WEBVTT - McDonalds Sales Fall, US Tech Earnings

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Affo card playing Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Just men sitting in for Alex Steele here today. I'm

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 2>pol swhen you're live here on a Bloomberg Interactive Brokers Studio.

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Earnings Day, Big Earning, State's Big earnings week actually coming

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 2>up a lot of tech names. We'll keep an eye

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>on that. The story of the morning is, I think

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of just from the earning's perspective, is Ben McDonald's.

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 2>It's been in the news a lot recently with Coli breakout,

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 2>cole Ye break up. Anyway, Stock put out some numbers today.

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 2>I thought they were okay, but some international weakness. Same

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 2>store sales still negative. That's a challenge for them. They

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 2>try to build traffic there. Again, this quarter does not

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 2>include some of the concerns that they've seen over recent weeks.

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Michael Halen joins US senior restaurant in food service analysts

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 2>for Bloomberg Intelligence. Hey Mike, what did you make from

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 2>McDonald's in the latest quarter, and then like, maybe more importantly,

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:10.639
<v Speaker 2>what is management saying about kind of what they expect

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 2>their fourth quarter traffic.

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 3>To look like.

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Unfortunately, they didn't give us too much information about

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 4>the fourth quarter. I'd say the biggest takeaway from this

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 4>call and the reason why the stock is up right now,

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 4>although it's you know, not knocking to cover off the ball,

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 4>is the fact that they their initiatives, including the five

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 4>dollar value meal Buntdill, the five dollars meal deal I

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 4>should say, the Chicken Big Mac, and some of the

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 4>other initiatives better operations, had actually led to a mid

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 4>single digit same store sales increase and positive traffic for

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 4>the first three weeks of October, and so the streets

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 4>kind of taken that as a positive. Right now, in

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 4>terms of the fourth quarter, it was, you know, they

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 4>didn't give us much information. We did get a nice

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 4>report from Bloomberg second measured Data yesterday that showed Seamstar

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 4>sales were down nine percent last week, so that basically

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 4>wiped out the mid signal digit gain and they're probably

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.679
<v Speaker 4>a little bit from like flat to upp modestly here

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 4>in October, right And so yeah, it's it was kind

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 4>of a good news bad news last couple of days

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 4>for McDonald's.

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, John, you were asking, what is a five dollars

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 2>meal deal include? It includes a micdouble or a McChicken sandwich,

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 2>small fries, four piece chicken, McNuggets, and a small soft

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 2>drink that's.

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 5>Solid for five dollars.

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 6>So that's what I missed. The proper dollar menu, Yes

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 6>they were, but I was always a big fan of

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 6>that in college. But I would point out, like in

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 6>twenty fifteen, you saw other companies like Chipotle that were

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 6>hit by E. Coli outbreaks and unfortunately at that time,

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 6>chapotely had to temporary close a number of restaurants on

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 6>the West Coast. What do you think we can glean

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 6>from other instances when this has happened in the restaurant

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 6>industry and how quickly this could be cleared up?

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well we think this is very different than Chipotle.

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 4>So a big part of it is just the operational differences.

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, McDonald's is a clothes kitchen. You know, it

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 4>turned out to be the slivered onions, and so it

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 4>was one item it wasn't you know, beef patties spread

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 4>across many different products. Right, it was just the onions

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 4>served in the quarter pounders with cheese. So we think

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 4>this outbreak will be smaller than we saw with a

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 4>lot of other chains. Chipotle was also unique. Chipotle same

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 4>star sales dropped for five straight quarters. They were down

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 4>twenty percent that first year. But you know, their food

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 4>is out in the open, right, it's behind a sneeze guard,

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 4>but you know it can get you know, contaminated by

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 4>multiple different employees, even some of the customers potentially, right.

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 4>So it's a much harder operation to get right at Chipotle,

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 4>And for some of those reasons, we think it's gonna

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 4>be a lot shorter, and it's gonna be a lot shallower,

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 4>you know. That being said, I think fourth quarter same

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 4>store sales are definitely going to take a hit. I

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 4>think people are going to be turned off from McDonald's.

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 4>I think it will probably spread a little bit into

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 4>the first quarter next year. But McDonald's is working hard

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 4>to get those same US same store sales kind of

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:16.359
<v Speaker 4>back on the right trunk. You know, it's gonna be

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 4>about value. There's gonna be more, you know, the five

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 4>dollars meal deal is going to go through your end

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 4>and expect to see more of those type promotions next year.

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 4>They're gonna roll out in everyday Value menu in the

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 4>first quarter. That's should should help boost results next year.

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 4>You know, better operations, more chicken sales like the Chicken

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 4>Big Mac, more digital sales, and they even hinted at

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 4>some fourth quarter food innovation coming out. So they're working

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 4>hard to try to try to course correct here.

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 6>Something with McDonald's I always like to keep an eye

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 6>on for a telltale sign of consumer confidence is the

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 6>French fry indicator because you can tell if how French

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 6>fries are done and how the number of people or

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 6>fries can indicate sort of sentiment, what do you think

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 6>with sort of the latest earnings and what you can

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 6>glean from that and what that really means when it

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 6>comes to what consumer confidence can tell us when the

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 6>French freredicator.

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, listen, I'm not looking at the French fry indicator

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 4>to be honest, you know, but but you know what

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.559
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing and what we think will continue to see

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 4>is low income consumers struggling. And so McDonald's that their

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 4>strong result in the first three weeks of October. A

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 4>lot of that was driven by being able to track

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 4>low income consumers in with a very strong price point.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 4>And you know, but inflation continues to hurt these low

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 4>income consumers. Right we see this ke shaped economy where

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 4>low income consumers are really pulling back on their restaurants spending.

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 4>But right now, asset prices are near you know, a

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 4>lot of them are near all time high. Stock the

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 4>US stock markets near an all time high, Gold and

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 4>silver have been ripping higher, bitcoins approaching another all time high.

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 4>Home prices have held in throughout the higher rates and

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 4>everything else in our near all time highs. And so

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 4>we think, you know, upper middle income, middle income, high

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 4>higher income consumers are all doing well and spending, and

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 4>you know, our chains are trying to attract those customers.

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 2>So, Mike, you, in your research coverage universe, what's kind

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 2>of the best name or two or three that kind

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 2>of standout as or sector in a restaurant business that

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 2>you like better than others?

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Well, I think past Casual is kind of outperformed

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:23.799
<v Speaker 4>a bit that some of the names we cover anyway,

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 4>not that the entire industry, but Wingstop has done a

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 4>great job attracting both younger and higher income consumers into

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 4>their brand and they're absolutely knocking to cover off the ball.

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, Chipotle has done a great job with their

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 4>digital sales and strategic part pricing and they're continuing to

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 4>draw consumers that see value on the plate there. And

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 4>then Texas Roadhouse is another one that's absolutely crushed it.

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 5>You know, we're not super.

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 4>High on casual dining, but they've been a machine man.

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 4>They're they're driving people into the restaurant with a lot

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 4>of value on that plate, right, and a very good experience.

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 4>And that's another one that's that's killing it. I think

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 4>there's Seams sourch sales are actually even better than Chipotle's

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:08.679
<v Speaker 4>over the last five years, trailing.

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 3>So okay, all.

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, Mike.

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Always good to catch up with you and get the

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 2>latest on the restaurant biz. And McDonald's here today with

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 2>their earnings stock trading a little bit higher. Here McMichael Halem.

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 2>He's a senior restaurant and food service analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple.

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 5>Card Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Jess meant sitting in for Alex Steele on Paul Sweeney.

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 2>We are live here on Bloomberg Interactive Brokers Studio, streaming

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 2>live on YouTube as well. So go check us out there.

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Big Tech Earnings it starts today after the close with

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 2>your friends at Google, and then we're gonna hear from

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, Meta and everybody else along the line, Apple

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 2>and Amazon and all that kind of good good stuff.

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 2>So when you want to talk tech company, you want

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 2>to talk tech earnings, you need to talk to Gene Monster,

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 2>managing partner and co founder at Loop Ventures. I think

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the more tenured reasonable voices on all things technology. Gene,

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much for joining us here. Let's start with Google.

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna hear from them after the close. Year This

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 2>stacks ABO up a little over twenty percent, but it

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 2>just feels like there's some concerns around Google in their

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 2>core search business, perhaps under some type of threat from AI.

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 2>How do you position the Google story here and what

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 2>will you be looking for?

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 7>Paul, you nailed it. I mean that is what I

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 7>would identify as the pressure point, the single piece that

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 7>matters the most. This is more important than the Google

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 7>Cloud number. A lot of investors are going to be

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 7>focusing on the Google Cloud, but keep in mind clouds

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 7>call it twelve percent of revenue. Search is just over

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:49.839
<v Speaker 7>fifty and cloud is not in front of some existential

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 7>threat related to AI. And so the quick backstory is

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 7>that Google Search in the March quarter was up fourteen

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 7>percent year of year. It was up fourteen percent in

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 7>the June quarter, so showed some surprising strength quarter to quarter.

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.719
<v Speaker 7>There the streets looking for plus twelve. But this is

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 7>where the plot thickens is that in the September quarter,

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 7>this will be the first full quarter where AI overviews

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 7>powered Google Search in the US. They launched in May,

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 7>so it got a partial quarter in the June quarter,

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 7>but we're going to see the first full quarter. And

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 7>then they launched another one hundred countries in the month

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 7>of October, so that's going to impact the December results.

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 7>But the reason why this search number is so important

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 7>is that if in fact the US search business holds

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 7>together for the first full quarter, that would be the

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 7>most I think substantial data point that Google investors can

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 7>have to feel comfortable about how this transition over the

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 7>next one two five years is going to go for Google,

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 7>that they're not going to lose share to the likes

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 7>of Open Ai, and so I'm really focused on that number.

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 7>Just one other kind of the inside baseball here. Google

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 7>doesn't break out US search revenue, so we're not going

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 7>to get really a clean look at that number. It's

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 7>just a global number. They do break out Google revenue

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 7>in the US. It was up eighteen percent in the

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 7>Just Reporter quarter. It's expected to be up twelve percent

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 7>in the September quarter. So if they do better than

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 7>that twelve I think it's going to be a good

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 7>view of AI overviews and keep Google investors confident that

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 7>this company can navigate this seismic change.

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 6>Of course, as you know, Gene, we're going to have

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 6>meta platforms after the bell on Wednesday, And when you

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 6>look here to date for Meta up about sixty six

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 6>percent compared to about twenty percent roughly for Google. What

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 6>are you watching when it comes to meta and the

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 6>AI story.

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 7>I mean, then the bars much higher the plus twenty

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 7>four the streets looking for I think eighteen percent growth

0:10:55.080 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 7>for this quarter or twenty two I should say it

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 7>peaked at twenty four percent. Growth is at twenty two percent.

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it really comes down to their advertising growth

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 7>and ultimately if they can continue to keep that going,

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 7>you know, as impacting all their business. Another important factor

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 7>is their daily active users three point three billion. I mean,

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 7>this remarkable number, up six percent year of a year,

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 7>is up seven percent in the previous quarter. They just

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 7>keep cranking, and I think it's testimony to how addictive

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 7>Metas products are just really incredible.

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.839
<v Speaker 2>And the stock market agrees with the genius stocks up.

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's been one of the best performers of

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of the big tech.

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 7>It games, particularly twenty four percent YEP over the past

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 7>three months, NAZEKX up seven Paul, Yeah, and it's just

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 7>continued to power forward. And I just I would stress

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 7>that point that the bar is high from Meta going

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 7>into this earnings UH trades at twenty four times. But

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 7>this is just an overall revenue growth story. And Zuckerberg

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 7>has kind of made the case to investors more recently

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 7>at their dev day that you know, they're just going

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 7>to be AI across all of their.

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Products and gene There was a time not too far

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 2>ago long ago when people are worre concerned about the

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 2>spending at Meta, particularly on the metaverse, what's the thinking

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 2>now about how management's thinking about that.

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 7>Well, they've gotten to pass because the growth is accelerated

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 7>essentially to a kind of had bottom that right around

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 7>twelve percent and then accelerated up to twenty four percent

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 7>over the past year and a half. And so that

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 7>kind of, as I think, kept investors in a comfortable place.

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 7>But the spending on reality labs, this is the group

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 7>that's predominantly working on some form of AI glasses, something

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 7>that's more like the ray bands that they have. They're

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 7>very different than Apple's Vision Pro, but the spending on

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 7>that group continues to be aggressive, and specifically is that

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 7>they're expected to lose about twenty billion dollars this year.

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 7>I mean to put that into perspective is that on

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.719
<v Speaker 7>a similar type of initiative for Vision Pro, Apple will

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 7>spend about two billion dollars in development a year. And

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 7>so we're talking about kind of a ten x magnitude

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 7>of investment that they're making. And the answer question, Paul,

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 7>is that investors are giving Meta a pass right now.

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 7>I see their aggressive spending in reality labs as a

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 7>win win for Meta long term. If in fact these

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 7>wearables do take off with their oryan project in the

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 7>next few years, then you're going to see some revenue

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 7>growth and that would be viewed as a positive. And

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 7>if they don't, if this doesn't take off, they're going

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 7>to cut spending and that should be good for earnings.

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 7>And so, in kind of a strange twist of events,

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 7>this Reality Labs is actually setting up to be a

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 7>positive for the stock in the next couple of years

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 7>when it comes.

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 6>To people talking about the AI potential slowdown in growth.

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 6>But of course there are all those base effects right

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.079
<v Speaker 6>when it comes to big tech, because in twenty twenty two,

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 6>obviously there was such a low bar. We were in

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 6>a bear market. Earnings projections were a lot lower than

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.439
<v Speaker 6>obviously last year. Once in Nvidia had that gangbuster revenue

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 6>forecast last May in twenty twenty three, obviously the base

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 6>effects were a lot more dramatic. So when you're looking

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 6>at the kind of year over year growth, the numbers

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 6>around twenty percent for the BAG seven obviously not quite

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 6>as high as the average more than thirty percent growth

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 6>in twenty three, But what do you make of that

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 6>when you see more of the growth stocks and in

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 6>the projections for their profit growth coming more in line

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 6>with the rest of the S and P five hundred

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 6>next year.

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 7>I think investors are missing this. I think that this

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 7>may be kind of an uncomfortable I believe this is

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 7>going to be an uncomfortable truth around AI, and what

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 7>it means for big tech is that this is going

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 7>to be more significant than what I think. Investors believe.

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 7>It's going to grow faster for longer, and I think

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 7>what you just described agree with all those facts, and

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 7>ultimately there's this sense for investors that were just one

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 7>quarter away from some sort of data point that's going

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 7>to show that AIS the substance is not going to

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 7>reach the hype, and I suspect that, well, we may

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 7>get occasional data points that are to kind of the

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 7>barish case of AI. The overwhelming body of evidence we're

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 7>going to see in the quarters ahead are going to

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 7>suggest that this trend is unstoppable. And that's some pretty

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 7>high bars I like to be measured in my expectations,

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 7>but I do believe that these companies, most of them,

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 7>are going to see growth higher than what investors think.

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 7>I'm already tuned into the twenty twenty six growth numbers.

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 7>Most of them for these big companies are kind of

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 7>in the low teens range, and I suspect that the

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 7>growth will be mid to high teens.

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Gene, thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate getting

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 2>a few minutes of your time. As always, Gene Mounster.

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 2>He's a managing partner. He's a co founder at Loop

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Ventures based in Minneapolis.

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on.

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 5>Fo card Playing and Broudoto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Custumer competence data came out one away point seven. The

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 2>consensus was ninety nine point five prior period was revised

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 2>up to ninety nine point two. So a big, big

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 2>jump here relative to expectations in the last period. Let's

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 2>break it down. Jess re checking with Dana Peterson, chief

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 2>economists at the Conference Board. Dana put this number into

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 2>context for us. It seems certainly really good relative to

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 2>what the market was expecting.

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 8>Yes, definitely, consumers were on the whole pretty happy in

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 8>October certainly they think the present situation is better. And

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 8>also expectations and notably expectations for jobs were positive for

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 8>the first time in almost a year and a half.

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 8>So there's really good news out there.

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 6>So what do you think this means as far as

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 6>the direction of the economy here, Well, the.

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.479
<v Speaker 8>US economy has been doing quite well, and indeed consumers

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 8>have been driving it. We saw on the tracking data

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 8>from retail sales and also from the BEA that consumers

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 8>are buying goods, they're buying services. That's certainly supporting growth,

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 8>and we're seeing that finally show up in confidence. Indeed,

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 8>consumers were getting a little bit worried about the labor

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 8>market over the summer, but then we had those blockbuster

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 8>payrolls numbers. Most consumers are seeing their incomes rise because

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 8>wages are elevated. Most consumers are working. We are seeing

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 8>a little bit of layoffs here and there, but again,

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 8>the predominant sense among consumers, at least for this month,

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 8>is that they're okay.

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 2>How much data do you think is impacted at all

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 2>by the Fed cutting rates? Does that come into your

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 2>calculation here?

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely? We have one question where we ask about interest

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 8>rate expectations, and that measure actually ticked up. And we

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 8>do have items where consumers said that they're not as

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 8>convinced that rates are going to come off. But then

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 8>we did see some who were saying, look, the Fed

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 8>has cut interest rates. We're seeing a little bit of

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 8>improvement in that. So certainly we're going to need more

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 8>interest rate cuts before consumers pretty come out, probably come

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 8>out strongly and say yes, we're confident in this rate

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 8>cutting cycle. But consumers are starting to get out there

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 8>and buy big ticket items because they're cheaper, not so

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 8>much because interest rates are lower, but as streets ball,

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 8>we think they'll buy more cars and furniture, things that

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 8>they need to finance.

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, some pretty solid numbers also know the Conference

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Board Expectations data point came in at eighty nine point one.

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 2>That's versus revised eighty two point eight from last month.

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 2>So also in terms of expectations, better than expected. Dana Peterson,

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much for joining us. Dana Peterson a chief

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 2>economist at the Conference Board.

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg business app. You can also listen

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Jess Meant and sitting in for Alex Steel today, I'm

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 2>Paul Scoeneyer live here in our bloomergen Director Broker Studio.

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 2>We're streaming live on YouTube as well. YouTube dot com

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 2>head there, search Bloomberg Podcast or Bloomberg Live Radio. That's

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 2>where you'll find us. Speaking of YouTube, what would you

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 2>like to hear on Bloomberg Radio? Help make shows like

0:18:56.480 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 2>ours even better by taking our Bloomberg audience, Sir, visit

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 2>YouTube dot com slash Bloomberg Podcasts and click the link

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 2>in our profile or community sector to take the survey,

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 2>which is host to buy our partners over at material

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 2>Fill it out now at YouTube dot com slash Bloomberg Podcast.

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Our next guest. This is how it's gonna work post.

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:17.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna ask a question and I'm gonna turn off

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 2>my Mike and John and I are going to sit

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 2>here and listen and try to get a little bit

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 2>smarter and take notes and take notes. Neil Grossman. He's

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 2>a co founder and former CIO of K n G

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 2>Capital joints us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio.

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 2>We're in a suit today. Can remember last time I

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 2>saw you in a suit?

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 3>Neil.

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 2>We got a lot of economic data, we got right

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 2>smack in the middle of earnings. All that's important. But

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 2>I think since we have you here, I would just

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 2>love to get your opinions about how you think the

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 2>markets are digesting a big, pretty big election next Tuesday.

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Are you when you talk to clients, are you saying, hey,

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 2>if Trump wins, think this, if Harris wins, think that,

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 2>how are you kind of positioning all that?

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Well? I think there's two levels to this. But by

0:19:58.000 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 3>the way, thank you very much for having me. It's

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 3>a pleasure as always. At least as a start, both

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 3>of the platforms seemed to be talking about spending a

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of money. So the first question is what's the

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 3>impact of that on the economy, on the FED? And

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 3>then you can try and maybe zero in on what

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 3>the theoretical differences are between the two. Look, if you look

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 3>at the economy and where we are and where we've been,

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 3>I would look at the July September FED meetings and

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 3>just scratch my head we had functionally two fairly when

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 3>one fairly weak and one moderate job number job numbers

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 3>that propelled the FED to what looked to me like

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 3>they were panicking. And it turned out, of course, with

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 3>the revision, that that really wasn't the case. So I

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 3>think where we find ourselves right now is a couple

0:20:56.320 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 3>of things. One, the labor market is fine. There are

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 3>going to be some real unusual impacts over the next

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 3>number two because of the Boeing strike and the hurricanes,

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 3>which really affected a pretty significant part of the population.

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know how to read the employment numbers now,

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 3>but I will tell you this. You know, I think

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 3>you know my daughter lives in Saint Pete. If you

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 3>go down to Saint Petersburg and you drive, and the

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 3>miles and the miles and the miles of people's lives

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 3>have been destroyed but have to be rebuilt. There is

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 3>an enormous amount of money that is going to be

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 3>put to work in this economy. Forget the fact that

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 3>we're running eight or nine percent, you know, deficits, which

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 3>is historically staggering. The biggest question you might ask yourself

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 3>is can they actually address the deficits without having a

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 3>significant economic impact, because to go from a deficit growth

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 3>rate of eight or nine to back to traditional three

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 3>percent probably will be a very difficult task.

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 9>I've heard candidates promising the world, and I don't know

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 9>how they're going to fund it. Liz Trust kind of

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 9>ran into the same problem. Where are the bond vigilantes

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 9>and all this? You're starting to see it a bit.

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 9>Look the yield curve. I mean, I think the last

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 9>time we were on we were talking about yield curve

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 9>structure and it steepened a lot. Yeah, and I suspect

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:17.919
<v Speaker 9>that the long, long, this is one of the problems

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 9>with the FED did. I mean, there was absolute panic

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 9>in the way they did things. And I mean this

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 9>concept of recalibration to me, it's an awful, laughable world word.

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 9>It's going to be recalibration is going to become the

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:31.360
<v Speaker 9>new transitory.

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 3>You know. The bottom line is they don't really know

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 3>what a neutral rate is, and they certainly don't know

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 3>what a neutral rate is when we're spending money fiscally

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 3>like its rain. So if they really wanted to try

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 3>and ease in and understand the impact, this would have

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 3>been a very slow, elongated process. Watching in the meantime,

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 3>what happened They not only cut fifty, but they've sort

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 3>of promised that they think you're going to be another

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 3>two hundred points in short order. And the first thing

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 3>that happened, of course, is the yield curves started to

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 3>steepen like this note tomorrow if you really want to

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 3>look at things. To me, you know, we've the FED

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 3>focuses on short rates, but at the end of the day,

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 3>long term interest rates are an indicator and a measure

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 3>of what you should be expecting for long term growth

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:24.479
<v Speaker 3>and how you manage, you know, the investment and capital

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 3>allocation decisions. And I don't see any reason to think

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 3>that if they keep cutting with liquidity or already its

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 3>just beyond imagination. Stocks at all time highs, very high deficits.

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 3>We're still at relatively low rates of unemployment. A lot

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 3>of the wage settlements have been very large, by the way,

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean the last one, which is and we have

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 3>not seen most of the government workers union workers ask

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 3>can you imagine I mean, I think there are twenty

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 3>five million people employed by governments in this country, which

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 3>is about one in six. Can you imagine if these

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 3>if those union workers are going to insist in the

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 3>same nature of wage agreements going forward. I mean, this

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 3>can't be.

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Handled so, but I mean in terms of the deficits

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 2>in the national debt. I started working on Wall Street

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 2>in June of nineteen eighty six. It was an issue.

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Then it's still an issue.

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 9>Debt clock, Yes, it is.

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 3>And do you know what do you know what the

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 3>unfunded liabilities are? Stud of three hundred trillion, which is

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean that's dwarfs all the problems. Yes, and part

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 3>of that is Look, social Security is going to run

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 3>out of money trust fund and then that will go

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 3>on to the budget as well.

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 9>So there.

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Look, I don't know if there's time left to solve

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 3>the problems or not. I think I don't think history

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 3>teaches you that you can avoid reality. And our deficits

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 3>relative to the nation's capacity are are certainly put causing

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 3>the seams or may cause the seams to burst. And

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, the sooner you deal with a problem, the

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 3>less you usually have to do to solve it, and

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 3>the easier the transit.

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 2>But there's just no political there's never ever ever been

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:09.239
<v Speaker 2>in political will to do well.

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 3>How do you, Paul, how do you? How do you look?

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 3>I think something on the order of sixty five percent

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 3>of the of the working populations pays no net taxes.

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 2>And since they pay no net taxes.

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, when you look at all the benefits and add

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 3>it all together, how do you tell people? And I

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 3>have this discussion with a lot of people. I mean,

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 3>how do you tell them that they can't they're going

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 3>to lose something. That's a very difficult thing to start with.

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 3>And then you end up with these discussions about well,

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 3>you're social Security and Medicare Medicaid need to be cut

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 3>and they said, well I paid for this, said, well,

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 3>you really didn't pay for it when you look at

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 3>the projections. The problem is you're relying on the future

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 3>to continue to pay for your problem. And I don't

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 3>know the answer to this. I think we've missed opportunity

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 3>after opportunity to address it.

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 2>And you know, and again, as john said, I don't

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 2>hear either candidate talking about that.

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Nobody can directly even their problem. What's his name? McCarthy

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 3>and Mike Johnson, both of them, when asked every time

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 3>they sit down to negotiate, the first thing they say,

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 3>or entitlements are sacricient, they won't be touched that's functionally

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:17.360
<v Speaker 3>I think. I think the actual number is we historically

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 3>take in eighteen percent of GDP and traditionally spend twenty

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 3>one percent. And by the way, that eighteen percent is

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 3>consistent across almost every tax regimen we've ever seen. But

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 3>if you went back twenty years ago, one third of

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 3>government spending of that eighteen percent was entitlements. We're beginning

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 3>to push. I think we're very close to where almost

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 3>every dollar coming into the government is going out in

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 3>the form of entitlements, and we're not. You know, so

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 3>the extra eight or nine percent or above that or

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, actually, I guess it's about nine percent of

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 3>incremental spending is all deficit funded, and it's going to

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 3>get to be it's going to be a very painful.

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 9>There was a time where you had bipartisan kind of consensus,

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 9>like a committee Simpson bulls the balls, But I suspect

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 9>that environment is long gone though.

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 3>What was Phil Graham's partner's name, and the same thing, Graham.

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 9>Graham, the same thing, you know.

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 3>That's the way. I mean, it's sort of kick it

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 3>down and put it to it some sort of you know,

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 3>under the counter committee and hopefully you listen.

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 9>But again it doesn't.

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't.

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Given that dire what do you do in the financing world?

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 2>What do you do in the economic the investing world?

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 2>How do you think about it?

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 3>Field curve number one. I believe if the FED is

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 3>going to continue easing, the long end of the Yeld

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 3>curve is going to be under pressure. How high it goes,

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 3>that's up to that will be a function of inflation.

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 3>I do think you're going to start to see inflation

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 3>in ways you don't want to want to. For example,

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:54.360
<v Speaker 3>again the Southeastern issue, used cart prices are already being

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 3>pushed very high down there, cost of construction materials going high,

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Probably labor calls are going up in those ways. So

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 3>some of the broader pictures. That's not the whole United States, obviously,

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 3>but there is likely to be cost of housing, by

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 3>the way. So I think that there is a lot

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 3>of risks that you are going to see higher inflation

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 3>numbers over the next six to eighteen months just from that. Now,

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 3>was that going to be from a two and a

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 3>quarter in two and a half or is it going

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 3>to be from a three or is it two? I

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 3>don't know, but I suspect that the progress towards lower

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 3>inflation is going to find itself struggling for the moment.

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 2>So what does the Fed do November seventh, here, two

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 2>days after the election. We probably won't know, you know,

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 2>who's the one.

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 3>I suspect they have more room to say, look things

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 3>of the data since we talked about this has been

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 3>well above expectations. We'll see what the employment problem is.

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 3>The employment data could be really weak, and so they

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 3>could take say, look that number is really bad, or

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 3>they could say that number is sort of distorted by

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 3>factors beyond our control. My suspicion is as supposed to

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 3>say that unless you see an inflation rate drop to

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 3>two percent or below, and that includes a core rate

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:11.719
<v Speaker 3>which is still above three, that say, drops the two

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 3>six all of a sudden. I think they're supposed to say,

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 3>we need to you know, we've already had a significant impact,

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 3>and other things being equal, we have time to take

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 3>our take our time. I don't know if they feel

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 3>that they can do that, because I think there are

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 3>things like stock markets that they worry about more than

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 3>other things.

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 2>And they kind of it's almost like they did set

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 2>the expectations for it.

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 9>But that's the problem.

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 3>They shouldn't be setting an expect when they tell you

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:39.959
<v Speaker 3>the data dependent, I guess that's you can laugh about it.

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 3>But when they tell you the data the dependent and

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 3>the data is up in opposition to what they thought

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 3>it was going to be, that they're supposed to, you know,

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.479
<v Speaker 3>take a step back and try and understand what they

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 3>were doing. So I don't know what they do, but

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 3>I suspect given all the current data that nine months

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 3>from now, whatever you thought there, we're going to be

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 3>in the absence of a significant change. They're going to

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 3>be harder than what you thought at the front end,

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 3>and they're going to be harder than what your thought

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 3>at the back end.

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, Neil, great stuff, as always Neil Grossman. He's

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 2>the co founder and he's a former CIO of k

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 2>n G Capital. Coming into our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio.

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Just give us some thoughts here as we parse out

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 2>this market.

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Android

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's look at crude oil here. We've had a kind

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 2>of a de risking of crude oil in the last

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 2>week or so, I guess on the backs of Israel's

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 2>retaliation against around was a little bit less than expected,

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe dialing down the tensions a little bit there. But

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 2>whenever we talk about global oil, we want to talk

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 2>to Ellen Wald. She's a president of Transversal Consulting. Ellen,

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 2>what do you make of kind of what's happening the

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 2>global crude oil prices here? Is it's simply kind of

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 2>taking maybe a little bit of that geopolitical risk out

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 2>of the price of oil.

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, that's what I think we're seeing. At least yesterday

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 10>was quite the day for de risking. I think it's

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 10>Israel really made a very concerted effort to let people

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 10>believe that they were about to attack Iran's oil production

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 10>and export infrastructure, and it seemed that the market was

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 10>really taken with this, and there was definitely.

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 11>A lot of talk about, you.

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 10>Know, Israel potentially doing this and the effect it might

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 10>have on the market. And so I think that now

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 10>that that risk seems to have passed or at least

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 10>been postponed for a while. We're seeing oil prices really

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 10>come down as a result.

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 11>I do think that that fear was totally misplaced.

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 10>I think Israel cultivated an image that it was going

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 10>to do this, even though the likelihood that they would

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 10>do that was actually quite small. Also for people who

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 10>didn't actually think that that this was going to happen,

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 10>there was definitely the possibility to kind of ride this

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 10>in in an interesting way. But now that we're past

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 10>this you know, kind of hump at least right now, Uh,

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 10>there's more of an opportunity for the supply and demand

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 10>issues to you know, to come to the forefront.

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 11>And I think that's what we're seeing in oil prices now.

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 6>I'm glad you brought up supply because walk us through

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 6>how oil traders are really split right now and whether

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 6>OPEC will hike supply in December.

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, this is I think the really big issue that

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 10>you know, oil traders are looking at now because OPEK

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 10>has already you know, pushed its plans off once they

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 10>made they set up this, this whole plan for these

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 10>very gradual increases, they set it up, they announced it.

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 11>They've given the market ample time to get.

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 10>Used to this, and yet we're still seeing it being

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 10>pushed off and pushed off. Initially, OPEC's forecasters had a

0:32:56.400 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 10>much much more optimistic picture for what demand was going

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 10>to look like this year. I think then other people

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 10>did and they've really had to trim that forecast for

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 10>for demand growth back. And so as a result, the

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 10>group has pushed off its planned to increase production and

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 10>to implement this kind of gradual plan. They already pushed

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 10>it off, but they're set to start doing this December January,

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 10>and so, you know, the big question is now that

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 10>demand is looking pretty weak. You know, we're still waiting

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 10>to see what's.

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 11>Going on with China.

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 10>Is the group going to you know, make another another

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 10>push it off again? And I think that's a really

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 10>big question. There definitely seems to be a split. I

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 10>think OPEK itself doesn't know. They did recently issue a revision,

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.479
<v Speaker 10>a downward revision in their forecast, which could be an

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 10>indication that they're setting things up for another uh, you know,

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 10>another uh to push it off again when they meet

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 10>in December, but you know, no one really knows.

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 2>So Ellen, you mentioned China, What is the feeling about

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 2>demand coming out of China here, it's I guess in

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 2>the margin it's been weaker than expected. Is that something

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 2>that the market things could go into next year.

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 11>I think it is at this point.

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 10>It's very interesting because there's definitely a lot of skepticism

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:10.919
<v Speaker 10>about demand.

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 11>At China where it's going.

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 10>What this stimulus plan that they've been talking about, is

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 10>that really going to actually result in higher demand? Is

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 10>that really going to provide the kind of economic stimulus

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 10>that is needed to really, you know, push oil demand higher.

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 10>I think that there's a lot of skepticism about that.

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 10>What's interesting, though, is that the CEO of a Ramco

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:37.760
<v Speaker 10>recently spoken he's much more optimistic about demand from China.

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 11>I think that that may impart come from.

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 10>The fact that he's very much focused on crude oil

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 10>products and petrochemicals as opposed to just straight crude oil demand.

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 11>The market has been very focused on.

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 10>The diesel the distillate demand in China, which has been

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 10>rather rather disappointing, whereas I think he's much more focused

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 10>on the petrochemical demand, which he sees as growing as

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 10>opposed to just straight crude oil. Which is why there's

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 10>kind of disconnect between what a Ramco sees for China

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:13.720
<v Speaker 10>and maybe what other forecasters are are looking at for China.

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 6>As you know, especially when it comes to looking what

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 6>oil could mean for the trajectory of the global economy.

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 6>I mean, just looking right now, the Atlanta fed GP

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 6>model just got updated. It's actually for the third quarter

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 6>to two point eight percent, revised slightly lower from three

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 6>point three percent recently as well, but still nonetheless it's

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 6>been trending higher over the past month as we get

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:34.840
<v Speaker 6>more of the third quarter data coming in here. But

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 6>when it comes to OPEC and if whether or not

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 6>they push again off those plan increases, what do you

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 6>think that could translate when we're looking kind of more

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 6>globally and especially US economic growth.

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think.

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 10>It's it's really a big question right now. You know,

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 10>I don't think that you can't say, you know, it's

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 10>not bad economic growth. We're not you know, we're not

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:56.280
<v Speaker 10>in a depression. We're not we're not seeing things go backwards.

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 10>But it's just not the kind of growth numbers that

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:00.800
<v Speaker 10>we were expecting, or they that a lot of people

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 10>were expecting to happen. I do think, you know, growth

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 10>is cyclical, you know, there are these cycles and you know,

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 10>it's not like this is, you know, kind of the

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 10>end or anything like that. There's still a lot of

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 10>opportunity for growth out there. I do think it, you know,

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 10>depends on where you're looking, what indicators are looking at.

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 10>Different sectors, you know, are experiencing different different issues right now.

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:27.359
<v Speaker 10>When it comes to crude oil, I do think that

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 10>we are seeing a big shift to increased petrochemical production

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:34.240
<v Speaker 10>and and so there's a lot.

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 11>More crew that's going to that, and also.

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 10>A lot more natural gas feedstuck that's going to that

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:41.879
<v Speaker 10>as opposed to just straight crude for transportation fuels. And

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 10>so I do think that that we're seeing this as

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 10>a shift and a change in the market, and so

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 10>we need to maybe look at the numbers a little

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 10>bit differently than how we were looking at them previously.

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Ellen, how's the US or the North American oil producer

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 2>behaving these days, mournering? Are they are they supportive of

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the market or are they, you know, drill baby, Drill's

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.800
<v Speaker 2>what's going on with the North American supply source.

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 10>That's a really good question, especially because there's a lot

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 10>of speculation about kind of the fracking industry starting to

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 10>fall off, the production is gonna you know, start to

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 10>decline or at least a second grow. We're really at

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:23.280
<v Speaker 10>a high point right now. I mean we're we're having

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 10>massive amounts of production. The US is the largest producer

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 10>in the world. You know, the question is can it

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 10>go higher or should it go higher?

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 11>And I think that US crew.

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 10>To oil producers are at a very different position now

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 10>than they were two years ago, three years ago, five

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 10>years ago, certainly, And so there's a lot less emphasis

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 10>on you know, we need to drill, baby drill.

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 11>We don't need to drill, baby drill.

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:51.279
<v Speaker 10>We've got much more complicated production techniques that can get

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:53.279
<v Speaker 10>a lot more out of every well. So there isn't

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:55.760
<v Speaker 10>a need to necessarily drill new wells all the time

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 10>in order to produce those barrels. And I think that

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 10>because of the map amount of consolidation that we've seen,

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 10>they can be a lot more strategic about it. And so, no,

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 10>that doesn't mean the US oil entry is abst to

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 10>follow a cliff, but it does mean that they are

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 10>making more strategic decisions about production and how production is

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 10>going to come online, when it's going to come online,

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 10>whether it's worthwhile and that can maybe look like fewer

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 10>wells being drilled, but it doesn't necessarily mean that, you know,

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 10>we're about to hit a cliff and production's going to

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 10>necessarily decline.

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 5>Hail.

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 6>Whenever you're talking with oil traders, what are some of

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 6>the key sort of technical levels they're looking at, whether

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 6>it's a WTI or brint well.

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:39.360
<v Speaker 10>I think that there's a lot of discussion about, you know, okay,

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:42.399
<v Speaker 10>what's the point that wt t I has to hit

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 10>when it's going down in order for the US to

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 10>start buying barrels to refill the SPR, because that has

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 10>definitely resulted in some you know, increasing in the price today.

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 10>Just today the US said, oh we'd like to you know,

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 10>we're thinking about buying some more oil for the SPR,

0:38:57.200 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 10>and the prices go up.

0:38:58.520 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 11>So there's there's.

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 10>Certain it's there. I do think also that there's this

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 10>indicator for Opek. You know, Opek wants you know, ex

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:07.359
<v Speaker 10>price per barrel and they're going to do whatever they

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:07.759
<v Speaker 10>have to do.

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 11>To get it.

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 10>I think that that's that's not necessarily the case.

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 11>I do think that Opek and certainly Saudi Arabia would

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:17.360
<v Speaker 11>love to keep Brent around eighty dollars a barrel.

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 10>But I do think they realized that they may not

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 10>get that, and they're willing to work with, you know,

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 10>within the confines of what they can. But there's certainly

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:28.280
<v Speaker 10>this idea that they'd like it to be a bit higher.

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 10>They'd like it to be more closer to eighty than seventy.

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Ellen, thank you so much for joining us. Really appreciate it,

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Ellen Waller. She is the president of Transversal Consulting and

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 2>a Senior Fellow at the Atlanta Council. Joining us via

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:41.840
<v Speaker 2>zoom talking about global oil.

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:47.280
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard.

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 5>Play and Androyd Auto with the Bloomberg Business.

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:39:55.680 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 2>This is a story I've been wanting to read for

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 2>the longest time. In chess. Men's here sitting in fra

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Alex Steel and Paul Sweeney, Triple A bonds go bust

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and revealed depths of US office market crash. This is

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 2>exactly what I've been waiting for.

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 6>We're all about the office.

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I just looked down Third Avenue and I

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 2>say empty, empty, empty, half empty. Somebody owns the mortgages

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 2>on those things. Yeah, it's gonna have to come home

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:28.959
<v Speaker 2>to roost at some point. Carmen Arroyo and her team

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 2>at Bloomberg News. She's a credit reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 2>They have this story out here today, Karmer, what are

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:37.760
<v Speaker 2>you finding on some of these bonds that were triple

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:40.919
<v Speaker 2>A rated, which means I don't have any real risk here?

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 2>What's happening to some of these real estate backed bonds

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 2>that were triple A rated?

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 12>Sure? So in May we saw the first triple A

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 12>bond commercial mortgage, triple A bond being hit backed by

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:56.320
<v Speaker 12>a single office property, and then we started like digging

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:58.839
<v Speaker 12>into basically the data to see what other buildings could

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 12>get hit. And the results there's a few a ton

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:05.320
<v Speaker 12>of Like the office properties across across the US have

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 12>been distressed for years. It just takes a long time

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 12>for that to reach bond holders, and now it's starting

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 12>to get there. So we kind of like analyze the data.

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:18.399
<v Speaker 12>We saw at least like twelve other buildings are said

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 12>to have some type of loss some will be at

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 12>the TRIPLEA level, some will be just the investment grade portion.

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:26.479
<v Speaker 12>There's definitely a lot of more pain to come.

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 6>Which regions across the US are most vulnerable.

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 12>It's all over, It's all over the US. Actually we

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 12>saw there's buildings in New York, of course, Chicago, La

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 12>San Francisco, but there's also buildings in Kansas City. Like

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 12>it's it's kind of everywhere.

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 2>But if I'm holding a triple A bond, I expect

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:48.280
<v Speaker 2>to get paid back here. So what's happening to these bonds?

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:50.919
<v Speaker 2>Are they coming up for maturity and then the owner

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 2>has to refinance the bond or house this soft playing out?

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 12>Sure, so every triple A bone holder thinks they're going

0:41:56.880 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 12>to get paid back. Actually that's why you buy it.

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 12>But they, like a lot of these buildings have not

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 12>been receiving interest on the bonds for a while, and

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 12>the minute like the presoul's drop and kind of like

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 12>the owners of the buildings get rid of them or

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 12>like sell them. The losses are realized, and the gist

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 12>of it is that the buildings are worth like a

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 12>fraction of what they were worth like a few years ago.

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:23.880
<v Speaker 12>So there's just not enough money to pay back everyone,

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 12>not even the Triple A holders, and that that's the

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:29.439
<v Speaker 12>whole issue, Like the real estate is just not worth it.

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 6>When you're speaking to triple A bondholders, what are they

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 6>telling you as far as why they might still be

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 6>holding onto that and what's the risk reward.

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 12>I A lot of the Triple A bondholders will get

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 12>some money back, like the lower trenches won't. And I'm

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 12>not sure if there's some market for that type of

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 12>like those type of bonds at the bit they may

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 12>want them.

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 2>And I'm looking at I mean, you have a big

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:55.320
<v Speaker 2>take story, which means it has great graphics in addition

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 2>to being well reported, well sourced. Some of these buildings,

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:01.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean New York Chicago, Las, I mean five fifty

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 2>five West fitth Street, seven twenty five South Figaroa. I

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 2>know that building. But these things are being valued at

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 2>significant discounts, right, and some not even covering the amount

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:13.919
<v Speaker 2>of the outstanding loan. So that's where the that's where

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 2>the problems come in.

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, that's the problem. And it's also like a lot

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:19.279
<v Speaker 12>of those buildings depend on one single tenant. So the

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 12>minute that tenant's like, look my lease is up, I'm leaving.

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 12>I want a newer office. This building is really old.

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:29.400
<v Speaker 12>The bond's just shoppen price because that's where they're getting

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:29.800
<v Speaker 12>the income.

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 6>I think anytime it comes to anything revolving around real estate,

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 6>as we know very well, people want to harken back

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 6>to the global financial crisis in two thousand and eight.

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 6>But this is a very different situation, especially coming out

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 6>of the pandemic, and talk to us more about how

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:45.240
<v Speaker 6>this is a very small subset of the bond market

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 6>when you're looking at this.

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:48.840
<v Speaker 12>Yes, definitely, like there's definitely some type of eco to

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 12>the like similar to the financial crisis in the sense

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:53.760
<v Speaker 12>that like you don't really see losses on the principal

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:56.320
<v Speaker 12>level and triple A bonds like that hasn't happened since oaight.

0:43:57.520 --> 0:44:00.080
<v Speaker 12>But again, like it's just a few bonds with the

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 12>commercial mortgage backed securities market.

0:44:02.280 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 6>Right, So when you're speaking with your sources, I mean,

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 6>what are the risks of other broader ripple effects or

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:09.839
<v Speaker 6>any sort of other red flags potentially brewing. And then

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 6>maybe the off side of that where there's more optimism

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 6>of what could happen.

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:16.319
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I think like the risk is mainly for any

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 12>building that's old like and that the tenants are walking,

0:44:20.640 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 12>there's going to be issues. But if any new building that,

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 12>like you know, has a great reputation has a lot

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:29.080
<v Speaker 12>of tenants, like there's that market is kind of booming

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:31.920
<v Speaker 12>like right now in new issue markets, like buyers are

0:44:31.960 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 12>like just gobbling up the dead like, So it really

0:44:34.520 --> 0:44:35.280
<v Speaker 12>depends on the building.

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 9>I used to work in one of those buildings in

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:38.440
<v Speaker 9>the Garments Center.

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 13>Really and talk about old. The elevators would break down

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 13>at least once a week, and the elevator, the shaft,

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 13>the gears were all made out of wood.

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:50.839
<v Speaker 6>Did you ever get stuck in one?

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:53.319
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, all the how long were you?

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:44:54.120 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 9>I don't remember. Ago Fly had some beers with us.

0:44:57.560 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 2>So find back in the day karma. Is there any

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 2>sense from your reporting that the office real estate market

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 2>is at or near bottom or is anybody calling that

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 2>or too?

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:08.759
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, a lot of people are calling that. Like when

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 12>we start to see the office buildings get sold, that's

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 12>that's where we've reached the bottom and then everything is

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 12>going to go up.

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:18.640
<v Speaker 6>Is there a time period timeline as far as how

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:19.359
<v Speaker 6>long that could take.

0:45:19.480 --> 0:45:22.480
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it could take a long time because the leases

0:45:22.560 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 12>are so long that tenants may be locked in for

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:28.399
<v Speaker 12>like years, but most people are saying it's between now

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:29.640
<v Speaker 12>in the next few months.

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:33.239
<v Speaker 2>Interesting because you know there's some iconic buildings here in

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 2>your thing. I mean, six hundred California Street in San Francisco,

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:40.280
<v Speaker 2>fifteen hundred Market Street, market in Fifteenth Street in Philly.

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:43.440
<v Speaker 2>These are some big ones. The Aon Center, which was

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:46.279
<v Speaker 2>the former Sears Tower in Chicago. Look at it, I mean,

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 2>basically half of it's underwater, so crazy, crazy stuff there.

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:52.399
<v Speaker 2>We knew it was coming, but you just somebody's gonna

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 2>have to pay, unfortunately. Carmen Arroyal credit reporter for Bloomberg News,

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:58.800
<v Speaker 2>joining us here on a Bloomberg interactive broker studio. You

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 2>can read story and more stories from Bloomberg on at

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal and at Bloomberg dot com slash Big

0:46:06.040 --> 0:46:08.879
<v Speaker 2>Take again. The Big Take stories come out every day

0:46:09.320 --> 0:46:12.560
<v Speaker 2>from Bloomberg News. They're deep dive stories into really compelling stories,

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:16.879
<v Speaker 2>deeply sourced, deeply researched, great graphics, and we just love

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:18.359
<v Speaker 2>highlighting them whenever we can.

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 9>It's a great read.

0:46:19.440 --> 0:46:23.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:46:24.160 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you will get your podcasts. Listen live

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:30.800
<v Speaker 1>each weekday, ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:46:34.400 --> 0:46:37.560
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal