WEBVTT - TechStuff Opens Windows 8

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from stuff

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hello again, everyone, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>My name is Chris Polette and I am an editor

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot com. Sitting across from me

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>as usual, this star of stage and screen, the inimitable

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>senior writer Jonathan Strickland. Hey there, that's my that's my

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>disaffected Hollywood voice. Uh now, right off the bat, we've

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about Windows eight before. Yes, we know that, yes,

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:38.599
<v Speaker 1>so don't write in. But when we talked about Windows eight,

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.959
<v Speaker 1>it was from whatever little information we could glean at

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the time, because we had not had any experience really

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.639
<v Speaker 1>using Windows eight, at least not much. I think we had.

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>You had I think downloaded an early, early early build

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of Windows at to developer build. Yes, and that was

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>all we had had a chance to play with. But

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>since then we have had a chance to a with

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.479
<v Speaker 1>the more or less full version of Windows eight. Now, granted,

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>by the time this podcast goes out, Windows eight will

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>have been released to the wild in the wild, to

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the wild wild people will be using Windows eight by

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the time this podcast goes live, But we're recording it

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the week before that happens. Ye, And uh, you know

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I am one of those people that I've learned sort

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of from past experience that maybe you don't want to

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>stand in line for the brand new operating system the

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>first day it comes out. It might be better to

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>see what happens and let them release an update before

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you go ahead and put it on there. Because it

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>seems like there's and it doesn't seem to matter who

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it's coming from. This just computer operating systems in general.

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>It's agnostic as far as as operating systems go, in

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the sense that there's only there's so much testing you

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>can do during the development of an operating system, but

0:01:55.480 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the the even the most rigorous testing uh environment is

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>not going to be able to account for every single

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>way people use their computers and the software they use

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>in the hardware they use. So often in the early

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>days of any operating system being released, you'll hear problems

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>about or people complain about problems like certain software doesn't

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>seem to work with that operating system, or it doesn't

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>seem to recognize particular types of hardware You plug it

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>in and like the driver is missing, so you can't

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>use this one particular kind of hardware like a microphone

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>or mixer or that's the kind of stuff that I

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>always worry about. I was writing a paper for school,

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted to go ahead and install the new

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>operating system, and now I can't print. Yeah, that can happen,

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>so but but feeling that, I mean, that's just a

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>problem that is that goes with the territory with any

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.639
<v Speaker 1>new operating system. We wanted to talk more about what

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>makes Windows eight different, and uh, it's it's it's a

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>dramatic departure from previous versions of Windows. If you are

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:03.399
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the the way Windows tends to look, that's

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a graphic user interface and has been for a

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 1>couple of decades now. Um it's uh, you know, you're

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you're used to things like the start button at the

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>in the bottom, which was introduced what was that Windows

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 1>ninety five or I remember it being in wind Okay.

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's been around for a while and it's gone now.

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's so long since I've used Windows three point

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>x that I write, I don't even remember what. I

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>just remember all the tiles or or the icons rather tiles,

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>but the icons that you would click on. So you know,

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Windows eight still has a desktop mode, although the start

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>button has gone from it. UM, so if you were

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>used to the start button, be prepared to lose it

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>right it's gone. But it also the probably the thing

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that's gotten the most attention is the the tiled interface

0:03:55.560 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that Windows eight has, the Windows eight interface that you

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>can when you look at you just know this thing

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>was made for touch screen devices. You look at and

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you're like, this is It's clear that these are the

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of icons where if this were a touch screen

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I would touch that part of the screen and the

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>app would launch. Uh, And in fact that is the case.

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>It is designed so that will will work both with

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>touch screen interface devices or displays and with the more

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>traditional keyboard and mouse interface. UM, you can do either.

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's with our our limited experience with it,

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I would say that I would imagine there's going to

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>be quite a learning curve for people who adopt this,

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>who are especially people who are really used to older

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>versions of Windows. It's going to take time to get

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to a familiarity with this oberating system where they feel

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>they can navigate through it seamlessly, particularly if they're using

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 1>a keyboard and mouse. It's not that it's impossible, it's

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>not that Windows has made it uh ungainly or anything.

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>It's just so different from what you knew before that

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take time to learn all those tricks

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and it may be a little frustrating at first. Now,

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>if you have a touch screen device or touch screen display,

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>it's going to feel pretty natural because it's got this,

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>like I said, this tiled approach to laying out all

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the apps, and you navigate the way I guess the

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>way you navigate just about any touch screen interface. At

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>this point, you touch the screen, you can drag your

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>finger one way or the other and it moves the

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>tiles accordingly. And then by tapping on a tile, you

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>open up the the app or feature or whatever it is.

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And so I mean it's very intuitive from a touch perspective,

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>but using the mouse and keyboard, like I said, it's

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>going to it's gonna take some time for people to

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>adjust to the different layout and the different navigation scheme. Yeah,

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>the uh Microsoft really got into the navigation and how

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>people are going to be using this, and they, um,

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>it's clear that they were thinking about something that could

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>be cross hardware. Um, you know, it could be used

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>on a computer, could be used on a mobile device. Um.

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, you know, if you look at the form

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>factor of screens of all types, we've really gone, you know,

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>towards the sixteen by nine ratio as opposed to the

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 1>four by three, which four by three is like a

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>standard definition TV when you're looking at it in the

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>sixteen by nine is the um the way an HD

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>TV looks. So it's you know, uh, longer, more rectangular,

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>less square, more of a wide screen. Look. Yeah, and

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean our phones look like that, tablets look like that. UM,

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>computer monitors look like that. Laptops have have developed you know,

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>according to that too, So uh it makes a lot

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>more sense, um, to have the operating system be designed

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>with that in mind. And UM, they've really um, you know,

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about the earlier release that we had a chance

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to play with some quite some time ago. Now, UM,

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft has been really um outgoing about its efforts to

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>woo the developers because you know, they do have a

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>strong relationship with their developers. And um they's subtle, subtle,

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>little references to a very popular video on YouTube, which

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is not so subtle. But no, they've they've they've really

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>reached out and said, look, these are guidelines that we've

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>uh that we've come up with usability guidelines, navigation guidelines.

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>We really think if you design your applications to work

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>with this in mind, it will be a positive experience.

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>And the the the apps that we had a chance

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to play around with really did you know, it wasn't seamless,

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>but there was very little seam if you will, I mean,

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>they really did fit in with the environment. Pardon me,

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>wise backed the table with my n What's what's interesting

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>also is that you know, bringing the world of mobile

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>with the world of PC together is challenging on multiple fronts.

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Um One, you have to design hardware that is capable

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of keeping up with like mobile hardware that's capable of

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>keeping up with what we're used to from a PC,

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a laptop or desktop. You also have to

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>factor in, well, the input for a tablet tends to

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>be very different than the input for a computer, So

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>how do we account for that. For apps that are

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>designed for touch, there's no problem, you know, that's that's

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>designed with the tablet form factor in mind. But what

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:49.599
<v Speaker 1>about those desktop applications that are not designed for touch interface,

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>at least not not primarily designed for touch interface? How

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>do you get around that and it's it's Windows eight

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is a is goes a long way to trying to

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 1>reckon style all of that. Now, we haven't had chance

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to really play with all the different stuff that we

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>would normally use on a Windows machine. For example, Office,

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, that's productivity software. And a lot

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of people know what Microsoft You know they've used Microsoft Office.

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>It's word and Excel and power Point, things like that. Uh,

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I've used those quite a bit on computers with the

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>mouse and keyboard combinations. I'm very familiar with that. I

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know what that would be like on a tablet

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>if I did not have a peripheral devices because most

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>tablets nowadays will support peripheral devices, whether it's through Bluetooth

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>or USB or whatever. But you can often connect to

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a tablet something like a keyboard and a mouse, or

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it will have a docking station where you can connect

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>everything through the docking station to the tablet and it

0:09:55.920 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it becomes essentially like a very lightweight laptop computer. It's

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>just that all the elements detached from each other. Um.

