WEBVTT - Rajaratnam Says Law Misunderstood Hedge Fund Business

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Searched Bloomberg Global News. Roger Roger Rottenham was the co

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>founder of the technology hedge fund Galleon Group, one time

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>managed more than seven billion dollars. He was arrested in

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>charge with insider trading that was back in October of

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 1>oh nine. Twelve days of deliberations, a jury in New

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>York did find him guilty of fourteen counts stemming from

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.319
<v Speaker 1>a seven year plot to trade on insider information from

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>corporate executives, bankers, consultants, traders, and other insiders. Sentenced to

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>eleven years in prison for his role in what prosecutors

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>called one of the largest hedge fund insider trading rings

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in US history. He did serve seven and a half

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>years in prison. He is out. He's written a book.

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>It's called Uneven Justice, The Plot to Sink Gallian, And

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we are delighted to have him in studio here in

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>our Interactive Broker studio. Thank you for joining us and

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>coming here. UM, how are you. I'm great, You're great. Well,

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I want if you would, UM, give us all the

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>what was happening back in October of oh nine. I'm

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to take us back to the day. It was

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a Friday and you had FBI UH, an FBI agent

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>knock unity door. What happened? Well, I was about to

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>fly to London that evening Friday. Also was my son's

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>thirteenth birthday and we're going to celebrate that, and then

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I was going to take the last flight, UM from

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>New York to London. UM, if you had asked me

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that morning, one of the hundred things you worry about

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>inside of trading was not one of them. If you

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>had asked me, the FBI guy is doing a good job,

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>but the prosecutors are doing a job. Good job. I

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>would have said yes. I didn't know anybody who went

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to prison, nor did I know anybody who knew anybody

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>who went to prison. So when I got that knock

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>on the door at approximately six or seven o'clock kids

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in the house, I opened it and I saw this

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>sea of blue um jackets with the FBI with guns drawn.

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And they said are you Raj Rajaratnam And I said yes,

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and they said you're on the rest. I said what for?

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 1>And they said, we can't tell you, and then started

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a first inness series of misconduct. They told me that

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't I won't see my son for twenty five years.

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>They said, take a good look at your wife. She

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>looks happy because she can spend all the money, and

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 1>then hand me and took me down in their car

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to the FBI offices. We were talking when you came in, Raj,

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.399
<v Speaker 1>about when you actually had time to write this book,

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and you said you wrote some of that and you

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>wrote it when when you were in prison? What what?

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>What was it like? You know? I wrote of the

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>book by hand in prison. And as I told you,

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I have tremendous respect for Shakespeare and authors of that generation.

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Because you couldn't move paragraphs around. You couldn't do spell checks,

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you know. But when it's project that you're passionate about, uh,

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it's easy. I started writing one hour a day, then

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>two hours and three hours, and I was exhausted after

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>four hours. It's it's most authors will say that. I

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>have to say, just picking back and went to mask.

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:55.839
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that as our news room knows

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that you were coming in to talk with us. One

0:03:57.600 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of the questions that so many people ask me that

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, ask him, what was jail like? Jail was?

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say, if I had to say it in

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>one way, spartan? Um, you know, I went to boarding

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>mistreated at all, Well not really, but you know I

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>went to boarding school in a different country, foreign country,

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>at the age of eleven, and that life was spartan.

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 1>But you get used to it. Now. You have to

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>be smart because in jail, like in the jungles of Africa,

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>there are predators that tried to prey on you, try

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to get money from you, and you have to stand

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>your ground and you know, give the impression that you're

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>not going to be bullied. Did you ever run into

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>um Rag Gypta because he was the former government SAX

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>director He was convicted of insider trading, of passing illegal

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>tips to you. He went to that same Massachusetts prison.

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Did you run into him. Did you guys have conversations? Yeah,

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we had breakfast every day, We played scrabble, we played bridge. Yeah. Yeah.

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Um So I wonder as you look back at what happened,

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>how it evolved, would you have done anything differently in

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of how you ran your fund um and how

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you ran things there. No, Carol, I I don't regret anything.

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Let me just explain. The SEC interviewed twenty four Galleon analysts,

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and all of them said, we didn't see anything that's wrong.

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>When you run a company with hundred and eighty people,

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody would see something if you did something wrong. I

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>think what happened was the law enforcement people did not

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>understand the hedge fund industry or the investment industry. What

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>we do all day long is talk about stocks. I

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>had thirty five analysts, really highly educated, highly skilled, that

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>we were spending a forty million dollars a year. Right.

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>That was the bedrock of my analysis and my trading.

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 1>Now you might ask me why do you talk to

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>other people. You talk to other people because you want

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 1>to know what's in the market, what are people chatting about?

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And is your view different from that of my trades

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that they alleged. We had an existing can precon in

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>position before the alleged trip. Right at that time, the

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 1>U S Attorney is Supre Barara, came up with his

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>own theory of what insided trading should be or that

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>even he prosecuted. Five years after my conviction, the second

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Circuit firmly rejected his theory, saying that the person who

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>did the trade or the tip should have known the

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>tipper should have known that the tipper was violating a

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>fiduciary responsibility and should have given a benefit. Soon after that,

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>We've had a very few inside a training cases. Ros

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Now might be somebody listening right now and just asking

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the question why why we are interviewing you. You do,

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of course I have a book out, But what would

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you say to somebody who says, you know, even after

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>these convictions, why why should people listen to you? Okay,

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>let me just take a step back and then I'll

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>answer your question. Number one, all proceeds of the book

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to charity, so I'm not trying to get richer.

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not getting rich org it. Number two, this is

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>not about Raj Raj Ratnam. This is about a bigger issue.

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>It's social justice. And I had a front row seat.

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I was. They came into my apartment early in the morning.

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>They arrested me. I went to trial. You know that

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of the people who are alleged, UM plea bargain. I

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>knew there was a trial penalty, which is two x

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>a sentence when you if you, if you pre bargain,

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and I spend time in prison. Right. The reason I'm

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>writing this book is to begin a discussion on the

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>biggest social justice issue. Number One, the FBI lied in

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the affricat to get a white tap on me, right,

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and the judge allowed it. Now, the FBI lied and

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the judge allowed it. Every single American should be concerned, You,

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Tim and Cattle, you should be concerned that the FBI

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>can lie and listen on to you. The second point

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>is there are no checks and balances for law enforcement

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>with its prosecutors or FBI agents. I want to jump

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 1>in because hence this really explains and you go into

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it all of this in your book on even just

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>as hence the title, UM and I think we could

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>probably go for hours, and I think it's productive that

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we do um, certainly as journalists and just society, to

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>look into measures in terms of how law enforcement operates.

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>We've certainly had a lot of conversations coming off of

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>George Floyd over the last couple of years and just others,

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.439
<v Speaker 1>case after case on Wall Street or elsewhere. I guess

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the point is bottom line. You know, many would argue

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that the case against you was solid. Uh, we've seen

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>other to go to jail right as a result connected

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>with it. We think about a nil kumar um and

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering, I mean, do you argue in the

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>end that you were innocent, that you that there wasn't

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>something There wasn't insider trading, there wasn't information that was

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>going on, or are you concerned about the process good

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>or bad. But that got to a case that many

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 1>said was very solid against you, and you were convicted,

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and you tried to appeal it and it and it

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>still was undone. Those are great questions, and let me

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>answer right as an American, I accept the juris credict number.

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Two Three years later, in a case against a quote

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>conspirator of mine with the same stocks, the same district

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Southern District, the same cooperating witnesses. A jury found that

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>person innocent a different jury. I'm sure you're gonna ask

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>me why. That's because Anil Kuma, the government's chief witnessed,

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>totally recanted on his testimony and said I didn't give

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>large any information that was useful, and that's in the

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>court documents. Five years later, as I said, the second

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>circuit reversed pre Barara's position, and one last point, Mr

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Barrara himself in assembled the task force with some of

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the same judges in my case and some prosecutors, and

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion was the loser murkey and this tremendous confusion

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of the market participants. Now, as a market participant, I

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>welcome rules. I want the rules to be followed not

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>only by the market participants, but the authority. Do you

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>feel like regulators, you know, don't really have enough information,

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>don't really understand the way markets work. Are they just

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>getting so complicated and intricate that it is tough to regulate? Well,

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I can already talk about my case. I

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think they understood the rules and the life of

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>an investor. Number two in their enthusiasm to bring a

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of cases. Because remember this was in the aftermarket

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of the financial crisis and made off and all of that.

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>They wanted somebody that because the public were crying for blood,

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 1>they didn't go after any of the big banks criminally,

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.239
<v Speaker 1>or so they tried. Many would argue that the prosecutor

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors were looking certainly into the big banks, they didn't

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>look hard enough, right, And what they did was they

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>settled for billions of dollars. Now you know who paced

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>those fines, the shareholders, not the management or the guys

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>who did the mal feast. And they were banks that

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>were hiding taxes, I mean hiding assets of Americans. There

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 1>were banks that were doing a money launching for hotels

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and so on and so forth. So I maintain that

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I was not guilty. I respect the verdict of the

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>jury because that's the bedrock of this system, and I

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>will continue to talk about it because it's wrong, and

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>America it's looking for a criminal justice reform. It's a

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan issue, and criminal justice reform doesn't stop with brutality

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>on the street. Now, I many much broader issues there.

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Very quickly thirty seconds, are you an investor still do

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you still invest in the market. I do in technology,

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in technology, and my passion is investing in deceptive technologies

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and deceptive come. This is a great time to be

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>an investor. There's so much going from cryptocurrency to n

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>f t s, to cloud computing to security. So I

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>do we missed cryptocurrencies? Yes? Bitcoin, Yes do coin? Okay,

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we gotta run. You are jem. Thank you for giving

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>us time. I knew it wouldn't be enough, but I

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>am so gracious that you did give us as much

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>as you did. Thank you, Thank you, Carol, and thank

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you to thank you ros. It's a pleasure. Ra Raja Rottenham.

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>His book is uneven, just as the plot to sink Gilly,

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of information in that book. There

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly is. Uh. Let's talk a little bit about COVID

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, because most COVID nineteen cases in that we

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>are seeing trace to the omicron variants so far have

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>been mild illnesses. We got this news from the US

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Centers for Disease Control just in the last couple of hours.

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>We're also seeing that vaccine boosters improved protection to as

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>much as SEV against the rapidly spreading amicron variant. This

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 1>is based on preliminary UK data, So Carol, we're continuing

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to get more and more data about what exactly is

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>going on with this newest variant, no doubt about it.

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>And back as he always is on a Friday, usually

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Dr Ian lust Bed, a clinical professor of medicine at

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>n y U landgown with us on the phone in

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>New York City and so good to have you back

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>with us. The headlines continue, but you and I and

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Tim know this. Um tell us about what stands out

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>for you, and especially that latest mask wearing that we're

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>getting from the New York Governor saying that uttering all

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>businesses to require masks indoors if they do not have

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine requirement. Hey guys, Happy Friday. And uh, I

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have any insight information on the governor, but I

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>can say that, uh, you know, mask mandates, UH, you

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>know can make sense in some circumstances. You know, part

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of the problem is what kind of masks and how

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>they're worn, uh, and enforcement and uh and how effective

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>were they really when you already have infection throughout the community.

