WEBVTT - Earnings, IMF, ETFs, and Autos (Podcast)

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Fund The Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, we got

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>earnings kicking off later this week. We want to get

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a sense from some professionals like, how should we think

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>about these these earnings? What should we be looking for?

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>What are the risks out there? So let's bring in

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Gina Martin Adams. She's our chief strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and she joins us here on our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio.

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>So we appreciate that you get the gold star. You know,

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>we've dealt with a lot until last time we talk

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to you. It seems like it's been a little bit Gina.

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>We've had a banking crisis, we've had a FED continuing

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to raise rates, market pricing in rate cuts. Let's get

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>back the fundamentals stocks earnings. What are you looking for

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>this earnings period? Well, I think it's going to be

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty ugly earning season. Remember, at the beginning of

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the year, analysts we're anticipating about a two percent drop

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in first quarter earnings. They're now anticipating an eight percent decline.

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>They are also anticipating at least a three quarter earnings

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.559
<v Speaker 1>recession that began with a fourth quarter of twenty twenty

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>two will extend through the first half of this year.

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>At the very least, probably by the end of earning season,

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll find that it will be a full four quarter

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>earnings recession extending through the third quarter, because the third

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>quarter estimate is on the verge of decline already. Wait,

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>these are your analysts. Is this is the consensus of

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street analysts? Ah, well, what do you think. Look,

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>our model says we get a five percent earnings contraction

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that was as of Our model is suggesting we were

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>headed into earnings recession as early as the middle of

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>last year. It currently says somewhere between a five and

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>seven percent earnings contraction overall on a trailing twelve month basis.

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the trailing twelve month numbers as

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>implied by the analyst consensus, it's closer to a three

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent earnings recession. That's very similar to

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the twenty fifteen twenty sixteen earnings recession, which was a

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>midscal recession, but certainly very light relative to your typical

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>earnings recession was about fifteen percent. I think what everyone

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>is struggling with right now, as everyone says the market

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is fully unprepared for this recession. Unfortunately, I think that

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the timing is a little bit messy because as of October,

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>our models would suggest actually the market was pricing for

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>up to a fifteen percent recession emerging in twenty twenty three,

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:28.119
<v Speaker 1>so we already priced the earnings down draft that we're

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>going through right now. You have to get to a

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>point where the consensus capitulates so far, so fast that

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 1>they're now starting to say, look, this could be even

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>worse than fifteen percent before the market even need go

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>lower than it was in October. And I think that

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that is what is creating a lot of confusion on

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the part of investors is are we ready for this?

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Are we not ready for this? I think the market

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is very well prepared for this, and that's why it's

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 1>been able to look through a lot of this weakness,

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>so stocks can perform. The market can perform in a

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>period where earning are coming down yep, And essentially we

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>already priced this in, We've already dealt with it, and

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>we've already recovered on the market, even though you haven't

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>seen it hit the street. Two conditions that need to

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>happen that we need to see happen for that to

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>remain the base case. The first is estimate revision momentum

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>cannot go lower than it was in October. So intriguingly,

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>estimate revisions reached the worst of their worst momentum in

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the October November time period as well, So even though

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>analysts are marking down expectations, they're not marking them down

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>as fast as they were in October and November, and

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that momentum is really critical to driving price. So yes,

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you can absolutely see earnings continue to remain weak, and

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>as a matter of fact, on average, stock prices bottom

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>two quarters before earnings ultimately find their bottom. We can

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>continue to see earnings remain weak in stock prices move higher,

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>but we need to see that momentum remain a little

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>bit less bad, if not start to improve. The second

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that is absolutely critical to maintaining I think market

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>momentum going forward is these do need to continue to

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>cut cost to the point where we can get confident

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that margins will bottom in the first half of this year.

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>This is something we've been talking about since twenty twenty one.

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>When margin weaknesses started to emerge on the index. It

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>was a very critical sign of weakness coming for the

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>index itself, and we need to see margins bottom. Now.

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.119
<v Speaker 1>The analyst consensus says, hey, margins are going to bottom

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter. We're going to see the worst

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of the worst in the first quarter. It's going to

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>get slightly less bad going into the second quarter, in

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter because finally all these cost pressures are

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>starting to abate, and that is really quite a critical

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to forming that ultimate earnings turn around to twenty twenty four.

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Who don't get enough cost cuts. It's a problem when

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you look across the university of companies that you and

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence covers, do you see that happening? I mean,

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you can tell right before you really get earnings if

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>they fired enough people, if they've so it has it happened.

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>It has happened for some sectors. It has absolutely happened

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>within the communication services space. This is at the forefront

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of everything. This is the world, This is Paul's comfort zone.

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>These are the companies that are really at the forefront

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of this. Yeah, even though this used to be a

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 1>meta free zone. Yeah, trying to get with the kids.

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>You can't help himself. Netflix, those Disneys of the world.

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Those companies were at the forefront of the massive margin

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>problems that emerged in twenty twenty one. They are now

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>at the forefront of finding some margin lows through their

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>cost cunning endeavors. You're also seeing tech start to get

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in on this game some select consumer discretionary stocks. We're

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>not seeing it end mass, and we may need to

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>see it in mass before we can really create that

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>margin low. You know, you've had very few layoffs in

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the financial sector, very few layoffs and industrials there are some,

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps not enough to create those really solid margin lows.

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I would anticipate we continue to hear more news about

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>layoffs over the JIL. Corporate America has more work to

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>do into Q two. As your mentor, yeah, I think

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. They also have a lot of

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>cost rationalization they can do, though, just in just general

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>marketing and expenditure you know, the general expenses can come

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>down as well, which would help that operating leverage. I

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>think the investor relations people like across the corporate America

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>have said to their CFOs and CEOs, cost cuts the

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 1>market likes, oh yeah, yeah, the stocks go up when

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>you talk about cutting costs. That's kind of the market

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>right now, as opposed to the market wants to see

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>top line both. So anyway, Gina has been talking about

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>and her team I've been talking about watch those margins

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>for years and been spot on there. Gina Martin Adams,

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 1>chief equity strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us here in

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio again. Ernie's kicking off later

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>this week and we'll have full coverage from the bi analysts,

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>from the strategists, and from external analysts, as well as

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>some Sweet Suite people coming in as well. You're listening

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to the team can'ser Line program, Bloomberg Markets weekdays at

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>ten am Eastern, Bloomberg dot Com, the I Heard Radio app,

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 1>and the Bloomberg Business app. We're listening on demand wherever

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcast. We got interest rates rising early

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>over the last twelve months. A rate we've never seen before.

