WEBVTT - GameStop Trading and Robinhood’s Fallout

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanebeck. We're here every day bringing

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world's of business and finance,

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Lots of things to cover today.

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Shares of game Stop. We know Tim raleiged again today,

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>they also fell off some of those highs, but nonetheless

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>we continue to see uh this volatility and it's playing

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>out to some other names as well. She has been

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>reporting NonStop on the market gyrations around game Stop and others.

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So let's get into it with Bloomberg News investing reporter

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Annie Massa. She is on the phone in New York City. Um, Annie,

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.279
<v Speaker 1>where are we? What do you think our audience at

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>this point needs to know about what it's going out

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>with game Stop and others. What's going on with robin hood?

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>And it has been an absolutely wild week, as I'm

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>sure anybody listening can tell. I guess yesterday things really

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>came to a head because you started to see brokerages

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>including robin Hood slamming the brakes on new purchase orders

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>for game Stop, am C and some of these other

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Reddit fueled names that have been going crazy in the

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>past couple of days, and that drew a big backlash

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>online from users and also from some pretty unlikely pairings

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of people, including AOC and Ted Cruz, both of whom

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>criticized robin Hood for preventing people from buying new shares

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of those companies. Jim said it yesterday's like strange bed

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>fellows as a result of the exact Yeah, it didn't

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>last very long. A retweeted his tweet and told him

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to resign. But you know, that's a conversation for a

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>different day. Um. Look, I'm wondering what we learned about

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>what robin hood did yesterday. There was a lot of

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>confusion about why robin had prevented some basic functions for

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>its users. What do we learn in the the last twenty

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>four hours and what did Robin have to have to

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.679
<v Speaker 1>do in terms of getting this lifeline of a billion dollars. Yes,

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>So when you look under the hood, what happened yesterday

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>was there's machinery kind of underlying the market. Yeah, that's

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>meant to manage risk. And what happened was the central

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>clearing house asked Robin Hood and other brokers to effectively

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>put up more collateral um that day because of all

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the volatility, because of all the risk in the market,

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and Robin Hood, as you mentioned, as a result, had

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to go out and raise kind of an emergency one

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar fundraising round from its existing investors. So there

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>was a bit of a scramble for cash amid this

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>this really really wild training session. So any I guess

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm still trying to figure out is was this a

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>logistical operational problem in terms of clear clearing trades and

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>so on, or was this traders colluding as you know

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Vince Signorella mentioned kind of at the top of the show.

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Did people break the law in terms of what you're

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>allowed to do trading or was it again an operational

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>problem in terms of clearing these trades. Well, it's been interesting.

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood put out a statement yesterday trying to kind

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of assuage their investors and the people using their app, saying, listen,

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>this was a risk management decision that we made. Um,

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worry that this this decision was

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>made at the behest of electronic traders or anyone else. Now,

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't really enough to calm down the wild conspiracy

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>theories that flew around the internet yesterday. Um it was.

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>It was a little too little, too late for that.

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>But um, robin Hood did try to calm people's nerves

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and say, um, you know, it was a tough decision,

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>but we had to make it for for risk management reasons.

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>So what does this mean for a company like robin

0:03:58.000 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Hood that has really been the darling of so many

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>REATA investors and of course also A venture capitalists. The

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>company's supposed to have an IPO soon, yeah, zooming out.

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>It really raises questions about how robin Hood can navigate

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>this the hoopla of our current moment, and if it

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is still looking towards an I p O sometime this year,

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it's going to have to kind of prove that it

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>can manage all of the reputational and financial strains frankly

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that this game top episode has has put upon it.

