WEBVTT - TechStuff Tidbits: What is a Unicorn?

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey thereon

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>an executive producer with iHeartRadio and how the tech are

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you so. A decade ago, an investor named Aileen Lee,

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the founder of a venture capital firm called Cowboy Ventures, which,

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>like crap, that's a great name. She coined the term

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>unicorn to describe a startup that has reached the unbelievable

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>milestone of a billion dollar valuation, and since then, tech

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>boffins have used the term unicorn to single out startups

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that stand out from among the crowd. Every startup founder

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is hoping for a unicorn. In fact, every investor is

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>hoping that they get in on the ground floor of

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>supporting a unicorn. The end goal for most investors is

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to sink a decent investment in a startup, see that

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>startup climb and valuation to astronomical heights, and then rake

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 1>in the wealth when that company inevitably goes public. That's

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the dream scenario. You see this huge return on your investment.

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there are venture capital firms that really count

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>on a few of the companies they pick reaching a

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>level of unicorn status because it pretty much carries the

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>entire company. It'll help carry and balance out all the

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>ones that didn't really reach those levels. What's interesting to

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>me is that there's no point in this journey toward

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar valuation where a startup actually needs to make

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a profit. Startups can reach a billion dollar valuation without

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.559
<v Speaker 1>making a profit. They could potentially make it without even

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>having a plan to reach profitability, although that's less likely.

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Typically they will be at a point where they're generating revenue,

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>but they're not making more than what they're spending, so

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>they're still operating at a loss. So as an example

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of this, I'll give you a unicorn example. The former

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter now X originally reached a billion dollar valuation back

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and nine, but Twitter didn't turn an

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>annual profit until two thousand and eighteen. Nine years later,

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it was worth a billion dollars but had not yet

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>made an annual profit. It did make a quarterly profit

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times before twenty eighteen, but the first

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 1>time it made a profit at the end of a

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:51.839
<v Speaker 1>year was twenty eighteen. Crazy, So profits are not really

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a necessity when it comes to achieving unicorn status. It's

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly not a necessity for making a boatload of money

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>off of a company. Now, that was not always the case, right.

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Once upon a time, investors were much fewer and further between.

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>It was harder to get hold of investment capital. So

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for a business to really survive, it had to make

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a profit, or at the very least, it had to

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>break even. Otherwise there was no way to cover the

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>costs of operation, and you would you run yourself out

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of business. It'd be too expensive to run the business

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to stay in business, and any hope of becoming an

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>enormous success really hinged upon being profitable. But let's put

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that aside for a little bit. Let's get back to

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about unicorns. So in twenty thirteen, Aileenlye writes a

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>piece titled Welcome to the Unicorn Club. Learning from billion

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>dollar Startups, and Lee called these billion dollars startups unicorns

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>because of their rarity. They were so incredibly rare. According

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to her company's research, out of the thousands of companies

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that had been launched in the previous decade from two

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand and three to twenty thirteen, only point zero seven

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>percent of them reached a billion dollar valuation. I want

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to say it was like thirty nine companies at the time.

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>So that raises a question, what exactly is valuation? How

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>do analysts determine or really, if we want to be accurate,

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>how do they estimate the value of a startup, especially

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a startup that may not have a product to sell. Now,

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>with publicly traded companies, one way to measure value is

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>through market capitalization. This is a pretty simple concept, really,

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So publicly traded companies have shares. Right, you can purchase

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a share in the company. Each share is worth a

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>certain amount, and that amount is determined by the market. Now,

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>going into all the different forces that play into the

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>the share value of a company would go well beyond

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>my meager ability to explain. If I could explain all

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of that in great detail, I would be in a

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>different tax bracket. But essentially, for market capitalization, you take

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the number of shares that are outstanding the ones that exist,

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in other words, and you multiply that number of shares

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>by the value per share. Then you get the market

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>capitalization of a company. So we'll use an overly simplified

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical example. Let's say we've got a company and we're

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>calling it Willie's Widget Wonderland. It's a publicly traded company,

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and the shares for Willy's Widget Wonderland are trading at

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars per share. So for ten American dollars, you

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>can buy yourself a single share in this company. Let's

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>also say that there are only one hundred thousand shares

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of this company at all, that's all that exists. Well,

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.799
<v Speaker 1>we would then multiply these two numbers together, right, ten

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars per share, one hundred thousand shares. That gives us

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars. Boom, that's the market cap for Willie's

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Widget Wonderland. Now, like valuation, market cap doesn't rely on

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff like profit or revenue, at least not directly. Those

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>factors can play into the value of the company by

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>affecting the company's stock value, and that in turn does

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>affect market capitalization. So market cap tells us what the market,

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the stock market in this case, values a company at.

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Often investors will reference marketcap as the size of the company. Now, technically,

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>market cap doesn't indicate if a company is, you know,

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 1>physically larger or smaller than any other company, but rather

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the size of its value in the marketplace. However, typically

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>larger cap companies are more established, and usually that means

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>they are also more stable than companies that have a

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>smaller market cap. But you know, to talk about the

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>value of a company beyond just the measure of market cap,

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to talk about all sorts of other stuff,

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>like you might have to take into account how much

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>revenue the business generates, what are its costs of operation,

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>how much does it pay in taxes? You know, how

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>much of the business has depreciated over time, and by

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>how much. This kind of gets us into the dreaded

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>EBITDA or EBITA as I've heard it said that actually

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it's eb I t DA. It stands for earnings before interest, taxes,

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>depreciation and amortization, And y'all, I have been in meetings

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>where EBEDA is part of the discussion, and every time

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it happens, I can feel my eyes start to glaze over.

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I will say that there are critics who have argued

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that EBEDA has been misused, that companies have leaned on

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>EBEDA to perhaps overstate their profitability because it does take

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of costs out of that equation, and that

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it's really just a way for companies to make it

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>seem like they're doing a lot better than perhaps how

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>they are really doing once you take all of these

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>different factors into consideration. But to get into it further

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>would mean we'd need to find another host because I

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>would fall asleep. And anyway, we're not really talking about

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded companies, are we We're talking startups. So a

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>startup typically is a privately held company, a corporation. It

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>usually has the goal of becoming a publicly traded company

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>at some point in the future. It's not necessarily its goal,

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>but often that is the understanding among both the startup

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>itself and its investors. So how the heck do you

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>assign value to an entity like that. It's not a

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>business that's established, that has a history, that has actual

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>spreadsheet showing things like costs versus revenue. How do you

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.839
<v Speaker 1>put a value on a startup that, perhaps in its

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 1>earliest stage, is very little more than just a good idea,

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>or hopefully a good idea. And that's a really good question.

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>So let's imagine that we have a brand new startup

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and the founders have, you know, an interesting idea, but

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>at the start, they don't actually have a product to sell.

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>There's no operating income for the business. Maybe they've got

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a company structure, like maybe they've designated officers for the

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>business who are in charge of specific functions, but as

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of right now, they're not yet producing something that they

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>can sell. How do you place a value on that

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of operation? But hold on, it gets even more

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>complicated than that. Let's say that this startup is a

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>really new idea, like it's really innovative, something that hasn't

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>seen much or perhaps any representation in the market as

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of right now. Now, well, that makes it even harder

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>because it means you have very little you can compare

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that startup against in the market, So that becomes a

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 1>barrier to valuation. You can't say, oh, well, this other

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>company is valued at such and such, so that's probably

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the ballpark where we need to look at for this

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>other startup. If the two startups are nothing alike, then

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason to port over that value from company

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>A to company B. On top of that, the market

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>changes quickly, which makes it really hard to predict how

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the startup is going to perform in the future. So

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>will the market continue to support this startups business model

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and thus lead to enormous growth, which is what all

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the parties involved want to see. Or will the market

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>itself change and thus the business model then becomes irrelevant.

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not that the business model was bad, it's just

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it no longer applies because the market itself has changed.

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Or will it turn out that the market demand for

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the company's product just isn't there, like you think it's

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>there because it sounds like a great idea, but once

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 1>you actually get it out there, no one really seems

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 1>jazzed about it. Here this reminds me kind of of

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 1>how I see the metaverse right now. Obviously, the metaverse

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>itself is not a startup, but the fact that I

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>often see a lack of enthusiasm in the general public

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>around the concept of the metaverse makes me question the

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>wisdom of investing billions of dollars into that idea. So

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 1>the truth of the matter is that lots of factors,

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>some of them subjective ones, will come into play to

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>determine a startup's value, and they can include things like

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>investor opinions. If investors are enthusiastic about a startup, that

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>startups valuation typically goes up. But other stuff involves things

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>like market trends or assumptions about the market in general.