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Now in that case, you would I could see using

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>those those uh, those pieces of software in essentially the

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>same way you would if it were a true laptop

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>or PC. Without them, I'm not sure how I would

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>use them. Uh. It's not to say that they're unusable.

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I just haven't had that experience. But that's one of

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the challenges that Microsoft faces with Windows eight and the

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>design of an operating system that can work on both

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>mobile and and PC platforms is how do you make

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>sure that you you are catering to both audiences without

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>sacrificing too much for either one. Because if you cater

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>too much on the tablet side, everyone who uses the

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>desktop or laptop version of the the operating system is

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.959
<v Speaker 1>going to feel like things are too difficult to do

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in that form factor to just by that operating system, right,

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So balancing that is really tricky, and I think they

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>did a pretty good job with it. We did practice

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>navigating through Windows eight using only the mouse and keyboard,

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>so even though we were we were using it on

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a tablet. We had a tablet device that had Windows

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>eight loaded on it that we tried to play with.

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I'm just gonna go ahead and tell

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you it was not the surface. I really want to

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>play with a surface tablet, but I have not had

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity yet, at least as of the recording of

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Who knows by the time between the wind

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is recorded when it launches, I'm gonna guess I still

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't really played with one, but unless there's a store

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that happens to have one. Anyway, we we did navigate

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>with just the keyboard and mouse, and it took some

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>even for us. It took some time for us to

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of just even get the basics. But once we

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>got the basis right, Okay, I understand how this works. Now.

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely one of those things where I'd have to

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>train my brain to catch up to make this feel natural.

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we could definitely see how to get

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>around whether or not it's easy enough for the average

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>user so that that level of frustration isn't overwhelming. I

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know it'll be. That will be a real test

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of the operating system. It'll especially once people if people

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>want to go to the desktop to use some of

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the more robust programs, because as I understand it, things

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>like the productivity software of Office would be in the

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:35.079
<v Speaker 1>desktop version of the view, not the Windows eight interface

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>version of the view. So if you wanted to open

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>up Word, you would go into the desktop and then

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>open it up that way, and you would, you know,

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>do all your your work in there. And now they

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>do have some uh they have an upcoming version of

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of Office that's going to incorporate touch commands as well

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 1>as your regular keyboard and mouse commands. But even then,

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's all relegated to the if I may

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>be wrong about this, but I think it's all relegated

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 1>to the desktop version of the view of Microsoft date,

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>not the interface, not the tiled interface. Um on. One

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>thing that I'm sorry to all I was gonna say

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is that this should not be confused with there are

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>two different versions of this tiled interface coming out. There's

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Windows are T and there's Windows eight. And Windows are

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>T is designed for mobile devices that are on the

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>lower powered end of the spectrum. So these are ones

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that that tiled interface is what you get, and that's

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's mainly meant to to compete in

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the tablet market as we understand it today, so that

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>being things like the iPad and Android tablets where they

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>are running uh, simplified versions of software so that the

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>software doesn't tend to be as robust as a full

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>PC program would be you know, they're there. They're more

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>like the apps that we've become accustomed to over the

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 1>last few years. Windows eight, the full version of Windows eight,

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>is something that is running on higher end tablets as

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>well as PCs and laptops. That would be uh, the

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>one that has the desktop view and can run these

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>more robust programs like Microsoft Office. Yeah, and UM yeah,

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a good point because they've kind of gone

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>in the other direction to um to have some of

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the elements of Microsoft Office bleed over into the operating system. UM.

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you've noticed this or not been

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>In opening a couple of the Windows just in Windows Explorer,

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I noticed that the ribbon interface from Office, which Jonathan

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>loves so much, by the way, um, that appears at

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the top of the screen with all your little uh

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>gadgets and gizmos a plenty. Um, and who's it some

0:14:55.840 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>webs at skill Lore. Um. The that same in your

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>faces appearing in other parts of Windows at least in there.

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>So people who are familiar with Office are going to

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>be familiar with that part of the operating system as

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a whole, with that part of the interface as a whole.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think I finally figured that ribbon thing out.

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Now it's about time form you change with the Yeah,

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>now that that is something that I feel a lot

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of empathy toward users who get frustrated with major changes

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in operating systems or any kind of software, because when

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you become accustomed to something and you really have streamlined

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>your approach to using a particular piece of software, it

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>does become a bit of a frustration when that changes

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>so dramatically as to interrupt that flow. And I mean

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>this is not this is not unique to Windows or

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>really to Microsoft at all. This is something that goes

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>across all platforms, all software, all operating systems, really any product.

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>When you get down to it, is that when you

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>get used to the way something is and then get

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the new thing, that's even if it's demonstrably better than

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the old thing, if it's different enough you start to

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>complain about, I can't find anything on this this because

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it's they've changed where everything is. Um So I'm not

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>immune to that. Yeah. Well, Apple has had the same

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>thing going on too with um uh. One of the things,

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the example that popped into my mind was the recent

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>change of the scroll direction with a scrolling mouse. We

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>flipped it so that exactly so if you, you know,

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>use your iPad and you now you you go through

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>your email and then you go to your computer, you

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>don't scroll in the opposite direction. And people complained about that,

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and of course Apple made it possible for you to

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>go into your your system preferences and it off and

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>make it make it the traditional way. But people were

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>complaining about that thing. And you can you can tell,

0:16:56.720 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Windows ahead, I'm sorry it with Windows eight,

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>with the the option for the more touchscreen oriented layout

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>even on a computer, and uh, the mac os appearing

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>more like iOS that that um computer and operating system

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers are seeing that the world's bleeding over into one another.

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>That you expect computer functionality from a tablet or a smartphone,

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and you expect navigation to work the same on on both,

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and beyond that that you expect to be able to

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>work on the same stuff from one platform to the

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>next in a in a seamless a way as possible.

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So this brings in the whole idea of the cloud

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in there as well, so that when you are saving

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a project, whatever it may be, in whatever program you're

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>thinking about that when you put down one piece of

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 1>technology and pick up another, that you are able to

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>go right back into that project uninterrupted as if you

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>have been working on the same platform the entire time. Yeah,

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a powerful experience. Anyone who has had that

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 1>where they you know, something as simple as watching a

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>video on Let's say you pull up a really long video,

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>like a movie on your laptop and you're watching a

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of it, and then you have to take a

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>bus ride somewhere, and it's a long bus ride, so

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you pull up your your phone and you get your

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.719
<v Speaker 1>your earbuds in because you're being nice and you're not

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 1>listening to something so that the entire bus has to

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>hear you watch Independence Day you um, you pull it

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>up in it and because you're using this this uh

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>service that goes across multiple platforms, it pulls it up

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>right where you left off when you were watching on

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the PC, and you continue watch again. Then you get

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>home and you think, oh, well, I've got this set

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>top box connected to my television and there's the last

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes the movie and I need to see uh

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Quaid go up and blow himself up inside the giant

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 1>spaceship spoiler alert. Um, then you know you can you

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>can load that up. And because again it's a service

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>that goes across these multiple platforms, it picks up right

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>where you left off on the phone. That's a great experience,

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and I mean that's that's the one that I think

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone uses as an example, like you're listening to music

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>or you're watching a movie and you're able to move

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:21.239
<v Speaker 1>from one device to another and continue that experience as

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>always shown as being completely seamless, which in reality never happens.

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>There's always there's always buffering, there's there's lots of things

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that go into that, but you know, the idea is there. Well,

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the same thing is true with these operating systems like

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Windows eight, where the idea is to try and have

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the mobile world and PC world together so that you

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>can have an uninterrupted experience and whatever you're working in.

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So that way, if you need to pick up and

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>go and you want to do some minor changes to

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>something on a tablet that you had been working on

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in a PC, you have that option and UH. And

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so that requires a very robe bust operating system that

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is UH that can be used in multiple form factors

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>It's also true that in upcoming there there are more

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and more laptops and even desktop displays coming out they

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>have touch screen functionality built into them. I do not

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>own any of these. I don't have a touch screen display.

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a laptop with a touch screen monitor.

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>But um, but imagine they're pretty pricey for for most

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>people at this point. Yeah, but they have been coming on.

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I remember seeing a few of them a

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago at c E S, and I'm

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>sure I'll see a lot more of them at the

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 1>c E S. Uh. I don't know. It may very

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>well be that the future of operating systems requires that

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of hardware to be optimal right for you to

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>get the most out of it. But again, the goal

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that Microsoft had was to treat create an operating system that,

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>no matter what for M you were using UH to

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>run the operating system on, you would be able to

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>navigate through it as easily as possible. It's it's a

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>challenging thing because it's so fundamentally different, you know. I

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>mean that was something that Apple really paid attention to

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in the development of the iPhone and the iPod Touch,

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and then later the iPad was that, how do we

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>design a an operating system that is easy and intuitive?

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 1>And uh, do we you know, how much attention do

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>we pay to our uh computer version of that operating system,

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>like do do we model it after a computer reversion?

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And Apple's decision was to depart dramatically from the computer

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>operating system. Uh. Microsoft's decision is more to create a

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 1>an experience that can work across all of it, as

0:21:55.680 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>opposed to let's do something specifically for this form factor

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>and only this form factor. Yeah. Microsoft, of course is

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>uh the still very much the operating system of choice

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for businesses and very very popular among enterprise applications. Yeah,

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and I would I would say that it's likely that

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>with the release of the new Office Suite and the

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the cross hardware capabilities of the operating system, they're they're

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 1>planning on making a big push to be the operating

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 1>system with Windows eight for the for the enterprise market,

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you know. Plus with the hybrid computers coming out now,

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to the laptops that have a removable screen that turns

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>into a tablet or they flip around with a slate, Yeah,

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>they you know, these are intended to you know, to

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>function in multiple modes and uh, you know previously the uh,

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the Lenovo that you saw at CES a couple of

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>years to go, um the U one yeah, um, when

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you pulled the you know, the screen out and it

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>became a tablet, it ran on Linux, it switched operating systems.

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>When it was in laptop form, it was running a

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 1>version of Windows, and then you detached the screen and

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it would switch to a Linux based operating system. The

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>idea trying again trying to maintain the seamless approach as

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>much as possible, so that if you were working on

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 1>something in Windows and then you detached the screen, it

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>would open up a comparable application within Linux and try

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to continue that experience, which, as I'm sure you can

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>all imagine, is not an easy thing to do, nor

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>was it completely successful. Right, Yeah, so tough. That's a

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>tough thing. And then they changed it, I think with

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>going to an Android based approach. I think in a

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 1>later version it's still never made it to market in

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Yeah, but this but but having Windows

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 1>eight be able to uh uh you know, function in

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:10.400
<v Speaker 1>either mode, it's going to make that a lot more possible,

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and they'll be able to make that push and I

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>think you're you're going to see developers working on more

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>productivity uh stuff. That's what you're going to see in

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the Windows Store earlier. And that's actually we hadn't talked

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 1>about the Windows Store really, which is is going to

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 1>be the marketplace for Windows apps, right. So, UM, to

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to find stuff, you would go to the Windows Store

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and they'll have it organized by category. They'll have it organized.

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh you can do searches things like that to find

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that you need to find. Uh. The app

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>development process is very well documented on Microsoft. You can

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>find out lots of information if you are interested in

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>building apps for the Windows eight platform. Um, they talk

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the fact that you know, Chris talked

0:24:57.600 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 1>about this earlier. They Microsoft has done a lot of

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 1>research on how people use tablets, and they can even

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>they share that research with developers. So if you're a

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>developer and you want to create an app that has uh,

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you know it's you know, you've got a primary function

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>for that app, as well as some others secondary or

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>tertiary functions. Uh, you can look at that research and see, oh,

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.439
<v Speaker 1>this is how people use tablets, this is how they

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>typically hold them. It makes most sense for me to

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>put the primary feature of my app in this location

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>because it will be the most convenient for the user.

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You know. That's the kind of research Microsoft has done

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>so that developers can take some of the guesswork out

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and not have to build out something tested, then totally

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>redesign it and build it a different way if their

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>first build doesn't seem to be you know, optimally laid

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>out for the user. They have something called the grid,

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>which is this. Uh. This, it's kind of a way

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of aligning your app. Like once you've design and that

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you can you can line it up so that is

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>attractive and effective. Uh and and then it will work

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>well within the Windows eight operating system for the users.

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>That is where Tron fights for the users into line.

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Uh there's uh, yeah, there's yeah, there's a there's a

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of resources out there, and and like there's one

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that Chris and I looked at even about navigating, you know,

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>how to how to design the navigation of your app,

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and it gave lots of high level approaches to you know,

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>ways you could design your app so that the user

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 1>can navigate through it and find what he or she wants.

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 1>And I mean it's just obvious that they've tried to

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>build as many resources for developers as possible so that

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>people can go out there and build great apps. And and

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and of course that's important. I mean, that's important for

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft if if for Windows eight to well, it needs

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to have really great apps to show off within its interface.

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, if if if all the apps that come

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>out are just sort of half hearted attempts, that does

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>not reflect well on Windows eight. Even if the operatings

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, but even if the operating system itself is uh, phenomenal,

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>if the apps aren't any good, then that's what people

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>are going to remember. So Microsoft's really gone out of

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the way to try and give developers a head start

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>for creating things specifically for the Windows eight environment. Yeah,

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 1>it's um. It's interesting to note too that the developing

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>for the language could mean one of really kind of

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple different things. Um. You could be using the

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>traditional languages of computer programming like C plus plus um

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>um and C sharp, and that's what I sort of

0:27:57.800 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>think of when I think of programming. I'm thinking you're

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>getting into that. But they also use a lot of

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>web web languages to they're they're promoting the use of

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>HTML five along with JavaScript and and CSS to complement

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the the h T M l UM, which of course

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you know is one of the rising methods of creating

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 1>web apps to these days. So you know, if you

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>are a UM, if you are a web web developer,

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you may find yourself able to create apps for Windows

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>eight as well. Right depending on what you needed to do,

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you may be having to get into. So let's say,

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>let's say you have a website about movie news and rumors,

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and you've got this this website and you thought, well,

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>what if we created an app where people could launch

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the app and read the top stories and breaking news

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. Um, then you know, building that

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>app in HTML five is probably going to be a

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>lot easier for you. One you're already going to be

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>familiar with HTML, but too you will be able to

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>port over a lot of the content that you want

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to showcase in this app because it was built on HTML.

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>So you don't have to convert anything, you don't have

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to build anything new in that sense, so a lot

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of your work has already done for you. And that's uh.

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>That's another thing about the resources. They do go into

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>detail about what the different languages are and even give

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>suggestions over you know, when to use each family of

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>languages depending on your expertise and what you want your

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>app to do. And clearly, someone who's building a game

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to be looking at languages very differently than

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>someone who wants to port a web a web page

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>experience into a web app experience. So uh yeah, And

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean the other thing was that Chris and I

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>were not web developers, and we don't. We've done some programming,

0:29:57.800 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>but that was for me that was a long time ago.

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember the last time I actually sat down

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to program something. So the what I'm getting at is

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that the information that was laid out was very easily

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>understandable for me, and that's from someone who has not

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>done any programming in a very long time and has

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>not kept up with it frankly. So um, that was

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>something I appreciated, was the fact that it was easy

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to understand. Yeah, just just just ask developers. The easier

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>it is to program for a platform, you know, the

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>more you know worthwhile, it seems if you have to

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>go way out of your way to learn some obscure

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>programming language just for this one operating system, especially for

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>something that you know, you aren't. You can't be sure

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>what the success rate is going to be. Then that

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>tends to make people shy away from developing, understandably, because

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you're you have a limited amount of time and resources

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to dedicate to this sort of stuff, so you wanna

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to aim for, um, the the best targets possible. UM.

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>With Windows eight, it's still very early, so it's kind

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:08.959
<v Speaker 1>of hard to say what the success rate is going

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to be. I mean, Microsoft has had some some great

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 1>success in the operating system arena. I mean that that's

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a huge understatement, but they've also had some pretty well

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>publicized missteps. Well yeah, and and this cough cough. Well,

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and of course they've they rectified a lot of that,

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>but the initial release, right, The problem was that the

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>initial release of Vista had enough problems in it, and

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it was a big enough change from previous versions of

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Windows to really upset people. And even though Microsoft did

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>address many, if not most, of those problems by the

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>time that was in place, the damage had been done

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>because that early response was so negative that to this day,

0:31:56.080 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Vista has that stigma attached to it, even though the

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>later versions of the operating system were very different from

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>those first releases. So a lot of people skipped Visa

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>entirely and waited for Windows seven before, or they stuck

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>with Windows XP UM because they had heard so many

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>bad things about Vista even you know, and by the

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>time they had fixed it, it it was too late. Yeah,

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>they Microsoft has a problem in a way because so

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>many people are sticking with XP even now. UM that

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:34.239
<v Speaker 1>even even with the success of Windows seven, I think

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I would go so far as to say that pretty

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>much everything I've read about Windows seven is very positive.

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I've had positive experiences when I've used it, um and

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I like the operating system. But people say the same

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things about Windows XP because it just it

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>just works. And then that that's you know, people are

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing that as a barrier to entry for Windows eight.

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So if you've waited, you've skipped Vista, you've skipped Windows seven,

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and you say, oh, Windows eight looks kind of interesting,

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be much a much more dramatic change

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>for you than it would be for somebody who's been

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>using Windows seven. Right, and and to keep this in perspective,

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the challenges of being the the choice operating

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>system among enterprises is that when you update your operating system,

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you know that your customer base is not going to

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>adopt it that quickly, at least not most of them,

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's a it's a big deal for a company

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to upgrade an operating system. I mean, especially if all

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the I T people in your your business are well

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>trained on that operating system right there, just have to

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>get retrained on a new one. It's that's a lot

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of time, it's a lot of money. You have to

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to gain new knowledge because you have to

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>know how to support the new operating system. You have

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that any of the mission critical software

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you runs is still operational on that new operating system.

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>You may have some legacy software that you cannot port

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 1>over to a new operating system. Well guess what this

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>one this one program works in Windows three point one

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's it. Well, that means we have to keep

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 1>this machine running on Windows three point one because we

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 1>have to have access to this um software. And in business,

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.359
<v Speaker 1>I went to just the other day, had a and

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I looked at it. It It was a Windows screen because

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that way was they were using a very specialized piece

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of software. Right, So that's a big problem. And also

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>just the logistics if you are if if you're running

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a large company and you've got a lot of employees

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:41.399
<v Speaker 1>and every employee has a computer, you know, rolling out that,

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting the licenses, and then rolling out the

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>operating system to each of those machines. This is a

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>process that tends to take quite some time per machine,

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>or it can take quite some time per machine, depending

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>on the machine. Um, it's just it's it's you know,

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a lot more complicated than UH and average

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 1>consumer saying, oh, that operating system looks really cool. I'm

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in the I'm in the the market for a new computer,

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>so I'll just go out and buy one of those.

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot easier for us as consumers than it

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>is for businesses. And with Microsoft having so much UH

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:19.839
<v Speaker 1>support in the enterprise realm, it's, um, you know, that's

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the big challenges. You know. It's it's

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a great thing to say, like, you know, businesses depend

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 1>on our operating system. That's a great story to tell,

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>but it it presents a whole realm of challenges that

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>aren't applicable to a company that's really just going after

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the average consumer. And one of those one of the

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 1>recent changes for Windows eight two, one of the most

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I think interesting because it's well, for one thing, it's

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of fun um and at the same time sort

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of an innovative security feature or intended security feature. Is

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the ability for your machine to recognize your face when

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you sit down in front of it. I mean, that's

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we talk about about the Xbox

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>and connect. Hey it's you, which isn't really an issue

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>when you're playing a game, your difficulty levels too easy.

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But uh, but when you are using your company's computer,

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you have proprietary information that they don't want to get out,

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 1>and a photo of your face will work just as

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>well as your face. That's a problem. And Jonathan, I

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:26.720
<v Speaker 1>have just read a report that the facial recognition uh

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>security software and Windows eight is a little uh insecure. Yeah,

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it might be one of those things where again, uh,

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a corporation may just end up disabling it or forbidding

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 1>people from using that as a means of accessing the computer,

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>so that instead you use a standard strong password in

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>order to access it or whatever. Um you know, retinal

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>scan fingerprints could happen. I use, I use, I use

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a fingerprint scanner for one of my machines. Um, I'm

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:04.319
<v Speaker 1>not the one that I currently have in front of me,

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>that one I actually use a strong password for. But uh,

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:11.360
<v Speaker 1>they yeah, that's it's one of those things where, again,

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the certain features are built in I think for convenience,

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and it may work well for one segment of the market,

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that being consumers who are you know, just it's just

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>their own personal machine and they're not you know, perhaps

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the the Uh, it's not as big a target for

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:32.479
<v Speaker 1>a hacker or someone else to to try and get

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 1>access to it as opposed to a corporate machine that

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>might have some truly valuable information on it. Uh. I

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>would say that that that facial recognition is made more

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 1>for again the general consumer. Oh, I think so. But

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you were tempted to turn that on

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 1>for your work computer, your I T professional may come

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>by and shake kids her fist at you and say,

0:37:56.880 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 1>do not do that. That is against the rules. Um,

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>there will have to be a rule for it, probably,

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>But again, these are one of those things where new

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>technology comes out gives us some some new ways of

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 1>accessing our information. Sometimes they work great, and sometimes there

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 1>are ways around that. So uh, it's it's to be expected. Yeah,

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I think so. But but by and large I really

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:26.360
<v Speaker 1>liked having the opportunity to fiddle with it for a

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of hours just to see, you know, how how

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it's going to work, how the the interaction between the

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 1>touch screens style interface versus the desktop style interface, UM

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>would work. And it was. It was. It flowed pretty well. Yeah,

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and it was. It was really pretty. Oh, it's very pretty.

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And and we were again we were using it on

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:49.279
<v Speaker 1>a tablet, so it was a tablet that did run

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:53.879
<v Speaker 1>both the desktop and the tiled version of Windows uh.

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>And it was not difficult to navigate between the two

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>um uh. But yeah, I mean, even even on a

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 1>form factor like that, because most of us think of

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>tablets as being significantly underpowered to compare to desktops or whatever.

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>It was a very very smooth UM experience, you know,

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:16.840
<v Speaker 1>transitioning from one to the other and navigating through the

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 1>new user interface and and playing with the apps and stuff.

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>It was. I enjoyed it, and I thought it was

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a very attractive UM design. I agree. I agree. Alright, cool, Well,

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess this wraps up our in depth look at

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>what Windows eight is all about. Some of you probably

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>have been using it for a while, we should ask

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you what you thought about it. So, hey, drop us

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a line and line what what you think about all right? So? Yeah,

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>let's know. You can send us an email, are in justted,

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>text stuff at Discovery dot com, or let us know

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook or Twitter. Are handled. There is tech stuff

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 1>HS double That wraps us up. We'll talk to you

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>again soon. End of line. For more on this and

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 1>thousands of other topics, visit hastaff works dot com.