WEBVTT - Fantasy Baseball 2019: Puig/Machado Struggles, Paddack Sent Down

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess dude Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio networks. Do dinit

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>right now. That's welcome your host, Fi Grate from five

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>did Bro say, Francis, start ball ladies and tell them

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in your ps. And with that we welcome you inside

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Studio thirty four. This is the BFFs. That is Frank Stample.

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg Sauceman. Pleasure to have you here with

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>us on a Thursday. Virginia Zakis have inside injuries. We'll

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>join us coming up, you know, about fifteen minutes from now.

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>It's well twenty pm Eastern time. For Frankie, how's it going.

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing well, gree how are you doing? I just

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>sleep last night. I slept well and you need very

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>silly as she took a nap at like nine pm

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>after dinner. Terrible idea. So then he woke up at

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>ice cream, watched the show and said, we're going to

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>bed now. I'm like, I'm really going to bed. She

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been old hyper and like I'm trying to sleep,

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Like why do you got to do this right now?

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Are you a napper? Um? No, not really yes, And

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not like a lot. I can't do it because

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>if I nap, then I can't sleep in it. It

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really bother me as long as if at the

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 1>right time, Like sometimes they go home from work and

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>it's like six is or whatever. I have TV on,

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.239
<v Speaker 1>I can see my I doze, but like I'm not

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>like out cold, you know, like someone opens the door,

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll be a week an instant. So yeah, I know

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>people who are chronic nappers like sleep for hours when

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 1>they get home from work and they just go to

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>sleep at night. To have no idea how that Judie

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>can sleep, wake up at ten o'clock or eleven o'clock

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>on a Saturday or weekendor whatever, right do activities are

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>on three four o'clock, takes another nap until about six

0:02:55.840 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>six thirty, has dinner, comes home, it was back to sleep.

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>That's crazy. I don't know. I don't know how that's possible.

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't get it, do not get it. I can't

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>fathom them. And but I still um hasn't been great recently.

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I keep waking up early in the morning, like five,

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>six am, and I can't go back to sleep. But

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>today it wasn't so bad. It was a little bit

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 1>better today. It's like going on greed. Lot going on

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in the world of fantasy baseball, a lot going on

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in betting baseball at too. How do we do last night?

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I know I missed the half a run.

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Both of mine were wrong, all right, And shout out

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to shout out to the Padres defense, who I believe

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>had four errors last night. And I was watching that

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>start because they had Joey lu CAZy starting in multiple places.

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>They did him no favors. So yeah, shout out to

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the Padres defense. Like the Padres moneyline, they would they

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>were in a I mean solid position. Joel CAZy actually

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>allowed to earned runs three runs total because the defense

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>was terrible. But yeah, they couldn't really score off Sean

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Anderson either, so that didn't work out well. And Zach Eflin.

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>To his credit, I like to Philly his money line.

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>He pitched awesome eight innings, nine strikeouts. He was great.

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Meryl Kelly was a little bit better. So didn't work out, Grey, No,

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it didn't work out, But the idea I thought it

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>was kind of right on the money. Uh, today's poll question.

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>We had have alluded to it yesterday. Frank, We're finally

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it. Yeah, there's a lot of fantasy analysts.

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I understand. You want to promote yourself as someone that

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>gets a lot of things right. That's how you sell yourself,

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's how you get people to read your work

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and listen to your shows. And of course everyone wants

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to get things right. But if people read your work

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and they listen to your shows, then they'll know what

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you said before the season, and they'll know whether you

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>were right or wrong, whatever it might be. So you

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>don't have to remind everyone how right you are all

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the time. So I just thought, let's put out a poll.

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>See what see what the fans think. The people who

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously listen and watch. Do you do you want to

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>fantasy analysts, it's constantly telling you how right they are

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Someone who tells you that they're right

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and wrong, tries and learn from their mistakes, or someone

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>who just tells you they're wrong all the time and

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>tries and have fun with it. Because actually we might

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>be closer to that. We're probably in the middle. Like

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>we still do say when we get things right, we

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>definitely tell you what I've just let off the show

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>telling you that we got our bets wrong esterday. It's true.

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>It's true, we got ourselves on the back, but not

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>like hardcore. It's more like, yeah, I don't. We don't

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely beat our chests, but Greg, I mean, we know

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a how to people who do this, who they've never

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>got a single thing wrong in their lives. I don't know.

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 1>It seems a little dishonest to the viewer. I agree,

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I agree with that too much stuff. The

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>other thing we really wanted to accomplish getting the votes.

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Tell us what you want a respond to the chat

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>call on three sixty seven nine if it's working, I

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I can't promise that. UM no, not working,

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>don't call it, just respond or tweet at us. Um

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>more than we really wanted to hit on today, And

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>we're getting like the stuff from last night. We always

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>tend to, but I wanted to make sure we heat

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>on this. I'm gonna do it at the top so

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't forget Frank, And that is is there still home? Right?

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>It's June twelfth today? Watch this wrong? Okay, it's June twelfth, yesterday,

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>due tonight. We are through June twelfth. In baseball, there's

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guys that you drafted, that you believed in,

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and you want to know is there still hope? And

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the most common name that I've been tweeted about, You've

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>been tweeted about, you had worries about yourself. He's Manny Machado.

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>About a month ago, almost exactly a month ago, you said,

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Manny Machado is one of those guys that you are

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>most buying in on that you want to buy low

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. A month later, not all that much has changed.

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Has your opinion changed in terms of buying low? Yeah,

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I would still like to buy low on Manny Machado.

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not the same situation as Joseer Mirriez. While Jose

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Mirriez does have a to three year track record of

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>being a very good player, and his first half last

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>season was m v P caliber. Manny Machado has done

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>this for a long time. He's been a really really

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>good player for a long time, and I think I

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>have more faith in him bouncing back than other players

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that we are going to talk about. If you look

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>at Manny Michado's line at this point the season to

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>forty batting average, ten home runs, thirty one runs scored,

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty three RBIs, he has not lived up to what

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>we have wanted from him, obviously, you know, we were

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>expecting probably close to thirty five home runs, maybe ten

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen steals, and only has one stolen base a

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, two eighty plus batting average. He was a

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>borderline first round pick. He was a late first early

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>second rounder, and for good reason, multi position eligibility. Again,

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>He's done this for a long time, I mean dating

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>back to you know, twenty fifteen, this guy has been

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a perennial over thirty home runs, you know, over a

0:07:55.760 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred runs scored, gives you stolen bases, and I'm still buying.

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm still buying on many Machado. I think that there

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>are better days ahead, Like there are things that he's

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>doing this year that he needs to correct. Most definitely

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the strikeout rate for him, and swinging strike rate is

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>up two percent this year. His strikeout rate is up

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>seven percent from last year. It's that's twenty one point

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>three percent, and his career mark in the strikeout department

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>sixteen point seven percent, so it's even up there as well.

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>And yes, that can mean the difference between you know,

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty to forty points of batting average. If you're striking

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>out seven eight percent more than you are in years past,

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, that's going to affect your your overall batting

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 1>average output. And if you look at his bat and

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>ball data, forty two percent. Hard hit rate up this

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>year for Machado, although it's up for everyone, but it's

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a career best for him. Um needs to correct the

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>infield fly balls as well. The strikeouts and the infield

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>flyballs are what's killing him. And I said this before

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the season two, I wanted to pay a little bit

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>more attention to infield flyball rate. For his career's fourteen percent,

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>this year, it's eighteen point seven percent. You have to

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>realize that eighteen point seven percent of his batted balls

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>our infield flyballs. Those are automatic outs, so almost one

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>fifth of his batted balls right now are automatic outs

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>and one fifth of his plate appearances are strikeouts, So

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.679
<v Speaker 1>that's what's absolutely killing his batting average right now, and

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>those are all up. Like the infield flyball is up,

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the strikeout rate is up. So if it comes back

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to anywhere near his career norm, then he's going to

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 1>be better rest of season. And the fan grass projections

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>all expect him to be better too. They have him

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>for a between two seventy and two eighty batting average

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>rest of the way, anywhere from seventeen to twenty two

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>home runs the rest of the way, which would put

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>him right around, you know, thirty, slightly over thirty home

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>runs for the season. He's going to be better, Greg,

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>So for everyone who's freaking out, what do I do

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>with Manny Machado? Should I be buying low on him

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>right now? I've sent out a few buy low opportunities.

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>What are those by opportunities that you sent out frank

0:09:55.480 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>trade offers or they legit I I don't remember specifically.

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>It was like you, Darvish, because this person needed a

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>starting pitcher and like a middle infielder who's semi breaking out.

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember who it was, so it was like

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a let's say top twelve middle infielder and a U

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Darvish for Darius and Tommy Lostella's are you telling me

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:19.599
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't time to the cell but maybe something like that.

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So probably could have done better there. But if you can,

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>if you can buy low, it's something that I would

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>look into do. I think he's gonna be better. I

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's just oh first year of a contract

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>playing in the NLS. He played half of the season

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in the NLS last year. He was perfectly fine with it.

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>There's just a lot like pressure, right like you going

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to New York and you're struggling, like you're gonna kind

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>of chalk it up to the New York pressure. You

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have that in San Diego. Yeah, Like they weren't

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>really expected to make the playoffs this year. They're kind

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of scuffling right now. They're two games under five hundred.

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Talk about Paddock a little bit later on as well.

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think we have a month enough of a

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>track record from a childo where if his numbers just

0:10:56.480 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>normalized to where they usually are in terms of infield

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>flyball rate, strikeout rate, the battle ball numbers are still there.

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>The expected batting average. If you look at that, it's

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not as good, it's not where it normally should be.

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>That's because of the strikeouts. So overall, I do think

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Maniado is gonna better. And ball ratios is a little

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>bit closer to right a thirty percent now traditionally as

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a fift, so it goes off like not significantly. Also,

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>he's been terrible against right handed pitching this year, great

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.959
<v Speaker 1>god off this year to sixteen batting average six o

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>nine o p s against rights. In his career to

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>seventies seven eight oh nine o p s against rights.

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that this guy just forgot how to

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>hit against right handed pitching. He is clearly struggling right now.

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>But again, if any of these numbers normalized to where

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>they are supposed to be what we've seen out of

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>Manni Matado for so long, then he is a prime

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>by low candidate right now, and that's what I believe

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>him to be. Okay, what other players do you believe?

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>He's a prime by low candidate up to that level,

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>like Manny Machado's. One of them is Jose Ramirez or

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>those two guys that you're buying low at the moment. No, no,

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:09.839
<v Speaker 1>I I have a little bit more concerned when it

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>comes to those guys. Obviously, with Jose Ramirez, I mean

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>he's the top. He's he's the top of the pecking

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 1>order when it comes to severe underperformance this year. I

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:21.599
<v Speaker 1>mean I tweeted out the other day it was it

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>was June eleventh that day, Greg so I actually got

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the date correct. But um, I basically labeled him as

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.839
<v Speaker 1>a bust. Like there's no way around it when it

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>comes Josie. He's batting around two hundred, He's been at

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 1>that mark er below for most of the season. His

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>expected numbers, he's he's expected like a two forty batting average,

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>he's expected slugging his expected woe but all around league

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>average or worse. We did not draft Josier Meres to

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>be a league average hitter. We drafted him to be

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 1>a you know, guy with a you know, two e

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>D plus batting average. That's what I was expecting out

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of Jose Ramirez. And it's just it's not happening right now,

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's really baffling. And I don't know that there's

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>any one thing that you can kind of put your

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>finger on to figure out what's up with Jose Ramirez.

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>You know a few people have tweeted at me, Well,

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>there was a there was a steroid report last year,

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a p e D report, like the p D report.

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I looked into this, what it happened in May, and

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>he didn't really start struggling struggling until August. Now, maybe

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>once he heard the report, maybe he stops using stuff

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and then it takes a few months to affect his performance,

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that's a real possibility. Again, this is just speculation,

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>but there's nothing else that you can really point out.

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted out an article from Tom Verducci where he

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>broke this down in depth. Basically, the past three or

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>four years, Joseiramirez was the best hitter in baseball in

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of turning on inside fastballs, and basically since August

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 1>he's been one of the worst. So you don't just

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>lose that ability overnight. So there's some underlying issue when

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Jose ramire Is, and I really don't

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>have as much faith in him that he's going to

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 1>turn around. When it comes to yas Peak, a lot

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of similar issues to Manny Machado actually greg for his career.

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>How about this I guess right handed pitching two eighty

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>two batting average seven OPS. Peak was always someone who

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.599
<v Speaker 1>actually had reverse splits. He's better against prities than he

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>was lefties. Strike at rate for his career against righties

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>this year two oh six six oh three ops a

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>seven percent strike at rate against right handed pitching. Now

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>for Puig, at least the counting stats are still there

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>for him, Greg He's on page for twenty seven homers,

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>eighty three ribbies, twenty twenty two stolen bases. That's a

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>really good year from Peak, and I think most people

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>would take that if he was giving you his to

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy batting average, are you expected? The problem is he's

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>batting to twelve and he's actually what he's doing differently

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>is he's trying to lift the ball too much. There

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>are there are guys in the game that are capable

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of lifting the ball, and then there are guys that

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it's just not natural for them to do it. And yeah,

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Sale Peak is one of those guys. He's one of those.

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>He's normally been around a forty groundball rady, hits a

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of line drives, not really known for being that

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>much of a flyball hitter. And I think he's stressing

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too much, maybe because he's gonna contract year,

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>because he's in Cincinnati, so he's in a smaller ballpark.

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he's trying consciously to hit more home runs. Uh.

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>The strikeout rate is actually is up this year as well,

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the swinging strike rate, the chase rate. I think he's

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>putting a lot of pressure on himself to try and

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>live up to this contract year, and he wants to

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>earn a contract. I think he just has to go

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>back to what he's uh, he's used to doing, hitting

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>more line drives, hitting the ball on the ground and

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>just be yourself. Yeah. Peak, But the counting stature still there.

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>You see the two thirties seven babbit it's god awful.

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>That's because it goes hand in hand with him hitting

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>more flyballs. Hit more flyballs a the lead to home runs,

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>which don't count for babbit anyway, and you're gonna normally

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>guys who had a lot of fly balls are low

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>BABIT hitters all like a Joey Gallo because a lot

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of flyballs are outs or home runs. So that's why

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you see the batter than the batting average so low

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>for yas again, like Mannie Machado the past two or

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>three years from Puig, if he just gets back to

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>doing what he was doing those years, then the numbers

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>will normalize and we're looking rest of season. What can

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you do rest of season? So if he gets back

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to being a even a two six seventy hitter and

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>keeps with these counting stats and is aggressive on the

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>base paths, then yeah, yeah, peak will be fine. But

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I have a little bit more concerned with Puig than

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I do Machado because not much of a track record,

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a headcase, he's in a contract year,

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>seems like he's pressing a little bit. The plate discipline

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit more all over the place when

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to puigu um As opposed to Manni Michado.

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm ranking them, I'm most likely to buy

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>right now Machado in terms of turning it around, then Puig,

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and then Josier Mirrors. I I just don't have a

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of faith in Josie Mirrors. Is there anybody else?

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, those are big three, and those are the

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>names that we're getting major, major questions on night, and

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I agree, like I wanted a monthly when we have

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>this conversation. I wanted to, like Cosie Ra mirrors. There's

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing that said he was gonna turn it around many

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>how there were signs yes, if we got a few

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>as well, I rank him in the same way. Is

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:11.959
<v Speaker 1>there anybody else who comes to your mind that's kind

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of like this. I'll just throw two pictures out there

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>real quick before the break. Noah Syndergarden, Jack Flaherty. There

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>has been guys that I've been kind of yeah, all right,

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll take a break, wanning into what happened last night

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>with Chris Paddock as well in a little bit, but

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 1>comed up next. Virginia zak Is Inside Injuries joins us

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:31.959
<v Speaker 1>here on the BFFs. Daily Rodo dot Com learned from

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the game's best DFS players. We don't just give you advice.

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>We play every day, all major sports, all year round.

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and custom projections,

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily rodos dot Com optimized in minutes,

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 1>build an optimized line up for cash games and turneys

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>from the games players joined Daily Rodo dot Com. The

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>following ad contains shocking material. Listener discretion is advised. Is

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>someone in your family playing a dangerous game of Russian roulette.

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Over forty three thousand people die a year from drug overdose,

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and twenty people a day, five people every hour,

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>one person every twelve minutes. Eight thousand people die every

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 1>year from alcohol abuse. Over two hundred and forty people

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a day, ten an hour, one person every six minutes.

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Somebody you know, maybe next learn how to help someone

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you love get away from the drugs, alcohol, and bad influences.

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>With the f m l A, people can take a

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>leave of absence from their job and still keep it.

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Call now and learn how we can help you. Eight

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four nine six two one eight

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four nine six to one. That's

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>eight six six four eight four ninety six one. Do

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you want to risk wagers up to one thousand dollars?

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>If so, go to points bet dot com forward slash grid,

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>open yourself up a points pet sports wagering account, enter

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the promo code grid, and you'll get to risk free

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>bets of up to one thousand dollars. In addition to

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>traditional betting, points pets also offers its own betting concept,

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>where customers they're rewarded by how much they win their Pett.

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>That's points pet dot Com Forward Slash Grid, enter the

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>promo code grid and get your two risk free bets

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>of up to one thousand dollars. Today, we're back with

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.959
<v Speaker 1>you on the bff's Frank Stample, gregg suspen work. You're

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.719
<v Speaker 1>getting Virginia's They We have a monstosity of technical issues

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>going down, but we appreciate you're sticking with us. If

0:19:57.359 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you listen on the podcast, you probably don't even know

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>any of these issues drapping, So thank you and thank

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you for listening, and thank you for listening as well.

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Go by Manny Machadocado and you know what tomorrow he's

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>not a vandal. Contest, Yeah, Greg, we need people to

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>sign up. Send us your fan will use your name

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>or if you've been in the contest before again just

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>click on the friends tab on the top. You're already

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>part of it. All you have to do is set

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>your lineup before the main slate starts at seven pm

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>sor time four pm Pacific, So jump in, set your lineup.

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>As long as we get sixteen out of the supposed

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty to join in, the contest will run for money.

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And of course Greg I am the master of winning

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the contest when it's not for money. So last week

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we got up to fifteen people. We didn't

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have enough to run for money, and I

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>came in first place. So yeah, shout out to me.

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm the best. I'm the best fantasy analysts of all time.

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm the best FANDUL player. No one can beat me.

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I had a really good, really good night too.

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>How did they lose? Because I was in you you

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>know who it was, m m hm m hmm. Yeah

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>it was your boy, Ramond Loriano and Jeff McNeil. You

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>had those guys in your lineup, Ramone, Mariano Greggy by

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the way, Oh my goodness, gracious you did that. I

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>think it could be a good disgracious with um. Well,

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, did you see what he did yesterday? I

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>was playing against him in one of my my home

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>leagues in a in a point did not Actually he

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>had a grand slam and two stolen bases. He proba

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>like seventeen fantasy points in my home league, which is

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>basically like a quality start from a picture. The guy

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>has just been on real. I tweeted about this last night.

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Let me see if I can pull it off for you. Greg.

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>It's basically been since early to mid May. He's just

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>been a complete stud. Here you go, Greg, so a

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit over a month now. Since May eight, Ramone

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 1>Loriano is thirty seven. This is including yesterday three oh

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>six batting average, six home runs, nineteen runs scored, sixteen

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>rb i s, and five stolen bases. These are my

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>trout level numbers, Greg. Over the past month, Romo Loronando

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>has performed like Mike Trout to what you say, Breck,

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>You're right we should have um. Alex Smith is all

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the super hot. Oh actually funny. Sorry, I'll show you

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>this during the break. Some one of my patrons on Patreon,

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>they private messaged me yesterday and they said, I listen

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>to your show yesterday. I know that you don't like

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to uh toot your own horn so too much, but

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you were so right about Malex Smith. He said, you

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>need to give Greg crap every single day for the

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>rest of the baseball season. He said, I needed stolen basis.

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I picked up Alex Smith. This guy has been a godsend.

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to Patreon. I subscribed paton right now. There

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you go. You will get the best fantasy analysis of

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>all time. That meating me. No, No, that's just me

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>imitating every fantasy analysts who thinks they're the best, which

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>just goes back to the poll, goes back to the

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 1>poll question. Yea, how about you pat me on the

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>back too while we're at agree Yeah, there you go.

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>You can't see you might have hurt moving over these obviously.

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I love that we're doing a lot of video elements.

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>We're not on videos on the back job. Yeah, a

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>little pad on the back like that, Alex Smith. Shout

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>out to Alex. And to be fair, I think in

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 1>both leagues that we played together. I own him. I

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>do not follow my own advice. I follow Frank's advice. Yeah,

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>well you should ask me about Josh Bell, Greg, I did.

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I told you to drop Jo. You said, yeah,

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you have no issue with me dropping Josh Bell. We're

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to go back to the tape. We can, uh.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>While Greg is doodling with his share, I think it's

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>worth mentioning we should bring this up. We'll have a

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 1>little conversation here about Chris Paddock because everyone's freaking out rightfully.

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So we got the report yesterday in the middle of

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the day that he's going to be sent to High

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>A ball. Uh, And everyone's like minor league endings count

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the same as major league nings. Well, he's not really

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna pitch in in High A ball. He's going there,

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe when it's his turn in the rotation,

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>he'll like have a relief day, like he'll throw like

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>a bullpen something like that. But they are doing this

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to limit his endings. And I see people talking about

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>like manipulating service time, blah blah blah blah blah. Well,

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.239
<v Speaker 1>he started the year in the majors and right now

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>he's on pace for a hundred and fifty six innings pitched.

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Last year he only pitched ninety innings in the minors.

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:30.959
<v Speaker 1>So a realistic jump forward forty forty five innings, if

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to be aggressive, maybe fifty. That puts him

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for between a hundred and thirty and a hundred forty innings.

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>You're being aggressive on his step forward this year. We

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier on in the show, we were talking about Machado.

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:43.719
<v Speaker 1>The Potters are two games under five hundred. They're five

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 1>games out of the wild Card. They're not out of

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it by any means, but this is a team that's

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>more so built for the future. They have one of

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the best farm systems in baseball, they're one of the

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>youngest teams in baseball. They're looking towards the future. They

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>need to basically do what the Warriors didn't and kind

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>of protect Chris Paddock from himself little bit here. So

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>everyone's freaking out. I understand he's been mostly really really

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>good this season. He scuffled a little bit lately, but

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be back. Greg, What what do you expect?

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>How many weeks do you expect him to be down

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in minors before he's back. So we're chatting about this

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>before the show began, and he pitched about what do

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>we say last year? So he pitched ninety innings last year,

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>So I thought he was gonna be good for one

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>thirties currently on pace for one of the six you

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:33.479
<v Speaker 1>told Nick, So that means he has to go probably

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>about thirty innings down realistically, right, So that's actually more

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>so than I figured out downstairs. I said three weeks

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>three he starts, it's more like five starts. I think

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance if they hold him down now break

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>He also rais exactly what you need. It's not a month,

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 1>it's a month from now. It's a month from now.

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And if you hold him now he missed five starts,

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>then he's good for the entire rest of the year. Again,

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>as Freik mentioned, if San Diego is out of it, though,

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not gonna push this kid in September, there's no

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>reason too. So I think then there's a chance that

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you bring him back a little before the All Star Break.

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's certainly a chance they bring him back for

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a start before the All Star making because then you

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 1>have a week and you can reconfiguree ther rotation. He

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>missed a couple of weeks here, so I think there's

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a chance he misses like three his next three starts,

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe brought back sometime in early July, and then you

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>have the All Star break something like that. And this

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>could be a blessing in disguise as well, if it

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>turns out the potteries are somewhat in a wild card

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>race down the end of the season. If they held

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>him out now, then you're gonna have more of Chris

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Paddock later on in the season. Shout out to the closer,

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Chris Venture who brought this to my attention downstairs. He says, oh, well,

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, if we can have Chris Paddock for the

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the stretch run of Fantasy Baseball or you know,

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the head to head Fantasy playoffs, and that's actually more meaningful.

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather have Chris Paddock then than than now. I

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>understand you've got to make it to the playoffs, but um,

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>having Chris Paddock later on in the season could also help.

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>But again, if they're out of it, then maybe they

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:04.439
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like shut them down in September. If

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>if they're not, if they're not going for anything. But overall,

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Greig, we knew this was gonna happen, right.

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>We said that earlier on season when we all had

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it was pitching as well as he was. We said,

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>if you can trade him for a top top twenty

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>starting pitcher that you have more faith is going to

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>make every start all like a Jack Flaherty. That's the

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>example we kept giving. But basically, anyone in that range

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and make the trade. And I also think if you're

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>in a keeper or dynasty league and you realize that

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>this isn't your year and the person who has Chris

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Paddock this is their year, you can kind of prey

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>on them right now, and that's something that you should

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>be going out there and trying to do. Dynasy and Keeper.

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:44.959
<v Speaker 1>You should be trying to buy Chris Paddock while everyone's

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>freaking out. I just it's unbelievable. I'm sorry. Yes, Chris

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Paddick's gonna be back keeper leagues, dynas is you're feeling great.

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I am gonna say, as you mentioned, though, if they

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>get into September and they're out of it, he gets

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>shut down. If you were trying to fight for that

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 1>playoffs it is a redraft league and you were playing

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>the end of August and Tember is your playoffs, it

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>might be an issue. It really might be. Yeah. Look there,

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you're allowed to have skepticism when it comes to Chris

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Paddock for the rest of the season. The only people

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>who really know are you know, the Padres front office,

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Chris Paddock himself. They said anything they I mean, they

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 1>basically have just said that they're trying to limit his work,

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>like I knew that. Yeah, I mean they haven't. I

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen any like crazy quotes, right, I believe that

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>our one of our sponsored podcast, the Fantasy Sports Radio Network,

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Baseball Hour, with Matt Striker, Mikero, Rotto Coop. I

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>saw this on Twitter last night that they actually got

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Chris Paddock's brother to call in to there to the podcast.

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.040
<v Speaker 1>So when we when we put that on demand it

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>on today, you can listen to that and get some

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>more details when they today, Golden They recorded it last night,

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>so I wish I could he had a phone. The

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>phone line's working. I'll just call Striker right now. If

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>what he said, I don't know, all right, but yeah,

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a little a little bit of plug for that podcast.

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, you might be able to get more details

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to that. But ultimately, uh, it's it's

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a hazy situation when it comes to Chris Paddock. But

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I do still believe in buying low and keeper in

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Dynasty and Redraft. I don't know that I would be

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to actively acquire him. I'm not just actively trying

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of him either, you know, if I

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>can afford to hold onto him, So I spec that's

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>what I would do. I speak of it a lot.

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>So Dennis Lynn, who's Apologize beat reporter for The Athletic,

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, tweeted out the option patic does

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>not sound would be sound like he will be down

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>long the likely planets for packs only miss one turn

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Big League rotation. Okay, yeah, I believe it

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>when I see it, I think it's probably like at

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>least two or three, but they're you know, they say

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>something like that to try and calm everyone down, like oh,

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>he's only gonna miss one. And then it turns out

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>like we're two or three weeks later and everyone's like, oh, well,

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was only gonna miss he was only

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna miss one. Star was Chris Paddick. Yep. So just

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>something to pay attention to. Obviously, justin Verlina is incredible. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. Fifteen kys zero walked or man that was

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>his uh that was his career high and strikeout school

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>just surprised me. Yeah, I thought it would have been

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>highed to career high fifteen strikeouts last night, nine swinging

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>strikes on. You know, it was nuts to me. Our

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>guys at Daily Rotor dot com. And I'm not pipping them,

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking about the pole and when things. People

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>get things right, nobody calls out people get anything wrong

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>more than I do. But the Daily Roado last night,

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you watched the FanDuel Hurry it yesterday and it was

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a combination of Ricky and Drew filling this thing out.

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Verlinder was their starter. Okay, you're not not telling me much.

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Although I called him, I was like facing the Brewers,

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>like sure you want to do that? He's like, yeah, yeah, fine.

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Verlinder was his top play on the board. He's under

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the radar pitcher was Danny Duffe? You pitched well, Tigers

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>strained him in the pit league. Fine, let's under the

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>radar hitters last night? Rady to Les j Mancini Houn

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and a triple really really impressive last night. Let's go

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>they're doing a great job. Really, he was really impressed

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>by that. Um No, wils did a great job last night.

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Greig Jordan's Yamamoto. How how about the debut for the

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>kid man. I was actually watching MLB Network that had

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>him on. They interviewed him, uh, talked about his first

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>start with him. Did you know he actually went to

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>high school with Marcus Mariota the Hawaii It's awesome. So

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>he was a freshman when Marcus Mariota was a senior.

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So there you go, Hawaii producing a NFL quarterback and

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>how a Marlins starting pitcher at the MLB level. So

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>he was great elamrto last night seven show. In his

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>five strikeouts two walks, he allowed just three hits at

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a hold a good parking Marlins park, faced the Cardinals,

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>who aren't exactly the Marlins when it comes to hitting here,

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I assume Yallamoto gets another start at least. How interested

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>are you picking up Yellowmodo now? I have I have

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>slight interests. He actually went for seven dollars out of

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a hundred in one of my home leagues, Like we

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>run Wednesday, Friday and Sunday FAB, so he went for

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>about he went for seven percent of FAB here in

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 1>my home league. I wouldn't be that aggressive on him

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>in deeper lys. I'm gonna take a shot. It's kind

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of similar to you know, when we talk about any

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Giants pitchers, any Morlins pitchers, half of their home starts

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>are really favorable starts because they pitch in such big ballparks.

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>And Yamamoto is gonna have to be able to get

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:41.479
<v Speaker 1>more swings and misses at the major league level if

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 1>he wants to to continue to perform this way. He

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 1>only had eight swinging strikes on last night. That's an

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>eight point four percent swinging strike raight and league averages

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>around eleven percent this year. And his first pitches he

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>threw a heat threw first pitch strikes to fourteen of

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty four batters faced. That's fifty eight point three percent.

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>So both of those numbers are going to have to improve.

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>But I like what I saw from him. Right he's

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>not overpowering fastball, but he mixes in four other pitches

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that he throws pretty confidently. He has a is a cutter,

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a slider, a changeup, and a curve. And he's actually

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be known for his curveball, but his slider

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like a I don't want to I

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>don't want to boasted too much, but it looked a

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit like that Jose Burrio slurve that he throws,

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>where it just kind of like sweeps across the strike zone,

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>in on lefties and away from right e's. But it

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>was like a slurve type slider where he made a

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>few people look very foolish last night. And you want

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to get the Cardinals lineup, I mean there that's no

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>slouch of a line up two. So to give you

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that much depth, seven endings, five strikeouts. I really like

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 1>what I saw from him. I have interest, obviously, and

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and it only should be owned already fifteen teamers. I

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>would like to pick him up twelves if you have

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>someone on your bench that you're not using a speculative

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>ad for him, you know, one to maybe three bucks.

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a problem with it. Greg. I think

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get another start, maybe he's in the rotation.

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Short term, we'll find out what's going on with like

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Jose Urania Caleb Smith. But I think that they're going

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty safe, especially when it comes to Caleb Smith.

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Yamamotos next start comes June, if he's still in the

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>rotation against the same St. Louis Cardinals that he faced

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>last night, this time in St. Louis. He's actually projected

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:18.959
<v Speaker 1>for a two star week next week if he sticks

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>around for that long. St. Louis and who else. You know,

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.839
<v Speaker 1>I can pull it up. Yeah, I know, I knew St.

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Louis was the next team that he can tell you

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:29.760
<v Speaker 1>hold on, I can pull it up in a moment

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for you. It's it's the Cardinals and in the Phillies

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>in Philly, So I don't love that. No, that's not

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>so good. That's not so good. I don't love that. Yeah,

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>both of those on the road too. So uh well,

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 1>man Moodigon next week. He'll help us figure out whether

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>or not we want to use Jordan Yamamoto. But I

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>think with those two matchups on the road to a

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit more hostile, probably with Lean with right now

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 1>not using him even though he's on a two star week.

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's go from a young picture to a veteran that

0:34:57.239 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>was fantastic yesterday. And it's not just justin Berland and

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Bruce co Hamels in Colorado yesterday, the over under for

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>this game was twelve twelve and a half. Right, you

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:09.280
<v Speaker 1>like the under and I said there was. That's scary.

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:12.439
<v Speaker 1>The Cups put off ten runs themselves and they still

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>hit the under thanks to Coal Havil seven shoot out

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>in he's in Colorado, nine cas, he walked one. He

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:21.439
<v Speaker 1>did a lot of six hits. Now if he can't

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>get Virginia on the line. Uh. In a bit, we

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>asked Rabanolan Aronado because Hamils did hit Ronado in the arm,

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>but Black said there was no significant damage, which is

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>not which is encouraging. You're not like all that encouraging.

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Like I wanted to say that he's fine, but yeah,

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no significant damage, which means that there's damage, right, Yeah,

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>like there's at least minor damnit. I feel like he

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>broke his arm. It's not there was There was four

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>people hitting this game, yes, already two on east side.

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't Why didn't you know where were the injections yesterday?

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Gosh right, Joe must Grove barely touches someone's shirt, Josh Donaldson,

0:35:56.880 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and he gets rejected because Josh Donaldson wants to fight

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>hit doesn't make any sense. But when it comes to

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Cole hamil's really just putting together a nice year. Here

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 1>greg twelve percent swinging strike rate, right in line with

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 1>last year's numbers. He's got a two point nine eight

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 1>e r A. Uh, the underlying numbers say that there's

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be some regression for him. He's got a three

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.320
<v Speaker 1>point eight eight x FIT. I wouldn't expect him to

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:20.839
<v Speaker 1>pitch to a sub three e r A. But if

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>he can give you a three five three six e

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:26.919
<v Speaker 1>r A with his eight point eight case per nine

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and a fifty three percent groundball, right, that's the biggest

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>difference for him. He's able to mitigate some of these

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:34.720
<v Speaker 1>walks because he's over three walks per nine. It's always

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of been an issue for Hamil's but he's able

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to mitigate some of those walks because he's he does

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>get a decent amount of swings and mrs almost a

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:43.240
<v Speaker 1>strike out for ending. But the fact that the groundball

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 1>rate is up as high as it is fifty two

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 1>point eight percent right now, if the season ended today,

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that would be Cole Hamil's highest market in the season

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in his career. So to go into Coors Field yesterday,

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:56.359
<v Speaker 1>pitch those seven endings, seventeen swinging strikes on ninety three

0:36:56.400 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>pitches whole. Hamiles has been a godsend, Greg, He's been

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable for the clubs and for fantasy owners. Would you

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>say he's better than Kyle Hendricks gig hold oh oh

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 1>my pet on back? Yeah, you can't hear it, but

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Greg Sausman is patting me on the bat pat on

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the back too. So take a break, final break, The program, Best,

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Best Forever, and and more come out next. The Fantasy

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Sports Network is ready to take you out to the

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.879
<v Speaker 1>ball game. Our experts and analysts are following the Boys

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of Summer through all one and sixty two games the

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen MLB season with the best fantasy baseball

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>analysis in the industry. Catch the latest news and notes

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>every day to help you win your fantasy leagues and

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>your TA best tournaments. Will always want you back listening

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and watching the Fantasy Sports Network on the f t

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:53.279
<v Speaker 1>s Y Radio app and the fan t s y

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel, The Fantasy Sports Network where we're root root

0:37:56.600 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>rooting for your fantasy baseball team. Re Sale two thousand

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 1>and fifteen, two thousands and sixteen European Long Drive Tour

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Champion two thousand seventeen, World number one. Me personally, I

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>keep my game face on me all it until I

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 1>just give me an up tape. Still Virginia, nothing especially

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 1>coming out with the cleaving the range or you're leaving

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the poorts. What's your story? Actually? Still the game things

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>grooming dot com from all your athletic facial wipes and

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>body cleansing de boys. The morning after, I never realized

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>just how I'm hit Canadian Missambulis blues actually were when

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 1>he gave sand Louis, who we turned into like a

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>serious f bomb fest, except It was very Canadian hoser

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like for lack of a better turn right after the

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>game like ice for to God, I thought I was

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:52.800
<v Speaker 1>watching the Calgary hit Man, the Red Deer, the Kelowna

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Rockets win the Western Hockey League Sweet Days not at

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on F and T s Y Radio and on

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>your popular podcast providers ain't get enough fantasy football. Rhoto

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Experts has launched their NFL Fantasy Football Package, which includes

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the best math based seasonal projections and rankings available anywhere

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet. Davis Maddick and the Roto Experts are

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>providing dynasty, season long betting, best ball, and NFL Draft

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>content every day of the year to give you an

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>edge regardless of what type of fantasy football you play.

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Save temper cent at roto Experts dot com with the

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 1>promo code V and T s Y. It's the NFL

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>three Fantasy Football Package only at Rhoto Experts dot com.

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, you like the man in the mirror? Alright?

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Michael Jackson met him? Horrible interest songs is Brian? That's okay,

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that's before it's time. You know Greg in this? You

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:08.359
<v Speaker 1>are you boring? Brian? It sounds so weird to hear

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that documentary, so he just turned on Yep, January. Have

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>you read that? Have you read that? Bryan? All right? Uh,

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:24.720
<v Speaker 1>back with you here on the b f f's Frank Stample,

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Greg Susman and Frank a lot of patting you back today. Yeah,

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>we're doing exactly what we're not supposed to be doing.

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Greg great, Uh, No one Arnado, Um gets hurt yesterday.

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 1>It's hitting the arm. David Donald continues to rank another

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:40.719
<v Speaker 1>three game for him. He's been ridiculous, dude, not much power,

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:42.759
<v Speaker 1>but it's just the average is really really good. Um,

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 1>let's get in the bruland there here. I love that

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 1>they all came in. It's Lefty too, Greg, he's been

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>very very good Berland yesterday, I told you the fifteen

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 1>strike out's a lot of three runs overre seven innings,

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 1>four hits, didn't walk anybody, only three runs, you lad.

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:55.800
<v Speaker 1>We're all on solo home runs from you as a

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 1>money Garandal or Ryan run and Eric Thames. He does

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 1>even get a win as his one goes in the

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 1>fourteen and the Astros actually lose this game six to three.

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Branda Woodruff gotta match him. And then the amount of

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>strike outs, but seven things and three run ball, four hits, uh,

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:16.759
<v Speaker 1>three walks, six ks. Nice job by bullpens in bull

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:21.439
<v Speaker 1>on both sides until the ash was ultimately blue. Yeah.

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:23.399
<v Speaker 1>And for Justin Verland, he's got a two point five

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 1>o e r A on the season, a zero point

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 1>seven three whip. Are you serious? It's like this guy's

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 1>pitching like an elite reliever. He's zero point seven three whip.

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 1>It's just absolutely insane. He doesn't have a three point

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 1>four three x fit and at three point zero eight Sierra,

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's gonna be some slight regression for

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Justin Verlander. He's pitches more to fly balls, and it's

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:49.879
<v Speaker 1>his hard contact rate is up this here. Everyone's hard

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>contact rate is up this year. But his swinging strike

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:56.360
<v Speaker 1>rate is just absolutely ridiculous fifteen point nine percent, his

0:41:56.480 --> 0:42:00.360
<v Speaker 1>oh swing, his chase rate thirty nine percent, like a

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>fine wine greggy. Justin Verlander just getting better with age.

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Even if the e r A rises to like the

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>high twos, even the low threes, he's gonna give you

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a ton of strike. Guy, He's gonna give you a

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 1>massive whip. His walks have been awesome this year, one

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 1>point seven zero right in line. With last year's one

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:20.240
<v Speaker 1>point five six walks for nine. So justin Verlander easily

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:22.799
<v Speaker 1>and trenched as one of the top two or three

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers in fantasy. He's awesome. He's how how many

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 1>years in a row are we gonna doubt this guy? Greg?

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't doubt him this year, like I think we

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 1>initially did, but then we came around, Well, why didn't

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 1>we bid on him? Then? Greg? Why do we end

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:37.839
<v Speaker 1>up with Trevor Bauer? Because that was the plan. Friend

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:43.359
<v Speaker 1>plan were alan was Trevor Bauer. Garrett Cole probably should

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:45.840
<v Speaker 1>have got Garret Cole, and then the plan for hitters

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 1>was Ronald Lucoon you or Christian Yelloch. We probably a

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>really good team. Imagine we had yellowt and Garrett Cole

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:56.919
<v Speaker 1>or Yellow and Verlander. Oh my gosh. Like the plan,

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea was right, process over results, process over results.

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Not really that you know what. Ronald da cun is

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 1>having a fine season, it's just not Christian Yellows the season.

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I would like to look up what Ronald Cuna is

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>on Pace four actually, which I will do. Well, you

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 1>introduce whatever you want to talk about next, Craig. Oh,

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:23.759
<v Speaker 1>we should talk about the blue Jay's bullpen, because Ken Jiles,

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:25.760
<v Speaker 1>we should talking about that and everything else that happened.

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I can Giles on the list, did I?

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe I did? I remember anyway? Before that, ronalda

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Is on page for two eighty three six home runs,

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty one steals, runs, scored a hundred eight ruys. That's

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a really, really good It's not Christian Yellis, but that's

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a damn good year, like someone who was worth taking

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 1>as a top six pick in right around we had

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the Ken Jiles in just one second? What's up? Crazy

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>trade in he releague? Trade in my league? All right?

0:43:56.640 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you got? J was in the last place?

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Traded away Justin Verlander, Robbie Ray, whit Meryfield and a

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>sixteenth round pick. I mean, this is this has to

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 1>be some kind of crazy fire sale for Vladimir Guerrero Jr.

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>And a third round pick and you keep players forever.

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Four years? Has lad already been kept? I've been kept

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>one year, for three more, for three more years. He

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>gets vlad a third round pick, he gets lad In Verlander,

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Ray, Merryfield and who is this Robbie Ray Verlander? Wit?

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:40.640
<v Speaker 1>That's it? And I like a late pick. Is that

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a fair trade? I don't know, what do you think?

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:47.279
<v Speaker 1>It seems like a trade that if it happened in

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:51.359
<v Speaker 1>my league I would be pretty frustrated about. I mean,

0:44:51.400 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it isn't it's a lot to give up. I'm like,

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we just talked about verlind top three pitcher in baseball,

0:44:57.120 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Ray, top thirty five starting pick. You're in Fantasy

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 1>baseball and with Merrifield, who position, versatility, second base, outfield, batting,

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it all right, Well, maybe it's not so bad because

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:11.960
<v Speaker 1>he's a third round pick and Vlader mc guireo is

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be like a borderline first second round pick

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and Fantasy next year keep him for three more years.

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>He seems like, what side are you on? I don't

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:24.799
<v Speaker 1>even know what. It seems like the person who gave

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 1>up Verlander give up a little bit too much. You

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:30.880
<v Speaker 1>get Lad Yeah, and a third round pick and a

0:45:30.960 --> 0:45:33.279
<v Speaker 1>third round pick. I mean that's not nothing. Yeah, but

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:35.360
<v Speaker 1>like you can't even keep lad forever. You can just

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:38.080
<v Speaker 1>keep for the next three years. But he has him late,

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:43.200
<v Speaker 1>he has him round. It's not it's not one of

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the worst keeper lead. I don't think it's hard. I've

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:48.279
<v Speaker 1>heard like the worst things have happened in my keeper leave.

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 1>He would have lad in the fourteenth next year, that

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it's twelfth, in the tenth. It's I think it's not egregious,

0:45:55.640 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>but I would slightly lean that giving up Verlander winch

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in Robbie raised a little bit. So to me, it's basically,

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>let's say Radford Orlander. Okay, we have any issue with

0:46:06.960 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that because I wouldn't and no issue with that. Okay,

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:12.400
<v Speaker 1>take that out of it, so that it's whit Maryfield

0:46:12.440 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and Robbie Ray for a third. It's so egregious in

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a keeper league. I'm fine with that. I have no complaint.

0:46:22.520 --> 0:46:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean what Maryfield himself was like a third round pick, right, agree?

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>And Robbie raising it top thirty five streakout, it's not,

0:46:34.200 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not, it's I have I have no issue with.

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I have no issue with doing that. Now this person,

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:45.239
<v Speaker 1>obviously this keeper trade, Yes, the little he couldn't. He

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:47.799
<v Speaker 1>could have shopped around, but who knows if he gets

0:46:47.840 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 1>better than this, I don't know. How are you doing

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in that league? To the bash bro No bash is

0:46:54.680 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the one day the trade though? Got Verlander? Yeah, interesting

0:47:01.640 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>hometown hellers in first home down. Hello, he's a Jaguars fan,

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 1>right all right, shout and Jeff the Jets fans in

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:13.440
<v Speaker 1>third alright, So Greggy and all his boys right at

0:47:13.480 --> 0:47:19.959
<v Speaker 1>the top. Let's get the Blue Jays bullet out of nowhere.

0:47:20.000 --> 0:47:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday Ken Giles was placed on the I L where

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 1>we're like, all right, who's gonna be the closer? I

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 1>believe Frankie tweeted out Joe Bie and Jeannie probably the

0:47:27.239 --> 0:47:29.360
<v Speaker 1>most likely candidate, not the only person tweeted out. Everybody

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of assumed that's what would be. Daniel Hudson came

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 1>on in the eighth inning last night, gets the last

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 1>out clear uh in the fire storm here, I had

0:47:37.480 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to clear it out, does his job, then puts himself

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:41.479
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the storm in the ninth inning,

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:43.959
<v Speaker 1>but then gets out of that as well. Daniel Hudson

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 1>gets the first opportunity, Will he get the next opportunity?

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I would lean that way as of right now. They

0:47:49.560 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 1>brought Joe Bijanie in in the eighth ending with runners

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:54.880
<v Speaker 1>on first and second in an eight three game, and

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:57.839
<v Speaker 1>clearly not a save opportunity. They just you know, they're

0:47:57.840 --> 0:47:59.399
<v Speaker 1>trying to close out the game, but they bring Joe

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:02.960
<v Speaker 1>big Yegini in. Uh, he does not perform well. Before

0:48:03.000 --> 0:48:06.360
<v Speaker 1>we know it, it's eight six and it's a safe situation.

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:10.879
<v Speaker 1>So Daniel Hudson comes in in that eighth ending puts,

0:48:11.000 --> 0:48:13.080
<v Speaker 1>puts the fire out and then also puts pitches. The

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:18.360
<v Speaker 1>ninth allows one walk with three strikeouts. I would assume,

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I would assume Daniel Hudson gets the next save, Greg,

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but it wouldn't surprise me if it's like a committee,

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 1>if it's him and Joe Biagini. For now, it sucks

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:29.279
<v Speaker 1>because Ken Giles was actually performing really well. You know,

0:48:29.480 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 1>if you've listened to this podcast or show for years now,

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you've known I'm not really the biggest Ken Giles fan,

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>but I mean this year he has been otherworldly. Fifteen

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 1>case for nine, one point zero eight r a one

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 1>point zero four whip me Shrike, Greg. Ken Giles has

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:48.680
<v Speaker 1>been amazing eleven saves on the season as well. That

0:48:48.760 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of comes with the territory of being the closer

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:52.560
<v Speaker 1>for the Toronto Blue Jays because they don't win that

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:54.960
<v Speaker 1>many games. But this is a big loss for Ken

0:48:55.040 --> 0:48:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Giles owners. So if you're if you lost him, you're

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:01.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna want to be aggressive on Daniel Hudson. I would

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:03.759
<v Speaker 1>say he is one A and no, it's he's one.

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>He's one, he's not one A. And then and then

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and then job Jeanie's too. But we'll see what happens

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of save opportunities. Yeah, you know we

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:12.840
<v Speaker 1>when we last talking about Ken Giles was in relation

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to Craig Kimbroll, right like where did Giles fall on

0:49:16.080 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that scale? And I believe we ultimately decided he was

0:49:20.400 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 1>one spot after Kimberrell or or right out of the

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:24.759
<v Speaker 1>top ten I thought it was inside of the top

0:49:24.800 --> 0:49:30.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve um, right outside the top ten um. And there's

0:49:30.280 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this one hurts because Giles has been really, really good.

0:49:32.160 --> 0:49:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I know in the past it's been very volatile Ken Giles,

0:49:35.520 --> 0:49:38.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly in his years in Houston, but he's been really

0:49:38.520 --> 0:49:40.960
<v Speaker 1>good this year for Toronto. Daniel Hudson I don't have

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:43.600
<v Speaker 1>much trusting Like who would you rather own, Sean Kelly

0:49:43.760 --> 0:49:51.200
<v Speaker 1>or Daniel Hudson. I would take. We don't know how

0:49:51.320 --> 0:49:53.680
<v Speaker 1>long Ken Giles is going to be out. Daniel Hudson

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:56.160
<v Speaker 1>may have the job for a day, he meant not

0:49:56.400 --> 0:49:59.319
<v Speaker 1>get the next opportunity like when did Bigini last pitched?

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:00.799
<v Speaker 1>He pitched last, like, I have no idea he did.

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 1>He did. He was terrible. Yeah, he was the one

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:06.800
<v Speaker 1>night it was eight to three. He put them into that.

0:50:07.440 --> 0:50:11.799
<v Speaker 1>He made the game eight six, and then Daniel Hudson

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:14.479
<v Speaker 1>came in and put out the fire. So I would

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:18.560
<v Speaker 1>probably still lean with Shaun Kelly because it's probably gonna be, like,

0:50:18.640 --> 0:50:20.799
<v Speaker 1>we know, he's gonna get the same opportunities moving forward.

0:50:20.840 --> 0:50:23.480
<v Speaker 1>For now, I still think that, you know, by the

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:25.439
<v Speaker 1>All Star break or maybe after the All Star break,

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Jose mc clurk is is the guy ends up being

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the closer again. I mean, the Rangers have kind of

0:50:30.360 --> 0:50:32.400
<v Speaker 1>hinted at that, but you're right there, we don't we

0:50:32.400 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know that Daniel Hudson is the guy. So just

0:50:34.160 --> 0:50:36.480
<v Speaker 1>because we know Sean Kelly is the Rangers closer for now,

0:50:36.480 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I would lean him. But I don't really love either situation,

0:50:39.600 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess understandably understandably, so um Chuck Hilly definitely the

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:46.480
<v Speaker 1>guy that I would choose over Daniel Hudson. I used

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to love Danie Hudson as a start of Arizoner, Like

0:50:48.320 --> 0:50:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I always thought he would be really good and then

0:50:50.160 --> 0:50:52.000
<v Speaker 1>he had. I guess it was Tommy John and has

0:50:52.080 --> 0:50:53.560
<v Speaker 1>not been. He used to be a top prospect for

0:50:53.600 --> 0:50:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the White Sox back in the day. Correct, and he

0:50:56.000 --> 0:50:59.279
<v Speaker 1>started and he started with the White Sox's supposed to

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:01.960
<v Speaker 1>be started your prospect, he did. He was jacked by

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 1>the White Sox and came over. That's very funny. You

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 1>know who got traded for uh, Edwin Jackson. Jackson's funny one.

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Now that on the same team toge how about that?

0:51:16.960 --> 0:51:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Ah Man. Yeah, So earlier on in his career, I

0:51:19.560 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 1>thought he was gonna be really good for the White

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Sox to so. Yeah, so he had to Tommy John surgeries,

0:51:26.480 --> 0:51:28.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what it was. He went under one Tommy John

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in twelve. A year later he retour it and did

0:51:31.680 --> 0:51:36.279
<v Speaker 1>it again, and that completely sapped him in my opinion. Yeah,

0:51:36.320 --> 0:51:38.719
<v Speaker 1>but I mean he's actually performed well so far this year,

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 1>um right around a strikeout for any eight point seven

0:51:44.200 --> 0:51:46.799
<v Speaker 1>case per nine three point three zero e ar a. Uh.

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:49.360
<v Speaker 1>The walks have been an issue for him. His underlying

0:51:49.480 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers like x fips here and not good when when

0:51:52.080 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 1>it comes to UH to Daniel Hudson. That's why I

0:51:54.360 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 1>thought Joebigini was going to get the job because over

0:51:57.040 --> 0:51:59.439
<v Speaker 1>all his numbers and his underlying numbers were just better

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:02.080
<v Speaker 1>than Daniel Hudson. But you know the fact that he

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 1>actually converted a save already, I think that's that's going

0:52:04.600 --> 0:52:06.839
<v Speaker 1>to help his cause moving forward. So something to pay

0:52:06.840 --> 0:52:09.080
<v Speaker 1>attention to. But if you lost Ken Giles, I would

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:13.759
<v Speaker 1>probably be fort to five percent of my fab on

0:52:14.000 --> 0:52:15.840
<v Speaker 1>on Daniel Hudson, just to make sure I have what

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I assumed to be the next man up. Let's see

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:21.960
<v Speaker 1>what happens over the weekend too. Yeah. Absolutely, I wouldn't

0:52:21.960 --> 0:52:23.520
<v Speaker 1>think we wait and see. I don't I don't really

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:25.359
<v Speaker 1>want Dannie Hudson. I know he's been good this year.

0:52:25.360 --> 0:52:26.759
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't really want. But if you played in a

0:52:26.800 --> 0:52:29.239
<v Speaker 1>fifteen team or Greg, I mean, there's not gonna be many.

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Like the speculative closers, they don't come around very often.

0:52:34.200 --> 0:52:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you lost Ken Giles, you might not have

0:52:36.920 --> 0:52:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a choice but to be aggressive on Daniel Hudson. Let's um,

0:52:40.680 --> 0:52:42.440
<v Speaker 1>we got five minutes ago, so let's be the best

0:52:42.440 --> 0:52:45.200
<v Speaker 1>best forever. Cool? Yeah, let's go all right, see best

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:47.879
<v Speaker 1>best forever. Yesterday on the program, I gave out again

0:52:48.080 --> 0:52:50.320
<v Speaker 1>starting five minutes from now, it was the Indians and

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the Reds. I had over nine and a half. They

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 1>got stuck at nine. That's a loss for me. Uh.

0:52:54.560 --> 0:52:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Frank also lost his two from yesterday. He liked the Phillies.

0:52:58.000 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Zac Evlin was really really well. Um, and you also

0:53:01.160 --> 0:53:03.600
<v Speaker 1>like San Diego Joey Lucas who also pitched well, but

0:53:03.760 --> 0:53:06.560
<v Speaker 1>their defense let them down. Today we're gonna get back

0:53:06.680 --> 0:53:09.919
<v Speaker 1>on the board, and for me, first one that stands

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 1>out is the Dimebacks and Nationals. Dimebacks are a slight favorite,

0:53:13.200 --> 0:53:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a much once two, but it's Grinky agains Eric Freddy,

0:53:15.880 --> 0:53:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll think Greggy, Yeah that actually, Uh, that stuck out

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to me as well. I'm gonna go in a similar situation,

0:53:23.200 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a really good picture who's on the road. And we've

0:53:24.960 --> 0:53:28.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about this before. It seems like whenever we get

0:53:28.560 --> 0:53:30.879
<v Speaker 1>a really good picture who's on the road, they are

0:53:31.000 --> 0:53:33.040
<v Speaker 1>not as big of a favorite as they should be.

0:53:33.200 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm looking at Matt Boyd and the Detroit Tigers

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 1>going up against Homer Bailey in the Kansas City Chiefs,

0:53:40.800 --> 0:53:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and Greg, you're getting the Detroit Tigers at a minus

0:53:42.960 --> 0:53:46.120
<v Speaker 1>one two money line. So I like Matt Boyd and

0:53:46.120 --> 0:53:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the Detroit Tigers to get it done today against the

0:53:47.960 --> 0:53:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City Royals. Alright, I got here? Still you got here.

0:53:52.040 --> 0:53:56.040
<v Speaker 1>We've been all over this Tiger's Royals series because I

0:53:56.120 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 1>mean both teams suck. Is that so that's why we're

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in on? Yeah, because I mean, like they can. The

0:54:03.120 --> 0:54:07.719
<v Speaker 1>decision of these games could easily be swung. They're both

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:10.239
<v Speaker 1>not good teams. Spencer Turmboll either day, we talked about it.

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:12.840
<v Speaker 1>He was in a good spot to win, but I

0:54:12.880 --> 0:54:16.600
<v Speaker 1>believe the bullpen blew would after we left. Oh this

0:54:16.760 --> 0:54:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is really good. What do you got? I like the

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Rangers a lot tonight and plus two ten I was

0:54:24.520 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at that. I just don't know that I trust

0:54:27.160 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Sampson on the road. I looked into his home

0:54:29.000 --> 0:54:31.560
<v Speaker 1>road splits because he doesn't have a two star week

0:54:31.600 --> 0:54:32.799
<v Speaker 1>next week, and I think a lot of people are

0:54:32.800 --> 0:54:34.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna be in on Adrian Sampson for his two star

0:54:34.840 --> 0:54:36.880
<v Speaker 1>week next week. Both of those starts are at home,

0:54:36.920 --> 0:54:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's why when I looked at the home road

0:54:38.200 --> 0:54:40.440
<v Speaker 1>splits actually had a bit on him. Last night, I

0:54:40.600 --> 0:54:43.600
<v Speaker 1>got slightly outbid, so I didn't get him. But tonight

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:45.759
<v Speaker 1>he's on the road in Fenway and he's got something

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:47.400
<v Speaker 1>like a like a low two z r A at

0:54:47.440 --> 0:54:49.520
<v Speaker 1>home and an earrator on six on the road. Right,

0:54:49.600 --> 0:54:52.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm just seeing like Sampson's pitch better as of late. Yeah,

0:54:53.120 --> 0:54:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and two tens is too big and he's just too

0:54:55.040 --> 0:54:57.040
<v Speaker 1>big a dog. I get what you're saying here with

0:54:57.160 --> 0:54:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the with the value, Like if you're a red Sox

0:54:59.120 --> 0:55:01.120
<v Speaker 1>standard and there's no you touch this game, I'm minus

0:55:01.160 --> 0:55:03.400
<v Speaker 1>two is way too big coat. I just think I

0:55:03.480 --> 0:55:06.120
<v Speaker 1>just think this number is way, way, way too big.

0:55:06.200 --> 0:55:07.680
<v Speaker 1>You can make you make a bit of a property here.

0:55:07.719 --> 0:55:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Plus two ten. Yeah, I think people are just looking

0:55:09.440 --> 0:55:13.280
<v Speaker 1>at Adrian Sampson and they're just not like fantasy owners

0:55:13.360 --> 0:55:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and analysts alike. We didn't really know how good this

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:17.360
<v Speaker 1>guy was pitching until we looked it up over the weekend.

0:55:17.800 --> 0:55:19.520
<v Speaker 1>The last five stars, he's actually been pretty good. So

0:55:19.960 --> 0:55:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the books are kind of reflecting that sentiment

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:24.839
<v Speaker 1>that they don't know how good that Adrian Sampson has pitched.

0:55:24.880 --> 0:55:26.960
<v Speaker 1>So I would agree with you that there's value to

0:55:27.000 --> 0:55:29.640
<v Speaker 1>be had at plus two ten, Greg, But overall, I

0:55:29.800 --> 0:55:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't really have a good feel for Adrian Sampson

0:55:32.400 --> 0:55:34.759
<v Speaker 1>and the Rangers tonight. Yeah, that's fair. I'm just taking

0:55:34.760 --> 0:55:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the value. That's really what I'm looking at. Yeah, like

0:55:36.719 --> 0:55:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you could sprinkle something on it, but it's not something

0:55:39.040 --> 0:55:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that I would put my normal unit amount. I agree,

0:55:41.200 --> 0:55:43.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not my best bet forever. That's the Arizona Diamondbacks

0:55:43.880 --> 0:55:47.840
<v Speaker 1>against the Gnats tonight. But my other bet that I like,

0:55:47.960 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you right now plus to ten. That's great.

0:55:51.040 --> 0:55:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Texas in Baltimore in Boston, excuse me. Adrian Sampson on

0:55:55.120 --> 0:55:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the mound for the Texas Rangers tomorrow on the show,

0:55:58.120 --> 0:56:00.799
<v Speaker 1>will be joined by Mike florial hopefully, Yeah, I gotta

0:56:00.800 --> 0:56:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I gotta contact him and confirmed that, but I would

0:56:02.600 --> 0:56:04.040
<v Speaker 1>assume he's good to go. All right. We'll we joined

0:56:04.080 --> 0:56:05.760
<v Speaker 1>by Mike florio Is to take a look at the weekend.

0:56:05.920 --> 0:56:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Weaver's Adrian Samson, one of these two star pitchers you

0:56:08.120 --> 0:56:10.520
<v Speaker 1>may want to consider bidding on. As Frank did, I

0:56:10.520 --> 0:56:13.239
<v Speaker 1>will also take a look, Um, we'll take a look

0:56:13.239 --> 0:56:15.480
<v Speaker 1>at everything that he needed over baseball for the weekend.

0:56:15.719 --> 0:56:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you right now, tell you right now. We're

0:56:18.480 --> 0:56:21.640
<v Speaker 1>going to discuss the NBA Finals, like Game six is tonight.

0:56:22.280 --> 0:56:25.359
<v Speaker 1>You're probably gonna talk They're gonna be talking about there's

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:28.440
<v Speaker 1>game seven, there's a Game seven, or the Raptors have

0:56:28.560 --> 0:56:31.040
<v Speaker 1>conquered their first championship in NBA history. We're gonna do it.

0:56:32.000 --> 0:56:34.759
<v Speaker 1>So and we get Mike's thoughts too, because Mike I

0:56:34.960 --> 0:56:37.000
<v Speaker 1>heart Knicks fan. He wanted Kevin Duran on the team

0:56:37.000 --> 0:56:39.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. So well, we'll talk a little bit about it.

0:56:39.160 --> 0:56:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's say we spend ten minutes out of the hour

0:56:41.880 --> 0:56:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that we have Michael Florio on, is that fair? Greek?

0:56:44.040 --> 0:56:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I think ten minutes. I think that I think that's reasonable.

0:56:45.960 --> 0:56:47.160
<v Speaker 1>But I want to get very clear. We're gonna do it.

0:56:47.360 --> 0:56:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Get back last early first half of the first second.

0:56:50.320 --> 0:56:52.759
<v Speaker 1>So all right, I want to thank everybody for all

0:56:52.800 --> 0:56:54.759
<v Speaker 1>their help downstairs. I know it's been uh, you know,

0:56:54.760 --> 0:56:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of trouble here today give the technical issues.

0:56:57.400 --> 0:57:00.600
<v Speaker 1>But podcasts look good to goes. We appreciate you guys listening,

0:57:00.760 --> 0:57:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and we've got tomorrow with Florida. Frank Staffel, I'm great exhaustment.

0:57:03.640 --> 0:57:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for listening to the best friends

0:57:05.760 --> 0:57:08.600
<v Speaker 1>forever you're on the Fantasy Sports Radier Network. Will do

0:57:08.680 --> 0:57:10.600
<v Speaker 1>all go tomorrow, We hope