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>So it gets very whibly wobbly. We're going to take

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. When we come back, I'm going to

0:11:53.920 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about some approaches toward assigning value to startups. Okay,

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 1>we're back. So, as I mentioned, there are a couple

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of different ways that investors will attempt to assign value

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to a startup, which will ultimately determine whether a startup

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 1>reaches Unicorn status. One of those ways is called the

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>market multiple approach. So broadly speaking, this method takes a

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>look at recent acquisitions in whatever sector the startup is in.

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>So if the startup is at all similar to other

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>businesses that are part of these acquisitions, this is a

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>good approach, or at least a viable one. So what

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:44.599
<v Speaker 1>you do is you look at the acquisitions that have

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>been made. You also take a look at how much

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>those businesses, those startups that got acquired, how much were

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>they making in sales or how much sales were they

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>actually seeing at the time of acquisition, And then how

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>much of a multiplayer is there for the amount of

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>sales versus the amount that was paid for at acquisition.

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>That gives you your market multiple. So let's talk about

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>our fictional widget company again. Let's imagine the widget company

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is not publicly traded, it's a startup. And let's say

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that investors look at how much other companies are paying

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 1>to acquire hardware companies that are in some way similar

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:25.119
<v Speaker 1>to this widget company, and it turns out the acquisition

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>price is about six times greater than the actual sales

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that these companies are making. That that's the average that

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing across these acquisitions six times more. So your

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>market multiple is six and you can use that multiple

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to kind of estimate your own company's valuation, though obviously

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have to tweak that depending upon the

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>status of your own startup. So for example, if you

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>haven't really built out manufacturing facilities yet and you don't

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>actually have anything to sell, well, you can't really multiply anything.

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>If you're at very low scale then and maybe your

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>multiple is much lower because you haven't proven that you

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 1>can scale the business up yet, and that means that

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>investors are taking on a greater amount of risk when

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>they invest in your company. So your multiple ends up

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>being smaller than the market six times multiple that you're

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing elsewhere. But this can be a way to kind

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of guide you toward valuation. Obviously, the big hurdle here

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>is that the market multiple approach is dependent upon finding

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>comparable businesses in the market that have been acquired. If

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>your startup is really innovative and really doesn't resemble other

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff that's already on the market, then you don't have

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>anything to compare it against. You don't have any way

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to derive the multiple in the first place, because there's

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>no one else out there that's like you. So you

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>can't depend upon what's happening in other parts of the

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>market because it may not have any application toward your situation. However,

0:14:56.720 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>there are other means to assign valuation. So another is

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>called the cost to duplicate. This is pretty self explanatory.

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>How much money would it take to build a duplicate

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>copy of the startup in question. Now, actually coming up

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>with that figure can be a little tricky because it

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>can involve stuff that's a little more ephemeral than just

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>how much do the facilities cost? How much is the

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>business paying its staff, like how much is not just

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>rent but the cost of operations. It can actually include

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>other stuff too, like intellectual property that becomes harder to

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>put an actual, like monetary value to and that gets

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a bit wishy washy, or things like the value of

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>research and development that's going on within the startup. How

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>do you put a monetary value on that. So the

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>cost to duplicate has a pretty big drawback. It gives

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a snapshot of a company's current value, but it doesn't

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>necessarily take all of its assets into account because not

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>all of them are so easily reduced to a figure,

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and it cannot bring into account the potential for the

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>company's success. Right It's looking at a snapshot of why

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it's valued right now, but it's not telling you what

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>will it be valued six months from now, assuming that

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>everything's working well. So there are assets that just might

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>not be quantifiable, but they are still valuable to the organization,

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>but they're not going to show up on a spreadsheet

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>because he can't reduce it down to that data point.

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>For that reason, the cost to duplicate method can undervalue

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a startup, sometimes by a significant amount. So you could say, like,

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, well this is the low ball range of

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the company's valuation. That would be a safer thing to say,

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>because you are acknowledging that this cost to duplicate method

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>does not take all assets into account because it just

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not designed to be able to do that. Next up,

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>we've got the discounted cash flow method, or DCF method,

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 1>and in some ways it's kind of the opposite of

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the cost to duplicate approach, because it's all about looking

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 1>forward as opposed to getting a snapshot of current value.