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So regulators are getting involved. As we said at the top, UM,

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 1>where do you think this is going? What are you

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>hearing from the financial community that you're talking to two traders,

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to observers to I'm sure you're going kind of too academics,

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, what are you hearing about? Kind of where

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>this goes? Well? Now, I mean it's impossible to ignore

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>this in Washington, So regulators have that, like they don't

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>have a full plate or anything. Anny but okay, exactly

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly add this, add this to the list. Um. But

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the SEC did say today they put out a statement

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>saying that they are watching, um the kind of insanity

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>not there words, but of what's been happening in the

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>past week or so, and that they will, you know,

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>seek to identify any potential wrongdoing in the market. I

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>mean it is worth mentioning though that, Um, it's clearly

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>in the terms of service when you sign up for

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a robin Hood account that something like, you know, the

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>broker choosing to put the brakes on UM trades in

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a certain security can happen. So and I talked about this,

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>we any problem there, Tim and I were talking about

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>this yesterday because when we were seeing things like being

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>shut down and an account, and we thought there's gotta

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>be some stuff in the in the fine print. And

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>indeed last night people were tweeting images from from the

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>from the terms of service that like that like highlight

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that that people don't read those of course, Um yeah,

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>who's ever read the terms of service? I know that

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you should do it through it, but you want to

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>make that trade any very fly implications for for next

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 1>week and just taking it like a broader look at this, Um,

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>what are the implications for this as we go into

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>next week? I think the key thing to watch will

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>be how some of this um, you know, craziness spills

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>over to other names. We're already seeing that the chaos

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>has spun out from just game Stop and am C. Now, um,

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, Bitcoin is having its own you know, an

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>already volatile cryptocurrency is having its own wild day. And

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>there are other stocks that are having uh similar issues too.

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, you've just seen a spiral way out

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>from game Stop into other parts of the market. So

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>as you continue to cover this story, Okay, what are

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>the angles you want to know about? What is it

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that you're kind of watching for, especially as we are.

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're wrapping up this trading week, but we're

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna get ready for a new trading week in a

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>new month next week. What are the angles and stories

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, issues that you think we need to

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>be kind of sensitive to. I think we'll absolutely have

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to watch the strain that some of this has put

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on the broader financial system. I mean, I think that

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty unexpected how we've already seen the stress that

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the very like nuts and bolts of uh

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:14.119
<v Speaker 1>financial markets were put under by this whole episode. So

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.559
<v Speaker 1>that's one thing, and then the other thing I guess

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I would watch is how short sellers have been affected.

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we saw Citron research put out today that

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>they are no longer you know, publishing short possess. That

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>was huge, huge, yeah, huge decision and um so not

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>publishing or not taking just not publishing not yeah, I'm yeah.

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's kind of up ending their strategy for

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the past twenty years. It's it's a huge turnaround for them. Well,

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>how does this make other short sellers think about this? Because,

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>as you know, a lot of people point out to

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Twitter on Twitter today Mark Gangla from Bloomberg Opinion. We

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about this earlier today on Quick Take. Short sellers

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>have a role. They have a role in exposing fraud

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and exposing wrongdoing at companies, and they're some great examples

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of short sellers doing that. I mean, we think and Ron,

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we think wire card more. That's right. And the format always,

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the typical format that we think of as

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a short seller, you know, has a short position and

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>then does a big reveal and then the stock sells off.

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, as we've seen when people on Reddit

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>plan out in the open um, you know, to to

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of orchestrate a short squeeze. You know, if if

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>this can happen regularly, short sellers might have to rethink

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>how they go about that. That entire business. Yeah, I mean,

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just pretty amazing and things that just have moved

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>so quickly. Um, and thank you so much, really appreciate it.

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News investing reporter any Massa check out all of

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>our work on the Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot com,

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>because um, that's the thing. Like we talked about hurts

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>last year and I think we were like, oh, but

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>now we've seen a lot more names, and it's just

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the cycle has been happening much more and I think

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to like more widespread applications totally. I mean, it's really

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>impacting certainly. Uh. I guess we still have yet to

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>gauge the impact on the overall market right um, but

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>we've definitely seen some big institutional, well known, sophisticated investors

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>feeling an impact as a result. This is Bloomberg Business

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovich

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. We've got a bunch of headlines that

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>we want to mention our thanks again to J and J.

