WEBVTT - Can Biden Still Win?

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Cool Zone Media. Welcome to it could happen here a

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>podcast about it happening here, it being the slow crumbling

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of the old world and the painful birth of the new.

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>And here to talk about the painful birth of the

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>new world is someone who was compared to me very

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>recently born, Garrison Davis. How are you doing, Garet.

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Good Good as a new member of the KHive nation,

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 2>I have a new life under me now.

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you've embraced the Kamala of it all and are

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>now are now just vibing? Yeah, it's a beautiful place

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to be. Yeah.

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately it might be just as a delusional as Biden's

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 2>own insistence that he should be the one to run.

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 2>And that's kind of what we're talking about here today.

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh good, I love delusion and its impact on American

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>political life.

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>So our initial post debate comments, we're a little bit frenzied,

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 2>little bit chaotic, as was the debate, I suppose, and

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 2>post debate polls were also just kind of a mess

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 2>initially with wildly differing results from source to source, but

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 2>over time they have since stabilized and kind of synced

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 2>up to like phyciically put it, essentially, the debate undid

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 2>most of the pro Biden shifts that had happened in

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 2>the wake of Trump's felony conviction.

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I've seen some poles have shown it tightening

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit again. But it's it's very I mean,

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I always wonder like how much you've got kind of

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>two camps, broadly speaking in terms of the people who

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>seem like they're not completely insane. One of them is

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of the Nate Silver side of things, which shows

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Biden as having fallen fairly far behind and having you know,

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>he's got Biden at about a thirty percent chance, which

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is where Trump was in twenty sixteen, so that doesn't

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>mean z zero. Whereas the new five thirty eight polling average,

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and I kind of have been following their new head

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of statistics for a while, has it still close to

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a dead heat. And then obviously, you know, there's arguments

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that people will make that Trump or that Biden is

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>actually very far behind, which have more to it than

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the arguments that Biden that Biden is going to win

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>in a landslide, the kind of democratic like the polls

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>are wrong entirely. I don't think that's likely, but I

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>think we're looking at somewhere between Biden as a definite

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>like underdog, or more or less tied. I guess that's

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>where it seems to me like the evidence still is yep.

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 2>A USA Today Suffolk University poll conducted immediately after the

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 2>debate gave Trump a four point boost. The week after

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 2>the debate, a New York Times Siena poll found Trump's

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 2>lead had increased by three percent, now leading by six

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 2>points with likely voters. Other questions were pulled in the

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 2>wake of the debate. A CNN found that seventy five

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 2>percent of Democrats believe the party would have a better

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 2>chance at defeating Trump with a candidate to other than Biden.

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 2>And overall, yes, his number dropped or kind of coasted

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 2>with what it had been in like, you know, April, March, February,

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 2>and according to Politico, other than Trump in twenty twenty,

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 2>no incumbent has trailed this far behind in horse race

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 2>polling since Jimmy Carter's re election bid forty four years ago,

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 2>which does not make me feel super optimistic.

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not great, and man, it would be. I suspect

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the polls are still over emphasizing it to a degree

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>because if if Biden losing by six percent would be

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>like the big the worst performance of a Democrat really

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>like a generation, like in a long long time, and

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I just don't believe it's going to be that far off,

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>but like it is. Definitely things are a lot uglier

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>than they were when we recorded our last horse race episode, right,

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Like the debate was somewhere between pretty bad and catastrophe

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of its impact on the polls.

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, but Trump, what Trump actually gained himself as a

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 2>candidate is not very much. It's mostly it's mostly, it's

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 2>mostly decreases on Biden. And five pollsters did pre and

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 2>post debate polls, and Trump is gaining on the margin,

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 2>but in none of the polls did he gain anything

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 2>more than a four point swing. So they're all pretty consistent,

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 2>and it's it's not all the end of the world

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 2>here either. A poll released last Saturday by Bloomberg and

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Morning Console showed Biden narrowing Trump's post debate lead, specifically

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 2>in swing states, with only a two percent difference between

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 2>all seven swing states, with Biden being ahead in Michigan

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 2>and Wisconsin. Yeah, two percent is within that margin of error,

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 2>So things are also starting to level up over time.

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think some of this may have to

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>do We're going to talk a bit about Project twenty

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, which which I tend to think, uh, and

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we've been chatting about this online all week in our

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>work chat. People are overemphasizing as opposed to what Trump

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>is that because Agenda Project twenty twenty five is basically

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a blueprint for a Christian fascist takeover of the US,

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 1>published by the Heritage Foundation, and a lot of people

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>who have been affiliated with Trump, who were in his

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>administration last time, have are on board with it, have

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about it, have boosted it, so people are obviously

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>scared of it. I think what Trump is actually promised

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to do in office, which is the Agenda forty seven,

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>we did a whole week of stuff on it, is

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a more realistic thing to be afraid of. But either way,

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that some of that tightening is probably a

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>mix of you've got everywhere, you had a bunch of

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of on the fence, voters swing away from Biden

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 1>because he performed so badly in the debate, and then

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it has dims have done a pretty intensive job of

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>spreading out a lot of you know, what you might

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>call fear porn over a fascist takeover of the country.

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's part of why things might be

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>tightening back up.

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it would be nice to eventually, one year

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 2>vote for vote for something instead of just be voting

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 2>against something. But again, I'm not sure if we'll ever

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 2>get to that point.

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Again. Yeah, hasn't happened yet. Well no, no, no, I

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>mean I was. I remember I got to vote for

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Obama the first time he ran, and it was hard

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>not to be optimistic.

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 2>So immediately after the debate, we had a whole bunch

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>of like friends of Biden, kind of upper level Democrat

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 2>not like online influencers, but like actual like influential, like

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 2>like pundits and people you know, call for perhaps Biden

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 2>should step down, perhaps we should find somebody else. And

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 2>this has kind of been the ongoing post debate ever

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 2>since the debates has been this question and we'll get

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 2>I we'll kind of get to this a little bit

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 2>more later. Honestly, I think we had a stronger chance

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 2>at this possibility a week or two ago. I think

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 2>by now Democrats have largely kind of closed ranks around Biden.

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 2>But this is this is definitely still developing. And I've

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 2>been keeping up with all of Biden's appearances in the

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 2>media since the debate, just because I've been interested to

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 2>see how he will handle this kind of universal flub.

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I watched his ABC interview and his recent phone calls

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 2>into various morning news shows. In all of those, he

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.239
<v Speaker 2>did not perform especially well as expected. They were slow

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes kind of like mumbly, But neither have they

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 2>been like the death blow to his campaign needed to

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 2>finalize the shift to an alternative candidate. Instead, we're just

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of coasting along with this general uncertainty regarding the

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Democratic candidacy, and meanwhile, Biden is just continuing to affirm

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.239
<v Speaker 2>that he will be the one to lead the ticket.

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to quote from Washington Post here. Quote. As

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 2>of Sunday, nine House Democrats, four privately and five publicly,

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 2>had called for Biden to exit the race. In addition,

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 2>at least to eighteen current and former top Democrats as

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 2>of Saturday had publicly raised concerns about Biden's fitness for

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 2>office and his ability to defeat Trump unquote, And it

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 2>has remained the same since then. There's gonna be meetings

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 2>in the next few days. Including the day after we

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 2>record this. We're recording this on Monday, so there's gonna

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 2>be meetings in the Senate and in the House about

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of this issue. So this is definitely still developing,

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 2>but you're starting to see more and more politicians fall

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 2>into rank. AOC just put in a statement saying, no,

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna we're gonna all support Biden. So like there

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 2>was this uncertainty for a while, and now I think

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 2>people are kind of being told to like, come on,

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 2>get on the platform. Yeah, but Biden hasn't been handling

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 2>this well like personally either. He's come across like very angry.

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>No, the emails I've been getting from the Biden campaign

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 1>have been wild, and I've been belaving podcasters.

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 2>He's been blaming.

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Past the media, and I'm kind of bummed that it's

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the pods save guys. He got angry. Yet we've been

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>We've been shitty to Joe Biden for so much longer

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>than those assholes.

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but he's been treating it very weirdly. He's been

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 2>doing a lot of like a denial of the polling.

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 2>He's been doing some revisionist.

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.719
<v Speaker 1>History, very magical thinking.

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Regarding like twenty twenty pulling I think, I think kind

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 2>of referencing the Democratic primary, but still the way that

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 2>he's talking about it, it's making it sound like he,

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, like he was behind in the polls in

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty, that he was that Democrats were behind in

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 2>the polls in twenty twenty two, which just wasn't true.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 2>The red wave comment was was certain pundits and Republicans

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 2>trying to conjure a red wave, but the actual polls

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 2>were very accurate in twenty twenty two. And he's also

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 2>crediting himself for that red wave not happening in twenty

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty two. So he's been having a lot of weird statements,

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 2>like blaming media and blaming the elites for trying to

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 2>replace him on the ticket. I'll include one clip here

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 2>from the morning Joe, come on.

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Give me a break.

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting so frustrated.

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But by the lease, now, I'm not talking about you guys,

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>but about the elase in the party who.

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 2>They know so much more.

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>But any of these guys, I don't think I should

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>run against me.

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Announced for president, challenge a man to convention. Kind of

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 2>his continuous line to justify his own candidate. See is

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 2>has been him claiming that he won the primary, which

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 2>is a ridiculous thing to say as an incumbent, because like,

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:12.839
<v Speaker 2>come on, come on, and he has repeatedly said that

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 2>that that Democratic voters in the primaries have quote spoken

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 2>clearly and decisively. They've chosen me to be the nominee

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 2>of the party, which is not how it worked. Quote.

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 2>Do we now just say that process didn't matter, that

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 2>the voters don't have a say, I declined to do that.

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 2>How could we stand for democracy in our nation if

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 2>we ignore it in our own party. I cannot do that.

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 2>I will not do that, unquote, which is just absurd,

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 2>right because like especially there was many people who actually

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 2>voted in the like false primary for like the like

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 2>other option.

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, but like seventy five percent of Americans

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>would prefer to vote for someone besides Biden.

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Like it's it's absurd, especially when you're running like an

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 2>uncontested as an incumbent. If you want people to challenge you,

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 2>you could have said so, like it's come on, like

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 2>this is there was there was no pretty goofy.

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>No real primary for the dims, and there usually isn't.

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>That's not abnormal with an incumbent, But in this case,

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 1>people have severe questions about the incumbent's fitness to do

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the job in a physical way. Like I hate to

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>say it, but like Trump might physically be better able

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to survive a four year term than Biden. Is, you know,

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.599
<v Speaker 1>not that I think he's mentally a better president. I

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think honestly. Part of what we are accepting here

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.719
<v Speaker 1>is that, like that's so that doesn't really matter, right,

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Like we're all kind of acknowledging if you're on team

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>anything but Trump, because he might end the concept of

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>democracy in this country, then you're accepting that, like, yeah,

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I am not. I am voting for a guy who

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>probably can't really do the job anymore, and just assuming

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that the people around him will not be as evil

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>like you do. Kind of have to accept that. Otherwise

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you're just lying to yourself about the state that Joe

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is in because he's he's not He's not all there.

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>He's not all there the way he was in twenty twenty.

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 2>No, but do you know what still is here just

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 2>like it was back in.

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Twenty twenty, capitalism, Baby, We didn't manage to take it out,

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>even though we elected this our Communist leader Joseph Biden

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>chairman Joe.

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Enjoy these capitalism sponsored ads.

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, we are back. Yeah. So there was a

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>report that came out from CHIP fifty, which is like

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>an analytics project. It's like the Civic Health and Institution Project,

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's like a survey of all fifty US states,

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and they did a survey on like opinions of voters

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>before and after the debate, and there showed like fairly

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>small movement, like very little was changed at all in

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 1>terms of like and primarily what was changed wasn't people

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>going from Biden to Trump, but from people preferring from

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>preferring Biden to preferring other rights like someone else, someone

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>else right. And so that does kind of go back

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to what we're like, people are not making their minds

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>up about Trump like now. And I think what the

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>DIMS can do if Biden stays in and he doesn't

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>seem like he's leaving. It seems like the primary thing

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that will make progress for them is hitting on how

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>dangerous Trump having a second term will be. That seems

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to be what moves the needle, which.

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.719
<v Speaker 2>Is part of their current strategy. But their shategy is

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of all influx right now because of the poor

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 2>performance in the debate, They're trying to save face on

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Biden's part as well as emphasizing that Trump is like

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 2>a dangerous possibility. And again, like, even if Biden does

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 2>decide to drop out or step down, He's going to

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 2>keep saying he's running until literally the day that happens,

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 2>right because that is that is what you do as

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 2>a politician. You were gonna you were going to keep

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 2>insisting it until one day you are no longer doing that.

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 2>And that's just kind of how politics goes. But he

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 2>has it's made continuous, continuous gestures towards the fact that

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 2>he is he is going to stay. He has no

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 2>plans on stepping down. He wants to win in November.

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.319
<v Speaker 2>This Monday, he personally made twenty calls to congressional members

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 2>trying to convince them that he is going to be

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 2>the one on the ticket.

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>No, really, guys, it's going to be me again.

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Really, And I think part of what he's doing here

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 2>is like he does not have to demonstrate at the

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 2>moment that he will like survive until like November. All

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 2>he has to do right now is run out the

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 2>clock until the convention and then it'll be too late

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 2>to swap him out for anyone else. There's a few

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 2>other people kind of saying this, and I believe that

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 2>is kind of what is what is happening. All they

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 2>need to do is just keep delaying this question, keep this,

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 2>keep this uncertainty until the convention, and then it's going

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 2>to get locked in there. And that's all he needs

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 2>to do. He doesn't need to demonstrate his viability come November.

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 2>He just needs to make sure that he gets he

0:14:55.720 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 2>gets the official nomination this August. And I don't know.

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Biden supporters' reactions to this have been really weird, including

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 2>we've kind of had like a new upgrowth of a

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 2>pro Biden personality cult among liberals because I feel like,

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 2>largely like a culmination of like MSNBC Russia Gate, like

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 2>bluing on type stuff that people are just now convinced

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 2>there's like a secret conspiracy to take down Biden, and

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 2>any attempts to question Biden's legibility as a candidate could

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 2>only be rooted in some secret agenda to get Trump elected.

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 2>So I think this is why they're so volatile about this,

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 2>is that they think like the only one who would

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 2>ever propagate questions over Biden's like legibility would be someone

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 2>who secretly wants Trump to be in office again, and

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 2>that is such a threat to them that they they're

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 2>lashing out very very oddly and very conspiratorially against anyone

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 2>raising questions about maybe Biden's not the best guy actually,

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 2>and they're spinning this into like actually being secret Trumpers.

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 2>It's odd because even the way Biden talks about his

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 2>own drive to beat Trump is kind of wishy washy,

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 2>certain like more polished statements will be like, yes, this

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 2>is like a threat to democracy. We have to we

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 2>have to do this to keep Trump out of office.

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 2>This is an existential threat. But in that in that

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 2>ABC interview, he gave a really kind of soft answer

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 2>to this question, saying that all that he needs to

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 2>do is just give it his all.

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you stay in and Trump is elected and

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>everything you're warning about comes to pass, how will you

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>feel in January? I'll feel as long as I gave

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it my all and I did the goodest jobs I

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>know I can do.

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 2>That's what this is about. It. That's not convincing.

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>That's such like a like ninth like cartoons for a

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>ninth grader's way of saying it, like, well, what matters

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>is that I tried put it all my best work board. No, man,

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't matter at all.

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah it is. It's not great, it's it's it's not

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 2>it's not reassuring because it doesn't matter if you give

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 2>it your all, people's lives are are on the right

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 2>and you're just like, eh, I'll give it the old

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 2>college try, You're like, okay.

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 1>It means one of two things. He's either is completely

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>delusional to the point where he doesn't realize how nonsensical

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that is, or he doesn't really think that Trump is

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a threat to democracy in people's lives. And I guess

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the third option would be he doesn't care, like if

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>he loses reelection, fuck everybody, if he doesn't get to

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>keep being president. Like maybe he is just that kind

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of person. I do have a feeling that only that

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of person can become president of the United States.

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I mean, like that was kind of my

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 2>read after the ABC interviews that he seemed just kind

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 2>of like delusional and narcissistic, like he really believes after

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty that he's the only one that can beat

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Trump and this feels like like a very genuine view

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 2>of himself that he's the only one strong enough to

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 2>beat Trump. Yeah, And the more and more that there's

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 2>been pushback against his legibility, the more he's been digging

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 2>his heels in. And I think if things continue like this,

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the Democratic Party will be able to

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 2>organize and unite enough to do like a soft coup

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 2>and convince Biden to step down. And without a complete

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 2>united front against Biden, he himself would need some kind

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 2>of like excuse to allow himself to step down without

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.719
<v Speaker 2>sacrificing his pride and showing weakness both in himself and

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 2>the party. This could be like a convenient medical diagnosis, right,

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 2>although the increasing number of calls for him to undergo

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 2>thorough neurological examination will probably have the same backfire effect

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 2>of Biden attempting as much as he can to avoid

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 2>any in depth medical and neurological testing. He's been making

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 2>these comments like every day I take a neurological test

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 2>by doing my job, and like, come on, man, we

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 2>also we're watching you do your job. It's not the.

