speaker 1>at the same time as they enter orbit, but getting

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that magnificent view that John Glenn got on his first orbit, right,

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 1>And so one question you might ask is is there

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>any money in this? And so Kelly and I actually

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>tried to look into this. There's not a lot of

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>people who run surveys that are like how much would

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you pay to go into space? But there's some evidence

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>everything the exact number, but it's something like a decent

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 1>amount of middle class Americans would at least say on

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a survey that they would part with like fifty grand

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 1>for an orbital trip. Whether they would whether you could

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>convince your spouse that that's like a good investment, is

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>therek question? It does seem like there's an economy there, right,

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>There is a market. And what's exciting about that if

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you want there to be like a really cool moon base,

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 1>is you know, if you've got a tourist market like this,

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>even if it was just adventure tourism for the relatively rich,

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Like that's going to require a lot of development of

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:16.439
<v Speaker 1>like high reliability vehicles, life support. One of our big

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>things we winged about is there all these basics that

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't think about, like making sure the toilet doesn't

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>break like it did on inspiration for launched by SpaceX,

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. And so you're getting all this basic tiki

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>TACKI life support stuff really worked out. One thing is

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a big d the US is like most astronauts are

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>middle aged dudes, right, just some high percentage of all

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>astronauts ever middle aged men who are in like peak

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>physical condition, and so like the question is, like what

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>happens when like I go up, I bring like a

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 1>slightly sub average body into space slightly.

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh you're very handsome.

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's have some boundaries here, Yeah, thank you, minus one.

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm blowing a whistle on that one.

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but no more seriousness, Like we don't have a

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of on like old people, people have various conditions

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to performance this. We just don't have it.

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>And so there's all this stuff you'd want to have

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>for a really cool moon base that you would get

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>naturally from a tourism business.

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Zach and I in a city on Mars, call ourselves

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 3>this space. I'm gonna say jerks for the show so

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:18.760
<v Speaker 3>that our editor doesn't have to do too many bleeps,

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.240
<v Speaker 3>but to just to provide a non space jerk counter argument.

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 3>One of the Wiener Smiths leaves the house, and so

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I went to a bunch of space conferences. And if

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 3>you go to the space conferences, they would say that

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 3>space tourism is just absolutely taking off. They count the

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 3>suborbital flights. They are saying that the number of astronauts

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 3>is increasing rapidly. And so I do think there's a

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:41.439
<v Speaker 3>lot of activity in this area, a lot of people

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 3>who are excited. And so there are people who are

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:45.720
<v Speaker 3>not as negative as the Wiener Smiths.

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Is there anybody who's more negative than.

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 3>There are there are?

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, there are friends.

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 3>That's right. There are the people who talk to us.

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 3>All right, So let's take a break and when we

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 3>get back we will talk a bit more about the

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 3>space economy.

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we're back, and we're talking to the Winnersmith's about

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 2>the future in space. Where are the great great, great

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 2>great great grandkids of this wonderful marriage, going to set

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 2>down their roots where they live on the moon, where

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 2>they live in space, or would they still be in Virginia.

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to be in Virginia.

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we're gonna have sunsets on the moon

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 2>the way we have in Virginia for quite agreed, Yeah, exactly,

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 2>we have to paint them on the wall or something.

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 2>All right, So let's talk about realistic space economies. I mean,

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 2>we've talked a lot about how difficult to it is,

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 2>how expensive it is, but it is getting easier, and

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 2>we have an explosion of space satellites. And you guys

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 2>are skeptical about space tourism, But what are some space

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 2>economies that we could have eventually, maybe somehow get going

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 2>without finding gold on the Moon?

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Can I clarify real quick that I'm not necessarily skeptical

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 3>about space tourism. That seems to me to be a

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 3>thing that's happening right now. I might be a little

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 3>less skeptical than Zach. All right, go ahead, Zach.

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I would actually agree with that it's not exploding, But

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I would actually say that's the most optimistic case of

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:21.759
<v Speaker 1>space tourism. You know, it's not like an industry that

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>makes us all more productive, but it is one that

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 1>might exist. I there's enough each people want to go,

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, so let's talk about other possibilities. So there's

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 1>been this desire for many years for there to be

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>some reason to go to the Moon or Mars or

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the asteroid belt. So we could talk about like some

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 1>of the most common things and why we're a little

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 1>bit skeptical. I would say the most common ones you

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>hear Kelly current me of you disagree are space based

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 1>solar and let's go mind the Moon or the asteroids

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:50.359
<v Speaker 1>or something and space based solar. You know, it could

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>be a whole episode, but the short version is do

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a back of the envelope calculation, and you know, even

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 1>with really low launch costs, it's almost always going to

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>be better to put up a good voltap panel and

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>like Arasz or the Sahara desert them launching itto space.

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 3>If I can just quickly plug some work that Daniel

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 3>and I have done in the past back on Daniel

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 3>and Jorge Explain the Universe. Daniel and I did a

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 3>chat about space based solar where we talk about some

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 3>of the limitations, and also I do feel like something

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 3>we've sort of skipped over. That's important to mention is

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 3>that the economy and low Earth orbit for satellites and

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 3>stuff is huge. That is making tons of money, and

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:27.800
<v Speaker 3>we'll continue to expand. And we talked to Jonathan McDowell

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 3>about the implications of more satellites going into space and

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 3>collisions and how that could affect the economy. But so

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:36.879
<v Speaker 3>now we're working beyond just putting satellites in space, right, And.

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:40.359
<v Speaker 2>There aren't some arguments for space based solar power. I mean,

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 2>I think on the whole they don't win out, but

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 2>there are some reasons. It's not total insanity. The idea

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 2>is that your solar panels are always in the sun right,

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 2>because you're never in the Earth shadow, which is cool.

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 2>So it's a gain of three x right there on

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Moost or two x. And they could beam power to

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 2>anywhere on Earth, which is very cool. So you don't

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 2>have to have solar panels in a place where you

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 2>have lots of sun Norwegians can get solar power in

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the winter. That would be amazing and nice and cozy,

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 2>But of course there's lots of issues there, like you're

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:09.479
<v Speaker 2>building a huge beam and pointing it at the Earth.

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:11.839
<v Speaker 2>Could that ever go wrong? I can't imagine.

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>The father of rocketry, Hermon Obert, actually proposed putting a

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 1>giant mirror in space for agriculture and for weaponizations. This

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is one of the oldest ideas in space.

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 2>But of course we do use solar power in space, right,

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 2>satellite solar panels and all sorts of stuff. There is

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 2>a solar power up there, and you know, I think

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 2>that highlights it, like, if you want to do something

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 2>in space, you should do it for the space economy

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 2>bringing it back down to Earth is almost never profitable. Yes,

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:40.719
<v Speaker 2>so then what is like, what is the space economy?

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 2>What is the space version of the chicken sandwich.

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>One of the possibility which I'll just do this very quickly,

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is we either mind the Moon or there's something we

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 1>need to make in zero gravity. And so there's been

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:53.439
<v Speaker 1>talk of the something for decades and you will still

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 1>say this be like, well, you can make very pure materials.

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess there are plays to be easier to make

0:40:57.480 --> 0:41:00.880
<v Speaker 1>certain biochemicals in space. And this is all to my understanding, true.

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just that it's hard to win on price when

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to fly to like a space station and

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>assent bloat there, and so far it just hasn't happened.

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And if someone in your audience is probably objecting, like, well,

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:13.360
<v Speaker 1>such and such company just put in millions of dollars

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to do it, so what are they crazy? And my

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 1>answer is that our book I read a book from

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the eighties it was like, you know, John Deere just

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>paid three million dollars to send this thing into space,

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:24.439
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, look, companies do this for promo. It's

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not proof that it's a good idea. But the other

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>option is the moon or the asteroid bilt like we're

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:31.319
<v Speaker 1>going to go mine. And that goes back to what

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we were saying earlier about like, look, there's no special stuff.

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:37.760
<v Speaker 1>So the exception people often say is on the moon,

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll get helium three. And their papers written about this.

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Harrison Schmidt, the senator slash astronaut slash geologist, it was

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:47.359
<v Speaker 1>big on it, and we cite in our book there's

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a great paper. I'm blanking on the name, but basically

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 1>just is this incredible takedown. But the very short version is,

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the only real use for helium three that's

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 1>big money is you could have a neutronic fusion, which

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is to cleaner form of fusion. And the problem is,

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>like it's a much harder version of fusion that the

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:08.320
<v Speaker 1>fusion we already can't do, and the vision we already

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:11.319
<v Speaker 1>can't do is actually quite clean compared to like other

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 1>energy methods. I think of like this a neutronic stuff

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:16.320
<v Speaker 1>as like a kind of show off version of fusion.

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>We've already achieved utopia, why not push it a little further.

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not like there's hunks of it on the moon.

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:26.839
<v Speaker 1>It's just an a moderately higher concentration on the You're

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:28.800
<v Speaker 1>in the position of saying we have to like mine

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:31.319
<v Speaker 1>and process huge parts of the moon, and like, don't

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 1>even get us started on how to run construction equipment

0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:36.479
<v Speaker 1>in a vacuum at one six gravity. It's a whole

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 1>other thing. But also, and this for me really got me.

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 1>If you know your nuclear reactors, think y'all did an

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 1>episode on this at some point. You know, there's a

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 1>type called a heavy water reactor. The main ones are

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in Canada, the mini states that are built thinking that

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>uranium would be hard to come across in the future.

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 1>As they're a little more efficient, they use deuterated water

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and one of their byproducts is helium three. We really

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 1>urgently needed loads of helium three. Probably you're better off

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:04.239
<v Speaker 1>building these like weird fission reactors and just sucking off

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:07.839
<v Speaker 1>the byproduct. So unfortunately, if you're boring, you run into

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 1>this problem every time you have one of these ideas

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>about why we need to go to space.

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 3>I think another problem is that you're always kind of vulnerable.

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:18.439
<v Speaker 3>So say you did start mining helium three, it would

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 3>be super expensive. As soon as someone figured out a

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 3>cheaper way to do it on Earth, or any way

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:25.399
<v Speaker 3>to do it on Earth, they almost immediately can beat

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 3>you at cost. And so there's fiber optic cables I

0:43:28.000 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 3>think that people want to make in space. But again,

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 3>if you can figure out how to do it on

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Earth and get them just as good, you immediately beat

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 3>the competition. So I feel like you're always at risk.

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean that's the whole Like sex sorting story,

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 1>this is our favorite story, which is there were proposals

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>in the seventies to send bull seam into space for

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>sex sorting, which I guess is a little easier in

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 1>zero gravity. And then the eighties methods were developed, and

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:50.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's like any money that had been spent in

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:54.279
<v Speaker 1>like nineteen seventy five to sort bullga meats on Skylab

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:56.280
<v Speaker 1>would have been really badly spent.

0:43:57.440 --> 0:43:59.479
<v Speaker 2>I feel like a lot of these ideas are sort

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 2>of bad faith reverse engineering to cover. Like somebody just

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 2>wants to go to space, and like, let's come up

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:07.719
<v Speaker 2>with an excuse to do it. And I think there's

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 2>just sort of like an enthusiasm there, like it feels

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:12.760
<v Speaker 2>like it's the future. Let's just get it started.

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 3>I know those people. I go to conferences with those people,

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 3>and I genuinely believe that a lot of them really

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 3>do feel like the things they're doing in space are

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 3>just so much better than what we could do on Earth.

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:25.320
<v Speaker 3>I think there's plenty of people who believe and aren't

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 3>acting in bad faith. I'm just not convinced.

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:30.200
<v Speaker 2>I guess bad faith is too strong. I mean, I

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 2>think the real motivation is enthusiasm for space, not like, hey,

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:36.360
<v Speaker 2>this is a good idea and it needs space, so

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 2>therefore let's go there. Is that fair?

0:44:39.239 --> 0:44:40.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:42.319
<v Speaker 1>I think, all.

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, so let's get back to trashing other people's data

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 2>centers in space. I've heard people talk about these data

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:52.000
<v Speaker 2>centers because, like Google spends huge amounts of money building

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:54.400
<v Speaker 2>these computers and taking up a lot of land and

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:57.360
<v Speaker 2>using a lot of energy and like warming the planet

0:44:57.600 --> 0:45:00.319
<v Speaker 2>and you know, using a lot of water. But like,

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:03.320
<v Speaker 2>why don't we build this stuff in space? Right? Space

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:06.360
<v Speaker 2>is big and cold? So what are your thoughts about

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 2>data centers in space? Exactly?

0:45:08.560 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I mean this is one of those ideas that

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:13.239
<v Speaker 1>structure is one of the most bizarre ideas I'd never heard.

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:14.879
<v Speaker 1>I was like nervous to argue about it because people

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:16.360
<v Speaker 1>be like, no, the physics works out, and I was like,

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 1>but so may maybe we should go over for your audience.

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Like it's hard to dump heat in space. Okay, it's

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 1>really hard. Space is like colded in some formal sense,

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:26.400
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't mean it's easy to dump heat right,

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 1>for the same reason, like if you have a hot

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>hunk of metal, it's easier if you have a bucket

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of water than like cold air to dump heat. There's

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:35.479
<v Speaker 1>just more molecules to pull away the heat. In space,

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:38.440
<v Speaker 1>You've got nothing or almost nothing, right, and so it's

0:45:38.520 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>very hard to dump heat. If you look at the ISS,

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it is just radiators that are dumping

0:45:43.360 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the heat, like generated by the systems and the humans

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in it. It's just one of the problems for space

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:48.760
<v Speaker 1>based solar is you have to deal with all this heat.

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:51.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so let's get into the physics that for a minute, Like, yeah,

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 2>how do you cool down? You cool down in two

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 2>different ways. One is like you have air around you,

0:45:56.760 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 2>which is bouncing off of you, and it's stealing your heat.

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 2>If you're hotter than the air, you're going to lose

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:04.280
<v Speaker 2>your heat to the air. It's like heat diffusion essentially,

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:06.359
<v Speaker 2>and out in space you don't have that method. There

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:08.840
<v Speaker 2>is no wind to make it feel cold. There is

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 2>another method you can use to cool down, that's what

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned, which is radiation. You know, everything that has

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 2>a temperature it can be thought of as a black body,

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 2>and so it radiates, and things that are hotter radiated

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 2>higher frequency. That's your only way to lose heat in

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 2>space because there is no wind. So, as you say,

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:27.800
<v Speaker 2>even though space is technically cold, although parts of space

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:31.399
<v Speaker 2>are technically super duper hot because the particles are moving

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 2>really high speed and so like you would freeze to

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 2>death in a super hot but very dilute plasma. But

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:41.360
<v Speaker 2>also you could burn up, right, you could burn up

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 2>because it's hard to cool down, even if you're in

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:46.440
<v Speaker 2>a super hot, very dilute plasma. But so all your

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 2>intuition about hot and cold goes out the window. And

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:51.319
<v Speaker 2>the bottom line is it's hard to shed heat in

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:53.440
<v Speaker 2>space because there's no air to dump it into.

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and to be clear, the people proposing data centers

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in orbit know this. Yeah, But the point is, like,

0:46:57.880 --> 0:47:00.960
<v Speaker 1>data centers are hot, so what is the solution.

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 2>The solution is basically giant radiators. And I think the

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 2>people proposing data centers in space they understand that they

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 2>are complicated, right, because you need more elaborate cooling and

0:47:10.719 --> 0:47:14.040
<v Speaker 2>also like refurbishing your data center is harder, Like everything

0:47:14.120 --> 0:47:17.360
<v Speaker 2>is in space, right, and you need radiation protection and

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:20.719
<v Speaker 2>getting up there to swap out a new GP or whatever.

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:24.040
<v Speaker 2>It's complicated. I think they acknowledge that all these things

0:47:24.080 --> 0:47:26.239
<v Speaker 2>are hard. I think the argument, if we're going to

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:28.799
<v Speaker 2>like steal man it to try to be fair about it,

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:32.719
<v Speaker 2>is that resources eventually on Earth aren't limited, right. We

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:36.800
<v Speaker 2>have limited space and limited energy and basically unlimited demand

0:47:36.840 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 2>for computing, so eventually space has to be an efficient

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:42.680
<v Speaker 2>way to do This.

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Is another part of the argument that they're using the

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 3>space based solar to power the data center, and so

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 3>being in space solves a bunch of the problems for

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:52.520
<v Speaker 3>space bace solar we were talking about earlier.

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:54.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you don't need to bring the power back to Earth.

0:47:54.719 --> 0:47:57.239
<v Speaker 2>You just power the computers there, and in principle, maybe

0:47:57.280 --> 0:48:00.160
<v Speaker 2>even the compute is for your space economy. Right. For

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:03.279
<v Speaker 2>people who are generating images of chicken sandwiches on the Moon,

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:05.800
<v Speaker 2>they don't have to go back and forth from Earth

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:08.319
<v Speaker 2>in order to have their AI slave make their art

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 2>for that.

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Whoa. You know. One of the things I probably often

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:15.280
<v Speaker 1>had writing the books is you'd be talking to someone

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:17.239
<v Speaker 1>and they'll be like, and that's why we'll need a

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand foot tall tower in the poles of Mars. And

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you'd be like, but I don't see when that's going

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:24.839
<v Speaker 1>to be a good idea. They'll be like, well, I'm

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about ten thousand years from now, when we're I'm

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:30.280
<v Speaker 1>like Kardashev scale level eighty three, And you're like, well, okay,

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess I would even argue about that. So people

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:34.880
<v Speaker 1>will say this right, so like, we'll eventually have to

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:37.000
<v Speaker 1>do this because we're going to use up all the resources.

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:39.360
<v Speaker 1>But resources don't work that way. There's not like a

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of lump of stuff called resources that you can

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 1>use up right. So like before lithium ion batteries, like

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:47.399
<v Speaker 1>lithium had uses, but it wasn't this super valuable stuff.

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Now it's a really important resource. The same was true

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 1>for like high quality sand, for silicon. It was true

0:48:52.200 --> 0:48:55.919
<v Speaker 1>of petroleum before the combustion engine. Right. People substitute stuff

0:48:55.920 --> 0:48:58.319
<v Speaker 1>when new technology comes along, right, And that's how you

0:48:58.360 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>get more valuable over time. And so you know, not

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to be too deprising, but you mentioned like we're all

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:07.439
<v Speaker 1>going to have our like AI, I'll say servants, like, look,

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:10.359
<v Speaker 1>if you just want value, value means humans say they're

0:49:10.400 --> 0:49:13.399
<v Speaker 1>willing to pay dollars for it or whatever for it, right,

0:49:13.480 --> 0:49:16.359
<v Speaker 1>So like you can literally have infinite value just by

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 1>putting people in the matrix or something like if we're

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 1>willing to entertain these like, well, in a thousand years,

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:23.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll do this possibility, like wehen as well entertain that.

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:25.839
<v Speaker 1>And just to like talk about what it would mean

0:49:26.040 --> 0:49:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to need to go to space for a data center, Kelly,

0:49:28.560 --> 0:49:29.919
<v Speaker 1>you correct me if I'm wrong, but I think under

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the Antarctic Treaty system you could like litter Antarctica with

0:49:32.840 --> 0:49:35.839
<v Speaker 1>data centers. You could probably do that now, and it's

0:49:35.920 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 1>like cold and there's water. They have pancake breakfast at McMurdo,

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're not doing that. So I don't know. Maybe

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:46.319
<v Speaker 1>when we're done with Antarctica and we've like filled the

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:49.720
<v Speaker 1>oceans with data centers and we're all just made of data,

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:55.040
<v Speaker 1>then that like aggregative like computronium, will need to expand

0:49:55.040 --> 0:49:58.719
<v Speaker 1>into space. I have trouble seeing it earlier. The only

0:49:58.760 --> 0:50:00.279
<v Speaker 1>last thing I would say is I think people who

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:02.680
<v Speaker 1>are really into this, well, I think often have a

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:05.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of libertarian leaning, so they'll say, well, look like

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the Earth is getting bureaucratic and overregulated, and this is

0:50:09.000 --> 0:50:10.399
<v Speaker 1>going to be the only place where we could put

0:50:10.400 --> 0:50:13.360
<v Speaker 1>more stuff without having the like save the whales. Maybe

0:50:13.360 --> 0:50:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the future. I don't know. The costs are so extravagant.

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like even if you had elon Musk predictions,

0:50:19.360 --> 0:50:21.320
<v Speaker 1>like it's ten dollars, it's kilogram to go to space,

0:50:21.360 --> 0:50:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't know if anyone's way to data center,

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:26.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's a lot of kilograms. It's just hard to

0:50:26.840 --> 0:50:28.279
<v Speaker 1>imagine you're gonna win on price here.

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:31.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, a lot of this feels like chicken and egg problems. Right,

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:33.600
<v Speaker 2>you argue that there's no eggs because there's no chickens.

0:50:33.600 --> 0:50:35.759
<v Speaker 2>There's no chicken because there's no eggs. Let me ask

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:37.880
<v Speaker 2>you this in fact, like think a thousand years in

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:39.480
<v Speaker 2>the future or five thousand years of the future, do

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:43.320
<v Speaker 2>you think humans will ever have a viable space economy

0:50:43.520 --> 0:50:45.320
<v Speaker 2>or do you think it's never. Because if it's ever,

0:50:45.640 --> 0:50:47.680
<v Speaker 2>that means it's going to happen, and eventually you are

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:49.920
<v Speaker 2>going to want data centers in space. The only other

0:50:50.000 --> 0:50:51.839
<v Speaker 2>argument I think is that it's never going to happen.

0:50:51.920 --> 0:50:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Is that what you think?

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:55.239
<v Speaker 1>I would actually say, there's a middle argument, which I

0:50:55.360 --> 0:50:57.719
<v Speaker 1>prefer to make. I'd be curious if Kelly disagrees with me.

0:50:57.840 --> 0:51:00.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's like, so, it may be the case that

0:51:00.480 --> 0:51:03.600
<v Speaker 1>there's never a quote unquote good economic reason to do this,

0:51:03.840 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 1>just meaning you pay a dollar or someone does something,

0:51:06.239 --> 0:51:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you get two dollars back. Right, I think there's a

0:51:08.880 --> 0:51:11.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty good case that it'll either never be like that

0:51:11.080 --> 0:51:13.400
<v Speaker 1>or wouldn't be any time soon. It doesn't mean we

0:51:13.440 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 1>won't do it. It just means that at some point it

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:18.160
<v Speaker 1>might be like Star Trek, Right, so it's like, why

0:51:18.200 --> 0:51:20.319
<v Speaker 1>does Captain Kirk go around the galaxy? Was because we're

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:22.880
<v Speaker 1>all doing well and we'd like to see what's out there,

0:51:23.280 --> 0:51:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and so, meaning like it could be at some point

0:51:25.200 --> 0:51:27.680
<v Speaker 1>we're just so technologically advanced and riched we put people

0:51:27.680 --> 0:51:29.719
<v Speaker 1>on Mars as a sort of esthetic choice.

0:51:30.400 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Like building particle colliders or something exactly like that.

0:51:33.760 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to let up the secret, but I

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:38.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think CERN is going to like get you cheaper butter.

0:51:39.360 --> 0:51:41.279
<v Speaker 1>You do grow cows abuff parts, it don't think so.

0:51:41.400 --> 0:51:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:51:42.480 --> 0:51:45.880
<v Speaker 2>There are buffalo at Fermulab, yes, and bison butter is

0:51:45.920 --> 0:51:46.600
<v Speaker 2>pretty good.

0:51:46.560 --> 0:51:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay with drawn, but no, I mean, like why do

0:51:49.600 --> 0:51:51.839
<v Speaker 1>we have a base at McMurdo. I mean there is geopolitics.

0:51:51.840 --> 0:51:53.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not like nice all the way down, But mostly

0:51:53.520 --> 0:51:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it's because we think it's cool. We're much richer than

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:57.680
<v Speaker 1>we were one hundred years ago, and we just do it,

0:51:57.840 --> 0:52:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and so like stuff like that could lead to a

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:03.840
<v Speaker 1>serious martyrs presence. It's just that there's no good economic

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:05.920
<v Speaker 1>case for it. If you really want to give me

0:52:05.960 --> 0:52:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a thousand years to work with, I don't see why

0:52:09.000 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't get to a stage where we all individually

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:14.400
<v Speaker 1>have like four thousand robot butlers who attend on us

0:52:14.400 --> 0:52:16.920
<v Speaker 1>all day long, and we have like amazing rockets to

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:19.239
<v Speaker 1>do anything we want and it's all very safe. Then yeah,

0:52:19.280 --> 0:52:21.920
<v Speaker 1>why not that at least rules out what ninety nine

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:23.839
<v Speaker 1>percent of advocates are saying when they say we have

0:52:23.880 --> 0:52:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to go soon to get rich or to fix society

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 1>or not be like thwarted by the bureaucrats who are

0:52:29.200 --> 0:52:31.239
<v Speaker 1>dominating Earth. All that stuff goes out the window. If

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:33.239
<v Speaker 1>you're saying it's just an aesthetic choice will make because

0:52:33.239 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it's cool.

0:52:34.000 --> 0:52:36.399
<v Speaker 3>So Zach and I spent like five years writing the book,

0:52:36.400 --> 0:52:38.680
<v Speaker 3>and we had to argue until we agreed in the

0:52:38.719 --> 0:52:39.960
<v Speaker 3>content that would go in the book.

0:52:40.080 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 2>That's why it took so long.

0:52:41.280 --> 0:52:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, you know, so we don't usually diverge too much,

0:52:46.160 --> 0:52:48.160
<v Speaker 3>but I do want to add to what Zack said.

0:52:48.440 --> 0:52:50.440
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of why we do stuff in

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:53.360
<v Speaker 3>space comes down to prestige, and I suspect Zach agrees

0:52:53.400 --> 0:52:55.160
<v Speaker 3>with me on this point too. Yes, and so you

0:52:55.160 --> 0:52:57.919
<v Speaker 3>could end up getting a space economy because the US

0:52:57.960 --> 0:53:00.799
<v Speaker 3>and China are in a race to put research out there,

0:53:00.840 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 3>and then they need data centers and things just kind

0:53:03.440 --> 0:53:05.279
<v Speaker 3>of build up over time, and so it might not

0:53:05.400 --> 0:53:08.000
<v Speaker 3>be because there's something out there that's so valuable we

0:53:08.040 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 3>should actually go out there and get it. It might

0:53:10.160 --> 0:53:12.359
<v Speaker 3>just be that both nations think that they look great

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:14.840
<v Speaker 3>on the international stage if they were doing these things,

0:53:14.880 --> 0:53:16.840
<v Speaker 3>so they'll do it. So I think that could be

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:19.319
<v Speaker 3>another way we create the economy that makes some of

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:20.480
<v Speaker 3>these ideas worthwhile.

0:53:20.640 --> 0:53:23.560
<v Speaker 2>It wouldn't be the first time that science and technology

0:53:23.600 --> 0:53:27.040
<v Speaker 2>has ridden on the back of nationalism and patriotism to

0:53:27.120 --> 0:53:29.640
<v Speaker 2>make its case, right. I accuse other folks of bad

0:53:29.640 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 2>faith arguments, but there's a lot of that also in science, Like, Hey,

0:53:32.680 --> 0:53:34.319
<v Speaker 2>what we really want to do is X. We're going

0:53:34.360 --> 0:53:36.160
<v Speaker 2>to sell it to you as why because we think

0:53:36.239 --> 0:53:38.239
<v Speaker 2>you want to buy why. So I'm a little bit

0:53:38.239 --> 0:53:39.919
<v Speaker 2>of a hypocrite there, or at least a ten billion

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:40.319
<v Speaker 2>dollar here.

0:53:42.760 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Zach and I are waiting for our alien question. Oh yeah,

0:53:47.400 --> 0:53:48.560
<v Speaker 3>don't let us sound Daniel.

0:53:48.800 --> 0:53:50.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, here's my alien question. So, Zach, do you

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:54.800
<v Speaker 2>think that you guys are the reason for the Fermi paradox?

0:53:54.880 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Do you think on every planet is somebody out there

0:53:57.320 --> 0:54:00.160
<v Speaker 2>that's written the wet blanket book about going to space?

0:54:00.239 --> 0:54:02.400
<v Speaker 2>And that's why the aliens have never gone to space

0:54:02.480 --> 0:54:04.840
<v Speaker 2>and we haven't been visited by aliens. It's all the

0:54:04.840 --> 0:54:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Wiener Smith's faults.

0:54:06.000 --> 0:54:09.239
<v Speaker 1>There's some kind of tentacle like Smith.

0:54:11.719 --> 0:54:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Holding the back humanity exactly.

0:54:14.360 --> 0:54:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's what I'm suggesting.

0:54:17.040 --> 0:54:18.839
<v Speaker 1>As a guy with a book to sell, I would

0:54:18.880 --> 0:54:23.239
<v Speaker 1>go on any broadcast. I suppose maybe our message has

0:54:23.239 --> 0:54:24.880
<v Speaker 1>reached other planets and they gave up.

0:54:28.480 --> 0:54:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Are you guys going to sell your book on Mars

0:54:30.680 --> 0:54:31.839
<v Speaker 2>when there is an economy on.

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:38.000
<v Speaker 5>Mars if we can, that's right, Well premise, that's right,

0:54:38.120 --> 0:54:41.319
<v Speaker 5>that's right, you know, even if they're just selling it

0:54:41.360 --> 0:54:43.120
<v Speaker 5>to laugh at us because of how wrong we were.

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:45.320
<v Speaker 3>That's great. We'll take the royalties, will.

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Just like I love hate downloads of the podcast,

0:54:49.520 --> 0:54:51.799
<v Speaker 2>and there people who downloaded just to complain about it, like,

0:54:51.960 --> 0:54:52.960
<v Speaker 2>keep going for it.

0:54:55.560 --> 0:54:56.719
<v Speaker 1>That's beautiful, all.

0:54:56.680 --> 0:54:58.319
<v Speaker 2>Right, So thank you very much Zach for coming on

0:54:58.320 --> 0:55:00.520
<v Speaker 2>the podcast to tell us all about why going into

0:55:00.560 --> 0:55:04.480
<v Speaker 2>space is still hard and still expensive and everybody should

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:05.680
<v Speaker 2>go to Antarctica first.

0:55:05.960 --> 0:55:15.279
<v Speaker 3>Great job, Zach, All right, yes, thank you, yeah, yeah yeah.

0:55:16.120 --> 0:55:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe is produced by iHeartRadio. We

0:55:20.000 --> 0:55:22.400
<v Speaker 3>would love to hear from you, We really would.

0:55:22.560 --> 0:55:25.319
<v Speaker 2>We want to know what questions you have about this

0:55:25.520 --> 0:55:27.200
<v Speaker 2>extraordinary universe.

0:55:27.320 --> 0:55:30.280
<v Speaker 3>We want to know your thoughts on recent shows, suggestions

0:55:30.280 --> 0:55:33.279
<v Speaker 3>for future shows. If you contact us, we will get

0:55:33.320 --> 0:55:33.719
<v Speaker 3>back to you.

0:55:33.960 --> 0:55:37.440
<v Speaker 2>We really mean it. We answer every message. Email us

0:55:37.480 --> 0:55:40.320
<v Speaker 2>at Questions at danieland Kelly dot.

0:55:40.120 --> 0:55:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Org, or you can find us on social media. We

0:55:42.040 --> 0:55:45.920
<v Speaker 3>have accounts on x, Instagram, Blue Sky and on all

0:55:45.960 --> 0:55:48.719
<v Speaker 3>of those platforms. You can find us at D and K.

0:55:49.239 --> 0:55:51.359
<v Speaker 2>Universe will be shy right to us