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Just catching up in terms of their vaccine news today

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it was interesting what they talked about

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the variant they're upscaling already for the South African variant

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that has started already, so you know, managing the current situation,

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>but also thinking about kind of where it's going. You

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>need that to that end, Carol, the chief scientists telling

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>us that shots are likely needed quote for the next

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>few years, sort of thinking about it at least in

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 1>the near term from their perspective of like a flu shot,

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>because as the doctor told us, as virus is here

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>for a while exactly, and we know we need multiple vaccines.

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>They expect to start delivering shots in March. They told

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>David Weston back in September, a billion shots in one

0:09:55.880 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and uh he reiterated at Paul Staffles again today, so

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>uh interesting. But he did talk about the fittest variants

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>will survive, which makes me a little terrified because that

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>means the strong variants. Yeah, I don't like to hear that.

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But they were already working to adapt their vaccine to them.

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, So that's going on. We know Mexico overtook

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>India as the country with the third highest number of

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>fatalities after the US in Brazil. New York City can

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>reopen indoor dining at that's going to happen on Valentine's Day.

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.199
<v Speaker 1>Here's the count everyone global virus cases exceeding a hundred

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and one point six million deaths near two point two million,

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>with more than eighty seven point one million shots given worldwide.

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's get into it as we always like to

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>do on our Fridays. Dr Ian Los Padre back with US,

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at n y U Landgoing

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Medical Center. Back with US on the phone in New

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>York City. Dr los Pader, nice to have you here.

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Don't know if you were able to hear too much

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of that J and J conversation that we just had.

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of the J and J news today?

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I think overall, by the way, happy Friday Friday to

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>join you guys. So I think overall the J and

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>J news is encouraging. I think UM people initially in

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the stock probably suffered a little bit based on that

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty effective against a mild and moderate disease. I think

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the key numbers that Paul the Chief Scientific Officer talked

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>about UM, and I think the fact that it can

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>be refrigerated at normal refrigeration temperatures, you know, three degrees

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:32.719
<v Speaker 1>fahrenheit makes it storable now in your local CVS or

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Walgreen's pharmacy, the local doctor's office. So I think it

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>does have the potential to be distributed much more easily.

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that we haven't looked at, but people

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about is maybe a second shot of either that vaccine.

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Even though it's advertised obviously as a one shot, some

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>people feel giving either another shot or even a different

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>vaccine might really potentiate the antibody response. So uh, if

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>at all her point another vaccine is developed, it could

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>be an m R and A or something else that

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>might really boost people's immunity for longer to come. So

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, I think there's a lot of good

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 1>potential there, obviously, are you no, no, no no. I

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>think the J and J shot is a very helpful

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>addition to the armamentarium. I think if we find any

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:31.319
<v Speaker 1>issues along the way, uh, booster shots, so even of

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>another vaccine may be very helpful. You know, it's talked

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>about theoretically whether or not, um doing two different kinds

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of vaccines may even be very beneficial at least some

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>scientists you know, talk about that. But overall, I think

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>this is very good news. And the key metric, which

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is hospitalizations, was really you know that a hundred percent

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>efficacy hospitalization, So it literally doesn't get any better than

0:12:56.040 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a right. And again this is not and you know,

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>we haven't looked at this at millions of people. I

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>mean that number may come down a bit. That was

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>just in the study group. So overall, I think it's

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>very good news, and I think the storage is also

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>very good news. Um well, I just want to draw

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>some distinctions here between the vaccines that are available right now,

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the MR and A vaccines from Moderna and fiser Bion Tech,

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and in this vaccine because I think, I think when

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>we saw this headline number this morning, we we we've

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of been a little spoiled because we've seen numbers

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of efficacy above nine for the m R

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and A vaccines. Seeing a number like sixty, um was

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I think to a lot of people was just like

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>not as good. But can you kind of go through

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the pluses and minuses of each one here, because it

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>seems to me the storage issues or lack thereof when

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the Johnson and Johnson one and the

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's a single shot, plus you have that

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>figure where it prevents a hundred percent of hospitalizations and deaths, Like,

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty good. I'm with you, So you know, just

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to start more at ground zero. Each of these vaccines

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>has a slightly different technology. The m R and A

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>is really amazing and brand new and probably does provide

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>us some more flexibility in modifying that if we get

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>any mutations, which we're seeing. So we worry about some

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of the mutations because, uh, some of the evidence of

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the UK and South Africa strains, you know, make it

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>more contagious. So what does that mean. It does seem

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that some of these strains bind a little more avidly

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to the host cells. It also makes it seem that

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>they have a higher viral count. In other words, the

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>way the virus may adapt is that there are fewer

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>symptoms early on, so it gives a chance for the

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>virus to replicate. Patients don't feel sick yet if they

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>call for sneeze, they have a much higher amount of

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>virus in that. So these viruses, you know, as Darwin,

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, adapt and become more effective along the way.

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's one thing that we do have to be

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>aware of and concerned about. Those m RNA vaccines can

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>be adjusted to some of the mutations. But I think

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the key metric really is how do you reduce hospitalizations?

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think the J and J really meets that

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>metric and maybe over time even more effective than that

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>against a severe disease, because that's really what we worry about.

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>And I agree, I think the storage will allow it

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to be more distributed. I took the glad no please go.

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I took the two fighter shots. Um, you know, minimal

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>side effects. I think the mRNA is great. And I

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>think at the end of the day, whether you want,

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Cadillac or the or the Buik or

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the Mercedes. You know, these are all going to be

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>great ways to get you to where you want to be.

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>They're all cars. But do they all have heated seats?

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna put I don't care as long as

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it is a seatbelt. If it's a well that exactly

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it has a seatbelt. Um, now are you feeling more optimistic?

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>And I am curious though, Ian. I always ask you,

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I know, Tim, and I ask you, um, what kind

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of patients are seeing with the virus? What kind of

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>flows are you seeing? Because you know, we see numbers.

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>It feels like the numbers are coming down the cases

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and so even though there's still at high levels around

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the country, what are you seeing the firsthand? So hospitalizations

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>are up a little bit, they're nowhere near that we

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>saw previously. So I think things are overall stable. Part

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of the problems that we're encountering really is availability vaccine.

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to do better to get vaccines

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to the states, and the states to get it really

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to the vaccine center. So we are. We're not doing

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>as well as we should be because we really have

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>got to just get these vaccines in people's arms in

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>order to bend the curve. I also see a lot

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of patients asking me questions, you know, shall I check

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>antibodies after I get the vaccine? No, the commercial um vaccine.

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>The commercial test look for something called an anti nucleo

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>capsid antibody, so it detects if you've had an infection.

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't routinely check for the anti spike, which is

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>really what we're getting antibodies too. So people should not

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>be asking about getting antibody tigers after the vaccine. Most

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>of the commercial essays will really not detected, and people

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.360
<v Speaker 1>should not worry if they're negative because they're looking at

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>the wrong thing. So I think we do need to

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>do better with vaccine distribution. I think even one vaccine

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 1>does provide some additional protection. But I do think we're

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to wait a little while for J and J.

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>As we say, March is a long way to go

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.719
<v Speaker 1>until March, and I think we do have to be careful.

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>But Dining New York is going to open. Can we

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>just go there? Yeah? I was just gonna go there.

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that the right thing to do, because you know,

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you talk about bending the curve. It seems like we

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>are getting some encouraging news from the West coast from

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>here in New York, or we're starting to look like

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we could be coming off that peak. I don't want

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>to say we are, because you know, we just don't know.

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>We can't see the future. Is now really the right

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>time to be easing these restrictions? And this is bear

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to Blasio saying new COVID variance could take our progress

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and reverse it if we don't act quickly. I think

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whether he was on CNBC, but like,

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>help us out here, this doesn't make sense. So this

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is a new pandemic. I don't think we can say

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that we know are percents scientifically if you open restaurants

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>or twenty six percent, or we just don't have that precision.

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 1>I do think part of this is political, and I

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 1>think part of this is keeping our businesses alive. To

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a degree. We know that eating outdoors and that's worked

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>fairly successfully. We'll keep a lot of the restaurants and

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 1>businesses afloat indoors. Does seem reasonable to me. There's always

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>some risk that people take whenever there with other people,

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>But I think if there's adequate spacing and dentilation, that

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>is reasonable. Every restaurant is going to have to sort

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of do this carefully. But my senses, we're not seeing

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 1>spikes from school openings, So school certainly is reasonable for

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>kids for a variety of reasons. And I think restaurants

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>have opened carefully can also work even in the winter

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>withoutdoor heaters and smaller percentages and and kind of thread

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the needle between keeping businesses afloat that I think we

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>need to do and keeping people safe. Yeah, I have

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to say that with my own daughter's school. I mean

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>there's an occasional case. We even see it certainly in

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>our office, but it's not like all of a sudden,

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, two cases go to ten, cases go to twenty.

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 1>We aren't see that. So there is something, um, you know,

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you that we are seeing it more manageable.

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess it feels like I don't know, or we're

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>just all being smarter about wearing masks and social distance.

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm looking at I was going to say,

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's almost like masks and physical distancing net

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 1>work I mean it's as simple as that. Right. The

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>schools and restaurants I think are learning pods, hybrid and

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>so forth. So I think they're doing a better job.

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>And certainly if they do have cases, they can jump

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>on that for context and maybe closing down that particular class.

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>But overall, I think it's working fairly well. And as

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 1>the Chief Scientific Officers said, we're going to have to

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of learn to deal better with this. Possibly now

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we thought it would be a year. I think it's

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>certainly looking like it maybe a few years before globally

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 1>we really eradicate this because you know, vaccinating um eight

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>billion people. Uh, it's going to take some time and effort.

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>The logistics of it went yeah, No, I mean it's

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 1>it's the logistics are just uh we ask you every week,

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>dr lust beder Um expectations have they shifted it all

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>for a return to normalcy given the J and J news,

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>given that we've you know, we've we've been opping o

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>our vaccine roll out of here in the US, I'm

0:20:55.920 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>still optimistic by end of summer life in the United

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>States should return really two more normal. I think people

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>will still some people want to wear masks. I think

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that's totally reasonable to do. It's fine to be safe. Um,

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I think we've reduced flu shots. Let's also remember flu

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is only about thirty percent effective, and everyone takes a

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>flu shot every year and we're happy with that. So

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's keep it in perspective that, you know,

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>we take the flu shots happily and they're like thirty effective,

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>varies from year to year. Right, that's a really good point. Hey, Ian,

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Take care of yourself, Have a

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>good weekend. Dr Ian los Beda Clinical Associate Professor Medicine

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>at n y U Landgoing Medical Center. On the phone

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>So one of our top stories of course following the vaccine,

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>but also the Reddit boards at it again once again

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>bidding up shares of game stop and worn with headphones

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 1>by seeking out targets such as see it Financial and

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:04.479
<v Speaker 1>TWiki make our hostess brands. It continues. SEC meantime is

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>saying it's going to look into potential misconduct and review

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>some decisions by the brokerages to curtail transactions on certain stocks.

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Read it, We not read it. Um rolling hood, we

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>saw curtail trading. We also saw it on wee bill.

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>So let's see what the CEO we Bill has to

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>say about all that. Anthony Denier joins us on the

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>phone in New York City. Hey, Anthony, good to have

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you here with Tim and myself. So, um, why did

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you restrict trading? Let's just put it out there. Sure,

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 1>let's get right to it. Um, thanks for having me well,

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Carol and Tim. We we did not have a say

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>in the matter. We're an introducing firm. We do not

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>operate our own clearinghouse right, so we do not put

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:46.719
<v Speaker 1>any customer, We do not put any collateral on behalf

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 1>of customers to settle all the transactions that happened on

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>our platform. We are simply a portal. So our third

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>party clearing house called me at approximately nine eight am

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and informed me that they may not be able to

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>settle new by orders in three particular names of three

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.239
<v Speaker 1>most popular ones that were seeing on Reddit, and I

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>had to make the hard decision to send out a

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>message to our users that we are not able to

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>support by orders. Why was that a decision you had

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>to make it. Why was that a decision you had

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.479
<v Speaker 1>to make? It sounds like it wasn't even a decision

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>like you had to send that. Well, you're right, I

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>had to send it exactly. I mean I could have.

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>I could have went back to the clearing house and

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.239
<v Speaker 1>said no, I'm going to keep yours open, and what

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>possibly could have happened is those trades would have failed,

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>which would have cascaded into a much bigger problem. So

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe you're right, I did not have that, did not

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>have a decision to make. Well, So so where what

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is the issue that needs to be fixed here in

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>order to to to be able to actually make trades

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>when when when your users want to make trades? What

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>needs to be fixed? Uh? Well, first off, there's a

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>two day to business day waiting period first settlement. Right,

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>The systems that go into settling transactions are very antiquated.

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>To put it lightly, they're working on techno ology that

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>was built decades ago. Right, it used to be T

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>plus three, now it's T plus two. There is talk

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna work till T plus one. That's two

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>whole days. That massive amounts of capital need to be

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>allocated as collateral to deal with margin requirements as the

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>DTC clearinghouse. So what needs to be done. We need

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to implement new technology i e. Blockchain, which has been

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>talked about for a long time. But when you're taking

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:22.919
<v Speaker 1>an old system and trying to bring it into the

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>new world, that does take time. Um, So there needs

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to be technology technological advances in order to ensure that

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>this does not happen again. So that's what we're trying

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>to get to. Like, what's the problem. Was it traders,

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>individual retail investors, you know, doing something wrong or was

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it just a case that the infrastructure, the logistics just

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't quite work as you say antiquated systems. Is that

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the problem? Now that's a that's a loaded question a

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit because on on the surface, I will say

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that that is the problem. Now, obviously I think what's

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>going on is a little deeper than just the market

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>mechanics of trade settlement right now. If you if you

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about the story of why specific brokerages

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>stopped the new opening positions or i e. By orders

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of these specific stocks, yes, it was a market mechanic.

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>It was a lack of capital right and fear of

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>counterparty risk that was the reason for that, But more

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>underlying is why are these masses having a populous movement

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>going against what you know they would call, you know,

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the institutions, right, the hierarchy, you know, um, you know

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the suits. There's an unlevel playing field that's been going

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.479
<v Speaker 1>on for a long time and and furs like weevil

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>have been aggressively trying. We've been trying since we started

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>two and a half years ago, open up the playing field.

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't I'm not even gonna bother using the word

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 1>democratization because it gets used too much. We're giving access

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>two uh, not only tools, but access to markets and

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:01.199
<v Speaker 1>trading strategies that retail investors had ever had access to, right,

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>or they did have access to they had to have

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:04.959
<v Speaker 1>huge amounts of capital at the firm, or they had

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.439
<v Speaker 1>to pay ridiculous fees a platform for you, subscription fees

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 1>or commissions. And we removed that and that started, that

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>started the turn. But now they want to play for

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>level on all levels. Right. Why does what does institutions

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>get the ability to have a ten x leverage capability

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:23.479
<v Speaker 1>with portfolio margin where regulation stops a retail investor from

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>two x leverage. Well, you know someone would say, forgive

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>me not my words or my assessment, but smart investor

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>versus dumb investor. Do individual retail investors really understand the

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>implications of that kind of leverage. I think they're really

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>starting to. Okay, And like I said, not, um, hey, Anthony,

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>give us some numbers from from this week. I mean,

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 1>what kind of increase in action did you see on

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the platform? We saw some of these trading apps moved

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to the top of the iTunes app store, so obviously

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of activity. Yeah, um, a lot

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of that stivity is probably putting it lightly. Um. We've

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we've been very fortunate to have to be growing at

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a at a very fast pace over the course of

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the past year and a half, in particularly coinciding with

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:16.199
<v Speaker 1>the whole retail trading world going to zero commission. It

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>opened up retail investing to a whole new demographic of user.

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Most of those users were app based users, right, we

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>are an app based platform. Are demographic tins to skew

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>younger because we are so app specific. Um, so we've

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 1>been very fortunate to have good growth numbers. Now that

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>this you know, this movement has gone viral, so to speak,

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it's reopen that it's the new reawakening of zero commission.

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>It's people realizing that, hey, I can take control, I

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>can make changes, I can improve the system. So we

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 1>went from you know, I we you know I would

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>look and scroll in the finance category of app on

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the App Store, whether it's Android or I l S,

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:58.919
<v Speaker 1>and you know I was getting I put up a

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of posts. I was really excited did because we

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:03.159
<v Speaker 1>made the top ten in the finance section. We were

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.439
<v Speaker 1>nowhere near in the top thirty for overall apps compared

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to like TikTok and Zoom and Instagram and and now

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>if you look for the last couple of days, it's

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>been Robin Hood's number one. We will number two and

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>read it number three, which tells the story of what's

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>going on. So bottom line twenty seconds. It's just made

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you even that much more popular. It has increased our popularity. UM.

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>It's also increased our need to make sure that customers

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>are informed, educated, we're transparent about what we're doing, why

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 1>we're doing it. Um. You know, these are things that

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that make a successful product. So you've grown. Can you

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>give us a number? Just you get fishing for a number.

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate a number number number two in the app stote.

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a big deal. Hey listen, Anthony, thank you so much.

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.479
<v Speaker 1>And I hope we can get you back in the future. Uh,

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>CEO of we Bill Anthony Denier joining us on the

0:28:55.200 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>phone in New York City Journal. Yeah, but you let

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>me drive? Oh no, no, no no, no home an please,

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the riding drivel. I want to drive. Just drive, baby,

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it's the questions drying. This is the drive to the globe. Gimmu. Thanks,

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll drying us to dawn on Bluebird Radio. Yet time

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>for the drive to the clothes. Getting ready to wrap

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>up the trading day, the trading week. What a week, man, right,

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't even know where to begin. Historic

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>history making one for the history books. One we're going

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to remember, right, And it ain't over Like there's more

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to come. So let's get into the market. Talk with

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Tom Plum. Back with US President, Chief investment Officer Plumb

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Phones based in Medisone, Wisconsin. He's joining us on the

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>phone from there, And uh, I should put out the

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Plumb Balanced Fund consistently a top performer. It's in percent

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>over the past five years, just about all of its

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>U of the other funds in that category, returning on

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>average annually according to Bloomberg Data about a top performer. Tom,

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Good to have you here, Tim, and I have to

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>start with the week that was. Um. Listen, you you

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>have been investing for years. You know you really think

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>about fundamentals when you, you know, pick a name and

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>put it in your fund. What do you make of

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen with Game Stop AMC, the likes and

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and the volatility that seemed to have created in the marketplace. Well,

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you certainly have had something to talk about this week.

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I remember an old saying that sometimes the dog wigs

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the tail, and sometimes the tail wigs the dog and

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the market activity. I considered the tails. Usually people think

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of the fundamentals, the economics, the UH government actions and

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>things like that being the dog, and the tail being

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the market. Certainly, the activities and all that stuff that's

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>been going on in the market has really made people

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>stop thinking about a week when Apple reported, Visa reported,

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>MasterCard reported, Apple reported the new Biden administration had over

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty executive orders. All of that stuff is pushed to

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the backside because of this incredible activity that we've seen

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in game stock and companies like that. Um, this is

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a brand new one that we haven't seen. The group

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of people that have been retail oriented caused these shortcovers. Uh.

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>In the past, you would have other companies do that when,

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>especially when there was good news came out on a

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>company that was heavily shorted and you could see some

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>shortcovering rallies. But this one here is Uh. You know,

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been in the business for a long long time

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and I've never seen anything like this week. Does it

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Does it make you tom think any differently about your strategy?

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And look, I know you're not, you know, participating in

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 1>anything that we saw this week, but or I would

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I should assume that. But um, but does it make

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you think differently about your overall strategy at all? Well,

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, you do wonder if the markets Obviously there's

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>people talking for years about is the market over extended?

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>And we had a nice round last year with some

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>specially the companies that were in the crypto or the

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>financial tech area being leaders. We're still feeling that we're

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in an economic recovery. We're going to have this incredible

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>volatility for a while, but that it's still gonna mean

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that you want to own good companies that are going

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to participate in an expanding economy and actually have good

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>business plans that will extend long before, long after the recovery.

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Well and listen your top holdings read I've said this

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to you before, like who's who when it comes to

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>brands and big companies. Um. So, having said that, I

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>mean Apple is on it. They reported earnings this week,

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft's reported. Uh, there were a lot of um, you

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>know you talked about Visa and MasterCard. I mean a

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of these have reported. Um anything that you got

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally from many of these companies that made you, you know,

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>think about either adding or you know, change the fundamental

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>story for you on them, I'm guessing not. Well, No,

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that what you had last year where there

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>were some very very good companies that continue to grow

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>even though there's all these challenges that you think might

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>have eliminated, especially when you look at the earnings sort

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of the overall s and p that it was going

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a very very tough year. But there is

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies that had growth in Some of

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the grow that we've talked about in the past has

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>been accelerated by the pandemic and those trends have continued.

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you take a for example, a company

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 1>like MasterCard, which besides being involved in a lot of

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency and things now that are pretty exciting. You know,

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:24.720
<v Speaker 1>they have had uh fifty one percent now they say,

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:28.839
<v Speaker 1>of people in the United States use contactless payments in

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>one form or another, it's up a hundred percent year

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>over year. Those trends are going to continue. They're going

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>to recover with the economy. A company like MasterCard was

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>hurt last year by business t and a expense going down,

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>by travel going down, by restaurants hospitality going down, but

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the business of buying online offset a lot of that.

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:55.279
<v Speaker 1>And there's still such a well managed company that they

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 1>were very profitable even if profits were down last year. Hey,

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>what did you make Tom of Apple's earnings in its

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 1>most recent quarter, a hundred more than a hundred hundred

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar quarter. Uh And I know that Apple is

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 1>one of your top holdings. Well, you know, Apples are

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a great example. They've for quite a while now it's

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>been uh sell shortly on news after their report because

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>they've been reporting very good earnings growth the last four quarters.

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 1>But they also give you this cautionary appraisal of what

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>might happen in the future. They're being a little concerned,

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:36.959
<v Speaker 1>and so the stock has typically sold off a little

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>bit after their report. But I think after that's digested,

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>people are going to look at this company is probably

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the best benefactor of the beneficiary of the five G rollout.

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 1>The new generations are going to be strong for them,

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 1>and they've modified their model to include much more recurring

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>rep to do us from service and and other programs

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that go through their app store. So I think people

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 1>are gonna look at it a couple of weeks from

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to digest. It had quite a run

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 1>last year, but then I think it's still going to

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>be in that same trend, right and accessories and services right,

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>We saw certainly some pickups there. Hey Tom, thank you

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:22.400
<v Speaker 1>so much. Have a good weekend. Tom Plow and President

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and chief investment Officer Plumb Funds joining us on the

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:30.919
<v Speaker 1>phone from Madison, Wisconsin. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com,

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 1>and you can also listen to our radio show at

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Sarah to Bloomberg Global News,