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>So there are really a lot of questions. I think

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the Governor's approach is trying to feel like they're doing something. Uh,

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is relatively benign. I mean, that's you're not

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>forcing anyone to get vaccines. Okay, So Dr Lesbia, that's

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>so interesting that you say that, because that's exactly the

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>response ies offering people on Twitter who are like, wait

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a second. If you've been living in New York, which

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, in New York City at least, which um

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>has really high adherence to mask wearing. Despite the complaints

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that I make about writing the subway each and every day,

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact is almost everybody except one or two people

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in the car are wearing a mask. This isn't going

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to change much for you. You You know, I agree with

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you most people, although I was out on the streets

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of New York and there are a fair number of

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>tourists and many people are are not wearing mask. But

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that's outside right, That was outside right, Yeah, exactly right.

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't need to I mean, correct me if I'm wrong,

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>but we don't need to wear masks outside right, totally

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>correct that You're there's really minimal, minimal risk. So I

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>do think, um, you know, there can be some benefit.

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it turns out that for most of us

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in close quarters, for example, seeing patients. You know, we're

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>we're wearing masks, and uh, it really is kind of

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a thick soup. Right, people are vaccinated, we're partially vaccinated.

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, what's the benefit of a third shot? As

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you say there, there does seem to be some benefit

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>with that. The good news is, at least based on

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the data from South Africa and the UK, is that

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>this omicron variant is a it's probably gonna spread quite rapidly,

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>be it does not appear to be giving severe disease,

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>which I think was the relief news last Friday, you know,

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>when we saw markets about face from sort of minus

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>four hundred back back up a bit. So I think

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>eventually we are all going to get O macron because

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>we see even people who have had Delta, at least

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in South Africa are are having uh infections with O macron.

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>It does look like that third shot for the time being,

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>really does reduce any sort of severe disease, which is

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly encouraging as well. But I think, you know, government

0:16:59.920 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is trying to do what they can do. Let's have masks.

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>How effective it's going to be, It's hard to know.

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it will make some positive impact. Will that

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>just delay everyone eventually getting O macron? It's hard to know.

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>My gut feeling is that probably most of us will

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>get it, will probably have mild infection. We won't even know.

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>And part of the reason is we don't test everyone.

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>We may test people and you get that COVID positive

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>or negative, but you don't know what strain it is.

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Just quickly, do we be worried about um? If we

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>all get a macron? Are there going to be long

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 1>haulers as a result of it? Like? Do weaker variants?

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess if you can call it a weaker variant UM,

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>does it still have the long haul concerns? And just

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>got about thirty seconds real quick? Oh, I'm sorry, we

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of minutes forgive me. No, no, I

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's a great question, and you know, I think

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it really is too early to tell. In general, most viruses,

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>as we say, mutate to become more infectious, and this

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>is certainly an example of that. And most viruses mutate,

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, as a selective advantage to be less lethal

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 1>to their host, uh, you know, to the people who

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>get the infection. So if that's the case, I think

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.479
<v Speaker 1>we will have less long hold to worry about. But

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we certainly with delta, we certainly have almost a third

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>they say, of people who have had Delta may have

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>some long hold symptom or another. We haven't really seen

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that with O macron yet. So fatigue and headache and

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and O macron. The key feature there is this fatigue

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>element headache, muscle ache. So you know, if you have that,

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly it's reasonable to to get tested. You know, when

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we do have you know, treatments. It's not clear whether

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 1>the monoclonal antibodies that were helpful for Delta will be

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>all that helpful for omicron. We haven't really seen that. Also,

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely a thick soup. Well, I'm wondering dr les better

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>if indeed the data that we're getting that it is

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 1>is not as dangerous. And I want to be really

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>careful with my words here because we are still getting

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of data, but we know it's more transmissible.

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Is this potentially how the this this pandemic kind of ends.

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Does the does the omicron variants spread and and we

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>all get it and hopefully that's okay. I think that's

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly what will happen. Tim. I think we will all

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>be getting this highly transmissible to one degree or another.

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Most of us will not feel sex some of us

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>may not feel sick at all. There probably will be

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a few people who are immunocompromised who don't do well.

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 1>But I do think eventually, when we all get antibodies

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to this and it spreads through billions, that will be

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>how the pandemic ends. There may be other variants, they'll

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>probably be less effective in competing with O. Macron. Uh.

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that's probably the scenario over time. Uh,

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, unless we get a surprise, you know, more

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>lethal variant which doesn't hopefully will not happen. Hey, that

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>masse by center of it's at the center of an

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>investigation to a possible new COVID NIGHTEA outbreak in Taiwan.

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Or that's after I work at a high security lab

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>was confirmed as the island's first local case in more

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>than a month. Does that alter your thinking at all

0:19:55.320 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>about this? Well, the whole situation with labs and and

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>viral manipulation, you know, it was always a big question

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and concerned, you know, could there be other strings that developed?

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>It looks like at this point, oh Macron, because for example,

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a ten day incubation period. I think this is

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be our final variant. It's hard to tell.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a crystal ball, but I think, um,

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>we will all get a reasonable number of antibodies, and

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>if future variants come along, hopefully we will not be

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>so sick. And uh, ultimately, I think that's what will

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>how it will all play out, all right, Thank you

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>so much. Hey, have a good weekend. Dr In los Pader,

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>clinical professor, medicine and why you landgo medical Center on

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 1>the phone in New York City. How are you feeling

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>over there, buddy, I'm feeling okay. Now, I'm glad I

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 1>got a booster. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Hey,

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>so we mentioned earlier in our boy to the Day

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of more than eighty containerships that were

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>waiting two dock at the ports of l A and

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Long Beach, California, cutting half an EVM, although, as we

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, not exactly the case, right Tim, the vessels

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>are disappearing from the cure, actually hiding from it. They

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>were loitering out the Pacific, out of reach of that

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>official count. Everyone thought it was transitory. But well, just well,

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's not hiding today is Mr. Ed Ludlow. He's

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>our West Coast correspondent at Bloomberg News. He's on location

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>with us and the Port of Los Angeles. Ed, give

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>us an update about what you're seeing. You were there

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a few months ago. What's it looking like now? Yeah,

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>things are worse by all accounts. You know, it's interesting

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 1>because the data tells different stories. You know. You have

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the ships that Carol is just talking about them, seven

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of them, not just in the San Pedro Bay, which

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>is immediately next to the port, but even further out

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>tens of miles into the Pacific Ocean because they can't

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>get a birth here at the Port of Los Angeles

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>or Long Beach, and they're waiting on average three weeks

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>to come into ports to be on unloaded. It takes

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>three weeks to come from China to the West Coast

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of America anyway, So they wait eating as long a

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>anchor as it took them to make the journey in

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the first place. And all of that means tight inventory, right,

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>tight supply. The things they're carrying and not making their

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>way to shelves. And you saw in the CPI print

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 1>this morning that means higher inflation. So wait, okay, better

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 1>than it was the last time you were. There are

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot worse, Like, how do we measure this? Yeah,

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a really good point. I was last here

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>in the last week of September and I put this

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>point to the Port of l A executive director Jean Siroka,

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>are things better and how can you prove that? And

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>he basically said that volumes are the same, right, the

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>demand from the consumer is still great. The same amount

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of stuff is coming in and that's a challenge. They

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>have opened the port, they say seven. Normally they'd worked

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>four hours a week or something, but they've opened. He

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>says that what's that What that has meant is, well,

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you look over my shoulder for the YouTube audience and

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>for the radio audience behind me, are towers of contain

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>has stacked one on top of the other. The executive

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>director of the reports says those idol containers aging containers,

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>they call them a down six since late October when

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 1>they basically started finding people that weren't moving them on. However,

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I just spoke to the CEO of the Harbor Trucking Association,

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.719
<v Speaker 1>which represents the truck drivers that come and pick up

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:25.239
<v Speaker 1>these trucks, and he says, seven thing is nonsense and

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 1>things are getting worse for them because they're not able

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to take containers away because there are too many empty

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>containers filling up spots for containers that have stuff in them.

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just fascinating. So that's the problem that right that

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>was there before. Well, it's like this chain reaction. And

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>if there is sort of one area where there's I

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:45.959
<v Speaker 1>mean that is it's a supply chain right where there

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is a bottleneck, then you're going to see that. Okay,

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>so what's the solution for these empty containers? Then? Yeah,

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.959
<v Speaker 1>this is what's so fascinating that you know, there's no

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 1>quick fix. There's a system. A truck driver arrives, is

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>given a ticket. The ticket tells him which lane to

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>go to which container. He pulls up to that lane,

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the container goes on his truck, and he drives away

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>or she drives away to the destination where the container

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>is destined. What we're hearing is that there aren't appointments available.

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>The congestion here is such that there's just not enough

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>room to move around. There are too many empty containers

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in the way. So you know, the long term seems

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to be better infrastructure, not hard infrastructure, but also software

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:31.959
<v Speaker 1>technology that can better synchronize the different arms of the system.

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>If there is one bright spot, remember that's just the

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 1>truck drivers. The other way the containers leave the port

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is on rail. You can't see it behind me for

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube audience, but you have to take my word

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>for it for the radio audience on the other side

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of the port of rail lines where they just move

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 1>the containers off the ship, straight onto the rail and

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>off it goes to its next destination. And that's where

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing improvement. Okay, So that's that's sound a

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit of good news. Okay, So how can we

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>think of what happens we're moving forward from here? If

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>we think about this as you know, once in a

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>lifetime supply chain bottleneck, when do things actually start to

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>get better. There's a range of forecasts. You know, we've

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>been speaking to people all day long. I think the consensus,

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it's fair to say, is that supply chain constraints in

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of the ability to move goods efficiently. Last well

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>into at least two hot second half of two, potentially

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 1>even three. What this whole situation has exposed our long

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>term shortcomings in infrastructure, and again I'm not just talking

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>about hard infrastructure, roads, rails, port space. I'm talking also

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>about digital infrastructure, the ability to coordinate between lots of

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>different parties. And what you hear from all of them,

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 1>irrespective of whether they blame each other, is that there

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>needs to be better data sharing to fix this issue,

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and that does all require money. Unfortunately, the federal government

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>seems to be putting its money where its mouth is.

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's a lot of reasons why we still haven't

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>cleared it. Um, Yeah, what's the outlaw care? Any indications,

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>any clear clarity on that? Not? Not in particular. I mean,

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>one thing that that all parties want to see is

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 1>the passage of this bill that was passed in the

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.719
<v Speaker 1>House yesterday and is now headed to the Senate, and

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that is around regulation. I can't believe I've steered the

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>conversation towards regulation, but what they want is basically rules

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that hold the different parties to account. Remember the empty

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>container issue from the truck driver's perspective, that's them saying

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you are the sport managers. You need to make it

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>possible for us to pick up containers that actually have

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff in them. And there's a feeling that this build

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that's making its way through the Capitol will do that.

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>It will hold different parties in the sports system to account,

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>which long term means it will run more efficiently. M hmm, Okay,

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>perhaps that's not a no, it's a good it's a

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>really good answer. It's just like, you know, we're in

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented territory here. I think there's no sort of there's

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>no playbook for this, and I think people, just like

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the virus, are are figuring this

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>out as this happens in real time. ED. Yeah, I

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>mean I Tom Keene is off today. But I didn't

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>know that first. So I went and opened my history

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>books to understand the history of this place, and I

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>also looked at the data around consumer demand. Right now,

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>these were built in a time where Amazon dot Com

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:25.199
<v Speaker 1>didn't exactly, but Amazon has been around for a while.