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>That can't be good for real estate. So how do

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you in your world look at real estate today? What's

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>your call? First of all, Paul Mcko morning, thank you

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>again for having me. You're talking about our home Green Street.

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I hear the kind of David here. I'm fine. Oh okay,

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>there we go. Headphone problem, David, We hear you. Good

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>man sound check successful sound check before the show. Um,

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you know and appreciate the Green Street mentioned my farm

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>home and yeah, you're right. Definitely the pre eminent reet

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and research shop. You know, when we talk about the

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>current environment of reets in a rising at just rate environment,

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>my approach is to focus on the fundamentals. We are,

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, with us focused on the residential reet income

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>et FR ticker as house h a US. We're looking

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>at the residential reads focused on that rental income. So

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>from a fundamental perspective and a strong employe in an

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>environment that we're experiencing, the rent is paid. A lot

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of the rental players have tailwords in their favor, which

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>should lead to a pretty decent first quarter earning season

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>for many of these single family rental players. The multifamily

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>reats and other players that are in the sector. Well,

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>so everything's good now, but what happens when they have

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to refi at these rates, Well, that's a great question, Matt.

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know what's interesting is we published a blog

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>recently looking at the balance sheets of our top ten constituents,

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and what we've noticed is that, first of all, we're

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>operating in a ten year environment right now, looking at

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>my Bloomberg of three forty two, much different than what

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>we experienced during COVID, when the ten year was training

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>around one and a half percent, Much different than just

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a few months ago when we were training near four percent.

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>And so, as a result, because of what happened during COVID,

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>many of these reats were able to take advantage of

0:08:55.600 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>basically unprecedented lending conditions to really well capitalize their balance sheets.

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>And then our blog that I mentioned, we talk about,

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the top ten holdings are looking at their

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>debt maturities pretty much across the board. We say that

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>right now, for our guys, right now, the average debt

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>maturity over the next three years, it's about twenty percent

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 1>of the stack. No more company is rolling more than

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent over the next three years. We say, right now,

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the weighted average debt maturity is about eight years with

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>an average weighted interest rate about three points six percent

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of pretty much right online. With the tenure where we're

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>at right now. Result, you know, with many of these guys,

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, predominantly with fixed rate debt, I don't see

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it being into at this point, and hopefully by the

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>time that it really comes into play, we will see

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, federal reserve interest rates being in a more

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>manageable level. And David, I know you guys focus on

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a residential real estate biz. So that's regional big time Reasonal,

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess the pandemic has just exacerbated the regional differences.

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So is it just as simple as go along the

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 1>sun Belt? You know, I wish they were that simple,

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>because if that was the answer, Matt, you and I'd

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>be traveling cross country on my G five, going to

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>see all the shows we want to see. Unfortunately, you know,

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>first of all, location matters. You know, we have firms

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that are out there, we all see them every day,

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Coast Stars, Zilo, Real Page, redfin et cetera. That are

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>telling where those migration trends are going. And one of

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the key takeaways here is that if you were called

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>during COVID, pretty much there was this massive exodus from

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the coast, from New York, San Francisco, LA. And what

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing, especially out of companies like F six, which

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is a West Coast based apartner route, people are coming back.

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And so as a result, though the Sun Belt remains

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>very resilient, you are seeing pockets of strength happen again

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>back in certain parts of New York City, San Francisco, LA,

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the southern parts of California where there are

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:53.719
<v Speaker 1>tenants that are moving back into those properties. Interesting. So

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>people are well capitalized, they got right with race during Zerpe,

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and the tenants are moving back into the you know,

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>properties they abandoned on the coasts. What about costs? You know,

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we were just talking with Gina Martin Adams from Bloomberg

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence and she was saying, the market, you know, broadly

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>priced in or accession last year, and so we just

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>need to see that hit the street. But the only

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>concern she has when we get earnings this quarter is

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that companies need to deal with costs. They should hopefully

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 1>already have taken care of them, but maybe they had

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>need to into the second quarter. What about reets. Great question,

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and obviously Gina always delivered the goods when she's either

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>on TV or radio. Super you know, top guests for

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>me to follow up on. You know, a couple of

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>takes here from a cost perspective that is always in

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>the wheelhouse of every single reef management team trying to

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>focus on can we maximize our revenues through growth? And

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>how can we minimize our expenses through a spect control

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of about utilizing smart technology a Podding concept, you know,

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a Podding concept would be, let's say you have three

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>residential properties within a two mile radius. You could use

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>let's say one or two maintenance guys across all three properties,

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>opposed to planting one at each location. So I think

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>with these guys focused on trying to minute maximize the

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>bottom line, the NI number, you know, that's expense control

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>plays into it. But from a very high level. You know,

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>right now, the rental market remains strong. You're talking about

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty your mortgage rates that are above seven percent. Housing

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>affordability is out the window, especially if you're in one

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of these desirable markets. So for those factors alone, that

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>benefits the rental landlord. Remember we're focused on rental income.

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>That rental income that you pay to the landlord as

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>your monthly rent payment goes into investors pockets in the

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>form of dividend income. And that's what we're focused on,

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>is the rent goes up, that dividend hopefully should go

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>up at the end of the day as well. So

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking just at the SP five real Estate Investment

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>Trusts index, and year to date it's kind of flat

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit. Where are the riets stocks relative

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to say navs right here's or value in rates or

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in a rising in real real estate or a rising

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>interest rate environment, just maybe don't want to get near them.

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Let me get a little pedestal here and give you

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the four one one on four to eleven. There, public

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>traded roets are trading at a massive discount to net

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>asset value. That soundlike some of the private vehicles that

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>are out there talking about them trading at premiums to

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>net asset value. Historically though, and if you go back

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to some mayreet the National Association or real Estate Investment

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>trust some of data over the long term and rising

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>periods of rising interest rates. Rates are the sector that

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to be invested in, you know, Traditionally, reets

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>have been that usual go to during flights to safety

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>because again of that dividend income stream, and so you know,

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>until we do see a major reset in this interest

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.359
<v Speaker 1>rate environment, we're focused on those strong pockets and fundamentals,

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you know. Taking it outside of residential, there's a reason

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 1>why company sectors of industrial reefs or different rets and

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>tower reefs continue to remain very strong because these are

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>properties and sectors that are being used every single day.

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Self storage there's a there's a merger that's going on

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>right now between extra Space Storage or tickers EXR and

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Light Life Space Storage tick LSI, and so there's some

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>tail ones in that storage space. Remember we're all holding

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>more and more stuff. You know, Matt, I can't go

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to a show without buying another T shirt or a magnet.

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>So you know, that just adds up into the storage unit.

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>And so as a result, these are sectors that are

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>just going to continue to grow. It's those other sectors

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that are right now. You know, everybody tech heres about

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>offices and malls and what's the long term future for

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>those sectors. I wish I knew the answer to that,

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>but I can tell you that they're definitely long road

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>ahead for residential reefs as far as that, you know,

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>maintained strength. Don't get me started on malls, dude, When

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we recently got the summer tour schedule, what are the

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>what are the must see shows? What are the shows

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that you can't miss? Are you coming back to MSG?

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm hopeful to be at ALL seven MSG. I will

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>be seeing my two hundred show next week at the

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood Bowl in La. Sorry, we can't be together, but

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>if all goes well, yes you will. I will be

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>at ALL seven at MSG again. Vernado, you know, big

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>New York office and plaza, big major redevelopment going on

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in the area. Currently on pause, I believe, But you know, again,

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it's hard. You can't walk around New York City without

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>being hit in the face. Buyer reets at pretty much

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>every single intersection. All right, David, good stuff. Appreciate that.

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>David auerback, managing director at Armada ETF Advisors. So you

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>were talking fish fish. I want to an amazing fish

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>show with David and I guess I hope I'll be

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>doing it again. And they just tour all the time,

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>just like the Dead did they tour? Yeah? Pretty much.

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean they've had hiatuses. I don't know the plural

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of netword, but they're on tour again and I'm ssighted

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to see them this summer. This is the last summer

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>for the Deadenco. By the way, is that right? If

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you want to see Bobby and Mickey play with John Mayer?

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>This is it? All right? I'll make a note. All right,

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>very good this mister Weir. By the way, do we

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>not believe he's seventy seven? Maybe you're listening to the

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>tap Can's are Live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen live

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. All right, we got

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>some m and A out there, folks. Gold Giant numont

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>raises new Newcrest bid to nineteen point five billion dollars.

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Some movement there in the gold space. Grant's spa, Spora?

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>How do I do that? Grant? Grant? How do I

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>pronounce your last name? Spora? It's Spora. Yes, he's a

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>metals of Mining Senior an also Bloomberg Intelligence. So Grant

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about this, uh, you know Newmont deal

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>for Newcrest, what's going on there? M yeah, thank you

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.919
<v Speaker 1>for having me on. Firstly, in the gold space, I

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>mean they're two drivers for M and A. One is,

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>every year these gold companies eat up their reserves and resources,

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and if you're of a certain scale, you really struggle

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to replace those reserves and resources. So the one way

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:38.199
<v Speaker 1>to do that quickly and you know arguably well it

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>depends on your valuation, but hopefully not too expensively is

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>through M and A. So that's the one reason. And

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>in this case Newcrest does have a particularly good or

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>large reserve base. Um, so that's what Newmont are after.

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And the second reason, or the second rational is there

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>is a school of thought it's the bigger you get

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in gold, the more you likely to attract the generalist shareholder,

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to staying in an inner sector, which is

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>often perceived by mainstream investors as a bit niche. So

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you become the let's say, the the

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Xon of the gold sector, that'll that'll get you a

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>premium because people will naturally gravitate towards you, so that

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>both of these are at play here. For for new

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>month's bid for New Crest, so nonetheless the shares are

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 1>down today they were down yesterday. Um, is this price

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>too much? So if it depends on which way you

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>look at it, So if you look at it on

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>an earning is multiple, the answer is possibly. Um, the

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>implied sort of valuation bid in terms of EVT but

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>dies around nine point six times for New Crest, which is,

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, way more expensive than its next most expensive pier,

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>which is a Nico Eagle at around eight point eight times.

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 1>So on near terms earnings basis, you know, one would

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 1>say Newmont is paying up. If you look at it

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>from another perspective, if you look at it in terms

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of reserve value, then it actually isn't you know? Then

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>then for instance, Agnico Eagle is you know, is around

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and thirty dollars per ounce of reserve, whereas

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the New Crest but is only around two hundred dollars

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 1>an ounce. So on that basis, you know, Um, future

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>future reserves or future growth is not that expensive today's

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>earnings are, so I guess investors today you're saying, well,

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in the near term that looks a bit expensive, given

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that that Newmont's shares about the only gold sector gold

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>stock that is down today. So grant in the space

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.479
<v Speaker 1>is here. I mean, is the scale matter? I mean,

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>when I'm digging the stuff out of the ground, the

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 1>scale matter? Why do this gale anything? Well again, it's

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's in fairness. You know. My initial reaction would

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>be would be to say, look, it's all about quality, right,

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>It's how much value are you adding? What's your your

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>cash flow to share things like all the good good

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 1>metrics if we look at UM. But so far Newmont,

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>which has built some scale, UM it does trade, also

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>traded a premium versus many of its peers, including Barrick

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>which is his nearest, its next biggest competitor. So let's

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>pulled the valuation gap on its on its nearest competitor.

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, in terms of quality, I wouldn't say

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Newmont is necessarily a better quality company than Barrick UM.

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>But the market seems to um, you know, be wanting scale,

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So that the market seems to has seems to be

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>indicating that, yes, scale does matter. Um, you know, my, my, my,

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I would the opposite side of it, and say, you know,

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather see the value add in terms of you know,

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>are you able to take those reserves and resources and

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>actually develop them and deliver the cash flow out of

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>those ouncers. And this deal will will take some time

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>before that comes to light. You know, you could be

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>two to three years before we actually see the benefit

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>of the deal coming out. So how have grant these

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:27.360
<v Speaker 1>gold miners then in general traded next to gold? I mean,

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the underlying commodity breeds two thousand dollars and

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>get pretty close to an all time high. So in

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of if you look at year to day performance,

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>most of the certainly the more leverage names have done

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>very very well. So some of your your South African stocks,

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, up fifty percent here to date, really really

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>done very well, massively outperformed gold. Some of the larger

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>cap plays of have marginally outperformed gold. Because of course

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:00.439
<v Speaker 1>you still have lingering cost inflation, so that you know

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>what you what you gain on the top line, you're

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 1>also giving away on the on the bottom line to

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a certain extent. And and Newmont because it's in a

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's the aggressor in a bidding situation

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>has that's kind of underperformed a little bit. So it's

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the one stock that has actually underperformed slightly. UM. So Yeah,

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in general, you know, the gold stocks and the more

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>leveraged ones have done very very well here to date.

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So grant, what's the Is this a space, the mining space,

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>something across all metals. Is this a space that is

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>ripe for consolidation, has already consolidated? Give us a sense

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of how that space looks. So I think I think

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to sort of before I answer that question directly, I

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>would say that the miners are definitely tilting from UM

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>cash returns to too much more growth, so you'll see

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>capital spend rise as well as the sector being much

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>more willing to look at M and A as a

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>growth angle. So I mean, for the past, i'd say,

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, since about twenty twenty thirteen or so, they've

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:09.239
<v Speaker 1>been in the in the sin bin um for for

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 1>overpaying at the top of the cycle in past them

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and A transactions. So they've kind of redeemed themselves by

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>by paying lots of you know, good dividends and doing

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>share buybacks and being very very disciplined with their capital.

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 1>So they've kind of earned the right to go out

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and grow again, and we are starting to see that

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>slowly emerge UM, and and so is gold is I

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>would say, is right for consolidation. Some of the other

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>sectors are it's a little bit more challenging UM. But

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:42.719
<v Speaker 1>in in base metals, you know, the battery metals, particularly copper,

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is very sought after and it's quite difficult to get

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>your hands on on really good assets. Gold. Is gold

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>set to keep rising? I mean two thousand and five

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars a troy ouns right now two thousand and six

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>as the FED taps out at the terminal rate, which

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is the expectation, and then goes on pause. Are we

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>expecting gold to continue to climb? Oh wish? A good

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>gold looks quite expensive to me at the moment. So

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>at the moment you are, it's kind of anticipating that's

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>fed on pause. And it's also it's also pricing in

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>quite a hefty let's call an insurance premium against any

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of tale risks that are out there in the

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>financial in the financial system, you know, more banks potentially

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>in trouble. So for me, gold looks expensive, but it's

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly in a bold market. So I wouldn't rule out

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that it continues to climb, but you know, it's getting

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>more and more expensive versus a whole raft of other

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>financial metrics. All right, Grant, thanks so much. We appreciate

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>you coming on here talking to us about this deal.

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:49.679
<v Speaker 1>In the gold space and kind of the gold market overall.

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Is Matt was saying, golds north of two hundred dollars

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>lots here and it's yeah, it's pushing up towards all

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 1>time record grants for he is a metals and mining

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 1>senior analyst at Bloomberg can tell just looking at a CV.

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>He was a head of euromining and research at Macquarie,

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>at Deutsche Bank, he did a stint at UBS and

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>he's been at Bloomberg Intelligence now for about three years.

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Team Cancer Line program Bloomberg Markets

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am easting on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app, and the Bloomberg Business app. We're

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>listening on demand wherever you get your podcast. We're waiting

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>some comments from Washington, d C. Secretary at Jennet Yellen

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 1>scheduled around the bottom of the hour. We'll see how

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>that goes. When she does speak. We'll bring those comments

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to you. I want to talk about this economy. I

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about the FED. So I want to

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>talk to somebody who kind of knows what they're talking about.

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Here Neil Grossman, co founder and former CIO of t

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>k n G Capital Neil while the rest of us

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>word and an advisor to the Norwegian Central Bank. Oh nice,

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>How did you actually live in Norway? Fortunately, no, you

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>did it from over here, because Norway's pretty nice. Actually,

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>they usually only invited me to come visit in February, right, exactly.

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>You get some you get some deals there. I guess. Hey,

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, last Friday most of us were

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>not here. Weird markets were closed. We're celebrating Good Friday

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>or however you do that thing. We had another good

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>jobs number. You know, Payrolls are still strong, unemployment rate

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 1>is low. Can you have that and this greatly anticipated

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.360
<v Speaker 1>recession at the same time. It's going to take time

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to evolve into what I would guess the number. By

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 1>the way, a couple interesting things about the number, two

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty six thousand jobs. The trailing twelve months

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>was about three hundred and forty two thousand and that's

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the weakest since we've started the real recovery. But if

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you go back pre COVID, the single strongest twelve month

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>period going back into the eighties, it was three hundred

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and thirty two thousand jobs over a twelve month period

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>on average. So we're still creating jobs in a sense

0:26:55.040 --> 0:27:00.080
<v Speaker 1>at a rate that's very, very strong. To get the

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate up is going to be tremendously difficult. I mean,

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the one hundred one hundred and twenty five thousands usually

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>viewed to be at break even, So you're going to

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>have to go below that to start to push the

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>rate up. Does this fed have the I don't know

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>if courage is the right word the metal to push

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>through that point, because it's going to be painful for

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Americans and not politically palatable at all. Well, I mean, again,

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:26.959
<v Speaker 1>the question is going to be how you balance that

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 1>with inflation. I think most, for the most part, Americans

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>would probably tell you that the inflation they've experienced has

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>been horrifically difficult for them. True, but those who I mean,

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're faced with rising prices are losing your job?

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>I think I know what most Americans, So the question

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>matters how far below. First of all, one hundred and

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty five thousand jobs a month is still not losing job.

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Even going down to zero job creation is not fully

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 1>losing your job. It means, of course, the unemployment rate

0:27:56.920 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>will be rising. In the background, I think the question

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a couple of things. First of all,

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>there is no way to keep adding jobs at this

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>rate unless the workforce starts so expansing the you're going

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to hit a limit where there's just no jobs available.

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I actually think in the background this is what could

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>be the Fed's biggest problem, because if you're not really

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>losing jobs, which are probably likely to find, is that

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the competition for good employees is going to push wages up.

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's where the FED, I think, is worried. That's

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the wage price spiral that they want to avoid. We

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>did just talk with Gina Martin Adams, who runs our

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:36.919
<v Speaker 1>equities coverage for Bloomberg Intelligence, and she said, what we

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>need to see, what investors need to see to justify

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>these valuations is real cost cutting and that maybe we

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen enough in the first quarter. Corporate America needs

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to do more in Q two. Yeah, you haven't seen

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>much and Again, the other interesting feature of what's going

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>on is I think people scratched their head why the

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>economy has tended to remain strong. But what we've had

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>as a very strong nominal economy for the less several years,

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and what's been coming down is real growth is real

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>growth because inflation has been going up. We're now starting

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to see inflation come down. Even though nominal growth is

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>coming down, that will still support the real number. The

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>real problem is going to come. And this is what

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm I've started in a position for for whatever it's worth,

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm beginning to buy protection into the fall because I

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>think in the fall you're going to see the consequences

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of falling earnings what will be weaker growth, not only nominally,

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>but I think you're going to start to see inflation

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>actually rise as we move into the fall. Wait, before

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>we get further into the economics of it, give us

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the structure the mechanics of that trade. How do you

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>buy protection? Well, for me, I'm well, first of a

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of things are interesting, and we've talked about this before.

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>What I've been doing for the last let's say half

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a year to year, because volatility is high, I'm very

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I've been very happy writing optionality and getting paid to

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>take risk. Volatility has come down significantly, So I've started

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>actually by way out the money puts, and I'll build

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a structure where I can have a fairly significant size,

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>either outright or a spread trade designed to you know,

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to benefit if we have a fairly sizeable move. I'm

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>not really as worried about a five or six percent move.

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Those are not the type of things that cause problems.

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>You're protecting against a big ten to twenty percent drop, ye,

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>or yeah, it could be thirty. I mean, you know

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the streets analysts are looking for three thousand,

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty two fifty that type of drop. I want to

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>make sure I'm making a lot of money on my hedges.

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>How the market drop or do you risk that much

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in the face of declining interest rates? That story, well,

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>interest rates have fallen, you're talking about the front end.

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is if inflation starts to rise. Listen,

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>remember we had a period less fall where the average

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>inflation rate headline CPI use it was at point one percent.

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>That's fairly low, and so it's going to be a

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>very easy situation for the year on your numbers to

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>start to push up the year on year inflation rate.

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So if inflation is rising while you're getting slowing earnings

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and slowing growth, the Fed's hands are still tied functionally.

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's really the situation I think we have to

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>be worried about. So no cuts at the to the

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>target rate. I mean they've told us time and time again.

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Jerome Palace said, don't expect any cuts in twenty twenty three,

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>but the market is still pricing in four From the

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>way I read the WORP page, the World Interest Rate

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>probability page, and you're probably someone who's much better at

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>reading that kind of stuff, I'm not sure it really

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>means that the market believes the FED is going to

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>cut rates four times. Maybe they're hedging as well well.

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's where the three month live or or

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the sofa, you know, futures are priced for. So people

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>are actually out there putting on positions that are directing

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>these these these yielding you know, break evens. I think

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the answer to all this is and the last time

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I was on, I think Paul asked me, do I

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna cut rates? The answer is generally know unless,

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and the unless is a really is a stocking marker

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>comes apart. I see no wonders. I don't understand why

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>anyone thinks if you're near full employment and the economy

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is still doing okay, why the FED has any reason

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to cut rates. And it's the equity market that feels

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it needs lower yields to push prices up in this

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>type of environment, the FED, I think, if you're looking

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>at a longer term, you know, a dynamic stochastic process

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever you want to call it, the FED needs

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to ring out inflation to actually maximize the outcomes over

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a long period of time, not just in the next

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>three year six. Do you think is materially coming down

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>or is it just kind of stuff we see maybe

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I think some of it is and some of it isn't.

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>If you go into a restaurant and try and right,

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>or you fly or you go to I mean, I

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>can tell you stories about hotel prices just you fall,

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you fall off your chair. If you look at some

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of the things, for example, some of the union issues

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that are going on now, I think you know, if

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Rutgers just went on strike, I mean, this is not

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the type of behavior in a weak economy where you're

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>worried about your job. This is I think you deserve

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to pay me more. And the question is if we're

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to see upward pressure, I think the

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>doc workers are threatening or on strikeout West again, that

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, has much more of a flow through impact.

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>You know. Then then you've got the issues that it

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>makes it harder and harder to you know, to look

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>at say commodity price inflation and ignore the other stuff.

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>What do you pay attention to the Jolts data? Yes,

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>why is it now? I went back and just looked,

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and it usually is like four to five million, six million.

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>We've been sitting around ten or eleven million openings for

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a long time. What's happened our workforce world? Well, it's not,

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Number one, it's not clear that those

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>are all real jobs. I mean, sometimes if you need,

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>if you need workers, you may be spreading out more

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>job requests and you don't know if that people are

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>on multiple I'm not an expert on the dynamics that's hot,

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>but that's for sure true. I mean I can just

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you looking for used Hellcat online, use what dodge

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Challenger Hellcat. A lot of the ads there are no

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>longer relevant, you know. And it's the same thing with

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>job with job openings. Right. You're listening to the team

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Ken's her live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the I Heard Radio app

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Bloomberg Business App. We're listening on to mand

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcast. What did tree here? We

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>got a new contributor to Bloomberg News in New York.

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just been your fault. I was gonna say,

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>not new to me. I've been interviewing her since before

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 1>she left, then while she was gone, and now she's

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:45.800
<v Speaker 1>come back. She's back, Simone Foxman. She is a reporter

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News, joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio. So you get a gold star for coming

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>in not phoning it in, Matt Night. We may we

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>keep notes of that, Simone. You were in Qatar for

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 1>like how many years? For three and a half years

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and covering all things, covering all things geopolitics, energy, a

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>little sports. Yeah, I remember we talked to her. We

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>talked to her during the World Cup. That's right, that's right. Oh,

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that's oh boy, what a great time with or soccer.

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Still it's still soccer to me. Good all right, But

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 1>and you also did energy in a big way, right, yeah, yeah, absolutely, So.

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know OPEC plus what was it a

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 1>week or so ago of yeah, it was it was

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Sunday before last. Okay, OPEC plus comes in and cuts production.

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of that? I mean it sounded

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty coordinated to me. Absolutely. I mean, look, we clearly

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>have golf producers, especially Saudi Arabia, wanting oil prices higher.

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're looking for eighty dollars of barrel and

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that's largely because of the economic transformation that Saudi Arabia

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 1>is pursuing. It has these you know, trillion dollar projects

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>right like Neiom and needs the money and needs the

0:35:56.880 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>money in order to is what. That's the that's the Drey,

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>It's the dream city on the Red Sea. Yes, this

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is extremely exciting really building it. They are absolutely trying

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to build it. They are hiring lots of people, slow process.

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 1>They have big targets for twenty thirty. Actually, so we're

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna try and see. We're gonna see how this goes

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 1>over the next course of the cut, next couple of years.

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>This will be the biggest master plan community in the world.

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:23.879
<v Speaker 1>When they're really and if you if you check out

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 1>so the projections, it's this line. I believe it's like

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 1>fifteen hundred kilombs. There's a very law I don't want

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to say the wrong number here, extremely length, the massive project,

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.399
<v Speaker 1>super futuristic. But you know, in order to do this,

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>they need oil prices at eighty dollars a barrel because

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, their break even is something like seventy dollars

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a barrel, so they need that extra to balance there. Well,

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:48.800
<v Speaker 1>they got it there, right, I mean, WTI trades for

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>around eighty Brent trades for eighty five and yeah, right now.

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>But I mean I think that's why you see a

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>move from OPEC plus you know, this time really led

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>by Saudi Arabia cutting five hundred thousand barrels a day.

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 1>That's why you're seeing this because they need that oil price.

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>And so if there's any concern about demand from China

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:12.919
<v Speaker 1>going you know, rebounding slower than expect it, concerns about

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>recession in the United States and Europe, you're going to

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>see them be really proactive about this to try and

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>keep those prices high. I think that's just the way

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:24.720
<v Speaker 1>they've come out on this so far, it looks good

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the European and US economies. Right the

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 1>China reopening, is that still the big question mark? I

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:33.879
<v Speaker 1>think it's a little bit of everything. I think there's

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 1>just a broader concern that you know, you're going to

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>see the FED continue to tighten because of things like

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>inflation remaining high, and I think energy doesn't probably help

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that kind of conversation. But yeah, I mean, look, you know,

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the markets are just jittery and they haven't

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of landed on an ultimate explanation, and you know,

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>unless things turn around in China, then you know, the

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>whole question is bigger. If you're so for the Qatar economy,

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 1>is it all energy? A lot energy? I forget the

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 1>exact breakdown, but they have tried to grow their um

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>non energy sector, tourism, tourism. Wealthy people that are going

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to be arrested everywhere else in the world love to

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 1>go to Qatar. Right, Hey, I mean I feel like

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you can lump a couple well I

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't say this, but there's a lot of things that

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>are the same among these Gulf countries, and there's reasons.

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Clutter is no longer part of OPEC, but there's reasons

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 1>for all of them. No, no geopolitical, but but there's reasons.

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 1>They all want to keep oil prices relatively high. You

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>look at the UAE as well. I mean, these are

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:49.280
<v Speaker 1>all places that see the end of hydrocarbons eventually down

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the road, and they say, this is our moment to

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 1>really capitalize on this, to try and build non oil

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>economies that haven't existed before, with the exception maybe of Dubai,

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>which really largely is moved through its oil. And so

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 1>again that's why you've seen them act in conjunction. So

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the place to go a really hot place if you're

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 1>an international fugitive billionaire has been Dubai. Right, But isn't

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia trying to get some market the boost the

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>profile of RIAD to get some of those people. Okay,

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>not the fugitive billionaires. I don't think anyone particularly is

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 1>excited about hosting them. But maybe the former king of Spain, right, Okay, Well,

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Yad's plan is say everyone move your global headquarters here

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>if you want contracts with Saudi Arabia over the coming years.

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:41.359
<v Speaker 1>And they've said, you know, a deadline. I believe it's

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four. But you've got to move here if

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you want our contracts. You can't have your regional headquarters

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and somewhere else like Dubai. So this has been a

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>real challenge to Dubai. You know, the problem with Saudi

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Arabia is the standard of living is different than you

0:39:57.719 --> 0:39:59.919
<v Speaker 1>might expect. It's very it's very different from the West.

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Still feels foreign despite all the reforms that you've seen

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>there in the last couple of years. You know, the

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>looser dress codes, you can find alcohol even though it

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 1>continues to be illegal. You know, but there's various reasons

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 1>people don't want to live in real Okay, so where

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>they still do want to live in places like the

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 1>UAE or even though hot for that matter. Okay, Well,

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess you know it's interesting here because the Journal

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>had a story out recently, Saudi led oil cuts hit headwind.

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Some small producers have boosted their output, threatening to undercut

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the effort. I mean, how powerful is OPEC and OPEC

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:37.479
<v Speaker 1>plus today versus I don't know twenty thirty years ago,

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 1>because it seemed pretty like they still kind of have it.

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:42.800
<v Speaker 1>If you will, they can still move the markets. Obviously,

0:40:42.880 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 1>well absolutely, they can still move the markets, but I

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>think the US supply is a real challenge to them.

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 1>And notably, the US has increased its output by more

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>than a billion barrels a day over the past year.

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>But the Washer Journal story it points out something very

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:01.799
<v Speaker 1>interesting that even members of OPEC the issue. Part of

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the reason that we had really you know, tight markets,

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>high prices for a little while was because even members

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 1>of OPEC, like Nigeria, for example, they were overcomplying so

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 1>weren't producing as much as the quota that they had.

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>So the issue for places like Saudi Arabia is now

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.720
<v Speaker 1>they're actually producing much closer to the quota they had.

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, they'd shut down some of their mining and

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:31.280
<v Speaker 1>production for COVID nineteen and it was a slow start

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:34.759
<v Speaker 1>for them. They there was some theft issues, particularly in Nigeria,

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 1>but you know, Nigeria adding three hundred fifty thousand barrels

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:40.760
<v Speaker 1>per days in September, you know, that erases about half

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Saudi cut at that time. So it's not

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>just the overall OPEC plus move, it's you know, working

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:50.279
<v Speaker 1>against these even small players one hundred thousand barrels a

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>day here, two hundred thousand dollars a day there. You know,

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that erodes the overall power of someone like Saudi Arabia, Russia.

0:41:56.719 --> 0:42:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's broaden it out to a globe conversation about gas prices,

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 1>because we were freaking out. We were a year ago,

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and especially Europe was not in a good place. But

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>they've done relatively well, helped by I guess a milder weather. Right,

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 1>how does it look now we're heading in the summer,

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna be okay, but going in the next winter. Yeah,

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>they got super lucky with the weather, and it really

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>meant that storage was not eroded by as much as

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it could have been. I think we ended the season,

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the overall season around sixty percent of storage still remaining full.

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>And we heard a lot of folks, you know, I

0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:43.319
<v Speaker 1>think coming into this, you're saying, well, the twenty twenty

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 1>three twenty twenty four winter, that's gonna be the main concern.

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:50.760
<v Speaker 1>But now you have Morgan Stanley's saying that they believe

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that European storage is gonna be a one hundred percent

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>full by late August. That's not so far off from

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 1>our BNF forecast. Of a couple of weeks ago, ninety

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:02.439
<v Speaker 1>percent at the end of September, and this really sets

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:05.600
<v Speaker 1>them up for a very positive year here. A lot

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of this, however, is demand destruction. You know, industry not

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing much higher prices still and therefore you know, slower

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>European economy. That said, you know, if the concern was

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that Europe's going to fall apart because there were decline

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and supplies from Russia, that's just not really what we're seeing. Again.

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>We got a couple of winters here though, to get through.

0:43:27.719 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, So you've been when you should move back

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to New York, like two weeks ago? What do you

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>miss most of Qatar? The pool in my building? The pool? No,

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:38.759
<v Speaker 1>I miss my friends too, but but you know you

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:41.399
<v Speaker 1>live in New York City. Yep, I don't know how.

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are handful of people who probably have

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a pool in their building. But you know, good upstairs

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:48.399
<v Speaker 1>and what and what were you looking forward to most

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:50.720
<v Speaker 1>coming back to New York? Oh, my friends and family

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 1>we live we live around here. But you know, also

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>good pizza, great pizza. I mean there was good food

0:43:57.480 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in cluts are too, but um, you know the differences.

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not walkable in the same way. It's very new,

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it's very fresh, and I think it is going to

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:10.760
<v Speaker 1>take them time to kind of build more cultural cachet.

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:13.160
<v Speaker 1>That's just that's just my opinion. Well, welcome back to

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the capital of the world. All right, Simon Foxman. She's

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a reporter for Bloomberg Television and News. Joining us here

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in a Bloomberg in Actor Broker studio. You're listening to

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the tape cans are live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 1>ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, tune in app, Bloomberg

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App. You can also

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. Looking at the

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>shares of CarMax about eleven percent today, put out some

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty good numbers. Let's get break it all down. We'll

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>talk all things auto. Since Matt Miller is not here,

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 1>he went over to the TV studio to get ready

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 1>for his show. So let's talk cars. Kevin Tyne and

0:44:57.440 --> 0:45:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Cedar auto analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. So Carmack's big moving

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to stock here today. Kevin, what's the story with their earnings. Yeah,

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you know one of the companies that just given the scale,

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the experience, the market positioning that you did a decent

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 1>job with controlling costs in a market where volume is

0:45:19.200 --> 0:45:22.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be low for a while. Gross profit per

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 1>unit was strong, but you know, this is a company

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be dealing with a much lower volume

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:32.719
<v Speaker 1>environment for probably quite a while, and that's really what

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:36.400
<v Speaker 1>derailed you know, some of the pure play online only

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>used sellers like Carvana and Shift and Room and companies

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:45.840
<v Speaker 1>like that. So you know, just their market position was

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>was a big advantage to them in this kind of

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 1>environment where we're just not going to sell as much stuff.

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:54.400
<v Speaker 1>And Kevin I remember just you know, putting in the

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 1>context when the pandemic hit, you know, Detroit shutdown its

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 1>lines and so people in the car they had to

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>really start looking at the used car market, and as result,

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:05.799
<v Speaker 1>used cars went prices went through the roof. Are we

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:10.840
<v Speaker 1>now lapping that? And that tough tough comps? Now, well

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:13.399
<v Speaker 1>here's a problem. And you know, everything you hear about

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the used car market is like, oh just wait, here

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:21.400
<v Speaker 1>comes prices just tumbling down, and you know that volume issue.

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>On the news side, I think bleeds into the use

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 1>side as time goes by, and especially like in areas

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:31.319
<v Speaker 1>like leasing. You know, so when we prior to the pandemic,

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:33.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about a seventeen million unit market at

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent lease penetration, you know, we had five million

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 1>off lease vehicles coming every you know, every year. But

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic hits and we go down to fourteen million

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 1>unit market. And then on the news side, you're not

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 1>incentivizing those sales because there's so much lower right selling

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:57.360
<v Speaker 1>over sticker, no more incentives, no more discounting, so prices

0:46:57.400 --> 0:47:00.279
<v Speaker 1>are high. So you're getting a market or you had

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:04.399
<v Speaker 1>a market that didn't need lease incentives. So leasing goes

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:08.359
<v Speaker 1>down to twenty percent in twenty twenty two, and we

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:11.840
<v Speaker 1>only did fourteen million units. So you're talking about a

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>world where we're going to see instead of five million

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:18.279
<v Speaker 1>off lease vehicles, two and a half. And so that

0:47:18.360 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of situation, you're saying, like, Okay, well, how do

0:47:21.800 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>prices come down if we're going to cut the off

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 1>lease supply in half? Yep? Yep. So I mean maybe

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:31.319
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the declines we're going to see. So so

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:36.120
<v Speaker 1>if I'm CarMax am am, I like the new, like

0:47:36.160 --> 0:47:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the new model year guys. If I'm at like CarMax

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:41.399
<v Speaker 1>selling used cars, am I selling fewer units but maybe

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:43.719
<v Speaker 1>at a higher gross margin? I think so. And I

0:47:43.760 --> 0:47:47.720
<v Speaker 1>think like you said, you know, new vehicle dealers, and

0:47:47.920 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean full line dealers that are doing new use

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:54.480
<v Speaker 1>part service financing Church. All those guys and then they

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 1>used only and the online used only, like, all those

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:02.160
<v Speaker 1>dealers or all those retailers should be prepared in all

0:48:02.200 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 1>those business units to be doing less volume except for

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:09.440
<v Speaker 1>probably you know, your service bays, your parts counters. Right

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>as people are going to be holding onto their vehicles

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:14.520
<v Speaker 1>longer because of pricing or interest rates, you know, you

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:17.879
<v Speaker 1>can expect you know, more wear and tear maintenance. So

0:48:18.280 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the full line dealers probably have a little bit of

0:48:20.520 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>advantage in that business unit specifically, But anybody's selling vehicles

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 1>new or use prepare for a much lower volume environment.

0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:33.400
<v Speaker 1>All right. So again, in my lifetime, the Detroit you know,

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the auto guys will crank out seventeen million units a year.

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:38.880
<v Speaker 1>You're telling me that's kind of a thing of the past,

0:48:38.920 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that these guys are going to have the discipline to

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 1>keep production down at I don't know, fourteen or fifteen

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:45.920
<v Speaker 1>million a year. Yeah, I think so, And I don't know,

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it's so much discipline. I think, you know, this is

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:51.800
<v Speaker 1>where the market or the industry has wanted to be forever,

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and it all comes down to rationalizing those costs. You know,

0:48:56.239 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it was a world where it had to be seventeen

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:01.400
<v Speaker 1>million units because you know, there was a lot of

0:49:01.440 --> 0:49:06.440
<v Speaker 1>fixed costs in their legacy costs, you know, pensions, union,

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>labor related costs. So it's really a different environment now

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:14.400
<v Speaker 1>on the on the cost side of the ledger that

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you just don't need to produce that many vehicles. And

0:49:17.040 --> 0:49:19.279
<v Speaker 1>I think the other thing that's nice too, when you

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:21.120
<v Speaker 1>look at it from that perspective, you got all the

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:24.120
<v Speaker 1>transportation costs, the carrying costs for the dealers. So it's

0:49:24.120 --> 0:49:28.800
<v Speaker 1>not just the manufacturers that are okay with this lower volume,

0:49:29.239 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>richer margin mix. It's also the retailers. Right. You don't

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:39.280
<v Speaker 1>have you don't have logistics and floor plan expense on

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a sea of vehicles that you're not going to move

0:49:43.160 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 1>for months at a time. Yeah, I guess so. I

0:49:46.440 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 1>mean it sounds like, you know, this is the best

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>spot the industry has been in from just a profitability

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:55.719
<v Speaker 1>perspective that I can remember. I mean, is that am

0:49:55.760 --> 0:49:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I overstating it? No, not at all. And I think

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:00.719
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing is everybody goes, oh, you know, are

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:03.400
<v Speaker 1>they going to have the discipline? And you say, well,

0:50:03.920 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's where you want it to be. So

0:50:06.080 --> 0:50:09.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not an accident that the industry is here.

0:50:09.200 --> 0:50:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I think, to their credit, manufacturers and even retailers have

0:50:14.040 --> 0:50:19.640
<v Speaker 1>moved their businesses to a point where it's it's more efficient, right,

0:50:19.880 --> 0:50:22.720
<v Speaker 1>fewer years now, you don't have to worry about tacking

0:50:22.760 --> 0:50:27.759
<v Speaker 1>on those extra two and a half three million units

0:50:27.760 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 1>by throwing money at the problem. Right, So hey, if

0:50:31.160 --> 0:50:33.759
<v Speaker 1>I only need to get my market share of a

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:36.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen million unit market, that's a lot easier than trying

0:50:36.800 --> 0:50:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to get that same market share and create a seventeen

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 1>million unit market. And it's you know, it's it's better

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 1>for the income statement, it's better for your retail network.

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:51.879
<v Speaker 1>So it's a much organically healthy environment. But I think

0:50:51.920 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 1>people look at things from the consumer's perspective and say,

0:50:55.480 --> 0:50:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, where do those two and a half million

0:50:57.480 --> 0:51:00.680
<v Speaker 1>units go? The market is rolling over, it's you know,

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:04.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's devastated. It's and it's really not. It's

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:09.960
<v Speaker 1>because the revenue pool is actually larger. How come it

0:51:10.000 --> 0:51:11.759
<v Speaker 1>seems like maybe this is a sector that should be

0:51:11.760 --> 0:51:15.360
<v Speaker 1>rerated from an investment perspective, stock perspective, a multiple perspective.

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Are you surprised we haven't seen these stocks move higher

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:19.359
<v Speaker 1>because it sounds like a lot better business than it

0:51:19.360 --> 0:51:21.640
<v Speaker 1>ever has been. Yeah, I think I think the way

0:51:21.680 --> 0:51:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it's looked at is that, right, you're either a growth

0:51:25.280 --> 0:51:28.400
<v Speaker 1>industry or you're a value play. And you know, I

0:51:28.400 --> 0:51:30.799
<v Speaker 1>think the problem is that when you go, well, how

0:51:30.840 --> 0:51:34.000
<v Speaker 1>do you explain being a growth industry going from fifteen

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:36.960
<v Speaker 1>million years? You know, from seventeen to fifteen, Right, that's

0:51:37.000 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of growth. But you know, people aren't really

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at what that means for you know, the revenue

0:51:42.920 --> 0:51:47.879
<v Speaker 1>and profit contribution from fewer units. So, and I think

0:51:47.920 --> 0:51:50.799
<v Speaker 1>what we're on the verge of is, look this, this

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:54.759
<v Speaker 1>industry couldn't grow total volume, so it became about mix

0:51:54.840 --> 0:51:57.799
<v Speaker 1>shift to truck from cary. Now you have a lot

0:51:57.840 --> 0:52:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of automakers that can't shift anymore truck for it is

0:52:01.440 --> 0:52:04.759
<v Speaker 1>like ninety eight percent already and most are already there.

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So what you're getting now is that the next growth

0:52:07.520 --> 0:52:11.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunity comes from the mixed shift to electrification. Problem is

0:52:11.680 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not profitable yet. And ultimately thirty seconds left, Kevin, Ultimately,

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:18.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you think the profit margins on an EV

0:52:19.160 --> 0:52:21.759
<v Speaker 1>vehicle will be versus an ice? Well, you know, the

0:52:21.840 --> 0:52:28.440
<v Speaker 1>idea is that simple manufacturing, simpler manufacturing process, which I'm

0:52:28.480 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 1>not sure. I think if we look at the way

0:52:30.600 --> 0:52:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Tesla does things, there's a lot of copy and paste,

0:52:33.040 --> 0:52:36.319
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the models look the same, and you know,

0:52:36.360 --> 0:52:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that a full line portfolio is as

0:52:40.040 --> 0:52:43.120
<v Speaker 1>efficient in terms of production, but fewer moving parts, and

0:52:43.480 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the whole idea of it. Look, it's a

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:47.240
<v Speaker 1>skateboard of batteries and then you're just going to flap

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a different body on it. You know it can get there,

0:52:49.719 --> 0:52:52.800
<v Speaker 1>but you know you're talking about a whole different menu

0:52:52.920 --> 0:52:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of materials too. Yep, all right, Kevin. Always a pleasure

0:52:56.719 --> 0:52:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to speak with you, particularly when Matt's not here, because

0:52:58.680 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I could get a question two in their Usually Matt

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:04.800
<v Speaker 1>just goes all over the auto story. Thanks for listening

0:53:04.840 --> 0:53:08.319
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:53:08.360 --> 0:53:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to interviews of Apple podcasts, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:53:13.040 --> 0:53:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen

0:53:16.440 --> 0:53:19.080
<v Speaker 1>seventy three. And I'm fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:21.960
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:23.399
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio