WEBVTT - Free Picks for EVERY Week 9 NFL Game (Ep. 374)

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Betting Pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>your bets. It is me Joey P joe P Zapia,

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's time to look ahead for the games in

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>week and nine in the NFL. Some really good value

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>last week early on, we nailed the Cincinnati Bengals. We

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>also nailed the under on the Jets Giants, which wasn't

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>too hard, but still we nailed that one anyway, and

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a few other gems. A few things did not go

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>our way, but that's okay. That's the nature of the Beast.

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>We're always going to be here making sure we celebrate

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the w's and well take responsibility for the ls. That's

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>also a big part of this and to help us

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>get through week nine and see if there's some early

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>value this week, Pat fitz Morris and Sam Hoppen joined

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>me as always here on the program. Gentlemen, let's jump

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>right into it. Before we get to some of the

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>pieces this week that we want to take some early

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>looks on, I want to remind everybody we've got a

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>new giveaway for you, a one year subscription to our

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>premium Betting Pros for free. You can win this. All

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is drop a comment below, subscribe

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Betting Pros YouTube check and all. That's it.

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>That's all you gotta do and click those notifications so

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you know if you are the big winner of the

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>one year free premium upgrade to our Betting Pros product,

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>don't forget with BP bets smarter, not harder. So let's

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>do that. Let's bet smart here, and let's start with

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night football, always a fun place to start. I

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>guess we're gonna get Mitchell Trubisky for this game. I

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 1>don't know, it's early, so we'll not sure what we're

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna figure out here. But Will Levis we are going

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to get again in Week nine in the NFL. Will

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Levis somehow was the cheap coat unlocking DeAndre Hopkins. Who'd

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>have thought the number for this game, gentlemen, is thirty six.

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the Pittsburgh Steelers are three point favorites at

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>home against Tennessee. If you like Tennessee for the upset

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>plus one thirty that's available as well. Pat let's take

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a look at this game here. I know Levis exceeded

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>all expectations the Pittsburgh Steelers. The injury to Kenny Pickett

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>really kind of ruined that opportunity for them to win

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>at home against Jacksonville. So what do you make out

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of this early line that you see so far?

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I can't in good conscience take these dealers here, Joe,

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 2>like they've just burned me too many times. And I

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 2>thought it was such a good spot for them coming

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 2>out of the by against the Jaguars. I thought they

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 2>would circle the wagons and have their act together, and

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 2>that really wasn't the case. So are they going to

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 2>write the ship in three days? I'm skeptical, But at

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 2>the same time, I also worry that the encore for

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 2>will Levis won't go as well as the debut. So

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure if I see any value here to

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 2>either side. But I've already bet the under. I think

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 2>we could see one of the lowest totals of the

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 2>year in this game. It's thirty six and a half

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>was the open. I think it's going to continue to

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 2>go down, so I wanted to grab it at thirty

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 2>six and a half. I think it goes down to

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 2>thirty six, maybe thirty five and a half before kickoff

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 2>on Thursday.

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the under is my early lean on this one,

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>as well, Sam, maybe they can petition to wear the

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Oilers jerseys every week. Maybe that's the thing for Will Levis.

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>If I was in that's what I'd be doing. What

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 1>about you here in this one, Sam? Do you think

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the Unders a way to go? You think maybe just

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>keep rolling with Bill Levis and Hopkins and the Titans

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>on the money line.

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 3>I think that if you're going to back the Titans,

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 3>the money line is the way to go, because you're

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 3>sort of betting into the variance of Will Levis, not

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.519
<v Speaker 3>you know, totally knowing what he is at this point.

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 4>It was kind of weird. Vraybel came out.

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 3>This morning and said that Levis was the starter, but

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 3>then I think he said that he was going to

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 3>be the starter if Tannehill couldn't go. So I don't

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 3>know if that's him trying to lead on that Tannehill

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 3>is maybe healthier for the trade deadline that's coming tomorrow.

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 3>But I do think that the Titans, again in this

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 3>spot with a thirty six point total, are an incredible

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 3>teaser leg seizing him out to eight and a half.

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 3>You know you've got the wrong teaser aspect of this.

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't see a situation where the Steelers are blowing

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 3>out this Titans team.

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're gonna go to Germany for a big

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>game here. This was a fun one. The Cads City

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs coming off a very tough loss here, they are

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>six and two. They'll take on the six and two

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.119
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins. So fifteen and a half is the number

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>for this one. Miami on the money line is plus

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>one twenty five. But as one would imagine, the Kansas

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>City Chiefs two and a half point favorites. Now, Sam

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in this game yesterday, obviously it was a little rough

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>sledding there for Patrick Mahomes. He was ill, he was

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>playing through it. He did not look quite like himself,

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, in this game. But no excuses. It was

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>not a good loss for them on the road against Denver.

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Now you got to travel from Denver, you gotta go

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>all the way to Germany. What kind of impact you

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>think this has on Kansas City and on this line

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>potentially as the week goes on.

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 3>I think the line's about right. I made this Kansas

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 3>City three and a half, and after thinking about it more,

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 3>I think Kansas City being on the other side of

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 3>three makes a lot more sense for me. The early

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 3>lean I have is to bet the under. I mean

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 3>this is these are two teams that are have some

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 3>great offenses. But I've talked a lot about recently how

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 3>well the Chiefs defense has been playing. The Dolphins defense

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 3>is getting a little better. They got Jalen Ramsey back

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 3>this past week. And again, Miami hasn't played a great schedule.

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 3>They've played the Giants, the Panthers, Patriots, and the Eagles

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 3>in the last four weeks so and they lost that

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 3>game against the Eagles. But I do think both of

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 3>these teams traveling abroad for the first time I remember

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 3>the last time either of these teams were abroad, but

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 3>doing so with Patrick Mahomes again coming off of the illness,

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 3>that offense took a little bit of a step back

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 3>for sure. So I leaned the under here. Fifteen and

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 3>a half is a lot, and there's a chance we

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 3>could see some fireworks. But I think that all of

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 3>those factors contribute to this going under.

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Pat This one, to me is an individual game. I'm

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>looking for individual props here because I'm kind of where

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Sam is. I think the Lions just feel right for

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>this well. They're giving Miami enough respect and also Kansas

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>City as well. But what are your thoughts on this one?

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you see any early value?

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean not really on either side. And we've

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 2>seen the Dolphins establish this pattern where they beat up

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 2>on lesser teams and then wilt against the like super

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Bowl caliber teams, and I don't know if we'll get

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 2>that same script. The Chiefs really did not play well

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 2>against the Broncos. That's an understatement, I think, and so

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's a good bounce back spot for them against

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 2>a team that has not handled quality well. But I

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 2>don't really want to bet the Chiefs here at this number.

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 2>I will be looking at the travel itineraries shoe to

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 2>see if anyone makes the dubious decision to fly over

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 2>on Friday, and if they do, I'm going to be

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 2>betting against that team. But hopefully these teams are going

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 2>to be a little smarter than that. We've seen that

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 2>happen with the late rivals in the past usually get

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 2>their lunch eaten in the overseas game. I'm a little

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 2>on the opposite side of the total lough. I kind

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 2>of think we're going to see fireworks in this game.

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.119
<v Speaker 2>Like when I saw this at fifty and a half,

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 2>I My inclination was to think that was a little

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 2>low of where I thought it was gonna be. I

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 2>thought we'd see something closer to fifty two. So Sam

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 2>could be right. The last four Chiefs games have played

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 2>under but I do think we're gonna see points in

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 2>this game. I kind of think it goes over.

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Sam.

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 4>You had something to add here, Yeah, a couple things.

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 3>The Chiefs had five turnovers this past week against the

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 3>big Broncos. I don't think that holds up against the Dolphins.

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I could be wrong, but I do think the Dolphins

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 3>are going out to Germany today Monday, and the Chiefs

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 3>are going out there later this week, so it could

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 3>be something for you to consider their pet.

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>There you go. Look at that. Pat's already clicking on

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the Betting Pros app right now. I could feel it going.

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget to make all your picks count too. Join

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>our NFL contest bettingpros dot Com slash NFL Contest. It's free,

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it's fun. You don't even have to make wagers. You

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>just got to make picks. Just make five a week,

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>one hundred on the season, and the winner is a

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Smith and jigbu Jersey We're also giving away weekly

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>prizes monthly prizes BP the Upgrades FP Upgrades. We're also

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.679
<v Speaker 1>giving away gift cards to our Fantasy pros and Betting

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>pro shops. So have some fun, make some picks, compete

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>against us at bettingpros dot com, slash NFL Contest, or

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>just click on the community tab on your VP app

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and join the NFL Contest there as well. Next one here,

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Vikings. Poor Kirk Cousins, you know, just when things

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>were going better for the Vikings. It's tough, man, It's

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>tough to be a Vikings fan. Thirty seven and a

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>half is this number as they travel with Jaron Hall

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>likely to play quarterback here against the Atlanta Falcons. Now,

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons secondary did not play well this past week

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>against the Titans, and I don't want to talk too

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>much about that, but look, we'll see what the health

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is of Desmond Ritter. Tarol Heineke did come in and

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>play in that game. So these are two four and

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>four teams. I'm not sure where we stand with them,

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>but Atlanta is a four and a half point favorite

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in this game. The number for the Vikings plus one

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>point eighty pat This one kind of scares me because

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.959
<v Speaker 1>I know it's like, Okay, we're losing our quarterback, we're

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>losing all these things, and then we're going on the road.

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the Falcons have been kind of an

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>enigma all year. I would not be shocked here looking

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>at this money line and the plus one eighty if

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings just won this game. Outright, I'd like to

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>hear a little positive news here for some practices about Hall.

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:13.959
<v Speaker 1>But what do you think here? What do you make

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of this one? Any early value?

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we get our first possible battle of the

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 2>backup quarterbacks on Thursday, and we get our second one

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 2>in the early window with this one, because we don't

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 2>know what the status is for Desmond Ridder, like there

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 2>were reports that he was being checked for concussion, but

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 2>we don't know whether it was play related or injury related,

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 2>and whether we're going to see Ridder or Heineke getting

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the start this week. But the Falcons do get their

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 2>second straight game against a non first round rookie quarterback

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 2>making his NFL debut. Didn't go so well for them

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 2>last week, with Will Levis torching that secondary as you mentioned,

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 2>Joe and beating the Falcons twenty eight twenty three.

