WEBVTT - 4/12, Part 1: Florio Friday, Thursday MLB recap, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess dude Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy best

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. Do To to Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:53.960 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do do don too. Yeah. Oh,

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>this is the Fantasy best Friends Forever here on the

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports for Your Network, alongside Frankie Standford. I am

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Greg Susan Bragg Greggae. Happy Friday, t G I f

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>thank god it is Friday. Greg, We've made it. Tell

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>him me man through the week tired, A lot going

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>on here, a lot to talk about from last night,

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we starting baseball, we got some waiver, tired to talk

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>about for over the weekend, maybe getting some two start

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.839
<v Speaker 1>pitchers as well. For all that, Greg, I just sleep

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>last night, Buddy, I slept well, but oh but very tired. Today.

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>I slept well. I came in an hour late. As

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>we kind of kicking you in Caboose. I guess, I

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>guess that's what it is. I guess I just feel

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>like I've been kicked. That's what it is. I'm going

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>on that I don't know about. No, I'm just I'm

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>just tired, tired, and sleep very well last night, a

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of beers before the before bed, but it didn't help.

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>So you know what I did last night? Oh so

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Judy was not home again? Oh week, where's Judy party?

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Animal duties? She was working late last night. So I

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I watched um some TV and I had to catch

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:15.239
<v Speaker 1>up on I was watching a little baseball and I

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:17.399
<v Speaker 1>got kind of boring until I watched like the second half.

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 1>I wound up doing some watching something, then watching the

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>second half of the Giants Rockies game to completion Jeff So,

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Marja and Johnny Gray. Oh again, and how about in

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>my home be shark dude, dude do dodd? In my

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>home league, I was facing Jeff So, Marja and john Gray.

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>So that was like demoralizing, that's disastrous. That was me

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 1>last week I was going up against I think it

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>was Brad Keller, and he had three starts and he

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>outscored Max Scherzer. And I'm just like, what the hell

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 1>is going on? I'm just saying that. It was like

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I cannot believe this is real. So that was incredibly frustrating.

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Um anyway, So before that, I watched the last week's

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>episode of Barry on on HBO. Go and watch Barry now.

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I know sometimes I think you just make up these

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>shows stars Bill Hater, he's an actor, he's a star.

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Barry anyway, So I watched, Um, oh, I've seen ads

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>for this show. It's good. It's he'd like it. That's fine.

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Eight point one out of ten according to i MD.

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Brock Myer is much better. Brock Meyer's hysterical. I watched

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>second episode. I watched second episode of that yesterday as well.

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Watched that. I watched um, a couple episodes of Modern Family.

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>It is very quick to watch, you know, you fly through,

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and then the Cubs Pirates game. It just wasn't interested

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in at all. Oh, come on, Greg, it's a pictures duel.

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>It's great. It was a great Pictures dual. Right. So

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I was just like a cat against Joe Musgrove, right,

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>so that's how I felt, and we have shares of

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>both of those guys. Come on. I was listening to

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it on the radio. I couldn't believe that what is

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>happening expected you. They played semi charmed Life coming back

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>from I was like, you know those games on TV.

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>They must know that I'm listening. They played semi charms

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>coming back from a break. I was driving around so

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I needed something to keep me occupied. So anyway, they

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I had HBO go on for Barry, and I just like,

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, and then I put on I just

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>fast forwarded through. It's the parts that I like, the

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Greatest Showman. Oh, it's awesome. You know the greatest Showman. Bavona,

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>This is a joke. This guy's a joke, absolute joke. Bavona.

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 1>This is the perfect opportunity of you to chime in, Bona.

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>But I was saying how I was, um Christ to

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>stop talking when we're on the air. So I was

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>saying when we were I was just flipping through and

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I was on HBO Goal last night and I had

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>watched an episode of Barry and then I just saw

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>looking into Showman and I just I just played fast

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>forwarded to all the great parts of the movie, and

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought you'd appreciate it. I really do love Yeah. Say,

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I knew it. I knew it. It's amazing. Yeah, is

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the greatest. It's so good. This is a musicale and

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you're surprised that I haven't seen it. Why this is

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the greatest show man? Oh, I thought that's what was

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>coming next, The greatest show me No, trying to you know,

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>fit in, Like the soundtrack is man the greatest? The

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>soundtrack is just ridiculous, Pavona, isn't it like interesting? Yeah?

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>There was perfect. Yeah, I'm with you, man. I guess

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>he's getting pumps. He's got the goose bumps going on

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a Friday. I got him back. So I watched the

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>last night. You can't watch without this massive smile on

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>your face. That's how I felt. Okay, I did not.

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I was listening to some of the Katana against Big

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Joe musgroove. Then I watched two episodes of Game of

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Thrones like that getting me ready for I thought, I

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>thought about that all so, and I'm almost done with

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>season seven again, so I'm up to the final episode.

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll watch that probably tonight, and then I'm good to go.

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>For Sunday and then, like you, I turned on some

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>John Gray and Jeff some Martina called the end of

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that Sleepy Time. Watch the entire second half of that

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that game like from the fifth inting on, and um,

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it was annoying because I just wanted runs anyway, all

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted his runs. These are not scoring runs right now, Greg,

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know if you've noticed that. They're

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>They're very bad. Rockies are very bad right now. Yeah,

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna get Michael Flory on at some point.

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>They're awful. We're trying, We're trying, We're trying. But you know,

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>this would have been a perfect opportunity for him to say,

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>I love jo I love John Gray. He's the best.

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>That's one you're gonna say because he's the best. I'm

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>just sitting here, like, you know what. One of them

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>was going around probably picked two hundred, and one of

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 1>them is going around picked four hundred. So would you

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>rather have can be the guy going around pick four on?

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe that happened last night. To me, it

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>was like the worst, and I love that it happened.

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh from Jeffson margin against you, Greg, because you talk

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>so much smacks so much SMA about margin? Is that

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a real thing? What is fantasy karma a real thing?

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>When you talk smack about a player on the air.

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Because I've talked smack about Tyler Glass now all preseason

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going against him this week he dropped almost

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty fantasy points on my head, right, So not a

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>thing is that because I talked smack about him. Now

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I talk smack for Dames about Jordan's urin. It worked

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>out quite perfectly, now you didn't. I was almost getting

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you to buy in, almost not on Jordan's Erman. I

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>bought it on the bowl And we can start right there,

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>right you want? How about we start on the other

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:43.119
<v Speaker 1>side much better? The Beabes Beabs and you love the Beabes.

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>You love the Beabes, man, I love the Beabs all right?

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Where do you actually want to start? Where I started?

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>The Beams? Shane Bieber yesterday seven innings of three hit ball,

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>six strikeouts, one walk. He was fantastic against Detroit. Spencer

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Turnbull not as fantastic against Cleveland, but limited the damage

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>through his four innings. Yeah, Turnbull was disappointing yesterday, to

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>say the least. I streamed him. If you places I

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>recommended him as a stream on Patron, I'm sorry, but

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you know I also streamed him. So everything that I

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>tell um, you know, people who listen or read what

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I write, is exactly what I would do myself. So

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I had Turnbull in the lineup as well. I had

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>him in the main event. It pushed for Turnbol over Wheeler,

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>we still had Turnbull in there. We had Turnbull and

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Wheeler and we bet Jose Kitana, which was clearly not

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the right decision. But there's still I think there's still

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot to like with Turnbull. I know yesterday was

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>not great, Greg, but over eleven case per nine to

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>start the year, you look at the swinging strike rate,

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the first pitch strike percentage UM, they're still very good.

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Twelve and a half percent swinging strike rate for Spencer

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Turnbull in the season, a near six nice first pitch

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>strike percentage. I still have a lot of interest in Turnbull.

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>This was a disappointing performance, to say the least against

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Indians, but I'm not dropping him yet. I'm

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>not giving up on the Bull. Shane Bieber, on the

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>other hand, was great. As you mentioned, the Indians need

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>him to be great with everything that's going on with

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Mike Clevinger. And I actually looked into Shane Bieber a

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit this morning. Greg had thirteen swinging strikes yesterday,

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>four on his current bolly, it's seven on his slider,

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and so I looked into his pitch usage. How about

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>this Greg? Last year his forcing fastball was not good.

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>He allowed a one nineties six isolated power against his fastball.

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Last year he's lowered his fastball usage by eleven percent

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and upped his slider usage by eleven percent, So direct correlation.

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Throwing a slider more throwing his forcing less. His slider

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>is a very good pitch. So I think this is

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>addition by subtraction to take away some of that fastball.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>And through two starts, opponents are have a one forty

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>three isolated power against his fastball, so it's down about

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty points. So I think using his fastball lesson using

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>his slider more is actually helping Shane Bieber a lot

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>this year. We believe the Biber just who starts face

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>the Tigers and the Blue Jays, right right? Yeah, so

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>very good matchup. I have no again, no issue with

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>me from there, but good to see him taking advantage

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of matchups that he should be doing, and that's exactly

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:07.719
<v Speaker 1>what happened. That was part of the reason you like

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bieber and all these Indians starters because they played

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 1>the al Central and we thought the matchups would be

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>good and they were. And Greg. One thing that I

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>will let you know about Shane Bieber is right now,

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>his hard hit rate is forty seven percent, so it's

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 1>a little scary. It was around forty four percent, but

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it will say this right. So one of the main

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>things that we were saying about Bieber heading into the

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>season was that he can't pitch in the zone as

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>much as he did last year. He's got a nibble

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. He's gonna throw outside the strike zone.

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>He is actually doing that this season. His zone percentage

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>last year was forty eight percent, so forty eight percent

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>of his pitches in the zone last year and this

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>season it's forty point nine, so he's lowered it by

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>about seven percent. And he's getting opposing batteries to chase

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>pitches outside the strike zone thirties five point seven percent

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of the time. That's up five percent from last year.

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>His first strike percentage is great scent, swinging rakes or

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bieber. So pretty much everything is there that that

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you want to see from him. I want to see

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that hard hit rate obviously come down. I want to

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 1>see a few more groundballs, but good command strikeouts are there.

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>So far Bieber has been great. I want to see, uh,

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:17.319
<v Speaker 1>if you can put this together in tough matchups as well. Greg, Yeah, absolutely,

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I wanted I wanted to be and again he did

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>what he had to do for the first two matchups.

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 1>The hard hit rate a little bit harder than we

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted it to be, but overall, feeling pretty good about

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bieber through his first two starts. Very confident Spencer Turn.

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>When we start him again next week, we own him.

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Next week, I I would continue to own him. I

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>would have to look up who he faced. I don't

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>know off the top of my head. Obviously. You know,

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Turnboll is more of a matchup play not performing the

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>matchup that we liked this week. Next week going up

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>against Pittsburgh, that's not a bad matchup. Pittsburgh does not

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>have a great lineup, and especially with Corey Dickerson out

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of the lineup. He's on the injured list, they're missing

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a few other people. They just have like a random

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>cast of characters. They still have Josh Bell, they have

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Frankie Savelli and Stop Marte. But really not a lineup

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that scares me. So in deeper leagues and ale only,

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I would leave Turnbull in the lineup. In a twelve

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:09.719
<v Speaker 1>team league, I would imagine that your replacement value is

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>probably better. Again, I wouldn't drop him, but against the Pirates,

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not scared of that, Craig. In a daily transactions league,

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I'm screaming pictures, I would use him

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 1>against the Pirates. Sure, I tend to agree with you.

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm also using him against the Pirates if i still

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>have him on my team by next week. Offense wise,

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>as Frank said, when we were watching the game, everybody

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.199
<v Speaker 1>was crushing the ball. Everybody is getting hit on the

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>ball except for one guy, and he would over five

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:40.199
<v Speaker 1>with two strike as yesterday, and that was Jose Ramirez.

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>And I'm hoping to get Florial along because I do

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>want to talk to to Mikey about Jose amrors and

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:45.599
<v Speaker 1>see how nervous he he is when it comes to

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Jose Um But really bad man, really really bad. Yeah,

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a few times that I've talked to Mike regarding Jose Ramirez.

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>His sentiment has been, it's only been two weeks. You know,

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it's very early on in the season. Let's give this

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>guy's hands. But this is a guy who normally walks

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a decent amount. He's only walking four percent of the time.

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 1>And we spoke about him the other day. He's striking

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit more than usual. Still hitting too

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>many fly balls. I understand that's what he did last

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>year in the first half and it worked for him.

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 1>He hit forty percent fly balls last year fifty one percent.

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.199
<v Speaker 1>He's fifty percent of the balls that he's putting in

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>play are fly balls. So I just think he's trying

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>too hard to lift the ball here. Um again, I

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>spoke about the pull rate the other day that we

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>need to see that go up because the past, basically

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>his whole career, he's a forty three percent pull hitter.

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>He's only this year. And remember Greg, when we were

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>watching we watched the Jose Ara mirrors that bat yesterday

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>he hit a screamer to the to the warning track

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and it got caught. So he was a little bit

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>unlucky there. He made good contact on that one, and

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 1>he's just been a little bit unlucky this far. He's

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>got babbit s batting average. Again, the babbit is that

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 1>low because he's hitting fifty one percent fly balls. Hard

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 1>hit rate is around thirty seven percent. It's just it's

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>not great to start the year. The one saving graces

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that he still has three stolen bases. But he's got

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to turn it on, you know, by next week, a

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>couple more weeks, Like if he's still hitting under two hundred,

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>I might start to hit the panning button. I'm not

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it right now, only two weeks into the season,

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 1>but Greg, if we have a whole month of a

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>sample size he's still hitting under two hundred, yeah, I'm

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna start to worry a little bit. By that point.

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>You have to it's your first round pick. It's not

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>only your first round pick, Frank, but it was just

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>second half of last year. Also, it's not just it's

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>not just a two weeks or the one month sample size.

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the issue. I want to ask more Deka about

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Josera mirrors too. So do you know because we talked

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot about whose Era mirrors. I think it's because

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>we own no whatnot? You know Nolan no Ronado also

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>does not have a home run yet this year. Yeah,

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe he and Josire mirrors might be the only

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>first round hitters, first round caliber hitters without a home

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>run to start to see. I understand that they have

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of injuries, but and they haven't played a

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of home games either. I believe they've only played

0:14:58.280 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>two home games and one of them got snowed out.

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that it they only played two against the Braves

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's where got but still has thirty eight runs

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>scored greg their third most in baseball. Yeah, the marriage

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is a thirty eight run scored yesterday, So it's like, well,

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to put that in perspective, they actually have a hundred

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and seventeen thirty eight more triple Think about this. The

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Stanfords just Go Giants have thirty nine runs scored. They

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>have one run scored more than the Rockies, which was

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>basically last night they won one zip thanks to who

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Jeff baby shark? Do do do do do technically because

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that's because of stay hot, young man, Stay hot? Why

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>all he's been doing his homework? Are you telling just

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>stay hot? For anyone who might own him. Yeah, I

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>mean obviously should be on there. He should be own

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>in fifteen teamers, fift team mixes. Tigers had just three

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>hits yesterday. Niko Goodrum had one of them. War is

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>eight percent for the for the Indians. We joked about

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Santana, but on the years at five one, he

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is on a fire right now. Stay hot, young man,

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Stay hot? Are you mocking me about who let off

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the game? Greg? You're just gonna completely skip over that.

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Leones Marttine Martine hits a home run and steals a

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>base in this game. His home run was the second

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of the season. He also added a double. He was

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>basically the nemesis of term but that's what happens when

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you face off the bull. But three hits for Leoni's

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Martin interesting power speed combination. Should he be owning anything

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>shallower than a fifteen team league? Greg? No, probably not,

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>You don't think so. Probably not. He got off to

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a slow start, but he's started, he's picking it up.

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>He's got the power speed combo. Have you playing a

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve team roto league with five outfielders? Leonly's Martine be

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>owned there? Probably as a fifth outfielder. I think so

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>shallower than that, like four our fielders or last like

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>twelve teams three outfield leagues. No, we only marteam doesn't

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>have to be on ro five outfielders. I think you

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 1>should day break. We'll come back. I'm not gonna hit

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>too much on this A's this A's boils games. We

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about all about the show yesterday Live is christives

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>say a home runs well all the other baseball from yesterday.

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>We hope you get floral as well. Next. Daily rodo

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>dot Com learned from the game's best DBS players. We

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>don't just give you advice. We play every day, all

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>major sports, all year round. We never stop. Industry leading

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily roado

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>dot Com optimize her in minutes, build an optimized line

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>up for cash games and tourneys. Learn from the game's

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>best DFS players joined Daily rodo dot Com. The following

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>ad contains shocking material. Listener discretion is advised. Is someone

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in your family playing a dangerous game of Russian Roulette?

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Over forty three thousand people die a year from drug overdose,

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>A hundred and twenty people a day, five people every hour,

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>one person every twelve minutes. Eighty eight thousand people die

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>every year from alcohol abuse, over two hundred and forty

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>people a day, ten an hour, one person every six minutes,

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody you know. Maybe next learn how to help someone

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you love get away from the drugs, alcohol and bad influences.

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>With the f m l A, people can take a

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 1>leave of absence from their job and still keep it.

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Call now and learn how we can help you. Eight

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four nine six two one eight

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four nine six to one. That's

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>eight six six eight four ninety six one. Here is

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>are he's calling the shots if he could. If you

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 1>could choose any person to speak three hours and him

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>you shot listen to be Morgan. It's not a bad one.

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't mind listening to Morgan free now. I wonder

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>how long until he kind of puts you to sleep,

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>not because afford of it, because of the tone of

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>his voice, the soothing nature. Potentially have the opportunity. I

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>listened to talk for three hours. Andy Samberg, let's start

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a competition. Get Andy Samberg and Jas eight pm to

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>eleven pm Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking on your

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>popular podcast providers than on the night. It's taking over you.

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the greatest show through can taking over you.

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the greatest show back here on the greatest show,

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy best Friends Forever. That's right, Frank Stample Gregg,

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Sam Pavona. Are you going to have this played at

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>your wedding? There is a strong possibility at some point. Yeah. Well,

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about my mom recently. She's like, you're

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>definitely gonna have like a real band, right, you definitely

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to as a band guy. We we were looking

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>at it. It's actually just better for us to have

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a DJ. Okay, are you gonna grab the mic and

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>sing that song? Because I could just I could again

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>imagine the vone and just stealing the mic and singing

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 1>that song. She might Uh, I definitely won't, all right,

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Um yeah, so I was all for My mom was like,

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you guys should walk into that song. It's like the

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>greatest show. It's the greater show you night. I'm like,

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>do you know your first song yet? Uh? We do?

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Can And I basically changed every day like we hear

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a new song, We're like, oh, that's gonna be the

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>first You're gonna just be like, are you kidding me

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>with mine tell you off the broadcast? Why not? I

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know, you don't want to everyone else to know yet?

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Or is my friends don't want to reveal it. So

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>my friends or some of my friends listen. Yeah, that's fun. Yeah, um,

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>so I'll tell you off the Aero problem. But my

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>mom was like, oh, the greatest show, the greatest show,

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 1>god Ma, so for you that. By the way, all right,

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>they just deemed him asking for a skype by day

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 1>SA look at that, So I definitely have it somewhere

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.360
<v Speaker 1>like we connected with him last week or two weeks ago.

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>There you go, all right, dirty Mike and the boys

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>and the boys, all right, is there anything on the

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Orioles As game yesterday that you wanted to hit on?

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>The know? We talked, We joked a lot during the

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:28.479
<v Speaker 1>show about the ages being bombs away yesterday. All these

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>home runs I felt like happened with Orioles and the Aids.

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I will say this again. If you're playing in our

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 1>fandal contest tonight, you've set your lineup, but by four pm,

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>four pms to cut off. If you're in the contest

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and you don't set your lineup, I'm booting you. I'm

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>inviting more people. I wanted to run tonight. I won

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>last week and it wasn't for money, so very annoying.

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>But I will say this, Greig, the A's are going

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>up against true Smiley tonight. Stack the Oakland seem like

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Mark Canada tonight, I will say, yeah. I mean, he's

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be in the line up. He's gonna bat

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of this lineup. Chris Davis is doing

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Chris Davis. You're gonna be in there, first one to

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>uh first one and nine home runs on the season.

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Is Chad Pinder him in a lone up? I don't

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.959
<v Speaker 1>want to sure. They gave Matt Chapman the day off yesterday,

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>so he was in there because of that. But against

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the lefty, yeah, he probably will calm down, probably will stop.

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 1>The other side Cric stop, I think you could drop

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Cedric Mullins. And with that, we're welcome to Michael Florio. Mike,

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry you had to hear Greg's crappy singing again.

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I had to cut him off because this guy just

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>won't stop. How are you doing, Mike, and are you

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>dropping Cedric Mullins. I don't own Cedric Mullins. And I'm

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>doing all right. I just sleep last night. I'lept pretty good.

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of Gregg scene that as usual? Right? Yeah,

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean nothing has changed. Have you ever seen the

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>greatest showman? No? Really, I can see Nicolette loving it.

0:22:53.800 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Apparently it's as with ye that Fron Really? Yeah, you

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>really just sold me on it there, gregs awesome, Zach,

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone's awesome and said da pretty hot. Zac Efron is

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty awesome, like Greg's Greg's fit like Jack Alter Ego

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and zac Efron, No doubt I'll take that is way

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>too high of a compliment for Greg. I kind of agree,

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>way to have a compliment like zac Efron is like

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the upper echelon of like what I also prefaced my saying,

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>you know is Jack fit version. That's awesome, man, I

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>will take that like any comparison I'm in. Yeah, well

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>normally like Jack fitman Ard, you know, much better looking

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 1>than us. I mean you're saying it for how it is. Absolutely,

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:44.479
<v Speaker 1>of course it's going to be much better than who

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we Yes, definitely, I'm sorry. But if you could get

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>as in shape as that Efron, and I highly doubt

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you will, you will reach his level of you know,

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>being a successful actor in Hollywood. He's that's a high bar.

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a very high bars, Greg, I put you on

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a pedestal. I put you on a high pedestal, and

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Florio's trying to drag you down. Takes Nicola let me know.

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 1>She if she's seen the greatest Showman? Okay, Yre cool,

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's awesome. Mike. We did bring you up during

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the first segment because we wanted to get your thoughts

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>regarding jose Ra mirrors. Obviously, we all own him in

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>GSC together. He was our first round pick. We took

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>him fourth overall. Are you worried about him? Have you

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>looked into the bad and ball data? To me, he's

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>hitting balls. It just seems like it's too much, like

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to lift the ball. Maybe a little bit

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>too much here, striking out a little bit more than usual.

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>What do you got on Josier mirrors? Are you worried yet? No,

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 1>He's he's lifting the ball. He's hitting the ball hard

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>at the same rate as he was last year. Once

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 1>it warms up, I think those are gonna leave the park. Uh,

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>there's already been a couple this year where I thought

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>if it was warm whether it would have left the park. Plus,

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I think once you know Lindore returns, that's an obvious

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 1>boost for his value. We saw last year this guy

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>could really like get his numbers in a two or

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>three month stretch. So no, I'm not worried yet about

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Jose Ramirez, which obviously makes him better for Roto because

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>as long as we get the end of season Novembers,

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't really care when they come for you know,

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>head to head, you need a little bit more consistency.

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>But I didn't to agree with you. Look, Josie ra

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>mirror is I think has to come around. We didn't

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>really plan I guess to ask you this, but we

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.479
<v Speaker 1>talked about him a lot yesterday regarding Tyler Glass Now,

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and we spoke about you know, what level picture are

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you trying to trade glass now four If you're trying

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 1>to sell him, If you're buying into him and what

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>he's doing so far, then you're obviously not trying to

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>sell him. I had someone tweeted ay today that he

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:34.360
<v Speaker 1>sold Tyler Glass now to get Chris sale, which awesome,

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a great job. I think, where are you out

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>on Tyler Glass now to start the year? If you

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>own him, are you trying to sell high? Probably not.

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>If I own him, I probably got him the way

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I draft. At least, I probably would have ended up

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>with him as like my SP three or four. And

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>if I have that kind of depth at my pitching,

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>then I'm I'm kind of set with that. It's a

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>lot like with Blake Snell last year. Why I wasn't

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>selling him after his hot start, I just I believed

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 1>in it, and with Glass now I I do as well.

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I did actually write about him potentially being this year's

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Blake Snell. But my thing is I want to I

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>still want to see him develop a third pitch or

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>start to use that curveball even more. Because he's throwing

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>his fastball like six of the time, well above league average.

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>We continue to see the decline in fastball usage. So

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I think if he either has to heavily incorporate that

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>curveball a little bit more, or if he can develop

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a third pitch, that this guy can take that next

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>step and really be I think right now I have

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 1>him as like a I would value him as kind

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of an s P two with how he's pitching. If

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>he can make those adjustments as the year goes on,

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>and if I'm trusting any team to help a picture

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>make that adjustment, it would be the Rays would be

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>one of them. If he can make those adjustments, I

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>could see him really taking even another step in the

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>right direction. And if he can continue to build up that,

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>he could potentially be a league winner. I wouldn't be

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 1>so quick to sell him, but if you would get

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>like a Chris Sale or or a proven picture like that.

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:58.360
<v Speaker 1>The first thing that came to mind was like James Paxton.

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I would try to him for Paxton right now, Like,

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>if you could do something like that, then I would.

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:04.959
<v Speaker 1>I would do that. But if you have to get

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>lower than that, I'm just gonna stick with the upside

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of glass. Now what about Walker Bueller. Walker Mueller I'm

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 1>afraid of I didn't. I didn't draft him anywhere because

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.719
<v Speaker 1>out of the well, it started off as fourteen aces

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and by you know, the end of draft season, it

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 1>was twelve bases out of the fourteen, and out of

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:27.479
<v Speaker 1>the twelve, he was always my last ranked one. Uh

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And part of it is because he's the least proven

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of the bunch. I wasn't worried about his innings in

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the sense of on a perse start basis because we

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>saw him last year. They'll let him go six seven innings.

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I was more worried about his if they were gonna

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>let him, you know, go two hundred innings. And I'm

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the guy who always says, you know, you want the quality.

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.199
<v Speaker 1>The quality of the innings don't matter as long as

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you're getting strong performances. But with my top two pictures

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in the rounds that I have to invest, I do

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>view that a little bit differently. Plus, I'm always cautious

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of pit shoars who go deep into the playoffs because

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>then they have a shorter time to to recover and

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>to start ramping it up for the next season. And

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Bueller was a pitcher who not only had a significant

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>inning jump last year, but also it was pitching into

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the World Series. So to me, there was some red flags.

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't saying like I had him as a bust

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>or anything, but he was always consistently the last of

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>the aces. For me, I think that makes a lot

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of sense. And I'm going to try and paint the

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>glass half full here, Greg, because I do own a

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>share of Walker Bueler in a great fantasy based momentational

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and if you own Walker Bueller, I think this is

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>what you might want to hear. I don't disagree with

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>what Mike said coming into the season, but on the season,

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>his command has been got awful. You saw that yesterday

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>he hit a few batters. He like walked in runs.

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>He's averaging over three nearly four walks for nine three

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>point seven five walks for nine. His strand rate is

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>like that, that's just abysmal. He's still getting fifty percent groundballs.

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>The swinging strike rate is a little bit down, but

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 1>his first pitch strike percentage also down, um, but down

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the chase rates down. The chase rates down, so people

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>are laying off of pitches outside the zone and that's

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason why the walks are up. But

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the velocity, the fastball velocity still there. I'm looking at

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the cutter velocity, Greg, it's up two miles per hour

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this year. UM. The slider is down, which is weird.

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So I understand. I think he's kind of getting ramped

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>up here because he has such a late start to

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>spring training. It's kind of similar to Chris Sale. They

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>both go deep into the postseason. Obviously, Chris Sale much

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>more proven, so we have more trust that he will

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>bounce back. But you know he got Walker Buler got

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a late start to the spring, Greg and I think

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of still part of his spring training. Um.

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, he's never been a guy to walk

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>this many batters. So it wouldn't surprise me if we

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>see a Dodgers like i Elston at some point here,

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I think soon with Kershaw and rich Hill, you know,

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>nearing their return like that wouldn't surprise me regarding Walker Bueller,

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not completely jumping ship yet. If I own him,

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>like I'm not just trying to sell. Are you doing

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the opposite then? Are you just buying low? So like

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Glass now for Walker Bueller, is that something that you

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>would do Me personally, I'm not a huge believer in

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Glass now, so I probably would do that. I would

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>do that. But you know, if if you're a believer

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>in Glass now, if you're someone who trusts what he's done,

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and you trust the prospect pedigree and you expect him

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to kind of take this next step forward. Maybe you know,

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Mike mentioned his name in the same breath as a

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Blake Snell, So if you kind of believe that he

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>can take obviously not that step. Not be a cy

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>young but take that next step and be this good.

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Then you're probably on the side where you want to

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>just keep Tyler Glass now. And if that's you, that's fine.

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't own him anywhere, but if if that's you,

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that's fine me Personally, I would I would trade him

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>for Walker Bueller if I can. But that's a classics

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, sell high by low. We mentioned Josie Ramirez,

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the other name that I brought up before Florio where

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you got on, and I was talking to Frank about

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll go back into the games in the second with

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>nol Aranada, who has not hit a home run yet

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>this season. Frank mentioned, Hey, they only play two games,

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, but I don't care when Nolan Arnado's playing

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.479
<v Speaker 1>and he's the first round pick because he's very, very

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>good everywhere. What's non Eronado? I just think the whole

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Rockies organization as a whole is off to a slow start.

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>We saw this last year too, and they were able

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to bounce back. Ronado. I I don't I'm not worried

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>about him at all. I I do believe at the

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>end of the year he'll be where he always is

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact. I mean, if we look at it, it's

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, like you said, they have they've only played

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>two games at cores So and they've also played in

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>like Marlin's Park, which is a hard place to hit.

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not giving, you know, excuses for Nolin Ernando,

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>but it is way too early for me to even

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>consider worrying about him. He's I think, the most consistent

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>player in fantasy baseball. Yeah, I do agree with that.

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>That's the hard hit rate thirty eight percent, basically on

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>par with his career. I think he might be trying

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to lift the ball a little bit too much to

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>start the season. Greg, his his fly ball percentage is

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>actually up and he's actually been jammed a few times.

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>His infield fly ball rate is up to which we're

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>not normal uh normally used to scene from nol Aranado.

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>So I do tend to agree. Again, Look, know a

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of his production is going to come at home

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in coorse Field. Wants the weather heats up there. You know,

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>he's like every other Rockies hitter. He has great splits

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>at home regarding coors Field. So just look, there's gonna

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>be more of those games to come. So if someone

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in your league is freaking out about Ronado. I would.

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>We're also still at the point of this season, though,

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>where one game could literally change the entire like pro

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>player profile right now. Like I saw on Twitter, it

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>was actually PAULS. Boord was leading about it. He wrote

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>about how Joey Gallo had a his strikeout rate was

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>down significantly this year, and then Joey Gallo had a

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>three I think it was a three strikeout game, and

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>his strikeout rate was back over thirty. So we're still

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>at the point where we're dealing with extremely small sample

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>sizes and literally one game could change ratios across the board.

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a good point too, because we own Ronald Dakunia

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>greg and look at that. It's a couple of games

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in a row. Now he has a three hit performance.

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Last night he was just batting like one eighty and

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>now he's hitting two sixty two and he's got five

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>home runs in the year. So it only takes a

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>few game for these guys to get hot. I e

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Kumia absolutely and hopefully that happens soon rather later

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>for No Nada and Josie Ramirez and more of Ronald

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Dakunia and all the other players, were you more likely

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.479
<v Speaker 1>to buy low Greg, Jose Ramirez or No One Arnado?

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>No One or not for me? Um, Josie Ramirez obviously

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 1>has the ability to steal bases and runs. We've seen

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of steals out of Ramirez, but I just

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>can't get out of the back of my mind now

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and again it's been two weeks. I recognize that the

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>second half of last year, like No. One, I didn't

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 1>have that down horribly down second half of last year,

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and he has a whole lot more games at course

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to come. I think Ramiro's will bounce back and be fine.

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 1>If I have to choose one of them to pick,

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to pick, it's probably Aaronada. Even though we drafted Josira.

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Mirror is over Aronada. You know three weeks ago, why

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>did think he'd be this bandman? Look, I would say,

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>if you play in a any kind of categories or

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>RODA League, I would still rather take the stolen base

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of thirty thirty upside of a guy like Josie Ramirez.

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>But in uh In I had to hit you know what,

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Josier Mirrors is really good and head to head points too.

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess overall, I would just rather take Josier mirrors.

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>What do you think, Mike, If I'm one, Yeah, I'm

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably gonna go with Ronado just because, not that

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I would I had him ranks higher than Ramirez. I

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>just think he's safer and more consistent, so if you

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>have some worries, also, I think he's in a better lineup,

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>better ballpark, everything, kind of, He's just so much safer.

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>So I would be more inclined to buy Ronado. But

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 1>at the same point in time, I think it's much

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>more likely that a Jose Ramirez owner is panicking based

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>off of the second half last year in the slow start,

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:40.240
<v Speaker 1>rather than Ronado. I I would imagine that most Ernado

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:42.399
<v Speaker 1>owners feel very similar that we do, Like this guy

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be fine. I'm surprised Gregg hasn't asked if

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we could drop him yet. Mike, Yeah, I know. Greg

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>wants to drop everyone every week, everyone but the most players. Yes,

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we were going through GDD today, He's like this guy,

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:57.399
<v Speaker 1>we gotta drop, this guy, we gotta drop. I wasn't

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 1>really wrong in any of them. Is here, Mike, Here's

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>who I said. I wanted to drop Wellington Castillo, which

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I put in a bit, and I'm dropping it. He sucks.

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Why am I keeping him? I wanted to drop Yonder Alonso.

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Frank said, no, I find fine, you could have that one.

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.439
<v Speaker 1>But whatever, what I don't Yonder Alonzo was terrible. Oh well,

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>let's move on. I wanted to drop Wilmar Flores, Great,

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>no problem. I wanted to drop Tyler by the way,

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it was Tyler ro O'Neil. I want to drop Great,

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>no problem. I said, we could drop Marwin Gonzalez, Fine,

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>no problem. Is there anything he was so wrong about there? No? Um,

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 1>there was the Yonder Alonzo one. I've never been a

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:37.359
<v Speaker 1>big Yonder guy. Like, I'll admit that that was Frank's guy.

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 1>But I did write about him in Fancheck, my one

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>of my fan checks articles this week. His walk rate

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is up dramatically, Like it's twenty three point three percent

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 1>right now. Last year was eight point nine. So if

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 1>that's something he's incorporated into his game, the ability to

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 1>draw more walks, I do think an ov P and

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>points leagues there's reason to be intrigued there. But g

0:35:58.040 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>d D is just a five by five rodor league, right,

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I don't love Alonzo in that format and

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>uh the other guys. Yeah, I think you're depending on

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>who's out there though, because that's always a big factor

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>in leagues that deep. Like. So, I was I was

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.879
<v Speaker 1>going to we put bids in on dead, vogel Box

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and Mitch morelandex obviously vogo Box, you guys, all three

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of those guys, act, Will Frazier and vogel Box. You

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>guys are gonna be spending on I hope. Well, how

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 1>aggressive are you on vogel Box right now, Mike? Because

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I have reference this the other day and you picked

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:29.280
<v Speaker 1>him up in our home league for I believe nine bucks,

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>So how aggressive would you be on him? Yeah? I

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>mean I spent nine out of a hundred bucks, So

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm feeling pretty aggressive on him and that league though,

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I will say, uh, Frank, you're in that league as well.

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:42.240
<v Speaker 1>It's an auction league. I went more stars and scrubs

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>than I haven't had before. Uh, So I am looking

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to fill in some holes in my lineup. For corner infield,

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I had C J. Crone, who I think is better

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in Rhodo. Don't really love him in points at all,

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 1>so I dropped him for vogel Box, and I'm hoping.

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:58.359
<v Speaker 1>All that I think vogel Bock needs is a playing time,

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think they would be silly to get away

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:03.280
<v Speaker 1>from giving him playing time. So I'm kind of trusting

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the Mariners here to do the right thing. And I

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>think if he continues to see the playing time, he's

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.359
<v Speaker 1>been crushing the ball so and and he is also

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a player who came with some prospect pedigree, so I

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 1>think there is reason to be excited there. Well, so

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you're talking to Floria about everything we learned yesterday. When

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 1>we come back, the Fantasy Sports Network is ready to

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 1>take you out to the ball game. Our experts and

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>analysts are following the Boys of Summer through all one

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and six two games of the two thousand nineteen

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>MLB season with the best fantasy baseball analysis in the industry.

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Catch the latest news and notes every day to help

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you win your fantasy leagues and your dat best tournaments.

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Will always want you back listening and watching the Fantasy

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Sports Network on the F and T s Y Radio

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>app and the f F and T s Y YouTube channel.

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>The Fantasy Sports Network where we're root root rooting for

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy baseball team. Morie Salad two thousand and two

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand and sixteen European Long Drive Tour Champion, two seventeen

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>World number one. Me personally, I keep my game face

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>on me all the time, especially coming out with the bucker,

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:20.240
<v Speaker 1>leaving the range or even leaving the pots. What's your story?

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Go to game face grooming dot com from all your

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>athletic facial wipes and body cleansing eats, scout Fantasy Sports,

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and lean towards it being juiced. This kind of his

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>reminiscent of two thousand seventeen. And you just see some

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 1>swings and you're like, really, how that ball get out? So, yeah,

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the pitching not as good too. Yeah, you can

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:41.840
<v Speaker 1>look at that in a lot of the aces so

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 1>far have really not performed well. So maybe they're a

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit behind us. Some of these guys have not

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 1>gotten the innings in the spring. But it certainly feels

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>like the ball is juiced again week days to the

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 1>four pm Easter and on the Fantasy Sports Network and

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:56.280
<v Speaker 1>on your popular podcast providers can't get enough fantasy football.

0:38:56.520 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Road to Experts has launched their NFL three Fantasy Football package,

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 1>which includes the best math based seasonal projections and rankings.

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Available anywhere on the Internet. Davis Madigan the Rhoto Experts

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:10.240
<v Speaker 1>are providing Dynasty, season long betting, best ball, and NFL

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Draft content every day of the year to give you

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.319
<v Speaker 1>an edge regardless of what type of fantasy football you play.

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Save temper cent at roto Experts dot com with the

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>promo code Evan t is y. It's the NFL three

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>six five Fantasy Football package only at Rhoto Experts dot com.

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>When and see you here, this is one of my

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:42.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite ones. Yeah, it's not any favorites, not only like

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:47.479
<v Speaker 1>this one. Ron. There's a country version of the Grandish showing.

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:52.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not like it's not good, it's it's it's arguably

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 1>at least you things that we don't condone here on

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:58.399
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy BFFC. Definitely one of them. Shock and done

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 1>country music. Do we do not condoned Dave Matthews band?

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Whatso we end the show every day with Dave Matthews

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 1>not we you do not me. I never agreed to that, Uh, Bavona,

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I curse you because because during the breaks, now every

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>freaking break, Greg's just sitting here, you know, answering around

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>and singing this show. So I'm happy. Yeah, kissing me off?

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:25.759
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, right, no, no, no, please don't play Metallico. No,

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 1>let me we're about to say, well, well let me well,

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>let's know what we're about to sail well back with

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 1>you Fantasy best friends for whatever Fantasy Sports Network voted.

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:46.840
<v Speaker 1>We can get that Jack Affron Hugh Jack Mason and

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>they sing together where they're at the bar. That great.

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Please don't do that like that one, thanks buddy. No, Mattaca,

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we start off the hour two of Metallica. Did you

0:40:57.560 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 1>start off every segment with Mattaca? Greg Metal? That's amazing. Um,

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about it last earlier, Florio, So I wanted

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you about it. What took place in

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that Colorado San Francisco game where Baby Shark and John

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Gray both went wild seven innings of three hit, ball,

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>one walk, seven caves for some marja uh six and

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 1>two thirds five hits. The only run that Johnny Gray

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:25.719
<v Speaker 1>allowed was a Kevin Pollard homer in the seventh, six

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:28.400
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts for your body, John Gray? What was real? What

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>was not here? Mike? I think a lot of it

0:41:31.640 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>was matchup based, Like I'm not getting excited about Gray

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:37.720
<v Speaker 1>because he can pitch well against the Giants in San Franz,

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Like that's the best picture ballpark. That's you know, one

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of the worst lineups in baseball outside of Kevin Pollar,

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>who was just absolutely on fire with the Shark. I

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 1>did tweet last night like seven shutout innings, seven strikeouts,

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 1>only thirteen swinging strikes. But still it's a step in

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the right direction against I know, I understand the Rockies

0:41:55.680 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 1>are atrocious right now offensively, but I still think you

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 1>have to take notice. I did put I'm not trusting

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:03.840
<v Speaker 1>him yet. I'm not like picking him up and starting

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:05.880
<v Speaker 1>him by any stretch, but if he's out there, I

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:07.800
<v Speaker 1>do think, you know, throw a couple of bucks on

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>him this weekend and see if you have anything there

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>with him, because again I'm not fully sold on him,

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 1>but he's done nothing wrong to to kind of, you know,

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:18.319
<v Speaker 1>get treated like some Marja the last couple of years,

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>half Vona. If Greg's gonna request bad music coming back

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>from breaks, then I want baby Shark as one of

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 1>our songs. Commemorate jeff So Marja owning your ass yesterday, Greg,

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 1>because you hate jeff So Marja and he owned you.

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:38.840
<v Speaker 1>That would be baby Shark Bivona, Baby Shark is Elvis

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Andrews is legit walk up song. That's great. I don't

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>know like he comes up to it every yet, at

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>least he did early in the season. I don't know

0:42:45.640 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 1>if he still does. Who came out to the Undertaker

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 1>song the other day, Hansel Robulists and you guys haven't.

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>If you guys haven't seen the entrance video the Angels

0:42:56.040 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>have made for Robulists, please go check it out. It

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:01.239
<v Speaker 1>is the weird thing. Ever. He comes up to the

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Undertaker's music and in the video they show rose petals falling,

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 1>they show a horse running, they show just his feet

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>as he runs in from the bullpen. It's a very

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 1>very strange video and it also cannot be more unfitting

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 1>for a picture to come out to that song than

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Hansel Roblists actually just retweeted it. If anyone else wants

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to watch it, I'm watching it right now live. There

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 1>are candles, there are rose pedals. Why are they making

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>such a big deal out of Hansel Roblists. This is

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:35.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a like a wrestling intros. Now, if

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 1>he was, his finishing move would be pointing at home runs,

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>thinking their infields flyall. I love what he does that.

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Every time there's a fly ball, he just points up

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 1>at the sky and it goes five feet. It's the best.

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen anyone else do that before. Hello, what

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>does that? He does it every time? Man, any time,

0:43:55.600 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 1>every fly ball he thinks it's a pop up five

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:02.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred feet out? What are you doing the salad? What

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>are you doing? I wanted to hear it. You can't

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 1>hear during the break? Come on? What are we doing right?

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:13.360
<v Speaker 1>What was Cantana versus Joe Musgrove last night? A pictures

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 1>do well? An awesome, awesome performance here, Mikey. Unfortunately we

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:22.359
<v Speaker 1>uh we did not use Jose Cantana because he got

0:44:22.480 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>rocked in his first started to give up eight and

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>runs against the Brewers. But he was much better yesterday

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:30.280
<v Speaker 1>at fifteen swinging strikes, and I looked into his pitch ustage.

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 1>So far this season, it's a lot closer to what

0:44:32.680 --> 0:44:36.799
<v Speaker 1>he was doing, which is great because THO those were

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:39.200
<v Speaker 1>his best years, whereas last year he sucked. So I

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>think only good things are going to come right for Rosana,

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>like as long as he's not walking the world like

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 1>he did last year, and the swinging strikes are up

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 1>this year. And he's getting a few more wishes on

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:53.000
<v Speaker 1>his curve and his changeup as well. Like this is

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of why I was back in on Jose Cantana.

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Would you see last night from both him and Musgrove.

0:44:57.440 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm much more excited about must Grove. I'm not fully

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:03.359
<v Speaker 1>sold on Qantana yet. The fact that he could pitch

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:06.800
<v Speaker 1>well against the Pirates isn't enough to completely push me overboard.

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Plus I'm kind of burned. I had him in a

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of spots last year, and this was a trend

0:45:10.640 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>with him, bad good, bad good, just when you were

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:14.800
<v Speaker 1>ready to drop him. Every time, he'd go out and

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 1>throw a start like this and suck you back in.

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Then you put him in your lineup and he would

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 1>just get rocks. So I kind of want to see

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:22.719
<v Speaker 1>him do it a little bit more. I'm not saying

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason to be intrigued by him. I know

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>both of us read that article in the Athletic this

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:30.400
<v Speaker 1>year and we were excited that he made a mechanical change.

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 1>So I was very hopeful that he could get back

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Jose Quintana of old. But I wanna this

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 1>was a great step in the right direction. I want

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to see him do it more than one outing against

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the Pirates. But as for Joe Musgrove, He's looked awesome

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 1>so far this year. He's everything we all thought he

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 1>could be and more. I haven't got to do my

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 1>deep dive on these pictures yet. I do it every

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 1>morning for my Patreon page. I put it right up

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 1>on it, so I'm gonna do that after this show.

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 1>But I can tell you right now I'm already much

0:45:57.560 --> 0:46:00.080
<v Speaker 1>more excited about Joe Musgrove. And it's probably because as

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I've been burned in the past by Kantana, but I

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 1>want to see it a little bit more out of him. Yeah.

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:05.759
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of shares of Jose Kantana, so

0:46:05.800 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously I needed to see this bounce back performance against

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the Pirates. I agree, it's obviously a great matchup against

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>him next week in Miami against the Marlins. Uh. That

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:16.360
<v Speaker 1>goes without saying that that's a must start. But I

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:18.239
<v Speaker 1>do like what I what I saw when I kinda

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:21.279
<v Speaker 1>I kind of dove into some deeper stuff with these

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 1>guys today regarding Katana and must Grove, and I like

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that he's using his pitch arsenal similar to Stretch where

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:32.439
<v Speaker 1>he was obviously much better Greg, and then for must Grove.

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you'll you'll notice this when you look at it, Mike.

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 1>His velocity is down. I know it's only two starts

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and usually they build up, but his four seen velocities

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 1>down three miles per hour and his slider velocities down

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>two miles per hour. So normally, if you start the

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 1>year down one or two miles per hour, like we

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:50.719
<v Speaker 1>expect you to build it up three miles proble on

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the fastball, two miles on the slider. Again, I love

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Musgrove raft, Joe must grow. We started the chant here

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:59.080
<v Speaker 1>um and I still like what I've seen from him,

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 1>but the La City is definitely something that I'm paying

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 1>attention to here. Mike. Yeah, I wrote that on after

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 1>his last start that he was down consistently across the

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 1>board about to maybe on some pitches a little bit

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:12.400
<v Speaker 1>more than that, So that is very worrisome. It is

0:47:12.880 --> 0:47:14.800
<v Speaker 1>uh still, you know, very early in the season and

0:47:15.000 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 1>very cold, and last night's game was sub optimal weather conditions.

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:21.279
<v Speaker 1>But what I liked again, I haven't looked at his

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:24.799
<v Speaker 1>last night's outing, but he threw as a before last night,

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:26.840
<v Speaker 1>he was throwing his slider almost thirty two percent of

0:47:26.920 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the time. He had twelve of his uh seventeen swinging

0:47:30.040 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 1>strikes on that pitch. And remember last year I kept

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 1>saying the starts that he pitched well were the ones

0:47:35.160 --> 0:47:37.759
<v Speaker 1>where he didn't use his four seam fastball, like I

0:47:37.800 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 1>believe the number was like fifty plus percent of the time,

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and the starts where he pitched poorly was when he

0:47:43.040 --> 0:47:45.440
<v Speaker 1>was heavily reliant on that fastball. So to see him

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 1>throwing his slider as much as he is, I'm very,

0:47:48.200 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 1>very excited right now. It's a good call too, because

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:53.759
<v Speaker 1>even after last night's game, his slider percentage is up

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 1>around eleven percent, and his whiff rate on that slider

0:47:57.160 --> 0:48:00.719
<v Speaker 1>is that that's up five per sent from last year

0:48:00.719 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 1>at eighteen percent, So yeah, he's doing using the slider

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 1>more and it's actually been even more effective this year

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:06.279
<v Speaker 1>than it was last year. So that's a good call.

0:48:07.600 --> 0:48:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Florio gonest Tom I actually was able to remember my

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:15.759
<v Speaker 1>log in for Fandels, so I ken play in it now.

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll get you invite, We'll get you in there. I

0:48:18.760 --> 0:48:20.439
<v Speaker 1>won it last week, but we didn't have enough people

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't count, so it didn't run for money, but I dominated.

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:25.479
<v Speaker 1>I had like a hundred ninety points, and I didn't

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 1>win anything because not enough people joined. Boo, we'll have

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 1>one more this week. Didn't count. Didn't count. My didn't

0:48:35.600 --> 0:48:37.880
<v Speaker 1>count because you probably finished in fourteenth that of fifteen.

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:40.279
<v Speaker 1>I would say fifteen, but I know that Chris venture

0:48:40.280 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 1>finished in fifteen. I have some suck. I've set a

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:48.360
<v Speaker 1>preliminary lineup for now. I'm waiting to see, you know,

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:51.800
<v Speaker 1>when more lineups come out. Obviously I've done though a

0:48:51.880 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of set. He's just gonna leave it alone no

0:48:54.160 --> 0:48:56.800
<v Speaker 1>matter what. Yeah, you reveal what picture're using, or you

0:48:56.920 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 1>do not want to do that you're using. Go to

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the squad Chris Paddock. Paddock going up against the Diamond Paddy. Actually,

0:49:11.440 --> 0:49:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I read a great article on Paddock on The Athletic

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:20.160
<v Speaker 1>where seven thousand people retweeted, Actually, it's it's awesome. I

0:49:20.400 --> 0:49:23.239
<v Speaker 1>actually got into a little spat on Twitter because of it,

0:49:23.360 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 1>because someone wanted me to give it away and I

0:49:25.280 --> 0:49:28.200
<v Speaker 1>was like, no, dude, I'm I also right and like stuff,

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:30.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to give away someone's work for free.

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:33.239
<v Speaker 1>And they got like a little bit annoyed at me.

0:49:33.320 --> 0:49:36.400
<v Speaker 1>But great article by. You know, the it's all about

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:38.680
<v Speaker 1>his changeup and how he's been working on it since

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 1>high school. It has two lefties, it kind of goes

0:49:41.160 --> 0:49:43.360
<v Speaker 1>out of the strike zone, that moves back in, and

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:46.399
<v Speaker 1>it's just an absolutely filthy pitch. So Paddock, Yeah, I'm

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm very excited about him, although we did

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:53.279
<v Speaker 1>sit him in our league this week. So I noticed

0:49:53.400 --> 0:49:55.480
<v Speaker 1>last week you put the put him back up, put

0:49:55.520 --> 0:49:57.839
<v Speaker 1>them back up, Martina. So I noticed this last week.

0:49:57.840 --> 0:49:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Week you just had a blank wall behind you. Now

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:03.359
<v Speaker 1>there's one thing on your way. Had that last week, Yeah,

0:50:03.520 --> 0:50:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and I pay attention. I guess he was sitting directly

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:08.239
<v Speaker 1>in front of it last week. I didn't see it.

0:50:08.960 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 1>When he moves around, he gets and he did see it.

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I also don't have this view of the screen like

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:16.879
<v Speaker 1>you do. You know that right your eyes checked. It's

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:21.719
<v Speaker 1>about angles. My apartment is still pretty bad. We're still

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:24.359
<v Speaker 1>in the process of during NFL season, it was really

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:26.839
<v Speaker 1>hard for me to really do anything. So we're gonna

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a desk and like put up a bunch

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of stuff right behind where I'm sitting now. Actually, but

0:50:31.280 --> 0:50:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that sign, it's the exact mileage from where we live

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:37.759
<v Speaker 1>to City Field. Nicolet had a custom made for me.

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:40.399
<v Speaker 1>It's very nice. That's a good fiance right there. It's

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 1>a very good fiance. Greg, Mike, when are you coming

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:47.320
<v Speaker 1>back to New York? I don't know yet. There's a

0:50:47.760 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you, guys, some stuff off the air. There's

0:50:49.680 --> 0:50:53.279
<v Speaker 1>some stuff holding it up. But when I when I do,

0:50:53.440 --> 0:50:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I will be back in New York at some point.

0:50:55.640 --> 0:50:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And when I do, I'm hoping I get to go

0:50:57.960 --> 0:51:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to a Met game. And I had to bring this

0:51:00.200 --> 0:51:03.359
<v Speaker 1>out because you know, today is a day I get

0:51:03.400 --> 0:51:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to see this guy. It's Wheeler Day, all right, that's cool.

0:51:07.440 --> 0:51:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Wheels up, baby, let's go. It's amazing the publicity. Wheels

0:51:12.920 --> 0:51:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Up is a Wheeler Day. Harvey Dame was the thing

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:17.000
<v Speaker 1>until Harvey sucked, and we can't do a Harvey Dame. Ya.

0:51:17.080 --> 0:51:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Now it's wheels up, wheels amazing. Do we have anything else?

0:51:22.280 --> 0:51:24.960
<v Speaker 1>What do we? Of course, that's not a thing now.

0:51:25.120 --> 0:51:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Thor Day is not a thing, Greg, probably something are

0:51:27.680 --> 0:51:31.360
<v Speaker 1>making a synder Garden Game of Thrones bobblehead and it

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:34.360
<v Speaker 1>looks amazing. I'm actually getting one, so I'm pretty exciting

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that admit this. Mets do a much better job with

0:51:39.880 --> 0:51:43.520
<v Speaker 1>their bubbleheads, and these ones are they're nice, like I

0:51:43.719 --> 0:51:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I got Brett Gardner last year in David

0:51:45.520 --> 0:51:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Wells and tonight is actually Bernie Williams Bobblehead night tonight

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:51.160
<v Speaker 1>at the at the Stadium where Bernie Williams Jersey, but

0:51:51.320 --> 0:51:53.239
<v Speaker 1>I will not be attending. But they, you know, the

0:51:53.280 --> 0:51:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Mets just to a lot more creative stuff with the

0:51:54.840 --> 0:51:57.160
<v Speaker 1>whole Todd Fraser w w E one that was awesome.

0:51:57.640 --> 0:51:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Did you get that? I didn't get it. But the

0:51:59.440 --> 0:52:01.440
<v Speaker 1>thor Game of Thrones when I've seen that too, it's awesome,

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it looks awesome, it's great. I also saw the Angels

0:52:04.320 --> 0:52:06.359
<v Speaker 1>were doing one. I think last week it was Mike

0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Trout silver Slugger bobblehead was just like a bunch of

0:52:09.080 --> 0:52:13.239
<v Speaker 1>silver bats. And from sick that the Mets they did

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the Jacob Degraham saw Young Award and actually someone is

0:52:16.120 --> 0:52:19.880
<v Speaker 1>sending me that one as well, but it's it's just

0:52:20.040 --> 0:52:22.160
<v Speaker 1>him holding the trophy. It's not as creative as the

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:25.640
<v Speaker 1>other ones. Still more creative than anything Yankees got. Going

0:52:25.640 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 1>on May the fourth, they're doing CC with the with

0:52:28.440 --> 0:52:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the light saker that they always do that they had

0:52:30.680 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Judged last year. It doesn't excite man jed I because

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you know it doesn't like it. It's just because everybody does.

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:39.160
<v Speaker 1>That's all. You guys might get mad at me for this,

0:52:40.520 --> 0:52:44.440
<v Speaker 1>But Peter Alonso to me, is the most fun player

0:52:44.480 --> 0:52:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in New York since the first year of Aaron Judge.

0:52:47.040 --> 0:52:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I know we're very early in the season, but it

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:52.000
<v Speaker 1>just reminds me of like when Judge first that first season,

0:52:52.040 --> 0:52:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and which is destroying baseball's every night, and like that's

0:52:54.960 --> 0:52:57.319
<v Speaker 1>all like people were talking like when Peter Alonso gets

0:52:57.400 --> 0:53:00.239
<v Speaker 1>up now, like on Twitter, that's you just see one

0:53:00.360 --> 0:53:02.560
<v Speaker 1>like oh, like Peter lands will doing this, like doing that,

0:53:02.719 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 1>like it's the mode. To me, it's the closest thing

0:53:05.640 --> 0:53:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I've experienced since your guys Aaron Judge phenomenon. And I'm

0:53:09.400 --> 0:53:10.840
<v Speaker 1>not mad at you at all. I actually said this

0:53:10.920 --> 0:53:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the other day. I actually compared him to Aaron Judge

0:53:13.719 --> 0:53:15.839
<v Speaker 1>in terms of his stature, how hard he hits the ball,

0:53:15.920 --> 0:53:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and even if the strikeouts are there, the fact that

0:53:17.920 --> 0:53:19.799
<v Speaker 1>he hits the ball so hard, like he's not gonna

0:53:19.800 --> 0:53:22.279
<v Speaker 1>sink your batting average because he makes optimal contact. And

0:53:22.640 --> 0:53:24.839
<v Speaker 1>I saw the home run. I believe it was again

0:53:24.920 --> 0:53:28.600
<v Speaker 1>last night, right, he had another one. The way to

0:53:28.680 --> 0:53:31.600
<v Speaker 1>describe it for me is easy power, Like when you

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:34.800
<v Speaker 1>watch him swing, it's this easy power, like he makes contact,

0:53:35.000 --> 0:53:37.200
<v Speaker 1>just drives it to straight away center field like it's nothing.

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:39.960
<v Speaker 1>So I tend to agree with you. It's like every

0:53:40.040 --> 0:53:41.799
<v Speaker 1>time this guy steps to the plate, there's a chance

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that he's gonna hit a home run. So I'm not

0:53:44.080 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 1>mad at that call. You know. I think Matt Moldika's

0:53:46.680 --> 0:53:49.760
<v Speaker 1>description was the best Joey Gallo with a batting average.

0:53:50.080 --> 0:53:54.120
<v Speaker 1>That's what it was. And I said that it's funny

0:53:54.160 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 1>because we were talking, Um, it's not as much of

0:53:56.719 --> 0:53:58.879
<v Speaker 1>like a three true outcome like Judge because he doesn't

0:53:58.920 --> 0:54:01.680
<v Speaker 1>walk as Wright knew. I knew. I saw the perfect

0:54:01.960 --> 0:54:04.279
<v Speaker 1>comparison from a guy I can't remember what it was though. Yeah,

0:54:04.719 --> 0:54:06.640
<v Speaker 1>what is Alonzo's walk? Great? Right? I think it's like

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:09.800
<v Speaker 1>under ten percent. But I know his barrels per played

0:54:09.800 --> 0:54:14.320
<v Speaker 1>appearance because Baseball finally released twenty nineteen information he's second

0:54:14.560 --> 0:54:17.360
<v Speaker 1>behind only one player in baseball. And I don't know

0:54:17.400 --> 0:54:19.440
<v Speaker 1>if you guys would guess it or not. I actually

0:54:19.520 --> 0:54:21.040
<v Speaker 1>just looked it up, so I can't guess it. Greg,

0:54:21.400 --> 0:54:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you get one guess? Are you get two guesses? Chris Davis? Nope,

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:30.279
<v Speaker 1>such a bad Chris Davis four. It was not It

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:33.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't great then, all right, so then just tell me

0:54:33.960 --> 0:54:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna get it. Dan Vogelbach Um, No, he actually

0:54:37.840 --> 0:54:39.840
<v Speaker 1>ranked sixteen, so not both of your guests were in

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the top six scene it is El Garrichez who you know.

0:54:45.480 --> 0:54:48.200
<v Speaker 1>The Yankees just added Kyle Hi Gashioka to the roster. Greg,

0:54:48.320 --> 0:54:50.600
<v Speaker 1>does that make you worried about Gary Sanchez? Yeah? I

0:54:50.640 --> 0:54:52.400
<v Speaker 1>mean you have to go on the i L now

0:54:53.320 --> 0:54:57.080
<v Speaker 1>one word DHL weekend just not be el Really. Yeah,

0:54:57.160 --> 0:54:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what I was gonna say. The Yankees right

0:54:59.120 --> 0:55:01.440
<v Speaker 1>now would be small to call up a catcher like

0:55:01.480 --> 0:55:04.239
<v Speaker 1>they did and actually get Gary Sanche at bats a

0:55:04.320 --> 0:55:06.600
<v Speaker 1>d H while their outfield is you know, banged up,

0:55:06.680 --> 0:55:08.799
<v Speaker 1>and I mean while their whole lineup is banged up.

0:55:08.920 --> 0:55:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Take advantage of that and not make Gary's First of all,

0:55:11.920 --> 0:55:14.640
<v Speaker 1>don't subject your pictures to Gary Sanche's catching for the

0:55:14.760 --> 0:55:16.480
<v Speaker 1>time that you don't have to, and don't subject his

0:55:16.520 --> 0:55:18.120
<v Speaker 1>body to that wear and tear. And you haven't been

0:55:18.160 --> 0:55:19.960
<v Speaker 1>all over the Yankees like like we are Floria, but

0:55:20.120 --> 0:55:24.560
<v Speaker 1>also reminds that a terrible year on like ast outside

0:55:24.600 --> 0:55:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of that like four weeks stretch last year has never

0:55:27.680 --> 0:55:30.759
<v Speaker 1>been that great. I haven't seen him defensively, he's good,

0:55:32.320 --> 0:55:36.000
<v Speaker 1>just strictly talking defensively. YEA, yeah, dad, I don't know. Yeah.

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:38.160
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I just so you know, Pete Alonzo

0:55:38.400 --> 0:55:40.479
<v Speaker 1>I predicting him as my Rikie of the year, saying

0:55:40.560 --> 0:55:45.239
<v Speaker 1>me too. I had Chris Paddocks, so sure, I like,

0:55:45.560 --> 0:55:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we both have pretty through two whole weeks

0:55:48.560 --> 0:55:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of the season. We're on it in the al though,

0:55:51.160 --> 0:55:53.279
<v Speaker 1>I had ELOI, so that's looking terrible. What did I

0:55:53.360 --> 0:55:56.680
<v Speaker 1>haven't the probably glad, I would assume A. Yeah, just

0:55:56.719 --> 0:55:58.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of taken the chalk with that one. Seems a

0:55:58.600 --> 0:56:02.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit too easy. Let you be up soon. Um. Like,

0:56:03.080 --> 0:56:05.440
<v Speaker 1>outside of Dan, Vogelbacher had a few names here on

0:56:05.440 --> 0:56:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the rundown, Who do you think is the most must

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:09.200
<v Speaker 1>add player right now? We're gonna obviously dive into the

0:56:09.200 --> 0:56:11.680
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire alot. Second, what do you think is the

0:56:12.000 --> 0:56:16.719
<v Speaker 1>biggest must add player in fantasy right now? Um? I

0:56:16.840 --> 0:56:18.960
<v Speaker 1>like Max Freed a lot if he's available. I think

0:56:19.040 --> 0:56:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Dan's by Swanson should be added. Uh. And if Jesse Winker,

0:56:25.320 --> 0:56:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I see you have him on the list here too.

0:56:26.719 --> 0:56:29.600
<v Speaker 1>If he's been dropped, I'm still picking him up. I

0:56:29.640 --> 0:56:32.239
<v Speaker 1>want to end this with this way. Floria in a

0:56:32.440 --> 0:56:40.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve team league mixed is Jerriedson profile an absolute must own? Uh?

0:56:40.160 --> 0:56:42.839
<v Speaker 1>He is much better in points league. So if you're

0:56:42.880 --> 0:56:44.719
<v Speaker 1>in the points league, I do think so. He hits

0:56:44.719 --> 0:56:46.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of doubles, he's gonna walk, he's gonna limit

0:56:46.800 --> 0:56:50.239
<v Speaker 1>the strikeouts in a standard five by five league. I

0:56:50.280 --> 0:56:52.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's a you know, a guy that you

0:56:52.239 --> 0:56:53.800
<v Speaker 1>have to have on your roster, but I would be

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:56.160
<v Speaker 1>hard pressed to cut him this early in the season.

0:56:56.320 --> 0:56:58.680
<v Speaker 1>All Right, there you got Mike Florial. We appreciate the time.

0:57:00.200 --> 0:57:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Just Patreon, I mean what, he has a Uber fan

0:57:02.560 --> 0:57:05.040
<v Speaker 1>tracks and everywhere else he writes. All right, we appreciate time.

0:57:05.080 --> 0:57:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Then of course, thank you guys. Let's doing this with y'all.

0:57:08.040 --> 0:57:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Flowsers up next the Ventura. Okay,