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 1>The DCF method requires analysts to predict how much cash

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>flow a startup will have in the future, and then

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>also bring into account the expected return on investment that

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the startup is going to create, and putting those together

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 1>tells you how much that cash flow itself is worth,

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and that ends up allowing you to place a valuation

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>on the company. To me this method comes across a

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>lot like telling fortunes. You're making the best guess you

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>can based upon the information that's currently available, but knowing

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>how things can change quickly means that at some level

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you really have to acknowledge that this approach is far

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>from bulletproof. The last method can sometimes feel the most

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>arbitrary of them all. It's called the valuation by stage method,

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>So this method assigns value based upon how far along

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the startup is as it develops to become a real boy. Wait,

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, No, I'm sorry, that's pinocchio. I mean when

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 1>the startup is becoming, you know, its own standalone, real

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>company that can exist without regular injections of investment cash. Obviously,

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the earlier the startup is on the journey, the lower

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>its valuation is going to be. And only if the

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>startup is able to hold together and continue to develop

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and reach certain milestones like finding the right leadership team

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a milestone, or forming strong allegiances in partnerships with

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>other companies that's another milestone. Hitting these milestones tells the

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>investor community, Oh, you have reached the next kind of

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>level in your growth, and thus your valuation has increased

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>because you are more stable and you're on a better

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>footing for reaching profitability or eventually going public. As we said,

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>profitability kind of doesn't matter, it's kind of crazy, but

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>profitability in the view of investors, as in they're getting

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a return on their investment. So that can also include

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 1>things like if you're able to show that you have

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a really strong path toward generating revenue and scaling up

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the business, that is incredibly valuable, enormously valuable, and a

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of startups fail to ever reach that because scaling

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>is hard. Now, the goal of the investor is pretty simple,

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to get a return on their investment, preferably a nice, big,

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>fat return. The goal of the startup that depends. There

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>are a few potential outcomes for startups, and depending upon

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>what the founders want, some of them may be desirable

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and some of them may not be. All of them,

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>assuming everything turns out well, means that they will be very,

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>very wealthy. We're going to talk about those potential outcomes

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>after we take another quick break. All right. Before the break,

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned that there are a few different potential outcomes

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 1>that are hoped for among startups in general and unicorns

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in particular, and they're pretty easy to understand. One, as

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I've mentioned before, is for the company to ultimately go public,

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to become a publicly traded company. Usually this is managed

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>by having an initial public offering or IPO. There's a

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>whole process involved in that, and obviously it's not just

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>for the tech sector. It's for any company that's going public.

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>But the goal here is to offer shares of the company,

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>shares of ownership up for sale on the stock market,

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and this will end up creating a big in jecttion

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of capital which the business can then use toward, you know,

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>increasing the size of the business, expanding business in various ways,

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>business e business stuff. So it's all about growth really.

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>It does, however, mean also that the leadership and the

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 1>investors are seeding some control of this business to the shareholders.

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Like when you own a share in a company, you

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>also technically have a say in how that company is run. Now, obviously,

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.959
<v Speaker 1>if you only have a share and there are millions

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of shares out there, your voice is a tiny one

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's only through big collections that you can really

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>make any kind of movement. But there are groups that

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>form together to do just that. And they're also like

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>activist investors who will invest very heavily in a company

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>so that they have you know, a significant ownership, maybe

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>not you know, enough to rank a whole percent even,

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>but significant enough for them to be a voice that

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>is impossible to ignore. And that means that you know,

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 1>you're not making all of your own decisions. Some of

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>those decisions are subject to the whim of the shareholders.

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>It gets a little more complicated than that, but you

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>get the basic idea, But there's no rule that says

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a startup, even a unicorn, has to go public. It doesn't,

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>It could remain a private company. The issue with that, however,

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>is that private companies don't have a way to generate

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>this enormous influx of capital the way a publicly traded

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>company does with an IPO, So it is very difficult

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to get the capital together to do things like expand

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the business and to scale up, and it might mean

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>having to get more investments, which you know that can

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>end up being a law term challenge, or relying upon

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the company's own profitability where you're pouring the profits back

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 1>into the company itself, or to grow the business. But

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that can be much much much slower than holding an IPO.

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Even in publicly traded companies, growth isn't always enough. It's

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>not enough for a company to grow from quarter to quarter.