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I've been getting a lot of pracktages from Amazon for

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 1>years talking. I'm talking decades, and the thing is serious.

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I love love, thank you so much. That's I Love,

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast correspondent for Bloomberg News, joining us on

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>location from the port of Los Angeles. This is Bloomberg

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 1>Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. All Right, there's a great story.

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, it's really a favorite story of mine

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>this week is to look at the side are a

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:56.959
<v Speaker 1>side of E s G investing that many of us

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>are either misunderstanding or just ignoring it. The story in

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the magazine is called the E s G Mirrage Tim.

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>It's among our most read in the Bloomberg terminal today.

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>It's the Bloomberg Big Take. It's also I'm going to

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>say it's a must read in this week's new issue

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week magazine. Yeah, that magazine available on

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>newsstands now and at Bloomberg dot com slash business Week.

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Cam Simpson is one of the three bylines on the piece.

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>He's the Projects and Investigations reporter for Bloomberg News and

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone from London. Cam I echo

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Carol's comments about this piece. I think it's fantastic, and

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I also encourage people to read it online because of

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the interactive nature of it. But let's just start with

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>M s C I because it's also a deep dive

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>into M s C I. So, so what is M

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>s C I and and how are they involved in

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>E s G. Yeah, thanks so much for having me go.

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'd love to talk about this. Um. You know,

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>MSCI has sort of been like a critical back office

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>company on Wall Street for years that nobody ever heard of.

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>It was broad public in two thousand and seven and

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>they produced, you know, they produced indexes for for the

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>asset management business, like you know, uh, indexes that people

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>turn into portfolios, model portfolios or even used to build

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>E s G R E t F funds. And then

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, they got in two thousand nineteen because they've

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>been building up a business of E s G ratings,

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, creating the ratings that are the basis the

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>underlying foundation of the entire E s G investing universe,

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, it's just completely skyrocketed and they

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>now totally dominate this business. You know, more than more

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>than sixty cents out of every dollar in retail funds

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence calculated goes into funds that are built on

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>M s C I S E s G alone is

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a crazy statistic. But well we put that to Nry

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Fernand's there's the only CEO and chairman M. S c

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I has ever had, and me said, no, that figure

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is too low. It's every They're everywhere. Nobody else is

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>even close, right, I mean, so much money, trillions of

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars are are being allocated based on these ratings and

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>nobody really knows what they are, and nobody really understands

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what they are, and very fundamental basic things about them

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>people don't get. So we just some kind of from

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>first principles decided what does it take to be an

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>investment grade E S G company? I mean they mimic

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the credit ratings right to which kind of gives them

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>an order of credibility that they don't deserve. They're not regulated,

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the data is not regulated that they're based on. Like,

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just kind of everybody can come up with their

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>own system, and everybody does come up with their own systems,

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and so cam I'm just gonna jumping because first of all,

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and everybody should read it and also check it out

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>online because it's kind of a fun interactive way that

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it's been put together online as well, but there's a

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>box highlighted if you read it online, it says some

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>companies with massive emissions or that have controversial records on

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>climate change while they still manage upgrades, including for environmental factors.

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And I wrote next to it, wait, what, so how

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>does that happen? Yeah? Well, I mean, look, you have

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to understand the basic lens of the system. So this

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to to kind of look at your impact on the

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>world as a company. It's designed to do the opposite

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of that, is designed to look at risk that the

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>world is creating to your bottom Climate change is a

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>great example. You know, unless you're a utility that's regulated

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>for burning fossil fuels, climate change is in the risks

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you at all. It doesn't even factor in your score

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>because the score is about is regulation going to cost

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>your bottom line? Regulation from climate change? It's not are

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you contributing to climate change? Okay? So then when okay?

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, so I I guess the question is where

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>where does the consumer come into this? Because if M

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>s C I has this clear understanding of what happens,

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if the asset managers do as well,

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>but then they sell these products to asset managers who

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in turn or offer these products asset managers, who in

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>turn offer them to perhaps every day investors. Do where's

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the message lost? Because the message changes when it gets

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to the consumer. Look, it's lost from start to finish.

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>This is the This is by far biggest growth area

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in the global financial services industry, and everybody is jumping

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in with both feet because it's a place for them

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to make money. Black Rocks got the biggest et f

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Uh, and it's built on M s

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>c I data. And you know, one of the only

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>really critical differences between this and their core SMP five

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred fund is that they charged five times the fees.

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's I think really what this is about.

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>That feels like that goes against e s G standards

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>or metrics. Doesn't it feel that way? Well, But but

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>not if you really know what the s G metrics are,

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>because the metrics kind of what you think they are, right,

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So you know, look, we lifted up the hood. We

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>looked at a hundred and fifty five upgrades. We looked

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>at every upgrade in the SMP five hundred, every company

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that got an upgrade in this record period of growth,

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>All of last year and the first half of this year.

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we pretty much forensically show what you know,

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>even when it's not stuff that's in directly contradiction to

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>making the better, which is msci's marketing, and rebranded the

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 1>company and Fernandes them and in two thousand nineteen at

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the start when he saw this coming, this boom, you know,

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the new brand is better portfolios are better investments for

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a better world. And so this is what everybody sells.

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>It's the main pitch of the s G. But reality

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>is is the opposite. You can do more damage. You

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>can have increased the carbon footprint of your portfolio by

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>investing not just in E s G but in E

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>s G portfolios and companies that have high E ratings

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>like you said right like McDonald's is a great example.

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>There are emissions because of their supply chain, biggest beef,

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest beef purchasers in the world, same

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>as Portugal or Hungry, and they were going up and

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>part of their score, MSc I took them out of

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the calculation of their score because they're not a utility

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>burning fossil fuel, so it's not going to cost them anything.

0:33:57.960 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>One thing I would say is and what's interesting is

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember remember like early on with the E s

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>G conversation, it's we started talking about, hey, folks, the

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>reason as investors you have to care about climate change,

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>even if you don't believe it, is that it's happening

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to impact companies. There will be financial

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 1>impacts on their bottom lines as a result. So I

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of understand a little bit where M s c

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I is coming from. But when you think about all

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the marketing that's going on when it comes to E

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>s G funds, I think investors a lot of them

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.959
<v Speaker 1>were thinking, wait a minute, we're making investments that really

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>help the environment. But there are a lot of critics

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>out there. And you mentioned to Wreak Fancy in your story,

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>who was formerly head of E s G Blackrock. Um.

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>There's so much in this story, including specific companies like

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan, Dr Horton, that you go into uh McDonald's,

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>which I really highly recommend that everybody check out because

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.720
<v Speaker 1>it really resonates and really gets very specific. Cam terrific,

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Cam Simpson, Projects and Investigations reporter

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>up Bloomberg News on the phone from London, um, we

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>apologize some of the audio was a little funky. He's

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>in our weekend show, which is eight am on Bloomberg Radio.

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Also on her podcast feed, so you can hear a

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit more there. It's a little bit more of

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a clearer feed. And also perhaps you before you listen

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to that, go and check out camp. Story is available

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 1>in the new issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine. It's

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>available on news stands. Also check it out on the

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal and then of course at Bloomberg dot com

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>slash business Week. Again, some really good interactive features in

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 1>the story, so a good one to read online. You're

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. All Right, it's

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin on pace for its fourth consecutive weekly decline

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.760
<v Speaker 1>after brief bounce triggered by report showing US inflation accelerated,

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>failing to unwind the negative sentiment that has recently gripped

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>digital asset markets. It's really been a trade as of late.

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 1>In our weekly cryptocurrency segment, back with us Jusaka Chaw,

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 1>she's head of OTC options Trading at the crypto exchange Crack,

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and she's also co founder of America's first approved crypto

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>derivative platform, led your X. She's on the phone in

0:35:56.239 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>New York City. Forgive me for that mispronunciation. UM, good

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 1>to have you back with us. You know, as we

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 1>get more market information analysis on crypto, is there any

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:08.800
<v Speaker 1>conclusions on the usefulness or lack there of a bitcoin

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>as an inflation hedge? Well, I think that the inflation

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 1>hedge is definitely um a piece of not just the

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 1>narrative but um of the fundamental offering of bitcoin. But

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, it is an early asset. You know,

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it is still the early days and has a lot

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of idiosyncratic risk. And then I think on top of

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>that d as it's gotten more institutionalized, there's more and

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>more overlap in the participant base between the traditional markets

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and the crypto markets, and so that will necessarily lead

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to price action that might be more correlated in certain

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>cases um than in others. So I think the short

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of it is that many people who are investing in

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:54.280
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin are doing so because it is an inflation hedge.

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I think over time one would expect that to play out,

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 1>But over shorter periods of time time, whether it's macro

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:04.799
<v Speaker 1>or idiosyncratic, there are a lot of other drivers of prices. Okay,

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>So if it's an inflation hedge, was today's high report

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that did come in line with expectations? Was that priced

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>in help us understand recent moves with the with the

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:19.280
<v Speaker 1>inflation read that we got today, because because I should

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 1>know it. As Carol mentioned cryptos, you know Bitcoin right

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 1>now is just hired by six tents of one percent.

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of jumped around a little bit today. Yeah.

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 1>I think the short term price moves are due more

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to UM the flows between the traditional markets and the

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:38.399
<v Speaker 1>crypto market. So to use an example, if you look

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 1>back at something like Thanksgiving or when you get a

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>large crash, UM when there's an overlap of participants between

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the two and cash is king at the end of

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the day, UM, cash is king, whether it's crypto or

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's traditional. Now where you start to see um

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>some differentiation would be I think as things stabilized a

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:01.479
<v Speaker 1>little bit in the traditional markets and institutions come back

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in to reallocate to portfolios into risky assets is where

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we'd start to see more differentiation. But over

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the short term, like if we're talking, you know, number

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 1>minutes after a number comes out. I think it's driven

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 1>more by those kinds of dynamics. Jus, you know, I'm

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:19.959
<v Speaker 1>just thinking we're almost down with one. What stands out

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>about this past year when it comes to cryptocurrencies, Well,

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, for me, it's just the immense volatility still.

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think if you had asked me or

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:33.800
<v Speaker 1>folks in the space a few years ago, if bitcoin

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 1>hit a trillion dollar market cap, would you expect it

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to be less volatile? The answer would be absolutely and

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>expected maybe to be up I don't know, forty fifty ball,

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and it sustains a like a realized of seven d

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>ish ball is implied ball of ninety. And so I

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's really what stood out this year is even

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:58.839
<v Speaker 1>though um we've seen massive price appreciation, the volatility still

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 1>remains immensely high. Was just literally one month ago, November

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>tenth is when we hit all time highs at sixty

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:07.760
<v Speaker 1>eight k as was highlighted in the Cracking Intelligence report

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>UM and and that was just a month ago, and

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>now we're lower. So I think that it's still even

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>though it has matured in a lot of ways the

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:20.280
<v Speaker 1>volatility points to uncertainty, UM, fear from the traditional markets,

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 1>just a number of factors that are still UM still

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 1>out there. On Wednesday we saw eight. We saw a

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 1>handful I should say, crypto executive space, House lawmakers. It

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>was on the eighth, just a couple of days ago.