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Problem, bro, Like you got up in front of the

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>like again referred to the last episode. Do you what

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I did on the horse race? Our attitude was like, yeah,

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>things have really improved for Biden. I think he's probably

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the smart money bet. And like sitting down and watching

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that it was horrifying, Like, yeah, there's no dinner. That's

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>part of why this. You have to if you're still

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>on team, Like, I don't think it's fair what people

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>are saying to Joe if you're on team, This was

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>bad strategy from the beginning expressing any kind of doubt. Well,

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's right, but I don't know what else people

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to do if you don't if you really

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>think that this is he is not demonstrated, like is

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>seriously concerning incapacity for the work. Think about how unprecedented

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>having this degree of open challenging of him as the

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>candidate this close to an elections. I've never seen anything

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>like that.

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Especially as especially on like in incumbent yes the president, Yeah,

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 2>and an incumbent who's served two times as vice, Like

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 2>that's ridiculous. And like the last real neurological medical examination

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 2>that he undertook was last February, which for an eighty

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 2>one year old is a very long time, especially if

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 2>you compare like news clips of him from like a

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 2>debate two clips of him from last February or last year.

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 2>There actually is like a decent difference, And I don't know,

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 2>it seems it seems kind of absurd that he that

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 2>he keeps harping on this line. For his ABC interview,

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 2>he declined to take a cognitive test and make the

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 2>results public in order to reassure voters that he was

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 2>fit to serve another term, saying that I have a

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 2>cognitive test every single day doing this job. Everything I

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 2>do is a test. No, not great.

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 2>He also said that only the Lord Almighty could persuade

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 2>him to change his mind and drop out of the race.

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>What the fuck? What the fuck? Show?

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 2>There we go? Seriously, man, So that's again not not

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 2>super reassuring. But do you know what I can be

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 2>reassured by Robert.

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 1>The fact that sweet lady capitalism is always there for us.

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 2>It's always there, like a good uncle or something.

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Yeah, yeah, yeah, something something that state farmad.

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I agree.

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.239
<v Speaker 2>All right, we are back. It is certainly feeling like

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 2>nineteen sixty eight all over again, isn't it.

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Uh yeah, I mean, And that's obviously having an

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>open convention in sixty eight. The chaos around that did

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>not help the Democrats. They did not know that election. No,

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 1>we got fucking Dick Nixon. So that's not good.

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 2>No, it's not granted with with campus protests and everything,

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 2>it all is starting to feel like sixty eight over here.

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, a lot of people are saying.

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 2>If Bien does step down before the DNC in Chicago

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 2>this August, we could have ourselves an open convention to

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 2>nominate a new candidate. The last time this method was

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 2>used by Democrats was in sixty eight at the also

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Chicago DNC, after the leading candidate, Senendate Robert F. Kennedy,

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 2>was assassinated weeks before the convention by twenty five four

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 2>year old Palestinian man for his support of Israel during

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 2>the Six Day War. So again, there is a lot

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 2>of a lot of parallels here. And if it's not

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 2>going to be Biden, then who is it going to be? Right,

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 2>This was a bigger question last week and it still

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 2>is kind of a lingering question in a lot of

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 2>people's minds. Who's it going to be? Probably Kamala I

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, there's really for a lot of reasons

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 1>in terms of including like I think what would have

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to happen with like the donations, like if it would

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to be a totally new group of people, that would

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>cause insurmountable bullshit. And also like if you're talking about

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 1>from a war gaming this out perspective, you know, Kamala

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>does not look bad in the polling and might might

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in fact be just for a variety of reasons, one

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.479
<v Speaker 1>of the better choices, Like I can, I can in

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>my head think, wow, I sure wish it was you know,

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Pritzker and Whitmer maybe, but like, I think that a

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of what I've seen in the polls has kind

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of convinced me that Kamala is probably our are best

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>all around bet and if you include practicality and actually

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>like beating Trump.

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 2>Yes, in the polls, she is consistently higher than any

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 2>other potential Democratic replacements and doing, if not as well,

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 2>often better than Biden against Trump, usually closing that race out.

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 2>A CNN poll from last Wednesday showed that she's in

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 2>the margin of error against Trump nationally with forty five

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 2>to his forty seven, which is much better than Biden

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 2>is doing nationally, and she's projected to do much better

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 2>in an electoral college race than Biden specifically. So there

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 2>we go. I'm gonn quote from CNN here quote. An

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 2>anonymously written Google doc titled Unburdened by What has been

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 2>the Case for Kamala, written by self described senior operatives

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:48.360
<v Speaker 2>within democratic political institutions, has been popping up in group

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 2>chats of Democratic donors and leading coalition groups. It lays

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 2>out a detailed argument and plan for a campaign. So

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 2>this doc I was able to get a hold of

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 2>a copy, and parts of it definitely read like an

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 2>aaronsor counscript like that is that is the closest thing

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 2>I can I can describe this thing as But I

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 2>think it is worth digging into here for our last section.

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 2>So I'm gonna I'm gonna read some some small parts

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:17.959
<v Speaker 2>of this doc and Robert, and I'm curious to hear

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 2>what your thoughts are on this. It starts by saying,

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 2>we are currently losing. We need to do something different

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.120
<v Speaker 2>to win. The number one most important priority above all

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 2>others is defeating Donald Trump. Nothing is more important, and

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 2>we need to be very real that we are currently losing.

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 2>So off to off to a good start okay, that is,

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.719
<v Speaker 2>I would uh, I would, I would argue accurate. Quote.

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Biden's debate performance, the campaign's defensive response, and the total

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 2>lack of plan to reassure his base and the voters

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 2>about his about his capability should shake everyone's confidence that

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 2>he can win this election. Now we have three possible options.

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Biden can take the necessary step to demonstrate that he

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 2>is up to the job, he can step aside for

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 2>another candidate, or Trump will win. The discourse around potential

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 2>alternative candidates and the event that Biden does step down

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 2>is increasingly detached from reality. Donors, pundits, and democratic elites

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 2>are freely slinging around wild ideas about dream tickets. This

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 2>chaos is used as a shield by stay the Course

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 2>advocates who frame the choice as Biden or chaos. The

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 2>swirl over different possible candidates is obscuring the fact that

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 2>there's a single clear path forward. There's one path out

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 2>of this mess, and it's Kamala unquote. And this is

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 2>one of the interesting things I found about this doc

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 2>is that the way that they view this kind of

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 2>current chaos as we win just as a deliberate strategy

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 2>and as a deliberate tactics just to continue this uncertainty

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 2>all the way to the convention. And a lot of

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the what this dock advocates for is that we need

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 2>to call this as soon as possible to give whatever

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 2>option we're going to go forward with the most amount

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 2>of success, whether that's Biden, whether that's Kamala, it needs

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 2>to we need to decide what it is so we

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 2>don't spend the next few months doing weird like democratic

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 2>party infighting and instead actually like lock down what's happening.

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:07.360
<v Speaker 2>So there's a cohesive strategy. And they argue that Kamala

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 2>has the strongest claim to democratic legibility among all other

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 2>alternative candidates. Quote, she's the only candidate that can take

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 2>the reins right now instead of in late August with

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 2>less than three months ago. To be clear, this isn't

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 2>an argument about deservedness or why should personally love Kamala.

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 2>It's about strategy and winning in the face of unimaginable

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 2>electoral stakes.

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Now, the doctors point out that only Biden himself has

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 2>the power to drop out and choose to head off

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 2>chaos by anointing Harris. But Biden does listen to people

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 2>and the people that he listens to, listens to other people,

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 2>and that is the audience for the people reading this doc.

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 2>That's what this is circulating among. That was like the intention,

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 2>and they argue that if Biden does drop out, Democrats

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 2>have to unite quickly behind the elected successor, as opposed

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:57.360
<v Speaker 2>to inviting this extended period of chaos. And although Kamala

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 2>has limitations in polls regarding her name recognition, she currently

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 2>wins any poll of alternative Democratic candidates by a very

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 2>wide margin. This doc dos pointed out that Kamala is

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 2>by no means a perfect candidate. She does have real deficits,

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 2>but they are mostly addressable. The doc mentions her Biden

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 2>level approval, rating her involvement with Biden's immigration shortcomings and

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 2>her kind of awkward camera moments reminiscent of a drunk

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 2>aunt and quote. After years of a relatively low profile,

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 2>voters don't see her as a strong leader for the country,

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 2>but running as a presidential candidate will allow Harris to

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 2>present herself in a more commanding light. She'll be a

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 2>prosecutor going up against a convicted felon, a woman fighting

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 2>against the man who ended Roe V. Wade unquote and

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 2>that is a lot of the tight sort of messaging

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 2>that they are promoting if Kamala does end up being

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 2>the option. A Morning consoled political poll on the vice

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 2>president from June reflects a number of advantages she would

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 2>have over Trump in a head to head match based

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 2>on his greatest vulnerabilities. A majority of voters se Kamala's

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 2>mentally fit, level headed, and prepare contrast to Trump and

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 2>even Biden, and a majority of voters trust Kamala on jobs, abortion,

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 2>climate change, and LGBTQ rights. Public opinion is already moving

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 2>towards Harris over Biden. Forty three percent of voters indicate

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Harris is fit to run, compared to Biden's thirty five

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 2>And while the issue is complex and the distance here

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 2>is relative, she's broadly considered to be on Biden's left

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 2>on Israel Palestine, an issue where he has major vulnerabilities.

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Kamala also has advantages with the younger and POC voters

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 2>that the Democrats are currently bleeding in the dock. Here

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 2>they contain some stats on this, saying Biden won the

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty election by just forty four thousand votes, and

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 2>most of those are votes that he is bleeding. A

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 2>New York Times cenpol in February found that Harris is

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 2>nearly ten points ahead of Biden with black voters, and

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 2>fifteen points up with Latino voters, twenty points up with

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 2>young voters. These are massive advantages. Now that is older data,

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 2>but it's probably worth some consideration. Part of the reason

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 2>why she is also favored among other Democratic contents is

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 2>that she has direct access to the Biden Harris campaign

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 2>war chest of over ninety one million dollars in cash,

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 2>which would create a smoother transition.

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and is probably I mean again, just given the

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of chaos that would be inherent in a totally

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>open convention, it just seems like the only feasible option.

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 2>And what they're advocating for is that if Kamla takes

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 2>a position now or soon to now, she'll have an

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 2>extra month and massive structural advantages. Quote, if we can

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 2>unite behind Harris in July, we have an extra month

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 2>of party unity and message unity. That's a month where

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 2>we can keep the media focused on Donald Trump, Project

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five and mega extremism instead of waiting in

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 2>dread for the next Biden misstep or talking about democrats

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 2>fighting it out to win delicate count Fear of racism

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 2>and sexism is playing an outsized role not supported by data.

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 2>The impact of sexism and racism on the vote is

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 2>marginal compared to the potential to make gains in the

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 2>crucial block that will decide the election. Right now. This

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 2>race hinges on alienated and unenthusiastic double haters who dislike

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 2>both Biden and Trump and want an alternative choice. Some

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 2>polls put the size of this group at twenty five

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 2>percent nationally, or even higher nearly thirty percent amongst.

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>The basically everyone I know well.

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Especially among inconsistent voters who are likely who are likely

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 2>to decide the election in key battleground states. For these

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 2>double haters, vote choices being driven not by prejudice but

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 2>by anti enthusiasm for the two currently eighty year old

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 2>white men presented here as the only options. YEAH voters

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 2>more likely. These voters are also more likely to be young, Hispanic, black,

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 2>and women in urban or suburban areas, the exact kind

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 2>of voter profile that Kamala is gaining appeal with.

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 2>And I find this little bit to be the most

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 2>compelling statement in this entire document. Because like that lays

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 2>out an actual map towards how Kamala would have a

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 2>better election viability than Biden, especially in the voters that

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 2>he's been bleeding dramatically in the past six seven months. Now.

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 2>The DOCA does close by saying, if Biden stays the course,

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 2>we need Kamala to be strong. The most likely outcome

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 2>is that President Biden declines to step back. In that case,

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Kamala's role is more crucial than ever. She will be

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 2>the strong communicator on the ticket, especially on our most

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 2>important issue abortion. Second, many voters will understand her to

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 2>be Biden's near guaranteed successor, and we will need to

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 2>feel comfortable with her potential assent to the presidency to

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 2>vote for the Biden Harris ticket. For anyone in the

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Biden's nominee, we must rally around him camp. It's essential

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 2>that we project confidence in his selection of a running

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 2>mate by one pushing the administration to stop sidelining Kamala,

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 2>by two promoting Kamala as the leader of the party

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 2>and country. Three be prepared to align with political and

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 2>financial support, and three debate over and ultimately organize around

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 2>a new running mate. Consolidation around Vice President Harris will

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 2>not guarantee victory in November. No option is free of

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 2>risk at this point. But this is our clearest path

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 2>to win. We should take it. And that's how the

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 2>document ends. And I like some of the arguments they

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 2>make here. I don't like Kamala as a person. I

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 2>think she is many many and I don't like cops,

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 2>but absolutely, especially if their messaging will be like Kamala

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 2>the prosecutor against Trump the felon, which I personally don't like.

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>But that could work.

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 2>That's not going to lose her important voters. That's not

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 2>going to lose her all of the anarchists who already

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 2>aren't going to vote.

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Like that, that might be a really good strategy, because

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Americans do not feel the same way about prosecutors as

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I do, and these you do right, like we have

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to accept that at a certain point, I think so.

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I I the think that's most frustrated to me about

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it doesn't look like Biden's going to

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>step down is that like the smartest thing they could

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>do strategy wise would be to drop that announcement on

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>like Monday of next week and utterly like cut the

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>wind out of the sales of the r NC, Like

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>suddenly the biggest story is that and not you know,

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>everything that the Republicans are putting out, like you could

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 1>actually really do some damage to them, because there's there's

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>not really anything that they could do in response.

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 2>And so much media attention right now is being focused

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 2>on Biden very clearly not being fit for office, and

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 2>all of that would go away if Kamala gets put

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 2>into the spot, then then then everyone will start focusing

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 2>once again on how bad Trump is. And I can

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 2>understand some of like the Biden camps like upsetedness at

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 2>at like the fact that currently there is just so

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 2>much attention on Biden and everyone kind of is ignoring Trump,

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 2>but that just is due to how poorly he himself

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 2>has been behaving like that, Like that that is ultimately

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 2>the Biden campaign's fault that they didn't plan for this constituency.

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 2>And if they want all of that like discourse to stop,

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 2>they have a very easy option to And it's just

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 2>reliant on Biden not being too personally prideful and acknowledging

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:53.959
<v Speaker 2>that he's just too old for office and there are

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 2>better candidates out there. So yeah, that is that is

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 2>the current, that is the current situation on the rise

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 2>of the case Hive, something I at this point am

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 2>very skeptical to think will actually happen. But it may

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.240
<v Speaker 2>be actually a viable strategy for the Democratic Party.

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Yep. I mean, we'll see what they actually do. Probably

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>keep running Joe Biden and hope that Americans panic enough

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>about Trump to But you know, we can all dream.

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 2>I dream to that point. We could also dream that

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 2>like that, that like the delegates will just like rebel

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 2>against they're like polite duty. Yeah, by by not committing

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 2>to their to their non binding promises. Although that would

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 2>be extremely unprecedented and it would make the DNC a

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 2>lot more fun.

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh, we would. We would have a great DNC if

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that were to go down. Yep.

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, well, we're gonna have fun at the R and

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 2>C instead.

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we sure will. Garrison, You and I are going

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to be on the ground in the exclusion zone and

0:34:56.480 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>at the convention itself where we cannot have backpacks or.

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Gas masks or canned food.

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But I might be able to carry a gun. Let

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>me see if they do reciprocity. Uh, where what is

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>this is Minnesota?

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 2>No, this is not Minnesota.

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Wisconsin, Wisconsin.

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 2>This is Milwaukee, Milwaukee.

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:21.840
<v Speaker 1>We can see how well prepared I am. Let me see.

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>That could make a fun episode all its own.

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I do have an idea for an episode that I

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:34.240
<v Speaker 2>will mention to you off air that I really want.

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 1>To do for the rn C. Wait, it looks like

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 1>yes with restrictions.

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I love restrictions.

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>That's great. We'll see what those are.

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Stay tuned to you, but the restriction.

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned, everybody.

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 2>It could happen here as a production of cool Zone Media.

0:35:59.840 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 2>More podcast from.

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Cool Zone Media, visit our website cool zonemedia dot com,

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts.

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 2>You can find sources for It could Happen here, updated

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:14.720
<v Speaker 2>monthly at coolzonemedia dot com slash sources. Thanks for listening.