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 1>The rate of growth becomes important. Shareholders want to see

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a company grow faster this quarter than it grew last quarter,

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So the rate of growth is important, not just that

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the company grew, but how fast did it grow. It's

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>wild to me that it could be a case where

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you might say, oh, this company didn't grow as much

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>as we hoped it would, and therefore we've lost confidence

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in it. It's crazy to me that that's a thing,

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>because the company still grew, it just maybe didn't grow

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>as fast as you liked. So like sometimes you'll see

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>headlines about a company reporting a decline in growth but

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>still growing. It's just not growing as quickly as it

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>was previously, and yet that can be seen as this

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>terrible sign. And I think personally this focus on growth

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 1>has been incredibly unhealthy for companies in general and for

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>society as a whole. I just don't think it's the

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:29.959
<v Speaker 1>right philosophy. It's very difficult to sustain, and it drives

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bad decisions. I would say, but that's

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>again I'm getting off topic. I apologize so anyway that

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>even with public companies or private companies, growth is always

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>a concern, and it's harder to do when you're a

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>private company. Sometimes there is a third option. You don't

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>have to go public, and you don't have to stay private.

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>The third option is he finds yourself a sugar daddy.

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>By that, I mean you find a bigger company that

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>wants to acquire your startup. This is kind of it

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 1>almost became a joke that people were going out and

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 1>founding startups just in the hopes that a bigger company

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>would come along and spend a ridiculous amount of money

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to acquire the startup. And you don't have to worry

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not your business is profitable, like that

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.479
<v Speaker 1>never even becomes a concern. All you have to do

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is create an organization that seems desirable for some reason

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and then sign on the deadline and accept the big

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>old checks. And you didn't have to do something as

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 1>complicated as running a business and making it successful. There's

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 1>a bit of there's a bit of truth to that,

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.959
<v Speaker 1>but that's obviously an oversimplification and almost a parody of

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>what's actually happening. So what is going on here, Well,

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe the bigger company is looking at the startup as

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>a potential rival further in the future, and so the

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>bigger company wants to buy the smaller company before the

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>smaller company a company becomes a competitor. You can look

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>at Meta slash Facebook. That company has done this a lot,

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 1>purchasing companies that either we're already starting to compete with

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's attempt to dominate online attention, or we're rising up rapidly,

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and then Meta swoops in purchases the company for some

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>ridiculously high cost and then may or may not end

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>up doing anything with it. Maybe the bigger company sees

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>that there are bits and pieces of the startup that

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>could be useful in the bigger company's own products, Like

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>it's not that the startup itself represents something that the

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>company wants, but rather the assets that the startup has.

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Some of those look really valuable, and maybe you incorporate

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.199
<v Speaker 1>those into your own stuff, and then maybe later on

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you even discontinue that stuff. I'm looking at you, Google,

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Google does this all the time. But it remains that

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the startup team is really just hoping to drive

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>valuation up as quickly as possible and get some offers

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>from bigger companies that can lead to a huge opportunity

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 1>to cash out. This can go different ways, too, right Like,

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>there are stories about startup founders who turned down fairly

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 1>big offers to buy out their company because they say, oh,

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>now this is undervaluing what we're going to do. And

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>sure maybe right now, like as of right now, you

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>know your your fifty million dollar offer is more than

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>enough to cover all the assets that we currently own,

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't cover the potential, and we would rather

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>bank on our potential than cash out for fifty million.

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>There are plenty of stories like that, but again, unicorns

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.640
<v Speaker 1>are rare, or at least they're supposed to be. Remember,

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>like in twenty thirteen, when Aileen Lee first coined the

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>term unicorn, her company estimated that there were fewer than

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>forty companies that would merit unicorn status from two thousand

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and three. Within that decade, there were like thirty nine companies.

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>But according to say CB Insights, as of July twenty

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, there were over twelve hundred unicorns in the world.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And then not only that, you had variations that were

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>even more kind of grandiose than unicorn. There's the deccacorn,

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a startup that hits a ten billion dollar valuation,

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>or the Hectocorn, which is a hundred billion that's a

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. If you're wondering what companies were hitting

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>more than one hundred billion in valuation, SpaceX would be one.

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Byte Edance, the parent company of TikTok is another. But yeah,

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of companies out there that are in

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the unicorn decacorn status a lot more than there were

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty thirteen, so it's not nearly as rare

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>as it used to be. I mean, it's still not like,

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>if you go out there and launch a startup today,

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got a real good chance of having a unicorn

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>on your hands. It is not that common, right, It's

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:20.239
<v Speaker 1>still pretty darn rare. It's just way less rare than

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it was when Alienly coined the phrase back in twenty thirteen. Okay,

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that's it. That's what a unicorn is in the world

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of business, and the tech world in particular is known

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>for these, So that's why I thought I would cover it.

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I hope you are all well, and I'll talk to

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production.

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.