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Your big takeaway from what we saw in terms of

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 1>what we should expect when it comes to the way

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 1>that lawmakers are thinking about regulation. I think it was

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>more constructive than UM than a lot of people were

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>worried about. Keep hearing that. The questions were pretty good

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>from lawmakers, right, Yeah, exactly they were. They were good,

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, credit to them because it's very difficult to

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:58.880
<v Speaker 1>keep up with everything that's going on in the space,

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:01.919
<v Speaker 1>and they have and they obviously have day jobs too,

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>so they had to handle on it. And I think

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the tone overall was more constructive, and especially over the

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>summer when UM the tone especially out of the SEC

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>was coming out about some of the impending regulation. I

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:18.280
<v Speaker 1>know there was a lot of concern in the crypto space,

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and so I think to a degree, UM, I wouldn't

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 1>say that regulation has been d risk, but I think

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that folks maybe feel a little bit more comfortable that

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it will be more of a constructive environment. Hey, jes

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:31.240
<v Speaker 1>think I just got about thirty forty seconds left hair crypto,

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 1>uh currency collectible? Are we still trying to figure out

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly what it is? And just quickly, um, Well, n

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:40.479
<v Speaker 1>f T s are still having a really strong month,

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>etheriums having a very strong month, and obviously Bitcoin as

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the inflation head. So I think all of the above

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is the short answer. Okay, well said, Well said. And

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 1>we talked about n f T s and art. It's

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in our weekend show as well. I mean, it's interesting

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to see what the auction houses are doing right here,

0:40:55.760 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and U n f T. I'm a traditional list, I mean,

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>right like art, I'm with the art in the out

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of all, I remain I'm open minded. I yet to

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 1>be convinced, but I do like the idea. And f

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 1>t's in fashion that maybe it's pretty cool. You have

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:12.919
<v Speaker 1>so much. You talk about that in the new issue

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week magazine as well. All right, do

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you think a chat she's head of OTC options trading

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>at crack and on the phone in New York City. Yeah,

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive? Oh no, no, no, no,

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 1>this is not a toy home. All right, please, I

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>want to drive. It's a good question. This is the

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 1>drive to the clothes on Bloomberg Radio. TikTok, everybody, just

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 1>about Timmans left in today's trading session. Hey, we are seeing,

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly on the SNP and the Dow, a leg up

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to our top levels, best levels of the session. So

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:58.319
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing some buying into the clothes here on what's

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:01.359
<v Speaker 1>been a really bullish week for the your equity averages. Well,

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:03.840
<v Speaker 1>let's get into it with Ryan Dietrich, chief market strategist

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 1>at LPL Financial. He joins us on the phone from Charlotte,

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:09.280
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina. Hey, Ryan, how are you? Hey? Tim and Carol.

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm glad to be back. And like you said,

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 1>we might have new all time highs today. So what

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:14.799
<v Speaker 1>did day to come on the radio with you. Well,

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 1>let's talk some technicals here, because I know that's what

0:42:16.800 --> 0:42:18.799
<v Speaker 1>certainly what you focus on. What are you keeping an

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:21.319
<v Speaker 1>eye on, especially in the wake of the fundamental data

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that we got when it came to inflation today. Yeah, him,

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean you think about let's go back a week

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>ago just for a second, right, we had all the

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:30.880
<v Speaker 1>selling the concerns. There was actually some buying late on

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the last Friday a week ago today. Now you fast

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>forward to this week up three and a half percent,

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the best week for equities since February, and today, if

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:41.360
<v Speaker 1>we closed it an all time high would actually be

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the sixty seventh all time high this year at the

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>second most all time highs ever for the SP five,

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and would be the first new high of December, making

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>it twelve or twelve. Every single month this year we

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 1>had a new all time high on the SMP. Only

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:00.879
<v Speaker 1>has ever done that. There's some cocktail bets you could

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 1>bet there that four teen made new highs all twelve months.

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>But here you go, what does it all mean? Well,

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, we come up, go on for a while,

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:11.360
<v Speaker 1>and fundamentals are decent, and the and they're strong actually,

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and the technicals are strong. But to us is the

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:15.880
<v Speaker 1>question as well, you know, we'll Santa come to town.

0:43:15.880 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And you look at history the first half of December, guys,

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>historically it's kind of choppy and volatile. It's the second

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:25.759
<v Speaker 1>half of December that's usually strong. And we don't need

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>too many reasons to think that, you know, Santa might

0:43:28.000 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 1>come to town again and we can have a four

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 1>bias to end this year, hence the Santa Class rally.

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Let me just correct, so you're saying we could be

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>near our sixty seventh all time high in the SMP,

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:39.359
<v Speaker 1>and this would be this the second year that we've

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>seen the most highs on the SMP team being the last. Well, no,

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:46.399
<v Speaker 1>so that is the most all time highs for any

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:51.240
<v Speaker 1>one year only other than more new all time highs.

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 1>But this is the only other year besides to have

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 1>a new high all twelve months'ways despice the data, but

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>still the bottom line one has been amazing. Maybe let's

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>put it that way. Okay, So you you obviously I

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:08.880
<v Speaker 1>can hear the optimism you talk about the technicals, and

0:44:08.920 --> 0:44:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I like looking at technicals to ryan what specifically are

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:16.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing that technically shows that this is a strong market

0:44:16.480 --> 0:44:19.720
<v Speaker 1>with the ability to continue a move to the upside

0:44:19.719 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 1>on the equity side. Yeah, I mean you great question there.

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean you look at kind of what's been leading us,

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and it is you know, it's it is your industrials, right,

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>your cyclical cyclical value names have been doing well. Financials

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 1>been hanging in their technology, which last I checked, the

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>most important group largest group in the SP five hundred

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>it on a relative basis has broken out to all

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 1>time highs on a relist drink basis verse SMP five hundred.

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So there are the correct groups in our opinion that

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:48.719
<v Speaker 1>are leading, and those are positive signs. We had the

0:44:48.719 --> 0:44:51.040
<v Speaker 1>little law, we had some selling you know, here and

0:44:51.080 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 1>there throughout the year, But the true leaders of this

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 1>market are the more aggressive areas and those are what

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:58.879
<v Speaker 1>are leading, and we like to see that, and that's

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a real positive. And again it doesn't mean we're gonna

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 1>go straight up. I mean next year is a mid

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:04.880
<v Speaker 1>term yere, right, I mean, let's talk next year for

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a second. I want to ask you about Ryan, is

0:45:07.080 --> 0:45:12.279
<v Speaker 1>is how this all translates into what happens in Yeah,

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 1>let's let me dust it off for a second here. So, um,

0:45:15.160 --> 0:45:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, you think about it this year when you

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:20.600
<v Speaker 1>go back in history, guys, when you gain twenty percent,

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that next year has been higher in the last nine times,

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:26.319
<v Speaker 1>and seven of them a double digits. So that's just

0:45:26.560 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 1>one data piece, but it does suggest the bull market

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:31.360
<v Speaker 1>is still alive. But the other thing is it's a

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 1>mid term year. Historically, when you look at the four

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>year cycle, the mid term year is the most volatile.

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 1>You have nearly a nineteen percent pete to trough average

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:43.160
<v Speaker 1>correction since the sixties, the last fifty years or so

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>during a mid term year. Remember twenty eighteen we got

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 1>almost a twenty percent correction in eighteen. UM stocks actually

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 1>down in if we remember, you know that that time frame,

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 1>So just be aware it's not gonna be quite as easy.

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 1>But still with the fundamentals the uh, you know, the

0:45:57.600 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy, fiscal policy tail winds there with a strong

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 1>economy being led by the consumer, we'd still bet on upside.

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:06.399
<v Speaker 1>But we're not probably gonna gain twenty five percent next year.

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 1>But hey, we take a ten to twelve game next year,

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's kind of what we think could happen. So okay,

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:12.799
<v Speaker 1>I hate to use this phrase of taking money off

0:46:12.840 --> 0:46:15.239
<v Speaker 1>the table, but you know, you can be greedy and

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you can go too far. And what is an outpoint then?

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you obviously are bullish, I get it, Ryan,

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, is there a point where it does

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 1>make some some sense to maybe pull some money out

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 1>of the market and just write it out, especially when

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 1>there are still so many questions about economic growth? To

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:33.440
<v Speaker 1>be fair, uh, and whether or not the Fed's going

0:46:33.480 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to get it right when it comes to policy moves. Yeah,

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the FED will see the Fed sticks of landing and

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:40.239
<v Speaker 1>that might start this Wednesday. Right. But but but you're right, Carol,

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and after a hundred and ten percent rally on the SMP,

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>people have really been spoiled. If you've been fortunate enough

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to have not panicked in March and ridden this up,

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe it makes sense to during the cash register a

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:54.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But well, we like to look out of

0:46:54.320 --> 0:46:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the lp L research. What are the credit markets telling us?

0:46:56.920 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to get two geeky with this, but you

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 1>look at high yield spreads, investment grade corporate spreads, they

0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 1>are not breaking out to new highs this year. They

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 1>popped up on the recent concerns over a Macron and

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 1>potentially FED tapering as we've all been talking about, but

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 1>they've really calmed down, uh this this this week specifically.

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:16.359
<v Speaker 1>So the credit markets are kind of the smartest guys

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 1>in the room until they start really worrying. That's when

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:20.799
<v Speaker 1>you would start to worry a little more. And they're

0:47:20.800 --> 0:47:22.920
<v Speaker 1>not right. So that's a good sign. Hey, just quickly,

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's wacky that you've got the NAZAC

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 1>moving higher and you've got yields moving higher. That is

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 1>not a typical correlation. No, you're you're exactly right, it's not.

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 1>It's one of those one day things. Honestly, like it's

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:36.080
<v Speaker 1>not a one day thing. It's actually been I think

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 1>eight nine or ten days that we've seen that correlation.

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:42.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a great point, great point more recent. I guess

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 1>some you know, you look at today, we've got the

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>inflation data. We said, FED days get a little quirky.

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:49.400
<v Speaker 1>But maybe it's just a sign that hey, you know,

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:52.160
<v Speaker 1>technology which did lag there for about six months in

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the year, it's taking the baton again.

0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:56.279
<v Speaker 1>And that's how that's have a healthy bowl market in

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:58.840
<v Speaker 1>our opinion, Carol, you know, you've passed the baton around

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and and maybe it's text time. We did just release

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:04.800
<v Speaker 1>our two outlook this week. We called it passing the

0:48:04.920 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 1>baton because we said we're going to go from monetary

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and fiscal policy being in charge to the consumers and

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:14.000
<v Speaker 1>small businesses and capital expenditures that are going to take charge.

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:15.879
<v Speaker 1>So we've been passing the baton is a nice theme

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:18.480
<v Speaker 1>for next year, but tech taking the batonages the healthy

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:20.880
<v Speaker 1>sign especially with the yield, like you said, making that

0:48:20.920 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>movement there. All Right, we gotta run. Hey, have a

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:25.800
<v Speaker 1>good weekend. Ryan Dtrich, chief market strategist at LPL Financial,

0:48:25.880 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 1>with us on the phone from Charlotte, North Carolina. It

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 1>has definitely been a week for the bulls. Thanks for

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:37.200
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:48:37.239 --> 0:48:39.799
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:48:39.920 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News