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 3>So.

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 2>I can't bet either side. I'm not willing to take

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 2>the points or lay the points. But six of the

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Falcons eight games have gone under the total this year.

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Seven of the Vikings eight games have gone under the total.

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 2>We've got at least one and maybe two backup quarterbacks

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 2>playing in this game. Thirty eight seems pretty optimistic for

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 2>that total, So I've already hit the under on this one,

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 2>and I think this is another game we see go

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 2>down in the total as the weekend goes along.

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>So many backup quarterbacks, second certing quarterbacks, third string quarterbacks

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>even that have made their appearances this year. Sam thirty

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. Again Les Patt's point, it feels

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>like another one where maybe the under is the early

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>lock in here.

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 3>What do you think it probably is? I mean, this

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 3>is just a shame with what's happened at Kirk Cousins.

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 3>I know that he's been the butt of jokes in

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 3>the past, especially in a primetime games, but he was

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 3>having a pretty good season this year and over the

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 3>last couple of games had probably his one of the

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 3>best games of his career in primetime last week. But

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 3>I can't touch this game without knowing what the Vikings

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 3>are going to do. I don't think Jared Hall is

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 3>a feasible option at quarterback, and I know he's not

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 3>a first round pick, but he's definitely not on the

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 3>level of Will Levis, who got taken at the beginning

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 3>of the second round. So I think there's an opportunity

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 3>for the Vikings to go after a Colt McCoy, a

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Carson Wentz like some one of these veteran guys who

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 3>I think can keep the offense at a higher floor

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 3>than what Hall would bring. So I'm staying away from

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 3>the game. I think it under is probably the best

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 3>bet right now, but this is.

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:44.719
<v Speaker 4>It just it really sucks.

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the under is the safest one too. And

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I will say this, of all the games we've talked

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>about so far, just sort of like the early one

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 1>with Tennessee, this one to me even more so the

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>way Ritter has struggled. If he comes back or not,

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what Heineke does of this offense if he

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>gets more of an opportunity. But and a half, it

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel like by the time we get to Sunday

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 1>that number is gonna still be available. This feels like

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it's going to continue to go down. Seattle is gonna

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>travel to Baltimore, Baltimore six and two handling their business,

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:13.079
<v Speaker 1>Seattle eking out a victory here in dramatic fashion. They

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be five and a half point underdogs heading

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to Baltimore this week. Forty three is the number plus

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>two hundred on the Seattle side on the money line, Sam,

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on this contest here? Does Baltimore really handle Seattle,

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>because theoretically they should, but sometimes that's not always gone

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the way.

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't think so.

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 3>I made this Baltimore by four and a half when

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 3>I was first going through the games.

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 4>I struggle with this one. This is gonna be a

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 4>fantastic matchup.

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 3>I think the Seattle defense has played a little bit

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 3>better than what their actual actual personnel dictates. They haven't

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 3>allowed a positive EPA per play since week four. Again, granted,

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 3>the offense hasn't played that great either. They haven't had

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 3>a positive EPA per play since then, either. But I

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 3>do think that Gino Smith has really grown into some

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 3>of the deep ball passing he's had. I think that's

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 3>where you can attack this Ravens secondary. This is a

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 3>lower total obviously not as low as as some of

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 3>the games we've already talked about, but I think with

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:21.479
<v Speaker 3>that in consideration, I'm taking the points with the Seahawks.

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Pat your thoughts on this one. Forty three is the

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>number here. Sam likes the Seattle side in the five

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half. You think they can keep it close.

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So the Seahawks are for one on one against

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 2>the spread in their last six games. They are on

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 2>an upward trajectory, but some are the Ravens. They're rolling.

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 2>They've won three straight and they've won them all by

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 2>at least a touchdown. Plus we have a West Coast

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 2>team going out east for an early kickoff. I tend

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 2>not to like betting the West Coast teams under those circumstances,

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know. I'm not really leaning strongly to

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 2>either side, although I like the Ravens as a slightly

0:13:56.400 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 2>better percentage play. Perhaps I'm more inclined to go with

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 2>the under here. The last twelve Seahawks games, eight of

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 2>them have played under, and for the Ravens, twelve of

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 2>their last eighteen games have played under plus. Nine of

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 2>the last ten Ravens home games have played under. Opponents

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 2>just don't score a lot at M and T Banks Stadium,

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 2>So I think I'm gonna bet the under here and

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 2>layoff the side.

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Bears are coming off a Sunday night loss here to

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers. They are two and six, so we don't

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>know if they can have justin fields for this game.

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the number is seven heading into New Orleans again,

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans seven point favorites, and this one Derek Carr's

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>been airing the ball out lately, that's for sure. Forty

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>one and a half is the number for this one.

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>If you like the Bears in the upset, it's plus

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>two forty five over on betting pros. So Pat, let's

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about this. Do you want to lock in this

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>seven now in anticipation of fields not playing or do

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to potentially wait this one out and see

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>if there's any change and then a field's return this week.

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 2>I think I want to sit this one out, Joe.

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 2>We have talked about the vexing unpredictability of the New

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Orleans Saints this year. They have been my bete noir

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 2>as far as betting, my betting bet noir. Yeah, like

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I just and we've seen the Bears like they haven't

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 2>been good all year, but the two wins they have

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 2>been very convincing blowouts of the Commanders and Raiders. So

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the big wild card obviously the status of Justin Fields,

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 2>and I'm disinclined to make a bet either way on

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 2>whether he comes back or not. So I'm just gonna

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 2>sit this one out and let someone else try to

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 2>pick the Saints correctly because I just can't say them.

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Are you as vexed as pat is on this one?

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I am.

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 3>I The Saints offense has actually looked pretty good. Obviously,

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 3>had the sort of a stinker against the Jaguars on

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Thursday Night Football a couple of weeks ago, but there

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 3>they have so many great weapons on offense, and I

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 3>don't see how this Bears defense is able to stop that,

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 3>even if Derek Carr, you know, goes back into his shell.

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 3>So I think laying seven points against the or with

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 3>the Saints, I guess it is tough. I think I'd

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 3>rather again combine them with the Titans, like I mentioned

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 3>earlier in a teaser leg.

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, so teasing in around there, Let's go to

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the next one here, Arizona and Cleveland. Cleveland really had

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of opportunities to win that game in Seattle,

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and they just couldn't take advantage of those opportunities. They

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>are now four and three. They are gonna head back

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>home here with the Arizona Cardinals. Now I doubt we

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>get Kyler Murray back in this when it seems to

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>be like we're gonna wait another week for him. Cardinals

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>are one and seven. The Cardinals always keep these you

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>know games. They have a tendency to continue to compete,

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>which is always a dangerous thing for some of these lines.

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>The number is seven here Cleveland being the favorite at home.

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Thirty eight and a half is the total plus two

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to fifty for Arizona. Sam When you're taking a look

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>here at this one, do you think Cleveland handles this

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>one in the seven points very easily or do you

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>think this could be a struggle for them.

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 3>I think it could be a struggle. I mean, this

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 3>offense still looks out of sorts. They have a really

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 3>great game plan against the Seahawks this past week with

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 3>the screen game they got working, but their defense is

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 3>looking not like the historical defense we were expecting. Both

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Zadarias Smith and Alex Wright left the game this past week,

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 3>as did corternerback Greg Newso the Arizona offense isn't getting

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 3>much better, but I just don't trust the Cleveland offense

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 3>to move the ball enough to win by more than

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 3>seven points, even against the Cardinals defense. So I think again,

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 3>with the lower total, I'm taking Arizona with the points pad.

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Do you trust the Cleveland defense though, to get a

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 1>score in this game and maybe make this seven a

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit more comfortable than we realize?

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that could happen, And despite some of the injuries,

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm still inclined to bet on the Browns

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 2>defense because of how deep that unit is and how

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 2>many impact guys they have in that unit as game

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 2>and effort the Cardinals have been giving us every week.

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 2>They have lost five straight games and all of those

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 2>losses have been by seven or more points, and on

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 2>the road this year zero to four, and all of

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 2>those losses had been by nine or more points. So

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm going to take the Browns at home here,

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 2>even laying a touchdown or more.

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Battle of two three and four teams here. The Houston

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Texans at home two and a half point favorites against

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Also, three and four forty is

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the number for this one. Again, not a very inspiring

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>total necessarily plus one twenty six for the Bucks on

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 1>the money line. Now, the Bucks did hang close, So

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday Night Football last week, Bobby and I did

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>nail that one on the nine and a half. They

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:42.239
<v Speaker 1>covered that bad boy. This one is a tighter margin here,

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. Pat When you're looking at this one,

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>do you see any early value potentially with the Bucks

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>in Houston or do you think Houston gets back home

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and gets back right after disappointing loss to the Panthers.

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 2>I think I do see a little early value with

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 2>the box show. And I know that the Texans toast

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 2>stubbing against the Panthers upset some people, but some of

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 2>us thought the Texans were maybe coming into that game

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 2>a little overvalued in the betting markets, and some of

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 2>us took the Panthers in the points. So yeah, I

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 2>think Sam and I might have been on different sides

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 2>of this one last week.

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And Erickson was on that Carolina Panthers side. He was

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about this on Friday, talking about the showing up there,

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and I understand, you know, team's coming off by you think, Okay,

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you know the Houston's played well, But Sam, when you're

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at this one too, is the right way to go.

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Just straight for the Tampa Bay money line and plus

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>one twenty six here.

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 3>If you want to bet back the Bucks, sure, I

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 3>mean this is this one. I didn't really have a

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 3>good leanod because again I think the Texans aren't as

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 3>good as I thought they were.

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:44.360
<v Speaker 4>I didn't catch much of the much of this game.

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 3>I need to go back and rewatch it just to

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 3>see what happened in the Texans offense because they were

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 3>in a perfect spot against the Panthers, and so I

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 3>do think the Texans again should be able to have

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 3>some success through the air. I do think the under

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 3>on this game is in play just because both of

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 3>these teams love to run a halfback dive on first

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 3>and ten and it just sets them back right away.

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 3>So I'm hoping that Texans win because I like this team.

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I love what Demiko Ryins has been doing. But from

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 3>a side perspective, I'm not touching it right now.

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>New England Patriots at home, coming off a game another

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>loss to the Miami Dolphins. There again, they competed, they

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>kept it interesting at least towards the end minus three.

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Though they are favorites at home against the Washington Commanders,

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>who constantly play up and down to their competition. So

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>another weird, dangerous spot. They're so competitive against the Eagles

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and another teams. You watch them play and you just

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out, how do you not just wiping

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 1>the floor with the Giants? I don't know. Forty is

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the number for this one plus one thirty for the

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 1>upset on the Washington bunny line? Sam, what do you

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>make out of this one?

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm going with Washington and probably the money line.

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 3>At first glance, I didn't really see much value in this.

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 3>I made the game exactly what it is right now.

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 3>But looking a little bit deeper into it, the Patriots

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:18.199
<v Speaker 3>defensive weakness is through the air. They get a thirty

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 3>percent pressure rate on defense, and obviously we know the

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 3>biggest weakness for Washington is Sam Howell taking sacks. So

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 3>I think with the way that offense is clicking, I'm

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 3>enticed to take again Washington with a little bit of

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 3>variance and hoping they come away with that victory.

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Pat do you see things the same way here as Sam?

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>In this game against Washington and New England.

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm inclined to trust Sam, but I'm probably just gonna,

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, cheerlead for him, while I don't bet this

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 2>game at all, because like, I can't trust the Commanders.

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 2>You said it, Joe, Like, how how does this team

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 2>play the Eagles so tough twice and then get completely

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 2>stopped by the Chicago Bears. And meanwhile, we've got the

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 2>Patriots who went one in four in October one and

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 2>four against the spread in October, but the one win

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.719
<v Speaker 2>was against the Bills at home, So like, if they

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 2>can beat the Bills at home, they can't handle business

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 2>against the Washington Commanders. I just I can't trust either

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 2>of these teams.

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to about this one. Now. This one

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is very interesting coming up next because you have the

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay Packers at two and five. This is kind

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>of I don't want to be dramatic, but this is

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:29.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of their season here. I can go to two

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and six, this is done. It's over the Los Angeles Rams,

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>another team that you know, we just try to keep

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out. This is going to be their

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>second consecutive road game for them as well. The Packers

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>are still three and a half three point favorites in

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>this one. The numbers thirty nine and a half plus

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>one forty four of the Rams on the money line. Pat,

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the wrong team is favorite in this game.

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 1>But I can't make a logical cojin argument as to

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 1>why the Rams should be favored, except for the fact

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>that if Matthew Stafford is healthy enough to play, that

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>this should be a game that the Rams go out

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>there and handle their business against frankly an offense in

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay that has just not worked. Let's just call

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it what it is. So the question is the Matthew

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>Stafford health. That's the thing that's holding us up. So

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>do we want to jump on this game now and

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>bet that Stafford's gonna soldier through this injury or do

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to wait and get more information and maybe

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:21.199
<v Speaker 1>miss some value.

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm on the fence here, Joe, because on Sunday

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 2>night this game was Packers by one and a half.

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 2>And I saw your point about taking the Rams getting

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 2>points in Green Bay when their offense has been functioning

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 2>in a much higher level than the Packers offense of late.

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, if Brett Rippen is the

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 2>starter for the Rams as a warm weather team coming

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 2>into LAMBA on what should be a pretty chilly Sunday

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 2>afternoon next week. Like, I think the Packers are actually

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 2>of value at anything a field goal or less if

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 2>it's ripping starting. So man, Like, yes, I want to

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 2>bet something now to try to get a beat on

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 2>this game before we know more about Stafford's injury. But like,

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know which way to go with this one,

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 2>because you know, would feel wrong about the Packers if

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 2>it was Stafford playing. It would feel wrong to have

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 2>the Rams if it's ripping going into Green Bay. So man,

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm probably just gonna bite the bullet and lay off

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 2>this one.

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a tricky situation here, and I'm stuck between

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 1>Instead of two ferns, it's two Packer fans, So cheeseheads.

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Come on, Sam, are you gonna put the final nail

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>on the coffin for the Packers here with the Rams?

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Or are you gonna wait this one out?

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 3>Oh, We've already put the nail in the coffin. I

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 3>know this is a football podcast. I've got the Bucks

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 3>shirt shirt on today.

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you've already transitioned to NBA. I'm wearing the Bengal

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 1>shirt from my Bengals money line pick that paid off

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 1>big time. Let's go. They said San Fran wouldn't lose

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 1>three games in a row. Sam and I say, hold

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>my brock party. I say, just wait.

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 3>We're already firing up the mock draft simulator seeing how

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 3>many picks it'll take straight up to the number one

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 3>spot for Caleb Williams. But onto analysis of this game,

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 3>Jordan Rodrik of The Athletic did report this morning that

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 3>the Rams are evaluating a number of options with Matthew Stafford.

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 3>They're going to test his test his thumb out and

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 3>how he can grip the ball throughout the week. I

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 3>think the chillier conditions in green Bay, combined with the

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 3>fact that the Rams have a bye following this game,

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 3>keeps Stafford out of this game. But I honestly still

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 3>kind of like the Rams. I mean, they've been running

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 3>the ball a ton the past several weeks. Their passwright

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 3>over expectation is deep in the negatives, I mean to

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 3>a Falcons esque level, and the green Bay deep rush

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 3>defense had its best performance against Minnesota this past week.

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 3>But I think the Rams are just going to hand

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 3>the ball off to the combination of Daryl Henderson and

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Royce Freeman, who have played pretty okay in the stead

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:02.680
<v Speaker 3>of Kyron Williams. So I think this is I mean again,

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 3>the coffin is in or the nails in the coffin

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 3>for the Packers already. I think the Rams honestly have

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 3>a chance to steal this one, even if Stafford is out.

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 4>I do.

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:13.959
<v Speaker 1>I like the three already with the Rams. Just give

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:15.479
<v Speaker 1>me the three in the Rams right now and we'll

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>see how it goes. And if Stafford ends up, you know,

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>clearing through and they think you can give it a go,

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>then double down with it and take the Rams on

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>the money line. That's how I look at this one.

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis going against Carolina. Carolina gets their first victory, Indy

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>coming off another l here they are now three and five.

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna still be road favorites though minus two and

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:35.919
<v Speaker 1>a half of the Colts here at minus one fifteen

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 1>forty five is the number for this one. Carolina. Can

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>they do it too? In a row? Plus one point

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty says if they can, Sam Hoppin, what do you say.

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 4>This one's tough?

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean the Colts's road favorites is kind of stinky

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 3>to me. I think that that said, Shane Steichen has

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:59.479
<v Speaker 3>been such an upgrade at coaching for the Colts obviously,

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think Frank Reich last year got jobbed

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. But man, if they had stuff with

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 3>stuck with Jeff Saturday, I don't know what this team

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 3>would have looked like. But in any case, I struggled

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 3>to have a take on the side here. All of

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 3>the Colts games this year have been points fest. They

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 3>play super fast, they play well enough to move the ball.

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 3>I do think the market has caught up to that

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 3>a little bit with the total where it's at, so

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a little bit too high for me

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 3>to go over, even though again the Panthers in their

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 3>win only scored fifteen points. So this is just a

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 3>complete stay away from me.

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 4>All right? Pat?

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Are you running the other direction from Panthers and Colts too, Joe?

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 2>The Saints are the one team, the first team that

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to touch. That just terrify me, and

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the Colts are the other like the other team I

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 2>can't get right on. We're on the eve of Halloween here, Joe,

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 2>and I think my Halloween horror would be betting Saints

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Colts games every week, so I'm glad we're not getting

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 2>that matchup again. I'm not going to bet either side

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 2>on the Colts. I don't like them as a road favorite.

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.919
<v Speaker 2>But the Colts have become one of the most predictable

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 2>over teams in the National Football League. They've gone over

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 2>the total in four of their last five. The average

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 2>point total in Colts games this year is fifty four

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 2>point three points, and six of the Colts eight games

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 2>this season have played over fifty points. So I'll ride

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 2>that trend and take the over here, even though you

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 2>know the Panthers might need a little help getting that

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 2>point total up, but maybe the Colts can oblige and

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 2>put up thirty.

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Or all Right, this one's definitely a must watch game.

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna like this one. The Eagles seven to one

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to host the Dallas Cowboys of five and two.

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys looked great, phenomenal game for them. They were

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>rocking and rolling, Dak Prescott throwing the ball over to

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>play Ceedee Lamb crushed that five and a half receptions

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>over we talked about on Friday. Bobby, by the way,

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 1>was four out of five out of his picks on

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Friday to great job at a him. Forty six is

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the number for this one plus one thirty five for

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. Upset. I'm gonna keep this one easy, Pat

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>for me. Give me the Eagles in the three right now,

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>because I know the Cowboys look great. Everyone's talking about

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys are back and all this stuff I said

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>from before the season. During the season, even when people

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>were concerned, I still think the Eagles are the class

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of the NFC by a long shot. I don't want

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to hear anybody tell me differently, so be careful because

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>if you tell me differently, we might have to have words.

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but what do you think here about

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>this when the Cowboys and Eagles, Because I just want

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles in the three and just walk away from

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>this one. I'm confident the Eagles at home are going

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to handle their business.

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:40.239
<v Speaker 2>At first Blush. I like the Eagles in the under Joe.

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 2>But here's what scares me about this game. It's starting

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 2>to look like pass coverage is a real achilles heel

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 2>for the Eagles, and we saw that yesterday with the

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Commanders and Sam Howell, well, I'm not even sure if

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 2>he's a good quarterback, yet just picked the Eagles apart, Like,

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 2>if their pass rush does no get home, these Eagle

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 2>cornerbacks cannot stay with wide receivers, and like, that's a

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 2>big problem with Ceedee Lamb coming to town off a

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 2>twelve catch, two touchdown game. So man, like, I think

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna stay away from this one. I just like

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I can't back the Eagles when I was so horrified

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 2>by their pass defense yesterday.

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>You make a great point about that, and that is

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a good logical point. My point is a little bit

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>more on the emotional side, Sam, which is I don't

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>think the Dallas Cowboys have the mental and emotional fortitude

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to go into Philadelphia and win a football game. I

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>just don't think they're that team. They have not shown

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>me they're that team. Just because you beat the Rams

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this week does not necessarily change my opinion of that.

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>What say you?

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 3>I disagree. I think the Cowboys are in a great

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 3>spot here. Pat mentioned the Eagles pass defense. Over the

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 3>last four weeks. They've allowed a ten point four percent

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 3>explosive pass rate that is thirtieth in the league. Meanwhile,

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 3>over that same stretch of games, the Cowboys offense is

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 3>first having a ten point seven percent explosive pass rate

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 3>the Eagles. Excuse me, the Cowboys defense is still getting

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 3>a ton of pressure on opposing quarterbacks. The Eagles offensive

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 3>line has has struggled a little bit lately. They're allowing

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 3>a thirty to nine percent pressu rate over the last

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 3>four weeks. The Dallas passing offense just looks great. I mean,

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Dak is out there dropping some dimes that touchdown pass

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 3>to Jake Ferguson just over the defender's head. He's been

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 3>playing exceptionally well. The Cowboys are starting to pass the

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 3>ball a little bit more. I think they understand that

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 3>the rushing offense is just not what they might have

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 3>expected it to be. So I think Dallas can go

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 3>into Philly and take the upset or at least cover

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 3>the three points.

0:31:58.080 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Now, after all of that, I think I want to

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>tease this and I want to take the Eagles by

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>even more. That's what I think. That's what I think.

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Enough see everyone bet that they do this all the time.

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>You start to lot cooking the Cowboys. They're looking good again.

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>There's such a public team, and I was gonna go

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>run and bet the Cowboys. Now stay with the Eagles.

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's see on Monday. If I'm right or wrong, then

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the Boys can hammer me. If I'm wrong, we'll see

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>what happens. The New York Giants two and six will

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>take on the Las Vegas Raiders. Three point underdogs going

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>into Las Vegas are the Giants thirty eight and a

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>half is the number for this one. The Giants on

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the money line plus one forty possibly Daniel Jones coming

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>back here in this one. Sam, I know some of

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>these games are pretty ugly.

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Here.

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>We've got two more left after this, one of which

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is much more exciting. So do you want to just

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>fast forward through Giants Vegas? Or does something that appeals

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to you.

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 4>Pass? I'd be like the Giants. Out of twenty seven.

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Success rate on Sunday, like almost three quarters of the

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 3>plays got them further away from scoring.

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 4>It was just so so bad.

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 3>I know there was the rain, Tyrod getting hurt. Daniel

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Jones is clear to return. It sounds like he's going

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 3>to play in this game. But I still think the Raiders'

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 3>offense is pretty solid and they'll be able to move

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 3>the ball. So give them the Raiders, I guess give me.

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 1>The over on Saquon Barkley's carry total whatever that is,

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>what the rushing attempts are over. That's how you bet

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>this game. Pat, you see anything else, you'll like this?

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean laying a field goal or more with the Raiders,

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Like give me the points every time against Josh McDaniels

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 2>and the Raiders, Like, especially with Daniel Jones coming back?

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Will this be the first time all year where they

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 2>have Daniel Jones and Saquon Barkley health?

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Hear?

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>First little while?

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Healthy, that's a different question. Healthy since Week one maybe

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>or two?

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess. I guess early in the season. So

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I'll take the Giants and the points here. Like, I know,

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 2>they haven't given us much reason for optimism yet. But

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't like the Raiders. It's a big favorite.

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Come on, I'm not a big favorite. They are they

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 1>are the standard favorite. They are the home here's three points. There,

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you go too big to be fair enough? All right? Well,

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>how about the three points that the Cincinnati Bengals are

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>getting at home against the Buffalo Bills. Forty eight and

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a half is the number on this one plus one

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty for the Buffalo Bills. You know where I'm gonna go.

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm representing who Day, Let's go. Let's go a little

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Bengals action. I picked the Bengals last week. I

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>canna keep rolling with them. I think the Bengals are

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite for a reason in this game. I think the

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills, you clearly can see they missed certain of

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>those missing pieces on defense. Joe Burrow looked by far

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the healthiest he has been getting out of sacks running

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 1>around in the pocket. I think the rest of the

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 1>AFC better get real worried here because the Bengals are

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 1>getting back into this thing. So pat do you think

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>they handle the Buffalo Bills here at home?

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this line's really interesting joke because the Bengals do

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 2>look like the Bengals again, and the Bills haven't really able.

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 2>They haven't been able to get decisive wins against bad teams.

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 2>They're last three games one score games against the Buccaneers, Patriots,

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:05.879
<v Speaker 2>and Giants. They lost the Patriots game and came within

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 2>a whisker of losing that game to the Giants. I

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 2>think when we look at the power rankings this week,

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 2>like when Massy Peabody updates their ratings, it's gonna say

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 2>that the value is with the Bills. But that's taking

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:20.760
<v Speaker 2>into account the entire body of work, where the Bengals

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 2>were so out of sorts early in the season and

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 2>now they are just humming again, and they're basically back

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 2>where they were the last couple of years as valid

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl contenders. So I can't blame you. I'm leaning

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:34.359
<v Speaker 2>towards the Bengals here as well.

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Sam, Come on this plenty room on the train, Hop

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a board, let's go. We're going to Cincinnati.

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.399
<v Speaker 3>Look, this is gonna be some good, clean fun. We're

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 3>gonna start our Sunday morning with a matchup between the

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 3>two MVP favorite. It's gonna roll into the afternoon with

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Ravens at our Seahawks Ravens. Then we're gonna get a

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 3>nice Mattine viewing with the Cowboys and Eagles, and then

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna wrap up our night with this Bill's Bengals.

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's gonna be phenomenal. They have football.

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm on the Bengals though I took them at two

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 3>and a half this morning. They were one and a

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 3>half even earlier this morning, So getting a lot of

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 3>steam here for the Bengals. But you mentioned it, Joe

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Burrow looks healthy. In weeks one through six, Joe Burrow

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 3>took fifteen snaps from under center. In week eight alone,

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 3>he took fourteen snaps from under center. His health is

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 3>going to open up this offense so much more. Obviously,

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 3>the Bills get some extra rest playing on Thursday Night

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Football the previous week, but they just don't look like

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 3>the juggernaut that they used to be. Have had some issues.

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 3>I think some of the decision making that Sean McDermott

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 3>made in that game against Tampa Bay was very suspect

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 3>and it kept the Buccaneers in that game to the

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 3>point where if Chris Godwin turns around a little bit earlier,

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 3>like they are losing that game and are you know,

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 3>just even further behind the Dolphins. So I like the

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Bengals in this. I think the Bengals are just looking

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 3>like they can make a real, real run here.

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, one more game Monday Night Football, because you know,

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the NFL loves to put these New York teams here

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:15.439
<v Speaker 1>on the standalone games. We've got to do it every week.

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 1>It feels like I've got to have at least one

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of them. The Jets at four and three somehow won

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that football game. Don't ask me how I watched it.

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I watched the highlights twice. I still can't understand how

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that all happened. Four and three, they are two and

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 1>a half point underdogs, though to the Chargers forty one

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half is the number plus one twenty five

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>for the Jets side. Sam, We're giving the Jets a

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>little too much credit here at this plus two and

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a half number here. I mean, look, I don't love

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers, and I never love the Chargers traveling across

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the country, and I never love the Chargers on primetime.

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 1>And the more I'm saying these things out loud, the

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>more I understand the line. But g whiz, I mean,

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>should the Chargers go in there and just put up

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of points on the Jets at this point?

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 4>They should?

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think if the Chargers get out to

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:01.320
<v Speaker 3>an early lead, they should be able to salt this

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 3>one away. The Jets lost more offensive linemen to injuries

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:09.839
<v Speaker 3>in Sunday's games. Center Connor McGovern and left guard West

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Schweitzer both got hurt. The Chargers pass runs rush hasn't

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 3>been great this year, but the Jets are already allowing

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 3>a pressure rate over forty percent. I think the Chargers

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 3>defense run defense continues to be solid, so if they

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 3>decide to shy away from Zach Wilson, that the Chargers

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:32.720
<v Speaker 3>rush defense will be able to hold them to feury yards.

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, I mean Justin Herbert is just stratosphere is

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 3>better than Zach Wilson. I get the rest of the

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 3>team is not as much up to stuff, and the

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Jets defense as a whole is pretty good, but I

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 3>think Justin Herbert can can do some damage.

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Pat, well, Justin Herbert do damage? Or are we gonna

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>somehow see the Jets sneak out another victory here? I'm

0:38:58.200 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 1>at a loss with this one here with the Jets.

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:04.840
<v Speaker 2>That Jets defense is really really good. And you know,

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 2>we know the Chargers tortured recent history. Heck, they're tortured

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 2>long term history. I mean, it's just like really hard

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:14.800
<v Speaker 2>to back the Chargers when I saw that line against

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the Bears last week at eight and a half, and

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers give them credit, they took care of business,

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 2>but they usually don't take care of business so easily.

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:25.320
<v Speaker 2>And meanwhile, you've got this Jets team that wants to

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 2>play everyone close, whether it's a really good team or

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 2>a bad team like the Giants. So man, I just

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 2>like I'm not touching this game.

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm not touching.

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 2>It's an interesting matchup, but I do not want to

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:38.359
<v Speaker 2>bet this game at all.

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 1>This one feels like a live bet game. Or you

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>get in there and you get a sense of what's

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 1>going on in the first quarter and then you try

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to make an impulsive stand one way or another. That's

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>what that's what this feels like to me. Especially it's

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>fun because it's standalone, so it's a lot easier to

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>do that because you've got no other games distracting you.

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's one that I'd be looking at. But again,

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 1>as Sam pointed out, definitely you could start in the

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>morning with your coffee and then and after dinner drink.

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 1>By the time you get to Sunday night football and

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>then maybe maybe Monday night you find something to do

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>with the kids. I don't know, instead of having to

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 1>watch the Jets. We'll see. But again, we want to

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. Drop your comments below and one of

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>them just might win a one year premium upgrade to

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>betting Pros. To make sure you drop those comments, tell

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:20.240
<v Speaker 1>us what you're in on for Week nine in the NFL,

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and don't forget to subscribe to the YouTube channel for

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros and click that bell for notification. Still it

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>goes ding. That'll do it for us, but the story

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 1>of the game goes on for Sam Hoppin and Pat Fitzmorris.

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time.

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 5>Kids. Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. Follow

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 5>us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and Instagram

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 5>at Betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube channel

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:44.720
<v Speaker 5>at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros.